►
Description
In the Stewards Working Group the Community Stewards come together to coordinate workstreams, share experiences and reflect on what is going well and what can be done better in order to achieve the mission of the TEC and best serve our community.
Find us on the #stewards channel on our Discord!
We gather every Wednesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Tamara
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
Cool
thanks
mert
and
since
you
came
a
little
late,
you
probably
don't
know
who
hasn't
gone
yet,
but
nate
hasn't
gone
so
I'll
pass
to
him.
C
Thanks
yeah,
everything
is
really
great,
really
excited
to
see.
This
token
live
and
see
the
reaction
to
it
from
people
in
the
space,
and
so
it's
really
exciting
and
then
yeah.
Just
all
the
working
groups
like
there's
so
much
getting
going
on
right
now
and
so
much
incremental
progress,
and
I
cannot
wait
until
we
actually
have
these
products
that
we're
putting
out
into
the
te
space
whether
it's
the
gravity,
the
consilience
library,
the
soft
processes,
the
research.
C
It's
the
reward
system
like
everything,
is
moving
in
so
many
different
directions
and
it's
really
exciting,
but
also
like.
We
got
a
lot
of
work
to
do
still.
So
it's
really
cool
to
to
have
that
type
of
hype
and,
like
oh,
my
goodness,
let's
buckle
down
and
get
going
again
so
yeah,
I'm
I'm
just
really
excited
about
seeing
all
the
participation
that
we've
had
so
far.
So
I
will
pass
it
on
to
tara
taurus.
B
Welcome
teresa,
you
landed
in
our
stewards
weekly.
Would
you
like
to
take
a
moment
and
introduce
yourself
you're
very
welcome
to
hang
out
here
with
us.
B
I
see
that
your
mute
went
off
but
can't
hear
you
wanna
try
again.
B
Now
no
sound
is
coming
through
yet
all
right.
Well,
if
you
do,
if
you
are
we,
so
we
still
can't
hear
you,
but
if
you
are
able
to
maybe
you
could
introduce
yourself
a
little
later
too
and
I'll
pass
to
vi
to
keep
going
hello?
Oh
yeah,
we
got
you
all
right,
good.
D
Yes,
so
we
can
hear
you
now
my
phone
connecting
the
bluetooth
from
the
car
so
like
it
wasn't
working
well,
no,
it's
actually.
My
first
call
that
I'm
listening
from
the
discord,
I'm
very
happy
to
be
here.
I
want
to
cover,
regulate
you
all
with
the
lounge
of
tech,
I'm
still
learning
about
the
whole
david
economy,
all
the
all
that
given
how
to
offer
all
the
different
things
out
there.
So
I'm
just
happy
to
be
listening
and
I'll.
Keep
up
cool
you're,
very.
B
Welcome
to
listen,
it's
nice
to
have
people
join
our
call
and
maybe
I'll
pass
to
vi.
Then
why
do
you
want
to
give
your
temperature
check.
E
It's
burning
hot
right
now.
I'm
really
really
excited
about
the
launch
and
reward
system.
I
just
I
just.
I
can't
wait
for
praise
us
to
get
a
stable
version
of
place
going.
The
trial
con
went
well,
even
though
we
had
we
like
lost
the
database.
E
We
like
plugging
all
the
holes
and
fixing
things
ensuring
that,
like
the
final
version,
is
all
right
and
I'm
super
pumped
up
about
the
five
av
plus
rgg
discord
course
for
labs
and
I'm
just
figuring
out
how
what
what
would
be
like
good
for
eight
days
like
how
much
stuff
we
can
put
in
there
and
what
were
the
best
things
super
ex
excited
about
that
and
yeah
I'll
pass
it
to.
I
think
everyone
has
went.
B
B
Okay,
he
mentioned
his.
His
connection
is
a
little
weak
right
now
where
he
is
okay.
So
then
I
guess
the
last
one
is
me,
but
we
feel
free
to
jump
in.
If
you
want
to,
I
would
say:
there's
I
mean
I
don't
know
it
didn't
hit
me
when
we
launched
and
it
was
really
exciting
and
then,
as
I
was
taking
a
walk
to
do
something
in
the
neighborhood.
It
really
hit.
C
B
So
that
was
that's
very
cool
and
then
I
would
say
just
overall,
you
know
it
was
really
cool
to
see
the
te
academy.
It
has
about
half
a
percent
half
of
the
conviction
that
it
needs
already
after
about
24
hours.
So
that
was
really
neat.
It's
nice
to
see
it
everything
live
and
how
things
work,
and
it's
just
really
cool
that
we're
finally
live
after
so
many
months
of
of
work
to
get
here,
hey
craig
welcome!
B
Do
you
want
to
share
a
temperature
check.
F
Oh,
it's
smoking,
hot,
congratulations!
Everyone!
Finally,
abc's
live
it's
funny,
I'm
thinking
back
to
the
beginning.
When
griff
was
like
yeah
january,
if
he
was
right,
it
was
just
a
year
later.
F
B
G
Not
just
excited
to
have
sent
the
you
know
the
emails
to
all
of
our
contacts
and
hotspot
and
getting
to
see
the
engagement
on
the
different
people
who
opened
it
and
and
even
getting
to
see
how
that
reflected
on
some
people
buying
like
after
they
opened
the
email
I
mean
I
can't
know
for
sure,
but
there
were
checking
on
the
smart
contract.
G
There
were
a
couple
buys,
so
I
could
have
tilted
it
in
our
favor
so
definitely
willing
to
share
my
screen
to
show
some
of
the
analytics
that
we
can
see
on
hotspot
later
on.
If
that's
within
the
scope
of
this
meeting,
if
not
I'm
just
happy
to
be
here
with
everyone.
B
B
If
you
want
to
throw
it,
throw
it
at
the
bottom
and
if
there's
time
left
over
otherwise,
maybe
we
can
also
see
it
next
week
because
it'd
be
interesting
cool
thanks.
B
So
I
don't
think
I
missed
anyone.
I
think
that's
correct,
so.
B
H
H
Yeah,
sorry,
I
I
have
like
limited
reception,
but
it's
it's
like
I.
I've
just
been
like
super
happy.
We've
been
talking
about
this
for
months.
It's
like
it's
like
beyond
hot.
It's
like
a
new
like
state
of
matter.
It's
it's
been
very,
very
exciting
to
see
everything
working
on
and
and
just
to
feel
how
everyone
is
is
very
happy
about
this
finally
happening
so
so
yeah
yeah,
we
yeah.
Let's
see.
B
Yeah
you're
breaking
up
a
little
bit
at
the
end,
but
we
got
the
high
vibes
came
across
cool
okay.
So
now
I
think
everyone
really
really
went.
I'm
gonna
jump
to
the
t-e-a-t-e-c,
so
it
was
amazing,
juan
carlos.
Your
presentation
went
really
well
we're
gonna
keep
doing
this.
So
the
token
engineering
academy
and
token
engineering
commons
will
present
introduction
to
token
engineering
together
every
month
they
selected
two
more
dates,
and
I
know
we
discussed
having
it
be
a
different
steward
that
presents
every
time.
B
There's
some
one
small
piece
of
feedback
around.
We
might
even
be
able
to
make
it
more
high
level
and
maybe
stay
out
of
some
of
the
details
that
might
be
confusing
for
people
who
maybe
don't
know
the
tec
at
all.
So
maybe
we
can
maybe,
when
we,
the
next
person,
who
does
it
can
can
adjust
the
deck
to
do
that.
So
I'd
love.
If
anyone
wants
to
volunteer
for
it,
you
can
do
it
on
this
call.
B
You
can
just
you
know,
add
your
name
to
the
agenda
or
drop
it
on
the
stewards
telegram.
I'm
gonna
keep
moving
just
to
keep
the
flow,
because
you
know
it's
february
16th,
so
we
have
time
to
organize
we'll
do
it,
but
if
anyone
wants
to
do
the
presentation,
please
do
you
know
make
yourself
volunteer
known
griff,
you
wanna,
do
the
initial
buy
thanks
for
bringing
this
up.
I
Yes,
there
is
a.
There
is
an
important
vote
at
the
bottom
of
the
conviction
of
the
gardens.
That
is
looks
really
boring
and
ominous.
It
is
it's
a
decision
vote
three
or
four
people
have
voted.
It
will
send
the
tec
tokens
that
were
minted
in
the
initial
buy,
to
the
rewards
multisig
and
to
the
the
rewards,
the
roar
board
and
to
the
laser
tag
group.
So
we
should
do
that.
It
was
supposed
to
happen
in
the
deployment,
but
for
some
reason
we
minted
it
in
the
common
pool.
I
Sorry
about
that
guys,
tc
is
sitting
in
the
common
pool.
It
needs
to
go
to
the
other
two
multi-sticks
help.
B
Awesome
yeah:
let's
get
that
passed
thanks
for
adding
that
okay,
so
there
is
a
final
version
of
the
anything
else
about
that
griff
before
I
move
on.
B
Okay,
there's
a
final
proposal,
so
I've
updated
a
few
things
in
here,
so
it's
ready
to
go
to
conviction
voting
before
it
does
I'd
love
to
go
through
the
stuart.
The
stewards
go
through
it
one.
Last
time
specifically,
I
want
to
ask
about
you
know
this:
is
we
have
nine
working
group
coordination
leads
14
stewards,
so
this
is
what
the
budget
comes
out
to,
based
on
there
being
a
monthly
stipend
of
750
for
working
group.
B
The
14
stewards
are
here,
the
nine
working
group
coordination
leads
are
here
and
the
question,
so
I
am
welcome.
Anyone
is
welcome
to
add
comments
in
this
document
or
to
raise
questions
now.
If
you
have
questions
or
comments
that
you
want
to
make,
and
then
the
thing
I
want
to
know,
I
really
need
help
with.
Here
is
what
I
am
proposing.
B
What
we've
proposed
in
here
is
that,
every
month
I
was
thinking
there
would
be
a
thread
under
the
stewards
channel,
where
people
would
request
their
that
those
that
compensation
that
month
so
yeah
and
then
I
was
wondering
how
are
other
working
groups
going
to
be
doing
it,
and
then
I
was
wondering:
is
this
actually
something
that
we
could
use?
Do
you
work
for
like
the
monthly
like
the
the
bounty
would
be
the
fixed
price
and
it
would
be
for
the
the
month
of
stewardship
or
something
like
that.
B
So
those
are
things
I
wanted
to
get
some
feedback
from
other
stewards
about.
Does
anyone
want
to
share
and
like
can
someone
jump
in
for
and
share
how
your
working
group
will
be
keeping
the
payments
transparent
to
the
community.
J
Actually,
tom,
like
me
and
ivy,
were
also
thinking
on
adding
tea
work,
but
then
also
like,
like
you
had
this
comment
like
this
is
like
a
test
tool
and
then
we
thought,
like
also
like
actually
a
similar
approach,
like
you
were
suggesting
before,
like
just
people
applying
and
then
sharing
it
on
a
threatening
discord
like
having
a
special
thread
for
you
know,
ask
for
your
trace
or
whatever
we
call
it,
and
then
in
this
only
in
this
channel,
you
see
like
all
the
traces
and
that
would
be
transparent
and
until
the
work
proves
to
be,
you
know,
working
properly.
B
B
I'd
love
to
I'd
love,
to
hear
that
too
chewie.
I
know
your
connection's
a
little
bad.
I
don't
know,
I
think,
is:
is
comms
exclusively
using
dwork
to
keep
trans
to
keep
compensation,
transparent.
H
Well,
in,
in
the
end,
it's
it's
a
it's
a
gnosis
say
because
pretty
much
like
the
only
thing
that
the
work
does
is
submit
the
transaction
once
it's
once,
the
task
is
done
so
in
in.
In
the
end,
I
I
feel
it's
it's
it's
a
multisig
multi-stick.
H
So
if
I
think
a
good
option
could
could
also
be
like,
maybe
handle
it
directly
in
nosy
safe
instead
of
doing
like
a
d
workspace
or
if
it
provides
like
any
more
like
transparency
or
or
yeah
yeah,
just
to
like
the
overall
process,
maybe
the
work
could
be
the
way,
but
I
mean
it's
not
it's
not
directly,
something
that
makes
a
difference
like
with
with
multisig.
B
Okay,
cool:
if
anyone
has
any
other
ideas,
please
share
them
in
the
stock.
I'm
expecting
to
probably
wait
a
little
while
it's
like
12
hours,
something
so
people
can
comment
if
they
want
and
then
post
it
on
conviction
voting
in
the
morning.
So
I'll
give
it
maybe.
K
I
I
have
one
idea
and
for
for
managing
the
gnosis
yeah,
instead
of
having
like
several
people
having
to
participate
in
that
process
and
having
to
vote
in
gravity
where
we're
going
to
have
like
one
responsible
for
the
execution
of
the
payments.
K
B
I
was
thinking
something
similar.
I
was
thinking
something
along
like
the
one
of
three
so
that,
like
three
people
could
do
it,
but
one
person
would
be
able
to
do
it
on
on
their
own.
That's
a
great
topic
actually
like
how
how
other
working
groups
are
organizing
the
multi-sigs
and
or
the
distributions.
L
I
ask
a
question:
what
do
you
have
an
example
tamara
of
the
special
projects
of
what
a
special
project
might
look
like
or
and
to
give
I
I
can
give
some
context
of
the
labs
for
the
current
state
of
the
labs.
So
I
would
say,
like
you
know,
I'm
the
steward
of
the
labs,
but
metaverde
has
been
facilitating
the
labs
for
the
past
seven
seven
eight
weeks,
so
we
could
split
that
steward
and
working
group
coordination
lead,
but
we
also
might
just
categorize
the
labs
itself
as
a
special
project.
B
Yeah,
I
see
what
you're
saying
and
I
I
guess
I
would
wonder,
because
metaverdi
doesn't
really
participate
in
the
transversal
coordination.
The
sprints,
the
planning.
E
L
B
Of
defined
in
in
here,
but
special
projects
was
what,
if
we
have
another
steward,
you
know
what,
if
there
is,
I
don't
know
something
a
tool
that
we
need
to
use,
so
it's
sort
of
for,
like
a
just
in
case,
something
there's
something
and
we
would
be
able
to
have
a
little
bit
of
bandwidth.
You
know
a
little
bit
of
buffer,
I
mean,
or
it
could
be
something
like
that.
B
Maybe
there's
a
speaker
that
we
want
to
bring
in
and
do
some
some
training
for
the
stewards
and
there's
you
know
a
price
attached
with
that.
So.
L
It's
really
anything
that
needs
a
budget
needs
its
own
sort
of
dedicated
budget,
and
so
would
it
make
sense.
The
special
projects
is
probably
more
likely
variable
like
it's
not
like
everyone
would
be
2000.
Would
it
be
more
on
a
case-by-case
basis?
I.
B
B
E
B
B
B
B
B
I
I'd
also
love
to
hear
people's
opinion
about
that.
If
you
know,
there's
a
strong
opinion
for
it
or
against
it.
You
know,
please
do
drop
comments
or
yeah.
M
I
didn't
feel
like
it
would
be
the
best
use
of
I
don't
know
it
didn't
make
sense
to
me
to
make
a
working
group
a
funding
proposal,
but
to
use
the
reward
systems
and
see
if
that
would
be
enough
to
engage
participants
also
almost
like
an
experiment,
and
if
there
is
any
type
of
project
that
we
would
need
a
certain
type
of
budget
to
submit
that
as
a
proposal
to
the
dow.
So
I
think
that's
also
a
way
to
do
it.
L
Yeah
keeping
in
mind
the
multiple
parallel
channels
we
have,
we
have
the
reward
system,
we
have
the
proposals
on
the
commons
pool
and
those
are
in
parallel
to
these
budgets
for
stewards
and
coordination.
Coordination
leads.
B
B
And
so
I
was
thinking
like
for
probably
for
something
like
the
you
know,
meda
verdes
facilitating
the
solidity
zombies
course
that
would
sort
of
be
a
special
like
a
budget
for
for
the
labs.
Actually.
B
Yeah
I'd
say
for
something
like
the
the
metaverde's
facilitation
of
the
crypto.
I
mean
the
zombies.
L
Okay,
so
this
is
a
so
there's
budgeting
per
working
group.
That
is,
that
does
that
go
through
the
comments
pool
through
a
proposal?
L
B
No,
it's!
Okay!
All
of
these
working
group
funding
goes
through
conviction.
Voting
yes,
and
transparency
already
has
theirs
there,
and
most
of
the
other
working
groups
have
already
put
it
on
the
forum.
I
guess
the
process
is
to
first
put
it
on
the
forum.
H
C
So
I
just
want
to
add
a
comment:
real
quick,
I
I
hate
being
the
critical
guy,
but
I'm
still
very
skeptical,
of
the
role
based
compensation
model
that
we've
proposed
for
the
both
the
working
groups
and
the
stewards
just
because
it
it
does
hamstring
us
a
little
bit
from
like
adding
stewards
and
from
kind
of
managing
the
the
work
within
each
working
group.
The
way
that
it's
open
and
accessible
to
to
newcomers
and
contributors.
B
Yeah,
well,
thanks
nate,
I
guess
there's
definitely
trade-offs.
Right,
like
we
could
do
a
different
model,
but
then
there
will
be
disadvantages
of
that
model
too,
and
I
think
part
of
the
reason
it
feels
like
we
can
move
forward
with.
This
is
at
least
it's
like
okay,
we're
doing
this
for
three
months
and
then,
if
there's
a
better
proposal
for
how
to
do
it,
we
can
always
then
pass
a
bet,
the
better
for
a
different
version.
That
has
more
advantages,
but
I
I
don't.
B
Okay,
cool,
so
without
any
further
comments,
thanks
thanks
everyone
for
your
thoughts
and
we'll
move
on
from
that
one,
but
feel
free
to
add
comments
and
thoughts
in
here
as
well
or
on
the
forum.
It's
on
the
forum
as
well.
So
that's
probably
an
even
better
place
to
add
some
comments
and
then
the
steward's
six-month
terms.
So
this
is
something
we
talked
about
already
before,
but
sort
of
putting
it
into
practice
will
be,
will
be
happening.
B
Kind
of
now-ish
like
in
a
few
days,
so
the
stewardship
term
is
six
months
and
multiple
terms
are
possible
and
then
there's
these
windows
of
like
basically
commitment.
You
know
where
you're
publicly
declaring
your
commitment
to
be
a
steward,
and
if
that
doesn't
happen,
then
you
just
sort
of
the
steward
role.
It
just
falls
off
the
person
who
sort
of
maybe
decides
that
they
can't
be
a
steward
anymore
or
can't
be
as
active
or
moved
on
to
a
different
project
and
the
process
should
start
february.
B
I
see
there'd
be
two
two
windows
so
february
and
august
the
beginning,
the
first
two
weeks
of
february,
the
first
two
weeks
of
august.
I
will
draft
a
version
of
it
so
that
anyone
who
wants
to
can
use
a
similar
template
to
the
one
that
I
draft.
The
idea
here
is
a
few
things
right,
so
you
know
full
transparency.
All
of
the
stewards
are
on
the
forum,
basically
committing
their
to
stewarding
the
tec
and
that
basically
will
just
last
until
the
next
six
month
term,
unless
somebody
is
off-boarded
in
between
that
period.
B
B
Okay,
cool-
you
can
always
go
drop
them
in
the
document
in
the
manifesto.
If
you
want
to
make
a
comment
in
there,
in
which
case
I'm
going
to
move
on
to
the
stewards
council
topic
for
tomorrow,.
I
Is
my
guess
and
people
would
and
we'd
have
to
pick
like?
I,
I
think
we're
gonna
find
that
we
have
to
coordinate
like
as
a
as
a
community
what
proposals
pass
a
little
bit
so
like
you
know,
because
two
weeks
means
20
of
the
token
holders
or
30
percent
of
token
holders
sitting
behind
that
proposal
and
not
voting
for
other
ones
for
two
weeks.
I
B
Okay,
cool
anyone
have
any
thanks
for
bringing
that
point
up.
Actually
two
weeks
does
seem
like
a
bit
of
time,
but
I
and
I
also
think
it
would
start
february
so
as
long
as
it
passes
before
the
end
of
february.
It
should
be
fine
for
the
month
of
february
to
start
covering
to
start
allocating
the
first
week
of
march,
for
the
month
of
february,.
B
Any
other
topics,
I
think
that's
a
great
topic
for
us
to
delve
into
zeptimus
last
week,
raised
the
point
about
a
possibility
of
staking
stables
or
using
the
working
group
funding
that's
sitting
in
their
treasury
for
other
other
investments.
That's
also
another
idea.
I
thought
we
could
possibly
cover
as
well.
B
B
H
Oh,
it's
pretty
simple:
we're
using
tomorrow's
community
called
for
having
a
tec
launching
party
and
and
yeah.
We
are
we're
just
gonna.
Do
like
the
neutrals
around
the
phrase
and
yeah
like
get
to
get
to
attract
people
just
to
celebrate
with
us.
The
launch
of
the
tc,
so
asset
laser
is
working
now
in
a
flyer
right
now
that
we're
gonna
be
pushing
and
yeah
am,
I
forgetting
something
here.
I
No,
I
I
think,
that's
it
I
mean
just.
I
don't
think
we
need
to
do.
I
I
guess
I'd
be
curious.
If
anyone
feels
like
they
need
to
give
some
major
working
group
updates,
I
think
I
think
we
I
I
think
the
reward
system
probably
does,
for
instance,
because
there
was
a
lot
of
action
there.
I
don't
know
if
any
other
working
groups
really
need
to
have
updates
me,
but
we
we
can
make
space
for
that,
but
I
think
we
should
also
just
make
space
for
like
tc
launch
party.
I
B
B
Yeah
yeah
cool-
it
might
even
be
interesting
if
there's
enough
people
that
come
in,
like
maybe
like
a
little
q,
a
you
know,
answer
some
questions.
People
might
have
a
lot
of
questions
too.
I
Sure,
if
someone
wants
to
facilitate
a
q,
a
I
think
in
these
larger
things,
it's
like
have
people
write
the
question
in
a
channel
and
then,
when
the
question
is
good,
you
we
could.
You
know,
I
don't
know
it's
tough,
it's
always
a
gamble
with
short
time
to
be
like
hey,
you
know
you
do
want
to
vocalize
your
question.
It's
a
good
question.
You
know
kind
of
a
thing
or
just
have
a
facilitator,
read
the
question
and
give
the
person
props.
B
Cool
okay,
awesome,
so
don't
update
your
slides
tomorrow.
B
When
does
anyone
ever
say
that
and
rewards
libya?
I
guess
you
give
the
update
on
rewards
tomorrow.
I
It's
what
we're
doing
to
the
I
think
the
reward
system
is
really
worth.
You
know
it's
a
major
piece
of
our
economy.
I
N
There's
there's
enough:
there's
like
30
35
now,
but
there's
some
people
who
didn't
sign
up
on
time
to
get
to
play
with
the
dashboard.
So
that's
the
only
reason
I
would
do
another
one.
I
Oh,
hey,
did
you
guys
know?
I
have
t
c.e.
I
also
have
te
commons.eth
they're
kind
of
fun.
Maybe
we
should
assign
them
to
something.
The
problem
is:
if
we
assign
we
can
assign
them
to
gnosis
multisig
safe,
and
it's
really
nice
because
it
like
you,
can
redeploy
the
noses
safe
on
every
chain.
So
if
someone
sends
us
money
on
arbitrarum
or
finance
smart
chain,
we
can
actually
deploy
the
multisig
underneath
it,
I
would
say,
hey,
let's
send
it
to
the
common
pool.
I
I
I
would
love
to
hear
thoughts
on
this
also,
I
feel
like.
If
we
get
donations
honestly,
we
have
a
funding
stream,
it
might
be.
The
best
thing
that
we
could
do
is
actually
create
liquidity,
for
our
token
is
probably
the
best
thing
to
do
with
some
of
this
money
so
or
any
like.
If
we
make
a
bitcoin
grant,
for
instance,
or
put
a
project
up
on
give
it,
it
just
goes
to
this
multisig
and
I'd
be
curious.
If
there's
any
thoughts
on
this,
should
I
make
a
forum
post?
Should
I
just
do
it?
I
I
mean
in
the
end
I
control
these
things.
I
don't
need
your
permission,
no
I'm
just
kidding.
I
would
like
your
permission,
though
I
could
even
transfer
them
to
the
tec
to
the
laser
tag.
Multisig.
J
L
L
L
I
think
it's
awesome.
That's
that's
great
that
you
have
that
thinking
about,
like
income
streams,
grants
donations
to
the
tec.
It's
gonna
be
nice
to
have
that
and
nice
habit
to
have
it
go
to
laser
tag.
It's
super
agile,
I
think,
and
and
like
septi
said,
we
already
have
all
the
infrastructure
around
laser
tag.
So
it's
perfect.
I
Part
of
advice
process-
okay,
cool,
that's
great!
I
actually.
I
have
something.
That's
kind
of
I
sorry
to
add
it
to
this,
but
it's
I
didn't
write
it
down,
but
it's
related.
I
also
have
all
the
previous
donations
that
were
raised
by
git
coin
on
a
key
that
I
just
hold.
Should
I
send
that
to
laser
tag,
should
I
yeah
any
any
thoughts
there?
I
M
M
I
I
Yeah,
but
you
got
to
buy
the
tc
token
while
it
was
a
dollar
well,
it
was.
J
B
E
Why
not
both
like
we
send
some
to
the
reward
system
and
the
rest
goes
to
laser
tag?
I
think
we
can
maybe
find
out
if,
like
what
would
be
a
good
amount
for
reward
system
so
that
they
don't
have
future
issues
with
asking
for
funds
and
then
the
rest
goes.
Today's.
I
I
I
guess
actually
all
right:
it
has
000
die
on
mainnet,
so
let
me
see-
maybe
it
has
more
than
two
thousand
dollars
I'll
I'll,
get
more
research
I'll
investigate
and
make
a
forum
post,
because
there's
enough
ideas
already
before
the
other
idea
was.
The
other
question
was
unanimous.
So
this
one
gets
a
forum
post
thanks.
B
Chewie,
the
next
item
on
the
topic
is:
do
you
want
to
give
an
update
about
the
delegation
for
dawn
so
and
then
for
gnosis?
I
don't
know
if
it
sort
of
came
up
last
week.
I
don't
know
if
your
internet
is
in
a
stable
enough
for
you
to
share
an
update
on
that.
H
Yep,
it's
much
much
better.
Now,
still,
no
updates.
We
eventually
have
to
take
a
decision.
I
feel
comfortable
being
the
tc's.
H
Don
dao,
however,
I
don't
think
that
it
could
be
something
like
necessarily
good
to
also
stay
in
the
gnosis
staying
and
innovation
now,
so,
if
anyone
would
be
interested
in
becoming
a
a
delegate,
I
just
feel
that
it
could
be
a
good
decision
for
just
for
the
sake
of
not
centralizing
like
a
lot
of
delegation
in
different
communities
to
one
person
so
yeah
this.
H
This
would
only
this
would
be
like
the
only
thing
that
we
would
have
to
make
a
decision
on
so
yeah
if
anyone
is
into
like
no
stream
yeah.
Let
us
know.
B
Okay,
cool
thanks
for
that
update,
julie,
okay
proposal,
inverter,
merch
and
mitch.
Do
you
have
anything
that
you'd
like
to
share
with
with
everyone
about
the
proposal
inverter.
A
Yeah,
I
can
share
that
now.
A
bitcoin
proposal
will
be
sent
probably
next
week
to
call
funds
with
tcn
prime
to
development
of
proposal
inverter.
N
Yeah,
I
can't
really
add-
I
spent
the
the
hour
there
just
like
absorbing
all
the
information.
There's
a
lot
of
people
in
this
working
group
and
a
lot
of
ideas
buzzing
around,
and
so
I'm
just
like.
I
was
basically
just
trying
to
collect
all
the
information
from
that
last
call
and
then,
like
mert,
said,
there's
a
lot
of
coordination
that
has
to
happen.
B
Okay
cool,
if
it
makes
sense
I'll,
leave
a
space
on
this
stewards
weekly
for
updates
there
until
it
doesn't
make
sense
anymore,
but
thanks
for
that
and
that
we
reached
the
end
of
our
agenda,
I
think
we're
gonna
take
up
zepp's
question
in
the
stores
council
tomorrow.
Oh
no,
we
didn't
I'm
sorry
bye.
Should
we
bring
up
the
conversation
about
whether
we
should
shift
praise
code
repos
to
common
stack
org?
Should
this
be
brought
up
in
the
reward
systems
working
group?
Are
there
any
more
considerations
to
have?
B
So
that's
a
very
good
question.
By
should
we
shift
praise
to
the
common
stack,
bitcoin
repo.
E
Yeah,
so
the
main
rationale
behind
this
is
because
praise
was
initially
a
common
stack
product
and
it
makes
a
lot
more
sense
to
have
the
tooling
over
there,
and
you
know
the
question
is
like
ben
would
be
a
good
time
to
bring
up
this
conversation
in
rewards
board
out
of
the
reward
system
working
group
especially
consider
like
now.
E
I
mean
it's
it's
to
me.
It's
the
same,
but
like
that's,
that's
a
concern
that
I
was
having.
I
From
from
my
perspective-
and
I
I
think
it's
always
actually
been
a
common
stack
thing
more
than
a
tec
thing.
Even
sorry,
could
you
guys
hear
me
or
not?
I
E
Yeah
and
the
added
questions
with
that
would
be
since
this
this
would
be
a
productivity,
like
probably,
there
might
be
some
conversation
about
us
providing
services
to
other
dogs
for
setting
this
up,
and
would
that
be
a
common
step
thing?
Would
it
be,
I
think,
like
I
don't
know,
maybe
we
should
have
these
discussions
somewhere
down
the
line.
E
B
Guess
the
question
is
that
the
most
important
question
you
raised
by
is
like:
what's
the
timing
like?
Can
it
be
done
completely
transparent
like
transparently,
it's
not
the
word
I
mean
but
like
without
interruption,
or
is
it
something
that
should
once
praise
has
really
launched
and
is
operational?
Then
it
sort
of
gets
moved
without
disruption?
That's
the
word.
I
was
looking
for.
E
I
I
I
don't
think
it
would
be.
Disruptive
like
transferring
repo
is
straightforward.
E
E
I
was
worried
about
what
would
be
a
good
time
to
have
the
conversation
like,
preferably
I'd
like
this,
to
be
like
something.
That's
also
discussed
in
the
consideration
for
the
reward
reward
systems
budget,
because
this
this
does
have
an
impact
on
you
know
because,
like
they're
paying
people
to
it
and
then,
if
there's
an
extra
angles
with
like
two
different
groups
that
are
partnering
over
there.
So
that's
why
I
was
wondering
what
would
be.
E
I
B
All
right
and
we're
at
the
top
of
the
hour,
so
maybe
just
to
close
out
I
mean
if,
if
you're
comfortable,
bringing
it
up
with
the
rewards
group
and
they
keep
the
word
working
group
and
sort
of
determine
based
on
the
current
timeline,
where
that
makes
it
good
when
a
good
time
to
do
it
is
that,
I
think,
would
work
for
everyone
too.
B
Thanks
for
being
here
today
and
oh
it's,
the
war
watch
group
meeting
happening
right
now,
isn't
it
so
speaking
of
the
rewards
working
group,
I
think
it's
happening
now.
J
Yeah,
hey
yj,
hello.
Did
you
record
the
call
by
any
chance
I
just
I
have
it
recorded
yeah?
Oh
nice,
can
you
send
it
over
to
me.
L
Should
I
just
put
it
on
youtube?
Oh.