►
Description
TheSoftgov Working Group researches and applies best practices for governance, social collaboration and contribution rewards while implementing Ostrom’s 8 principles for governing the commons in its foundation.
We gather every Tuesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Liviade
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
C
A
A
A
It
made
me
feel
like
the
culture,
the
mainstream
culture
is
just
collapsing
and
just
seeing
so
many
interesting
funny,
I
don't
know
what
to
call
interactions
and,
and
then
I
was
curious
to
what
do
you
guys
think
of
how
is
mainstream
this
idea
of
mainstream
or
the
media,
as
we
know
today,
going
to
change
once
we
have
more
decentralized
communities
and
and
the
world
is
ruled
by
daos.
I
don't
know
in
this
utopian
future.
Can
you
imagine
what
the
media
would
turn
into
and
what
would
that
do
for
our
culture.
E
I
was
just
going
to
say,
like
it
will
be
like
something
that
it's
really
happening
in
you
know
in
youtube,
and
everything
like
people
start
to
create
their
own
content,
and
people
will
just
see
the
content
they
are
liking
to
see.
But
at
the
same
time
I
think
there
will
be
like
actually
like
it's
also
happening
now
like
there
will
be
people
with
a
lot
of
followers
that
will
have
like
huge
power.
D
I
largely,
I
think
I
think
we
still
have
the
same
problems.
I
I
don't
see
decentralization
or
taos
changing
our
obsession
with
celebrity
culture
or
changing
the
way.
Information,
I
think,
will
have
more
misinformation
and
I
think
that's
problematic.
D
And
so
I
don't
really
think
we
can
get
rid
of
that
problem.
I
think
that
is
very
much
a
human,
a
human
urge
that
we
cannot
get
rid
of.
It
has
to
be
learned
over
time
and
that
whole
thing
got
me
so
mad
not
because
of
the
whole
thing
that
happened,
but
because
it
interrupted
quest,
love's
award
afterwards
for
getting
an
award
on
his
documentary
about
the
blues
birth,
and
I
was
like
such
a
great
award
for
him
anyway.
F
Thanks
nate
yeah,
I
remember
that
once
I
asked
a
question
to
send
like
hey:
how
do
you
see
the
future
and
he
said
like
I,
don't
see
one
future.
F
I
see
multiple
futures
coexisting,
so
I
don't
think
that
this
culture
around
media
and
celebrities
will
be
erased
completely,
but
I
think
that
there
will
be
other
other
culture
arising
that
will
coexist
with
this
with
the
celebrity
culture
and
like
everyone
will
choose
in
which
culture
would
they
like
to
be
living
in
and
yeah,
it's
not
that
that
there
will
be
like
one
future
for
all,
but
it's
it.
It's
like
in
this
present
moment.
F
There's,
oh
and
in
the
present
moment,
will
will
be
coexisting,
the
future
and
the
past
at
the
same
time,
yeah.
Maybe
I
go
to
ethereal
but
but
yeah.
I
I
think
that
in
the
present
like
I
am
seeing
time
not
so
much
like
a
line
but
like
a
continuous
present
and
maybe
in
the
future,
we
will
go
back
into
into
some
of
of
ancient
things
so
or
what
we
consider
ancient
things
in
this
present,
but
yeah.
It's
just
my
thing.
I'll
pass
through
manu.
G
G
As
one
future
anyway
regarding
the
question,
oh
man,
society
is
spectacle
right.
It
is,
I
don't
know
it's
it's
it's
weird.
It's
just
been
accelerated
by
by
social
media.
We
become
this.
This
objects
for
consumption
and
yeah,
like
nate
said
you
know,
celebrity
culture,
it's
it's.
It's
an
ideological
thing
that
it's
not
gonna,
be
solved
by
bonding
curves
or
cultural
builds
actually
by
cultural
builds.
It
might
I
I
take
that
back.
I
think
it
is
a
cultural
thing.
G
I
don't
know
I
long
for
the
times
of
simpler
men.
I
think
it's
it's
a
lot
of
pretense
right
now.
G
Curiously,
what
I
like
about
dreams
is
that
there's
no
pretense,
you
know
if
you
see
someone,
that's
maybe
all
all
adorned
in
the
very
beautiful
clothing
or
or
you
know
a
suit
or
very
beautiful.
You
can
sense
if
that
person
has
healing
content
towards
you,
but
in
spanish
I
mean
in
reality,
as
we
say
in
spanish
right,
we
see
the
faith.
We
cannot
see
the
heart,
which
is
why
I
think
dreams
are
even
more
real
than
this
matrix,
but
that's
even
more
ethereal
than
what
funka
said.
G
I
just
think
there's
a
lot
of
pretense
inside
in
celebrity
world
and
being
fame
famous.
I
think,
there's
a
point
where
you
can
change
people's
lives
and
have
a
platform
through
fame,
but
I
think
it's
also
corrosive,
so
I
I'm
ambivalent
about
it.
I
think
the
things
that
I
want
to
do,
I
might
it
might
be
useful
to
be
famous,
but
at
the
same
time
it
just
opens
the
door
to
places
that
I
do
not
know.
If
I'll
have
the
you
know
moral
tenacity
to
control
anyway,
that's
that's
too
long.
H
Hey
thanks
yeah,
I
guess
my
first
thought
was
less
about
like
celebrity
and
more
about
media
and
what
I
think
is
interesting
about,
like
media
right
now
versus
like
a
possible
decentralized.
Future
media
is
like
we
have
these
kind
of
legacy
channels
that
have
become
kind
of
the
gatekeepers,
and
so
there's
only
like
a
couple,
different
versions
of
events
that
are
out
there.
You
know
each
of
them
kind
of
have
different
flavors,
that
is
in
the
u.s,
and
I
can
see
like.
H
It's
just
like
this
multiple
futures,
it's
everyone
is
kind
of
living
in
their
own
hyper,
tailored
kind
of
set
of
entertainment
and
facts
and
and
culture,
and
that
you
know
could
contribute
to
like
polarization
and
stuff.
But
I
don't
know
it's
just
really
interesting
and-
and
I
think
a
decentralized
media
would
be
a
little
less.
H
How
do
you
say,
like
everything
is
based
on
the
ad
model?
Now,
so
you
know
people
criticize
crypto
for
being
hyper
financial,
but
I
think
it's
just
explicit
right
so
like
because
they
don't
have
ads
that
are
trying
to
sell
you
stuff.
H
E
B
So
yeah,
I
guess
I
my
thinking
is
not
too
far
from
what
what
you
were
sharing
ben's
immediately.
It
brings
to
mind
a
number
of
things
as
soon
as
you
post
the
question
livia,
you
know
the
first
one
is
taos
right,
like
will
dao's
change,
what
we're
seeing
being
this
trend-
and
I
don't
think
gals
are
necessarily
the
solution
for
the
wealth,
inequality,
that's
growing
and
that's
part
of
the
problem,
and
I
don't
think
it's
a
solution
for
media
consumption
and
I'd
say
those
are
the
two
main
drivers
or
two
main
drivers.
B
B
This
amazing
book
called
amusing
ourselves
to
death
around
how
people
are
trending,
and
this
was
like
in
the
60s
right
trending
towards
lulling
themselves
into
particular
states
by
their
consumption
of
amusements
media
things
that
things
that
are
abused
them,
but
don't
actually
trigger
it
more
deep
thought
process
and
then
later
in
the
80s
mcluhan
has
this
quippy.
You
know
his
catchphrases.
B
The
medium
is
the
message,
and
you
know
this
idea
is
the
effect
that
media
has
on
human
senses
on
how
we
perceive
the
world
and-
and
we
now
fully
live
in
an
attention
economy,
and
we
fully
are
paying
attention
to
the
things
that,
like
the
things
that
we're
paying
attention
to,
are
rewarded
for
it.
B
So
the
more
that
we
consume
those
media
that
sort
of
we,
you
know
we
want
to
criticize
the
the
better
it
is
for
them,
actually
we're
we're
contributing
to
that
to
that
importance
of
those
of
that
culture
by
even
paying
attention
to
it
and
yeah.
You
know
we
have.
B
B
I
Thanks,
so
I
don't
really
know
how
how
I
feel
about
that,
like
there's,
definitely
going
to
the
web.
3
space
is
definitely
going
to
have
an
impact,
and
that
I
don't
know
if
it's
going
to
be
more
positive
negative.
I
What
I've
been
thinking
is
a
few
months
ago
I
was
reading
something
I
don't
remember
about
how
the
internet
and
social
media
was
sort
of
these
competition
to
more
traditional
media,
motivational
media
and
the
media
was
sort
of
forced
to
play
this
attention
game,
and
so
the
news
and
everything
they
posted
the
phrasing
and
like
the
structure
of
of
the
content
and
the
immediate
self,
was
made
more
to
attract
attention.
I
So
you
know
to
get
revenue
then,
for
the
sake
of
the
information
per
se,
and
so
I
think,
with
the
web.
3
space
has
a
shot
on
providing.
I
Making
a
mechanism
with
where
the
incentives
are
more
aligned
with
information
per
se
than
the
the
attention
or
or
other
things
that
are
driving
the
media
now,
but
that
doesn't
mean
that
we
are
going
that
we
are
going
to
end
up
with
better
information.
I
guess
because
that's
my
main
concern
or
sort
of
the
quality
information
or
the
source
of
stress,
like
I
think
quankas
point-
is
a
really
good
one,
but
anyways
as
the
world
is
more
globalized
and
we
are
more
connected
together.
I
I
I
don't
think
as
well.
Dials
are
necessarily
the
the
component
that
we
changed
that,
but
I
think
the
web
3.
The
word
with
you
could
could
do
something
great
about
that.
I
think
I'm
the
last
one.
A
Hey
batman:
welcome.
Do
you
wanna
we're
just
passing
this
question
around
how
how
will
the
media
change
if
we
live
in
a
downward
society?
If
you
wanna
answer
that.
A
J
Okay,
once
again,
let
me
just
open
this
yeah
I
mean
I
literally
just
saw
the
how
they
go.
The
presentation,
as
I
hope
for
my
computer
but
yeah,
but
I
agree
I
think
dao's
will
make.
They
may
not
be
the
main
tool
that
will
change
the
society,
but
they
will
definitely
be
one
of
the
tools
that
will
have
direct
impact,
and
I
think
I
mean
it's
going
to
change
everything
you
know
like
once.
We
learn
that
we
can
self-govern
ourselves.
J
Like
you
always
say
you
know
olivia
that,
like
you
know,
we
have
the
money
that
we
call
the
taxes
and
we
give
it
to.
You
know
small
group
of
people,
so
they
can
use
it
to
rule
the
majority
and
I
think
they
will
be
have
the
that
will
be
the
core
element
they
will.
They
will
have
other
and
a
core
change
and
yeah,
and
I
think,
like
the
whole,
like
I
mean,
I
believe
that
you
know.
After
the
first
world
war,
empires
fell
apart
and
republics.
J
Were
you
know
established
like
where
I
come
from
is
a
great
example.
Ottoman
empire
fell
apart
and
then
turkish
republic
came
into
being,
but
I
I
think
now
we
live
in
a
time
where
democracies
and
republics
are
gonna,
crumble
into
pieces
and
taos
are
going
to
emerge
into
existence,
whether
it
being
you
know,
a
community
on
the
internet
or
like
a
like
token
engineering,
community
or
or
tesla
google.
I
think
we're
gonna
see
smaller,
bigger,
any
form
of
organization.
You
know
turning
into
a
dao
and
and
declaring
the
independence.
J
So
I
believe
it's
an
exciting
time
and
also,
I
wanted
to
say
something:
I've
been
reading.
The
notes
like
there's
a
lot
of
I
see
that
a
lot
of
people
are
still
using
the
language
of
the
future
like
web,
like,
for
example,
some
people
mentioned
that
web
3
will
change
the
future.
I
think
it's
present
like
it
is
changing
everything
already.
A
For
this
point
and
hey
chewie,
welcome
just
an
interest
of
time
I'll
start
on
the
agenda,
but
if
you
want
to
share
for
like
20
seconds,
what
do
you
think
of
like
if
the
media
will
change
if
we
live
in
a
doubt,
rural
society?
That's
a
question,
a
good
question
for
you.
What
comes
oh.
K
Oh,
I
have
20
seconds
for
this.
It's
unfair
I
could
get
so
politic
about
it,
but
yeah.
I
feel
that
every
tool
works
in
like
according
to
its
own
like
time,
and
I
mean
at
one
point.
There
was
like
all
of
this
like
hype,
also
around
like
web
2
and
and
facebook
and
twitter,
and
all
of
these
new,
exciting
ways
to
communicate
with
each
other
and
how
that
served.
K
The
purpose,
but
now
I
mean
media
but
like
media,
can
manipulate
information
much
much
easier
on
the
internet
right
now
than
how
they
did
it
in
the
in
tv
and
traditional
media.
So
I
feel
that
I
mean
it's
it's.
K
It
could
be
interpreted
as
a
small
look,
but
I
what
I
do
really
love
about
everything
going
on
right
now
is
the
amount
of
of
just
heart
and
and
soul
that
people
are
putting
into
this
and
how
people
believe
in
in
in
you
know
like
taking
action
now,
rather
than
just
like
pointing
trouble
in
in
you
know,
like
sharing
opinions,
I
feel
that's
gonna
be
like
the
small,
huge
difference,
but
I
mean
it's
we're
we're
we're
human
so
like
in
the
end,
we'll
always
find
a
way
to
like
corrupt
ourselves,
but
that,
at
the
same
time,
will
take
us
to
new
paths
of
coming
up
with
new
ways
to
strengthen
that,
and
I
think
there's
like
a
beauty
to
that
process.
A
But
cool
yeah
thanks
everybody.
A
I
think
my
perception
of
how
I
receive
from
from
mainstream
narratives,
but
the
first
point
in
our
agenda
is:
I
wanted
to
draft
some
action
items
from
the
console,
so
we
had
this
big
discussion.
A
That
would
be
interesting
to
explore
a
little
bit
more,
so
I
chatted
with
ygg
a
little
bit
because
he
had
elaborated
on
the
idea
that
nate
and
I
shared
of
like
what,
if
we
had
consortiums
that,
could
help
token
engineering
projects
and
still
create
some
type
of
revenue
model
for
the
tc.
A
A
What
types
of
working
groups
would
be
which
working
groups
would
be
involved
offering
what
type
of
services
like?
I
think
this
was
the
the
idea
that
made
more
sense
and
you
felt
like
there
was
a
good
feeling
about
it
from
everyone,
but
I
don't
know
if
there
is
any
blocking
opinion
to
like
even
looking
more
into
that
or
if
we
are
going
to
look
more
into
that
where
to
start.
D
So
I
think
that,
though
the
idea
of
requiring
anybody
who's
requesting
services
to
simply
do
a
one-time
purchase
of
tec
to
hold
in
the
treasury
doesn't
give
as
much
benefit
as
it
would
be
to
require
them
to
pay
for
these
services
into
tokens,
because
I
I
just
don't
yeah,
I
just
I
think
creating
utility
around
the
bonding
curve
is
the
the
ultimate
goal
with
this
in
terms
of
outside
of
providing
the
actual
services
to
to
kind
of
generate
that
economic
activity.
D
I
think,
if
we
just
like
say,
hey,
buy,
do
a
one-time
purchase
and
hold
it
in
your
treasury.
It
doesn't
really
benefit
the
tec,
all
that
much
even
if
we
do
require
them
to
purchase
it
from
the
bonding
curve,
but
we
can't
really
require
them
to
do
anything.
So
it's
it's
one
of
those
things
that
I
just
I
keep
coming
back
to.
A
If,
if
we
request
them
to
mint
the
tokens
they
would,
I
mean
they
would
passing
by
the
bonding
curve,
we
would
receive
a
tribute
and,
and
that
would
that
would
provide
a
bigger
liquidity
to
the
token
it
would
probably
it
would
probably
bring
the
price
up
and
we
would
have
the
the
tribute
fee,
and
maybe
there
is
a
balance.
That's
what
I
was
saying.
Maybe
there's
a
balance
of
like
part
of
that
can
be
payments
for
services
and
part
of
that
could
be
holding
in
the
treasury
or
like.
H
I
guess
you,
don't
you
don't
necessarily
so,
if
you're
concerned
about
like
trying
to
like
make
or
dictate
what
people
can
pay
in.
H
Whatever
the
tribute
of
buying
into
the
bonding
curve
would
be
so
like.
If
it's
a
two
percent
tribute
they
want
to
pay
in
x,
die,
it
would
be
like
the
full
price,
but
then,
if
they
wanted
to
pay
in
tec,
then
they'd
get
like
a
two
percent.
D
So
if,
if
you're
trying
to
say
I
want
to
give
a
discount
like,
I
really
do
think
you
know,
we
should
be
like
hey
in
terms
of
value
alignment
by
if
you're
going
to
pay
these
people
for
the
work
that
they're
doing
pay
for
it
and
tec
tokens
directly
from
the
bonding
curve
minted
from
the
bonding
curve
and
pay
them
yeah
it
make.
We
can
take
the
the
cost
for
each
individual
to
be
a
little
less
to
to
match
up
with
that,
because
the
percentage
is
not
two
percent.
D
It's
like
what
16
now,
so
I
don't
know
what
the
end
do.
We
know
what
the
ends
percentages
are
going
to
be.
H
I
guess
I
was
thinking
like
if
they
paid
an
x
die
or
whatever,
whoever
received
the
payment,
could
mint
off
the
bonding
curve
using
the
x
die.
F
I
think
that
it
would
be
interesting
that
we
say
to
that
other
dow,
like
they
have
to
mint
tc
according
to
the
amount
of
the
service,
and
then
they
send
the
dc
to
the
to
the
working
group
and
then
the
tc,
the
the
the
working
group
can
decide
if
they
want
to
hold
the
tc
or
change
it
and
like
change
it
to
x,
die.
F
And
if,
if,
if
we
do
this,
we
can
have
benefit
from
both
the
entry
tribute
of
the
dow
that
acquired
the
service
and
also
the
exit
tribute
of
maybe
the
working
group
changing
some
of
the
dc
for
for
stable
coins.
A
K
Hey
libby,
I'm
sorry,
I'm
a
little
bit
distracted.
I
miss
some
of
the
some
of
the
points,
but
we
were
just
discussing
in
the
in
the
previous
communications.
Call
that
we're
actually
gonna
like
go
ahead
and
start
like
testing
this
for
the
animation
team.
We
are
making
like
a
new
proposal
that
is
gonna,
be
using
just
a
fraction
of
the
of
the
funds
that
were
purposed
originally
and
the
idea
is
to
have
I
mean
regarding
deliverables
from
the
animation
team.
K
We're
gonna
have
the
reward
system
quantification
process,
but
we're
also
gonna
be
doing
some
bounties
in
one
hype.
Tv
and
there's
also
like
some
interest
in
shape
shift.
So
the
idea
is
that
the
first
three
gigs
or
bounties-
let's
call
them.
The
idea-
is
to
request
these
payment
in
tec
tokens.
So
the
first
three
projects
external
projects
that
this
animation
team
works
on
are
gonna,
be
paid
in
in
in
tec,
so
yeah.
K
We
I
mean,
adding
on
top
of
this,
that
there
is
a
legitimate
interest
by
this
team
to
get
more
involved
and
participate
in
the
governance,
since
they
haven't
really
had
a
chance
to
get
a
more
significant
amount
of
tec
tokens.
Yeah
we're
just
gonna,
be
trying
that
and
see
how
how
it
turns
out,
but
but
yeah.
I
feel
that
I
mean
it's
it.
K
It
could
be
much
much
like
improved
and
there
are
like
some
ideas
that
come
to
mind,
but
I
feel
that
taking
that
first
step
with
people
that
have
integrated
to
our
cultural,
build
is
is
going
to
be
just
like
a
new
experience
for
the
community
as
a
whole,
so
so
yeah.
I
feel
that
there
are
a
number
of
different
things
that
we
can
in
ideas
that
we
can
get
for
providing
services,
starting
with
this
change
around
the
animation
and
video
production
team.
A
B
Thoughts,
sort
of
at
the
end
too,
I
guess,
there's
a
few
things.
I
think
that
there's
going
to
be
different,
evolvements
of
working
groups
into
service,
providing
dows
and
there's
sort
of
this
incubation
period,
where
it's
actually
the
tec,
funding
the
working
group
and
then
there's
going
to
be
the
period
where
the
servicing
dow
is
funding
itself,
and
so
for
the
first
case.
B
You
know
something
could
be
very
interesting
where
the
you
know
the
payments
are
in
tec
tokens.
Of
course.
I
think
that
really
makes
a
lot
of
sense
for
a
number
of
reasons.
B
First
of
all,
to
get
communities
that
are
engaging
with
token
engineering
commons
to
value
the
token
engineering
commons
as
a
public
good
to
the
entire
token
engineering
community
and
then,
and
that
maybe
goes
straight
into
the
commons
pool,
but
that
in
later
phases
where
the
dow
is
self-sufficient,
something
like
20
or
10
percent
or
whatever
the
right
figure
turns
out
to
be
sort
of
as
a
kickback
to
the
tec
or
as
a
donation
to
the
tec
or
as
an
acknowledgement
to
the
tec
in
tec.
B
Tokens
might
serve
the
same
purpose,
but
also
yeah
sort
of
show
the
importance,
or
you
know,
model
the
importance
of
supporting
this
commit
this.
This
comments
as
a
public
good.
D
E
Okay,
I
really
don't
like
like
this,
like
the
service
that
was
like,
then
having
to
pay
back
the
dc.
I
think
that
would
go
like
I
mean,
of
course
like
if
they
want,
they
can't
just
give
donations,
but
as
a
free
engines
like
like
with
us
individuals
when
we
go
on
bitcoin
or
giveth
or
whatever,
but
yeah,
I
really
think
it
should
be
like
up
to.
D
Yeah-
and
I
I
tend
to
agree
with
you
in
the
terms
of
like
I-
want
people
to
be
free
to
execute
on
their
own
work
and
get
paid
for
their
own
work
without
having
to
give
a
cake
back
to
the
tec,
but
then,
if
you've
used
funds
to
get
startup
capital
for
for
your
your
venture,
if
you
will
to
to
provide
services
from
the
tec
and
you're
using
that
startup
capital
to
generate
funds
for
individuals,
I
think
that
is
something
that
we
need
to
have
checks
and
balances
for,
and
even
if
it's
as
small
as
like,
requiring
that
they
paying
tokens
like
that
is
something
that
keeps
that
entry
of
small
group
of
people
aligned
with
the
mission.
D
Otherwise,
then
people
are
just
going
to
be
like
hey.
I
need
some
some
money
to
provide
services
for
me
and
just
provide
services
for
whoever
they
want
and
then
keep
the
keep
the
profits
for
themselves.
I
I
think
they
have
to
disagree
there
or
like.
I
think
it
depends
a
lot
on
the
case.
I
It's
like
is
the
tc
funding
me
or
is
the
tc
paying
for
something
the
tc
needs
because,
like
at
least
on
the
individual
level
like
if
I
do
something
that
the
tc
needs,
because
dc
thinks
that
it's
going
to
provide
some
value
and
the
value
should
I
don't
know
how
to
say
like
you
should
you
should
see
the
value
sort
of
coming
back
itself
rather
than
me
having
to
pay
back,
because
I'm
providing
a
service,
I'm
not
getting
funded
by
the
tc,
and
I
think
that
applies
as
well
to
to
subdials
like
unless
they
are
asking
for
funding
in
a
way
that's
for,
like
I
am.
I
I
am
like
a
separate
entity
from
the
tc
from
the
beginning
and
I'm
just
asking
for
some
funds
to
get
kickstarted.
That's
one
thing,
but
if
I'm
providing,
if
I
am
small
grilled
and
I'm
just
providing
a
service
that
the
tc
thinks
that
is,
that
has
some
value.
I
don't
I
don't
see.
Why
should
I
give
it
back
if,
at
some
point,
I
decide
to
to
go
like
my
old
god.
D
E
But
then,
in
the
other
way
like
we
could
you
know
the
tc
could
have
take
their
own
services
like
they
could
offer
to
people
under
the
brand
of
tc
and
those
services
could
be
paid
in
tc,
and
that
would
you
know,
create
economy
activity,
and
that
would
be
one
way
to
fund
the
community
because
you
are
creating
goods
like
being
used
for
other
people
and
they're
paying
for
it,
like
any
other
service,
and
this
is
yeah
like
how
economies
work
like
you
have
different
economy
agents
and
they
interact
between
each
other
and
actually,
when
they
interact
between
them,
like
they
are.
I
On
that
same
note,
I
just
want
to
add
that
I
think
also
the
services
that
the
tc
provides.
I
guess
this
is
more
a
personal
opinion
and
just
to
see
how
the
discussion
goes,
but
I
think
this
comes
back
to
the
boundaries
of
within
subdials
and
the
tc,
like
I'm,
not
sure
how
I
feel
about
every
sub-dial
providing
a
service
being
sort
of
required
to
provide
the
service
in
like
in,
in
close
connection
to
the
tc.
It's
like
going
back
again
with
with
an
individual
example.
I
If
chewie
decides
to
make
a
particular
job,
for
I
don't
know
for
one
hive
or
whatever
he's
well
is
more
than
anything
a
member
of
the
tc,
even
he
may
be,
even
though
he
would
be
contributing
a
bit
on
other
places.
If
he
goes
to
one
hive
for
a
job,
he
is
not
required
to
get
paid
in
tc,
and
so
I
think,
probably
not
not
services,
especially
if
the
service
itself
is
not
aligned
with
the
mission
of
the
tc.
A
Yeah,
sorry,
I
didn't
want
to
expand
so
much
more
in
this
discussion.
I
just
maybe
just
to
wrap
up
a
few
points
that
we
have
here.
I
think
first,
there
is
no
expectation
that
the
working
groups
would
be
providing
a
service.
There
are
like
there
can
be
many
many
models
of
of
working
groups
and
what
is
the
purpose?
They're
they're,
achieving
or
they're
serving
within
the
community.
But
since
this
question
has
come
up
of
some
working
groups
having
been
delivering
services
to
this
community
to
other
communities
and
this
funding.
A
Aspect
of
it,
how
do
we
do
it,
and
I
think
I
need
to
draft
it
more.
I
think
this
point
with
ygg,
but
the
idea
was
not
to
only
request
this
services
to
be
paid
in
tec
tokens,
but
to
have
some
type
of
agreement
with
projects
that
are
aligned
and
that
could
benefit
from
having
like
an
umbrella
of
services
being
offered
that
could
have
a
lower
cost
for
who's
offering
and
for
who
is
receiving
and
then
part
of
that
agreement
being
having
this
locked
tokens
or
having
to
mint
tac
tokens.
A
More
is
like
partnerships
of
projects
that
are
aligned
having
tc
in
their
treasury
and
creating
this
type
of
like
trust
and
mutual
help
relationship,
but
maybe
there
there's
a
lot
more
that
needs
to
just
be
drafted
and
be
put
in
an
eloquent
way,
and
then
I
think
there
was
great
points
here
too
and
understanding
the
what
are
the
directions.
We
don't
want
to
go.
What
are
the
directions
that
are
seeming
like
open
and
possible.
D
No,
I
just
yeah,
I
think
that
you
know
we.
We
have
this
mental
mindset
of
traditional
markets
and
how
they're
supposed
to
operate
and
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish
is
developing
a
commons,
and
I
don't
think
you
know
the
the
framework
of
looking
at
it
as
a
commons
is
a
different
mindset
than
than
the
one
we're
traditionally
used
to
thinking
about.
And
that
doesn't
you
know
the
market.
Free
market
concept
looks
at
the
tec
as
a
client
and
it
shouldn't
look
at
the
tec
as
a
client.
D
We
are
all
part
of
the
tec.
We
are
all
part
of
the
token
engineering
commons
and
I
think
that
we
play
a
dangerous
game
when
you're
able
to
basically
come
in
and
use
funds
that
were
meant
for
token
engineering
and
advancing
the
fields
of
token
engineering
and
use
it
for
your
own
ends.
D
And
that's
that's
what
you
get
when
we
look
at
it
in
this
free
market
model,
where
you
can
just
go
and
do
anything
you
want
and
not
to
say
on
an
individual
level
but
as
a
group,
and
so
I
just
think
that's
something
that
we
need
to
keep
an
eye
on
and
maybe
articulate
a
little
bit
more
in
depth
about
and
to
evaluate
so
I'll
try
to
post
something-
and
maybe
I
can
get
some
engagement
around
it.
A
A
I
don't
think
this
is
happening
now
that
the
tc
has
been
communicated
as
or
like
communicated
as
a
client,
but
maybe
it
has
been
seen
as
a
client
and
that's
a
good
clarification
to
make,
and
I
think
we
we've
been
making
that
clarification,
but
yeah.
That
would
be
great
if
you
could
elaborate
more
on
that
nate
and
anyone
that
has
thoughts
on
this.
A
Maybe
let's
try
to
write
it
down
and
have
it
more
concise.
So
we
can
understand
next
steps
and
how
to
move
forward
with
all
the
thoughts
that
came
in.
A
And
then,
finally,
I
just
wanted
to
share
this
governance,
cleanup
that
I'm
doing
in
the
forum
and
see
if
this
makes
sense.
A
A
So
it's
just
explaining
a
little
bit.
What
is
my
impact
decision
medium
and
large
and
then
I'll
put
this
graphic
in
all
of
them
and
then
having
advice
process
be
used
just
for
financial,
technical
and
cultural
proposals
in
the
forum.
A
A
F
I
think,
maybe
from
the
twitter
team,
we
can
also
make
some
kind
of
of
like
relationship
to
this
post
so
because
yeah,
maybe
all
the
information
is
there,
but
we
also
need
people
to
go
there.
So
yeah,
maybe
having
some
engagement
with
this
forum
thread.
E
Actually,
I
was
having
a
discussion
with
ratio
he's
making,
like
you,
know,
monitoring
all
the
advice
process
and
then
saying
which
of
these
advice
process
went
through
a
proposal
both
even
in
surveillance,
that
shot
conviction
voting
and
then
it's
important
actually
to
be
consistent
with
the
title
like
because
there
was
one
at
least
one
decision
that
I
was
doing.
That
was
one
title
and
advice
process.
That
was
the
same
decision,
but
it
was
a
different
title
and
snapshot,
and
that
was
confusing
so
maybe
like.
E
We
could
have
also
like
a
cultural
thing,
but
we
are
consistent
on
the
yeah
just
the
title.
It
would
help
so
much
to
the
transparency
actually.
E
A
G
I
have
just
a
thing:
there
is
currently
an
issue
about
collaborating
with
communities
to
create
awareness
around
proposals,
so
I
just
wanted
to
take
a
couple
minutes
and
see
if
we
can
just
crowdsource
a
couple
of
ideas
from
people
about
how
can
we
bring
this
forward
and
it's
actually
related
to
to
to
the
last
point
I
think
one
guy
mentioned
around:
how
do
we.
A
We
have
discuss
this
a
little
bit.
I
think
we
just
need
to
make
a
decision
on
how
we're
going
to
go
about
it.
A
I
think
some
of
the
options
were
having
a
few
people
that
are
dedicated
to
looking
at
all
the
proposals
and
then
signaling
them
or
bringing
to
the
community
call
or
writing
comments
like
what
are
some
consistent
ways
that
we
could
engage
with
proposals
and
bring
to
everyone's
awareness,
and
then,
I
think,
also
organizing
the
forum
will
help
a
lot
even
for
us
to
track
what
is
going
on
and
what
there
will
be
like
a
new
proposal
for
conviction,
voting,
a
new
proposal
for
towel
voting
and
I'll
a
new
one
snapshot,
and
that
will
also
be
visible
in
the
forum,
as
of
now
is
all
in
the
same
category.
A
E
L
G
Yeah,
honestly,
no
no
expectations.
I
just
think
I'm
growing
and
I
keep
doing
what
I
like
and
being
valuable
to
my
community,
and
I
mean
sharing
all
my
days
with
all
you,
wonderful
people
that
I
admire
and
learn
a
lot
from.
So
I
I
don't
I'm
already.
I
already
got
what
I
wasn't
didn't
even
know
I
wanted
so
I'm
cool,
so
just
send
me
whatever
good
energy
and
I'll
amplify
it.
Somehow,
thanks.
A
Hope
you
get
everything
you're
wishing
for
thanks.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
everyone
for
joining
today.
I
would
love
some
help
to
organize
this
agenda
into
like
possible
action
points.
If
anyone
wants
to
help
me
with
that,
that
would
be
very
appreciated.