►
From YouTube: TEC Sprint 2 Planning
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Intentions and distractions
10:15 - Overview
18:45 - Gravity
28:20 - Onboarding
38:20 - Comms
01:02:38 - Paramms
01:13:10 - Garden Swarm
01:14:02 - Legal
01:20:00 - Transparency
01:22:47 - Soft Gov
01:36:57 - Sprint goal
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Shall
we
do
some
quickish
round
of
check-ins
and
then
get
started
I'll
start
well?
My
intentions
are
to
have
an
awesome,
sprint
planning
session
and
to
to
take
a
look
at
our
roadmap
to
review
our
roadmap
and
to
think
about
what
we
want
to
accomplish
for
the
next
two
weeks
to
plan
it
and
then
just
deliver
it.
I
have
no
distractions
at
all,
so
I'm
good
and
I'll
pass
to
olivia.
B
C
D
D
E
E
Yeah
just
get
some
things
on
the
board
catch
up
with
the
pm
site.
I've
been
really
deep
in
the
distribution
this
week
to
promote
everything
and
trying
to
get
back
on
track,
and
maybe
looking
at
delegating
some
of
the
project
management
so
that
I
can
focus
more
on
the
content,
production
and
distribution,
and
I
don't
have
any
distractions
except
half
of
a
bagel
and
I
will
pass
it
to
santi
unless
he
went
during
my
refreshing.
F
Hello
guys,
I
also
was
listening
to
libby
with
some
problems.
I
I
don't
know
if
it
looks
like
it
may
be
her
okay,
anyway,
intentions
just
sing
with
everyone
get
that
that
board
ready
for
the
next
sprint
and
distractions
a
big
storm
here,
and
hopefully
I
don't
have
internet
connections
while
we're
having
meeting
I'll
pass
it
to
zeptimus.
H
Hello,
everyone
it's
to
get
to
know
what
everyone
has
been
planning
for
the
next
sprint,
also
and
see
if
I
can
help
in
anything
besides
my
own
onboarding
working
group
and
my
instructions
is
like
the
same
with
everybody
who
is
in
barcelona.
There
is
a
kind
of
a
weird
shady
weather
here
today,
so
it's
quite
like
you
know,
if
you
hear
any
weird
sound,
it's
probably
coming
from
the
hell
of
a
wind
that
it's
shaking
everything
and
and
the
other
sections
I
just
came
up
from
a
work
meeting.
H
I
Hi,
my
intention
is
to
find
a
spot
on
the
sprint
board.
I
already.
I
think
this
is
where
I'm
supposed
to
be
talking
about
how
to
help
with
the
onboarding
flow
for
people
to
the
new
discord
that
we
don't
have
yet,
and
my
distraction
is
I'm
hungry
and
I
just
put
some
pizza
in
the
oven
and
it'll
be
out
in
about
10
minutes.
I
I
I
I
J
K
E
C
K
Yeah
well,
I'm
here
well,
as
you
know,
griff
I'm
I'm
trying
to
get
a
hold
of
what
you
guys
are
working
on
in
in
tech
and
well
legal
is.
I
I've
been
like
in
form
of
what
you
guys
do
here,
so
I
just
wanted
to
jump
in
and
and
try
to
get
some
semantics
of
what
the
community
is
working
on,
and
I
mean
regarding
distractions
yeah.
K
I
mean
probably
like
that
like
run
to
the
door
or
the
other
day,
I
was
in
in
the
middle
of
a
meeting
and
there
there
was
like
a
loud
noise
outside,
and
I
thought
that
that
someone
fell
or
something
like
that
and
I
had
to
run
so
yeah.
I
mean
it's
yeah,
it's
like
pretty
much
like
incidentals
like
that,
but
yeah
I'm
living
on
my
own.
So
it's
it's
not
common
to
have
a
like
distractions,
but
they
just
it's
weird.
They
happen
to
they.
A
G
J
Your
internet
sounds
so
good,
though
craig
so
good,
so
yeah
intentions
for
the
call.
I
am
very
excited
about
this
sprint
planning,
I'm
so
inspired
from
that
last
call.
I'm
like
hi
right
now,
I'm
kind
of
forgetting
what
we're
even
here,
to
do,
but
distractions,
I'm
quick
trying
to
quickly
label
everything
with
next
sprint
so
that
I
can
so
it
gets
on
the
board
and
but
yeah
other
than
that.
I'm
pretty
much
here.
A
A
A
A
A
I
will
encourage
everyone
now
to
take
a
few
minutes
to.
If
you
have
an
issue
that
is
finished,
that's
closed.
Can
you
just?
Can
you
guys
close
it
out
now,
so
we
can
just
see
what
we
have
left
and
then
we
can
maybe
go
through
some
make
sure.
I
already
checked
everything
for
next
sprint.
That's
already
closed,
so
that
we
probably
want
to
re-plan
some
of
the
things
that's
still
in
progress.
I
I
A
A
E
Was
just
gonna
ask
a
question
him
and
I
think
a
lot
of
these
are
mine.
I'm
still
catching
up,
I'm
working
on
them.
Now
too,
I
just
I'm
closing
stuff,
you're
very
close
to
being
done
as
well,
and
then
I
wanted
to
ask
you:
did
you
create
any
new
issues?
Are
the
repeating
issues
we
have
to
create
them
new
or
is
somebody
doing
those
like,
for
example,
the
news
blog
like
that's
a
repeating
task?
So
should
I
go
and
open
an
issue
or
is
somebody
else
creating.
A
Okay,
so
here's
what
I'm
gonna
do.
I'm
gonna
move
everything
back
into
the
sprint
backlog
and
while
I'm
doing
that,
will
you
everyone
here
choose
the
top
two
or
three
priorities
for
your
working
group
and
if
they're
not
already
tagged
next
sprint,
then
please
tag
them
next
sprint
and
keep
in
mind
the
top
two
or
three
priorities,
but
everything
you
think
should
go
into
the
next
sprint.
Can
you
start
tagging
them
next
sprint?
I
I
I
I
E
I
I
E
G
I've
been
in
contact
with
him.
He
doesn't
seem
to
need
support.
I've
offered
support
griff
may
no
more,
but
it
seems
like
he's
close
to
doing
what
needs
to
be
done
to
start.
The
migration
to
the
tec
would
be
better
if
he
were
here.
I
can't
necessarily
speak
for
him
other
than
like
he's
the
one.
That's
doing
that.
I
have
no
knowledge
or
activity
there
until
it's
ready
to
come
to
the
tec
side.
A
E
C
C
C
C
A
I
I
C
C
No
all
the
roles,
all
the
rules
I
mean,
and
there
is
a
document
where,
where
it
says
like
community
standard-
and
this
is-
and
these
are
the
responsibilities
of
the
committee
steward
and
there
are
other
roles
that
are
like
subject
matter
expert.
So
I
like
suggested
this
new
role
to
add
to
that
document.
C
I
I
A
A
C
B
Sorry,
that's
what
you
were.
I
think
I
didn't
understand
right
before,
but
yeah.
We
definitely
need
to
update
that
document,
but
I
think,
as
we
have
now,
I
actually
looked
at
it
with
them
the
other
day
and
it
seems
pretty
up
to
them,
so
we
would
just
have
to
move
to
a
better
place
rather
than
the
document
that
nobody
sees.
I
A
All
right,
let's,
let's
move
on
cool
sorry,
I
didn't
mean
to
take
up
some
and
then
the
terms
and
conditions
do
you
think
you'll
have
time
to
do
just
look
at
any
of
these
today
and
I
might
need
some
help
with,
I
guess:
livia
the
terms
and
conditions
or
maybe
griff
terms
and
conditions
which
ones
are
the
ones
that
are
ready
for
each
of
the
us.
The
working
groups
to
have
a
look
at
them.
A
A
C
A
A
All
right,
excellent
yeah.
So
when
we're
doing
this
print
planning,
we
we
sort
by
next
sprint
so
that
we
see
the
each
of
the
issues
that
the
working
group
has
tagged
for
next
sprint
or
somebody
belongs
in
the
next
sprint-
is
tagged
for
next
sprint.
So
if
we
don't,
if
it's
not
tagged
with
that,
it
may
get
lost
during
the
sprint
planning,
it's
just
sort
of
a
way
to
to
prioritize
outside
of
the
large
product
backlog,
cool
thanks,
juan
carlos
eduardo.
Should
we
do
onboarding?
A
B
H
A
I
H
H
E
H
H
H
A
I
I
A
H
I
H
H
A
A
H
A
There
was
one
that
was
crea.
Okay,
I
think
the
one
that
I'm
thinking
of
is
actually
not
in
on
burning
it's
actions.
So
can
we
wait
until
we
get
there
actually
yeah
because
it
has
to
do
with
it
had
to
do
with
using
the
one
hive
model
for
onboarding
journey
and
channels
and
discord
to
to
to
use
as
a
model
for
tec
and
that
one
was
under
communications,
not
under
onboarding?
So
let's
wait.
A
J
I
J
A
E
I
feel
like
there's
cool
there's
some
work,
that's
still
getting
reflected
on
the
board,
but
that's
also
okay.
It's
things,
I'm
handing
off
like,
for
example,
this
week
I
talked
with
sean
because
I've
been
it's
been
a
lot
of
time
actually
to
do
like
the
promotion
and
distribution
for
tec
labs.
So
he
is
now
going
I'm
giving
him
the
twitter
powers,
and
I
gave
him
the
graphic
templates
and
he
said
I
asked
him
because
you
know
I
don't
want
to
take
away
time
from
like
coding,
but
he
said
he's
cool.
E
He
has
a
bandwidth,
so
I'm
gonna
hand
off
that,
because
the
promotion
yeah
was
turning
into
kind
of
a
lot
more
with
these
various
collaborations
that
are
being
spun
up,
so
that
will
help.
But
that
was
something
that,
like
wasn't
on
the
board,
that
took
up
quite
a
bit
of
time
this
sprint
but
yeah.
Sorry,
I
think
I've
updated
most
of
everything,
I'm
on
the
verge
of
shipping,
these
two
articles,
other
than
that.
E
E
E
E
J
I
J
I
E
I
already
have
a
call
with
her
about
submitting
a
proposal,
so
I
figured
I'd.
Do
it
all
at
once,
and
since
I
have
probably
you
know,
I
have
a
good
relationship
with
her.
I
thought
we
could
just
tackle
it
in
the
same
call
two
for
one
and
I'm
working
with
her
for
something
else
as
well.
So
I'm
I'm
already
doing
I'm
doing
the
talking.
E
And
then
I'm
gonna
drop
everything
with
like
I'm
trying
to
hand
off.
I
guess
the
the
bigger
project,
like
somebody
needs
to
own.
The
new
discord
you
know
like
chris
is
owning
the
back
end
set
up.
I
am
owning
like
the
content
supporting
the
onboarding
or
somebody
else
can
can
own
that
and
I'm
happy
to
give
it
all
up.
I
just
figured
I'm
talking
to
angela
anyway
I'll
ask
her.
E
I'm
in
the
middle
of
trying
to
find
a
calendar
spot.
I
think
I
should
talk
to
her.
I
think
next
week,
because
I
want
to
get
her
yeah.
She
said
end
of
january
she's.
She
wants
to
submit
the
proposal
so
next
week,
I'm
I'm
back
and
forth
with
her
right
now.
Okay,
thank
you,
griff
that
helps
to
clarify,
because
yeah,
I
guess
I
was
just
a
little
bit
stuck
on
like
it
feels
like
a
big
thing,
but
yes,
we
only
have
to
do
one
thing.
E
I
A
E
A
E
I
E
E
It's
not
on
the
board,
it's
new
and
yeah.
If
anybody
else
griff
or
jake
have
any
other
thoughts
on
content
pieces
coming
up,
I
kind
of
just
need
to
sit
with.
Let
me
go
look
at
this
roadmap.
I
think
for
content
pieces.
I
just
need
to
look
at
the
roadmap
and
identify
what's
the
priority.
I
would.
I
would
also
wanted
to
bounce
off
of
griff
and
santi.
E
I
guess
the
main
blocker
is
not.
I
guess
we
could
start
to
work
on
how
to
become
a
hatcher
piece,
even
a
draft,
because
the
c-stack
token
dap
will
be
getting
finished.
Is
my
understanding
this
week.
For
me,
that's
the
biggest
content
piece
is
missing
right
now,
it's
missing
from
the
welcome
to
the
tc.
E
E
I
E
E
A
Yeah,
I
think
more
shorter
pieces
will
be
more
digestible
yeah.
So
would
you
this?
This
goes
into
this
print
too
cool.
What
about
these
three
that
I
think
were
assigned
assigned
to
craig?
I
don't
know
craig
if
you
want
to
jump
in
on
these.
These
were
in
the
last
print
too,
but
I
don't
I
don't
know
those
we
are.
I
E
I
G
I
G
A
E
Yeah,
that's
a
good
question.
Maybe
we
need
to
talk
to
chris
and
dan
craig
to
uncover,
like,
I
guess,
there's
a
question.
Maybe
around
legally
like
are
the
trusted
seed
members,
an
asset
of
the
common
stack,
and
can
we,
as
the
tec
quote-unquote,
get
it
from
them
or
do
we
need
our
own
process
to
collect
data
and
email
information?
Maybe
that's
a
blocker,
but
I
think
it
just
needs
like
a
touch
with
dan
and
chris.
We,
basically,
what
we're
trying
to
do
is.
We
would
like
to
have
either
mailchimp
or
hubspot.
E
Hubspot
seems
to
be
the
better
choice
so
that
we
can
do
outbound
push
campaigns
leading
up
to
the
hatch
to
provide
the
tec
members
with
information,
because
it
cannot
all
be
done
from
the
common
stack
side.
Anything
related
to
you
see.
We
need
our
own
hubs,
but
we
need
our
own
mailing
system
and
we
will
need
to
do
like
a
mass
communications
for
sending
out
articles
leading
up
to
the
hatch.
A
I
E
E
That's
pretty
easy
right
craig.
You
can
just
cross,
compare
the
trusted
seed
list
to
your
tec
list,
but
can
we
like?
Is
there
going
to
be
any
legal
issue
if
we're
taking
the
assets
of
the
comstock?
I
don't
know,
I
don't
actually
know
if
there
is
even
an
issue.
Maybe
it's
not
a
concern,
but
chris
would
know.
G
G
J
The
blocker
is
that
we
need
to
ask-
and
I
don't
know
that
it
made
this
seat
deck
sprint,
and
I
don't
know
if
anyone
else
who
is
that
on
the
common
stacks,
but
the
plan
was
that
we
would
ask
we'd,
send
out
an
email
to
ask
everyone
if
they
want
to
opt
in
to
get
sharing
their
information
with
the
tec
and
this
these
are.
These
are
like
you
know.
We
have
to
do
a
better
job
of
separating
the
common
stack
from
the
token
engineering
commons,
and
this
is
part
of
that
process
of
saying.
J
I
J
E
J
I
E
E
That
should
that
should
solve
that,
and
then
we
can
work
on
the
actual
moving
the
data.
But
then
this
will
have
to
do
sorry.
We
still
have
to
do
a
retro,
the
people
that
are
already
in
it
to
go
back
and
send
an
email
to
ask
them
dan
asks
the
trusted
seed
to
opt-in
and
levy,
update
the
form,
two
separate
issues,
and
then
we
can
move
on
with
the
tec
crm.
G
I
E
E
A
I
E
Disclaimer
for
proposals-
oh
yeah,
that
was
when
I
had
written
a
question
in
for
olivia,
so
I
did
kind
of
my
part,
which
was
to
do
the
disclaimer,
but
then
she
now
is
doing
some
other
work.
That
has
actually
changed
that
work
or
you
know
this
issue.
I
think,
is
closed.
I
did
kind
of
my
part
and
then
livy
is
taking
it
forward
and
then
asking
me
for
like
feedback
here
and
there.
But
that's
I
don't
know
libby
if
that's
a
separate
issue
and
we
can
close
this
one.
E
E
This
was
okay.
What
happened,
I
think,
was
we
didn't,
have
the
advice
section
fully
fleshed
out,
so
in
the
meantime,
I
was
going
into
the
proposal
template
to
write.
You
know
what
happens
after
you
submit.
This
is
like
a
pre-approval
process
where
you
get
feedback
and
yada
yada
yada,
then
libby
started
realizing
that
the
better
solution
was
to
flesh
out
the
advice
section
and
we're
still
in
process
of
figuring
out
the
best
way
to
have
these
form
sections
and
represent
the
content.
E
So
it's
kind
of
ongoing
forum
fixing
the
proposal
section
so,
however,
to
represent
that
in
issues,
I'm
not
sure
to
me.
This
issue
is
closed.
It
has
now
become
a
new
issue
which
is
kind
of
more
ongoing
of
fleshing
out
the
proposal
section
and
adjusting
the
templates
and
libby
is
doing
her
thing
with
like
how
she
wants
to
run
the
governance.
B
Oh,
I
see
thanks
for
clarifying.
There
was
just
that
moment
that
we
talked
in
the
avoiding
working
group
that
was
like
during
the
calls.
Also,
you
know,
to
tell
people
when
we
are
awarding
their
proposals
that
like
hey
this
is.
This
might
not
be
the
final
version
of
the
proposal
that
will
go
to
the
comments,
so
it
was
also
kind
of
like
a
verbal
disclaimer
when
people
were
submitting
the
proposal
and
then
like
telling
them.
I
I
A
I
E
Yeah,
that's
a
good
point
yeah.
It
was
just
the
understanding
of
what
happens
next
and
that
you
are
submitting.
We
don't
know
what
how
much
money
we're
gonna
raise
so
submit
what
you
want.
This
will
help
to
guide
our
minimum
for
the
race
and
then
they
you
know
telling
them.
You
will
go
back
once
you
get
feedback
gather
feedback
from
the
community
and
then
once
the
dow
is
live,
you
can
see
how
much
we
actually
raised
and
then
resum
you
know,
submit
your
request
to
the
actual
dao
and
and
ask.
A
E
I
D
J
D
I
J
J
D
J
D
J
I
C
J
F
J
J
J
D
D
J
D
E
Yeah
I
mean
to
really
understand
and
have
kind
of
like
a
tldr,
a
high-level
overview
of
the
prems.
I
think
that's
something
that
could
be
really
interesting:
yeah,
it's
creating
a
huge
value
for
the
entire
ecosystem,
and
I've
mentioned
it
to
sherman
as
well,
and
she
may
be
interested
to
support
the
documentation.
J
I
mean
I
feel
like
we
for
the
hatch,
because
we
have
all
these
parameters
documented
in
the
forum
there's
a
little
bit
of
cleanup
there.
That
can
be
done,
but
probably
the
big
next
push
on.
This
will
be
next
sprint
like
the
sprint.
Hopefully
we
can
polish
the
the
cad
version
so
that
I
can
move
ygg
to
the
commons
upgrade
by
the
end
of
the
sprint,
and
he
can
start
working
on
that
because
that's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
and
it's
going
to
be
a
blocker
for
the
hatch.
So.
D
E
Okay,
cool
yeah
I'll,
just
when
I
I
have
a
college
for
next
week
about
her
proposal,
so
I'll
just
mention
it
to
her
in
the
case
that
she
also
wants
to
write
a
blog
on
the
tec.
She
was
asking
me,
you
know
what
are
the
highlights
that
she
should
include
so
she's
going
to
be
putting
out
a
piece
in
her
networks
and
token
kitchen
about
the
tec.
E
I
E
Yeah,
I
hear
you:
okay,
that's
good
context.
So
now
I
know
and
yeah
we
can
wait.
Wait
a
bit
or
she's
gonna
write
like
a
basic
piece
on
the
tec
and
then
she
could
do
like
a
deep
dive
on
this,
because
she's
gonna
be
submitting
a
proposal
to
to
create
documentation
around
analyzing
token
models,
so
yeah,
okay,
great
good,
to
know
cool.
J
I
A
J
D
I
I
F
Okay,
well,
there
is
there's
three
of
the
issues
that
are
on
the
spring
on
the
spring
battle
backlog,
which
are
quite
quite
finished.
Okay,
the
first
one
is
242,
which
is
the
legal
tc
terms
and
conditions
gravity.
No
excuse
me,
not
this
one,
the
hatch
one,
the
one!
That's
on
the
back,
it's
on
the
back.
It's
on
the
backlog.
F
F
I
I
A
A
I
A
F
I
I
I
A
And
I
mentioned
this
to
ivy
today,
but
you
know
the
gravity
group
has
their
has
their.
What
is
it
called?
The
protocol
for
tec
calls
and
there's
some
portions
of
it
that
are
really
specific.
I
think
to
the
the
you
know
the
facilitators
and
moderators
of
the
call,
but
there
is
one
section
that
is
like
the
the
rules
for
participation
and
that
would
be
great
to
add
into
the
attendance
terms.
F
Well,
the
idea
of
the
attendance
terms
is
not
that
much
of
of
the
rules
to
manage
the
calls
it's
about
the
it's
about
the
content
being
being
recorded
on
the
call.
So
anyone
who
attends
a
call
is
aware
that
we
can
be
posting
the
meeting
anywhere
on
our
on
our
social
media
channels
and
and
also
warning
them
that
anything
that
we
may
say
there
on
the
meetings.
It's
not
financial
advice,
we
don't
assume
any
risk,
they
they.
You
know
all
those
kind
of
things.
F
So
the
idea
is
to
to
have
this
sentence
at
the
beginning
of
the
agenda
and
mention
it
on
the
beginning
of
the
of
the
call,
but
then
have
this
link
that
anyone
can
go
and
check
and-
and
you
know,
read
everything
about
the
calls
being
recorded
and
posted
here
and
there
and
that
anything
that
we
mentioned
here.
It's
you
know
it's
not
legalized.
F
Right
because
the
github
we
already
started-
and
I
added
the
work
that
we
did
on
the
legal
working
group-
it's
the
245
one.
No,
oh,
you
moved
it
yeah
right
243,
so
I
I'm
intending
to
do
the
rest
with
the
with
the
documents
or
the
initial
terms
that
they
start
with
and
give
it
a
give
it
a
thought
and
a
view
on
the
legal
working
group
so
anything
that
they
may
have
I'll
just
jump
on
it.
F
A
G
I
A
G
I
A
A
B
A
B
A
Okay,
yeah,
I
see
what
you're
saying.
Do
you
think
those
that
the
terms
and
conditions
for
at
least
this
that
batch
not
including
the
bonding
curves,
dandelion,
voting
or
conviction
voting?
Do
you
think
the
other
terms
and
conditions
will
be
ready
this
sprint?
Do
you
think
the
next
two
weeks
they'll
be
finalized,
or
do
you
think
it's
maybe
gonna
take
a
little
more
time
than
that?
A
I
think
they
will
be
ready.
Okay,
so
then,
maybe
if
we,
if
we
we
can
leave
them
in,
we
don't
have
to.
We
can
leave
them
in
this
area
and
sorry
in
this
as
individual
items
specifically,
so
that
we
can
see
that
each
of
the
groups
has
signed
off
on
each
specific
one.
Even
if
we're
like
the
the
working
session
is
essentially,
they
will
each
be
their
own.
B
J
I
E
I
don't
know
if
it
needs
to
be
blocked
the
point
of
the
article.
I
think
it's
okay,
the
where
it's
at
livia
on
tamara
is
I
scaffolded
an
article
about
the
governance
in
the
tec.
Some
of
it
will
be
changing
because
of
celeste,
so
I'm
kind
of
I
wanted
to
actually
ask
you
grandpa.
I
have
a
call
of
stem
anyway
next
week,
so
I
was
going
to
talk
to
him
a
little
bit
to
explain
me
more
about
it.
I
think
it
doesn't
need
to
be
in
this
sprint.
E
I
do
think
we
could
write
the
article
without
knowing
about
celeste.
I
think
it's
a
really
interesting
and
important
piece
for
people
to
understand
that
governance
isn't
one
thing
and
we
can
say
a
few
of
the
things
that
we
are
and
have
been
doing
but
yeah
I
I
agree.
I
mean
it
doesn't
have
to
go
in
this
sprint,
but
I
think
it
is
interesting
and
important
for
people
to
know
how
our
governance
is
or
is
going
to
work,
but
we
can
hold
off
on
it.
Okay,
maybe.
B
I
A
A
B
I
B
B
I
A
A
A
E
A
A
A
B
That's
right
proposal,
because
now
we
have
those
different
sections
for
proposals.
Actually
I
have
to
create
two
more,
that
is,
a
template
for
conviction,
vote,
changing
the
template
from
the
main
proposal
place
to
the
to
the
sub
category
and
having
and
then
the
lion
template
prediction
template
foreign
template.
B
J
A
E
I
think
it
depends
griff
I
mean
I,
it
could
be
like
a
whole
te
academy,
research
group
or
something
around
this
I
mean
like.
Similarly,
for
example,
what
we
just
spun
up
with
ygg
t
academy
block
science
is
like
they're,
looking
at
the
bitcoin
cad
cad
model
and
there's
a
whole
there's
a
coding
group,
that's
actually
working
to
expand
on
the
model
for
the
coding
and
then
there's
an
academics
group
who
is
discussing
it,
and
maybe
there
will
be
some
documentation
coming
out
of
it.
Yes,
this
could
become
a
whole
huge
thing.
E
J
J
I
A
A
So
send
suggestions
to
tec
stewards
and
we
can
we
can
figure
it
out
there
sound
good
and
I'd
like
to
show
you
a
brand
new
milestone,
so
off-boarding
process
for
working
group
wait
a
minute.
Sorry
juan
carlos
did
is
this
in
sprint
two
for
you.
This
is
in
this
group
and
this
working
I
mean
in
this
sprint.