►
From YouTube: Impact Hour Intervention Run-off Results
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
B
Yeah,
that
sounds
good.
I
can't
stay
for
long.
So
if
I
can
just
say
one
thing
and
then
I'm
gonna
have
to
jump
in
maybe
five
or
ten
minutes,
so
mostly
listen,
but
just
the
proposals.
There
were
three
proposals
that
reflected
restoration
of
impact
hours
for
paid
people.
B
Tamara's
was
number
four
so
ranked
highest,
but
there
were
some
votes
that
favored
olivia
your
suggestion,
so
whether
or
not
to
factor
that
in
in
any
way
and
how
otherwise
that
sounds
good
and
thanks
for
explaining
clearly
it
sounds
like
a
good
place
to
start.
A
And
then
those
two
are
also
related
with
bad,
for
the
commons
is
bad
for
us
all,
except
that,
instead
of
individual
look
and
all
of
the
paid
contributors
is
suggesting
restoring
40
percent
to
all
contributors
based
on
what
they
are
deducted
now.
B
A
C
So
if
someone
has
been
paid
so
much
money
and
and
and
they
had
so
many
hours
deducted,
then
we
should
multiply
the
amount
that
they
were
paid
by
the
number
of
impact
hours.
They
were
deducted
and
divide
it
by.
Oh
sorry,
we
paid
y
wages
and
so
every
so
it's
every
round.
C
If
they're
paid
something
for
that
round,
then
you
multiply
the
what
they
were
paid
times.
How
much
was
deducted
and
divide
it
by
the
total
amount
that
they
were
paid?
E
Cool
yeah,
I
was
just
gonna,
say
it's
basically
a
scaled
way
to,
rather
than
having
a
lump
deduction.
It's
scaling
it
with
the
amount
that
they
were
paid
in
that
period
relative
to
what
everyone
was
paid
in
that
period.
E
A
C
What
I
would
say
is
that,
like
just
said,
they
all
address
the
impact
hour
deduction
as
the
issue
and
they
address
it
in
a
way.
That's,
like
you,
know,
hey.
We
should
give
back
well,
this
one
doesn't
actually
say,
do
less
deductions.
This
says
spread
it
out
evenly
based
on
how
much
they
were
paid,
but
they
all,
but
it
is
definitely
addressing
that.
A
Then
the
sum
of
them
both
would
be
like
similar
to
what
tham's
proposal
got.
I
would
be
okay
with
going
with
tim's
proposal,
but
I
don't
know
if
that
makes
sense.
A
Yeah
totally,
but
I
mean
do
you
think
so
for
so
tense
proposal
isn't?
Fourth,
do
you
think
that
that
proposal
so
because
this
fork
here
is
so
weird
right?
It's
such
a
light
fork,
but
that
divided
I
mean
this
shoe.
A
E
The
cameras
and
yours
and
jess's
livi
is
that
tamra's
proposing
that
restoring
forty
percent
of
deleted
impact
hours
and
you
propose
sort
of
the
tiered
system
for
restoring
more
for
people
who
work
less
sort
of
thing
right,
but
both
in
the
same
kind
of
ballpark.
A
A
A
Like
a
slight
difference,
and
I
talked
to
a
lot
of
people
in
the
list
to
understand
how
their
work
is
shared
between
one
workload
and
another
and
and
then
I
proposed
like
a
one
by
one
based
on
this
tiers,
and
since
it
was
not
so
many
people,
it
was
like
possible
to
do
that
and
then
just
afford
this.
Exactly
so
proposing
the
same
thing
for
this
one
here,
so
forking
that
and
then
she's
proposing
a
ubi.
On
top
of
that,
to
all
of
the
list
of
seven
impact
hours,.
C
So
the
the
the
challenge
is
that
there's
a
lot
of
subjectivity
in
in
the
individual
piece
that
can
be
very
difficult
to
implement
and
the
nice
thing
I
I
just
gotta
say
for
the
40
just
reduction
like
as
far
as
like
executing
on
it.
There
won't
be
any
questions
about
whether
or
not
this
was
done
correctly.
C
It's
like
here's.
The
number
of
negative
impact
hours
that
were
issued
to
each
person
we're
giving
them
back
40
way
easier
way,
cleaner.
No!
Nobody
if,
if
that
gets
proposed,
so
easy
to
implement
and
execute-
and
everyone
can
say
yes,
this
happened
correctly,
but
if
we
go
one
by
one
and
we're
saying
like
well,
how
much
of
your
time
was
part
of
the
tec?
C
What
are
you
talking
about?
Give
me
back
my
full
impact
hours.
You
know
and
it's
like.
Oh
a
little
dicey,.
E
I'm
just
doing
a
bit
of
math
on
these
just
to
confirm
the
percentage,
because
percentages
are
funny,
because
when
you
go
when
you
go
down
it's
one
number,
but
when
you
go
up
it's
another
number
so,
like
you
know,
seven
is
like
almost
fifty
percent
more
than
five,
but
five
is
only
like
20
or
30
less
than
seven.
You
know
what
I
mean
so
so
there's
a
little
bit.
E
I
just
want
to
clarify
so
when
we
say
restore
40
of
deleted
impact
hours,
so
we
deleted
85
and
now
we
are
restoring
40
of
that
85,
which
is
35,
which
would
mean
that
they
were
left
with
15
plus
35
percent
is
50
ish,
so
they
will
have
half
of
what
they
originally
were
awarded.
Is
that
that
did
I
do
the
math
right
there?
I.
F
Did
the
chart-
and
I
described
exactly
that
because
I
also
didn't
want
to
have
any
confusion,
so
it
says
if
you
had
50
now
you
have
70.
If
you
had
15
percent
now
you
have
49.
Actually,
I
think
was
the
number
and
then
I
included
a
chart
from
everything
between
every
five
interval
between
five
to
eighty.
A
C
I'd
love
to
see
tam's
data
just
to
see
like
if
it
was
a
one
person.
One
vote
poll
for
those
last
ones
just
to
confirm.
F
H
F
F
F
F
C
Now
it's
yeah,
but
it
is
interesting
because
it
says.
C
I
bet
I
bet
this
last
guy
voted
right
after
olivia
took
this
screenshot,
but
before
closed
yeah,
because
there's
this
extra
50
votes
from
kk.
F
C
C
H
A
A
Oh,
but
then
doesn't
it
don't
they
get
back
all
zero.
C
C
A
F
A
A
F
I
almost
feel
like-
maybe
we
just
take
mine
out,
I
say
just
take
it
out
and
let
let
the
one
that
has
the
I
know
it's
easier
and
that's
why
I
mean
griffey
really
convinced
me
that
the
easier
solution
is
the
easy.
Like
is
the
nicest
way
to
do
it,
because
it's
less
time,
but
I
also
feel
like
it's
competing
with
another
one.
F
F
The
one
the
two
that
deal
with
I
mean
I'm
sorry
we're
the
four
that
we're
looking
at
are
do
nothing
the
what
is
it
called
graph?
Yours.
F
The
armageddon
praise
again
wait
which
one's
I'm
sorry
I'm
it's
me
who's
confused.
A
F
A
F
H
F
A
A
For
for
everyone,
or
just
what
what
we're
doing
now,
so
I
thought
that
we
were
going
to
choose
tim's
proposal
because
it's
more
objective,
like
you
said
jeff
but
then
griff.
Did
you
suggest
that
we
look
into
the
data
to
see
if
the
amount
of
people,
if
tham's
proposal
is
also
the
winner
in
terms
of
number
of
voters,.
K
J
C
C
A
A
L
C
I
think
I
think
is
luckily
it
never
happened,
but
I
think
what
that
I
assume
that
the
check
is
like
okay
are
any
of
these
open
proposals.
Did
they
vote
on
them?
We're
checking
off
chain
right
and
then,
if
we
reopened
it,
those
old
votes
would
count
and
their
new
votes
was
count
so
that
one
person
would
have
voted
with
extra
votes.
L
L
E
A
couple
went
in
at
the
last
minute,
one
said
close
your
proposals
to
unlock
votes.
I
don't
know
if
that
was
an
actual
proposal
or
just
something.
Okay,
that
is
on
there.
Yeah
nine.
C
In
fact,
our
deductions
should
be
proportional
that
we
just
paid,
but
I
only
got
29
votes.
I
I
think
we
can
kind
of
ignore
it.
It's
looking
like
most
of
the
people
who
voted,
I
can't
get
good
data.
It's
not
going
to
be
perfect
data,
but
either
way.
C
C
12
people
voting
on
restore
gov
power,
seven
people
voting
on
wrong
tool,
praised
mageddon,
3.36
people,
voting
on
extending
the
deadline,
three
people
three
and
a
half
people
voting
for
tams
2.1
people,
voting
for
justices
and
2.3
voting
for
olivia's,
so
tam
definitely
won
that
on
that
metric
too.
L
L
80-
or
I
don't
know
like
on
the
parameters
when
we
choose,
I
mean
it's
a
softbox
thing
when
we
change
rules
like
on
dandelion
voting
when
we
have
the
dial
on
chain
normally,
we
will
have
like
80
percent
to
change
rules.
L
C
A
A
Doesn't
so
we
have
it,
so
we
have
the
top
four,
I
guess
for
for
the
runoff,
usually
in
the
or,
let's
just
say
for
the
params,
how
we
did
it
was
that
the
proposals
could
be
edited
to
make
information
more
clear.
So
if
there
is
something
that
you
saw
that
you
have
in
your
proposal
that
you
think
oh,
this
could
have
been
like
explained
better.
I
could
have
used
more
time
here
or
something
like
that.
A
They
could
be
improved,
but
nothing
of
the
content
and
of
the
actual
proposal
so
just
wording
in
this
play
and
since
the
four
of
you
are
here,
no
sam
is
not
here,
but
we
can
talk
to
him
since
the
griff,
jeff
and
tim
are
here.
Do
you
guys
feel,
like
you
need
time
to
polish
anything
in
your
proposal.
C
C
Oh,
that's
nice
screenshot
all
the
comments
and
put
them
in
there
for
one
maybe
leave
the
memes
out.
C
A
E
I'd
say
the
memes
are
a
good
explainer
aspect
of
the
proposals.
I
don't
know.
C
L
A
I
have
two
opinions.
One
is
that
for
somebody
that
might
be
looking
so
we're
gonna
promote
this
those
votes
now
we're
probably
gonna,
send
some
newsletters
and
really
try
promoting
it
to
the
wider
community,
and
I
think
that
maybe
is
like
a
lot
to
come
to
a
proposal
and
see
like
a
load
of
of
comments
and
and
memes
and
stuff
that
are
not
like
in
the
body
of
the
proposal.
That
is
what.
C
Yeah,
it's
basically
okay.
Should
we
help
number
one?
Should
we
bring
the
comments
over
because
we
have
to
close
all
of
the
issues
we
have
to
close
the
issues
and
remake
the
issue
so
because
to
get
people
to
reset
the
votes,
so
do
we
move
all
the
comments
over
and
then
how
do
we
move
the
comments
over?
So
if
we
move
all
the
comments
over,
do
we
also
move
over
the
meme
that
we're
in.
E
I
would
say
the
memes
in
the
proposals:
yes,
because
that's
just
an
easy
like
copy
all
and
and
paste
yeah,
and
then
the
other
one
is
like
copying
each
individual
one.
I
I
mean
yeah
if
I
feel
like
most
of
those
memes
are
duplicated
in
the
comments
anyway.
So
if
we
want
to
keep
the
ones
that
are
in
the
proposal
and
not
like
screenshot
20
different
memes
in
the
comments,
then
I
think
that's,
okay,
my
my
initial
thought.
C
E
Is
it
possible
to
just
drop
a
link
to
the
old
issue
like
the
closed
issue?
So
we
can
say
hey
four
comments
from
the
first
round
of
voting
click
here
and
just
add
that,
like
at
the
bottom
of
the
new
proposals
or
something
and
then
people
can
click
through
to
the
closed
ones,
see
the
thread
if
they're
interested,
but
otherwise
we
give
a
fresh
forum
to
discuss
and
just
leave
a
link
where
people
can
go
and
see
the
other.
E
F
F
C
F
I
just
want
to
say:
maybe
we
move
just
the
comments
and
leave
the
memes,
because
the
comments
were
spent.
People
spent
hours
and
time
like
really
a
lot
of
time,
sifting
through
the
data
to
make
these
comments
somebody
who's
coming
in,
especially
if
we're
doing
this
wide
outreach
will
get
so
much
more
context
from
community
opinions
and
discussion
about
this
than
if
they
just
have
to
sort
of
look
at
it
for
the
first
time,
and
then
it
I
mean
this
is
a
thing
right.
It
takes
time
to
digest.
F
It
takes
time
to
all
of
this
analysis
has
already
been
done
by
our
community.
We
should
offer
it
to
people
who
are
going
to
come
to
make
a
decision
we're
expecting
to
make
a
fast
decision
right.
Like
hey,
you
got
the
weekends,
do
it
do
it
now,
but
I
I'm
ambivalent
about
the
memes
they
can
come
or
they
cannot
come.
M
Think,
well,
I
would
say
that
it's
not
necessary
to
to
add
all
the
comments
back
again.
M
But
if,
if
you
decide
to
to
to
copy
the
comments,
then
I
I
would
say
like
yeah,
the
memes
on
the
comments
are
not
are
not
necessary
to
be
passed
on
and
and
yeah.
Also.
I
think
that
that
could
be.
M
It
would
be
good
to
have
like
a
tldr
for
each
proposal
because,
as
as
levy
said
like,
there
are
a
lot
of
comments
and
a
lot
of
content
in
the
proposal,
and
it
would
be
really
easy
to
have
like
a
one-liner
two-liner
explanation
of
what
really
is
the.
C
So
wait
so
you
would,
you
would
say,
no
no
comments,
you
wouldn't
move
any
comments
or
you'd
move
the
comments
with
the
text
and
not
the
memes
or
you'd
remove
all
of
them.
L
I
mean
I
would
move
the
comment
for
sure
and
the
memes
I
think
we
can.
I
think
I
mean
I
I
think
songs
are
a
bit
meh,
but
I
think
I
think
overall
the
memes
are
meant
to
be
fun
and,
as
jeff
was
saying,
they
also
helped
to
explain
the
content,
so
I
yeah,
I
would
put
them,
I
think,
they're
good,
but
we
can't
just
post
them
again.
You
know
like
I
would.
L
C
C
Okay,
cool
yeah
and
I'm
I'm
anti-all,
but
that's
okay,
looks
like
there
are
four
four
pro
comments
so
that
that
sounds
like
the
win.
Zeptimus
were
you
down?
Well,
I
guess.
First,
we
have
to
who's
who's.
Gonna
submit
all
the
proposal.
Oh
emojis
in
the
titles.
Should
we
standardize
the
titles?
E
C
C
Okay,
so
we
have
jeff
is
pro
emojis
okay,
so
let's
lay
out
the
options
again,
there's
emojis
and
same
titles,
but
everyone
gets
emojis
same
titles
or
what
I
would
propose
is
that
we
standardize
the
titles
with
a
number
and
a
very
short
like
like
two
to
four
words
max
description
of
the
of
the
of
the
thing:
that's
what
we
did
for
the
last
param
runoff,
where
it's
like
number
83,
simple,
whatever
right.
C
F
M
Yeah,
I
would
go
for
standardize
and
if
you
want
someone
to
post
them,
just
one
person,
maybe
I
could
do
it
too,
because
also
what
we
discussed
is
that
names
also
did
somehow
like
influence
on
the
on
the
decision.
Definitely.
C
C
A
L
Oh
the
pressure
I
I
normally
like
people
have
creativity
and
freedom,
so
I
would
let
them
use
emojis
or
whatever.
They
think
it's
good.
C
C
Okay,
so
it
sounds
like
wonka
you're
down
to
repost
everything.
Maybe
I
would
recommend
that
everyone
figure
out
their
emojis
like
tam.
Do
you
want
to
figure
out
your
emojis
and
would
you.
C
K
A
M
M
Like
yeah,
the
the
the
maximum
hour
to
post
them
again
and
yeah,
I
I
think
that
it's
up
to
the
proposer,
if
they
want
to
make
some
changes
from
here
to
the
to
the
time
of
the
proposal,
maybe
just
changing
some
words
or
something.
C
E
Yeah,
I
probably
could
the
description
is
below
a
lot
of
the
information,
so
I
could
probably
do
a
tldr
of
the
proposal
at
the
top.
A
E
I
can
I
can
edit
the
closed
proposal
and
just
send
the
paragraph
or
whatever
to.
E
A
E
A
Have
a
timeline
for
that?
Are
you
guys.
E
F
F
C
C
But
I
can
just
what
I
can
do
is
I
can
fix
it
really
quick,
but
it
has
no
impact
on
anything.
I
see
the
problem
and
it's
just
it
only.
It
only
changes,
a
line
that
didn't
impact
anything.
A
Tim,
do
you
have
anything
that
you
would
like
to
change
in
your
proposal?
I
think
yours,
the
title
was
pretty
much
the
tldr
right.
A
M
But
for
the
commons
is
bad
for
us
all
is
times
one
okay,
perfect,
I'm
clear
on
that.
A
L
C
H
C
A
Okay,
guys,
I
have
to
go,
and
I
know
it's
super
late
for
tim
and
also
for
you,
griffin
zap,
but
you
guys
are
at
the
party
mood.
So
we
can.
We
can
close
this
call.
Thank
you
so
much
everyone
for
sense
making.
That
was
great.
I
think
we
got
like
in
a
good
place,
and
so
next
steps
is
jeff.
That
needs
to
send
some
info
to
one
still,
and
hopefully
we
can
get
those
out
in
the
next
hour
or
so
like
still
get
the
run
up
run
off
going
tonight
and.
A
A
F
F
C
C
C
C
F
Are
you
doing
the
test
now
closer
to
knowledge.
C
C
C
Like
jeff,
what
would
you
say,
harmony
or.
C
J
H
C
Really,
four
questions
right:
it's
like
does
being
around
a
lot
of
new
people,
drain
your
battery
or
charge
your
battery.
That's
extroverted,
introvert
right
so
who
feels
charged
when
they're
around
a
lot
of
new
people.
N
C
Okay
and
then,
and
so,
who
feels
their
battery
is
drained
like
they
need
alone
time
to
recharge
them.
I
also
need
a
lumper
wow.
I
don't
need
a
long
time,
but
that's
the
other
extreme,
and
then
do
you
like
to
communicate
in
abstract
terms
like
metaphors
and
stuff,
or
do
you
like
talking
of?
Do
you
like
talking
about
abstract
concepts,
or
do
you
like
talking
about
what
happened?
Who
like
what
who,
where
when
and
like
this
is
going
to
happen,
or
this
happened
like
do?
You
prefer
abstract
who
prefers
abstract.
F
C
F
Yeah
sometimes
it's
fact,
sometimes
it's
concept
right,
like
abstractions,
but
in
the
middle
they're,
both
pleasurable
and
they
both
serve
a
different
function
at
a
different
purpose.
Right
anyway,
sorry
go
on
with
it.
C
Who
prefers
concrete,
like
this
happened?
Yes
fd?
I
think
that
makes
sense,
and
then
so
that
would
be
us
people
who
prefer
concrete
and
ends
people
who
prefer
abstract
and
then
who
yeah
and
then
like.
Actually,
my
favorite
question
is:
are
you
would
other
people
say
that
you're
too
hard
on
people
or
too
soft.
N
C
N
N
A
C
Oh
so
the
challenge
here
is
that
it
all
these
letters
depend
on
each
other
right.
So
if
you're,
if
you're
an
n,
then
the
order
is
more
for
your
abstract
world
right.
You
need
order
in
your
abstract
world
and
if
you're
an
s,
then
you
need
order
in
your
external
world
so
for
s's.
C
Actually,
the
dominant
combination
is
s
in
in
p
or
j.
If
you're
an
sj
you're
a
guardian
and
there's
a
whole
class
of
the
guardians
are
more
similar.
If
you're
an
sp,
then
you're
an
artisan
and
that
and
those
are
more
similar,
but
for
ends
the
more
concrete,
the
more
like
stronger
division
is
idealists
and
rationals
and
f's
or
nts,
and
so
so,
if
you're,
an
n,
the
p
and
the
j
is
a
little
fuzzier.