►
From YouTube: Budget Committee - February 13, 2019 - Part 1 of 2
Description
Budget Committee, meeting 3, February 13, 2019 - Part 1 of 2
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=15453
Part 2 of 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPLGUxBDbH4#t=8m31s
Meeting Navigation:
0:10:13 - Call to order
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
I
would
like
to
welcome
everybody
to
the
third
meeting
of
the
budget
committee
and
we
can
just
have
everybody
quieten
down
a
little
bit,
so
we
can
begin
perfect.
This
is
the
third
meeting
of
the
budget
committee.
It
is
the
first
of
two
wrap-up
meetings
where
we're
gonna
be
wrapping
up
the
budget,
the
budget
committee
recommendations
that
will
be
going
off
to
executive
and
then
from
there
to
full
council
in
a
couple
of
weeks
again.
This
is
the
first
meeting
of
two
wrap
ups
and
for
those
who
have
seen
the
process.
A
I
will
discuss
it
just
in
a
couple
of
minutes
on
that.
But
the
goal
again
is,
as
I
said,
to
finish
the
recommendations
for
the
budget.
For
next
week
we
acknowledge
the
land
we
are
meeting
on
his
traditional
territory
of
many
nations,
including
the
Mississauga's
of
the
credit,
be
honest,
Wahby,
the
chip,
Wadud
nashoni
and
the
wind
at
people's,
and
is
now
home
to
many
diverse
First,
Nations,
Inuit
and
maytee
people.
We
also
acknowledge
that
Toronto
was
covered
by
treaty.
B
A
So
I'm
just
going
to
kind
of
go
through
what
to
expect
so
I'm
going
to
propose
that
we
begin
at
the
top
of
the
order
and
work
our
way
through
the
rate,
supported
budgets
and
then
from
there
we'll
go
on
to
the
tax,
supported
budgets.
So
for
each
item,
Josie
la
Vida,
the
executive
director
of
financial
planning
division
is
going
to
present.
If
you
have
been
part
of
the
process
in
previous
years,
it
is
the
we
go
through
the
what
we
call
the
blue
and
green
sheets.
A
Josie
does
an
exceptional
job
at
moving
us
through
very
efficiently.
So
we'll
do
ask
questions
of
all
these
supplementary
reports.
All
of
the
briefing
notes,
and
then
we'll
have
we'll
ask
questions
overall
on
any
of
the
agencies,
the
divisions
and
all
the
different
sections.
Community
social
services,
infrastructure
development
so
be
an
opportunity
to
ask
overall
questions,
and
then
there
will
be
an
opportunity
to
you
can
move
motions
today
if
you
choose,
but
we
won't
be
voting
on
any
motions
that'll
be
held
over
until
next
week.
A
We
will
be
voting
on
any
more
briefing
note
requests
today,
and
hopefully
they
will
be
ready
for
next
week's
final
wrap-up,
which
is
on
February
20th.
Any
questions
at
all
on
the
process
should
be
fairly
straightforward.
Once
we
begin
on
that,
I
will
pass
it
over
to
Josie
La
Veta
to
run
us
through
the
morning.
All.
C
Right
good
morning,
everyone,
so
what
you
have
before
you
are
two
sets
of
green
documents
and
two
sets
of
blue
blue
represents
capital
matters
and
the
green
represents
our
offering
budget
matters.
We're
going
to
go
through
the
rate
budgets
first,
so
the
blue
and
green
sheets
that
have,
in
the
top
right
hand,
corner
are
EBU
point
three
one
three
point,
two
and
three
point
three
address
the
Toronto
Water
the
solid
waste
and
the
Toronto
parking
authority
budgets.
C
Okay,
the
other
thing
that
is
also
before
you
and
they
were
sent
out
last
night,
would
have
been
the
subsequent
briefing
notes
that
were
requested
at
the
last
meeting.
Just
to
recap,
there
was
a
group
that
was
issued
February
4th.
They
were
briefing
notes,
numbers
one
to
ten
and
then,
as
a
result
of
the
requests
made
at
the
last
meeting,
we
have
briefing
notes
number
11
to
36,
which
would
have
been
issued
late
yesterday
and
I.
C
Believe
packages
are
here
for
you:
okay,
all
right,
so
I'm
going
to
start
with
capital
rate
supported
budget
blue
sheets,
and
if
we
follow
along
I'll,
navigate
you
through
this,
so
we're
on
page
two,
and
we
had
two
briefing
notes:
excuse
me
that
were
issued
back
in
February
4th.
These
are
standard
briefing
notes
that
are
provided
by
our
Toronto
Water
staff.
These
have
been
requests
in
the
past
that
outline
the
basement,
flooding
protection
program
and
provides
a
status
update.
C
That's
briefing
note
number
eight
and
briefing
note
number
nine
actually
provides
the
list
of
projects
that
will
be
that
are
planned
in
the
10
year,
capital
plan
for
the
first
five
years
of
the
program.
So
these
are
here
before
you.
If
you
have
any
questions
of
the
general
manager,
now
would
be
the
time.
C
Eat
right
so
we're
looking
at
the
brie,
the
blue
sheets
that
has
bu
one
bu
3.1
3.2
3.3,
that's
the
rate
for
those
of
you
that
have
your
laptops.
If
you
have
the
wrap-up
notes
online,
they
actually
have
you
can
click
on
the
left
hand,
column
and
go
right
into
the
briefing
note
the
report
or
whatever
is
before
you
so
that's
available
as
well.
C
A
D
D
What
I
would
what
I
would
note
a
difference
this
year,
then
you've
seen
in
subsequent
years
is
that
we've
we
put
out
a
very
large
request
for
proposals
to
start
all
of
the
remaining
environmental
assessments
this
year,
so
that
document
is
out
on
the
market
right
now
to
be
tendered
on,
and
so
that's
why
you
see
on
page
2
of
that
briefing.
Note
all
the
remaining
basement
flooding
study
areas,
starting
with
a
start
date
of
2019.
Our
objective
is
try
to
accelerate
the
completion
of
the
environmental
assessments
for
all
those
areas
we
wanted
to.
D
We
wanted
to
get
at
least
the
studies
completed,
so
we
can
begin
the
construction
programming
for
those
wards.
So
that's
something
that's
different
and
the
cash
flow
has
been
accounted
for
in
our
budget.
If
you
go
on
page
4,
you
will
see
a
breakdown
of
properties
receiving
subsidies
for
the
flood
protection
devices.
Those
are
the
individual
subsidies
that
homeowners
can
apply
for
we've,
given
you
a
breakdown
per
reward,
so
that's
that's.
The
first
briefing
note
essentially
highlighting
the
acceleration
of
the
environmental
assessment
studies.
The
second
briefing
note
the
length
year.
D
One
is
our
annual
update
on
the
project
lists
for
the
next
five
years,
the
20
19
to
2023
capital
plan,
as
identified
in
in
our
total
capital
plan.
That's
submitted.
We've
extracted
out
the
basement,
flooding
projects
just
to
show
clarity
for
councillors.
They
could
see
which
projects
are
are
to
be
constructed
in
2019
and
we
have
the
breakdown
by
Ward
and
by
street
name
and
into
year
two
year,
three
as
well.
D
We
also
keep
in
this
briefing
note
the
running
tally
of
projects
that
exceeded
the
$32,000
for
benefiting
household
cap,
and
we
we
show
that
list
as
well
that
so
that's
on
the
briefing
note
as
a
companion
we've,
given
you
updated
maps
now
reflecting
the
new
25
Ward
boundary,
showing
the
work
that
has
been
completed,
award
by
award
for
environmental
studies,
construction
activity
and
basement
flooding
subsidies.
So
that's
that's
the
dashboards,
the
annual
dashboards
we
provide
as
well.
So
that's
the
summaries
of
the
two
briefing
notes.
It.
D
Through
mr.
mr.
chair,
no
not
in
the
within
the
middie
year
within
year,
1
and
2,
where
the
storm
occurred
this
past
august,
it
actually
hit
parts
of
the
city
that
are
had
already
been
identified
as
having
problems
with
basement
flooding.
So
it
was
just
another
event
for
homeowners
that
are
experienced
successive
flooding
in
the
past.
So
we
are,
in
those
particular
words
already
doing.
Construction
in
some
cases
completed
constructions
and
in
other
areas,
just
in
the
cusp
of
completing
EA's
are.
B
You
able
to
identify
if
any
of
the
ravine
work
that
needs
to
be
done
around
the
major
water
courses
as
it
pertains
to
toronto.
Water
is
that
included
in
the
state
of
good
repair,
because
there's
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars,
perhaps
more
in
those
that
need
to
be
done
to
the
water
courses
and
ravines,
is
that
included
in
the
state
of
good
repair
through.
D
Mister
chair,
yes,
it
is
not
in
the
basement,
flooding
program
yeah
with
intro
waters,
capital
program.
We
do
have
a
couple
of
other
line
items.
We
have
light
items
to
deal
with
stream
erosion
that
impacts
Toronto
water
infrastructure
in
particular,
and
then
we
have
another
line
item
where
we
provide
monies
to
the
Toronto
region,
Conservation
Authority,
for
them
to
deal
with
other
critical
erosion
sites.
We've
got
I
believe
you're
marked
about
one
hundred
and
forty
million
dollars
to
the
TRC
a
over
the
next
ten
years,
dealing
with
the
most
critical
locations.
D
D
D
Would
have
a
list
jointly
between
us
and
the
TRC
a
is
that
list
available.
We
could
we
could
get
it
as
a
separate
list.
It's
not
included
in
in
our
notes.
It's
used
by
staff
right
now.
The
Toronto
region,
Conservation
Authority,
as
a
methodology
on
ranking
the
criticality
of
erosion
sites,
and
we
use
that
as
the
basis
of
funding
we'll
take
the
most
critical
and
that
could
change
based
on
storm
events.
D
They
will
reprioritize
that
list,
but
we
don't
fund
their
entire
the
entire
list,
because
some
on
that
list
are
state
of
good
repair
or
need
to
get
to.
But
it's
not
critical.
Yet
when
you
add
that
up
you're
into
the
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars
to
deal
with
all
erosion
sites
across
the
city,
but.
D
E
D
F
Through
the
chair,
that's
correct:
we're
working
on
the
implementation
strategy
for
the
ravine
strategy,
which
will
come
back
for
consideration
in
the
2020
budget.
It
will
have
a
look
at
the
items
within
the
water
budget,
transportation
budget,
the
TRC,
a
budget
and
the
parks,
forestry
and
recreation
budget
around
various
priority
sites
within
the
ravine
system
and
identify
the
existing
funding
for
them.
The
prioritization
order
for
them,
as
well
as
a
number
of
unfunded
areas
that
we'll
need
to
look
at
in
future.
So.
E
A
20-year
starting
and
and
as
part
of
that,
then
is
it
also
to
to
kind
of
create
an
umbrella,
because
it
sounds
like
you
know,
I
mean
the
question
is
getting
pushed
between
departments.
So
will
this
kind
of
create
like
an
umbrella
strategy,
that
kind
of
better
integrates
and
streamlines
through
the.
F
Exactly
correct
the
idea
around
the
strategy,
we
actually
have
an
inter
divisional
capital,
Coordinating
Committee
working
right
now
on
looking
at
all
of
the
capital
budgets
associated
with
the
ravines,
between
all
of
those
divisions,
with
the
idea
of
prioritizing
a
joint
prioritization
framework,
so
that
funds
can
be
used
together
and
capitalized
as
much
as
possible
in
in
a
single
project.
That's
going
on.
So
as
an
example,
we
all
don't
go
back
at
various
times
to
do
different
things
and.
E
F
E
A
Other
questions
just
want
to
remind
counselors
that,
when
we're
going
through
we'll
have
plenty
of
opportunity
to
ask
questions
on
overall
different
divisions,
but
again
these
were
briefing
notes.
Just
on
the
basement
flooding
we
tended
to
move
on
to
talk
a
bit
about
ravine
strata,
so
I'm
going
to
try
to
push
us
into
just
focusing
on
this.
A
C
C
So
then
really
what's
left
in
this
document
are
the
reports
for
consideration,
which
are
essentially
the
recommendations
in
the
budget
notes
as
we
move
forward
for
final
wrap-up
for
Toronto
water
on
page
three
and
I
think
the
point
to
note
there
is
for
2019
we're
looking
at
960
million
dollars
of
funding
to
continue
with
that
program,
and
then
it
sets
out
the
10
year.
Capital
plan
recommendations
on
page
five
for
solid
waste
management.
The
2019
budget
in
recommendation
4,
is
19
cash
flow
of
80
4.6
million,
and
then
there
are
the
10
year.
C
C
So
we
have
a
report
before
us
is
three
point:
three:
a
there
are
operating
recommendations
and
capital
recommendations.
What
we
have
done
here
is
isolated
the
capital
related
recommendations
as
part
of
the
report.
So
what
we
need
to
get
is
authorization
here
to
deal
with
outstanding,
2016
capital
requirements
and
have
that
funded
and
also
look
at
funding
the
19
program
from
section
37
and
45
funds.
C
There
are
other
recommendations,
as
it
relates
to
the
operating
side
of
bike
share
that
we'll
deal
with
in
a
moment,
so
that
reports
before
you
and
for
your
consideration
at
our
next
meeting
and
then
finally
on
page
7,
the
toronto
parking
authority,
capital
budget
and
plan
for
2019
at
sixty
eight
point,
four
million,
and
that's
it
mr.
chair
for
for
our
rate
capital.
C
A
G
G
C
G
And
can
we
because
that
is
such
a
because
that
is
such
a
point
of
interest
for
for
a
specific
group
of
residents?
Can
we
make
sure
that
it
does
make
its
way
to
the
to
the
budget
page,
the
end
goal
being
by
the
time
we
adopt
the
budget
in
2019?
Anything
you'd
ever
want
to
know
about
the
budget
in
2019
is
in
the
is
on
the
page
we
set
aside,
for
it
is
that
possible.
H
B
D
Through
you,
mr.
chair,
what
we
do
is
we
sit
down
with
the
Toronto
region,
Conservation
Authority,
and
we
identify
those
projects
that
are
on
their
list
and
and
they
keep
a
running
list
as
the
strong
water.
So
there's
two
two
lists,
one
that
the
city
has
to
fund
under
percent,
others
that
we
have
to
assess
whether
they
get
a
contribution
from
Toronto
water,
or
do
they
get
some
from
property
tax?
How
its
funded
is
split,
sometimes,
as
it
could
be,
just
a
a
private
property
matter,
and
so
what
TRCA
does?
D
Because
they
identify
the
long
list,
and
it
includes
issues
such
as
Gibraltar
point
and
bluffers
Park.
So
those
are
very,
very
large
projects
that
require
tens
of
millions
of
dollars,
if
not
several
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars
to
address.
So,
if
you
funded
their
entire
list,
you
would
have
to
look
at
big
increases
to
water
rates
and
property
taxes
potentially
to
fund
the
entire
list.
So
the
way
we've
been
doing
it
for
many
years
is
dealing
with
the
most
critical
and
critical
sites
first
and
keeping
an
eye
on
those
other
locations
and
as
well.
D
What
the
TRCA
has
is
their
annual
allocation
for
state
of
good
repair
funding,
which
is
a
more
conservative
amount,
so
base
amount
of
which
they
get
around
to
dealing
with
state
of
good
repair
projects.
What
we've
done
in
the
city
of
the
last
few
years
is
given
a
giving
them
a
top-up
over
the
base
amount
that
we
funded
for
their
state
of
good
repair
funding
under
OSHA
control
we've,
given
them
a
special
account
for
the
critical
ones.
D
G
Just
just
a
quick
question:
we
we
saw
in
this
year's
notes
that
icy
parking
authority
did
just
walk
in.
There
are
some
parking
authority
people
here
we
saw
that
it's
it.
Bike
Share
is
on
a
certain
footing
now
I'm
just
wondering
about
we're,
also
adopting
in
this
letter
the
some
some
financial
principles
that
their
financial
principles,
but
in
a
way
their
service
levels.
G
Well,
we're
well
we're
going
to
adopt
this
statement
today.
All
those
other
principles
of
how
we're
growing
that
the
system
can
can
go
on
well
we're
well
we're
adopting
this
that
doesn't
preclude
your
if
it
ran
into
problems
or
if
you
wanted
to
propose
a
certain
expansion
you
could
or
your
board
could
come
to
Council
and
say
this
is
your
principal,
however,
if
that
would
still
be,
that
would
still
be
in
order
I
believe
so,
okay,
okay,
thank
you.
Thank.
E
B
It
possible
I'm
just
saying
for
me,
but
I'm
sure
some
other
colleagues,
if
you
could,
if
you
could
reach
out
independently
and
just
about
right,
the
motion
for
us
to
release
those
funds
as
part
of
this,
so
we're
not
doing
it
later
on
that
that
would
be
help.
I
know,
there's
section
37
and
45
within
Ward
11,
going
towards
already
dedicated
to
bike,
share
and
I'm
happy
to
move
those,
but
given
that
we're
gonna
be
delving
into
bigger,
deeper
budget
items,
we
might
not.
We
might
miss
that.
B
C
C
A
A
C
C
Again,
it's
bu
point
three
point,
one
three
point:
two
and
three
point:
three:
as
we
move
forward
on
to
page
two:
we're
showing
you
the
potential
financial
impact
related
to
one
of
the
motion
sets
before
us
and
that
emotion
when
we
get
to
it
represents
a
change
in
the
industrial
waste
surcharge
formula
that
would
be
applied
to
all
tribal
parameters
that
would
have
a
revenue
loss
of
2.3
point:
six
million
dollars.
Okay.
So
on
page
three,
we'll
start
with
briefing
notes,
there
was
a
request
for
a
briefing
note.
C
It's
briefly
note:
number
twenty
nine
to
the
general
manager
providing
information
on
a
list
of
the
businesses
charged
under
the
industrial
water
surcharge
program
and
the
parameters
that
they
are
exceeding
to
receive
the
surcharge
and
then
a
recommendation
to
move
to
the
industrial
waste
surcharge
program
towards
full
cost
recovery.
So
that
briefing
note
is
before
you
and
it
outlines
the
companies
that
exceed
the
water.
B
D
Through
you,
mr.
chair,
if
you
look
on
page
three
of
the
briefing
note
yeah,
there
are
there's
a
listing
of
370
companies
that
have
active
industrial
waste
surcharge
agreements
with
us
and
at
this
present
time,
359
of
those
companies
have
multiple
parameters.
So
there's
a
much
smaller
percentage.
Now
that
have
only
one
parameter
now
we
have
lost
some
industries
along
the
way
too.
So
there
is
a
lesser
number
of
industrial
waste
surcharge
agreements
than
prior
years
as
well,
and.
D
To
you,
mr.
chair,
yes,
there's
great
variability
amongst
the
various
companies.
They
vary
on
between
size
flow
concentration,
the
number
of
parameters
that
are
impacted
so
when,
when
we
look
at
the
individual
impacts,
the
the
range
is
significant,
so
you
may
have
a
a
medium-sized
company
that
has
some
multiple
parameters
with
some
higher
strength
discharges
that
we
can
treat
at
our
plant.
D
They
could
be
impacted
significantly
by
this
change,
while
in
other
cases
you
may
have
a
company
who
may
have
multiple
parameters,
but
with
respect
to
the
highest
parameter,
it
may
be,
for
example,
Bo
D
being
the
largest
one
that
that
they
are
paying
for
the
other
parameters
may
be
just
very
smaller
months,
and
so
the
impact
may
not
be
that
great.
So
it
is
very
industry,
specific
company
specific
and
it's
hard
for
us
to
predict.
B
D
B
D
D
B
E
Realize
all
the
companies
are
different,
but
in
general,
do
you
think
that
if
you
were
to
switch
to
this
type
of
rate
based
program
that
there
would
be
incentives
for
them
to
decrease
their
contaminate
loads
or
to
change
their
their
treatment
parameters
like?
Is
it
actual?
Is
it
possible
for
them
to
have
savings
going
forward
if
we
were
to
go
through.
D
Three
mr.
chair,
with
respect
to
the
cost
to
implement
pretreatment
or
a
treatment
at
site,
it
would
vary
from
company
to
company
and
could
be
difficult
for
some
of
the
smaller
and
medium-sized
companies
to
make
that
kind
of
capital
investment
for
for
the
larger
companies.
Some
of
them
have
already
migrated
to
pretreatment
and
that's
why
we
no
longer
have
industrial
waste
surcharge
agreements
with
them.
It
made
economic
sense
for
them
to
look
at
putting
in
some
pretreatment,
as
opposed
to
paying
the
city
to
treat
that
over
strength
for
some
of
the
smaller
companies.
D
They
might
not
be
able
to
raise
the
capital
to
do
that,
and
that's
why
we
have
this
program,
because
our
treatment
plants
can
effectively
treat
this
over
strength
waste.
It's
Bo,
DS.
It's
it's
suspended
solids,
that's
what
our
treatment
plants
are
designed
to
do
is
treat
that
kind
of
of
load,
and
so
the
program
we
offer
is
economical
in
that
we
already
have
the
emphasis
we
were
just
charging
more
because
it
exceeds
the
the
maximum
allowable
concentration
limits.
So
we
do
charge
a
little
bit
more
for
that.
So.
E
D
With
respect
to
so
we
do
have
the
five
tradable
parameter.
So
phosphorus
is
one
of
them
we
can
treat.
You
know
there
is
it.
There
is
a
cost
for
treating
that.
We
have
to
add
chemicals
to
precipitate
out
the
phosphorus.
It
typically
ends
up
in
our
salt.
Let's
train
train
at
some
of
our
plants.
We
actually
use
that
biosolids
as
we
call
it
and
we
turn
it
into
pellets.
D
We
put
it
on
fields,
so
the
phosphorus
is
is
a
nutrient
and
it
gets
used
that
way
and
in
another
facility
we
we
continue
to
incinerate
it
with
respect
to
anything
that
we
can't
treat.
Well,
then
no,
they
have
to
comply
with
the
by
law.
The
only
reason
we
have
these
five
parameters
is
because
their
treatment
plants
are
designed
to
treat
that
they're
just
sending
us
something
that's
stronger
than
the
maximum
allowable
in
the
by
law,
so
they
pay
a
surcharge
over
and
above
their
normal
base
rate.
D
E
D
Really
mr.
chair,
not
not
through
Toronto
water,
sometimes
there
are
other
programs
through
federal
provincial
programs
that
deal
with
manufacturers.
Those
are
the
ones
that
typically
would
struggle
I'm
thinking
of
in
in
Toronto.
In
particular,
we
have
a
lot
of
food
processors
that
are
smaller
nature
that
do
have
over
strength
agreements
with
us.
You
could
see
on
the
list.
Those
are
the
ones
I
think
that
would
be
challenged,
sometimes
to
make
an
investment
a
few
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
pretreatment,
but
we
ensure
our
water
do
not
subsidize
technologies
and.
E
D
E
D
C
So
we're
now
on
page
four
briefie
note
number
30
was
the
second
request
of
the
general
manager
Toronto
water,
asking
for
information
that
examines
the
options
of
modifying
the
block
to
rate
looking
at
the
benefits
and
the
implications
of
a
discount
ranging
from
one
to
five
percent.
So
that's
before
you,
it's
called
water
rate,
structuring
and
options
have
been
provided
and
what
it's
showing
is
if
it
were
a
1%
discount
at
seven
point,
seven
million
over
ten
years.
C
Five
percent
phased
in
over
two
years,
would
be
a
thirty
seven
point:
almost
three
million
dollar
impact
and
a
five
percent
block
rate
reduction
in
one
year.
Thirty-Eight
point
six
million.
So
if
that
were
to
proceed,
the
briefing
note
says
this
would
have
to
be
absorbed
by
other
ratepayers
or
a
reduction
in
the
capital
financing
contribution,
with
the
corresponding
reduction
in
the
10
year.
Capital
plan
expenditures.
D
B
E
D
B
D
We
did
provide
that
in
the
briefing
notes.
So,
if
you
take
a
look
at
the
way
we
set
up
the
briefing
note
the
the
table.
When
you
see
the
a
component,
we
when
we
show
on
the
top
line,
the
additional
increase,
the
block-
one,
for
example,
on
option
one
would
be
a
point:
zero
five,
eight
percent
increase
to
the
block
one
rate
for
each
percentage,
point
drop.
D
So
if
you,
if
you
looked
at
option
two,
which
would
be
a
a
one-year
implementation
of
a
five
percent
change,
the
discount
factor,
you
would
have
to
increase
the
block
one
rate
by
0.3
of
a
percent.
So
on
top
of
on
top
of
the
requested
rate,
increase
right
now,
you'd
have
to
add
another
point.
Three
and.
D
B
B
B
D
I,
don't
remember
that
specific.
Why
I
do
remember
in
general.
The
conclusion
is
that
there
are
quite
a
number
of
cost
factors
for
a
manufacturer
within
the
city
and
that
water
was
not
really
the
major
determinant
of
whether
an
industry
state
or
not,
even
if
it
was
a
large
water
user,
it
was
a
lower
cost
input
to
manufacturing
and.
B
A
D
Mr.
chair,
yes,
when
we
restructured
the
water
rate,
we
brought
report
forward
in
2007.
We
we
had
a
former
7
Block
tiered
system
and
inverted
you
as
they
called
it.
In
the
industry,
we
recommended
going
to
one
block
with
a
second
block
discounted
for
large
water
users
and
we
phased
in
that
transition.
We
started
with
a
20%
discount
factor,
and
each
year
we
held
back
the
increases
to
only
1/3
of
the
residential
and
all
other
user.
D
G
So
we
did
all
that,
for
them
got
rid
of
any
flat
rate
areas
in
the
city
for
residential
users,
raised
residential
users
9
percent
a
year
every
year
for
nine
years
and
then
stepped
down
to
three.
We
had
some
5%
years,
so
we've
done
a
big
adjustment
to
residential
to
make
them.
You
know
fairly
charged
in
comparison
to
other
GTA
municipalities
and
other
major
cities
in
the
province.
G
D
Three,
mr.
chair:
yes,
when
we
compare
the
block
to
rate,
it
remains
competitive
with
other
GTA
municipalities,
with
with
a
few
anomalies
in
southern
Ontario,
where
some
some
municipalities
been
very
aggressive,
giving
a
greater
discount
to
large
water
users,
but
for
the
most
part,
we're
in
that
lower
band
of
of
being
competitive.
We're.
D
Those
all
those
previous
programs
have
achieved
what
we
wanted
them
to
do
and
that's
and
that's
to
keep
the
water
rate
to
be
affordable
for
large
water
users.
We
do
look
at
affordability
every
year.
We
present
that
information
do
this
to
this
committee,
as
we
compare
our
rates
to
other
jurisdictions
right.
Thank
you.
Thank.
C
C
C
To
page
six,
second
briefly
note:
requests
of
the
parking
authority.
It's
we're
a
briefly
note
number
twelve,
two
parts
to
that.
The
first
was
request
that,
in
consultation
with
the
general
manager,
transportation
provided
firm,
a
Chinon,
the
metrics
of
the
discounts
given
as
part
of
the
king
street
pilot,
whether
these
incentives
continue
to
be
necessary
and,
secondly,
that
the
general
manager,
transportation,
chief
planner,
bring
data
to
assist
City
Council
with
reviewing
whether
Toronto
parking
authority
discounts
are
still
necessary.
So
we
have
before
you
the
one
on
King
Street
transit
pilot
discounts.
C
What
it
identifies
is
that
a
discount
was
offered
in
2018
I,
had
a
cost
of
five
hundred
nine
and
a
half
thousand
dollars
with
78
over
almost
seventy
nine
thousand
uses.
The
assumption
is
that
if
it
were
to
be
extended
for
a
six-month
period
into
2019,
that
would
have
a
revenue
loss
about
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
there
is
work
being
done
to
evaluate
the
pilot
and
with
the
data
to
be
collected,
and
that
will
be
coming
back
to
look
at
those
considerations
for
the
future
questions.
A
C
All
right,
so,
turning
to
page
seven,
we
now
have
motions
that
are
before
us
regarding
these
three
groups,
so
the
first
one
was
placed
at
our
last
meeting
and
that
will
be
referred
to
the
final
wrap-up,
which
is
consideration
being
given
to
approving
an
industrial
waste
surcharge.
That
would
then
be
moving
forward
to
the
final
wrap-up
again
if
we
went
if
this
were
to
be
recommended
to
go
forward.
That
would
have
a
two
hundred
four
thousand
dollar
revenue
impact
over
the
six
year
period.
C
B
C
B
F
F
D
Mr.
chair,
if
I
could
jump
in
that's
as
I
do
recall
this
debate
from
a
former
councillor
and,
and
so
the
the
issue
was
about
topping
up
the
the
contribution
that
trommel
water
already
makes
to
tree
canopy,
which
is
about
two
million
a
year.
So
we
fund
that
every
year
and
have
so
per
greater
part
of
more
than
a
decade
now,
and-
and
so
there
was
a
one-time
draw
to
bump
up
the
parks
reserve.
D
That
was
three
million,
along
with
a
recommendation
that
we
look
at
adding
five
million
year
to
top
it
up,
even
more
the
premise
being
that
we
should
replace
trees
that
we
damaged
during
construction.
We
do
our
that
already,
when,
when
we
do
construction
work,
whether
it's
completed
by
ECS
or
engineering,
construction
group
or
trial
water,
we
put
in
that
budget,
the
replacement
of
trees.
We
work
with
forestry
and
have
a
plan
that
reinstates
it
and
it's
embedded
already
in
our
capital.
So
what
we
saw
this
as
being
redundant
redundant
need
sure.
C
A
recommendation
that
was
made
last
year
during
the
budget
process
to
draw
3
and
a
half
million
dollars
out
and
to
contribute
those
funds
to
the
Meno
Reznor
project
which
is
under
I,
believe
the
T
rca's
Authority.
Then
the
request
was
to
see
of
Toronto.
Water
could
replenish
up
to
3
million
of
it.
So.
C
B
G
Okay,
okay,
the
pen
you
just
draw
for
the
big
thud,
but
just
to
just
to
put
a
point
on
this
for
the
for
the
new
councilors.
The
the
purpose
stated
here
in
the
motion
is,
is
the
key
to
the
redundancy
here
built
in
to
the
built
into
the
project.
Cost
of
each
project
is:
is
the
cost
of
restoring
front
lawns
and
boulevards
and
and
replacing
trees
if
they're
not
protected?.
D
Three-Room
is
sure,
that's
correct
if
we
damage
any
trees
in
the
roadway,
we
will
replace
them
and,
in
fact,
if
we're
doing
large
projects,
we
work
very
closely
with
our
colleagues
in
forestry
to
have
a
planting
plan
behind
it.
I
could
think
of
water
plot
ponds
that
we
built
where
we
did
take
down
some
trees
and
we
replanted
double
the
amount
behind
it.
So
we
work
out
right.
D
Right
the
same
rules
and
if
not
enhanced,
because
we
already
contribute
2
million
a
year
on
the
budget
on
top
of
the
Capitol.
So
we
have
allocations
within
our
specific
capital
projects
and
then,
on
top
of
it,
there's
a
separate
line.
Item
2
million
a
year
for
for
just
general
tree
replacement,
and
so
we
work
closely
with
the
director
on
how
best
to
use
those
monies.
So.
G
D
C
I
hope
that
was
enlightening.
Next
item-
page
seven,
solid
waste
management
services,
so
city
council,
its
meeting
on
January
30th
adopted
motion
directing
the
general
manager
solid
ways
to
provide
each
city
councillor
the
opportunity
to
host
second
community
environment
day
undertake
the
administrative
process
of
booking
one
additional
one
and
preparation
for
the
19th
season,
pending
the
outcome
of
the
2019
budget
process.
C
So
that's
before
you
as
a
motion.
What
is
currently
in
the
solid
waste
management
services
budget
is
605,000
for
one
community
environment
day
in
each
ward
and
I
understand
that
some
work
is
being
done
to
look
at
the
administrative
process
to
how
that
could
be
supported
and
the
GM's
here
to
speak
to
any
questions
that
you
might
have
councillor.
E
E
What
was
the
amount
spent
on
this
in
2018
through
you,
mr.
chair
to
the
councillor
I,
believe
it
was
around
$900,000?
That
was
the
budget.
I'll
just
have
to
double
check
with
my
team
here
on
the
exact
cost
of
the
entire
program,
and
then
so
this
605
is
edition.
So
what
is
the
total
cost
for
2019
if
everybody
gets
to
sew
through
you?
Mr.
E
chair
to
the
counselor,
the
total
budget
for
this
year
is
anticipated
to
be
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
total,
so
not
an
additional
to
that
nine
hundred
thousand,
but
that
includes
so
sir
okay
I
want
to
make
sure
I'm
clear
on
that.
So
it
was
nine
hundred
last
year
now
you're
thinking
total
at
605
and
not
includes,
if
counselors
still
have
to
know
so
through
you,
mr.
E
chair
to
the
counselor
there,
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
would
be
for
one
per
ward,
we're
currently
reviewing
our
practices
and
our
job
duties
and
staffing
requirements
for
days
to
see
if
we
can
accomplish
an
additional
idees
per
ward
within
that
allotted
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
that
will
be
brought
forward.
If
a
briefing
note
is
approved
by
council
to
discuss
next
week,
okay,
perfect
that
sorry,
that's
where
the
confusion
was
okay,
great!
Thank
you!
I
just.
A
G
Can
I
just
I
just
want
to
put
a
fine
point,
because
I
think
my
question
and
and
with
respect
counselor
McKelvey's
was
a
bit
different.
My
question
was
whether
or
not
he
can
estimate
by
polling
the
counselors
who's
actually
gonna
want
to,
because
it
isn't
all
of
us
so
not
just
if
we
do
to,
but
to
the
best
of
our
knowledge
what
it
would
cost
to
accommodate.
The
motion,
which
was
at
the
request
of
so.
E
Through
you,
mr.
chair
to
the
counselor,
we
are
working
on
the
assumption
that
we
will
be
providing
to
to
every
ward
and
working
to
to
identify
the
resources
required
to
move
that
forward,
and
we
are
right
now
canvassing
counselors
offices
to
see
which
counsel
would
like
to
have
to.
But
we
will
be
working
on
the
assumption
that
there
are
two
per
ward
and
be
bringing
that
back
with
the
brief
you
know.
Next
week,
counselor.
G
E
E
I'm
surprised
this
is
an
awful
lot
of
money
for
environment
Dave
had
no
idea,
but
is
there
any
way
that
you
can
give
us
I
mean
there
might
be
a
way
for
us
to
find
savings
from
this
amount.
That
can
just
tell
us
exactly
what
the
$605,000
provides
like.
Maybe
there
are
certain
things
that
we
don't
need
and
we
can
still
host
an
environment
day
without
without
without
being
true,
rather
than
one
that
there
must
be
a
way.
This
is
awfully
expensive.
So
through
you,
mr.
chair
counselor,
that
information
will
be
provided
in
the
briefing.
C
E
E
E
B
And
perhaps
I'd
just
take
this
as
more
of
a
statement
in
case
the
briefing
notes
being
prepared:
I
counsel,
none
Giada,
no,
no
I'm
gonna
say
something
positive
is
I
I
think
she
may
be
getting
there
a
little
bit
because
there
there
are
those
of
us
that
probably
don't
need
the
full
contingent
at
either
either
environment
day
or
at
a
secondary
environment
day,
but
could
certainly
use
the
hazardous
waste.
Pickup
could
use
the
compost
drop.
B
That
are
there
about
other
issues.
That
probably
once
would
be
sufficient.
So
if
there's
a
way
of
crafting
this
in
such
a
way
that
allows
for
more
at
a
less
expensive
rate,
I
think
you
might
find
that
you
have
some.
There
might
be
counselors
at
want
fall,
but
there
may
be
some
that
opt
for
an
environment,
daylight,
I,
think.
A
E
Quickly
from
the
environment
days
last
year
and
to
help
people
decide,
you
know
what
what
they
need.
Do
you
know
what
was
picked
up
in
all
the
different
words
and
the
volumes
so
that
that
could
help
them
if
you
turned
it
to
like
a
menu,
and
you
pick
and
choose
that
that
would
help
counselors
with
selections
through
you,
mr.
chair
to
the
counselor,
we
can
provide
that
in
the
briefing
note
as
well
what
materials
generally
are
collected
in
in
specific
areas
and
the
overall
volumes
of
those
materials.
C
So
that
takes
care
of
solid
waste.
So,
finally,
there
was
one
motion
that
was
place
at
the
last
meeting
that
will
be
referred
to
final
wrap-up,
that's
on
page
8
regarding
the
Toronto
parking
authority.
I
will
read
that,
but
that
was
tabled
at
the
last
minute.
I'll
get
referred
and
dealt
with
for
a
report
back
as
part
of
the
2020
budget
process.
Okay,
all
right.
So
turning
to
page
9.
Now
it's
any
reports
for
consideration
before
you.
So
for
Toronto
water.
It's
the
budget
notes
recommending
the
operating
budget.
C
The
recommendations
are
highlighted
here
before
you,
so
approval
of
the
operating
budget
does
provide
Authority
for
the
delivery
of
the
services
and
a
capital
from
current
contribution.
That
then
helps
to
fund
our
capital,
and
you
can
see
the
value
for
2019
and,
of
course
this
has
to
be
considered
with
the
rate
report.
That's
also
before
you
and
if
you
turn
the
page
on
to
ten,
it
says
the
report
here
sets
out
the
rates
and
service
fees
for
2019.
C
C
Okay,
so
moving
to
page
13
for
solid
waste
management
services.
Similarly,
we
have
the
recommendations
on
the
operating
budget
which
are
found
starting
on
the
bottom
of
page
13.
So
if
you
turn
to
page
14,
you
can
see
the
allocation
or
the
funding
of
each
of
the
services
in
in
solid
waste.
Their
capital
from
current
contribution
is
twenty
million
dollars
to
help
pay
for
their
capital
program
and
then
on
page
fifteen
is
the
report
that
recommends
the
solid
waste
rates
and
fees
for
2019.
C
G
C
G
C
So
we're
now
going
to
move
to
the
Toronto
parking
authority
on
page
17.
So
this
is
the
balance
of
the
bike
share
program
report.
That's
before
you
as
it
relates
to
the
operating
side.
So
essentially,
what
this
report
is
trying
to
set
out
are
the
financial
principles
to
continue
with
the
bike
share
program,
understanding
that
we
have
had
deficits
in
the
past.
C
Again,
it's
a
three
program,
three
services
that
are
provided
and
net
revenue
of
sixty
six
and
a
half
million
dollars,
of
which
some
of
that
goes
to
to
them
for
retained
earnings,
to
pay
for
the
capital
and
through
the
income.
Sharing
agreement
comes
to
the
city,
and
that
would
be
in
town.
Mr.
chair.
A
What
I
was
gonna
suggest
is
I
have
some
motions
that
are
just
administrative
to
move
everything
to
next
week
to
make
a
decision
and
I
had
that.
One
brief
room
note
request
for
the
environment
days:
I
thought
we
could.
We
could
move
all
that
now,
so
we
can
get
the
right
done
so
at
least
they're
done
and
staff
don't
have
to
wait
around
councillor
Auckland
Council
Annunziata
had
one
more
so
why
don't
I
they're
in
pink
in
front
of
you
so
I've
distributed
them.
A
A
E
C
C
C
Almost
twenty
million
dollars
for
state
of
good
repair
projects
or
about
fifty
percent,
but
with
that
we're
seeing
a
decline
in
in
our
state
of
good
repair,
but
once
you
pull
back
the
Gardiner
Expressway
revitalization
in
Toronto
water,
it's
actually
going
up.
We
have
contributors
to
that
increase,
which
include,
of
course,
transportation
services
with
updated
asset
values.
The
addition
of
our
TCH
C
backlog,
estimate
and
I
just
want
to
be
really
clear.
That's
in
the
absence
of
any
additional
funding.
C
Beyond
the
interim
funding,
that's
been
provided
to
the
end
of
xix
working
on
strategies
going
forward.
That
number
would
be
coming
down
and
we
are
expected
to
report
back
this
year.
Moving
forward
on
that.
So
we
have
some
additional
amounts
where
we're
seeing
programs
going
higher,
TTC
facilities,
parks,
forestry
and
Recreation
and
Toronto
Public
Library.
This
does
not
clued
the
latest
information
that
we've
received
from
TTC
on
their
capital
investment
plan.
C
C
We
need
to
continue
the
work
we
do
on
aligning
our
cash
flow
funding
with
project
activities
based
on
stage
gating
and
readiness
to
proceed,
because
our
we're
still
seeing
underspending
in
this
area
and
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
you
know
other
funding
strategies
to
help
support
the
city
in
trying
to
reduce
this
backlog.
And
of
course,
we
have
to
set
priorities
not
only
for
backlog,
for
state
of
good
repair
projects,
but
up
against
the
service
improvement
in
growth
projects,
so
that
we
can
move
this
information
forward.
I
guess.
C
C
C
C
I
I
I
I
C
I
C
Seeing
over
the
10-year
period,
a
change
of
2.6
billion,
so
that's
a
major
increase.
Okay,
that
is
the
result
of
updated
information
and
audits,
as
well
as
assets
coming
to
the
end
of
their
useful
life
for
the
TTC.
The
number
that's
represented
there
729
and
only
reflects
that
portion
of
the
capital
that
goes
below
the
line
because
of
their
capacity
to
spend.
So
we
have
yet
to
do
the
work
around
the
capital
improvement
plan,
estimates
so
that
will
grow
parks,
forestry
and
recreation
actually.
C
Well,
you
can
see
the
numbers
here:
Public
Library
again,
Toronto
Community,
Housing
Corporation.
This
is
the
first
year
we've
had
this
estimate
added
to
our
backlog
and
again
it's
in
the
absence
of
any
additional
funding
which
we
know
we
have
work
to
do
both
with
them
and
with
our
other
orders
of
government.
In
terms,
if.
I
I,
if
I
could
pause
on
that
one
for
a
minute,
so
going
back
the
idea.
That
was
that
we
would
do
a
third,
a
third,
a
third
and
actually,
as
I
recall,
the
proposal
was
that
we
would
get
a
sales
tax.
This
is
to
city
managers
ago
to
pay
our
third.
Do
we
have
in
hand
an
agreement
from
the
federal
government
for
their
third,
the
provincial
government
for
Arthur,
and
do
we
have
a
proposal
for
their
third
and
do
we
have
a
proposal
for
where
the
money
would
come
from
for
our
third.
C
C
G
Was
just
trying
to
I
was
trying
to
square
the
circle
when,
when
you
gave
councillor
perks,
the
number
seven
and
a
half
billion
grows
to
nine
and
a
half
billion,
but
the
percentage
of
assets
goes
down
because
the
Gardner
hybrid
is
a
state
of
good
repair
project.
Let's
classify
the
state
of
good
repair.
Yes,
so
if
I,
if
I
pull
it
out,
if
I
wanted
to
pull
it
out
of
these
numbers,
I'd
only
have
to
I'd
pull
it
out
of
the
the
number
today
and
then
it
disappears
from
the
state
of
good
repair
backlog.
G
C
G
Apologize
for
taking
a
while
to
get
there
I'll
just
flag,
for
you
know
the
reason
it
took
me
a
while
to
get
there
the
briefing
note
in
the
agenda
just
now
the
links
to
the
briefing
notes
in
the
on
the
tax-supported
one
I
couldn't
open
it
on
the
briefing
note
online
version,
so
I
just
but
I
found.
My
I
found
my
way
there
through
the
the
budget
page.
So
so
on
page
4,
the
the
chart
I'm
looking
at
shows
me
what
that's
the
accumulated
backlog
without
the
gardener
in
it.
G
C
C
Okay,
bottom
page
3,
again,
that's
coming
from
our
four
financial
planning,
it's
not
before
you!
Yet
we
are
still
working
on
this.
This
was
a
request
for
the
estimated
unmet
capital
needs
for
the
City
of
Toronto
over
the
10-year
period,
so
that
would
be
here
for
the
February
20th
wrap-up
meeting,
turning
the
page
to
page
4.
C
So
those
were
the
corporate
ones
now
we'll
get
into
the
program
specific
ones.
The
first
is
for
economic
development
and
culture,
briefing,
note
number
14
and
it
was
a
request
about
the
delays
to
building
condition
audits
and
will
there
be
any
risk
or
damage
associated
with
that.
So
that
briefing
note
is
here
for
your
consideration.
B
J
A
B
A
C
Next,
one
shelter,
support
in
housing
is
briefing
note,
number
22,
requests
on
the
current
status
and
estimated
cost
of
funding,
Regent
Park
phases,
four
and
five,
including
the
social
development
plan
in
the
new
community
safety
plan.
So
that's
here
before
you
and
based
on
current
tcht
projections,
the
cost
for
phase
four
is
a
hundred
and
thirty
2.4
million
and
two
hundred
sixteen
point.
K
K
They're
there,
through
the
chair,
there
have
been
modifications
to
the
Regent
Park
plan.
If
you
take
a
look
at
the
original
plan
that
was
approved
in
2006,
it
didn't
incorporate
a
large
park
in
the
middle
of
the
community.
It
didn't
include
any
of
the
MLSE
sports
fields,
the
Daniel
spectrum,
the
Aquatic
Center,
so
there
have
been
there
have
been
modifications
along
the
way.
We
also
went
for
a
rezoning
in
2013.
Thank.
A
Colleagues,
I
just
got
a
request
from
the
clerk's
office.
They
may
not
be
able
to
be
here
to
answer
questions
when
we
get
to
they're
operating.
It's
the
so
I'm
just
wondering
if
it's
possible.
It's
briefing
note
number
36
from
City
Clerk's,
which
is
a
2022
projected
election
costs
and
I'm
just
wondering
if
we
could
go
to
it's
the
green
sheets
I'm
just
wondering,
if
maybe
we
could
go
to
that
one
first.
So
it's
on
the
green
sheets,
briefing
note
number
36,
it's
in
the
green
sheets
for
operating
I,
don't
know
who
councillor
perks.
C
A
C
C
I
F
I
But
you
can't
go
out
for
an
RFP
until
we
put
something
in
the
budget,
so
maybe
to
the
city
manager,
which
came
first,
this
chicken
or
this
egg
I
mean
we.
We
have
these
things
that
are
at
the
end
of
their
life.
I'm
told
I
can't
find
out
how
much
it
costs
unless
we
put
money
in,
and
we
can't
put
money
until
we
know
how
much
it
costs.
So,
how
do
we
get
out
of
this
conundrum?
Mr.
F
Chair,
if
I
can
take
a
stab
at
answering
the
question,
the
Municipal
Elections
Act
actually
gives
the
clerk
what
I
call
requisitioning
Authority
for
election
costs.
So
when
we
expend
money,
we
are
required
to
simply
certify
those
costs
and
the
section
says
the
municipality
shall
pay.
It
does
not
give
the
city
a
choice.
So
are
your.
I
F
That's
what
it
says
and
that's
what
our
briefing
note
explains
and
there's
reasons
for
that
which
are
obviously
to
ensure
that
democracy
is
protected
and
that
we
are
not
required
to
take
shortcuts
if
it
were,
if
I
can
say
that
in
order
to
run
an
election,
so
I
think
what
we
will
do
and-
and
there
is
a
note,
I
think
in
the
budget.
Currently
it's
16,
roughly
16
million
dollars.
I
expect
it
could
be
more.
It
could
be
less.
I
I
Understand
so
in
either
world,
let's
say
you
do
it
as
a
capital
cost.
It
could
be
an
annual
contribution
to
a
reserve
over
X
number
of
years.
If
it's
a
leasing
cost,
it
would
just
be
a
running
thing.
So
I'm
really
am
gonna
push
your
hair.
To
give
me.
Let's
say
you
want
to
amortize
it
over
10
years
and
or
do
Elise
what
placeholder
number
would
be
the
best
and
of
course
we
can
adjust
it
next
year
if
we're
to
hire
to
loan
I.
F
Can't
tell
you
what
there
is
counselor.
What
I
can
ask
is
financial
planning
to
address
an
issue
of
a
strategy
for
funding
the
unknown
number
at
this
point
and
I,
do
you
know
you
all
know
that
it
was
in
the
budget
for
many
years
as
a
question
mark
and
the
number
did
get
lowered,
but
I
can't
tell
you
what
that
numbers
gonna
be
okay,.
I
C
G
A
quick
question,
so
we
heard
about
this
certification
Authority,
so
you
don't
need
it.
You
don't
need
a
motion
from
us
to
to
give
you
the
authority
to
come
back
in
2020,
but
given
the
length
of
procurement,
etc.
We
should
expect
to
see
some
dialogue
about
this,
and
the
next
analysts
notes
are
the
ones
after
that.
Mr.
F
F
C
Okay,
so
we
were
on
page
five,
mr.
chair,
so
through
you
we're
now
moving
to
the
bottom
of
page
five
corporate
services,
there
was
briefing
note
number
31
directed
to
the
general
manager
facilities
management,
asking
about
whether
the
deferral
of
payment
towards
accessibility
for
Ontarians,
with
Disabilities
Act,
puts
the
city
of
were
at
risk
of
being
out
of
compliance
with
the
province
mandated
deadline.
C
So
the
briefing
note
outlines
that
the
dekappa
plan
actually
has
one
hundred
ninety
two
point:
five
million
to
fund
the
implementation
for
city
facilities
that
was
actually
provided
in
2018
and
that
they've
looked
at
various
measures
to
streamline
the
implementation
to
ensure
that
everything
is
being
done
by
2025,
as
well
as
measures
to
mitigate
any
risks.
So
the
the
fact
that
there's
approved
multi-year
funding
is
actually
to
help
move
that
forward
and
mitigate
the
risks
to
any
program
delivery.
B
H
Through
the
chair,
when
we
did
the
original
forecast
and
17
for
the
18
through
27,
we
had
just
started
the
audits
of
the
AODA
of
the
facility,
so
it
was
more
of
a
projected
spend
on
what
we
knew.
Then
in
18
we
completed
all
of
the
audits
and
had
conducted
jurisdictional
scans
on
the
best
way
to
approach
the
program,
and
now
that
we
knew
exactly
what
was
what
was
required
in
each
of
the
facilities
and
knew
how
to
realign
the
program
implementation.
H
B
H
What
we
completed
them
because
we
were
doing
427,
we
broke
it
up
into
lots
and
there
was
so
much
information,
a
lot
of
information
that
we
received
on
each
of
them,
because
we
were
doing
both
AODA
audits,
as
well
as
the
Toronto
accessibility
design
guidelines.
So
there's
a
lot
of
information
for
all
the
facilities.
H
We've
actually
now
created
a
database
to
actually
load
all
that
information
and
because
it's
important
that,
over
the
course
of
the
program
that
we
actually
document
what
we've
completed
in
each
buildings
and
also
to
support
people
aquitine
human
rights
on
their
reporting.
So
we
want
to
be
able
to
track
all
of
the
reporting
as
well.
It's
a
very
large
program
based
on
the
amount
of
work
we
need
to
do
so.
We
want
to
be
very
succinct
on
delivering
this
project.
H
H
So
what
we've
done
is
is
as
through
through
the
through
the
capital
funding
as
well.
We've
allotted
for
a
three
FTE,
a
senior
project
manager,
project
manager
and
a
program
project
coordinator
just
strictly
to
deliver
on
that
on
the
program,
the
delivery,
so
that
they'll
focus
on
working
with
the
design
groups
to
get
the
the
tenders
out
and
then
the
actual
PMO
project
team
will
then
do
the
delivery
of
the
project.
So
we're
separating
that
out.
H
B
And
just
finally
there's
a
pretty
hefty
number
that
could
result
that
we
could
be
fined
as
a
result
of
not
completing
our
our
AODA
requirements.
We've
got
a
report
back
in
this
year
in
December
this
year
on
our
on
our
status.
Should
we
be
concerned
with
generating
a
significant
fine
from
the
provincial
government
or
not.
H
B
G
This
is
this
really
does
this
really
give
effect
to
capital?
Coordination
are
some
of
the
20
million?
Is
that,
because
in
facilities
managed
places,
we
were
doing
the
AODA
work
in
conjunction
with
other
capital
works,
and
so
we've
just
by
jurisdictional
scan
you
mean
you
went
looking
to
see
when
other
projects
were
happening.
No.
H
H
We
did
it
with
looked
at
financial
institutions
that
have
multi
locations
across
the
country,
so
what
we
did
was
so
the
jurisdictional
scan
came
back
that
what
they
did
is
they
did
RFP
to
get
one
design
firm
architecture
firm
to
go
for
the
duration
of
the
project,
so
they
would
set
up
a
team
just
to
do
design
and
then
do
a
team
just
so
that
we
can
bundle
tenders
because
you
know
we
want
so
they
would
bundling
the
tenders
and
tenders
of
ten.
We
looked
at
each
of
our
client
groups,
like
Toronto
police.
H
You
know
fire
and
EMS
to
make
sure
our
ternal
paramedic
services
to
make
sure
that
we're
only
doing
five
or
six
a
year
with
them
so
that
you
know
we're
not
impeding
their
operations
as
well,
so
that
that's
that
was
the
jurisdictional
scan.
So
it
was
the
best
practice
on
how
to
deliver
a
multi-year
multi
like
projects.
So.
G
H
G
C
Page
seven
another
request:
a
briefing
note
from
the
deputy
city
manager,
Corporate
Services,
its
briefing
note
number
32,
with
the
around
the
into
what,
when
the
st.
Lawrence
Market
says,
construction
project
business
case
is
anticipated
when
I
will
be
completed
and
in
the
status.
So
that
briefing
notes
before
you.
It
highlights
that
the
South
construction
project
is
currently
at
90
percent
detailed
design
of
completion.
C
That
work
also
includes
bringing
forward
a
business
case
on
the
financial
performance
of
the
newly
renovated
lower
level
and
comparing
what
the
revenue
and
performance
would
be
after
the
renovation
versus
right
now,
and
that
the
report
will
be
coming
forward
in
q2
that
seeks
Council's
approval
for
design
in
the
business
case
and
should
that
move
forward.
It'll
be
another
priority
to
be
considered
as
part
of
the
2020
budget
process.
A
L
Thank
you
very
much,
mr.
chair
and
through
you
with
respect
to
the
business
plan
that
is
going
to
be
designed
in
consultation
with
the
st.
Lawrence
precinct,
Advisory
Committee.
What
would
be
the
evaluation
framework
for
that?
How
you
determine
which
direction
to
go?
There
are
a
lot
of
long
term,
stakeholders
and
and
occupants
who
have
a
particular
way
of
conducting
business.
There
will
be
obviously
a
retail
strategy
that
will
have
to
come
into
play.
I
will
be
able
to
that.
L
H
Through
the
chair,
those
are
all
good
points
and
those
are
all.
Factors
are
going
to
be
layered.
On
top
of
making
the
decision
on
a
go-forward
basis,
some
considerations
will
be
provided
perhaps
through
phasing
the
project
if
it
does
have
those
impacts.
In
order
for
us
not
to
interrupt
the
the
current
fabric
of
the
st.
Lawrence,
Market
precinct
and.
L
H
L
H
L
C
So
we're
on
page
eight
three
mr.
chair
a
request
again
from
the
for
the
general
manager
facilities
management
to
provide
a
brief.
You
know
listing
all
the
security
cost
changes
operating
in
capital,
so
briefing
note
number
34.
It
provides
both
the
cap
on
the
operating
on
page
eight
it
out
lot.
It
outlines
the
capital
costs
and
if
you
watch
it
address
the
operating
at
the
same
time,
its
page
28
of
the
green
sheets
that
outlines
the
operating.
C
Mr.
chair,
we
just
dealt
with
the
City
Clerk's
briefing
note
number
36,
so
we
can
turn
now
to
page
10.
That
concludes
briefing
note:
requests
related
to
the
capital
program,
the
tax-supported
capital
program,
starting
on
page
10,
our
motions
that
replace
at
the
last
meeting
that
we
would
be
considering
at
our
net
our
final
wrap-up,
the
first
for
city
planning
regarding
the
section
of
the
amount
of
section
37
funds
to
be
secured
for
affordable
housing
over
the
next
five
years.
C
The
next
motion
was
for
the
Toronto
Transit
Commission,
asking
a
city
council
asking
city
manager
to
work
with
the
TTC
and
report
back
again
for
the
2020
budget
process,
on
requests
made
to
the
other
orders
of
government
for
operating
and
capital
investments
and
projected
funds
available
from
other
orders
of
government
in
the
ten
year
program.
So
that's
a
motion
to
come
back
on
page
11
is
emotions,
a
members
motion
that
came
as
a
referral
to
this
budget
process.
C
Back
in
June
member
motion
43
point
four:
eight:
it
was
entitled
development
charges
for
the
Leslie
Naimark
Toronto
Community
Housing
Corporation
redevelopment.
So
a
direction
was
given
from
Council
to
consider
a
one-time
increase
in
funding
to
TCH,
see
to
fully
compensate
them
for
any
reduction
in
profit
from
the
live.
C
Leslie
Naimark
revitalization
project
due
to
development
charge,
increases
related
to
construction
delays,
so
what
we
actually
have
in
the
capital
program
when
we
provided
interim
funding
to
TCH
C,
we
provided
state
of
good
repair
funding
for
two
years,
as
well
as
in-flight
rebuy,
light
Asian
projects
so
in
the
shelter
support,
housings
capital
budget
for
2019
is
almost
twenty
two
million
dollars
to
fully
fund
the
the
Leslie
Naimark
project,
but
there
is
no
additional
funds
for
any
changes
in
the
cost
of
development
charges.
In
my
understanding
this,
that
is
potentially
an
impact.
G
Some
questions
here,
because
this
this
is
a
long
story
as
revitalizations
often
are,
but
it's
a
situation
that
could
happen
in
any
of
them,
so
the
the
the
intent
here
I
think
it
was
councilors
Shriner
who
helped
councillors
out
with
this.
The
intent
here
is
to
make
sure
that,
as
in
any
revitalization,
TCH
see
isn't
bearing
the
development
charge
impact
through.
G
K
G
If
this
motion
was
referred
to
the
2020
budget
process,
if
that's
in
order
mr.
chair,
because
we
would
know
the
exact
amount,
then,
if
the
if
the
bill
came
due
and
TCH
see,
were
required
to
to
pay
up,
would
they
be
able
to
absorb
it?
If,
if
council
was
to
be
able
to
to
address
this
in
the
2020
budget,
or
would
you
have
to
come
to
us
for
an
in
your
adjustment.
E
G
G
Okay,
okay,
so
we'll
dress
that
bye-bye,
it's
possible
that
I
could
work
with
staff
to
come
up
with
emotion
if
I
wrap
up
that
actually
makes
sure
that
we're
doing
that
I
understand
this
was
referred
to
budget
because
it
wasn't
clear
if
we
were,
we
were
making
TC
HC
hole
or
the
private
developer
hole.
Now
there
were
clear:
it's
the
TC
HC
amount,
we're
concerned
about.
Can
I
can
I
move
a
motion
that
last
minute
wrap-up
yeah.
G
C
Number
of
motions
that
are
before
you
on
our
capital
program,
so
moving
to
page
12,
we
now
will
be
addressing
reports
and
referrals
for
consideration.
So
the
first
one
is
item
3.4
F,
that's
on
the
clerk's
agenda.
It's
a
letter
dated
from
City
Council
and
vision,
0,
road
safety
plan,
implementation
of
community
safety
zones
and
the
recommendations
directing
budget
reconsider,
funding
the
implementation
of
the
community
safety
zones
and
every
school
in
Toronto,
including
high
schools
and
private
schools,
part
of
the
2019
budget.
M
The
chair
in
2018,
a
million
dollars
provided
us
with
implementation
at
three
hundred
and
five
G
schools.
The
1.25
in
2019
would
enable
us
to
do
an
additional
400
schools,
bringing
the
number
to
750
the
the
additional
200
sites
have
not
yet
been
by
LOD,
so
they're
not
included
in
this
funding
request.
So
so
that's
the
amount
that
we
requested
in
order
to
accelerate
the
program
to
get
it
completed
and.
C
Item
3.4
G
again
it's
a
letter,
it's
from
City
Council
regarding
implementation
of
additional
road
safety
measures
of
accelerating
the
vision,
zero
road
safety
plan,
so
that
is
the
for
Budget
Committee,
for
consideration
about
the
allocation
of
additional
funds
for
the
vision,
zero
project.
On
the
right-hand
side,
it
gives
a
bit
of
a
history
around
what
was
funded
in
2018,
which
accelerated
the
then
five-year
plan.
So
there
was
three
years
worth
of
funds.
M
M
M
The
chair
we
committed
the
entire
twenty
two
million
I
believe.
Actually
it
was
twenty
four,
because
we
did
additional
work
with
Toronto
Hydro.
That
was
able
to
be
accommodated
through
our
base.
We
were
able
to
spend
approximately
fourteen
million
by
the
end
of
December
and
the
rest.
We
needed
to
wait
for
the
good
weather
to
complete
in
2019,
but
that's
that
work
is
programmed.
We.
B
M
Through
the
chair,
I'm
I
kind
of
say
that
it
was
probably
better
placed
in
the
2018
budget,
given
the
technologies
that
we
brought
online,
that
we
were
not
yet
utilizing
in
2017,
so
I
think
there
was
more
ability
for
us
to
implement
a
broader
suite
of
tools
that
were
envisioned
in
the
2016
plan
that
council
adopted,
but
really
needed
a
little
bit
more
technical
work
to
be
able
to
understand
what
that
role.
That
would
be
there.
B
M
The
chair,
I
actually
think
it's
we've
been
working
very
hard
to
get
a
lot
of
projects
designed
into
the
capital
budget
and
through
the
coordination
process,
so
that
we
can
really
deliver
significantly
in
ninth
and
2021,
which
is
the
two
years
that
we
need
to
do
that
coordination.
So
I'm,
not
sure
it's
really
a
staffing
issue,
it's
really
a
project
design
issue
and
a
project
coordination
issue.
Given
that
we
have
a
lot
of
coordination
requirements
with
with
our
other
municipal
partners.
Okay,.
B
A
C
C
So
seeing
if
there
are
no
questions
there,
we
turn
to
page
15
transmittal
from
the
Board
of
Health
regarding
Toronto
public
house
capital
plan.
So
what
the
Board
of
Health
has
recommended
versus
what
we
have
in
the
10
year,
capital
plan
as
staff
is
not
the
same.
So
what
we
have
that's
before
you,
the
staff
recommended
capital
budget
plan,
includes
an
additional
six
hundred
and
sixty
thousand
dollars
for
funding
being
carried
forward
for
2018
projects
are
underway.
So
the
numbers
are
a
little
bit
higher
in
that
regard.
C
It
was
deemed
that
this
should
wait
a
year,
so
that
decision
happened
after.
The
item
was
before
the
Board
of
Health,
but
for
all
intents
and
purposes,
except
for
Kerry
Ford
funding
in
the
one
project
and,
what's
before
you
is,
for
the
most
part,
consistent
with
Board
of
Health
recommendations,
questions.
C
So
the
final
one
is
the
transmittal
from
the
Toronto
Transit
Commission.
So
overall,
what
we
have
before
us
is
a
10
year.
Capital
plan.
That's
six
point:
four:
five:
three
billion
for
the
base
TTC
program.
It
is
because
well,
staff
recommended
capital
plan
is
exactly
the
same
as
it
relates
to
the
Scarborough
subway
extension
of
3.3
billion
it
we
the
same.
There
is
a
closeout
amount
of
money
of
sixty
million
for
the
the
Toronto
York
extension
that
is
in
there
and
hopefully,
as
the
is
the
end
of
the
funding
for
that
project.
C
So
the
one
area
where
we
have
some
difference
between
what
the
Commission
saw
and
what
we
have
before
us
is
in
transit
studies
program.
So
we
have
an
additional
twenty
four
million
that
was
added
in
the
TTC
capital
plan
for
work
being
done
on
the
deaf
from
bridge
in
2021.
We
do
not
have
that
included
and
recommended,
because
there's
work
to
be
done
with
transportation
to
and
with
Metrolinx,
to
ensure
that
we
have
alignment
around
the
timing
but
other
than
that,
then
all
is
the
same.
Any
questions,
questions.
A
J
I
J
I'm
and
I'll
play
the
card
if
I'm
a
councillor
through
the
chair,
I
joined
in
April,
so
I
wasn't
at
that
meeting,
but
I
have
been
sitting
in
meetings
where
we've
been
talking
about
upcoming
TTC
board
meetings
and
I'm
fairly
confident
that
the
April
meeting,
so
our
next
board
meeting,
is
February
27th.
Our
very
next
board
meeting
after
that
is
April,
11th
I
believe
and
that's
the
meeting
that
the
updated
cost
is
coming
forward
to.
I
J
Gonna
be
a
little
careful
in
what
I
say
only
because
it's
not
my
file,
it
is
the
the
file
of
Gary
downy
as
the
the
chief
of
transit
expansion,
but
I
believe
from
the
meetings
that
I've
been
in
I
believe
that
the
TTC
board
and
through
the
board
City
Council,
will
be
quite
impressed
with
the
volume
of
work
that
has
gone
on
in
station,
designed
track
design,
property
owner
negotiations
and
and
so
on.
So
we're.
I
J
J
J
You
know
engineering
technicians
on
our
staff
and
through
contractors
who
have
been
tuning
up
what
were
so,
whereas
previously
you
might
have
a
rough
sketch
of
a
station
or
a
rough
sketch
of
track
alignment.
We
now
know
exactly
how
we
want
to
do
that
station.
The
property
required
to
purchase
it.
It's
you
mean
it
is.
It
is
hundreds
upon
hundreds.
I
A
I
A
J
E
E
E
Then,
as
for
design,
my
understanding
is
that
over
the
last
year,
there's
been
a
lot
of
integration
with
the
Eglinton
East
LRT
project
as
well,
and
that's
been
incorporated
into
the
design
of
the
line
to
extension,
because
the
two
are
both
coming
out
of
Kennedy.
So
is
that
also
included
in
some
of
the
design
work?
Yes,.
E
G
J
It
would
well
the
ten
year.
Yes,
the
short
answer
is
yes.
The
ten-year
plan
has
component
so
does
the
state
of
good
repair
and
growth
component
as
the
expansion
component,
so
it's
included
in
the
expansion
component.
The
reason
I'm
leaving
you
I'm
elaborating
is
that
the
capital
investment
plan
that
we
released
on
January
24th
is
just
state
of
good
repair
and
growth,
but
we
actually
have
a
separate
portion
as
well,
which
is
expansion,
progress
and,
and
so
right.
G
But
it's
in
your
tenure
numbers
and
what
it
has
that
now
you
know
a
tremendous
amount
of
design
has
gone
on
here.
You've
got
a
big
design
envelope,
but
is
the
SSE
now
moved
to
what
gets
expended
on
it
is
being
expended
in
this
three
point:
three:
six
billion,
whether
its
design
or
1-day
procurement
and
etc,
etc.
J
K
The
chair
so
well,
we
have
included
in
the
tenure
capital
budget
and
plan
specifically
for
line.
Two
ceased.
Extension
is
the
three
point:
three
six
billion
over
a
ten-year
planning
period,
but
that
is
consistent
with
the
the
budget
that
was
developed,
probably
five
or
six
years
ago.
Now
so
from
when
we
were
the
original
last
year,
we
have
not
updated
the
budget.
G
K
G
Okay,
so
that
if
we,
if
we
get
to
pre,
get
to
the
final
stage
gate,
you
can
begin
spending,
but
you
can
begin
spending.
But
what
we'll
have
to
do
is
then
go
to
the
out
years.
From
that
point
that
we
know
the
true
cost,
they'll
probably
be
you'll
have
to
adjust
upwards
each
of
those
years
to
fit
it
all.
In.
J
G
B
J
No,
absolutely
not,
that
is
I,
mean
I,
believe
it
would
be
a
coincidence.
It
was
just
a
one-page,
we,
okay,
the
the
purpose
of
that
page
through
the
chair
counselor
was
we
wanted
to
acknowledge
that
there
were
other
calls
on
capital,
but
it
wasn't
just
data
good
repair
and
growth,
and
so
we
we
and
we
included
a
page
that
had
a
list,
a
project.
It
was
not
intended
to
prioritize
them.
K
Through
the
chair
so
the
10
year,
capital
plan-
that's
before
you
includes
385
million
dollars,
primarily
for
design,
as
well
as
funds
that
have
been
identified
and
added
as
part
of
this
capital
budget
process,
325
million
for
just
trying
to
ensure
it's
essentially
early
early
work
opportunities.
Okay,.
B
J
Sometimes
through
the
chair,
sometimes
counsellor,
you
appreciate
that
a
particular
organization
is
the
purse
master
but
you're
working
in
collaboration
with
others.
So
on
that
particular
project.
Although
we
hold
the
purse,
we've
been
given
money
from
from
funding
partners,
our
meetings
very
much
involve
York
metro
links
and
so
on.
So
it's
it's.
It's
not
a
case.
I
just
want
to
be
clear
and
answering
it's
not
a
case
of
us
doing
the
work
in
isolation.
B
J
I
believe
this
is
through
the
chair.
This
is
a
question
we
would
have
answered
and
on
previous
occasions
and
I'm
very
happy
to
answer
it
again.
We
have
a
lot
of
concern
about
the
ability
of
the
young
line
to
handle
capacity,
even
if
young
North
doesn't
come
online,
but
absolutely
we
need
two
things
to
happen.
Our
view
is
based
on
our
forecast.
J
B
J
B
J
Going
to
answer
through
the
chair
very
carefully.
First
of
all,
we
have
previous
meetings
indicated
a
sense
of
responsibility
for
agreements
that
we
signed
and
work
that
we
said
we
would
deliver
so,
but
I
would
also
want
to
say
to
you
my
observation,
although
it's
not
my
file
in
Cid's
belongs
to
my
colleagues,
Susan
Reed,
Tanaka
and
Gary
downy
I
believe
that
we
are
able
to
I'm
observing
that
we
were
able
to
march
forward
on
all
fronts
in
in
good
collaboration.
J
C
Chair
that
concludes
any
discussion
around
the
TTC.
So
the
final
one
is
item
3
point
4
Q,
which
is
a
transmittal
from
the
Toronto
Police
Services
Board,
with
their
recommendation
for
the
10
year,
capital
plan
for
the
Toronto
Police
Service.
That
is
consistent
with
what's
before,
even
the
staff
recommended
10
year
capital
plan
and
provides
funding
for
the
replacement
of
their
vehicle
and
equipment,
as
well
as
some
funding
for
the
district
model,
implementation
and
some
of
their
facilities.
C
C
So,
starting
on
page
two,
what
we
have
done
here,
page
two
and
three-
is
identified
any
financial
implications
associated
with
information.
That's
been
brought
forward,
firstly
in
briefing
notes
related
to
motions
or
any
of
the
reports
that
are
before
you.
I
won't
go
through
all
that,
but
it
is
there
for
your
reference.
So
starting
on
page
four.
C
Okay,
so
try
on
page
four,
we
start
with
briefing
notes.
The
first
set
of
briefing
notes
are
those
that
were
issued
back
on
February
4th.
There
are
some
corporate
ones
here
that
we
do
annually
the
first
one
being
actually
before
briefly
note
number
one
and
it's
consolidating
all
the
changes
to
existing
user
fees
and
new
user
fees
that
are
included
in
the
in
the
2019
recommended
operating
budget.
C
B
Thank
you
very
much,
just
one
one
note
on
page
four
of
the
of
the
briefing
note
under
parks,
forestry
and
Rec
I
think
it's
an
important
distinction
that
needs
to
be
made.
The
four
point:
zero.
Seven
percent,
isn't
the
inflationary
adjustment?
It's
a
three
point:
zero,
seven
percent
plus
an
additional
one
percent
above
inflation.
So
it's
not
just
it
hasn't
been
made
distinct,
there
I
think
it
means
I,
think
it
needs
to
be,
and
and
and
maybe
just
a
question
directly
to
staff
the
one
percent.
What
is
the
rationale
about
like?
B
Is
that
a
market
adjustment
did
we
study
what's
going
on
in
other
jurisdictions
or
are
we
just
saying
we
need
an
extra?
We
need
an
extra
I.
Have
the
number
here.
Don't
tell
me,
don't
tell
don't
tell
me
I,
don't
have
the
number
here.
Do
we
need
that
extra
funding
to
balance
the
books
or
are
we
doing
it
because
it
will
better
reflect
citywide
the
the
cost
of
those
programs
compared
to
other
jurisdictions
right.
B
We
get.
Could
we
see
that
report
because
I
heard
two
things
there
that
it
wouldn't
bring
us
out
of
line
with
other
municipalities
and
that
compared
to
market
it
was
lower.
I
think
it's
right
that
compared
to
market
it
should
be
lower,
but
comparing
to
other
municipalities,
if
it's
not
completely
out
of
step
I,
think
we
need
a
bit
more
of
an
idea
of
what
that
means.
So.
F
K
Through
the
chair,
when
the
fee
was
originally
introduced
in
2015,
he
was
linked
to
the
cost
of
on
street
car
parking
prices,
so
parking
meters
effectively.
So
the
fee
has
always
been
related
to
that.
So
the
increase
this
year,
we
simply
to
bring
us
in
line
with
increases
which
TPA
made
to
their
parking
rates
in
2017,
but
we
didn't
update
our
lane
occupancy
fees
at
that
point
in
time.
So
we
were
updating
you
now
so.
B
K
B
I
was
to
put
a
value
on
a
lane
of
the
Gardiner.
Would
would
that
be
comparable
to
the
parking
rate
that
we
charge
week,
because
we
charge
below
market
parking
rates
so
that
that
means
the
method
we're
using
to
determine
the
lane.
Occupancy
fees
are
below
market
all
right
doesn't
that
are
we
adjusting
it
to
be
the
cost
of
a
one
month,
rental
parking
space
in
the
vicinity,
I'm
just
I'm
curious.
B
B
If
it's
taken
for
two
years,
we
charge
X
times
four,
if
we
char,
if
they
take
it
for
three
years
and
we're
getting
Lane
occupancy
request
for
three
years
on
Yonge
Street,
on
Avenue
Road,
on
major
arterials
for
cars
like
this,
isn't
this
isn't
taking
bike
lane
space
always,
but
is
there
a
way
of
us
having
a
sliding
scale?
Then,
if
they
add
a
month
here
and
there
can
we
charge
an
astronomical
rate
for
not
meeting
their
original
commitments,
is
there
anything
stopping
us
from
doing?
That
should
be
an
easy
answer.
B
K
K
G
We
had
our
deputation
nights
and
and
as
as
you
can
imagine,
permit
users
may
deputations
regarding
the
fee.
Increase
and
I
had
some
sympathy
for
the
deputation
this
year,
where's
ordinarily
I.
Don't
they
made
two
complaints,
one
that
that
the
the
3.0
7%
came
as
a
surprise.
Gt
HL,
for
instance,
was
anticipating
two
and
a
half
percent,
and
that
actually
is
our
property
tax
increase.
So
they
were
surprised
to
find
that
they
were
at
a
higher
rate
and
I
know.
G
G
Would
that
be?
Would
that
be
communicated
to
the
users?
Clearly
that,
yes,
the
reason
I
asked
this
question
is
is
because
that
was
the
strategy
that
they
were
suggesting
that
you
know
we
get
inflation,
we're
used
to
it.
You've
been
adding
inflation
every
year,
but
the
over
and
above
inflation
and
our
move
to
cost
recovery
with
those
permit
users
they're
their
financial
year
because
of
the
way
registration
work
really
is
about
April
1st,
but
they
don't
seem
to
know
that
over
and
above
inflation
increases.
That
is
the
way
we're
applying
them
through.
F
G
F
An
example
in
2014
council
approved
increase
was
3.75
percent
on
fees
on
our
basket
rate
of
fees,
and
we
had
a
six
percent
increase
2015.
It
was
two
point,
two
five
and
two
point:
two
five
2016
it
was
2%
and
then
an
additional
2%
on
top
of
that.
So
there
is
yes
question
in
that.
It
is
not
a
the
only
time
that
we've
we've
done
this
approach
around
fee
adjustments,
so.
G
F
A
C
So
just
before
we
move
to
the
next,
if
I
may,
just
clarify
for
council
councillor
is
that
US
per
the
user
fee
policy,
the
inflationary
increases
are
delegated
or
automatic
delegated
to
staff,
but
anything
above
inflation.
Where
does
a
market
rate
adjustment,
a
new
fee
that
is
subject
to
the
budget
process,
and
so
they
would
never
begin
prior
to
approval
of
the
budget
process.
That's
regular
practice.
C
Having
said
that
page
five
briefly
note
number
two
was
another
corporate
brief.
You
note
we
distributed
it
to
was
has
been
a
long-standing
practice
to
consolidate
from
all
the
budget
notes,
all
the
contributions
to
and
withdrawals
from,
reserving
reserve
funds
that
are
being
used
both
in
the
operating
and
the
cap
of
the
side.
So
that's
here
before
you
just
summarizes
based
on
for
the
operating
side,
what
we
know
is
coming
out
of
the
cap
out
of
the
are
going
into
the
reserves.
What
anticipated
contributions
we
happen
if
they're
budgeted
annually,
if
they're,
not
we
don't.
C
Moving
forward,
the
third
briefing
note
page
six
was
a
request
that
budget
launch
that
we
include
in
a
briefing
note.
Those
Noonan
had
service
requests
that
have
not
been
included
in
the
ten
into
the
2019
staff
recommended
operating
budget,
and
so
these
have
been
provided.
They're
also
identified
in
each
of
the
sets
of
notes
where
there
is
an
appropriate
amount,
are
appropriate
item
to
identify
these
are
items
that
have
been
either
referred
or
to
be
considered
with
the
budget
process.
C
So
if
you
turn
to
page
seven
in
total,
that's
worth
about
six
point:
nine
million
dollars
growth,
six
million
dollars
net
for
those
items
that
have
been
referred
to
the
budget
process,
but
most
of
them
really
come
from
board
recommendations
that
have
just
been
made
in
this
cycle.
That
we
have
not
included
in
the
staff
recommended
budget.
A
G
F
Current,
the
chair,
that's
correct.
We
don't
have
a
proactive
program
around
litter
pickup
in
ravines.
We
have
a
reactive
program
to
various
things
that
occur
like
dumping
and
other
things
where
we'll
proceed
to
to
deal
with
those
issues,
but
we
don't
have
an
ongoing
program
and
the
ravines
looking
at
litter.
Picking
so.
G
In
Congress,
in
my
community,
this
people
jumped
at
this.
Yes,
yes,
you
can't
cut
that
I
think
it
feels
like
a
cut
to
them,
because
the
problem
has
grown
and
I'm,
not
in
an
urban
ravine
where
large
communities
of
people
are
living.
The
problem
of
litter
has
grown
down
there
and
I'm
wondering
if
there's
a
correlation
between
shortchanging
ravine
maintenance
leads
to
now
the
litters
starting
to
accumulate.
Now
they're
looking
for
an
operating
program
to
cover
this
off
so.
F
Through
the
chair,
methey
usage
of
the
ravines
and
with
the
increased
usage
of
the
ravines,
there
is
increased
litter
in
the
ravines
as
well,
and
we're
hearing
that
from
our
stakeholders,
we're
talking
about
thousands
of
hectares
of
ravine
system.
So
the
program
we
don't
have
a
proactive
program
of
ongoing
maintenance
within
the
ravine
system
and,
unlike
other
parks,
where
we
have
a
maintenance
program
in
a
park
and
litter
pickup.
As
part
of
that,
we
don't
have
the
ongoing
presence
in
the
ravine
system
to
respond
to
it.
So
this
is
an
enhanced.
G
And
so
you
know,
if
council
does
want
to
look
at
this,
it's
costed
here,
6.8
people
coming
in
at
655
thousand
and
all
their
equipment
etc
and
startup
costs
I
can
assume
that
what
this
is
a
simply
increasing
seasonal
staff.
This
would
be
a
seasonal
program
and
we're
looking
at
unbeneficial
just
doing
this
work
through.
F
G
If
once
counsel
balances
the
budget,
we're
still
not
balanced,
yeah,
the
budget
overall
for
the
city
is
not
balanced,
but
if
counsel
during
an
executive
committee
should
balance
the
budget
and
they
want
to
add
some
things,
they
could
work
with
staff
to
maybe
scope
this
pilot
such
that
they
could
afford,
adding
in
at
least
something
and
getting
started,
and
because
that's
the
structure
of
it
that
it's
part
time
it's
possible
that
we
could
grow
it
over
time.
The.
F
Program
can
be
grown
or
reduced
to
whatever
extent
council
would
want
us
to
consider.
It
could
be
one
crew
in
the
first
year
that
success
followed.
You
know
by
an
assessment
at
the
end
of
that
program,
you
know
around
what
the
long-term
need
is
right.
Certainly
we're
willing
to
work
in
any
scope
to
advance
this
fantastic.
C
On
page
7,
the
next
briefing
note
number
four
is
entitled:
equity
impacts
of
changes
of
the
nineteen
operating
budgets,
so
this
is
now
our
third
year
as
we
have
been
implementing
in
a
phased
approach,
equity,
responsive
budgeting
at
say,
Toronto.
So
this
briefing
note
comes
with
a
summary
of
of
you
know,
providing
a
bit
of
overview
of
what
equity
budgeting
is
the
process
that's
been
taking
place.
L
Yes,
thank
you
very
much
mr.
chair
and
through
you
with
respect
to
the
understanding
of
what
an
equity
responsive
budget
would
look
like.
There
will
have
to
be
some
tools
that
will
be
developed,
so
staff
can
evaluate
their
budget
in
its
current
form
and
the
impacts.
Those
budget
decisions
and
recommendations
will
make
positive
value,
as
it
relates
to
different
groups
of
people
that
will
be
receiving
that
program
or
service.
What
does
that
tool?
Look
like
right
now,
the
City
of
Toronto
and
how
do
staff
use
it.
K
Through
the
chair,
the
tool
that's
used
in
the
equity
based
budgeting
review
is
attached
to
the
briefing
note
it's
working
from
an
equity
lens
tool
that
colleagues
in
the
city
manager's
office
have
put
together.
I
would
agree
with
your
opening
comment.
I
think
that
we
have
much
more
work
to
do
in
deepening
the
understanding
throughout
the
organization
of
what
equity
seeking
groups
are.
The
kinds
of
considerations
stopped
me
need
to
have
in
determining
impacts
and.
L
Is
this
an
electric
electronic
digital
tool?
Is
there
adequate
training
for
staff
to
understand
how
to
use
it?
Is
there
a
mechanism
evaluating
that
it's
been
implemented
or
used
properly,
so
that
mean
equity
lenses
incorporated
over
those
numbers?
What
is
it?
What
is
the
mechanism,
the
implementation?
What
does
that
look
like
so.
K
All
of
that
work
is
ongoing.
The
ongoing
review
stopped
from
financial
planning,
equity
diversity
and
human
rights
and
social
development
lead
that
process.
In
the
corporation
there
is
ongoing
training,
additional
training
and
the
ultimate
accountability
is
certainly
through
the
comments
from
the
external
review
panel,
who
pointed
out
a
number
of
shortcomings
in
the
process
and
made
a
number
of
recommendations
on
how
to
deepen
it
and.
L
So
I
recognize
that,
at
the
beginning
of
this,
the
introduction
of
this
budget
note
that
there
was
language
saying
that
this
is
the
city
of
Toronto's
third
equity,
responsive
budget,
and
so,
but
what
I'm?
Hearing
from
you
is
that
it's
still
a
tool,
that's
in
deep
development
that
there
probably
is
not
as
much
understanding
around
it.
The
external
expert
review
panel
has
said
there
are
some
shortcomings
that
need
to
be
addressed
so
before
us
today.
K
The
the
process
has
not
fully
matured
when
we
initiated
the
work
three
years
ago.
We
indicated
that
it
would
be
a
process
of
developing
I
should
add
that
it's
not
as
if
this
is
a
well
understood
practice.
We
are
learning
and
creating
some
of
the
approaches
we
go
through.
I
would
agree
with
you.
We
have
not
applied
it
to
base
budget,
we
have
not
applied
it
to
the
capital
budget.
We
need
to
begin
to
move
in
those
directions
and
ensure
that
there
is
an
equity
lens
placed
on
the
entire
city
budget.
L
It'd
be
easier
for
the
divisions
to
perhaps
showcase
some
of
the
the
the
big
thought,
leaders
and
champions
who
really
want
to
embrace
equity,
responsive
budgeting,
gender
responsive
budgeting.
Would
it
be
easier
to
break
it
off
to
showcase
the
division
work,
as
opposed
to
asking
all
the
divisions,
because
it's
business
has
now
been
three
years
and
I
know
that
your
your
your
team,
the
team
is
working
very
hard,
but
it's
it
perhaps
too
big
to
to
ask
for
that
system.
I
You
to
continue
with
what
counselor
Wong
Tam
was
asking
about.
I
looked
at
a
number
of
the
analyst
notes,
and,
and
some
of
them
had
a
statement
saying
this
budget
has
no
impact
on
equity
and
it
occurred
to
me
that
that
actually
is
probably
a
bad
thing.
Shouldn't
the
task
be
in
an
inequitable
Society
that
each
of
the
budgets
gets
reviewed
to
see
what
it
does
to
make
our
society
more
equitable
through.
K
The
chair
on
page
four
of
the
briefing
note
we
have
a
summary
table,
and
particularly
with
respect
to
newer,
enhanced
investments.
Ideally,
you
would
want
to
see
the
majority
of
those
investments,
if
not
all
of
them,
resulting
in
a
positive
effect
on
equity
thought.
That
would
be
the
ultimate
impact
of
the
tool
right.
I
But
I'm,
just
thinking
about
and
I
understand,
the
answer
that
you
gave
councillor
wong-tam
about
our
review
being
principally
focused
around
new
and
enhanced
I
just
found
it
puzzling
that
that
we
would
be
introducing
any
programs
what,
while
we're
doing
an
equity
based
budget
review
where
neutral
would
be
treated
as
neutral
shouldn't.
The
task
be
that
when
we're
implementing
City
services
that
were
increasingly
equity
in
the
City
of
Toronto.
K
K
The
chair,
yes,
and
as
we
look
at
the
new
and
enhance-
and
if
you
look
at
the
split
between
those
changes
that
have
a
positive
impact
on
equity
and
those
that
are
neutral,
we've
set
no
targets
right,
simply
identified
what
the
split
is,
as
we
mature
the
work
over
years
that
there
may
be
an
opportunity
to
look
at
setting
targets
in
that
regard.
Okay,.