►
Description
City Council, meeting 29, May 24, 2017 - Part 1 of 3 - Morning Session
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=11859
Part 2 of 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TS6ki21qJO8#t=1m09s
Part 3 of 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GOSCRFzhLU
B
A
We
acknowledge
that
we
are
meeting
today
on
the
traditional
territory
of
the
Mississauga's
of
the
new
credit
first
nation,
the
head
nashoni,
the
huron
went
at
and
home
to
many
diverse
indigenous
peoples
for
the
benefit
of
those
who
are
connected
to
the
internet.
The
city
clerk
has
posted
all
of
the
agenda
materials
for
today's
meeting.
A
Toronto
CA,
slash
council.
B
E
You,
madam
Speaker
I
apologize
for
not
speaking
to
you
earlier,
but
I
wanted
to
bring
to
the
attention
of
counsel
and
I
know.
The
mayor
is
aware
of
this.
That
we've
had
incredible
work
by
our
city
staff
on
the
islands
and
we
are
in
grave
danger
of
erosion
on
the
islands.
The
families
on
the
islands
and
the
people
on
the
islands
are
doing
pretty
good,
there's
huge
work
that
has
gone
24
hours
at
times
to
save
those
home
both
by
the
Islanders
and
by
our
remarkable
staff.
E
But
in
addition
to
that,
I
wanted
to
point
out
to
the
members
that
that's
not
really
the
bay.
The
main
destruction
that
is
going
on
the
main
destruction
is
the
erosion
of
the
islands
themselves
and
we've
had
several
places
where
they
have
been
pierced
and
where
the
lake
has
come
in
to
the
lagoon.
So
there's
going
to
be
a
huge
amount
of
reclamation,
work,
I
really
appreciate,
I.
E
So
if
I
could
I
hope
that
the
city
manager
conveys
the
thanks
of
City
Council
to
our
great
staff
for
the
work
that
they
have
done
and
I
hope
that
over
the
next
little
while
we
begin
to
look
at
what
we
have
to
do
to
put
that
jewel
back
together
and
that's
not
going
to
be
easy
and
it's
not
going
to
be
cheap.
So
thank
you
for
that.
Madam
Speaker
thank
accounts.
Mcconnell.
A
F
Batter
the
speaker,
I
would
move
that
report
for
meeting
twenty
five
of
the
executive
committee
listed
on
the
agenda.
Accounts
will
be
presented
for
consideration,
with
the
exception
of
items
ex2,
five,
twenty
five
point:
seventeen
in
the
x.25
point,
twenty
two
in
which
I
had
declared
an
interest
and
will
do
that
as
as
things
unfold
in
the
appropriate
order.
F
Today
we
dealt
with
a
number
of
important
items
at
the
executive
committee
meeting
and
I
want
to
thank
the
members
of
the
committee
and
members
of
council
and
all
the
public
decadence
who
took
part
in
the
meeting,
and
I
want
to
just
touch
on
a
couple
of
the
items
that
will
be,
of
course
before
us.
Today.
F
We
are
asked
here
to
approve
today,
and
we
did
approve
at
the
executive
committee
a
an
adjustment
to
the
alignment
in
order
for
staffs
to
complete
the
environmental
assessment
process,
and
this
is
a
crucial
step
in
advancing
the
process
which,
of
course,
will
provide
a
substantial
degree
of
relief
at
the
young
gluer
interchange,
which
is
a
huge
pinch
point
for
the
transit
commuters
at
the
moment,
and
it
will
pave
the
way
for
future
expansions
of
our
transit
system
to
relieve
congestion
on
the
young
line.
And
the
report
does
recommend
the
initiation.
F
I
think
this
is
a
very
important
step
that
we
should
be
taking
note
of
the
initiation
of
some
work
and
the
development
of
the
initial
business
case
for
the
relief
line
north,
which
will
continue
the
expansion
of
the
transit
network
and
when
I
say
that
we
have
to
build
and
to
build
and
to
build
and
I
know.
There
are
some
hurdles
to
be
overcome.
But
I
think
what
we're
looking
to
do
here,
madam
speaker,
is
to
find
ways
to
say
yes
to
doing
these
things
and
confront
some
of
the
hurdles
that
exist,
financial
and
otherwise.
F
But
move
forward
with
these
things
so
that
we
don't
fall
into
the
trap
we've
fallen
into
in
the
past.
The
the
report
also
recommends
madam
Speaker,
advancing
the
planning
and
design
work
for
the
Yonge
subway
extension.
But
the
report
is
very
clear
that
this
work
must
not
proceed
until
the
relief
line
is
operational,
so
that
the
former
meaning,
the
extension
doesn't
increase.
F
Beyond
the
initial
funding
which
I
gratefully
acknowledge
on
your
behalf
for
the
planning
and
design
of
st.,
the
federal
government
has
come
to
the
table,
but
I.
Think
members
of
this
council
will
know
we
cannot
hope,
but
to
build
the
relief
line
to
relief
on
itself
the
northern
relief
line
or
the
other
priority
projects.
We
have
endorsed.
We
as
a
council.
The
Scarborough
is
to
Eglinton
East
LRT
and
the
waterfront
without
their
help
a
second,
madam
Speaker.
F
We
considered
a
report
from
our
city
manager
aligning
the
city,
budget
direction
and
schedule,
and,
let's
again
remember
madam
Speaker
I
say
to
you
respectfully
to
my
colleagues.
What
we're
doing
here
is
beginning
a
process
as
we
do
every
year,
and
in
no
way
does
it
does
it
does
it
presume
what
the
result
of
that
process
is
going
to
be,
but
rather
it
sets
out
a
process.
The
first
steps
in
a
process-
and
there
is
no
proposal
from
staff,
no
proposal
from
councillor
Crawford
no
proposal
from
me
that
we
cut
any
services
whatsoever.
F
What
we
are
doing,
though,
is
to
say,
before
we
ask
taxpayers
to
commit
to
a
single
extra
dollar
coming
from
their
pockets,
that
we
will
examine
spending.
We
are
presently
doing
on
the
why
this
possible
range
of
facilities
services
and
make
sure
that
that
money
is
spent
effectively.
This
is
the
beginning
of
a
process.
F
Madam
Speaker,
as
was
the
case
last
year
in
the
year
before
the
year
before
of
the
year
before,
that
additional
monies
new
monies
will
be
allocated
to
priority
areas
and
that
this
will
not
involve
the
cutting
of
services,
but
rather
careful
decisions
on
where
we're
going
to
allocate
additional
resources.
The
final
thing
I'll
mention,
madam
Speaker,
is
that
we
considered
a
report
which
will
be
considered
here
on
a
new
model
for
dealing
with
the
city's
real
estate
in
order
to
make
the
best
use
of
these
important
assets.
F
Examples
are
brought
to
my
attention
literally
every
day,
including
today,
of
instances
in
which
people
are
off
dealing
with
our
real
estate
in
a
non
strategic
matter.
I
think
this
is
going
to
help
us
I
know
many
councillors
have
talked
to
our
staff
about
this
I
thank
the
staff
and
I
thank
councillors
for
all
the
input
we've
received
and
look
forward
to
receiving
more
as
we
move
this
forward
at
this
council
meeting.
Thank
you,
madam
Speaker.
I,
look
forward
to
our
discussions.
Thank.
A
A
G
H
I
Yes,
thank
you
very
much.
So
madam
Speaker
I
am
pleased
to
request
that
the
report
from
meeting
19
of
the
board
of
health
is
on
the
agenda
of
council,
be
presented
for
consideration.
I
would
draw
council's
attention
to
two
items
on
that
on
the
agenda
that
they
may
be
interested
in.
One
is
the
implementation
resources
for
the
Toronto
overdose
action
plan.
I
know
that
people
know
that
we
do
have
a
drug
overdose
epidemic,
not
just
in
Toronto
in
Canada
and
frankly,
even
in
the
United
States.
I
We
need
to
do
what
we
can
on
that
upfront
and
we
need
to
do
it
now
if
it
was
any
other
issue.
Car
accidents,
children's
deaths.
They
are
numbering
in
the
dozens
by
the
month
and
in
the
hundreds
by
the
year,
so
the
overdose
or
thee
as
the
there
is
a
secretariat
that
we
have
and
the
community
that
we
have
that's
very
and
aptly
chaired
by
a
council
of
Crecy
that
has
come
forward
with
a
request
to,
and
the
request
was
made
last
month
with
an
attempt
to
try
to
get
some
provincial
money.
I
So
the
request
here
is
for
this
particular
year
to
look
at
funding
it
from
from
city
resources
at
the
end
of
the
day,
because
we
have
some
money
left,
some
ceiling.
Money
left
from
the
provincial
budget
allocated
for
Public
Health
at
the
end
of
the
day
would
cause
us
$44,000
to
leverage
another
180,000
dollars.
Something
of
that
order
to
basically
put
in
place
three
people
to
work
on
overdose
prevention
and
response,
training,
which
is
urgently
needed,
and
it
will
have
a
direct
impact
on
the
saving
of
people's
lives.
I
I
We
are
serving
200,000
just
under
two
hundred
thousand
students,
each
and
every
day,
with
a
well,
not
each
and
every
day,
but
certainly
many
days
Monday
to
Friday,
because
we
don't
have
enough
of
provincial
and
federal
funding
which
I'll
get
to
in
a
sec.
But
our
contribution
is
allowing
two
hundred
thousand
students
to
basically
begin
their
day
with
a
good,
nutritious
breakfast
or
snack
program.
That
is
allowing
them
to
learn
better
and
to
also
frankly
behave
better.
I
There
is
nothing
worse
than
a
than
anyone
frankly,
who
has
not
had
a
good
start
to
the
morning
from
a
nutrition
perspective,
so
that
something
is
really
powerful
for
us
to
have
done
a
powerful
story.
That
I
think
we
should
be
all
very,
very
proud
of
noting,
of
course,
that
is
one
year
left
in
the
five-year
plan.
That
became
the
six-year
plan
and
that's
2018,
but
we'll
deal
with
that.
I
In
the
budget,
but
we
can
then
say
by
the
end
of
2018,
if
we
fund
that
piece
that
we
have
done
our
job
to
fund
20
percent
of
the
of
the
of
the
program.
I
can
also
report
there
that
that
we
have
had
men
meetings
and
more
coming
with
the
province
and
the
federal
government
to
get
their
participation
to
get
there
them
to
ante
up
their
20%.
The
province
is
well
on
route
to
doing
that,
the
federal
government
has
never
been
part
of
student
nutrition
programs,
but
they
are
certainly.
I
There
are
people
within
the
government
of
Liberal
caucus
that
are
working
on
that
issue
and
we
are
supporting
them
as
much
as
possible,
not
just
alone,
as
the
City
of
Toronto
will,
but
with
partners
frankly
across
across
the
country,
so
that
that
is
a
that
is
I
would
say
in
a
pretty
good
place
right
now.
So
I
commend
these
these
reports
for
your
consideration.
Thank
you,
madam
Speaker.
Thank.
A
B
A
A
G
Thank
you,
madam
Speaker,
that
the
report
from
meeting
20
of
the
community
development
recreation
committee
lists
on
the
agenda
Council
be
presented
for
consideration.
I
would
simply
draw
to
your
attention
item
20.6
funding,
allocations
for
shelter
and
related
services,
a
vital
report.
That's
come
forward
and
mapped
out
the
future
funding
for
vital
community
service.
Thank
you
thank.
A
A
L
Good
morning,
speaker
that
the
report
from
meeting
21
of
the
Economic
Development
Committee,
listed
on
the
agenda
for
council
be
presented
for
consideration.
I
wanted
just
to
highlight
a
few
things
on
the
agenda
that
we
dealt
with
at
committee
speaker,
particularly
ad
21.5,
which
basically
deals
with
improving
services
for
youth
with
experiences
in
the
criminal
justice
system.
L
There
is
a
tremendous
challenge,
that's
being
faced
by
young
people
who
are
being
underemployed
and,
in
fact,
are
having
challenges.
Finding
jobs
and
so
on
and
part
of
the
issue,
speaker,
is
that
the
system
continues
to
be
changed
in
a
way
that
actually
is
detrimental
to
their
interests
and
their
development.
So
they
may
have
bought
themselves
into
some
challenges
and
so
on
in
the
criminal
justice
system
and
in
order
to
extricate
themselves
from
that
particular
process
growing
going
forward
as
they
developed
into
a
much
more
mature
age
and
into
adulthood.
There
is
a
stigma.
L
There's
a
strain,
that's
seeming
to
affect
their
progression
in
their
development,
which
is
causing
a
position
for
many
of
these
young
people
to,
in
essence,
to
be
amputating
their
spirits
and
their
opportunities
for
development.
There's
a
requirement
then
for
dependency
on
the
system,
because
they're
not
able
to
get
jobs,
they're
not
able
to
have
opportunities,
and
so
on
because
of
the
records,
and
the
federal
government
has
changed
the
conditions
with
risk
with
respect
to
pardons,
for
example,
the
length
of
time
has
not
been
extended.
L
The
cost
in
terms
of
doing
that
has
also
been
extended
and
we're
recognizing
it's
creating
tremendous
hardship
for
young
people
in
the
city.
We
are
not
suggesting
that
young
people
who
commit
criminal
offences
and
so
on
shouldn't
be
responsible
for
their
actions.
That's
not
what's
being
suggesting
we're
just
suggesting,
though,
that
the
system
that
is
in
existence
now
is
creating
such
a
tremendous
burden
on
them
as
they
develop
further
in
terms
of
their
you
know,
professional
opportunities
and
so
on.
L
That's
creating
a
problem
so
we're
looking
at
asking
for
some
changes
there
additional
additionally
speaker
when
young
people
are
in
the
system.
There
is
no
real
training,
there's
no
real
help
to
assist
them
in
terms
of
developing
any
type
of
occupational
development
in
salon.
So
in
essence,
they
come
out
of
penal
institutions
into
our
society,
and
then
they
will
continue
to
do
the
same
things
that
they
did
in
order
to
survive
and
those
conditions
are
causing
them
to
obviously
go
back
into
the
system.
L
We're
asking
the
provincial
government
to
to
help,
and
certainly
federal
government,
as
well
additionally
speaker
on
the
agenda,
Eadie
21.3,
the
city's
desire
to
bid
for
a
designation
as
a
United,
Nations,
Educational,
Scientific
and
Cultural
Organization,
otherwise
known
as
UNESCO
for
a
creative
City
of
media
arts,
which
would
bring
us
into
a
network
of
about
a
hundred
and
sixteen
cities
around
the
world.
And
this
would
create
huge
opportunities
in
terms
of
Toronto
being
a
film
television
of
cultural
arts
city
and
bring
that
notoriety
around
the
world.
L
A
J
A
A
M
I
do
madam
chair
and
members
of
council
good
morning
to
everyone
that
the
report
from
meeting
19
of
the
licensing
standards
committee
leader
and
the
General
Council
be
presented
for
consideration.
Madam
Speaker
I
will
just
a
couple
minutes
to
go
over
a
couple
items
that
were
before
the
community
that
were
so
many
importance.
The
first
one
is
a
late
nineteen
point,
one
I
mean
chapter
six.
Ninety
three
signs
are
fibrillated
relation
signs,
and
this
item
has
been
shameful
debate
and
the
next
one,
the
paramount
one
is
a
less
19.2.
M
That's
a
graffiti
management
plan
as
it
relates
to
it
is
speed
art.
As
you
may
recall,
madam
a
speaker's
us
neighborhood
committee.
There
was
a
request
you
can
see.
The
staff
could
make
representation
on
the
street
art
here
a
council,
but
we
advise
us
not
possible.
So
I'm,
going
to
attempt
just
said
to
bring
members
of
council
among
men
to
the
public
is
up-to-date
with
the
tremendous
success
of
that
in
five
years.
M
Literally
speaking,
these
Street
I'll,
that's
the
key
and
the
pillar
or
the
graffiti
management
plan
has
captured
the
hearts
and
souls
not
only
for
the
arts
community
eternal
by
the
arts
community
throughout
the
world.
I
think
that's
extremely
important
to
note
and
I
am
delighted
and
proud
at
the
same
time
that
the
street
art
program
has
reached
new
heights
and
I
can
only
imagine
where
this
program
is
going
being
a
key
component
of
a
graffiti
management
plan
that
was
adopted
by
City
Council
in
2012.
M
As
noted
in
the
report,
the
street
our
program
aims
to
develop,
support,
promote
and
increase
awareness
of
a
sweetheart,
as
is
an
indispensable
role
in
adding
beauty
in
character
for
local
neighborhoods.
So
it's
important
to
note
that
this
program
is
given
the
multicultural
and
diversity
that
we
have
in
this
great
to
eternal
this
program
not
only
promotes
they
create
the
creativity
and
cultural
vibrancy
of
this
great
city,
but
also
helps
us
celebrate
our
cultural
roots,
traditions
and
that's
been
done.
One
mural
at
a
time.
M
So
it's
been
a
wonderful
experience
and
the
partnerships
that
have
been
created
with
the
transported
service
Metrolinx.
All
of
that
is
great
and
something
amazing
that
happening,
especially
as
it
relates
to
innovative
design,
use
the
street
art
to
tell
true
stories:
connect
with
neighborhood
beautification
strategies,
attract
private
and
public
sector
support,
provide
mentorship
and
training
opportunities,
and
that's
to
those
people
who
are
trying
to
learn
from
the
best
combat
graffiti
vandalism.
M
That
has
been
a
tremendous
problem
in
the
field
in
the
past
and
we
what
we
are
having
all
throughout
is
just
mentioned
and,
of
course,
provide
ongoing
maintenance.
In
essence,
webs
Council,
the
street
art
program,
is
one
of
the
most
creative
initiative
ever
supported
by
this
council
and,
as
chair
of
the
community,
I
couldn't
be
any
happier
and
proud
of
what's
in
our
country,
all
across
the
city,
and
that
things
also
to
the
amazing
work
of
city
staff,
as
well
as
the
arts
community.
Thanks
so
much.
A
B
I
do
thank
you
good
morning.
Everyone
that
the
report
from
meeting
818
of
the
parks
and
Environment
Committee
listed
on
the
agenda
of
council
be
presented
for
consideration
and
we
had
an
exciting
day
talking
about
our
pollinator
protection
strategy
as
well
as
unanimously
passing
the
strategy
to
expand
the
city's
tree
canopy
on
private
lands,
and
so
through
the
parks
and
trees
foundation.
We
will
be
able
to
continue
to
give
empower
groups
and
and
give
out
grants
of
1.6
or
1.7
six
million
dollars
to
groups.
B
N
N
Unfortunately,
the
number
0
and-
and
there
are
1526
units
being
approved,
none
are
affordable.
There
are
a
couple
of
sites
in
Toronto
where
funding
has
been
achieved
towards
20
community
housing
projects
or
affordable
housing.
But
if
we
were
going
with
our
numbers
of
10%,
which
is
what
we
strive
to
do,
we'd
have
a
hundred
and
fifty
two
units
instead
of
none
staying
with
you
hn
does.
The
speaker
would
like
me
to
do
yes,.
A
N
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
make
those
comments
at
every
meeting.
There
is
an
item:
PG
20.3,
prioritizing
the
scheduling
of
Ontario
missile
board
cases
related
to
Toronto,
and
my
colleagues
I
put
this
motion
on
the
agenda
as
it's
important
to
understand
that,
because
we
now
have
the
Toronto
local
appeals
body,
we
have
created
a
tremendous
amount
of
time
at
the
entero
Municipal
Board
for
hearings,
because
50%
of
all
the
hearings
were
for
minor
applications
from
the
City
of
Toronto
on
average
for
the
previous
years.
N
The
concern
is
that
that
time
will
not
be
used
to
deal
with
the
important
items
that
we
had
appeal
there,
such
as
our
zoning
bylaw,
where
we're
using
to
when
every
time
someone
goes
to
committee
of
adjustments,
but
theirs
is
2013
we're
dealing
with
our
neighborhood
and
apartment
policies,
and
so
many
other
of
the
policies
that
this
council
approved
were
appealed.
The
internal
municipal
board-
and
we
have
not
been
hearing
that
the
time
that
is
now
available.
We
use
for
those
and
my
concern.
N
That
is,
that
applications
that
were
filed
with
the
city
when
the
clock
runs
out
after
180
days.
Applicants,
because
of
our
tardiness
and
getting
some
of
these
true,
will
appeal
to
the
board
to
try
and
speed
themselves
up
and
take
advantage
of
the
time
that
we've
actually
created
by
doing
our
own
local
appeals,
when
what
we
really
need
is
for
that
time
to
be
allocated
towards
clearing
up
the
backlog.
N
B
B
G
A
G
B
A
D
A
H
You,
madam
Speaker
I,
do
I
move
that
the
report
from
meeting
24
the
trial,
East
York
Community
Council,
listed
on
the
agenda
of
Council,
be
presented
for
consideration
and
also
with
that.
Thank
our
amazing
clerk
support
staff
who
were
able
to
help
us
smooth
through
92
items
in
a
very
timely
fashion,
compared
tab
to
garbled
City
Council
with
18
items,
North
York
with
46
item
and
East
Shore
community
council
with
39
items
and
also
a
pelvic
altering
turns
over
:.
Sorry.
A
P
A
A
A
Yes,
well
for
members
of
council
that
were
not
here
when
we
started
is
that
there
was
two
items
on
the
executive
committee
that
the
mayor
had
an
interest
in,
so
we've
separated
it
and
the
deputy
mayor
is
introduced.
Those
two
items
and
the
mayor
has
introduced
the
balance
of
the
agenda
council
care
G.
Honestly,
that's
why
we're
taking
two
votes.
A
F
Madam
Speaker
I
would
like
to
declare
an
interest
in
respective
items:
e^x
25
point
17,
the
short
stream
utility
permit
item
and
the
item
X
25
point
2
to
the
FM
radio
smartphones,
and
this
is
on
account
of
my
previously
disclosed
continuing
association
with
the
Roger's
family
interest,
but
out
of
an
abundance
of
caution,
these
effect
or
potentially
effect
Rogers
Communications.
Thank.
A
H
You,
madam
Speaker
I,
have
petitions
here
with
519
signatures.
The
petition
is
we
the
undersigned
urge
you
to
campaign
in
cyber
championing
counsel,
the
adoption
of
the
aggressive
plan
of
climate
action
for
the
City
of
Toronto
honoring,
the
commitments
made
by
meritorious
to
the
signing
of
the
Paris
city
hall
declaration
on
December
4
2015.
H
E
You,
madam
Speaker
I,
want
to
repeat
what
my
colleague
has
said:
I'll
just
present
420
of
my
constituents,
who
have
signed
a
petition
and
congratulate
Alan,
Adamson
and
Margaret
Rowe,
who
are
here,
I,
believe
oh
right
here
and
Lynne
Adamson,
who
I've
known
since
the
active
days
in
the
school
board.
So
they're
still
at
it,
and
we
have
some
some
good
petitions
here.
Thank
you.
Thank
You.
M
You
very
speaker,
I,
do
have
also
another
petition
that
was
Anan
same
lines
that
was
circulated
on
my
Environment
Day
that
took
place
on
a
the
20
2007
thing.
I
may
your
glory
was
that
thank
you
for
coming
and
the
petition
has
68
people
in
the
world
have
been
submitted
by
Mary
as
well
from
the
real
tight
Thank
You
Margaret
Thank.
A
K
You,
madam
Speaker
I,
have
a
petition
in
regard
to
Edie
21.5
2017
major
of
cultural
organization
allocations.
It
is
a
petition
of
nine
thousand
nine
hundred
and
sixty-two
names
calling
for
the
police
services,
Toronto
Police
Services
to
be
allowed
to
March
and
be
present
in
uniform
at
Toronto
Pride
and
the
signatures
are
from
Toronto
and
all
over
Canada
Thank.
B
N
You
madam
Speaker
I'll,
also
be
presenting
to
counsel
to
the
mayor
and
council
members
the
same
petition
urging
us
to
champion
the
adoption
of
the
climate
change
plan
for
the
city
of
Toronto
honoring.
The
commitments
made
by
Mayor
John
Tory
for
the
signing
of
the
Paris
city
hall
declaration
of
December
4th
2015.
C
G
G
G
A
A
C
C
It
began
in
nineteen
2008
by
Sarah,
Jordan
who's,
now,
14
years
old,
I
and
her
sister
Claire
who's
now
11,
and
at
that
time
they
and
our
lease
side
and
Davisville
communities
raised
and
collected
a
cumulative
two
hundred
ninety
thousand
pounds
of
food
for
the
Daily
Bread
Food
Drive.
It's
become
the
largest
community-based
fundraiser
for
the
daily
bread,
and
last
year
alone,
fourteen
schools
and
over
seventy
thousand
students
were
involved
as
well
as
many
locally
side
and
Davisville
businesses,
and
they
raised
seventy
five
thousand
pounds
of
food.
C
This
year
is
the
tenth
anniversary
of
the
food
drive
and
Sarah
Claire
would
like
to
make
it
the
biggest
year
ever
so
they're
actually
looking
for
more
communities
to
get
involved,
and
they
requested
that
I
expressed
their
challenge
to
you
and
your
respective
communities,
more
schools,
more
businesses,
if
you
as
a
councillor
as
a
leader
in
your
community,
would
like
to
get
your
community
involved
in
sarin
clears
food
drives.
You
can
go
to
triple
W,
Sarah
and
Clare's
food
drive.
C
Comm
I'm
also
going
to
be
sending
out
a
one-page
letter
from
Sarah
and
Clare
directly
to
you,
so
you
can
share
with
your
local
school
councils
and
local
businesses,
but
this
really
isn't
I,
just
I
love.
How,
while
we,
you
know
deservedly
talked
a
lot
about
the
work
that
those
of
us
in
Council
and
our
staff
and
those
of
us
at
City
Hall
are
working
on
every
day
here
within
the
chambers.
C
B
A
Members
I
will
not
review
the
order
paper.
We
have
one
deferred
committee
item
on
this
agenda
item
a
you
eight
point:
four
headed
management
of
the
city's
employee,
extended
health
and
dental
benefits
based
to
ineffective
controls
and
fine
design,
leaving
the
city
vulnerable
to
potential
benefit
abuse.
The
mayor
has
designated
the
following
items
as
if
key
matters
for
this
meeting,
the
first
key
matter
will
be
item
e.x
25.1
headed
advancing
planning
and
design
for
the
relief
line
and
Yonge
subway
extension,
and
the
second
key
item
will
be
item.
Ix
25.9
headed
citywide,
real
estate
transformation.
A
This
will
be
our
first
and
second
item
of
business.
Today
notices
emotions
are
scheduled
to
be
dealt
with
at
2:00
p.m.
tomorrow.
Only
at
the
mayor's
key
items
have
been
completed.
I
propose
that
city
council
set
a
time
for
closed
session,
is
required
later
in
the
meeting.
Remember
the
council
before
I,
take
additional
holds
I
wish
to
rule
on
Scarborough
community
council
item
22
point
14
regarding
a
community
sign
as
installation
on
Guildwood
village
last
year,
City
Council
delegated
to
the
general
manager
of
transportation
services,
final
decisions
and
approvals
for
neighborhood
and
business
area.
A
Identification
signage
and
encroachments
on
city
highways,
pursuant
to
the
neighbourhood
and
business
area,
identification
sign
policy,
the
general
manager
has
the
sole
discretion
to
refer
any
application
for
neighborhood
and
business
area.
Indentification
finance
to
community
council
for
consideration
and
final
decision
on
a
question
of
fine
copy.
Councilors
procedures
have
been
amended
to
reflect
this
delegation.
Oh.
A
I
didn't
write
your
dividers,
but
I
didn't
read
the
next
page
according
as
this
matter,
according
as
this
matter
is
delegated
I'm
ruling
that
items
SC
22
point
14
is
that
a
board
or
not
property
before
City
Council
I
invite
the
word
councillor
to
consult
with
the
general
manager
of
transportation
services
to
seek
a
resolution
to
this
matter.
That's
my
ruling.
I.
A
J
The
the
reason
that
this
matter
went
before
is
garbage
community
council.
Madam
Speaker
is
I
consulted
with
staff
from
the
Transportation
Office
on
a
proper
process.
To
put
this
forward
and
transportation
staff
directed
me
to
put
a
vote
for
Scarborough
Community
Council,
so
now,
I'm
being
told
it's
out
of
order.
Now,
I
have
to
go
back
to
the
same
staff
tasks
for
them
under
delegated
authority,
the
same
staff
that
told
me
to
put
it
to
Scarborough
Community
Council.
We.
A
All
right,
the
city
clerk
has
noted
the
items
that
members
wish
to
hold
and
when
I
go
through
the
items
listed
on
the
order
paper
to
take
additional
holds.
I
will
recognize
requests
to
make
matters
urgent
and
time
specific
after
I
go
through
the
items
for
additional
both
once
your
two
papers
been
approved
by
council,
any
change
when
needed,
two-thirds
vote
page
three
counselor
Deanna
with
five
minutes
quick.
J
A
B
B
B
Q
G
C
M
You,
madam
Speaker
ey
twenty
two
point:
twenty
two
is
Terrace
update
on
the
city
initiative,
Center
Avenue
studies
and
I'll
see
page
number,
eight
at
the
top
of
the
page
ey
22.2.
That's
the
status
update
on
the
city,
initiated
sanitarium
studies,
opa
84
and
144
between
Blackburn
Avenue
and
Spring
Grove
and
its
catalogue.
Thank.
A
J
A
I
Thank
you
very
much.
My
name
is
associated
with
te
24.1
3
intention
to
designate
under
part
4
of
the
Heritage
Act,
explain
Crescent
on
the
advice
of
staff.
I've
been
asked
to
put
that
forward
to
I.
Think
the
October
6th
I
think
staff
have
the
wording,
thank
you
so
deferred
till
October,
2nd
and
3rd
Hey.
J
A
J
B
C
A
F
Waiting
for
that
and
can
plan
accordingly
and
I
would
also
like
to
move
out
of
speaker
that
we
time
item
e^x,
25.6
proposed
stormwater
charge
to
be
the
second
item
of
business
tomorrow.
Following
the
completion
of
the
budget
directions
item.
This
is
again
to
ensure
that
staff
who
need
to
be
here
can
be
here
at
that
time,
but
also
on
account
of
mister
D.
Geronimo
I
understand
is
ill
and
has
been
out
for
a
couple
of
days
and
I.
F
B
F
A
K
C
Thank
you
kindly
speaker
and
my
motions
are
to
try
to
make
the
agenda
very
efficient,
I
move
to
move
a
you
8.4
management,
the
city's
employee,
extended
health
and
dental
benefits,
Phase
two.
In
effect,
controls
and
plan
design,
leaving
the
city
vulnerable
to
potential
benefit
abuse
to
be
the
first
item
after
member
motions
and
immediately
followed
by
item
C
C.
Twenty
nine
point:
one:
zero.
A
A
K
A
N
A
A
P
A
No,
please
counterman,
lady
just
try
to
keep
it
down.
We
you
know,
I,
know
that
you're
dying
to
say
something
today,
but
like
just
keep
your
mouth
shut,
just
for
a
few
minutes,
councillor
Fletcher
every
day
we
we
adopt
the
order
paper
councillor
Fletcher
every
day
we
adopt
the
order
paper.
So
at
that
point,
then,
if
there's
any
items
that
we
need
to
make
time
specific
or
reorder
the
order
paper,
we
can
do
that.
I
do.
P
A
A
P
S
P
A
P
A
O
Dr.
Don,
a
point
of
order
just
to
follow
up
from
what
councillor
shiner
was
asking
for
I
mean
according
to
the
council
agenda.
This
is
the
three
days
scheduled
meeting.
So
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
clarify
for
me.
How
is
it
that
we
can't
schedule
things
for
the
third
day
of
council
when
this
is
a
three-day
meeting,
yeah.
A
Councilor
practice-
and
this
was
brought
up
at
the
last
council
meeting
as
well-
is
that
if
we
can
but
the
agenda
may
change,
we
don't
know
what's
going
to
happen
today,
we
don't
know
what's
going
to
happen
or
tomorrow
that
so
my
recommendation
is
way
to
tomorrow
to
see
where
we
are
on
the
agenda
and
then
you
can
move
items
time
specific
on
Friday
tomorrow.
So
when
we
go
through
the
consent
agenda,
so
it's
not
that.
A
K
I
think
there
was
probably
a
slip
of
tongue
when
you
address
accounts
from
a
m'lady.
Maybe
you
can
reexamine
the
ueb
the
tape
and
see
if
what
it
was
said,
it
was
appropriate
by
yourself
to
console
my
milady
and
it
was
appropriate.
Finally,
but
but
if
it
was
and
I
thought
that
I
should
mention
it
to
you,.
F
A
K
Madam
Speaker
I
don't
think
it's
appropriate
I,
don't
think
in
any
in
any
chamber
in
this
house
elect
a
chamber
that
language
is
appropriate
or
use
I
understand
it.
Could've
been
a
slip
of
the
tongue
and
I
would
ask
of
you
please
to
relook
at
the
tape
and,
if
you
think,
it's
appropriate
fine,
then
I
will
start
using
it,
and
people
in
this
table
start
using
it.
Thank.
B
R
A
H
Yeah
I'm
trying
to
work
out
where
all
the
time
Titans
are
right.
Now
what
I'm
wanting
to
do
I'll
tell
you
what
I
want
to
do
is
page
11,
DC
29.2
the
Ombudsman's
report,
as
always,
I
do
like
to
time
it
and
have
a
presentation,
I'm
happy
to
do
this
tomorrow
or
I
would
say
after
the
to
order
two
generals
reports,
but
as
I
say,
I'm
happy
to
stand
up
tomorrow
and
do
this
if
necessary,
I
think
I.
E
H
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
N
In
fact,
it
is
on
behalf
of
a
number
of
my
colleagues
and
as
chair
Oh
George,
you
for
a
moment
as
chair
the
planning
of
growth
committee
at
the
last
meeting.
The
same
question
was
raised
as
at
this
meeting.
It's
that
all
the
staff
have
availed
themselves
to
councillors
to
deal
with
items
on
the
agenda
that
are
held
with
the
exception
of
the
chief
planner,
the
last
meeting
she
was
not
here
and
I'd
know
if
there
was
a
reason
this
meeting
she's,
not
here
and
I,
don't
know
whether
you
were
to
the
deputy
city
manager.
N
O
A
We're
not
we're
not
finished
yet
we
haven't
even
started
the
agenda.
Yet.
Okay,
members
of
council
I
just
have
a
few
a
couple
more
pages
and
then
we
can
start
the
agenda.
So
I
want
to
stress
the
importance
of
preparing
your
motions
in
advance.
The
Curt
staff
are
here
to
help
you
prepare
your
motions
in
particular.
If
you
intend
to
move
a
motion
during
the
release
of
hold
I
will
insist
that
your
motion
be
prepared
in
advance
and
given
to
the
clerk.
A
If
you
do
not
have
your
motion
ready,
I
will
not
recognize
you
and
I'm
also
reminding
members,
but
you
must
state
your
motion
first
before
you
speak
to
it.
Member
city
council
follows
a
routine
for
the
processing
and
adding
of
any
motions
without
notice
during
the
meeting.
Please
remember
that
emotion
without
notice
must
include
a
reason
for
urgency.
If
you
have
an
urgent
motion
without
notice,
you
wish
to
bring
forward
at
this
meeting.
Please
give
your
motion
to
the
city
clerk
staff.
They
will
prepare
the
necessary
procedure.
A
Motion
from
my
review,
along
with
your
motion,
the
chair
must
agree.
The
motion
is
urgent.
Before
you
can
seek
leave
to
introduce
it
at
this
meeting,
it
will
require
30
votes
that
emotion
without
notice
to
the
agenda.
During
the
meeting
motions
added
to
the
agenda
not
subject
to
a
vote
to
waive
referral
to
a
committee
or
agency
I
will
be
reviewing
our
motions
carefully
and
will
vise
counsel
after
each
recess,
which
motions
need
a
motion
to
add
to
the
agenda.
Now
we
can
start
the
agenda
I
understand
before
we
started.
A
A
A
A
L
Through
the
through
the
speaker,
we
carried
out
the
first
phase
of
feeling
congested
the
official
plan
review
of
the
transportation
components
of
the
official
plan,
including
an
initial
review
of
rapid
transit
projects.
We
will
be
re
re-evaluating
all
of
the
rapid
transit
projects
as
part
of
the
second
phase
of
that
review
and
coming
back
to
council,
we
anticipate
coming
back
in
early
2018
with
a
with
the
first
part
of
that
phase
of
the
opie
review.
Okay,.
O
L
L
P
Q
B
E
To
the
speaker,
we
are
presently
studying
the
capacity
challenges
that
young
blur
station.
We
have
a
consultant
doing
that
word
presently
we're
looking
at
four
options
at
the
moment,
and
that
word
is
scheduled
to
be
completed
at
the
end
of
this
year
upon
completing
that
we'll
be
able
to
do
some
estimating
to
figure
out
how
much
we
do
need
to
carry
forward
in
the
budget.
Ask
okay.
O
A
G
R
O
Recommendation
13
calls
for
further
consultation
with
York
Region
and
Metrolinx
to
identify
and
evaluate
other
possible
measures
to
address
line
1
demand.
So
we've
already
done
a
lot
of
that,
though.
The
TTC
is
2012
downtown
rapid
transit
expansion,
study,
2
and
Metro
Lynx's
2015
young
relief,
Network
study
purpose
was
to
identify
and
examine
solutions
to
line
1
overcrowding,
correct.
R
O
B
L
S
Council,
if
I
might
add
to
that,
we
are
aware
of
the
issues
north
of
Bloor.
What
we
do
need
to
do
is
upgrade
and
greatly
enlarge
Yonge
and
Bloor
station
to
provide
additional
relief
at
that
location
plus,
as
you
know,
we're
implementing
automatic
train
control
in
phases
that
will
be
fully
in
on
line
one
by
the
end
of
2019
that
plus
the
additional
capacity
provided
by
the
Toronto
rocket,
which
there
are
82
and
which
are
already
deployed
on
line.
One,
does
provide
some
relief,
but
we're
committed
to
looking
at
other
options.
S
S
So
the
budget
they
say
the
ATC
project
is
on
time
and
on
budget
we're,
starting
from
the
other
end,
because
the
tyo
see
which
will
open
in
December
needs
to
have
clearly
a
functioning
signalling
system
makes
no
sense
to
put
in
conventional
signal
on
cyc,
so
we're
doing
it
in
phases
going
round
line
one
and
that
will
conclude
with
the
line
up
to
Finch
by
the
end
of
2019.
So,
yes,
I
can
confirm
that
it's
on
time
and
it's
on
budget.
What's
the
second
part
of
your
question,
counselor
in.
S
That
that,
and
that
is
fraught
with
risk,
because
we're
not
talking
about
paving
a
road
we're
talking
about
implementing
a
safety,
critical
system
for
which
you
have
to
have
not
only
the
hardware
in
place,
but
also
the
software
in
place,
and
it
needs
to
be
done
when
the
railway
is
not
is
not
operating.
So
what
have
we
the
luxury
of
closing
the
subway?
In
order
to
week,
then
we
could
accelerate
ATC,
absolutely
vocally.
B
S
The
relief
line
south
will
do
is
take
some
people
off
the
critical
interchange
point
of
Yonge
and
Bloor
because,
rather
than
go
west
on
line
through
an
interchange
at
Yonge
and
Bloor
and
AD,
so
the
already
congested
part
of
Lyman
South
of
Yonge
and
Bloor
people
will
instead
be
incentivized
by
a
another
option
to
go
via
the
relief
line
south
from
place
down.
Carlo,
okay,.
B
B
S
S
B
B
T
Through
the
chair,
as
per
the
Planning
Act,
we
in
fact
are
required
to
go
through
the
approvals
process.
What
we
can,
in
fact,
do
is
recommend
in
a
refusal
if
the
development
is
not
in
keeping
with
the
city's
policy
framework.
The
intention
of
Midtown
in
focus
is
to
put
as
a
bright
building
in
place
so
that
there
will
be
more
clarity
as
to
what
the
infrastructure
needs
are
in
keeping
with
in
device.
Firs
comment
about
the
increased
capacity
as
a
result
of
automatic
train
control
being
complete
in
2019.
We
as
well
as
the
Eglinton
crosstown.
T
B
C
Madam
Speaker,
at
repeated
council
meetings,
I've
asked
this
question
of
the
city
manager,
the
TVC
CEO
and
the
chief
planner.
What
is
the
evidence
based
top
transit
infrastructure,
priority
or
expansion
priority
that
Toronto
has
and
each
time
the
answer
has
been
consistently.
The
relief
line
I'd
like
to
ask
both
mr.
Byford
and
miscues
Matt.
If
they
stand
by
that
answer
today,.
S
The
council
got
plans
if
I'm
a
tenant.
Third
ctc's
perspective
certainly
would
be
the
belief
line,
but
we
recognize
that
it
needs
to
be
seen
as
part
of
a
overall
transit
network,
therefore,
that,
if
they're,
not
binary
that
doesn't
preclude
other
important
initiatives
such
as
fair
integration,
such
as
smart
traction
and
other
things
that
need
to
be
done.
C
S
What
I
was
saying
and
I
was
happy
to
repeat
it.
What
I
was
saying
was
they're
not
binary,
it's
not
either
all
absolutely.
The
relief
line
needs
needs
to
be
a
priority
to
the
TTC,
but,
given
that
that
takes
time
to
achieve,
if
there's
something
else
that
can
be
done
in
the
interim
and
smart
track
is
a
faster
or
more
immediate
solution,
as
is
fair
integration,
that
that
doesn't
mean
it's
a
case
of
you
do
one
that
you
don't
do
the
other
I
think
you
should
see
these
as
a
package
are.
S
T
C
You
for
your
candor
young
north
extension
to
York
Region,
we've
done
fielding
adjusted.
We've
done
other
studies
to
try
to
set
priorities
as
far
as
transit
expansion.
Where
does
that
fit
our
is?
Is
the
mayor
has
suggested
through
executive
committee
that
the
young
north
extension
should
be
considered
concurrently
with
the
relief
line
and
made
an
announcement,
in
fact,
with
your
regional
mayor's
just
the
other
day?
T
The
speaker
in
the
context
of
our
2013
feeling
congested
analysis.
We
did
include
the
extension
to
York
Region
in
our
modeling
analysis,
and
it
was
not
one
of
the
top
ten
projects
in
2018.
We
will
be
revisiting
that
analysis
and
given
new
assumptions
and
it
might
bump
around,
but
in
the
2013
analysis
that
we're
currently
working
on
it
was
not
in
the
top
ten.
Thank.
C
C
You
answered
that,
but
I
just
want
to
make
it
crystal
clear,
because
I
don't
want
any
mythology
or
false
assumptions
to
be
made.
Is
it?
Is
it
a
fact
or
not
that
if
we
focus
on
relieving
the
pinch
points
of
Yonge
and
Bloor
Station
that
those
of
us
who
commute
from
north
of
Lewers,
let's
say
in
Midtown,
Toronto,
Yonge
and
Eglinton
area,
will
see
relief
with
respect
to
capacity?
Given
that
that
pinch
point
has
been
relieved,
that
congested
point
in
the
middle
and
both.
S
Both
things
have
to
be
done.
We
believe
absolutely
we've
got
to
build
the
relief
line
south
plus
we
have
to
do
the
expansion
work
at
Yonge
and
Bloor,
which
is
a
very
heavily
congested
key
point
of
interchange
and
that
work
will
also
need
to
be
done.
What
will
provide
the
relief
for
young
north
or
the
the
Midtown
element
supply,
one
that
you've
suggested
180c
and
and
the
rocket
chains
that
we've
already
got
deployed
and
to?
Ultimately,
we
believe
there
will
need
to
be
a
relief
line
north.
C
You
very
much
and
and
I
have
actually
one
final
question
for
mr.
Rossini.
It
just
occurs
to
me,
given
that
we've
now
we've
received
confirmation
that
the
relief
line
is
indeed
the
top.
It's
not
a
key
transit
expansion
priority
to
deal
with
the
existing
overcrowding
at
on
our
system.
You
most
especially
right
as
a
pinch
point
of
Yonge
and
Bloor
answer,
mat
last
questions.
To
conclude
the
question:
we've
we've
been
funding
other
expansion
projects
such
as
the
the
one-stop
subway
to
Scarborough
town
centre.
N
I
I
It
is
the
top
priority,
or
is
it
part
of
the
a
matrix
of
priorities,
maybe
top
five
priorities
that
need
to
happen
concurrently
and
the
reason
why
the
question
is
important
is
because,
if
you
say
it's,
the
top
one
and
you
drop
other
things
that
you
have
going
down
the
pipe
and
you
focus
on
your
top
priority.
If
you
say
it's
in
the
top
five
priorities,
then
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
matrix
saying
you
know
what
there's
also
a
Glee
in
the
East
Passyunk
is
also
a
LinkedIn
West.
R
Madam
Speaker
I've
got
several
answers
to
the
question.
First,
on
the
fielding
congested
criteria,
we
ranked
a
series
of
priorities
and
the
ranking
had
at
the
time
and
the
circumstances
of
that
ranking.
At
that
time,
we
bring
it
forward.
Belief
line
was
the
top
part
in
amongst
a
series
of
priorities.
I'd
also
observed
that
we've
had
a
number
of
election
campaigns
and
announcements,
political
announcements
around
priorities
in
the
city
that
also
color
the
debate.
R
We've
also
had
direction
from
Council
on
a
number
of
these
projects,
maybe
not
saying
priorities
but
asking
us
to
take
action
on
four
specific
projects.
So
to
say
that
there's
one
list
with
one
definitive
thing,
I
think
would
be
doing
us
a
disservice.
We
were
accumulating
a
lot
of
projects,
we're
getting
them
through
the
development
of
at
the
EA
process
and
therefore
we
think
that
that's
the
way
to
prioritize
so.
I
Would
it
be
also
fair
to
say
that
if
you
prioritize
one
way,
the
relief
line
comes
out
on
top?
If
you
prioritize
another
way,
say
inclusion
of
more
marginalized
communities,
you
might
find
that
egg
lincolnÃs
comes
out
ahead
of
downtown
relief
line.
If
you're
looking
at
employment
zones,
you
might
say,
egg
Lincoln
West
comes
out
a
little
bit
ahead
because
of
the
connection
with
the
airport
lands
and
smart
track
with
its
link
to
two
tomorrow.
Madam.
R
T
The
speaker
of
the
eight
criteria
that
we
identified,
we
also
went
through
an
exercise
where
we
didn't
wait
the
criteria
equally,
but
we
in
fact
prioritized
different
criteria.
So,
for
example,
supporting
growth
could
be
prioritized,
you
can
feed
it.
A
link
to
the
airport
would
in
fact
be
higher
under
supporting
a
supporting
growth,
affordability,
supporting
neighborhood
improvement,
aerated
areas.
Social
equity
is
one
of
the
criteria
as
well.
T
You
can
take
any
one
of
the
eight
criteria
and
pick
it
out
and
use
it
as
the
basis
for
analysis,
and
you
will
get
a
different
set
of
priorities
so,
when
I
identify
that
we
beat
the
priorities
in
front
of
City
Council,
that
is
under
the
scenario
where
we
weighted
the
criteria.
Equally,
the
reason
for
that
is
in
our
sense
of
public
consultation.
T
We
ask
the
public
to
take
these
eight
criteria
and
pick
three
and
the
public
came
back
to
us
and
very
strongly
indicated
that
they
felt
all
eight
criteria
supporting
the
environment,
supporting
healthy
neighborhoods,
supporting
social
equity,
all
of
the
criteria
matter,
and
that
we
should
use
the
weighting
of
those
criteria
equally
to
evaluate
priorities.
Moving
forward
right.
I
So
so
what
I'm
hearing
here
is,
frankly
a
more
complex
answer
than
simply
a
single
line,
and
you
know
I'm
the
thankful
core
or
we're
not
prioritized
on
one
two,
three,
four
we're
prioritizing
there's
a
package
of
things
that
we
need
to
get
together,
we're
highlighting
this
one
now,
but
at
other
moments
we
highlight
other
ones
and
together
to
build
a
city
to
be
growth,
oriented
social
equity,
oriented
employment,
oriented.
We
need
to
have
a
complex
analysis
and
a
complan
the
numerous
projects
going
forward,
frankly,
at
more
or
less
the
same
time,
so.
R
I
Very
chronically
are
you
assuming
that
the
from
pace
north
has
to
be
a
subway,
or
do
the
numbers
allow
for
possibly
given
that
it
eventually
goes,
makes
its
way
up
to
Shepherd
and
that's
a
heck
of
a
lot
of
subway
money?
If
it
or
can,
can
we
be
thinking
that
you'll
be
thinking
or
analyzing
light
rail
as
a
possibility
with
paving
the
node
counter.
A
R
A
E
D
You
speaker
I,
wanted
to
focus
on
operating
costs.
I
did
that
at
committee
and
I
want
to
again
currently
the
Scarborough
subway
extension
we've
agreed
to
assume
100%
of
the
operating
and
maintenance
cost
that
correct
it's
ours,
that's
correct
the
Toronto
York
Spadina
extension
we've
assumed
100%
of
the
operating
maintenance
and
lifecycle
cost.
Is
that
true?
You.
S
D
N
D
D
D
J
D
The
other
thing
that
came
up
was
whether
or
not
and
I've
already
heard
a
question
about
whether
the
Yonge,
subway
extension
would
be
developed
concurrently,
the
mayor's
called
it
concurrently,
the
Premier's
called
it
concurrently,
I
believe
the
other
mayor's
said
they
were.
They
wanted
to
see
it
developed
concurrently,
along
with
the
relief
line.
Is
it
not
the
case
that
we
have
to
build
the
relief
line
before
we
bring
massive
more
ridership
on
to
the
young
line,
not
concurrently
up
for
Ana.
R
D
D
D
When
are
we
really
going
to
see
some
information
that
can
help
us
to
understand
one,
what
the
ridership
will
be
and
two
what
our
priorities
will
be,
because
the
fare
structure
is
absolutely
key
to
those
that
information
and
including
the
cost?
When
are
we
going
to
see
some
information?
When
is
natural
links
going
to
debate
this.
J
Madam
Speaker,
as
you
point
out,
counselor
we're
dependent
on
the
provinces.
Dementia
links
is
timing.
On
this
we
understand
they
will
continue
to
provide
us
with
updates.
They
are
collaborating
it
to
some
level
with
us,
but,
to
be
honest,
I
think
that
we'll
probably
hear
a
little
bit
more
later
this
year,
but
hopefully
next
early
next
year,
when.
J
Madam
Speaker,
just
to
remind
the
counselor,
the
fair
integration
piece
is
a
key
principle
and
a
key
condition
for
us
to
move
forward
on.
Many
of
these
cost
share
principles
for
that
for
that
discussion
to
be
further
developed
and
for
the
two
governments
to
sort
of
come
to
come
to
terms
on
that,
it
is
a
very
important
point
for
staff
and
it's
something
that
we're
paying
attention
to
very
carefully
Thank.
H
Madam
Speaker
I
want
to
add
staff
with
respect
to
clarification
around
priorities
and
I
do
recognize
that
staff
are
speaking
about
a
network
that
that
stitched
together,
where
were
you're,
able
to
carry
people
back
and
forth
in
a
timely
fashion,
but
I
want
to
clarify
the
top
priority
again,
because
the
the
way
I
read
the
recommendations
in
the
way
the
report
is
is
is
outlined.
It
doesn't
it's
not
clear
to
me
the
number
one
priority
versus
the
we'll
answer
in
the
written
answer
so
again
can
I.
L
H
There
a
reason
why,
if
the
answer
is
not
so
clear
in
the
report,
because
in
the
report
we're
talking
about
the
relief
line,
south
relief
line,
north
they're
all
listed
as
key
priorities,
including
the
yuen
yuen
subway,
invention
like.
Why
is
it
that
your
answer
on
the
floor
council
is
so
much
clearer
than
what
is
contained
in
the
recommendations
of
the
port
and.
R
It's
because
they
answer
on
the
floor.
That
was
clear
within
the
context
of
the
2013
feeling
congested
exercise
at
that
time,
and
since
that
time
we've
had
additional
priorities,
including
spark
track
identified.
So
this
current
report
it
indicates
that
there's
pressing
need
for
the
relief
line
we
want
to
get
on
with
planning
and
design
and
at
some
point
in
the
near
future
or
in
certainly
2019.
H
R
H
Why
is
it
that
the
young
subway
extension
is
further
ahead
than
the
release
line,
despite
the
fact
that
repeatedly
is
been
fed
by
the
pipes
by
staff
and
yourself,
and
that
the
release
line
is
the
number
one
priority
like?
Why
do
we
keep
advancing
other
projects
when
they
yep,
when
the
number
one
priority
for
Toronto
remains
the
relief
line.
H
But
that's
that's
what
you're
saying
to
me
now
but
again:
I
think
what
I'm
seeing
is
that
the
work
will
continue
to
advance
on
other
projects
when
the
relief
line
remains
the
number
one
priority.
So
how
do
we
reconcile
what
is
being
said?
What
the
reports
in
the
past
have
said
was
what
priorities
help,
what
council's
priorities
have
been
versus
the
actual
work
yet
you're
carrying
out.
So
how
do
we?
How
do
we
align
that?
Well,.
R
Madam
Speaker
2009,
we
got
direction
to
look
at
the
relationship
between
extension
and
Ling
young
north
and
the
relief
line
we
when
we
did
the
doctor
test
the
downtown
rapid
transit
expansion
project
2012,
the
TTC
2013
did
feeling
congested.
We've
been
advancing
the
environmental
approvals
through
the
tea
path
process
had
that
approved
largely
last
year
and
now
are
coming
back
with
the
further
alignment
work.
The
implication
that
we're
not
we're
having
been
doing
work
on
this
would
not
be
correct.
R
H
Then,
just
clarifying
both
the
relief
line,
as
well
as
the
yuen
yuen
subway
extensions.
None
of
them
are
funded
in
any
stretch
of
the
way
for
capital.
Correct,
that's
correct,
and
so
will
you
be
at
some
point
when,
when
we're
going
to
talk
about
funding
for
capital
for
the
next
transit
priorities,
will
you
be
champion
a
relief
line
over
the
young
subway
attention
so
about
a
speaker
you're
asking
for
both
right
now
again?
That
was
your
last
question.
A
R
Are
asking
to
move
forward
without
with
both
on
planning
and
design,
as
I
indicated
previously,
I
believe
we'll
have
to
come
back
with
a
report
that,
as
a
network,
will
look
at
the
priorities,
the
funding
availability
and
the
relationship
between
these
facilities
so
as
to
fulfill
the
commitments
that
we've
made
to
ourselves
as
council
and
attending
the
staff,
and
also
to
our
funding
partners,
Metrolinx
and
York
Region.
The
fact
that
we
had
a
decision
in
2009
to
support
young
north
expenses.
One
of
the
reasons
we're
here
today
thank.
P
Lecturer,
yes,
I'm,
going
to
ask
a
couple
of
questions
to
our
mirror
on
this
and
mr.
mayor
about
a
week
ago,
think
we
were
out
maybe
a
little
more
at
Carla
and
Gerrard
looking
across
the
street
at
where
the
relief
line
station
would
be,
and
at
that
time
you
were
considering
that
we
may
have
to
say
that's
it.
We
can't
do
anything
more
on
the
young
north,
because
we
have
no
commitment
on
the
relief
line
and
subsequent
to
that,
we
had
a
number
of
key
officials
come
from
905
and
I.
Believe
you
can.
P
F
I
I
said
what
I
did
with
respect
to
the
fact
and
we've
maintained
even
today
that
certainly
what
can't
happen
is
that
the
young
north
extension,
which
is
a
project
in
some
respects
that
is
a
subjective,
even
though
it's
our
subway,
it's
a
project
that
is
discussed
provincially
between
new
york,
mayors
and
the
orc
chair
and
the
province
almost
in.
Sometimes
it
seems
like
we
don't
exist.
But
having
said
all
that
I
said
what
I
did
about
that.
F
F
So,
as
a
result,
I
felt
it
was
better
to
have
them
as
allies
than
it
was
to
have
them
as
enemies
as
it
were.
Recognizing
I
think
that
the
political
reality,
madam
speaker,
is
that
the
two
transit
projects
in
the
provincial
domain
will
be
proceeding
in
some
way
related
to
one
half
one
another
anyway.
F
P
Could
you
agree
that
we
have
some
new
allies
in
our
request
for
money,
because
when
we
been
at
our
press
conference,
noting
that
we're
going
to
be
starting
an
environmental
assessment,
but
we
only
we
do
not
have
any
committed
funding
to
actually
build
the
relief
line.
Once
that
assessment
would
be
said,.
F
Madam
Speaker
I
would
say
that
and
answer
that
question
we
have
certainly
because
the
federal
government
of
allocated
billions
and
we're
going
to
get
confirmation
very
shortly
of
that
number
to
our
priority,
based
approved
by
this
council,
which
is
the
relief
line,
the
Eglinton
East
LRT
and
the
waterfront.
We
have
a
strong
indication
of
funding
from
the
feds.
We
have
to
go
back
to
square
one
thanks
to
the
road
toll
decision
and
decide
how
we're
going
to
finance
our
share,
but
the
missing
partner
at
the
table,
without
whom
I've
argued
and
I
believe
correctly.
F
I
would
say
about
Zika
I've
asked
to
chair
the
CEO
of
the
TTT
to
look
at
other
ways
in
which
we
can
help
in
the
meantime,
with
relief,
ops,
the
Yonge
Street
line
to
the
north,
but
in
the
meantime
this
is
an
urgent
project,
as
you
well
know,
and
I
appreciate
the
support
of
the
councillor
madam
Speaker,
coming
to
the
different
events,
but
we've
got
to
move
forward
with
this
as
part
of
constant
transit
building
in
Toronto,
where
we
don't
stop,
we
keep
going
like
every
other.
Self-Respecting
city
is
doing
it.
Thank.
P
S
L
P
G
Thank
you,
Mena's
Vick,
I'm,
not
sure
who
this
should
be
directed
to,
maybe
even
the
deputy
city
manager,
but
if
I
was
traveling
west
on
the
young
line
and
I
wanted
to
go
to
Yonge
and
Bloor
Dundas
Wellesley
College
Queens
Park,
st.
Patrick
museum
I
would
not
get
off
at
Pape.
Have
you
done
your
calculations
to
see
how
many
westbound
travelers
on
the
blue
air
line
will
actually
get
off
at
Pape
and
use
this
six
billion
dollar
relief
line
story?
I'm,
correct
sorry,
seven
billion
dollars
through.
L
The
speaker,
as
part
of
our
analysis,
we
looked
at
a
number
of
different
options
for
where
the
relief
line
would
connect
on
the
blur
Danforth
line.
The
two
key
locations
we
looked
at
were
broad
view
and
Pape,
and
we
did
determine
that
that
tape
would
in
fact
be
a
good
location
for
attracting
transit
riders
off
the
opticore
Danforth
line
before
Yonge
and
Bloor
a.
R
Madam
Speaker,
it's
like
I
just
might
enforced
if
I
could
just
reinforce
the
answer.
The
traffic
modeling
as
a
fine
grain
of
traffic
Souls,
and
it
has
the
origin
and
destination
desires
that
the
traveling
public,
and
so
yes,
it
looks
at
all
the
different
desires
lines
and
where
people
want
to
go.
And
yes,
some
people
would
continue
to
choose
to
go
westbound
to
Flora
to
come
down
to
college,
but
others
that
would
be
able
would
be
going
down
to
king
or
queen
or
port
parts
of
the
area
of
south
or
over
to
universe.
R
G
As
a
regular
subway
user,
I
can
only
tell
you
that
if
I
were
traveling
west
and
I
was
going
to
any
one
of
those
stations
that
I
had
mentioned,
I
would
not
I
would
not
get
off
of
Pape
now,
with
a
seven
billion
dollar
decision
before
us.
I
also
like
to
bring
up
the
issue
of
the
connection
between
downs,
eustachian,
young
and
Sheppard,
the
North
York,
a
relief
line,
which
is
estimated
through
course,
which
have
circulated
to
all
counselors
at
about
two
and
a
half
two
and
a
half
billion.
How
close
they
did.
G
R
Madam
Speaker,
we
have
before
us
a
recommendation
for
the
planning
and
design
funding
for
the
relief
line
south
in
the
business
case
for
relief
line
north.
You
do
not
have
before
you
a
decision
principle
decision
on
six
point,
eight
to
seven
billion
dollars
for
the
relief
line,
and
so
then,
like
I,
really
don't
think.
The
question
can
be
answered
in
the
way
that
you
framed
it
well.
G
Executive
Committee
certainly
asked
staff
to
report
back
on
that
I
hope
I
hope
to
see
that
in
the
future
I
was
asked
on
the
weekend.
Why
don't
we
just
build
the
field
and
let
York
Region
worry
about
the
rest.
Have
we
considered
that
option
wire,
even
if
some,
if
a
third
party
is
paying
for?
Why
are
we
investing
our
resources
in
a
subway
system
that
is
beyond
municipal
boundaries,
amount.
R
Of
speaker,
first
in
2008,
City
Council
approved
and
recommended
pursuing
the
work
for
the
relief
or
for
the
young
extension
north.
In
that
process,
the
York
Region
has
been
indicating
that
they
and
the
province
will
be
the
ones
over
to
be
the
funders
not
not
to
cut
the
cost
to
the
City
of
Toronto
and
so
we're
holding
them
to
that
bargain
and
we're
expected
to
continue
to
work
with
them.
As
the
mayor
and
others
have
indicated,
to
see
that
those
plans
realize,
because
it
has
advantages
for
us
and
will
defly
itself
and
its
funding.
G
S
Come
so
maybe
I'll
have
a
go
at
that
I
think
really
it's
a
it's
a
trade-off
between
the
point
you're
making,
which
is
that,
yes,
sure
you
could
say
well,
we
won't
tie
our
planners
up
an
hour
and
people
who
do
construction,
Susan's
team,
to
build
the
extension
so
that
they
can
focus
on
something
else
offset
against
the
fact
that
it's
our
line
it
needs
to
be
built
to
the
same
standards.
It
needs
to
be
built
to
our
satisfaction,
because
it's
a
continuation,
it's
not
an
adjunctive.
S
B
S
G
Thank
You
Man
I,
think
of
my
questions
for
the
deputy
city
manager.
Mr.
Libby
I
know
you're
getting
pulled
in
45
different
directions.
I
know
the
priorities
are
great
across
the
city.
The
waterfront
reset
was
supposed
to
come
back
on
the
second
core.
That's
been
delayed
now.
What
is
that
coming
back.
R
G
Now
I
know
the
city
manager
and
the
chief
planner,
both
acknowledged
Humber
Bay
shores,
is
built
out.
There's
a
plan
back
in
the
80s,
where
the
three
levels
ever
got
together.
We
built
the
Caminos
that
was
approved
by
this
council
and
by
planning
Parklawn
I'll
call
it
the
Westside
going
up
to
the
QEW
was
not
in
our
plan.
We
lost
at
the
board
the
OMB,
and
we
have
probably
30,000
new
residents
in
that
area.
Right
now,
and
the
big
unknown
is
the
Kraft
plant
mr.
Chrissy's,
across
the
street
27
acres.
G
R
If
the,
where
does
this
fit
the
planning
and
design
for
relief
line
and
the
young
extension
or
put
our
different
projects?
Obviously
the
reset,
as
we
said,
we're
coming
back
in
the
fall.
The
I
think
this
was
a
fairly
exciting
work
done
by
the
staff
to
look
at
some
options
that
will
help
your
community.
We've
also
got
direction
on
the
Park
Lawn
go
station
and
that
presumably
gets
tied
into
the
first
capital
proposals
that
they're
contemplating
on
that
mr.
Christie
site.
So
we'll
tie
that
together
it
will
come
back
again.
It's
one
of
these
projects.
G
All
so
you
know
we
I
fought
I,
won't
say
with
mr.
vibrant
pirate.
Mr.
pirate
I
fought
for
an
express
bus
for
buses
to
come
down
to
peak
periods
for
my
residence.
Is
it
time
for
my
residents
not
contain
double
the
fare
to
bring
them
down
to
work
in
the
morning
and
at
home
at
night,
they're
paying
double
the
fare
for
a
premium
service.
B
G
B
E
B
J
E
E
S
My
understanding
counselor
was
that
that
was
direction
of
council,
but
that
the
equation
was
based
upon.
We
would
the
reciprocity
prosity
would
be.
We
would
own
the
line,
even
though
it
goes
up
to
your
region,
so
we
pay
for
the
operating
costs,
but
we
get
to
own
the
assets.
Apart
from
the
bus
terminal
and
car
parts,
we
own
the
stations,
even
though
they
are
in
your
region.
So.
E
S
S
So
and
well,
I
mean,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
more
people
who
use
the
service,
obviously
the
great
for
the
revenue
income
for
the
TTC,
and
we
should
be
looking
to
maximize
that
to
maximize
the
return
on
our
investment
joints.
Investment
with
your
region
so
and
I
said
it
wouldn't
be
opposed
to
then
developing
the
areas
around
the
stations
are
already
doing.
That
places
like
your
University.
Yes,.
E
And
my
next
question,
I
guess
is
not
for
mister
Byford
I'm
wondering
if
there's
anything
that
could
be
done
at
this
point
to
alter
the
the
deal
so
that
we
are
the
recipients
of
something
anything
from
the
huge
development
potential
around
the
station
in
the
905,
where
we
are
paying
100%
of
the
bill
and
getting
nothing
in
return.
You'll.
R
Recall,
madam
Speaker,
that
there
was
a
direction
to
pursue
tip
funding
which
would
have
provided
some
incremental
revenues
based
on
extra
densities
that
developed
along
the
line
we
were
unable
to
get
to
get
the
Provost
to
implement
such
a
scheme.
That
would
be
a
helpful
thing
for
us,
or
the
provincial
government,
to
authorize
us
through
regulation
to
do
a
tip
on
law.
Thank
you.
C
G
C
S
C
I
C
S
C
S
C
S
I
guess
anything's
possible
counselor
in
the
past.
What
we
have
had
is
positional
release
on
the
extensions
to
subways
from
the
province
where,
until
the
the
operating
costs
or
the
other
revenue,
the
revenue
and
the
ridership
reaches
a
a
viable
level.
We
get
transitional
relief
from
the
province
that
something
else
that
we.
S
C
Of
mr.
Livy
I
would
assume
that
the
extension
north
on
Yonge
could
not
be
done
without
the
city's
cooperation.
Would
that
be
correct
because
that's
correct
so
so
we
then
would
have
the
leverage
to
require
that
we
have
the
other
projects
funded
prior
to
agreeing
to
that
extension.
Would
that
be
correct?
Speaker.
R
C
And
I'll
out
the
asking
the
same
question
of
the
mayor
and
a
sec
I
know
he's
engaged
in
a
conversation,
but
I'll
ask
you
first,
mr.
libya's
or
anything
in
this
these
recommendations
which
state
that
explicitly
that
if
we
don't
get
funding
for
the
relief
line,
including
the
Bloor
subway
station,
that
we
are
not
cooperating
with
the
extension
north
to
York
Region.
Does
it
explicitly
say
that
anywhere
the.
R
Most
madam
Speaker,
we
have
on
the
record
the
council
decision
of
2008.
That
said
that
you
had
to
have
a
relief
line
and
you
had
to
have
an
improvement
of
blurring
and
Yonge
and
other
matters
that
are
going
to
be
sufficient
for
us
to
before
so
ours.
Ours
was
a
conditional,
City
Council
approval.
We're
simply
asking
today
for
the
advance,
applying
a
design
to
the
15
to
30%
recognizing
we
have
a
previous
council
there's.
C
No
reiteration
of
that
condition
in
here
so
I'll,
because
I'm
going
to
run
a
time
I'll
switch
to
the
mayor.
Mr.
mayor,
is
it
still?
Is
that
still
the
your
intention
is
that
we,
the
funding
for
the
relief
line,
including
improvements
to
the
blur
station,
must
be
in
place
prior
to
our
cooperation,
to
expand,
or
at
least
concurrently
with,
but
not
not
after
I.
F
K
You,
madam
Speaker,
through
you
to
staff
in
order
to
help
you
make
a
decision
of
how
I
vote
on
this
and
you
please.
Let
me
know
what
is
happening.
The
report
that
you're
supposed
to
be
doing
along
Shepherd
from
Don
Mills
to
East
and
from
Yonge
Street
West
along
Sheppard
Lane.
There
was
a
report
that
you
were
supposed
to
be
coming
back
on
the
1st,
the
the
early
2017
and
we're
at
that
stage,
almost
caught
in
the
middle
of
2017.
L
Through
this
speaker
that
that
report,
we
will
be
bringing
back
at
the
beginning
of
2018.
This
is
the
second
phase
of
the
Official
Plan
review
on
transportation,
and
we
will
be
re-evaluating
the
full
range
of
different
transit
projects,
including
those
identified
by
Council,
to
be
added
to
the
list,
such
as
those
along
Sheppard.
Thank.
L
K
R
K
Given
the
look,
okay,
I'm
gonna
ask
a
question
that
I
tried
to
make
it
the
TTC
the
other
day,
and
that
is
when
will
we
receive
from
either
the
chief
planning
of
the
deputy
city
manager
a
list
again?
This
follows
up
on
earlier
questions
a
list
again
of
our
city's
transit
priorities
in
sort
of
an
order
of
which
are
the
most
most
urgent.
K
R
Madam
Speaker
first
Jennifer
will
be
bringing
forward
an
update
on
our
feeling,
adjusted
and
the
network
and
in
2018
early
in
2018
and
I,
believe
that
will
be
coming
back
with
a
more
fulsome
comprehensive
report
on
the
various
priorities
at
2019
early
and
2019
late,
18
apps,
the
election
okay,
so
as
to
assign
some
funding
priorities.
So,
given.
K
R
K
Right
so,
okay,
the
CLE
I
guess
this
is
for
mr.
pert
allâh.
The
question
is
in
regard
to
this
is
in
regard
to
West
I'm,
going
to
follow
up
on
counselor
pass
your
next
questions.
Westbound
passengers
going
toward
bluer
help.
Do
we
know
how
many
passengers
go
southbound
at
at
bluer
and
how
many
passengers
go
southbound
at
st.
George,
the
westbound
passengers.
K
L
K
K
K
I'm
wondering
we're
being
asked
to
give
you
know
this.
We're
I
think
we're.
We've
spent
4.1
million
on
this
analysis.
So
far,
we've
allocated
55
million
in
the
10
year
capital
plan
I
mean
this
is
a
fairly
significant
decision
that
we're
asked
to
carry
on
with
this
is
it.
This
is
apparently
the
number
one
transit
priority
I'm
just
wondering
why?
Some
of
that
detailed
analysis
is
not
on
the
report.
K
K
Over
the
next
two
years,
okay
and
now
I
think
ahead,
one
more
Oh,
so
last
question,
I
and
and
and
I,
don't
know
why
we
call
this
relief
when
it
really
isn't
providing
leaf
relief
for
anybody.
That's
you
know
getting
on
it
Finch
or
are
those
stations
north
of
north
of
Bloor
that
are
coming
south
that,
in
fact,
you
know
some
of
the
other.
K
You
know
councillor
Matt
Lo
and
councillor
Robinson's
and
councillor
Carmichael
grebs
residents,
because
there's
really
not
provided
and
councillor
filling
in,
of
course,
right
he's
right
in
the
middle
of
it,
because
it
really
doesn't
provide
relief
for
all
of
those
transit
riders.
So
why
have
we
not
looked
at
perhaps
double-tracking
that
line
or
poor
or
providing
or
costing
out
what
it
would
cost
to
add
add
a
rail
line
along
that
north-south
route
at.
R
Least
your
last
question,
madam
Speaker,
just
one
thing:
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
understand
you're,
saying
it's
not
providing
relief
what's
happening.
Is
that
the
extra
capacity
that's
because
of
the
diversions
and
so
you're
attracting
latent
demand,
so
there's
actually
some
new
riders
coming
into
that
line
because
there
is
some
excess.
So
it's
not
quite
right
that
savers,
no
relief,
there's
still
going
to
be
similar
levels
of
congestion,
but
it
is
attracting
the
right
and
Susan
can
answer
the
question
on
the
double-tracking.
E
G
S
S
G
In
the
context
of
excuse
me,
in
the
context
of
an
integrated
system
and
recognizing
that
sometimes
a
particular
project
that
might
be
high
on
the
priority
list
will
have
an
impact
on
some
of
the
other
required
lines.
So
in
that
context,
what's
the
benefit
of
trying
to
get
people
to
use
the
Spadina
line,
somehow
with
Overland
Service
or
even
a
subway,
for
example,
I
just
throw
this
out
I
know,
there's
been
con
talk
about
connecting
the
shepherd
line
from
young
over
to
over
to
the
island.
G
Just
that
kind
of
a
connection
to
the
moment,
to
the
point
that
you
can
promote
people
using
the
Spadina
line
as
a
way
easing
congestion
on
the
young
line
and,
of
course,
that's
not
to
say
that
we
eliminate
the
relief
line
because
I
think
the
reef
line
is
needed,
but
in
terms
of
maximizing
needs
the
use
of
existing
lines.
Why
would
we
not
sort
of
look
at
projects.
S
So
counsel
we
are
and
that's
the
reason
we
do
the
extensive
modeling
and
the
reason
why
we
look
at
this
as
a
networks
you
put
in
all
of
the
variables
you
add
in
things
like
fair
integration,
the
impact
on
smart
track,
the
impact
of
the
Spadina
extension
and
the
impact
of
various
other
options
that
could
be
built
in
order
there.
You
look
to
see
on
a
network
perspective,
what
provides
the
greatest
relief
and
what
provides
the
greatest
use
of
existing
capacity
so
that
we
already
do
okay.
So
it's
all
in
the
modeling.
A
R
G
R
E
In
the
purse
to
you
Madam's
figure
in
the
first
phase,
we
will
be
getting
some
relief
in
the
southern
portion
to
the
relief
line
south.
But
we
are
working
closely
with
the
city
and
Metrolink
to
develop
the
planning
for
the
relief
line
north
and
it
will
be
the
leaf
really
flying
north
portion.
That
will
provide
the
relief
to
the
northeast
of
the
city.
J
Thank
you
so
I
guess
through
you
to
the
deputy
city
manager
in
a
world
that
scarce
funds
would
our
eggs
or
our
priority.
When
we
approach
the
provincial
government,
our
energy
not
be
better
spent
securing
those
scarce
funds
for
the
for
the
relief
line,
as
it
goes
well
up
to
the
Danforth
but
north
of
the
Danforth,
as
opposed
to
any
looking
for
funds
to
extend
the
Yonge
Street
line
north
into
Richmond
Hill.
Madam.
R
Speaker
we're
going
to
some
chains
not
to
ask
those
questions
in
this
report.
What
we're
trying
to
do
is
get
the
planning
and
design
to
15
and
30
percent,
so
you
have
the
ability
to
look
at
that
priority
against
other
priorities
and
a
comprehensive
network
fashion
and
we're
not
proposing
you
have
to
make
these
trade-offs
those
kinds
of
trade-offs
today,
but
we
do
believe,
given
the
important
of
the
relief
line
historically
and
on
an
ongoing
basis
that
you
have
to
have
good
information,
and
we
think
you
need
15
to
30
percent
designed
to
do
that.
R
J
Q
Yeah
Thank
You,
speaker
I,
just
I,
guess
to
Mister.
By
for
that,
and
following
up
on
a
question
I
heard
that
was
asked
by
councillor
Mary
saw
on
the
Spadina
subway
extension
north
of
steals.
It's
my
understanding
that
York
Region
picks
up
any
shortfall
in
in
operating
costs.
York
Region
subsidizes,
the
Spadina
extension
from
steals
to
highway.
Seven,
if
it
underperforms
correct
I'd,.
S
Need
to
check
my
facts
on
that.
Certainly,
we've
discussed
a
transitional
arrangement
as
the
ridership
bills
and
but
unless
Rob
can
correct
me
on
that,
I
don't
believe.
That's
the
case,
I'm
pretty
certain.
That's
not
the
case.
Counselor
I
think
the
the
operating
costs
accrue
only
to
the
TTC,
but
obviously
we
also
get
the
revenue
back.
They
do
not
get
any
of
that
revenue.
I
well.
Q
Know
that
that
wasn't
my
understanding
some
time
ago
when
I
was
on
the
Commission
and
we
were
actually
dealing
with
this
and
and
if
that
changed
at
some
point,
it
would
be
interesting
to
find
out
where
it
was
my
understanding
that
that
a
a
York
Region
pays
the
capital
costs
or
their
share
the
capital
costs
to
build
the
subway
from
skills
to
highway.
Seven
correct
answer.
S
Q
And
it
was
also
my
understanding
that
that
York
Region
would
pick
up
a
shortfall
in
projected
some
some
years
back
three
four
years
ago,
five
years
ago,
that
the
shortfall
would
be
in
around
nine
ten
million
dollars
and
and
that
York
Region
would
pick
up
that
operating
shortfall.
For
that.
For
that
section
of
the
line
north
of
steals
on
an
ongoing
basis
again,.
S
Q
Would
be
I
would
be
very,
very
interested
in
that,
because
that
was
our
understanding
back
then,
and
and
if
that
changed
I
would
be
interesting
to
see
how
and
where
that
changed.
I
guess
my
other
question
and
I
really
don't
know
who
to
ask
this
question
of
in
practical
terms.
I
look
at
the
report,
that's
in
front
of
us
in
practical
terms.
What
are
we
really
doing
today?
What
do
we?
What
are
we
doing
with
this
report
gift
today,
I'm.
R
Speaker
in
practical
terms,
were
confirming
the
Carla
alignment
of
the
relief
line.
South
we've
had
extensive
public
consultation
and
investigation
and
that's
being
recommended
we're
recommending
that
we
continue
to
have
design
work,
planning,
a
design,
work
done
on
the
relief
line
south
and
parallel
what
the
work
that's
being
done
on
you
and
young
extension
north.
Those
are
the
principal
objects
of
this
report,
so.
Q
It
from
from
the
practical
other
than
the
alignment
from
a
practical
perspective.
What
what
design
work
are
we
really
talking
about
and
how
much
design
work
before
you
get?
Any
kind
of
you
know:
funding
commitment
from
the
from
the
provincial
or
federal
government,
given
the
magnitude
of
money
that
we're
talking
about
with
respect
to
this
project,
do.
E
The
speaker
over
the
next
two
years,
we
plan
to
begin
with
geotechnical
investigations,
some
tunnel
design,
some
preliminary
station
configuration
and
establishing
the
property
requirements,
establishing
utilities,
utility
relocations,
some
initial
systems
design
and
some
project
management
services.
For
all
of
that.
That
will
bring
it
to
the
15
to
30%
design,
completion
that
we're
looking
for
so
that
we
can
refine
the
schedule
and
estimate
to
a
class-3
where
we
can
have
more
certainty
when
we
bring
that
back
here
to
Council
at
the
end
of
18.
Okay,.
Q
And
again,
given
the
magnitude
of
this
particular
project,
a
in
terms
of
costs
and
B
in
terms
of
you
know,
construction
challenges,
if
you
will
both
from
a
design
perspective
as
well.
Actually
building
is
that
we're
we're
talking
a
great
many
years
here?
Is
there?
Is
there
a
plan
to
do
to?
You
know
build
in
the
improvements
above
ground
that
provide
some
relief
to
what
is
a
very,
very
congested
line,
and
is
there
any
relief
in
sight
for
the
current
users
of
the
of
the
Yonge
Street
subway
line,
I?
Q
Think
or
is
that
all
basically
suspended
and
as
we
as
we
begin
to
wrap
our
minds
around
and
around
this
particular
project,
and
given
that
this
might
be
out
there
decades
in
the
works?
What
relief
are
you
planning
for
the
current
users,
the
people
that
are
backing
up
out
of
the
sort
of
the
subway
platforms
today,
I
try
to
use
the
line
so.
S
Number
number
of
things:
one:
we've
introduced
the
Toronto
rocky
trains
which
that's
now
82.
They
provided
something
like
10
percent
extra
capacity,
because
their
walk
through
change
with
no
middle
cabs.
So
that's
the
first
thing.
Second
thing:
progressive
rollouts
of
ATC
automatic
train
control,
which
is
the
communications
phase,
change
control
system
that
allows
you
to
safely
move
trains
closer
together.
That
will
be
in
situ
in
phases
by
the
end
of
2019.
And
thirdly-
and
this
is
an
ongoing
thing-
successive
iterations
for
the
timetable,
operating
practices
that
get
trains
moving
more
quickly
reduced
delays.
A
S
N
S
S
N
S
N
S
N
S
N
What
how
can
we
work
out
the
fact
that
and
deal
with
or
what's
in
these
reports,
or
how
do
we
deal
with
it
as
we
go
forward
with
the
extension
to
be
able
to
make
sure
that,
if
you're
coming
from
out
of
town
into
the
city
on
an
ongoing
basis
and
using
the
extended
subway
system
that
there
is
a
fair
financial
contribution
made
to
the
upkeep
and
operation
of
the
system
and
the
City
of
Toronto
taxpayers,
don't
have
to
fund
that?
Well,.
S
J
N
A
motion
to
that
extent,
as
we
go
forward
will
be
worthwhile
and
then
the
last
question
is:
if
I
recall
there,
subs
was
miniscule
for
public
transit
compared
to
ours.
You
know
what
the
subsidy
is.
The
annual
amount
that
York
Region
pays
towards
supporting
public
transit
and
general
the
amount
that
the
city
is
paying
to
support
public
transit.
The.
S
Last
time,
I
look
Consular
because
it's
suddenly
kind
of
dear
to
my
heart,
because
I'm
constantly
quoting
the
TTC,
is
the
low
subsidized
transit
in
North
America,
not
the
standing.
What
City
Council
gives
us
and
our
subsidy
providers
around
ninety
eight
cents
per
ride,
that
some
I
look
New,
York,
Region,
believe
it
or
not
as
just
south
of
five
dollars
per
ride.
But.
N
N
S
P
P
A
D
S
D
S
Well,
I
mean
if
X
of
Lee,
with
what
we're
saying
the
timeline
is
driven
by
the
point
at
which
we're
saying
we
must
have
to
believe
line
in
situ
that
that
is
what
the
modeling
shows
by
2031.
We
will
not
be
able
to
cope
at
the
key
interchange
of
yet
line
one,
namely
young
employed.
We
do
not
start
the
work
if
we
don't
have
the
line
in
situ
by
then
and
so
the
actual
construction
elements
at
that
time
line
is
about
eight
years
great.
D
And
so
during
the
14
year
period,
just
looking
at
the
advances
in
technology
and
the
velocity
in
which
they're
coming
what
technological
changes
do
you
anticipate
in
the
next
fourteen
years?
Knowing
that
we
don't
know
the
future
and
I
mean
myself
just
working
in
the
ecosystem,
knowing
that
we
don't
know,
but
what
changes
do
you
anticipate
with
the
driverless
vehicle
and
the
sharing
economy
in
the
next
14
years?
Well,
so
I.
S
Mean
we
are
keep
as
a
TTC.
We
are
watching
what's
happening
with
developments
such
as
automated
vehicles,
we're
embracing
new
technologies
such
as
automatic
train
control,
and
we
are
talking
to
other
transit
properties
to
see
what
are
the
latest
technologies
in
terms
of
tunnel-boring
machines
and
ways
to
expedite
and
tunnel
construction.
So,
and
we
are,
we
are
mindful
of
developments
and
we
try
to
keep
abreast
of
them,
and
so.
D
In
looking
at
the
agreement
that
Innisfil
just
recently
had
with
uber
for
their
entire
transit
system,
are
you
in
conversation
at
all,
with
uber
or
lyft,
to
look
at
ways
that
we
can
look
at
the
offsetting
I
mean
we've
had
a
decline
in
the
ridership,
because
people
are
opting
into
the
pool?
Are
you
seeing
that
or
we're
reaching
out
to
ver
to
see
if
that
would
be
an
offset
waiting
for
something
to
come
in
14
years?
From
now
about.
D
B
D
B
The
entire
gambit
of
what
exists
out
there,
we're
looking
at
what
San
Francisco
has
done
with
religion
at
different
parts
and
in
the
in
North
America
to
see
what
has
been
done
and
what
we
can
do
with
either
uber
or
or
or
the
taxi
Association
in
Toronto.
So
we're
not
ruling
out
anybody
at
this
stage
are
that's
something
that
we're
currently
working.