►
Description
In the Stewards Working Group the Community Stewards come together to coordinate workstreams, share experiences and reflect on what is going well and what can be done better in order to achieve the mission of the TEC and best serve our community.
Find us on the #stewards channel on our Discord!
We gather every Wednesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Tamara
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
B
C
B
Yeah
yeah,
I
can
take
it.
I
am
super
excited.
I
am
happy
that
the
gitcoin
grant
starts
today
and
that
we
have
so
many
cool
projects
that
tribute
to
the
to
this
big
ecosystem,
and
I
am
also
happy
about
the
way
gravity
is
going
today.
We
had
a
meeting
with
some
people
from
gitcoin
and
it
seems
that
we
can.
We
are
going
to
be
able
to
work
together
to
to
find
and
improve
conflict
management
in
daos.
B
So
that's
great
and
nothing
else,
happy
that
we
are
all.
I
feel
that
we
are
getting
a
certain
maturity
over
the
params
and
and
over
the
proposals.
So
the
debates
now
are
like
more
or
more
level
and
yeah
I'll
pass
to
chewie.
C
Thank
you,
kwanka.
I
feel
that
it's
it's
it's
it's
a
great
momentum
right
now
on
on
many
things
I
I
was.
I
was
a
little
bit
bit
worried
at
the
beginning
of
of
the
week
that
maybe
like
some
some
stuff
wasn't
gonna
be
like
met
on
time,
but
the
support
that
everyone
is
is
providing.
I
feel
that
it's
gonna
bring
like
everything
at
it
at
the
right
at
the
right
time
and
and
yeah.
C
I'm
I'm
excited
for
for
this,
for
this
call
and
yeah
for
the
topics
that
we're
gonna
be
checking
I'll,
pass
it
to
everyone.
D
Thank
you.
It
was
nice
to
try
out
the
new
deck
on
the
orientation
hall
and
it
actually
works
very
good,
so
praise
just
laser
for
that.
D
That's
on
that
side
and
on
the
other
side
I
I
finally
adjust
the
time
zone,
so
I'm
finally
like
okay,
I
can,
I
can
be
on
my
mind
and
present
on
fully
on
the
calls.
So
I
don't
know
this
week
has
been
good
and
it
felt
good
to
be
on
my
normal
schedule.
D
Finally,
so
besides
that
orientation
call
went
well,
key
minute
does
went
well,
so
we're
in
a
good
strike
at
the
moment,
looking
forward
for
how
it
goes
and
bye-bye
we
should
deploy
today
the
new
bot
first
survey,
so
we
will
have
more
information
about
users,
so
that's
also
nice
and
I
will
pass
it
on
to
oh
there.
You
go
lauren
hello
to
you.
E
Thanks,
I
do
check
in
temperature
shocking
to
me
I'm
feeling
I'm
feeling
good
temperature
check.
I've
been
feeling
with
the
well.
I
mean
I
had
two
pram
parties
this
week
that
nobody
showed
up
to.
So
I'm
thinking
that,
like
we
had
this
little
confusion
with
extending
the
the
deadline
for
for
parameters
and
then
and
then
I
think
it
lost
a
little
bit
of
steam,
so
I
think
ramping
up
a
little
bit
and
trying
to
bring
more
people.
It
would
be
a
good
thing
yeah.
E
I
don't
have
too
much
else
to
say
I'll
pass
it
on
to
I
jumped
in
late
I'll,
pass
it
on
to
griff.
F
Yeah
temperature
check
is
hot,
I
mean
we
just
did
the
common
snack
ama
and
the
room
was
full
people
couldn't
get
in.
So
that
was
really
nice
and
I
feel
like
no
one's
coming
to
the
param
parties
on
fort,
which
is
kind
of
lame,
but
we're
yeah,
I
feel
like
we
need
to
really
readjust
how
we're
advertising
and
planning
our
pram
parties,
but
but
honestly,
I
feel
like
people
know
that
it's
hot
and
and
it
has
really
good
vibes
in
the
space.
F
So
I
I'm
feeling
pretty
good
and
I'm
just
really
excited
for
the
parameters
and
the
common
swarm
are
both
almost
done.
You
know
apollo
and
some
are
working
hard
on
the
deck
getting
the
demo
out
and
I
I
think
we
might
be
able
to
show
it
off
next
week.
It's
looking
very
promising
internal
demo
should
be
out
this
week
and
then
and
then
perhaps
there's
only
four
issues
left
that
haven't
been
addressed
in
in
the
fran's
dashboard,
so
wow
amazing.
F
You
know
it
feels
really
good
to
feel
like
done
almost
and
I'll
pass
it
to
ryder.
G
Yeah,
I
can
do
a
short
temp
check
in
my
little
corner
of
the
world.
I'm
getting
excited
for.
I'm
gonna
put
my
camera
on
for
the
emergence
of
the
reward
board
working
group,
and
not
only
is
it
emerged,
and
it
is
a
working
group
now,
but
just
I'm
it's
the
first
one.
I've
emerged
in
tc,
which
feels
really
cool,
but
it's
also
it's
so
crucial
to
have
a
committee
to
like
be
at
least
like
delegating
these
things.
If
not
and
like
you
know,
also
having
boundaries
about
how
much
to
do
so.
G
It's
just
really
cool
to
see
a
group
of
people
working
that
out
from
the
bottom
up
and
so
and
then
you
know
mitch
just
brought
up
brought
up
like
hey
when
you're
ready
for
a
pram's
party
like
reward
board.
It's
like
yeah,
exactly
you
know
like
so
that
feels
like
it's
popping
off
and
I
will
pass
the
tam
so
that
she
can
choose
the
next
person.
A
I
Oh
yeah,
I
didn't
hear
that
you're
thinking
so,
okay,
yeah!
No,
it's
good
temperature
check
is
good
excited
about
the
param
parties
and
submissions.
Hopefully
we
can
get
more
participation
out
of
that.
I'm
really
encouraged
by
what's
going
on
in
the
comms
working
group.
I
think
breaking
down
into
these
sub
groups
is
really
awesome
and
good
job
chewie
on
that,
and
I
think
that's
the
orientation
call
went
amazing
and
we
keep
getting
new
people,
and
I
want
to
send
out
major
praise
to
aloysius
for
being
a
super
spreader
of
the
tec.
I
J
J
I
don't
know
I
and
yeah,
I'm
also
so
excited
for
the
working
group,
param
parties,
I
think
like
if
it
would
be
so
cool
if
every
working
group
ends
up
proposing
a
set
of
params,
and
maybe
we
can
you
know,
debate,
I'm
very
excited
also
for
the
omega.
K
Everybody,
I'm
feeling
very
excited,
I'm
seeing
the
the
need
for
the
tec
work
in
the
common
stack
and
so
many
other
conversations
that
I'm
having
worked
with
my
buddy
on
a
proposal
for
regen
network.
Can
I
see
the
the
stack
here
just
making
a
lot
of
sense
and
yeah
just
been
enjoying
the
param
parties?
K
M
No
thank
you.
My
temperature
is
hot
and
cold
hot
and
cold.
I'm
feeling
I'm
feeling
really
hot,
I'm
feeling
very
bullish
about
the
reward
system.
It's
like
coming
together,
there's
like
a
lot
of
work
and
figuring
out
still.
That
has
to
be
done,
but
it's
like
what
what
I
do
see
is
looking
really
really
good.
So
I'm
excited
about
that.
Extending
the
comments
upgrade,
I
I
feel
a
bit
lost
after
it,
and
so
I'm
just
like
figuring
out
like
okay.
M
How
do
we
keep
moving
forward
with
it
and
like
a
lot
of
the
things
that
we
were
building
momentum
for,
have
lost
momentum
now
and
and
lost
direction?
So
I'm
like
I'm
feeling
a
little
bit
cold
on
that
one.
So
an
interesting
mix
this
week,
but
I'll
pass
it
to.
H
Thanks
yeah,
I
feel
super
excited
about
the
reward
system
too.
There's
so
many
things
now
like
there
are
more
concrete.
H
Coming
from
the
research
group,
I
posted
a
graph
that
andy
made
in
the
in
the
reward
system
chat
if
everybody
wants
to
check
it
out,
it's
just
like
so
many
visualizations
coming
up
and
we're
still
working
with
the
old
batch
of
praise,
but
a
lot
of
ideas
coming
out
from
there,
and
I
had
a
few
brainstorming
sessions
with
christopher
this
week
to
work
on
on
an
identity
system
using
praise,
and
I
think
that
could
like
influence
a
lot
our
governance
system
and
we're
looking.
H
H
Personally,
maybe
selfishly
I
wasn't
having
time
to
participate
before
and
then
now
this
approach
of
working
with
the
working
groups
and
having
more
like
directed
commitments
with
different
groups
and
the
ama
we
had
today
was
awesome.
It
feels
like
more
eyes,
came
into
from
the
right
place
and
yeah.
I'm
feeling
excited
to
think
about
what
would
be
like
the
best
cultural
proposal.
A
Right
everyone
else.
What
okay
I'll
say.
You
know
I've
been
very
absent,
I'm
prioritizing
you
know
friend,
essays
about
books,
seventh
grade
level
and
all
kinds
of
homework
that
I'm
not
used
to
helping
with
and
the
same
with
the
fourth
grade
level.
Two,
so
it's
a
little
you
know
hot
and
cold
is
a
good
way
of
describing
it.
A
We
have
a
good
happy
vibe,
so
I'm
just
letting
everything
go
with
the
tec
and
it's
I
just
you
know
I'm
looking
forward
to
monday
when
at
least
one
of
them
is
back
in
school,
nobody
else
is
positive.
Everyone
else
tested
negative,
so
just
the
nine-year-old
is
is
positive.
Nobody
else
she
didn't
spread
it
to
anyone
else.
It's
really
weird,
but
she
goes
back
to
school
on
monday
and
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
that
a
so
psa.
Have
you
updated
your
sprint
issues?
A
Don't
hesitate
to
go
to
github.com
notifications
and
check
anything
that
you've
been
tagged
in
so
you
know
last
week
during
our
I
just
I
want
to
propose
this
there's
a
little
exercise.
I'd
like
us
to
do.
25
30
minutes
maximum.
A
A
Retrospective
and
mitch
was
the
first
to
share
his
reservations,
but
it
seemed
as
if
other
people
in
the
stewards
also
felt
like
it
didn't
sit
right.
You
know
whatever.
That
means
let
us
get
into
that.
I
want
us
to
dig
into
just
that.
I
was
thinking
of
doing
a
post-mortem
during
the
session
for
council
for
the
council,
but
I
actually
think
we
can
just
do
an
after-action
review.
A
It's
a
super,
simple
exercise.
We
will
hop
into
this
miro
board
and
then
we
could
have
a
params
party
in
our
council
tomorrow.
If
everyone
is
cool
with
this,
I
think
I
think
it
will
actually
help
us
not
just
feel
better
about
where
we
are
but
also
understand.
A
Okay,
here's
the
things
that
happened,
and
this
is
what
we
fixed
next
time.
So
I
think
we
yeah,
I
think,
it'll-
be
a
good
exercise
for
us.
I
don't
think
it
should
take
this
whole
time,
I'm
expecting
it
to
be
20
20
to
30
minutes.
A
So
after
action
review
is
essentially
just
you
know,
it's
just
to
improve
our
future
work.
It's
not
like
hey,
we
succeeded
or
we
failed.
It's
like
there's
almost
no
judgment
at
all.
We
always
have
weaknesses
to
improve
the
strengths
to
sustain
it's
a.
A
Retrospective,
just
for
one
event,
participants
should
be
honest
and
observe
what
actually
happened.
There's
no
blame.
There's
no
praise.
There's!
No!
You
know,
there's
there's
no
judgment.
There's
no
compliments!
It's
just
very.
You
know
just
facts:
ma'am,
no
one
has
all
the
information,
so
everyone
has
something
to
impart
and
to
share
the
ground.
Rules
are
essentially
you
know,
everyone
should
participate.
A
Everyone's
views
have
equal
value.
No
one's
has
more
value
than
anyone
else's.
There's
no
blames,
there's
no
right
or
wrong
answers,
we're
all
open
to
new
ideas
and
seeing
each
other's
perspective,
we
can
be
creative
and
proposing
solutions
and
the
you
know
the
improv
rule
of
yes,
and
rather
than
either
or
consensus,
where
possible,
if
not
clarification
and
continue
looking
for
commitment
to
looking
for
opportunities.
A
Okay,
so
the
way
this
starts,
is
we
just
go
through
four
categories?
So
what
did
we
expect
to
happen?
You
know,
so
the
idea
is
like
extending
the
timeline
for
commons
parameter.
What
did
we
expect
like?
What
should
that
have
looked
like
you
know?
What
we
expected
to
happen
was
a
sprint
retrospective,
but
that's
not
what
actually
happens.
I
mean
that
did
happen,
but
that
surfaced
something
really
important,
and
then
you
know
that
took
precedent.
So
what
we?
What
did
we
expect
to
happen?
We'll
just
do
this
for
about
five
minutes.
A
What
actually
happened,
what
went
really
well
and
why
and
then
what
could
we
improve
and
why
and
then
at
the
end
of
this,
hopefully
we'll
sort
of
dig
into
like
what
are
the
things
that
we
can
do
to
avoid
a
situation
where
there
is,
you
know,
reservations
or
like
hesitations
about
our
decision-making
process
or
the
way
that
we
decided
or
whether
we
even
have
the
right
to
decide
or
do
we
have
the
right
to
decide.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
J
That's
not
clear
to
me
that,
because
what
actually
happened,
we
have
to
see
it
right
like
we
have
to
see
the
benefits
or
the
cons
of
the
decision.
So.
L
A
Okay,
yeah,
I
would
think
about
it
from
more
of
the
actual
voting
itself.
You
know
how
it
came
out.
Oh
it
came
about,
it
was
surfaced
through
the
through
the
retrospective,
the
the
the
you
know,
the
what
we
could
do
better
with
surface
through
them,
and
then
we
voted
on
it
quickly.
A
So
I
would
look
at
it
more
so
like
in
that
instance,
rather
than
how
it
will
pan
out
in
the
future.
Okay.
A
Okay,
and
maybe
now
four
minutes
and
15
seconds
on
what
went
well
and
why
did
it
go
well
before
we
go
to
what
maybe
didn't
go?
Well,
what
could
be
improved
so
what
did
go
well
if
we
look
at
it
objectively.
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
A
Okay,
cool
all
right,
so
anybody
want
a
few
more
minutes
to
fill
in
any
of
these.
A
So
olivia
do
you
want
to
start
and
pass
it
on?
I
mean
just
read
the
whole
section
and
then
pass
on
to
someone
else
to
read
another
whole
section.
H
So
what
did
we
expect
to
happen?
I
didn't
saw
it
coming.
We
expected
to
launch
mid-december,
we
expected
to
have
active
full
participation
in
param
parties.
We
expected
to
have
very
engaged
community
community
and
the
param
parties.
We
expected
the
timeline
to
continue
in
having
the
vote,
and
yesterday
we
expected
clear,
go
clear,
good
proposals.
H
We
expected
the
time
with
the
flying
was
going
to
be
ideal
for
learning
experimenting,
proposing
and
debating.
We
expected
to
have
more
advice
process
for
such
a
big
decision.
I
expected
that
we
recognized
when
a
decision
is
rushed.
I
expected
more
awareness
of
timing
and
pros
cons.
We
expected
to
have
more
token
holders
informed
better.
We
expected
more
debates
participation.
H
We
expected
adequate
time
to
evaluate
the
decision.
We
expected
a
decision
like
this
should
be
voted
on
snapshot.
We
expected
more
engagement
from
stewards.
We
expected
to
fully
address
any
dissent
opposition
to
a
decision
having
a
clear
set
of
good
proposals
to
vote
on.
We
expected
to
make
this
sort
of
decision
earlier.
I
was
expecting
there
to
be
actions
to
take
into
the
next
print.
H
E
Sorry,
my
head
had
avocado
all
over
it.
What
actually
happened?
We
didn't
make
a
clear
action
plan
for
the
future.
The
project
was
supposed
to
launch
in
2020
will
launch
in
2022..
Oh,
it
meant
2021..
We
lost
momentum.
Steward's
working
group
made
the
decision.
The
engagement
plan
took
too
long
to
change,
seeing
the
lack
of
activity
from
the
community.
E
E
Tech
holders
were
not
adequately
involved,
the
parties
must
go
on,
dominant
forces
were
carried
further,
dominant
voices
were
carried
further
token
holders
had
no
voice.
There
was
many
other
things
happening
simultaneously
and
engagement
wasn't
optimal
new
contributors
standing
by
for
the
commons
upgrade.
E
E
E
E
The
decision
was
reactive,
not
inventory,
more
timeline
for
reflection
on
the
impact
for
specific
people
and
role
and
to
make
preparations
for
the
change.
The
sprint
call
ran
overtime
and
the
vote
and
decision
happened
in
the
time
between
the
sprint
and
the
call.
Not
all
stewards
were
present.
We
felt
pressured
to
take
a
decision
and
gained
some
time
to
feel
more
confident.
I
Thank
you
and
I
will
go
up
all
right,
so
we
have
more
time
to
set
better
parameters
we
are
now.
We
are
now
have
more
focus
on
our
own
working
group
education
time
to
outreach
more
members
of
the
community.
We
are
questioning
ourselves.
If
we
consider
this
a
working
group
decision,
it
went
really
well.
We
created
more
space
to
get
te
and
top
token
holder
involvement
in
the
design
of
the
economy.
I
Considering
the
problem
was
stated
very
last
minute,
we
made
a
quick
decision
that
seemed
beneficial.
At
the
moment
we
identified
some
problem
areas
that
could
have
been
solved
for
prior,
essentially
avoiding
this
problem
in
the
first
place.
This
reflection
process
is
important
for
our
governance.
Moving
forward.
We
get
to
educate
ourselves
better.
Before
taking
a
decision.
I
We
were
prompted
to
come
up
with
new
ways
to
really
do
collaborative
economics.
Everyone
who
was
present
had
a
chance
to
speak.
Nobody
blew
all
their
votes
before
the
deadline.
We
were
able
to
make
a
quick
decision.
As
a
group,
we
brought
it.
We
brought
as
much
information
as
we
had
to
the
table.
We
had
info
needed
for
the
community
to
call
it
was
important
not
to
push
the
vote
in
that
call
or
to
push
the
vote
in
that
call.
We
quickly
made
the
right
call.
We
we
needed
the
time.
I
I
We
have
more
work
more
time
to
work
on
the
commons
dashboard.
We
have
more
time
to
work
on
reward
systems.
We
have
more
time
to
work
on
tests
of
the
deployment
of
the
abc
and
cv
under
the
pressure
of
the
community
call
and
at
the
end
of
the
vote
on
november
30th,
the
decision
was
reached.
I
Stewards
was
the
right
working
group
to
make
the
decision.
All
of
the
working
group
except
omega
in
labs,
has
stewards
in
the
vote.
Our
working
group
is
an
open
and
safe
space
where
we
can
voice
reservations,
disagreements
and
be
heard.
Stewards
could
represent
the
concerns
of
their
working
groups.
The
time
after
exhaustion
is
where
the
most
creative
ideas
arise.
I
We
synced
our
launch
to
not
lose
attention
during
the
holiday
season
and
collectively
it
became
known
that
more
time
was
needed.
Good
job
team
capitalism
urges
speed,
decolonizing
work
looks
like
slowing
down
and
noticing
our
urges
to
speed
up,
and
instead
we
gotta
talk
through
the
discomfort
of
the
decision
making
process
and
what
we
can
improve
and
how
I
will
pass
it
to
edu.
D
We
could
have
had
an
explicit
action
plan
for
what
is
next.
We
should
be
able
to
implement
software
systems
into
community
decisions
to
validate
it.
We
could
have.
We
could
have
a
guide
for
extending
date,
since
this
happened.
So
often
we
needed
24
hours
for
a
decision
of
this
magnitude.
So
all
time
zones
have
a
chance
to
integrate
and
give
feedback.
D
Attending
meetings
like
that
shouldn't
be
so
important
is,
if
someone
missed
a
meeting
that
should
that
should
always
be
okay.
Important
decisions
can
be
made
in
a
snap
like
this.
We
can
take
advice
process
more
seriously.
By
giving
more
time,
we
didn't
consider
the
cost
of
these
decisions,
time
for
contributors
and
resources
for
common
stack,
all
parameters,
all
params
and
comes
contributors,
weren't
present
in
the
decision,
even
being
the
ones
most
affected
by
it.
The
criticism
to
the
way
things
were
handled
could
have
been
more
constructive,
offering
solutions
for
improvement.
D
That
was
a
really
difficult
decision.
Actually,
there
are
notable
advantages
and
disadvantages
to
each
option.
As
someone
who
voted
for
the
side
that
did
not
win,
I
can
only
say
I
am
100
committed
to
making
the
winning
side
decision
as
successful
as
we
can.
The
extra
time
can
leverage
great
publicity
and
education
for
a
larger
community
than
just
the
tec,
establishing
metrics
for
success
with
cu
proposals,
an
adjusting
timeline
to
reflect
participation
levels,
don't
let
dates
govern
us.
D
Decisions
should
have
a
process
and
we
should
stick
to
it,
not
letting
pressure
get
into
our
decision
making
process.
Social
awareness
time
to
learn
about
boundaries
and
consent
before
people
can
interpret
what
that
means
in
regard
in
regard
to
tech
applications,
and
I
think
that
would
be
all
back
to
you.
Tim.
A
Lasted
a
little
longer
than
I
expected,
but
I
think
some
really
important
insights
came
out
of
here.
I'm
gonna
pass
it
around.
We
will
not
have
enough
time
for
a
minute
and
a
half
for
everyone,
but
maybe
we
just
get
started
with
with
that
anyway.
I'll
ask
olivia
you
to
start
and
pass
it
on.
H
Just
a
general
reflection
on
everything,
okay,
yeah
yeah,
so
I
think
for
me.
I
think
this
happens
often
that
we
have
to
change
dates,
and
maybe
we
could
already
have
some
type
of
best
practices
for
it,
and
this
could
be
like
an
output
of
this
process
to
work
on
like
oh.
Whenever
we
want
to
change
dates.
Maybe
we
needed
a
time
like.
H
But
then
I
think,
given
the
rush
that
we
had,
that
an
important
decision
was
made
quickly
and
that
shows
some
resilience
also
that
when
we
need
to
decide
on
something
that
we
can
gather
and
do
that-
and
I
feel,
like
the
stewards
working
group-
have
a
good
overall
look
into
the
community
to
be
able
to
access
this
yeah
the
the
things
that
could
go
wrong.
H
But
then
I
do
think
that
chewie
raised
the
point
that
we
didn't
give
full
attention,
because
we
were
in
a
rush
and
that
day
I
felt
like
particularly
quiet
in
a
good
mental
space
to
make
a
decision.
So
I
felt
like
I
wasn't
like
prepared
to
like
put
all
my
focus
and
energy
there,
and
maybe
that
should
be
a
practice
and
moving
forward
like
hey.
Is
everyone
like
really
mentally
present
to
think
about
all
the
pros
and
cons
and
then
how
we
can
move
forward
and
no
pass
to
huanka.
B
This
is
my
first
time
doing
this,
so
I
am
learning
while
doing
and-
and
I
feel
that
sometimes
we
can-
we
can
like
feel
pressure
but
of
of
taking
a
decision
in
a
hurry,
but
we
should
always
have
our
minds
cold
to
to
not
like
let
that
pressure
get
into
our
decision
making
process
so
like
yeah,
taking
things
slow
is
a
good
way
to
to
to
manage
things
without
being
reactionary
and
I'll
pass.
Donate.
I
Yeah
I'll
keep
mine
quick.
I
think
my
biggest
concern
with
this
is
not
not
the
way
we
handled
ourselves.
I
thought
we
did
great.
I
think,
preventing
this
type
of
scenario
in
the
future
is
the
most
important,
and
especially
with
a
long-term
initiatives
like
the
commons
upgrade
to
have
kind
of
these
metrics
of
success.
I
These
kind
of
go
no-go's
for
for
launching
stuff,
like
that,
making
sure
that
we
have
enough
participation
and
saying
this
is
what
we
need
in
order
for
this
to
be
a
valid
initiative
and
to
move
forward
so
avoiding
the
situation
altogether
is
kind
of
the
priority
for
my
opinion,
but
I'll
pass
it
over
to
lauren.
E
I
really
love
what
nature
said
about
like
creating
these
actionable
steps
check-in
steps
beforehand,
but
I
think
the
way
that
we
I
mean,
I
think
we
we
made.
We
were
talking
about
on
the
call
we
needed
to
make
this
decision
before
the
community
calls.
So
we
can
announce
it
to
everybody.
It's
changing
the
way
that
the
whole
structure
is
going.
I
think,
like
considering
the
rush
that
was
like
apparent.
We
made
it.
We
did
an
okay
job
of
like
listening
to
everybody
through
throughout
the
call
making
the
decision.
It
wasn't.
K
E
That
the
decision
was
kind
of
made
in
a
call
and
didn't
involve
everybody,
but
I,
I
think,
like
the
main
thing
that
I
I
think
we
could
improve
upon
in
the
future,
with
these
kinds
of
things
is,
if
we
make
a
snap
decision,
then
to
make
like
a
snap
clear
plan
like
shortly
after
maybe
like
you
know,
not
right
away
right
away
but
like
in
that
day
and
part
of
like
the
the
spillover
that
that
I
felt-
and
I
was
talking
about
with
mitch-
is
like.
E
E
I
think
if
we
like
implemented
that
plan,
then
like
at
least
throughout
this
week,
we
could
have
taken
advantage
of
the
time
that
we
have
right
now
to
get
more
participation
in
brand
parties,
whereas,
like
the
reality
of
what
happened,
is
that
it
was
like
the
parent
party
participation,
kind
of
dropped
yeah,
but
that's
all
I'll
pass
it
to
griff.
F
I
really
liked
what
nate
said
honestly,
I
feel
like
having
dates
that
are
longer
than
a
month
doesn't
longer
than
two
weeks,
just
historically
never
works
in
crypto,
because
everything's
moving
and
changing
so
fast
so
like
having,
instead
of
maybe
instead
of
having
dates.
If
we
had
more
like
metrics
that
we
wanted
to
fill
or
go
or
no
go
for
from
people
and
go
in
with
that.
That's
what
we
did
with
the
hatch
launch,
and
I
think
that
would
work
really
well
for
the
comments
upgrade
as
well.
F
But,
of
course,
it's
nice
to
give
the
expectations
of
dates.
I
think
I
think
snap
decisions
like
this.
We
should
always
have
at
least
a
day.
You
know,
I
I
think
it's
a
snap.
I
think
things
probably
could
have
gone
better.
If
we
would
have
said
hey
we're
thinking
about
delaying
it.
Don't
vote
in
the
community
call
but
like
we
want
to
hear
the
voices
of
the
community
whether
or
not
we
should
delay
or
not,
and
then,
and
also
we
still
don't.
F
I
would
love
to
hear
feedback
on
the
proposed
dates
and
see
if
those
work
for
everyone
and
I'll
pass
it
to
chewie.
C
Thank
you,
griff
I'll,
also,
keep
it
short.
I
I
feel
like
pretty
pretty
much
like,
unlike
cuanca,
I
like
looking
back
at
the
decision
and
how
it
had
to
be
made
like
it,
it
had
to
be
made
like
we
needed
the
extra
time,
but
what
I
take
from
it
is
like
this,
like
looking
back
on
it
and
and
saying
like
what
can
we
improve
and
and
yeah
I
I.
C
I
think
that
if
now
that
we're
having
these
ideas
and
also
about
what
griff
said
about
what
the
the
new
dates
look
like,
I
feel
that
there's
enough
time
so
that
we
can
put
to
practice
some
of
the
ideas
that
we're
throwing
here
like
making
like
soft
and
commitments,
for
example.
So
yeah,
that's
what
I
have
to
say
I'll,
pass
it
to
septi.
J
Thanks
to
yeah
I'll
keep
it
short
for
me,
like
the
the
thing
that
doesn't
feel
right
like
it
seems
like
we're,
taking
decisions
on
the
store
working
group,
but
that
was
involving
like
contributors
like
you
know,
maybe
they're
expecting
some
compensation
and
they
are
waiting
for
the
commons
upgrade
somehow
and
then
it's
getting
delayed
and
also
like,
like
the
common
stock
resources.
We
are
not
like.
N
Yeah
hi
everybody
thanks
zepty.
Clearly
I
missed
a
snap
decision
and
I
missed
most
of
this
call,
but
it's
been
very
helpful.
Listening
to
you
all
and
I
have
nothing
useful
to
add
other
than
I'm
going
to
take
a
dive
and
and
see
what
happened.
A
Cool
I
mean
I
might
just
take
it
from
you
in
the
last
minute
and
20
seconds.
I
think
I'd
say
you
know.
I
agree
that
there's
some
really
good
outputs
from
here.
I
think
that
everyone
agrees
that
it
feels
rushed
and
that
at
least
24
hours
would
have
been
better.
I
think
there's
some
disagreement
about
whether
it
was
a
decision
that
could
be
made
by
the
stewards,
as
sort
of
like
the
keeper
of
the
top
the
work
streams
of
the
working
groups
or
needed
input
from
token
holders.
I
think
it's
it's
it's.
A
I
think
that's
an
interesting
question
too,
and
I
think
there's
no
there's
definitely
no
harm
with
posting
it
as
advice
process
for
the
community
for
on
the
forum,
which
is
what
ended
up
happening,
and
I
think
that
was
a
really
strategic
move,
and
then
I
guess
I
want
to
say
this
metric
thing
like
what
are
our
metrics
for
the
next
for
the
next
vote.
What
should
they
be?
How
many
proposals,
how
many
proposals
that
are
deemed
good
enough
to
actually
make
it?
A
I
think
it's
maybe
interesting
to
explore
them
we're
at
the
top
of
the
hour,
and
where
do
I
don't
think
you
went?
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
take
30
seconds.
D
Sure
yeah,
I
think
this
idea
of
a
soft
kind
of
resistance
that
we
implement
when
we
recognize
it
is
a
rush
decision
like
if
we
make
our
own
decision
immediately,
we
can
jump
into
what
are
the
pros
and
cons
and
what
are
the
actions,
and
if
we
do
not
have
actions
or
pros
and
cons
clear,
then
the
decision
cannot
be
made.
This
kind
of
cultural
practice
could
be
interesting
to
implement,
so
we
can,
everyone
can
do
any
spot,
doesn't
matter
what
call
it
is
you
can
always
do
it?
That's
it.
Thank
you.
Tim.