►
From YouTube: Budget Committee - February 13, 2019 - Part 2 of 2
Description
Budget Committee, meeting 3, February 13, 2019 - Part 2 of 2
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=15453
Part 1 of 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJC63cwuG4M#t=10m13s
Meeting Navigation:
0:08:31 - Meeting resume
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Committee
members
I'm
just
wondering
if
we
could
dispense
of
the
rate
base
section
that
we
were
trying
to
do
you
have
it
all
in
front
of
you
in
pink
papers.
It's
just
referring
all
the
motions
off
to
the
next
meeting
and
I.
Think
there's
two
small
brief
from
note
requests
in
there.
So
I'm
just
wondering
if
we
could
just
do
that
now,
just
to
sort
of
dispense.
Okay,
so
I
think
you
have
the
package
in
front
of
you.
Most
of
them
are
my
motions
yeah.
A
Okay,
I
just
want
a
consideration.
The
following
motion
be
referred
to
the
February
2019.
This
is
councillor
Layton's
initial
motion,
so
we're
just
moving
that
to
the
decision
we've
made
next
week
on
that
on
favor
opposed
that's
carried
consideration
of
the
Adam
be
deferred
until
February
20th
2019
on
favor
opposed
that's
carried
again
the
consideration
of
the
following
bulbs:
okay,
that
the
budget
committee
received
briefing
notes,
29
and
30
on
favor
opposed.
That's
carried
consideration;
okay,
I'm
just
reading
a
little
too
quickly.
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
What
it
shows
is
a
series
of
things,
but
I
think
the
key
messages
are
that
the
2.57
eight
million,
that's
in
the
2019
staff,
recommended
operating
budget
fully
funds,
the
the
youth
equity
strategy
implementation.
It
also
identifies
that
between
2015
and
with
the
funding
to
be
considered
for
19
cumulative
Lea.
That
would
be
a
hundred
and
three
point:
three
million
dollar
investment
in
the
Toronto
youth
equity
strategy,
and
it
also
outlines
the
status
of
over
110
recommended
actions.
C
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
chair
and
through
you
to
staff
with
respect,
is
a
question
for
obviously
mr.
Dillinger,
with
respect
to
the
accumulative
budget
of
2015
to
2019
three
million
dollars.
The
report
says
has
been
already
mostly
will
have
been
invested.
If
we
approve
the
additional
2.5
million
this
year,
the
numbers
don't
quite
add
up
to
one
hundred
and
three
million,
but
you
I
think
you're.
Can
you
explain
the
the
2015
base?
Is
that
16
point
almost
17
million
every
year
with
the
new,
with
the
new
initiatives
added
on
top
of
that
through.
C
Thank
you
so
I
think
there
were
some
reports
earlier
and
especially
a
background
note
from
city
staff
closer
to
the
end
of
2018.
That
said,
it
would
cost
about
fifteen
million
dollars
a
year
to
implement
the
strategy,
but
what
you're
and
that
it
was
unclear
whether
or
not
that
funding
was
was
in
place
and
and
that
it
also
said
at
one
point
that
it
probably
was
not
funded
and
there's
been
some
confusion
about
whether
or
not
it's
funded
it's
the
fifteen
million
dollars.
C
Is
it
overall
for
the
full
implementation
of
new
strategy,
which
is
what
I
believe
was
a
2018
background
note
and
then
I
heard
that
was
15
million
dollars
possibly
per
year?
Can
you
clarify
all
of
that,
because
if
103
million
dollars
or
there
abouts
has
been
allocated
and
mostly
spent
the
two
point,
two
point:
five
million:
now?
C
D
Fourteen
point:
eight
million,
roughly
fifteen
million-
that
was
a
projection
at
a
point
in
time
in
2015.
In
a
briefing
note
that
number
that's
the
only
reference
I
can
find
to
that
number
because
of
the
confusion
you
referenced.
I
included.
That
briefing
note
with
this
briefing
note
what
you
have
in
the
appendix
of
the
current
briefing
note
in
appendix
one
is
the
facts:
these
are
the
budgeted
amounts
that
have
been
approved
in
the
city
operating
budget
over
the
last
five
years.
D
C
D
C
So
can
you
help
me
understand
the
appendix
number
one
that's
now
attached?
It
now
says
that
there
was
a
base
investment
of
about
seventeen
million
dollars
in
2015,
but
in
the
appendix
three
briefing
note,
if
it
was
fourteen
million
dollars
did,
did
council
approve
this
quantum
plus
an
extra
actually,
it's
almost
17
million
it
plus
an
extra
three
million
dollars.
On
top
of
that,
that's.
D
Correct
so
the
2015
was
a
briefing
note
juror
the
budget
process.
This
set
of
numbers
is
what
was
actually
approved
in
the
2015
budget.
I
think.
Another
point
of
confusion
with
respect
to
the
2015
briefing
note
is
that
it
included
base
funding
for
the
youth
shelter
system
in
order
to
compare
apples
to
apples.
The
base
funding
for
the
youth
shelter
system
has
been
included
in
the
appendix
thank.
A
E
First
of
all,
the
the
the
the
text
briefing
note,
the
the
full
text
briefing
note
talks
about
if
we
will
be
on
track,
if
council
approves
two
and
a
half
million
dollars
worth
of
requests,
that
is
that
is
that
spread
out
in
the
in
the
2019
column
here.
Is
that
spread
out
amongst
the
various
streams?
Yes,.
E
E
Now
part
of
the
confusion
here,
I
think
stems
from
the
Fulford
strategy
contemplated
getting
more
money
from
the
National
prevention
crime
prevention
strategy.
In
the
first
place,
we
we
were
hoping
to
get
upwards
of
30
million
dollars
worth
from
them
over
time,
and
we
got
far
less
than
that.
We
got
six
million
dollars
somewhere
like
that
through.
D
D
Direction
to
apply
to
the
federal
government
came
from
Council
in
July
of
2018
in
respect
to
a
report
it
considered
at
that
time.
Regarding
youth
violence,
prevention
measures
to
address
youth
violence
provide
is
what
we
were
directed
to
apply
to
the
federal
government
for
components
of
that
were
directly
related
to
the
Toronto
youth
equity
strategy.
Other
components
were
not
and
there's
a
briefing
note
further
in
the
green
sheets.
That
speaks
to
ok.
E
And
so
sorry
to
belabor
this
mr.
chair,
but
but
I
just
wanted
me
clear,
I
think
counsel
confused
the
issue
for
for
youth
for
and
particularly
some
members
of
the
youth
cabinet,
in
that
they
thought
if
we
got
those
that
this
was
not
only
going
to
fund
everything
but
but
enhance
it
somewhat.
There
are
a
number
of
actions
in
here
that
are
to
be
executed
within
existing
resources,
but
that
was
always
the
case.
Was
it
not
when
we
adopted
the
strategy?
That's.
E
D
E
But
it
would
be
a
bit
tricky
to
start
moving.
You
know
if
we
were
not
satisfied
with
some
of
those
would
be
a
bit
tricky
to
start
moving.
It
would
be
arbitrary.
Let's
put
it
that
way
to
move
numbers
to
change
that
we're
better
off
waiting
for
the
review
that
you're
bringing
back
to
inform
the
next
strategy
that.
G
D
The
strategy
was
approved
by
council
in
2014
and
council
directed
some
resources
in
2014,
more
than
2015
to
implement
the
strategy.
It
is
not
a
standalone
program.
There
were
a
number
of
time,
limited
actions.
There
were
a
number
of
pieces
of
work
that
had
to
do
with
the
way
in
which
the
city
delivered
services
and
then
some
recommendations
with
respect
to
new
programs.
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
D
D
H
D
The
chair
there
have
been
many
achievements
through
the
implementation
to
date.
Some
of
the
highlights
from
my
perspective,
would
be
the
diversion
programs
in
2018.
Forty-Seven
youth
were
diverted
from
the
criminal
justice
system
into
the
diversion
program.
We
need
to
continue
to
grow
that
particular
program.
D
Another
significant
achievement
was
the
provision
of
services
to
youth
and
remand
so
that
we're
actually
working
with
youth
who
are
already
in
the
system
to
give
them
options
to
moving
out
of
it.
The
strategy
has
been
also
successful
in
helping
city
staff
community
stakeholders
to
understand
and
look
at
this
target
population
differently.
We
need
to
continue
that
work
so
that
we
more
effectively
serve
youth
vulnerable
to
violence
and
crime.
Thank.
I
Bradford
thanks
very
much
through
the
chair.
The
trial
youth
equity
strategy
has
a
number
of
complementary
equity
initiatives
and
strategies
and
we're
kind
of
changing
the
way
that
those
those
services
are
delivered
out
of
the
hundred
and
ten
recommendations
recommended
actions.
Some
of
those
have
been
shifted
to
other
programs.
Is
that
correct?
Could
you
just
elaborate
on
that?
A
little
through.
D
The
chair,
when
the
strategy
was
approved
by
council,
we
clearly
stated
that
the
drivers
of
youth
violence
were
poverty
and
racism,
since
the
approval
of
the
policy
or
strategy
council
has
both
adopted
a
poverty
reduction
strategy
and
created
units
to
confront
anti-black
racism.
So
there
are
additional
tools
now
in
place.
Any
new
strategy
will
need
to
be
developed
kind
of
in
the
context
of
the
other
city
efforts,
so.
D
I
A
C
Thank
you
very
much
mr.
chair
for
the
indulgence
in
to
the
committee
and
largely
because
there's
been
so
much
confusion
over
the
implementation
and
the
funding
with
respect
to
the
84
sort
of
service
components
that
are
funded
implemented
or
in
progress.
Those
are
three
big
categories.
Can
you
break
that
down
for
us
further?
How
many
of
them
are
actually
in
progress.
D
C
D
The
chair
I
think
it's
important
to
understand
it's
a
hundred
and
ten
factions.
Some
of
them
are
programmatic.
Some
of
them
are
about
staff
training.
Some
of
them
are
about
modifying
staff
Kroger
program
criteria,
so
we
they're
not
it's
not
as
if
this,
the
recommendation
was
for
a
hundred
and
ten
discreet
programs
to
be
initiated,
but
we're
happy
to
do
that
break
down
and
provide
that
view
and.
C
With
respect
to
programs
that
that
were
time
specific,
they
start-
you
know
in
a
week
and
they
end
in
in
in
six
months,
was
there
any
measurement
of
how
effective
that
is
and
whether
or
not
there
is
an
opportunity
to
bring
it
back,
because
the
community
has
said
neighbors
in
Regent
Park
have
said
they
don't?
They
need
these
fund,
these
programs
to
be
sustained
and
ongoing.
Otherwise,
whatever
good
work
is
being
developed,
it
just
evaporates
as
soon
as
the
program
ends.
C
D
Through
the
chair,
absolutely
that
is
one
of
the
directions
for
the
report
back
in
the
fall
on
the
needs
of
youth
and
the
review
of
Youth
Services.
Overall,
with
respect
to
community
comments
about
programs,
starting
and
stopping
I
would
completely
agree
with
their
concern.
I
believe
staff
have
articulated
this
to
council,
our
federal
and
provincial
colleagues.
Their
funding
mechanisms
are
all
project-based,
so
gang
intervention
programs
are
funded
for
five
years
and
then
they
disappear.
D
C
You,
the
you
in
in
the
briefing
Noda,
referenced
the
poverty
reduction
strategy,
the
anti
black
racism
strategy
in
your
prior
answers.
You
mentioned
that
even
a
youth
shelter
was
somehow
embedded
in
all
of
these.
The
financial
numbers
that
are
before
us
are
we
and
and
there's
already
reports
out
and
inline
items
like
hopefully
aligned
items
to
those
to
those
strategies
and
and
in
in
other
budgets.
Is
this
a
matter
of
double
dipping
or
we
somehow
and
sorry?
First,
it's
not
the
right
term.
Are
we
double
accounting?
D
D
With
respect
to
how
staff
report
on
investments
against
various
council
strategies,
the
strategies
do
work
together.
There
is
an
overarching
social
policy
frame,
poverty
reduction,
confronting
anti
black
racism,
youth
equity
strategy
and
others.
We
try
to
be
as
clear
as
possible
when
we're
reporting,
which
numbers
are
being
reported
under
which
strategy
thank.
F
J
J
J
D
The
chair
this
this
again
goes
to
the
heart
of
some
of
the
confusion.
The
way
the
recommendations
are,
the
actions
are
worded
they're,
often
open-ended,
so
there
would
be
an
action
that
would
say,
increase
the
number
of
youth
spaces.
It
doesn't
say
by
twenty
forty
sixty.
So
it's
it's
difficult
to
respond
to
say
you
know,
is
every
action
fully
implemented.
There
was
no
measure
set
in
the
original
strategy
against
which
to
to
respond
to
that
and.
D
B
So
through
you,
mister
chair
just
on
this
item,
maybe
mr.
brill
injure
and
I
can
just
work
on
revising
appendix
two
and
to
break
that
out
and
then
that
could
be
redistributed
next.
One
is
briefly
note:
number
six
Toronto
Toronto
a
poverty
reduction
strategy
that
was
distributed,
February,
fourth,
as
well,
that
provides
an
implementation
status
on
that
strategy,
which
was
in
its
first
phase
from
15
to
2018
and
the
action
plan
associated
with
that.
So
what
it
outlines
is
that
again,
progress
has
been
made
on
the
major
objectives
in
the
in
the
plan.
B
Can
there
is
over
300
discrete
work
plan
items,
the
majority
of
which
have
been
implemented
between
2015
and
19?
There's
been
an
increase
of
181
million
dollars
in
the
operating
budget,
including
the
recommended
funding
for
2019
and
not
including
additional
capital
investments
that
have
been
funded
through
other
revenue
sources.
So
for
2019
there
is
a
30
million
dollar
increase
in
the
base,
which
is
essentially
the
annualized
cost
of
decisions
made
last
year,
plus
an
additional
nine
and
a
half
million
of
new
asks
and
they
are
to
fund
the
transit
fare
equity.
B
E
B
I
believe
the
the
briefing
note
and
mr.
Pillinger
can
clarify,
but
the
the
brief
Ino
identifies
181
million
that's
been
funded
in
the
operating
budget
for
Pia,
for
strategy
related
initiatives,
including,
what's
in
the
2019,
but
doesn't
include
additional
capital
investments
and
programs
that
are
financed
through
existing
or
other
revenue
sources.
Operating
funding.
That's
been
provided
through
through
Council's
approval
and.
E
D
The
chair,
yes,
we
are
working
on
an
evaluation
framework.
You've
articulated
the
challenge
perfectly
in
terms
of
from
the
context,
the
decisions
beyond
the
city's
control,
perhaps
deepening
poverty
and
so
trying
to
disaggregate
those
things
and
understand
the
impact
of
city
investments.
We
are
working
hard
to
do
and
we'll
be
able
to
report
out
on
and.
E
There's
well
well,
some
things
have
come
along
and
built
into
it.
There
are
things
such
as
the,
for
instance,
a
caring,
caring
forward
the
open
hours
program
in
in
Toronto
library,
where
not
funding
the
next
step
in
that,
and
that
was
that
was
seen
as
having
an
impact
on
on
poverty
reduction
strategy.
Is
there
a
way
of
listing?
These
are
the
things
we
can't
do
without
without
adding
more
funds.
D
That
discussion
would
happen
through
the
development
of
the
next
term
plan
for
poverty
reduction.
So
when
the
poverty
reduction
strategy
was
originally
approved,
it
included
a
four-year
term
plan
with
very
clear
objectives,
we're
just
in
the
process
of
completing
the
four-year
plan
and
coming
forward
to
council
I
believe
in
queue.
Two
or
three
with
the
term
plan
for
this
term
of
council
will.
E
K
Lane,
you
may
have
just
answered
this
question
in
in
a
roundabout
way,
the
the
other
elements
that
that
pertain
to
poverty
reduction,
but
aren't
listed
as
unfunded
in
this
briefing
note
around
the
implementation
of
the
childcare
subsidy
program
to
its
full
3-year
implementation,
the
fair,
fair
implementation
that
also
includes
the
housing
subsidy
side,
the
the
extended
library
hours,
were
they
not
included
in
the
original
poverty
reduction
plan.
That's
why
they're
not
listed
here
again.
D
K
There
any
way
of
listing
what's
unfunded
in
this
budget
that
would
pertain
to
poverty
reduction,
but
are
sitting
in
that
unfunded
category,
because
we
weren't
specific
in
the
original
plan.
Can
you
get
so
I've
identified?
Three
of
them?
There's
the
child
care
number
which
I'll
get
a
number
from
from
Children's
Services,
the
fair,
fair
implementation
which
and
I
don't
have
a
number
for,
but
it's
a
couple
million
dollars.
K
D
K
The
open
hours
number-
that's
also
a
that's
something
that
would
be
would
would
be
poverty
reduction,
but
it
hasn't
been
listed
here.
Do
you
have
the
number
for
that
or
should
I
I
can
ask
Toronto
libraries
in
a
couple
minutes
if
you
don't
I,
don't,
however,
we're
fine,
okay,
yeah
I've,
to
be
honest,
I,
have
it
right
in
fright?
It's
three
point:
three
five
million,
but
I'll
ask
so
it's
more
formal
later
I
think
that's
it!
Thank
you,
council
McKelvey.
Thank.
G
D
The
strategy
would,
through
the
chair
that
strategy
was
approved
in
the
first
year
of
the
last
term
of
council.
The
overall
strategy
is
a
20-year
horizon,
but
provides
for
four-year
term
plans
to
coincide
with
the
term
of
Council
we're
just
completing
the
first
four
year
term.
We
will
be
reporting
out
on
that
and
working
to
develop
the
four
year
term
plan
for
this
term
of
Council
and.
G
When
you
report
back
well
that
will
there
be
a
section
that
does
kind
of
more
clearly
show
how
this
strategy
aligns,
with
others,
for
an
overlap
with
youth
equity
and
making
sure
that
everything
is
in
its
proper.
You
know
bucket
and
aligning
wealth,
yes
and
then
what
is
the
total
amount?
That's
being
funded
in
this
strategy
this
year
or
being
requested
in
the
strategy
this
year?.
D
C
I
I
B
Through
the
chair
and
I
think,
Chris
could
probably
answer
this
better
than
I,
but
these
were
the
items
that
form
part
of
the
poverty
strategy,
but
their
poverty
reduction
strategy
overall,
as
a
as
a
strong
as
a
city,
when
we
were
a
staff,
what
we
were
looking
at
noon
enhance
funding.
We
wanted
to
continue
to
see
what
we
could
fund
for
existing
strategies,
so
the
fair
equity
Phase,
two,
the
part
that
can
be
done,
is
what's
in
here,
the
Sunday
library
hours,
which
are
part
of
the
poverty
reduction
strategy.
I
D
B
We're
now
on
page
10
and
moving
the
shelter,
support
and
housing
there
series
of
briefing
notes
for
this
program
area,
so
the
first
is
number
seven.
This
was
distributed
back,
February
4th
and
it
is
entitled
refugee
claimants
lows
to
Toronto
and
associated
pressures
on
the
shelter
system,
so
it
provides
the
overall
summary
of
the
trends
in
the
number
of
newcomers
and
claimants,
as
well
as
the
pressures
that
have
happened
as
a
result
of
the
influx.
E
There
is
some
confusion
in
the
community
about
this,
because
there
there
are
the
shelters
that
the
community
generally
knows
of
and
then
you
have
separated
out
the
college
dorm
program
that
played
out
over
the
summer,
but
we
now
have
a
number
of
residents
that
are
housed
in
hotels
and
we
are
funding.
Those
is
that
set
the
case.
L
E
I
think
I
think
where
the
confusion
is
in
the
community
when
I,
you
know,
when
I
canvassed
for
opinion
on
the
budget,
that
the
one
negative
thing
comes
back
that
tends
to
come
back
and
it's
unattractive
I'm
paraphrasing
here,
but
it's
one
of
those
one
of
those
refugees
doing
in
our
shelters.
There
were
actually
not
by
and
large
in
in
what
are
classically
known,
shelters
around
town
they're
in
this
separate
hotel
program.
L
L
E
Right
and
so
when
we
when
we
say
that
we're
asking
the
federal
money,
the
federal
government
of
these
dollars,
there's
no
attempt
here
to
sort
of
blur
the
lines
and
and
just
try-
and
let's
use
this
moment
to
improve
on
on
what
are
the
shelter's
we've
been
running
all
along
we're
by
keeping
them
distinct.
We're
also
very
clear
that
the
numbers
we
are
we
are
stating
to
our
other
government
partners
and
the
number
we
are
asking
for
it
is
truly
to
deal
with
our
refugee
claimants
that
are
housed
in
this
special
way.
L
B
So
we're
off
to
economic
development,
Bhama
page
11,
there
was
a
request
there
to
provide
some
very
specific
information
regarding
the
development
of
the
2019
recommended
operating
budget
for
the
program
area,
so
starting
on
the
bottom
of
page
11,
and
there
are
one
to
seven
items
with
specific
requests
for
information.
They
have
all
been
provided
and
are
summarized
here:
I
won't
read
them
all,
but
very
specific
items
with
the
answers.
Okay,.
B
Back
to
shelter,
support
and
housing,
the
briefing
note
number
16.
This
was
requested
at
our
last
meeting.
It's
a
briefing,
no
reporting
on
the
outcomes
of
the
discussion
with
the
provincial
government
and
operators
of
24-hour
drop-in
centers
regarding
the
resources
needed
for
operations
and
the
cost
that
would
be
required
to
increase
resources.
B
So
the
briefing
note
provides
some
information
on
the
work.
That's
done
to
date
with
the
Toronto
central
in
and
their
kind
of
discussions
that
they've
had
with
a
bit
of
update
on
where
that's
at
any
additional
funding
has
been
identified
would
be
required
about
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
support
24
hour
hour,
respite
sites.
K
K
K
I
think
your
your
your
mic
may
have
been
off
there
or
is
it?
Is
it
on
getting
texts
from
people
watching
counselor
perks
can
take
a
wild
guess
who's
watching
and
texting
me
that
they
can't
hear
the
answers
from
staff
perhaps
used
to
ask
a
lot
of
questions
in
this
horseshoe
during
budget
time.
She
wishes
everyone
well.
H
K
So
it,
and-
and
this
can-
this
will
be
my
last
question
about
this-
is
the
sistering
and
the
other,
24-hour
women's
drop
ins
aren't
funded
as
shelters?
Correct
can.
Is
there?
Is
there
an
easy
way
of
breaking
down
the
the
different
funding?
Is
it
a
per
diem?
Is
it
is
it
twenty
percent
different?
Are
they
funded
more.
K
B
So
we're
on
page
14,
it's
briefing
note
number
17
again
with
shelter,
support
and
housing
request
for
information
listing
all
the
city
funding
requests
submitted
to
the
National
House
to
the
National
Housing
Strategy
for
funding
and
what
we've
received
so
far.
The
briefing
note
identifies
that
we
are
yet
to
receive
any
funding
through
the
National
Housing
Strategy,
and
you
repeat
that
and
on
page
15
identifies
four
separate
requests
that
have
been
made
as
well
as
some
we're,
but
we
are
waiting
for
a
decision
shortly
on
the
would
green
Community
Services
project
and.
M
Thank
you
and
thank
you
for
this.
So
I
see
Josie
just
building
on
on
your
comments
here.
So
we
have
the
4i.
There
are
four
areas
we
have
currently
applied
for
funding
through
the
National
Housing
Strategy.
They
one
point
three
four
billion
for
TC
HC
and
then
some
others
related
to
housing.
Now
the
open
door
projects
and
a
co-investment
fund
is
that
correct
through.
M
I
question
I
have
related
to
supportive
housing
is
last
term
in
the
spring
of
2018,
Council
adopted
a
ten-year
supportive
housing
target
and
a
nine
hundred
and
some-odd
million
dollar
price
tag
for
it.
I
guess
the
question
is:
why
was
that
nine
hundred
million
dollar
price
tag?
Not?
Why
did
we
not?
Why
is
that
not
in
the
list
of
funding
requests,
we
have
to
the
National
Housing
Strategy,
or
is
there
a
second
tranche
when
it
will
be
on
the
list.
L
Through
the
chair,
currently,
we
are
working
with
the
provincial
government,
as
you
know,
on
the
home
for
good
funding
in
terms
of
the
national
housing
strategy.
There
are
some
specific
applications
in,
but
it's
not
quite
clear
yet
on
what
all
of
the
allocations
are.
So
we
will
be
looking
for
those
opportunities
on
supportive
housing
to
submit
allocations
or
apply
for
those
particular
programs.
So.
M
If
council,
if
there
is
a
desire
to
increase
the
supportive
housing
funding,
requests
through
the
federal
government
and
to
see
those
funding,
requests
proceed
through
to
the
application
format
through
the
National
Housing
Strategy,
what
should
council
be
doing
here
because
we
pass
motions
to
ask
the
feds
for
Mundek
money
as
a
counselor?
What
do
I
need
to
do,
or
or
what
should
council
be
looking
to
do
in
this
budget
cycle,
to
direct
staff
to
include
supportive
housing
funding
in
our
requests
than
the
National
Housing
Strategy?.
L
K
L
L
F
F
K
I
L
I
L
L
B
Okay,
we're
on
page
16
is
briefly
note
number
18
again
to
the
general
manager,
shelter
sport
in
housing.
This
is
regarding
the
neighborhood
information,
post,
trustee
ship
or
a
red
bag
program.
So
there's
some
information.
That's
come
back
on
that
that
highlights
the
amount
that
highlights
the
amount
of
funding.
That's
in
the
budget,
2.2
million
dollars,
which
is
consistent
with
two
thousand
we're
on
page
16.
B
So
that's
consistent
with
the
2018
level
of
funding.
If
there
were
to
be
any
expansion,
there
would
be
another.
Seventy
thousand
dollars
required
to
serve
additional
50
new
clients
and
I
believe
this
program
is
has
been
fully
funded
by
the
federal
homelessness
partner,
partnering
strategy
and
the
king
hand.
Chippy,
and
those
are
fully
fully
committed
programs.
L
Through
the
chair
of
the
it's,
it's
really
it's
that
discussion
about
priorities
based
on
the
the
very
significant
investments
that
we're
asking
for
currently,
so
we
have
so
we
have
many.
Many
programs
and
I
know
that
many
of
them
are
interested
in
enhancements,
and
so
that's
the
that's
really
the
issue
so.
K
L
B
Briefing
note
number
19
again:
general
manager,
self
support
and
housing.
This
is
a
request
for
an
understanding.
The
number
of
supportive
housing
units
scheduled
to
be
built
through
nineteen
to
2021,
as
long
as
how
those
units
are
being
funded,
any
partnership
and
any
other
information
which
18
gives
a
summary
table
on
those
estimates.
M
Councillor
Chrissy,
I,
think
and
I
won't
repeat
questions
I
just
asked
on
briefing
up
14.
So
if
I'm
looking
at
on
this
one
on
page
three
of
the
briefing
note
do
am
I
reading,
so
there
are
in
20
1961
new
supportive
housing
units.
We're
looking
at
constructing
and
36
can
purchase,
and
conversion
is
that
right,
so
97
units
this
year
through.
L
M
L
M
M
I
guess
just
so
we
are
is
the
reason
that
there
are
787
new
supportive
housing
units
scheduled
for
2019.
What
a
reduction
to
190
and
2020
is
that,
because
the
homes
for
good
money
is
running
out,
is
that
the
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
why
the
significant
drop?
Because
we
know
we
have
a
supportive
housing
waiting
list
of
15,000
people
it's
growing
longer.
Meanwhile,
we're
projected
to
only
build
190
in
2020.
L
Sorry
Mike
there
through
the
chair,
these
are
the
new
ones
in
that
year.
Those
numbers
would
continue
on
with
the
operational
funding
supported
throughout
those
those
years.
So
as
an
example,
that's
690,
we
would
continue
to
provide
those
supports
to
those
those
households,
as
you
continue
on,
but
there's
no
new
ones
there
and
in
2020.
So.
M
I
I
I
I
L
Through
the
chair
again,
I
wouldn't
want
to
speculate
on
that
when
we
look
at
you
know,
typically,
if
there's
a
provincial
envelope,
the
city
you
know
has
seen
in
the
twenty
four
twenty
five
percent
range
of
the
total
for
provincial
allocation.
But
again
it
would
be
speculation
for
new
programs.
Okay,.
B
Briefing
note
number
twenty
bottom
of
page
eighteen
again
for
the
general
manager,
shelter
support
housing.
This
is
information
around
the
cost
for
two
additional,
a
two-and-a-half
additional
FTEs
for
the
tenant
defense
fund
for
tenant,
hot
lighting
outreach
work.
So
this
briefly
note
has
been
provided
just
a
few
stats.
Three
hundred
thousand
is
funded
in
the
base
for
the
to
help
support
the
tenets,
Defense
Fund
plus
another
two
hundred
five
thousand
for
the
right
Federation
of
metro,
tenants
association.
So
that's
a
total
of
five.
Just
over
five
hundred
thousand.
J
You
I
just
want
to
establish
a
little
bit
of
background
here.
So
when
we
were
last
last
term,
we
got
a
sort
of
a
housing
market
forecast
developed
jointly
by
the
affordable
housing
department
and
the
Planning
Department,
and
at
that
time
I
asked
the
question:
is
it
the
case
that
we
are
losing
units
at
the
bottom
end
of
the
rental
market
to
things
like
rent
evictions
faster
than
we
are
building
them
through
the
variety
of
social
housing
programs
that
we
fund
at
the
City
of
Toronto?
J
Okay,
I'm
relieved
to
get
that
right
and
a
significant
part
of
the
function
of
the
tenant
defense
hotline
is
to
provide
services
to
tenants
faced
with
illegal
evictions,
renovations
all
those
various
tools
that
landlords
use
to
drive
out,
tenants
paying
low
rents
and
bring
in
other
uses
at
hire
and
prints
at
one
of
their
key
functions
through
the
chair.
That's
correct!
That's
correct!
Now,
I'm,
also
remembering
that
we
have,
over
the
last
eight
years,
done
more
than
one
review
of
this
organization
and
what
they
do.
L
J
We've
all
we've
quite
recently
done
a
review
of
their
their
work
through
the
chair.
That's
correct,
okay,
so
we've
done
a
review
of
their
work.
We
know
that
they
are
helping
to
keep
people
from
homelessness.
We
know
that
the
need
for
that
is
growing.
Those
are
the
three
things
that
I
have
learned
in
this
question.
Thank
you.
E
Carol
I
just
wanted
outline
it
pretty
much
says
this.
In
the
briefing
note
it
just
doesn't
go
all
the
way
to
the
two-state
it.
The
reason
this
briefing
note
was
requested
was
because
we
know
that
in
the
community
they
were
asking
for
2.5
FTE
to
support
the
increased
volume
and
the
work
being
done
by
it
by
the
Federation,
but
I
understand
what
it
mentions
at
the
end
of
the
briefing
note
is
that,
in
the
short
term,
you're
doing
a
review
and
in
the
short
term
well
that
review
is
going
on.
L
B
Very
bottom
of
page
19
is
briefly
note:
number
21
again,
general
manager,
shelter,
support
and
housing
to
request
around
the
provision
of
menstrual
hygiene,
product
dispensers
in
shelters,
24-hour
respite
sites
and
community
centers.
Page
20
just
provides
a
summary
saying
that,
in
fact,
these
products
are
provided
currently
by
by
the
division
on
all
these
sites
and
they're.
In
compliance
with
the
standards.
They
have
not
received
any
complaints,
but
if
you
were
to
install.
B
E
We
have
any
way
of
verifying
that
they
haven't
had
any
complaints
that
they're
the
reason
I'm
actually
stunned,
because
the
the
whole
reason
this
motion
was
moved.
I
moved
her
on
behalf
of
another
counselor,
but
the
reason
I
moved
it
is.
There
is
an
activism
program
because
they're
apparently
dispensers
in
all
these
sites
and
they're
just
always
empty
that
without
I'm
paraphrasing,
but
that's
what
they
said
when
they
visited
with
councillors
last
summer
and
was
summer
wasn't
even
the
busiest
time
in
the
winter.
L
Through
through
the
chair,
I
think
there's
two
pieces
to
this,
so
the
one
piece
is
the
shelter
system
and
and
network.
We
have
confirmed
that
products
are
distributed
throughout
the
entire
shelter
system,
respite
system
and
approximately
90%
of
the
drop-ins.
There
is
not
dispensers,
but
all
of
the
products
are
there
and
free
and
available.
One
of
the
questions.
A
separate
issue
that
had
come
up
was
the
strong
neighborhood
community
centers
and
the
veil
the
availability
of
them
there.
L
So
that's,
though,
there
are
two
separate
issues,
so
I
think
the
complaints
that
you're
describing
may
may
in
fact
be
that
it's
not
the
shelter
system,
though
the
products
are
there
and
available
and
handed
out
it's
the
strong
neighborhood
community
centers.
That's
the
issue.
I
think
that
maybe
people
were
getting
at
and
that's
the
lion's
share
of
120.
It's
a
hundred
thousand
of
120
thousand.
B
B
It
highlights
that
there
is
some
work,
that's
being
done
to
kind
of
review
overall
how
the
youth
spaces
are
determined,
and
the
note
identifies
that
right
now.
It
remains
largely
I'm
coordinated,
whether
it's
a
youth
hub
or
an
enhance
you
space.
You
have
programs
that
have
both
of
them
and
there
are
two
that
are
being
approved
in
this
budget
for
Toronto
Public
Library's
part
of
poverty
reduction.
They
do
have
a
plan
to
look
at
another
five
years
of
expansion,
twenty
one
twenty
five-
and
that
would
be
for
youth
hubs
for
parks,
forestry
and
recreation.
B
J
D
Through
the
chair,
there
were
two
plans:
there
was
a
plan
approved
three
four
years
ago
in
PFN,
our
four
ten
additional
hubs
that
was
funded
over
the
three-year
period
and
implemented
Toronto
Public
Library's
also
had
a
plan.
Yes
we're
in
the
third
year,
I
believe
a
second
year
of
the
implementation
of
that
plan.
That
includes
the
two
that
are
included
in
the
recommended
budget.
D
J
D
A
Colleagues,
I'm
just
I'm
noticing
the
time
it's
three
o'clock
here.
We
have
a
lot
of
diseases,
just
briefing
notes
left
and
there
seems
to
be
a
lot
of
questions.
We
also
have
a
lot
of
senior
staff
here
that
are
kind
of
waiting
tip
for
us
to
get
through
these
briefing
notes,
so
I'm
just
wondering
can
I
ask
I,
mean
just
straw
vote
with
with
regard
to
some
of
the
agencies
trying
to
please
the
TTC
Public
Health
Library.
A
M
A
A
So
we'll
begin
so
with
regard
to
the
agencies,
the
police,
I
believe
there's
some
questions
coming
up
on
the
next
briefing
note:
TTC
parking
tags,
public
health
library,
any
of
the
other
agencies,
I,
don't
think
there'll,
be
any
questions,
so
I
just
want
to
make
an
agency
wise
okay.
So
if
you're
in
the
audience
and
you're
one
of
the
agencies,
you
can
leave.
F
B
B
So
it's
part
of
the
recommendations
made
in
July.
There
was
an
application
for
30
2.6
million
dollars
on
behalf
of
the
city
and
of
that
amount,
I
believe
six
million
and
change
has
been
provided
sexually
in
the.
In
the
note,
the
police
has
applied
for
an
additional
twenty
two
point:
seven
million
and
TCH
see
for
five
million
from
the
provincial
government.
These
have
not
been
funded.
M
Thank
you,
and
so
of
the
SDF,
a
submission
where
we've
requested
as
part
of
the
our
immediate
steps
to
address
gun
violence
we
put
in
six
grant
applications
totaling
thirty,
two
point:
six
million
we've
received
six
point,
eight,
so
the
outstanding
twenty
six
point:
two
million.
Have
we
received
a
firm
answer
from
as
to
whether
the
federal
government
is
funding.
These
are
not
at.
D
M
The
on,
within
the
briefing
note
here
of
the
list
of
the
unfunded
city
I,
the
the
city,
unfunded
actions
that
we've
requested
funding
for
the
community
safety
and
well-being
expansion,
is
that
the
community
crisis
response
program
in
the
focus
tables
it
is
and
that's,
unfunded
for
the
expansion.
That's.
M
For
2019
to
2020,
you
have
a
million
dollars.
They
are
currently
unfunded.
If
that
million
dollars
were
to
come,
what
would
we
be
doing
with
those
funds
for
community
crisis
response
in
the
focus
tables?
What
would
those
programs
be
doing
if
we
had
that
million
dollars,
and
where
would
they
be?
If
we
know.
D
With
respect
to
the
crisis
response
program,
council
did
increase
resources
in
that
program
in
the
last
budget,
yep
which
moved
us
to
for
crisis
response
workers.
Unfortunately,
the
experience
in
2018
indicated
that
we're
still
not
completely
resourced
in
that
area,
so
any
additional
funds
would
be
utilized
to
enhance
that
program,
and
it's
not
just
the
crisis
response.
It's
also
the
capacity
building
in
communities
that
experience
violence
on
an
ongoing
basis.
With
respect
to
the
focused
programs
in
partnership
with
Toronto
Police
Service,
the
United
Way
of
Greater
Toronto,
we
have
four
focus
tables
operating.
M
M
M
And
33
neighborhoods
in
the
submission
to
the
federal
government
under
the
National
Crime
Prevention
strategy,
TPS
requested
an
additional
7.5
million
for
the
neighborhood
officer
program.
Is
that
to
scale
up
neighborhood
officers
into
every
into
every
neighborhood
or
what
was
that
7.5
million?
What
would
that
get
us
that.
N
M
M
N
M
M
J
D
Community
healing
program
is
working
to
working
with
peer
leaders,
training,
peer
leaders,
other
community
members,
to
do
peer,
led
workshops
focused
on
a
trauma-informed
approach,
so
taking
the
approach
of
understanding
the
broader
context
of
youth
who
have
experienced
violence
or
perpetrated
violence.
It
also
includes
skill
building,
building
the
kind
of
basic
supports
that
allow
those
people
to
then
begin
to
think
about
employment.
The
notion
that
we
can
just
move,
someone
who
is
gang
involved
or
at
high
risk
of
gang
involvement
into
employment
is
challenged.
J
K
N
H
N
B
Okay,
we
are,
we've
now
completed
briefing
notes
associated
with
community
and
social
services
and
we're
turning
our
attention,
infrastructure
and
development
services.
Briefly
note:
number
25
at
the
bottom
of
page
23
is
a
request
of
the
executive
director
of
policy
planning,
finance
and
administration
on
their
service
levels.
So
briefing
has
been
provided
that
actually
has
actual
service
levels
achieved
from
2016
and
18,
along
with
the
2019
service
levels,
an
indication
that
the
program
area
will
go
under
a
comprehensive
review
in
19
in
preparation
for
the
20
budget
process.
B
One
on
page
24,
Toronto,
building
a
slum,
a
similar
request
around
service
levels
asking
for
the
achieved
service
levels
in
2018
and
the
service
levels
for
2019
again
they've
been
provided
to
the
extent
that
they're
available
and
a
note
that
there's
a
program
review
underway
and
that
will
be
used
to
inform
any
adjustments
to
service
levels.
It'll
be
brought
forward
in
a
future
budget
process.
J
Perks,
thank
you
and
that
helps
me
to
understand.
What's
gonna
happen
for
2020,
but
it
doesn't
help
me
to
understand:
what's
gonna
happen
for
2019,
so,
for
example,
we
have
a
service
standard
for
our
service
level,
for
what
percentage
of
the
large
buildings
are
dealt
with
in
20
days
and
the
service
level
over
the
past
been
bunch
years
been
57,
65-58
62
and
it's
left
blank.
J
J
B
Let
me
start
and
then
the
chief
building
official
can
I
think
if
you
just
look
at
the
format
of
the
table
consular.
What
you
have
is
an
approved
row
and
then
an
actual
row.
So
if
you
look
at
the
one
you
were
just
referring
to
above,
it
is
the
approve
which
says
for
2019
75%.
The
approved
is
blank
because
it's
it'll
come
at
the
end
of
19,
okay,.
J
F
J
J
A
B
You
know
number
27
on
page
24
again
from
the
chief
building
officer
requesting
info
on
a
more
detail.
Explanation
for
the
one
time
CPI
adjustment
referred
to
on
page
10
of
the
briefing
note
so
that's
been
provided
and
explanation
has
been
identified.
This
is
an
adjustment,
a
one-time
adjustment
to
the
indirect
costs
associated
with
the
supports
to
a
direct,
a
full
cost
recovery
program
and
there's
a
review
being
done
in
2019
for
2020
and
essentially
it's
like
a
catch-up
that
will
then
be
informed
on
a
more
permanent
basis
for
2020.
B
Know
number
28
against
again
the
chief
building
officer
requests
about
providing
some
information
on
the
increases
in
the
service
in
rent
category
expense
from
2017
to
2019.
The
briefing
note
provides
an
explanation
by
year.
There
is
a
table
here
on
page
25
that
summarizes
the
information
for
you
from
17
and
then
on
page
26,
18
and
19
changes.
B
A
A
B
We're
now
moving
to
Corporate
Services
briefing,
note
number
10,
it's
a
request.
Sorry
briefing,
Oh
number
10
was
a
briefing
note
that
was
distributed.
February
4th,
providing
an
update
on
the
implementation
of
the
transform,
teo
short-term
strategies.
It
highlighted
what
has
been
funded
in
the
2019
staff,
recommended
operating
budget
and
provided
specific
information
regarding
what
those
activities
were.
B
J
Thank
you
briefing
note
that's
in
front
of
me
that
was
prepared
here,
compares
what's
in
the
current
budget,
to
the
operating
request
for
18.
What
it
does
not
put
in
front
of
me,
which
is
actually
what
I
had
asked
in
the
questions,
was:
how
does
the
budget
allocation
in
this
year
compared
to
the
plan
that
was
put
in
front
of
us
in
2017?
J
O
J
And
and
I
wanted
I
and
I
I
appreciate
that,
but
just
to
just
to
be
clear,
the
original
proposal
for
the
plan
that
was
going
to
get
us
to
80
percent
reduction
by
the
year
2050
at
a
series
of
markers
for
what
we
had
to
do
in
each
of
the
initial
years.
In
that
plan
that
was
presented
to
Council
for
what
you
would
have
to
do
to
get
to
those
goals.
My
memory
is
correct.
J
J
You
know
the
other
piece
that
I
was
curious
about
and
I
was
hoping
that
this
would
appear
in
the
briefing,
though
we
had
a
bit
of
a
discussion
when
your
presentation
came
to
council
or
the
Budget
Committee
before
about
the
federal
program,
our
sorry,
the
provincial
funding
now
I
have
here
a
report.
P
27.3
funding,
update
municipal
greenhouse
gas,
Challenge,
Fund
I
asked
you
last
time
we
were
here.
If
the
cancellation
of
the
provincial
carbon
pricing
scheme
would
affect
any
programs,
and
at
that
time,
I
was
told
there
weren't
any
I
have
here.
J
J
O
I
did
a
list
if
you're
not
sure,
no
counselor
through
the
chair.
Each
of
those
projects
continues
to
move
forward.
The
business
cases
that
we
put
together
for
each
of
those
work
were
created
before
we
had
municipal
challenge
funds.
What
did--what
the
MCF
did,
of
course,
is
make
the
return
on
our
investment
better
by
the
date.
The
the
projects
themselves
continue
to
move
forward.
I
understand.
J
O
J
Next
question,
so
we've
established
that
we
are
not
staffing
up
or
implementing
the
short-term
actions
that
were
designed
in
the
original
plan,
and
we've
also
established
that
the
projects
that
we're
going
to
be
co-funded
by
the
municipal
challenge
fund
are
being
slowed
down
when
the
transform
plant
geo
plan
was
put
forward.
We
were
given
this
graph,
which
showed
that
we
had
to
take
certain
actions
in
certain
years.
In
order
to
achieve
the
reductions
in
the
plan,
there
was
no
spare
room.
We
don't
have
a
arriving
at
2020
with
a
90%
reduction.
J
It
also
shows
that
without
the
actions
being
implemented,
that
our
reduction
plan
are
our
co2
vehicles
just
basically
flatline
and
stop
reducing.
So
given
that
we
are
behind
on
implementing
the
QuickStart
actions,
given
that
we
are
behind
on
implementing
the
programs
that
we're
in
the
municipal
Challenge
Fund,
can
you
still
say
we
will
meet
this
goal?
I
think.
O
F
E
What
it,
what
it
actually
does,
get
at
the
very
end,
councillor
purchases
question
of
the
10ft
versus
five,
but
what
it
says
is
that
the
five
positions
were
directly
related
to
positions
being
deferred
or
are
associated
with
advancing
retrofits
in
existing
buildings
across
the
city.
So
when,
when
counsel
originally
contemplated
this
plan,
did
we
have
a
clear
idea
of
how
many
buildings
and
therefore
how
many
people
is
that
how
we
arrived
at
the
position?
The.
O
E
A
delay,
so
it
wouldn't
be
if
we
continued
to
sort
of
term
away
at
the
people,
and
we
arrived
at
the
number
of
people
by
specific
numbers
of
existing
buildings
that
need
to
be
retrofitted,
while
we're
building
all
the
new
buildings
according
to
green
building
standard.
Would
it
be
fair
to
say
that
what
counsel
should
present
every
year
is
an
adjustment
of
the
total.
E
O
O
E
E
O
N
N
M
N
O
Excuse
me:
through
the
chair,
we
have
an
existing
private
sector
partnership
with
an
wave
for
the
development
of
low-carbon
thermal
energy
systems.
We
have
one
well
underway
at
the
Westwood
theater
lands.
We've
got
an
ongoing
arrangement
with
our
partnership
with
Toronto
Hydro
to
develop
and
implement
PV
systems.
Those
would
be
the
two
big
ones
do.
F
H
O
H
H
N
So
mr.
chair,
as
Jim
mentioned,
we
are
bringing
forward
to
council
a
status
report
on
where
we
are
in
terms
of
implementing
the
short
term
strategies
and
in
relation
to
the
targets
or
sets.
So
if
I
can
be
a
bit
vague,
we
feel
very
confident
that
we're
on
target
but
I
think
it
would
be.
You
know
inappropriate
for
us
to
give
you
a
definitive
yes
or
no
until
we
bring
forward
that
full
status
report
in
q2
of
this
year.
The
other
thing
I
think
dimension
is,
as
council
adopted,
transform
2.
H
N
N
H
K
K
O
K
K
O
I
Sorry
thanks
very
much
I
just
want
to
like
we've
got
this
graph
up.
It
seems
like
we
don't
have
accounts
at
consensus
amongst
colleagues
here,
but
this
was
the
biggest
thing
that
one
of
the
biggest
things
we
heard
about
it
deputations
there's
a
lot
of
people
are
concerned
about
where
we
are
with
trans,
to
transform
tio
and
I
just
wanted
like
what
I'm
hearing
from
staff.
What
I'm
hearing
from
you
is.
You
know
we're
ahead
in
some
areas
behind
in
other
areas.
Overall,
we
are
ahead
and
you
confidently
say
that,
yes,.
F
I
A
B
Okay,
we're
on
page
27
is
briefly
note.
Number
33,
it
is
a
was
a
request
of
the
general
manager
facilities
manager,
but
it
really
is
the
director
of
environment
and
energy
and
was
request
around
service
level
targets
that
are
under
development,
and
if
you
provide
some
information
on
that,
so
briefing
notes
been
provided.
The
service
level
targets
that
are
under
development
are
speaking
to
I
believe
some
of
the
transform
teo
targets,
as
opposed
to
the
general
of
service
delivery
charges.
But
it's
here
for
your
information.
A
B
B
Sorry,
let
me
backtrack
page
28.
We
dealt
with
on
the
security
changes,
which
was
the
operating
and
capital
items
so
that
we
can
pass
that
so
on
page
29,
which
was
the
second
briefing
note
on
transform,
tianhao
delays
may
impact
ongoing
co2
reduction
goals.
I
believe
we
just
addressed
that.
So
unless
there's
any
further
questions,
we'll
move
on
page
30,
City
Clerk's,
we
dealt
with
that.
That
was
a
Municipal
Elections
Act
issue
and
the
funding
for
the
costs
of
the
election.
B
Finally,
on
page
31
was
a
briefing
note:
request
of
the
executive
chief
executive
officer
of
TRC
8
provide
information
on
the
costs
of
addressing
the
funding
imbalance
between
municipalities
over
three
years.
That
has
not
been
provided
yet,
but
will
be
provided
the
final
wrap-up
meeting
on
February
20th,
okay,
so
that
ends
all
budget
briefing.
Note
requests
mr.
chair,
so
page
31
and
I
will
go
through
these
quickly.
B
The
following
are
motions
that
were
placed
at
the
last
meeting,
the
first
regarding
the
metrics
and
tools
to
measure
the
impact
of
vacant
storefronts,
the
next
one
for
parks,
forestry
and
recreation.
To
look
at
the
budget
to
be
allocated
for
implementation
of
the
Toronto
ravine
strategy,
those
are
for
the
2020
budget
process,
page
32.
B
Is
a
request
to
look
at
the
poverty
considered
solving
the
poverty
reduction
strategy
2.0
and
there
are
three
items
that
are
identified
there
and
infrastructure
and
development
services?
There's
a
motion
for
City
Planning,
the
2020
budget
process,
looking
at
the
amount
of
section
37
funds
secured
for
affordable
housing
over
the
past
five
years
for
transportation
services,
there's
emotion
of
the
requesting
the
general
manager
of
transportation
to
review
winter
maintenance,
as
requested
by
merit
Ori
and
there's
a
series
of
items
to
be
identified
in
that
review.
A
E
It
can
I
just
ask
I'm,
not
sure
who
moved
this
motion
that
but
I'm
looking
at
page
33.
The
motion
include
in
future
Auditor
General's
annual
reports,
beginning
in
2020
savings
achieved
by
city
divisions
and
agencies
resulting
from
the
implementation
of
the
Auditor
General's
reports
and
recommendations.
Sweet
they
always
are.
We
always
do
get
that
number.
E
What
I'm
wondering
is
if
the
person
meant
to
say,
can
we,
because
that
I
have
a
feeling,
there's
been
an
ongoing
issue
with
this,
that
what
they
were
really
looking
for
is
to
make
sure
that
that
number
now
is
net
of
implementing
the
recommendations,
because
we
always
get
a
projection
of
how
much
you
will
save.
If
you
just
do
what
this
Auditor
General's
report
says,
but
it
never
really
contemplates
the
cost
of
implementation.
Is
it
possible
the
person
moving?
B
O3
mr.
chair
I
believe
the
motion,
above
that
one
does
because
it
does
include
costs
as
well
as
any
cost
reductions
and
revenue
increases.
So
we've
actually
begun
a
few
mr.
chair
this
year
to
identify
any
AG
recommendation
implications,
whether
it's
a
cost,
a
savings
or
a
revenue
change-
and
this
is
just
well
I-
believe
this
motion
formalizes
that
request
so.
E
H
Through
the
chair
the
way
I
interpret
this,
is
you
actually
have
to
specific
and
distinct
reports?
One
is
the
AG
report
that
comes
out
independent
of
the
budget
process
and
she,
this
particular
motion
identifies
the
fact
that
that
it
will
be
a
request
that
the
AG
tracked
the
savings
within
the
budget
process,
which
is
a
completely
different
document.
It
will
be
up
to
city
staff
to
identify
the
costs
associated
and
the
savings
associated
with
AG
recommendations
that
have
been
implemented.
So,
if.
E
H
B
E
F
A
H
I,
just
because
it
was
my
motion
that
I
moved
last
year,
you're
absolutely
correct.
That's
exactly
what
the
intent
of
the
motion
is
that
during
the
budget
process
that
we
see
each
division,
the
actual
savings
through
the
Auditor
General's
rec
nations,
which
we
were
not
seen
before.
Thank
you
for
clarifying
that.
Okay,
hey.
B
Bottom
page
33
is
a
member
motion
coming
from
City
Council
regarding
the
tommy
Thompson
Park
shuttle
service.
So
that's
asking
the
chief
financial
officer
treasure
in
the
deputy
city
manager
of
community
and
social
services
to
consider
as
part
of
the
2019
budget
process
$130,000
to
operate
a
public
shuttle
service
to
tommy
Thompson
Park.
So
this
would
be
required
of
TRCA.
So
there
is.
We
have
not
received
an
official
request
from
TRCA
for
this
particular
item.
B
B
Okay,
finally,
on
page
34
there's
a
motion
that
was
placed
at
the
last
meeting
as
well,
requesting
the
city
manager
consultation
with
TTC
to
report
on
the
requests
that
have
been
made
to
the
province
and
federal
governments
for
operating
capital
investments
in
TTC's
in
the
Toronto's
transit
system
and
any
current
projected
funds
available
from
other
orders
of
government
in
the
10
year.
Capital
plan.
So
those
are
all
the
motions
to
chair.
B
Okay,
so
we're
going
to
turn
to
the
last
group,
which
is
essentially
the
referrals
and
reports
for
consideration
that
are
before
you
for
final
decision-making
at
your
next
meeting.
The
first
one
is
from
the
city,
manager's
Toronto's,
participatory,
budgeting
pilot
evaluation.
So
three
years
ago,
City
Council
approved
a
pilot
program.
It
was
initially
for
one
year
and
then
it
was
extended
for
two
other
two
additional
years
in
three
separate
Ward's.
E
Just
two
questions:
first
of
all,
there
is
a
recommendation
to
proceed
with
the
the
financial
things
here,
but
the
the
issue
do.
We
need
a
motion,
the
issue
that
in
the
city
manager's
office,
they
might
have
a
toolkit
for
people
who
just
want
to
do
this
with
section
37
funds
within
their
own
resources.
That
toolkit
is
still
gonna
be
created.
That's
my
understanding,
okay,
then.
The
only
other
question
is
this.
Within
the
proposals
here
am
I
clear
these
were
developed
before
counsel
had
already
gone
ahead
and
enhanced
its
its
own
account
its
own
staffing
budgets.
E
B
E
So
if
we
were
to
do
a
motion,
we
might
want
to
reconsider
that
because
each
of
the
proposals
includes
adding
I,
think
a
half
a
half
a
position
versus
a
half,
a
position
of
part-time
hours
per
counselor's
office,
conducting
one
of
these
and
and
if
we
were
going
to
proceed.
If
there
was
a
motion
to
proceed
in
all
likelihood,
we
wouldn't
need
that,
so
we
could
actually
change
the
numbers
here.
B
E
B
Report,
that's
before
you
page
36
comes
from
the
general
manager
of
economic
development
culture
in
the
2018
budget
process.
There
was
a
request
for
the
general
manage
to
report
back
in
this
process
on
a
multi-year
plan
that
looked
at
results
of
research,
analysis,
benchmarking,
the
city
of
Toronto's,
investment
in
culture
relative
to
other
jurisdictions,
and
an
assessment
on
future
increases
that
might
begin
starting
in
2019.
B
So
this
report
identifies
where
we've
been,
which
is
essentially,
we've
reached
the
$25.00
per
capita
target
from
our
previous
strategy
that
was
done
in
2018,
however,
to
move
forward.
There
are
some
challenges:
some
need
to
have
some
consultation,
and
the
report
is
recommending
that
that
work
be
done
in
2019
and
report
back
as
part
of
the
20
but
process.
K
N
N
K
N
E
Believe
the
2
million
that
we're
asking-
because
this
was
one
that
we
heard
a
lot
of
deputations
on
in
in
all
parts
of
the
city-
it
would
be
spread
across
majors
minors,
lassos
and
and
the
Arts
Council
grant
envelopes.
So
it's
really
my
am
I
right
in
assuming
that
what
they're,
basically
asking
for,
is
cost
of
living
across
all
those
bodies?
No.
N
E
Yes,
mr.
chair
I,
don't
know
if
you
didn't
tells
me:
I
went
out
of
the
room
to
go
to
the
washroom
when
the
economic
development
briefing
note
went
by,
but
it
actually
relates
to
the
the
motion.
That's
here
with
respect
to
major
special
events,
so
we're
looking
forward
a
little
bit
of
efficiency
there
we
withdraw
we,
but
we've
made
some
withdrawals
from
some
major
events
that
we
anticipated
and
now
we're
looking
for
efficiency.
There
there's
another
list
and
a
briefing
note
of
things
that
were
announced
as
areas
of
focus
and
aren't
they
wonderful.
E
But
those
are
now
where
you're
going
to
look
for
in
your
efficiency.
The
one
thing
that
we
aren't
looking
for
an
efficiency
in
is
restoring
the
level
of
expenditure
to
the
year
before
on
travel.
I
was
surprised
to
see
that,
because
I
I
thought
that
when
I
saw
the
travel
number
reducing
in
2018
I
thought
that
had
something
to
do
with
the
the
having
global
Toronto
up
and
running
and
taking
part
in
trade
missions,
but
I
gather
that
that
is
not
the
case.
No.
N
E
That
the
mayor
wouldn't
be
spearheading
as
many
trade
missions
correct.
So
is
it
anticipated
that,
despite
the
fact,
without
this
regional
authority,
we're
still
gonna
we're
still
going
to
be
probably
based
on
our
cluster
strategy,
doing
roughly
the
same
number
of
trade
missions
correct
and
how
much
do
we
fund
global
Toronto
as
part
of
the
sharing
agreement
there?
We
still
just.
F
B
We
have
another
report
from
the
general
manager
of
economic
development
culture.
This
has
recommendations
essentially
to
award
$750,000
over
three
years
to
two
recipients
for
significant
events,
investments
and
this
will
be
fully
funded
from
the
major
special
events
reserve.
So
the
work
has
been
done
now
needs
to
be
awarded
and
it's
being
funded
from
the
major
special
events
reserve.
So
we
get
to
that.
It
just
needs
to
be
adopted.
B
B
There
were
a
couple
of
recommendations
that
had
been
sent
through
to
the
budget
process
they're
outlined
on
page
39,
so
essentially
it's
the
allocation
of
20
million,
putting
it
into
the
reserve
allowing
the
creating
the
funding
capacity
for
the
1
million
for
the
nonprofit
housing
capacity
fund
and
a
budget
of
seven
million
dollars
gross
zero
net
to
establish
the
Secretariat,
so
this
budget
would
have
to
so
approving.
This
would
amend
the
budgets
of
the
various
recipients.
There
are
participants
that
are
part
of
the
the
overall
Secretariat
support.
B
There
is
a
recommendation
for
at
the
bottom
of
page
40,
that's
outstanding,
and
that
was
a
request
by
council
directing
the
city
manage
to
review
the
staffing
in
part
19
of
the
report,
which
were
the
essentially
the
recommendations
above
and
to
report
back
as
part
of
the
2019
budget
process.
That
report
is
underway
and
will
be
here
for
the
final
wrap-up
so,
depending
on
what
that
report
says.
That
may
impact
the
recommendations
about
so
page
41
and
the
top
of
page
42.
B
Our
transmittal
letters
are
reports
from
the
auditor
from
the
accountability
officers,
so
I'll
just
quickly
highlight
for
you,
so
these
are
essentially
their
their
requests
to
the
committee
regarding
their
budgets.
So
for
the
Auditor
General's
budget,
it's
a
2.1
percent
increase
or
$135,000
over
the
2018
of
budget,
no
new
requests
for
the
office
of
the
integrity,
Commissioner
office
of
the
integrity.
Commissioner,
though
the
requests
being
transmitted,
there's
is
767
gross
and
net,
which
is
a
children
$48,000
increase
over
2018.
B
There
is
a
request
for
one
hundred,
ninety
thousand
dollars
in
new
funding
and
that's
to
help
support
legal
and
investigative
work.
The
next
one
is
from
the
office
of
the
lobbyist
register-
registrar,
sorry,
it's
one
point:
four,
nine
million
gross
and
net
and
that's
280
and
higher
than
last
year's
budget,
primarily
because
of
a
request
for
to
staff
of
255,000
for
some
statutory
education,
outreach,
work
and
investigative
legal
requirements.
B
Finally,
at
the
top
of
page
42
for
the
ombudsman,
the
request
there
is
two
hundred
twenty
six
thousand
higher
than
their
eighteen
budget
and
that's
primarily
for
two
staff.
I
have
a
hundred
sixty
seven
thousand
to
help
support
in
take
complaints,
analysis
and
investigative
work,
so
that
will
be
before
you
for
the
next
meeting.
Now.
Turning
to
our
agencies,
again,
we
have
a
series
of
transmittals
the
first
from
the
board
of
health.
B
That
really
essentially
is
their
request
to
to
the
to
the
recommendations
to
budget
committee,
and
so
what
we've
provided
is
some
comparison
in
relation
to
what's
before
you.
So
there
are
a
few
differences
before
between
the
staff
recommended
budget
and
what
the
Board
of
Health
has
recommended.
There
were
two
subsequent
requests
for
new
funding
that
were
not
before
us
when
we
were
doing
the
administrative
review.
These
were
tacked
on
at
that
meeting.
B
One
is
for
55,000
grows,
14,000
net
to
support
project
management
for
creating
Health
Plus,
which
provides
nutritious
food
on
a
weekly
basis
at
29th,
drop-ins
plus
30,000
gross,
an
8,000
net
for
the
Toronto
Food
Policy
Council
to
support
net
worth
of
food
champions.
So
those
were
not
with
us,
so
they
are
not
been
included
or
recommended
at
this
point
in
time.
B
In
addition
to
that,
so
what
we
do
have
before
us
is
a
budget
that
is
1.1
million
dollars
lower
than
the
Board
of
Health.
We
have
some
base
budget
adjustments
that
were
recommended.
We
have
some
items
that
the
Board
of
Health
at
the
MOH
would
have
had
before
them
that
we
have
funded
through
some
other
sources
and,
finally,
a
new
request
for
the
student
new
student
nutrition
program
for
independent
schools
that
have
not
been
recommended
as
part
of
the
staff
recommended
and
that's
all
laid
out
on
pages
20
or
42
43
and
44.
B
The
next
one
on
page
45
is
the
board
recommendation
from
create
tío.
We
do
have
some
differences
there
as
well.
We
have
prior
eyes,
or
we
sorry,
we
have
adjusted
start
dates
for
some
new
positions
from
what
was
before
the
board.
That
was
for
January
1st
to
April
1st,
to
take
into
account
the
budget
approval
date,
and
there
are
some
positions
that
we
will
be
reviewing
in
year
regarding
rail
deck
park
and
the
Toronto
parking
authority
and
we'll
determine
how
we
address
those
with
the
various
divisions
and
agencies.
B
So
here
again,
we
have
a
difference
between
what
the
police
service
board
has
requested
of
the
city
versus.
What's
in
the
staff
recommended
budget
for
the
police
service
board
subsequent
to
our
preparation
of
the
budget,
they
added
a
renew
request
for
for
funding
one
and
a
half
new
staff,
and
it's
$149,000
gross
this
year
at
another
97
next
year
to
help
support
their
governance.
So
we
have
not
recommend.
We
have
not
included
that
in
our
recommendations.
B
A
Is
there
questions
on
those
again?
Those
motions
were
there
last
week,
they're
coming
next
week,
so
I
just
wanted
to
know
questions
on
those
okay,
we're
getting
down
to
the
to
the
end
of
today.
What
I'd
like
to
do
now
is
to
ask
sort
of
last
questions
on
two
areas:
community,
social
services,
infrastructure
and
development
and,
of
course,
the
accountability
offices.
If
there's
any
extra
questions
on
those,
so
let
me
begin
with
community
and
social
services.
Are
there
any
general
questions?
A
A
Okay,
so
we
are
yes,
I
know
we
are
gonna
recess
for
15
minutes
the
clerk's.
As
you
recall
last
week,
it
was
a
bit
of
confusion
with
trying
trying
to
get
everything
else,
so
people
can
look
at
the
motions
that
are
in
front
of
them.
They
still
need
to
print
some
of
them
out.
So
if
we
can
just
take
a
10
10
minute
recess,
so
they
can
print
out
and
some
and
send
out
all
the
requests
well
briefing.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
K
Thank
you
very
much,
I,
don't
think,
there's
any
brief,
or
was
there
one
briefing,
no
Orbitz,
no
ID
or
year's
report.
They
were
just
republican
or
items
to
be
eventually
referred
to
staff
I
can't
remember,
which
ones
are
gonna
go
up.
This
has
to
do
with
the
Lane
occupancy
fee.
I,
don't
think
we're
charging
enough
and
if
we're
using
our
TPA
parking
rates
as
the
basis
for
a
fair
market
value,
I
think
we're
making
a
big
error.
K
I
also
see
that
the
TTC
and
I
think
by
way
of
a
motion
from
councillor
Crawford
it
brings
in
it,
might
bring
this
in
around
pricing
them
according
if
they
accordingly,
if
they
cost
us
money
by
redirecting
TTC
routes
or
slowing
down
transit
vehicles.
So
that's
one.
It's
just
ask
for
a
report
back
the
next
one
again
a
report
back
on
expansion
of
the
Red
Bank
and
trustee
ship
programs.
K
Thirty
years
from
now,
when
we're
all
probably
gone
from
from
this
place,
I
should
be
I
should
be
included
there
and
it
should
be
reflective
in
our
transform
tío
recommendations.
I'll
save
any
comments
for
for
the
budget
wrap-up,
but
I
hope
you
can
support
these
these
these
recommendations
going
for
it.
Thank.
A
You
I
believe
I
am
next
I
have
a
number
of
briefing
note
requests.
This
is
one
and
everybody
has
a
copy
of
them
in
front
of
them.
Toronto
Transit
Commission,
to
look
for
recent
improvements
in
capacity
on
the
network
system
fares
compared
to
the
eternal
Transit
Commission
fares
and
a
methodology
to
calculate
their
proposed
Lane
occupancy
recovery
fee
again
with
public
library.
It
is
looking
at
cost
and
funding
delays
with
the
library
hours
on
Sundays
and
the
youth
hubs.
A
A
Shelter,
support
and
housing.
I
won't
read
it
all
it's
in
front
of
you,
it's
just
looking
for
some
numbers
and
that's
that
we're
gonna
receive
all
these
briefing
notes.
I'm
not
gonna,
create
them
all,
but
there's
lots
of
them
there
and
that
the
considerations
of
all
motions
referred
from
the
Budget
Committee
meeting
on
February
4th
and
six
and
motions
by
counsel
late
from
this
meeting
be
referred
to
the
February
20
1920
February
20
2019
meeting
that's
for
next
week.
Consideration
of
the
item
be
deferred
until
February
20th
2019
meeting
next
week.
A
A
A
A
We
need
to
go
to
BU
3.5,
the
additional
City
of
Toronto
reporting
requirement
as
a
result
of
Ontario
regulation
to
eight
6/0
nine
budget
matters
expenses,
and
we
have
to
refer
that
consideration
of
the
edit
also
be
deferred
until
February,
20th
2019
next
week
on
favor
pose
that's
carried
I.
Think
we're
done.
We're
done
we'll
see
everybody
next
week
and
thank
you
very
much
for
the
staff
for
all
the
work
you
did
and
thank
you.
Josie.