►
Description
Etobicoke York Community Council - June 6, 2018 - Part 2 of 3
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=12964
Part 1 of 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A92AwMe6UFw#t=6m37s
Part 3 of 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USf0YxsE2WU#t=6m36s
Meeting Navigation:
0:07:23 - Meeting resume
A
Good
afternoon
everyone
we're
going
to
we're
going
to
begin
the
meeting
counselor
we're
going
to
continue
with
the
speakers.
Yes,
so
we
were
on
a
speaker's
list,
so
we're
gonna
we're
going
to
go
to
the
next
speaker.
We
were
an
item
ey
31.4,
which
was
the
final
report:
High
Park
apartment,
neighborhood
area,
character,
study
and
our
next
speaker
is
Ellie
mcLaughlin
Allie
good
afternoon
good.
B
My
name
is
Elle
mcLaughlin
I'm,
the
president
of
the
High
Park
Community
Alliance,
the
High
Park
Community
Alliance
is
comprised
of
approximately
800
members
from
the
High
Park
North
Area.
We
represent
homeowners
and
ratepayers,
and
we
are
I'd
like
to
address
council
today
and
ask
that
you
adopt
the
official
plan
amendment
for
1-9
mm-hmm.
B
We
believe
that
this
amendment
will
help
protect
our
neighborhood
from
overdevelopment
we'd
like
to
thank
the
city
for
conducting
the
character
study,
which
resulted
in
the
draft
amendment
as
residents.
We
believe
that
protecting
our
neighborhood
and
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
is
very
important,
and
it's
very
assuring
that
the
city
felt
this
was
important
as
well.
B
I
can
also
say
that
this
past
month,
I
witnessed
a
lot
of
visitors,
come
to
our
area
and
exit
the
High
Park
subway
station
and
as
there
as
they
were
on
their
way
to
High
Park
and
to
see
all
of
the
cherry
blossoms.
They
also
witnessed
a
lot
of
construction
going
on
in
our
neighborhood
and
we're
hoping
to
be
able
to
limit
that
somewhat
in
the
future.
I
also
sat
on
the
High,
Park
character,
study
working
group
and
I
would
like
to
thank
Alice
or
made.
It
was
a
bit
silva,
stewart
and
jennifer.
B
We
also
appreciate
the
item
that
states
the
maximum
total
building
frontage
along
each
Street
property
line
will
not
exceed
approximately
2/3
of
the
total
frontage
of
each
Street.
So
they've
got
a
couple
of
items
that
really
stand
out
for
us
and
that
help
respect
the
character
of
the
existing
buildings
and
of
the
neighborhood,
with
my
guards
to
both
form,
something
that
we're
particularly
satisfied
with
was
the
development
redevelopment,
including
mechanical
pet
houses,
will
be
required
to
fit
within
a
45
degree.
Angle,
err
plane,
pretty
much
everything.
B
It's
a
wonderful
place
to
live
and
I
know
that
we
have
a
lot
of
long-term
tenants
who
have
been
in
the
neighborhood
for
thirty
years
twenty
years,
and
this
amendment
will
help
to
ensure
that
more
people
will
be
able
to
join
our
community,
but
with
adherence
to
certain
guidelines
and
regulations
and
we're
hoping
that
you'll
adopt
the
amendment.
Thank
you
thank.
E
D
You
so
good
afternoon
to
mr.
chair
unity,
council,
and
thank
you
very
much
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
this
morning.
My
name
is
Piper
Morley
and
I'm
legal
counsel.
On
behalf
of
the
Toronto
District
School
Board,
we
provided
you
with
a
letter
of
today's
date
and
I
hope
that
you
have
that,
but
essentially
what
the
letter
does
is.
It
sets
out
our
concerns
regarding
the
acute
pressures
that
the
local
schools
in
the
Hyde
Park
area
are
facing
currently,
and
it
also
sets
out
a
potential
solution
to
that
issue.
D
Like
the
city,
the
TDSB
was
not
anticipating
the
intensity
of
growth
in
this
area,
since
the
area
has
always
been
a
staple
residential
neighborhood.
There
are
certain
hot
spots
within
the
city
generally,
where
growth
has
simply
outpaced,
both
of
the
required
infrastructure
necessary
to
service
growth
and
the
community
facilities
in
the
area,
including
schools.
This
includes
the
young
Eglinton
area,
which
is,
as
many
of
you
know,
experiencing
unprecedented
growth
to
address
this.
The
city
took
steps
recently
to
include
robust
and
comprehensive
policies
in
the
young
Eglinton
secondary
plan.
D
Similarly,
in
the
recent
geo
core
council
decision,
council
resolved
to
support
the
Toronto
District
School
Board
and
the
Toronto
Catholic
District
School
Board,
in
advancing
planning
for
school
facilities
facing
growth,
driven
enrollment
pressures,
we
commend
the
city
and
taking
steps
to
ensure
that
those
neighbourhoods
that
experience
unanticipated
growth
have
the
tools
available
to
them
to
deal
with
this.
In
its
recent
policy
decisions,
the
city
has
essentially
recognised
that
schools
are,
from
a
complete
community
perspective,
critically
important
to
the
functioning
of
local
communities.
D
In
our
letter,
we
asked
the
community
council
to
adopt
a
recommendation
that
set
out
on
the
very
first
page
of
our
letter,
the
recommendation
incorporating
certain
policies
that
we
provide
in
a
schedule.
It's
Schedule
A
attached
to
our
letter.
These
policies,
in
a
nutshell,
recognize
the
recognize,
the
role
of
schools
and
contributing
to
a
complete
community,
that's
just
required
by
the
growth
plan
PPS
and
the
Official
Plan,
and
also
provide
a
pathway
for
addressing
the
cumulative
impacts
of
the
numerous
development
applications
and
the
corresponding
need
for
timely
accommodation
of
the
increased
student
enrollment.
D
We
note
that
the
language
used
in
schedule
a
is
very
similar,
if
not
some,
in
some
cases
identical
to
the
language
in
the
young
Eglinton
secondary
plan,
so
I
don't
intend
to
go
through
it
in
detail.
Unless
you
have
questions
about
it,
first
I
want
to
explain
why
these
policies
are
so
necessary
for
this
particular
area.
The
High
Park
neighborhood
study
was
undertaken
as
a
result
of
two
significant
development
proposals.
Those
two
applications
would
add
over
two
hundred
students
to
an
already
overburdened
area
from
a
school
capacity
perspective.
D
D
We
understand
that
there
may
be
upwards
of
thirty
nine
hundred
to
forty
two
hundred
additional
units
in
the
study
area
in
the
future.
To
be
clear,
the
public
school
facilities
in
High
Park
do
not
have
sufficient
capacity
to
accommodate
any
new
development,
let
alone
four
thousand
new
units.
So
how
do
we
deal
with
this?
We've?
Provided
you
with
our
recommendations
in
Schedule
A,
just
to
go
through
them
very
briefly,
in
a
high-level
manner
in
the
goals
section
of
OPA
four,
four,
four
nineteen.
D
We
propose
to
add
two
new
goals
and
they
basically
recognize
community
facilities
as
being
required,
commenced,
commensurate
to
growth,
and
then
we
drill
down
a
little
bit
further
on
exactly
what
these
specific
goals
look
like
in
the
community
facilities
aspect,
which
is
section
eight.
Essentially,
those
policies
state
that
community
services
and
facilities
will
be
required
to
support
future
development,
that
those
services
will
be
delivered
in
a
timely
manner
and
may
be
permitted
in
private
developments,
which,
frankly,
just
represents
the
modern
approach
to
living
vertically
as
per
city
policies.
D
We
then
operationalize
these
requirements
by
adding
a
new
section
to
OPA
for
nineteen
titled
phasing,
and
this
part
is
critical.
This
is
how
it
gets
done,
and
the
most
important
part
of
that
section
is
the
holding
provision
policy
and,
as
I
said
before,
this
part
specifically
is
identical
to
what's
proposed
to
be
in
the
young
Eglinton
secondary
plan.
At
nine
point
five
point:
one:
it
provides.
C
D
Provides
the
community
with
a
tool
to
ensure
the
development
does
not
take
place
until
there
is
appropriate
provision
of
municipal
servicing
infrastructure,
community
service
facilities
and
public
parks,
amongst
other
things,
it's
TDSB
submission
that
these
policies
are
necessary
in
order
to
achieve
complete
communities
and
to
allow
growth
to
occur
in
a
responsible
way
in
the
high
park
area.
Those
are
my
submissions.
Thank.
D
A
A
D
It
doesn't
it's
unable
to
get
development
charges
because
there's
capacity
within
the
whole
structure,
meaning
that
while
we
could
the
students
an
hour
out
of
the
way
to
go
to
school,
that's
obviously
not
what
a
complete
community
is
complete
community
is
where
you
watch
your
kids
to
school,
drop
them
off
and
pick
them
up
at
the
end
of
the
day.
So.
D
These
two,
but
that
initiated
this
study,
they're
expected
to
bring
in
over
200.
We
don't
have
the
exact
number,
because,
obviously
the
number
of
units
sometimes
for
a
change
and
with
the
4,000
units
we
actually
don't
know
yet
how?
How
many
that
would
add
it.
It
depends
on
certain
factors,
as
you
well
know,.
A
G
D
D
D
The
city
would
basically
provide,
and
what
were
what
we're
requesting
here
is
a
holding
provision
be
placed
on
properties
as
they
come
forward.
So,
as
a
developer
comes
forward
with
the
property,
we
would
put
a
holding
provision
and
essentially
they
would
have
to
satisfy
the
TDSB
that
there
was
sufficient
room
in
the
local
school
and
if
there
wasn't
we,
we
do
a
long-term
accommodation
study.
Every
year.
D
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
H
You
very
much
for
coming
today.
I
grew
Cal
family
tea.
We
don't
often
get
TDSB,
but
thank
you
for
being
involved
with
the
whole
process.
My
question
is
this:
you
said
what
was
the
capacity
at
Keele
right
now.
There
was
no
ly
8%
and
we've
just
had
an
addition
built.
There
am
I,
not
correct.
We
both
did
what
in
Latin
712
classrooms
in
the
last
three
years.
Did
we
not
are.
H
We're
now
98
percent
capacity
in
the
local
school
after
adding
I
think
it
was
either
12
or
swansea
got
12
or
14.
So
we
had
two
additions
built
to
our
schools
in
the
last
three
four
years
and
we're
now
already
at
98
percent.
That's
right!
Where
will
children
in
any
development
coming
in
within
this
catchment
area?
Where
will
they
be
bused
to
they
love.
D
Yes,
they
will
be
bused
to
north
of
st.
Clair.
We
don't
actually
have
a
plan
yet
of
where
they
would
be
bused
to,
but
essentially
they
they
would
not
be
able
to
be
accommodated
within
the
local
area.
The
whole
idea-
and
you
well
know
this
as
well.
Our
accommodation
strategy
is
to
make
schools
walkable,
you
know
to
be
able
to
have
students
and,
and
their
parents
walk
through
the
school.
D
That's
the
whole
concept
of
a
complete
community
is
set
out
in
the
growth
plan
and,
unfortunately,
we
would
have
to
bust
them,
or
we
would
have
to
in
some
way
change
the
catchment
lines
or
something
like
that
in
order
to
accommodate
it.
That
is
that's.
It's
not
just
not
ideal.
It's
not
land-use
planning,
it's
not
planning
it's
a
band-aid.
So
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
is
actually
plan
this
community
appropriately,
and
you.
H
I
I
mean
it's
nice
to
have
schools
where,
where
kids
walk
to
school,
but
that's
not
the
case,
most
schools
in
my
word
they're
all
bust.
But
what
I
don't
understand
is
that
there's
them
whenever
a
development
application
comes
in
and
it
always
has
come
in
in
the
past,
the
application
is
sent
to
the
school
board,
to
review
and
for
years,
they're
caught.
The
comments
from
the
district
school
board
has
always
been.
We
have
no
issues,
we
have
no
issues,
they've,
never
comment
I'm
telling
on
the
ones
in
Meyer.
I
I
I
C
I
J
Thank
You
charity.
Thank
you
for
speaking
to
us
today,
I'm
similar
to
councilor
Nunziata.
It's
question:
is
there
any
look
at
the
circulation
process
so
that
comments
from
the
school
board
can
be
front
and
center
in
every
development
application?
I
remember
a
time
when
they
were
there
and
I
haven't
seen
them
for
a
little
while,
for
perhaps
many
reasons
and
buried
in
the
body
of
reports.
J
D
We've
actually
already
started
that
process
as
of
2017,
as
many
of
you
probably
know
when
we're
circulated
in
application.
What
we
used
to
do
is
say:
there's
no
capacity
in
this
area.
Fair
warning
and
you
have
to
put
this
in
your
agreements
of
purchase
and
sale,
so
that
people
who
are
purchasing
in
this
area
know
that
their
kids
are
going
to
be
bused
they're,
not
going
to
have
that.
You
know
nice
community
feeling.
D
However,
we've
now
since
2017
late,
2017
we've
been
taking
a
much
more
aggressive
approach,
saying
we
do
not
support
this
development
and
the
reason
we
don't
support.
It
is
because
we
don't
think
that
it's
good
planning
to
have
a
development
here
when
we
don't
have
the
ability
to
accommodate
students.
So
we
have.
We
have
changed
our
policy
on
that
and
we
are
taking
a
much
more
active
approach
in
applications
as
they
come
forward.
D
But
this
is
kind
of
why
we're
coming
forward
at
the
OPA
level,
because
we're
doing
that
on
an
application
by
application
basis,
preserving
our
ability
to
appeal
if
we
need
to
we'd,
also
like
to
have
something
that's
available
to
us.
Working
with
the
city
to
provide
a
hold
on
the
property,
so
that
you
know
once
once,
we've
determined
that
there
you
know
we
cannot
accommodate
these
folks.
It's
it's
a
matter
of
phasing
it
appropriately
from
that
point.
So.
J
D
Can
tell
you
what
what
we
have
been
doing
we're
essentially
at
this
point
you're
basically
number
two
on
the
list
at
this
point.
What
we're
doing
is
we're
trying
to
identify
those
higher-order
policies
like
opa
s,
because
in
an
OPA,
that's
where
you
require
the
holding
bylaw
language
so
that
we
can
actually
use
it
when
the
development
comes
forward.
So
we're
trying
to
identify
I,
think
I
I
reference
hot
spots
within
the
city,
we're
trying
to
find
those
hot
spots,
identify
them
and
basically,
as
higher-order
policies
like
OPA
s,
come
forward.
D
C
Thank
you
any
further
questions.
I
have
one
question:
there's
probably
gonna
be
unfair
to
you,
but
I'm
just
reading
Hamlet.
So
if
the
school
board
now
is
I
started
putting
in
comments
that
they
don't
support
the
application,
do
you
think
the
city
should
have
the
right
to
oppose
sales
to
your
schools
that
they're
you're
putting
on
the
surplus
list?
J
I
C
I
C
B
That
high
park
is
both
jointly
owned
by
the
province
on
the
city
and
that
the
cities,
because
of
the
down
building,
has
been
given
the
responsibility,
double
responsibility
and
the
city
was
supposed
to
consult
or
to
speak
to
the
province,
and
unfortunately
it's
it
was.
This
has
not
worked
out,
and
so
tomorrow's
election
and
I
aim
to
go
to
the
province
and
ask
to
fix
that.
This
is
obviously
not
the
workable
situation
and
I'm
going
to
ask
that
this
be
uploaded
so
that
the
province
can
take
care
of
its
own
jurisdiction
again
anyway.
B
I
hope
that
when
the
the
province,
whoever
is
a
leader
tomorrow,
when
I
bring
this
in
front
of
them
and
say
that
this
is
not
a
workable
for
the
city
city
cannot
take
care
of
a
potential
matter,
is
unwilling.
I,
don't
know
can't
or
is
unwilling
that
that
the
city
will
cooperate
in
this
uploading
and
because
this
is
to
your
advantage.
I
think
this
is
the
neglect.
The
hyper
has
gone
on
too
long
that
in
the
province
needs
to
take
their
own
responsibility
here,
because
this
is
not
good
for
the.
B
B
This
is
I,
think
it's
unfair
for
the
city
personally
to
have
been
given
this
responsibility,
which
they
never,
which
you
I,
think
you
never
understood
it,
and
maybe
it's
not
it's
not
understandable,
I'm
Jennifer
Keating
that
when
I
confronted
her
about
four
years
ago,
she
said
she
didn't
know
what
Mandy
she
don't
know
that
was
downloaded
and
she
said
it's
impossible
and
I
think
it's
impossible
to
that,
a
provincial
we
designated
you
know,
land
is
downloaded
and
the
former
Commissioner
Gordon
elder.
Also
when
asked
he
said,
no,
it's
not
downloaded.
B
That's
you
know
it's
not
possible,
so
maybe
we
fix
the
situation
so
that
both
the
province
in
the
city
can
jointly
protect
I
park.
I
think
that
that
is
a
very
the
right
thing
and
that
how
it
should
have
always
been
and
I
think
that
I
hope
that,
when
I
ask
for
this
at
this
juncture,
when
the
studies
coming
completion,
that
they
will
see
that
this
is
the
right
thing
to
do
at
this
point,
you
know
that
this
study
becomes
worse,
something
I.
Think
a
study
is
not
worth
very
much
without
the
provincial
government.
B
C
H
H
I
did
mention
when
I
came
up
before
that
very
very
concerned
about
the
requirement
that
to
ensure
that
the
natural
heritage
is
protected
for
the
long
term
and
that
affects
the
lands
adjacent,
develop
no
development
or
site
alteration
unless
it
has
been
shown
that
there
is
no
negative
impact
and
the
negative
impacts
are
in
High.
Park.
Reiterate
the
urgency
of
upgrading
the
management
plan
to
the
level
of
the
provincial
standard
in
the
natural
heritage.
Reference
manual
I
also
have
an
opportunity
to
make
another
point.
H
A
speaker
before
me
mentioned
infiltration,
which
is
in
the
character
area
study
in
within
High
Park
is
Grenadier.
Pond
Grenadier
pond
gets
half
its
water
from
ground
water
and
half
of
its
water
from
surface
water,
Spring
Creek.
There
are
plant
communities
around
there
that
get
their
water
from
largely
from
ground
water
and
there
are
seeps
in
the
area.
H
The
quality
and
quantity
of
ground
of
of
water
is
something
that
planning
authority
shall
that
little
word
shall
again
shall
protect.
They
are
protect,
improve
or
restore
I'm.
Just
this
is
PPS.
Two
point
two
point
two
point:
one
by
maintaining
linkages
and
related
functions
among
ground
water
features,
hydrologic
functions
and
natural
heritage
features
and
areas
and
surface
water
features,
including
shoreline
areas.
H
What
we
don't
have
shoreline
areas,
but
we
have
all
the
others-
and
there
is
no
adjacency
to
this
policy
as
there
is
to
two
point,
one
which
is
the
no
development
in
the
length
Jason.
So
I
am
really
pleased
to
see
that
in
protecting
the
unencumbered
lands,
the
the
OPA
provision
contributes
to
meeting
the
requirements
of
the
PPS.
H
/
noon
cheer.
Thank
you
very
much
and
thank
you
to
the
counselors
and
I
highly
admire.
The
planning
department
on
this
project
have
been
fantastic
and
I,
also
very
impressed
with
the
community.
My
time
in
High
Park
goes
back
to
about
1980
and
I
were
moved
into
her
gothic
Avenue,
and
that's
where
we
went
with
our
little
son
when
we
became
Canadians.
H
School
board,
it
is
very
unusual
to
see
them
here.
My
background
I
went
to
U
of
T
and
completed
my
architectural
education
and
came
out
as
a
graduate
from
U
of
T
I
also
worked
for
a
number
of
years.
In
Toronto
we
were
living
in
London
Ontario
as
a
little
boys
away
for
20
years
during
that
time,
because
I
was
so
upset
about
things
that
were
going
on
with
the
trees
and
the
episodes
and
things
like
that.
I
became
a
city.
Councillor
I
became
the
downtown
city
councillor.
K
H
Help
of
communities
like
these,
the
input
was
fantastic,
I
found
of
some
of
these
meetings
and
the
inputs
being
great
and
I
really
have
to
thank
them
and
admire
them.
I
want
to
just
say,
please,
all
of
you
every
one
of
us,
whether
we're
citizens,
communities,
councillors,
elected
positions,
paid
really
hard-working
civil
servants
in
any
of
the
departments.
The
provincial
policy
statement
is
imperative
that
we
follow.
H
B
H
Be
lucky
way:
nian
Park,
which
is
right
outside
my
window,
where
I
hear
the
children
playing.
If
it
hadn't
been
a
great
big
Hollow
in
the
lake,
we
probably
would
not
have
a
green
space
there.
So
the
hose
that
now,
since
we've
become
overs
of
the
land
and
builders
of
the
city,
we
must
imperatively,
save
at
our
peril.
I
should
say
as
much
green
space
as
we
can,
whether
it's
on
the
top
of
a
parking
building
which
is
awkward.
However,
it's
now
part
of
the
green
spaces
and
believe
me,
the
birds.
H
The
boss
must
the
butterflies,
the
bumble
bees
whatever
they
are.
They
don't
know
the
boundaries.
The
hope
that
sits
from
the
tree
of
my
heart,
my
son
telephone
clendenon,
would
not
be
there
if
it
wasn't
for
High,
Park
High
pad
is
a
tiny
park,
it's
actually
smaller
than
Central
Park
and
look
what's
in
the
middle
of
downtown
New
York.
So
please
be
mindful
of
the
importance
of
the
bigger
picture
and
I'm
really
glad
that
has
come
forward.
I
live
it
255,
King,
Kingdom
and.
H
I'd,
say
I've
lived
here
too
long,
but
that
goes
to
see
that
I
never
drink
when
we
moved
on
to
gossip,
but
I
would
be
looking
to
age
in
place
in
the
community
that
I
have
put
down
roots
and
spend
a
lot
of
time,
we're
very,
very
fortunate,
and
we're
only
fortunate
to
have
such
a
beautiful
city
because
of
the
water
system.
The
original
ravines
gave
us
this
legacy.
We
must
protect
it
even
if
it's
no
longer
virgin
or
original
or
heritage.
H
It
has
become
part
of
the
green
system,
and
even
if
it
was
man-made
green
space
on
top
of
three
ravines
in
the
ravine
system,
it's
now
become
part
of
it
and
that's
why
we
have
still
so
many
birds
and
different
kinds
of
trees
and
things
like
that.
But
it's
precious
and
it's
vulnerable,
and
we
also
don't
want
to
bust
that
kids
out
of
this
beautiful.
H
G
C
L
L
A
L
In
fact,
a
community
believes
that,
for
whatever
reason
that
that's
not
an
accurate
statement
and
choose
and
that
include
the
school
board
chooses
to
appeal
an
application
on
the
basis
of
inadequate
infrastructure
in
place.
They
could
appeal
to
the
new
land
tribunal
body
that,
over
whatever
it's
called
now,
I
used
to
notice
the
Ownby.
A
Through
year,
esotery
I
think
you're
right
counselor.
It
would
have
to
be
couched
in
the
terms
of
being
inconsistent
with
the
PPS
and
not
complying
with
the
growth
plan,
and
you
could
craft
an
argument
around
inappropriate
structure
to
accommodate
the
development
and
not
meeting
those
policies.
But
yes,
you
could
do
that.
Okay
and.
L
When
it
were
when
it
was
in
the
hands
of
the
land
tribunal,
they
could,
in
fact,
if
they
agreed
with
the
local
community,
impose
essentially
placed
a
holding
provision
on
that
particular
application.
That
is
to
say,
given
approval,
subject
to
the
holding
provision
that
the
the
individual
made
reference
to.
Rather
than
have
us
put
it
in
as
a
as
a
condition
in
our
OPA
amendment,
we
could
leave
it
to
thee
to
the
appeal
body
to
impose
it
when
they
felt
it
was
necessary.
L
L
A
Through
you,
mr.
chair,
well,
the
City
Council
can
certainly
put
a
use
a
hold
in
the
Official
Plan
si
SP
policy
should
desire
to
do
so.
I
think.
The
challenge
in
this
instance
is
quite
frankly
that
this
is
a
significantly
late
request.
This
came
in
about
six
o'clock
last
night.
We
have
not
really
had
the
chance
to
Coulson
Lee
sit
down
and
look
at
this,
so
it's
problematic
from
that
regard.
I'd
also
note
that
we
actually
have
a
holding
provision
in
the
Oh
in
the
city's
overall
official
plan
right.
C
A
Just
when
finished
I
think
the
other
challenge
to
this
is
is
that
the
deputy
suggested
that
this
was
encoded
within
the
young
Eglinton
secondary
plan
and
our
quick
rita
visit.
It
is
not
I
believe
the
school
board
has
asked
for
it
to
be
encoded
in
the
young.
It
speaks
to
community
services,
but
it
doesn't
speak
to
schools.
Okay,.
E
G
Only
get
only
a
few
minutes,
I
know
that
we
all
love
love
to
do
this,
but
I
get
the
point,
but
if
we
were
able
to
put
a
hold
on
it,
wouldn't
wouldn't
we
be
able,
then
to
speak,
especially
on
the
larger
kind
of
developments
to
developers
that
really
want
to
be
able
to
develop
and
with
density,
an
ability
for
them
to
contribute
to
new
schools.
If,
if
it
were,
if
it
were
part
of
our
holding
provisions,
okay.
A
G
G
All
right,
no
I
I
did
I
didn't
I
didn't
finish
I.
My
next
question
is
this:
with
respect
to
the
closing
of
schools,
and
the
school
board
regularly
makes
decisions
to
close
schools
and
there's
a
pecking
order
well
in
terms
of
who
was
interested
in
those
schools.
Where
are
we
on
that
pecking
order,
in
other
words,
who
do
they
have
to
give
it
to
before
they
give
it
to
the
city
I.
A
G
A
G
So
my
point:
is
the
school
boards
being
forced
to
close
down
many
of
these
schools
if
they,
if
they
don't
agree
on
the
funding
formulas
that
the
province
gives
gives
to
them?
So
how
is
it
that
we
can
help
should?
Should
we
not
be
saying
we're
interested
in
all
schools
for
future
for
the
future,
then
why
are
we
saying
no
to
schools,
I.
J
Through
you
to
staff,
just
along
the
lines
of
the
questions
that
I
asked
the
speaker
from
the
school
board,
what's
our
practice
around
including
information
about
school
capacity
in
the
council
reports
of
versus
the
body
of
work
that
goes
into
a
planning
application,
and
is
there
a
way
to
have
the
point
made
front
and
center
about
capacity?
Should
we
do
that.
A
Through
mr.
chair,
yes,
I
think
the
I
think
the
deputies
point
about
the
school
board
becoming
more
aggressive
is
a
good
point
up
until
very
recently,
all
we
would
get
would
be
we're
over
capacity.
Please
put
signs
up
and
put
it
in
the
purchase
and
sales
agreement,
and
that
was
it
I'm,
taking
a
more
aggressive
stance
and
providing
the
city
with
a
greater
ability
to
say
the
infrastructure
is
not
there.
If
we're
inclined
to
say
no
because
of
that
aspect,
I
think
is
really
helpful.
A
I
know
that
we
have
collectively
got
a
team,
a
city
team,
that's
working
with
a
school
board
on
working
through
a
lot
of
these
issues,
and
so
the
notion
of
utilizing
holes
until
school
capacity
is
available
in
high
growth
areas.
I
frankly,
I
think
this
is
a
citywide
issue.
I,
don't
think
it's
that
I.
A
Don't
think
it
is
something
that
we
should
be
contemplating
in
this
instance,
because,
frankly,
I
don't
think
it
helps
in
the
current
instance,
where
you
have,
first
of
all
to
development
applications
under
appeal
to
the
board,
where
the
school
board
did
not
step
forward
and
say
that
there
are
capacity
issues.
Don't
approve
these
I,
don't
think
it
will
help
in
terms
of
the
current
policy
framework.
That's
in
front
of
you
today,
because
you
already
have
the
ability
to
do
that
through
the
overall
holding
bylaw
within
the
holding
policies
within
the
overall
official
plan
anyway.
A
J
I'd
go
just
a
little
further
backwards
and
say:
is
there
appetite
or
utility
in
giving
the
question
of
school
board
capacity
more
prominence
in
the
planning
reports
that
are
before
us,
especially
in
light
of
the
comments
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting
about
the
City
Council's
documentation
being
an
important
part
of
the
l-pad
process?
Right.
A
And
I
think
that
that's
a
good
observation,
councilor
I,
think
that,
given
the
new
planning
regime
that
we
find
ourselves
in
in
terms
of
talking
about
the
PPS,
the
growth
plan
in
a
more
robust
way
than
we
had
previously
I,
think
these
are
the
kinds
of
issues
that
will
sort
of
come
up
over
the
next
I.
Don't
know
six
to
eight
months
to
a
year
as
we
start
to
learn
exactly
what
matters
of
provincial
interest
are
of
significant
importance
to
the
City
of
Toronto
through
council
decisions
and
through
challenges
at
the
board.
A
A
I
guess
my
yeah.
My
question
for
mr.
quest
well
is
that
in
this
report,
can
you
can
you
just
highlight
three
of
the
key
ingredients
that
have
been
undertaken
to
protect
the
you
know,
the
current
neighborhood
or
the
key
substantive
recommendations
from
this
that
are
being
brought
forward?
Well,
there's
there's
quite
a
number
of
them,
but
I
think,
as
a
number
of
the
deputies
have
mentioned,
the
recognizing
the
the
existing
open
spaces
between
the
buildings
is
really
important.
A
It's
a
key,
definitive
character
characteristic
of
this
community,
also
recognizing
its
tie
to
high
Park,
is
extremely
important
and
recognizing
that
the
development
in
this
community
has
to
recognize
that
it
is
adjacent.
The
high
Park
I
also
think
that
the
third
thing
is
the
built
form
policies
in
in
section
5,
recognizing
that
if
you
are
looking
at
typically
when
we
look
at
taller
buildings,
we
talked
about
point
towers
and
talking
about
floor
plates
and
quickly
moving
shadows
in
this
community.
That
built
form
is
it's
not
an
appropriate
built
form?
A
So,
in
regard
to
the
open
space,
the
green
space
are
you
referring
to
those
green
spaces
that
are
on
apartment
lands
already,
where
there's
an
apartment
building
and
it's
the
surrounding
land,
because
that's
where
that's,
where
our
policy
provides
for
infill
housing
that
consumes
that
that
land
and
and
that's
and
that's
why
the
policy
is
one
of
the
deputies
pointed
out
space
to
65%,
open
space
on
on
on
development
application
sites,
because
that's
very
much
reflective
of
the
existing
character.
And
again
you
go
to
take
a
step
back
to
what
what
we're
doing
here
is.
A
We
want
to
bring
forward
a
policy
regime
that
is
reflective
of
the
existing
character,
which
we
think
is
functioning
quite
well.
You've
heard
the
residents
here
talking
about
it
today.
Well,
the
reason
why
they
chose
to
live
in
this
area
is
because
of
the
character
of
the
commune.
So
the
official
plan
provides
policy
at
a
very
high
level,
and
so
what
we've
done
is
we
delve
down
into
it
to
create
a
a
greater
level
of
specificity
around?
A
What
we
believe
the
open
space
character
should
be,
what
the
built
form
character
should
be
how
the
natural
heritage
of
the
area
should
be
respected.
The
walking
paths
who
the
community
should
be
respected.
So
it's
all
those
kinds
of
specific
level
of
details
that
find
its
way
into
the
ese
SP.
It's
just
the
last
follow-up.
Is
it's
in
regard
to
this
notion
of
a
holding
provision,
because
there's
not
enough
accommodation
for
schools,
I
mean!
A
Is
that
really
any
different
than
other
in
other
communities
where
they
would
object
to
development
because
of
traffic
concerns
and
roads
are
already
clogged?
We
would
never
put
a
holding
provision
on
because
our
streets
cannot
accommodate
more
traffic.
That's
not
necessarily
the
case
councilor.
We.
A
So
I'm
certainly
familiar
of
a
couple
of
them
where
we
have.
We
have
used
holding
provisions
in
the
zoning
bylaw,
for
example,
but
again
we
probably
provide
those
provisions
in
the
in
the
zoning
bylaw
because
we
know
there's
a
level
of
specificity.
We
also
know
that
there
is
a
way
out
that
the
city
controls
to
take
the
H
off
in
this
case
of
school
capacity.
A
H
A
You
mr.
chair
that,
then
then
the
policy
recommendations,
if
they
are
endorsed
by
Community
Council,
move
forward
to
City
Council
I,
think
the
meeting
is
July,
not
June
23rd
for
approval
by
City,
Council,
correct
and
then,
as
do
as
the
staff
report
suggests,
we
will
use
the
these
recommendations
and
these
policy
directives
who
bring
forward
that
the
staff
reports
on
the
two
significant
applications
in
this
area
and
our
attention
is.
We
are
targeting
those
reports
for
the
July
4th
community.
A
H
Thank
you
very
much.
I
will
be
moving
the
staff
recommendations.
Obviously,
but
I
want
to
start
again
by
thanking
the
community.
We've
had
so
many
speakers
come
out
today
and
thank
you
for
being
patient
and
going
for
lunch
and
coming
back.
We
appreciate
that
this
report
wouldn't
be
the
report.
It
is
without
your
input
and
particularly
to
the
working
group.
When
we
signed
the
working
group
up,
we
told
you
there'd
be
three
meetings.
Maybe
four
we
had
six
and
you
know
what
people
came
out
and
they
kept
giving
us
input
and
we
gave
you
homework.
H
We
gave
you
homework
to
get
back
to
us
anywhere
from
four
to
seven
days
and
you
always
came
back
to
us.
You
promoted
the
online
data
we
wanted
from
the
community
to
say
how
do
you
use
this
land?
Where
do
you
loot,
use
this
land
and
all
that
data
gathered
went
to
our
three
most
amazing
ladies
possible
Elizabeth,
Allison
and
Jennifer
and
mister
Cresswell?
They
do
need
a
day
off.
H
They
put
this
report
together
so
quickly,
but
very
carefully,
listening
to
everyone's
input,
considering
what
planning
can
and
cannot
do
but
thinking
outside
the
box
at
the
same
time.
So
as
counselors
we
have
before
us
over
nearly
50
emails
hear
from
residents
showing
their
support
to
what
we
have
before
us
today.
We
don't
normally
get
that
many
emails
in
support.
We
usually
get
it
when
they're
not
supporting,
but
not
when
you're,
in
support
of
something
so
I.
Thank
you
also
for
doing
that
for
us
today,
hi
Park,
Alliance,
you're,
brilliant.
H
You
come
together
as
a
group
originally
for
slightly
different
reason
for
some
proposals,
but
you've
also
been
out
at
our
working
group
meetings.
You
have
engaged
your
hundreds
of
residents,
not
just
the
tenants
in
the
buildings,
not
just
the
local
residents,
but
everyone
in
the
community
to
get
involved
and
as
I
say,
we
need
that
these
studies
wouldn't
be
the
studies
they
are
without
the
input.
H
One
of
the
things
we
heard
again,
as
you
heard
through
the
blue
West
Avenue
study,
which
is
the
reason
I
asked
the
Avenue
study
to
come
first,
because
that
did
start
for
us
and
a
lot
of
the
information
we
were
able
to
research.
There
has
come
into
this
report,
hi
Park.
We
never
want
to
do
anything
which
will
affect
or
damage
hi
Park,
it's
the
jewel
of
our
city,
the
lungs
of
our
city.
H
The
way
they
were
to
make
it
work
to
give
us
green
space
to
give
us
trees
to
give
us
light
to
give
us
sky
views
to
give
us
birds
sitting
on
a
tree
outside
your
window.
If
we
don't
move
a
report
which
carefully
considers
what
could
be
built,
we
as
a
community
are
going
to
lose
that
one
of
the
most
fascinating
things
we
heard
and
I
think
was
most
fascinating
and
the
design
review
panel.
This
has
been
twice
the
design
review
panel.
H
They
thought
was
fascinating
was
that
grass,
which
so
shows
not
just
where
the
buildings
are,
but
what's
underground,
how
many
underground
garages
are
actually
almost
a
property
line?
And
we
as
counselors
know
if
you've
got
a
high-rise
apartment,
building
every
40
50
60
years,
they
decimate
the
trees
because
they
have
to
fix
that
membrane
of
their
garage.
That
is
why
it
is
important
on
new
development
not
to
allow
underground
garages
to
go
right
to
the
property
and
the
street
line.
H
We
want
there
to
plant
bigger
trees,
mature
trees,
which
won't
be
cut
down
every
50
years.
That,
again,
is
why
people
moved
into
this
part
of
a
neighborhood.
One
good
part
is
one
of
the
developers
used
to
lease
a
piece
of
property
just
after
their
property
north
of
Bloor
Street,
and
they
built
a
tennis
court
on
it.
A
course
of
a
tennis
court
is
on
their
private
property.
3/4
of
a
tennis
court
is
now
on
city
property
right
now
that
piece
of
land
is
going
to
be
tapped
as
passive
green
space.
H
Until
we
have
a
meeting
with
the
community
to
say
what
would
you
like
to
do
on
that
passive
green
space?
Maybe
more
benches?
Oh
the
gentlemen,
here
this
morning,
asking
just
for
more
benches,
you
can
sit
and
enjoy
peace
and
quiet
so
frisbee,
sir
soccer
ball.
The
community
was
asking
also
through
this
whole
process
and
I
will
just
add
on
the
working
group
we
did
have
the
developers
we
did
have
property
owners
on
the
working
group.
H
The
community
was
saying
that
we
do
actually
want
family
size
units
we
want
to
build,
so
families
can
come
to
our
community.
On
the
other
hand,
we
heard
that
our
schools
were
at
capacity
I,
think
I'd
miss
a
keel
had
an
addition.
A
few
years
ago,
I
think
it
was
at
least
12
classes
were
built
thanks
to
the
province.
They
gave
us
funding
to
do
that.
We're
not
getting
any
more
additions
now
because
we
had
ours.
So
we
do
consider
TDSB,
they
are
on
their
internal
working
group.
H
They
are
parties
at
the
OMB
hearings
for
the
two
developments
you'll
be
hearing
about
next
month
and
begin
given
the
wrap-up
sign,
but
I
do
just
want
to
thank
everyone.
Yes,
every
development
which
has
come
into
our
ward
as
long
as
I've
been
counselor
TDSB
has
said
your
child
may
be
bused
Catholic
school
board.
We
don't
hear
as
much
from
they
sometimes
they're
able
to
accommodate
their
children.
They
don't
do
quite
so
much
buffering
so
I.
Thank
the
TDSB
force
coming
stepping
up
to
the
plate
getting
more
involved.
H
G
So
it's
only
the
task
as
it's
going
to
be
part
of
my
my
dialogue,
I
I'm,
going
to
support
this
because
I
think
it's
needed
I
think
every
community
should
go
through
this
process
and
I
think
nothing
should
be
built
until
each
community
goes
through
its
own
process.
With
respect
to
planning,
we've
done
it
in
your
quest.
G
It's
it's
taken
all
of
20
years
to
start
seeing
changes
in
your
quest,
but
it's
happening,
and
it
only
happens
when
people
want
to
invest
in
your
community
in
community
like
mine,
the
property
values
are
very
low
and-
and
we
don't
often
get
the
developers
coming,
knocking
on
our
doors
to
want
to
develop.
So
some
of
us
want
them
to
do
that.
It
becomes
very
difficult,
but
it's
easier
to
do
once
you
establish
the
the
guidelines
that
everybody
needs
to
go
through.
G
G
We
do
it
with
recreation.
Now
we
have
to
enter
into
into
recreational
agreements
with
school
boards.
Let
us
have
control
of
the
schools
and
we
can
make
all
kinds
of
decisions
at
the
end
of
the
day.
They
will
bit
benefit
the
local
communities,
including
which
buildings
we
should
keep
or
lease
out
in
case.
We
need
them
in
future
years
and
which
ones
we
don't
right
now
the
school
boards
are
faced
with
difficult
situations
and
positions.
G
Even
though
we
can't
and
I
heard
that
there
should
be
some
provisions
there,
that
that
allow
the
city
to
be
able
to
to
to
understand
the
needs
of
communities
when
it
comes
to
schools,
but
it
has
to
come
from
the
provincial
government.
That's
why
I
asked
you
who
your
MPP
is,
because
it
is
not
us.
It
is
not
us
that
have
that
capability.
Here
folks-
and
it's
not
your
school
board
trustee
that
has
that
capability,
it
is
the
person-
that's
been
knocking
on
your
door
during
this
election.
G
It's
the
provincial
government
that
has
to
step
up
to
the
table
and
come
and
save
the
the
communities
with
respect
to
this
sort
of
thing,
and
we
have
to
do
that
together.
I
understand
it,
but
please
don't
come
here,
expecting
us
to
be
able
to
do
things
that
were
just
not
capable
of
doing
legally
many
of
the
things
that
you've
asked
us
to
do
here.
G
They're
selling
them
they're
selling
them
everywhere,
I
can
give
a
sort
northa
Sinclair
I
can
give
you
two
or
three
that
have
been
sold
over
the
last
little
while
to
developers
and
now
what
happens
after
all
these
years,
we
give
up
what
we're
going
to
do
by
expropriate
land
and
build
in
communities
that
had
once
a
school
sitting
in
it's
in
its
neighborhood
I
think
we're
doing
it
all
backwards.
Government
needs
to
start
from
the
bottom
up,
not
from
the
top
down,
and
until
we
get
that
straight.
I
It's
just
briefly,
first
want
to
thank
the
local
councillor
and
residents
that
are
here
on
the
city,
both
of
them
31.4
and
31.5.
It's
good
that
it's
really
going
to
make
a
difference
along
Bloor
West,
I'm,
just
I'm,
just
hoping
in
my
area
we
have
st.
Clair
Avenue
and
which
is
in
very
much
need
of
revitalization
and
densification,
and
in
Mount
Denis,
where
I
have
all
storefronts
vacant
storefronts
with
people
living
in
them
with
curtains
I
hope
that
the
staff
spend
as
much
time
in
Mount,
Denis
and
st.
I
C
C
C
Any
further
speakers
seeing
no
motions
remove
countered
assets,
move
the
staff
relation.
She
wants
a
recorded
vote,
I'm
sure
all
in
favor
Council
to
George
I'll
counter
to
set
counter
palacio.
Councillor
Annunziata
councillor
grimes
deputy
mayor
holiday
comes
from
Amelie
D
and
trusty
councillor
Campbell.
G
C
H
C
H
H
C
J
C
E
F
C
We
have
a
speaker
on
that.
We
have
a
speaker
on
that
and
we
else
click
releases,
okay,
seeing
none
we'll
go
back
to
our
regular
scheduled
program,
which
is
30
1.17
application
for
fence
exemption
8
5
for
Weston
Road.
Are
there
any
speakers
on
Westar
oil?
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank
you
for
your
baby.
Please
state
your
name
and
address
and
yield
five
minutes.
J
Smith.
A
C
I
F
F
C
I
I
Okay,
so
I
did
attend
and
what
the
what
the
owner
did
do
they
removed
all
the
plywood
off
the
fence,
because
that
was
on
previously
and
so
it
aesthetically.
It
looks
a
lot
nicer
now
than
it
did
last
month,
but
when
I
did
get
there,
it
looks
like
the
owner
did
an
extension
to
the
house
without
a
permit,
and
so
there
was
some
work
order
and
that
application
now
has
to
go
to
the
committee
of
adjustment.
I
C
A
Michael
Pazhani
18
rivarly
Drive
after
having
built
a
pool
fence,
enclosure
and
abiding
Volvo's
rules,
one
of
the
fences
was
too
low,
as
municipal
licensing
had
stated
so
I
had
gotten
a
lattice
to
increase
it,
and
apparently,
after
discussing
it
with
the
neighbor
to
the
bank,
we'd
agreed
to
just
have
it
straight
across,
as
opposed
to
a
stagger
and
as
I
found
out
later
on.
It
was
between
12
and
perhaps
18
centimeters
too
high.
On
the
docket
there
there
was
a
sign
letter
from
the
neighbor
to
the
bag.
Gary,
who
said
it
looks
wonderful
here.
C
Questions
of
staff
questions
are
stop
seeing
none
on
behalf
of
Council,
for
when
we
move
in
the
alt
recommendation
to
grant
the
application
you
know
well
is
to
so
we're
moving
number
two
to
grant
the
application.
Sorry,
okay,
so
I'm
moving
or
counselor
channels
moving
to
grant
the
exemption.
All
in
favor
opposed
carried.
F
C
I
M
Name
is
Christy
Mercado
I
live
at
11
Atherton
Crescent
I'm,
the
chair
of
the
Long
Beach
neighborhood
association,
I,
just
wanted
to
thank
first
of
all
thank
councillor,
grinds
for
actually
generating
this
report
and
the
forestry
department
for
for
actually
contributing
and
making
this
report
possible
and
I
would
also
like
to
thank
dr.
max
pita
for
his
involvement
in
attending
T
lab
hearings
as
an
expert
witness
to
advocate
for
our
protecting
our
trees
in
Long
Branch.
M
So
the
L
DNA
has
decided
to
present
today
to
make
sure
that
this
council
is
aware
of
the
devastation
urgency
on
this
report.
Residents
feel
that
the
Long
Branch
canopy
is
unique
and
is
unique
and
mature,
but
it's
also
a
resource
that
needs
to
be
managed
and
protected
so
from
living
in
the
area.
This
is
what
we
see
on
the
ground
that
actually
contribute
to
loss.
So
not
many
people
don't
know
about
the
emerald
ash
borer
beetle
and
unfortunately
we
have
a
lot
of
ash
trees
down
in
Long
Branch,
particularly
on
Ash
Crescent.
M
We
do
thank
the
city
for
actually
trying
to
treat
these
trees
and
protect
them.
However,
all
they've
done
is
is
that
they
just
extended
their
life.
Unfortunately,
the
the
end
result
is
the
same.
So
you
end
up
with
the
Green
Dot
to
say
that
it's
been
treated,
but
eventually
that
green
dot
turns
to
orange,
and
at
least
we
can.
We
can
start
managing
and
start
replanting,
but
these
trees
are
like
80
to
120
years
old.
So
eventually
the
result
ends
up
being
the
same.
M
So
also
we've
got
storm
damage,
so
we
all
pretty
much
remember
the
the
ice
storm
of
a
few
years
ago,
but
just
as
recently
as
last
month,
there
was
a
significant
wind
storm
that
blew
through
Toronto
and
took
down
what
we
count
to
what
we
could
count
on
public
and
private
property,
12
spruce,
trees
in
Long
ranch,
so
these
again
are
significant
trees
that
are
anywhere
between
70
and
80
years,
old,
all
on
public
and
private
lands
and-
and
they
just
quite
simply
blew
over.
So
this
is
something
that
it
happens.
M
Okay,
you
can't
really
do
much
about
it,
except
try
and
keep
your
trees
healthy
and
maintain
them,
so
perhaps
that
they
can,
they
can
actually
stand
up
to
terms
like
such.
It
sounds
like
such
now.
This
these
are
the
things
that
we
can't
really
control.
So
let's
talk
about
the
things
that
we
can
control.
So
our
big
thing
down
there
is
development.
M
We
have
long
branches,
actually
become
a
choice,
location
for
developers
to
come
in
and
do
do
the
practice
of
lots
of
ring
where
they're
doing
intensification
in
neighborhoods.
Now
everything
is
legal
and
it
goes
through
the
committee
of
adjustment
and
the
OMB
and
quite
recently,
T
lab.
However,
the
thing
is
is
that
the
tree
protection
zones
are
not
sufficient
as
far
as
protecting
our
mature
tree
canopy
in
Long
Branch
and
the
on
ground.
Anecdotal
evidence
is
quite
obvious,
so
we
have
73
and
75
ash
Crescent.
These
trees
were
protected.
Okay,
these
trees
died.
M
Okay,
and
these
are
two
trees
that
ended
up
coming
down.
They
actually
came
down
last
summer,
75
25th.
This
is
one
of
the
first
lots
of
rinses
that
occurred
in
Long
Branch
on
27th
Street
and
again.
This
was
actually
part
of
this
was
protected
as
part
of
the
OMB
ruling
and
it
didn't
survive.
So
it
actually
came
out
last
summer
and
you
can
see
it.
It
took
about
two
years
to
die
and
you
can
see
it's
reduced
crown
defoliation
and
weak
foliage.
M
So,
and
this
is
what's
there
now,
okay,
we've
got
two
and
four
27th
Street
okay.
This
is
one
of
the
big
ones
that
really
ticked
off
the
residents.
Okay,
where
this
ended
up,
resulting
in
several
fines
where
this
tree
can't
the
seven
large
our
greens
were
taken
out.
So
that's
the
after
picture
of
what
was
left
over
those
are
private
trees,
and
then
you
can
see
the
big
silver
maple
in
the
front
and
that's
what's
left
now,
so
you
can
see
the
tree
stomping.
As
you
can
see
right
now,
there
was
no
rot.
M
That
was
a
very
healthy
tree
and
now
what's
left
is
unfortunately
the
residents
actually
bought
the
house
because
of
the
tree,
so
it's
twin
is
actually
across
the
street.
So
this
silver
maple
was
the
twin,
and
it's
still
there
right
now
and
as
you
can
see
one
house,
it
was
developed
actually
a
couple
years
ago
and
one
house
was
built
and
tree
protection
actually
happened.
M
There
was
tree
removal,
however,
it
was
done
sensitive
and
with
the
neighbors
consent,
and
this
tree
is
still
thriving,
so
it
is
possible,
but
plantable
space
becomes
a
real
thing
when
you're
actually
trying
to
do
development
around
trees
and
that's
why
we're
actually
saying
that
our
tree
protection
isn't
going
far
enough.
So
where
did
you
now?
So
these
are
our
new
summer
students.
This
is
Henry
and
Natalie
I'm.
A
Camel
so
thank
you
very
much
for
that,
because
that
is
I've.
Never
seen
that,
and
you
know
you
hear
about
tree
protection
and
and
it's
supposed
to
be
there,
but
I
haven't
seen
that
it
actually
doesn't
work
and
trees
do
die
as
a
result
of
this,
so
healthy
I
mean
you
showed
a
few
examples.
How
prevalent
is
that
in
down
a
Long
Branch.
M
And
the
thing
is
is
that
it
happens
over
a
series
of
seasons.
So
between
the
point
in
time
where
the
application
is
approved
and
then
the
building
goes
out
like
all
the
permits
and
everything
are
got,
the
building
goes
up
and
then
it
comes
and
then
the
sometimes
the
builders
have
actually
lived
in
it
for
a
year
and
the
building
is
bought
and
then
the
new
owners
don't
have
a
tree.
So
it's
within
a
three
or
four
year
span,
but
it's
pretty
much
100%.
So.
B
M
A
M
They
do
blow
over,
but
the
thing
is
is
once
you
dig
through
that
compacted
soil.
The
thing
is:
is
the
the
footprint
is
so
big
on
the
house
when
you're
building
to
that
their
compact
of
the
soil
and
the
trees
are
so
old.
They
need
so
much
support.
So
this
is
the
thing
is
that
a
tree
of
that
size
needs
significant
support,
so
the
the
tree
I
think
probably
a
place
to
start
would
be
that
the
zones
would
have
to
be
bigger.
A
C
C
M
Absolutely
Henry
and
Natalie
they're,
posing
with
a
professor
danjela
one
of
Malena
vaq
she's,
a
professor
with
the
University
of
Toronto
Faculty
of
Forestry,
and
what
the
Long
Branch
Neighborhood
Association
did
was.
We
got
a
grant
from
Canada
summer
jobs
and
we've
hired
two
summer
students
to
actually
do
a
tree
inventory
and
Long
Branch.
So
this
is
going
to
be
an
inventory
of
public
and
private
trees.
So
the
kids
started
the
kids.
The
students
have
actually
been
trained
by
the
professor,
and
they
are
now
can
measure
trees.
C
I
M
So
if
you
have
a
lot
of
trees
in
an
area,
you
actually
have
trees
actually
manage
a
lot
of
water.
They
actually
scrub
a
lot
of
CO
out
of
the
air.
So
to
say
that,
and
the
thing
is,
is
that
you
have
to
invest
in
those
trees
to
actually
have
them
old
enough
to
do
anything
and
that
that's
a
long
cycle
to
be
planning
for.
I
Because
I
I
know
that
and
I
have
a
number
of
applications
in
my
ward,
where
they're
severing
properties
and
building
and
residents
are
against
the
application
and
they're
coming
because
there
happens
to
be
a
tree
on
the
property
trees
on
the
property
and
the
application
still
gets
approved,
because
the
comments
from
forestry
is
well,
you
need
do
you
need
to
protect
these
trees,
but
we
will
support
your
application.
I
think
you
should
be
a
little
stronger,
yeah.
M
I
M
K
K
So
that's
the
most
successful
event
to
eight
for
that
event,
but
planting
trees
is
not
enough
to
get
to
the
40
percent
tree
canopy
that
we
want
to
get
to
in
the
report.
It
refers
to
data,
that's
from
2007
that
we
have
a
tree
canopy
of
26
percent
in
Long
Branch,
as
Christine
showed
we're
far
below
that
now,
because
of
all
the
the
insects
and
the
weather
and
the
development
that's
happening
so
that
goal
of
40
percent
was
set
in
2004
and
we're
actually
below
it
now.
So
that's
not
successful.
K
So
we
need
to
better
protect
the
existing
healthy
trees
and
some
of
the
recommendations
that
we
have.
We
actually
only
got
the
report
last
week,
so
we
didn't
have
a
chance
to
speak
to
forestry
or
the
councillor
about
it,
but
we
do
have
additional
recreation
Dacians
beyond
this
committee
just
receiving
the
report.
One
of
the
things
is
is
that
we
would
recommend
that
the
committee
of
adjustment
be
made
aware
of
their
low
rate
relative
to
other
committee
of
adjustments
of
following
forest
trees
recommendation
for
denial.
K
That
way,
it
wouldn't
applicants
to
make
it
a
priority
to
preserve
the
existing
trees,
which
is
outlined
in
the
policy
of
the
Official
Plan,
which
is
policy.
Three
point
one
point
two,
which
is
preserving
existing
richer
trees
wherever
possible.
If
the
finds
and
the
permits
were
related
to
that,
then
that
would
encourage
that
more
often
other
examples
that
people
gave
is
that,
in
the
case
of
injuring
a
private
tree,
the
builders
should
be
required
to
post
a
bond
in
case
there's
future
damage.
K
And
if
there
are
no
street
trees,
we
would
ask
that
street
trees
be
planted
on
the
property
and
that
the
Builder
bear
the
cost
and
also,
finally,
that
new
builds
should
be
required
to
preserve
plantable
space.
Because,
again,
that's
so
key.
If
trees
do
have
to
come
down
and
trees
do
have
a
life,
they
do
have
to
come
down
occasionally,
but
they're
very
plantable
space
for
large
trees
so
that
they
can
grow
in
that
they
can
thrive.
So
those
are
our
recommendations.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Questions
come.
H
K
H
You
aware
that,
a
couple
of
months
ago
we
had
a
report
come
to
parks
and
environment,
about
how
forestry
works
with
committee
of
adjustment
or
committee
of
adjustment
should
work
with
forestry.
In
that
report,
I
move
the
motion
for
nine
items
and
it
all
pertains
to
some
of
the
things
you're
talking
about.
Are
you
aware?
We've
actually
asked
that
on
every
drawing
we
get
for
committee
of
adjustment,
the
proponent
has
to
identify
trees.
I
wasn't.
H
Do
some
don't?
Okay?
We
have
also
asked
that,
because
we
have
an
election
coming
up,
as
we
heard
from
council
mammal
each
evening,
I'm
talking
about
a
further
election
in
October
after
the
election.
Are
you
aware
that
we
actually
we
hire
or
we
look
at
our
committee
of
adjustment
panels
and
we
have
asked
that
one
of
the
criteria
someone
on
that
panel
has
to
have
knowledge
of
our
streets
now.
H
You
also
aware
that
now
forestry
is
going
out
and
doing
workshops
for
our
committee
of
adjustment
panels
talking
about
the
private
tree
bylaw
and
explaining
how
important
the
tree
canopy
is
so
that
I
hope
would
you
agree,
might
help
us
when
it
comes
to
YFC
of
a
not
always
acknowledging
forestries
report.
I.
H
I
H
Not
or
being
not
being
adhered
to
and
we've
asked
that
they
report
to
forestry
rather
than
having
to
have
forestry,
go
and
inspect
every
single
tree
so
hoping
that
will
help
the
last.
Are
you
aware
it
is
when
someone
does
have
to
plant
a
tree,
a
replacement
tree?
We
have
asked
that
that
person
has
to
report
back
at
the
two-year
mark
with
a
photograph
of
the
tree.
H
A
K
Sorry
was
I
was
aware
of
that,
but
can
I
just
make
a
comment
on
that
last
one
because
we
actually
went
with
the
students
to
be
trained
as
well
at
University
of
Toronto
forestry
department
and
one
of
the
things
that
I
was
not
aware
of
that
I
am
aware
of
now
is
when
trees
are
planted,
they
get
girdling
roots.
Sometimes
so
it's
the
quality
of
the
tree
that's
planted,
and
it's
also
the
space
that's
planted
in.
If
it's
planted
in
a
space,
that's
heavy
clay
and
you
dig
a
hole.
K
Then
those
trees
roots
will
go
out
and
they'll
hit
it
like
hitting
a
pot.
So
it's
like
putting
a
tree
even
though
they're
planting
it
after
two
years
it's
going
to
be
hitting
a
pot
and
that
tree
will
still
never
thrive.
So
so
I
guess
you
know
that's
not
the
solution
here,
but
it's
just
it's
one
of
the
things
that
I
wasn't
aware
of.
So
those
planted
trees.
They
may
survive
two
years,
but
they
may
never
survive
into
a
fully
grown
tree.
So
thank
you
for.
C
I
A
C
Worried
about
my
trees
and
wind
award,
my
good
friend
max.
How
are
you
good,
so
I
know
as
Council
to
set
the
stated
that
were
in
the
next
term
were
probably
enough
people
with
forestry
experience
on,
but
how
do
we
get
the
Seaway
to
recognize
the
value
of
these
trees
when
they've
come
for
us
all,
we've
been
doing,
we've
been
fighting
everything
most
as
lot
of
severance
we've
been
fighting.
I
know,
you've
been
fighting
with.
It
goes
off
to
the
board
and
now
we're
starting
to
see
some
success.
C
E
Does
happen?
Is
the
committee
of
adjustments
and
the
request
for
comments
to
forest
yeah
same
thing
to
the
transportation
other
divisions?
As
soon
as
we
got
the
request
for
comments
of
the
proposed
variances
or
proposed
concept,
then
we
have
staff
at
Endocyte
and
see
if
the
trees
are
in
conflict.
So
if
the
trees
are
that
are
in
conflict
with
the
proposed
variances,
we
normally
object
and
a
very
specific
than
the
lawn
memo
to
the
committee
of
adjustment
for
every
single
file.
I
know.
E
All
of
this
mammals
by
the
way
can
be
found
under
the
application
information
center,
which
is
on
the
committee
of
adjustment
website.
They
upload
all
the
members
there,
so
our
position
is
clear:
if
the
tree
is
healthy,
we're
objecting
the
variances
and
the
concept
for
the
trees
that
are
in
poor
condition
or
there
is
a
workable
solution.
Then
we
advise
them
to
apply
for
perimeter
satisfy
forest.
That's
happened
according
to
the
tree
by
law
requirements
under
Chapter,
8,
13,
18,
B
5.
C
Over
half
the
investigations
found
the
true,
sir,
that
the
bylaws
being
broken,
and
you
saw
the
pictures
up
that
the
Association
brought
forward.
You
know
the
LOB
splits
which
wasn't
fighting.
We
brought
report
through
here
on
getting
some
urban
design
guidelines
and
over
here
is
very
familiar
with,
what's
happening,
long
branch
minutes
each
with
the
lot
splitting,
but
you
see
the
association's
showing
these
homes
when
they've
been
built
and
the
trees
are
half
dead.
If
not
that
I.
How
like?
How?
How
do
we
get
our
I
know?
E
City
Council
approved
last
week,
maybe
two
months
ago,
and
we
started
to
two
years
ago
having
a
staff
ten
position,
and
now
we
have
a
permanent
compliance
and
enforcement
group
which
they're
driving
around
or
we
get
called
some
time
from
the
community
from
the
neighborhoods.
So
stop
we'll.
Go
there
right
away
and
they're
doing
that
within
four
or
five
days.
So
every
single
case
is
investigated.
Some
of
them,
maybe
it's
kind
of
minimum
impact
to
the
trees.
So
it's
something
that
is
not
important.
Still.
E
C
E
C
E
E
E
To
try
to
prioritize
some
time-
it's
not
really
under
my
section,
but
it's
a
compliant
enforcement
group
when
you
get
a
call
from
the
neighbors
or
consular
office
or
3-1-1,
and
you
see
something
that's
really
happening
now.
Even
in
afternoon,
we
have
a
standby
person
in
urban
forestry
who
can
attend
the
side
yeah,
but.
C
E
C
E
E
C
E
Have
a
tree
protection
plan
in
place
only
let's
say
the
cases
that
we're
showing
here
are
the
cases
that
they
apply
to
injure
the
tree
because
they
get
a
1
B
decision
and
then
the
tree
died
after
that.
So
we
don't
know
exactly
when
that
died
is
what
are
the
reasons
so
sometimes
they
have
it
undertaking
and
release
which
want
to
issue
the
permit
conditional
to
protect
that
tree.
They
have
to
to
implement
the
tree
protection
mitigation
measures,
but
some
of
the
developers
they
will
sell.
E
A
E
That
correct,
what's
happened.
First
of
all,
is
some
misunderstanding
or
misleading.
Here,
the
Italy
they
fully
protected
the
tree
according
to
the
tree
protection
policy,
so
99%
the
tree
is
not
going
to
die
because
of
the
construction.
Okay,
but
what's
happened
sometime
in
those
cases
they
put
the
tree
protection
on.
They
show
that
our
protecting
the
tree,
they
get
a
permit
to
injure
the
tree
and
they
later
on,
they
remove
the
holding
and
they
violated
or
encroach
the
tree
protection
zone.
For
example,
they
dig.
E
A
You've
got
the
numbers
on
page
five
of
the
report
in
twenty
six
percent
of
the
cases
in
Etobicoke
and
forty
three
percent
of
the
cases
in
Ward.
Six
urban
forestry
requested
the
dawn,
denial
of
the
variance
or
consent
to
sever
because
of
trees
and
only
13%
of
the
time
they
they
listen
to
the
forestry
people.
A
A
E
C
I
J
We
thank
you
sure
through
you
to
to
max
I
one
of
the
things
the
speaker
said
was
they
were
concerned
with
the
size
of
the
tree
protection
zone
and
I?
Think
I
heard
you
say
that
you
were
okay
with
the
the
city's
policies
around
the
tree
protection
zones,
but
it
was
more
of
a
matter
of
violation
that
sometime
during
the
construction
period,
the
bylaws
weren't
adhered
to
is
am
I
correct
in
that
yes,.
E
C
E
J
But
it
seems
as
though,
in
the
vast
vast
majority,
the
cases
provided
the
rules
are
followed.
The
tree
has
a
pretty
good
likelihood
of
survival,
any
guess
at
99
percent,
but
I'll
take
it
out
very
good
odds.
Do
you
have
any
advice
to
us
with
respect
to
a
time
period
at
which
a
tree
may
die
as
a
result
to
some
transgression
to
the
tree
protection
zone?
Is
it
one
year,
two
year,
five
years
ten
years
she.
C
E
J
J
J
Last
question
I
have
is
I,
think
the
most
important
there
is
a
there's,
no
doubt
in
the
room,
there's
a
lot
of
concern
over
seven
seas,
there
being
granted
by
the
committee
of
adjustment,
there's
a
lot
of
public
opinion
on
some
of
the
rulings
of
committee
of
adjustment,
but
it
is
what
it
is
when
you're
asked
to
comment
on,
a
committee
of
adjustment
matter
am
I
correct
in
that
you
don't
take
into
account
any
anything
with
respect
to
sentiment
or
how
egregious
the
particular
application.
Is
you
look
at
the
tree?
J
E
Our
position
is
really
neutral
liquid
the
tree
and
the
impact
that
the
proposed
concept
or
proposed
variances
are
is
to
the
tree.
So
if
the
trees
in
direct
conflict
with
the
proposed
concept,
then
we
object
to
that
concept.
If
the
treating
in
direct
conflict
with
proposed
violence
is
only
then
we
object
to
the
proposed
variance.
So
we
revise
seated
on
a
revised
the
guideline,
how
to
review
the
committee
of
adjustment
application
two
years
ago
and
that's
why
we
object
or
the
fair
request
deferral
for
the
application
that
proposals
are
in
direct
conflict
of
the
trees.
E
J
That
sort
of
summarize
you,
you
offer
advice
of
rejection
in
circumstances
when
the
tree
is
essentially
going
to
be
harmed
because
of
the
proposal
before
you.
But
a
proposal
to
sever
a
lot
would
receive
the
same
objection,
as
would
a
proposal
to
put
a
family
room
on
the
back
of
the
house.
That,
in
all
due
respects
for
the
the
entire
committee
of
adjustment
process
wouldn't
be
contested
by
anybody.
But
yet,
if
it
was
going
to
take
a
tree
out
would
be
at
the
same
stature
or
or
objection
as
would
a
lot
reverence.
It's.
E
The
same
thing
in
terms
of
reviewing
the
application,
however,
is
the
one
difference
when
they
come
as
a
right
to
build,
then
on
the
tree.
Bylaw
urban
forestry
issue
the
permit
for
that
tree.
So
if
they,
let's
say
they're
having
addition
in
the
house
with
the
zoning
bylaw
allows
that
so
the
trees
within
the
building
envelope
for
the
zoning
bylaw.
As
of
right,
the
northern
forest
issue,
the
parameter
holding
tree
Bible.
J
L
You,
mr.
chairman,
max
when
someone
applies
committee
of
adjustment,
typically
the
committee
with
just
negative
approval,
on
the
condition
that
the
the
tree
are
gets
clearance.
The
removal
of
the
tree
gets
clearance
through
urban
forestry,
correct
and
the
applicant
then
makes
an
application
to
injure
the
tree
if,
in
fact,
he
has
difficulty
with
trying
to
achieve
what
he's
trying
to
achieve
he
he
puts
a
deposit
in
my
question,
is:
is
the
deposit
anywhere
near
or
in
the
neighborhood
of
what
the
actual
value
of
the
tree?
L
E
E
L
L
E
L
E
E
I
E
However,
the
by
law
authorizes
140
to
issue
permit
for
the
private
trees.
If
the
project
is
approved
by
committee
of
adjustment
for
City
trees,
committee
of
adjustment
does
not
have
full
authority
to
for
us
to
issue
the
permit,
even
if
they
approve
the
project,
so
maybe
could
go
to
Community
Council
and
City
Council.
One
example
we
have
in
your
area
was
a
one-eighth,
135,
Johnson
Johnson
matter,
Matthew.
I
And
I
went
to
the
OMB
on
a
committee,
but
severance,
and
my
community
argued
about
the
tree
and
deal
one
be
approved.
It
even
note
was
damaging
all
the
trees
on
the
property.
You
were
there
with
me.
Yes,
so
that's
what
I'm
saying
our
rules
are
not
tight
enough,
like
they're
they're,
getting
approval.
E
I
C
Signal
for
the
question
speakers-
it's
my
ward
in
all
speak
I
want
to
thank
the
Long,
Branch
neighbor
Association,
bringing
this
forward
to
my
office
and
I'm
happy
to
bring
this
for
NASA
report
I'm
not
prepared
to
move
Rasheed
on
the
state,
so
I'm
gonna
be
moving
deferral
to
next
day,
because
there's
some
recommendations,
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
look
at.
They
would
like
me
to
move
on
their
behalf
and
I'm
happy
to
do
that
so
and
I'd
also
like
to
work
with
forestry
and
maybe
with
planning,
what's
happening.
C
We're
under
siege
in
Long,
Branch,
very
desirable
neighborhood
guys
are
coming
in
developers
coming
in
not
from
the
area,
don't
really
care,
they
kind
of
built,
some
of
the
stuff
into
the
costs
and
just
hacking
out
these
150
rolled
trees.
We
just
had
a
commemoration
of
a
two
hundred
fifty
year
old
oak
and
some
of
them
made
like
three
hundred
fifty
years
old.
So
it's
on
the
top
list
for
the
residents
of
Long
Branch,
but
they're
coming
in
here,
hacking
them
out
what's
happening.
Is
they
get
to
you
know
they
get.
C
The
committee
of
adjustment
we've
had
some
success.
Now,
where
we
defer
it
in
order
to
get
the
applicant
to
listen
to
the
neighbors
and
say,
let's
try
and
work
around
the
tree
revise
your
application.
In
some
case.
That's
happening
some
case.
It's
not,
but
then
you
have
the
guys
split
these
Lots
they're
out
of
here
in
two
years.
New
people
move
in.
C
They
don't
know
kind
of
what
happened
before
they
bought
this
million
dollar
home,
and
then
they
may
make
some
alterations
and
before
you
know
it,
you
see
what
happens
to
the
trees
that
were
shown
by
this
association
here
today,
and
it's
happening
more
and
more
and
more
and
people
are
ticked
off
with
it.
So
a
counter
to
sat
there
tree
advocate
is
saying.
There's
you
know,
change
is
coming
on
that.
C
What
the
committee
adjustment
but
I
think
we
have
to
somehow
get
a
value
on
these
trees
and
get
the
committee
understand
the
value
of
these
trees,
and
it's
just
it's
happening
one
after
the
other.
So
I
think
my
association
will
be
okay.
If
I
defer
to
look
at
those
recommendations,
work
with
planning
work
with
the
committee
and
see
you
in
coming
and
I
know.
Probably
the
new
term
would
be
some
other
changes
to
it.
C
J
Very
brief,
I
will
support
the
deferral,
but
I
wanted
to
make
two
comment
on
this,
and
the
first
is
to
underscore
my
positive
experiences
with
the
forestry
department.
I
believe
they
provide
excellent
advice
and
they
know
all
there
is
to
know
about
trees
and
can
teach
a
lot
of
people
a
lot
of
the
ways
to
do.
The
right
thing
and
I
agree
with
the
information
that
mr.
J
Deva
told
us
today
is
that
what
we
tend
to
get
into
trouble
is
where
people
don't
adhere
to
the
rules
and
the
policies
around
this,
and
the
problem
is,
is
that
the
result
of
this
shows
up
a
couple
of
years
down
the
road
and
that's
a
hard
thing,
because
people
change
change,
hands
of
lots
and
the
burden
of
proof
is
very,
very
hard
to
establish
two
years
later
on.
I
will
say
one
other
comment,
though,
and
it's
I
think
it's
a
caution
about
the
public
policy
around
attempting
to
increase
the
stature.
J
C
C
C
L
H
C
H
C
C
F
In
essence,
what
I'm
doing
is
replacing
recommendation
number
one
with
the
following
that
City
Council
Alexei
is
talking
to
the
director
affordable
housing
to
continue
to
negotiate
with
the
AppScan
to
resolve
outstanding
issues,
retail
in
this
report
and
through
streamlined
application
in
your
coins,
where
they
open
door
policies
on
December
the
5th
6
&
7
of
last
year,
City
Council
through
the
Executive
Committee,
approved
the
affordable
component
of
this
development.
There
so
and
I
think
it's
essential
to
be
on
the
same
page.
F
F
E
A
C
There's
been
a
lot
okay,
so
you
got
the
stats
which
really
needed
so
okay.
Thank
you.
Questions!
Stop!
Okay,
so
I
will
speak
to
my
ward,
I,
very,
very
rarely
overturn
transportations
recommendations.
This
case
I'm,
going
to
move
the
recommendation
to
approve
East.
These
two
stop
signs.
This
is
Morrison
Street,
which
is
south
of
Lake.
Shore,
Boulevard
and
I
had
a
chance
to
talk
with
counter
to
set
before
the
meeting
started.
This
morning
we
are
getting
bombarded
with
the
wait.
Traffic's
moving
through
our
neighborhoods
I
had
a
child
hit
on
a
bike
there.
C
A
couple
weeks
ago
we
had
a
cyclist
hit
on
Stanley.
Today
it
is
crazy.
The
way
people
are
traveling
through
our
neighborhoods
at
this
point
and
we
are
getting
inundated
inundated
with
calls
to
our
office.
So
you
know
we
have
to
do
something
to
slow
these
people
down
and
again.
I
there.
I
can
count
on
this
hand.
In
my
15
years,
I
when
I've
gone
against
transportation
staff,
but
on
Warren
Avenue
people
are
heading
down
there
to
get
off,
Fletcher,
Boulevard
and
darting
across.
C
A
I
just
want
to
comment
anyone
right.
This
general
comment
on
stop
signs
in
general.
Right
I
mean
this.
This
road
has
as
what
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
7
stop
signs
already.
You
know
we're
we're
not
helping
you
we're
not
helping
the
into
more
now
we're
not
helping
the
environment
in
greenhouse
gases
and
I
know.
Counselor
do
said
is
concerned
about
the
environment
and
greenhouse
gases.
A
B
C
F
Our
wars
have
song
and
she
was
known
within
the
community
for
not
only
for
volunteering,
for
generosity
has,
but
for
being
one
or
the
best
kids
that
we
have
in
the
community
so
having
a
large
passions
with
the
community.
The
recommendation
that
I'm
putting
forward
is
ask,
as
you
start,
to
look
at
stability
of
doing
that
and
report
back,
and
this
is
a
one-time-only
applying
school.
C
50
request
returns,
eternal
local
peabody,
vol,
38,
31st
Street
in
Long
Branch,
all
in
favor,
pose
I'm
opposed,
carry
51
safety,
real
queens
out
in
Stanley
Avenue.
This
is
my
ward
again.
My
square
report
requests
where
a
child
will
just
hit
near
there
a
couple
weeks
ago
by
car,
and
we
had
someone
hit
by
a
cyclist
hit
so
I'm
that
Queens
out
he
keeps
coming
up
again
and
again
I'm
asking
staff
to
look
and
work
with
me
to
see
what
we
do
there.
C
So
all
in
favor
posed
arrey
3152
report
for
traffic
calming
on
Flair
Mill
Avenue.
We've
got
a
new
subdivision
going
in
there
that
madami
homes
is
building
in
there
straightaway
we've
got
staff
to
report
and
look
at
that
over
the
years
gaining
Geist
again.
So
another
report
request
for
thermal
very
long
stretch
all
in
favor.
C
A
A
C
To
be
fair
councillor,
Campbell
I'm
asking
the
report,
they
don't
know,
they've
looked
at
it,
but
again
it's
just
being
built.
Now
it's
not
finished
so
they'll
have
to
do
the
work
to
see
the
amount
of
new
homes
going
in
and
if
they
this
is
just
new
to
them.
They
know
I'm
walking
this
on,
but
I'm
asking
to
come
back
and
look
at
it
and
look
at
that.
Anyone.
C
J
J
G
C
F
Miss
chairman
is
this
is
well,
then
downsize
that
week
he'll
be
there
Eglinton,
crosstown,
lefty
and
last
year
last
year,
that
was
kind
of
changes
such
as
the
base
have
to
allow
the
tractor
to
roll
on
Wilton,
and
the
close
proximity
is
Daffron
Street
in
Eglin
from
creating
a
tremendous
tremendous
relock
in
that
section
there.
So
it's
a
safety
issue
for
the
gloom
over
all
and
what
I'm
asking
is
for
the
reporting
procedures,
testing
the
TA
lip
stability
to
have
something
very
temporary
there
and
to
bring
back
a
reporter
there
to
the
next
customer
I.
G
C
A
A
Talking
about
the
bills
you
know,
council
mammal
et
gets
all
kinds
of
latitude
and
then
he
takes
off
and
there's
no
justice
that
the
that
the
Etobicoke
York
Community
Council
passed
and
declares
bylaws
bill.
Six:
six,
nine,
two:
six:
eight:
two:
six:
seven:
nineteen,
seven:
twenty
six
and
seven
thirty
five
and
excluding
bill
676
prepared
for
the
June
6
2008
een,
meeting
31
of
the
community
council,
shell.