►
From YouTube: City Council - January 31, 2019 - Part 2 of 2
Description
City Council, meeting 1, January 31, 2019 - Part 2 of 2
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=15348
Part 1 of 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfiCPy1UX3M#t=11m15s
Meeting Navigation:
0:12:07 - Meeting resume
2:39:23 - Public session
A
B
C
B
People
are
looking
on
this
at
this.
This
was
sent
yesterday
for
over
20
over
10
venues
over
20
days
of
liquor
license
extensions
sent
yesterday
in
two
wards.
It
is
an
unfair
practice
that
we
are
accepting
this
and
that
it
is
all
being
put
on
the
backs
of
our
wonderful,
wonderful
clerks.
We
need
to
change
this
soon.
B
E
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
B
H
A
A
A
H
A
D
A
I
B
B
H
A
A
A
A
Mm
2.17
notice,
if
this
motion
has
not
been
given
a
two-thirds
vote,
is
required
to
waive
notice.
This
motion
is
subject
to
have
to
refer
to
the
North
York
Community
Council.
A
two-thirds
vote
is
required
to
waive
referral.
This
motion
has
been
deemed
urgent
by
the
chair
on
favor
of
wavy
notice,
recorded.
A
A
J
Point
of
privilege-
yes
I,
just
want
to
say,
I-
want
to
thank
members
of
council
for
taking
this
historic
vote
that
we've
really
made
an
important
step
in
terms
preserving
Italian
heritage
in
Toronto.
By
doing
this,
I
want
to
thank
former
councillor
czaja
Mary
and
councillor
Cole
for
also
being
very
involved
initials
stages
and
I
want
to
thank
all
the
volunteers
who
took
on
this
attempted
scheme
to
develop
the
Columbus
center
and
they
fought
hard
and
long
to
save
it.
J
I've
got
people
here
like
former
MP
and
colleague
of
council
carriage
as
Joel
Volpe
is
here
my
granddaughters
here,
Lucia
Taylor
and
all
the
Inka
Mary
McDonald
from
heritage
Toronto,
what
a
great
job
she
did
and
all
the
volunteers
and
really
thought
long
and
hard
and
I
want
to
thank
them
all
for
a
job.
Well,
I
I
born
a
job,
but
John
Lombardi
would
save
it
and
councillor
boots.
Yes,.
A
B
A
A
Yes,
was
Johnny
Lambert
job
Foley?
Okay,
let's
continue!
Thank
you
very
much
everyone
for
coming
2.18.
This
motion
has
been
deemed
urgent
by
the
chair.
This
motion
is
not
subject
to
a
vote
to
waive
referral.
This
motion
has
been
added
to
the
agendas
before
council
for
debate
on
favor
carried
on
the
I.
Oh
yeah,
we're
on
the
item.
Thank
you,
mM
2.19.
A
A
B
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
F
A
A
F
The
other
item
is
specifically
to
do
with
the
corner
of
Cottingham
and
Avenue
Road,
and
this
you
know
Cottingham
is
the
outlet
for
the
neighborhood,
and
there
are
significant
concerns
about
safety
at
that
corner,
with
additional
staging
hoarding
on
a
lane
of
Avenue
Road
I,
don't
agree
that
we
should
be
giving
up
a
lane
on
Avenue
Road
to
the
developer.
I
also
recognize
that-
and
this
is
why
councillor
Thompson
I
have
worked
well
together
on
this,
because
I
also
understand
the
reality
in
front
of
us.
F
That
being
said,
though,
just
so
you
know
this
developer
when
he
first
when
he
first
wanted
to
build
here,
initially
wanted
to
use
Robertson,
Davies,
Park
adjacent
to
the
property,
and
he
was
told
right
out
of
the
gate
by
city
staff.
We
don't
do
that.
We
don't
allow
parks
to
be
used
for
staging
areas
for
construction.
F
Not
only
did
he
not
hear
that
from
city
staff,
he
then
went
and
wrote
a
letter
to
the
whole
community
and
dropped
a
door
to
door
to
door
asking
the
residents
to
lobby
me
and
city
staff
to
allow
him
to
build
his
building
from
the
park.
We
once
again
said:
that's
you
you
we
don't.
Not
only
do
we
not
do
that,
but
we
don't
want
to
set
a
precedent
so
that
other
parks
in
the
future
might
be
a
theme
of
developers
to
build
from.
F
He
wouldn't
take
that
for
an
answer
and
he
continued
lobbying
for
this
park.
When
I
say
lobbying,
I
mean
he
literally
lobbied
and
lobbied
and
lobbied
and
then
came
forward
with
Delaine.
At
that
point,
his
behavior
was
so
inexcusable
that
I
decided
that
it
would
be
better
to
work
with
city
staff
rather
than
somebody
who
was
not
willing
to
actually
address
realities
to
achieve
the
goals
for
the
community.
That
was
fair.
We
looked
at
things.
F
We
even
said
we
looked
at
options,
including
perhaps
even
allowing
for
temporary
daytime
staging
during
off-peak
hours
and
then
having
them,
remove
it
during
peak
hours.
The
challenge
that
was
raised
to
me,
though,
and
I
and
I,
appreciate
city
staff's
advice
that
that
the
police,
when
they
are
paid
Duty
there
they
could.
F
They
could
make
a
decision
that,
if,
if
the,
if
the,
if
a
crane
hoist
is
done
outside
of
the
hoarded
area,
that
they
could
actually
opt
to
just
shut
down,
the
entire
view,
haven't
you
wrote
all
together
and
that's
not
a
good
option
either.
So
I'll
conclude
by
just
saying,
I'm
fed
up
with
developers
just
sort
of
bullying
their
way
through.
We
have
to
make
reasonable
decisions
on
principle.
F
I
I
disagree
with
this
Lane
I'm
going
to
exhibit
that
in
my
vote,
but
I
also
believe
that
these
amendments
are
important
to
move
forward
with
and,
ultimately
you
know,
I
I'm,
just
frustrated
and
I.
Think
a
lot
of
you
are
too
what
I'm
told
all
the
time
is
that
if
you
don't
approve
a
lane,
a
closure,
they're
gonna
go
and
sue
you
they're
gonna
go
sue
the
city.
F
A
B
K
Through
you,
I
just
had
some
quick
questions
for
the
city
manager
and
I'm
trying
to
find
my
copy,
but
I
don't
seem
to
have
it.
But
my
recollection
is
that
in
2017
there
was
a
request
for
you
to
city
manager
to
come
back
with
a
report
on
this
very
subject
matter.
I'm
just
wondering.
Where
is
that
report
and
Weitz
hasn't
returned
yet
to
us.
K
L
K
K
K
K
A
K
Thank
you
through
you,
madam
Speaker.
Mr.
Williams,
this
motion
is
similar
to
one
that
was
made
I
believe
in
2017
requesting.
Obviously
we
look
at
a
series
of
things.
In
some
cases
a
tax
freeze
and
looking
at
what
we
could
do
to
assist
business.
You
and
I
have
had
some
discussions
around
the
challenges
that
we
were
having
across
across
town
I.
Think
this
is
relates
to
the
downtown
relief
line
and
so
on.
C
C
C
So
I
did
speak
to
the
mover
of
the
motion
about
the
possibility
of
pushing
back
that
report
back
deadline
by
until
quarter
1
of
220,
which
is
when
we
would
have
all
the
material
ready
and
can
address
the
issues
on
the
relief
line,
but
equally
we'd
be
applicable
to
all
major
construction
sites
across
the
some
suit.
That.
K
Was
sort
of
my
concern
why
I
held
it
because
I
wanted
to
ensure
that
we
weren't
going
to
have
two
distinct
report
or
actions
taken
on
this
matter?
That
is
global
in
nature,
in
terms
of
the
city
and
so
you're,
suggesting
that
the
members
motion
will
be
reflected
in
the
report.
That
you're
working
on
that
will
be
brought
back
in
is
a
cue
we're.
C
C
So
we've
already
commenced
a
significant
amount
of
work
with
respect
to
trying
to
help
mitigate,
to
some
extent,
to
challenges
as
a
result
of
councillor
Cole
and
councillor
Burnside's
earlier
motion.
So
we're
we've
been
moving
on
those.
So
we
have
a
suite
of
programs
that
we're
working
with
in
terms
of
supporting
areas
of
rbis
and
also
supporting
areas
that
don't
have
be
is
just.
D
A
C
So
we're
gonna
bring
back
a
review
of
many
different
options
and
then,
in
terms
of
in
the
interim,
yes,
a
budget
that
will
be
in
front
of
you
over
the
next
six
weeks.
That
does
include
some
money,
specifically
for
crosstown
to
roll
out
in
more
extensive
basis.
Some
of
the
ideas
now
we're
in
counselor
:,
counselor
Burnside's
earlier
motion.
Thank.
I
There
is
the
Eglinton
motion,
which
is
very
clear
and
you've,
been
speaking
to
counselor
thompson
about
that,
but
when
we
looked
at
expediting
all
of
the
work
on
the
relief
line,
this
is
just
a
part
of
ensuring
that
we
consider
business
protection
as
one
of
the
threads
to
that
needs
to
be
considered
in
the
planning
of
the
relief
line.
That's.
C
Fell,
I
think
you
can
anticipate
our
report
indicating
that
this
work
should
be
done
earlier
in
the
process
in
terms
of
planning
for
a
business
mitigation
and
for
preventing
as
much
as
possible
business
disruption.
Some
was
obviously
going
to
always
occur,
but
we
need
to
have
the
plans
and
the
budget
in
place
from
the
get-go.
However,.
I
For
the
relief
line,
we're
looking
at
utilities,
sewers,
property
acquisition
and
I
think
that
this
motion
is
intended
to
just
place
business
protection
as
one
of
those
many
things
that
are
part
of
the
planning
without
taking
over
your
process,
but
actually
advancing
that
a
little
bit
in
the
early
stages
of
the
planning
rather
than
after.
The
work
is.
I
I
A
A
K
K
It
has
been
a
great
challenge
for
many
of
the
businesses,
as
we've
heard,
along
Edington
Avenue
from
the
very
West,
a
very
East
as
part
of
the
crosstown
construction
activities
and
so
on,
and
we
have
been
consulting
with
businesses
on
Edgington
Avenue
from
the
area
from
Victoria
Park,
essentially
over
to
Kennedy
Road.
Many
of
them
are
feeling
now
the
the
challenge
is
that
well,
that
has
come
as
a
result
of
the
construction
activity
and
development
along
Eglinton
Avenue.
K
It's
something
that
we
all
want,
but
we
know
that
there's
a
corresponding
impact
that
has,
in
many
cases
rather
detrimental
effect
on
businesses,
and
so
we
don't
want
to
close
businesses.
We
want
to
ensure
that
they
open.
We
want
to
be
able
to
retain
them.
We
don't
ensure
that
people
are
employed,
I'm,
buoyed
by
the
fact
that
my
conversation
with
mr.
Williams
today
about
you
know
what
can
be
done
in
terms
of
mitigating
and
helping
in
terms
of
short-term.
K
Requests
came
from
members
motion
in
2017
was
to
ensure
that
you
know
there
was
more
of
a
thread
in
terms
of
the
the
overall
concern
and
objectives
to
ensure
that
businesses
can
sustain
themselves
and
can
contrive
and
or
that
we
do
as
much
as
we
can
to
help
them
to
sustain
during
this
particular
period
of
construction,
we're
talking
about
additional,
like
there
was
seven
years
of
construction
and
so
many
of
those
businesses.
Unfortunately,
we
don't
help
them.
K
They
will
not
survive
and
clearly
I
don't
want
to
be
a
part
of
a
system
where
we're
gonna
kill
business
in
the
city.
It's
chair
of
Economic
Development
community
of
development.
I.
Don't
want
to
see
that
quite
frankly,
we
want
to
enhance
growth.
We
want
to
ensure
that
people
can
go
to
work,
we
live
and
the
businesses
that
are
complaining
they're.
Not
in
my
view,
you
know
doing
something
that
is
unwarranted.
K
It
is
their
very
survival
that
they're
concerned
with
and
I
think
that
when
we
make
decisions
we
ought
to
ensure
that
we
factor
those
considerations
in
and
in
in
order
to
help,
because
clearly
we
want
to
progress
and
see
things,
development
and
so
on,
but
at
the
same
time
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
actually
don't
kill
business.
So
those
are
the
concerns
that
I
have
and
I'm
hopeful
that
when
this
report
comes
back,
we're
able
to
obviously
have
a
policy
that
will
help
us
in
godess.
K
I
I'll
just
be
quickly
and
say:
I'm
happy
councillor
Thompson,
if
this
is
helping
with
thinking
about
how
to
handle
the
cross
links
when
it
comes
in
to
you
or
when
the
subway
starts.
But
it's
just
been
my
experience
in
a
couple
of
projects
and
then
watching
the
Eglinton
crosstown
that
while
we
love
transit,
we
need
to
build
it
right
away.
I
We
need
to
actually
help
the
business
owners
and
I
know
it
will
be
a
painful
discussion,
because
at
what
level
do
we
start
assisting?
What
level
do
we
talk
about
property
tax
relief?
How
do
we
ensure
that
people
that
have
built
their
lives
and
have
been
in
business
for
a
long
time?
Aren't
the
victims
of
a
great
transit,
a
great
transit
improvement,
so
on
paper
venue
we're
taking
people's
homes,
we're
doing
different
things?
We've
got
big
relationships
with.
I
All
of
them
were
spending
a
lot
of
time
talking
to
those
people
about
the
route
and
the
impact
on
their
residential
property,
but
I
don't
think
we
spend
near
enough
time
talking
about
the
impact
and
the
business
impact
on
the
commercial
property.
So
this
is
my
intention
is
to
weave
this
theme
into
the
many
other
threads
that
have
to
get
started
in
order
to
have
the
relief
line
ready
and
it
was
very
exciting
to
go
to
Pape
station
with
the
mayor
and
with
Callister
bradford
councillor
robinson
and
councillor.
A
D
D
Because
we
just
underwent
the
construction
of
the
Spadina
subway
extension
in
the
area
and
the
keel
Finch
intersection,
for
example,
as
an
example
was
very,
very
bad
for
for
local
businesses
for
everybody,
you
know
I
did
you
know
it's
not
just
businesses
that
suffer
during
these
things?
It's
everybody,
the
entire
community,
is
kind
of,
like
you
know,
in
in
the
middle
of
a
big
big
construction
zone
for
a
long
period
of
time
and
everybody
suffers.
D
We
are
just
about
to
undertake
another
very
significant
project
on
on
Finch
Avenue
as
an
example
and
and
same
kind
of
thing,
part
of
our
difficulty
with
all
this
speaker
is
that
as
part
of
the
the
the
tenders
as
part
of
the
the
construction
you
know
in
in
terms
of
how
we
award
contracts,
we
are
not
there
yet
in
in
order
to
to
be
able
to
minimize
the
impacts
on
local
community.
Why?
D
D
What
we
need
to
start
and
I
can
I
understand
why
contractors
and
builders
they
just
want
to
use
systems.
They
know
and
understand
in
building
out
some
of
these
things,
because
that's
what
they
know
dig
a
ditch
poor
foundation,
some
steel,
some
concrete
up
up
up
up
up
cover
it
up,
and
then
you
that's
the
way
they
do
it.
D
D
D
So
I'm,
just
hoping
that
that
we
actually
turn
on
minds
to
this
to
this
question
in
a
serious
way,
as
opposed
to
just
kind
of
simply
emotion
every
once
in
a
while
that
says:
hey
you
know
what
we
need
to
businesses
in.
That
area
are
dying.
We
need
to
rope
in
a
laneway
or
or
whatever,
because
that's
not
going
to
work,
that's
not
going
to
cut
it.
So.
J
If
I
just
want
to
add
that
you
know
this
motion
was
moved
previously
in
the
last
council
by
councillor
Josh,
Cole
and
I-
think
by
councillor
Burnside,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
so
I've
had
some
history
with
this
motion
and
this
whole
issue
that's
being
raised
here,
I
think.
As
a
councillor
Perutz
has
said,
there
needs
to
be
a
rethink
here
on
these
mega
projects,
because
the
impact
on
communities
is
enormous
and
its
long-term.
J
Again,
a
negative
we've
gone
through
this
for
a
decade
and
that's
not
including
when
you
were
the
Honorable
mayor
of
York
when
they
started
the
first
Eglinton
subway
that
was
filled
in
by
another
government
that
got
elected
and
said
Subway's
we're
thing
of
the
past
anyways.
So
we
went
through
two
of
these
things
on
Eglinton
twice
dug
up
the
street
destroyed
everything
anyways,
and
we
all
certainly
want
this
investment.
J
So
that
is
was
incorporated
where
money
was
put
into
the
project
through
community
benefits.
That
was
the
first
time
that
was
a
breakthrough
now
going
forward.
They
again
my
advice
is
that
the
impact
of
these
major
construction,
prolong
term
of
benefits
have
a
dramatic
impact
on
not
the
property
owners,
but
the
business
tenants.
J
These
are
the
little
mom-and-pop
shops,
the
barber
shops.
You
know
the
nail
shops,
the
randy's
patties,
all
these
little
shops.
They
basically
cannot
withstand
one-two-three
catch
in
ten
years,
you're
trying
to
run
a
business
and
you
can't
park,
and
you
can't
even
see
your
store
cuz
there's
a
trailer
parked
right
five
feet
from
your
front
window
for
five
years
five
years.
Mr.
Pizza
counter
pizza,
never
mind
the
little
truck
you
had
and
Finch
there.
The
remember
was
parked
there
at
Finch
and
keel
five
years
with
a
giant
trailer
in
your
front
door,
your
business.
J
So
right
now
the
property
owners
get
a
lot
of
benefit
because
of
the
increased
property
values
capital
gain.
They
do
fine.
They
bought
the
properties,
all
of
them
on
England
bought
properties
for
125,000
bucks
back
in
the
day.
God
bless
them
under
$25,000.
Now
they
got
expropriated
or
the
property
values
go
up
to.
J
You
know:
2
3
million
for
the
same
property,
so
the
property
owners
are
taking
care
of
its
the
business
tenants
that
need
some
support
to
sustain
them
through
this,
and
there
were
employers,
they
all
employ
three
four
or
five
people
again,
I've
I've
put
another
before
between
keel
and
bathrooms,
I
counted
them.
A
hundred
stores.
Work
closed
still
closed
today,
can't
rent
them
no
business.
So
it's
a
hundred
job
now.
The
other
thing
is
just
be
careful
that
the
city
cannot
sustain
the
support
for
business
or
communities
by
itself
on
tax
benefit.
J
So
if
you're
going
to
go
into
this,
make
sure
there's
a
partner
at
the
table
that
helps
support
the
impact
on
business
again,
business
tenants
on
the
communities
that
are
affected
by
this.
So
that's
the
critical
caution
I
have
we
can't
do
it
alone
on
the
property
tax
base.
You
need
help
because
these
projects-
they
don't
last
for
weeks
or
months,
it's
years
and
there's
going
to
be
major
ones
coming
down
the
road.
Thank
you
thank.
F
F
We,
the
voices
of
the
of
the
small
business
owners
who
are
struggling,
and
then
you
know
some
people,
you
know,
will
just
say:
oh
well,
you
know
they
just
it's
for
the
greater
good
and
we're
building
these
major
projects,
so
they
just
got
to
deal
with
it,
and
why
are
they
complaining
and
why
are
they
crying
about
it?
We're
building
we're
building
wonderful
projects
and
everyone
should
be
happy.
F
You
know
a
thoughtful
person
can
hold
two
thoughts
in
their
head
at
the
same
time,
and-
and
there
is
one
reality
that
yes,
we
are
strongly
supportive
of
construction
like
the
crosstown,
as
we
will
be
with
the
relief
line
and
other
major
projects
that
will
that
will
improve
the
quality
of
life
in
Toronto.
But
that
doesn't
mean
that
we
should
discount
or
ignore
the
reality
that
there
are
I've
talked
to
I
earlier
about
somebody
who
I
became
friendly
with
a
shop
owner
who
started
crying
in
my
office
in
front
of
me.
F
F
The
provincial
government
should
be
stepping
up
and
helping
out,
but
while
we
consider
big
ticket
items
like
tax
relief,
there
are
thoughtful,
specific
things
that
I've
heard
from
businesses.
That
I
think
could
go
a
long
way,
such
as
one
example
restaurants
have
said
to
me:
why
is
the
city
continuing
to
force
me
to
pay
for
a
patio
permit?
Well,
we
can't
use
the
patio
because
of
the
noise
and
the
construction
outside.
Are
there
things
like
that?
That
could
just
show
us
that
you
get
it
that
you
get
it
that,
like
we
can't
use
the
port.
F
This
patio
is
like
redundant
now
so
come
on,
and
are
there
things
that
we
can
do
creatively
to
try
to
relieve
their
burden
to
keep
them
alive
from
year,
one
to
year,
ten
or
whatever?
It
is
until
the
construction
is
complete?
That's
what
we
should
be
focusing
on
and
I
think
you
know,
Mike
and
I
and
others
who
have
been
through
this
experience
can
tell
you
from
our
own
experience
how
difficult
it
is
for
them
and
for
those
of
you
who
will
have
projects
go
through
your
communities.
You
will
find
the
same
thing.
F
You
know
this
is
not
about
the
contest
between,
should
we
be
having
great
public
works
projects
or
not
it's
that
we
should
proactively
think
about
who's
going
to
be
affected
by
this,
so
that,
whether
they
be
residents
or
businesses
alike,
they
don't
become
collateral
damage
and
that's
what
we
want
to
avoid.
Thank
you.
I
I
A
A
K
I
A
L
Okay,
counselor
holidays.
Thank
you,
madam
Speaker,
and
thank
you
to
the
staff
for
waiting
I.
Don't
need
to
place
questions
to
remind
members
of
counsel
with
the
community.
Environment
Day
is
all
about,
but
for
the
purposes
of
the
record,
could
staff
comment
on
the
main
types
of
collections
and
services
that
they
do
on
Environment,
Day
I.
Think
electronics
is
the
big
one
household
hazardous
waste.
Can
you
remind
me
of
just
the
categories
that
form
the
bulk
of
the
purpose
of
the
Environment
Day.
M
L
So,
in
the
environment
day,
we
bring
these
large
bins
in
we
do
some
advertising.
We
tell
members
of
the
community
bring
on
down
all
the
things
that
you
can't
normally
throw
into
the
garbage
or
into
the
recycling.
We're
gonna,
collect
them
on
Environment,
Day
and
and
make
it
a
community
event.
Is
that
an
accurate
representation
of
what
these
things
are
through.
L
So
up
until
now,
councilors
held
one
Environment
Day
per
councillor
Ward
if
they
held
them
across
the
city
and
that's
correct,
that's
that's
what
we've
been
doing,
and
so
the
motion
before
us
looks
to
increase
the
number
of
community
environment
days
in
recognition
that
there's
25
councillors,
25
Ward's,
that's
correct.
Okay,
any
any
sense
on
what
the
cost
to
do.
Such
an
exercise
is
through.
M
L
L
M
L
Addition
to
the
the
actual
pickup
of
the
items
and
the
the
bulk
in
the
the
the
tonnage
and
that
sort
of
thing
is
it
fair
to
say
that
it's
a
substantive
effort
of
staff
to
put
on
environment
day
to
have
all
the
people
go
out
there.
Regardless
of
how
many
people
show
up
on
Environment
Day
and
also
a
fair
amount
of
resources
that
go
into
advertising
these
type
of
events
and
newspapers
and
wherever
else
that
they
go.
L
A
N
E
M
N
B
M
N
B
N
N
M
N
B
M
M
B
B
B
Through
the
chair,
the
intentions
at
that
time
was
to
collect
household,
hazardous
wastes
and
also
at
the
time
we
were
distributing
backyard
composters.
So
the
intention
was
to
primarily
deal
with
household
hazardous
waste
and
also
provide
back
here
composters
to
manage
organic
waste.
Okay,
okay-
and
there
was
some
education
element
as
well
around
that
as
well
was.
B
G
B
G
And
I
just
found
out
that
you
could
drop
some
of
these
things
and
some
of
the
places
that
you
you
mentioned
it,
but
I
know
that
I
have
a
lot
of
residents
that
wait
for
the
environment
day
to
get
rid
of
their
paint
cans
and
their
tires
and
their
electorates.
Don't
you
agree
that
if
we
make
it
easier
for
them
because
they
already
know,
this
is
already
something
they
know
and
though
we
have
a
much
higher
chance
of
having
actually
these
properly
separated
and
unrecycled
through.
M
You,
madam
Speaker
ease
of
use,
is
an
extremely
important
feature
of
a
well-managed
solid
waste
system
and
having
multiple
depots
and
multiple
transfer
stations
and
multiple
businesses
that
accept
these
materials,
all
feed
into
that
solid
waste
management
system.
So
they
are
currently
available
whenever
you
need
to
bring
materials
back,
you
don't
have
to
wait
for
that
one,
but.
M
B
I
I
just
wanted
to
ask
our
CFO
I
gathered
that
this.
Actually
we
can't
make
this
decision
proper.
It
should
go
to
the
budget
process
to
be
finalized
there,
but
we
can
advise
the
budget
process
that
we're
interested
in
having
this
restored
would
I
be
right.
To
put
it
like
that
through
the
speaker,
that's
correct,
very
good!
Thank
you
so
much.
This
is
I'm.
Just
gonna
ask
the
city
manager
a
question.
I
When
we
left
here
in
July,
August
September,
whatever
our
last
meeting
was,
and
we
instructed
our
staff
to
go
to
court,
we
one
of
the
arguments
they
made
was
that
if
we
go
to
25
seats,
that
our
constituents
will
have
less
service,
less
access,
etcetera
and
I'm,
assuming
that
there
is
an
intention
to
maintain
service
for
the
new
area,
let's
say
that
I've
taken
on
in
the
city
would
I
be
right.
So.
N
I
B
I
N
I
I
I
Motion
that
I
have
here
would
basically
approve
a
second
compost,
Environment
Day
for
someone
that
wants
it.
Some
councillors
might
not
need
that,
but
councilors
like
myself
and
others
have
a
old
Burrell
that
are
now
part
of
our
neighborhood.
So
that
would
work
if
we
were
to
take
the
days
and
let
the
staff
know
what
days
we
might
like
and
then,
if
budget
counts
are
budget
approved
it,
then
we
would
have
our
days
already
set.
Would
that
work
for
your
staff
through.
G
You,
madam
Speaker,
recognizing
the
importance
of
environment
days.
Councillor
Fletcher,
our
new
general
manager,
Matt
Kelleher,
you've
had
the
quick
opportunity
to
meet
we've
been
discussing
the
opportunities
to
make
sure
that
we
can
make
this
happen
for
you.
He
has
already
put
into
place
actions
to
start
tentatively
planning
those
second
days
for
you
pending
the
outcome
of
the
budget
committee
and
then.
I
I'll
just
come
over
to
our
staff
and
ask
that
the
Environment
Day
is
a
very
creative
way
of
bringing
people
together
around
the
environment
in
the
City
of
Toronto
and
it's
very,
very
popular.
Are
there
of
you
ever
consider
your
your
divisions,
very
creative
in
their
advertising?
Trying
to
get
people
to
recycle?
Have
you
ever
considered
something
a
bit
more
creative
at
Environment
Day
around
the
education
package
that
you
could
be
offering
to
the
tens
of
thousands
of
people
that
dutifully
bring
their
things
there?
A
through.
M
M
K
B
A
M
So
through
you,
madam
Speaker
to
the
council,
historically,
the
compost
has
been
dropped
off
in
a
big
heap,
and
residents
would
scoop
it
up
and
taking
themselves
in
in
working
towards
a
more
efficient
process
and
handing
out
materials.
We
will
have
it
bagged
and
that
will
be
dropped
off
for
residents
to
pick
up.
That's
really.
The
only
change
in
the
program
this
year
is
that
the
material
will
be
bagged
for
ease
of
use
for
the
residents.
N
M
Through
you,
madam
chair
to
the
council
on
compost
days,
you
can
order
as
much
as
we
have
in
stock
and
we
will
try
to
make
sure
that
we
can
deliver
it.
What
we
will
be
doing
in
the
next
few
days
is
sending
out
a
notice
to
all
councillors
to
identify
the
number
of
loads
that
they
would
like
and
the
number
of
compost
days
in
order
to
manage
the
supply
of
our
material
and
historically,
we
charged
the
councillors
$250
per
load,
and
that
will
continue
this
year
as
well.
$250.
N
N
N
Okay
staff
compliment
so
the
savings
that
we
were
having
their
300k.
That
was
primarily
yet
the
the
ideas
we
would
have
fewer
staff,
that's
correct,
but
we
might
also
have
more
people
who
actually
show
up
more
residents
who
might
come
out
to
participate.
Yes,
that's
awesome,
okay
and
then
the
is.
Is
there
an
education
component
of
this
for
solid
waste
for
the
programs
that
you
offer?
Do
you
use
this
day
as
a
way
to
educate
and
share
information
and
and
communicate
with
residents?
That's.
M
N
G
Hurt
madam
Speaker
I
apologize.
If
this
isn't
the
clear
clarification
you
want,
but
I
need
this
clarification
before
I
vote
on
the
environment
days,
because
I'm
now
hearing
the
answer
stated
different
ways:
can
we
have
separate
compost
days
anymore,
I'm,
understanding
now
that
people
have
phone
to
book
and
been
rejected
through.
G
M
You,
madam
speaker
to
the
council.
There
are
no
changes
with
compost
days.
They
will
be
offered
this
year
based
on
councilors
demand
on
when
they
would
like
to
have
them
the.
What
we'll
be
doing
over
the
next
few
days
is
sending
out
a
notice
to
the
councilors
to
see
what
days
they
would
like
to
have
their
compost
days
on
and
and
the
number
of
loads
of
compost
that
they
would
like
to
have
delivered
in
order
for
us
to
balance
the
supply
and
demand
to
make
sure
that
we
have
enough
supply
for
all
the
councillors.
Okay,.
G
G
G
What
is
the
cost
of
the
bagging
as
opposed
to
dumping,
a
truck
load
at
two
to
three
hundred
dollars?
I?
My
staff
would
be
better
at
telling
you
what
the
cost
of
each
truck
load
is,
but,
but
here
we
are
looking
for
two
hundred
eighty
three
dollars
in
efficiency
on
environment
days.
What
is
the
cost
of
bagging
this
compo
that
my
residents
are
deliriously
happy
to
just
load
it
into
their
truck
right
now,
through.
M
I
I
Just
so,
basically
understanding
that
this
has
to
go
into
the
budget
process,
we're
not
making
that
decision
today,
but
that
have
our
staff
undertake
a
process
where
we
could
book
those
counselors
that
wish
to
have
a
second
environment
date
can
book
that
day
and
then
presuming
that
we
agree
to
this
in
budget
those
will
be
already
booked.
So
that's
that
process
setting
up
there
and
no
requirement
to
have
a
second
one
unless
you
want
to
have
one.
So
that's
replacing
the
original
motion.
B
A
B
L
Offer
some
comment:
so
I
was
listening
to
the
dialogue
about
some,
how
citizens
are
gonna,
have
less
access
and
no
education
about
the
environment
and,
like
look
think
about
it,
we
got
twenty
five
warts.
Everyone
gets
invited
to
an
environment
day.
It's
not
as
if
people
are
counting
these.
So
it's
it's
sort
of
a
farce
that
somebody
is
gonna
miss
a
missing
environment
day,
because
everyone
is
still
invited
to
one
I
mean
the
only
thing,
that's
something
that
people
are
going
to
miss
is
when
they
open
up
their
utility
bill.
L
So
you
know
I
want
everyone
to
play
this
tape
back
when
everyone
calls
them
and
complains
about
the
boost
in
price
on
medium
and
large
bins
of
$100.
You
can
tell
them
why
an
extra
environment
day
is
such
a
great
idea
as
far
as
I'm
concerned
these
things
that
are
redundant
they've
morphed
into
something
that
they
weren't.
Originally
they
were
originally
to
collect
household
hazardous
waste
and,
as
we
heard
to
you,
know,
distribute
green
bins
and
composters.
The
fact
is,
all
that
stuff
is
different
done
differently.
Now
you
don't
need
to
go
to
environment.
L
They've
dumped
your
paint,
you
can
take
it
to
the
local
store
that
sells
painting
they
take
it
back.
So
the
world's
changed.
You
know
I.
This
is
all
about
self
promotion
of
counselors
call
it
for
what
it
is.
I
understand
the
temptation
we
can
see
the
wagons
got
circled
as
soon
as
we
started.
Picking
at
this
I'm
calling
it
exactly
what
it
is,
and
so
my
motion
is,
is
going
cancel
it
if
you
want
to
have
an
environment
day.
Counselors
have
a
nice
that
budget
now
that
we
just
doubled
up
lots
of
money
for
promotion.
L
So
if
counselors
want
to
have
an
environment
data,
they
should
use
their
their
office
budget
explain
to
their
constituents
why
they
think
it's
such
a
great
value.
We
had
one
booked
already
now
and
now
we
just
want
to
double
it
down.
It
just
doesn't
square
up
we're
going
to
go
back
to
constituents
and
tell
them
that
we
need
money
now
for
solid
waste
and
I
I.
Don't
know
how
I
could
possibly
explain
that
I
can't
support
doubling
up
environment
days.
N
You
madam
Speaker
displayed
in
bold
attempts.
We've
been
unable
to
book
our
environment
days
on
abiding
by
a
day
on
weekdays
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
if
you
can
put
it
on
the
screen,
City
Council
directed
general
manager,
solid
waste
management
to
revise
the
community
environment,
a
booking
policy
such
that
events
can
be
booked
on
any
day
of
the
week
and
not
restricted
to
weekdays.
I
should
point
out
this
weekend.
N
That
being
said,
I've
been
a
big
fan
of
the
environment
days
for
for
many
years,
they're
extremely
popular
they're,
great
educational
tool,
they're
a
great
way
to
get
dangerous
wastes,
possibly
flammable
products
out
of
households.
It
it's
very
cost
efficient,
efficient.
It's
a
vital
service
people
enjoy
coming
there
and
meeting
with
their
city
councilor,
as
well
as
being
able
to
clear
out
their
garages
and
basements
from
potentially
hazardous
waste.
It
plays
an
important
role.
N
A
B
A
I
Crawford,
the
budget
chief
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
weren't
passing
that
that
is
a
sent
into
the
budget
process.
Pardon
me
that
it
was
going
to
the
budget
process,
and
indeed
that's
where
this
is
going.
It's
not
it's
not
we're
not
agreeing
to
we're
sending
that
request
to
budget
for
call
for
the
process.
That's
it.
A
L
To
the
floor,
I
mean
look,
you
know
we're
facing
tax
hikes
and
we're
looking
at
enhancements
of
services,
and
you
know
if
I
wasn't
worried
about
the
risk
that
this
council
might
actually
pass.
It
I'd
put
a
motion
to
have
hayrides
in
some
of
the
parks
in
my
area,
we're
just
getting
into
more
and
more
things
here
and
I'm,
not
sure
that
all
of
this
stuff
is
sustainable
and
I.
Just
you
know,
I'm
glad
is
going
at
least
to
budget
rather
than
being
decided
here
on
the
floor,
but
I
regret
that
these
motions
come
forward.
B
B
B
I
G
L
G
L
G
L
G
L
F
I
J
I
Yes,
I'm
sorry,
nobody
wants
to
answer
this.
That
is
correct,
so
we
do
have
a
policy
for
the
TTC
we're
trying
to
encourage
people
to
take
TTC
and
we're
foregoing
some
revenue
and
so
not
all
areas
of
the
city.
Let's
say
if
you're
in
some
Ward,
even
the
north
part
of
my
Ward
and
you
decide
to
keep
your
stay
over
because
you've
had
too
many
drinks
on
New
Year's.
More
than
likely,
you
would
not
get
a
ticket.
B
G
G
I
G
I
I
But
we're
not
directing
we're
simply
requesting
you
know
it
is
up
to
the
Chief
of
Police
and
the
city
manager
would
advise
the
Chief
of
Police
we'd
like
to
have
that
around
enforcement
and
take
that
into
consideration
for
their
operational
guidelines.
That
would
be
the
pathway
if
this
was
passed
through.
F
Don't
know
I
don't
see
Vince
here,
but
perhaps
one
of
you
can
answer
with
respect
to
the
the
permit
park
in
inventory.
Has
there
been
any
consideration
whether
it
whether
the
intent
is
good
or
not,
what
the
impact
would
be
through
you,
madam
Speaker,
on
the
inventory
that
we
have
on
the
streets
where
there
are.
There
are
streets
where
there's
you
know
there,
maxi
capacity
and
and
and
it
could
there
be
an
adverse
effect
of
of
sort
of
messing
with
the
inventory
on
yours
in
that
in
that
way,.
G
B
F
That
do
you
understand
the
where
we
allow
where
we
allow
for
permit
parking.
The
inventory
means
the
the
number
of
spaces
that
we
have
on
the
street
and
there's
a
certain
number
of
permits
that
are
provided
to.
However,
many
spaces
have
been
determined
to
be
on
the
street,
given
that
I
give
you
to
Vince,
for
example,
whose
very
you
know
proud
of
his
work.
F
G
F
It
in
Europe,
given
that
say
this
delicately,
the
the
the
dearth
of
information,
perhaps
that
we
have
about
exploring
this
positive
suggestion.
Might
it
be
wiser
to
send
this
to
the
appropriate
committee
to
get
some
of
these
answers
and
then,
if
the
answers
come
back
as
to
tell
us
that
there
wouldn't
be
any
significant
concerns
or
adverse
impact
than
perhaps
we
should
support
it,
but
maybe
we
need
this
information
in
front
of
us
first
through.
G
You,
madam
speaker,
started
I
am
aware
that
the
issue
of
on-street
parking,
particularly
downtown,
is
quite
a
contentious
and
complicated
matter.
I
know
this
came
up
when
we
talked
about
car,
share
spaces,
etc.
I
do
also
believe
that
our
GM
of
Transportation
is
looking
at
this
parking
issue.
More
broadly
so,
I
would
appreciate
the
opportunity
for
us
to
get
the
proper
information
to
inform
your
discussion
through
a
committee
process
and.
F
L
F
A
I
A
L
So
I
just
want
to
make
a
point
on
this
before
we
vote.
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
need
to
be
understood
about
the
Hearne
generating
station
and
why
the
vote
is
important,
so
we
did
already
vote
on,
exploring
or
or
supporting
that
a
report
come
forward
to
establish
this
as
a
Heritage
Site.
This
is
what
we're
talking
about.
Here's
the
húrin
generating
station.
L
We
can
debate
all
day
about
its
merits
as
a
historical
site.
We
can
debate
all
day
about
its
merits
as
a
property
to
purchase,
but
one
Thank
You
councillor,
Prusa
I-
can
focus
here
just
for
a
moment.
One
of
the
big
pieces
of
this
site
is
the
smokestack
I
hear.
There's
asbestos
in
it,
I
hear
all
sorts
of
things,
but
you
know
it's
a
it's
a
great
big
smokestack
that
you
can't
miss
if
you're
down
in
the
harbor.
Why
is
that
important?
L
L
Okay
thanks,
madam
speaker,
so
I
won't
be
long,
but
I
just
want
to
point
out.
The
existence
of
the
airport
in
the
harbor
and
what's
important
to
understand,
is
the
orientation
of
the
runway.
If
you
follow
the
line
of
the
runway,
you'll
see
that
it
intersects
with
the
her
and
generating
station
over
here
there,
her
and
generating
station
tower,
is
so
tall.
You
can
see
how
it
casts
a
shadow
for
my
understanding
of
the
airport
in
the
airport's
operations.
Is
that
that
smokestack
is
very
important
to
flight
paths.
L
Aircraft
will
actually
maneuver
to
avoid
it
and
when
they
take
off,
they
will
actually
take
a
steeper
plane
of
incline.
In
order
to
avoid
that,
my
understanding
as
well
and
I'm,
not
the
expert
on
this,
but
there
are
people
around
that
are
experts,
and
there
are
questions
to
be
asked
before
these
reports
come
back,
is
what
is
the
overall
impact
on
that
stack
towards
any
changes
or
growth
to
the
airport?
L
Now
again,
we
could
fill
a
day
with
the
council's
debate
about
the
airport,
but
I
think
everyone
in
this
chamber
would
recognize
the
economic
impact
of
that
Airport
and
the
strategic
importance
that
asset
is
to
this
city.
So
the
message
I
like
to
leave
to
councillors
is
be
very
careful
on
this.
These
are
not
votes
to
be
taken
lightly.
They
have
strategic
and
city
billing
impacts
and,
very
specifically,
is
the
impact
of
in
the
future
of
that
smokestack.
L
So
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
way
in
the
future
that
if
this
council
wants
to
own
that
building
and
create
a
historical
site,
if
we
can
find
a
way
to
tear
down
a
big
ugly
smokestack,
because
it
will
have
a
tremendous
impact
on
the
city
and
on
the
airport
and
the
strategic
importance
of
that
Airport.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
B
I
And
this
is
an
exercise
not
only
to
ensure
its
heritage
nature
as
well
as
to
look
at
how
we
might
ensure
that
for
years
to
come
and
in
the
building
out
of
the
East
End
of
the
waterfront.
This
this
building
would
play
an
incredibly
important
role,
make
a
big
contribution,
and
it
would
it's
seen
as
a
building
around
the
world,
not
just
here
in
the
City
of
Toronto.
So
attempting
to
now
that
the
market
value
has
been
established
of
the
building
attempting
to
bring
that
into
the
public
realm
as
part
of
the
waterfront
redevelopment.
I.
A
F
A
L
So
I,
thank
you,
madam
Speaker
I.
You
know
look
I
just
want
to
make
the
point
that
I
think
we're
poking
around
in
a
place
we
shouldn't
be.
This
is
about
enforcement.
This
is
about
existing
bylaws.
There
are
systems
in
place
to
purchase
a
temporary
permit
for
parking
overnight.
Hey
you
know.
As
a
city,
we
got
this.
What
I
don't
understand
is
how
we
would
ever
square
up
with
anybody
that
calls
in
and
says
I
got
no
place
to
park.
L
There's
a
bunch
of
cars
parked
illegally
come
write
some
tickets
and
get
them
out
of
here
and
so
look
I.
Don't
know!
There's
no
way
for
me
to
do
this
in
a
motion,
but
I'd
love
to
publish
the
name,
the
phone
numbers
of
all
the
counselors
and
their
cell
phones,
so
that
you
know,
if
somebody
calls
the
parking
dispatch,
they
can
just
refer
it
over
to
the
counselor
to
sort
out
you
know
at
2:00
or
3:00
in
the
morning,
but
people
just
want
to
park
by
their
homes.
L
We
see
this
at
Community
Council
all
the
time
when
we
have
terrible
fights
over
parking
permits.
I
think
there's
a
point
to
be
made.
People
just
expect
the
laws
to
be
enforced,
and
if
somebody
wants
to
stay
overnight,
we've
got
a
system
in
place
where
there's
room
in
those
parking
areas
to
go
and
apply
and
purchase
a
temporary
permit.
It's
not
that
hard
anyways
I
just
want
to
make
the
point.
A
A
F
So
my
motion
is
to
oppose
the
Provinces
appeal
with
the
Court
of
Appeal
to
pursue
a
leave
to
appeal
application
to
the
Supreme
Court
of
Canada
in
the
event
of
the
the
province
is
successful
on
its
appeal
at
the
court
of
appeal
and
to
take
any
further
steps
necessary
and
consistent
with
these
instructions
in
consultation.
But
the
city
manager
I'll
simply
say
that
I.
F
The
many
voices
in
the
city
who
we
represent
and
I
want
to,
moreover,
say
that
while
there
have
been
divisions
about
different
tactics
and
strategies
and
there's
been
a
lot
of
tension
amongst
some
of
us
and
certainly
even
not
seeing
eye
to
eye
in
the
award
elections,
I
want
to
acknowledge
that
I
believe
that
Mara
Tory
and
the
majority
of
council
are
completely
on
the
same
page
with
this
common
goal,
to
make
sure
that
we
can
represent
our
constituents
well
and
that
our
local
democracy
is
strong
and
intact
and
has
integrity.
Thank
you.
K
A
E
Madam
Speaker
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
will
be
voting
for
option.
One
and
I
want
to
explain
why
it
is
in
part,
because
counsel
gave
very
clear
instructions
by
majority
and
I
realized.
There
were
people
who
voted
against
that
back
at
the
time
of
the
discussion
of
the
size
of
the
council
and
what
was
going
on
with
bill
five
at
the
time
of
much
greater
importance
to
me
at
this
stage
of
the
game.
E
Is
that
whether
it's
the
current
government
or
some
government
twenty
years
from
now
and
we're
not
here,
I,
believe
that
an
appeal
decided
one
way
or
another
in
terms
of
what
the
decision
is
may
well
provide
us
with
something
we
were
severely
lacking
in
which
I
think
would
be
beneficial
for
the
country
to
have
and
for
our
city
to
have,
which
is
the
courts.
Reasoning
that
may
put
some
context
around
the
whole
matter
of
the
provinces,
legislative
power
to
do
things
affecting
cities
and,
in
particular
the
City
of
Toronto
and
I.
E
Think
that
kind
of
judicial
reasoning
might
be
of
help
to
some
future
council
or
this
one
in
some
future
event.
Because,
right
now,
if
you
read
some
of
the
opinions,
we've
had
occasion
to
read
and
they've
been
released
to
the
newspapers,
so
I'm
not
telling
any
secrets
here,
you
know
on
the
subject
of
transit,
unloading
and
other
things.
There
is
both
not
much
that
sort
of
speaks
to
the
role
of
municipalities
and
there's
not
much.
E
That
gives
much
reason
for
encouragement
in
that
regard
and
I,
don't
know
whether
a
court
decision
on
this
matter
will
produce
anything
like
that.
But
I
think
some
reasoning
that
takes
into
account
a
document
that
was
written
in
1867
and
maybe
sort
of
takes
a
look
at
it
in
2019
from
the
perspective
of
a
court
could
be
helpful,
no
guarantee
of
that.
But
to
me
that
is
reason
enough
for
the
future
of
other
events
that
involve
the
province
of
Ontario
and
the
City
of
Toronto.