►
From YouTube: Praise Quant 12 - Review Session
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
B
My
intentions
is
to
share
my
findings
from
quantifying.
I
think
it
been
like
two
or
three
rounds
since
the
last
time.
A
B
A
A
Yeah
I
this
time
I
was
very
small
phrases
that
are
quantified
like
people
who
are
who
showed
up
at
this
or
that
meeting.
So
it
was
a
very
easy
quantifying
round
and
other
than
that,
I
think
it
went
super
cool.
I
mean
I
had
no,
I
found
no
bugs,
but
I
I
I
love
it,
the
the
fat.
B
Cool
yeah
for
myself,
I
thought
it
was
interesting
to
finally
use
the
the
new
duplication
and
dismissal
ux.
I
guess
we
could
call
it
sure.
A
B
So
that
was
cool
to
see.
I
love
the.
B
B
A
B
B
Yeah
yeah,
so
that
was
cool
other
than
that
it
was
super
easy.
I
lowered.
I
lowered
the
amount
of
praise
per
quantifier
so
instead
of
like
250,
I
lowered
it
to
like
150.
B
B
Were
we
able
to
find
enough
praise
to
cut
enough
context
to
adequately
quantify
praise?
Olivia
wrote.
Yes,
there
was
one
from
rex
that
I
dismissed
for
everyone,
because
he'd
sent
a
poor
context.
A
Yeah
I
gave
I
quantified
that
one
as
well,
and
I
gave
I
think,
13
because
or
eight
because
I
saw
that
it
was
just
a
mistake.
I
didn't
feel
like
it
was
something
he
just
forgot
to
give
context
whether
he
and
typing
forgot
and
then
last
week,
phrases
from
my
part-
and
I
felt
like
that-
was
just
incomplete,
but
it
was
sharing
some
value
and
yeah.
B
But
in
in
this
case,
like
a
a
really
good
example,
is
like
I
had,
I
had
the
same
praise
from
rex
and
I
was
looking
at
his
praise
and
I
was
like
dude.
This
doesn't
make
any
sense,
and
so
I
just
dm'd
him
and
I
was
like
hey,
I'm
quantifying
your
praise
and
it
doesn't
make
any
sense
and
so
that
he
was
like
oh
okay
and
then
I
don't
know
if
he
went
back
but
like
then
at
least
he
gets
some
feedback
that,
like
maybe
he
needs
to
add
more
context
or
change.
B
A
I
had
two
things
that
I
think
that
would
fit
in
the
out
of
context.
A
Questions
first
is
that
I
took
another
look
at
the
rules
of
praise
and
or
rules
of
quantification,
and
then
I
saw
that
we
should
not
praise
people
for
engaging
in
for
the
forum
in
t
comments
for
all,
because
this
is
something
already
been
being
done
by
source,
cred
or
or
someone
else,
and
so
we
should
not
ditch
phrases
because
of
contributing
there,
but
because
of
a
value
that
you
found
by
the
person
that
was
commenting
or
or
bringing
a
subjective.
A
B
A
A
A
B
Is
that
does
that
answer
your
questions.
B
A
B
Yeah,
it
looks
like
a
bug:
yeah
safe
bet
is
just
a
dismissed
one.
B
B
B
A
A
B
A
A
I
did
yes,
I
understand
a
little
bit
more
about
the
the
culture,
the
values
that
you
have
not
because
of
something
that
I
saw
in
a
meeting
or
by
what
I
see
from
what
I
hear
from
levy
who
I
had
more
contact
with
before,
but
because
I
see
the
community
praising
people
for
that
for
this
or
that-
or
I
see
other
quantum
fines
giving
you
a
higher
value
in
this
or
that
so
gives
me
a
practical
sense
like
I
can
see
the
culture.
It's
like
the
culturing
practice.
B
Yeah,
that's
cool
myself.
I
was
quantifying
something
about
a
t,
governance
guild,
and
so
I
was
like
what
the
heck
is
that
and
so
I
went
on
the
forum
and
I
looked
it
up
and
I
learned
what
the
te
governance
guild
is
sort
of.
I
think.
A
Yeah,
it's
a
very
cool
initiative.
A
B
B
A
Of
a
part
of
the
steps
is
to
be
par.
One
of
the
steps
is
to
be
part
of
this
tea
governance
guild
and
you,
where
you
get
in
touch
with
talk
engineers
in
a
more
advanced
level,
to
guide
you
and
also
to
share
thoughts
and
and
experiences
and
learn
together
with
tokyo
engineers.
So
I
don't
know
exactly
what
softcup
is,
but
this
is
not
only
about
governance.
A
B
A
A
B
It
doesn't
give
me
a
reason,
so
I
reached
out
to
noggin
and
christopher
a
couple
hours
ago
heard
anything
back
why
we
can't
see
the
top
10
praise.
B
But
it
looks
a
lot
different
than
last
week,
like
I
think,
if
we,
if
we
actually
look
at
it,.
A
B
A
A
A
A
B
Lots
of
34s,
which
I
think
is
from
marking,
duplicates.
A
A
A
B
A
B
Praise
giving
distribution
oh
wow,
so
this
is
like
the
amount
of
tokens
gave
for
the
amount
of
praise
they
dish.
So
it
looks
like
I'm
like.
B
A
B
B
A
A
A
B
B
B
A
A
B
A
B
B
You'll
have
like
the
you'll
have
like
a
certain
set
of
people,
but
then,
like
other
people,
might
have
different
combinations
of
contributors.
That
they're
quantifying.
A
B
B
A
B
A
Ever
done
like
do
you
go
over
the
reason
and
the
amount
given
and
check
if
it
makes
sense,
or
only
if
it's
raised
in
a
flag
like
in
one
of
the
graphs.
B
I
think
I
usually
only
deal
with
it
if
somebody
like
raises
it
as
a
flag
to
me.
This
was
something
that
we
talked
about
in
the
stewards
call,
because
it's
like
there's
so
much
there's,
like
hundreds,
sometimes
thousands
of
praise,
and
so
I
think
we
need
more
people
who,
like
want
to
look
at
this
stuff
and
like
do
more
analysis
and
like
actually
make
like
progressive
improvements,
because
it's
like
the
system
works
but
like
the
overhead
to
actually
like
take
the
analysis
and
look
at
it
and
then
like
make
improvements.
B
I
was
like
yeah
there's,
like
definitely
lots
of
ways
that
we
can
improve,
and
I
think
a
lot
of
it
is
just
like
like
reaching
out
to
quantifiers
or,
like
maybe
changing
certain
variables
in
the
system,
but
as
to
what
those
are
like.
It
would
be
cool
to
have
people
who
could
like
actually
look
through
this
stuff.
B
B
What
else
do
we
have
here
displacement?
So
you
can
see
this
is.
I
think
this
is
similar
to
this
one
here,
but
we
just
see
more
accurately
like
who
was
the
least
generous
to
the
most
generous,
with
their
scoring
so
innovator
yourself,
myself,
seaway,
going
all
the
way
down
to
craig
vivei
and
then
ustwa.
A
A
A
B
That's
cool.
Do
you
have
any
questions
about
any
of
this.
B
Okay,
do
you
have
any
suggestions
or
things
that
you
want
to
see
after
quantifying.
A
B
B
Oh,
that's,
that's
a
bug
that
I
reported
I'd,
love
for
it
to
work.
B
But
I
had
another
idea
that
I
was
kind
of
braining,
because
zeb
put
up
that
post
for
improving
praise
accuracy
or
like
improving
the
distribution.
I
guess.
B
So
I
don't
know
that
seems
that
seems
a
little
bit
weird
to
me,
and
so
I
would
love
to
see
like
a
factor
applied
to
people
who
are
receiving
salaries
like
perhaps
reducing
the
amount
of
boards
they
receive
and
then
boosting
everything
else.
Outside
of
that.
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
We
would
we
would
have
it
in
the
same
distribution,
but
basically
we
would
like
take
people
who
are
who
are
receiving,
rewards
and
like
either
reduce
their
score
or
reduce
their
rewards.
I
would
say:
reduce
the
rewards
like
on
the
final
calculation.
A
A
A
A
No,
I'm
wondering
the
last
time
I
see
people
teaching
phrases.
I
saw
people
ditching
braces
in
the
community
call
they
were
new
people,
but
I
never
saw
I
don't
remember
seeing
anyone
any
praise
from
the
quantification
round
that
I
gave.
I
didn't
see
any
new
person
giving
a
praise
that
they
spoke
so
to
translate
phrases,
make
sense
for
newcomers
or
to
give
them
more
incentives
of
actually
writing
their
down.
A
Their
praises
would
be
a
way
I
mean
the
the
community
call
is
one
of
the
biggest
reminders,
at
least
for
me
that
I'm
not
working
in
the
tc,
I'm
working
in
the
community
with
the
tea
academy,
so
the
community
call
is
one
of
the
biggest
reminders
that
I
have
to
ditch
phrases
and
I
already
know
how
to
do
it.
So
if
you
are
new.
A
B
B
A
B
Cool
yeah-
those
are
some
great
ideas,
I
think
maybe
I'll
talk
to
edu
and
what
he
thinks
about
that.
A
B
A
B
B
Yeah
and
if
you're,
if
you're
really
serious
about
the
reward
system
things,
you
could
always
ask
to
join
the
reward
board.
A
B
Like
make
some
of
the
high
level
proposals
for
like,
if
we
need
to
change
the
source
credit
settings,
if
we
need
to
change
the
settings
like
like
the
duplicates,
or
maybe
the
scoring
metrics
like
the
fibonacci
sequence,
and
so
like
anybody
can
propose
that
stuff.
B
B
B
Okay,
that's
no
problem.
Yeah,
I
would
say
the
reward
system
call
is
where
we
give
all
the
updates
and
talk
about
a
couple,
different
issues
so
yeah.
If
you
want
to
learn
more,
then
that's
a
great
time.