►
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Today
may
be
a
little
bit
light
because
of
ucc
there's
a
few
folks
I
know
are
not
going
to
be
here.
I'm
sure
tam
is
not
going
to
be
here.
I
doubt
griff
is
going
to
be
here
and
I
don't
know
about
zeptimus.
A
So
why
don't
we?
Why
don't
we
dive
in
and
then
we
can
yeah,
let's
dive
in
with
just
starting
off
with
the
question.
So,
oh
actually
before
we
do
that
lisha.
Do
you
wanna?
Do
you
wanna
just
introduce
yourself,
give
a
quick
background.
B
Yeah
sounds
good,
so
I
reached
out
to
gideon
a
couple
days
ago
asking
if
I
could
play
a
bigger,
bigger
role
in
sampo.
I
I
learned
more
about
it
in
the
orientation
call.
B
Last
week
my
background
is
in
industrial
engineering
and
I
want
to
go
more
into
the
token
engineering
space,
but
I've
been
just
working
in
the
fintech
space
myself
for
the
past
five
five
years
and
have
taken
on
a
host
of
roles
from
product
management,
to
operations,
to
even
business
development
and
at
one
point
was
the
leader
of
a
b2b
business
within
a
firm
called
wealthsimple.
So
that's
just
a
little
bit
of
background
on
myself
and
just
really
excited
to
get
to
know
you
guys
and
help
out
wherever
I
can.
A
Cool,
thank
you
well
welcome
again,
and
so
what
we're
gonna
do
is
we
always
start
off
with
somebody
reading
the
sample
mission
and
empty?
Do
you
want
to
do
it
today.
C
A
Cool,
thank
you
yeah.
I
always
just
like
grounding
what
we're
doing
in
that
mission
every
day.
So,
let's
start
off
with
just
a
check-in
question.
What
I
thought
would
be
good
is
you
know,
rather
than
focusing
on
like
the
specifics
of
like
economics
and
like
the
work
we're
doing,
I
just
wanted
to
do
a
quick
check
out
on
like
how.
How
are
you
feeling
about
these
sample
calls,
and
you
know,
is
there
anything
we
can
do
to
make
them
better,
so
I'll
start
with?
Well,
let's
start
with
nate.
D
Yeah,
so
the
what's
the
original
question.
Sorry,
how
are
you
feeling
about
these
sample
calls
and
what
could
we
do
to
make
it
better?
I
actually
really
like
it.
I
think
that
you
know,
I
think
it's
a
good
time.
I
think
it's,
you
know
we
cover
everything,
pretty
succinctly,
as
things
start
to
build
up
and
we
start
to
have
more
work.
That
needs
to
be
done.
D
I
believe
that
kind
of
focusing
on
the
different
areas,
because
sampo
covers
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
initiatives
right
now
in
the
economic
layer,
and
so
when
it
comes
to
tec
utility,
I
think,
having
kind
of
more
dedicated
times
for
these
initiatives
would
be
really
nice,
maybe
even
like
hack
sessions,
especially
when
it
comes
to
the
investment
strategies.
On
my
end,
what
I'm
working
on
would
be
really
nice
to
have
as
well,
but
overall
I
think
it's
really
good.
D
It
covers
everything
that
we
need
to
cover
and
we
can
have
separate
calls
if
need
be
so
but
yeah,
that's
how
I
feel
about
it.
I
think
it's
going
really
well
so
I'll
pass
it
over
to
inti.
C
Oh
thanks
yeah,
I
feel
the
same
I
like
them.
They
feel
like
they're,
really
productive.
I
feel
we
cover.
We.
We
end
up
covering
everything
we
need
to
cover
and
in
that
same
note,
we
may
we
kind
of
already
have
been
having
a
few
separate
calls
to
for
more
specific
stuff,
but
as
far
as
this
one,
I
think
it's
great
I'll
pass
it
over
to
cryptocycle.
E
Hey
guys
yeah,
I'm
feeling
good
about
these
calls.
I
think
that
we're
slowly
starting
to
make
progress
in
identifying
like
a
mission
and
scope
for
what
this
group
is,
is
really
focused
on
and
really
identifying
a
good
sustainable
system
or
model
that
can
revolve
around
the
token
to
help
tec
achieve
its
goals
of
being
a
powerhouse
for
token
economists
to
to
both
learn
and
find
each
other
and
share
good
resources
and
also
get
connected
with
projects.
E
Looking
for
that
type
of
type
of
expertise,
so
I
I
think
that
we,
our
conversations,
do
cover
a
very
big,
a
very
broad
range
of
topics,
but
we're
so
slowly
starting
to
refine
and
narrow
down
the
scope.
F
F
I
think
time
is
really
well
well
used.
So
yeah,
I
really
don't
have
any
feedback
at
the
moment,
so
I'll
just
pass
it
to
two
who
is
missing.
Gene.
G
Thanks
man
yeah,
I
would
just
concur
with
nate
that
the
the
project
call
is
is
good
and
perhaps
just
having
expansion
of
the
individual
initiatives
to
have
their
own
logger
calls
would
be
a
good
idea
at
some
point
other
than
that.
Yeah
call
is
great
and
pastor
rica.
B
Okay,
I
guess
I
can
take
a
stab
at
it.
So
far,
I've
really
enjoyed
how
the
mission
is
restated
at
the
beginning
of
each
call,
and
I
really
like
that
everyone
is
everyone's
input
is
gathered
right
before
we
get
into
more
specific
things,
so
it
feels
very
collaborative
and
always
focused
on
kind
of
staying
on
the
same
page,
I'll
pass
it
on
to.
A
I
think
that's
it.
Okay!
Thank
you,
yeah
I'll
I'll.
Just
give
a
quick
thing.
I
I
mean
I
feel
like
these
calls
are
going
are
going
well,
but
if
anybody
feels
like
yeah,
I
didn't
really
want
to
like
say
like
maybe
I
have
something
I
I
don't
feel
comfortable
saying
in
front
of
the
whole
group
or
whatever
just
reach
out
to
me
drop
me
a
note,
and
let
me
know
if
there
are
things
you
think
we
could
do
better.
A
I
think
that
the
point
about
the
sub
teams-
I
I
would
encourage
like
if,
if
you're
part
of
one
of
those
one
of
those
groups-
and
you
feel
like
it's,
you
know
it
would
be
good
to
get
together.
Just
do
it
like
you,
don't
need
permission,
just
do
it.
I
think
the
only
thing
I
would
I
would
ask
is
just
in
the
spirit
of
sampo:
let's
not
meet
just
to
me.
A
You
know,
let's,
let's
try
to
do
as
much
async
as
possible,
there's
so
many
meetings
in
the
tdc
and
like
adding
more
to
that.
Just
for
the
sake
of
meeting
is,
I
don't
think,
that's
a
good
use
of
people's
time.
So
you
know
I'm
a
big
fan
of
like
meeting
when
you
know,
for
I
think
this
weekly
meeting
is
good.
A
We
should
be
doing
that
just
to
make
sure
that
we're
all
in
sync
and
then
the
sub
teams
like,
if
you
know
just
use,
doodle
and
like
find
time
to
to
get
together
when
it's
really
needed.
You
know
to
move
things
forward.
A
That's
my
that's
my
recommendation
at
least
okay,
so
I
wanted
to
just
touch
on
so
we've
got
a
few
things
to
talk
about
today,
just
some
quick
updates
and
then
we're
gonna
go
into
how
we're
thinking
about
structuring
bounties
in
sampo
bear's
done
a
whole
bunch
of
work
talking
with
auntie
and
me
about
that,
it'd
be
great
to
get
some
feedback
and
then
nate's,
gonna
kind
of
like
just
update
us
and
get
some
feedback
on
the
like
where,
where
we
take
the
treasury
policy,
he's
done
a
ton
of
work
on
this,
so
so
the
updates.
A
If
you
look
on
the
screen,
I'm
gonna
click
on
this
we've
done
we're
gonna
be
doing
roles
like
we're.
Really,
I'm
a
big
believer
in
separating
roles
from
souls
right.
What
I
mean
by
that
is,
like
you
know,
let's
create
sockets,
where
certain
types
of
work
belongs.
A
That
you
know
serves
the
mission
and
people
can
come
in
and
they
can
take.
You
know
all
of
a
roll.
They
can
take
part
of
a
role.
A
You
know,
let's,
let's,
let's
not,
try,
let's
not
try
to
like
tie
a
particular
person
to
a
particular
role
over
time
right,
but
let's
identify
the
roles
that
we
know
are
going
to
be
needed
in
order
to
move
this
work
forward
and
then,
like
you
know,
if
I
get
hit
by
a
bus
here,
it
is
right
so,
rather
than
going
into
like
blow
by
blow
what
each
of
these
are
I'm
just
gonna
like
cover
the
major
categories,
and
then
I
would
encourage
we
do
this
async,
if
you,
if
you
have
a
moment
like
go
into
this
dock,
and
leave
some
comments.
A
If
you
have
questions
or
think
there's
things
that
are
missing
or
things
that
it's
too
much
here,
so
you
know
the
what
I
see
this:
the
the
sampo
steward
role
as
being
primarily
focused
on
these
things,
outcomes
like
making
sure
that
all
of
the
work
that
we
do
here
is
really
outcomes
oriented
and
that
those
outcomes
align
with
the
goals
of
the
sample
mission,
but
then,
more
importantly,
the
goals
of
the
tec
mission
right.
Those
are
linked.
A
Those
are
linked
in
our
mission
and
then
strategy
making
sure
that
that
we're
going
someplace
right.
That
makes
sense-
and
some
of
that
includes
like
advice
process,
that's
a
big
thing
in
tec.
So
it's
like
making
sure
that,
as
we
develop
our
strategies,
you
know
they're
mixing
kind
of
like
short-term
and
long-term
objectives
and
we're
getting
feedback
and
governance
from
the
rest
of
the
community
communication.
A
You
see
this
role
of
the
steward
as
being
kind
of
a
chief
spokesperson
for
sampo
in
the
community,
the
broader
community.
Another
big
thing
is
people,
like
you
know.
I
see
a
big
part
of
my
role
is
as
like,
recruiting
and
encouraging
and
getting
engagement
from
folks
around
the
community
and
also
you
know
for
people
who
want
it
like
coaching
and
kind
of
like
peer
coaching,
because
I
can
always
use
help
too
right,
so
so
kind
of
peer-to-peer,
coaching
and
then
fiduciary.
A
So
it's
like
fiduciary,
we,
we
kind
of
are
the
fiduciary
signal
for
this
commons
and
this
community,
and
so
how
do
we
as
a
group,
make
sure
that
the
fiduciary
responsibilities
of
the
stewards
and
the
commons
overall
is
being
clearly
and
adequately
being
represented?
A
And
so
there's
some
some
some
roles
responsibilities
that
roll
up
into
that
and
those
are
all
here.
So
I'm
gonna
leave
this.
You
can
get
to
this
document
by
going
to
the
sample
meetings,
which
is
you
know
on
the
home
page,
you
can
always
get
if
you
go
to
just
like
a
navigational
thing,
you
can.
A
A
So,
just
for
time,
I'm
going
to
like
skip
a
bunch
of
like
feedback
right
now,
but
I
really
do
encourage
you
to
you
know
if
you
have
some
time,
take
a
look
at
that
and
provide
some
feedback.
A
Consulting
intake
update,
so
consulting
intake
service
is
now
got
a
name
token
engineering
request
board.
It's
it's
not
like
a
brand
name
that
I'm
expecting
to
see
on
like
coke
cans
or
anything
like
that.
It's
not
the
sexiest
name,
but
it
does
describe
what
we're
doing
and
we
decided
not
to
like
get
super
fancy
on
this.
A
Just
keep
it
very
clear,
so
the
the
co
we've
done,
tam
has
done
a
ton
of
work
and
I've
been
helping
her
and
jeff
emmett
has
been
has
been
helping
out
advising
as
well,
which
is
so
great,
and
so
what
we
boil
this
down
to
is
really
simple.
This
is
this
is
just
like
the
essence
of
a
minimum
viable
product
right.
Basically,
what's
going
to
happen
is
we're
there's
a
form
that
people
will
fill
out.
People
who
need
token
engineering
help
we'll
fill
out.
A
This
form
tam
is
working
on
the
questions
we're
going
to
keep
them.
Probably
pretty
simple
in
the
beginning,
and
not
too
structured
like
over
time.
I
see
that
that
data
that
we're
gathering
becoming
more
structured
and
probably
a
little
bit
more
quantitative,
but
in
the
beginning
it's
going
to
be
pretty
unstructured
text
and
fairly
qualitative
and
that
information
will
come
in
we'll
nt
is
working
on
what
that
tool
is
going
to
be
the
the
form
submission
tool
that
data.
A
It's
going
to
take
a
while
to
get
people
into
the
habit
of
wanting
to
look
for
projects
there,
especially
when
they're
so
busy.
So
I'm
not
expecting
wild
success
on
this.
I
think
we
should
all
be
very
circumcised.
Circumspect
about
that
like
this
is
not
going
to
be
some
gigantic
service,
probably
between
now
and
the
end
of
the
year
right.
A
We're
just
going
to
be
learning
a
lot
as
we
go,
but
I'm
also
hoping
to
be
able
to
tap
some
of
the
folks
from
the
token
engineering
academy
to
come
in
and
interact
with
those
posts
and
maybe
like
the
ones
that
look
most
interesting
and
use
that
as
kind
of
some
very
simple
curation.
A
So
that's
it
for
this
first
release
and
then
we'll
be
we'll
be
iterating
on
it
and
doing
a
next
release.
This
one
is
called
alpha
one
and
alpha
two
will
probably
be
in
october
sometime.
A
So
any
questions
on
that
before
we
before
we
move
on
tam
will
probably
do
a
more
in-depth
look
at
this
next
week
and
get
some
feedback
any
questions
at
this
point
or
comments.
A
No
okay,
the
new
time
bear.
Do
you
want
to
talk
about
this.
F
Yeah,
thank
you
given
yeah,
it's
just
like
a
reminder.
I
I
wrote
a
post
on
the
discord
channel,
just
letting
you
guys
know
that
we're
trying
to
find
a
new
date
on
time
for
the
weekly
call.
So
here's
the
link,
if
you
wanna,
open
the
doodle
and
just
add
your
availability
to
see
like
which,
which
time
could
work
better
for
us
and
yeah.
That's
that's!
Basically.
It.
A
Okay,
thanks
mayor
all
right,
so
let's
go:
let's
jump
into
the
discussion
about
bounty.
Bear
you're
gonna!
Leave
that
too
right.
Do
you
want
me
to
do
you
want
me
to
link
to
that
document.
F
Yes,
if
you
could,
if
you
could
open
that
one
yeah,
that's
the
one
yeah
so,
as
gideon
said
before,
we've
been
working
with
with
nt
and
myself
in
trying
to
figure
out
the
best
process
to
start
working
on
on
on
this
style
of
bounty
based
contributions.
F
This
is
something
that
we
believe
it
is
going
to
be
really
important
and
allow
a
lot
of
permissionless
work
happening
in
the
in
the
working
group.
So
this
is
basically,
you
know,
use
like
a
first
document
where
we're
trying
to
give
this
process
some
some
structure,
it's
open
for
adding
any
comments,
any
feedback
that
you
would
like
to
that
you
would
like
to
have.
F
Please
feel
free
to
do
so,
and
we
can
just
maybe
give
a
quick
review
on
this
and
then
maybe
all
the
feedback
can
be
done
async,
so
we
can
keep
doing
the
other
stuff
we
have
left,
but
so
so
so,
basically
it's.
I
think
it's
important
that
each
bounty
that
that
is
created
has
at
least
a
basic
structure
of
you
know,
defining
what
problem
is
it
like
trying
to
solve?
What's
the
objective
of
of
the
bounty
defining
that
problem
with
detail,
you
know
and
something
that
is
done
in
the
tc?
F
It's
a
really
good
habit
of
the
advice
process.
You
know
how
big
is
the
pro
problem,
who's
gonna
get
affected
by
this.
If
it's,
if
it
has
a
big
impact
around
the
community,
I've
been
thinking
about
the
possible
outcomes
that
the
bounty
could
bring.
You
know,
like
different
hypotheses
of
of
the
possible
results
that
this
could
bring.
F
I'm
building
on
that
a
strategy
right
like
how
are
you
gonna?
Do
it
who's
the
people
in
charge
of
doing
it?
You
know
if
it's
just
one
person
doing
it,
do
you
need
a
team?
You
know,
how
long
is
it
going
to
take
you?
What
are
your
deadlines?
What
resources
are
you
going
to
need?
Do
you
need?
Are
you
going
to
need
some
funding?
Maybe
you
know
so
making
all
that
part
of
the
strategy
and
then
also
you
know,
knowing
how
are
you
going
to
measure
progress
and
being
transparent
and
accountable
about
it?
F
F
We
think
that
these
four
roles
would
be
important
to
include
a
project
manager
as
like
the
head
of
the
of
the
bounty
responsible
of
specifying
the
bounty
like
the
different
tasks
underneath
doing
time
estimates
you
know
doing
all
the
leading
and
all
the
planning
for
the
for
the
bounty
that
that
that
would
be
in
charge.
That
would
be
in
charge
of
the
parade
for
the
in
the
project
manager.
F
The
contributors
would
be
anyone
involved
at
any
level
in
the
project,
so
it
could
be
the
same
project
manager
and
all
the
assignees,
that's
kind
of
like
the
word
that
clarity
uses
for
bounties.
So
it's
just
basically
the
person
actually
the
task,
that's
how
they
call
it
and
assign
it.
So
that
would
be
some
other
kind
of
contributor,
the
reviewer,
the
advisor
you
know
anyone
anyone
involved
would
be
a
contributor.
F
Then
you
have
the
assignment.
That's
what
I
just
mentioned,
fulfilling
the
tasks
of
the
of
the
bounty,
and
they
are
the
people
eligible
for
payments,
and
you
have
then
the
reviewer.
This
person
will
be
in
charge
of
you
know,
making
sure
that
things
are
being
accountable.
You
know
that
the
project
is
actually
completing
all
the
objectives
that
it
was
promising
and
at
the
end
it
also
approves
the
payments
for
the
different
contributors.
F
Retractive
ones
are
more
like
volunteer,
volunteer
volunteering
type
of
bounties
that
people
just
with
an
idea
or
when
they
see
a
problem
they
can
propose
a
solution
for
that.
We
that's
still
like
in
progress,
so
we,
I
think,
that's
gonna,
take
a
little
more
time
to
to
figure
out
the
best
process
for
that,
so
right
now
we're
focusing
more
on
proactive
based
on
actual
needs
and
projects
that
the
that
sample
is
is
taking
on
currently.
F
So
this
is
basically
just
some
explanation.
Maybe
I
don't
have
to
go
into
much
detail
on
how
to,
for
example,
set
the
rewards
for
each
bounty,
the
meaning
we're
trying
to
use
this
concept
of
overage.
That
I
think
it's
really
interesting
to
allow
have
more
flexibility
for
timing,
so
for
bounties
we
would
be
doing
like
an
hourly
wage.
F
So,
based
on
how
long
would
it
take
a
task
to
be
completed?
You
will
be
having
the
possibility
to
have
some
extra
hours
or
some
extra
time
if
it's
needed
to
be
completed
right
and
then
also
some
transparency
and
accountability,
measures
that
I
think
it
would
be
important
to
consider
when,
when
dealing
with
bounties
and
yeah,
I
think
that
that
would
be.
That
would
be
basically
it
I
don't
know
gideon.
Should
I
do
you
think
I'm
missing
anything
else.
A
A
Actually
one
is
you
know
if
you
look
across
the
tec,
there's
kind
of
this
informal
hourly
rate
of
like
21
die
per
hour
that
a
lot
of
the
working
groups
of
21
22
per
hour,
that
a
lot
of
the
working
groups
seem
to
standardize
on.
A
I
don't
know
how
that
happened,
but
like
kind
of
like
across
the
board,
so
for
bounties,
we
thought
like
well,
it's
probably
not
right
to
use
that
same
21
base,
because
you
know
the
21
base
is
like
for
people
who
have
like
a
fixed
period
of
time
and
it's
like
a
recurring
agreement.
Economic
agreement.
A
This
is,
is
more
free
and
more
free
from
both
sides,
but
it's
less
reliable
right.
So
so
it
makes
sense
to.
I
think
we
did
it.
We
we
bumped
it
up
by
a
third,
that's
what
the
28
per
hour
is.
A
A
The
other
thing,
oh
the
other
thing
in
the
that
you
it's
not
in
this
document
yet,
but
that
nt
was
talking
about
earlier
today-
is
that
we
probably
need
to
include
something
in
this
about
the
tails
right,
like
the
ongoing
tale
of
any
project
right.
Everything
you
do
has
like
some
kind
of
operational
debt,
so,
for
example,
this
is
how
this
came
up
like,
and
he
was
talking
about
our
token
gating
project.
Right,
like
it
seems
simple
like
once
we
make
the
decision
we
launched.
It's
like
we're
done
right.
A
No,
actually,
like
somebody,
you
know,
there's
we've
got
to
make
sure
that
people.
You
know
that
the
tc
has
like
access
to
those
accounts.
So
it's
not
just
a
person's
hands,
probably
need
like
somebody
there
to
to
know
how
to
use
that
thing
and
be
able
to
like
change
it
or
do
things
over
time.
So
so
that's
probably
one
thing
that
we
just
talked
about
just
like
a
couple
hours
before
this
call.
A
A
D
Yeah,
so
I
guess
it
it
makes
sense.
I
was
just
curious
about
the
you
know
when
it
comes
to
how
detailed
each
bounty
is
going
to
be.
Is
it
going
to
be
priced
out
by
project
or
priced
out
by
like
task
within
projects,
and
do
we
have
people
who
are
going
to
set
the
parameters
like
should
like
when
submitting
a
proposal
to
be
done
proactively?
D
Should
we
have
like
a
template
to
follow
when
it
comes
to
saying
this
is
how
much
we
expect
them
to
have
for
this
type
of
work,
and
so
on.
F
F
And
then
you
would
get
like
this
estimate
for
every
task
and
you
would
calculate
the
reward
based
on
that
for
that
task
and
then,
like
the
total
sum
of
the
tasks
within
that
project,
would
be
like
the
total
bounty
amount
for,
for.
Let's
say
that
that
specific
project,
so
that's
kind
of
like
the
idea
and
then
what
you
say
about
about
the
template
yeah.
Yes,
I
think
that's
that's
also
we're
gonna
also
start
working
on
to
have
some
kind
of
template
that
can
give
you
like
the
key
parts
that
the
bounty
should
include.
F
So
there's
like
a
guideline
over
there,
so
yeah,
that's
something
I'm
I'm
planning
on
working
on
really
soon
andy.
I
don't
know
if
you
have
you
had
any
other
question.
A
Let
me
just
show
an
example:
this
is
one,
so
you
know
this
is.
This
is
something
that's
live
like
the
we're
literally
working
on
this
this
week
to
figure
out
how
to
you
know
like
last
year
last
week
we
figured
out
how
to
do
payments
for
salaries.
You
know
for
people
who
are
getting
ongoing
payment,
and
this
week
is
bounty
stuff,
bounty's
a
little
bit
more
complicated,
but
here's
an
example
based
on
a
project
that
nt
is
working
on.
So
you
can
see
that
here
so
like
these
are
the
subtasks.
A
A
But
if
you
go
down
into
this
one
here,
which
is
reach
reach
out
to
a
couple
of
customers
to
get
feedback
on
both
token
gating
tools,
so
we're
looking
at
collab,
land
and
guild.xyz,
and
so
you
can
see
the
nt's
done,
an
estimate
of
like
probably
three
hours
total
to
like
get
all
this
feedback
and
just
make
sense
of
it
and
then
there's
a
buffer
here.
That
is
just
30
minutes,
so
so
he
can.
Basically,
you
know
three
hours,
no
problem.
A
If
he's
going
to
go
beyond
that,
like
we're,
trying
to
figure
out
where
we
draw
the
line
you
know
like,
does
it
make
sense
to
have
to
go
to
the
reviewer,
see
I'm
the
reviewer
on
this?
Does
he
have
to
come
to
me
till
for
30
minutes?
I
don't
know
like
that's,
probably
getting
a
little
bit
too
detailed,
but,
like
you
know
you
can
imagine
on
a
bigger
project
where
you
know
it's
like
a
10
to
15
hour
project
and
somebody's
going
over
by
you
know
four
to
five
hours.
A
Yeah
probably
need
to
get
the
reviewer.
So
that's
the
kind
of
the
next
level
of
detail
you
can
kind
of
see
here
like
this
is
the
next
thing.
This
is
like
how
to
post
a
recommendation
on
the
forum
and
a
comment,
and
so.
A
This
doesn't
seem
like
this
is
the
right
place.
But,
oh,
let
me
go
back
so
pricing
like
questions
about
pricing
and
and
support
these
tool
providers.
This
is
another
one,
it's
two
hours,
so
when
you
roll
it
all
up
the
project,
the
total
project
for
total
token
gating
is
10
hours
and
then
like
a
an
overage
or
buffer
of
an
hour
and
30
minutes,
and
and
I
and
so
I
am
the
reviewer,
so
does
that
make
sense.
A
C
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
think
that
we've
been
making
really
great
progress
and
work
with
with
this,
particularly
because
we
have
to.
We
have
to
have
in
mind
that,
unlike
other
working
groups,
bounties
on
sample
are
probably
more
like
projects
instead
of
like
they
are
not
as
granular
bounties
as
we
have
on
on
many
other
working
groups
on
the
tc.
So,
like,
I
believe
the
document
better
has
been
putting
together.
It
is
really
great
for,
what's
probably
coming
up,
for
example,.
B
B
F
Great
question:
yeah
yeah!
No,
that's
that's
a
great
question
yeah.
I
think
that
would
be
more
of
what
we're
also
thinking
on
planning,
but
maybe
a
little
more
in
the
future
of
retroactive
kind
of
bounties
like
projects
that
people
have
and
how
are
we
gonna
choose
which
one
is
is
viable
and
how
are
we
gonna
measure
the
impact
they
have?
So
I
think
that's
gonna
be
because
I
think
it's
gonna
be
a
little
more
complicated
figuring
that
out
so
yeah
we're,
probably
gonna
focus
on
that,
maybe
a
little
in
the
coming
weeks.
A
A
On
that,
so
so
right
now
the
proactive
ones
are
the
ones,
and
this
is
from
the
perspective
of
sampo
proactive.
That
means
that
sampo
has
promised
to
do
these
things.
So
if
you
go
to
you
know
the
home
and
then
road
map
you'll
see
these
are
literally
what
we
promised
in
our
funding
proposal
worked
with
transparency
working
group
to
build
a
real-time
snapshot
of
all
tc
treasuries.
So
that's
done
right.
All
of
these
were
just
kind
of
like
we
ticked
off.
A
We
did
all
the
ones
we
said
we
would
do
in
june
and
now
we're
working
on
these
it's
going
to
be
tight,
but
I
think
we'll
get
through
most
of
them,
they'll
be
like
probably
one
of
these.
We
won't
or
we'll
be
very
close
on
on
these,
but
you'll
see.
This
is
like
this
defines
all
of
the
projects
that
have
been
approved.
How
did
they
get
approved
because
they
were
part
of
our
funding
proposal
so,
as
bear
said,
the
the
it's?
Not
it's,
not
proactive,
but
retroactive.
A
That's
we
got
to
think
that
through
and
my
guess
is
that
part
of
that's
going
to
be.
You
know
like
if
it's,
if
it's
like
three
four
hundred
dollars
or
three
or
four
hundred
die,
then
it's
like
okay,
we'll
in
it
and
if
it
seems
like
there's
enough
energy
going
and
it
seems
like
it's
supporting
all
of
the
stuff
that
we've
signed
up
for
then
we'll
probably
just
say:
yeah
we'll
do
it.
A
But
if
it's
a
sizable
proposal,
then
we'll
probably
need
to
take
it
to
conviction,
voting
right
and-
and
so
that's
you
know
we'll,
because
we're
starting
to
think
of
sampo
and.
A
As
more
like
a
a
birthing
ground,
like
you
know,
it's
it's
it's
that
will
that
process
will
be
if
it's
sizeable,
we'll
probably
need
to
take
a
conviction,
voting
and
get
feedback
from
the
community,
but,
like
bear
said,
we
don't
know
yet
what
look
like?
That's
something
we'll
be
working
the
next
month
or
so
it's
not.
B
E
A
And
welcome
to
I
don't
know
how
to
say
your
name.
A
A
So,
okay,
let's,
if
there's
no
other
comments
right,
now,
feel
free
to
go
into
the
document
and
add
comments
on
your
own
later
and
with
that,
let's
turn
it
over
to
nate
and
nate.
You
want
to
take
it
away
and
dive
into
your
questions
about
the
treasury
policy.
D
D
I'm
just
going
to
kind
of
go
over
what
I've
put
out
so
far
in
this
just
kind
of
very,
very
rough
draft
and
ask
you
guys
some
questions
and
get
some
feedback
here
in
person,
because
I
do
think
that
right
now
my
mind
is
on
not
only
this
policy
document
but
researching
investment
strategies
and
and
what
is
the
future
of
measuring
managing
a
treasury
as
we
move
forward,
and
so
the
truth
and
policy
document
is
set
out
to
kind
of
just
set
the
stage
for
what
what
our
purpose
is,
what
we
intend
to
do
with
this
treasury
management
and
what
we
plan.
D
D
I
you're
not
on
mute
lobby
so,
but
if
you'd
like
to
introduce
yourself,
you
please
feel
free
to.
E
D
Thank
you.
So,
within
the
trail,
through
and
policy
document,
we
have
our
statement
of
purpose
our
vision,
which
sets
out
you
know
what
we
tend
to
do
and
then
here
we
go
over
kind
of
the
treasury
overview.
D
What
kind
of
are
the
issues
that
we're
facing?
So
the
it's
really
difficult
to
plan
a
treasury
system,
modeling
other
dowels,
especially
because
most
other
dials
have
a
consistent
form
of
revenue
coming
in
and
at
the
moment
we
we
do
not
have
that,
and
so,
as
we
start
to
develop
revenue
generating
practices
within
the
tec,
that
this
document
will
need
to
evolve
with
it.
But
out
here
we're
just
trying
to
outline
kind
of
the
management
goals,
the
operational
considerations
and
an
overview
of
the
d5
mechanisms
that
we're
going
to
explore.
D
And
so,
if
you
have
any
feedback
on
any
of
these
things,
I
would
really
really
appreciate
your
comments.
As
you
can
see
gideon.
I
have
gone
tit
for
tat
on
a
lot
of
the
the
details
of
this
document
and
it
will
be.
It
will
continue
to
be
revised
throughout
this
week
and
I
hope
I
hope,
by
the
end
of
this
week
we
can
get
at
least
a
forum
post
out
of
this
and
and
and
kind
of
present
it
to
the
community.
A
A
Getting
that
you
know
that
lever
in
the
right
combo
of
those
two.
I
think
you
know
there's
like
markets,
you
know
like
some
will
be
like
small
cap,
large
cap
international,
that
kind
of
thing
so
there's
probably
some
element
to
that.
That's
like
the
instruments
laid
out
in
the
document.
A
I
I
personally
think
that
you
know
we're.
We've
worked
so
hard
so
hard
to
raise
these
that
it
we
kind
of
function
as
like
a
little
bit
like
a
foundation
or
like.
What's
it
called
that
a
school
has
like
a
university
has
endowment,
you
know
it's
like
they
work
so
hard
to
build
up
that
cash.
They
have
to
be
super
careful
to
not
squander
it
and
not
lose
it
by
being
too
aggressive
the
strategy.
A
G
Thanks
kidding
yeah,
the
word
that
comes
to
mind
is
just
responsibility
and
getting
mentioned
in
one
of
the
aspects
earlier
about
the
concept
of
fiduciary,
and
that's
really
just
what
you
know
kind
of
resonates
here.
This
is
the
responsibility
and
the
care
for
or
watching
these
funds
for
yeah.
That's
the
principle
I
would
think
of
first
and
past
empty.
C
Thanks
yeah,
I
would
say:
there's
two
parts
to
all
of
these:
I
guess
the
first
one
express
how
we
manage
the
phones
there's.
I
would
agree
with
gain
a
lot
of
responsibility
and
accountability.
That's
probably
what's
more
important
to
these
and
then,
as
far
as
the
funds
themselves,
probably
sustainability.
I
guess
we.
C
We
should
prioritize
for
sustainable
and
mid
to
low
risk
strategies
that
can
sort
of
that
can
sort
of
that
may
not
bring
a
lot
of
revenue
back,
but
we
we
know
for
certain
that
we
can
expect
it
being
sustained
right.
So
yeah
there's
that's
that
I'll
pass
it
over
to
richard.
B
This
may
have
already
been
included
in
one
of
the
principles
that
makes
listed,
perhaps
under
growth
and
resiliency,
but
I
think
just
efficiency
is
important,
so
making
sure
that
we're
making
we're
getting
the
most
out
of
the
dollar
is
spent
and
then,
of
course,
like
ease
of
use
and
access
are
important
too.
So
I'm
just
when
groups
need
need
the
capital
that
it
is
available
at
like
a
regular
cadence.
I
think
those
two
could
be
cool
in
there.
F
F
I
don't
think
it
has
been
done
much.
So
I
don't
think
there's
like
a
lot
of
examples
of
really
good
experiences
doing
this
in
the
way
we
want
to
do
it.
F
That
is
like
decentralized
and
responsible
and
not
yes,
like
focusing
on
return,
but
at
the
end,
focusing
on
being
sustainable
and
not
just
getting
crazy
with
with
what
we're
doing
like
we're,
not
like
a
obviously
you're
like
like
our
main
goal,
is
not
like
investments,
so
you
know
just
like
finding
the
right
measure
to
to
to
be
able
to
do
this
align
to
what
the
tc
is
doing
as
well.
F
E
Hey
yeah.
I
also
think
that
responsibility
for
the
funds
is
a
big
one.
I
think
representation
of
the
the
the
wills
or
desires
of
the
token
holders
is
also
a
really
big
one
and
maybe
not
like
in
the
form
of
a
direct
democracy
where
they're
taking
every
token
holder,
must
vote
on
every
every
area
of
the
budget
every
time,
but
instead
maybe
indirect
democracy,
where
the
token
holders
elect
fund
managers
to
distribute
and
budget
out
funds
in
the
most
efficient
way
possible.
E
I
pass
it
to
who.
D
Yeah,
okay,
yeah,
so
that's
it
and
then
I
don't
know.
Do
I
have
time
for
one
more
open-ended
question
just
to
help
inform
the
development
of
this
video?
Okay,
the
other
thing
was.
If
I
were
to
pose
a
scenario
to
you,
if
say
we,
we
have
our
initial
funding
proposal
for
this
investment
strategy.
We
implement
the
investment
strategy,
everything
works
out
well
and
we
see
the
returns
beyond
what
we
expected
and
say:
there's
an
additional
seventy
thousand
dollars
that
we've
earned
over
the
five
month
period.
D
D
How
much
do
you
believe
should
go
to
the
common
pool
I
just
kind
of
want
to
get
a
little
bit
of
an
idea
of
where
people's
heads
at
of
what
the
purpose
of
of
generating
these
funds
are
for
and
to
kind
of,
I
don't
know,
get
a
framing
of
what
we
should
prioritize
in
terms
of
conveying
this
these
ideas
to
the
community
to
the
rest
of
the
community,
and
so
I
guess,
if
you
have
an
idea
on
this,
just
go
ahead
and
unmute,
and
then
we
can
go
from
there
if
you'd
like
to
pass
it
around,
you
can.
D
If
somebody
just
wants
to
talk
about
it,
we
can
as
well.
So
I
just
want
to
ask
that
one
question.
So,
oh
anybody
want
to
get
us
started.
F
Yeah,
I
think
that's
a
great
question
I
think,
for
me,
probably
is
one
of
the
most
important
ones
to
be
answered
right,
because
is
the
actual
purpose
of
why
we're
doing
this
this
initiative.
So
in
my,
in
my
opinion,
the
way
I
see
it
is
that
we're
trying
to
do
this
as
a
compliment
for
trying
to
make
the
tc
financially
sustainable,
like
what
I
was
saying
before
this
is
not
our.
F
Our
main
focus
is
just
like
a
tool
like
an
instrument
or
some
instruments
that
we're
gonna
use
to
solve,
try
and
make
part
of
the
solution
of
the
of
running
out
of
fonts.
You
know
so
for
me
for
me
it's
that
maybe
in
the
future
it
can
also
change
right.
Maybe
the
way
I
see
it
is
that
probably,
ideally,
these
funds
would
be
used
to
invest
in
more
in
more
public
goods
in
more
projects
to
do
with
token
engineering.
F
C
I
can
say
something
too:
I
think
we
should
try
to
keep
and
reinvest
as
much
as
possible
and
I'm
not
sure,
but
I'm
really
not
sure
how
it
would
look
like,
but,
for
instance,
in
the
case
of
the
gnostics
dao
or
the
daos
that
that
have
a
big
treasury
is
invested,
they
usually
reque.
The
funding
proposal
are
requested
directly
to
the
treasury
managers,
and
so
they
are
the
ones
that
take
the
money
out
of
the
of
the
investments
or
whatever
for
to
fund
whatever
they
they
choose
to
fund.
C
And
so
in
our
case
I
don't
know
how
would
that
look
like,
but
if
we
can
try
to
like,
if
we
could
try
to
make
everything
in
the
tc
with
the
common
pool
money
and
just
leave
the
investments
for
very
specific
things
when
they
are
needed
or
something
I
think,
that's
that's
the
real
scenario
and
probably
just
to
keep
track
and
just
to
cash
out
on
on
on
revenue.
We
could
do.
B
I'm
still
pretty
new
to
understanding
some
of
these
things,
but
it
feels
like
if
there's
state
table
stakes,
projects
that
are
in
the
works
that
need
to
be
done
in
in
the
near
medium-term
short-term
medium-term
future.
I
think
it's
better
to
reinvest
rather
than
distribute
and
then
like
that
can
be
assessed
on
an
ongoing
basis.
So
maybe
that's
how
I
look
at
it.
A
Yeah
I'll
I'll
pile
on
here
yeah.
I
think
I
think
that
there's
some
kind
of
combination
here
of
well,
first
of
all,
I
think
reinvesting-
is
like
figuring
out
a
way
for
this
capital
to
accumulate
and
show
the
community
how
that
works
right.
It's
like
you
know.
If
we
keep,
if
we
don't
accumulate
and
it
doesn't
build
on
itself,
then
it's
kind
of
like
the
whole
purpose
starts
to
dissipate
and
like
it
loses
its
power
right.
A
So
yeah,
that's
what
capital
is
for,
like
it's
really
good
at,
like
you
know,
building
on
itself,
but
maybe
there
is
some
way
to
kind
of
peel
off
a
portion
of
it
to
to
make
this
compelling,
like
actually
in
the
document.
Nate
had
this
idea
of
like
using
it
to
fund
praise
the
reward
system,
and
you
know
that
might
be
I'm
not
sure
how
I
feel
about
that.
But
but
something
like
that
is
tangible
is,
I
think,
good.
A
I
think
one
thing
that
would
be
kind
of
a
mistake
is
if
we
just
if
there
was
some
portion
of
this,
that
was
peeled
off
and
and
wasn't
allowed
to
accumulate
and
we
just
dumped
it
back
in
the
common
pool
and
be
like
you
know,
there's
no
measurable,
like
impact.
Maybe
we
could
report
on
it
and
stuff
like
that,
but
it
just
feels
like
it's
just
like
a
kind
of
like
a
drop
in
the
bucket.
A
You
know
like
especially
initially
it's
not
going
to
be
tons
of
of
money,
and
so
I
think
psychologically,
it's
important
for
us
to
have
a
signal
here
right,
like
one
signal
of
growth
like
capital
growing
on
itself
and
two.
Actually,
this
is
working
and
there's
some
benefit.
That's
pouring
back
to
the
even.
G
Yeah
thanksgiving,
I
I
would
just
say
either
go
ultra
conservative
or
ultra
experimental,
so
or
maybe
a
little
slight
combination
of
the
two
maybe
find
somebody
that
did
start
a
treasury
management
account
with
that.
Does
that
like
like
llama
or
so
that
would
be
an
ultra
conservative
mechanism
and
then
maybe
on
the
other
side,
do
some
really
exotic
yield
bearing
strategy
like
a
personal
urine,
vault
or
what
you
were
talking
about?
G
The
document
with
perpetual
protocol,
some
really
long
heavy
leverage
on
some
position,
but
small
small
pieces
that
are
either
yeah,
either
an
opportunity
to
experiment
or
an
opportunity
to
safely
set
up
a
backstop.
F
Yeah
and
just
to
add
on
to
what
everyone
has
said
yeah,
I
think
it's
important
to
consider
the
compound
interest
right.
I
think
that's
key
thing
on
on
on
investments,
so
definitely
something
where
we
should
be
looking
to
to
get
and
also
something.
I
remember
also
from
nate's
document
this
idea
of
governance
swaps
with
other
dows.
F
I
think
that's
also
really
powerful
and
really
interesting
for
for
us
to
experiment
with,
because
then
you
you're
not
just
looking
into
increasing
your
capital
gains,
but
also
your
social
gains
right,
your
relationships
with
other
organizations
through
investing
in
them
and
and
them
investing
in
the
tc
right.
So
it's
like
win-win
for
everyone,
so
I
think
that's
a
really
noble
approach
that
that
this
space
could
could
allow
so
yeah
pass
it
back
to
unit.
C
I
wanted
to
add
something
really
quick.
I
think
that
something
that
could
be
made-
or
at
least
think
about-
is
making
the
traditional
management
management
itself
sustainable.
So,
but
I
guess
so
like
setting
priorities
to
cash
on
the
investments
and
so
before
thinking
about
returning
to
the
common
pool.
C
D
Yeah
yeah
the
operations
is
one
of
those
things.
That
is,
it's
tough
to
balance
in
terms
of
just
relying
on
the
common
pool
for
these
initiatives,
and
hopefully
those
problems
are
solved
with
increased
volume
into
the
abc
with
the
token
utility
being
created.
But
you
know
these
things
are
far
off
and
so,
when
conveying
to
the
community
at
this
point
in
time,
we
have
some
members
who
are
looking
at
this
as
being
like
hey.
This
is
going
to
get
us
out
of
a
hole
and
keep
us.
D
You
know
propel
us
forward
very
quickly
and
it's
like
well.
We
need
to
learn
how
to
manage
those
expectations
and
making
sure
that
we
convey
this
message
properly
within
the
policy
document
and
then
execute
on
everything
that
we
said
we're
going
to
execute
like
gideon
said
before,
and
so
I
think
these
steps
of
gaining
trust
with
the
community
by
doing
what
we
said,
we're
going
to
do
and
kind
of
tampering
down
the
expectations
and
making
sure
that
everybody
understands
what
is
ahead
of
us,
because
this
is
not
an
easy
thing
to
accomplish.
D
It
really
isn't
I
the
more
the
more
I've
researched
it
and
gone
into
how
other
dolls
are
doing
it.
It's
basically
a
copy-paste
job
and
you
know,
nobody's
really
explored
the
methods
of
how
to
do
this
in
a
decentralized
way,
and
I
think
this
is
something
that
we
should.
You
know
adhere
ourselves
to
to
to
really
to
really
set
this
kind
of
model
up
for
other
dows
to
to
utilize,
and
when
we
do
that
we
have
to
really
set.
You
know,
infinite
time
horizon.
D
You
know
we're,
let's
build
this
infrastructure
piece
by
piece
and
and
get
it
done
correctly
and
don't
try
to
rush
things,
and
so
I
want
to
thank
gideon
for
reminding
me
of
that,
and
but
I
also
I
we
are
getting
at
the
top
of
the
hour,
so
I
want
to
pass
this
back
to
get
in.
If
you
have
any
more
comments,
please
enter
it
into
the
documents.
It's
yeah,
I'm
going
to
be
working
on
it
this
week.
So
thank
you.
A
Thanks
nate,
I
just
actually
I
want
to
just
take
a
moment
to
say
like
thank
you
to
you
nate
for
like,
if
you
weren't
doing
this,
this
would
not
be
getting
done
right
now
and
you're
doing
a
great
job
like
the
document
itself
is
just
so
well
thought
through.
There's,
like
I
mean
some
of
this
stuff.
Like
I
mean
I,
there
were
a
couple
of
months
like
wow.
I
got
to
go.
Look
that
up
right
so,
like
you're,
really
digging
in
and
I
I
love
it,
and
I
think
this
does.
A
A
A
I
think
that
rex
is
going
to
give
us
an
update
on
the
accounting
spreadsheet,
like
where
things
are
going
with
that
and
then
last
week
I
did
kind
of
an
overview
of
like
income
generation.
I
want
to
do
a
follow-up
on
that.
I've
been
thinking
a
lot
about
that
and
how
we
think
about
kind
of
the
economic
layer
of
this
commons
right
and
how
we
start
to
build
economic
policy.
A
That
can
you
know.
So
what
do
we
do
if
there's
a
working
group
that
is
formed
here
and
it
was
formed
based
on
our
funding?
What
is
that?
What
obligations
is
that
does
that
open
up,
and
how
do
we
manage
it?
So
we'd
love
to
get
your
feedback
on
some
of
that
next
week.
So
that's
next
week's-
and
if
you
have
other
suggestions
for
next
week,
just
put
them
right
there
at
the
bottom
of
this
agenda
in
the
next.
You
know:
there's
a
bullet
there.
A
Okay,
that's
it
we're
at
the
top
of
the
hour
or
one
minute
over
damn
it
so
we'll
say
goodbye
thanks
everybody
for
joining
and
we'll
see
you
next
week.