►
Description
The Sampo working group develops and grows the value of the economic layer of the Token Engineering Commons. It aligns this micro-economy with the TEC mission and the collective success and individual benefit of its token holders.
Steward: Gideon
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Let's
dive
into
it
and
then
we
can,
if
we,
if
we
see
that
we
just
don't
need
the
full
time,
we'll
we'll
cut
the
meeting
short,
why
don't
we
start
with
the
sample,
Mission
and
acid
laser?
Can
you
read
this?
Can
you
can
you
see
that
maybe
you
could
just
read
that
sure.
B
A
Perfect,
thank
you
yeah,
so
I
thought
that
today,
one
of
the
things
is
I
mean
it's
interesting,
because
we
just
kind
of
got
off
of
a
call.
That
was
where
we
were
talking
about
some
of
this
stuff
already
so
I.
It's
kind
of
interesting
that,
like
this
was
I,
didn't
write
this
just
now.
This
was
something
I
wrote
yesterday.
The
check-in
question
that
I
wanted
to
just
start
with
is
in
your
view,
what
are
the
biggest
challenges
currently
facing
the
Tec?
A
So
that's
very
it's
a
very
timely
topic
right
now,
so
why
don't
I?
Who
does
anybody
feel
compelled
to
go?
First?
Does
anybody
have
like
a
like?
Oh
I'll,
jump
into
it.
B
C
Yeah,
thank
you.
Yeah
I,
guess
probably
related
to
what
you're
saying
I
think
the
like
the
structure
of
the
whole
dial.
That's
probably
one
of
the
biggest
challenges
we
have
and
that
we
should
prioritize
because
from
that,
then
we
can
start
building
with
more
clarity.
The
next
stages
of
the
work
we
want
to
do
so
yeah
I
would
say
that
I'll
pass
it
to
Nate.
D
Yeah,
doesn't
we
have
television
in
terms
of
where
we're
heading
I
think
it's
the
most
vital
aspect
of
it
all
I
think
everything
else
falls
into
place
after
we
articulate
a
Clear
Vision
to
the
community.
D
You
know
we
had
the
working
groups.
I
agree
with
what
bear
had
said.
The
structure
of
the
whole
dowel
is
really
really
important.
I
think
that
you
know
working
groups
in
general
in
most
styles
are
suffer
from
isolation
and
they
are
not
into
an
integral
part
of
like
the
social
program
of
the
community
and
I.
Do
think.
D
That
is
something
that
we
really
need
to
address
if
we're
going
to
organize
ourselves
and
maybe
find
new
avenues
of
organizing
ourselves
in
the
structure,
so
I
think
that
is
a
huge
deal
and
so
vision
and
structure
is
really
really
important.
Foreign.
A
A
It's
like
too
many
too
much
structure
right
too
many
working
groups
and
it
it
it
kind
of
created
a
little
bureaucracy
and
it's
a
bureaucracy
with
no
hierarchy.
So
it's
natural
that
the
pieces
don't
really
talk
to
each
other.
That
much
and
so
that's
like
that's
one
problem
and
then
the
pieces.
A
Not
only
are
they
not
talking
to
each
other,
but
they
don't
have
a
shared
Vision
other
than
the
MVB,
but
the
MVB
wasn't
really
actionable
right
because
there
wasn't
a
common
strategy,
so
that
resulted
in
like
just
things,
kind
of
going
in
lots
of
different
directions
without,
if
necessarily
creating
value
for
the
stakeholders,
and
so
then
the
stakeholders
basically
stopped
showing
up
you
know
and
then,
when
this
the
stakeholder
stops
showing
up
our
chances
of
being
able
to
replenish
the
funding
pool
started
to
drop
precipitously
because
people
lost
faith
in
the
Tec.
A
We
were
actually
building
something
that
creates
value
for
the
field.
Token,
engineering-
and
so
then
you
know,
like
people
kind
of
lose
Faith
they
sell
the
token
and
and
then
you
know
we
got,
we
start
getting
scared
about
the
common
pool
drying
up
and
then
we
have
to
start
cutting
funds,
and
then
you
know
or
like
slowing
spending,
and
then
you
know
a
lot
of
the
people
who
were
here
just
primarily
for
economic
reasons.
A
They
are
the
first
people
to
drop
off,
and
you
know
it
just
you
know,
starts
to
kind
of
like
feel
not
great
right,
because
it
feels
like
things
are
slowing
down
or
maybe
winding
down.
So
I
think
that,
like
that,
our
challenge
right
now
is
to
turn
this
thing
around
like
get
this
spinning.
The
other
direction
and
I
think
that
you
know
that
starts
with
creating
real
value
to
the
to
the
actual
stakeholders
and
I
think
that
that
also
relates
to
Vision.
A
You
know
like
if
you
look
at
the
great
companies
out
there,
that
you
know
they.
They
started
with
like
a
pretty
Clear
Vision
like
Amazon,
like
you,
may,
have
we've
seen
these
companies
kind
of
get
corrupted
along
the
way,
but
Amazon
Google,
even
Facebook.
They
they
started
with
like
a
clear
vision
of
how
they
wanted
to
serve
so
I
was
gonna.
A
I
was
going
to
try
to
focus
the
conversation
on
the
curation
service
and
getting
the
incentives
right
for
participating
in
that,
but
I
don't
know
I
I'm
feeling
like
it
might
be
worth
sharing
a
vision
with
you
all
right
now,
just
I
don't
know
because
it
just
feels
like
kind
of
short
on
that
right
now
and
it
would
be,
it
would
be
great
to
get
some
feedback
on
it
and
maybe
just
start
a
little
conversation
around
it.
A
So,
let's
just
what
do
you
guys
think
about
changing
this
agenda
and
talking
about
vision
for
a
little
bit.
C
B
A
Okay
Okay,
so
let
me
find
this.
A
This
is,
this
is
TC
in
general
hold
on
just
one.
Second,
let
me
pull
up
these
slides
foreign.
A
A
You
know
I've
been
thinking
a
lot
about
this,
this
organization,
this
this
economy,
Commons,
and
you
know
why,
of
all
the
things
I
could
be
doing-
I'm
almost
60
years
old,
so
I'm
gonna.
You
know
I'm
way
older
than
you
guys.
A
I've
done
lots
of
things
you
know
like
I
could
be
just
resting
right
now,
but
I'm,
not
you
know,
I'm
I'm
plugging
in
here,
because
I
actually
do
believe
that
you
know
if,
if
we
don't
do
something
as
a
society
right
now,
the
next
Generations
are
gonna
be
really
screwed
and
the
Earth
is
going
to
be
really
screwed.
I
mean
this
is
like
I
I've
spent
a
lot
of
my
life
actually
like
working
on.
A
You
know
the
environment
and
I
just
saw
that
getting
like
I
worked
with
a
lot
of
non-profits
and
they
would
make
advances
in
passing
certain
laws
and
then
a
year
or
two
would
go
by
and
then
business
Community
would
come
and
unwind
it.
You
know
they'd
just
spend
money
and
influence
the
laws
and
change
the
laws
back
to
the
way
they
wanted
it.
I
was
like
you
know.
A
This
is
just
weird
living
in
a
broken
economy,
and
so
to
me
you
know:
I
feel
like
this
field
of
the
basically
blockchain
technology
and
in
specific
token,
engineering
I
think
it's
like
the
future
fabric
of
the
economy,
so
that
that
thing
that's
in
quotes.
There
is
really
that's
just
me
like
I,
it's
just
a
placeholder,
so
like
don't
get
attached
to
don't
get
attached
to
that.
But
for
me
personally,
I
see
it
as
that's
what
the
stakes
are
like.
We
have
a
chance
to
rewrite
the
rules.
A
The
code
within
the
code
of
our
economy
and
and
I
so
I
see
the
token
engineering
Commons
is
like
a
huge
lever
for
creating
a
new
type
of
economy
and
I.
Think
that
you
know
we,
you
know
the
common
stack
team
actually
had
a
really
powerful
vision
of
of
setting
this
up
as
a
common
and
I
think
it's
really
important
for
us
to
be
clear
about
what
David
Bowie
has
this
great
definition
in
his
book.
A
We'll
call
this
like
com
being
a
commoner
or
something
like
that,
and
he
says
that
a
Commons
is
a
common
pool
resource
stewarded
by
a
community
based
upon
agreed
upon
protocols,
and
so
you
know,
I'm
just
trying
to
simplify
things
down
and
saying
like
what
is
that
resource?
Well,
I
think
it's
token
engineering
expertise,
that's
that's
the
resource
at
the
center
of
this
community
and
we
have
a
community
that
we're
trying
to
build
up
Steward
that
resource
through
some
agreed
upon
protocols.
A
A
That
Commons
did
all
this
work
around
the
social
layer
and
the
governance
layer
like
actually
pretty
groundbreaking
work,
but
by
itself
it
became
bureaucratic
because
we
didn't
have
this
top
layer
figured
out,
which
was
basically
the
way
that
we
build
the
build
the
economy
so
because
the
economy
I
think
is
like
that's
the
key
to
actually
building
the
value,
and
so
you
know,
as
a
result,
with
no
economic
development
plan
and
there's
no
way
of
replenishing
the
common
pool.
A
A
We
know
that
this
is
at
the
root
of
the
problem,
and
if
we
don't
do
something,
this
will
just
dwindle
down
to
zero
and
there
you
know
we
will
have
blown
a
huge
opportunity
to
help
I
believe
help
civilization,
so
the
vision
that
I
keep
coming
back
to
I
just
see
it
all
the
time
in
my
head
and
like
this
feels
so
strong
to
me,
like
is,
is
this,
which
is
seeing
token
engineering
as
a
tree.
A
Basically,
you
know
you've
got
the
roots
which
are
research,
you
know,
and
the
research
like,
if
you
ever
see
that
token
economic
flower,
you
know
look,
you
know,
has
like
all
of
the
research
areas
feed
into
this
field
right,
but
rather
than
seeing
it
as
a
flower.
Maybe
these
are
roots
that
then,
like
feed
to
nutrients
of
you
know
basic
research
into
this
field
of
token
engineering
and
then
you've
got
engineer.
A
You've
got
education,
which
is
like
how
you
pass
that
research
and
expertise
from
that
layer
up
into
the
field
right,
you're,
training,
people
you're,
embedding
that
expertise
in
people
and
this
top
layer,
the
the
the
canopy
of
the
tree,
is
really
the
solutions
and
the
applications
like
what
what
we
actually
do
with
those
with
with
the
research
and
then
the
knowledge
that's
been
transferred
to
people
to
actually
solve
the
problems.
A
So
there's
just
really
a
couple
more
slides
here,
but
I
wanted
to
share
this
with
you
guys.
The
the
old
model
of
Technology
Innovation
was
one
where
you
have
like
governments,
funding
the
basic
research
and
even
a
lot
of
the
education.
A
A
This
is
awesome
like
we
didn't
have
to
train
those
people.
We
didn't
have
to
do
that
research
ourselves.
Now
we
can
just
build
the
tools
and
the
solutions,
and
we
can
make
a
ton
of
money
off
of
this.
A
This
is
great
right,
so
what
happens
is
over
time,
and
you
can
see
this
in
the
United
States,
like
all
this
stuff
starts
to
dry
up
this
stuff
here
that
you
know
the
basic
research
starts
to
dry
up
the
education
basically
kind
of
goes
to
you
know
people
who
can
afford
it,
and
you
know
there.
There
are
some
differences
like
there
are
some.
We
have
scholarships
and
things
like
that,
but
fundamentally
like
it's
becoming
increasingly
expensive.
So
this
whole
thing
is
starting
to
Wither
in
the
United.
A
A
It
creates
energy
that
can
go
through
capillaries
down
into
into
the
trunk
and
into
the
roots
that
it's
a
closed
loop
and
so
that
all
this
money,
that's
resting.
On
top
of
all
this
work
down
here
gets
recycled
and
so
I
think
that
what's
happening
is
that
we've
got
this.
You
know
the
token
engineering
Academy
actually
is
ramping
up
and
it's
doing
pretty
I
mean
like
they're,
doing
a
good
job.
A
But
what's
missing,
is
this
canopy
layer
like
a
way
of
organizing
the
canopy
Solutions
layer
of
the
token
engineering
field,
and
so
that
I
think
is
a
really
good
opportunity
for
the
Tec
to
focus
on
you
know.
So
what
is
if,
if
you
think
about
who's
in
these
things,
we
know
that
researchers
and
teachers
and
students
are
in
The,
Roots
and
trunk,
but
the
canopy
is
made
up
of
all
kinds
of
players.
Right
you've
got
the
people
who
are
actually
doing
the
work.
A
You
know
individual
Consultants,
consulting
firms,
practitioners,
people
who
know
how
to
do
governance
to
know
how
to
do
dispute
resolution
in
this
kind
of
doubt.
You
know
decentralized
world.
All
of
these
people
who
are
critical
to
deploying
this
these
Solutions
and
then
you've
got
all
the
people
who
could
end
up
using
this
right.
Corporations.
Non-Profits
government
agencies,
communities,
but
then
also
individuals,
like
social
activists,
enthusiasts
policy
makers
and
I'm.
This
is
just
touching
surface,
so
I'm
going
to
stop
here.
There's
there
are
a
lot
more
to
these
slides
that
someday.
A
Maybe
we
can
go
to
but
I'm
gonna
I'm,
just
gonna
stop
here,
because
I
think
that
I
think
that
there's
a
great
opportunity
for
us
to
really
focus
on
being
two
things:
one
is
serving
as
a
community
that
attracts
that
Solutions
layer
and
then
also
an
economy
that
recycles
the
wealth.
The
money
that's
coming
in
from
the
solution
layers
back
into
the
research
and
the
education.
A
So
I'm
gonna
stop
there
and
just
get
some
thoughts.
Feedback.
D
Yeah
I
I
agree
with
that
Vision
a
lot
I.
You
know
I've
been
thinking
about
this
for
months
now,
and
it's
one
of
those
things
where
I
when
I
think
about
articulating
a
vision,
I
really
think
we
should
really
lead
into
our
strengths,
and
one
of
the
one
of
our
strengths
right
now
in
the
Tec
is
that
we
are
the
best
position
to
to
become
an
authoritative
voice
within
this
industry
in
general.
D
There
are
a
lot
of
you
know.
There's
this
interesting
balance
between
you
know:
self-regulation
and
compliance
with
government
regulation
within
this
industry,
and
it's
a
huge
huge
issue.
You
know
it's
almost.
It
has
been
the
wild
west
traditionally,
for
the
last
you
know
five
years
or
so
within.
Just
you
know,
crypto
and
I
think
that
is
a
huge
barrier
to
mass
adoption,
and
there
are
certain
fundamental
aspects
that
are
concerning
to
me.
You
know
I,
think
of
security
audits,
I,
think
of
a
smart
contract
development
I
think
I.
Think
about
these.
D
These
vulnerabilities
that
we
have
in
in
code
bases
and
how
we
have
these
kind
of
copycat
codes
that
just
pop
up-
and
you
know
you
just
have
Orcs
of
forks
of
forks
of
forks
and
it's
a
very
dangerous
place
to
be
for
a
lot
of
people
who
are
traditionally
trying
to
participate,
and
if
we
want
to
have
an
economic
system
based
off
of
this
technology,
we
need
to
have
set.
D
You
know,
good
examples,
established
standards
and
I
think
that
you
know
we
are
in
a
very
good
position
like
I,
don't
know
of
any
other
organization
that
is
even
close
to
being
able
to
aggregate
voices
of
authority
on
on
these
particular
subjects,
and
that's
why
the
this
concept
of
the
interest
groups
is
really
interesting
to
me,
because
you
know
we
do
have
people
who
have
been
in
the
industry
for
a
long
time
associated
with
the
token
engineering
Commons.
You
know
what
you
think
of
you
know
Trent
and
Paul
Haas.
D
You
know
we
think
about
the
Griff,
these
people,
you
know
they.
They
have
a
network
of
individuals
who
have
been
in
this
game
for
a
very,
very
long
time
and
who
have
a
lot
of
authoritative
voice
in
shaping
the
future
of
how
this
this
works,
and
so,
when
it
comes
to
the
interest
groups,
I
think
it
would
be
really
really
interesting.
Just
to
start
becoming
and
leaning
into
that
that
you
know
advantageous
position
that
we're
in
and
say,
hey,
let's
get
these
people,
people
who
are
really
great
at
you
know.
D
You
know,
let's
get
all
the
people
who
are
who
have
projects
that
are
associated
with
security
audits,
get
them
together.
What
is
the
standard
audit
look
like?
How
do
we
make
it
more
affordable?
Let's
start
facilitating
conversations
around
really
important
topics
that
affect
the
entire
industry
and
and
having
that
in
a
public
space,
maybe
even
in
our
Discord.
D
This
kind
of
comes
with
that
whole
shelling
Point
narrative,
where
we
can
say
Hey,
you
know
these
are
the
conversations
that
we're
having
and
underneath
that
conversation
we
can
invite
the
entire
token
engineering
community,
the
entire
crypto
Community
to
come
to
learn
to
actually
get.
You
know
a
kind
of
a
common
voice
towards
self-regulation
and
and
moving
this
this
industry
forward,
and
so
I
really
think
that
this
is
a.
We
do
have
a
unique
opportunity.
This
kind
of
first
mover
advantage
to
actually
become
an
authoritative
Voice
Within
token.
D
You
know
with
within
this
industry,
and
so
I
would
really
like
to
you
know
I
think
when
it
comes
down
to
it.
It's
the
the
authoritative
voice
and
the
economic
layer
and
and
at
the
end
of
the
day,
like
the
reason
I'm
still
here
is
because
I
truly
I
have
conviction
about
the
foundations
of
what
the
the
ABC
can
do
at
scale.
D
I
do
think
that
that
when
we
have
enough
economic
velocity
going
through
the
ABC
and
we're
able
to
generate
funds
for
the
common
pool,
we
will
be
able
to
do
a
lot
of
amazing
things
with
it
with
that
money
and
I.
I
think
that
this
is
a
great
foundation
for
us
and
I
think
we
just
need
to
develop
it
and
it
may
take
a
little
bit
longer
than
necessary.
D
I
think
one
of
the
biggest
issues
we
had
was
we
needed
that
big
Community
to
initialize
this
economy,
and
now
that
we
had
that
big
Community,
we
didn't
know
what
to
do
with
it
next
and
because
the
economic
layer
does
take
time
to
develop
and
I
mean
multiple
years
to
develop,
and
so,
as
it
starts
to
develop
back
again,
we'll
start
to
grow
the
community
again,
and
we
will
have
this
kind
of
you
know,
foundation
of
the
cultural,
build
the
things
that
we've
learned
with
our
working
groups.
D
What
worked
what
didn't-
and
we
can
start
this
to
to
responsibly
expand
Avenues
in
our
organizational
structure
and
so
I
do
think
that
the
the
interest
groups
are
an
integral
part
of
becoming
utilizing
that
authoritative
voice
and,
being
being
that
shelling
point,
I
think
we
have
to
get
the
right
people
in
the
room
and
I
think
we
need
to
have
it
structured
in
a
way
that
we
create
utility
for
the
Tec
token
in
the
process
and
I
and
I
do
see
us
becoming
a
a
focal
point.
D
You
know
this
kind
of
this
pivot
point
to
where
everything
revolves
around
the
knowledge
and
conversations
that
are
happening
within
the
token
engineering,
Commons
and
so
I
I
that
that's
my
big
vision
for
it,
and
you
know
it's
it's
very
similar,
so
conversations
that
I've
had
way
way
long
ago
about
the
IEEE
and
and
using
that
as
kind
of
a
foundational
model,
but
expanding
on
it
in
using
our
economic
later
to
actually
direct
this
industry
into
the
right
direction.
D
So
we
can
have
mass
adoption,
so
we
can
start
to
say,
hey
we're,
seeing
this
being
picked
up
all
over
the
world
and
people
are
not
afraid
of
it
anymore,
not
getting
scammed.
All
the
time
and
yeah
that
that's
my
personal
vision
for
it,
I
I,
do
think
the
authoritative
voice
is,
is
a
huge
incremental
part
of
that.
So
I'll
just
keep
that.
A
Yeah,
thank
you.
That's
great
yeah,
I
I
think
that
the
the
key.
A
With
me,
I
think,
all
of
that
and
I
think
the
key
is
right
now
I
I
feel
like
when
we
launched.
A
We
had
that
opportunity
to
do
that
right
away
like
there
was
a
lot
of
excitement
and,
and
then
we
kind
of
like,
took
our
eye
off
the
ball
for
a
little
bit
and
got
a
little
bit
too
focused
internally
and
so
now
it's
we're
gonna
have
to
work
to
build
that
Authority
or
I,
wouldn't
even
say
Authority,
because
we
don't
it's
like.
Maybe
it's
not.
We
are
the
authority,
it's
the
it's.
A
We
are
Community
organizing
The
Authority,
like
the
authorities,
all
these
people
we
want
to
pull
in
and
and
so
the
job
now
is
community
organizing,
like
how
do
we
get
people
to
believe
again
that
this
is
a
place?
That's
spending
time
in
and
I
think
if
we
can
do
that,
then
a
lot
of
that
stuff
that
you're
talking
about
Nate
possible
yeah.
A
C
Ian
I
mean
not
not
much
to
add,
to
be
honest,
I
think
I
also
really
resonate
with
what
you
showed
in
the
presentation.
Gideon
with
what
you're
saying,
Nate
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity
and,
and
something
that
really
motivates
me
and
and
keeps
me
excited-
is
that
slowly
I
think
we
are.
C
Taking
some
steps
into
into
the
right
direction,
you
know
I
think
when
I
just
joined
the
TC
and
all
the
way,
until
a
couple
of
weeks
or
months
ago,
I
I
really
heard
I
really
had
a
hard
time
trying
to
create
this
vision
of
the
Tec.
In
my
mind,
you
know,
for
me,
it
was
really
hard
to
think
you
know
like
what
is
in
common.
How
does
the
commons
look
like
in
a
digital
space?
You
know
how
do
we
allocate
this
funds?
You
know,
how
do
we
organize
around
talking
engineering?
C
How
do
we
do
it
in
a
way
that
is
decentralized
and
that
it
also
aligns
to
the
austrian's
principles?
You
know
it
was
like
many
questions
that
didn't
really
seem
to
have
like,
like
closing
points
in
which
they
all
converge
them
and
actually
generated
a
Clear
Vision
to
me
of
the
TC,
but
recently
I,
think
I.
C
Think,
thanks
to
the
conversations
and
to
the
ideas
and
and
to
the
visions
that
people
have
been
been
sharing
in
in
the
space,
I
I
think
I'm,
finally
realizing
it,
and
for
me
it's
getting
more
clear
every
time,
and
that
just
makes
me
super
super
happy
and
super
excited,
because
yeah
I
just
feel
it.
C
It
looks
more
achievable
and
and
more
possible
to
do
you
know
and,
and
then,
if
we
think
about
like
the
fundamental
reasons
why
we
are
all
here,
you
know
that
I
think
basically
is
to
to
help
the
world
yeah,
make
it
a
better
place.
I
think
that's
just
like
another
extra
layer
of
excitement
right
so
yeah
I
mean
I.
I,
also
think
it's
really
really
wise.
C
The
the
example
you
you
give
with
a
tree
and
just
like
taking
the
time
to
look
at
at
nature
and
like
to
to
actual
systems
that
they've
always
been
there
and
they've
always
been
working
perfectly
and
try
to
kind
of
like
bring
that
knowledge
and
that
that
wisdom
into
into
what
we're
doing
with
all
of
this
technology
and
with
all
of
this
way
in
which
we
want
to
organize
ourselves.
C
As
as
humans,
and
to
organize
the
knowledge
and
the
expertise
that
that
we
that
we
have
I
think
it's
really
really
important
to
take
nature
as
a
reference,
yeah
and
I.
Think
if
we
do
that,
I
think
that
the
chances
of
us
being
successful,
increase,
increase
radically
and
and
also
I,
really
resonated
with
what
Nate
was
saying
about
this
Authority
thing
yeah.
It's
also
some
kind
of
like
reputation
that
the
Tec
has
that
I
feel
it's
just
like
another
benefit
that
the
community
has
another
opportunity,
another
door.
C
That
is
open,
that
it's
super
interesting
for
me
because
you
know,
like
sometimes
I
I
go
to
another
Discord
server
that
you
know
and
I
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
TC
and
and
everyone
that
I've
met.
Actually
they
they
say:
oh
yes,
the
T
scene.
You
know
like
big
fan
of
of
your
War
guys,
like
you
know
it's
like
they
already
know,
they've
heard
at
least
of
the
TC.
You
know,
and
at
least
for
what
I
felt
they
have
like
a
good
impression
of
that.
C
So
if,
if
we
already
have
that
kind
of
of
reputation
and
Authority
in
the
space,
I
think
the
the
only
option
we
have
is
just
to
to
to
keep
that
on
on
a
good
standard
and
just
like
build
on
build
on
that
and
improve
it
and
become
this
place
of
an
action
and
chilling
point
with
with
yeah,
with
responsible
practices
with
with
all
of
these
pieces
that
we
want
to
to
put
together
to
make
this
a
good
Commons
right.
C
So
yeah
I
with
all
of
this
I
only
see
like
doors
of
opportunity
everywhere
and
and
it's
it's
just
really
really
exciting
and
and
this
idea
of
having
the
TC
not
work
as
a
company.
You
know
we're
not
a
company,
we're
not
an
organization
but
we're
about,
but
we
are
a
Commons
and
the
way
I
I
like
to
see
it,
and
that
Gideon
said
this
to
me
and
that
for
me
now,
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
Is
this
idea
of
a
social
network
right?
C
And
it's
not
it's
not
like
Facebook
or
Twitter
like
social
media
strictly,
but
but
it's
an
actual
network
of
people
of
project
of
initiatives
that
we
want
to
build
around
and
then
and
then
have
all
of
these
services
or
protocols
or
things
that
we
can
provide
to
to
these
people
as
support
for
achieving
their
their.
What
they're
looking
for
right
so
just
finding
the
way
to
organize
ourselves
in
how
to
operate
this
in
the
the
best
possible
way.
I
think
that's!
C
A
Thanks
bear
yeah,
I,
think
you
know
it's
because
I
I
think
a
lot
of
us
have
been
kind
of
feeling
the
deflated
energy
of
the
TC
over
the
last
month.
Right
and
so
I
mean
personally
what
my
experience
has
been
I'm
just
going
to
be
very
real
here.
A
My
experience
has
been
that
the
highlights
of
my
week
have
been
on
the
sample
calls.
It
just
feels
like
there's
just
a
lot
of
energy
and
like
There's
Hope
right,
because
because
I
think
there's
there
is
this
exciting
thing
that
we're
we're
all
kind
of
like
starting
to
see
it's.
You
know,
but
then
there's
just
also
kind
of
like
some
of
the
other
calls
it
feels
like.
A
A
I
think
that
part
of
what
we've
got
to
do
right
now
is
turn
the
energy
around
and,
and
so
I
I
do
believe
that
that
that
starts
with
vision
and
and
excitement
around
like
not
just
kind
of
a
blank.
You
know
like
a
high
level
mvv
but
like
how
are
we
going
to
actually
fulfill
that
Envy?
What
is
our
unique
value?
Add
what
is
the
value
that
we're
creating?
B
B
The
TC
Mission
ambition
when
I
start
I
was
just
collaborating
and
doing
contributions
and
and
attending
to
Cults,
but
I
I
never
was
too
much
into
what
does
DC
do
do
and
at
this
moment
I'm
feeling
very
into
TC.
You
know,
after
more
than
a
year,
I
feel
like
I
I
believed
in
this
project.
I
believe
to
our
mission,
and
the
only
thing
that
I
want
to
do
is
to
contribute
contribute
to
to
have
a
better,
a
very
Community.
B
You
know,
but
yeah
I
agree
with
where
that
that
the
biggest
the
biggest
I
don't
know
how
to
say,
but
it
requires
time
to
understand
TC,
and
maybe
that's
one
of
the
problems
that
that's
that's.
Why
people
it's
gone
because
it
requires
time
and
enter
to
the
calls
and
trying
to
understand
what
what
are
we
doing
and
what
we
want
to
do,
and
maybe
people
it's
not
too
related
to
that
and
just
want
that
everything
it's
done
already.
B
But
yeah
I
agree
with
with
all
you
guys
and
and
I
want
to
say
that
again
that
that
presentation
is
really
good
and
the
the
illustrations
and
all
that
stuff
is
really
good
and
also
I,
like
the
part
when
you
said
that
the
the
hand
of
the
tree
is
tea,
Academy,
that's
really
true,
and
the
top
is
something
that
we
need
to
to
the
structure
together.
To
get
like
a
final
objective
of
what
are
we
trying
to
do
in
in
this
field
of
token
engineering
and.
C
B
A
Thanks
acid
yeah
I,
so
you
know
I,
think
I.
A
Think
one
of
the
challenges
that
we've
been
facing
is
because
we've
had
this
like
two
months,
two
and
a
half
months
of
time
where
we
couldn't
really
coordinate
with
the
academy
and
yet
like
if
you
believe
that
vision
of
The
Commons
actually
being
the
full
tree,
not
just
the
canopy,
but
it's
the
full
tree,
then
you
can
see
that
the
academy
is
like
an
essential
part
of
this,
like
it
truly
is
essential
and
in
fact,
actually
like
in
some
ways
like
you
know,
those
are
the
public
goods
but
I
I,
actually
even
kind
of
think
of
it.
A
As
like
common
good,
you
know
it's
like
things
that
we
want
the
commons
to
support
and
figuring
out
how
to
create
a
closed
loop
system.
I
think
that's
like
a
really
powerful,
really
powerful
opportunity,
right
and
I
think,
but
what
that
does
is
it
shows
you
like
some
of
the
frustration
about
not
being
able
to
move
forward
until
you
have
these
conversations
with
Academy
like
I.
Think,
what's
interesting
about
that
vision
of
the
tree
is
that
you
can
see
yeah,
it
kind
of
doesn't
even
make
sense
to
me
like
we
can.
A
We
can
make
some
progress
in
like
defining.
Oh,
this
canopy
could
kind
of
look
like
this.
Like
hey.
You
know
like
these
are
things
that
we
think
could
be
important
to
attracting.
You
know
the
people
who
are
Building
Solutions
and
then
the
people
who
are
using
the
solutions
like
that's.
A
We
think
these
are
some
of
the
ways
that
we
could
do
that
you
know
curation
Services
might
be
one
but
like
they're,
gonna,
be
a
lot
more
services
and
but
but
like
aligning
them
with
aligning
them
with
the
academy
will
be
important
and
I'm
just
I'm,
going
to
give
a
concrete
example
of
this
I
think
you
know.
Some
of
you
have
heard
this
heard
me
say
this,
but
the
curation
service.
A
If
we
do
this
right,
it
won't
just
be
running
in
our
server
it'll,
be
running
in
other
servers,
including
the
academy,
but.
B
A
A
All
these
other
communities
and
try
to
come
up
with
provide
schema,
a
unified
set
of
categories
for
talking
about
things
that
becomes
super
powerful,
not
just
for
like
sharing
knowledge
across
the
field,
but
for
connecting
people
right,
and
so
what
that
might
mean
is
if
you're,
like
somebody
who
is
an
implementer
you're,
building
tools,
you're
offering
services
around
safety
audits
for
token
Engineering,
Systems
sure
you're
gonna,
like
want
to
come
into
you're,
going
to
want
to
see
all
the
stuff
that's
going
on
in
the
engineering
common
Discord
server
about
how
people
are
applying
that.
A
You
know
what
Solutions
people
are
building
and
like
staying
up
on
all
that
stuff,
but
also
like,
if
you
go
into
the
back
end
to
the
curated
feed,
which
might
be
a
token
gated
service.
So
that
requires
that
you
have
the
TC
in
your
wallet.
You
could
see
like
classes
that
are
being
offered.
A
You
could
see
research,
that's
that's
being
done
in
the
field
of
safety
and
it's
all
kind
of
a
unified
thing,
and
you
could
also
then
use
that
as
a
way
to
Traverse
your
shared
interests
with
other
people
right
to
find
the
researchers
to
find
the
teachers
to
find
the
you
know
whatever.
It
is
around
the
thing
that
you're
interested
in
in
your
interest
group,
yeah
and
I'll.
A
Okay,
so
so
one
of
the
things
that
is
becoming
increasingly
clear
to
me
is
that
whatever
organizational
structure
we
end
up
with
in
the
Tec
to
kind
of
like
refocus
ourselves,
that
there
are
going
to
be
these
services,
like
the
curation
service
and
I,
think
that
originally,
when
I
started,
this
I
I
kind
of
was
seeing
this
in
the
not
quite
the
right
way
like
it's
like.
A
Oh
no,
this
is
a
service,
that's
run
by
the
Tec,
you
know
being
built
by
the
Tec,
but
the
reality
is
actually
that
the
curation
service
is
actually
you
know.
It's
I
mean
the
truth.
Is
it's
being
built
by
third
party.
A
You
know
Common
Sense
team
and
we
want
to
partner
with
them
in
helping
them
to
shape
that
Vision
so
that
it
can
serve
not
just
the
Discord
server,
but
the
field
right
like
the
full
Commons,
and
so
in
that
sense
you
know,
I
think
what
we
need
to
do
is
shift
the
relationship
and
the
way
that
we
think
about
that
service
to
more
of
like
a
kind
of
traditional
project
that
we
might
fund
coming
through
the
common
pool.
Right.
That's
like
these
guys
came
to
us.
A
They
didn't
actually
ask
for
money
initially,
right,
though
they
I
think
that
we
probably
should
fund
their
development
and
but
I
think
that
what
we
need
to
do
forward
is
to
come
up
with
like
economic
framework
that
says
like
hey.
If
you
get
funded
by
the
TC
and
and
you're
doing
like
public
goods,
those
are
grants.
A
Some
portion
of
it
needs
to
come
back
into
the
comments.
Otherwise
it's
not
sustainable.
So
you
know
that
could
take
many
forms
right.
It
could
be
that
the
PC
gets
a
stake
and
you
know
gets,
gets
to
hold
a
portion
of
the
shares
or
Partnership
of
whatever
that
service
is.
It
could
be
that,
like
in
the
case
of
the
curation
service,
what
I'm
recommending
to
Common
Sense
folks
is
that,
at
least
within
the
field
of
token
engineering,
that
whatever
we're
doing
is
denominated
in
TC
right
so
like.
If
you
want
access
to.
A
You
know
if
you're
in
the
field
of
token
engineering,
and
you
want
to
access
that
curated
feed
you're
holding
Tec
right.
So
it's
like
it
requires
that
whoever
is
getting
funded
for
those
kinds
of
Investments
and
they're,
not
grants
they're
investment,
then
the
stipulation
is
that
you,
you
will
become
part
of
the
economy,
and
you
will
you
will
feed
back
wealth
into
the
comments
so
that
it
can
be
recycled
and
there's
a
lot
of
work
that
we
have
to
do
to
figure
out.
What
will
that
harness?
A
What
will
that
governing?
You
know
those
governing
principles,
look
like
economic
governance
principles,
but
I
think
that
that's
probably
a
healthier
way
of
thinking
about
these
kinds
of
services.
A
Is,
you
know,
particularly
it's
not
just
money
that
we're
putting
in
England
we're
putting
a
lot
more
than
money.
I
mean
we're
putting
a
lot
of
resources
people's
time,
you
know
people
who
are
being
paid
by
the
commons.
A
You
know
on
on
our
budgets
our
working
group
budgets
to
spend
time
on
this,
and
so
in
this
case
in
particular
like
when
we're
doing
a
lot
of
work
to
shape
the
service,
then
it
comes
with
some
other.
You
know,
like
some
other
conditions
and
I,
think
that's
part
of
what
we
need
to
talk
about
with
the
comments
I've
already
kind
of
like
in
that
direction.
A
D
D
We
for
sure
that
have
to
go
that
route,
where
we
have
that
harness
and
making
sure
that
something
is
is
being
generated
for
the
the
commons
and
then
and
then
the
other
aspect
is
the
common
pool
where
it's
like
the
grant
like,
if
you're,
a
non-profit
or
you're,
trying
to
advance
something
that's
within
our
our
broad
mission,
and
we
find
that
we
want
to
fund.
You
I
think
that
you
know
that
can
be
looked
at
as
a
grant.
D
But
with
that
being
said,
I
really
something
I've
been
putting
a
lot
of
thought
into.
Was
the
barriers
on
the
common
tool
for
that
particular
type
of
funding?
I
think
that
you
know
it'd
be
really
interesting
to
see,
depending
on
how
these
interest
groups
develop.
If
we
could
have
these
kind
of
committees
and
boards
with
these
different
areas
where
they
highlight
you
know
where
we
give
them
the
power
you
know.
D
Maybe
we
have
an
interest
group
and
there's
five
or
six
individuals
who
can
make
up
a
board
that
that
is
in
charge
of
that
Niche
area
of
token
engineering
that
can
actually
be
responsible
for
making
proposals,
and
we
limit
the
proposals
for
the
grant,
making
style
of
funding
limited
to
those
individuals
into
those
groups.
And
that
way
we
kind
of
have
this
barrier
on
who
can
access
the
common
pool
for
those
types
of
functions?
D
And
then,
of
course,
we
have
the
internal
aspect
of
it,
which
largely
should
be
minimal.
But
it's
worth
noting.
So
I
really
do
think
that
those
three
areas
of
how
we
we
can.
We
can
distinguish
the
three
areas
of
funding
by
those
three:
the
operations,
the
for-profit
and
the
non-profit
and
I
think
the
non-profit,
the
grants
that
needs
to
have
barriers
and
conditions
associated
with
as
well,
not
not
the
the
financial
harness
but
some
other
type
of
filter.
To
where
we.
D
A
Really
interesting
I
encourage
everybody
to
look
up
on
the
disc
on
the
TC
Forum
Nate
has
commented
on
this.
Soul
Sister
actually
had
it
some
interesting
ideas
and
we're
jamming
on
like
what
the
future
of
the
common
pool
might
look
like
and
actually
Nate.
Like
said
kind
of
like
got
me
thinking
too
like
if
you
do
think
of
you
know
that
one
of
the
resources
that
we're
building
here
is
token
engineering.
I
mean
the
core
resource
at
the
heart
of
this.
A
Commons
is
token
engineering,
expertise,
and
that
is
what
NT
has
said
several
times
in
the
past.
That
would
be
very
useful.
Ethereum
Foundation
like
be
able
to
come
to
us
and
say
like
hey,
we
know
you
guys
have
a
lot
of
expertise
around
token
engineering
help
us
to
spend
our
funds.
You
know
here's
a
million.
A
Here's
a
million
die
right,
spend
this
well,
you
use
use
the
wisdom
of
the
community
and
so
Nate
what
you
were
talking
about
with
interest
group
like
actually
you
know
if
you
start
to
see
the
interest
groups
and
the
schema
that
we're
building
around
categories
as
restricted
grants
right.
These
are
like,
if
you
want
to
come
to
the
Tec
and
like
designate
that
you
want
funding
to
go
to
like
safety.
D
Yeah,
and
and
really
like
and
I,
think
the
core
Point
here
is
that
we
get
more
expertise
involved
in
the
decision
making
of
what
becomes
funded
I
I.
You
know
as
much
as
I'd
like
to
say
that
the
trusted
seed
and
the
members
who
who
started
this
economy,
you
know
how
I
mean
everybody
who's
participated
is
great,
but
it
doesn't
mean
everyone
has
the
insight
to
know
what
is
best
for
the
industry
moving
forward,
and
so
even
if
they're
not
TC
token
holders
but
they're
experts
in
their
field
and
they
they
have
inside
I.
D
Think
having
that
expertise
at
the
beginning
when,
when
having
them,
control,
The
Narrative
of
what
enters
the
common
pool
as
a
proposal,
you
know
having
that
expertise
going.
This
is
what
we
need
and
having
them
decide
exactly.
What
is
the
priority
instead
of
us,
because
I
don't
think
we
can
set
those
priorities:
I'm,
not
an
expert
in
you,
know,
audits
or
smart
contract
development.
So
for
me
to
vote
in
support
of
one
proposal
over
another
within
the
conviction,
voting
module
yeah.
C
Just
to
add
on
to
to
all
of
this
conversation,
something
that
I
think
that
will
also
be
really
important
to
take
care
of
is
like
of
this
idea
of
becoming
really
good
or
becoming
really
good
in
in
observing
in
observation
of
the
different
Dynamics
and
and
movements
that
start
happening
within
the
interest
groups
either.
This
is
because
of
the
different
projects
or
initiatives
that
could
come
up
from
them
that
we
need
to
pay
attention
to,
or
the
the
people
and
the
expertise
right.
C
How
do
we
we
make
those
people
remain
in
the
Tec
and
start
building
from
that
in
a
like
organic
organic
way,
and
then
being
being
really
good
at
observing
those
those
Dynamics
in
order
to
even
to
start
creating
these
funding
Frameworks
that
we're
talking
about
to
do
it
more
instead
of
based
on
on
assumptions
that
we
can
think
of
more
in
the
actual
more
in
the
actual
yeah
dynamics
that
are
that
start
happening
in
the
in
the
in
the
interest
groups
and
and
within
the
community.
I
think
that
will
be.
D
Think
you
tapped
onto
something
really
important
there
I,
because,
like
imagine
imagine
we
have
like
a
round
table
of
of
high
the
top
experts
in
a
particular
field,
and
we
have
you
know
during
that
Roundtable,
you
have
a
lot
of
people
who
are
interested
in
that
field,
coming
to
listen
to
their
conversation
and
what's
really
important,
I
think
that
that
you
tapped
on
there
is
how
do
we
cultivate
that
interest
group,
those
people
who
are
interested
in
learning
more
about
this
topic
or
helping
to
progress
that
topic
to
actually
participate
in
progressing
that
topic
and
using
you
know
whether
it's
our
Discord
Channel
or
whatever
it
may
be,
to
actually
coordinate
with
each
other
to
create
initiatives
underneath
it
Guided
by
those
experts
and
and
how
we
can
cultivate
that
type
of
community
and
and
start
start
on
the
ground.
D
A
A
A
It's
looking
at
people's
sentiment
around
particular
topics,
so
it's
really
good
for
building
consensus
around
things
and
that's
one
of
the
challenges
of
having
like
industry,
trade
associations,
I
used
to
work
for
one
for
like
four
or
five
years
and
building
that
kind
of
like
yeah,
because
people
have
competing
interests
right
so
like
coming
up
with
good
tools
for
building
and
then
also
I
think
actually
our
work
with
Clarity,
not
that
we
would
open
Clarity
up
to
these
partners,
because
it's
too
complicated
but
I
think
that
the
expertise
that
we're
building
in
Clarity
would
be
really
good,
being
able
to
move
projects
along
and
keep
them
organized
on
behalf
of
groups
like
help
them
to
organize
and
make
progress.
A
Folks
I
think
that
so
we
have
just
one
minute,
left
and
I
think
we
should
we
should.
You
know
we're
at
the
top
of
the
hour,
so
we
should.
We
should
wind
this
up.
But
if
you
would
like
to,
we
can
have
this
be
a
topic
for
like
a
larger
group
next
week.
What
do
you
guys
think
the
interest
focus
on
interest
groups.
D
D
Yeah
identifying
interest
groups
and
identifying
the
experts
in
those
fields
that
are
really
important
to
start
looking
at.
So
if
you
have
an
interest
group
in
mind,
I'd
say
like
think
about
the
experts
in
that
field
that
you,
you
think,
are
really
important
and
just
say:
hey,
even
if
they're
huge
you
know
like
if
it's
vitalik
fine,
let's,
let's
at
least
send
the
offer.
You
know.
A
So
one
thing
I'll
share,
just
as
closing
is
I,
would
encourage
you
all
to
think
about
the
curation
service
as
an
incubator
for
interest
groups,
because
if
we
can't
get
people
to
engage
in
like
just
having
conversation
in
those
threads
on
the
Forum
around
a
particular
topic,
it's
unlikely
that
the
interest
group
will
sustain
itself.
A
So
I
think
that,
having
like
using
the
curation
services
a
way
to
start
to
build,
engagement
and
interest
in
like
excitement
around
a
particular
category
will
be
like
a
natural
natural
stepping
stone
to
incubating
an
interest
group.
So
if
you
can
be
thinking
about
that
for
next
week,
I
think
that
that
would
be
really
helpful
to
be
able
to
really.
You
know,
like
think
big,
but
then
also
think
very
pragmatically
about
like
how
actually
start
these.
Who
are
the
people?
What
level
of
expertise
do
you
want
in
here?
A
What
can
we
actually
expect
in
terms
of
people's
time?
So
let's
do
it.
Let's
we'll
have
that
the
topic
for
next
week,
all
right
guys
I,
am
heading
up
to
Canada,
so
everybody
have
have
a
good
week.
Rest
of
your
week
good
weekend.
Talk
next
week.
Have.