►
From YouTube: W57 Community Stewards: TEA X TEC Intro to TE, TEC Steward statement of commitment and more!
Description
In the Stewards Working Group the Community Stewards come together to coordinate workstreams, share experiences and reflect on what is going well and what can be done better in order to achieve the mission of the TEC and best serve our community.
Find us on the #stewards channel on our Discord!
We gather every Wednesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Tamara
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
B
Thanks
tom,
actually
I'm
feeling
pretty
weird,
like
you
know
like
now,
we
have
like
the
money
like
I
feel
like.
We
are
micromanaging
a
lot,
our
task
and
this
is
exhausting
and
then
I
also
have
another
problem
like
for
transparency.
You
know
it,
you
know
like
we
have
this
value
of
inclusivity,
but
then
it's
you
know
when
there
is
certain
tasks
amount
to
do
and
then
you
know
it's
it's
it
like.
B
B
A
No
problem:
hey
dergados,
always
welcome
it's
just
a
temperature
check,
so
anything
that
you
want
to
share
personal
or
about
the
community
or
about
working
group.
Anything
that
you
want
to
share
with
their
established
words.
D
Yeah
just
having
a
bit
of
a
rough
personal
time,
so
that's
that's
my
current
thing,
so
I'm
I'll
fade
into
the
hedge
bush.
Here
thanks.
E
The
temperature
is
actually
very
high,
like
I'm
very
enthusiastic
about
the
work
going
on
tc
like
in
omega.
We
we
will
prepare
our
working
group
proposal
today,
so
I'm
like
very
excited
about
it
and,
in
general,
like
I'm,
very
excited
and
happy
that
I'm
getting
more
inclusive
like
feel
more
part
of
tc,
as
well,
with
the
proposing
virtual
work
etc.
A
Maybe
pass
on
to
eduardo.
F
G
Thank
you,
sympathy
check.
D
G
Don't
know
I
felt
I
felt
I
felt
louse
not
lousy,
but
like
slow
and
not
very
productive,
the
past
three
or
two
weeks.
So
I
don't
know
I
don't
know
I.
I
felt
that
probably
the
thing
with
you
tim
and
I
don't
know
I
feel,
there's
a
lot
of
things
going
on
that.
I
can
now
take
taking
my
hands,
so
it
feels
productive.
It
feels
like
a
good
week.
The
orientation
call
went
well.
G
We
I
have
to
raise
the
voice
a
little
bit
to
make
clear
that
it's
really
nice
if
stewards
join
the
call
and
only
nate
and
me
because
then,
if
our
own
community
doesn't
share
with
new
people
who
will
share
with
new
people,
if
not
part
of
our
community.
G
So
that's
the
only
thing
grief
joined
and
he
explained
augmented
bonding
curve
and
he
was
really
good
and
he
talked
and
his
enthusiasm
is
really
nice
so
yeah
and
that
on
that
end,
very
good
looking
forward
for
this
week
and
specifically
for
communitas,
because
it
seems
that
the
onboarding
process
has
reached
some
people,
and
so
people
are
interested
in
their
on
our
onboarding
process.
So
we
are
getting
there
and
it
feels
nice
that
we
are
getting
some
external
validation
from
that
and
I
will
pass
it
on
to
libby.
I
Yeah,
I
think
it
was
interesting
to
see
from
last
week
that
was
the
launch
to
this
week
kind
of
how
the
movement
evolved,
and
I
think
I
think
I
don't
know
what
to
think
about
it.
Yeah,
like
the
the
cv,
was
out
for
a
couple
of
days.
I
think-
and
maybe
that
affected
a
little
bit
the
proposals,
but
I
think
there's
still
a
lot
of
engagement.
There's
like
comments
being
made
in
the
proposals,
and
I
feel
like
work-
has
a
momentum
like
just
like
it
always
did
and
more
people
being
interested.
I
C
J
Okay:
okay,
it's
temperature
check
it's
interesting.
It's
interesting
everything
that
is
happening
right
now.
I've
been
very
happy
and
very
motivated
because
of
of
the
amount
of
engagement
that
the
community
is
having
in
general.
Gravity
is
only
like
more
and
more
needed
and
at
the
same
time
is
growing.
More
and
more
people
are
hearing
about
it.
Community
is
doing
a
great
job
also
with
gums.
J
I
I
I
feel
very
very,
are
happy
and
motivated
because
it's
getting
there
like
it's
it's
starting
to
get
the
ball
rolling
in,
and
you
know
this
has
been
really
motivating
to
see
so
yeah
lots
of
things
going
on.
J
I'm
also
very
excited
for
the
tea
fundamentals:
presentation
on
friday,
I'm
very,
very
looking
forward
to
that
and
and
the
interest
that
is
going
to
bring
to
the
community
so
yeah
trying
to
be
ready,
be
prepared
mostly
because
it's
just
gonna
get
better
so
so
yeah
and
congratulations
everyone
for
all
of
the
efforts
during
this
sprint
I'll
pass
it
nate.
L
Yeah
thanks
yeah
everything
is
temperature
good.
I
think
personally,
I'm
you
know
feeling
a
little
bit
of
a
meeting
meeting
burnout.
L
I
I've
been
trying
to
stay
away
from
meetings
as
much
as
possible
and
focus
on
getting
some
work
done
and
being
productive
because
I
feel
largely
distracted
by
some
meetings
sometimes
so
I
just
want
to
put
that
on
the
forefront
but
other
than
that
yeah
everything's
good,
and
if
you
have
any
tips
on
how
to
deal
with
this
type
of
meeting
burnout,
let
me
know-
and
I
will
pass
it
over
to
wonka
if
you
go.
M
M
The
the
orientation
calls
and
the
launch
calls
are
really
important,
but
and-
and
some
of
all
other
calls
are
really
important,
but
I
feel
that,
like
sometimes
it's
it's
like
I
you
know
for
for,
for
for
one
people
to
to
assist
in
x,
amount
of
groups
and
from
from
gravity
side.
I'm
super
excited
about
the
proposal
being
in
the
gardens.
M
Things
are
getting
real
and
that
has
its
own
complexities.
Now
we
also
have
to
think
how
can
we
scale?
How
can
we
have
more
people
trained
and
not
trained
only
in
a
beginner
level,
but
trained
in
a
more
practical
and
advanced
level
for
mediation
so
that
we
can
like
scale
also
the
amount
of
conflicts
that
we
handle
and
also
I'm
finding
it?
M
A
very
interesting
experience,
the
the
thing
of
organizing
in
a
group
and
delegation,
because
I
have
been
doing
most
of
the
things
on
gravity
and
somehow
that
felt
control
but
like
delegating
also
is
somehow
like
not
being
micromanaging
everything.
So
it's
like
having
a
rope
and
tightening
it
and
putting
it
loose
and
like
yeah
finding.
What
is
the
right,
the
right
way
to
manage
it
and
I
will
pass
it
to
levy.
Did
you
go?
I
yeah.
I
heard
you
you,
you
went
sorry.
I
will
pass
it
to
tam.
A
Sure
so,
oh
god,
there's
a
lot
to
respond
to
actually
overall,
I
feel
so
I'm
gonna
say
I
feel
super
excited
that
there's
a
lot
that
we
can
start
doing
now
and
there's
this
you
know
like
adolescence.
Is
this
big
transition
phase?
A
Working
group
coordination
leads
and
stewards
have
especially
around
distribution
of
compensation,
and
so
I
think
it
we
can
imagine
that
finding
some
like
finding
it
comfortable
to
be
in
that
awkward
phase,
knowing
that
it's
normal
and
natural
that
when
we
go
through
a
big
transition
like
this,
it's
gonna,
it's
gonna
create
some
discomfort,
and
so
I
think
that
we-
I
expect
that
so
I'm
I'm
expecting
there
to
be
some
some
discomfort
and
when
we
transition
to
the
working
groups
having
funding
for
for
contribution,
contributors
and
bounties
and
such
and
overall
I'd
say
what
zap
shared
resonated
a
lot
like.
A
It's
it's
just
a
new
phase
now
and
there's
new
things
to
think
about
and
that
that's
part
of
that
whole
adolescent
phase
that
I'm
thinking
of.
I
also
really
think
communitas
is
doing
great.
I
think
that
there's
some
interesting
new
news
livia
brought
deep
work,
andre
and
deep
work
to
our
attention
and
they
want
to
share
their
learnings
from
an
encore,
they're
onboarding,
which
I
think
will
be
probably
incredibly
well
thought
through
and
executed.
A
So
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
seeing
what
parts
of
that
we
can
incorporate
into
our
own
they're,
also
very
interested
in
praise
and
would
like
to
figure
out
how
to
how
to
implement
it
there
and
that's
something.
Lydia
will
be
working
with
them
to
do,
and
so
that's
really
great.
I
think
that
there's
a
lot
of
recognition
still
of
the
tec
and
what
what
we
were
able
to
accomplish,
and
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
this
next
phase.
A
But
it's
clearly,
you
know
there's
like
before
the
commons
upgrade
and
after
the
comments
upgrade
so
it's
a
whole
new
tec
and
I
think
it
will
be
what
we
make
it
into
and
then
for
meetings
yeah.
I
you
know
there
is
one
week
where
I
really
wanted
to
get
something
done,
and
my
solution
was
basically
to
send
a
message
to
everyone
just
be
like.
I
have
to
cancel
this
week,
like
I'm
not
going
to
reschedule
it.
It's
just
like
for
me
to
cancel
this
figure.
A
I
won't
show
up
this
week
or
so
I
think
doing
that
from
time
to
time
is
clean,
is,
is
you
know
if
you,
when
you
get
the
productivity,
that
you
expected
by
doing
that?
It's
actually
super
healthy
and
cleansing
to
take
to
take
a
step
away
from
meetings
and
the
world
doesn't
stop.
A
K
Yeah
sure
we're
having
a
we're
having
a
buffet
over
here,
so
I'll,
just
I'll
go
first
and
then
I'll
pass
it
to
one
of
the
other
two
temperature
check.
K
Oh,
like
lukewarm,
I
would
say
I
have
some
concerns
with
the
reward
system.
Development.
The
database
being
lost.
Two
weekends
in
a
row
is
a
bit
concerning
to
me
good
thing:
they're
tests
right
and
the
proposal
inverter,
thankfully,
is
starting
to
make
sense
at
least,
and
I
think
there's
a
way
that
we
can
move
forward.
But
it's
again
you
know
lots
of
cooks
in
there.
So
hopefully
we'll
make
progress,
and
I
don't
know
foreign.
N
Wow
really
funny,
I'm
feeling
good
temperature
check.
I
feel
warm,
I
feel
like
like
lukewarm.
I
mean
it
doesn't
seem
like
it
seems
like
we
had
like
all
this
ramp
ramp
up
leading
to
the
launch,
and
then
it
was
like.
Oh
no
there's
stuff
happening
in
gardens,
I'm
like
how
do
we
organize
this
stuff,
so
I
feel
a
little
bit
like
what
tam
was
talking
about
with,
like
the
adolescent
growing
pain,
but
I
also
think
we're
we're
like
moving
through
it
really
well
and
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
eat
denver.
N
I'm
feeling
like
it's
coming
up
soon.
You
know
it's
only
in
like
another
week
and
a
half
and
tam's
going
to
talk
and
live
is
going
to
talk
and
griff's
going
to
talk
and
there's
going
to
be
so
much
tc
representation
there,
and
it's
also
gonna,
be
my
first
first
ethereum
conference
and
I
just
get
to
get
to
meet
a
bunch
of
you.
So
I'm
really
excited
about
that.
So
it's
like
okay.
N
Things
were
like
we're
figuring
things
out
at
the
tc,
but
it's
like
we're
about
to
go
to
the
to
eat
denver,
and
I
think
it's
going
to
be
like
a
huge
opportunity
for
like
connecting
with
people
and
talking
about
the
bonding
curve
and
talking
about
the
collaborative
economics
and
like
there's
just
so
much
that
I
think
can
come
out
of
that.
Then
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
it.
C
Mitch
was
just
dawning
chips
on
me.
It
was
great
anyway
yeah.
I
think
it's
pretty
hot
there's
just
so
much
like
it's
like
we
launched
the
biggest
piece,
but
then
it's
like
the
reward
system
still
in
the
works,
right
gravity
and
all
the
other
pieces
that
go
around
the
economy
are
now
like.
Oh
crap,
we
gotta
get
this
going,
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
this
like
new
initialization
energy.
C
Today's
just
yesterday
I
lost
internet.
We
lost
internet
at
the
house
at
like
four
and
haven't
had
internet
since,
and
I'm
feeling
like
I'm
just
feeling
I
don't
know
empty
inside
hollow
dead.
It's
hard,
thank
god
for
mitch,
she's
right
down
the
street,
and
we
can
hang
out
at
his
house.
That's
helping
a
lot,
and
so
it
just
feels
good
to
have
a
community
around
to
help
us
in
these
times
of
need
and
and
but
other
than
that,
I
I
think
the
tc
is
doing
well.
C
I
can't
believe
how
much
we
sold
in
the
first
week
really
really
happy
with
that
and
so
good
to
see
conviction,
voting
going
so
well
passing
proposals
so
quickly.
It's
like
for
me.
You
know.
I'm
in
a
different
situation
than
you
guys,
all
my
stuff
is
done.
You
know
it's
really
cool
the
only
the
only
big
challenge
is
like
now
that
sam
and
paulo
don't
want
to
make
changes.
There's
like
small
little
upgrades
that
need
to
get
done.
C
A
F
Hey
guys
yeah
share
sentiment
with
what's
been
said,
feeling
pretty
pretty
warm,
not
as
hot
as
you
know,
in
the
middle
of
the
launch,
but
I
think
that's
a
good
thing
like
we
don't
want
it
too
hot
that
we
burn
up
yeah.
So
things
are
warm.
Things
are
going
well.
I
heard
mitch
touch
on
the
proposal.
F
So
that's
exciting
and
the
token
engineering
academy
is
doing
their
ama
on
the
fundamentals
course
this
friday,
so
that's
exciting
and
then
the
following
week,
I'm
going
to
be
starting
on
the
summoning,
a
discord,
bot
army
series
with
5v
in
the
labs,
so
looking
forward
to
that
so
yeah,
so
you're,
nice
and
perfectly
warm
all
around
back
to
you.
Tim.
A
Looking
forward
to
that
discard
bot
army,
so
theo
rank
welcome
to
the
stewards
weekly.
We're
really
happy
that
you
joined
us.
I'd
like
to
give
you
a
moment
to
introduce
yourself
and
maybe
to
share
any
thoughts
you
might
have
about
the
temperature
and
the
community
in
the
teas.
O
Sure
so
yeah
hello,
nice
to
meet
you
all.
I
I
I
was
I'm
going
straight
from
orientation
call.
I
was
just
jumping
in
to
get
a
to
acclimate
myself
and
to
know
you
a
little
bit
more,
so
I'm
based
in
brazil,
I'm
used
to
the
hot
climate
yeah,
I'm
just
joking,
but
it's
a
pleasure
to
be
here.
Thank
you.
A
Cool
okay,
so
I'm
going
to
jump
into
the
next
item
in
the
agenda,
which
is
the
well
two
two
tdc
presentation
requests
one
or
that
one
is
the
tea
tec,
intro
to
token
engineering
nate.
I
believe
you
wrote
you're
interested,
so
it
would
be
great
if
you
could
do
the
one
in
on
february,
16th.
A
Okay,
awesome
that
one's
really
nice,
because
it's
your
time
zone
too,
it's
very
friendly
to
your
time
zone
and
then
eduardo
volunteered
to
do
the
one:
that's
not
so
friendly
to
pst
time
zone,
which
is
going
to
be
9
a.m.
Cet
on
march
9th.
So
that's
super
cool
and
then
anna
marie
asked.
If
the
tec
can
do
a
15
minute
presentation
at
the
end
of
their
community
call
it's
the
next
one.
We
missed
this
one,
but
the
next
one
will
be
february
16th
at
5,
30
pm
cet.
A
So
it's
a
great
opportunity
to
also
invite
people
into
the
the
tea
tec
meeting
which
will
happen
right
after
that.
So
I
was
wondering:
if
is
there
anyone
who
would
like
to
present
the
tec
to
the
popcorn
community.
A
Okay,
if
you're
interested
just
drop
a
note
in
the
agenda-
and
hopefully
we
could
find
somebody
otherwise,
maybe
nate.
Maybe
you
could
do
two
back
to
back.
A
Cool,
so
so,
if
nobody
else
volunteers
to
do
it
need
as
default
thanks
all
right.
So
we
have
two
requests.
I
think
they're
two
different
people.
They
have
two
different
handle
names.
Although
one
came
into
tec,
one
came
into
common
stack
and
they
were
about
compromised,
wallets.
A
A
Assuming
we
want
to
do
it
so
maybe
griff
you
could
talk
about
what
would
be
technically
required
for
us
to
be
able
to
do
this.
C
I'm
so
sorry
we
were
in
a
citation.
To
be
honest,
can
you
can
you
give
me
the
tldr
on
that.
A
C
Yeah
yeah,
I
mean
it's
definitely
technically
possible
the
same
way.
We
did
it
with
the
down
it's
a
little
bit,
so
sam
would
flip
out
because
he
really
doesn't
like
the
idea
that
we
can
mention
burn.
But
in
the
end,
if
we
mention
burn
in
one
transaction,
it
shouldn't
affect
the
bonding
curve
in
any
way.
As
long
as
we're
burning
the
same
number
of
tokens
and
minting
the
same
number
of
tokens
to
a
new
address,
so
I
don't
think
it
should.
I
don't
think
it's
the
problem.
C
It's
not
a
high
priority
and
we
shouldn't
make
it
high
priority,
because
we
don't
really
have
like
it'll
it'll.
We
can
make
the
request
and
I
think
general
magic
could
complete
it,
but
it's
like
we
have
to
get
the
bandwidth
to
do
it
right.
We
don't
like.
We
don't
have
a
dev
team
anymore.
C
So
you
know
things
are
a
lot
harder,
but
it's
it's
definitely
possible.
The
biggest
problems
are
more
social
like
how
do
we
know
this
is
really
their
address?
How
do
we
confirm
that
they're
not
doing
some
sort
of
elaborate
scam
like
do
we
know
them
as
their
trust?
Can
you
know
I
I
think
we
should
make
the
request
very
publicly
in
the
forum
and
even
tweet
about
it
and
and
try
to
use
it
as
a
comms
thing.
C
Just
be
like
hey
guess
what
token
engineering
commons
has
a
heart,
unlike
most
crypto
lose
your
keys,
so
we
can
help,
but
we
have
to
also
you
know,
so
we
should
take
the
time
to
make
sure
that
there
isn't
any
objection
and
then,
hopefully,
by
that
time
I
can
score
some
bandwidth
from
from
the
general
mat
from
really
mitch
is
probably
the
one
who's
going
to
help
us.
Do
it
the
most,
but
he's
he's
he's
going
on
vacation
and
there's
other
things
happening
so
like
we're
going
to
denver
all
this
stuff.
A
So
far
too,
but
considering
the
vesting,
the
thaw
is
52
weeks.
I'm
assuming
this
isn't
going
to
be
the
first
of
the
last
of
them.
N
Drop,
we
have
like
a
semi
secret
type
form
that
we
only
send
to
like
friends
of
the
family
and
that
can
like
switch
their.
We
could.
We
could
set
it
up
the
same
way
where
we
make
a
type
form
for
the
tc
and
it's
like
people
need
to
put
in
their
twitter
handle
like
how
we
know
you
and
some
information
and
then
just
like,
have
it
set
up
so
that
it's
like
yeah
there
needs
to
be
like
a
strong
foundation
of
trust.
N
L
G
No,
they
they
didn't,
provide
any
context,
and
I
think
there
are
three
cases
because
I
think
there
are
another
one
on
on
tc
or
I
maybe
it's
the
same
one
that
goes
to
this
to
common
stock
yeah.
Maybe
it's
the
same
that
this
common
stock
is
just
he
duplicated
in
both
places.
But
the
thing
is,
I
think,
it's
I
think
it's
a
bad
idea.
I
will
be
with
seven
days.
I
think
it's
kind
of
opening
up
pandora
box.
G
That
is
not
necessarily
because
we
are
assuming
responsibility
for
something
that
was
not
our
fault
and
they
when
you
enter
the
crypto
community.
You
know
this
is
gonna
happen
and
you
know
you
have
to
be
careful
about
this
kind
of
things
and
I'm
fearful
that
we'll
open
up
under
a
box
where
people
will
keep
asking
for
this.
We
have
271
hat
shares
that
supposedly
we
have
a
strong
trust
on
them,
so
we
will
have
to
probably
do
the
same.
G
If
that
happens,
to
7
seven
272
people
and
that's
a
little
bit
too
much,
I
feel
so.
I
wouldn't
open
that
up
under
a
box.
If
you
ask
me-
and
if,
if
this
is
something
to
happen,
I
will
be
transparent
and
put
it
in
a
on
a
snapshot
proposal
like
hey.
Do
we
allow
this
to
happen,
or
we
do
not
allow
this
to
happen,
because
I
feel
it's
a
community
decision
rather
than
stewart's
decision,
but
that's
just
my
opinion
about
it.
B
J
I
would
like
to
just
put
in
consideration
that
this
already
happened
during
the
hatch,
and
it
I
mean
it.
It
makes
more
sense
if
it's
about
the
trusted
seed,
if
it's
about
like
a
community
that
at
some
point,
has
some
kind
of
like
control
or
recognizement
from
from
the
rest
of
the
community,
but
I
feel
that
now
that
is
out
there.
I
feel
that
if
we're
gonna
ask
the
community
through
a
snapshot
both
or
whatever
mechanism
is
best
to
also
inform
them
that
this
has
already
happened
in
the
past.
J
I
feel
this
should
be
taken
in
consideration,
for
I
mean
I'm
personally
against
it,
but
if
it
goes
through
in
the
end,
I
don't
feel
that
we
should
be
putting
out
these
kind
of
proposals
like
every
every
time
that
that
that
this
happens.
So
if
we
could
approach
this
as
a
last
time
kind
of
thing-
and
we
all
agree
on
that,
that
might
be-
I
feel
more
responsible
on
on
the
side
of
of
the
community
that
is
proposing
it
so
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
bring
this
up.
C
I
guess
the
other
side
of
the
coin
is:
do
we
want
the
hackers
to
end
getting
the
tec
tokens
that
the
people
got?
You
know
that's
like,
because
I'm
with
you
on
the
responsibility
and-
and
all
these
you
know
like
hey,
people
should
know
that
this
is
a
thing
and
I
really
liked
olivia's
idea
of
making
them
work
for
it.
You
know
it
shouldn't
just
be
something
we
do
for
them.
You
know
it's
gonna
cost
the
down
money.
C
M
Yeah,
I
also
think
that
maybe
we
can
make
a
process,
and
maybe
try
to
to
say
like
how
in
in
what
period
of
time
can
can
a
person
do
that
like
that,
that
it's
not
for
individual
cases,
but
maybe
when
there
are
at
least
five
or
four
cases
that
that
want
to
do
that.
M
And
but
I
also
think
that
there
is
a
lot
of
people
that
is
new
to
the
crypto
space
and
that
they
are
being
on
boarded
by
the
tc
and
like
we
all
have
had
different
mistakes
in
the
space
and
yeah.
I
agree
with
forgiving
rules.
L
In
terms
of
a
time
frame
for
this,
since
the
the
keys
are
compromised
and
not
lost,
do
we
have
the
time
of
the
token
freeze
to
make
this
decision
until
it
starts
releasing
these
tokens
or
do
we
need
to
take
into
like
governance
decisions?
L
I
mean
I
assume
any
type
of
compromise
law
they're
just
taking
the
funds
and
bouncing
and
not
really
paying
attention
to
the
things
like
state
tokens
and
all
that
good
stuff,
but
does
it
have
any
impact
if
they
start
making
governance
decisions
and
start
voting,
and
things
like
that?
What
was
the
time
frame
for
this
type
of
decision.
A
So
all
very
good
points
just
to
answer
your
question
yeah.
I
assume
that
it
is
the
freeze
period
which
maybe
we
could
say
we
have
that
time
to
make
a
decision,
and
I,
like
the
idea,
olivia
a
lot
about
asking
the
person
to
sort
of
run
with
this
themselves.
A
My
only
my
thinking
there,
so
they
will
actually
be
like
hey.
So
how
do
I
do
this
hey,
so
I
so
they'll
actually
need
somebody
to
help
them
walk
through
the
process
to
do
that,
but-
and
I'm
wondering,
if
there's
a
way
to
make
it
easier
for
them,
you
know
just
maybe
start
a
conversation
on
forum
on
the
forum
might
be
a
way
at
least
to
put
some
of
the
burden
back
on
the
person
who's
making
the
request.
A
My
personal
feel
sorry,
my
personal
feeling
overall
is,
I
would
definitely
lean
towards.
I
mean
if
there's
no,
if
it's
technically
feasible
and
there
is
minimal
risk,
no
risk
would
be
great,
minimal
risk.
Then
I
would
probably
lean
towards
endeavoring
to
do
it,
but
that
is
a
huge
assumption
and
I
feel
like
that
would
be
the
first
thing
to
to
be
certain
about
and
then
yeah,
I
think
or
if
you
make
a
really
good
point
about,
I
mean
I
guess
anyone
who's
compromised
somebody
else's
wallet.
A
The
first
thing
that
they
would
want
to
do
is
sell
any
tokens.
I
don't
know
that
they
would
happen
to
our
snapshot
or
tao
and
start
making
vote
and
start
making
governance
decisions,
but
who
knows
it
is
also
a
risk
to
the
tec,
and
then
I
just
want
to
say
one
other
thing.
These
are.
These
are
all
I
mean
in
theory,
for
the
identification.
A
These
are
all
hatchers,
so
I
think
we
should
be
able
to
have
them
prove
their
identity
by
a
twitter
account.
For
example,
we
should
have
their
twitter
and
their
discord
and
we
should
we
should
be
able
to
prove
their
identity.
That
way.
That's
the
other
consideration
is
that
I
don't
know
that.
That
would
be
too
hard
to
do
and
if
we
run
into
an
obstacle
there,
then
we
could
also
always
just
say
that's.
I
don't
know
we
can't
be
done,
then.
I
It's
a
comment
on
the
the
cost
of
education
for
people
to
make
a
proposal.
I
think
this
is
something
they'll
actually
give
us
more
benefits
than
than
not
because,
especially
if
we
make
this
open
in
the
forum,
because
then
other
people
are
encouraged
to
also
make
proposals,
and
if
they
have
an
idea,
they
can
just
go
there
and
do
it
and
there
is
an
easy
process
to
follow
that
is
available,
and
all
of
us
can
help
with
that.
I
A
Okay,
so
it
sounds
like
we've
sort
of
reached
a
decision
that
the
we
will
have
the
requester
go
through
the
process
of
making
the
request
to
the
community
and
libya.
You
will
help
the
requester.
A
A
A
The
best
thing
to
do,
I
guess,
is
that
in
the
tec
stewards
channel,
we
can
share
the
people
that
have
made
these
requests
with
livia
so
that
she
can
make
the
next
steps
to
help
guide
them
through
submitting
requests
to
the
community,
especially
complicated
ones
like
this.
Thank
you
so
much
libra
for
taking
this
on.
A
Okay,
if
there's
nothing
else,
I'm
going
to
move
to
the
next.
The
next
agenda
item,
which
is
the
tec
steward's
statement
of
commitment,
so
I
drafted
what
I
want
to
post
on
the
forum.
I
shared
it
in
this
doc.
Essentially,
it
just
explains
that
we
have
two
periods
for
statement
of
commitments
where
stewards
just
like
basically
like
re-avow
their
commitment
to
being
a
steward
any
steward.
Who
doesn't
do
it
just
gets
off-boarded
automatically?
A
Not
without
not,
it
was
no
drama,
so
no
pump,
you
know,
follow
the
regular
off-boarding
process
and
then
I
put
the
terms
in
and
the
manifesto
and
the
idea
is
I
would
post
this
and
then
I
would
reply
with
something
like
this.
So
super
simple.
I
share.
I
would
like
to
share
my
personal
commitment
to
continue
to
serve
as
a
steward
of
the
tec.
A
You
can
embellish
it,
you
can
add
emojis,
you
can
add
memes,
you
be
you,
but
I
think
every
steward
who
then
shares
their
commitment
to
to
say
a
steward
really
to
be
active
and
present
servant.
Leaders
in
the
know-
and
the
tec
then,
is
eligible
for
the
funding
that
comes
from
the
stewards
working
group
for
the
next
six
month
period.
So
I
would
love
some
feedback.
A
If
anyone
has
an
initial
feedback,
I'm
planning
to
post
this
in
the
forum,
I
was
planning
to
post
it
tonight
unless
anyone
sees
any
reason
that
we
shouldn't
and
then
there
is
between
now
and
the
15th
of
february,
for
everyone
to
reply.
C
So
if
this
there's
there's
a
clear
off-boarding
process,
it
looks
like
is
that
is
that
gonna
be
part
of
this?
I,
I
guess
it
should
be
part
of
the
agreement
of
sorts.
C
C
C
That's
like
okay,
yes
I'll,
do
it
for
six
months
and
then,
if
I
end
up
having
another
thing
that
happens,
then
I
can
exit
and
I
don't
feel
guilty
for,
like
I'm
not
committing
to
six
months
of
work,
I'm
committing
to
six
months
or
of
indentured
servitude.
I'm
committed
to
you
know
being
here
for
six
months
to
the
best
of
my
abilities
and
here's,
the
exit.
A
That's
interesting,
I
don't
even
think
it's
necessarily
a
commitment
for
six
months.
I
wasn't
looking
at
it
that
way.
I
was
looking
at
it
as
a
commitment
to
continue
until
you
don't
want
to
continue
anymore
right
and
then,
when
you
don't
want
to
continue
anymore,
then
you
self-nominate
for
off-boarding,
and
that
can
happen
any
time
that
can
happen
a
week
after
this.
Actually,
you
know
you'd
be
changed
my
mind
and
then
that
just
follows
the
regular
off-boarding
process.
A
I
see
what
you're
saying
I
can
add
it,
but
I
think
it
for
me.
It
kind
of
ends
up
being
a
lot
of
words,
but
I
can
try
to
add
it
that
there
I
just
I
wanted
to
say
that
there
was
a
regular
off-boarding
process
for
people
who
self-nominate
to
off-board
and
for
other
people
who
are
nominated
to
off-board
and
for
people.
A
The
the
the
main
point
of
this
is
that
when
people,
if
somebody
just
disappears
and
stops
showing
up
then
after
six
months,
it's
just
clear
to
everyone
that
they're
no
longer
engaged
in
being
a
steward
and
there
doesn't
have
to
be
a
dramatic
nomination
for
off-boarding,
it's
just
like.
Oh,
you
missed
the
nomination
window,
so
you're
not
a
steward
anymore.
G
This
I
will
say
that
I
I'm
a
little
bit
on
with
graves,
that
it
would
be
nice
to
just
have
a
line.
Saying
hey
if
you,
if
you
want
to
know
about
of
boarding
of
you
whatever
it
is
the
boarding
process,
it's
on
the
store
manifesto
or
somewhere,
because
then
yeah
people
doesn't
read
sometimes-
and
you
know
just
to
just
to
be
obvious,
but
it's
just
a
line
to
just
state
that
like
hey
this
is
this
is
the
way
to
board.
A
A
A
Okay,
I'm
gonna
leave
it
up,
maybe
for
like
another
hour
or
two,
and
everyone
can
add
anything
that
they
think
they
they
want
to
see
in
there
before
before.
I
post
it.
Okay
next
thing,
so
gravity
proposal
clarification.
I
added
this
because
I
went
to
look
at
the
gravity
proposal
and
I
couldn't
figure
out
I.
I
was
not
sure
how
this
section
here
relates
to
this
section
here
and
I
wanted
to
know
if
you
could
maybe
give
some
clarification.
A
M
Yeah
for
sure
tom
yeah,
I
am
going
to
open
the
proposal.
M
M
This
will
be
three
roles
that
will
be
leading
coordination
and
like
the
planning
and
execution
of
activities
and
the
rewards
of
the
bounties,
we
also
will
have
two
or
three
active
gravitons
here
in
the
post.
I
posted
four,
but
there's
still
need
to
to
confirm
with
gene
and
aloe
issues
and
we
will
have
a
pool
for
for
bounties.
M
The
bounties
will
be
distributed
according
contributions
of
for
three
main
topics
that
are:
content,
production,
research
initiatives
and
business
development
and
yeah.
We
will
have
two
practice
groups
and
two
research
initiatives
coming
from
from
from
this
group.
Also,
the
conflict
management
side
will
have
its
own
treasury.
We
will
have
a
thousand
die
to
manage
conflict
per
month
and
that
it's
an
approximate
for
two
conflicts
per
month
and
the
graviton
training
is
charged
aside
and
it
will
have
its
own
budget
like
three
thousand
die.
It's
it's
their.
M
The
budget
for
the
graviton
training
so
like
the
people
that
is
listed
down
is
the
people
that
that
will
be
eligible
or
that
can
participate
in
the
different
activities.
So
there
will
be
a
lot
of
people
that
that
can
have
that
can
participate
in
content
creation,
but
our
bounties
will
be
retroactive.
So,
even
if
you
are
in
the
list
that
doesn't
mean
that
you
will
receive
funds
in
advance.
That
means
that
if
you
make
some
content,
you
will
be
able
to
to
to
receive
a
bounty
for
it.
M
But
also
yesterday,
I
had
an
interesting
talk
with
grief
and
maybe
we
we
will
try
to
organize
two
like
a
graviton
training
like
more
advanced
series
like
and
maybe
that
that
could
be
then
passed
into
a
different
proposal,
but
to
only
have
like
to
have
like
two
levels
of
the
graviton
training.
M
First,
one
is
like
the
beginner
level,
the
introductory
level
that
that's
the
one
that
we
got
covered,
but
also
having
like
a
more
like
a
more
concise
for
and
practical
for
mediation,
so
that
we
can
scale
the
group
of
people
that
is
actually
mediating
to
also
scale
the
the
amount
of
conflicts
that
we
can
handle.
A
A
M
I
don't
know
I
wanted
to
be
like
modest
with
the
with
the
payments
of
of
the
roles,
but
also
to
go
high
with
the
conviction
voting.
So
like
one
big
proposal
for
six
months,
but
that
proposal
is
smallest.
Maybe
I
am
not
having
not
even
like
four
hours
a
day
rolls.
All
of
the
days
are
like
two
hour
a
day,
and
that
is
also
to
encourage
participation
from
the
people
that
is
working
in
gravity
to
also
participate
in
other
projects
and
not
like
spend
all
their
time
in
gravity.
A
Cool
the
one
piece
of
feedback
I
want
to
give
is,
when
I
see
this,
it's
a
whole
different
organization
than
has
been
used
to
date
like
it's,
it's
really
a
rethinking
of
gravity
which
is
excellent
yeah,
but
it's
yeah.
I
think
that's
really
awesome,
and
but
it
feels
very
like
unproven.
A
This
idea,
you
know
it's
like
we
there's,
and
I
was
personally
my
feeling
is
that
it'd
be
nice
to
see
this
work
for
three
months
and
if
it
really
works,
then
even
ask
for
more
for
the
following
three
months
to
to
improve
it
versus
the
six
month
up
front
and
of
something
that's
not
hasn't
been
shown
to
work.
Yet,
if
you
know
what
I
mean,
that's
the
that
was
my
my
reaction
when
well.
A
M
Yeah
like
this
rethinking
has
been
mostly
led
by
me,
but
it's
also
like
at
least
the
way
that
I
think
that
gravity
can
grow
because
I
feel
like
I
have
been
a
lot
in
the
center
of
it
and
I
would
like
to
have
like
new
leaderships
new
people
participating
and
that's
why
I
even
like
took
a
step
down
in
in
this
new
proposal
and
because
I
would
also
like
to
have
a
participation
in
other
projects
and
in
other
things
and
like
I
have
been
too
much
in
the
center.
M
So
that's
why
I
wanted
to
have
like
delegation
and
to
have,
instead
of
me,
being
in
the
center
now
having
gravity
like
as
a
as
a
working
group
and
because
until
now
I
feel
like
the
working
group
has
been
like
mostly
turning
around
myself
and
yeah.
I
feel
that
that,
for
growing
gravity
I
need
to
to
not
be
in
the
center
of
it.
A
Okay,
thanks
thanks
wonka
moving
on
to
proposal,
inverter
update,
mert
or
mitch,
do
you
have
any
updates.
K
E
The
product
in
general
has
been
building
and
we
today
we
decided
that
we
will
this.
We
will
make
the
minimum
viable
product
more
simplistic
than
that.
We
have
talked
in
previous
working
sessions
because
you
know
like
I,
I
love
how
mitch
expressed
it.
It's
like
a
bunch
of
nerds
get
gathering
around
and
throwing
ideas.
E
It
was
like
this.
I
totally
agree
with
mitch
so
like
in
terms
of
development.
I
think
we
are
on
good
track.
So
in
terms
of
these
tc's
position,
mitch
me
and
nougan
had
a
sing,
and
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
how
we
can
make
tc
to
own
its
niche
within
the
proposal.
Inverter,
so
mitch
was
preparing
a
document.
Thank
you
so
much
jim.
E
E
K
Yeah-
and
I
want
to
add
to
that-
is
looking
at
reasonably
what
the
tc
can
offer.
I
have
started
talking
to
chewie,
maybe
there's
even
some
stuff
that
the
com
is
working,
can
outsource
some
work
to
them
and
then
bring
in
revenue
back
to
the
tec
in
that
way.
So
chewie
and
I
have
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
this
but
like
through
that
and
being
the
bridge
and
like
actually
contracting
services
to
what
the
tec
excels
at.
So
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
cool
stuff
that
can
happen.
F
Yeah,
just
that
well
said
guys-
and
I
know
we
just
all
had
a
meeting
together,
but
there's
a
lot
developing
in
parallel.
So
keep
me
in
the
loop
with
what
you
guys
are
working
on
mer,
said
you're,
putting
a
doc
together
mitch,
so
because
I
want
to
start
working
towards
getting
a
proposal
up.
I'm
thinking
I'm
going
to
do
one
more
iteration
of
advice
process
to
really
there's
something
I
brought
up
today
in
the
meeting
is
like
we
need
more
prams
parties.
F
Basically,
I
don't
know
if
we'll
go
to
that
extent,
because
it's
we're
doing
this
like
dog
food
model,
so
kind
of
using
the
idea
of
the
proposal
inverter
to
fund
the
proposal
inverter.
So
I
want
to
get
that
proposal
up
on
the
tec
for
conviction
voting
pretty
soon,
but
I
think
I'll
probably
do
one
more
round
of
advice
process,
because
I
think
it's
going
to
look
quite
different
than
the
one
that
I
currently
have
up
on
advice
process.
F
So
I
think
I'd
like
to
get
that
up
in
the
next
few
days
and
then
maybe
actually
have
something
live
for
conviction.
Voting
like
early
next
week
so
yeah
just
keep
me
in
the
loop,
like
everything
you
guys
are
working
on,
is
like
really
essential
for
that.
So.
A
C
F
Yeah
thanks
mitch,
I
hadn't
thought
of
it.
So
clearly,
but
that's
that's
exactly
the
the
case
yeah
there's
we
can
we're
taking
like
two
different
approaches
on
the
opposite
ends
of
this,
but
it's
kind
of
cool
like
this
and
and
as
we
do
this
dog
food
model
we're
learning
more
and
more,
and
we
realize,
like
I.
I
realized
today
that
we
have
a
group
of
people
all
collaborating
on
this,
and
everyone
is
like
a
broker
like
everyone
who
joined
the
proposal.
Inverter
call
to
get
today
is
like
10
brokers.
F
So
it's
neat
it's.
It
feels
very
empowering
to
have
that.
It's,
like
the
brokers,
are
also
the
owners
and
and
the
payers.
It's
neat
to
just
see
that,
like
roll
overlap,
play
out.
A
Cool
thanks
for
that
update
guys
all
right.
We
have
three
minutes
left
and
I
apologize
edu,
but
you
have
added
two
things
to
the
agenda
that
you
want
to
share.
Please
you've
got
these.
G
Three
minutes:
don't
worry,
rom
dao
sessions,
so
I
met
with
someone
from
romedale
today
and
they
want
to
sort
of
partner
or
exchange
knowledge.
They
have
it's
a
finance
tool
on
one
layer
and
the
second
layer.
It's
a
gamification
process
that
they
do
it's
quite
an
interesting
idea.
They
want
to
learn
about
token
economics
and
yg.
I
thought
about
labs
and
probably
the
same
way
we
had
these
sessions
with
with
medaverde
about
learning
solidity.
G
I
think
it
could
be
interesting
at
some
point
to
just
exchange
knowledge
with
this
community
using
the
labs
as
an
experimental
space
for
it.
I
don't
know
what
you
do
if
you
feel
interested
in
this
or
it
falls
out.
F
Yeah,
I
think
I
was
reading
about
rome
dow
the
other
week
randomly.
So
this
looks
super
cool,
so
we
could
do
a
series
like
two
or
three
or
four
like
lab
sessions
where
we
kind
of
collaborate.
Maybe
they
could
do
some
demos
of
their
product
and
their
community
and
then
we
could
do
some
collaboration
from
there.
So
yeah
yep.
G
G
What
is
this,
it
is
it's
they
use
this
gamification
process,
this
game,
actual
game
to
foster
engagement
and
the
use
of
the
token
that
they
have.
So
is
this
kind
of
game
yeah.
I
know
it's,
it's
very
peculiar,
so
that's
why
I
felt
it
was
interesting
and
we
can
learn
from
the
gamification
process,
the
basics
fastly
enough.
G
The
second
point
of
the
agenda
that
I
added
is
just
a
coping
question
that
I
really
don't
know
how
to
answer,
which
is
very
basic.
If
we
have
created
tooling,
we
have
created
a
token
we
can.
For
example,
we
created
the
praise
we
created
all
this
tooling.
I
don't.
I
seem
to
like
a
narrative
to
put
this
together.
I
don't.
I
I'm
still
missing
this.
A
narrative
that
sort
of
I
can.
I
can
framework
all
of
this,
fooling
that
we
are
creating.
G
Yes,
we
are
advancing
talking
engineering,
but
that's
a
catch
phrase
that
is
not
self
explainable,
so
I'm
missing
this
out
for
orientation.
I'm
missing
this
out
for
all
many
other
stuff
and
I've
still.
We
have
a
token
and
I
feel
the
token
doesn't
have
a
narrative.
Yet
I
think
this.
This
is
this
is
intuitive
for
a
community
who
engages
with
this,
because
if
you
don't
have
a
storytelling
or
a
narrative
around
a
product,
then
that
product
the
people
just
engage
down
the
mid
or
long
term.
C
The
story
is
making
token
engineering
a
public
good,
something
accessible
to
the
world,
something
a
tool
that
anyone
can
use
and
to
do
that.
Work.
There's
a
lot
of
ways
to
to
doubt
right
and
yes,
through
collaborative
economics,
we're
downing
through
reward
systems
where
we
appreciate
qualitative
work
and
and
yeah
and
when
we're
using
advanced
token
engineering
to
advance
token
engineering.
G
Yes,
and
and
that's
something
we
all
here
understand
because
we
have
been
here
for
a
long
time,
but
then,
if
you
externalize,
this
thought
there
is
no
narrative
to
support
this
thought
and
because
they
don't.
If
I'm
talking
about
tools-
and
I
talk
about
a
token-
I
talk
about
public
goods.
How,
like
the
game
that
you
created
for
explaining
public
goods,
remember
that
the
dashboard
for
gaming
gamification
that
you
had.
That
explains
because
that's
a
framework
that
allows
me
to
understand
it.
We
don't
have
that
in
tc.
G
We
don't
have
this
framework
that
sort
of
help
us
to
understand
the
cohesiveness
of
all
this
concept
that
you
all
explain
now.
So
I
feel
we're
missing
this
and
I
am
afraid
that
down
the
lane,
for
the
token
or
for
the
economy
not
talking
the
economy
and
the
community,
it's
not
going.
It
doesn't
bring
cohesiveness
to
this
aspect.