►
From YouTube: W5 Stewards Council: Param debates and steps forward
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
No,
it's
about
rocking
the
vote
about
getting
people
to
vote
yeah,
so
I
mean
I
I
was
proposing
that
we
have
this
this
council
really
exclusively
on
what
are
our
expectations?
How
what's
our
target,
how
many
people
do
we
want
to
vote
and
how
are
we
going
to
get
there
and
what's
realistic
and
maybe
what's
he
been
ambitious.
B
Yeah,
well,
I
think
the
most
important
thing
is
informed
voters
you
know:
what's
really
cool
is
like
we
don't
want
people
just
going
up
there
and
voting
for
the
favorite
meme
or
their
favorite
name.
We
do
that.
All
of
my
proposals
will
get
to
the
top.
No
I'm
just
kidding
my
name's
suck,
but
I
but
we'll
end
up
with
a
you
know
a
marxist
vlad.
Just
because
it's
funny
we
really
want.
B
We
really
want
the
propos,
the
people
to
vote
that
are
coming
to
debates,
and
I
think
the
most
important
thing
is
at
the
end
of
every
debate.
We
need
to
say,
hey,
go
vote
a
little,
you
know
and
get
people
voting
and
maybe
even
showing
them
how
to
vote
at
the
end
of
the
debate,
because
we
don't.
B
B
That's
that's
what
I'd
say
for
rocking
the
vote.
Also,
though
we
need
to
get
those.
Do
we
have
five
proposals
on
the
forum
yet.
A
I
put
one
up
today,
so
gideon
put
one
up
yesterday
too
nice
and
he
credited
mitch.
I
saw
in
the
parade
he
praised
mitch
for
helping
him
encouraging
him
and
helping
him
do
that.
So
that
was
very
cool
mitch.
A
A
Cool
so
welcome,
nate
and
mitch,
and
the
topic
for
today
is
rock
the
vote
and
what
are
any
strategies
issues
concerns
expectations,
plans
that
you
want
to
share
to
make
sure
we
have
a
good
turnout
for
the
vote.
A
A
D
Yeah,
I
think,
like
spamming.
The
tweeter
would
be
good,
like
maybe
making
a
lot
of
of
of
tweets
like
in
a
row
and
saying
like
okay,
let's
rock
the
boat,
and
also,
I
think
that
maybe
I
don't
know
if
it
would
be
good
to
remove
or
to
clean
a
little
bit
the
the
token
log
repository,
because
it's
like
too
many
proposals
and
that
may
be
like
scary
to
people.
But
I
don't
know
if
that's
like
making
things
too
complex
and.
D
Yeah,
I
think
that
that
telling
everyone
in
in
our
working
groups
that
the
the
boat
is
up
and
I'll
pass
to
mitch.
A
So
the
question
is
really
like:
share
any
strategies.
Issues
concerns
expectations,
plans
that
we
should
have
that
you
have-
or
we
should
have
for
rocking
the
vote
this
weekend
and
the
vote
will
close
tuesday
and,
of
course,
will
be
the
final
three
to
five
five
few
top
few
ones
that
will
make
it
into
the
runoff
that
will
be
considered.
C
Yeah,
I
think
it's
gonna,
be,
I
think
it's
gonna
be
tight.
There's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
proposals
that
I
think
are
going
to
go
into
the
runoff
I
think,
but
as
far
as
blockers
I'd
like
to
see
or
think
of
some
sort
of
creative
format
for
the
final
debate,
I
think
we
talked
about
a
little
bit
and
then
moving
into
voting
from
there.
You
know.
A
A
Maybe
we
look
at
the
hatcher
list
and
each
of
us
pick
five
or
six
people
that
we
want
to
really
be
like
hey.
Do
you
have
any
questions?
Can
I
can
I
answer
any
questions
for
you
about
the
these
votes.
B
I
I
think
for
this
phase,
though
it's
like,
if
they
don't
come
to
the
debates,
they're
just
they're
they'll
just
pick
randomly,
we
really
don't
want.
I
would
say
this
phase
is:
let's
rock
the
I,
let's
rock
the
debates
you
know
and
and
tell
people
to
vote
that
are
at
the
debates
because,
as
wonka
said
there's
just
so
many
or
maybe
is,
was
it
zeptimus
or
wonka
someone
clearing
the
clearing,
the
you
know.
We
shouldn't
clear,
in
my
opinion,
the
token
log,
because
we
said
that
we
were
going
to
keep
them
up
there.
B
So
we
should
stick
with
that,
but,
like
there's
just
too
many
choices
that
people
will
just
vote
by
name
if
they're
pushed
to
vote,
if
they
think
they're
supposed
to
vote-
and
I
think
for
the
next
phase-
we'll
have
it'll
be
way
more
digestible
they'll
have
four
options:
they
will
be
able
to
participate
without
engaging
in
debates
because
there'll
be
a
voter's
pamphlet
and
digestible
information.
B
This
is
just
chaos
a
little
bit.
You
know
it's
like
there's
100
proposals.
Some
some
of
them
are
being
debated.
Some
of
them
aren't.
Where
do
you
find
them
on
token?
Log,
I
think
it's,
I
think
it's
okay,
that
we,
if
we
have
lowish
voter
turnout
as
long
as
because
in
the
end
it's
just
curating
the
top
three
to
five.
That
will
be
well
digested
for
the
serious
vote
where
we
really
say
get
out
there
and
pick
the
economy.
B
You
know-
and
this
is
more
about-
like
you
know
getting
as
many
token
engineers
in
there
to
ask
really
strong
questions
into
like
about
this
stuff
and
and
then
stick
put
their
opinion
in.
I
think
it's
more
valuable
and
and
if
we
can
get
people
to
come
to
the
debates
and
be
informed
and
then
vote,
I
I
think
that's,
I
think
that's
better
than
just
having
people
get
out
there
and
click
the
button
and
then
it
just
increases
our
randomness.
A
Yeah
one
one
thing
I
see
is
that
once
we
have
the
final
votes,
then
we
can
no
longer
change
those.
So
any
token
engineer
that
then
has
a
great
insight
on
one
of
them.
That's
great,
except
for
this
one
thing.
Well,
there's
no
longer
anything
we
could
do
you
know
like
sort
of
like
oh
too
late.
We
can't
do
anything
about
that.
A
A
Okay,
do
you
want
to
pass
it
or
do
you
want
to
finish.
C
I'll
pass
it
on
to,
I
do:
have
you
gone.
E
Yet
thank
you
mitch
and
hello,
savage
how
you
doing
so.
Basically,
for
me,
it's
from
my
side.
I
think
it's
it's
always
been
about
bringing
the
community
around,
even
if
they
cannot
vote
so.
E
I
think
I
don't
know
if
we
have
abstract
from
the
situation,
but
I
feel
that
I
hope
that
the
debates
and
the
process
of,
for
example,
the
bigger
debate
on
next
week
that
could
be
recorded,
because
I
feel
we
have
a
huge
kind
of
content
that
could
be
really
nice
as
an
example
for
future
iterations
or
for
anyone
who
wants
to
learn
about
this.
But
a
strict
thing
talking
about
this.
E
The
only
thing
I
will
that
I
thought
about
was
what
I
proposed
in
community
does,
which
is
basically
just
create
attack
of
hatcher's
and
keeping
them
in
the
loop,
which
I
will
do
today.
The
category
for
the
hatchers
to
sort
of
you
know
at
least
tag
them
on
the
debate
and
make
them
aware
that
all
these
things
are
happening
because
then
they
are
the
ones
who
come
both
so
yeah
and
that's
it.
I
will
pass
it
on
to
nate.
F
Yeah
thanks
adam,
so
I
agree
largely
with
with
griff.
I
think
that
the
debate
is
probably
the
the
most
important
thing.
I
think
we
should
do
everything
that
we
can
to
promote
the
debate
debate,
because
people
show
to
the
the
debate,
then
they'll
show
up
to
vote
and
so
at
least
those
people
that
are
going
to
be
in
that
room.
F
I
think
having
especially
if
it's
going
to
be
a
large
debate,
that
we
can
educate
and
explore
all
the
different
aspects
and
concerns
people
have,
I
just
think
yeah
most
of
our
communications
and
promotion,
external
communications
for
individuals,
plus
the
organizational
accounts
should
be
dedicated
to
that
debate.
But
that's
the
only
ideas
I
have
for
it.
So
I'll
pass
it
over
to
target.
A
No
problem
welcome
to
goodness
we're
talking
about
this
weekend.
Being
the
weekend
to
vote
for,
hatcher's
can
vote
on
the
proposals
that
will
go
into
the
run-up,
the
proposals
that
will
be
eligible
for
the
runoff
vote,
so
the
shortlist
so
we're
voting
on
the
shortlist
and
thoughts
strategies,
issues,
concerns
expectations
or
plans
for
getting
our
community
our
hatcheries
to
vote
this
weekend.
G
Yeah
I
mean
you
guys
have
been
really
good
about
getting
everybody
out
there
up
to
now.
I
think
we
just
need
to
just
do
more
of
that,
and
then
I
think
it's
also
true
that
maybe
we
shouldn't
over
push
it,
because
people
might
think
that
this
vote
is
really
the
final
one
or
something
you
know.
If
we
do
a
major
kind
of
push
yeah,
it's
a
I
mean
participatory
democracy.
G
It
only
works
if
you
participate,
so
you
know,
that's
the
most
important
thing
right
participation
is,
is
the
crux
of
all
of
it
and
I
actually,
I
actually
feel
like
that,
should
actually
be
a
part
of
our
overall
communication
structure
in
terms
of
what
we
communicate
tonally
with
comms,
with
gravity
with
everything
right.
This
isn't
a
passive
sort
of
situation
right.
G
I
think
one
of
the
greatest
things
about
this
cultural
build
is
that
we
have
the
chance
to
write
many
wrongs
right
and
one
of
the
the
problems
with
centralization,
and
things
like
this
is
that
it
makes
you
feel
like
you
have
no
power,
and
you
just
internalize
that
so
the
fact
that
you
know
you're
being
friendly
and
saying
you
guys
should
vote
and
everything
it's.
No,
it's
really
it's
a
duty.
It's
an
obligation!
G
Also,
there's
a
it's
not
just
that
we're
we'd
love
to
have
you
and
that
we're
all
friendly
and
nice
and
we're
trying
to
include
you.
It's
really
important
to
make
sure
you
understand
that,
just
as
much
as
you
have
to
keep
your
keys
and
everything
and
now
because
the
bank's
not
doing
all
of
it,
it's
the
same
way
with
your
democracy.
You
have
to
care
for
it,
and
this
is
one
of
the
primary
ways
in
which
you
you
care
for
it.
So
that's
all
I
would
say
just
from
a
tonal
standpoint,.
H
Yeah,
thank
you
tim.
I
think
my
I
I
share
juanka's
concern
about
like
cleaning
up
the
token
log.
H
However,
I
mean
I'm
I'm
still
like
myself,
using
some
of
the
old
versions
of
of
some
proposals
to
get
some
ideas,
so
maybe,
if
maybe
it
could
be
up
to
people
that
submit
proposals,
they
could
take
the
the
vote
tag
out
this
way,
the
old
proposals
can
be
available
for
anyone
to
check
them,
but
the
token
log
interface
would
be
a
little
bit
cleaner
because
yeah,
it's
just
a
it's
just
a
concern
that
I
have
that
people
that
are
like
out
of
the
loop
will
go
inside
the
tool
that
we
use
for
voting
and
they
won't.
H
They
won't
really
get
a
lot
of
of
of
what's
going
on,
so
I
I
would
suggest
cleaning
it
up
a
little
bit
and
and
and
yeah.
Maybe
maybe
this
way
can
it
won't
come
off
as
something
like
so
intimidating
or
something
that
people
have
been
like
out
of
the
loop
for
yeah.
I
guess
those
are
my
two
sets
I'll
pass
it
back
to
youtube.
B
The
the
it's,
the
only
thing
is
it's
a
little
different
than
last
time.
Basically,
you
have
to
be
an
admin
to
to
change
to
edit
any
other.
Any
admin
can
edit
any
of
the
proposals.
I
saw
wonka
edited
his
his
proposal
to
add
his
meme
at
the
top
above
the
other
meme.
The
cheater
cheater
can.
B
Just
kidding
but
but
so
admins
can
anyone
who
owns
that
in
the
com
is
an
owner
in
the
commons
build
can,
but
because
we
have
a
bot
submitting
the
proposals
that
kind
of
creates
an
unfair
advantage.
You
know.
B
Build
slash
commons,
conf,
half
hyphen,
config
hyphen
proposals.
I
I
pasted.
A
So
the
topic
today
is
rocking
the
vote.
Strategies,
issues,
concerns
expectations
or
plans
for
the
commons
configuration
upgrade
proposals
which
happens
this
weekend
and
closes
on
tuesday.
G
I
heard
something
in
one
of
the
parameter
parties
that
we
should
ignore
the
numbers,
because
I
think
griff
said
we
should
ignore
the
numbers,
because
these
are
just
you
know.
These
are
just
largely
tests.
G
I
I
do
wonder
how
we're
gonna,
if
we're
sending
people
to
token
log,
how
do
we
make
it
so
that
it
doesn't
just
look
like
another
popularity
contest
to
them?.
B
Yeah,
the
I
don't
know
about
ignoring
the
numbers,
but
but
definitely
the
the.
I
think
that
the
strategy
should
be
you
know
the
people
who
are
proposing
parameters
need
to
say
this
is
how
you
vote
for
mine,
right
and,
and
we
need
to
have
some
convictions
and
start
curating.
This
a
little
bit
better
and
proposals
that
we
like
we.
We
start
we
can
start
rocking
the
vote
and
starting
to
curate
our
favorite
proposals
to
the
top.
D
What
I
think
that
what
that
got,
that
that
message
is
that,
as
before,
there
were
time
for
for
building
new
proposals.
It
wasn't
like
ideal
to
spend
all
your
voting
power
and
only
to
to
like
spend
a
little
bit
of
voting
to
highlight
them.
But
now
that
we
are
rocking
the
boat,
you
can
actually
spend
all
your
voting
power
because,
like
the
proposals
that
are,
there
will
be
mostly
the
ones
that
will
be
participating
in
the
decision.
B
I
would
say
you
have
free
reign
to
spend,
like
maybe
20,
of
your
voting
power
right
now,
try
not
to
spend
more
than
that
until
like
the
weekend
and
then
even
then
only
spend
like
50
of
your
voting
power
and
try
to
hold
off
the
you
know
if
you're
engaged
leave
that
last
50
for
tuesday.
So
you
can
really
like
you
know,
have
the
most
information
that
you
can
to
make
the
vote.
But
I
think
we
should
we.
A
A
A
Angela
comes
to
mind,
and
you
know
when
I
mentioned
the
vote
this
weekend
to
her
she's
like
what
tell
me
what
to
do
like,
and
it's
like
well
read
the
forum
and
and
choose
one
of
one
of
the
five
that
are
on
the
forum
now
it's
sort
of
like
the
call
to
action
there,
but
I
think
I
think
people.
A
I
think
that
what
we
have
on
the
forum
should
be
something
the
way
that
they
were
written
should
be
enough
for
someone
to
read
it
and
understand
what
the
general
differences
are
about.
Those,
even
though
we
don't
have
something.
That's
more
comparative,
you
know
transversally
yeah.
I
do.
E
Can
we
make
a
thread
on
twitter
with
all
proposals
and
sort
of
keep
this
gamification
process
of
hey
this?
This
proposal
got
updated
on
this
sentence,
so
we
have
five
threads
or
six
threads
on
twitter
that
we
can
sort
of
send
to
to
hatchers
or
to
people
who
want
to
know
on
the
go
just
a
brief
summary
of
the
proposal.
So
we
don't
sort
of
you
know.
A
I
like
that
idea,
I
like
that
idea
of
like
linking
to
exactly
you
know
like
on
the
voting
page
like
linked
to
exactly
the
the
proposal.
Actually,
no,
because
it
goes
to
the
github
so
never
mind
that,
but
linking
to
the
forum
which
describes
it
yeah
there's
something
there's
something
interesting
in
that.
A
H
Okay,
yeah,
that's
true!
Sorry,
let
I'll
reach
out
to
zero
to
see
if
he
has
some
free
time
during
the
day
today
and
and
we'll
jump
on
that
to
kevin
published
by
today,
I
was
gonna.
Ask
if
nate
you,
you
did
a
great
job
on
on
the
article
that
you
uploaded.
Are
you
gonna
be
doing
any
updates
on
on
that
one.
F
In
particular
that
article
no,
that
was
just
kind
of
a
dive
into
like
an
example
of
just
exploring
the
different
modules
for
people.
What
we
were
going
to
work
on
is
the
pamphlet,
the
voting
pamphlet
for
the
tec.
I
know
that
bins
was
showed
interest
in
actually
collaborating
on
that
so
yeah.
I
just
think
that's.
We
need
to
really
filter
down
to
how
many
proposals
that
we
want
to
do
and
then
figure
out
how
to
best
educate
the
community
about
those
proposals.
I'm
not
I'm
not
exactly
sure
the
the
method.
F
For
that,
though,
because
you
know-
and
a
part
of
me
just
wants
to
blast
token
log
with
as
much
information
like
I
don't
know
if
we
can
put
information
on
token
log,
but
like
right
there
when
they
vote,
but
I
don't
I
don't
know
if
that's
possible.
H
A
So
yeah
that
that
article
is
is,
is
awesome,
but
it's
also
not.
A
F
F
A
So
right
now
we
have
these
in
the
forum
and
griff
is
going
to
share
one
more.
So
it's
this
one,
one
that
I
shared
one,
that
is
up
to
miss
shared
he's,
abandoning
the
casino
for
reserve
ratio
matters,
which
is
very
cool
one,
that
gideon
shared
this
one,
that
wonka
share
and
mitch's.
A
F
E
A
Cool,
so
I
think
everyone
is
gone
any
other
thoughts
about
this.
A
It
sounds
like
we
push
for
the
debates
we
reach
out
to
some
people
that
we
think
are
going
to
be
interested
in
may
have
questions
we
share
what
we
can
on
twitter
to
let
people
hatchers
that
follow
us
on
twitter,
at
least
be
aware
that
this
is
the
vote
on
the
weekend
and
if
they
want
to
come
and
read
the
form,
the
five
on
the
forum
that
they
can
and
they're
invited
to
and
and
a
comparison
article
that
nate
will
work
on.
A
Awesome
mitch,
you
brought
up
a
format
for
the
final
debate
on
tuesday.
Do
we
want
to
delve
into
that
now?
Because
this
our
chance
before
tuesday.
B
The
only
concern
I
have
with
that
is
that
we
might
have
more
than
25
people
come
since
if
we
really
promote
it.
As
like
the
last
the
final
debate,
you
know,
and
we
should
have
a
plan
for
how
we
want
to
break
off.
B
Maybe
people
who
propose,
maybe
we
end
up
breaking
up
into
two
rooms,
and
you
know
the
people
who
propose
at
the
beginning
could
also
you
know
propose
at
the
at
the
end,
for
the
second
room
and
and
people
who
propose
at
the
end
in
the
for
you
know
at
the
beginning,
in
the
second
room
can
propose
and
debate
in
the
first
room,
potentially
just.
E
B
A
E
I
think
most
of
people
won't
be
able
to
go
to
the
other
debates
and
that's
a
further
date
to
go
so
people
are
will
be
able
to
schedule
it
better
than
the
other
ones.
So
that's
why
I
think
more
people
will
join.
F
F
I
think
it's
much
more
effective
than
having
individuals
debating
their
params
and
having
questions
asked,
which
is
going
to
take
a
lot
of
time
and
a
lot
not
as
much
information
and
education
is
being
done,
because
I
do
think
you
get
sidetracked
with
that.
Many
people
in
a
debate.
G
I
have
a
question
about
this
in
terms
of
education
and
I'm
often
pointing
people
to
token
engineering
comms
as
a
example
of
how
to
do
things
the
proper
way.
I
do.
I
do
wonder
every
time
I
attend
a
pram's
party,
even
though
I
I
will
probably
never
feel
entirely
comfortable
with
what
I'm
learning
there.
I
I
learned
something:
incredibly,
you
new
and
useful,
and
so
I
do
wonder,
are
we
in
any
way
capturing
some
of
this?
It's
the
the
wisdom
which
comes
out
of
these
things.
G
You
know,
like
I
don't
know,
do
we
have
you
know
like.
Oh,
if
we
set
this
thing
like
this,
then
it's
going
to
be
like
that
is
that
is
that
somewhere,
you
know,
like
I
know,
griff.
You
know
whenever
he
opens
his
mouth
says
something
really
smart,
but
the
fact
is
I'd
sure
just
like
to
be
like
you
know,
getting
the
gist
of
how
these
parameters
work
in
the
short
and
medium
and
long
term.
G
You
know
and
given
that
there
are
some
people
here
who
have
a
lot
of
brand
parties
under
their
belt.
I
don't
know
if
there
are
some
basic
principles.
We
could
outline
and
put
them
somewhere
for
the
community
to
look
at,
so
they
have
a
basic
understanding
of
this
thing
means
this,
and
that
thing
means
that
surely
it's
not
all
captured
in
the
in
the
in
the
dashboard.
A
I
mean
what
I
found
useful
there.
I
don't
know
if
this
answers.
Your
question
perfectly
was
like
reading
reading
the
rationale
for
each
of
those
modules.
G
A
G
Yeah,
I
just
I
guess
what
I'm
saying
is.
Is
that
what
I
might
write
about?
My
thing
isn't
necessarily
true.
Do
you
know
what
I
mean?
It
might
be
true
for
me,
but
it's
not
it's
not
factual.
This
is
my.
This
is
my.
This
is
just
my
estimation
about
it.
Like
the
thing
is,
it's
like.
I
don't
know,
I'm
not
casting
aspersions
on
you
specifically,
but
I'm
just
saying
that
that
I'm
going
to
weight.
You
know
griff's
opinion
over
almost
anyone
else
in
terms
of
this
so
generally
speaking
whatever
it
is.
G
That
he's
going
to
be
voting,
for
which
is
my
primary
interest
at
this
point
with
the
vote
is
probably
what
I'm
going
to
be
going
for
because
he's
the
single
most
informed
person
in
this
entire
space
as
far
as
I'm
concerned,
and
so
so
the
thing
is,
I'm
just
wondering
factually
how
to
how
to
what
are
real
facts
about
this.
This
implication
means
that,
and
this
means
that,
and
from
my
experience
you
know
I
don't
know
that's.
I
just
wondered.
B
B
That's
very
humbling,
I'm
definitely
nowhere
near
the
number
one
and
I'll
be
ending
just
like
everyone
else
will
have
to
end
up
voting
for
many
of
them
right
like
because
then
you
vote
for
yours
until
you
run
out
of
your
quadra,
your
favorite
until
you
run
out
where,
like
quadratic
voting's
like
oh
the
next
vote's
gonna,
take
you
know
half
of
your
voting
power
and
you're
like
well.
Maybe
maybe
I
give
one
vote
to
these
other
ones.
C
Just
to
maybe
I
know
we're
going
off
on
a
tangent
here,
but
I
don't
think
there's
any
way
to
really
prove
the
things
that
we're
saying
are
true,
because
we
don't
know
that
they're
true
until
we
we
have
the
data
to
back
it
up.
C
So
we
can
say,
like
oh,
a
high
entry
tribute
will
create
these
effects,
but
like
it's
all,
an
experiment
at
the
end
of
the
day,
because
there's
no
like
nobody's
done
this
there's
no
cookie
cutter
template
that
we
can
use
and
like
run
simulations
on,
there's
like
so
we
can
say
as
much
as
we
want
about
the
implications.
But
we
don't
actually
know.
A
Griff's,
probably
gonna
get
my
votes
too,
even
against
mine,
no
okay,
so
we
go
back
to
the
format
of
the
final
debate.
So
nate
you
suggested
a
different
format
of
having
sort
of
an
educational
module.
I
I'll
say
I
actually
really
like
hearing
people
present
their
their
proposal.
A
It
actually
is
one
of
the
ways
that
I
learned
the
most
more
than
just
trying
to
use
the
tool
myself
hearing
and
watching
people
describe
and
share
what
how
they've
arrived
at
the
conclusions
was
the
most
educational
part
for
me.
F
I
guess
my
question
is
how
many
people
are
actually
going
to
be
presenting
their
proposals
and
which
ones
are
going
to
be
presented.
You
know
we
got
a
two-hour
time
slot
to
fill,
and
so,
if
we
were
to
use
maybe
30
to
45
minutes
on
straight.
Just
like
you
know,
two
people
take
a
two
stewards,
take
a
a
module
each
and
they
just
basically
have
a
conversation
about
potential
implications.
The
ideas
behind
it,
the
you
know
what
drives
it
things
that
they've
seen
their
their
observations.
F
I
think
it
could
be
hugely
beneficial
before
we
get
into
the
debates
of
the
actual
proposals
that
can
inform
voters
on
on
what
they're.
Looking
at
what
they're
saying
what
you
know,
what
what
what
they're
trying
to
propose
and
what
they're
defending.
So
I
just
think
that,
especially
if
we
get
a
bunch
of
new
people
who
haven't
been
to
the
proposals
debates
before
or
submitted
their
own
proposal
or
coming
in
kind
of
fresh,
I
think
it's
really
important
for
them
to
get
that
information.
C
C
You
know
they're
always
interesting,
even
if
you're
not
american
and
like
there's
a
facilitator
and
they
like
present
questions
and
then
each
like
proposer
has
to
respond
to
them
and
like
make
their
case
and
like,
I
think,
that's
a
really
really
fun
way
to
like
see
people's
take
on
like
particular
topics
as
they
relate
to
their
configuration.
F
Yeah,
I
kind
of
like
that
more
than
than
just
having
you
know,
random
questions
from
the
audience.
I,
although
I
do
like
that,
I
just
think
that
we
get
kind
of
sidetracked
and
from
a
lot
of
the
debates
that
I've
seen,
we've
had
a
lot
of
questions
that
are
kind
of
out
of
left
field
that
take
up
15
minutes
of
time
and
a
lot
of
people
don't
get
much
out
of
it.
So
having
that
kind
of
like
controlled
facilitation,
like
you
said,
is
yeah.
I
like
that
mitch.
A
It
does
something
else,
that's
really
cool,
which
is
compares
them
across
each
other
like
one
by
one
versus
you
hear
everything
about
one
proposal,
and
then
you
hear
everything
about
the
next
and
then
the
next
and
you're
kind
of
like
wait.
What
was
this
one
again,
I
feel
like
there's
something
really
interesting
about
talking
about
one
module
and
then
having
five
people
respond
about
that
one
module.
B
I
mean
I
could
definitely
host
and
I
bet
lauren
would
be
down
to
take
the
one
that
I
want
to
promote.
She
didn't
end
up
submitting
one
so
and
then
also
it
wouldn't
be.
I
feel
like
I
already
in
this
call.
It
sounds,
like
my
opinion,
is
gonna
be
overweighted,
and
I,
like
all
of
these
proposals
for
different
reasons,
so
it's
not
really
fair
and
for
the
proposals
we,
I
don't
think
we'd
get
a
good
democratic
process.
B
Honestly,
if
I'm,
if
everyone's
like,
oh
well,
griff's
running
the
params
working
group,
he's
been
thinking
about
this
forever
blah
blah
blah
I'll
just
do
whatever
griff
says
I
vote
for
that,
I'm
happy
to
facilitate
as
a
as
the
question
person
like
hey.
What
do
you
think
about
vesting
lengths
boom
boom
boom?
We
passed
that
around
okay
conviction,
growth,
give
us
the
dirty,
you
know
and
we
pass
it
around
and
we
challen
you
know
different
people
represent
different
proposals
and
say
why
they
think
their
strategy
is
the
best
I
I
could.
G
G
Where
we
can
know
you
know,
in
terms
of
like
wisdom
of
crowds
or
whatever,
I
think
something
in
between
so
then
that's
like
a
baseline
for
where
we
are
in
terms
of,
and
then
we
can
show
how
that
might
deviate
from
one
thing
or
another.
It
might
be
an
interesting
sense-making
apparatus
or
give
us
a
keel
to
navigate
through
the
final
debates.
Here
I
don't
know
just
an
idea.
B
I
think
I
think
that
I
think
that
it's
not
as
I
think
it's
more
nuanced
than
averaging.
Unfortunately,
I
think
that
will
be
easy
to
do
over
christmas
for
the
runoff,
but
man,
you
know
it's
like
kind
of
like
well
look
at
this
cake
recipe
and
look
at
that
cake
recipe.
Well,
look
at
all
these
cake
recipes.
Let's,
what's
the
average
ingredients,
you
know
okay?
Well,
this
is
what
it
takes
to
make
a
delicious
cake.
It's
like
that!
Cake's
gonna
taste,
like
you
know,
so,
like
you
you're
you're
one.
B
B
You
know
it's
it's
more
like
we
would
want
to
put
each
module
kind
of
in
its
own
spectrum.
You
know-
and
I
just
think
it's
too
much
nuance
for
us
to
pull
off
in
the
last
five
days.
B
But
we
we
could
try,
I
mean
nate
and
I
are
going
to
go
through
some
stuff
after
the
community
call
and
we
could
try
to
look
at
different
different
sets
of
proposals
and
what
they
did
with
each
module
and
kind
of
like
maybe
make
a
spectrum.
But
man
it.
It's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
work.
A
Okay,
do
we
need
to
confirm
now
who
will
take
part,
or
we
just
will
see
who's
able
to
present
on
tuesday
or
to
defend
or
to
advocate
to
champion
on
on
tuesday.
A
A
A
Okay,
then
maybe
can
we
have
a
check
in
on
the
working
group
funding
proposals?
Are
there
any
blockers,
any
issues,
any
questions
you
want
to
ask
to
the
rest
of
the
stewards.
I'm
gonna
pass
around
I'll
pass
to
you
chewie.
First,
you
had
some
questions
which
we
talked
about
in
the
last
one.
Maybe
give
you
some
more
time
to
see.
If
there's
anything
else,
you
want
to
ask.
H
Not
really
it
it
was,
it
was
just
something
that
that
was
was
kind
of
blocking
me
because
after
we
pushed
some
of
the
dates,
I
didn't
really
know
like
how
to
like
approach
the
contributors
or
or
how
to
talk
about
this
delicate
issue.
But
since
I
brought
it
up
and
everyone
was
and
everyone
everyone
pretty
much
agreed,
I
I
feel
more
comfortable,
and
I
also
feel
that
they
are
a
little
bit
more
confident
in
saying
like
okay.
H
So
this
is
how
I'm
gonna
be
like
compensated
for
for
the
work
that
I've
been
doing,
and
this
is
what
I'm
gonna
start
doing
on
on
january,
after
the
comments
upgrade.
So
that
was
pretty
much
the
only
thing
that
I
felt
wasn't
clear
enough
in
in
the
funding
proposal.
So
now
it
should
be.
I
think
it
should
be
easier
after
we
have
the
first,
the
first
steam
sinks
to
yeah
close
this
this
proposal
and
start
having
a
more
formal
discussion
around
it,
but
yeah
that
was
pretty
much.
A
Are
there
other
working
groups
that
are
thinking
about
a
sort
of
bonus
for
retroactive
efforts
in
their
working
group?
E
B
I've
been
donating
on
giveth
as
well
to
fund
a
lot
of
salaries,
and
so
I
will
probably
eventually
get
around
to
asking
for
some
of
that
money
paid
to
be
paid
back,
probably
all
of
it
because
it's
very
well
accounted
for,
but
I'm
gonna,
not
it's
not
gonna,
be
my
highest
priority
and
it'll
I'll.
Just
put
the
proposals
up
there
and
not
really
ask
that
they'd
be
voted
on.
You
know
that's
kind
of
my
thought
on
it
and
if
they
pass
it
passes,
if
not,
it's
fine.
A
A
I
guess,
then,
the
question
is:
is
that
something
to
take
into
consideration
for
the
people
that
are
going
to
have?
Well?
B
If
they
would
like,
if,
if
they're,
if
they're
getting
more
than
if
they're
doing
more
than
a
thousand,
if
you're
gonna
ask
for
more
than
a
thousand
dollars
worth
of
retroactive
funding,
I
would
say
just
throw
it
in
give
a
thing
and
let's
it
doesn't
have
to
be
retroactive.
We
can
just
pay
them,
because,
if
they're
doing
good
work,
they're
doing
good
work
and
it
shouldn't
have
to
be
a
dow
vote
so
and
I
totally
trust
you
chewie
and
eduardo
like.
B
You
know
I
would
ask
for
some
reasonable,
like
consideration
of
that.
Just
for,
like
you
know,
to
make
things
a
little
more
fair
across,
like
you
know,
hey
when
I,
when
I
did
this
work
for
for
the
tec,
I
was
able
to
buy.
B
You
know
a
lunch
and
when
I
did
this
work
for
the
tc,
I
was
able
to
buy
a
car.
You
know
it's
like.
Okay,
that's
not
really
fair!
So
just
having
a
little
bit
of
recognition
of
like
different.
What
what
money
buys
you
in
your
in
your
locality
but
but
yeah?
I
I
trust,
whatever
makes
sense.
D
I
I
had
one
concern
and
like
this
is
an
idea
that
grief
gave
me
on
monday
and
and
for
gravity
and
is
to
have
like
a
treasurer
and
someone
who
can
be
like
responsible
of
of
making
the
the
the
distribution
of
of
the
bounties.
D
But
maybe
it
would
be
also
good
to
have
some
technical
guidance,
because
on
on
on
the
way
to
make
the
the
the
disbursements,
because
yeah
to
to
avoid
gas
and
and
all
that
to
le
and
to
like
use
the
best
way.
The
ck,
sync
and
and
all
that
like
to
just
have
like
a
guidance
maybe
to
all
the
working
groups
so
that
we
can
have
like
yeah.
Like
the
the
least
amount
of
of
of.
A
Thanks
for
sharing
that
wonka,
were
you
thinking
of
having
someone
who
is
a,
I
mean,
there's
there's
some
interest
in
maybe
sharing
this
piece
of
work,
this
treasury
role
across
more
than
one
working
group,
since
it's
something
that
many
working
groups
may
want
to
unburden
themselves
with.
D
Yeah
we,
the
thing
is
that
at
least
for
for
for
gravity,
as
we
are
deciding
like
a
lot
of
bounties
like
the
the
treasury,
would
would
vary
a
lot
between
the
months,
and
that
would
be
really
helpful
and
we
are
trying
to
to
to
like
shape
this.
This
responsibility
in
one
of
the
roles
that
that
we
are
designing
but
yeah.
I
also
think
that
it
can
be.
A
Cool
anything
else,
you
want
to
share
about
gravity,
or
were
you
past
his
optimist
for
transparency.
D
Yeah,
I
think
that
we
will
be
finishing
the
proposal
until
next
tuesday
and
I
think
that
after
next
tuesday
or
maybe
next
week,
we
will
be
uploading.
The
proposal
on
the
forum
yeah
we
we
wanted
to
be
there
for
the
start
of
the
year
and
we
yeah.
I
think,
that's
our
like
our
minimum
valuable
proposal
and
then
we
we
will
start
building
from
on
top
of
it.
B
I
I
I
will
say
fabio
is
probably
just
like
some
insight
that
fabio
is
doing
his
last
week,
a
balancer
full
time
and
then
he's
off
for
two
weeks
for
christmas,
so
he's
probably
and
he's
not
the
most
like
dm,
like
a
friendly
person,
so
he's
probably
just
waiting
until
next
week.
I'm
sure
he'll
be
able
to
make
the
time
because
his
full-time
jobs
just
stops.
So
I
bet
you'll
be
able
to
coordinate
with
him
easily
next
week.
A
I
also
think
probably
we
could
just
do
an
estimation
of
what
it
would
be
if
it
was
fabio
or
anyone
else
who
sets
up
doing
analytics
and
just
have
that
budget
set
aside
for
that
piece
of
work.
A
Okay,
cool!
Well,
that's
it
for
our
agenda.
We
still
have
two
minutes
before
our
community
call
happens
right
now,
so
any
last
things
anyone
wants
to
share
before
we
hop
off
this
call.
A
All
right:
well,
thanks.
Everyone.