►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - What do you think about death?
17:22 - Decision making guide
43:50 - Status of proposals
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
C
Well,
I
will
answer
and
then
pass
it
yeah.
I
think
that
we
are
sometimes
very
scared
of
death
and
when
we
talk
about
death
as
a
taboo,
we
like
but
value
too
much
the
individuality
that
we
are
that
we
all
have
and
like
when
we
understand
more
death
as
something
natural,
and
that
is
part
of
our
cycle
like.
C
For
me,
it's
interesting
and-
and
I
think
it
should
be
more
normalized
to
talk
about
it
and
also
about
the
beliefs
systems
of
like.
Is
it
there's
life
after
death
or
or
like?
Do
you
think
it's
just
this
and
yeah
it's
it's
just
interesting
to
talk
more
about
that,
and-
and
I
think
we
shouldn't
be
so
much
scared
and
and
not
talk
about
it
as
a
taboo.
I
will
pass
to
levy.
A
A
To
I
don't
know
the
awareness
of
life
and
how
like
fragile
life
can
be,
and
I
passed
to
so
for
everyone
that
just
joined
huanka
has
a
an
intro
question
of.
What
do
you
think
about
death,
we're
kind
of
thinking
about
like
a
minute
each,
because
this
is
a
topic
that
can
go
forever,
but
just
to
have
a
little
taste
and
I'll
pass
to
manu.
D
Thankfully
wow
what
a
great
question,
I
think,
what
you
do
in
life
echoes
in
eternity
honestly,
I
think
about
it
a
lot.
It
really
informs
a
lot
of
things.
I
do,
but
I
mean,
like
the
song
says
you
know
everybody
wants
to
go
to
heaven,
but
nobody
wants
to
die
right.
So
it's
I
think
it's
a
great
transition,
I'm
curious
to
see
what's
out
there
when
the
time
comes.
I
I
definitely
don't
want
to
leave
to
very
old
age.
I
just
want
to
leave
intensely
and
just
punch.
D
D
It's
it's:
it's
pink,
floyd,
stuff
right
there
and
yeah.
It's
just
very
interesting.
I'm
excited
to
see
what
comes
after
and
and
because
I'm
really
interested
in
dreams
too,
and
you
know
dreams
is
like
the
the
small
death
so
yeah.
It's
just
a
very
interesting
topic.
I
could
talk
about
it
for
four
hours,
I'll
pass
it
to
santi.
E
I'm
on
the
cell
phone-
and
I
just
I
was
trying
to
manage
well.
That
is
something
that
really,
I
really
don't
think
of.
Actually
I
had
a
tooth
taken
yesterday
and
that's
what
bothers
me
today
so,
but
no
it
it
always.
It
just
comes
to
my
mind
when
someone
dies
and
I
have
to
go
to
the
funeral-
that's
the
only
time
when
I
sometimes
think
a
little
bit
about
it,
but
usually
I
don't.
E
I
don't
think
about
it.
I
don't
fear
it
either,
but
it's
something
I
just
do
not
do
not
pay
attention
to.
I
had
a
a
very
sad
experience.
We
lost
our
second
kit
when
a
few
years
ago-
and
that
was
probably
this-
the
closest
I
was
to
death,
but
but
no
I
don't.
I
don't
really
think
about
it.
I
don't
pay
attention
to
it.
So
that's
that's
all
I
can
say
and
I'll
pass
it
to
done.
D
F
Man,
I
think,
can
you
guys
hear
me.
I
think
I
had
a
good
relationship
with
that,
we're
friends
and
stuff
I
mean
like
I,
take
it
very
kind
of
chill.
In
a
sense,
I
had
a
almost
killed
myself
the
last
time
I
I
drove
a
car
like
20
years
ago
like
because
actually
a
girlfriend
just
died,
so
it
was
kind
of
like
a
sunburn
in
10
years.
So
I
come
to
terms
with
thinking
about
that,
like
I
don't
know
not
really
afraid
of
it,
not
really
necessarily
looking
for
it
or
anything.
F
I
always
kind
of
like
put
myself
in
over
over
time
put
myself
in
situations
that
yeah,
maybe
other
people
won't
put
themselves
into,
had
like
a
good
tolerance
to
it.
No
allergies
towards
that
she's,
she's,
fine,
she's,
a
good
mistress,
and
I
don't
know
even
so
I
I
I
see
it
as
a
kind
of
like
just
you
know
the
great
shield
just
like
a
moment
of
peace
and
going
back
into
swords,
and
I
had
this
idea
about
like
that's,
not
necessarily
dodging
ever,
and
I
don't
know
I
don't.
I
see
the.
F
I
sense
that
as
a
kind
of
closure,
that's
needed
for
all
living
beings,
so
the
idea
of
immortality
or
whatever
in
in
whatever
sense
that
maybe
is
something
that
really
very
much
interests
me
as
technology
advances
and
whatnot,
so
how
we
are
going
to
approach
that
in
50
years,
100
years
from
now.
It's
something
I
think
a
lot
about
pronouns,
I
don't
know,
cyberpunk
cannot
approach
so
I'll
pass
it
to
nate.
G
Oh,
I
I
feel
I
kind
of
feel
like
santi.
I
I
never
think
about
death.
I
perpetually
kick
that
cane
down
the
road
all
the
time
and
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
it.
I
I
understand
that
there's
probably
a
lot
of
untapped
value
with
having
a
good
relationship
with
thinking
about
death
but
yeah,
not
for
me.
I
I
prefer
to
just
ignore
it,
and
hopefully
it
happens
unexpectedly,
and
I
don't
see
it
coming
so
yeah.
H
Well,
for
me,
that
is
the
only
thing
I
believe
we
don't
know
what
is
going
on.
It
happens.
I
mean,
after
so
as
a
anxious
person.
Someone
who
deals
with
anxiety,
something
that
I
have
I
have
learned
is
that
you
can
only
work
on
what
you
have
and
what
you
know
and
what
I
know
is
life,
and
it's
the
only
thing
that
gives
me
expectations
and
at
least,
if
there's
something
I
don't
know,
I
can
work
on
it.
But
death
is
the
other
way.
B
B
I
think
when
I
do
think
about
it,
it
does
scare
me-
and
I
think
maybe
part
of
it
is
just
the
unknown
aspect
of
it
and
I
think,
as
you
get
older,
maybe
you
become
more
familiar
and
at
ease
with
it
in
general,
just
at
ease
of
not
knowing.
What's
on
the
other
side,
I
guess
and
until
then
it's
kind
of
like
well,
why
you
know
stress
yourself
out
trying
to
figure
out
something
that
you'll
like
there's
no
way
to
know
so
focus
on
the
present.
I
J
J
So
I
think
that
it
is
a
positive
way
of
seeing
it,
because
nowadays
we
we
we
have
like
a
that
taboo
or
we
believe
that
that
is
only
to
to
feel
it
like
in
a
sad
way,
but
there
are
some
things
that
we
can
take
advantage
of.
This
kind
of
thoughts
like
that
like
reminds
us
to
do
we
to
appreciate
the
present
and
be
mindful,
so
I
don't
know
who
else
is
meeting
there,
but
I
passed
to
you
again
if
you
thank.
K
Yeah
thanks
libby
yeah,
I
I
you
know
I
normally
scientific,
so
I
do
not
believe
like
after
this
or
stuff
like
that.
But
what
is
really
awesome
is
like
jeff
vessel's
plan
to
stop
aging
and
growth.
So
I
I
also
think,
like
you
know,
getting
old
as
a
disease
like
you
know,
it's
not
like
you
know.
Normally,
when
you
get
old,
you
get
a
lot
of
disease
and
for
the
way
I
see
it
and
a
lot
of
scientifics
too.
It's
like
these
are
the
symptoms
and
the
disease
is
actually
aging
right
and
yeah.
K
A
A
A
So
I
wanted
to
go
through
this
decision
making
guide
with
everyone
just
to
hear
thoughts
and
see
if
there's
anything
missing
here,
jeff
gave
a
good
feedback
in
general.
I
need
to
integrate
all
the
feedbacks
to
the
proposals
I
posted
by
just
going
wanting
to
go
through
this,
because
I
think
there
was
some
confusion,
especially
with
the
last
proposals
of
like
how
do
we
go
about
this?
What
is
the
process,
and
something
that
I
was
talking
about
with
tim-
is
that
it
would
be
good
to
have
a
visual
for
this.
A
A
What
arrows
to
follow
so
so
yeah?
Maybe
this
one
I'll
expand
a
little
bit,
because
it's
something
that
we
didn't
have-
and
I
just
thought
it
was
lacking
to
have
some
type
of
like
a
formal
understanding
that
we
can
make
decisions
inside
of
the
working
groups.
So
some
of
the
decisions
that
we
have
are
very
like
specialized
in
one
working
group
are
very
like
contained
within
that
working
group.
A
So
the
processes
that
happen
and
emerge
there
for
a
decision
should
be
made
can
be
very
free
by
someone
that
proposes
something
in
the
working
group
and
to
have
a
little
bit
of
a
consensus
check.
And
then
there
is
this.
This
term
quality
consent
that
this
writer
expanded
in
this
paper
consent
and
political
legitimacy.
A
But
it's
quite
like
it's
a
little
bit
dense
to
to
read
at
all,
but
it's
very
nice
like
to
have
a
like
a
political,
political
and
also
blockchain
perspective
of
of
governance
and
the
types
of
consent
that
different
mechanisms
use
not
only
in
the
centralized
governance,
but
also
in
the
traditional
governance.
And
then
she
talks
about
this
quality
consent.
A
So
it's
very
subjective
to
say
what
is
good
or
not,
but
then
there
is
a
base
layer
of
something
not
being
harmful
as
like
as
something
that
we
can
agree
on
easily
and
then
build
up
the
the
quality
of
the
consent.
On
top
of
that-
and
this
is
all
kind
of
like
a
lot
of
theoretical
stuff
on
top
of
something
that
can
be
very
simple
in
practice.
A
That
is
like
mostly
what
we
do
already
like
having
this
house
and
meetings
where
everyone
is
present
and
it's
able
to
voice
their
opinions
and
then,
if
there
is
no
blocking
for
anything
to
happen
once
everyone
has
an
understanding
about
an
idea,
then
that
can
be
moved
on
within
a
working
group.
So
that's
why
I
just
added
this
part
here.
G
So
I
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
I
think
it
would
be
really
beneficial
to
have
kind
of
more
of
a
practical
guide
centered
around
the
technology
that
we
do
use.
You
know
understanding
the
differences
between
like
formal
and
informal
voting
like
if
you're
making
a
decision
within
cons.
Maybe
two
he
wants
to
implement.
Something
doesn't
really
understand
what
the
impact
might
be
within
the
community
but
acknowledges
that
there
might
be
an
issue.
G
You
know:
how
does
he
go
about
finding
that
signaling?
You
know
if
he
goes
through
snapshot.
Do
people
understand
that
we
use
snapshot
for
both
formal
decision
making
and
informal
decision
making
what
type
of
voting
method
he
should
use
for
getting
the
right
type
of
signal
to
inform
his
decision,
whether
he
should
be
executing
it
or
not.
G
These
types
of
things
come
to
mind
when
I
think
about
our
advice
process
in
general.
You
know,
because
there's
a
lot
of
decisions
that
you
might
make
that
you
don't
realize,
may
have
an
impact
with
other
working
groups
or
with
the
community
as
a
whole
and
having
an
easy
way
for
you
to
just
say:
hey,
I'm,
I'm.
I
want
to
this
is
my
intention.
G
If
anybody
has
anything
to
say,
I
want
that
there
be
there
to
be
a
vehicle
for
me
to
be
like
hey
what
about
this?
Oh,
you
didn't
think
about
that.
Okay,
then,
let's
reevaluate,
and
rather
than
just
going
through
individual
channels,
we
open
it
up
to
the
entire.
You
know
community
to
to
to
engage
with
it
and
and
creating
vehicles
for
that
and
making
sure
that
we
as
individuals
as
stewards
of
a
working
group,
know
how
to
use
it
and
making
sure
that
you
know
we're
using
this
process
correctly.
A
A
But
I
just
wanted
to
formalize
something
that
already
happens
and
give
kind
of
a
name
to
it.
And
then
this
creates
an
understanding
for
other
people
that
are
joining
that,
like
that,
it
is
possible
to
make
local
decisions
in
the
local
environment
and
that
if
these
decisions
won't
affect
the
whole
community,
then
you
don't
need
the
whole
community
input
or
if
we
see
that
there
is.
A
Like
if
some
decisions
need
to
be
taken
for
a
bigger
decision
to
exist
and
then
that
this
process
can
happen,
like
kind
of
freak,
friction
last
you
and
then,
if
people
so
the
idea
of
like
sharing
something
in
a
working
group.
It's
also
that
what
you're
saying
like
like
to
use
the
example
of
like
oh,
maybe
chewie-
wanted
to
implement
something
in
comps,
but
then
he
brings
it
to
the
comms
working
group,
and
maybe
he
couldn't
see
that
this
would
affect
a
larger
amount
of
people
and
he
thought
that
that
decision
could
be
taken.
A
Just
in
that
call.
But
then
someone
raises
the
point
of
like
no.
I
actually
think
the
decision
will
affect
more
people
and
maybe
should
be
posted
like
in
the
forum
for
advice
process
and
then
and
that's
why
it
would
be
called
the
map
that
I
was
talking.
That
tam
was
suggesting
because
I
think
having
this
visual
will
help
everyone
to
like
navigate
between
the
possible
types
of
decisions,
and
we
don't
want
it
to
be
super
complex.
It's
the
more
intuitive
the
better
and
I
think
we
naturally
have
these
intuitions
about.
A
Like
some
decisions,
you
know
like
we
need
something,
and
then
we
ask
someone's
opinion
and
then,
if
it
like,
if
things
are
sound
like
we
have
some
level
of
how
do
you
call
this
of
like
a
a
general
understanding?
I
don't
know
of
a
of
a
group
awareness
and
then
it's
also
based
on
trust
that
that
group
is
like
coherent
about
the
decisions
and
then
this
trust
we
build
in
the
culture
and
many
other
practices
that
we
have
been
building
like
together.
G
Yeah,
it
I
mean
it
does.
I
would
just
say
that
you
know
education
is,
is
a
huge
part
of
that
and
knowing
knowing
how
to
to
go
through
that.
So
I
think
a
vigil
is
really
important
and
then
just
having
practical
understanding
of
different
voting
methods
and
and
making
sure
that
the
people
who
are
making
decisions,
you
know,
can
utilize
all
the
tools
at
their
disposal
in
a
responsible
and
effective
way.
A
So
it's
like
an
in-depth
explanation
of
what
each
thing
consists
of.
So
if
someone
needs
more
depth
understanding
it's
also
available
there
and
the
education
part,
I
think
it's
very
fundamental
to
us
as
a
community.
I
think
the
tc
really
like
lifts
lifts
that
flag
and-
and
I
think
the
way
education
works
best
is
like
chatting-
is
person
to
person
interaction
but
then
also
having
documentation
to
support
it.
A
A
I
think
well,
this
working
group
thing
could
also
be
considered
some
type
of
advice
process,
but
more
localized.
So
I
think
another
name
was
just
good
to
separate
things
and
then
I'm
calling
advice
process
whenever
something
goes
to
the
forum,
and
then
I
I
separate
it
into
two
types
of
use
cases,
one
of
financial
proposals
that
will
be
submitted
to
conviction
voting.
So
this
is
optional,
like
we
can't
control.
A
There
is
nothing
like
there
is
only
constructive
things
that
are
elaborated
into
a
possible
solution.
I
think
whenever
that
happens,
this
should
be
enough,
and
that's
why
advice
process
was
created
in
the
first
place
was
to
give
autonomy
for
individuals
in
flat
organizations.
So
is
it's
like?
Oh,
if
I
have
an
idea,
a
proposal,
a
solution-
I
want
to
implement
that.
A
A
Then
either
it
can
be
dropped
or
it
can
be
restructured
or
it
can
be
proposed
to
to
the
whole
community
and
have
more
promotion
that
are
around
it.
I
think
it's
cool
that
advice
process
like
it's.
This
open
path
maker,
instead
of
like
like
one
more
process
into
into
something
or
when
like
how
we
are
doing
now.
A
So
so
then,
when
it's
like
this,
I
think
it's
useful
to
to
have
it
too
and
then
snapshot
use
cases,
cultural
agreements
and
practices
when
it
will
affect
a
large
majority
of
stakeholders.
So
we
we
can
have
recommended
uses,
and
I
think
here
then
it
comes.
What
you're
saying
is
optimus
and
we
can
have
more
discussions
about
this.
A
A
A
So
we
used
for
the
hatched
out
parameters
and
now
we're
gonna
use
for
the
commons
upgrade.
So
it's
something
that
is
built
into
the
dashboard
so
because
tokenlog
uses,
github
and
and
github
offers
this
modularity
of
being
able
to
connect
multiple
things
and
then
get
a
vote
straight
out
of
there.
Then
it's
really
great
to
use
token
log,
and
we
don't
need
to
use
snapshot
for
that,
because
it
would
be
harder
to
connect
everything
in
the
back
end.
A
And
then
the
last
thing
is
crowd
proposal
making.
So
when
we
need
kind
of
like
a
brainstorming
of
proposals
like
we
had
in
most
of
the
cases
that
we
use
token
log.
For
so
when
a
lot
of
people
are
encouraged
to
submit
a
lot
of
proposals,
and
then
we
need
kind
of
a
filtering
through
that,
and
for
that
token
log
works
great
because
we
can
open
this
proposals
on
github
is
easy
to
make
and
then,
after
that,
the
runoff
could
happen
on
token
log,
because
that
would
be
the
more
intuitive
part.
A
Since
we
can
program
like
the
beginning
and
the
end
of
the
vote
and
and
on
token
log,
it
happened
that
people
added
proposals
after
some
time
and
then
that
got
confusing.
So
to
avoid
that
we
can
pass
the
runoff
to
token
lung,
so
that
was
yeah.
That
was
some
of
the
patterns.
I
thought,
and
this
will
definitely
be
easier
in
a
visual
form,
but
I
just
wanted
to
hear
if
there's
any
other
questions
feedback
about
it
and.
K
I
I
think,
like
this
is
amazing
levy.
Like
you,
you
know.
This
brings
a
lot
of
transparency
on
our
processes
and
yeah
I
mean
there
are
details
we
will
still
working
on,
but
I
think
overall
this
was
this
was
super
needed
that
solzista
was
raising
it
long
time
ago
and
yeah.
Thank
you
so
much
for
taking
that
on.
A
Thank
you
yeah,
and
I
think
what
you
said
about
the
quadratic
voting
things
like
that
are
super
important
for
us
to
look
at
on,
like
what
types
of
voting
should
we
promote
or
not,
and
how
to
help
people
to
make
that
decision
and
be
like
educated
about
it,
because,
like
what
you,
what
you
brought
up
of
the
collusion
attacks,
I
wasn't
even
thinking
about
about
it
and
how
that
could
harm
some
of
our
processes.
So
I
think
that
is
really
cool
to
have
like
the
collective
intelligence,
bringing
up
issues.
F
I
had
one
question:
maybe
it's
not
the
time
for
it
just
now,
but
well,
and
one
comment
like
basically
the
main
thing
that
brings
me
here
is,
and
I've
been
participating
most
more
in
the
dc
after
the
hatch
is
thinking
about
the
trusted
seed
and
you
know
like
yeah
the
trusted
seed
of
the
is
from
the
trusted
seat,
and
how
do
we
want
to
get
them
to
participate?
I
feel
kind
of
responsible
from
commons's
tax
side
in
that
sense,
so
communicating
to
them
and
whatnot.
That's
a
big
deal.
F
I
very
much
in
love
with
what
you
just
presented
living.
I
I'm
very
curious
about
it.
There's
already,
maybe
in
your
mind
or
something
that's
brewing
and
will
be
case
by
case
maybe,
but
trying
to
something,
I'm
very
curious
about
is
basically
understanding
the
let's
say
the
target
participation
goal
that
we
want
to
in
any
of
these
cases
of
voting,
and
you
know
decision
making
processes
like.
Are
we
aiming
for
50
of
the
people?
That
hatch
are
we
aiming
for
xxx?
You
know
what
are
the.
F
A
Yeah,
that's
a
very
scary
topic.
I'm
glad
you
brought
up
because
we'll
need
to
figure
it
out
at
some
point
and
we
need
to
decide
how
to
decide
about
that,
like
what
are
the
yeah?
What
are
kind
of
the
parameters
for
token
log
voting,
for
example,
or
for
I
mean
for
snapshot
like
how
much
participation
is
needed
for
a
proposal
to
be
approved,
or
I
like
the
position
griff
has
about
this.
That
is,
we
shouldn't
require
a
minimum
of
participation,
but
we
should
have
a
strict
rule
for
when
something
is
blocked.
A
So
so
we
have
we
kind
of
assume
that
things
are
going
well
until
they
are
blocked
and
and
then
what
we
had
initially
for
the
first
votings
was
15
of
negative
of
of
a
block
is
enough
to
block
something.
So
so
that's
like
yeah.
That
would
mean
like
85
approval,
but
not
necessarily
like
needing
to
have
85
of
the
community
agreeing
with
something
but
just
needing
to
have
15
disagreeing,
and
then
that
would
need
to
be
reformulated,
but
we
should.
We
should
discuss
that
more
for
sure.
F
That's
that's
super
interesting
and
also
interested
in,
for
example,
like
a
more
targeted
approach
to
kind
of
like
funeral
people
into
specific
working
groups.
For
you
know
specific
decision
making
that
doesn't
have
to
go
to
the
core
to
the
whole
of
the
community,
but
say
like
people
that
are
mainly
had
expertise
in
communications
or
interest
in
how
we
communicate
maybe
funeral
that
way.
So
we
don't
necessarily
have.
L
F
Everybody
all
across
the
board
in
all
of
the
senses,
I'm
just
thinking
because
of
the
data
that
we
have
from
common's
tech
side.
That,
of
course
we
are.
We
were
not
able
to
pass
on
to
the
dc,
but
there
are
you
know
things
that
you
know
there's
a
bunch
of
people
with
different
interests
and
different
expertise,
and
that
can
certainly
be
I
don't
know
it
could
be
so
so
useful
if
properly
managed.
F
C
For
that
technical
aspect
and
going
forward
with
it
so
yeah.
I
think
I
think
that
the
75
governance
give
back
is
going
good.
We
haven't
have
any
signaling
from
the
community
on
the
on
the
on
the
boat
so
yeah.
I
think
that
maybe
we
can
have
it
this
this
starting
this
friday,
but
yeah
I
for
sure,
need
to
sink
on
the
things
that
maybe
I
missed
that
were
the
the
the
latest
discussion.
M
Hey
sorry,
yeah,
I
think
the
the
question
that
we
sort
of
batted
around
was
does
this
need
to
be
a
decision
to
the
hatch
tower
snapchat
snapchat?
What
am
I
talking
about
snap
snapshot
and
I
thought
you
know
trying
to
follow
this
decision
tree
and
it's
it's
not
fully
mapped
out,
and
I
I
submitted
a
draft
in
one
of
the
issues,
but
something
like-
and
I
just
maybe
want
to
raise
a
question
with
juan
carlos
too.
M
M
Does
it
require
code
change,
then
it
probably
means
that
this
would
have
to
be
a
decision
for
the
hatched
out
because
it
would
require
it
may
require,
depending
on
the
solution,
changes
to
the
augmented,
bonding
curve,
smart
contracts.
So
I
guess
that
was
sort
of
one
one
thing
that
came
up
out
of
a
discussion
that
we
had
earlier,
where
it's
probably
likely
that
the
solution
would
require
something
fundamental
to
the
hatch
dow,
in
which
case
it
should
probably
be
a
vote
on
hatched
out
I'd
love
to
hear
juan
carlos.
C
Yeah,
I
think
I
I
think,
if
we're
going
to
go
with
with
that
criteria,
yeah.
But
then
the
only
thing
that
I
would
suggest
is
to
post
this
in
the
forum,
because
yeah
that
that's
like
the
place
where
we
like
are
having
this
advice,
process
and
and
actually
yeah
the
the
last
post
that
I
did
was
to
to
propose
that
this
idea
that
I
just
said,
and
to
have
at
some
advice
process
and
and
yeah.
It's
perfect,
so
yeah.
C
If,
if,
if
you
think
that
it's
better
to
be
a
a
dow
boat,
I
don't
have
any
problem
with
it.
The
only
thing
that
I
see
is
that
I
don't
want
to
like
take
too
long
on
on
this
boat,
because,
as
I
understand,
the
implementation
of
the
technical
solution
is
also
going
to
take
some
time
and
and
yeah.
They
want
to
be
sure
that
the
community
is
going
to
be
able
to
welcome
that
amount
of
work
ins
before
doing
it
and
maybe
having
like
a
negative
support
from
the
community.
A
A
A
This
is
what
we
have
so
far,
so
the
idea
is
to
have
a
full
working
product
for
praise,
and
so
we
have
a
few
options
of
like
a
very
simple
change:
do
as
little
as
possible,
because
we
just
want
something
to
move
forward
with
and
then
add
some
product.
That
would
still
require
a
little
bit
of
like
spreadsheet
management
and
stuff.
That
would
be
more
manual
and
then
the
ideal
solution
is
to
have
a
product
that
cover
our
full
range
of
needs.
A
So
we
would
have
praise
source,
cred
and
alexandra
all
plugged
in
there,
and
that
would
even
give
the
space
and
capability
for
us
to
adding
other
reward
systems
in
the
future
if
we
want
yeah.
So
we
have
this
map
here
and
we'll
have
a
call
tomorrow
to
explain
more
in
depth.
Where
are
we
at
and
how
we're
gonna
start
doing
things
and
and
and
building
a
timeline
for
it?
L
I'm
super
bummed
you've
just
told
me
about
this
meeting
that
I'd
like
to
attend
and
I
had
just
scheduled
a
meeting
at
that
time.
Exactly.
I
just
also
wondered
you
know.
I
think
I
saw
you
talk
about
the
alfie
cone
book.
If
that
had
any,
you
know
if
looking
at
that
had
any
impact
on
on
your
thinking
in
terms
of
how
this
works.
A
Yeah,
that
book
is
so
interesting
thanks
for
the
recommendation,
so
we're
looking
more
into
like
the
conceptual
part
of
it
in
the
govern
outs
and
and
then
the
and
the
reward
systems,
research
group
that
we're
gonna
start
there
and
then,
for
here
we
need
kind
of
like
a
solution
asap.
So
we
are
leaving
a
little
bit
of
the
conceptual
the
diggings
aside
for
now,
until
we
have
something
to
move
forward.