►
From YouTube: TEC Transformation Strategy and Planning 1
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
B
Me
I
would
say
you
know
much
the
same.
You
know
I
think
when
we
talked
about
the
mission
for
the
Tec,
we
identified
like
the
three
key
categories
as
education
research
and
like
open
source
tools.
I
think
those
are
really
the
they
stand
the
test
of
time.
Those
are
still
the
public
goods
for
token
engineering
and
I
will
pass
to
Rex.
C
Okay,
I
didn't
have,
as
formal
has
formally
sat
on,
what
exactly
is
of
a
public
good,
because
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
things.
We're
calling
public
goods
which
may
be
Merit
goods
and
there's
like
a
well.
That's
like
a
technicality.
D
Thanks
Rex
yeah,
you.
D
I
come
back
to
this
idea
of
expertise
like
token
engineering
expertise,
and
you
know
sometimes
that
expertise
is
gets
embedded
in
the
human
brain.
You
know
that's
education,
sometimes
that
expertise
is,
is
being
like
discovered
and
applied
as
like
research
and
and
then
sometimes
it
gets
embedded.
You
know
in
software
as
protocols
and
other
you
know
coding,
so
I
I
think
it
does
go
back
to
some.
D
You
know
basically,
the
research,
education
and
tools
so
I
agree
with
Pam
and
but
I
think
of
it
as
kind
of
even
behind
that,
it's
like
expertise,
token,
engineering
expertise
and,
and
then
I
think
the
other
thing
like
public.
What
is
Public
public
is,
you
know
it's
available
for
everybody
and
I'm
also
really
interested
in
this
idea
of
like
common
goods.
You
know
like
comments
Goods,
like
Goods,
that
are
there
to
support
a
Commons
and
they
are.
D
They
have
the
kind
of
Economics
behind
them
that
supports
paying
back.
You
know
like
paying
back
to
the
people
who
came
before
and
helped
develop
those
things
and
and
keeping
that
kind
of
like
within
the
commons,
so
I
think.
That's
also
a
really
interesting
idea.
I
will
pass
it
to
Chewie.
F
Thanks
Eden
I
think
that,
like
a
good
token
engineering,
probably
good,
maybe
it's
like
a
little
bit
simple,
but
I
think
that
good
practices
in
general
I
feel
that
if
you
know
like
there
is
like
some
kind
of
voice.
That
makes
like
a
deeper
dive
in
like
expertise
and
just
like
good
decisions.
F
Responsible
decisions
around
tokenomics
I
feel
that
that
could
be
like
a
a
really
great
way
like
to
summarize,
like
the
the
mission
of
of
the
Tec
just
like
manual
or
a
summary
of
like
good
practices
and
having
the
opportunity
to
like
associate
the
that
idea
with
with
the
Tec
and
I'll
pass
it
to
Gene.
G
G
This
is
the
set
of
principles
that
that
we're
aligned
with,
but
so
I
think
that
that's
generally
what
what
is
being
developed
here
but
yeah,
that's
what
I
would
think
I
don't
know
who
else
is
going
to
next
we'll
pass
it
back
to
Chewie
for.
B
I
Well,
the
this
question
like
I
I,
am
glad
that
I
had
time
to
think
about
it,
because
what
is
a
token
engineering,
poorly
good,
when
I,
when
I
think
of
a
token
engineering,
public,
good,
I,
think
of
the
tragedy
of
the
public
goods
that
are
the
free
rider
problem.
The
prisoners
dilemma
that
no
one
wants
to
be
a
sucker,
the
provision
and
and
appropriation
thing
all
of
the
ostrom's
principles.
I
So
what
I
think
is
that
that's
why
we
are
not
the
token
engineering
public
good.
We
are
the
token
engineering
Commons.
Somehow
we
are
stewarding
and
and
putting
boundaries
on
on
the
token
engineering,
public,
good
and
yeah.
What
I
think
of
is
is
more
of
the
difference
on
this
question
between
a
public,
good
and
a
Commons,
and
why
we
are
a
Commons
and
and
yeah.
I
That's
that's
what
I
think
that
we
are
a
Commons
to
avoid
that
tragedy
of
like
no
one,
stepping
up
with
a
clear
leadership
or
like
not
having
the
real
boundaries
and
rules
and
not
being
able
to
have
our
own
governance
but
yeah
I,
I
I,
leave
it
there
and
I'll
pass
it
to
Libby.
E
Thank
you,
yeah
I
agree
with
mostly
what
everyone
said:
Education
and
Research,
and
best
practices,
guidelines,
safety
practices
and
I.
Think
of
public
goods,
not
as
something
that
needs
to
be
free,
because
I
I
think
everything
has
a
cost,
and
the
cost
will
also
always
fall
on.
Somebody
and
I,
like
this
distinction
that
what's
his
name,
think
like
a
commoner
made.
I
E
David
boiler
of
like
when
the
open
source
Community
changed
from
calling
free
software
to
open
source,
because
free
gave
this
impression
that
had
no
cost
and
yeah
I
think
it's
important
for
us
to
think
about
that.
So
I
think
public
goods
is
something
that
needs
to
be
available
and
accessible
for
all
of
the
people
in
that
Community
who
needs
those
things
to
be
used.
So
how
can
we
make
education
research
guidelines?
E
All
of
this
by
providing
all
of
these
things
an
accessible
cost
and
also
having
availability
of
reach
like
people
know
where
to
find.
K
K
Yeah
I
think
research
tools,
education
are
really
important
and
just
something
else,
maybe
just
to
add
to
the
conversation,
I
think
also
the
TC
and
I
think
that
the
general
web
3
Community
has
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
work
to
do
in
order
to
make
these
Concepts
and
these
definitions
more
more
clear
and
more
I
guess
Universal
I
feel
like
in
in
society
today.
K
Hearing
about
public
goods,
it's
it's
not
that
common
or
is
is
something
that
yes,
that
hasn't
been
talked
much
besides
politics,
and
maybe
not
with
the
best
definition
of
things
so
trying
to
to
reshape
that
into
public
goods
that
are
actually
governed
by
a
Commons
and
by
the
community
itself.
I
think
that's
really
interesting
concept
to
to
expand
to
to
the
rest
of
of
of
the
world
and
same
thing
with
talk
in
engineering.
K
I
think
both
Concepts
on
its
own
are
are
their
own
thing
like
are
not
easy
to
understand
at
all
and
I
think
we
just
have
that
that
task
of
making
it
easier
and
and
clearer
for
everyone
to
understand
what
public
goods
are
and
then
what
token
engineering
public
goods
are
as
well.
B
Okay,
cool
thanks
for
that
question.
Nate
I
was
actually
really
nice,
just
a
refresher.
Yes,
sorry
did
we
not
share
this.
B
They
even
dropped
that
okay,
sorry
about
that,
wanka,
okay,
so
Nate
and
I
prepared
a
little
agenda
for
us
today.
There
please
feel
free
to
add
anything
that
you
want
to
this
we're
going
to
run
out
of
time.
We're
not
going
to
cover
all
of
this.
Let
me
say
that,
right
now
we
have
about
47
minutes
left
so
how
to
phase
out
a
working
group.
So
we
have
some
working
groups
that
are
sort
of
stewardless
right
now.
B
Some
working
groups
that
are
phasing
out
on
their
own
in
a
I
would
say
non-controlled
fashion,
so
they
just
kind
of
disappear,
but
we
still
have
Discord
channels,
and
you
know
it's
still
on
the
website
and
we
still
have
calendar
entries
in
the
calendar,
so
we'd
like
to
provide
just
a
nice
way
for
working
groups
to
sort
of
go
through
a
checklist
to.
B
Let
me
see
oh
Nick,
good
you're,
sharing
it
to
go
through
and
and
maybe
I'm
going
to
share
it
too.
Actually
so
I
could
talk
while
I'm
moving
it
working
group
retirement.
B
So
this
started
as
like
a
pretty
rough
list
that
Nate
turned
into
like
a
really
nice
checklist,
just
the
the
things
that
a
working
group
should
consider
as
they're
retiring,
their
working
group
or
sun
setting
I'm
I'm
coming
to
the
word
sunsetting
as
a
nice
way
to
to
sort
of
end
the
working
group's
life
cycle
the
there
is.
This
is
a
draft,
so
please
feel
free
to
hop
into
the
document
and
you
know
add
some
suggestions
or
edits.
It
is
not
the
final
yes,
I
can
definitely
do
that.
Gideon!
B
Sorry,
that's
not
done
already.
Anyone
on
the
link
can
oh
I
cannot
do
that.
Sorry,
I
think
this
is
owned
by
Nate.
B
Okay,
cool
so
yeah,
so
the
idea
is
basically
it's
a
draft.
Hopefully
it
won't
take
us
more
than
the
rest
of
the
week
to
get
it
finalized
into
a
version
that
transparency,
soft
gov
communitas
will
all
be
using
pretty
much
right
away
to
just
make
sure
that
they've
considered
the
learnings
from
the
working
group,
the
financial
aspects,
what
they're
going
to
do
with
the
rest
of
the
funds?
B
We
can
maybe
have
some
more
conversations
about
that
here,
any
documentation
that
they
need
any
of
the
responsibilities
that
are
not
going
to
be
assumed
like
so,
if
there's
some
responsibilities
that
they
want
continuity,
continuity
with
to
find
the
person
who
can
pick
up
that
task
and
just
to
make
it
clear
to
everybody
who
will
be
helping
with
that
any
other
information
you
know
notifying
the
community
of
the
sun,
setting
of
The
working
group,
of
course,
so
things
stay
very
transparent
and
then
maybe
there's
other
things.
B
You
know
any
other
considerations
that
are
particular
to
that
working
group.
Maybe
we
could
also
have
a
space
for
that.
You
know.
Soft
gov
might
have
some
particular
some
particular
desire
for
how
to
continue
discussions
around
governance,
so
yeah,
please
feel
free
to
to
make
some
edits
and
improve
that
document.
B
Septimus
said
he
would
get
to
it
this
week,
so
I
think
he's
going
to
get
started
on
it
pretty
soon
and
then
Maxwell
had
this
really
good
idea
about
just
going
through
each
working
group
and
getting
a
status
check
on
each
working
group.
So
I
made
we
made
a
really
really
simple.
Just
like
go
through
the
list
know
where
things
are.
There
are
some
working
groups
that
are
starting
to
sun
sunset
themselves.
B
You
know,
transparency
was
you
know,
realizing
that
they're.
Basically,
the
scope
of
their
work
is
like
to
do
these
three
things
and
that
we
don't
need
an
entire
working
group
around
that
and
we
don't
need
a
steward
around
this.
This
piece
of
work,
but
maybe
these
These
are
operational
tasks
that
can
be
passed
to
a
smaller
group
to
work
on
operational
tasks
across
all
the
Tec,
so
for
communitas.
B
You
know.
To
be
quite
honest,
the
the
I
went
to
check
on
the
community
channel
to
see
an
update
on
community
toss
and
I
saw.
You
know
a
message:
that's
like
hey.
Is
there
this
community
task
happening
today
and
then
Costa
responded?
I
was
there
for
10
minutes?
No
one
showed
up
so
in
my
mind,
I
thought.
Okay,
so
communitas
is
probably
over.
B
Maybe
it's
nice
for
us
to
go
through
a
structured
sun
setting
for
that
working
group
to
make
it
very
clear
and
organized
as
we
get
rid
of
that
working
group
and
transfer
responsibilities.
I
think
that
there's
still
some
tasks
in
that
working
group
or
pieces
of
work
that
are
had
made
sufficient
advancement
that
they
can
be
picked
up
later,
even
if
they're
paused
for
now
so
Nate
accepted
to
sort
of
be
the
point
person
for
this.
B
So
we'll
work
with
the
active
contributors
in
or
the
contributors
who've
worked
in
communitas
to
help
put
together
this
sort
of
sunset
plan
for
communitas
and
Septimus,
as
I
already
mentioned,
will
do
transparency.
Olivia
is
going
to
do
the
this
exercise
for
soft
Dove
I
think
we
should
find
some
interesting
things
come
out
of
this
exercise
as
well,
especially
the
working
group
learnings
and
any
other.
You
know,
I
really
think
that
this
is.
This,
isn't,
like
you
know,
just
a
check
box.
B
You
know
it's
really
more
like
what
has
this
working
group
learned
and
how
can
you
bring
some
information
and
learnings
back?
You
know
it's.
It's
a
little
bit
of
both
it's
like
a
check
box
just
to
make
sure
that
the
calendar
entry
is
off
the
calendar.
So
it's
not
confusing.
Your
Discord
channel
is
archived,
but
it's
also
like
hey
what?
If,
what
have
we
learned
from
this
working
group?
What
can
you
share
with
the
rest
of
the
community?
B
So
that's
the
purpose.
Maybe
we
talk
about
the
other
working
groups,
so
I
would
say
Omega,
maybe
I
would
say,
there's
probably
people
in
this
room
who
have
a
much
better
handle
on
Omega
and
what
Omega
is
doing
now
than
I
do
so?
Would
anyone
like
to
volunteer
or
shall
I
just
ask
me
to
give
an
update.
B
Okay,
so
what
I
can
say
is
Omega
doesn't
have
a
steward,
it's
sort
of
it's
a
it's
a
it's
a
working
group
that
continues
to
move
forward.
Shebnam
has,
you
know
been
telling
us
for
a
few
months
now,
she's
like
I,
have
to
stop
being
a
steward,
there's
too
much
stuff
I'm
doing
so
in
August
she
did
stop,
and
so
I,
don't
I'm,
not
really
100
sure,
what's
happening
with
this
working
group,
but
I'll
Fascinate,
to
give
an
update.
J
Yeah
I
mean
the
interesting
part
of
this
is
that
the
the
participants
in
the
Omega
working
group
still
get
together
very
frequently
to
talk
about
it
and
they
kind
of
mimic.
What
we,
what
we
kind
of
strive
to
are
striving
to
build
with
interest
groups
and
so
I
think
they're
prime
prime
example
of
that
to
to
actually
push
forward
the
a
trial
of
how
do
we
set
up
an
interest
group?
J
How
do
we
reorganize
them
in
a
way
that
actually
gets
us
closer
to
what
we
want
to
do,
and
so
I've
talked
with
several
of
them
and
they're
very
willing
to
participate
in
the
interest
group
outside
of
that
they
do
have
some
work
streams
that
they're
actively
working
on
and
which
you
know
by
all
means
keep
working
on
them.
J
You
know
that's
just
kind
of
what
their
initiatives
are,
and
so
I
want
to
be
able
to
support
that
and
I
think
we
should
support
them
in
that
if
they
want
to
keep
doing
that
and
not
have
to
forcefully
retire
them,
but
it
would
be
nice
to
get
some.
You
know
closure
in
terms
of
like
you
know
what
was
different
about
Omega,
because
Omega
was
very,
very
different
in
terms
of
being
separated
from
the
core
group
of
the
working
groups
that
we
did
traditionally
have.
J
They
were
very
independent,
and
so
that
was
an
interesting
element
to
it.
So
yeah
outside
of
that
I'm
not
sure
something
nice
to
talk
with
said
about.
B
Yeah
and
I
just
maybe
a
point
of
reflection.
It's
like
what
is
the
difference
between
a
working
group
and
an
interest
group.
Is
it
just
that
it
doesn't
have
you
know
somebody
some
one
single
person
stewarding
it
or
is
there
more
differences
but
I
I
think
that
could
be
yeah
I
mean
that's
I
guess
my
point
of
reflection
is
like
hey
I,
don't
have
the
answer
for
that
other
than
you
know.
There's
there's
a
lot
of
like
ethics
in
Te.
B
D
Yeah
sure
Dan,
so
you
know
most
of
our
work
right
now
is
really
just
focused
on
rolling
out
this
curation
service
I
mean
that's
pretty
much.
What
we're
what
we're
focused
on?
We
have
a
meeting.
You
know
once
a
week
on
Wednesdays.
Where
we're
you
know
we're
focused
on
focusing
on
that.
To
be
honest,
I
would
say
that
you
know
the
the
calls
on
Sample
lately
have
been
thinking
kind
of
more
bigger
picture.
D
The
past
couple
weeks,
trying
to
figure
out
some
of
this
stuff
talking
with
people.
You
know
just
kind
of
like
a
vetting
space
for
people
to
kind
of
share
ideas
about
this
stuff.
D
I
do
think
you
know,
so
we've
been
pretty
careful
with
our
budget,
so
we
have
some
leftover
budget.
If
we
wanted
to
use
that
budget,
it's
kind
of
like
a
way
I
mean
we
could
just
give
the
budget
back
what's
remaining
or
we
could
use
it
as
a
bridging
strategy
to
kind
of
like
hold
like
basically
pay
for
some
of
these
ongoing,
urgent
and
important
functions
that
we
need
to
do
I
think
yeah
either.
D
One
of
those
is
fine,
but
that's
like
a
more
pragmatic
thing,
but
I
think
the
cleaner
things
probably
just
give
it
back
to
the
common
pool.
I
do
think
that
there
is
a
need
for
continued
Economic,
Development
stuff,
but
I
think
that
could
probably
roll
into
the
that
core
team
too.
B
Cool
thanks
for
that
and
then
you
know,
I'll
take
the
stewards.
I
think
that
you
know
when
I'm,
creating
or
when
you
know
when
I
was
helping
zip
first
draft,
the
sun
setting
document
and
then
speaking
with
Nate
and
having
Nate
improve
it
so
much.
You
know,
of
course,
I'm
like
well.
How
do
we
Sunset
the
stewards
working
group
and
the
you
know
the
one
thing
that
I
think
is
the
biggest
responsibilities
like?
What
does
our
coordination
look?
B
Like
you
know,
we've
we've
coordinated
across
multiple,
multiple
working
groups,
with
multiple
stewards
using
zenhub
and
this
like
sort
of
weekly
Cadence
and
a
stewards
Council
for
a
discussion
group.
You
know
I
I,
think
that
we
could
say
we're
gonna.
We've
already
said
we're
gonna
pause
that
but
I
think
having
a
absence
of
coordination
is
going
to
be
counterproductive,
so
I'm
very
interested
in
any
ideas
that
people
have
around
hey.
B
How
do
we
go
back
to
like
managing
this
and
coordinating
all
of
the
work
streams
to
to
get
us
through
the
transformation
to
the
other
side
of
the
time?
So
that's
really
on
my
mind
and
I.
Think
that
there's
a
few
people
in
this
room
who
have
some
good
ideas
and
I'd
love
to
talk
more
about
that
as
well.
You
know
some
of
the.
Maybe
we
go
back
to
Zen
Hub,
maybe
we'd
use
notion,
I've
seen
so
many
great.
B
You
know.
Team
Tools
and
kanban
boards
on
ocean
that
are
super
simple
and
very
effective
same
with
Clarity
I
know
that
the
sample
group
has
used
that
I
really
liked
it
as
well.
But
and
then
you
know
this
idea
of
servant,
leadership
and
passing
the
culture.
You
know,
there's
a
lot.
B
I
think
that
the
stewards
working
group
have
done
that
should
go
on
in
continuity
and
it's
I
think,
as
on
my
own
I'll,
make
it
or
with
Nate's
help
and
together
with
Nate,
we
could
do
a
little
exercise
and
like
how
do
we?
How
do
we,
you
know,
pass
those
things
and
where
do
we
pass
those
things,
but
it's
premature
for
us
to
to
sort
of
start
sun
setting
now
I
would
say,
and
then
we
have
the
comms
working
group.
I,
don't
know
Chewie.
E
Yeah
I
think
I
really
enjoyed
how
things
came
together
this
week,
for
example,
for
us
to
like
change
the
name
of
the
calendar
and
set
up
this
agenda
and
the
board
that
bear
put
together
I
feel
like
there
was
an
organic
coordination
that
was
spinned
up
and
perhaps
during
the
transition.
We
could
experiment
with
this
Cadence
of,
like
our
only
coordination
point,
is
those
meetings
we're
having
twice
a
week
and
see
how
it
goes
and
then,
as
things
flow,
see
the
necessity
of
like?
B
Maybe
I
can
just
jump
into
I
mean
my
immediate
reaction
is
I
already
feel
the
pain
a
little
bit
because
things
aren't
transparent
and
open
and
obvious.
Nobody
knows,
like
you
know,
there's
a
list
that
I
have
and
a
list
that
you
have
and
a
list
like
Gideon
has
and
I
think
that,
having
one
place
where
everyone
can
see
what
everyone
is
doing
and
understand,
the
interdependencies
was
really
important
for
us.
So
but
I
do
think
we
could
take
a
few
weeks
and
see
which
which
we
gravitate
towards,
which
makes
the
most
sense
I.
B
Don't
I,
don't
think
it
needs
like
okay
tomorrow
we're
starting
to
use,
notion
I.
Think
we
can,
you
know,
do
some
experimentation
but
yeah,
that's
I,
I
think
it
would
behoove
us
a
lot
to
have
a
lot
of
transparency
back
in
our
planning
and
our
our
calls
I
mean
you
know
in
our
for
everyone
that
makes
sense.
K
Some
just
just
a
quick
thing:
I
I
think
that
this
is
like
an
important
topic
like
coordination
moving
forward.
I,
don't
know
if
we'll
have
enough
time
to
maybe
talk
more
deeply
about
it
today,
but
maybe
it's
a
good
good
topic
for
next
call.
Definitely.
B
F
Okay,
so
on
Communications
I'm,
taking
care
of
a
couple
of
documents
that
fall
very
closely
to
to
this
guide
for
for
retiring
the
the
working
group.
F
F
However,
because
scams
used
to
be
more
like
spread
regarding
funding
because
of
the
teams,
we
are
like
returning
These
funds,
the
biggest
the
biggest
one
is
going
to
be
probably
marketing,
although
we're
still
figuring
out
like
some
some
stuff
that
we
could
be
doing
or
like
how
we
can,
how
the
the
the
Forum,
post
and
and
the
other
document
that
I'm
working
in
can
be
part
of
the
discussion
or
or
kind
of
like
start
the
discussion,
so
that
we
can
take
some
things
in
account.
F
However,
there
are
two
multi-sticks
that
are
already
well.
The
remaining
funds
are
already
back
in
the
common
pool,
which
are
the
comms
stewarding
multi-sig,
and
also
the
translations
multi-stick.
Both
of
those
have
already
sent
the
remaining
funds
back
to
the
common
pool
and
I'm,
including
also
like
the
transactions
and
all
of
that
in
in
this
document.
F
So
this
first
document
is
mostly
a
forum
post
that
is
going
to
be
following
the
retiring
guidelines,
also
I'm
thinking
of
putting
together
like
a
document
that
I
mean
it
could
be
named.
A
Manifesto
but
Gideon
and
I
were
also
discussing,
like
some
of
the
confusion
that
this
brings,
because
we're
not
gonna
be
like
really.
A
working
group.
F
However,
I
feel
that
it
might
be
a
good
idea
to
have
a
document
that
could,
you
know
like
if
some
people
approached
the
TC
with
you
know
like
this
will
to
contribute
to
Communications.
Just
like
a
document
that
can
say,
hey,
like
I,
mean
probably
not
giving
a
lot
of
explanations
about
funding,
but
maybe
creating
more
a
little
bit
of
like
some
Game
Theory
with
the
prey
system,
or
something
that
you
know
like
can
keep
people
slightly.
F
Incentivized
to
you
know
like
maybe
get
their
feet
like
into
the
in
into
the
water
with
regarding,
like
contributing
to
Communications
and
also
something
that
establishes
and
and
says
like
reminds
like
what
the
mission
Vision
Values
are
and
and
just
something
so
that
people
you
know
like
have
kind
of
like
an
introduction
and
have
like
a
at
least
like
a
broad
idea
of
how
to
contribute
to
Communications
the
right
way.
F
So
it
would
be
not
a
Manifesto
but
I'm,
calling
it
like
TC
Communications
contributors
guide,
so
so
yeah
just
so
that
there's
something
there
you
know
for,
for,
because
I
mean
we're.
We're
not
gonna
have
communities
We're,
not
gonna,
have
like
a
Communications
more
like
regular
weekly
call,
so
just
so
that
not
dropping
the
ball
on
anyone
that
maybe
has
like
some
influence
or
or
our
influencers
themselves
and
are
willing
to
help
out
Communications
around
the
Tec
and
yeah
I.
F
Think
that's
it.
It's
mostly
around
accountability,
with
transparency
in
in
funds
handling
that
I'm
I'm,
focusing
more
into
and
other
than
that,
I
feel
that
we're
falling
in
a
very
close
path
to
this.
One
that
this
supporting
process
is
suggesting
so
I'll
pass
it
to.
Oh
make
sure
it's
not
here,
but
okay.
J
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
ask
a
question
real
quick
to
to
both
you
too,
and
to
the
rest
of
the
community
in
terms
of
the
funds
that
were
remaining
in
multisig
wallets.
Is
this
something
that
we
want
to
during
this
transition
process
allowed
the
individual
working
groups
to
make
a
decision
on
where
they
send
those
funds,
or
do
we
want
to
have
come
to
a
Collective
Agreement
on
on
how
to
manage
the
funds
that
are
already
outside
of
the
common
pool?
J
F
But
maybe
I
can
I
can
start
with
that.
We
originally
intended
to
you
know
like
take
two
steps
back
and
maybe
like
work
on
another
proposal,
and
we
were
thinking
about,
like
you
know
like
asking
the
community
what
they
thought
of
or
or
maybe
if
the
right
move
was
to
send
back
the
funds
and
then
reapply
with
another
proposal.
F
But
I
think
that
by
now,
because
of
this
hibernation
mode,
that
we're
gonna
be
working,
I
I
personally
think
that
maybe
we
could
use
some
of
the
current
funds
that
we
have
to
kind
of
like
keep
this
thing
going,
but
not
in
a
way
that
is
going
to
be
I
mean
you
know,
like
there's
close
to
I,
think
like
18K,
or
something
like
that
in
the
marketing
multi-stick
I
mean
when
we
used
to
talk
about
like
another
reapproach
and
another
proposal.
F
Probably
we
were
thinking
around
like
half
of
that,
but
right
now,
like
I
mean
in
in
from
what
I've
been
talking
with
Gideon
I
feel
that
this
this
amount
would
be
much
much
much
less
and
the
idea
is
to
you
know,
like
kind
of
like
count
on
this
to
be
funded,
but
also,
like
being
you
know,
like
completely
transparent
about
the
process
and
everything
and
completely
open
to
you
know
like
if
somebody
in
the
community
doesn't
agree
with
this.
F
We
could
definitely
look
into
you
know
like
just
giving
back
all
of
the
funds
and
reapplying
with
a
new
proposal
from
scratch.
Although
I
don't
know
if
this
is
going
to
like
generate
like
some
delay,
so
that
maybe
we
could,
you
know
like
jump
into
this
mode
like
straight
away
and
not
you
know
like
delay
it
with
another
proposal
process,
but
those
are
my
like
two
cents
on
that
part.
B
B
Look
if
I'm
going
to
give
you
my
honest
opinion,
I,
think
it's
the
working
group
who
decides
I
think
we
can
say
what
we
recommend
strongly
and
provide
rationale
for
why
we
recommend
that
if
you
have
a
strong
recommendation
and
rationale
to
share,
please
do
but
I
think
you
know
there's
a
few
things
that
I
think
right
like
the
first
is:
there's
some
amount
of
continued
operations
and
for
this
transfer
for
this
transfer
of
of
responsibilities.
B
To
do
so,
I
think
the
working
group
will
need
to
sort
of
provide
that,
and
it
is
in
this
sun
setting
dock
right
like
what
is
the
financial
obligations.
I
think
is
what
it
what
was
called
in
there,
but
it's
like
hey
what?
What
is
the
cost
of
this
transition
even
happening
to
pass
on
these
responsibilities
to
another
person
or
another
group?
But
so
you
know
I,
don't
know
if
the
if
any
yeah.
B
So
my
my
feeling
is
that
the
rest
would
be
sent
to
the
commons
pool
I'm
feeling
pretty
like
that's
what
I've
felt
for
a
while,
though
I
think
that
there's
some
and
there's
some
you
know
if
there's
the
there's,
not
much
funds
in
the
stewarding
working
group,
there
are
600
xdi
and
maybe
that
gets
used
for
helping
this
transition
into
you
know.
Maybe
that's
something
like
you
know,
but
I
think
it
makes
sense
for
the
steward
of
the
working
group.
B
J
You
know,
there's
some
funds
that
we
could
be
using
for
this
transition
process
that
we
don't
need
to
have
to
have
a
separate
proposal,
because
the
money's
already
out
of
the
common
pool
I,
don't
know
if
that's
a
violation
of
what
community
expectations
or
standards
or
whatever
we
want
to
have
in
terms
of
transparency.
We
can
make
it
known,
but
I
do
think
it
is
a
a
a
big
burden
in
a
lot
of
ways
to
go
through
that
proposal
process
and
extracting
funds
from
the
common
pool
in
a
whole
nother
proposal.
So.
H
Well,
just
very
quickly,
I
think
money
wise.
We
should
probably
just
put
this
question
later
down
the
road
I.
Don't
think
we
have
enough
information
or
we
know
yet
what
we
wanted
to
know.
H
How
are
we
going
to
you
know,
making
a
decision
on
that
and
so
I
think
we
are
better
off
just
keeping
everything
on
the
multi-six
paying
for
whatever
expenses
we
we
have
currently
anyways
and
then
once
we
know
where
we're
going
to
actually
do
it,
then
we
can,
you
know,
maybe
put
back
the
money
on
the
common
pool,
or
maybe
we
take
it
for
for
the
next
stage
of
the
TC,
and
probably
we
I
don't
know
with
a
snapshot
proposal
or
something
just
to
get
everyone
on
check,
but
yeah,
probably
just
too
early
to
decide.
B
I
just
want
to
say
in
the
ideal
world
it's
like
Tamara's
decided
what
we
do
now.
I
do
advice,
process,
hey
stewards,
I'm
thinking
of
returning
These
funds
to
the
commons
pool
or
I'm.
Thinking
of
using
these
funds
to
you
know,
engage
a
PM
for
this
period.
Is
it
like
what
you
know
and
then
sort
of
get
advice,
process
and
be
able
to
then
make
it
the
best
decision
that
would
be
I,
think
ideal.
C
That
would
make
a
lot
of
sense.
I
mean
in
my
eyes
it's
yeah,
I
I.
The
optimal
solution
would
be
that
to
just
return
all
the
funds
or
give
some
sort
of
transparent,
yeah
transparent,
whether
it's
the
advice
process
or
the
Forum
post,
and
so
on,
just
explaining
exactly
where
those
funds
are
going
to
be
going
because,
ultimately,
the
voters
decided
on
on
one
One
Direction
for
these
for
these
funds
and
well,
though,
the
working
group
does
have
some
some
freedom
and
I
shouldn't
encroach
on
that.
C
You
know
the
voices
didn't
they
didn't
decide
to.
Maybe
move
like
the
like
from
one
work:
yeah
they
didn't
decide
to
like
remove
all
of
these
funds
or
something
completely
different.
So
then
I
think
that
that,
like
bendy's,
we
can't
just
like
do
like
the
I'm,
not
sure
whether
the
working
group
should
just
do
that
movement
themselves.
I
think
they
should
probably
like
do
some
sort
of
foreign
person
wait
for
anybody
to
disagree
for
doing
something
like
that
moves
away
from
that,
just
transferring
them
back
to
Common
pool.
D
I
could
just
say
I
think
so
one
thing
you
know,
there's
there's
a
part
of
me.
That's
like
just
wants
to
be
very
pragmatic
about
this
and
then
there's
a
part
of
this
like
we
need
to
follow
the
process
right.
So
the
pragmatic
part
of
me
is
like
you
know
what
it
feels
like.
This
is
a
little
bit
kind
of
echoing
what
anti-sands
like
I
feel
like.
D
We
just
need
to
finish
the
job
that
we
started
last
week
of,
like
let's
finish
the
Urgent
important
tasks
and
figure
out
like
what
are
the
things
that
we
really
cannot
drop.
Otherwise
things
start
to
break
badly
and
then
just
like
figure
out
some
interim
strategy.
That's
like
how
do
we
you
know
like
like
if
we
start,
if
we
stop
tweeting,
that's
probably
not
going
to
be
good.
D
You
know
if
there's
there's
a
bunch
of
these
things
that
we
have
already
identified
just
figure
out
some
way
to
like
do
some
type
of
bridge
funding
so
that
we
make
sure
that
people
aren't
having
to
do
that
for
free.
You
know
like
that.
We
can
pay
people
to
do
that
work.
It's
a
good!
You
know
it's
honest
work,
it's
like
needs
to
happen
so
figure
that
out
and
then
whatever
is
left
for
me
personally.
I
think
that
sampo,
like
I,
would
just
say
we'll
probably
give
it
back,
but
like.
H
B
You
any
other
thoughts
or
comments
about
this
before
we
move
on
okay,
then
I'm
going
to
jump
in
because
I
think
Chewie
raised
some
things.
Some
really
interesting
points
that
I
wanted
to
to
to
just
sort
of
double
click
on
for
a
minute
and
the
one
is.
B
You
know
this
idea
of
helping
contributors
figure
out
how
they
can
still
contribute
to
the
communications
of
Tec
you're,
not
necessarily
the
communications
working
group,
but
like
how
to
help
Communications
in
Tec
I
think
the
working
group
has
amassed
so
much
knowledge
there
and
is
the
best
working
group
to
produce
that
you
know
so.
I
think
that's
one
of
these,
like
you
know,
in
this
working
group
retirement,
it's
like
what
are
the
learnings
from
the
working
group
I
feel
like
that's
the
perfect
place.
To
add
that
kind
of
thing.
B
B
Even
if
there's
something
like
you
know
not
a
not
a
full-on
style
guide,
but
like
some
kind
of
like
styling
for
the
Tec,
and
you
know
how
how
we've,
how
the
what
the
what
the
commons,
but
the
comms
group
has
really
been
able
to
solidify
in
that
respect
too,
and
then
I,
just
you
said
the
word
hibernation,
so
I
just
want
to
touch
on
that
for
a
minute.
I,
don't
and
I
was
talking
earlier
with
with
Gideon
and
I
was
like.
B
My
framing
of
this
is
that
you
know
the
size
of
this
Commons.
If
this
was
a
traditional
non-profit
organization,
there
would
be
two
full-time
people,
maybe
three
full-time
people
and
a
few
volunteers
and
advisors,
and
you
know
patrons
and
that
all
that
thing
that
comes
out
of
non-profit
and
so
where
I
really
think
we're
just
sizing
right.
You
know
we're
just
we're
we're
coming
down
to
the
size
of
this
size
organization
and
the
this
Mission,
so
I
really
feel
like
I,
don't
think
we're
going
into
a
hibernation
mode.
B
I
just
think
that
this
size
Commons
our
economy.
We
didn't
have
the
revenue
coming
in
to
support
10
working
groups
and
15
stewards,
so
we
need
to
say
when
we
have
Revenue
that
comes
in
to
support
that
size
of
an
organization.
That's
when
we
have
that
size
of
an
organization,
but
we
don't
have
that
yet,
and
so
we
need
to
like
right
size,
build
that,
and
then
we
can
switch
art
to
grow
again.
So
that's
my
framework.
I
actually
think
this
is
super
positive.
B
The
direction
that
we're
going
in
to
be
able
to
support
ourselves
and
sustain
this
organization
and
then
from
that
place,
grow
and
grow,
triggered
me
with
the
word
hibernation
Chewie,
but
and
that's
why
I
think
it's
like
there's
these
key
tasks
and
comms
that
are
crucial
to
the
teasing
I
mean
crucial
to
the
Tec
and
so
like
passing.
Those
on
is
is
really
important,
so
it
just
I
want
to
check
so.
Okay,
so
I
think
we
could
say
also
sun
setting
and
thank
you
for
starting
this
work
before
we
even
had
this
document
together
Chewie.
B
Maybe
we
could
learn
from
your
document
too.
Maybe
there's
things
in
there
that
we
could
roll
into
this.
Maybe
if
you
you
know
have
time-
and
you
want
to
look
this
over
and
be
like-
you
forgot
this
one,
since
you
were
going
through
that
process
now
already.
That
would
be
awesome.
F
I
mean
I
can
I
can
share
a
draft
with
anyone.
Who's
interested,
but
I
have
to
warn
you
Tim,
like
the
first
part,
is
like
the
whole
analogy
on
hibernation
and-
and
you
know
it's
like
this,
like
I,
think
I
mentioned
it
to
a
a
few
people,
but
the
idea
is
to
approach
it.
That's
like
this,
like
the
2001
Space
Odyssey,
but
like
kind
of
like
a
token
engineering,
Odyssey
right
where
we
do
have
this
Mission,
it's
clear.
We
have
the
lessons.
F
We
have
the
expertise
within
our
community,
but
not
at
this
moment
like
right
now,
we're
like
in
the
middle
of
a
ship
in
only
a
few
astronauts
are
necessary
to
keep
the
Sheep
running
in
in
you
know
not
drain
all
of
the
resources
that
we
have.
So
that's
what
I
meant
by
hibernation,
but
I
do
agree
with
you
on
on
not
not
being
like
a
literal
hibernation
right.
F
True,
oh
sorry,
I'll
just
said:
I'll
send
it
to
you.
B
And
then
reward
systems,
we
we
don't
have
feedback,
Mitch,
isn't
here,
anyone
want
to
share
sort
of
reward
systems.
Their
perspective
I
had
a
chat
with
Christopher
about
it
just
to
be
like
hey.
What
is
reward
system
doing?
Are
we
are
they
doing
like
active
development?
Are
they
you
know
doing
this
operational,
making
sure
that
rewards
goes
through
like
the
the
thankless
work,
that
Mitch
is
doing,
making
sure
that
there
are
quantifiers
and
there
are
distributions
and
that
people
are
aware
that
they
have
to
you
know
finish
their
quantification
before
the
period
ends.
B
The
feedback
that
Christopher
gave
me
was
it's
more
or
less
operational.
Now
you
know.
The
rewards
working
group
in
the
Tec
is
really
just
making
sure
that
praise
and
distributions
happen
in
the
Tec
I.
Don't
know
if
anyone
has
any
other
yeah
yeah.
A
So
I'll
chime
in
because
the
reason
I
asked
you
know,
I
thought
I
suggested
kind
of
this
exercise
is
because
I've
mainly
only
been
in
reward
system
and
it's
been
chugging
along
and
and
so
all
of
a
sudden
I
was
hearing
about
changes
and
I
was
like
what
do
you
mean
it's
been
chugging
along
and
so
so
yeah.
It
is
very
operational.
A
There's
a
few
things
going
on
around,
so
the
I
think
the
piece
Nate
mentioned
about
it
becoming
longer
more
delayed,
getting
funds
at
a
common
pool
right.
So
as
of
right
now,
the
rewards
work
group
for
for
praise
funding,
looks
like
it's
gonna
run
out
because
it
had
the
last
Source,
Credit,
distribution
and
stuff
like
that.
So
there's
a
new
funding
proposal.
I,
don't
know
if
that's
going
to
end
up
passing
in
time
right.
A
So
so
there's
a
post
up
around
adjusting
some
of
those
distributions
to
make
that
last
a
little
bit
longer
and
just
to
right
size
with
the
engagement
and
prey
is
right,
but
yeah,
very
operational
and
quantifiers
are
still
engaged
and
yeah.
B
Okay,
the
analysis.
C
That's
that's
thanks.
I'd,
say
also
yeah
rewards
is
has
adjusted.
It
has
like
the
the
grace
of
mics
is
right
up
as
well
on
and
and
the
analysis
that
that
I
was
in
a
quantifier
call
earlier
today,
and
that's
what
Max
and
Mitch
we're
looking
at
some
other
analyzes
I
believe
Libby.
C
You've
been
on
it
too
so
I'd
say,
like
rewards,
has
already
kind
of
made
the
transition
to
become
sustainable
with
the
latest
post,
the
one
that
came
after
mine
on
changing
the
mechanisms
rewards
in
the
TC,
so
that
so
that
funds
can
last
a
while
longer
so
I
think
that
yeah
rewards
has
been
the
first
to
adjust.
I
think
that
it
will
stand
okay,
almost
in
its
current
form,.
I
Sure
well,
I
was
thinking
that
maybe
gravity
is
in
a
different
phase
between
Sun
setting
and
active
and
because
I
see
that
what
we
are
trying
to
do
is
to
doubtify
and
to
become
a
Dao.
We
need
to
stop
being
also
a
working
group,
but
at
the
same
time,
I
feel
that
we
are
not
mature
enough
to
have
our
own
infrastructure.
I
So
we
are
like
in
a
hatching
phase
inside
of
the
DC,
where
we
are
like
nurturing
from
the
knowledge
of
the
TC
nurturing
from
the
resources
of
the
common
pool
of
the
Goodwill
of
the
of
of
the
community
to
to
doubtify
this.
I
This
thing
that
started
as
a
working
group,
so
so
I,
don't
know
it's
also
an
interesting
thing:
I've
been
I've
been
gardening,
a
lot
these
past
weeks
and
I've
just
come
to
my
mind
with
this
idea
and
instead
like
yeah
to
reproduce
cactuses,
they
grow
from
the
cactus
so
and
when
they
are
mature
enough,
you
can
take
them
out
and
just
put
it
in
the
soil.
I
I
feel
that,
right
now
we
are
not
still
ready
to
be
put
placed
in
the
soil,
but
we
are
like
growing
as
a
lump
on
the
DC
and
using
its
infrastructure,
its
Discord,
its
Community.
But
then
we
will
try
to
like
be
our
own
community
and
have
our
own
infrastructure.
I
So
it's
like
yeah
living
in
the
house
of
your
parents
and
and
I,
don't
know
it's
it's
also
a
sun
setting
phase
in
a
way,
but
also
a
very
active
phase,
so
I
don't
know.
C
I
Yeah,
it's
just
like
what
I
had
in
mind,
but
it's
like
an
analogy
but
yeah
we,
we
will
always
be
very,
very
close
to
this
community.
B
So
I
just
want
to
say
one
thing:
we
have
nine
minutes
left
and
I
want
to
say.
I
think
gravity
is
a
very
interesting
use
case
in
the
Tec
and
light
coordination.
I
think
we
could
spend
an
hour
or
more
talking
about
it.
So
unless
anyone
objects,
I
would
propose.
We
just
sort
of
pin
this
for
a
future
discussion
and
then
allow
Chewie
and
Libya
to
present
the
stewards
working
group
learn
learning
board.
I
think
that
would
be
super
helpful,
but
I
just
also
want
to
not.
B
If
anyone
wants
to
say
anything
about
gravity,
I
think
that
now
is
a
great
time,
but
I'd
say
we
can
also
spend
an
entire
one
of
these
entire
sessions
working
through
what
what
that
can
look
like
the
relationship
between
gravity
and
Tec
foreign.
J
Group
is
set
up
for
a
kind
of
a
rainy
day
fund
for
anything
that
happens
in
the
legal
realm.
So
Ivy
was,
you
know
and
Griff
I
believe
we're
heading
up
that
that
working
group
for
a
while,
but
it
was
never
formalized
I,
don't
think
so.
Yeah.
B
Thank
you
for
that.
Rex
I
think.
That's
a
really
good
call!
Technically,
since
it
still
has
a
multi-save,
we
should
figure
out
what
that
looks
like,
but
yeah,
okay,
so
then
Lydia
can
we
pass
to
you
and
Chewie
for
presenting
this
learning
working
group
learnings
board.
E
Yeah
I
don't
want
to
get
into
the
board
now,
but
just
make
an
invitation
for
everyone
for
for
all
of
the
stewards,
and
also
all
of
working
group
participants
to
gather
learnings
about,
like
so
far
participating
in
this
working
group.
Stewarding
these
working
groups.
What
can
we
yeah?
What
can
we
bring
down
in
data
for
us
to
learn
and
not
repeat
the
same
mistakes?
E
Have
new
mistakes
have
insights
about
what
we've
done
and
to
formalize
this
transition
somehow,
so
this
would
be
like
the
closing
cycle
of
the
stewards
working
group
and
then
from
what
comes
up
there,
understanding
the
best
ways
to
transition,
so
I
wanted
to
get
what
would
be
the
best
day
for
that
maybe
passing
a
doodle
around
would
be
the
best
thing
or
using
one
of
the
sessions
that
we
have
booked
on
the
calendar
already,
since
everybody
said
they
can
participate
in
this
time,
and
if
you
want
to
share
anything
else
to
me,.
F
Thank
you,
yeah
I
I
mean
it's
it's
it's
a
little
bit
more
of
a
like
a
not
a
sensitive
topic,
but
a
topic
about
sensitivity,
I
personally,
in
in
reflecting
on
on
on
a
lot
of
like
these
Lessons
Learned,
but
from
having
like
acknowledgment
on
on
some
of
the
mistakes
in
in
the
bad
decisions
of
over
the
last
few
months.
F
F
So
probably
this
will
make
a
little
bit
more
sense
once
everything
has
a
more
more
shape,
both
the
document
that
I'm
working
on
and
also
the
board
but
yeah,
it's
it's
I
just
wanted
to
bring
up
like
the
importance
of
of
creating
a
space
where
we
can
like
openly
talk
about,
like
maybe
like
mistakes
or
bad
decisions,
reflect
on
that
and
and
help
these
shape,
whatever,
whatever
future
the
the
working
group
or
or
or
the
mission
around,
what
the
working
group
used
to
do
for
for
the
near
future
and
yeah.
J
I
I
will
say:
I
do
would
suggest
that
this
be
a
separate
meeting
from
the
normal
flow
that
we're
trying
to
get
into
for
the
transition
aspects
of
things.
I
do
think
this
is
really
important,
but
I
do
think
it
should
be
an
independent
meeting.
If
we
can
organize
that.
H
J
I
I
just
think
there
are
a
lot
of
tangible
things
that
we
can
organize
around
an
agenda
for
actually
that
the
transition
process,
in
terms
of
you,
know
the
urgent
things
that
we
still
have
to
do
and
transferring
functions,
making
sure
that
a
lot
of
the
things
that
Gideon
mentioned
before
that
things
that
we
we
have,
that
need
to
get
done.
Don't
break
I.
J
I,
really
think
that
we
should
have
our
focus
on
that
as
well
as
you
know,
and
then
having
this
as
a
kind
of
an
independent
where
we
can
spend
maybe
an
hour
even
going
through
this
and
discussing
it,
because
I
do
think.
This
is
a
a
big
big
activity,
but
I
do
think.
We
should
keep
the
transition
process
moving.
B
I
am
more
agnostic,
I
would
say
the
big
question
is
going
to
be
there's
certain
people.
You
want
to
have
in
the
room
at
this
time
and
that's
going
to
be
pretty
hard
to
do
so.
I,
don't
know
what
time
will
work
for
I?
Don't
know
that
the
other
people
that
should
be
in
the
room
for
this.
Could
it
make
this
hour
now
I
think
it's
more
about
finding.
You
know.
There's
there
are
people
that
have
can
really
contribute
to
their
learnings.
B
H
I
would
just
want
to
say
that
we
have
to
I,
guess
pick
and
choose
the
bottles,
because
I
don't
think
we
we
can
afford
to
spend
months
on
these
or
whatever,
like
I,
think
we
have
to
be
very
pragmatic
and
something
so
I.
Guess
too
late's
point
we
have
to
decide
which
are
things
that
are
absolutely
necessary
and
which
are
sort
of
like
activities
around
the
transformation
that
are
great
to
do.
H
But
no
that's
not
not
a
priority,
I
guess,
and
if
that
means
not
everyone
is
going
to
be
able
to
make
it.
You
know,
that's
you
have
to
be
confused.
B
Okay,
so
I
don't
know
that
we
have
a
clear
conclusion
on
that
other
than
I
think
we
figure
out
when
people
can
join
yeah,
maybe
a
doodle
would
be
best
and
that
you
know
to
there
is
a
lot
for
us
to
finish
for
this
transition,
and
we
only
have
these
two
hours
a
week,
so
that
maybe
is
an
additional
to
supporting
finding
another
time
that
works
for
everyone
to
do
it.
B
Hey.
We
have
one
minute
left,
that's
it!
That's
all
we've
got
so
I
knew
we
would
run
out
of
time.
We
did
run
out
of
time.
We
put
some
things
on
pinned
to
the
wall
for
us
to
talk
about
next
time
and
I
just
want
to
say
one
thing
who
wrote
this:
the
calendars
cleanup
ASAP,
who
added
that
all
right
so
who
wants
to
I
my
and
my
feeling
the
calendar
is
pretty
up
to
date
that
I
found
that
I
found
the
transparency
one
and
zeptimus
took
that
off
right
away.
B
Now,
in
which
case
we
take
off
communitas
transparency
Olivia,
if
you
want
to
take
off
soft
gov,
now
is
probably
a
good
time
to
do
it,
but
I
agree
that
the
first
step
in
this
sort
of
sun
setting
should
be
like
if
you're
going
to
not
have
meetings
anymore,
take
it
off
the
calendar,
but
I'd
say
we
spread
the
responsibility
a
little
bit
on
this
one
can
can
everyone
just
have
a
sanity
check
or
two
or
three
people
I'm
happy
to
have
a
sanity
check?
B
E
B
D
I
I
was
thinking
specifically
the
community
call
and
the
orientation
calls
just
like,
because
we
have
a
community
call
coming
up
on
Thursday
also,
and
we
like
yeah,
just
need
to
decide.
Are
we
going
to
do
that
or
not
that's?.
B
B
I'm
I'm
saying
maybe
we
have
it
this
Thursday
and
we
just
say
hey
we're
thinking
you
know,
is
part
of
our
message
to
the
community.
We're
thinking
we're
going
through
some
transition.
We
don't
have
it
all
figured
out.
Be
patient
with
us.
Please
here
are
some
updates,
keep
it
short.
Keep
it
tight,
be
honest.
A
I
support
that
I
mean
I.
Think
in
the
last
like
the
last
Community
call
was
canceled,
and
that
was
effectively
the
update,
we're
going
to
change
the
format
right,
and
so
that's
exactly
what
happened
and
changed
the
format
and
it
might
change
again
but
but
having
it
I
think
would
be
a
good
idea.
A
good
send
a
good
message.
B
A
My
comment
wasn't
that
we
should
change
the
format
just
that
when
I
looked
at
the
last
entry
talking
about
the
next
Community
call,
because
I
saw
something
in
Discord
saying
work
hands,
the
last
Community
call
got
canceled,
and
the
comment
was
that
this
the
format
was
likely
going
to
change
and
I
think
just
having
it
a
little
more
informal,
a
little
shorter,
where
we
do
some
short
updates
and
ask
people
to
be
ask
people
to
be
understanding
is
a
is
a
change
of
format
and
I.
A
D
Just
very
briefly,
I
also
think
that
you
know
sometimes
it's
good
to
just
not
to
say
we're
going
through
a
change,
but
I
think
you
know
the
the
people
who
will
actually
show
up.
There
are
probably
this
group,
plus
maybe
one
or
two
other
people
and
I-
think
it's
okay,
like
we
could
use
this
time
to
just
keep
having
this
conversation
right.
D
You
know
these.
These.
These
recordings
are
all
public.
So
anybody
who
wants
to
see
what
we're
talking
about
can
see
it
anyway,
so
I
think
I
think
it's
good
to
just
shine
some
sunlight
on
this.
You
know
and
yeah,
that's
I,
don't
know
exactly
what
that
looked
like,
but
that's
my
that
would
be
my
recommended.