►
Description
This is the Transparency Working Group! We help promote transparency, openness and mutual monitoring as the high-level ideal that we're moving towards at TEC. The way that we get there is by empowering people to share this experience with the Transparency Audits and making information available to everyone.
We gather every two weeks on Mondays at 3pm CET.
Stewards: Ivy and Zeptimus
Timecodes:
00:00 - Intentions and distractions
1:36 - Gitbook
7:44 - Credentials management
36:05 - Internal comms
53:25 - Rules for platforms
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
Thank
you
intentions.
I
would
like
to
sync
also
with
escanore
we're
seeing
some
stuff
around
the
hubspot
access
and
yeah.
It's
just.
I
would
just
like
to
touch
base
with
a
cold
access
issue
distributions
I'm
in
a
bus
station
waiting
for
a
bus,
because
I
missed
my
flight
this
morning.
So
I
don't
think
that
will
be
a
distraction
though,
but
yeah
I'll
pass
it
to
ivy.
C
D
A
Awesome,
yeah
cool.
I
think
we
can
start
with
the
yeah
like
last
week
we
updated
the
the
transparency
on
the
hitbook
yeah,
but
we
just
I
don't
know
like
yeah
yeah.
We
just
actually
like
with
it.
It's
based
some
of
the
stuff.
We
already
write
it
on
the
forum
and
on
the
about
we've,
also
pasted
the
youtube
description
we
created,
and
then
I
we
made
this
table
for
the
access,
but
yeah
it
does
what
we
have
already
and
yeah.
A
I
just
wanted
to
yeah
to
hear
from
you
guys,
if
you
think
that's
enough
for
this
part,
or
we
can't
start
to
work,
maybe
or
it's
good
for
the
moment,
but
maybe
it's
something
we
want
to
look
and
improve
in
the
future
yeah,
because
there
isn't
like
actually
like
this
more
issues
and
I
feel,
like
the
others,
are
more
important
than
this
one.
But
this
one
is
also
very
important.
So
yeah
just
wanted
to
want
to
hear
from
you
guys
around
so
I'll
pass
it
to
chui.
B
B
But
I
I
I
do
think
that
that
there
is
like
I
as
as
an
intention
this
week.
I
really
really
like
to
highlight
dedication
into
transparency
because
we're
like
at
a
moment
where
I
don't
think
we
can
like
really
stop
and-
and
we
need
to
follow
through
with
this
with
this
process,
because
it
is
really
really
important
like
there
is
not
a
lot
of
time
to
to
stop
and
think
during
the
hatch.
B
Maybe
I
don't
know
in
the
case
of
hatcher
outreach,
like
some
kind
of
like,
like,
like
transparency,
closure
to
to
put
it
in
in
in
a
way
and
and
yeah
it's
it's
it's
just
I
I
I
like.
I
know
sometimes
it's
a
castle,
but
it's
it's
it's
a
very
important
part
of
the
of
the
core
of
the
cultural
build.
So
I
I
would
like
to
like
contribute
with
with
making
this.
This
commitment
and
gabby
be
be
speaking
about
that
topic.
During
this
week's
working
groups.
A
Awesome
just
one
thing
to
if
you
feel
like
you
could
like
use
me
or
ivy
to
just
get
your
audit
finished.
If
you
think
that
would
help
just
tell
any
of
us
and
we
we
come
like
we
did
last
week
and
also,
I
think,
like
you,
did
a
really
great
job
and
the
thing
is
almost
done
but
again
like
if
you
need
one
another
another
hour,
it
would
be
great.
You
know
like
it's.
If
it
helps
you
to
finish,
get
it
done.
It's
awesome
like
we're
here
to
help
you.
B
Yeah,
thank
you
so
much.
It's
more
about
is
more
around
content,
really
like
what
what
was
driving
me
crazy
last
week
was
was.
It
was
the
like
the
structure
of
it
in
that
I
had
some
parts
that
were
missing,
but
yeah,
actually
with
that
with
that
guidance
fee
like
that
that
helped
me
a
lot
so
yeah,
it's
like
right
now
with
the
content
yeah,
I
I
I
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
matter
of
like
adjusting
it,
but
but
yeah.
A
C
I'm
looking
at
it
now
and
I
think
one
the
things
that
I
would
add
here
would
be
the
link
like,
for
example,
for
the
audit.
Maybe
we
can
link
it
to
the
forum
to
the
audit,
folder
or
category
in
the
forum
and
the
recordings.
Maybe
we
can
link
it
to
our
youtube
channel
so
yeah.
Those
are
the
only
two
things
I
would
add
here.
D
Yes,
I
think
that
I
really
like
that
you
added
the
list
of
the
document
access
the
access
document
and
that
it's
posted
in
the
git
book.
So
I
think
it's
great
the
access,
permissions
and
yeah.
I
agree
with
ivy
that
maybe
we
can
hyperlink
some
of
the
words
to
the
documents
they
refer
to,
but
I
think
it
looks
good.
D
A
A
A
Okay,
yeah
chris
jones
from
common
stock,
told
me
like
on
construct.
They
are
using
this
app
and,
for
example,
like
I
just
link
it
on
this
app,
twitter
and
and
google,
and
the
google
account
with
the
google
account
you
have
access
to
medium
hubspot
yeah,
all
of
this
and
yeah.
The
idea
is
like
when
you
have
like
this
app.
You
don't
need
to
share
because
you
enter
here
and
you
then
you
add
the
friends
you
want
to
get
access
in
here
and
then
you
can
also
revoke
and
yeah.
A
A
Yeah
just
to
to
go
through
advice,
process
and
yeah,
one
of
the
things
that
concerns
me
like
is
like
who
should
who
who
and
why
should
have
like
the
credentials
management,
because
one
like,
if
you
want
to
make
it
like
as
much
secure
as
possible.
You
only
have
one
person
and
maybe
one
to
back
up
just
in
case
something
happens
to
that
person,
but
not
more
than
two
on
the
on
the
full
axis,
but
then
on
the
like
it.
A
It
helps
access
like
I
was
like
I
was
saying
before
you
can
revoke
access
and
that's
one
of
the
good
things,
because
when
conf,
but
but
yeah,
the
the
cultural
thing
is
like
who
should
have
this
access?
And
why
and
do
we
want
to
only
one
person
have
all
this
power
or
not
like
it's
like
it's,
but
it's
almost
like
the
same
for
all
the
platforms
like
for
github
discord
like
for
everything
like
we
have
like
a
lot
of
admins,
and
I
see
like,
of
course
like
this
is
like
it.
F
A
But
at
the
same
time,
it's
more
risk
on
security,
so
yeah.
I
wanted
to
hear
guys
from
you
like
make
a
run
on.
Do
you
guys
would
prefer
like
a
more
centralized
system
or
a
more
decent
light
system?
It's
also
going
to
go
on
the
forum
post
so
like
the
whole
community.
I
feel
like
this
is
something
bigger
that
involves
like
the
whole
community
and
yeah.
I
really
want
to
hear
from
you
your
opinions
passing
to
you
juan.
D
Okay,
we
have
these
permissions
and
we
are
not
going
to
share
it.
It's
rather
than
okay.
We
can
share
our
permissions,
but
we
are
protecting
them
in
this
way.
So
I
think
we
can
take
some
good
insight
from
each
perspective
and
and
yeah
be
open
for
people
to
request
taxes,
but
also
administrate
them
the
most
secure
way
possible.
A
D
D
Maybe
you
septi
or
or
yeah
chewie
someone
who
is
trusted
in
the
community
who,
who
you
can
like,
give
access
to
that,
and
also
is
someone
who
who
works
very
close
and
related
to
these
issues,
because,
like
yeah,
if
we
give
this
to
to
grief,
then
people
is
going
to
like
reach
out
to
grief
for
this
issue,
and
maybe
grief
could
be
better
delegating
these
responsibilities.
So
yeah
it's
just
like
my
my
my
thinking.
We
could
use
like
a
central
person,
but
that
is
neutral
to
to
be.
D
A
Cool
and
another
thing,
I
think,
that's
also
interesting.
It's
like
it's
one
idea
that
I
had
on
on
mine
right,
but
instead
of
like
you
know
like
we
have
yeah.
Of
course
we
have
credentials
like,
but
almost
it's
only
two
like
the
google
credential
and
the
twitter
credential
like
then
we
have
access
for
other
stuff,
but
it's
more
shared
like,
for
example,
we
have
github,
but
then
we
have
like
the
normal
github
where
we
all
are
in
there,
and
we
also
have
like
the
common
square
github.
A
You
know,
and
then
we
have
git
book
and
we
have
this
quran.
I
feel
like
we
have
a
good
balance
where
it's
like,
not
one
central
point,
but
it's
like,
like
a
small
project
split
it.
So
I
I
think
that's
super
cool
actually,
and
I
also
write
that
on
the
on
the
forum.
I'm
writing
still
work
in
progress.
A
A
It's
an
app
that
same
and
show
me
it's
still
still
like
it's
not
developed,
but
we
would
be
using
a
yam
until
like
this
better,
but
more
decentralized
applications
come
to
the
surface
because
they
are
not
developed
yet,
but
they
they
are
starting
to
to
be
there
because
a
credential
management
on
the
house.
It's
a
thing
like
like.
We
still
need
more
decentralized,
apps
right,
because
jam
is
a
centralized
app
but
yeah
yeah.
I'd
like
to
hear
from
you.
A
A
A
Know
he's
working
on
incomes,
but
you
know
like
we
don't
have
a
broad
statement
like
I
I
honestly
I
don't
know.
I
mean
it's
hard
right
because
if
something
happens,
who's
responsible
for
something.
It's
me
it's
the
person
who
I
give
credentials
it's
it's
super
weird
like.
I
feel
we
really
need
a
prosthetic
here.
D
And
I
I
agree
it's
empty
yeah,
I
we,
but
we
could
use
like
our
own
criteria
like
like
being
in
the
dc
for
at
least
two
months
or
three
months
or
like
maybe
being
a
recognized
contributor
in
that
working
group,
and
also
maybe
we
could
also
make
the
people
like
even
just
talking
to
say
that
they
would
be
responsible
for
this
or
maybe,
if
they
could
or
if
we
wanted
written
they.
We
could
also
have
just
like
a
checkbox
or
or
or
of
like
okay.
A
Yeah
the
thing
I
have
it
disagrees
because,
like
imagine
like
the
case
like
it's
like
it's
like
what's
happening
right
now,
like
some
person
comes
to
help
on
something,
but
that
that
he
needs
credentials
right
and
he
just
came
because
someone
called
him
to
come
and
to
do
this.
So
that's
fine.
I
feel
like
this
person
should
get
the
credentials,
but
at
the
same
time
yeah
we
should
assign
like
responsibles
or
roles
or
something
like
you
know
like.
If
something
happens,
who's
responsible
for
it.
D
So
he
was
like
okay,
I
want
to
contribute,
but
I
am
not
being
able
to
contribute
because,
like
I
am
not
being
trusted
enough,
so
I
think
that
indeed,
in
this
case,
you
should
like
com
communicate
to
that
person
and
tell
him
like
okay.
What
are
your
needs?
And
maybe,
if
you
need
to
you,
can
escalate
the
request
to
to
to
the
steroids
or
something
but
not
like
just
overlooking
it,
because
that
yeah,
that
could
also
affect
the
the
person
that
is
wanting
to
contribute.
B
Yes,
empty,
I
was
just
gonna
suggest
that
I
I
mean
I.
I
do
feel
that
this
needs
to
be
put
up
for
a
vote,
but
but
I
would
go
for
I
mean,
even
though
I
know
that
jam
is
is
a
little
bit
more
centralized.
I
would
just
go
for
it,
because
productivity
productivity
is
a
very
like
fragile
factor
in
the
in
the
next
weeks.
B
So
I
mean
if
people
need
access
to
a
specific
platform
and
you
hold
all
the
credentials
and
maybe
iv,
because
as
a
plan
b,
you
know
you
both
are
in
different
type
zones.
So
if,
if
cepti
is
not
reachable,
probably
iv
is
gonna
is
gonna
be,
but
if
you
took
handle
or
or
or
just
whoever,
as
one
said,
just
whoever
is
someone
reliable
in
the
community,
but
I
mean,
if
it's
a
if
they
will
have
to
fill
a
google
form
for
getting
access.
B
I
mean
at
least
it's
a
clear
step.
You
know
I
mean
at
least
they
they
already
like,
requested
it,
and
they
were
as
clear
as
possible
with
what
they
need
and
the
form
is
sent,
but
like
right
now
I
mean
I
I
do
have
my
suspicious.
Probably
as
cannot
was
the
one
who
reached
out
to
you
for
twitter
because
he's
been
asking
for
for
twitter
access,
but
I
didn't
really
like
refer
him
to
oh
yeah
talk
to
safety.
He
will
give
you
access.
B
No,
it's
like
okay,
I
do
have
like
credentials
on
key
base,
but
we
do
have
a
2fa
or
twitter
and
septi
is
the
one
who
handles
that
to
a
face.
So
probably
yet
you're
gonna
need
to
do
something
with
him,
but
if
he
needs
this
access
and
he
fills
a
google
form
and
you
get
it-
and
you
already
know
like
you-
are
like
more
aware
of
the
steps
you
have
to
take
for
for
this
access
to
be
possible.
B
I
know
it's
something
centralized,
but
as
long
as
it's
transparent
as
long
as
this
process
is
transparent
and
it's
in
hands
of
someone
that
that
the
community
trusts,
I
think
that
it
can,
it
can
work
and-
and
also
I
mean
I
mean
probably
the
worst
part
of
this-
is
just
going
to
be
chasing
everyone
around
for
gathering
all
the
jam
credentials
right
like
okay.
Now
I
need
access
to
github.
B
Let's
fill
a
google
form
request,
the
platforms
that
we
need
access
to
and
when
you
have
the
time
and
when
you
have
like
the
a
method
like
clearer
like
in
this
case
jam,
I
I
feel
that
we're
we're
going
to
be
like
there
like,
where
we
need
to
be,
because
probably
there's
still
going
to
be
a
lot
of
improvement.
A
lot
of
room
for
improvements,
but
so
far
like
like
access,
is
just
like
nowhere
yeah
it's
just
like
a
pretty
much
gaining
access
to
any
platform.
B
A
A
A
Yeah
and
that's
also
like
something
like
gem
would
solve,
because
you
know
like
something
I
that
could
be
done.
It's
like
you
change
the
password
like
let's
say
every
month,
and
since
it's
only
giving
a
link
to
the
people,
people
could
ask
for
the
link
and
you
give
them
the
link
and
you
can
also
revoke
access
so
now
like
this
person.
B
Do
you
remember
septie
about
the
social
curation
role
in
in
one
height
like
we've
talked
about
it
as
an
example
like
the
way
people
like
vote
for,
what's
gonna
be
put
up
in
the
in
in
in
social
media,
is
that
they
have
this
channel
called
social
curation
and
once
any
kind
of
content
gets
10
up
votes
that
gets
published.
The
thing
is
that
this
role,
like
the
role
for
having
access
to
this
channel,
where
you
can
vote
for
social
curation,
it
resets
every
two
weeks.
B
So
if
people
don't
follow
through
or
don't
reselect
the
role,
the
channel
is
hidden
for
them
and
they
cannot
participate
until
they
have
that
role
back
so
with
with
changing
credentials
like
once
a
month.
I
think
that
would
be
like
the
equivalent
measure
in
this
case.
Like
is
it's
like,
oh
okay,
so
now
it's
july
and
I
needed
to
tweet
something,
but
I
don't
have
access
anymore.
Oh
yeah,
that's
true!
I
have
to
request
this
access
once
per
month
and
limit
it
to
only
the
platforms
that
I'm
using
inside
comps.
B
I
do
think
that's
a
that's
a
great
solution
and
it
does
solve
like
the
the
the
problem
of
of
of
just
like
resetting
people,
I
mean
not
having
access
to
the
platform,
is
gonna
be
much
better
and-
and
it's
just
gonna
be
a
better
option
right,
but
this
reset
can
probably
happen
every
two
weeks,
maybe
once
a
month
and
and
yeah
I
mean
if
there
are
any
like
old
contributors
that
are
no
longer
working
in
pc,
we
were.
We
wouldn't
have
to
worry
about
this.
B
However,
I
I
I
still
need
to
put
him
in
touch
with
craig
to
get
access
to
the
hubspot.
Then
when
he
has
access
to
the
hubspot,
we
need
to
link
the
twitter
account,
so
I'm
I'm
thinking
of
maybe
asking
craig
to
do
that,
but
then
craig
would
need
to
come
back
to
you
and
ask
you
for
credentials.
So
it's
it's.
B
Doing
the
same
thing
like
all
over
again,
so
unless
you
have
like
any
other,
like
reason
not
to
do
so,
I
would
probably
give
access
to
him
while
we
figured
this
credentials
thing
out
and
just
as
a
security
measure,
and
if
you
feel
better
about
it
once
we
have
this
thing
up
and
running,
let's
change
all
credentials
regardless,
just
so
that
it,
if
anything
slipped
through
the
cracks
like
this
thing
like
right
now,
it's
like
okay,
it's
kind
of
me:
it's
just
access
to
twitter.
So
will
we
figure
it
out?
B
You
go
ahead
and
have
the
account,
but
we're
gonna
revoke
credentials
when
we
start
doing
this
and
you'll
have
to
go
through
the
process.
I
I
find
this
like
reasonable
for
him.
So
unless
you
don't,
you
have
a
specific
reason,
I
would
give
him
a
chance
with
with
the
twitter
account
then
and
see
what
he
can
put
together.
A
No
yeah,
it's
cool,
like
the
only
reason
I
had
this.
I
don't
know
him,
but
if
you're
telling
me
like,
you
know
him
and
you
trust
him
yeah,
that's
better
to
get
the
work
done
done.
I
like
you,
know
like
what
like
what
was
telling
before.
I
don't
want
like
as
genuinely
feels
like
he
wants
to
contribute,
but
he's
not
allowed
like.
We
really
want
him
to
feel
comfortable,
so
yeah
and
if
you
tell
me
like
you,
know
him
and
you
trust
him
yeah.
Why
not.
B
The
only
reason
I'll
go
ahead
and
say
yes,
is
because
he's
my
one
hype,
patrino
like
when
I
first
walked
into
one
guy.
He
was
the
one
who
hey
what's
up,
I'm
from
venezuela
and
he
was
like
super
nice
and
I
have
never
like
in
in
in
the
past
six
months
of
knowing
him
of
being
part
of
the
community
like
I've,
never
seen
anything
better
suspicious.
B
A
B
A
I
think
what
like
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
what
I
think
like
she
said:
it's
like,
for
example,
I'm
working
on
youtube
and
then
I
also
should
go
through
the
process.
Like
you
know,
I
need
the
youtube
account,
because
I'm
doing
this
this
and
this-
and
you
know
like
give
like
treat
all
the
contributors
equally
and
yeah
like
everyone-
should
go
through
the
process.
Yes,.
A
Awesome,
I
think
yeah
we're
starting
to
only
have
20
minutes
and
there's
still
three
topics
to
talk
yeah.
I
I
like
the
next
topic
is
like
on
the
last
call
with
edu.
We
were
talking
like
we
need
some
internal
comms
and
I
think
that
something
like
transparency
and
comps
could
work
together.
If
you
think
that's
a
great
idea
actually,
but
actually
what
they
wanted
to
do
in
this
call
is
like
what
the
internal
comps
should
do
like.
What's
what's
that,
we
need
like
we
feel
like
like,
sometimes
like.
A
B
Yeah,
okay,
okay,
so
you
mean
gathering
gathering
information
and
updates
from
working
groups,
so
we
can
have
a
weekly
update
in
like
a
general
tsp
update
okay,
so
it
would
be
more
like
a
like
a
like.
Let's,
let's
put
it
this
way
like
it
would
be
like
a
more
informal
blog
post
with
updates
right
something
just.
C
A
E
B
I
do
think
like
I,
I
I
think
I
get
a
a
a
sense
of
of
what
you're
asking
for.
I
do
agree
it.
It
will
be
something
really
useful,
but
I
would
probably
just
like
ask
you
for
this
week,
just
to
finish
syncing
with
acid
laser
and
escanore
like
to
get
things
more
up
on
its
feet,
just
so
that
I
I
I
can
follow
through
us
as
many
times
as
necessary
and
and
once
once
we're
like
up
and
running.
B
A
Yeah
and
I
think
like
the
first
step,
should
be
defined.
This
role
and
you
know
like
even
if
we
take
like
two
three
weeks
you
know
like
we
are
not
in
a
rush.
This
is
not
critical
for
hacks,
so
we
can
take
our
time
and
do
it
correctly
like
we
don't,
I
feel
like
we
don't
need
to
rush,
and
everyone
is
like
super
busy
right
now
because
of
the
hatch.
A
B
Okay,
yeah
yeah.
I
I
appreciate
that
a
lot
septim,
it's
just
it's
like
it's
like
a
general
move
that
I
that
I
have-
and
I
wanted
to
start
this
this
week
because
the
hatch
is
coming
so
I'm
pretty
much
just
like
hyping
everyone
in
comes
so
that
we
can
have
this
move
like
you
know,
it's
like
okay,
we
gotta
be
on
top
of
this,
like
the
hatch
is
happening.
We
have
28
days,
we're
gonna
need
like
to
handle
this
and
that
so
it's
it's!
It's
like
a
more.
B
Let's
put
it
like
a
chaotic
or
even
dramatic
stage
at
this
point,
but
yeah
like
I,
it's
not
like.
I
mean
it's,
it's
not
like
my
intention
to
put
pressure
on
a
community
or
generate
like
any
kind
of
tension.
It's
just
like
something
more
like
a
more
active
and
reactive
approach.
I'd
like
to
have
for
comes
these
these
next
weeks,
so
yeah
like
like
just
so
that
I
I
I
want
to
be
clear
so
that
you
don't
take
it
like
us.
C
I
actually
have
two
questions
about
this
zap,
so
one
is:
will
this
be
assigned
to
only
one
person
who
would
be
creating
the
forum
post,
or
will
this
be
something
that
the
stewards
have
to
do
also
every
week?
Because
if
it's
gonna
be
because
I
feel
like
it's,
it's
a
it's
a
great
idea
actually
just
to
put
those
weekly
updates
in
the
forum,
but
I'm
also
thinking
it's
like
kind
of
redundant
with
the
community
called.
A
Like
it's,
it
should
be
like
a
work
through
a
transparency
and
comes
and
yeah.
The
idea
is
also
like
we
have
this
community
called,
but
some
people
like
more
to
write
than
to
watch
know
and
it's
a
it's.
It's
a
process
to
have
all
the
information
available
in
all
the
ways
possible
so
like
we
are
transparent,
but
the
idea
is
we're
transparent
because
the
information
is
there,
but
sometimes
like
people
don't
know
the
information
is
there
and
we
like.
A
C
And
another
thing
is
like
I
think,
because
I
I
don't
see
the
difference
right
now
with
what
we
are
talking
about.
I
mean
I
don't
see
the
difference
between
external
communications
and
internal
communications,
because
everything
we
communicate
in
the
forum
is
not
really
internal
because
it
goes
to
the
whole
community
right.
My
understanding
of
internal
comms
would
be
like
a
more
targeted
communication.
C
C
C
A
A
I
mean
we're
not
hiding
anything,
we're
just
making
sure
like
people
know
like,
for
example,
one
of
the
things
that
bring
my
bell
like.
Oh,
we
should
know
that,
like,
for
example,
tree
was
working
on
comms
and
he
didn't
know
about
the
burn,
for
example,
and
that's
something
you
know
like
truly
must
happen
and
the
idea
is
like,
if
you
don't
know
like
somehow,
we
have
a
system
that
makes
sure
that
true
is
not
true,
I'm
using
three
because
of
that.
But
everyone
knows
like
everything,
especially
like
the
stores.
B
This
is
just
like
a
it's
a
dumb
idea,
but
I
wanted
to
share
it
anyway.
What
about
like
weekly
quizzes?
Maybe
this
is
like,
like
I
mean,
if
we
praise
us
our
incentive,
maybe
we
could
like
with
this
weekly
update
thing.
Maybe
we
could
come
up
with
a
format
that
is
just
like
between
three
to
five
simple
questions
with
like
a
multiple
option
thing
and
maybe
something
that
we
can
put
out
there
like
from
transparency.
B
But,
yes,
you
say
like
how
can
we
make
sure
everyone
is
in
sync
with
this
right,
because
I
was
just
like
the
finding
out
about
this
thing
with
the
impact
hours.
There's
also
a
lot
of
people
that
didn't
know
and
through
me
like
realizing,
I
really
like
I,
I
realized
about
like
a
more
general
people
that
didn't
know
about
this.
So
what
do
you
think
about
this
idea?.
A
C
Yeah,
but
it's
more
external
and
not
internal,
I
I
think
we
have
to
ask
eduardo
again
what
he
meant
by
internal
homs.
I
mean
where
it's
coming
from,
I'm
just
confused:
what
how
to
differentiate
this
internal
comes
with
external
forms
that
he
was
proposing,
but
yeah.
My
understanding
is
it's:
it's
not
really
internal
comms,
but
more
like
a
targeted
communication.
C
I
think
it
was
from
those
from
communicating
to
this
people
with
impact
hours
who
don't
who
haven't
activated
their
trusted
seed
membership,
and
I
think
that's
the
issue
he
want.
He
was
talking
about
last
time
but
yeah.
I
just
want
to
clarify
first,
what's
the
goal
for
the
internal
comms
before
coming
up
with
the
solution.
B
A
A
Yeah,
I
also
think
yeah,
but
maybe
maybe
it's
more
than
understood,
not
that
transparency,
but
I
feel
like
like
the
goal
with
that
would
be
like
all
the
stores.
I
know
everything,
but
also
at
the
same
time
cv
was
mentioning
like
with
the
impact
hours.
We
we're
aiming
all
the
members
that
didn't
activated
their
trusted
seat
to
do
it
because
they
have
import
hours
and
they
are
value
money.
So
yeah
go
ahead.
E
B
B
A
Okay,
cool
just
one
thing:
if
you
can't
just
hear
it
like
okay,
I
would
have
in
the
agenda
like
what
do
we
want
to
make
for
the
internal
control
and
right
now
it's
empty
but
feel
free
to
add.
Any
rules
like
I
feel
like
our
first
step
is
to
find
this
role
so
feel
free
to
add
whatever
we
want
to
have
as
a
goal
there
and
yeah
yeah.
Thank
you.
So
much
have
a
have
a
nice
day.
B
A
Okay,
oh
yeah.
We
also
had
some
points,
but
it's
only
five
minutes,
so
I
don't
think
we
have
time.
Maybe
we
discuss
like
this
for
the
next
call.
I
mean
oh
yeah.
Sorry,
actually
like
one
of
the
points
was
like
we
work
actually
like,
since
you
hear
one
is
super
cool
because
we're
working
on
on
a
document
and
transparency
for
having
rules
and
we're
doing
something
similar
that
what
levy
was
doing
with
the
code
of
conduct,
but
we
are
doing
it
for
people
having
like.
We
need
to
have
this
process
of
the
management
credentials.
A
All
of
that
and
we
are
just
creating
some
kind
of
rules,
and
maybe
it
would
be
also
interesting,
interesting
to
have
a
gravity
inputs
in
there
and
maybe
some
sections
for
the
forbidden
things
I
don't
know
like
or
yeah
just
to
have
some
approaches,
people
break
the
rules
or
something
I
know
like.
We
have
this
positive
communication
and
yeah
just
to
have
some
kind
of
co.
Do
we
manage
that.
D
So
if,
if
we
say
like
okay
like
these
are
the
responsibilities
for
having
like
the
for
managing
our
platforms,
so
yeah,
if
you
like,
take
any
information
from
like
you,
accept
this
these
requirements
and
like
if
you
share
some
information,
some
private
information
with
people
external
to
the
organization
that
would
be
like
a
like
a
red
card
or
or
or
yeah
like
a
yellow
card
or
or
depending
on
on
the
severity
of
of
the
rules
we
want
to
implement.
But
I
think
yeah.
A
D
Okay-
maybe
I
would
I
wouldn't
be
able
to
join
this
week
because
I
think
I
have
also
a
call
at
that
same
time.
But
if
you
start
with
I
I
can.
I
can
check
the
dog
async
and
then
maybe
join
to
the
next
call
or
yeah
continue
working
on
that,
because
I
think
that
tomorrow
I
have
a
call,
after
after
after
soft
cop
already.
A
Okay,
yeah,
that's
totally
fine.
An
awesome
like
the
the
work
is
still
so
that's
when
gravity
can
just
start.
You
know
like
right
now,
it's
very
big,
so
maybe
yeah
I
mean,
of
course
you
can
contribute,
but
more
as
a
let's
say,
creating
those
rules
and
seeing
this
process,
but
not
just
the
sanctions
of
the
stuff,
because
we're
still
working
on
that
right.
We
don't
we
still
working
on
what
can
go
wrong
and
what,
on
all
of
that.