►
From YouTube: TEC Transformation Strategy and Planning 2 - Urgent/Important Functions & Community Call Restructure
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
Yeah
sure
yeah
I'm
really
well
I'm,
really
good.
It's
really
happy
to
see
so
many
people
joining
this
call
I
feel
this
week
and
last
week
we've
been
getting
distraction
and
this
momentum
that
I
think
it's
really
important
that
we
now
like
keep
moving
forward
and
I
think
we're
doing
we're
taking
the
the
right
steps
to
do
that
so
yeah
that
I
think
that
starts
building
up
some
more
excitement,
yeah,
so
yeah
I
think
everything
is,
is
really
good.
I'll
I'll
just
pass
it
to
I'll,
pass
it
to
Maxwell.
C
Hey
yeah,
no
I'm,
feeling
good,
fresh
and
finally
recovered
from
Halloween
and
yeah
the
same
looking
happy
to
see
everyone.
Everyone
joining.
Let
me
pass
it
to
Gene.
E
Cool
things
I'm
doing
quite
good
today,
I'm
feeling
happy
and
very
optimistic
about
everything.
That's
happening,
not
only
the
TC,
but
all
things
in
my
life
yeah
yeah,
because
just
that
I'll
pass
it
over
to
Nate.
E
F
Bear
yeah
tuned
good
I,
guess
good
news
that
one
of
my
good
friends
passed
away
so
I'm
heading
home
to
a
funeral
this
weekend,
so
but
outside
of
that
I'm
really
excited
to
see
the
Tec
we're
starting
to
get
that
traction
and
start
to
move
forward
with
things.
So
I'm
very
excited
about
that
foreign.
G
Thanks
Nate
and
I'm
sorry
to
hear
that
I'm
feeling
good
I'm
I
stopped
in
Peru,
like
for
the
next
month
and
I
I
haven't
stopped
for
a
while
and.
G
I
So
yeah
all
good
and
I'll
pass
to
Iran.
J
Hi
I
miss
you
all
so
much
I'm
happy
to
be
here
after
four
weeks
of
intense
travel
and
finally
recovering
a
little
and
yeah
I,
just
wanna
keep
up
and
even
though
I
won't
be
able
to
be
as
active
anymore,
just
wanna
just
happy
to
come
back
occasionally
and
see
and
learn
about
how
this
is
all.
J
Yeah,
just
I,
don't
know
even
virtually
super
happy
to
see
you
all
and
yeah.
This
is
great
I'll
pass.
It
I
joined
two
minutes
late,
so
I'm
not
sure
getting
can
I
pass
it
back.
I.
L
Can
take
it,
I
can
take
it.
Yeah,
I,
I'm,
feeling
great
I'm
driving
to
Panama
right
after
this
call,
so
that's
kind
of
fun
and
yeah
I
might
be
packing
a
little
bit
while
I
listen
to
the
to
the
enjoyment.
The
the
this
really
fun
call
Rex.
Did
you
go.
M
No
I've
just
joined
a
minute
ago,
having
literally
just
come
back
from
work
and
I'm
getting
settled
here
at
home
and
I'm
excited
to
see
the
progress
and
join
in
on
this
call
who
hasn't
gone.
I
believe
you
have
you
gone
yet.
N
Hey
so
happy
to
see
everyone
on
this
call
so
for
intentions,
distractions,
I'm,
sorry,
I,
didn't
see.
If
we
had
an
opening
question
but
I'll
say
intentions
are,
of
course,
to
continue
this
transformation.
I
thought
we
had
some
really
good
momentum
on
Tuesday
and
it
feels
like
we're
going
to
continue
that
and
that's
very
exciting
and
then
distractions
are.
N
We
are
at
an
airport
waiting
to
board,
but
it
looks
like
our
boarding
might
be
705
now
I
think
I
can
actually
stay
for
this
whole
call,
although
I'll
probably
be
more
quiet
to
the
Nations
pass
back
to
you.
Gideon.
A
Okay,
cool
Hey,
Chewie,
hey
welcome
we're
just
doing
just
a
quick
check.
How
are
you,
how
are
you
feeling.
O
Local
Lotus,
okay,
perfect
this
week
to
be
honest,
I'm
feeling
a
little
bit
more
motivated
because
I
feel
that
that,
just
like
the
stress
of
like
overcoming
the
situation,
and
all
of
that
is
a
little
bit
like
past
contributors
in
Communications.
O
Because
of
how
enriched
like
the
conversations
have
been
and
and
I,
feel
that
also
these
transformation
sessions
and
discussions
have.
You
have
also
like
constructed
like
a
very
safe
space
to
to
you,
know
like
discuss
and
and
and
share
different
ideas,
so
in
in
general,
like
in
a
temperature
check,
I'd,
say
I'm,
starting
to
gain
like
more
motivation
and
confidence
in
in
the
decisions
that
are
being
taken
by
by
the
community
in
general.
A
Yeah
I
think
that's
it
I
think
everybody's
gone
I'll
just
give
a
quick,
so
I
I'm
doing
really
well
I.
Actually,
it's
starting
to
feel
good
again
like
it's
starting
to
feel
like
things
are,
are
moving
and
I
had
I
had
a
nice
talk
with
Tam
and
we
kind
of
some
back
and
forth
and
We've
agreed
that
I'm
gonna
I'm
gonna
try
to
help
us
drive
this
process
forward,
and
you
know
what
I,
what
I
would
say
is
like
my.
A
My
motivation
for
this
is
totally
servant
leader
like
I'm.
A
Not
this
is
not
me
trying
to
like
exert
some
kind
of
like
power
play
or
anything
like
that
I'm
just
here
to
try
to
help
I
really
believe
in
this
Mission,
like
I
I,
deeply
believe
in
this
Mission
and
I
want
to
see
this
place,
succeed
and
I
think
you
know
we're
we're
in
a
little
bit
of
a
rough
patch,
but
like
I,
think
with
like
just
probably
a
couple
more
weeks
of
like
concerted
effort,
we'll
start
to
see
some
some
clearing
and
I
think
it's
going
to
start
to
feel
really
nice
and
I
I'm,
just
so
happy
to
see
all
of
you
here
today.
A
You
know
you
in
particular,
because
I
wasn't
sure
how
often
we
were
going
to
see
you,
so
it's
so
nice
to
see
your
profile
pic
there
so
and
yeah.
So
a
lot
of
stuff
is
is
kind
of
building
the
background.
A
There's
some
some
kind
of
plans
and
stuff
that
I'm
I'm
putting
together
that
are
very,
very
rough
and
so
I'm
doing
some
initial
advice
process
with
Tam
and
I'll
probably
start
to
you
know
what
I'd
love
to
do
is
share
that
with
everybody
next
week,
but
I
want
to
get
a
little
bit
more
feedback
on
it,
but
the
basic
things
are
like:
how
do
we?
How
do
we
move
this
forward
in
terms
of
like
some
process
to
like
keep
this
to?
Basically,
what
will
these
meetings
look
like
going
forward?
A
How
do
we
make
sure
that
they're,
super
effective
and,
and
then
all,
but
also
you
know,
respectful
of
the
culture
and
then
also
just
some
thoughts
on
like
how
do
we
I
put
this
I
added
this
into
the
agenda,
but
like
how
do
we
make
sure
that
we
can
keep
the
wheels
on
this
bus
and
keep
things
moving
and
actually
pay
the
people
who
are
doing
that
work
as
we're
making
this
transition?
A
That's
super
important
so
because
it's
it's
only
fair
and
also
we
don't
want
to
lose
people,
so
so
I
added
that
on
there
so
for
today,
I
just
basically
did
kind
of
two
agenda
items,
one
maybe
pretty
quick,
but
it's
just
basically
in
the
community
call
that's
coming
up
today.
What
I
was
recommending
is
you
know
we're
kind
of
in
this
transition.
A
So
you
know
if
we,
if
we
did,
the
kind
of
the
normal
format
might
feel
kind
of
weird,
because
there's
a
number
of
working
groups
that
are
not
here
anymore,
to
report
out.
A
So,
given
that
we
said
last
time
that
we
were
canceling,
the
community
call
because
we're
looking
at
reformatting,
it
I
just
thought-
maybe
we'd
just
open
it
up
to
the
community
for
some
input
on
what
people
would
like
and
just
use
that
session,
as
kind
of
like
a
jam
session
to
figure
out
what
we
really
want
to
do.
A
So
that's
where
I
wanted
to
start
today
is
just
kind
of
open
it
up
for
thoughts
on
not
so
much
what
we
want
to
do
with
Community
calls,
because
we'll
I'm
hoping
we'll
do
that
in
the
community.
Call
but
like
how
should
we
structure
this
conversation
today
in
a
community
call
if
we're
going
to
do
this.
K
L
We
can
start
with
praises,
we
normally
do
and
then
maybe
we
bring
in
like
what
would
you
like
to
see
in
the
community
call
if
you
were
if
it
was
like?
What
do
you
expect
to
see
in
a
Tec
Community
called
I
think
would
be
a
nice
prompt
for
a
question.
F
Yeah
I
think
at
the
the
Baseline
of
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish
is
trying
to
figure
out
what
the
purpose
of
the
community
call
is
what
you
know,
what
what
is
the?
What
are
we
trying
to
convey?
Are
we
going
to
take
this
time
to
update
the
community
on
the
initiatives
that
are
going
on
internally?
Are
we
trying
to
get
more
people
engaged
or
participating
in
the
news
that
is
going
on
in
the
te
Community
I
think
there
are
different
flavors
that
we
could
select
from
in
terms
of
purpose?
F
N
I'll
chime
in
with
some
more
second
thing
as
well
I,
mean
I,
think
what
Griff
said
is
really
important.
I
think
that
there's
something
really
open
and
inviting
to
giving
everyone
space
during
the
community
call.
So
it
would
be
great
if
we
can
somehow
retain
that,
and
then
you
know
our
our
former
format
was
essentially
the
review
of
a
scrum.
So
the
previous
purpose
was
to
sort
of
show
off
the
work
that
all
of
the
working
groups
were
doing
to
the
community,
but
that
doesn't
need
to
stay
our
purpose.
O
I
might
have
a
good
idea
for
that.
I
feel
that,
at
this
point
the
T
fundamentals
course
is
doing
great.
Maybe
we
could
kind
of
like
take
what
we
really
liked
about
the
spotlight
but
mix
it
with
giving
like
token
Engineers
that
are
like
out
of
the
oven
like
a
platform
you
know
to
like
speak
about
their
their
ideas.
O
I
mean
they
are
very
excited
about
what
they're,
learning
and
and
just
everything
that
they're
experimenting
with
and
I
feel
that
it
could
also
be
like
a
good
strategy
so
that
they
can.
You
know,
like
have
their
own
envities,
and
most
of
them
are
going
to
be
new
members
to
the
community,
so
maybe
reformatting
the
spotlight
so
that
it
can
be
more
about
like
token
engineering,
101
or
or
just
maybe
more,
like
testimonials
kind
of
like
format
about
like.
Oh,
what
have
you
been
learning
like
something
that
that
can.
C
O
Like
capture
that
excitement
around
how
the
the
course
is
growing.
E
I
have
to
second
that
I
was
yesterday
on
a
call
from
some
guys
that
made
like
a
group.
Both
people
are
out
of
the
the
academy
and
what's
what's
quite
nice,
we
were
chatting
about
everything
in
the
course
about
some
things
that
they
wanted
to
work
on,
and
they
were
wondering:
where
do
they
find
those
resources?
How
can
this
they're
working?
You
know
those
kinds
of
those
things
and
I
think
we
we
may
as
well
provide
that
that
space
for
for
that
kind
of
stuff
in
the
community
pool.
A
Okay,
any
other
thoughts
about
today
how
best
to
structure
this.
If
not,
this
is
probably
enough.
I
mean
I,
think
I,
think
yeah,
just
kind
of
an
open
invitation
for
comments
and
just
brainstorming-
and
you
know
just
trying
to
make
sure
we
hear
from
everybody-
would
be
be
really
good,
simple.
Anything.
L
If
we
want
to
go
crazy,
we
could
have
full-on
mirror
board
and
hosts,
like
give
me
a
call
input,
people
put
in
and
put
some
music
on
and
that
kind
of
stuff,
but
I.
It's
a
lot
of
work
to
host
and
to
brainstorm
a
mural
board
session
and
then
actually
like
execute
on
it
and
I
can't
do
it.
I
can't
even
come
so.
A
I,
don't
think
it's
that
bad
I'm
doing
this.
Let
me
one
thing:
I
wanted
to
clarify:
is
it's
not
right
after
this
it's
an
hour
after
this
call
right,
because
we've
got
the
time
change
so
I'm
willing
to
try
to
put
something
together?
If,
if
somebody
has
time
right
after
this
call
to
maybe
give
me
a
hand
and
do
that,
if
not
I
can
try
to
do
it
myself.
H
A
Yeah,
all
right,
that's
great,
so
one
of
the
three
of
us
just
maybe
stay
on
after
this
call,
and
we
can
just
do
a
quick
Jam
I,
don't
think
it
has
to
be
fancy
but
I
agree
having
the
ability
for
people
to
just
put
up
ideas
and
then
do
stars,
and
things
like
that
is.
Is
nice?
A
Okay?
Well,
hey,
let's
move
on
and
get
into
the
other
big
topic,
which
is
in
order
to
kind
of
keep
us
moving
forward.
So
there
is
a
process
that
I'm
that
I'm
trying
to
kind
of
work
through.
It's
not
done
yet
I
mean
not
done
done.
It's
not
even
to
a
place
where
I
can
share
it
really
easily
with
everybody,
but
in
the
meantime,
I
didn't
want
to
lose
momentum.
A
So
what
I
did
was
just
basically
took
the
stuff
that
was
that
got
the
most
responses
from
bears
board
last
week
on
the
Urgent
and
important
workflows,
and
so
I
just
put
those
here
and
then
I
added
I
added
two,
which
I
just
took
a
little
bit
of
Liberty,
because
so
the
the
second,
the
last
one
is
phasing
out
the
working
groups,
which
is
basically
just
the
work
that
Nate
and
Tam
started
earlier
and
I.
A
Just
you
know,
I
think
one
of
the
things
we
got
to
get
we
just
got
to
make
sure
is
that
we're
not
leaving
stuff
behind
like
starting
things
and
leaving
it
behind
so
I
put
that
on
here
and
then
the
last
one
is
the
thing
I
mentioned
at
the
beginning.
I
just
think
it's
it's
super
important,
like
we've
got
people
hanging
in
that
right
now
who
are
not
getting
paid,
and
you
know
and
they're
doing
work
and
that's
I.
A
Just
don't
think
that
that's
right
right
now
so
I
think
we
got
to
figure
out
some
kind
of
interim
thing
to
address
that
so
I
added
that
on
there.
A
So
what
I
thought
would
be
good
is
if
we
could
just
go
I,
basically
kind
of
just
copied
this
down
in
the
notes
section
and
what
I
thought
is
I
would
just
we
would
just
go
through
from
the
stuff
that
got
the
most
stars
all
the
way
down,
and
maybe
just
do
just
a
quick
check-in
on
what's
what
we
know
is
happening
there
and
who
is
actually
kind
of
taking
the
lead
on
that
right
now,
so,
let's
start
with
the
multi-sig
management.
Well,
actually
let
me
before
we
dive
further.
A
F
Well,
I
think
they're
just
highlighting
what
needs
to
be
done.
What
needs
to
be
answered
in
terms
of
the
sentence
making
I
think
that
understanding
what
wallets
need
to
exist?
What
are
the
options
for
the
working
group?
Stewards
who
do
have
currently
multi-six
with
funds
in
them?
What
their
options
are
in
terms
of
returning
those
funds
or
disbursing
those
funds
to
another
wallet
and
then
someone
to
kind
of
Spearhead
what
we
go
from
there,
especially
for
those
working
groups
that
are
sun
setting
at
the
moment.
A
Let
me
let
me
just
have
one
kind
of
process
thing,
because
in
order
for
me
to
kind
of
keep
nudging
this
forward,
it
would
be
great
if,
as
you're
making
comments,
hey
Mitch
if
you're
as
you're
as
you're,
making
comments
rather
than
me,
trying
to
paraphrase
paraphrase
what
you're
saying,
particularly
it's
kind
of
like
getting
into
the
Weeds
on
some
of
this
stuff,
just
type
it
in
that
would
be
great.
A
And
what
and
and
again
I
think
that
we're
not
going
to
have
time
to
go
into
detail
on
all
of
these
things
and
solve
these
problems
here.
Obviously,
so
what
would
be
great
is
yeah
if
we
could
just
say
like
who's
kind
of
right
now.
Holding
this.
A
That
would
be
the
first
thing
that
I
think
would
be
really
important
is
just
like
who
who
are
who's
the
one
person
or
are
there
multiple
people
who
are
thinking
about
this
and
working
on
this
right
now
and
then
yeah
just
like
what
are
the
key
things
we're
trying
to
solve.
That
would
be
that'd,
be
great
rather
than
diving
into
actually
solving
it.
Does
that
scene
seem
fair.
A
Maybe
I
shouldn't
ask
open-ended
questions
like
that.
Just
I'll
just
say:
if
yeah
I'm
gonna
I'm
gonna,
let's
move
forward
with
that
and
then
if
people
object
you
can
just
say
something
so
so
so
Nate
who,
on
the
multi-sig
you're,
are
you
kind
of
taking
the
lead
on
that
right
now,.
F
I
can
yeah
I
think
there's
yeah,
there's
there's
a
lot
of
advice
process
that
needs
to
be
going
through.
I
see
somebody
ask
a
question:
didn't
we
agree
on
waiting
to
have
a
clear
view
before
returning
everything
yeah
I
mean
that
that
is
one
of
the
the
aspects
of
the
the
I
think
it's
really
important
to
lay
out
the
options
for
through
the
working
groups
and
then
decide
you
know
what
is
the
most
efficient
way.
We
can
do
this
whether
we
need
to
return
these
to
the
common
pool.
F
Do
we
want
to
disperse
some
of
those
those
funds
to
the
transition
process?
There's
a
couple
of
questions
that
need
to
be
answered
so
I'm
more
than
willing
to
spearhead
this.
K
N
H
Can
I
make
a
comment
about
advice
process
that
I
I
feel
yeah
I
feel
like
we're
getting
a
little
bit
lost
on
one
advice
process,
as
thinking
like.
Oh
here
are
all
the
options.
What
are
opinions
about
all
of
these
options
and
how
we
could
move
forward
and
then
we
never
move
forward.
I
think
the
purpose
of
advice
process
is
having
a
clear
proposal
where
the
person
who's
proposing
it
has
a
Direction.
They
want
forward
and
they
can
also
expose
what
are
the
other
options.
H
But
there's
like
a
clear
path
for
execution,
and
then
people
can
give
advice
on
either
that's
a
path
they
agree
with
or
not,
and
if
there's
something
to
modify
in
that
path
and
if
people
completely
disagree
with
that
path,
people
are
incentivized
to
make
another
proposal,
but
I
think
the
way
we're
moving
we're
like
not
really
making
anything
concrete,
so
yeah
just
making
a
clear
proposal.
If
people
have
feedback
great
and
then
the
person
who
is
making
the
proposal
integrates
that
feedback
and
executes
the
proposal.
A
That
is
a
really
good
point.
Actually,
Libby
I'll
shoot
you
this
doc
that
I'm
working
on
that
is
kind
of
all.
Based
on
that
like
how
do
we?
How
do
we
really
use
the
advice
process
as
it
was
intended
to,
which
is
like
not
to
get
stuck
in
analysis,
paralysis
or
consensus
forming,
and
you
know
like
trying
to
get
consensus
on
everything
we'll
kill
ourselves.
If
we
do
that,
if
we
have
to
get
stuck
doing
that
for
every
little
thing,
so
yeah
so
I'll
share
this
to
you.
H
Yeah,
the
idea
of
advice
process
is
actually
the
opposite
of
consensus.
It's
like
we
don't
need
to
go
through
a
consensus
process.
We
can
just
go
through
this
fast
route,
where
people
that
are
affected
by
what
is
being
proposed
have
a
chance
to
give
an
input
and
that
can
still
be
executed
like
as
fast
as
possible.
F
I
would
say
that
my
only
counter
to
to
your
comments
Libby
is
that
when,
when
there
isn't
a
consensus
on
moving
forward
with
whoever
decides
on
the
the
path
that
that
has
been
articulated,
that
there
isn't
an
incentive
to
create
another
path,
not
a
lot
of
people
respond
with
a
with
a
new
solution.
It's
left
in
the
hands
of
the
person
who
created
the
first
path
and
they
are
stuck
with
the
same
same
problem
of
non-consensus.
H
But
but
the
thing
is
that
if
consensus
is
enriched
and
the
people
who
had
a
chance
to
propose
something
else
or
to
modify
that
that
initial
proposal,
if
they
don't
participate
and
the
proposal
is
executed-
and
they
don't
like
that,
I
mean
it's
kind
of
on
them
to
then
take
action.
And
then
that's
kind
of
the
purpose
of
democracy.
A
So
can
I
make
a
suggestion,
because
this
this
thing
that
I
was
pulling
together
yesterday
is
like
all
wrapped
around
advice
process
like
how
do
we
use
advice
process
to
drive
project
management,
and
so
maybe
what
we
do
is
have
this
discussion
next
week,
because
I
do
think
that
there's
a
lot
of
misunderstanding
about
advice
process
I
mean
it's
an
easy
thing
to
misunderstand:
I
actually
been
reading
Frederick
Lulu's
Reinventing
organizations,
which
is
a
great
great
book,
and
he
talks
about
it.
A
A
lot
and
I
think
even
just
helping
everybody
like
Libby
would
be
great
to
maybe
go
into
a
little
bit
more
detail
about
this
next
week.
A
If
you'd
be
willing,
because
I
think
it's
yeah
is
that
cool?
Can
we
do
that.
A
Okay,
all
right,
so
any
other
comments
about
the
multi-sig
management.
Before
we
move
on
to
the
next
one.
A
Does
everybody
feel
like
the
the
questions
that
Nate
and
I
can't
tell
who
who's
writing
this
I
think
I'm
assuming
it's
Nate?
Is
there
any
other
thing
in
here
that
needs
to
be
addressed
and
if
and
I
I
would
also
say,
like
feel
free
to
look
at
this
and
and
come
back
to
it
later.
If
things
come
back,
this
document
will
be
here:
it's
posted
in
the
stewards
Channel,
so
let's
keep
moving
then
so
credentials,
management,
Nate.
F
Yeah
and
Rex
Rex
has
contributed
a
lot
to
this
conversation
as
well.
I,
don't
know,
Rex
has
a
kind
of
a
Clear
Vision
for
this
in
terms
of
the
options
that
we
have
in
terms
of
Distributing
credentials,
you
want
to
go
ahead
next.
Sorry,
okay,
so.
M
We
do
need
to
take
a
look
at
what's
currently
being
done
in
a
bit
more
detail,
because
I
believe
that
we
are
using
a
well
a
non-open
source,
password
manager
and
I
am
not
too
sure
how
we're
sharing
the
passwords
but
say
I
know
that
some
aren't
being
stored
and
some
are
being
stored
in
the
in
the
password
manager.
M
So
there
needs
to
be
a
process
of
going
through
and
consolidating
these
kind
of
the
Dune
password
isn't
on
there,
and
so
there
might
be
one
or
two
that
we
missed,
that
that
need
to
go
on
there
and
then,
aside
from
that,
I've
been
looking
at
whether
witches
stay
in
the
current
in
the
current,
using
the
current
solution
or
move
to
a
more
organization,
an
organization
password
manager
which
would
allow
us
to
more
granularly
granularly
keep
roles,
let's
just
say,
could
have
a
a
comms
role,
and
only
those
in
the
comms
role
in
this
password
manager
can
actually
get
access
to
that
password,
rather
than
it
being
individual
sharing
right.
M
O
All
right
you
mean
Dashlane.
M
O
Oh
actually,
septi
is
is
the
one
that
has
like,
like
the
Dashlane
credentials,
and
he
is
able
to
give
the
rest
of
the
Community
Access,
but
I.
Think
that,
like
for
Twitter,
both
septi
and
I
have
the
2fa
and-
and
we
don't
really
handle
it
through
Dashlane
as
far
as
I
I
remember.
But
maybe
it
would
be
a
good
idea
to
check
in
with
him,
because
also
there's
like
something
about
like
a
premium
version
and
stuff
like
that.
M
Yeah,
that's
also
so
my
my
problem
with
dashley.
If
we're
going
to
talk
about
premium
versions,
is
that
it's
not
open
source,
and
so,
if
we're
going
to
look
at
premium
options
personally,
I
think
I
think
it's
more
in
the
it's
more
secure.
First
of
all,
because
open
source
cryptography
is
almost
a
givering
grip
that
we
know
that
and
yeah
a
second,
it's
not
the
division
of
the
community.
M
So
if
we're
going
to
pay
for
the
one
it
would
I'd
probably
suggest
either
bit
Warden
or
another
one
looking
at
or
all
self-hosting
straight
up,
which
would
be
cheaper
than
either
option.
A
Yes,
maybe
so,
rather
than
like
getting
into
the
details
of
it,
are
you
and
Nate?
Maybe
can
you
work
on
a
proposal.
M
Yeah
happy
to
get
to
do
it
happy
to
have
a
call
with
Deputy
sometime
this
week
or
before
Tuesday
and
come
up
with
something
with
an
outcome
for
whatever
next
meeting
is.
A
A
What
would
be
great,
though,
is,
is
getting
some
folks
who
are
like
really
interested
in
this
process
and
helping
to
drive
this
process
forward.
I
can
use
all
the
help
I
can
get,
and
you
know
so
what
I
mean
by
that
is.
A
You
know
I
would
say
like
in
terms
of
time,
commitment
like
at
least
an
hour
a
week
like
a
concerted
meeting,
that's
kind
of
like
focused
on
on
this
and
trying
to
drive
this
forward,
probably
on
Fridays,
maybe
instead
of
the
sample
meeting,
and
we
can
change
the
timing
of
it
but
like
having
a
having
a
small.
You
know
relatively
small
group
of
folks
who
are
dedicated
and
willing
to
dive
in
and
help
to
just
kind
of
brainstorm
and
figure
out
this
process.
So
any
volunteers.
A
A
And
just
to
be
clear,
I
mean
this
is
just
people
who
are
going
to
be
like
focusing
on
process,
but
the
actual
decision,
making
and
kind
of
like
advice,
process
and
all
that
will
clearly
it'll
be
like
this
will
be
a
community-wide
thing
right.
It's
just
like.
We
need
some
people
to
kind
of
like
be
able
to
step
up
and
help.
H
Will
be
off
in
December,
but
for
November
I
am
down
to
help
and
I
actually
feel
like
it's
simpler
than.
We
think
I
feel
like
this
meetings,
we're
having
now
we're
getting
so
much
solved
and
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
are
getting
into
track,
and
it's
probably
like
I,
don't
know
if
there's
much
more
than
this
should
be
done.
A
Yeah,
you
might
be
right,
I
think
that
the
way
I'm
seeing
it
right
now
is
that
there's
a
bunch
of
stuff,
that's
kind
of
like
short
term
the
Urgent
important
stuff,
but
then
I
think
we
can
morph
this
process
into
kind
of
the
longer
term
strategy
kind
of
road
map
work.
So
I
think
that
it
will
continue
over
time,
but
yeah
I
I,
agree
that,
like
this
short-term
stuff,
I
think
I,
don't
think
they're,
yeah,
I,
think
you're
right
I
think
we
will
get
through
this
relatively
quickly.
A
Okay,
all
right
so
yeah
and
I
mean
just
in
terms
of
like
you
know
what
this,
what
this
looks
like
as
I
mentioned
in
the
beginning.
Not
everybody
was
here
for
this
part,
but
you
know
I,
think
that
this
is
gonna,
be
about
like
what
does
this
core
team
look
like
like
what
are
the
functions
of
this
core
team
and
you
know
drawing
on
some
of
the
exercises
from
last
week.
A
You
know
using
that
to
figure
out
what
the
functions
are
and
then
really
just
process.
So
that's
then
that's
the
thing
I
was
talking
about
like
a
kind
of
an
advice
driven
like
advice,
process
or
advice,
driven
project
management
process.
A
A
A
Is
there
anybody
who
has
like
a
strong
interest
in
thinking
about,
like
our
community
calls
and
just
community
events?
Some
of
this
is
going
to
be
like
very
nitty-gritty,
like
how
do
we
just
remove
the
the
I
mean
some
of
it's
related
to
the
kind
of
the
winding
down
of
some
of
the
working
groups.
So
it's
like
just
removing
some
of
the
events
that
are
still
kind
of
showing
up
for
some
reason
and
making
sure
that
the
calendar
is
really
clear.
A
M
Just
wanted
to
point
out
that,
like
we
talk
about
the
calendar,
we've
got
a
bot
doing
all
of
the
calendar
events
now.
So,
if
you
delete
anything
on
the
Discord
side,
it
will
continue
to
pop
up
every
week.
Just
if
you,
if
you
did
it
that
way,
the
calendar
events
need
to
be
deleted
via
the
Google
Calendar,
that
we
have
completely
yeah
just
that.
A
Okay,
bear
I,
see
you
put
your
name
down
for
that.
Oh
that
may
that
may
be
enough.
I'm
I'm
certainly
help
I'll
I'll
certainly
help
with
that
too,
but
it
bear
if
you
can
be
kind
of
the
driver
on
that.
That
would
be
that'd
be
great
and
anybody
got
like
particular
like
interest,
not
in
maybe
not
driving
it,
but
if
you
got
strong
opinions
about
that,
are
there.
People
here
who
feel
like
hey
I
would
like
to
be
consulted
on
this
early
on
in
the
advice
process.
A
Okay,
anything
else
on
the
on
the
community
meeting
side
of
things.
K
A
Right,
we
were
just
cruising
along
here
all
right,
so
returning
funds
to
the
common
pool,
multi-sick
process,
as
stated
above.
A
Think
this
showed
up
twice
on
the
in
the
exercise
last
week,
so
we
can
probably
just
roll
this
into
the
multi-sig
I.
Think
that
probably
makes
sense
anybody
object
to
that.
A
Yeah
I'm
gonna
link
this
right
now
to
the
last
one,
this
paying
people
for
the
work
in
this
transition.
So
you
know
the
clean
okay.
A
Maybe
the
cleanest
thing
to
do
would
be
to
just
return
all
funds
to
the
common
pool,
but
given
how
hard
it
is
to
get
things
passed
in
the
common
pool
and
given
that
we
probably
don't
want
to
go
for
a
month
without
paying
folks,
there
is
this
idea
of
basically
just
using
one
of
the
so
so
there's
funding
that's
left
in
Sample.
A
We
could
just
basically
change
the
name,
so
sample
goes
away
and
change
it
to
whatever
we
call.
This
group
I
think
it's
probably
around
11k
that's
left
and
we
could
use
that
as
an
interim
Strat.
It
was
basically
an
interim
funding
pool
to
pay
folks
for
the
the
transition
work,
and
maybe
you
know
we
take
some
of
the
the
Calm
stuff
but
jury
and
use
that
to
pay
for
acid
to
do
Twitter
work
and
just
basically
pour
that
over.
That
would
be
one
option.
A
So
I
guess
the
general
question
is,
you
know,
do
we
do
it?
I,
don't
know
if
it's
by
the
book
or
or
maybe
it's
not
even
by
the
book
but
like
do
we
send
it
back?
Do
we
just
send
it
all
back
to
the
common
pool,
or
do
we
say?
That's
there's
a
risk
there
of
like
having
to
like
go
for
several
weeks
of
not
being
able
to
pay
people
and
it's
better
to
just
be
pragmatic
and
use
an
existing
fund
to
pay
thoughts.
E
On
that,
I
have
to
I
I,
have
very
strong
feelings
about
sending
funds
again
to
the
common
pool,
at
least
like
right
now,
I'm
pretty
much
against
for
a
few
reasons.
You
know
I
think,
first
of
all
too
early,
we
don't
we
don't
know
how
much
is
going
to
cost
over
how
much
time
it's
going
to
take.
E
E
I
think
this
is
a
situation
that
requires
working
groups
taking
those
kinds
of
decisions
and
then,
lastly,
in
the
worst
case,
we
can
do
a
snapshot
together
to
make
a
checkbook
check
or
whatever,
instead
of
returning
them
like
I,
believe
we
should
return
them,
but
once
we
know
how
much
is
going
to
cause,
how
much
like?
E
How
much
do
we
actually
need
to
move
forward
because
they
are
already
out
of
the
common
pool
and,
generally
speaking,
we
proposals
were
made
to
keep
the
TC
moving
and
we
are
technically
keeping
TC
moving.
It's
just
that
the
the
situation
has
changed
in.
So
that's
that's
where
I'm
at.
N
N
I
now
also
feel
very
much
the
opposite
specifically
because
the
transition
can't
happen
unfunded
and
that
if
a
working
group
is
going
to
to
retire
and
we
can
consolidate
the
funding
in
order
to
support
a
transition
to
this
new
structure,
I
think
it
really
makes
the
most
sense
and
in
fact
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
even
support
a
transition
without
it
and
then
I
like
the
idea
of
following
the
process
of
having
token
holders
agree
by
a
community
vote
as
well.
Snap
Shuffle.
M
I
I
agree
with
what
you
say:
Tom
I
think
specifically.
If
the
roles
of
this
working
group
are
going
to
be
taken
over
directly
by
this
new
this
new
organization,
then
it
does
lie
within
the
funds
of
that
of
that,
like
that,
then
it
isn't
as
obscene
to
move
the
funds
away
from
that
working
route.
M
So
if,
if
this
new
consolidated
working
group
is
going
to
take
over
the
role
for
transparency,
then
it
makes
sense
that
whatever
is
left
in
that
in
that
multi-seat
be
moved
on
to
this
isn't
so
long
as
there's
continuity
in
the
roles,
then
there
can
be
continuity
with
the
funds.
M
However,
I
I
still
think
that,
if,
if
there
is
no
continuity,
if
those
are,
if
the,
if
the
completeness
of
that,
if
the
totality
of
that
working
group
is
to
be
phased
out,
that
nothing
is
going
to
replace
it,
then
no,
it
should
go
to
them
all.
It
should
go
to
the
multi
string
just
based
on
principle,
though,
even
if
it's
difficult
times,
we
still
need
to
yeah.
We
still
need
to
respect
the
voters.
L
I
mean
in
the
end
the
money
is
controlled
by
the
multi-stick.
If
the
group
sunsets
themselves,
then
the
multi-sig
needs
to
decide
whether
or
not
to
send
the
funds
there
or
donate
the
funds
or
or
do
whatever
they
want
with
the
funds.
I
I
feel
like
we're.
Just
that's
just
the
the
laws
on
chain,
and
we
can.
We
can,
of
course,
suggest
and
culturally
influence
things,
but
in
the
end
it's
the
multi-sync
who
decides
and
if
they
feel
like
there's
still
work
to
be
done
in
the
transition.
L
A
Okay,
well,
these
are,
these
are
good,
I!
Think
it's
really
good
and
I
think
we
just
knocked
out
the
the
last
one
here.
So
that's
good,
so
Technology
support,
Rex
and
NT.
Anything
oh
I
see
you've
already
been
putting
stuff
in
there.
A
A
And
yeah,
just
like
a
quick
like
you
know,
here's
each
one
of
these
things.
Our
website
to
you
know,
get
book
blah
blah
blah.
Every
single
one
of
them
is
like
what
is
the
dependency
just
a
quick
summary:
that's
like
here's.
What
we've
got
just
so
we
have
like
an
inventory
of
you
know
if
things
were
to
go
wrong
with
those
things
like
we
know,
we
know
what
they
are
have
like
some
indication
of
like
who
is
driving
those
tools.
A
Think
that
would
be
great
and
NT
you
and
I
have
talked
about
that
before.
Do
you
have
any
thoughts
on
this.
E
Yeah
I
just
linked
the
document.
I
started
it's
already.
It
is
still
a
working
progress,
but
yeah
we
have
to.
We
have
a
lot
of
things
to
take
care
of
a
lot
of
things
to
watch
out
for
and
especially
now,
with
the
transition.
E
There
are
some
things
that
we
may
not
need
anymore
and
others
that
we
may
have
to
do
some
research
to
include
to
to
support
us
better,
and
so
this
is
something
that
generally
Rex
and
I
have
been
doing
wrecks
on
a
more
more
technical
level.
With
you
know
doing
in
about
supporting
stuff
and
me
that
have
done
a
few
of
the
things
and
I
think
that
you
know
we,
we
I
guess
just
keep
doing
that.
D
K
M
M
If,
if
any
one
of
these
admins
doesn't
have
two-factor
authentication
or
for
some
reason,
the
laptop's
stolen
or
anything
like
Whoever
has
control
of
that
account
can
just
nuke
a
whole
server,
which
is
oh
biggest
point
of
communication.
So
that's
just
one
I'm
sure
that
there's
others
and
yeah,
obviously
that
one
lies
with
both
credentials,
management
and
Technology
supporters
they
can
into
linking
of
both.
M
But
yes,
it
is
certainly
something
that
that
we
can
take
a
look
at
and
and
find
the
the
biggest
pain
point
and
these
these
issues
that
we
should
probably
sort
out
and
have
due
process
for
I
did
that
Dune
there,
because
June
yesterday
announced
pretty
much
out
of
the
blue
that
they're
going
to
archive
all
of
our
queries
in
six
weeks,
because
they're
built
on
an
older
engine
to
the
one
that
they
want
to
use.
So
that
will
be
I'm
going
to
do
a
more
clear
proposal.
M
Next
Tuesday,
so
I
wouldn't
like
to
spend
too
much
on
it,
but
yeah
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
that
the
finance
the
financial
management
which
would
lie
on
the
Technology
support,
is
like
someone
used
to
do
that.
Someone
needs
to
Port
all
the
queries
from
the
old
engine
to
the
new
engine
and
whether
it's
JH
or
it's
myself,
yeah,
that's
right.
That
will
need
to
be
done.
A
Okay,
cool!
Thank
you.
Thank
you
both
that's.
Okay,
so
and
then
the
last
one
on
here
is
the
phasing
out
the
working
groups
which
it
seems
like
Nate.
A
Are
you
driving
that
and
Tam
and
I
are
kind
of
helping
on
the
side?
Is
that
right,
yeah.
F
Yeah
we
can
do
that.
The
one
thing
is
that
the
meet
up
with
the
working
group-
stewards,
who
are
phasing
out
the
working
groups-
some
of
them
are
gone.
For
example,
Community
talks
I'll
be
taking
on,
but
having
that
off-boarding
checklist
done
and
ready,
including
Forum
posts
and
And
discussing
learnings,
we
we
should
have
that
we
need
to
select
a
date
for
that.
I
think
we
need
to
select
a
deadline
for
that
for
everybody
to
just
kind
of
like.
F
Let's
put
this
behind
us
move
forward,
get
this
all
done
so
does
anybody
have
a
good
time
period
or
projection,
for
that
is?
Is
two
weeks
enough.
N
In
my
perspective,
I,
don't
know
that
all
working
groups
are
sunsetting
at
this
moment
and
I
I,
don't
know
if
that
was
a
misunderstanding
on
my
part,
but
I
think
that
we
need
to
continue
to
look
at
the
process
and
some
then
talk
with
the
stewards
of
each
of
the
working
groups
and
have
conversations
and
see
what
what
responsibilities
there
are,
whether
those
make
sense
to
expand
just
in
transition
to
the
one
team,
but
yeah.
That's
I
just
want
to
be
very
clear
that
I,
my
understanding
is
not.
N
M
Yes,
I
I
do
see
that,
as
being
the
case,
I
I
did
mention
rewards
last
week,
I
I
think
that
rewards
is
pretty
strong.
There's
a
worker
we've
been
able
to
keep
on
going
that
way
and
what's
interesting
to
understand,
yes,
is
the
mechanics
of
like
interaction.
Let's
say
between
this
Consolidated
working
groups
and
those
that
remained
I,
assume
that
we're
all
going
to
be
on
par,
so
that
working
groups
can
kind
of
maintain
their
independence.
K
A
You
that's
good
good
reminder.
Okay,
so
I
think
we
got
through
all
this
and
we've
got
five
minutes
to
spare.
Let
me
just
open
We're,
not
gonna,
have
time
to
do
like
a
go
around
with
everybody,
but
we
do
have
five
minutes.
If,
if
anybody
has
any
closing
thoughts,
they'd
like
to
share.
A
A
Yeah
I
mean
I.
Don't
want
to
keep
everybody
here
to
do
that.
So
if
there's
no
other
closing
thoughts,
then
we
can
just
we
can
end
a
few
minutes
early.
N
Maybe
I'll
just
have
one
closing
thought
which
is
I
want
to
say
you're.
Just
thank
you
so
much
Gideon
your
leadership
and
commitment
to
the
tec's,
exemplary
and
I
want
to
say
how
much
I
appreciate
how
well
you
are
taking
this
off.
A
Okay,
all
right
everybody,
so
yeah,
let's,
let's
we'll
wrap
it
up
here,
we'll
meet
again
on
Tuesday
next
week
and
hope
to
have
some
stuff
for
people
to
look
at
before
then
and
yep.
Thank
you.
Everybody
I'm
glad
nice
turnout
today.
Thank
you
all
right
and
so
Libby
and
bear
do
you
want
to
hang
out.