►
From YouTube: W36 Transparency WG: Payment updates, audit
Description
The Transparency Working Group promotes transparency, openness and mutual monitoring as a high-level ideal that we're moving towards at the TEC. The way that we get there is by empowering people to share this experience with the Transparency Audits and making information available to everyone.
We gather every Monday at 5pm CET.
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
B
Yeah,
I
don't
know,
intentions
are
to
get
access
to
what
I'm
supposed
to
be
working
on.
Distractions
are
not
having
access
to
what
I'm
supposed
to
be
working
on.
Well
I'll,
go
back
to
intentions,
because
I've
I
mean
today,
I
intend
to
find
out
where,
like
offline
decisions
are
made,
if
they're
made
in
notes
and
I've
gone
through,
I
don't
know
maybe
10
10
agendas
and
I
haven't
seen
anything
so
yeah.
That's
it
so
pass
it
to
ivy.
C
Thanks
rachel,
my
intention
is
to
just
to
ask
zip
for
again,
I
think,
to
give
more
updates
about
the
payment.
C
I
think,
because
you
were
talking
about
some
if
there
were,
there-
are
some
kind
of
changes.
D
C
Our
payment
strategy
or
mechanism-
I
think
it's
it's
worth
sharing
with
the
team
zepty,
I
don't
know
we
were
talking
about
based
no
yeah.
So
that's
that's
just
my
intention
and
then
distraction.
None
at
the
moment.
D
A
Yeah
great,
let's
open,
let
me
show
the
agenda.
A
Yeah
I
mean
for
the
yeah
payments
like
actually
like
when
we
were
doing
the
payments
like.
I
was
expecting
like
to
get
like
a
2k,
and
then
it
was
like
five
higher
like
two
point
number
three
and
then
yeah.
I
think
like
myself,
I
will
add
a
role
and
probably
ib2
like
since
we
like.
We
do
the
task
like
regularly
and
we
know
what
what
we're
doing
every
week,
then
we
just
get
a
yeah
roll
base
payment
and
then
yeah.
A
C
Yeah
I
mean
for
the
we
when
we
were
doing
the
payment.
C
We
thought
that
maybe
for
it
would
be
great
to
I
mean-
maybe
it's
better
to
create
just
a
fixed
rate
like
for
for
zepty
and
probably
me
for
this
month,
since
it's
like
a
role
based
compensation,
because
it's
hard
for
us
to
track
the
hours
because
we're
we're
doing
coordination
and
yeah
like
small
tasks
every
now
and
then
it's
hard
to
count
the
hours
since
yeah
we're
supporting
also
other
working
groups,
but
for
the
month
of
for
the
month
of
january,
we
just
did
the
since
we
didn't
talk
about
it
in
the
for
the
month
of
I
mean
for
the
month
of
february,
so
we
did
the
hourly
rate
for
both
of
us,
so
we
wanna
yeah.
C
I
just
want
to
share
with
you
this
that
what
we
were
thinking
and
that's
what
we
will
probably
do,
but
we
wanna
know
your
thoughts
about
that,
because
we're
trying
to
adapt
what
comes
working
group
is
doing.
C
I
think
it's
simpler
to
do
to
get
to
have
a
role-based
compensation,
but
the
thing
with
transparency.
There
are
no
specific
rules,
but
we
have
more
tasks
but
except
for
zepty.
So
zepp
has
been
doing
a
lot
of
he's,
not
only
working
on
audit
he's
working
on
coordination
and
other
and
supporting
other
working
groups.
So
it's
it's
hard
to
hack
the
hours
so
yeah
because
sometimes
he
will
yeah.
C
I
don't
know
if
you're,
if
I
explain
myself
clearly,
but
that's
the
idea
so
yeah.
D
C
Want
to
know
what
the
what
the
rest
of
the
team
thinks
about
that
or,
if
do
we
want
to
have
that
for
everybody
or
we
just
or
for
contributors?
Does
it
make
more
sense
to
have
a
an
hourly
based
compensation.
A
I
want
to
add
something
very
quick
like
yeah
me
also
naive,
were
saying
like
having
you
know,
like
you
guys
do
like,
for
example
like
the
the
parts
of
the
audit
or
here.
So
you
do
the
event
like
how
you
know,
having
also
like
a
budget
fix
for
those,
and
you
know
like
okay,
the
audit
is
that
and
we
don't
count
the
hours,
but
the
task
like
when
you
accomplish
the
task,
then
you
get
toward
it,
but
also
at
the
same
time
I
was
thinking.
A
Maybe
you
know
that
could,
and
you
know
like
if
you
get
payment
a
payment
for
you
know
I
don't
know,
do
the
past
seven
of
the
audit
or
whatever
part,
and
you
got
a
fixed
amount,
then
you
know
like
you
are.
You
are
not
going
to
spend
more
time.
Just
because,
like
you
know,
and
then,
if
it's
hourly
rate
like
then
yeah
you
keep
working
until
you
think
like
the
work
is
in
the
best
shape
and
then
you
deliver.
A
C
For
granting
me
so
yeah,
that's
also
the
other
suggestion
like
for
audit
for
all
the
contributions.
Instead
of
counting
the
hours,
we
think
we
were
thinking
that
maybe
we
can
have
a
fixed
rate
for
each
part
of
the
audit,
and
so
you
don't
have
to
count
your
hours
as
well.
So
once
you
finish
your
part
of
the
audit
and
then
you
get
the
you
get
that
payment
instead
of
few
countdown.
B
B
Two
sides
on
this:
I
understand
100
what
you're
saying
as
far
as
your
work
with
other
working
groups,
unless
it's
100
I
mean
my
understanding,
is
like
this
is
transparency,
working
group
and
that's
the
transparency
proposal.
So
if
it's,
if
you're
being
paid
for
work
that
you're
doing
for
another
group
for
another
working
group,
that
should
not
be
part
of
the
transparency
payout
and
I'm
just
like
whatever's
decided,
is
fine
and
I'm
not
arguing
about
it.
But
that's
my
logic
on
that.
As
far
as
the
the
the
audit
goes.
B
There's
two
things
that
come
to
mind
is
that
you're
putting
value
like
if
they're
not
all
paid
the
same,
then
you're
putting
more
value
placed
on
a
particular
part
and
also
there's
going
to
be
cross-collaboration.
I
would
imagine
on
the
parts,
maybe
not
a
lot
or
maybe
a
lot.
I
mean
we
don't
know
right
now
because
we're,
I
don't
think
we're
really
at
the
point
where
we're
actually
structuring
the
the
audit
and
validating
the
information.
B
But
with
the
audit
I
mean
my
suggestion
with
that
would
be
like
there's
just
a
flat
pay
for
the
audit,
and
then
it
gets
distributed
between
all
people
because
you're
going
to
be
running
back
into
the
same
thing
like
whose
time
is
more
valuable
than
whose
time
and
then
how
can
you
prove
that
you
did
this?
B
And
how
can
you
prove
that
you
did
spend
this
much
time?
I
mean
it's,
I
don't
know
like
I
like
it
can
go
all
over
the
place.
I
know
there's
counter
argues
or
arguments
to
whatever,
whatever
I'm
saying,
but
yeah
and
pay
pay
becomes
one
of
those.
When
you're
talking
about
distribution,
it
becomes
one
of
those
touchy
situations,
I've
I've
seen
in
most
dows
or
or
groups
that
that
I've
been
in,
I
mean
I'm
fine
with
the
flat
with
the
flat
pay.
B
I
mean
as
long
as
it's
for
your
work
in
transparency
and
any
other
relation
there
might
be
within
as
transparency
relates
to
the
other
working
groups,
but
if
you're,
but
if
you're
talking
about
a
flat
pay,
because
you
did
work
for
gravity,
no,
that's
gravity's.
That
should
be
gravity's
responsibility.
D
I
think
the
flat
compensation
is
appropriate
if
you
know
if
the
expectations
and
responsibilities
are
clear,
that
shouldn't
that
shouldn't
be
a
problem.
I'm,
okay
with
you
know
you
getting
paid
in
whatever
way
you
feel
more,
more
comfortable,
anyways
prosperity.
Audit.
D
I
think
I
agree
with
ratio
here,
like
probably
hourly
rates,
or
some
other
way
would
be
a
bit
better,
especially
because
I've
seen
that
we've
been
sort
of
tweaking
the
give
me
one.
Second.
D
Sorry
yeah,
especially
now
that
I
feel
like
there's
some
particular
things
on
the
on
the
audi
that
we
are
still
figuring
out
and
so
putting
a.
I
guess.
A
bounty
on
each
part
would
probably
sort
of
harden
the
process
of
figuring
out
what
what
to
include
and
whatnot.
A
Yeah
totally,
I
totally
agree.
I
really
think
like
it's
better
to
count
the
hours
in
for
you
guys,
but
I
just
wanted
also
to
propose,
like
the
other
way
around
like,
because
I
really
think
if
you
count
the
hours,
you
can
push
the
project
to
a
better
state,
and
then
I
mean
yeah
regarding
the
other
thing
ratio,
like
the
answer
I
get
is
like
get
things
simple.
A
So
if
I
no
right
now,
I'm
I'm
I
mean
I
can
be
transparent
with
that,
I'm
getting
paid
from
storage,
gravity
and
transparency,
but
I'm
actually,
you
know
doing
a
lot
of
like
sometimes
I'm
even
hoping
the
common
stock
or
you
know,
and
then
you
know
like
if
I
have
to
make
requests
for
you
know.
Oh
I
did
this
thing
for
common
stock.
I
I
have
to
request,
like
you
know,
then
die
to
make
a
trade
for
10
or
29,
or
you
know
that
doesn't
make
sense.
A
So
I've
been
told
to
keep,
keep
things
simple,
and
then
you
know
when,
when
we
showed
the
deliveries
from
the
transparency,
we
can
include
those
the
proposal.
B
My
biggest
thing
is
that
if
it's,
you
know
like,
I
said
before,
if
it's
transparency
related
fine,
if
it's
not,
then
it
needs
to
come
from
another
fund.
But
if
what
you're
saying
like
updating
something,
that's
outside
the
scope
of
transparency
and
you-
the
pay
comes
out
of
the
transparency
proposal
fund,
then
send
a
bill
to
it
for
lack
of
a
better
term
and
send
the
bill
to
whoever
it
is.
You
did
to
work,
for
I
mean
transparency.
The
fund
can
pay,
but
then
it
gets
free.
B
And
I
know
it
sounds
stupid
because
it's
just
all
just
a
paper
trail,
it's
like
taking
it's
taken
from
peter
to
pay
paul,
but
there
still
has
to
be
that
that
accountability
as
far
as
like,
why
is
transparency,
paying
for
common
stack
issues
or
something
of
that
nature?
So
that's
that's
it.
I
mean
it's
in
the
grand
scheme
of
things.
If
the
money
all
comes
from
the
same
bucket,
it
all
comes
from
the
same
bucket.
Ultimately,
it's
just
the
accountability.
A
Yeah,
I
totally
agree,
but
at
the
same
time
also
with
you
know
the
way
like
getting
things
simple
like
in
order
to
you
know,
go
to
beer
to
give
to
paul
to
get
back
to
period.
You
know
it
adds
as
difficulty.
So
you
know
also
this
process
to
go
to
peter
to
go
to
paul.
That
also
should
be
paid,
so
actually
it
increased.
The
budget.
B
Yeah,
no,
I
I
I
agree
with
you.
I
understand
yeah
I
mean
I
mean
it's
I
mean
I
know,
y'all
came
to
us
as
a
group,
but
I
mean
ultimately
it's
I
mean
we're
here
to
provide
input
and
you
know,
hopefully
we
we
all
make
the
decision,
and
this
this
would
actually
be
one
of
those
decision-tracking
moments
that
I
would
put
in
the
audit.
Also
I
I
would
imagine
yeah.
A
F
B
B
I
don't
know
because
I
think
sometimes
like
if
you
make,
if
you,
if
you
voice
an
opinion
you're,
sometimes
it
might
come
across
as
like
you're,
making
a
character
judgment
against
someone,
and
that's
not
the
case.
So
I
trust
you.
I
trust.
I
trust
everybody
in
this
group
so
and
I
guess
I
trust
y'all-
to
make
the
right
decision.
That's
all.
A
A
You
know
it's
asking
for
more
money
than
the
value
is
providing
and
then
for
the
other
groups.
It
would
look
the
opposite
like
it
looks
like
they
are,
bringing
more
than
what
they're
asking
for,
and
that
should
not
be
good.
I
totally
agree
with
that,
but
I
think
like
if
we
can
work
it
out
in
the
audit,
like,
as
you
were
saying
and
make
all
these
things
clear.
There
that'd
be
fantastic,
actually
like
the
it
would
be
like
you
know
our
resource
to
show
everything.
B
Yeah,
here's
another
question
to
go
along
with
this
and
I'm
not
trying
to
you
know
to
drag
this
on.
So
so,
if
you
have,
if
you
and
I
don't
know
how
it
would
be
done,
but
I
guess
another
option
would
be
to
have
like,
for
instance
like
I
don't
and
I'm
just
hypothetical
say:
enti
is
responsible
for
for
dune
and
for
updating.
B
I
don't
know
mrs
denhub
or
something
like
that
like
if
it
was
if
there
was
to
make
it
easier
for
accountability.
B
I
mean
paying
by
task
by
by
task,
and
I
guess,
if
you
have
a
task,
if
you
have
the
value
for
a
task
to
be
updated,
that's
agreed
upon
within,
I
guess,
within
transparency,
since
this
is
the
transparency
proposal
part
of
the
proposal.
The
funding
for
the
proposal
is
that
if
you
have
that
put
value
on
a
task
based
on
time,
then
you
can
pretty
much
assign
somebody.
B
A
Yeah
yeah
I
mean
in
for
example,
in
your
case
I
could
understand
you
know,
like
monthly
payment
for
the
for
the
events
like
it's
the
same
task
every
every
month,
but
then
you
know
the
audit
it's
totally
different,
because
no,
this
is
the
first
time
so
this
you
know
this
time
is
going
to
get
more
work
actually,
but
then
next
audits
are
going
to
be
way
easier
than
they
are
today,
because
the
structure
is
going
to
be
done
and
right
now
we
are
doing
the
structure
and
we
don't
know
who
effort
is
going
to
take.
B
B
I
mean
is
that
you
know
what
does
that
make?
Does
that
make
sense
like
because
it's
it's
like
a
performance
based
pay,
but
it's
also
a
quality
based
pay,
so
you
get
the
performance
part
first,
that's
paid
because
you
helped
on
the
audit
and
then
your
quality
pay,
which
is
the
remaining
funds
for
the
audit,
is
paid
based
upon
community
feedback
to
the
audit
and
granted.
That
might
be
a
delay
in
a
remaining
payout.
But
then
you
can,
then
it
kind
of
justifies-
and
I
don't
know
if
that
makes
it
more
complicated.
C
I
think
it's
a
bit.
It
makes
things
it's
a
bit
more
complicated,
but
I
think
the
solution
for
the
quality
part
zetta
and
I
were
talking
if
the
community
doesn't
like
the
quality
of
the
work.
That's
been
done
and
it's
been
paid,
it's
been
fully
paid.
What
we
can
do
is
like
we
don't
give
that
task
anymore.
C
To
the
to
this
to
the
same
person,
I
mean,
of
course,
we'll
do
a
quarterly
audit.
If
the
committee
isn't
satisfied
with
the
quality
of
work
of
the
contributor
and
then
that
contributor
won't
be
won't,
be
like
sort
of
hired
for
the
next
next
round
of
audit,
we'll
give
the
task
to
somebody
else.
So,
let's.
A
This
is
how
they,
you
know
the
performance
and
the
quality
that
we
bring
to
the
table
like,
of
course,
like
you
know,
if,
if,
if
someone
does
some
job,
they
get
paid
anyway,
like
you
know,
when
someone
does
job
and
you
agree
to
pay
him,
you
just
pay
him
because
that's
the
agreement,
even
if
he
does
a
bad
job,
just
to
pay
him.
Then
in
the
next
time,
like
you
say
like,
maybe
I
prefer
to
do
it
alone
or
with
someone
else
right
and
agreement.
B
Yeah,
I
agree.
I
agree
just
one
last
question,
so
all
right,
so
what's
the
what's
the
what's
the
decision
then
like
what?
What
is
the
consensus
here
within
the
group
then
as
far
as
the
roles
and
how
the
audit
is
going
to
be
done,
because
I
know
we've
been
bouncing
ideas.
Well,
I
have
y'all,
you
know
yeah
like
we
can.
If
we
can
come
to
a
consensus,
but
you
know
like
now,
I
mean
that'd
be
great.
That
way.
Nobody's
left
wondering.
A
A
A
Then
you
know,
talk
the
average
and
then
we
could
also
have
a
place
where
you
know
expectations
from
the
income
and
then
in
the
other
side
like
we
have
like
expenses
working
groups
and
in
this
part
like
we,
we
keep
it
broad,
like
you
know,
working
group
how
much
money
the
work
looks
expensive.
A
You
know
and
then
you
say,
working
groups
use
this
amount
of
money,
but
you
don't
say
like
as
far
as
it
is.
This
is
because
this
disconnects
and
then
you
have
to
know,
I
got
an
overage
view
or
you
know
the
income
from
the
tc,
the
and
the
expenses
from
the
tc
and
then
also.
A
Like
I
want
to
push
us-
and
I
really
want
us
to
work
because
the
goal
of
the
the
commons
is
fantasy
projects-
not
working
groups
right
working
closely
with
operations,
which
is
great,
they
are
needed,
but
we
like
we
need
to
keep
focus
and
telling
to
the
community.
A
Look
because
right
now,
if
I
mean
I
just
you
know
like
we
pass
towards
proposal,
we
pass
transparency.
We
pass
communitize
gravity
is
about
to
pass,
comes
yeah,
that's
great
working
groups,
I
mean.
Is
this
commons
to
fund
working
groups
or
team
projects
because
t-press
for
the
moment
only
the
the
academy
and
that's
also
something
that
I
really
want
to
show
in
the
other.
Like?
Is
this
commons
to
fund
working
groups
or
team
project?
A
Maybe
we
need
to
start
looking
on
tv
projects
and
start
building
things,
because
otherwise
we
are
being
a
way
of
our
mission,
but
yeah
that
would
be.
You
know,
like
the
the
like
a
bigger
view
of
the
of
the
commons
as
a
whole
and
then
yeah
like
he
also
explained
like
okay,
the
money
will
have
in
the
common
pool,
and
you
know
like
after
three
months
like
we
started
with
this
amount
of
common
pool.
We
end
up
with
this
one.
A
At
this
rate,
you
know
who
yeah
hold
the
common
sent
in
in
two
three
years
and
yeah
the
the
detail
there.
How
yeah
I
mean.
How
are
we
if
we
keep
this
this?
This?
A
I
don't
know
the
english
word,
but
if
we
keep
doing
things
the
same
way
and
maybe
the
commons
will
run
out
of
money,
we
spend
more
than
we
income
and
then
and
then
yeah
in
part
in
part
b,
like
yeah,
as
I
was
saying
before,
like
talking
about
team
projects,
but
in
this
part,
like
being
more
concentric,
like
the
multi
academy,
tea
academy
asked
for
this
amount
of
money.
A
A
B
Have
a
question
about
this:
I
just
I
don't
know
if
it's
it's
in
there.
Looking
at
the
the
screen
is
there
like
for
the
for
the
audit,
like
I
see
everything
that
you
did
there.
B
Okay,
so
I
think
it's
this
part
like
I
don't
know
if
you
can
see
it
on
your
yeah
right
there,
where
I
just
so
that's
kind
of
like
auditing
the
proposals
right
and
kind
of
like
yeah
finding
out
like
well
that
I'm
not
and
I'm
not
trying
to
put
more
on
your
plate.
But
I'm
just
trying
to
get
clarification.
Is
that
like
finding
out
like
how
much
funds
they
have
left
what
they've
done
with
those
funds?
B
I
know
it's
like
a
monetary
audit
at
that
point,
but,
like
the
effectiveness,
is
there
a
way
to
audit
the
effectiveness
like
the
because
you
can
make
a
proposal
for
anything,
but
whether
or
not
it
was
good
for
the
community
and
it's
not
really
our
job
to
say
whether
or
not
it
was
good
for
the
community.
But
whether
or
not
the
community
is
utilizing
or
you
know
what
I
mean
like
the
does-
that
make
sense.
A
Yeah
yeah,
totally
and
yeah.
Actually,
what
I
was
thinking
is
like
don't
go
too
much
into
the
detail
on
the
project
like
if
they
have
carryovers
they
can
just
distribute
between
the
team
or
do
whatever
with
those
funds
like
what
is
more
important
is
like
okay,
tc
support
the
academy
and
look
what
the
cool
thing
that
the
academy
did.
Thanks
to
the
tc
funds
right.
F
B
A
Okay
and
then
yeah
in
the
other
side,
like
you,
know,
working
groups
yeah
in
in
this
place,
we
are
going
to
be
monitoring
like.
E
A
And
actually
like
whatever,
what
we
were
doing
before
is,
like
you
know
like
we
go
and
chat
with.
Whoever
is
you
know
like.
If
we
want
to
audit
comes
like
we
can,
you
know
we
can
start
auditing
them
with
all
the
information
we
have
on
the
community
available
for
you
know
for
everyone,
but
then
it's
also
nice
like
okay.
This
is
what
we
do.
We
did
with
comms,
but
then
we
go
to
choi
and
see
and
present
him
before
you
know
before
presenting
it
to
the
road
community.
A
We
also
chat
with
true
like
if
that's
if
we
are
not
missing
anything-
and
you
know
if,
if
it's
well
present
represented
what
what
you
are
accomplishing
or
maybe
we
maybe
he's
have
some
things
like
we
don't
know,
and
then
at
this
when
you
know
it's
in
we,
if
we
don't
know
it's,
because
maybe
it's
not
transparent
enough,
and
at
this
point
you
know
we
help
them
to
make
those
information
available
on
the
audit
and
then
in
part
d
it's
called
structurally
management
and
towards
the
worst
is
probably
going
to
be
a
working
group,
but
I'm
also
like
yeah
talking
a
bit
of
lasers,
and
actually
this
is
you
know
this
is
a
job
I'm
doing
which
actually
it
doesn't
fit.
A
I
mean
I
don't
feel
it's
transparent
to
work,
but
then
it's
also
not
it's
not
any
working
group
work,
like
you
know,
laser
tag
is
a
music
that
have
some
funds
and
then
I've
been
chatting
with
other
communities
like
to
do
trade
swaps
and
do
thoughts
with
other
relations
and
yeah.
This
job
doesn't
fit
on
any
working.
A
B
Would
laser
tag
be
like
I
guess
processes
more
than
it
would
be
proposals
or
projects.
A
A
I
would
like
to
know,
like
the
opinion
of
all
this
was
their
opinion
of
laser
tag
in
the
long
run
right
like
for
me,
you
know,
let's
attack
those
duty
and
then
the
funds
go
back
either
to
the
common
pool
or
to
an
agent
from
the
tower,
but
I
don't
think
like
those
funds
should
be
in
the
long
run
and
and
in
the
you
know
at
the
beginning,
it
was
good
because
it
helped
us
to
do
this
initial.
Why?
A
But
we
you
know
when,
when
this
thing
is
accomplished
like
there's,
no
need
right
now,
like
actually
yeah.
Actually,
there
is
no
need,
because
all
this
money
could
be
on
an
agent
until
and
this
money
could
be
governed
by
tower
boating.
B
B
Value
has
it
brought
into
the
community
to
distribute
the?
I
don't
know,
I'm
just
guessing
but
say
the
200
000
wrapped
x
die
that
was
sent
out
for
these
pro
proposals
and
projects
and
working
groups
and
yeah.
How
do
we?
How
do
we
get
that?
I
mean
I
don't
know.
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
way
to
do
it,
but.
A
Yeah,
I
think,
there's
no
way
because
you
know
like
okay,
that's
fine,
it's
transparency,
because
it's
the
easiest
one
for
us,
so
transparency.
You
know
they're
doing
this
other
they're
doing
these
calls
they're
doing
all
this
stuff,
like
changing
events
like
all
this
coordination
and
making
all
this
information
available
to
the
community,
but
it
also
generates
zero
money
to
the
commons
like
it
takes
value
from
the
it
gives
zero
value
to
the
congress,
because.
B
A
Yeah
yeah
totally.
I
think
what
what
I
would
love
like
we
accomplished
like
imagine
like
some
working
groups,
are
asking
you
know
a
lot
of
money
and
they
I'm
not
presenting
so
much
results
and
then
they
keep
asking
money
and
they
keep
passing
them
because
you
know
that's
what
happens
when
you
have
set
down
some
reputation
and
then
yeah,
then
you
know
the
idea
is
like
transparency,
it's
just
you
know.
Like
I
mean
I
don't
want
transparency,
be
they
were
like
look.
A
You
did
that,
but
it's
more
like
we
present
the
information
and
then
it's
like
the
community
to
judge,
but
we
present
the
information
which
is
important,
like
someone
has
to
do
it.
B
B
A
A
To
talk
more
formatting-
and
I
don't
know
like
do
you
guys
feel
like
I'm
missing
something
like
in
you
know,
then
in
working
with
like
you
know,
it
would
be
like
transparency,
stuff
of
every
working
group
and
get
details
from
every
working
group
and
yeah,
and
then
laser
tag
and
yeah.
That
would
be
like
part.
Four
of
the
audit,
like
you
guys
think
like
there's
something
like
would
be
nice
to
add,
or
something
that
remove
or
something
to
change.
That'd
be
great.
B
B
Yeah
I
mean
we
can.
I
can
hear
you
good,
like
95
of
the
time,
it's
just
that
one
bit
that
fades
away.
A
B
B
B
I'm
not
seeing
anything
like
so
far.
I
haven't
seen
anything
logged
as
far
as
internal
decisions
that
are
being
made,
and
I
guess
it
goes
back
to
our
agenda
that
we
have.
Maybe
we
should
put
discussion
on
the
agenda
on
the
agenda,
notes,
discussion
of
of
role
payout
and
you
know
that
way.
It's
there
in
case
somebody
wants
to
like
myself
go
back
and
see
if
there
was
a
decision
made
internally.
D
About
the
payments
for
communities,
I
was
looking
at
that
thing
yesterday
or
the
friday
or
friday,
and
they
have
the
descriptions
for
each
role
on
the
proposal
on
the
forum
so
yeah.
I
think
that's!
No!
That's!
No!
No.
B
Well,
I
think
I
think
the
problem
is,
I
mean
I
don't
know
if
it's
a
problem
or
not.
I
haven't
looked
at
every
working
group,
but
this
all
like.
As
far
as
information,
I
think
it
goes
back
to
like.
I
know
we're
supposed
to
be
a
decentralized
ish
platform,
and
but
there
still
needs
to
be
standards
as
far
as
how
things
are
structured
and
where
data
is
laid
out
to
where
it's
presentable
to
to
the
community
or
to
those
looking
for
the
information.
D
I
think
we
have
like
probably
just
two
options
in
this
case
more
or
less
like,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
that's
a
matter
of
self-governance.
D
So
if
soft
governance
decides
to
change
that
and
to
sort
of
require
some
sort
of
the
standard
for
operations,
that
will
be
one
thing
in.
D
In
the
other
scenario,
self
governance
doesn't
put
that
requirement,
and
I
guess
it's
on
us
to
make
clear
that
the
audits
are
going
to
be-
I
guess
more
expensive
or
whatever
of
time
in
and
budget
wise,
because
we
have
to
take
more
time
digging
into
that
information
idea.
Idealists
of
governance
would
require
something
some
kind
of
standard,
but
we
have
to
present
the
information
anyways.
I
guess.
A
Yeah,
actually
I
yeah
I
I
agree
like
with
you
and
I
think,
like
actually
like.
You
know,
95
percent
of
the
time
even
98
they're,
not
decisions
being
making
the
calls
and
agendas.
So
probably
is
like
not
a
wise
time
using
as
you
could
feel,
because
you
could
feel
yourself
like
looking
into
money
agendas
and
seeing
nothing
which
yeah
makes
makes,
I
feel
like
yeah
and
yeah.
A
A
A
B
A
B
A
And
yeah,
actually
you
know
if
you're
seeing
my
screen,
I
was
you
know
saying
like
the
tasks
I
was
doing,
the
man
I
was
requiring
and
then
I
also
said
here
like
in
the
forum
for
future
monthly
requests.
I'm
planning
like
it's,
you
know
it
was
it's
it's
here,
but
but
then
yeah
for
the
you
know
working
groups,
it's
yeah
most
of
the
time
like
they
are.
They
are
not
taking
decision
making
making
decisions.
A
So
that's
yeah
like
actually
like
when
we
were
building
the
audit.
I
was
very
acceptable
with
part
two
because
it's
very
hard
to
track
all
of
them
almost
impossible
and
it's
so
time
consuming.
But
I
know
I
will
like
really
like
it
to
keep
pushing
it
and
you
know
for
stuff
like.
B
B
I'm
gonna
go
back
through
the
forum
too,
because
there
might
be
some
advice,
but
that
advice
is
no,
never
turns
into
a
proposal.
So,
but
I
mean
that's
still
not
internally.
So
that's
still
public.
But
now
my
last
option,
which
you'll
probably
come
to
is
to
reach
out
to
the
to
the
various
working
groups
and
ask
them
if
y'all
made
any
internal
decisions
that
and
then
how
much
of
that
is
actually
like.
Oh
you're,
trying
to
pry
into
our
business
or
something
but.
B
As
simple
as
like
what
what
you
and
ivy
brought
brought
up
is
like
we
pay
our
we
pay
for
rolls.
Instead
of
hourly,
we
pay
like
a
a
flat
rate
for
a
particular
role,
or
something
like
that.
I
mean.
Is
it
important
to
track
that
I
mean?
Does
it
matter
because,
like
you're
not
affecting
you're,
not
asking
anything
else
from
funding
or
from
the
community
you're
just
using
what
you
have
and
kind
of
making
like
an
internal
structure,
change.
C
Yeah
exactly
when
we
were
creating
this
audit,
what
I
had
in
mind
for
part
two:
it's
like
not
it's,
not
necessarily
that
we
track
every
single
decision
made
internally,
but
only
those
decisions
that
affect
the
the
whole
community,
the
bigger
community.
You
know,
because
in
the
past
we
had
some
decisions,
like
choosing
the
stewards,
you
know,
and
it
doesn't
affect
only
the
stewards
breaking
group
but
the
whole
community
itself.
C
So
that's
what
I
was
thinking
when
we
structured
this
audit,
because
I
know
it's
hard
to
to
trap
every
single
decision
made
internally,
but
probably
those
only
those
important
ones
and,
of
course
the
I
think
the
advice
process
is
the
this
is
where
it
will.
It
will
go
to
and
yeah,
especially
the
decisions
and
not
decisions,
but
those
posted
on
the
advice
process.
I
think
they
are
more
important,
but
I
think
they
are
easier
to
track
than
the
than
those
made
internally.
C
B
Right,
yeah-
and
I
think
I
understand
what
you're
saying
so
there
was
there
was-
I
think
it
was
december
or
january.
I
don't
know
somebody
and
I
think
durgados
spoke
of
this,
but
somebody
decided
to
roll
up
like
15
decisions
into
one
vote,
so
I
think
that
would
be
important
to
find
out.
I
don't
know,
would
it
be
important
to
find
out
who
who
decided
to
make
a
roll-up
vote
instead
of
voting
on
each
each
section
or
each
each
each
part
of
that?
I
have
no
idea
what
you're
talking
about.
B
If
you
go
to
decision
tracking
yeah
and
then
I
think
it's
it's
not
tau
voting,
I
think
it's
single
choice.
Where
is
it
at
ranked
choice?
I
think
is
that
I
don't
know
there
was
somewhere
in
there.
It's
in
the
it's
in
the
I'll
have
to
find
it
it's
in
the
gardens
and
it's
under
clothes.
B
But
it
seemed
like
you
would,
you
would
put
create
new
permissions
would
be
like
one
instance
of
a
vote.
Create
new
permissions.
Granting
would
be
another
vote
instead
of
rolling
them
all
up
into
one,
because
what,
if
you
disagreed
with
one
of
them
and
then
you
have
to
either
vote
yes
or
abstain,
or
no
or
whatever
have
you?
B
A
A
Yeah
yeah
yeah,
I
mean
yeah
totally,
but
I
really
think
like
it's,
it's
not
necessary
to
like
we,
we
know
like
we
voted
on
those
parameters
and
actually
actually
it's
on
the.
If
you
look
on
this
decision
tracking
document
when
rachel's
voting,
so
it
was
called
the
logs,
that's
a
winner
that
goldilocks
it's
a
set
of
rams.
It's
that
decision,
you're
talking
about.
B
Yeah,
I
know
I
got
that.
I
understand
that
what
I
guess
it's
irrelevant-
it's
truly
irrelevant,
because
it's
regardless,
if
it's
like,
are
there,
so
is
that,
like
there
has
to
be
a
decision
like
who
decided
to
make
this
all
under
one
vote
versus
making
iterations
iterative
changes
like
iterative
votes,
like
you
vote
on
a
configuration
for
grants,
you
voted
on
a
configuration
for
this.
You
vote
on
removing
this
like.
B
Is
it
yeah
for
ease
of
public
viewability
or
is
it
being
rolled
up
because
there
might
be
a
parameter
in
there
that
it's
like
a
port
fund?
You
know
like
if
you
want
to
pass
it
in
the
u.s.
If
you
want
to
pass
this
bill
through
the
house,
then
you
have
to
accept
all
the
pork
that
goes
along
with
it,
because
you
want
one
thing
you
have
now
have
to
accept
eight
other
things.
B
A
I
mean
I
feel
it's
more
in
the
commons
farm
and
parameters
working
group
that
those
working
groups
are
done,
but
they
were
building
all
these
dashboards
and
you
know
all
the
smart
contracts,
so
they
were
taking
some.
You
know
like
we
are
not
we're
trying
to
finish
the
technocracy,
but
I
mean
it's
hard
like
it's.
It's
not
like.
A
I
was
telling
you
to
do
that
like
I,
I
cannot
know
any
other
doubt
that
make
all
this
parameters
decision
in
a
community
vote
which
you
know
even
if
it's
you
know
these
25
things
and
the
devs
telling
you
on
what
you
can
decide,
but
we
were
doing
a
as
a
community,
a
very
hard
work
like
educating
people
and
yeah,
making
them
available
to
see
make
decisions,
make
proposals
and
both.
A
But
you
know
like,
of
course,
like
common
swarm
and
parameters
like
made
a
lot
of
internal
decisions
on
how
this
data
is
going
to
be
presented
and
how
to
educate
the
community
but
yeah,
I
think
I
mean,
if
we
could,
you
know,
go
back
to
the
recordings
watch
all
of
them,
but
I
think
that
would
be
too
much
like.
I
feel
it's
easier
to
say
these
are
the
parameters
that
we
want
and
keep
with
the
flow
of
the
community.
A
B
Me
yeah
last
thing
I
want,
I
guess,
since
we
were
talking
about
the
change
in
the
payment
structure
like
how
do
you
want
the
the
pay,
the
the
distribution
sheet
to
be
changed,
and
also
if
I
was
not
aware
of
the
distribution
sheet,
there
was
an
error,
there's
an
issue,
not
an
error,
but
there
is
an
issue
with
the
february
to
march
week
the
rollover
week.
B
So
I
made
changes
to
the
time
sheet
and
I
just
want
to
touch
on
the
comments
that
I
made.
If
you
go
to
anybody's
it,
doesn't
you
can
go
to
anybody's
ticker,
it
doesn't
yeah.
You
can
go
to
anybody's
tab
that
you
want
to
it's
up
to
you.
It
doesn't
matter
so
where
it
says
february,
28
to
march
6.,
for
ease
of
distribution,
that,
for
that
day
in
february,
will
be
paid
out
in
the
march
distribution.
B
And
if
you
roll
down-
and
this
is
entirely
up
to
you-
but
this
is
what
I
have
in
my
mind
and
if
you
scroll
down
real
quick
lefty
same
thing
for
march
28th
to
april
3rd,
that
would
fall
into
the
april
payout
and
then
that
april
25th.
B
C
I
think
so
I
think
it
doesn't
matter
in
which
month
the
overlapping
these
payouts
fall
into,
but
as
long
as
it
doesn't
there's
no
duplicate.
I
think
that's
fine.
B
A
Yeah
exactly
yeah,
I
think
that's
that's
great.
Actually
there
was
another
thing
did:
did
you
make
another
question
ratio.
C
F
A
D
A
Yeah
yeah,
it's
already
the
time
actually
like.
I
want
to
say
like
in
part
2
ratio
like
where
I
could
you
know
what
I
could
see
also
like
bring,
would
bring
a
lot
of
value
and
I
think
it
wouldn't
you
know,
consume
you
so
much
time
I
mean,
of
course
it
takes
time,
but
you
know
not,
but
you
wouldn't
feel
like
you
are,
you
know
doing
worthless
stuff.
It's
like
the
advice
process
like
and
say.
A
Like
you
know,
this
were
the
discussions
handling
from
the
community
that
went
through
the
price
process
and
those
went
to
a
proposal.
Those
stop
it
there
yeah,
like.
I
really
think
like
advice
process
is
having
a
section
for
advice,
process
decisions.
I
mean
if
some
decisions
that
you
catch
up
like
news
to
our
or
stuff,
but
I
even
stores
I
don't
feel
like
we
need
to
make
you
know
a
big.
You
know.
A
Oh
there's
a
new
store
like
I
don't
you
know
it's
just
a
new
contributor
on
a
working
group
like
I
wouldn't
make
big
of
a
deal
of
that
in
my
opinion,
but
the
advice
process.
B
D
C
Yeah,
I
just
yeah
I
mean
quickly
but
to
what
zepty
is
saying
like
oh
yeah,
if
you
can't
find
any
decision,
if
it's
hard
to
find
a
decision
made
in
trendy,
you
don't
have
to
spend
too
much
time
on
it.
But
what's
more
important
I
mean
we
can
just.
C
I
think
we
can
agree
to
just
remove
section
a
you
know
and
because,
what's
the
most
important
part,
here's
the
advice
process,
because
some
decisions
are
being
made
through
the
advice
process
and
and
the
go
through
the
snapshot
or
conviction.
Voting.
C
I
think
we
can
just
continue
the
discussion
for
payment
structure
in
the
next
call.
A
I
actually
would
you
know,
like
I
think
payments
it
should
be
clear
like
I
really
want
to
push
dollars
like
yeah,
we
keep,
we
keep
early
payment
for
ratio
and
nt,
and
then
we
make
a
roll
base
for
menu
and
then
in
the
sheet,
like
we
make
sure
like
our
duty
iv
is
to
you
know,
put
the
tasks
like
we're
going
to
accomplish
with
this
payment
and
then
and
then
yeah.
That's
it
like.
B
B
I
would
just
ask
that
you
and
ivy
kind
of
like
have
an
open
channel
and
just
I
know,
y'all
have
an
open
channel
on
an
open
platform,
but
I
mean,
as
far
as
not
not
always
pushing
everything
to
the
next
meeting,
because
sometimes
there
might
be
information
that
we
need
to
know.
That's
not
that
can't
wait,
or
is
this
blocking
something
I
mean.
A
B
Oh
yeah
yeah
yeah,
no
we're
good
yeah
yeah
yeah
yeah
yeah
there.
Just
there
were
just
a
couple
of
times
where
it
was.
Let's,
let's
discuss
it
on
monday
or
something
like
that
and
I
know
you're
busy.
I
know
you
got
a
lot
of
stuff
going
on
so
but
yeah
like
I
said,
I'm
not
singling
anybody.
I
think
everybody
should
should
have
that
policy
as
far
as
being
open
and
available
to
discuss
issues
outside
of
mondays.
A
Yeah
yeah
totally
totally
like,
even
if
we
need,
like
you
know,
do
a
quick
call
like
you
know:
five
minute
call
we
can
just
have
you
know
if
it's
possible,
because
sometimes
it's
not,
but
if
it's
possible,
like
we
just
schedule
it
like
yeah,
let's,
let's
hang
out
there
and.
F
A
B
A
A
C
And
sometimes
zep,
and
I
also
set
us
scheduled
in
the
middle
of
the
week
if
we
need
to
work
on
something,
so
I
think
it
should.
It
can
be
the
same
for
all
of
us
like
if
there's
something
that
we
need
to
discuss
during
the
middle
of
the
week.
We
don't
have
to
wait
for
mondays,
but
just
use
the
transparency
chat
to
coordinate
when
you
want
to
all
of
us
to
meet
again.
A
You
actually
we're
in
the
top
of
the
hour,
and
I
actually
wanted
to
ask
you
I
feel
like
do
you
think
like
we
could.
I
don't
know,
of
course,
you're
availability,
but
I,
like
we
said
like
last
week
to
work
on
the
audit,
the
the
credentials
of
the
tc.
If
we
could
get
rid
of
that
now,
that'd
be
great.
If
not.