►
From YouTube: W24 Stewards Council: Radical Simplification on the TEC, Content Curation Service & Gitcoin Update
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
We
talk
about
tomorrow
in
our
council.
Is
there
anything
that's
been
pressing?
You
know,
and
we
came
up
with
this
idea
of
talking
about
radically
simplifying
things
which
has
been
something
that
you
talked
about
before
I
went
on
vacation,
so
maybe
just
get
a
feeling
for
what
that
is
and
looks
like
for
everyone.
Let's
see
I
don't
know,
zeptimus
usually
joins.
Let's
see
if.
A
But
Mitch
can't
join
Libya
can't
join
Griff
can't
join
Lauren,
won't
join,
so
a
bunch
of
a
bunch
of
folk
won't
be
joining
today.
I,
don't
know
Max
have
you
joined
this
Council
before
or
is
this
your
first
time.
B
This
is
my
first
time
but
I'm
super
interested
in
the
topic.
I've
reviewed
some
of
the
last
meeting
notes,
but
yeah
I'm
kind
of
a
newbie
here,
yay.
A
Welcome
well
I'd
like
to
introduce
you
and
well
I'll,
give
you
a
quick
introduction,
but
then
I'd
like
you
to
introduce
yourself
yeah
Max
is
the
head
of
trusted
C
that
he's
helping
the
trusted
seed
organization,
steer
and
and
redesign
themselves,
so
I'll
pass
to
Max
to
give
to
introduce
himself
and
then
maybe
since
we're
a
small
group
today,
we
could
all
take
a
moment
and
introduce
ourselves
to
Max,
except
for
me,
because
he
and
I
know
each
other.
Well
now.
B
B
Yeah
I'm
my
time
since,
like
three
first
words
about
me:
yeah
I'm,
working
with
a
trusted
seat
I
also
have
another
position
in
the
Ukrainian
Ukrainian
I
work
with
Ukrainian
government
to
develop
the
crypto
jurisdiction
to
develop,
dowels
and
stuff,
like
that,
but
yeah
I'm
here
on
the
behalf
of
trusted
seat,
as
we
see
like
stewardship
and
Community
stewards
is
like
Essence
like
this
important
part
of
cultural,
build
like
cross-pollination
and
everything.
My
intention
is
to
see
what
what's
going
on
in
tac's
stewardship.
B
What
are
the
challenges
potentially
find
a
ways
to
support
you?
So
that's
briefly
about
me:
maybe
I
can
pass
it
to
Gideon.
C
Cool
it's
nice
to
meet
you
Max,
yeah!
That's
really!
That's
great!
So
my
background,
I
came
out
of
the
tech
sector
and
then
worked
in
kind
of
like
Mission,
driven
technology
after
that
to
help
the
environmental
movement
and
since
then
been
doing
a
lot
of
writing
and
stuff
like
that.
But
over
this
last
year
I
got
more
involved
with
Tec
and
now
I
run
the
sample
working
group,
which
is
focused
on
economic
development,
so
TC
as
a
micro
economy.
D
C
A
A
Yeah,
you
might
have
just
joined
at
the
at
the
after
I
guess:
I
wanted
to
introduce
everyone
to
Max
who
is
working
with
a
trusted
seed
organization,
and
he
just
introduced
himself
and
I
thought
we
could
each
take
a
moment
and
introduce
ourselves
to
Max
as
well.
If
you
want
to
just
say
two
words
about
yourself
to
get
us.
E
Sure
yeah
I'm
here
mostly
for
the
people
and
for
the
culture,
so
yeah
in
the
comments.
That's
that's
my
main
thing:
I!
Don't
care
much
about
crypto,
apart
from
the
cultural
aspects
of
it
and
I'm
kind
of
a
autistic
polymath
yoga
teacher
I've
done
a
lot
of
different
Tech,
but
just
not
this
kind
of
tech.
So
thanks.
E
I,
don't
know
who's
gone,
Nate
I
guess
can
go.
D
Yeah
I,
you
know
I,
don't
have
really
a
bio
pitch,
but
you
know
I'm
I'm
a
steward
here
at
the
Tec,
been
here
for
a
while
and
I
really
enjoy
this
community
and
I
just
want
to
say,
welcome
Max.
This
is
really
awesome
for
you
to
be
here
and
look
forward
to
talking
more
with
you,
so
pass
it
over
to
Wonka.
F
Hello,
Max
yeah,
my
name
is
Juan
Carlos
I
am
from
Colombia
and
I
did
my
studies
on
political
science
and
on
alternative
dispute
resolution
and
since
starting
to
work
in
the
in
the
Dao
space
I've
been
wanting
to
to
carry
the
flag
of
conflict
management
as
something
critical
in
infrastructure
of
daos
and
the
DC
was
the
perfect
place
to
develop
a
project
like
gravity
and
right
now
we
are
on
the
face
of
continuing
the
development
of
that
project,
not
only
as
a
working
group
of
the
DC,
but
as
a
service
that
we
can
provide
to
our
communities
and
El
Paso
septic.
G
Thanks
everyone,
yeah
I
mean
we
already
meet
each
other
Max
in
the
evil
house.
I
mean
yeah,
we
didn't
I,
we
didn't
talk
a
lot,
but
yeah
I
mean
I'm
helping
here
in
the
transparency
working
group.
My
background
I
mean
I
was
doing
stuff
on
the
bus,
but
I
really
didn't
like
a
couple
of
years,
then
I
moved
to
accounting
and
yeah
and
then
I
I
started
working
actually
like
this
was
my
first
crypto
job.
I
was
in
this
page
for
a
very
long
time,
but
you
know
I
wasn't
doing
little
things.
G
A
Cool
thanks
cool
I
hope
you
feel
very
welcome.
We're
such
a
warm
living,
okay,
so
I
had
a
really
good
opening
question.
I
was
so
excited
about
it,
but
I'm
gonna
have
to
save
it
for
another
time,
because
I
wasn't
expecting
to
do
introductions.
So
what's
your
best
scar
story?
A
Will
it
happen
on
another
call?
So
I
didn't
know
what
we
would
talk
about
on
this
agenda,
Gideon
and
I,
and
our
one-on-one
sort
of
were
brainstorming,
some
ideas
and
he
suggested
we
maybe
raise
radical.
You
know
radical
simplification,
one
of
the
ideas
around
how
we
can
approach
before
moving
forward
in
the
the
Tec,
with
budget
constraints
that
we
have
so
I'd
like
us
to
to
go
into
that,
but
there's
two
new
things
that
Gideon
added
to
the
agenda
so
Gideon.
A
Why
don't
I
just
pass
it
to
you
to
go
through
these
two
and
maybe
also
introduce
the
idea
of
radical
simplification.
C
Sure,
thanks
Tam,
so
you
know
this
this
git
coin
round.
We
tried
something
a
little
bit
different,
I
I
think
we
talked
about
this
before,
but
basically,
rather
than
doing
a
general
pitch
for
the
Tec,
we
wrote
up
a
pitch
for
the
curation
service
and
the
reasoning
for
this
was
to
basically
kind
of
like
Target
it
on
a
specific
project
and
and
back
in
my
days,
doing
non-profit
stuff
that
always
seemed
to
be
a
better
way
of
capturing
people's
imagination
and
excitement
and
I
have
no
idea.
C
C
It
seemed
like
it
was
less
than
that,
so
it
does
seem
like
we've,
we've
gotten
some
traction,
but
today's
the
last
day
so
I
think
that
each
time
we're
going
to
get
better
and
better
at
doing
this,
like
we're,
starting
to
kind
of
like
learn
like
the
little
tricks,
and
things
like
this
that
we
like
we
made
some
mistakes
this
round.
C
In
terms
of
like
not
getting
into
some
of
the
focused
funding
areas
for
for
Bitcoin
and
like
next
time,
we
really
need
to
do
that
because
the
matching
on
that
is
just
so
much
more
powerful.
But
anyway,
this
is
just
I'll.
Put
a
link
in
you
know
because
of
the
quadratic
funding
like.
If
you
you
know,
they're
matching
there,
like
even
a
small
gift,
really
does
help
a
little
bit
and
I
think
it's
just
a
nice
sign
for
the
community.
C
If
the
more
people
we
get
in
this,
so
if
you
can,
we've
got
like
basically
until
I
think
eight
PM
Eastern
standard
time
today
and
then
then
it
all
closes
up.
C
So
I'll
put
the
link,
if
you
feel
so
moved,
you
know,
give
a
little
bit
be
great,
so
that's
the
update
there
and
then
I,
just
I'm
hoping
that
over
this
next
month,
or
so,
we
can
like
carve
out
a
little
bit
of
time
periodically
to
like
really
brainstorm
on
how
we
can
all
pull
together
on
this
curation
service.
C
So
the
reason
that
I
think
this
thing
is
so
important
right
now
is
that,
like
we
have,
this
is
like
the
second
service
that
the
TC
is
rolling
out
like
the
augmented
bonding
curve
was
really
the
first
one,
and
we
all
rallied
around
that
and
like
really
did
a
good
job,
I
mean
like
that,
was
actually
amazing,
the
param,
the
prams
parties
and
all
the
stuff
we
did
around.
That
was
just
super
unifying
for
the
community
and
it
was
cool
like
it
was
a
cool
it
was.
C
You
know
it
was
like
that
was
something
we're
very
proud
of,
and
so
I'm
hoping
that
we'll
be
able
to
generate
kind
of
a
similar
type
of
energy
for
this
curation
service,
and
so
it
hasn't
launched.
Yet
we've
got
like
a
piece
of
it
up
right
now,
that's
operating
in
the
Discord,
it's
the
Forum!
It's
it's!
Basically,
if
you
go
over
to
the
area
under
Community,
you'll
see
it
right
now.
It's
called
Community
signal,
so
you
can
go.
C
Governance,
we've
only
got
a
few
categories
up
there
right
now.
So
so
you
can.
You
can
start
sharing
some
stuff
there.
The
back
end
is
not
up
and
running.
C
Yet
we're
probably
going
to
do
we're
looking
at
like
doing
some
soft
testing
of
that
over
this
next
week
or
two,
but
the
back
end
basically
is
going
to
take
all
the
Emoji
responses
that
people
make
on
your
posts
and
then
aggregate
those
and
then
there'll
be
like
a
certain
threshold
above
which,
like
let's
say
it's
five
emojis,
that's
what
we're
working
on
right
now
that
will
highlight
the
post
and
then
we'll
basically
spit
out
the
results
into
an
air
table
and
what
we're
going
to
do
with
the
air
table
long
term
still
working
that
through.
C
This
is
something
that
I
want
to
get
all
of
your
thoughts
on,
but
to
start
we're
going
to
use
it
as
a
way
to
help
the
Twitter
team
come
up
with
more
interesting,
tweets
right
stuff,
that's
about
like
what's
going
on
in
the
field
and
we're
going
to
really
try
to
like
track
who
contributed
that
so
that
we
can
recognize
them
on
Twitter
and
help
build
some
engagement
and
help
build
some
sense
of
like
ownership
for
those
who
are
participating.
C
But
then
we're
also
going
to
like
acknowledge
who
the
author
of
the
piece
is
and
do
you
know
we're
going
to
try
to
use
this
as
a
way
to
really
help
our
Twitter
following
and
engagement
leap
Rock
right,
we're
going
to
try
to
like
use
this
as
a
way
to
kind
of
like
move
it
up
to
the
next
level,
and
so
acid
laser
is
totally
on
board.
C
He's
excited
about
this
VM
is
on
board
and
excited
about
this
I
mean
she's,
actually
leading
a
bunch
of
this
work,
and
so
my
question
for
all
of
you
is
well
first
I
would
welcome
any
questions
about
what
we're
doing
here.
You
know
why
we,
why
we're
doing
this
I'd
love
if
people
are
wondering
about
the
service
now,
would
be
a
great
time.
C
I'd
be
happy
to
field
questions
about
that,
but
I
also
have
a
more
specific
question,
which
is
I
think
that
the
tech
behind
this
is
pretty
simple
like
this
is
not
a
fancy
service
and
we're
deliberately
keeping
it
simple.
The
real
key
to
success
is
going
to
be
engagement,
like
the
engagement
of
the
community
are
like
the
existing
contributors
here,
but
also
The
Trusted
seat.
C
You
know
and
the
hatchers
and
and
then,
if
we
can
get
more,
you
know
if
we
can
expand
beyond
that
right
to
start
bringing
in
new
people
and
some
new
energy,
and
so
that's
my
general
question
to
all
of
you
is:
how
do
we
make
this
thing
succeed?
How
can
we
get
people
over
this
next?
You
know
this
will
probably
release
in
like
mid-october.
C
So
what
can
we
do
to
start
pulling
people
in
and
getting
them
to
use
this.
G
A
G
People
who
are
working
in
communities
do
you
know
you
can
choose
DM
these
people
and
you
know,
ask
them
to
participate
and
it's
always
like
you
know,
good
feedback
to
have.
A
For
an
idea
out,
would
it
be
interesting
for
each
of
the
working
groups
to
have
a
working
group
section
or
to
have
a
working
group
tag
in
the
curated
services
and
in
during
their
working
group
weekly?
Have
a
Brand's
like
five
minutes
where
they
think
about
what
would
be
relevant
for
their
own
working
group
as
part
of
their
weekly
agenda?.
C
Yeah
I
think
that's
a
great
idea,
but
you
know
eventually,
eventually
this
can
be
made
available
for
each
working
group
to
have
like
their
own
version
of
this,
but
I
think
to
start
that's
a
great
way
to
just
ramp
it
up.
Slowly,
so
you
know,
yeah
I
mean
I
would
say
any
working
group
that
that
wants
to
I
mean
I,
don't
want
to
like
try
to
force
this
on
any
on
any
working
group.
C
But
if
anybody's
interested
in
this,
let
us
know
let
Risha
or
me
or
you
know,
bear
or
empty,
no
and
and
we'll
add
attack.
You
know
we
can
add.
One
governance
is
already
up
there,
but
we
could
add
one
for
transparency.
C
You
know
Hawkeye,
not
sure
what
tag
you
would
want.
I
mean
it
wouldn't
be
like
gravity
but
like
it
could
be.
You
know,
like
I,
don't
know
if
you
I
hesitate,
we're
all
unless
it's
not
on
the
calls.
I
can
say
dispute
resolution
yeah.
F
I
I
think
it
at
least
for
this
pilot.
It
would
be
better,
at
least
from
my
side
to.
F
Not
receive
so
much
new
messages,
I
feel
a
little
bit
overwhelmed
by
the
amount
of
messages
that
we
are
receiving,
but
that
that's
why
I
would
I
would
think
that
maybe
for
a
second
stage,
would
be
better
after
having
first
the
ones
of
the
community.
G
The
thing
is,
like
you
know,
like
I
mean
I
even
fully
know
like
we
don't
I
mean
we
didn't
fully
build
a
strategy
or
anything,
but
some
days
we
were
talking
about
getting
rid
of
the
working
group.
Now
we
are
now
I
think,
like
it's
very
important.
G
On
what
we're
doing,
and
then
moving
this
way
like
if
we
are
doing
things
on
both
ways
that
can
be
using
resources,
we
might
not
have
so
yeah
just
wanted
to
point
it
out,
but.
A
Just
to
take
one
cause
comment:
what
do
you
mean
messages?
It
would
be
more
like
hosting
articles
about
dispute
resolution
or
trust
creation
on
a
forum.
It
would
be
something
more
akin
to
that.
I
don't
know,
and
maybe
this
is
I
I
misunderstand
to
Gideon.
Is
it
something
that
would
then
require
attention
and
responses,
or
is
it
more
like
your
post,
something
as
if
you
would
to
archive
or
like
a
curated
list.
C
Yeah,
let
me
let
me
take
like
two
minutes
and
just
show
you
what
it
looks
like
because
I'm
not
sure
everybody's
actually.
C
So
if
you
go
over
to
community
signal,
if
you
click
on
this
top
thing
here,
that
just
says
Community
signal
you
get
the
oh,
you
get
all
of
the
posts
that
are
in
there.
This.
These
messages
that
are
highlighted
are
set
to
expire
after
a
certain
period.
We're
figuring
out
how
long
that
should
be
Max
is
one
week,
but
it
could
be
as
short
as
one
day
so,
but
if
you
come
in
here,
these
are
the
various
tags,
and
so
what's
cool
is
that
I?
C
Can
you
know
I
can
filter
for
governance
and
see
how
lightning
fast
it
is
like
it's
pretty
it's
pretty
quick.
You
can
do
token
engineering,
you
could
do
you
know
regen,
there's
nothing
there
for
regen
right
now,
TC,
you
know
so,
and
then
the
the
search
on
this
is
also
like.
Pretty
pretty
good,
like
mission
like
this
is
just
a
much
better
way
of
navigating
things
in
Discord,
so
I'm
not
I'm,
just
looking
at
what's
up
right
now.
C
This
is
purely
the
discord's
new
feature,
which
is
called
forums
and
to
answer
the
question
Quang
that
you're
asking
and
and
Tam
yeah.
No,
this
isn't.
This
isn't
like
your
regular
working
group
Channel.
This
is
just
like
enabling
people
to
come
into
the
Tec
and
discuss
various
topics
that
we
think
are
important
to
focus
on.
So
it
may
be,
I
mean
to
your
point
zeptimist,
like
I,
don't
know
like.
Do
we
really
want
to
highlight
all
of
these
things?
C
I
mean
governance
is
definitely
Central,
but
I
think
we
would
just
need
to
figure
out
what
you
know
of
the
stuff
that
the
working
groups
are
doing,
that
we
really
think
is
Central
to
the
Tec
Mission
like
those
should
be
tags,
and
so
one
of
the
things
I'll
come
back
to
you
all
we're
going
to
have
a
process
that
will
be
rolling
out,
probably
the
next
week
or
two
is
as
a
community.
We
need
to
figure
out
what
these
tags
are
like.
This
shouldn't
just
be
like
a
sample
thing.
C
We
should
really
figure
out
what
we
want
the
signal,
but
but
damn
I
like
the
idea
and
I
think
I'm
going
to
talk
to
Livy
I
mean
this
was
already
something
that
we
were
going
to
talk
to
her
about
is
governance
seems
like
a
natural
thing
to
focus
on.
F
Well,
I
I
think
now
I
am
a
little
bit
more
clear
yeah,
let's
I
will
participate,
let's,
let's
add
the
the
tag
of
conflict
management
or
dispute
resolution.
F
A
D
No
yeah
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
sometimes
I,
think
there's
some
confusion.
When
we
talk
about
the
curation
service,
I
I,
look
at
it
less
as
a
service
and
more
as
a
product
and
are
kind
of
our
first
product.
I
I
think
that
this
could
definitely
turn
into
that.
D
D
What
tagging
we
use
and
then
having
this
process
happen,
we
could
actually
expand
this
to
other
discords
and
have
other
te
communities
start
contributing
towards
that
to
this
kind
of
collective
intelligence
product
that
we
can
aggregate
on
behalf
of
of
the
commons
and
so
I
think
that's
one
potential
Avenue
of
exploration
that
I
think
we
should
really
take
into
consideration.
D
A
C
For
sure
I
think
everybody
knows
this,
but
I'm
not
sure
so
I'll
just
say
it
so
this
is.
C
This
is
I
I
use
the
word
service,
but
I
mean
service
in
the
sense
of
like
Google
search
Amazon,
those
type
of
automated
self-service
platforms
like
things
where
people
can
come
and
serve
themselves
so
but
product
we
could
call
a
product
and
we
should
I
I,
don't
really
care
what
we
call
it.
But
it's
it's
basically
like
this
automated
service
that
people
can
use
for
themselves
and
yeah.
Nate
I
think
this.
C
That's
absolutely
right,
like
the
long-term
potential
for
this,
like
this
really
could
be
a
service
for
the
comments
that
we
can
use
as
a
way
to
partner
with
other
parties
and
the
folks
who
are
building
this
actually
building.
This
are
there's
a
unit
within
Dow
stack
and
then
another
group
called
tangible,
Ai
and
they're.
They
have
like
a
big
background
in
building
chats
conversational,
like
machine
learning,
driven
chat,
Bots
and
so
directionally.
C
That's
where
they're
interested
in
in
going
with
this,
but
they're
the
ones
that
are
building
the
Discord
bot.
So
this
is
really
their
thing.
We
won't
own
this
and
we're
not
paying
for
it,
but
we
are
the
first
ones
to
deploy
it
and
so
we're
having
an
outsized
voice
in
like
how
this
will
work,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
I
have
mentioned
to
them
is
this
idea
that
I
was
talking
about,
which
is
you
know?
C
Maybe
we
can
use
this
as
a
way
of
working
with
them
to
kind
of
distribute
this
within
our
networks.
You
know
having
other
Discord
servers
using,
so
they
you.
E
C
If
we
do
this
thing
and
nobody
comes,
then
this
is
gonna,
be
that
would
be
kind
of
a
disappointment,
so
I
think
it's
really
incumbent
upon
it
like
this
is
our
chance
to
like
have
like
a
second
Awakening
for
the
TC
and
really
build
some
just
build
some
engagement
and
excitement
around
this
thing,
because
this
is
cool
I
mean
it
will
be,
it's
not
going
to
be
like
the
super
amazing
service
day.
One
but
there'll
be
enough
here
that
people
can
rally
around
and
so
I
think.
C
D
So
I
guess
the
question
is:
is
when
can
we
provide
an
incentive
for
this
type
of
contribution
and
to
what
kind
of
cultural
things
can
we
do
in
the
meantime?
To
maybe
have
a
you
know?
Maybe
a
Friday's.
You
know
we
can't
contribution
party
or
something
you
know.
I,
don't
know.
C
Also
one
one
other
quick
thing
just
to
note
is
that
you
know
we've
struggled
for
a
while
when
people
join
the
Tec
with
like
what
are
some
simple
ways
for
people
to
engage,
you
know
it's
like
it's
kind
of
like
you
just
get
thrown
into
the
deep
end
here
right
and
this
is
this-
is
an
example
of
something
where
you
know
honka.
You
could
have
like
people
who
are
just
getting
started
in
gravity
like
you
could
say:
hey
you
know
what
would
be
great
is
if
you
can
just
go.
C
Do
research
find
like
some
of
the
best
articles
on
dispute
resolution
in
web
3
and
post
them
in
and
help
us
curate
help
us
like
provide
feedback?
There's
conversation,
the
other
thing
I
didn't
share.
C
Let
me
show
this
share.
This
really
quickly.
Is
that
when
you're
in
this
this
new,
this
is
not
this
service.
This
is
just
the
new
Forum
feature
within
Discord,
but
like
if
you
look
at
okay.
E
G
C
Recent
article
and
Auntie
was
the
one
who
shared
this,
and
you
can
see
that
it's
just
way
better
than
having
conversations
in
Discord
because,
like
it's
all,
it's
like
a
forum
right.
It's
all
of
the
all
of
the
interactions
and
conversations
are
just
organized
right
there
under
the
original
post.
C
G
I
mean
probably
it's
a
very
bad
idea,
but
I'm
wondering
like
if
it's
like
you
know
it
seems
like
that's
the
Forum,
then
we're
paying
the
Forum
like
I
mean
it's
worth,
keeping
it.
It's
I
mean
of.
G
Want
the
photo,
but
it's
like
just
I
thought,
I'd
come
to
my
mind
like.
Is
it
worth
keeping
the
foreign.
C
I
mean
I'd,
be
interested
in
everybody's
ideas
on
this,
but
I'll
share
my
because
I've
been
thinking
about
this
a
little
bit
like
I,
think
you
know
this
forum
here
in
Discord
will
be
more
for,
like
the
stakeholders
that
the
you
know,
people
who
are
using,
if
you
think
of
like
the
builders
and
the
governors
and
then
the
users
of
the
commons
I,
think
this
is
more
for
the
users
of
the
commons
way
for
them
to
come
in
and
use
this
service
to
share
information
about
the
field
of
token
engineering
itself,
whereas
the
the
discourse
Forum
to
me
is
a
great
place
for
us
to
talk
about
how
we
run
this.
C
This
comment,
you
know
how
we
govern
it,
how
you
know
the
culture
behind
it
all
that
kind
of
more
of
the
kind
of
like
governance
and
and
contributor
Focus.
That's
just
my
sense.
A
So
does
it
feel
like
the
answer,
the
question
was
answered:
how
do
we
stack
the
chips
in
favor
of
success
for
the
curation
service.
C
My
guess
is
that
when
you
all
go
off
over
the
next
couple
days
like
is,
as
this
starts,
to
become
like
front
and
center
as
you're
thinking
about
this
ideas
will
come
to
you
right,
it'll
be
like
oh,
we
should
use
this
for
blah
and,
oh
you
know
like
the
idea
of
the
meme
party
Nate,
like
that's
a
great
idea
like
we
should
experiment
with
stuff
like
that
and
just
and
see
you
know.
So
that's
that's.
C
My
ask
is
like
I
mean
I
I've
written
down
these
ideas,
I'll
take
them
back
to
the
team
and
and
we'll
start
exploring
we'll
actually
I'll
mention
them
in
the
sample
call,
but
yeah
I.
Think
if
you
can
take
this
and
just
start
to
kind
of
like
ingest
this
as
like,
this
is
going
to
be
a
critical
thing
for
the
Tec
to
re-energize
itself.
C
It's
like
our
best
bet
over
the
next.
You
know
foreseeable
future.
So
what
can
we
do?
And
so,
if
you
just
can
think
about
this
over
the
next
couple
like
next
couple
weeks,
that
would
be
great
and
feel
free
to
drop
stuff
in
the
sample,
Channel
or
ping
me
directly.
If
you
come
up
with
either
is
great,
but
thank
you,
I
mean
yeah
I
I'm
really
excited
about
this
I
really
I'm
like
I.
This
is
the
most
excited
I've
been
since
first
discovering
the
Tec
and
actually
getting
involved
with
it
like
that.
C
Those
days
were
like
I
was
so
like.
Oh
my
God,
this
is
so
cool
right,
I'm,
starting
to
feel
some
of
that
excitement
and
I.
Think
the
people
who
are
starting
to
get
to
see
the
potential
of
this
service
are
feeling
the
same
way.
I
know
Nate
and
I
were
talking
about
the
same
day
and
we're
like
oh
my
God.
We
could
do
blah
blah
blah
blah,
so
yeah
there's
a
lot
of
potential
here.
A
I
have
a
question
and
then
I
have
maybe
just
I
think
what
again
the
first
question
is
are:
have
we
already
shown
it
on
the
community
call
or
are
you
planning
to
show
it
on
the
community
call
today,
I.
C
Was
going
to
show
it
on
the
on
the
call
today,
just
a
quick
demo
of
you
know,
I
was
just
going
to
explain
it
like
I
did
pretty
simpler
here,
but
like
just
show
how
the
Forum
works
as
a
kind
of
her
step
and
invite
people
to
actually
start
contributing
content
up
there
today,
even
though
the
back
end's
not
up.
A
Oh,
we
have
this
great
thing
about
praise,
let's
drop
it
in
there,
but
I'd
say
or
a
write-up
prognosis
about
why
they
chose
praise,
which
is
a
really
compelling
article,
but
I
feel
like
the
difficult
thing
for
me
with
this
is
how
do
I
know
what
to
put
like
and
I
I
would
say
it's
more
like
if
I
I
felt
like
if
I
had
something
that
I
wanted
to
populate,
like
oh
I'm,
going
to
curate
this
subject,
I
would
find
it
a
lot
easier,
but
because
it's
just
like
so
broad
like
it
could
be
anything
or
you
could
choose
anything
or
it
feels
a
little
bit
like
I'm
a
little
lost
at
what
to
put
in
here.
A
I,
don't
know
if
that's,
maybe
what
holds
other
folk
back
in
the
Tec,
not
really
knowing
what
the
categories
are
or
which
ones
I
feel
a
strong
resonance
to
curate.
But
you
know
I,
look
at
token
engineering,
Dallas,
TC
governance,
Regen,
there's
something
around.
How
do
I
know
which
ones
should
go
in
there.
Does
that
make
sense
like
how
do
I
know?
C
Yeah
so
I
think
the
honest
answer
is
we
don't
know
yet
right
like
until
we
actually
start
playing
with
this,
we're
not
going
to
know
exactly
how
how
people
are
going
to
face
that
problem.
C
I
think
that
the
tags,
the
category
tags
will
be
a
pretty
good
signal
because
we're
we're
going
to
require
people
in
order
to
post,
to
select
a
category,
and
so
I
think
that
that
will
that
will
provide
some
guidance
on
the
types
of
things
that
we're
looking
for.
There
is,
you
know
like
the
problem.
Is
people
never
read
instructions?
You
know.
C
So
there
are
guidelines
that
are
right
on
that
will
be
right
when
you
come
in
there
there's
a
little
thing,
that's
right
to
the
right
of
it
at
the
very
top
that
says,
guidelines
for
posting.
We
haven't
filled
that
out
yet,
but
you
know
that
will
that's
an
opportunity
to
kind
of
provide
some
guidance,
but
the
honest
answer
is
I.
Think
the
determinant
of
what
is
good
will
be
something
that
will
emerge
from
the
community
Through
the
feedback.
C
You
know
the
the
purpose
of
this
forum
is
to
collect
a
lot
of
stuff,
and
hopefully
you
know
the
stuff
that
gets
the
most
engagement
will
be
the
stuff
that
will
be
the
most
interesting
it
will
float
to
the
top,
and
it
will
be
the
end
result
of
this
is
not
so
much
the
Forum.
The
end
result
will
be
the
air
table.
C
That
will
be
the
curated,
like
all
of
the
greatest
hits
right
all
the
stuff
that
really
resonates
with
the
community,
based
on
their
engagement
with
it.
That
will
be
the
stuff
that
will
be
the
gold
will
come
out
of
this.
The
question
is
going
to
be:
what
do
we
do
with
that
air
table
and
in
the
first
phase
of
this
again
we
are
starting
really
simply
first
phase
the
results
of
that
will
go
into
Twitter
to
try
to
make
our
Twitter
feed
much
more
compelling,
but
down
the
road.
C
You
could
imagine
that
that
airtable
being
a
pretty
valuable
asset
for
the
Tec
in
terms
of
like
you,
know,
very
high
quality
content
that
the
community
has
curated.
If
we
succeed
in
drawing
a
lot
of
Engagement
with,
does
that
begin
to
answer
some
of
what
you're
asking
or
not.
A
It's
more
a
personal
reflection
of
what
what
friction
I
feel
in
participating
in
the
curation
services
is
yeah.
I,
guess
that
but
I
yeah
I,
don't
know
I
don't
know.
Maybe
we
need
a
stewardship
tag
and
then
I
could
start
dumping
things
there
where
I
feel
like
okay,
you
know,
I,
don't
I,
don't
know,
I,
don't
know.
Maybe
you
know
everyone
else
in
here
who
hasn't
yet
contributed
to
the
curation
service?
Do
you
do
you
know
why
you
haven't
like
I?
D
No
yeah,
it's
been
time
to
be
honest
with
you,
so,
but
I
do
have
a
whole
list
of
articles
that
I'm
I've
got
ready
to
to
just
toss
it
in
the
tagging.
Thing
is
the
one
thing
I
kind
of
want
to
wait
for,
because
I
do
think
it
is
important
to
tag
I,
don't
know
if
I
don't
know
if
the
working
groups
is
the
correct
way
to
do
it.
I
think
you,
you
know,
you
know
whatever
your
interest
is
I
think
is
just
kind
of
I.
D
Don't
want
anything
to
block
you
out
from
submitting.
You
can
find
a
good
article
on
governance
submit
it
like
you
know,
you
don't
have
to
be
in
soft
God
to
do
that.
So
yeah
I
just
think
standardizing
those
that
that
tagging
system
is
really
really
important
in
the
long
term.
So
doing
this,
the
right
way
and
making
sure
that
we
have
standardization
is
really
really
going
to
help
us
out
in
a
long
time
so
yeah
with
that
air
tape.
C
C
Have
been
talking
about
taxonomies
schemas,
those
kinds
of
things
and
there's
this
idea
of
a
folksonomy
and
the
Fox
on
me
is
something
that
bubbles
up
from
the
crowd
right
and
so
I
think
that
we
have
the
potential
here
to
help
the
field
of
token
engineering
create
a
folksonomy
for
the
field
itself
right
and
using
this
service.
We
haven't
figured
out
how
yet,
but
if
we
can
get
this
feedback
correct
and
I
think
this
may
involve
some
things
that
are
not
just
this
curation
service.
C
Blah
and
blah
blah
blah,
but
it's
like
no
like.
Let's
try
to
get
feedback
from
the
broad,
the
broadest
Community
possible,
on
like
really
design
a
good
system
for
keeping
this
almost
like
a
dictionary
right
like
they
update
the
dictionary
every
year.
So
how
would
we
as
a
Commons,
help
to
kind
of
structure,
knowledge
for
the
field
of
token
engineering
and
keep
it
fresh
and
keep
it
representative,
there's
like
a
whole,
interesting
problem
here
that
could
be
very
valuable.
A
Okay,
we
have
a
20
19
minutes
left
anyone
wants
to
offer
any
other
thoughts,
comments,
questions
around
the
curation
services
and
stacking
odds
for
success
before
we
move
on
to
the
next
topic.
A
Five,
four,
three,
two
one
cool
all
right,
so
this
was
an
idea
that
I
Heard
Gideon
mention
in
before
before
the
August
break
around
this
idea
of
erratically
simplifying
Tec
operations.
So
thinking
about
the
things
that
we
really
need
to
focus
on
versus
some
of
the
things
we
could
focus
on
at
a
future
point
that
don't
need
to
be
focused
on
immediately.
A
A
So
it's
just
one
example.
So
I
want
to
check
in
with
everyone
and
ask
on
the
idea
of
radically
simplifying
tec's
operations.
What
is
your
initial
reaction?
Is
it
generally
positive,
negative
and
then,
whether
it's
positive
or
negative?
What
does
that
look
like
to
you
or
do
you?
A
What
is
your
interpretation
of
it?
Do
you
even
do
you
understand?
Do
you
have
an
understanding
of
what
that
would
mean
and
I
guess
I'll
pass
to
bear
if
you
want
to
get
us
started.
E
Thank
you,
Tim
yeah
yeah.
This
has
also
been
something
that
I've
been
thinking
about
for
quite
a
while
already,
and
my
first
reaction
is
just
positive.
I.
Think
simplification
of
things
could
help
us
a
lot
to
be
better
organized
and
become
more
efficient,
and
this
is
also
something
that
I've
heard.
Levy
talked
about
and
and
agree
on
and
and
the
way
I
guess
the
more
practical
way,
I
see
it
at
least
right
now
or
to
begin
with
Isa
in
two
things.
E
One
is
just
simply
in
regards
with
the
Discord
server
the
reassessment
of
the
channels,
the
purpose
of
each
of
the
channels,
and
maybe
just
trying
to
to
simplify
that
removing
the
ones
that
are
not
active
anymore
or
the
ones
that
could
maybe
that
could
might
have
like
a
similar
use
currently
and
more
focus
into
maybe
creating
new
channels
that
that
we
might
need
right,
like
that,
for
the
Forum
I
mean
the
content
curation,
that's
like
a
new
channel
that
we
really
need
to
make
visible
and
highlighted
in
the
in
the
server.
E
So
how
can
we
work
towards
that?
I
think
that
would
be.
That
would
be
important
and
also
to
make
it
simpler
for
users
contributors
like
any
person
that
visits
the
server
easier
for
them
to
navigate
so
I
think
that
would
be
one
of
the
things
the
other
one
I
think
it
would
be
also
interesting
to
revisit
each
of
the
working
groups
and-
and
that
says,
like
the
the
work
they're
doing
their
purpose,
the
the
plans
they
have,
the
roadmap
they
have
and
see.
E
D
Yeah
thanks
bear
yeah,
I
I
think
this
is
a
really
interesting.
I've
recently
been
exploring
this.
This
idea
of
you
know
what
would
it
look
like
without
the
working
groups?
I.
Think
that
having
you
know
in
in
septi
mentioned
this
before
I
think
that
having
these
specialized
feel
like
it
doesn't
take
away
the
working
areas
that
we
have.
You
know
people
have.
We
have
soft
gov.
We
have.
You
know
we
have
governance
issues,
we
have
comms
issues,
we
have
conflict
issues,
I
really
think
aggregating.
D
Our
efforts
into
a
highly
focused
area
would
be
be
really
helpful
in
simplifying
things,
but
it
would
also
help
us
focus
on
certain
our
Direction,
and
so
any
I
mean
any
during
times
of
like
trans
transitional
organization
transition.
D
I
think
that's
the
one
thing
that
working
groups
have
done
that
has
been
kind
of
on.
The
negative
aspect
is
that
it
has
boxed
people
in
you
know.
People
who
are
within
comms
feel
like
they
can
only
contribute
to
areas
of
comms
and
that's
what
they
go
to.
They
attend
the
meetings,
but
if,
if
they
feel
like
they
can
contribute
to
something,
that's
off
God,
they
feel
like
it's
out
of
the
realm
or
their
jurisdiction
and
I
think
that's
kind
of
what
I
would
like
to
see
change.
D
You
know
if
we're
all
in
the
room
and
say
hey,
we
need
this
done
and
you
feel,
like
you,
have
the
capacity
and
the
ability
to
accomplish
that
test
and
I.
Don't
think
there
should
be
any
barriers
from
you
accessing
it.
So
those
are
just
my
initial
thoughts
around
that
topic,
but
yeah
I'll
pass
it
over
to
exactly.
G
G
I
want
to
do
you
know
parties
on
our
own
and
ABC
Advanced
page.
Those
stuff
is
super
cool
and
excites
me
something
more
than
the
other
itself,
and
it's
I
also
had
a
conversation
with
Gideon.
Yesterday
like
it's,
like
you
know,
sometimes,
transparency
is
like
yeah
I
was
like
I'm
thinking
right
now
or,
like
you
know,
we
have
like
some
administrative
stars
that
are
cheap.
We
can
have
them
just
pay
them,
and
then
some
of
them
are
going
to
be
automated,
like
the.
B
G
Easy
tasks
like
IV
is
doing,
for
example,
like
updating
the
decision
breaking
stuff
and
and
Rex
is
updating
the
master,
like
those
things
are
actually
cheap
and
we
can,
you
know,
I
have
some
kind
of
budget
for
those
tasks
and
then
you
know
if
we
want
to
keep
having
them
and
then
I
mean
I've.
You
know
right
now,
I
don't
even
know
what
what
I
want
to
do.
G
G
The
information,
but
then
the
community
is
like
the
church,
but
that
thing
is
not
happening
so
I
at
someone
I
was
thinking
like
I
even
saw
it
in
the
last
transparency
call
maybe
like
we
don't
want
to
do
the
alt
anymore,
like
or
or
we
get
some
value
out
of
it
like
it
takes
so
much
effort
from
us
like
it
really
takes
a
lot
of
effort
and
yeah,
and
then
then,
when
you
don't
see
the
results
in
the
community,
it
doesn't
feel
great
and
yeah
and
again
I
really
agree
with
paneer
was
saying,
like
you
know,
I
don't
feel
like
I
have
to
only
do
transparent
to
work.
G
You
know
sometimes
I
want
to
do
other
things
that
are
so
fun
and
we
should
not
have
barriers
to
that.
Yeah
I
mean
and
I
always
seem
like
when
we
talk
about
simplifying
work,
always
it's
an
always
yes
response
and
then
Focus.
You
know
on
that
one
you
know
focus
on
actually
like,
like
you
know,
I
have
this
dream
like
the
TC
is
like
the
place
where
we
create
tools
for
better
economic
design,
or
we
explore
like
New
Economic
models
like
that's.
F
I,
think
that
the
Dao
space
is
very
liquid
and
that
we
shouldn't
focus
on
having
like
people
actively
participating
in
in
our
Discord,
because
we
will
be
like
bringing
them
to
an
island
and
I
have
always
thought
of
doubts
being
islands
and
like
you,
can
be
really
well
connected
to
other
Islands.
But
at
the
same
time
you
can
be
an
island
of
your
own
and
I
think
that
we've
spent
so
much
work,
building
our
Island
that
we
now
live
comfortably
in
it.
F
But
it
doesn't
mean
that
we
don't
need
to
engage
with
other
communities
and
it's
not
like
only
bringing
people
out
of
the
other
communities
to
our
community
and
having
them
here.
It's
more
of.
How
can
we
be
that
shelling
point
that
meeting
point
where
multiple
communities
gather
to
talk
about
con
about
talking
engineering,
yeah,
I
I?
Think
that,
instead
of
of
looking
of
more
things
on
on
our
inside,
we
should
try
to
to
exteriorize
our
services.
F
Our
our
our
products
and
and
engage
people
not
like
hey,
come
and
be
four
hours
in
our
Discord,
but
like
we
are
a
very
liquid
community
and
even
if
you
spend
10
minutes
on
our
Discord,
if
those
10
minutes
are
of
high
value-
and
you
are
advancing
token
engineering-
it's
better
to
spend
10
minutes
in
our
Discord.
Just
for
one
event
than
to
have
you
four
hours
just
being
around
and
yeah
I.
F
Think
having
good
relationships
with
other
communities
would
be
something
that
I
always
think
about
and
I
think
it
would
be
really
cool,
because
there's
also
this
thing
of
this
fast
moving
space
in
web3.
And
if
you
and
here
you
notice
a
lot
the
information
disparity,
even
if
you
like
notice
of
something
a
few
hours
later.
F
So
it
would
be
really
good
and
I
would
really
like
to
have
like
tentacles
like
having
eyes
and
and
and
people
that
can
not
only
be
TC,
but
that
our
participants
of
the
web
3
space
and
that
they
they
they
at
the
same
time
are
representants
and
ambassadors
of
the
TC.
It
doesn't
matter
if
they
spend
a
lot
of
time
or
few
time
in
the
Discord.
F
What
matters
is
if
they
are
committed
to
the
mission
of
advancing
the
token
engineering
field
and
participating
at
the
moments
that
they
will
be
most
impactful
are
sorry,
no.
A
A
Okay,
I'm
trying
not
to
take
too
much
time.
It
was
actually
really
helpful
to
hear
everyone
's
perspective
I
mean
of
course,
I'm
very
positive
on
this
idea.
I
think
that
most
people
know
my
perspective
of
we're
spread
too
thin.
We
tried
to
do
too
much.
We
went
too
far
and
I
think
we
need
to
like
bring
it
back
and
have
very
core
focused
on.
A
You
know
two
three
things
per
quarter
and
I
like
this
idea
of
working
groups
versus
interest
interest
groups,
I
think
a
lot
of
working
groups
simply
could
go
back
to
their
Manifesto
and
realize
you
know
they
either
need
to
redo
the
manifesto,
or
maybe
it's
time
to
retire
some
working
groups
that
whose
Manifesto
is
not
necessary,
anymore.
A
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
soul,
searching
that
we
can
do
in
that
regard
and
the
idea
of
getting
rid
of
working
groups.
First
time,
I
heard
it
Nate.
So
I,
don't
know
when
you
when
this
first
came
up,
maybe
when
I
was
on
vacation,
but
my
reaction
was
like
wait.
What
and
now
I'm
kind
of
like
there's
something
interesting
there,
so
so
I'd
love
to
I'd
like
to
see
how
that
conversation
evolves
actually
and
I'll
pass
to
Gideon.
C
Thanks
Tam
yeah,
just
really
quickly,
I
think
yeah.
We
have
become
too
like
what
you
were
saying.
C
Just
totally
resonates
with
me:
I
think:
we've
we've
we've
turned
inwards,
we've
been
too
focused
Inward
and
we've
gotten
really
good
at
like
building
all
this
process
and
I
mean
our
culture
is
awesome,
but
I
think
we
got
too
caught
up
in
in
that
and
it's
time
to
like
turn
the
Gaze
outward,
and
so
that
means
like
just
reducing
like
radically
simplifying
all
of
these
internal
things
that
seem
so
important
at
one
point
you
know
it's
really
all
about
serving
it's
about
serving
the
stakeholders
of
of
the
commons,
and
so
you
know
whatever
we
can
do
to
free
our
energy
up
so
that
that
becomes
like
it's
like
this
is
like
from
the
heart.
C
You
know
it's
like
we
gotta,
like
figure
out
how
we
tap
this.
This
isn't
about
just
I
mean
we
all
need
to
survive.
We
need
to
like
earn
money
and
stuff
like
that,
and
we
need
to
tap
that
extra
juice.
You
know
that
thing
that
comes
from
being
of
service
to
something
bigger
and
I.
Think
that's
that's
the
thing.
If
we
can
actually
do
that,
if
we
can,
if
we
can
get
people
excited
about
this,
isn't
just
about
looking
inward.
This
is
about.
C
We
have
a
mission
and
we're
here
to
like
kind
of
light
people
up
and
help
them
we're
gonna
unleash
so
much
energy,
but
we
have
to.
We
have
to
stop
doing
so.
Many
of
the
like
little
things
that
are
internally
I
will
pass
it
to
Max.
B
Thank
you,
yeah
yeah,
so
it's
my
first
course
I
may
not
know
everything
right,
but
what
you
say
seems
pretty
natural
to
my
experience.
In
the
other
comments
you
know
some
redesign
and
refreshment
is
something
needed
to
turn
happens
and
yeah.
Reducing
complexity
is
a
good
idea.
Usually
I
also
see
that,
like
at
least
like
in
last
week,
I
had
at
least
two
requests
where
TSC
Community
can
be
of
help,
and
that's
also
I'm.
Looking
how
to
engage
you
know
and
to
help
build
these
Bridges
and
I
also
was
recently
on
the
script.
B
The
commons
Association
Meetup
in
Austria,
where
we
discussed
the
vision
where,
like
there
were
like
two
axes
like
our
ability
to
self-organize
and
then
the
connect
is
to
the
other
hubs
and
they
compare
the
situation
where
the
like
there's,
not
a
lot
of
connection
to
being
like
you
know
more,
like
a
cult
you
know
and
more
like
enclosed,
and
the
more
positive
vision
is
like
be
really
connecting
with
everybody
else.
So
that
resonated
a
lot
with
me.
Thank
you,
so
I
don't
know
who
to
pass
to.
A
A
And
you're
very
welcome
to
to
hang
out
and
listen,
okay,
so
hey
that
was
actually
really
nice
discussion
that
helped
a
lot
actually
getting
so
many
perspectives.
Okay,
Gideon's
gonna,
run
to
sample,
maybe
we'll
end.
The
call
then
now
I
just
want
to
say
thanks
everyone
for
coming
today
and
always
a
great
time
spending
an
hour
with
you.