►
Description
In the Stewards Working Group the Community Stewards come together to coordinate workstreams, share experiences and reflect on what is going well and what can be done better in order to achieve the mission of the TEC and best serve our community.
Find us on the #stewards channel on our Discord!
We gather every Wednesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Tam
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
All
right,
it's
cool,
so
I
don't
have
messages
from
anyone
else.
Whether
they'll
join
or
not.
Let's
see
I'll
start
sending
some
messages
out.
A
So
I
think
that
ygg
is
doing
a
down
to
down
workshop
with
prime
down.
I
don't
think
it's
ended
yet
so
I
don't
think
he'll
be
joining
us
and
I'm
checking
with
libya
now
well
griff.
You
offered
to
mediate
a
discussion
around
the
initial
buy-in
and
some
of
the
options
that
were
tossed
around
and
some
of
the
directions
we
can
go.
B
So
yeah,
let's
start
with
just
like
getting
us
like
a
state
of
the
room,
so
here's
a
poll
I'll
put
it
in
the
stewart's
channel
just
to
like
understand
what
the
hell
we're
all
thinking
and
I'll
give
a
quick
little
background.
So
I
just
put
the
poll
in
the
stewards
channel.
The
idea
is
hey.
B
We
have
this
multisig,
it's
going
to
hold
170k,
which
will
likely
be
worth
even
more
than
that
after
pretty
soon
and
its
job
will
simply
be
to
do
the
will
of
the
community
to
push
a
button
whenever,
after
votes
and
stuff
to
execute
votes
on
snapshot
or,
however,
we
decide
to
like
decide
how
where
this
money
goes.
But
there
has
to
be
some
people
on
that
multisig
right
and
we
need
to
figure
out
how
we're
going
to
elect
them
to
the
multisig.
B
B
Do
we
elect
individuals,
so
we
just
have
a
whole
bunch
of
individual
people
and
then
you
kind
of
give
points
to
each
one
through
quadratic
voting,
and
then
we
vote
on
individuals
or
do
we
have
some
other
option
that
you
would
prefer
and
if
there's
enough
people
for
other
or
abstain,
then
we
can
continue.
This
conversation
be
like
okay,
both
those
options
suck.
But
if
you
like
one
of
the
sets
or
individual
option,
then
let's
then
vote
for
that.
C
When
you
mention
various
sets
of
seven
people,
you
mean,
following
this
idea
of
people
proposing
sets
of
seven
people,
or
you
mean
swords.
B
Yes,
going
people
proposing
sets
of
seven
people,
I
mean,
obviously,
why
isn't
it
I
I'm
not
seeing
my
results.
Are
you
guys
seeing
results
on
this
poll?
Yeah
me.
D
B
Well,
we
can
do
a
telegram
vote,
but
I
I
I
like
the
anon.
Is
there
anonymous
vote
on
telegram
yeah?
It
is
okay
cool,
so
I
guess
I'll
put
it
in.
B
I'll
make
a
quick
pull,
really
quick,
I'm
so
sorry
I
should
have
tested
this.
I've
used
this
tool
before,
but
I
guess
it
was
like
a
year
ago.
B
Are
we
making
a
decision
within
stewards
or,
like
everybody,
we're
we're
gonna,
try
to
just
make
this
decision
here,
but
there's
no
good
telegram
chat.
That
means.
G
A
Okay,
I
think
that
the
way
I
I'm
seeing
it
is
that
there's
sort
of
like
a
different
times
of
solutions
like
the
solution
can
be
had
today
right
if
we
decide
like
there's
that
there's
the
the
solution
and
then
the
decision-making
process
and
it's
sort
of
like
if
we
can
have
small,
like
short,
like
now,
immediate
medium
term
or
long
term,
and
the
the
way
that
we
decide
the
way
that
the
multi-stick
happens.
Each
of
these
multi-sticks
has
a
timeline
associated
with
it.
A
So
each
of
these
decisions
has
a
timeline
associated
with
it
right
the
there
is
the
voting
of
the
stewards,
which
means
we
choose
seven
stewards:
okay,
that
makes
a
very
small
list.
That
decision
could
be
made
in
the
next
24
hours
if
we
do
voting
with
seven
people,
so
any
tec,
token
holder.
Well,
that
would
be
maybe
four
or
five
days
right.
A
We
have
to
announce
that
these
nominations
are
open
and
then
people
would
have
to
submit
their
nominations,
and
then
we
would
have
a
token
vote
so
that
minimum
would
be
four
or
five
days
and
then
the
self-nomination
process
would
probably
take
about
the
same.
I
would
guess
I
just
want
to
sort
of
put
that
on
the
table
too,
in
terms
of,
like
you
know
I
I
was
thinking
today
like.
A
Maybe
we
just
do
a
solution
that
is
fast
for
for
being
able
to
pass
this
proposal
and
then
look
at
other
solutions
for
like
this
is
the
way
multi-sigs
will
be
decided
from
from
now
on
sort
of
decoupling
those
two
things.
It
was
another
thought
that
I
had
in
mind.
B
B
This
is
a
very
rare
situation
and
also,
I
really
think
this
is
kind
of
a
benign
decision
and
I
don't
think
we
should
waste
our
time
on
it.
There
is.
There
are
2,
4,
6,
ten,
eleven
people
every
minute
that
we
spend
talking
about.
This
is
wasting
11
minutes
of
the
collective
intelligence
of
the
tec,
and
it
is
a
waste
of
time.
B
So
I
want
my
plan,
for
this
facilitation
is
to
get
a
quick,
signaling
and
then
and
then
have
a
few
people
represent
each
side
and
then
a
final
vote
and
if
it's
at
least
somewhat
coherent,
if
you
guys
are
down,
then
we
just
move
forward
because,
like
it's,
it's
literally
just
executing
on
the
community's
decision
is
not.
It
is
not
like
they
are
the
ones
deciding
over
this
money,
so
I
I
feel
very
strongly
about
this.
I'm
sorry!
B
B
Yes,
this
is
t
e
commons
t
dot
me
slash.
T
e
comments.
Let
me
I
can
actually
put
this
in
the
steward's
channel.
Thank
you,
dergados
for
speaking
up.
B
I'm
jerking
out
too
nice
ten
votes.
Does
anyone
want
one
more.
B
Okay,
well,
this
is
at
least
good
signaling,
even
with
one
more
vote.
I
think
it's
it's
there's,
there's
a
bit
of
a
majority
opinion
of
various
sets
of
seven
people,
and
here
we
go
individuals
bringing
it
in
keeping
it
spicy
well
done.
Okay!
So
now,
let's
hear
who
wants
to
who
has
a
strong
opinion
of
having
sorry
for
the
delay,
I'm
going
to
need
an
extra
five
minutes,
just
so
10
more
minutes.
B
H
Yeah,
I
think,
I
think,
a
group
of
people.
We
have
an
understanding
of
the
whole
group
at
once
and
we
don't
transform
this
into
a
political
decision
about
each
individual.
So
there's
not
a
judgment
of
each
person
but
a
strategy
for
that
group
of
people.
I
think
it
would
create
less
friction
that
we
would
have
a
quicker
result
that
we
would
have
less
discussion
about
why
this
person,
why
that
person-
and
I
think,
we're
all
capable
of
doing
this.
So
if
we
have
a
collective
strategy
that
works
better
than
having
individual
strategies.
C
Yeah,
there's
three
minutes
go
ahead
edu,
so
I
used
to
think
that
this
set
of
seven
people
was
the
more
productive
one
but
less
collaborative
for
the
community
until
you
just
justify
the
listening
of
it
and
I
it
doesn't.
I
don't
see
the
point
of
individuals
if,
at
the
end
you
just
explain
about
the
community
and
just
making
the
decision.
C
So
for
me
seven
I
mean
this
is
effective
effectiveness
and
it
doesn't
harm
the
community.
So
I
don't
see
the
point
of
delaying
it
if
delaying
it
by
choosing
individuals
will
actually
be
harmful
for
the
process.
So.
A
Yeah
I'll
I'll,
second,
that
that's
why
it
is
perceived
right
actually
too,
because
it
will
be
something
that
is
you
know,
can
be
explained,
can
be
sort
of
rationalized.
I
think
that
the
person
that's
selecting
the
seven
is
going
to
have
to
make
sure
that
everyone
has
consent
and
make
sure
that
you
know
that
that
that,
like
that,
just
do
a
lot
of
that
that
leg
work.
Actually.
A
That
said,
I
was
really
compelled
by
watching
the
dna
delegate,
applications
and
those
self
nominations,
and
I
thought
that
would
be
an
amazing
way,
but
I
don't
know
that
work.
Our
community
is
ready
for
that
right
now,
but
that
would
be
an
amusing,
an
amazing
way
to
to
do
these
selections
in
the
future.
B
Okay,
then
we'll
we'll
leave
the
22
seconds
off
and
start
for
the
argument
of
the
other
one
individuals
who
wants
to
does
anyone
want
to
say
why
individuals
are
a
better
solution?
No.
D
D
Oh
I,
like
you,
know,
everyone
being
represented,
the
whales
are
blah
blah
blah
and
then,
when
you
choose
individuals
like,
if
you
know,
if
more
people
are
choosing
these
two
hours,
maybe
like
on
this
multisite,
you
have
six
stores,
but
at
least
you
have
one
token
holder,
so
it's
better
represented
at
the
same
time,
it's
easier
to
you
know
to
get
done
like
when
you
make
groups
of
seven,
how
you
make
those
group
of
seven
and
that's
an
extra
step
and
yeah,
and
I
really
like
the
way
like
shapeshift
or
ens
were
doing
it
and
they
were
just
you
know,
self-terminating
and
saying
what
they
would
be
good
for
and
then
the
community
deciding
it's.
E
I
also
think
it
would
be
good
for
minoritarian
voices
to
be
heard
and
to
be
accounted
in
in
the
in
the
conversation,
because
in
these
groups
of
of
seven
people,
maybe
there
will
be
like
a
lot
of
people.
That
would
be
repeated
in
different
in
different
options.
But
I
think
by
individuals
we
can
have
more
diversity
on
the
proposals.
B
Okay,
then
we'll
we'll
we'll
bank,
our
min
extra
minute
here
and
we'll
have.
B
What
I
would
like
to
propose
is
that
if
we
have
a
poll
with
over
60,
there
is
now
there
are
12
people
here,
and
so,
if
we
are
over
66
majority
so
and
then
I
think
we
just
go
forward
and
and
go
with
it
if
it's
exact,
even
even
if
it's
exactly
66
majority
that
so
because
I
would
say,
that's
not
a
polaris
polarity
decision
so
much
it's
like
you
know
only
basically,
if
three
people
say
one
and
the
rest,
nine
people
say
the
other.
B
Then
it's
still,
then
that's
that's
fine,
but
if
it's
worse
than
those
odds,
then
it's
not
so
as
long
as
we
have
66
voting
on
one
side
we
win,
so
I
think
you
can
actually
can
we
change
our
poll?
No,
can
you?
No?
It
doesn't
look
like
it.
So
I'll
just
make
the
exact
same
poll.
B
B
B
We
have
10
votes
would
like
to
see
it
get
to
12..
I
see
who
just
joined
aussie
cross.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
participate,
you
definitely
don't
have
to,
but
it's
in
the
it's
it's
in
the
te
commons
poll
or
te
commons
telegram
room
which
there's
a
link
to
in
the
stewart's
chat
did
anyone.
I.
A
B
Is
there
anyone
who's
not
voting
because
there's
an
abstain
option?
I
just
want
to
say,
like
you,
don't
have
to
vote
for
the
two
options:
there's
abstain
or
other.
B
B
C
B
I
guess
so
I
guess
so:
okay
cool
well,
this
is
this
is
73.
I
would
say
this
is
good
enough
to
go
forward.
What,
in
my
opinion,
unless
there's
like
major
like
major
objections,
it
seems
like
we
have
a
pretty
strong
majority
and
the
next
move
would
be
to
create
sets
of
seven
so
that
anyone
can
do
right,
and
that
would
be
the
way
we
nominate
a
set
of
seven.
So
you
know
like
I
know,
zeptimist
wants
to
get
some
top
token
holders
out
there.
We
can
still
do
that.
B
You
know
dm
some
people
and
say
hey.
Let's,
let's
get
you
want
to
be
on
a
multisig
that
holds
this.
It
executes
things,
it'll
be
fun.
I
think
it'd
be
fun
to
get
zargaman
on
multisig
like
this
right
and
get
people
who
aren't
stewards,
I
think
it'll
be
fun,
and,
and
so,
let's,
let's
anyone
who
wants
to
can
go,
find
a
set
of
seven
and
who's
actually
making
the
forum
post
for
this
or
what's
who's
who's,
carrying
the
flag
for
getting
this
forward.
J
Well,
I
was
just
gonna
append
the
og
forum
post
for
the
initial
buy-in.
If
that's
okay,
then
we
can
have
so
we
don't
have
all
these
scattered
proposals
that
are
all
related,
so
I'll
just
make
another
pendum
and
we
can
go
from
there.
Cool.
B
J
J
F
J
G
A
J
A
One
to
the
rest
of
the
agenda,
two
timelines
for
this:
how
long
does
the
community
have
to
make
these
nominations.
B
A
A
All
right
cool
any
last
things
before
we
move
on
to
the
next
topic.
H
Just
quick
question
to
nate:
I
remember
I
think
tam
shared
something
that
you
didn't
want
to
be
in
just
giving
a
second
chance.
G
Yeah,
I
know
I'm
good
with
it.
My
only
concern
was
that
we
kind
of
did
not
talk
about
the
liability
potential
of
multi-sigs,
and
so
I
think
that's
something.
That's
is
one
of
those
little
shadows
that
maybe
should
be
addressed
with
those
who
end
up
being
the
final
seven,
but
no
I'm
okay
with
being
it.
A
I
I
cleared
that
already,
that's
why
he
was
in
my
proposal.
Actually
I
already
proposed
seven
stewards.
I
guess
I'll
leave
that
one
alone
and
I
won't
submit
another
one
but
yeah,
okay,
all
right
so
believe
it
or
not.
What.
J
A
By
the
way,
20
minutes,
like
you
nailed
it,
I
don't
know
if
you
noticed
that
it
was
over
20
minutes,
we've
been
talking
since
then,
so
that
was
an
amazing
piece
of
amazing
feat,
so
eduardo
just
shared
with
me.
While
we
were
talking
about
voting
that
we
actually
made
it
to
the
optimism
retroactive
public,
good
funding,
we
are
not
high
on
the
list,
but
we're
on
the
list.
So
this
is
pretty
amazing
token
engineering
commons
was
voted
to
receive
retroactive,
public
goods
funding
from
optimism,
team
yeah.
That
was
very
cool
to
see.
A
I
just
want
to
say
it
was
amazing
how
gene
it
just
did
it
and
then
was
like
hey?
Is
this
okay
and
I
was
like
I
don't
know:
can
I
see
what
you
wrote
but
the
deadline
closed
and
I
was
like
no.
Maybe
we
could
take
it
back
but
like
it
was
really
it's
just
really
cool.
Please
make
sure
you
praise
gene
for
this.
That
was,
you
know
it's
not
the
money.
It's
really
just
that,
like
no
we're
we're
on
we're
there.
Somebody
somebody
in
the
optimism
team
thinks
that's
token.
A
Engineering
commons
is
doing
cool
and
that's
nice
eduardo
raised
the
question
about
how
we
receive
this
money.
So
I
think
the
next
step
is
to
yeah.
I
guess
speak
with
the
optimism
team
and
do
we
have
a
solution
for
that.
B
B
B
B
But
yeah,
okay
tokens
won't
be
issued.
The
way
ethereum
works.
It's
really
weird,
but
like
the
address,
has
no
awareness
that
it
even
received
a
token.
The
token
contract
has
its
own
balances
and
you
can
just
be
like
sending
money
anywhere
you
want
and
you
can't
stop
it
and
and
the
contract
has
no
awareness
that
money
was
sent
there.
B
So
when
we
were
actually
trying
to
mint
tokens,
you
had
to
first
approve
and
then
tell
the
contract
to
pull
money
out
of
your
account,
and
that's
because,
like
the
contract
needs
to
pull
the
money
out
and
then
take
actions
to
mint
the
tokens
based
off
of
the
money
it
pulled.
But
if
you
just
send
money
there
nothing
happens.
C
Can
I
be
a
contract
address
you
receive
money,
jokes
apart
really
like
I
mentioned
praise
gene
he
is
someone
who
is
seeking
to
sort
of
contribute
to
us
in
any
way
possible,
and
I
think
it's
a
good
example
of
when
we
sort
of
just
give
a
little
hand
to
someone
as
a
contributor.
C
A
A
Oh
yeah,
it's
high
for
12.
there
you
go,
there's
a
lot.
There's
a
lot
of
12.,
I
think
they're.
The
thing
that
really
stood
out
for
me
is
like
look
at
look
at
the
company
like
these
are
amazing
public
funds
projects
and
we're
now,
like
noted
as
one
of
those,
and
I
think
that's,
we
should
all
be
really
really.
A
A
All
right
temperature
check
in
the
community
halfway
through
you
know,
I
think
maybe
it's
worth
a
few
minutes
yeah
it's
it's
always
worth
it.
So
why
don't?
We
maybe
take
one
minute,
one
and
a
half
minute
each
and
do
a
temperature
check,
maybe
juan
carlos.
Will
you
kick
us
off.
E
Yes,
tom:
well,
I
feel
that
this
has
been
a
very
interesting
week,
like
a
lot
of
things
are
happening.
The
param
parties,
even
though
that
can
like
have
more
people-
I
think
they
they
have
been
really
interesting,
and
I
loved
manu
and
and
durga
session
of
the
graviton
training.
I
I
feel
like
I
am
actually
learning
more
from
the
training
than
when
I
am
what
I
am
trying
to
teach.
So
I
feel
that's
a
great
experience
and
yeah.
I
I
think
that
things
are
going
really
well.
E
I
also
liked
a
lot
the
the
crypto
cities
article
that
vitalik
wrote.
I
think
it's
it's
very
interesting
to
to
start
seeing
like
more
political
and
social
concern
with
the
usage
of
these
technologies
like
in
a
you
know,
from
a
leader
of
the
space
and
yeah,
I'm
all
good.
I
will
pass
to
libby.
H
Also
on,
like
yesterday's
soft
call,
really
hit
me
in
a
way,
because
I
was
thinking
like
wow,
when
did
I
when
did
I
start
becoming
so
like
making
things
bureaucratic?
Is
that
something
that
is
happening
with
me?
Is
there
how
how
to
always
look
for
the
most
simple
path?
And
I
think
it's
overwhelming
when
there
is
such
a
complexity
of
things
happening
at
the
same
time,
and
then
we
want
to
hear
or
thinking
for
me.
I
want
to
hear
everyone
and
make
sure
that
things
are
representing
the
community.
H
B
Yeah,
I,
the
temperature
check,
is
hot,
there's,
always
new
people
at
the
pram
parties.
It's
really
fun.
People
have
never
met
before
that
are
coming
in
with
skills
and
interest
and
we're
just
getting
it
started.
So
that's
really
exciting.
I
think
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
outreach
soon,
with
these
param
parties
going
in
other
discords,
I
feel
like
again
everyone's
just
like
swarming
gene
got
us
three
grand
and
a
lot
of
good
rep.
B
You
know
on
from
public
goods
funding,
and
you
know,
mitch
is
taking
on
the
calendar
and
everyone's
just
doing
their
thing.
Mount
mono
had
a
badass
gravity
call.
You
know
it's
just
like
everyone's
owning
their
thing
like
like
ev,
everyone
is
killing
it,
so
it's
just
you
know
I
feel
like
we're
just
on
a
waiting
game.
Basically,
it's
kind
of
like
we're
just
kind
of
going,
and
at
this
point
we
know
what
we're
doing
and
we
just
have
to
execute
and
make
it
happen,
love
the
post
by
olivia.
B
I
think
it'll
that
I
I
did
help
right
a
little
bit.
That's
probably
why
I
like
it
so
much
and
and-
and
I
think
it
sets
a
good
road
map
for
us
and
what's
really
cool
is
it
seems
like
it
also
sets
the
date
of
our
hatch,
which
is
really
fun,
probably
like
the
second
or
third
of
december
or
sorry.
The
date
of
the
commons
upgrade
we'll.
B
We
should
be
able
to
do
the
upgrade
also
sem
put
in
hours
and
hours
of
work
into
the
common
swarm
stuff
this
week
and
I'm
really
excited
to
see
the
results
tomorrow
and
see
where
we're
at
and
and
make
sure
that
we
can
start
having
demos
again
for
the
upgrade
and,
and
so
people
see
what
what
front
ends
they're
going
to
use.
B
B
But
the
forum
when
I
looked
at
the
forum
is
just
like
wow
there's
so
much
going
on
and
it's
just
so
cool
so
I'll
pass
it
to
durgadus.
F
Yeah,
I'm
excited
it
was
a
good
week.
I
was
a
little
more
involved
than
I
probably
should
be
given
my
workload
this
week,
but
there
was
just
so
much
happening
that
I
felt
like
I
wanted
to
be
around.
So
I
guess
that's
a
good
temperature
check
if
it's
anything,
I'm
really
too
busy
to
participate,
but
I
do
it
anyway.
F
So
so
that's
I
guess
my
basic
temperature
check,
I
could
say
a
lot
of
things,
but
I'm
I'm
also
pretty
excited
about
this.
All
these,
I
just
got
my
cards
from
the
liberating
structures.
Folks
you
know,
and
then
I
do
think
what
libby
just
said
you
know
might
be
served
to
maybe
a
good
thing
to
do
to
try
to
check
out.
You
know
what
we're
talking
about.
Is
it
you
know
in
the
connection
side
of
the
thing
is
it
you
know
clear?
Is
it
complicated?
F
Is
it
complex
or
is
it
chaotic
that
way
we
can
have
something
sort
of
guide
us
right
from
the
start
that
way
we're
not
trying
to
figure
it
out
right
in
the
middle.
You
know
so
I
think
that's
why
I
was
trying
to
make
that
suggestion
before
and
and
the
liberating
structures
stuff
has
a
similar
kind
of
effect
in
terms
of
meetings
and
direction.
So
thanks,
oh
I'll,
pass
it
to
manu.
I
I've
received
really
positive
feedback
on
last,
yesterday's
presentation
on
leadership
and
on
the
one
I
did
on
omega,
which
was
by
another
economic,
economic
nobel
prize
winner,
omar
dsn,
on
the
capability
approach,
and
so
I
think,
what's
coming
out
of
that
is
creating
up
tom
also
gave
me
the
idea
of
creating
some
sort
of
like
personal
development
group,
not
a
working
group
but
sort
of
like
a
weekly
event
like
the
non-vital
communication
book
club
or
the
spotlight,
where
I
go
into
topics
that
would
be
in
the
middle
of
like
communitize,
omega
and
softcup
being
that
leadership.
I
First
principles:
critical
thinking,
meta
thinking
that
type
of
thing
that
that
affects
the
way
we
make
decisions.
So
I'm
gonna
work
on
that.
That's
the
temperature
for
me
and
I
want
to
work
on
things
that
are
critical
for
the
commons
upgrade
and
yeah.
That's
pretty
much
for
me
I'll,
pass
it
to
chui.
L
Thank
you
manu.
This
is.
This
is
great
like
I'm,
I'm
I'm,
I'm
writing
like
a
a
retweet
and
I'm
also
like
tagging
the
the
people
that
gave
us
their
vote
and
and
it's
just
like
unbelievable
like
so
much
so
much
is
happening
and
it's
like
yeah,
it's
it's
it's.
It's
really
good
good
times
for
for
being
as
prepared
for
the
comments
upgrade
as
we
are,
and
it
just
makes
me
really
really
happy
and
proud.
L
So
yeah,
there's,
there's
still
some
stuff
to
be
done
before
the
comments
upgrade
so
yeah.
Let's,
let's
make
that
last
effort
before
the
big
moment
I'll
pass
it
to
make.
G
Yeah
thanks
jane
temperature
is
good.
I
you
know,
I
see
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
things
going
on
in
different
areas.
I
think
there
are
a
couple
of
things
that
have
been
kind
of
looming
overhead,
and
that
is
the
reward
system
and
progress
on
the
reward
system
for
each
of
the
working
groups.
I
know
that
we-
I
don't
know
if
the
update
of
it
yet,
but
maybe
only
a
handful
of
working
groups
have
fully
submitted
but
and
then
trying
to
figure
out
comprehensive
reward
system
after
the
comments
upgrade.
G
C
I'm
still
high
from
the
orientation
call.
There
were
14
people,
so
it
was
quite
an
interesting
approach
and
I'm
also
it's
it's
interesting.
I
don't
have
orientation
number
of
like
five
or
six
people
from
orientation
that
arrived
saying.
Oh,
I
heard
grief
on
the
podcast,
so
it's
like.
Oh
that's,
interesting
people.
I
don't
know
I
feel
like
there
is.
C
This
point
like
I
feel
there
is
this
point
where
the
project
itself
it's
sort
of
getting
talked
about
around,
and
I
feel
that
the
timing
of
building
a
community
and
maturing
the
community.
It's
matching
the
time
of
people
reaching
us.
So
it's
really
interesting
to
see
how
things
will
unfold
so
yeah,
I
don't
know
it's.
C
It
is
exciting
yeah.
I
felt
I
felt
a
lot
of
gratitude
on
yesterday's
calls
with
li
with
tough
call,
sorry
with
levy's
questions
and
so
on.
I
think
it's
an
interesting
exercise
also
to
bring
to
the
rest
of
the
community.
Not
only
people
who
assist
to
one
single
call.
D
Thanks
edo
yeah,
I
want
a
second
like
almost
grief
and
edu
like
there
is
a
lot
of
engagement.
I
feel
especially
for
the
pram
parties,
and
there
is
a
lot
of
people
who
you
know,
who's
interested
in
talking
in
economics
and
and
yeah.
It's
yeah.
You
know
like,
I
think
it's
been
awesome
and
also
like
it's
good,
like
we
finally
get
some
kind
of
solution
for
the
multisig,
so
yeah,
it
seems
like
it's
clean
now
and
we
know
what's
the
past
and
yeah,
I
don't
know
like.
I
feel
great
I'll
pass
it
to
ocross.
A
Welcome
aussie
cross,
so
this
is
where
we
normally
just
say
a
few
words
about
how
we
feel
about.
What's
going
on
in
the
community
or
ourselves
and
you're,
very
welcome
to
say
a
few
words
if
you
wish
to
yeah.
M
Okay,
I
am
joining
for
the
first
time,
so
I'm
just
trying
to
like
really
get
together
for
what's
going
on
in
the
community,
but
I
don't
really
have
much
to
see
now
until
when
I
really
have
a
better
understanding
of
what
is
going
on.
A
Cool
well
you're
very
welcome
to
hang
out
and
listen
to
all
right
and
then,
from
my
perspective,
you
know
this
was
a
strange
week
right
because
it's
like
there
was
this
the
multi-sig
discussion
and
then
it
was
just
like
it
was
only
zeph
and
myself
and
mitch
commenting
on
the
forum,
and
it
was
like
we're
like
we're
trying
to
find
like
what
the
right
thing
is
and
there's
just
there's
just
a
lot.
A
There's
a
lot
in
there
you
know,
and
then
it
seems
like
you
know,
in
the
stewart's
channel
we
came
to
like
oh
okay.
I
think
we
could
figure
out
like
they're
they're
in
some
really
good
options,
but
those
options
seemed
like
our.
We
weren't
ready
for
them.
Yet
you
know
I'd
love
to
see
something
like
that,
like
delegations,
even
delegations,
for
stewards
in
in
the
future.
Actually
you
know
and
self
nominations
and
these
kinds
of
things.
So
it's
really
sort
of
put
a
seed
in
my
mind,
so
I
think
it
all
worked
out.
A
Well,
I'd
say
we
also
off-boarded
five
stewards
this
week
and
we
will
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
it
and
the
the
ceremony
that
we'll
have
for
them
tomorrow.
I
don't
know
if
everyone
saw
santi's
message
in
the
discord
I
followed
up
with
him
just
to
be
like.
Is
this
what
it
means
do?
Would
you
like
to
off-board?
A
Would
you
like
to
step
away
for
a
little
while
you're
always
welcome
to
come
back,
you
know
just
and
he
he
does
need
to
take
care
of
his
family
right
now
so
he'd
like
to
be
included
in
the
off-boarding
for
this
week
and
then
on
the
other
side
like
fireworks
and
there's
so
much
going
on
and
there's
so
many
new
people
and
it's
like
everyone
seems
to
be
operating
at
like
just
the
best
version
of
themselves
for
lack
of
saying
in
a
different
way.
A
You
know-
and
I
it's
just
a
pleasure
to
be
able
to
watch
this
actually
and
to
be
part
of
this
all
right,
so
I'll
move
on
github
notifications.
Have
you
checked
them?
I
was
talking
about
the
stewards
council
tomorrow.
It's
dedicated
to
our
first,
the
first
of
its
kind
ceremony
for
off-boarding
stewards.
It's
going
to
be
kind
of
an
honoring
of
their
contributions,
and
I
think
that
we
wouldn't
be
here
today
if
they
didn't
do
the
the
stewarding
that
they
did
in
the
past.
A
So
it's
santi,
craig
suga,
marco
jason
sem.
Even
though
sam
was
a
while
ago,
he
actually
wants
to
celebrate
his
off-boarding
after
the
commons
upgrade
is
done
and-
and
I
thought
hell
I'll
be
in
barcelona-
to
celebrate
with
you,
then
so
they'll
they'll,
maybe
another
ceremony
for
some,
but
we're
gonna
include
all
of
the
students
who
are
off-boarding
at
the
same
time
into
tomorrow's
ceremony.
So
sam
won't
join
us,
suga
won't
join
us.
Marco
will
join
us.
A
Santi
maybe
depends
on
his
situation
at
home
and
I
think
we're
still
waiting
to
hear
back
from
craig
and
jess
just
to
let
everyone
know.
What's
going
on
there,
promotion
of
the
cdd
params
parties.
I
just
wanted
to.
I
threw
this
on
the
agenda.
We
don't
need
to
raise
it
if
it's
not
an
issue.
I
just
wanted
to
see
if
we
are
okay
with,
if
there's
any
thoughts
around
more
communications,
we
need
or
what
kind
of
communications,
and
maybe
I'll
I'll
drop
this
to
you
chewie.
A
If
you
need
help
one
thing
so
eduardo
and
myself,
and
maybe
other
people
have
been
sending
personal
messages
directly
in
the
dms
of
our
hatchers.
The
message
was
long,
so
I
ended
up
posting
it
on
the
forum.
So
now
we're
sending
a
short
message
with
a
link
to
the
forum
post.
That
has
all
that
information
in
it
and
I
feel,
like
people,
could
feel
free
to
use
that
if
they
want
to
and
then
I'll
pass
to
you,
if
you
have
anything
you
want
to
share
about
it,.
A
Okay-
well,
I
just
I
just
want
to
ask:
is
there
anything
that
you
need
help
with
in
terms
of
support
for
promotion
of
the
params
parties
of
the
configuration
dashboard
dashboard?
Is
there
any
help
that
you
need
there.
L
L
So
if
anyone
is
interested
in
hosting
a
param
party
like,
I
think
the
best
place
that
you
could
do,
that
is
the
calendar
that
we
made
for
it,
and
then
we
will
get
that
once
you
posted
the
event,
we
will
get
that
scheduled
in
in
in
the
regular
pc
calendar
and
also
the
flyers
that
we're
gonna
be
using
for
for
twitter,
so
so
yeah.
L
This
is,
if
you're
interested
in,
if
you
would
like
to
support
us,
just
yeah,
sharing,
sharing
with
a
personal
commentary
of
what
you
find
important
in
this
can
do
a
lot
so
yep
yeah.
That
would
be
it.
C
No,
I
think
the
outreach
will
go
through
this
week
and
yeah.
We
hope
that
it
will
work,
and
I
really
like
the
I
like
the
twitter
sort
of
graphic
and
stuff
that
was
shared.
I
think
the
only
thing
I
would
probably
suggest
is
to
just
this
framework
of
this
is
an
educational
process.
C
Everyone
is
welcome
because
we
have
this
question
in
the
orientation
today
of
someone
who
was
like,
oh,
but
I
don't
have
a
knowledge.
Can
I
join
that
call
without
like
knowing
too
much
you
know.
So
there
is
this
barrier
of
people
when
they
heard
the
term
economics
and
so
on.
So
maybe
they're
a
little
bit
of
explanation
that
everyone
is
welcome
could
be
no
matter.
Your
level,
at
least
to
listen,
could
be
interesting
to
have
on
the
accounts.
A
Okay,
he
had
noted,
I
think,
olivia
also
raised
the
the
params
as
such
is
so
ubiquitous
for
us.
We
know
what
it
means,
but
I
think
outside
our
community
people
might
not
know
what
a
pram
party
is,
and
it
might
not
click
with
them
that
this
is
something
cool
about.
You
know:
initializing
an
economy,
an
augmented
bonding
curve.
So
I
think
it's
a
good
point,
meaning
what
a
params
party
is
might
be,
might
be
a
helpful
tool
or
using
a
different
some
another
way
to
explain
it.
B
Is
there
anything?
Is
there
any
pram
parties
tweets
that
we
should
tweet?
I
was
just
trying
to
find
one,
but
you
know
we're
all
here
and
12
retweets
makes
something
real
nice.
You
know.
L
Yeah
the
one
that
brother
made
I'm
dropping
the
link
in
the
in
the
amplified
channel
the
amplify
cool
yeah.
C
Are
we
doing
a
small?
I
don't
know
if
this
is
out
of
the
or
the
context,
but
are
we
doing?
We
have
a
few
hatchers
that
have
a
wide
range
of
followers,
for
example,
wacky
and
so
on?
How
do
we,
how
we
sent
a
public
invitation,
kind
of
thing
to
them
and
we're
like
hey?
You
know
you're,
welcome
to
join
us
just
for
them
to
sort
of
share
it
too.
C
It
could
be
an
interesting
process,
maybe
for
people
we
know
all
for
in
the
case
of
grief
that
just
went
to
the
bankless
podcast.
You
know
we
have
these
small
connections
that
we
can
sort
of
use
for
distribution.
A
A
Okay,
and
maybe
that's
something
everyone
can
take
out
individually,
like
the
people
that
you
feel
comfortable
reaching
out
to
would
make
sense
too.
A
Cool
okay,
tomorrow's
community
call
it
just
a
reminder
that
we
don't
have
a
spotlight
tomorrow.
A
Last
week
we
ended
early
because
we
we
went
fast,
so
guess
what
this
week
you
can
take
your
time
when
you're
doing
your
updates
on
the
community
call
tomorrow.
C
Yeah,
just
briefly
interrupt
sorry,
I'm
interrupting
too
much.
Today
I
did
fail.
The
last
call
was
like
in
a
hurry
like
I
thought
we
were
like
rushing,
even
though
there
was
no
timer,
and
I
I
it
really
made
me
feel
a
little
bit
uncomfortable
at
some
point,
because
I
felt
there
were
some
people
who
were
new
or
were
like
there,
and
I
was
like
this
is
too
like
fast.
C
So
just
that-
and
I
I
don't
know
if
it's
the
place
to
it,
but
I
think
we
can
also
if
there
is,
if
there's
any
question
we
probably
if
we
have
the
time
at
the
call
to
just
allow
people
to
ask
questions
regarding
the
illness
that
we
are
giving,
because
it
feels
one
way
and
if
it's
a
community
call
not
a
informing
the
community
call,
you
know
kind
of
thing.
C
So
I
don't
know
how
possible
it
is,
but
I
think
just
a
little
more
of
engaging
with
the
persons
who
are
in
the
call
could
be
interesting,
just
at
least
open
the
window
to
that
just
a
small
suggestion
to
it.
A
B
I
I
don't
mind
ending
early
too,
but
what
I
would
say
is
that
it
would
be
great
to
have
a
a
plant,
because
you
know
when
you
do
these.
Oh
hey.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions,
everyone's
just
everyone's
afraid,
everyone's
afraid
to
go?
First,
they
need
the
the
first
follower.
You
know
the
the
the
person
to
say
yeah.
I
got
a
question
so
so,
if
anyone
has
a
wants
to
be
the
plant
or
or
recruit
a
plant
and
just
give
them
the
permission
to
be
the
first
question
answer,
it
would
help
a
lot.
C
I
agree,
and
also
I
mean
it's
not
only
for
new
people,
but
also
for
ourselves
like
I
don't
I
don't
go
to
gravity
so
if
gravity
makes
a
scenery
of
their
week,
I
I
there's
the
space
where
I
can
also
ask
juan
kai
hey.
Can
you
just
describe
a
little
bit?
What
was
about
you
know
it's
not
only
about
new
people,
it's
about
ourselves
too
and
being
informed
about
what
other
working
groups
are
doing.
So
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
public
exercise
not
only
for
new
people.
H
Also,
there
was
something
we
did
in
the
beginning
of
the
community.
Calls
that
was
opening
time
for
sharing
about
proposals
and
and
proposals
sometimes
might
not
come
from
a
steward.
But
I
think
opening
that
more
and
more
would
make
people
feel
more
comfortable
to
make
their
own
proposal
and
share
things
in
the
forum
like
opening
a
little
space
that
that
might
not
be
working
group
oriented.
C
Also,
I
think,
for
example,
now
that
we
are
having
this
busy
building
other
spaces.
C
It
could
be
a
nice
moment
to
also,
for
example,
because
I
I
don't
I
don't
like
community
really
or
like
tc,
related
things
that
happen
like
we
only
share,
for
example,
when
we
went
to
fcc
and
so
on,
so
it
could
be
also
nice
to
just
like
hey,
I'm
great,
whilst
in
bangladesh,
ex-person
went
to
lisbon
and
exposed
this
or
you
know
incoming,
it
could
be
nice
to
also
have
this
this
little
process
of
when
we
were
visible
at
some
point.
A
Okay,
we
have
five
minutes
left
and
there's
three
things
I
want
us
to
cover
and
we
need
to
cover
on
this
agenda.
So
I
think
these
ideas
are
great,
but
maybe
this
is
not
the
space
and
time
that
we
have
for
it.
I
know
nate
is
looking
at
sort
of
yeah.
That's
right,
there's
going
to
be
a
forum
post
when
the
I
think
that
these
are
the
kind
of
great
ideas
that
we
can
capture
in
a
forum
post
and
then
and
then
plan
for
all
right.
There's
a
call
for
help.
A
It's
me
calling
for
help.
There
is
a
task
to
roll
out
sesh.fyi,
but
it's
lots
of
little
things
and
it's
probably
a
few
hours
worth
of
work
of
organizing
the
it's
there's
a
dashboard
which
is
a
little
buggy
and
you
need
to
put
create
use
the
the
the
sorry
I'm
not
explaining
this
one
at
all.
I'm
gonna
try
again
so
the
fyi
is
the
bot.
A
That's
gonna
handle
the
call
announcements
going
forward
and
we're
gonna
retire
by
by
these,
and
so
vivei
v
is
helping
create
the
a
system
he
has
to
create
a
new
bot
to
support
this
spot.
But
it's
better,
I
promise,
but
in
order
to
set
up
all
of
these
call
announcements,
there's
a
probably
a
few
hours
piece
of
work
to
do,
and
I
was
wondering
if
anyone
or
anyone
in
your
working
groups
would
be
willing
to
support
this.
A
A
Okay,
there
is
this
which
I
didn't
get
to
last
week.
This
is
the
new
onboarding
survey.
Now
one
of
the
things
that's
important
for
this
working
groups
is,
we
would
like
to
be
able
to
guide
these
newcomers
to
the
working
group,
but
if
each
working
group
or
working
group,
coordination,
lead
or
steward
could
just
give
a
few
words
about
how
they
would
like
that
working
group
to
be
described
to
somebody
new,
I
think
it's
gonna
be
helpful
for
us.
A
Instead
of
us
trying
to
to
jump
into
these
definitions,
so
governance
and
culture,
for
example,
for
soft
gov
ethics
mission
value
for
omega,
so
I
will
probably
send
this
individually
to
everyone
to
ask
you
if
you
can
update
the
words
that
you
would
like
to
use.
The
guide
is
essentially
a
bot
people
will
land.
They
will
be
asked
a
few
questions
and
when
they're
asked
about
you
know
what
interests
they
have
it
will
it
will
match
them
to
a
working
group.
A
So
it's
going
to
be
an
automated
way
to
start
matching
people
to
working
groups,
I'm
giving
you
the
heads
up
so
that
you,
you
know
when
it
lands
in
your
dms
or
in
the
zen
hub
issue
that
is
open
for
it
and
then,
lastly,
lydia.
I
see
that
you
added
two
things
last
day
to
vote.
So
it's
important.
Do
you
want
to
share
more
about
last
name.
H
B
H
Okay,
so
I
have
to
update
that
in
the
forum
post
and
then
for
yeah,
it's
the
last
day
to
vote
on
snapchat.
We
had
seven
votes
last
time
I
looked
at
it.
Let
me
see
now,
but
we
need
well.
We
already
reached
quorum
according
to
the
hatchbrims,
that's
what
we're
using
for
this
boat.
So
it's
not
that
bad,
but
we
should
take
the
percent
the
president
for
getting
at
least
10
voters,
because
that's
the
new
param.