►
From YouTube: City Council - April 26, 2018 - Part 3 of 3
Description
City Council, meeting 39, April 26, 2018 - Part 3 of 3
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=13091
Part 1 of 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_o1Wm40fcYc
Part 2 of 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2JDxF1y6oM
A
A
E
F
A
B
G
B
A
H
F
B
A
H
A
H
F
A
B
F
B
G
A
E
H
J
G
E
E
C
A
J
You
very
much
in
the
interest
of
staff
that
are
waiting
on
reports
that
will
probably
not
get
heard
tonight.
Would
it
be
in
order
for
me
to
move
a
motion
to
complete
this
item,
the
in-camera
and
the
in
public
session
before
then
this
evening,
and
then
we'll
be
coming
back
anyhow,
just
to
finish
that,
because
then
some
of
the
good
people
that
are
here
won't
be
sitting
in
their
offices
for
an
hour
coming
in
just
to
leave
for
good.
Is
that
an
order?
Does
that
make
sense?
We.
A
J
B
B
A
E
A
A
E
F
A
C
Perks:
counselor
Perutz,
please
councillor
Kelly,
councillor
care,
Janice
and
councillor
Davis
when
you're
seated,
please
counselor
fruits
them.
Can
we
have
your
vote?
Please.
A
F
Ma'am:
okay,
City
Council
recess
its
public
session
to
meet
his
committee
of
the
whole
in
closed
session
to
consider
CC
30
9.10
actions
taken
to
date
arising
from
counsels
decision
inspecting
the
Auditor
General's
investigation
into
a
certain
land
transaction
reason
for
confidential
information,
personal
matters
about
identifiable
persons,
including
municipal
or
local
board
employees.
Okay,.
A
B
A
Okay,
thank
you,
members
of
council.
We
are
now
in
the
public
session.
City
Council
has
completed
its
closed
session.
Consideration
of
item
CC
39-point
ten-headed
accessed
8
actions
taken
to
date
arising
from
council's
decision
respecting
the
Auditor
General's
investigation
into
a
certain
land
transaction
City
Council
issued
confidential
instructions
to
staff
during
closed
session
as
permitted
by
196
b
of
the
city
of
toronto
act.
We
will
not
proceed
to
the
public
debate
on
the
item.
Callister
ma'am,
m'lady.
K
So
I'd
asked
for
the
costs
associated
to
this
and
they
were
disclosed
publicly
and
I
can
tell
you
that
I'm
totally
against
the
the
costs
that
have
been
associated
to
this
to
date,
there's
350
thousand
dollars
that
have
been
spent
and
we've
been
told
that
they've
allocated
an
another
450
thousand
dollars
for
this,
that
that's
what
was
told
the
council
that
there's
an
authorization
for
an
another
450
thousand
that
was
told
to
us
yesterday.
So
that
means
that
we
have
the
potential
to
be
to
be
billing.
The
taxpayers.