►
From YouTube: Executive Committee - January 23, 2020 - Part 2 of 2
Description
Executive Committee, meeting 12, January 23, 2020 - Part 2 of 2
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=17105
Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skJ2d6SU7PU
Meeting Navigation:
0:10:53 - Meeting resume
Agenda Items:
1:33:40 - EX12.3 - Toronto-Ontario Transit Partnership - Status Update (Ward All)
1:41:27 - EX12.5 - Advancing a New Culture of Innovation and Partnership (Ward All)
2:03:14 - EX12.7 - Toronto Police Service - 2018 Annual Statistical Report (Ward All)
A
A
A
We
are
ready
to
resume
now
and
just
to
remind
members
and
visitors
where
we
are.
We
finished
listening
to
the
deputations
on
the
ravine
strategy,
implementation
item,
IX
12.1,
and
so
the
next
stage
in
our
proceedings
would
be
to
move
to
questions
of
staff
by
members
of
the
committee
and
members
of
City
Council.
Are
there
questions
of
staff
counselor
miquellee.
B
Thank
You
Mara
Torrey.
My
question
is:
how
does
the
ravine
strategy
implementation
plan
interweave
or
complement
or
work
with
the
resilience
strategy,
the
transform
teo
strategy,
the
biodiversity
strategy
and
the
canopy
co
strategy?
Because
we
have
a
lot
of
environmental
strategies
and
how
are
we
working
towards
aligning
them
so.
C
Through
you,
mr.
mayor,
that
is
it's
a
great
question,
because
that's
actually
what
we're
trying
to
solve
in
in
the
way
that
the
strategy
is
coming
forward.
So
there
is
a
slide
in
the
presentation
and
there's
information
in
the
report
keep
on
speaking
about
the
presentation
that
wasn't
up
there.
That
looks
at
all
the
various
city
strategies
that
fall
and
connect
into
the
ravine
strategy
resilience
transform
tea.
C
Oh
the
tree,
canopy
study
that
is
also
will
also
be
before
council
next
week
and
a
number
of
other
environmental
initiatives
and
the
idea
around
this
strategy
is
to
connect
all
of
those
interweaving
city
strategies
through
across
city
Coordinating
Committee,
so
that
we
are
taking
all
of
those
strategies
in
consideration
when
we
move
them
forward
and
looking
at
as
much
efficiencies
of
projects
and
initiatives
as
we
can
as
we
move
forward.
So
it's
to
build
on
all
those
strategies
together
as
much
as
possible
and.
C
This
is
review
mr.
Mehra,
that
that
also
is
one
of
the
the
biggest
sort
of
goals
of
this
implementation
strategy.
There
is
a
section
in
the
report
that
looks
to
a
cross-divisional
a
number
of
cross
divisional
committees,
so
that
we
are
centrally
coordinating
the
capital
plan.
Our
community
engagement
plans,
as
well
as
another
one
that
looks
at
all
of
the
environmental
and
ecological
initiatives
across
the.
B
City
and
then
my
last
question,
one
of
the
deputies
spoke
about
equity
and
she
made
the
important
point
and,
having
had
two
children
I
understand
her
point
about
women
ends
the
increased
need
for
washrooms,
so
I'm
wondering
if
you
could
speak
specifically
to
that
as
well
as
one
finding,
because
that
was
an
interesting
point
that
people
might
be
hesitant
to
go
into
a
ravine
system
for
a
prolonged
period
of
time.
Knowing
there
may
not
be
a
restroom
available
through.
C
Three,
mr.
mayor,
it
is
a
great
point
and
a
great
thing
to
keep
in
consideration
as
we
develop
these
capital
plans
as
we
develop.
You
know
what
will
be
ravine
hubs
in
the
ravines
around
how
we
can
accommodate
better
usage.
I
agree
with
the
deputy
that
one
of
the
barriers
to
increased
access
to
the
ravines
or
the
amount
of
amenities
that
are
available
within
the
ravine
system.
C
A
D
C
You,
mr.
mayor,
ticks,
you
know
my
my
staff
are
telling
me
or
don't
classify
as
an
invasive
species,
because
they're
not
a
an
actual
plant
product
but
Public
Health.
Does
the
coordination
work
around
our
approach,
our
strategy
when
it
comes
to
ticks
and
I?
Think
that
would
be
a
question
we
can
certainly
take
offline
and
get
you
some
additional
information
on
okay.
D
And
only
ask
about
that
because
for
myself,
for
example,
the
number
of
ravines
and
and
the
green
space
that
I
have
in
my
war
and
you
have
the
signs
in
the
different
parks
about
ticks
and
Lyme
disease,
but
it
always
falls
back
with
the
questions
I
get
from
constituents,
not
so
much
of
it
from
the
hell,
the
Board
of
Health.
But
it's
what
does
Parks
and
Recreation
doing
so
sorry,.
C
Mr.
Neher,
the
the
I
mean
my
knowledge
of
ticks,
which
is
I'm,
not
the
ticks
expert,
but
a
lot
of
what
we
do
with
public
health
is
around
the
appropriate
signage
and
the
and
the
appropriate
public
education
around
what
it
takes
like
and
how
to
manage.
If
you
think,
you've
been
bitten
and
the
rest
of
it.
Okay.
D
C
D
And
then
I
also
wanted
to
ask
about
the
the
wayfinding
I
know.
There
was
a
pilot
project
on
a
Morningside
Park
around
wayfinding
and
in
terms
of
emergency
situations,
so
emergency
service.
The
staff
could
find
somebody
in
a
park
or
a
ravine
if
they're
in
distress
and
I
was
just
wondering,
is
that
going
to
continue
to
roll
out
or
are
you
looking
at
rolling
it
out
further.
C
C
D
And
then
my
last
question
I
just
wanted
to
ask
about
when
the
deputies
raised
and
I
have
a
lot
of
issues
with
it
along
the
ravines
of
my
ward,
where
people
are
throwing
trash
off
the
balconies
of
apartment
buildings
and
we
ended
up
cleaning
it
up
in
the
ravines
I'm.
Just
trying
to
understand
about
enforcement
strategy,
I.
Guess
it's
more
from
MLS
than
parks,
but
it
does
impact
on
parks
through.
C
The
mayor
I
think
you
know
quite
truly
we're
all
in
it
together
we're
working
directly
with
solid
waste
on
certainly
identifying
where
that
waste
comes
from,
and
there
is
some
involvement
with
MLS
as
well
and
I.
Think
through
the
strategy
and
through
the
increased
investment
that
we're
recommending
around
litter
pickup,
we
will
be
able
to
identify
those
sites
much
more
readily
because
we'll
have
more
eyes
in
the
ravine
on
an
ongoing
basis.
Okay,.
E
C
E
C
C
We
do
currently-
and
we
can
certainly
as
part
of
the
ongoing
strategy,
look
at
the
types
of
public
education,
material
and
age
that
we
can
provide
private
landowners
around
invasive
species
management
and
can
also
look
to
see
if
there's
any
federal,
provincial
programs
to
connect
them
to
the
city
currently
does
not
have
any
funding
programs
specifically
focused
on
private
lands,
but
it
could
be
something
that
the
leadership
table
looks
at
around.
What
a
program
might
look
like
in
the
future.
Now.
E
C
E
When
it
comes
to
bylaws,
two
things
that
came
up
was
littering:
I've
had
complaints
in
my
office
of
off-leash,
awfully
dog
dog
off
leash
violations
and
even
illegal
campfires
and
I'm
just
wondering
in
our
ravine
system.
I
realized
enforcement
of
bylaws
is
very
difficult,
but
is
there
a
plan
to
be
more
vigilant,
and
maybe
this
admissible
licensing
issue
be
more
vigilant
enforcing
our
bylaws
in
those
regards
so.
C
Through
the
mayor,
we
certainly
when
these
contraventions
are
were
made
aware
of
them.
We
certainly
connect
the
contraventions,
the
appropriate
city
divisions
from
an
enforcement
perspective,
whether
it's
MLS
or
or
solid
waste
again
I
think
the
ravine
strategy
recommends
some
increased
investments
in
the
ravines,
which
will
again
put
more
eyes
and
ears
in
the
ravine
and
have
a
better
idea
of
what's
going
on
an
ongoing
basis.
Currently
don't
actually
have
ongoing
crews
with
in
the
ravine
system
and
I
think
the
positive
piece
moving
forward
is
we'll
be
able
to
achieve
better.
E
C
The
mayor
no
I
think,
as
I
mentioned
in
the
presentation,
there's
ten
priority
investment
areas,
but
there's
over
a
hundred
and
five
segments
of
the
ravine
as
it
split
up
and
much
of
the
city's
larger
capital
program.
The
four
hundred
and
sixty
million
dollars
that's
allocated
over
the
existing
10-year
plan
looks
at
all
of
the
areas
of
the
ravines,
not
just
the
ten
priority
areas,
and
certainly
the
loop
trail
and
other
initiatives
go
through
many
areas
of
the
ravines,
not
in
the
10
priority
areas.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
Oscar
Pasternak.
Thank
you
other
members.
The
committee
wishing
to
ask
questions
of
staff.
Okay,
I
just
have
a
couple
of
change.
The
clock.
Oops
may
I
just
ask
what
am
I
done
with
me
here
we
are.
First
of
all,
can
we
be
assured,
because
I'm
going
to
move
a
motion
in
a
few
minutes
that
accelerates
the
funding
into
2020,
so
we
can
get
started.
I
certainly
learned
even
more
today
about
invasive
species
and
how
they
aren't
waiting
around
for
us,
as
I
said
the
other
day.
A
C
Was
gonna
say
through
the
mayor,
but
yes,
that's
exactly
what
we
would
do.
We
would
do
an
initial
assessment
of
where
the
hottest
spots
are
do
as
much
initial
cleanup
as
we
can
and
then
in
future
years
of
the
program,
get
to
a
better
ongoing
monitoring
program
so
that
the
hot
spots
are
then
resolved
and.
A
I
understand
that,
while
there's
some
sensitivity
involved
here
and
how
we
go
above,
is
that
you're
amenable
and
we
have
to
work
with
the
human
resources,
people
and
so
on
to
looking
at
a
recruitment
strategy
that
tries
to
focus
as
much
as
we
can
on
neighborhood
improvement
area,
young
people
from
that
area
to
get
these
jobs,
which
I
think
is
be
healthy
for
them
in
many
respects.
That's
something
that
you're
willing
to
discuss
with
the
HR
people.
We.
A
C
Yeah
we've
actually
commissioned
work
of
that
nature,
with
U
of
T
and
with
the
universities
and
to
your
point
we
agree
completely.
They
have
a
great
contribution
for
this,
and
we've
also
noted
that
some
of
these
projects
are
longitudinal
in
nature
and
actually
provide
great
opportunities
for
students
to
be
involved
in
these
kinds
of
study
areas.
A
B
You
mr.
mayor
and
I
just
wanted
to
start
by
thanking
you
for
your
leadership
on
this
file
and
the
motions
that
you
were
going
to
pass
later,
as
well
as
thank
counselor
Pasternak
through
his
role
of
chair
of
infrastructure
and
environment,
who
is
advanced
this
as
well.
There's
two
key
things
that
jump
out
at
me
that
are
really
bringing
us
into
this
century.
Frankly,
I
think
we
were
behind
on
our
way
of
environmental
management.
B
So
two
things
that
I'm
excited
by
is
that
we're,
finally
recognizing
that
our
ravines
are
important
green
infrastructure
and
we're
treating
them
as
such,
and
the
second
is
that
we
are
really
recognizing
that
people
are
part
of
the
environment
and
I
think
that
when
we've
separated
that
in
the
past,
that's
where
we've
really
failed
and
by
making
sure
that
the
social
components
are
really
interval
v'n
into
this
policy
and
into
the
implementation
plan,
I
think
that's
a
big
step
forward.
When
I
read
through
the
ravine
strategy.
B
There's
one
word
that
comes
to
mind:
it's
one
of
the
five
principles,
but
it's
the
one
that
I
really
think
jumps
out
at
me.
The
most
and
that's
connection.
We're
connecting
people
with
nature
through
this
strategy
and
the
implementation
we're
connecting
people
with
each
other
and
giving
them
the
opportunity
to
to
enjoy
each
other's
company
in
our
beautiful
green
spaces
and
we're
connecting
the
trails
themselves
in
the
different
ravines
so
that
we
have
these
connected
corridors
that
are
so
great
for
people
to
be
able
to
move
about
in
the
city.
B
B
For
that
and
I
hope
that
we
all
do
because
these
ecosystem
services
that
are
provided
in
these
ravines
total
eight
hundred
and
eighty
million
dollars
and
that's
the
money
we
would
have
to
spend
if
we
did
not
have
these
green
spaces.
So
there
is
a
considerable
return
on
investment
and
I'm
hopeful
that,
as
we
continue
to
advocate
on
this,
our
provincial
and
our
federal
counterparts
will
step
forward
as
well.
B
A
F
Thank
you
very
much
mr.
mayor
I'd,
also
like
to
to
thank
staff
to
thank
our
on
toes
academic
community
and,
in
particular,
our
community
partners
in
helping
raise
awareness
and
continue
the
advocacy
efforts
on
behalf
of
our
ravines.
Shortly
after
being
elected
to
the
changed
ward
boundaries,
I
got
a
call
from
the
friends
down
at
the
brickworks,
which
is
a
new,
was
part
of
the
new
Ward
I'd,
obviously
been
to
the
brickworks
before,
but
never
as
their
local
councillor.
F
Hopped
on
my
bike,
punched
in
the
GPS
coordinates
and
took
me
to
Milkman's
Lane,
never
been
on
Milkman's
Lane
you
ever
want
to
put
to
put
a
little
scare
into
your
life
is
bike
down
Milkman's
Lane.
It
is
something
else.
I
tell
you
now.
Since
then,
we've
completed,
we've
completed
the
switchbacks
up
in
Rosedale
that
make
a
huge
difference
and
while
I
still
have
to
push
my
bike
up
at
them
because
they
are
tough
they're
like
it's,
it's
it's
quite
the
incline.
F
Some
some
steps
have
been
made
to
make
our
ravines
more
accessible.
I
got
taken
on
a
tour
by
a
group
that
I've
since
ticket
get
gotten
to
know
quite
well.
The
Midtown
ravine
working
group,
and
they
walked
me
through
some
of
the
ravines.
Now
I
will
be
completely
honest.
The
last
time
it
was
in
some
of
these
ravines
I
was
a
teenager.
Growing
up
in
North
Toronto
spent
some
time
in
some
of
those
ravines,
and
it
had
been
a
while
since
I've
been
down
there,
but
but
Wow
hat
was
was
this.
F
It
frightened
me
the
state
of
them
a
little
bit
when
you
look
at
some
of
these
pipes
that
are
like
you
can
almost
see
them
crumbling
into
the
water
course
and
then
ever
then
getting
shown
pictures
of
of
year
over
year,
just
how
much
change
was
happening
and
then
seeing
someone's
backyard
and
and
their
their
their
back
porch
in
the
middle
of
the
ravine,
200
feet
away
from
when
it
slid
down
the
slid
down
into
the
ravine.
I
think
these
are
dramatic
images
of
of
what
the
state
of
our
ravines
are.
F
My
colleague,
councilor
Pressley,
is
reminding
me.
I
have
three
minutes
so
I'm
gonna
jump
ahead
and
just
say,
I
think
there
are
three
areas
that
we
need
to
focus
a
little
bit
more
attention
on
I
will
I
will
first
say
that
I
am
very
grateful
that
the
mayor
has
made
the
commitment
to
fully
fund
it.
The
this
strategy
this
year,
I
think,
if
anything
else,
we
need
to
recognize
that
that
shows
leadership
to
advance
it
into
this
budget.
That's
good
that
we're
currently
going
through
and
I'm
very
thankful
that
that
he
has
taken
that
position.
F
The
notion
that
we
need
to
look
at
protection
first
and,
above
all
else,
is
I,
think
critical
in
allowing
the
city
to
also
ensure
that
this
helps
us
realize
our
biodiversity
strategy
and
its
implementation
and
then,
finally,
on
fully
funding
the
capital
work.
I
know
that
we're
putting
a
lot
of
reliance
on
private
sources
of
capital.
There
will
be
some
there.
I
have
no
doubt
because
of
the
prestige.
F
That
will
be
that
will
come
with
this,
but
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
we
should
put
an
over-reliance
that
philanthropy
is
going
to
be
there
to
do
the
year-over-year
funding
that
we
need
that
we
really
need
to
ensure
the
long-term
safety
and
stability
of
our
ravines
and
the
health
of
our
ravine.
So
thank
you
very
much
mr.
mayor
and
the
committee
for
indulging
thanks.
A
E
You
Thank
You
mr.
mayor,
and
thank
you
very
much
for
your
leadership
on
this
file
and
and
thank
you
to
to
our
city.
Staffs
are
a
great
team
behind
me
who
has
done
years
of
work
on
this
report
coming
forward
and
well,
of
course,
we'll
do
years
of
work
as
we
implement
and
thank
you
to
Vice
Chair
McKelvey
for
her
leadership
on
the
infrastructure
and
environment
committee.
I.
E
Think
I
mentioned
a
while
back
that
I
grew
up
on
in
a
house
with
a
ravine
lot
and
we
spend
many
hours
running
through
the
ravine
on
various
pathways,
long
river
streams
among
the
the
trees
and
the
rocks
and
the
hills,
and
it
was
actually
I
feel
very
fortunate
growing
up
to
have
that
resource
very
close
to
our
household
and
bringing
it
up
to
the
current
date.
The
residents
of
Ward
6
loved
the
Racine
ravine
system.
E
York
Center,
is
blessed
with
a
wonderful
ravine
system,
with
river
systems
and
they're
attached
to
to
the
main
parks
in
the
city.
Our
bails
Park
to
you,
Ross
Lord
Park,
and
it
really
does
improve
the
quality
of
life
in
our
communities,
whether
there
neighborhood
improvement
areas,
whether
they're
single-family
detached
having
a
ravine
system,
abutting,
neighborhoods
and
traversing
through
neighborhoods
is
a
very
precious
resource,
but
to
keep
this
resource
healthy
to
make
sure
it
remains
strong
and
to
make
sure
we
continue
to
receive
the
dividends
of
a
vibrant
ravine
system.
E
We
have
to
invest
in
it
and
we
have
to
use
money
to
make
sure
that
our
rosy
ravines
are
connected.
That
people
can
cannot
only
enjoy
them
and
come
to
them,
but
we
also
must
take
initiatives
to
to
protect
them
and
preserve
them.
So
it's
a
balancing
act.
We
must
protect
them
and
preserve
them,
but
at
the
same
time
we
must
enjoy
them,
and
that
is
what
this
report
is.
All
about.
I'm
also
encouraged
to
hear
that
those
ravine
systems,
not
in
the
ten
priority
areas,
can
also
receive
significant
investments.
E
E
There's
the
claim
my
office
is
off
leash.
Many
people
consider
those
to
be
off
leash
zones
and
even
on
occasional,
open
fires,
which
of
course
are
illegal
in
the
ravine
system
and
in
our
park
system.
So
with
that
I
just
like
to
wrap
out
I
look
wrap
up.
I,
look
forward
to
this
going
to
council
and
I.
Do
apologize,
I
forgot
to
move
my
motion,
so
if
we
could
put
that
on
the
screen
as
well
I'm
at
three
minutes,
so
I'll
wrap
up
there.
Thank
you,
sir.
A
A
In
moving
the
funding
of
these
new
initiatives,
this
increased
funding
up
from
2021
to
2020s.
We
start
the
increased
funding
in
2020,
both
on
ravine
litter,
pickup
and
on
invasive
species,
control
and
so
I'm
very
proud
to
move
those
motions
because,
as
I
said
the
other
day
in
announcing
that
we're
gonna
move,
this
motion-
invasive
species
in
particular,
are
not
waiting
around
for
us
and
we
can
see
graphic
evidence
of
that
from
our
some
of
our
deputies.
Today
can
I
say
thank
you,
starting
with
the
councillor
McKelvey.
A
You
know
it
is
so
nice
and
I
say
this
not
to
diminish
any
of
the
backgrounds
of
any
of
the
members
of
council,
but
to
have
somebody
who
has
the
educational
qualifications
and
the
credibility
professional
credibility
to
be
able
to
comment
on
things
like
this
annoying.
That
is
something
that's
been
a
big
concern
of
hers
for
her
entire
adult
life,
if
not
before,
it's
really
helpful,
I
think
to
us
as
elected
officials,
because
most
of
us
get
to
know
about
these
things.
A
What
we
get
to
know
and
not
much
more
and
she
has
been
a
very
great
partner
for
the
staff
and
the
staff
have
done
a
great
job.
If
you
go
all
the
way
back
to
the
development
of
the
strategy
itself
and
as
councillor
Layton
mentioned,
the
outside
I
call
them
the
outside
community
partners,
parks,
people,
evergreen
and
others
I
think
it's
a
day.
It's
a
very
noteworthy
day,
it's
funny,
because
these
reports
often
don't
get
as
much
attention
as
some
of
the
ones
that
have
big.
A
You
know,
and
there
we
are
today
with
three
huge
reports
among
the
biggest
we
will
see
in
this
term
of
office
or
any
term
of
office
in
terms
of
the
amount
of
money
that
is
being
talked
about,
but
more
so
than
that,
the
difference,
the
transformational
difference.
Those
things
will
make
and
I
think
it's
a
transformational
difference.
A
transformational
difference
in
having
Toronto
sort
of
grow
up
to
being
the
global
city.
It's
already
become
as
usual.
A
Sometimes
government
is
running
behind
the
reality
of
the
world
and
this
has
become
a
global
city
in
terms
of
how
others
look
at
it,
and
protecting
the
ravines
and
building
them
up.
Building
the
rail
deck
park
and
and
building
proper
transit
and
and
having
proper
transit
vehicles,
I
think
are
examples
of
work.
That
is
transformational
like
that,
and
we
are
also,
of
course,
taking
that
step
of
moving
from
strategy
to
implementation.
The
last
thing
I'll
say
because
the
clock
catches
up
to
you,
I'm
gonna
work
very
hard
to
get
funding
from
the
other
governments.
A
I've
spoken
to
five
federal
ministers
already
about
funding
for
the
ravines
in
particular,
I
put
my
shopping
list
in
front
of
them,
they're
horrified,
but
I
just
say
look.
This
is
not
some
wish
list
of
nice
things
to
have.
These
are
things
we
must
do
in
the
best
interest
of
the
economic
engine
and
one
of
the
centers
of
innovation
and
centers
of
proud
natural
respect
for
the
environment
in
the
city
and
I'm,
confident
they
will
come
through
and
I'm.
A
Confident
the
private
sector
will
come
through
as
we've
seen
with
things
like
the
meadow
way
and
things
like
the
event
way.
Part
so
I
appreciate
the
support
of
everybody
around
the
table,
and
if
there
are
nobody
other,
nobody
else
would
want
to
speak.
We
can
move
forward
with
our
with
our
volt
anybody
else
going
once
going
twice.
A
A
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carry
most
of
the
motion
number
to
a
coming
from
me,
this
one
to
do
with
the
development
of
a
student
internship
program
for
the
ravines,
with
recruitment
strategy,
focusing
on
neighborhood
improvement
areas,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
and
finally,
the
recommendation
to
to
the
Budget
Committee
and
asking
the
Budget
Committee
to
advance
the
funding
increase
for
a
litter
pickup
and
for
invasive
species.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carry,
and
that
would
then
bring
us
to
the
vote
on
the
item.
C
A
You
and
thank
again
everybody
very
much,
including
our
staff,
especially,
but
also
all
the
people.
This
is
probably
one
of
the
most
widely
kind
of
engaged
deputation
list
that
I've
seen
in
the
time
that
I've
been
here
so
I
think
it
was
great.
That's
a
very
encouraging,
okay.
That
would
bring
us
then
to
the
digital
infrastructure.
A
H
Mr.
Jim
Parsons
and
I'm
a
health
tech
entrepreneur
currently
incubating
a
start-up
under
the
aegis
of
the
Ontario
centres
of
excellence,
I'm
also
an
invited
member
of
Canada's
operational
stress,
Injury,
Research
Consortium,
which
is
70
of
the
country's
leading
psychiatrists,
clinical
researchers
and
academic
professors
in
the
domain
of
PTSD
I'm.
Here
today
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
data
and
about
data
governance,
as
it
relates
to
the
infrastructure
plan.
H
My
principal
collaborator
is
Professor
Carolyn
McGregor
at
Ontario,
Tech,
University
and
I'm,
using
the
Apple
watch
in
connection
with
Carolyn's
cloud
computing
infrastructure
to
collect
data
from
first
responders
for
research
applications
as
well
as
clinical
treatment,
priests,
pre-injury
and
for
condition,
management
and
clinical
treatment,
post
injury
and
I
think
the
it's
critical
that
we
that
we
Revere
data
that's
either
generated
from
the
public
or
from
private
entities,
and
so
that's
the
position
I'm
taking
in
terms
of
recommendations
and
requests
of
this
group,
so
I.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
I
thank.
A
D
H
H
D
D
Okay,
all
right
and
then
I
was
just
gonna.
Ask
you
if
technological
czar
Bernie
came
up
during
the
consultation
process
at
all,
but
so
when
you
talk
about
sensors
on
the
streets,
so
you're
not
just
talking
about
the
City
of
Toronto
that
has
sensors
if
it's
a
private
company
that
has
sensors
whether
there
are
under
contract
of
the
city
or
not
any
information,
that's
collected,
the
City
of
Toronto
would
have
proprietary
rights
on
it.
Well,.
H
If
it's
used
in
any
other
capacity,
it's
their
data,
they
own
it
and
I've,
set
a
slider
button
where
they
can
choose
to
contribute
or
donate
that
data
if
they
choose
to,
but
otherwise
it's
their
property,
including
the
ability
to
permanently
and
replicas,
destroy
it.
So
that's
why
I'm
using
the
Apple
watch
and
anyone
with
respect
to
councillors
or
members
of
the
public
in
the
room
today,
anyone
wearing
a
Fitbit
device.
Basically
all
that
data
is
basically
sucked
up
by
alphabet
Google
and
commercialize.
H
So
people
with
Fitbit
soar
have
an
oil
derrick
on
their
wrist
pumping
a
commercial.
You
know
monetizable
asset
to
us,
multinational.
You
don't
have
to
be
that
doesn't
have
to
be
that
way.
You
should
have
control
of
the
data
at
the
source
and
I
feel.
Very.
Quite
strongly
about
this,
so
I
felt
that
those
parallel
for
the
individuals
and
the
city,
it's
the
same.
Let's
be
responsible,
take
a
sovereign
approach.
Privacy
is
a
public
good
and
I.
Guess
my
pitch
for
Ontario.
H
We
fancy
ourselves
with
clusters
of
technology
that
have
artificial
intelligence
infrastructure
in
the
province.
We
don't
necessarily
need
to
go
to
outside
Silicon
Valley
vendors.
We've
got
lots
of
talent
here
that
can
do
it
to
produce
positive
outcomes
on
behalf
of
the
city
and
the
residents
of
the
city,
all.
A
A
I
Thank
you,
John
Tory,
mayor
and
city
council,
I'm
Josie,
we're
I
was
born
in
Toronto
I'm,
a
member
of
a
corn
and
eat
corn
is
an
independent
organization
made
of
low
to
moderate
income
earners
fighting
for
social
and
economic
justice.
As
you
may
know,
many
Canadians
are
unable
to
access
the
Internet
due
to
lack
of
skills,
cost
and
availability.
I
Personally,
I
am
somewhat
lucky
to
use
my
landlords
internet
at
home,
but
I
pay
sixty
eight
dollars
a
month
for
my
cell
phone
internet
access.
Toronto
is
lucky
enough
to
have
a
few
options.
For
example,
acorn
won
a
$10
a
month
internet
program
for
people
in
the
TCH
C.
We
also
want
a
program
across
the
city
called
connecting
families
initiative
that
provides
$10
a
month
Internet
to
only
22,000
families
across
Canada.
That's
not
enough
and
many
people
do
not
qualify.
I
Unfortunately,
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
when
you
talk
about
Digital
Inclusion,
you
think
about
low
and
moderate
income,
families
and
communities.
We
are
living
in
a
digital
economy
where
internet
access
is
mandatory.
Low
income
families
are
being
locked
out
of
access.
Those
who
do
not
qualify
under
the
previous
programs,
so
let's
make
sure
that
everyone
has
internet
and
an
affordable
rate,
and
let's
make
sure
that
everyone
has
a
device
to
access
to
the
Internet
at
an
affordable
rate.
Let's
make
Toronto
a
livable
city
again.
Thank
you.
City
Council.
I
You
just
clarify,
you
said:
Tirana
housing,
what
you're
paying
$10
a
month.
Is
that
what
you
said?
Okay,
so
acorn
has
they
won
a
program.
It
was
a
internet
program
for
people
who
were
on
TC
HC,
so
the
living
in
that
type
of
housing.
We
also
won
a
program.
That's
called
connecting
families
initiative.
I,
don't
have
the
details
of
it.
I
You
know
you
can
call
a
corner
and
get
more
details
if
you
like
this
one
also
per
by
it's
$10
a
month
internet
for,
but
it's
only
covers
20
to
220,000
families
across
Canada,
so
that
would
be
a
lot
less
than
Toronto
I
guess.
But
that's
what
the
$10
a
month
is
yeah,
it's
just
two
programs.
It
doesn't
cover
everyone.
This
is
in
TC,
HC
buildings.
One
is
for
the
people
in
TC,
HC
buildings
and
the
other
one
is
is
the
other
program
has
to
do
with
like
families
who
are
getting
like
tax
credits.
I
J
A
J
So
my
name
is
Leslie
Johnston
and
I'm,
a
long-term
Toronto
resident
and
a
former
IT
professional,
so
I'm
speaking
today
about
my
deep
concerns
that
the
city
has
stated
that
it
will
proceed
with
its
vote
about
the
key
side
proposal
before
the
digital
industry.
Infrastructure
plan
is
complete
and
I'd
like
to
quote
Jim
Basel
II,
our
Canadian
entrepreneur
when
he
spoke
at
the
last
executive
committee,
know
the
Executive
Committee
in
June.
J
He
was
talking
about
moving
forward
with
key
side
without
developing
robust
regulations
around
the
data,
collection
and
surveillance,
and
he
said
doing
that
was
like
putting
your
socks
on
putting
your
shoes
on
before
your
socks.
It
doesn't
make
sense,
so
I
feel
that
the
city's
digital
infrastructure
plan
is
really
essential
to
effectively
reining
in
the
immense
power
of
digital
giants
like
Google
and
as
our
government.
The
city
has
a
duty
to
protect
our
democratic
rights
for
privacy
and
for
the
governance
of
our
committee.
J
Our
communities
I
appreciate
that
councilor
Pressley
has
proposed
a
set
address
principles
as
an
admirable
starting
point,
but
principles
are
not
easily
measurable.
Principles
are
not
substitutes
for
fully
developed,
measurable
and
enforceable
regulations.
So
I
would
like
to
see
that
we
developed
a
plan
before
we
start
voting.
K
K
Indeed,
I
resigned
from
Google
over
their
private,
no
public
defense
of
suppressing
human
rights
activists
and
journalists
for
the
Chinese
Communist
Party,
while
I
was
living
in
Canada,
and
this
is
quite
public,
you
can
look
it
up,
but
they
defend
this.
So
I
think
it's
critical
to
understand
in
that
context
that
smart
City
as
a
marketing
term,
in
particular
outside
of
North
America.
It
tends
to
be
referred
to
as
a
safe
city
initiative.
K
So,
for
example,
if
you
looked
at
what
IBM
is
sold
to
Rodrigo
Duterte
and
the
Philippines
in
Davao
City,
this
turned
out
to
be
a
surveillance
city,
full
of
cameras
that
was
indeed
used
for
executions
of
innocence
in
some
cases,
which
has
been
widely
reported.
Similarly,
Huawei
has
deployed
safe
city
initiatives
in
Nairobi
in
Kenya.
K
You
can
look
up
that
this
actually
has
its
roots
in
the
surveillance
of
its
own
citizens,
for
example
in
Shenzhen,
and
has
been
linked
to
abuses
in
Xinjiang,
so
I'm
short
on
time,
so
I'll
say
in
closing,
as
someone
who's
worked
and
taught
in
the
belly
of
the
beast.
Silicon
Valley
understands
the
history
of
abuse
from
these
technologies.
K
More
than
anyone
and
they're
increasingly
fighting
to
ban
these
technologies,
San
Francisco,
Berkeley
Oakland
have
all
banned
government
usage
of
facial
recognition
in
indeed
I
think
you
can
observe
that
Silicon
Valley
would
not
allow
as
surveillance
city
to
be
deployed
in
its
midst.
They
would
be
one
of
the
biggest
opponents
to
it
and
so
I
think
it's
an
important
question
as
to
whether
Toronto
will
protect
its
citizens
to
the
degree
which
Silicon
Valley
does.
Thank
you.
Thanks.
A
L
You
mr.
mayor
four
quick
points-
and
that
is
first,
the
Toronto
region,
Board
of
Trade,
wants
to
thank
the
public
service
staff
who
met
with
us
and
others
who
we've
met
in
passing,
who
are
developing
the
strategy
here,
they're
doing
excellent
work.
They
understand
the
hideous
complexity
and
nuance
of
all
of
these
files,
even
though
many
of
them
have
been
cobbled
together
from
several
teams
that
have
had
to
deal
with
several
aspects
of
this.
L
We
applaud
the
initiative
of
councillors
here
in
getting
this
strategy
to
this
point
and
note
that
other
governments
are
working
in
parallel
with
you
to
try
and
develop
their
own
data
strategies
business.
Our
business
members
certainly
support
strong
action
and
strong
regulation
in
this
area,
because
we
realize
it's
necessary
both
to
boost
public
confidence
and
to
be-
and
this
is
the
next
point,
interoperable
with
other
jurisdictions
that
are
going
in
the
same
direction.
L
One
reason
I
know
the
public
service
team
was
listening
closely
was
on
page
16,
there's
a
reference
to
adding
the
word
interoperability
to
the
equity
and
inclusion
principle
that
they
have
there
I
wanted
to
come
and
add
that
this
is
really
the
critical
issue.
That's
causing
anxiety
for
us
in
the
business
community
about
moving
forward
with
all
three
levels
of
government
in
this
direction.
L
We
know
you're
in
close
touch
with
other
governments,
on
their
initiatives
on
data
regulation,
data
governance
and
so
forth,
but
we
are
concerned
that
whatever
the
final
product
is
needs
to
be
interoperable
with
what's
happening
with
our
democratic
export
partners.
So
we
don't
end
up
in
a
situation
where,
for
example,
the
small
Toronto
firm
develops
a
great
technology
and
then
discovers
it
has
to
completely
recreate
the
wheel
at
its
expense,
just
to
be
capable
of
exporting
that
same
service
or
technology
to
the
EU,
which
is
governed
by
the
GDP.
L
Our
rules,
for
example,
so
watching
that
compatibility
and
interoperability
of
any
rules
that
are
produced
is
economically
critical.
It's
economically
critical
from
an
FDI
standpoint
in
terms
of
attracting
firms
to
see
us
as
a
potential
base
to
build
out
export
services
and
so
forth.
As
0.3
we've
noted,
both
from
the
previous
presentation
and
letters
from
CCIM
blog
sidewalk,
that
there
will
of
course
be
an
attempt
to
use
this
a
positive
work
by
the
city
to
say:
whoa.
Let's
stop
on
key
side.
L
If
we
need
to
consider
the
rules
here
and
one
of
those
letters
refer
to
Waterfront
Toronto
procuring
without
consultation
to
a
vendor,
the
other
referred
to
businesses,
local
businesses
not
being
consulted
before
key
side
was
designed
or
launched.
As
all
of
you
will
know
from
the
last
year
year
and
a
half
key
side
has
not
been
designed,
it
hasn't
been
launched,
it
hasn't
been
procured,
it's
still
in
process.
The
last
time
I
spoke
to
the
executive
on
this
issue
on
June
6
of
last
year.
Our
recommendation
from
the
board
was,
you
know,
let
them
negotiate.
L
We
had
confidence
that
waterfront
was
strong
enough,
despite
the
crane
claims
from
critics
to
actually
bring
this
to
a
point
where
a
public
interest
would
be
protected
and
the
massive
investment
that
we're
talking
about
590
million
in
cash
for
land
alone
would
be
protected
if
the
process
was
allowed
to
unfold.
We've
been
proven
right.
You've
been
proven
right
because
you
back
that
waterfront
has
done
a
spectacular
job
of
keeping
Sidewalk
at
the
table.
It
now
has
control
of
the
data
process.
L
It
will
be
the
host
or
the
contracting
host
for
the
data
hub,
its
setting
up
data
governance
rules
and
the
most
substantial
part
of
what's
left
or
sidewalks.
Innovations
is
going
to
now
be
focused
on
physical
realm.
Greentech
construction,
environmentally
friendly
construction,
providing
services
to
those
pieces
and
waterfront
is
reviewing
the
individual
technologies
as
we
speak
that
don't
fit
into
that
in
order
to
make
a
recommendation
to
you.
L
So
take
it
easy
and
my
one
more
point,
I
can
say
it
very
quickly
and
save
you
three
minutes
that
later
later
this
afternoon,
12.5
is
a
great
report.
Are
the
proposal
for
the
Civic
accelerator
and
the
Civic
labs
tío.
We've
been
calling
for
something
like
the
first
for
many
months.
If
you
are
being
consistent,
it's
the
kind
of
program,
you'd,
stop
and
wait
for
these
digital
rules,
as
well
as
other
programs
that
are
going
throughout
the
city.
L
If
you
were
going
to
say
no,
we
can't
move
ahead
unless
we've
got
our
strategy
fully
in
place.
There's
dozens
of
things
happening
in
this
building
that,
if
you're
consistently
applying
that
standard
you'd
hit
the
brakes
on
now,
that's
not
necessary.
Let's
keep
moving
great
great
point.
Five
or
five
grab.
A
J
All
right
good
afternoon,
members
of
the
executive
committee
Tori
I'm
here
to
speak
to
the
digital
infrastructure
plan,
but
with
specific
emphasis
on
data
rights.
So,
first
of
all,
I'd
like
to
start
by
thanking
the
city
staff
who
took
on
this
important
project
develop
a
comprehensive
digital
infrastructure
plan.
This
is
very
important
work,
but
what
I'm
hoping
members
of
the
executive
will
take
in
is
the
importance
of
getting
it
right.
The
city
city
staff
report
Flags
an
important
issue.
Staff
will
continue
to
receive
proposals
involving
digital
infrastructure
while
working
to
complete
new
rules.
J
J
Too
often
in
the
past,
decisions
about
digital
infrastructure
have
skipped
a
crucial
initial
question:
whether
digital
technologies
are
necessary
or
even
the
best
solution
to
a
particular
Civic
issue.
Will
a
law,
tech
solution
avoid
potential
social
and
environmental
risks
associated
with
data
gathering
infrastructure,
particularly
the
collection
of
behavioral
data?
We
hope
the
plan
will
involve
an
analysis
of
fundamental
questions
like
this.
Also
working
principles
are
created
to
guide
the
development
of
the
digital
infrastructure
plan,
not
as
an
evaluative
criteria.
J
This
case
is
called
include
large
long
term
contracts,
proposals
that
could
be
significantly
up
proposals
that
could
be
considered
disruptive
of
current
practices,
proposals
that
involve
the
collection
of
human
behavioral
data,
to
name
a
few
sidewalk
labs
proposal
for
quite
site
appears
to
have
all
these
features.
Toronto's
digital
infrastructure
plan
is
meant
to
protect
the
public
interest.
Sidewalk
labs
shall
not
be
able
to
slip
through
its
proposal
before
the
rules
are
in
place.
J
Also,
remember
that
Waterfront
Toronto
has
no
jurisdiction
to
create
data
governance
frameworks
and
opened
us
all
to
risk,
which
is
now
a
matter
being
considered
in
our
courts.
We
believe
it
will
be
responsible
for
decision
makers
to
approve
a
massive
precedent-setting
digital
infrastructure
project.
Likewise
I'd
before
the
city
has
actually
completed
and
approved
its
policies
and
regulations
guiding
principles,
no
matter
how
sound
they
are
can
be
a
substitute
for
regulation.
J
It's
the
duty,
I'm
gonna
emphasize
this
again,
it's
the
duty
of
each
one
of
you,
as
our
elected
representatives,
sitting
on
the
executive
committee
and
on
council
to
make
sure
that
our
data
rights
are
protected
by
passing,
regulations
meant
to
protect
and
further
the
public
interest
to
ensure
that
we
continue
to
have
a
livable
city.
So
I
hope
you
take
the
advice
from
members
of
the
community
seriously
by
making
sure
that
we
have
regulations
in
place.
Thank
you
thanks.
A
A
G
Very
much
the
principles
of
your
digital
infrastructure
plan
that
you've
outlined
are
as
good
as
Parenthood
and
gluten-free
apple
pie,
but
they're
insufficient
to
evaluate
vendors
and
projects.
Intent
is
one
thing.
Impact
is
another
to
do
an
impact
assessment.
The
city
needs
to
do
a
much
more
robust
job
at
engaging
those
whose
voices
have
been
left
out:
vulnerable
individuals
and
members
of
communities
at
risk
of
discrimination
and
historic
bias.
Today
there
have
been
29
deputations
on
ravines,
but
only
a
handful
on
this
digital
strategy.
This
demonstrates
the
need
for
more
literacy
and
consultation.
G
You'll
know
you're
doing
it
right
when
the
room
is
packed
all
day
on
this
issue.
Extensive
lobbying
by
sidewalk
labs
with
our
government
representatives,
has
tilted
the
scales
and
compromised
our
democratic
process.
More
time
needs
to
be
spent
with
those
whose
pockets
are
empty
than
those
with
almost
limitless
resources.
G
Ubiquitous
use
of
hardware
and
software
tools,
such
as
3d,
sensors
and
data-driven
decision-making
to
track
and
predict
movement
and
behavior
in
public
spaces
poses
risks
of
social
harm,
including
unintended
infringement
of
human
rights,
with
few
clear
or
proven
solutions
to
prevent
them.
The
answer
is
to
develop
a
clear
set
of
red
lines.
Where
will
you
draw
the
line?
Waterfront
Toronto
says:
they'll
support,
sidewalk
labs,
application
to
the
city
on
one
hand,
you're
working
on
this
digital
plan
and
on
the
other,
possibly
working
with
Waterfront
Toronto
to
approve
key
science,
which
is
your
priority.
G
G
This
submission,
so
I
could
go
over
it,
but
I'm
certainly
happy
if
you'd
like
for
me
to
outline
some
of
the
issues
and
the
groups
that
have
been
not
considered
a
reference
necessarily
yet,
for
example,
in
the
work
that
you've
done
so
far.
Would
you
like
me
to
name
a
few
of
those
great?
So
one
issue
is
the
expansion
beyond
the
12
acres,
Waterfront
Toronto
insisted
in
their
October
31st
agreement
that
it
sticks
to
the
12
acres?
G
We
haven't
had
any
clear
lines
in
the
sand
about
where
these
cool
amounts
that
could
allow
for
third-party
3d
sensors
to
be
applied.
Will
they
be
100%
going
forward
from
the
future
always
limited
to
those
twelve
acres
without
redoing
this
entire
process,
the
city
will
have
some
jurisdiction
over
Villiers
Island.
Is
that
or
is
that
not
on
the
table
when
we're
talking
about
limiting
to
12
acres?
There
are
issues,
are
an
opt-out
provisions
and
meaningful
consent?
G
What
is
the
who
has
the
privilege
to
opt
out
in
which
circumstances
there
are
issues
of
privatization,
of
public
services,
there's
issues
about
social
housing
and
whether
they'll
be
surveillance
and
social
housing?
There
are
issues
of
algorithmic
transparency.
There
are
issues
of
amplification
of
historic
bias,
there's
issues
of
what
information
may
be
shared
with
the
police,
there's
issues
of
re-identification
of
data
and
whether
that's
possible
in
an
environment
where
we're
mixing
data-
and
there
are
when
I
was
on
the
residents
reference
panel.
The
number
one
issue
that
came
up
with
this
community
wasn't
about
data.
G
It
was
about
green
space,
an
opportunity
cost.
Why
are
we
building
this
smart
city
when
what
people
really
wanted
was
green
space
access
to
the
waterfront
that
was
over
and
over
again
raised
by
the
35
people
who
participated
in
that
process
and
if
you're
asking
who
is
at
risk,
there
are
issues
around
children.
G
Unfortunately,
I
wasn't
available
on
the
day
that
it
that
had
occurred,
but
I
know
that
I
would
I
feel
confident
in
saying
that
few
people
knew
about
it,
like
you
had
to
be
pretty
tapped
in
to
hear
about
it.
So,
while
I
had
the
dates
been
different,
I
would
have
absolutely
attended
and
I
did
contact
the
the
folks
who
are
running
it
and
asked
for
the
material
afterwards
and
did
get
a
chance
to
look
at
those
and
have
been
in
touch
with
others
who
were
there.
G
A
G
M
N
Through
the
chair,
cities
that
are
looking
through
around
the
world,
Barcelona
would
be
one
of
those
Vienna
London
New
York.
Those
are
some
of
the
cities
that
are
looking
at
in
terms
of
internationally.
It
would
be
cities
that
we
would
look
to
adopt
in
sort
of
best
practices
or
moving
forward
in
this
space,
I
mean.
N
M
Tonight
so
I
seen
the
report
over
the
next
18
months
by
June
2021.
We
will
look
to
bring
back
a
comprehensive
digital
infrastructure
plan.
What
exactly
will
that
entail?
I
see
the
ethical
principles
to
guide
it,
but
is
that
a
new
management
model
around
how
we
deal
with
data
throughout
the
city
and
the
management
and
the
accountability
and
the
governance
thereof?
What
are
we
looking
at
specifically
within
this
plan,
so.
N
Through
the
pub
through
the
chair,
what
that
will
also
include
is
that
it
will
include
the
community
advisory
group.
There
will
be
very
specific
to
advise
the
city.
It
will
include
data
governance,
research
based
on
some
of
the
jurisdictional
scan.
It
will
include
looking
at
the
existing
policies
and,
more
importantly,
update
on
working
principle
so
comments
about.
How
do
we
take
those
drafts
that
we
have
right
now
and
actually
implement
them
to
exist
in
a
ways
to
execute
on
that
piece?
N
It
will
also
ensure
that
it
will
include
how
we
evaluate
applications
and
proposals
that
come
from
this
space
and
also
ensure
that
we
look
at
the
governance
mechanism
through
the
rest
of
the
divisions
is
incorporated,
so
it
will
have
a
very
comprehensive
view
of
more
importantly,
how
we
look
to
the
implementation
of
those
draft
principles.
Okay,.
M
And
so
that
means
its
internal
and
external
I
mean
I,
look
at
transportation
services.
We
have
video
capture,
data,
monitoring,
pilot
projects
on
King,
Street
and
Bloor.
We
have
parks,
forestry
and
recreation
collects
data,
just
as
does
the
TTC,
so
we'll
be
looking
at
how
our
internal
departments
manage
this
this
framework,
but
also
as
it
relates
to
external
proposals
that
come
in.
Is
that
correct
through
the
chair
that
is
correct,
okay,
so
on
then,
the
ethical
principles
that
are
put
here
and
your
recommendation
to
is
to
use
them
immediately.
M
N
Through
the
chair
we
do
have
on
the
internal
side,
we
do
have
process
and
ways
to
look
at
it
specifically,
and
this
was
actually
mentioned
through
the
consultation
that
commenced
in
December.
We
have
something
called
threat:
risk
analysis
which
is
looking
at
threats
in
terms
of
hacks.
We
have
vulnerability
assessment,
which
is
looking
at
the
vulnerability
in
terms
of
that
piece,
so
that's
internally
in
there,
and
we
also
have
various
areas
of
looking
at
the
the
impact
assessments,
those
immature
policies
and
processes
that
the
city
has
had
this
V
of
evolution
through
this.
N
N
When
we
look
at
some
of
the
technology
there
with
where
we've
talked
about
on
looking
at
trust,
how
do
we
build
trust
in
two
platforms
so
that
when
data
is
move
into
some
of
this
public
space,
it's
called
something
a
mutable
trust,
which
means
it's
very
difficult
to
hack.
So
we'll
look
at
other
technologies
that
are
in
the
space
from
blockchain,
etc.
How
we
continue
to
look
at
platforms
that
we're
assessing
in
terms
of
the
external
space.
N
A
D
You
through
three
Meritor
e,
miss
Rita.
We
signed
the
Declaration
of
cities
Coalition
for
digital
rights
in
it
at
one
of
the
components
of
it
is
around
technology,
sovereignty
or
sovereignty
of
day
data.
Can
you
explain
to
us
a
bit
about
what
that
means
and
how
the
digital
infrastructure
plan
deals
with
that
yeah.
N
Through
the
chair,
if
you
actually
look
at
the
definition
of
technology
sovereignty,
it
speaks
to
the
fact
of
looking
at
applicable
laws
and
applicable
regulations,
that's
based
in
each
country
and
applying
those
laws
into
that
principle.
If
you
look
at
the
digital
infrastructure
principles,
one
of
them
speaks
on
ensuring
privacy
and
security
and
those
privacy
and
security
are
still
within
our
existing
laws,
whether
it's
the
federal
laws
of
the
municipal
law.
N
So
that
shows
that
we
are
ensuring
that
data
that
comes
in
here
through
the
city
of
Toronto
is
still
being
managed
from
that
pace
and
that
could
be
associated
with
ensuring
that
their
sovereignty
and
ensuring
the
data
is
the
data.
That's
you
Canadians,
and
the
cities
of
coalition,
which
is
what
you're
referring
to,
which
includes
the
city
of
Barcelona,
speaks
on
that
in
ensuring
that
the
sovereignty
of
their
technology
used
in
their
countries,
ensuring
that
it's
it's
moving
to
those
laws.
N
So
I
think
that,
through
through
my
colleagues
and
through
the
whole
organization,
here,
we've
we've.
We
are
attempting
to
capture
that,
through
our
principles,
which
speaks
to
equity
and
inclusion,
all
those
are
the
principles
that
it's
really
about
Canadians.
First,
it's
about
ensuring
that
those
in
Toronto
and
knowing
that
from
the
public
service
we're
taking
those
laws
which
leads
to
the
essence
of
what
sovereignty
of
making
sure
that,
from
a
technology
standpoint
that
we
can
still
have
prosperity
for
all
of
those.
D
And
so
the
digital
infrastructure
plan.
In
the
report,
you
can
see
there's
a
summary
of
all
the
different
committees
that
have
had
some
type
of
technological
interest,
whether
it's
open
data
or
our
ABCs
libraries,
and
how
they
deal
with
technology.
So
this
digital
infrastructure
plans
really
looking
at
everything
that
we
need
in
the
21st
century
and
an
overarching
policy
that
we
have
a
standard
procedures
and
processes
around
data
across
not
only
our
city
departments
but
our
ABCs
correct
third
year.
That
would
be
correct.
Okay,
all
right!
Thank
you.
My
retort.
After.
A
M
Thank
you,
mr.
mayor,
and
let
me
begin
by
thanking
staff,
our
new
chief
technology
or
officer
Laurent,
and
his
team
as
well.
I'd,
also
like
to
recognize
councillor
Angley,
who
has
been
at
the
forefront
on
this
issue,
and
you
know
often
we
move
member
motions
at
council
and
you
move
the
motion
and
it
flies
away,
and
you
don't
know
if
it
ever
comes
back
and
last
February
when
we
collaborated
together
to
request
the
development
of
a
new
data,
digital
governance
in
smart
cities
framework
it
has
progressed,
and
we
are
seeing
that
today.
M
As
the
report
outlines,
cities
are
very
much
at
the
forefront
of
technology
innovation,
but
cities
are
also
the
closest
Democratic
institution
to
people,
and
so
it
makes
sense
and
it's
over
dude
that
a
city
like
Toronto
helps
to
lead
that
global
conversation
I
think
to
date.
A
lot
of
the
discussion
around
digital
governance
has
been
led
by
the
private
sector
and
whether
it's
mean
well-meaning
or
not,
it
has
not
been
led
necessarily
in
the
public
interest,
and
that's
where
we
step
in
cities
around
the
world
are
grappling
with
the
new
reality
and
every
single
day.
M
Every
day.
In
the
city,
we
are
looking
to
utilize
data
and
technology,
whether
it's
at
the
TTC
or
parks,
forestry
and
recreation
or
transportation
services,
and
every
day
we
receive
private
proposals
to
utilize
new
methods
of
technology,
often
in
the
public
realm,
and
so
the
objective
here
is
not
innovation
for
innovations
sake.
The
objective
is:
how
do
you
utilize
data
and
digital
governance,
to
solve
21st
century
challenges
like
climate
change
and
transit
mobility,
and
so
I
think
going
forward
developing
this
digital
infrastructure
plan?
M
We
all
wish
it
was
done
five
years
ago,
I
think
every
major
city
wishes
they
had
done
that
we're
not
alone,
but
the
you
have
to
get
it
right.
You
can't
just
get
it
done.
You
have
to
get
it
done
right
in
order
to
leave
the
conversation
and
that's
why
not
only
taking
the
time
over
the
next
18
months
to
get
it
right,
but
starting
with
the
foundational
framework
of
these
five
key
principles,
the
principles
around
privacy
and
accountability
around
social
and
economic
benefits,
around
democratic
transparency
and
accountability.
M
All
of
that's
critical
and
all
of
that
will
go
into
place
today.
Some
have
said
we
must
stop
all
things
digital
until
the
framework
is
in
place.
We
couldn't
do
that
if
we
tried
in
fact,
we'd
have
to
shut
down
a
lot
of
our
own
activities
here
within
the
city.
Rather,
let's
improve
where
we
are
today
with
these
ethical
principles
and
let's
lead
the
conversation
to
develop
a
new
21st
century
framework
and
I
look
forward
to
working
as
part
of
that
process
going
forward.
A
D
D
Just
last
week
there
was
a
report
on
how
many
technology
companies
now
are
within
the
City
of
Toronto
and
what
they
do,
but
ultimately,
all
of
that
data.
Our
residents
need
to
understand
that
it's
looked
after
properly
that
we
understand
as
a
municipality,
what
our
obligations
are
to
look
after
both
our
residents
and
that
data
and
I
think
this
digital
infrastructure
plan
that
we're
undertaking
does
that
and
it
and
it
works
with
21
21st
century
technology.
D
One
of
the
things
that
my
kids
were
looking
at,
one
of
them
was
actually
logged
in
when,
during
the
consultation
process,
we
used
YouTube
to
interact
with
residents,
which
is
something
even
two
or
three
years
ago.
The
city
of
Toronto
did
not
have
the
capacity
to
do
that
to
interact
with
our
citizens,
so
technology
has
come
a
long
way
and
as
a
municipality,
we
need
to
be
at
the
forefront
of
it
and
I.
Think
that's
why
we
need
this
digital
infrastructure
plan
and
I
would
ask
everybody
to
support
the
recommendations
in
it.
Thank
you.
Thanks.
O
Got
a
motion
I'd
like
to
add
this
recommendation:
the
City
Council
direct,
the
chief
technology
officer
in
the
development
and
implementation
of
the
digital
infrastructure
plan
use
existing
resources
to
limit
the
hiring
of
additional
staff
and
external
consultants.
So
that's
just
let's
not
blow
our
brains
out
in
terms
of
spending
money.
If
we
don't
need
to
I've
said
this
before
I
think
I
said:
there's
a
council,
we
have
over
a
thousand
IT
staff
I'm
guessing
that
within
those
resources
we
should
be
able
to
find
certain
levels
of
economy
there.
O
A
P
O
So
you
know
so
the
motion
reads
and
limit
so
I
want
them
to
use
prudence
in
if
they
can
use
staff
internally
to
get
this
done.
I'd
like
them
to
do
this.
This
doesn't
say
not
to
hire
consultants
as
required,
but
we
have
a
tendency
in
this
organization
writ
large
to
spend
millions
and
millions
of
dollars
on
external
consultants.
O
P
O
D
O
Explained
it
I,
don't
know
if
you
were
listening,
that
one
counselor
by
Lao
asked
asked
that
question
her
question,
which
was
a
similar.
It
was
along
the
similar
vein,
but
I
think
if
you
were
listening
a
lot
of
the.
What
to
answer
your
question
would
what
I
said
to
counselor
by
Lao
in
terms
of
efficiency
and
economy,
and
we
have,
as
I
say,
over
a
thousand
people
and
that's
not
including
all
the
consultants
we
hire
and
we
hire
a
lot
of
them.
O
You
know,
while
it
may
not
have
been
mentioned
within
the
in
the
body
of
the
report.
I
think
that
if
we
need
to
this
is
just
a
an
advanced
recommendation
from
this
council
that
this
council
would
like
to
as
if,
if
they
can
to
use
the
folks
that
we
have
here
over
a
thousand
of
them
to
develop
this
strategy
and
as
I
say,
I've
spoken
to
the
staff
about
this
I've
talked
to
talk
to
the
deputy
city
manager
and
she
is
quite
accepting
of
the
motion
that
I
moved
so.
O
O
A
Okay,
that
just
tells
us
it's
three
minutes
and
22
seconds
on
the
clock.
So
it's
time
for
a
what
do
we
call
it
a
break
in
the
action
all
right.
Are
there
any
other
questions
of
the
mover?
Fine,
then,
that
let's
move
on
then
to
other
speakers
there
may
be
on
this
anybody
else
wishing
to
speak
vile,
oh
yeah,
I,.
P
Analyzing
deals
like
the
sidewalk,
but
also
analyzing
what
needs
to
be
done
inside
City,
Hall
and
the
reality
is,
as
it
was
mentioned
before
by
other
colleagues
of
mine.
I
technology
is
moving
fast.
Yes,
we
would
like
to
be,
you
know,
always
in
the
forefront,
but
that's
that
that
is
not
the
case
and
we
need
to
go
fast
now.
P
We
need
to
be
ready
and,
to
be
honest
with
you,
I
think
our
residents
really
expect
us
to
be
ready
and
I
actually
think
that
what
frustrates
the
most
in
our
residents,
for
example,
is
not
so
much
the
number
of
people
in
the
IT
department,
but
is
the
results
that
are
not
there.
So
you
know
I
remember
when
we
took
so
long
to
have
the
app
to
pay
for
parking.
P
A
lot
of
these
also
translate
into
us
focusing
the
resources
and
the
tools
that
we
have
where
we
mostly
need.
So,
thanks
for
this
work
again,
I
hope
that
that
this
protects
the
public
interest
and
creates
actually
some
ambition
in
us
as
a
city
to
actually
look
inside
and
see
how
we
even
can
do
better
in
delivering
services
in
a
more
technologically
friendly
way.
I.
E
P
I
understand
because
I
had
a
couple
of
councilors
asking
me
the
same
question,
because
we
did
the
advanced
circulation
I
think
we
just
all
wanted
to
be
clear
for
everybody
that
is
paying
attention
to
this
discussion,
that
everything
that
is
happening
through
the
sidewalk
needs
to
be
put
through
these
lenses
again,
and
we
wanted
to
be
very
clear
on
this
issue
and
so
mentioned
that
by
name
we
thought
it
would
be
appropriate.
So
that's
why
there's
it's
you
can
consider
it
a
small
amendment.
Okay,.
E
E
P
It
needs
to
be
taken
in
consideration
to
go
down,
I
think
as
you're
negotiating.
You
know,
you
know
waterfront
sidewalk,
they're
all
having
these
negotiations
and
all
we're
saying
is
to
all
these
people
that
are
as
a
table
negotiating
pay
attention.
There's
all
these
principles
being
talked
about
agreed
on
there's
this
digital
strategy
being
developed
in
here.
Don't
go
off
on
a
tangent
without
taking
these
in
consideration,
because
this
lens
is
gonna
be
applied
to
you.
P
We
just
don't
want
silos
in
here.
We
want
to
be
every
everywhere
to
be
aware,
and
we
want
to
understand
that
this
is
work.
That
is
that
all
those
negotiations
at
the
end
of
the
day
need
to
be
put
through
this
lens
and
they're
all
meet
at
the
you
know.
They're
there
were
it's
work
that
is
being
done
in
parallel,
but
we
want
them
to
be
aware
of
each
other
and
understanding
that
they
need
to
respond
to
each
other.
Okay,.
A
Thank
you.
Are
there
other
people
wishing
to
speak
at
this
stage?
Okay,
I
will
make
my
shortest
speech
ever
and
just
simply
say.
This
is
very
important.
Work
and
I
want
to
thank
the
staff
for
doing
it.
I
think
it's
not
an
exaggeration
to
say
that
our
own
citizens
are
watching
very
carefully.
This
cuz
think
there's
abroad.
A
Do
gave
interest
in
this
and
concern
about
it,
not
to
the
point
of
obsession
but
I
think
people
are
concerned
and
I
think
the
world
is
watching
we're
doing
here,
because
for
two
or
three
reasons,
one,
they
know
there's
a
lot
of
smart
people.
Here
too,
we
are
kind
of
like
I
think
continue
to
be
acknowledged
as
the
AI
capital
of
the
world
and
I.
Think
of
a
city
that
bears
that
reputation.
A
Think
it's
constants
of
cressie
said
early
we've
gone
from
a
position
where,
frankly,
I
remember
at
this
very
executive
committee.
There
were
people
in
here
telling
us
compared
to
Montreal
compared
to
here
and
compared
to
there
we
were
way
behind
thanks
to
the
work
of
the
people
who
put
this
together.
I
know
there
were
Outsiders
and
staff,
we've
gone
to
a
position
where
I
think
where
we
have
the
potential
to
be
leaders
and
I.
Think
this
is
the
update
report.
A
There's
some
input
been
gathered
today
from
our
decadence
and
others,
and
now
we've
got
to
move
forward,
because
the
worst
thing
that
could
happen
is
more
passage.
Extensive
passage
of
time,
you
know
years
because
things
are
gonna
happen,
I,
don't
think
it's
actually
a
bad
thing
to
at
least
look
at
the
update
and
say
well
the
principles
that
are
in
there
at
least
have
a
look
at
those.
In
the
context
of
anything
that
comes
before
this
thing
is
finalized.
A
I
will,
perhaps,
surprisingly,
to
some
I
will
support
Deputy,
Merriman
and
Wong's
motion,
because
I
listen
this
morning
and
all
the
other
discussions
were
more
about
the
ravines
and
so
on
and
I
I
had
the
president
of
the
U
of
T
in
my
office
this
week,
and
you
know,
there's
so
much
talent.
We
have
out
there
that
can
help
us
with
this
kind
of
thing
and
they
want
to
help,
and
they
don't
want
to
charge
big
bucks
to
do
it.
A
They
want
to
help
because
they
want
to
be
involved,
and
so
I
would
like
to
sort
of
have
us
adopt
a
principle
that
sort
of
says.
But
let's
look
first
at
the
talent
we
have
inside
the
corporation
of
the
city
and
let's
look
at
the
universities
and
colleges
and
all
the
expertise
we
have
in
the
city.
In
that
regard,
before
we
rush
off
and
do
what
we
often
do
and
I'm
not
you
know
all
governments
and
big
companies
do
it,
which
is
hire
a
lot
of
consultants
so,
and
that
takes
a
long
time
anyway.
A
A
One
is
the
motion
motion
from
Deputy,
Merriman
and
Wong
concerning
the
resources
and
so
on.
I'll
ask
that
call
the
question.
All
those
in
favor
pose
carry
about
opposed,
okay
back
on
strings,
it
was
a
close
one.
Then
we
have
next
motion
to
the
motion
from
councillor
Barlow
to
do
with
the
digital
infrastructure
plan
working
principles.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carry.
A
A
Q
Minutes,
sir,
yes,
sir,
thank
you
for
your
time
again.
This
is
a
pretty
big
deal
if
it
goes
through
and
I'm
hoping
that
you'll
actually
be
really
slow
and
sticky
with
it
all,
because
the
implications
for
many
citizens
and
ourselves
I
think
are
pretty
serious.
So
it
may
be
called
an
understanding,
but
it
feels
more
like
standing
under
the
bullies
at
Queen's
Park.
Q
We
have
to
make
sure
that
we
have
more
control
in
our
house
and
over
our
our
lives
here
and
you
the
unfortunately,
even
though
there's
been
moderation
and
a
lot
of
good
work
by
staff
to
deal
with
the
Doug
tater
and
his
his
the
Metrolinx
people
and
everybody.
If
you
actually
look
at
the
level
of
trust
that
the
Conservatives
have
brought
to
issues
the
respect
for
the
City
of
Toronto
Act
bill,
five,
the
the
backing
away
from
the
gas
tax
when
they've
put
in
bills,
they've
actually
said.
Q
Oh
we're
going
to
rip
up
this
contract
and
you
can't
sue.
There
was
just
the
cancellation
of
the
Hamilton
LRT,
which
may
have
a
precedent
for
a
good
good
come
out
of
it,
because
they
were
looking
at
a
full
spectrum
of
cost
that
if
we
actually
applied
to
the
Scarborough
subway
extension,
we
might
actually
have
some
good
news
there.
They
might
back
away
from
it.
Q
So,
within
the
the
background
document,
there's
a
little
phrase
of
eliminate
some
constraints
so
what's
gone
or
what
will
be
gone,
zoning
safeties
of
citizens,
safety
of
workers
safe,
you
know,
will
they
remove
any
mitigation
of
impacts
of
noise
and
dust
any
chance
of
having
the
green
standards
capped?
Will
it
be
any
sort
of
control
by
locals?
Do
we
have
to
just
appeal
to
the
Minister
for
problems?
Q
Quite
honestly,
our
transit
system
is
at
an
overload,
as
it
is
that's
certainly
my
feeling
so
we
have
to.
We
almost
are
at
the
point
that
we
should
have
a
development
freeze
rather
than
more
more
more,
especially
with
the
time
frame.
To
all
do
all
of
this,
and
also,
very
importantly,
there
are
billions
in
play.
Absolute
billions
and
I
am
still
of
the
opinion
that
we
are
wasting
some
of
those
billions.
We
absolutely
have
to
spend
big
on
transit,
but
I
came
across
something
and
I've
man.
Q
The
time
goes
far
too
fast
came
across
something
in
rapid
transit
in
Toronto
from
the
the
metro
level
official
plan,
which
had
an
interesting
surface
valley
surface
in
the
Don
Valley
idea.
They
suggested
that
at
the
interchange
here
at
10,
which
is
up
here,
pardon
me
that
little
footnote
said
oh
well
goal
should
do
an
EI
back
in
97,
they
were
Metro
was
fine
with
having
a
surface
in
the
Don
Valley
route,
and
there
we
are
there.
What's
happened
to
this?
A
B
B
J
B
K
M
O
P
P
A
You
any
questions
of
the
mover
or
otherwise.
Okay.
If
there
aren't
any
that
will
sit
there
then,
and
are
there
any
other
comments
about
this
report?
I
will
just
make
a
comment,
then
briefly,
just
to
say
that
I'll
support
council
by
deputy
mayor
Barlow's
motion
by
the
way,
but
I
I,
just
think
this
is
in
again
it's
an
important
update.
A
A
It
doesn't
need
to
sacrifice
anything
in
the
context
of
sort
of
bulldozing
things,
but
I
think
we're
gonna
have
to
do
a
better
job
of
getting
these
things
done.
Faster
I
think
the
public
expect
that
they
need
that
the
city
needs
it.
The
environment
needs
that's,
oh,
we
will
see
what
comes
forward
in
terms
of
the
actual
legislation,
but
I
think
that
you
know
the
fact
that
we
need
to
speed
things
up
here,
and
these
projects
going
is
something
very
broadly
accepted
by
the
people
we
represent.
A
So
if
there's
hearing
no
other
comments
for
anybody,
we
will
awake
to
the
next
step
in
that
and
I
think
we
have
the
one
motion
and
there's
no
need
to
adopt
the
item
as
amended.
It's
just
the
this
is
the
item,
and
so
the
motion
is
from
counsel.
Sir
deputy
mayor
below
and
I'll
call
the
question
on
that
all
those
in
favor
opposed
Carrie.
Okay
next
is
12.5
advancing
a
new
culture
of
innovation
and
partnership.
There
are
two
deputies
on
this,
both
apparently
from
maybe
the
same
organization,
so
they
can
handle
that
as
they
wish.
R
R
We
will
probably
be
using
the
six
minutes.
That's
okay,
my
name
is
Dave
McNee.
This
is
Claudia
Amanda,
Kitsch,
academic,
director
and
I'm,
the
managing
director
of
quantum
sports
and
learning
Association
q
SLA.
Thank
you
for
having
us
today.
We
are
here
about
two
issues:
one
the
energy
retrofit
loan
application
and
the
innovation
community
hub
and
how
the
city
can
provide
assistance
to
secure
funding
just
a
little
bit
about
Q
SLA.
R
We
are
a
nonprofit
organization,
charitable
nonprofit
organization
founded
in
2010
as
a
stem
and
sports
development
center,
designed
to
support
neighboring
youth
with
academic
opportunities
through
sport
programming,
Q
SLA
has
been
working
to
serve
wards
with
high
priority
within
the
high
priority
neighborhoods
for
nearly
10
years.
Our
impact
in
the
community.
We
serve
in
our
very
own
ball
Maddox
program,
which
is
actually
a
combination
of
basketball
and
math,
which
we
turned
the
basketball
court
into
a
math
class.
R
We
work
with
post-secondary
institutions
like
UFT
to
explore
relationships
between
physical
activity
and
math
knowledge
and
confidence.
This
goes
back
to
our
ball
Maddox
program.
We
want
to
continue
the
academic
research
platform
to
improve
academic
achievement
or
the
academic
achievement
gap
that
exists,
especially
amongst
kids,
in
the
high
priority
neighborhood
areas.
R
So
continuing
with
our
youth
employment,
a
lot
of
their
students
that
come
to
us,
they
come
to
us
through
volunteer
work
and
then
a
lot
of
these
students
actually
become
employees,
which
is
their
first
job.
We
actually
have
a
lot
of
students
graduating
into
post-secondary,
which
is
one
of
our
main
objectives.
A
lot
of
their
students
like
this
particular
student
in
writing
on
the
board,
he's
actually
becoming
a
teacher
at
York
University.
S
R
R
R
The
space
will
be
transformed
into
actually
win
thanks
slide
into
the
accessible
community
space.
That
is
right
behind
you
on
the
screen,
so
the
facility
exists
it's
at
950
DuPont,
and
it's
actually
that
little
particular
red
circle
corner.
It's
a
57
hundred
square
foot
location.
Actually,
OLG
used
it
last
April
as
a
staging
spot
for
their
Larry
O'brien,
trophy,
which
coincidentally
Toronto
Raptors
won,
and
this
is
the
facility
that
we're
going
into
so
our
new
home,
and
this
is
what
it's
going
to
be.
Looking
like
what
we're
looking
for-
and
this
is
the
partnership.
B
Okay,
so
I'll
speak
a
little
bit
of
the
renovations
project,
so
it
includes
the
installation
of
a
soft
wall
in
a
glass
barrier
and
we
have
unsuccessfully
applied
for
the
under
hand.
We
we
do
have
spatial
limitations
currently
that
prevent
us
from
actually
getting
more
money,
because
we
simply
just
don't
have
the
space
we
have
to
rent
different
locations
to
run
our
programs.
We
have
to
transport
our
equipment
and
materials,
and
so
on.
So
it's
quite
costly
to
do
that.
B
So
for
the
energy
retrofit
loan
program,
we
actually
had
to
complete
up
a
feasibility
study
that
had
to
show
that
there
would
be
demonstrated
energy
savings
by
placing
this
soft
wall
barrier
in
the
facility,
and
we
did
get
the
results
that
showed
$13,000
per
year.
Energy
savings,
as
well
as
greenhouse
gas
savings.
B
We
really
are
hoping
for
the
City
of
Toronto
and
councillors
to
demonstrate
or
speak
on
our
behalf
and
and
talk
about
the
good
work
that
we
are
doing
in
the
community
and
also
support
alone
that
the
City
of
Toronto
would
potentially
give
to
us,
and
then
we
repay
it
over
a
20-year
period.
We
did
receive
a
written
response
yesterday
and
I'm
sorry
I'm
in
six
minutes.
The
written
response
yesterday
from
the
City
of
Toronto
again
showed
that
we're
not
eligible
for
this
energy
retrofit
loan.
B
We
really
just
are
hoping
that
this
division
that
we
want
to
put
put
in
place
in
the
facility
that
we
want
to
move
into
is
going
to
result
in
energy
savings.
We
are
an
organization
that
does
a
lot
of
community
work
and
we
do
a
lot
of
partnering,
like
Dave,
said
with
post-secondary
institutions
as
well
as
strategic
corporations.
That
really
does
help
the
community.
So
in
summary,
we
are
here
two
quick.
B
Summary
installation
of
a
soft
wall
and
glass
barrier
to
partition
the
qsl,
a
new
space
which
really
does
align
with
city
of
Toronto's
partnership
and
Innovation
Program,
as
well
as
the
climate
change,
budget
or
initiative,
and
we
are
requesting
the
city
to
include
the
loan
to
cue
SLA
in
their
budget.
Thank
you.
A
R
A
Met
each
other
before,
but
in
any
of
that,
okay,
so
questions
of
these
deputies
could
I
just
ask
you
you're
still
and
look.
We
some
respects
prefer
loans
to
grants
just
because
we
eventually
get
the
money
back,
which
helps
us
to
really
loan
it
to
somebody
else,
but
essentially
I
mean,
if
you
sort
of
boil
this
out
down
and
strip
out
the
energy
retrofit
start
the
clock
here,
strip
out
the
energy
retrofit
part,
which
is
where
you
started
essentially
and
I'm
not
trying
to
oversimplify
this.
A
R
That's
correct
and
what
we're
looking
for
is
again
alone,
we're
looking
for
hundred
thousand
dollar
loan
that
we're
gonna
be
paying
back
over
twenty
years.
We
fall
within
the
criteria
that
the
energy
of
the
building
partnership
office
required
of
us,
and
it
was
Friday
that
came
up
with
these
two
recommendations.
This
is
why
we're
here
that
the
city
included
to
their
budget
and
then
after
we
made
our
deputation
on
Monday.
We
got
that
letter
from
the
we
got.
R
This
list
letter
saying
come
to
something
completely
different,
which
is
that
our
space
and
the
other
space,
which
is
not
our
space
at
all,
would
conflict
in
some
way
and
as
such,
we're
gonna
be
disqualified.
So
it's
almost.
It
was
very
puzzling
that
on
Friday
they
could
not
produce
this
document,
but
after
we
actually
sent
them
a
message
back
to
the
better
building
office
that
we
got
this
response
so,
like
you
said
yeah,
we
are
looking
for
funding,
but
in
the
last
ten
years
we've
been
pretty
self-sufficient.
R
It's
one
of
those
things
where
we
have
approached
council
and
council
members
in
the
past
and
in
the
mayor
in
the
past,
to
actually
provide
us
assistant,
but
we
have
to
move
and
get
things
done
on
our
own.
At
the
same
time,
we'd
like
to
grow
and
we've
taken
on
a
lot
of
responsibility,
working
with
this
working
with
students
and
parents
within
these
high
priority
neighborhoods
and
actually
something
I
just
wanted
to
mention
we're
stem
center
and
we
use
sports
for
development.
R
So
I
heard
you
guys
were
talking
about,
and
it's
very
true
that
innovation
is
key.
But
one
thing
that
I
haven't
heard
is
that
working
with
students
to
get
them
up
to
speed
for
the
future?
These
a
lot
of
their
students
are
actually
lacking
in
the
the
know
and
knowledge.
That's
gonna
prepare
them
for
the
future.
We're
talking
about
digital
technology.
I
mean
it's
great,
that
we
have
these
smart
centers
and
we
have
these
digital
sidewalks
and
these
digital
labs
coming.
R
A
So
one
final
question:
just
back
on
tho
what
you
need
if
you
got
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
and
instead
of
alone
coming
from
energy,
retrofit
came
from
some
other
place
or
if
you
got
a
twenty
five
thousand
dollar
contribution
towards
your
activities,
which
could
be
used
for
capital.
Is
that
something
that's
going
to
be
helpful,
or
is
that
that's
a
definite
thousand?
And
that's
that
well.
R
I
mean
that's
a
great
step
in
the
right
direction,
but
when
we
were
building
out
this
new
facility
of
when
working
with
better
better
partnership
office,
the
amount
that
we
were
looking
for
would
pretty
much
take
care
of
that
soft
wall
that
we're
looking
to
to
install.
So
if
we
were
to
come
up
with,
you
know
twenty
five
thousand
or
even
thirty,
five
thousand-
that
would
guess
yeah
this
in
the
right
direction.
R
We
would
definitely
have
to
do
the
are
fundraising,
but
this
would
delay
the
project
and
again
this
list
acuteness
facility
has
already
been
secured
and
we're
technically
paying
rent
on
this
facility.
So
we
need
to
move
pretty
quickly
with
this
and
the
better
building
partnership.
They
said
that
they
would
be
able
to.
If
we
were
to
be.
If
we
were
to
qualify,
we
would
have
the
amounts
within
a
relatively
slim
timeframe.
J
Muir
I'd
like
to
say
for
the
record:
my
name
is
Ricardo
Keene
and
Dave
and
Claudia
are
my
business
partners
and
they
have
dramatically
changed
the
lives
of
many
youth
in
our
community
and
I.
Think
it'd
be
a
travesty.
If
City
Hall
doesn't
help
these
two
young
people
to
further
their
goals:
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
and
Thank
You
Council
for
listening.
Thank.
A
A
D
I'm
sorry
yeah
and
it
kind
of
follows
along
what's
discussed
in
the
report
of
at
Civic
lab
T,
oh
and
even
ties
in
our
last
discussion
around
the
motion.
The
deputy
mayor
moved
around
maybe
looking
outside
I'm
dealing
public-private
partnerships,
the
roadside
I'm
trying
to
understand.
There
is
the
letter
that
was
sent
by
the
University
of
Toronto,
but
the
bylaw
and
the
the
city
dealing
or
them
hoping
that
they
could
deal
more
with
academic
institutions
and
I'm.
K
The
through
the
chair,
I'll
take
a
first
crack
at
it.
The
controller's
office
and
and
the
purchasing
department
and
the
office
of
partnerships
are
going
to
work
on
figuring
out.
What's
the
best
mechanism
to
streamline
the
situation,
we
actually
have
two
bylaws
that
speak
to
procuring
services
from
public
bodies,
and
we
need
to
just
clarify
and
simplify
the
process
for
internal
staff
to
be
able
to
to
you
to
utilize
them,
nothing's,
actually
preventing
staff
or
me
from
engaging
with
post-secondary
institutions.
But
we
have
a
bit
of
a
confusion
that
we
just.
We
need
to
clarify.
K
K
The
chair,
I:
don't
have
that
I'm,
not
exactly
sure
exactly
which
pile
of
we're
going
to
change,
but
it
most
likely
will
go
to
a
general
government
licensing
committee,
but
I
there
might
be
I
had
I'm,
not
positive
on
which,
where
the
financial
control
bylaw
changes
go,
sometimes
I
do
come
here.
Primarily
they
go
through
GG
LC
and
we
hope
to
do
it
in
the
next.
A
P
P
But
the
good
thing
is
that
we
were
able
to
get
some
contact
and
and
try
to
get
some
support
to
guide
them
and
to
see
what
what
we
can
do
and
to
collaborate
so
myself
and
and
the
partnership
office
will
be
working
with
them
to
see.
If
you
know,
we
can
make
sure
that
we
guide
them
and
their
in
in
the
right
direction.
With
regards
to
the
report
and
what
it
is
at
hand,
I'm
really
excited
to
see
this
here
and,
in
particular,
the
city
lab
to
you.
P
I
think
that
we
need
to
strengthen
their
relationships
with
the
great
academic
institutions
that
we
have
in
our
city.
We're
very
lucky
to
have
some
of
the
best
academic
institutions
in
the
world
and
I
see
this
as
very
much
three
big
issues
that
that
are
three
pillars
of
this
relationship.
The
fact
that
we
need
to
continue
to
attract
talent
both
as
a
corporation,
we
have
huge
amounts
of
people,
retiring
sitting,
employees
retiring
so
attracting
this
talent
to
come
and
work
in
the
city
and
and
how
we
can
strengthen
that
relationship.
P
I
think
it's
an
important
pillar!
The
second
pillar
is
actually
be
a
little
bit
of
the
lab
for
these
academic
institutions.
How
can
we
ensure
that
innovation
is,
is
happening
and
being
tried
in
our
city
and
vice
versa,
when
we
have
an
issue
that
we
can
go
to
these
universities
and
take
advantage
of
this
great
talent?
So
this
relationship
back
and
forth,
I
think
is-
is
extremely
important.
It's
going
to
be
very
beneficial
and
I.
P
Think
it'll
be
you'll,
be
beneficial
for
us
as
a
city
and
for
the
small
companies
that
come
out
of
these
incubators
that
they
all
have,
and
how
can
we
ensure
that
we
can
get
them
opportunity
and
to
have
that
opportunity?
That's
why
I
do
think.
I
do
agree
with
the
letter
that
was
sent
by
U
of
T
and
that's
why
I'm
moving
this
motion,
because
I
think
we
need
to
streamline
our
procurement
process
to
give
these
opportunity
these
startups
to
this
talent
that
is
coming
out
of
the
universities.
P
So
that
again
we
can
be
their
lab
and
they
can
be
a
resource
more
easily
available
readily
available
for
us
to
take
advantage
of
this
so
I'm,
looking
forward
to
having
staff
looking
in
the
procurement
process
to
make
sure
that
this
happens,
and
then
the
third
pillar
that
I
see
in
this
city
lab
is
really.
You
know
ensuring
that
these
academic
institutions
are
flourishing.
P
So
I'm
excited
to
have
this
civic
lab,
and
this
relationship
with
our
economic
institutions
I
would
like
to
see
these
three
big
areas
of
policy
and
work
being
acted
on.
I
think
that
those
are
three
huge
major
outcomes
and
and
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
be
of
assistance
where
I
can
but
really
looking
forward
the
the
work
that
is
going
to
come
out
of
this
relationship.
So
thanks
to
the
staff
to
put
this
together
and
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
continue
to
follow
this
work.
Thank.
D
Thank
You
Mara
Torrey
I
just
want
to
thank
staff
for
all
the
work
that
they've
done.
You
know
the
the
three
projects
in
here
at
Toronto,
Civic
accelerator
program
that
really
came
out
of
general
government,
licensing,
civic
lab
tío
and
strategic
partners,
partnerships
office,
and
these
all
really
talk
about
how
we
can
engage
our
residents
and
over
the
past
few
years,
I've
had
numerous
conversations
at
different
events
with
companies
and
they're,
not
huge
company.
D
There's
small
companies
that
have
come
up
with
an
app
or
a
great
idea
that
they
think
can
really
help
the
municipal
government
and
trying
to
fight
through
I'm,
gonna,
say
fight
is
trying
to
fight
through
the
city
bureaucracy
to
get
their
idea
brought
before
somebody,
because
they
don't
understand
the
system
or
they
talk
about
silos,
or
you
know
just
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
engage
our
municipal
government
and
I.
Think
it's
a
two-way
street.
D
You
look
at
our,
for
example,
a
technology
sector
in
the
City
of
Toronto
and
how
much
they
do
downtown
and
I
run
into
firms
now
they're
all
over
Toronto,
not
just
downtown,
and
they
want
to
engage
the
city
they.
You
know,
and
often
they
say
just
by
engaging
the
city-
they
can
bring
a
great
product
to
market.
They
can
go
out
a
broader
market
just
outside
of
Toronto
hire
many
more
people
move
into
other
areas
of
the
city,
which
I
think
is
needed,
build
stronger
communities
and
and
help
the
City
of
Toronto
succeed.
D
A
Councillor,
you
see
others
wishing
to
speak.
Okay,
I
will
just
say
too.
I
really
just
want
to
not
comment
on
this
item,
which
I
think
it's
an
important
step
forward,
but
just
to
say
to
our
dècadence,
who
came
a
little
bit
out
of
the
ordinary
of
this
particular
item
that
I
think
we're
seized
of
the
situation.
You
have
you've
been
in
one
place,
applying
for
a
loan.
There
aren't
many
of
these
kinds
of
programs
we
have,
but
we
can
take
a
look.
A
I
think
you've
been
emailing
and
correspondence
with
a
number
of
us,
so
the
time
was
well
spent
coming
out
was
saying
that
this
is
not
something
that
would
be
added
to
this
item,
and
particularly
this.
This
this
item
here
certainly
doesn't
concern
loans
being
extended
to
anybody,
but
we
will
take
note
of
the
comments
and
maybe
somebody
from
my
office
and
I
think
you've
been
involved
every
mayor
and
we'll
we'll
see
if
we
can
follow
up
and
find
someplace.
A
R
A
Great,
thank
you,
I
think
we're
ready
for
the
question
on
this
in
terms
of
the
staff
recommendation,
which
others
a
motion.
Yes,
of
course
so,
there's
a
motion
from
a
deputy
mayor
by
Lao
concerning
procurement
from
the
post-secondary
community
and
I'll.
Call
the
question
on
that.
Where
did
she
go
for
her
own?
A
We're
just
sorry,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
you
we
were
voting
on
your
motion
here.
I
want
to
make
sure
you
had
a
chance
to
vote
for
it
all
those
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried,
and
then
the
item
is
amended.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
all
right,
we're
getting
there
folks.
That
brings
us
then
to
I
guess
what
will
be
the
last
item
of
the
day,
which
is
CX
twelve
point:
seven,
the
Toronto
Police
Service
2018
annual
statistical
report.
We
have
three
deputations
I'll
map,
the
first
coming
from
Hamish
Wilson.
Q
Readings
again,
I'll
be
brief.
I
haven't
really
been
able
to
dig
down
into
that
report.
All
that
much
like.
Hardly
at
all
there
didn't
seem
to
be
a
hotlink.
You
could
be
the
operator
me
to
actually
find
it.
The
crash
stats
are
always
of
interest
to
me,
especially
when
it
comes
to
bicycles
and
where
we
are
getting
hurt
and
sometimes
killed.
Q
One
of
the
things
that
I
worry
about
recently
is
that
we've
gone
to
killed
or
seriously
injured
only
metric,
not
all
the
collisions
or
near
misses,
sometimes
if
you're
a
cyclist
and
you
just
get
bored
or
scraped.
Well,
that's
minor
hurt
according
to
not
needing
a
hospital
visit
or
not
bothering
the
police,
but
if
it
actually
is
a
near-miss
and
you're
hurt,
then
you
go.
It
could
have
been
worse
so
in
the
past.
Q
I
think
we've
covered
all
of
the
collisions,
except
maybe
door,
prizes
and
streetcar
track
harms,
which
don't
include
vehicles
hugely
so
I'm,
hoping
that
we'll
actually
have
a
full
spectrum,
full
accounting
of
all
the
the
crashes
and
and
collisions
and
I
believe
there
was
a
motion
a
few
years
back
to
actually
start
counting.
The
harms
to
cyclists
from
streetcar
track,
harms
study
from
UBC
I
think
a
third
of
all
the
cyclists
taken
to
hospital
involved
tract
harms.
Q
Q
This
is
a
rough
imitation
where
the
when
we
had
good
levels
of
enforcement,
the
crashes
and
collisions
were
out
of
modest
level
when
we
stopped
enforcing
around
the
time
when
mayor
Ford
got
in
or
so
2013
the
collisions
have
spiked
really
serious
issue.
People
have
died
and
I'm
thinking
that
we
probably
should
be
asking
for
a
coroner's
review
of
this
particular
situation
of
the
decline
of
enforcement
and
whether
that's
led
to
preventable
death.
Q
I,
certainly
think
it
has
been
you've
got
to
make
sure
that
there's
enforcement
of
the
road
regulations,
the
speeding,
the
red
light
running
the
texting
I
get
out
on
the
streets
a
fair
bit
and
it's
bad
out
there.
It
really
is
bad.
It's
surprising
that
there's
not
more
crash
and
harm
from
all
the
red
light
running
I,
even
caught
a
an
officer
texting
in
his
big
vehicle
the
other
day.
It's
not
good,
so
you've
got
and
merit
orient
had
a
chance
to
read
it.
Q
You
sent
a
letter
out
a
statement
about
the
the
the
hit
and
run
just
the
other
day.
Thank
you,
yeah!
That's
the
sort
of
thing
it's
gone
up
because
hey
there's
not
so
much
penalty.
We've
got
to
keep
on
this
and
I
think
if
you're
wanting
to
really
will
act
on
the
vision,
zero.
Let's
ask
for
that
neutral
review
of
having
the
coronor
review,
everything
that
was
in
that
particular
chart.
Thank.
A
T
A
A
T
T
He
said
yesterday
that
the
City
of
Toronto
has
an
open
data
master
plan,
something
the
controller
honestly
had
been
working
behind
the
scenes
very
tiredly.
So
we
have
an
open
policy
that
it's
going
to
be
similar
to
the
province
of
Ontario,
any
open,
sub
and
standard
that
it
will
cover.
Now
all
City
data,
including
after
the
collection
of
data,
racial
data
base
data
or
as
I
call
it
car
in
2.0
as
a
proud
member
of
minority
community
I,
have
experience,
carding
and
racial
profiling,
police
brutality,
etc,
etc.
T
T
No
I
was
not
aware,
so
what
happened
is
the
top
four
sneakily
is
recruiting.
Well,
he's
saying
that
he
has
given
opportunity
to
any
member
that
come
here
to
become
a
member
of
the
Ontario
Human
Rights
Commission
and
yesterday
on
the
Toronto
CBC
News.
He
says
that
the
Toronto
Police
spokesperson
says
that
this
is
fine.
This
is
all
good
I,
don't
know.
If
you
mayor,
Tory,
has
been
consulting
on
this
appointment
of
an
active
duty
police
officer.
T
How
can
we
trust
honor?
How
can
we
have
trust
on
the
police
when
they
investigate
themselves
come
investigate
car?
We
know
the
answer.
We
know
the
end
result.
Mr.
John
Tory.
We
can
ask
the
victims
of
many
many
crimes
down
by
police
officers
in
Ontario
in
particularly
Toronto
that
want
a
Miller.
Remember
that
case
the
Fontan
Miller.
It
happens
under
your
watch,
mr.
Tory,
and
now
we
have
to
fight
in
court
all
these
lies
and
cover-ups
made
up
at
the
service
look.
T
This
is
this
is
open
up
a
controversy
to
have
a
police
office
to
investigate
claims
of
human
rights.
Violations
done
by
police
officers
is
totally
out
of
other
context.
I
mean
I
cannot
be.
I
can
say
enough
how
this
pleasure
I
am
how
upset
I
am
because
the
Human,
Rights
Commission
and
his
tribunal
are
the
only
mechanisms
that
we
have
residents
of
Toronto
to
defend
ourselves
from
abuses
of
power,
Analia
torah
t
given
to
the
board
to
the
service.
T
So
the
opponent
of
the
police
officer
in
question
arsenal
open
up
a
lot
of
controversy
and
you
as
a
mayor
who
was
taking
their
lead
to
represent
Toronto
after
the
City
Council
was
cut
down
from
44
to
25
members,
and
you
know
there
was
a
violation
of
Human
Rights
down
by
that
floor
and
the
pc
government.
I
think
you
asked
a
lawyer
right
now.
You
should
regular
to
talk
for
and
says,
don't
don't
take.
Don't
take.
Don't
tease
me
with
this
because
you
have
a
chief.
T
A
T
A
S
Just
want
to
mention
to
the
city
manager
briefly
that
I
recently
found
out
that
there
is
an
asbestos
problem
to
some
extent
at
the
Northern
District
Library,
so
integrate
its
3-minute
day
here
again
today.
So
in
this
report,
it
says
contains
data
for
the
second
reporting
year
of
the
new
regulated
interactions
under
the
Ontario
regulation.
50
8/16
of
the
police
services
act
for
the
collection
of
identifying
information
in
certain
circumstances,
so
I
just
want
to
let
you
all
know
of
a
fascinating
conversation
that
was
initiated
by
my
favorite
former
police
board
member
councillor
Carol.
S
When
the
subject
came
up
at
the
board.
Councillor
Cara
Lee
was
speaking
to
Jack
gamal
of
the
law
union
of
Ontario.
Councillor
Carroll
asked
him:
does
the
law
union
have
favorites
organisations
that
we
might
collaborate
with
that?
Have
a
particular
expertise
in
making
things
user-friendly
to
our
residents
on
the
ground?
Jack
Gemmell
responds
you're,
asking
a
lawyer
which
then
got
a
big
laugh
in
the
room.
Councillor
Carroll.
Yes,
yes,
you
know.
No
one
can
ever
understand
you.
S
Is
there
anyone
who
translates
you
well,
meaning
you,
lawyers,
Jack,
amel,
responds
reading
a
turgid
poster
or
a
turgid
web
page,
which
was
obviously
written
by
a
well-meaning
lawyer
in
the
ministry.
At
this
point,
Andy
Pringle
can
be
heard
chuckling
on
mic.
It's
just
your
eyes.
Stop
even
me
as
a
lawyer.
After
about
the
second
line,
you
are
on
to
something
else,
and
the
merit
or
you
way
in
the
problem
is,
as
you
know,
I
mean
I
know
from
having
studied
law
and
so
on
as
well
anytime.
You
try
to
explain
the
law.
S
S
Is
it
the
common
speech
definition
the
TTC
uses,
or
are
they
using
a
term
of
art
as
their
definition
for
what
a
bylaw
is?
As
I
explained
the
councillor
Bradford
at
North
York
budget
day?
Nobody
knows
because
the
TTC
doesn't
actually
give
notice
to
the
public
on
just
what
their
definition
of
a
bylaw
they're
using
is
do
I
get
an
extra
minute
like
Miguel
does
just
to
wrap
up.
Well,
hey
few
people
in
extra
minute.
I
just
have
the
definition.
A
S
A
I
A
Right
questions,
if
there
are
none
and
than
other
speakers
counselor
in
Seattle,
has
moved
receipt
of
the
report.
I'll
call
the
question
on
that.
Then
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carry
does
that
bring
us
then
to
the
end
of
our
proceedings
for
today,
unless
there's
any
other
business
from
committee.
Members
will
adjourn
the
meeting
and
thank
you
very
much
and
to
all
the
members
of
the
public
as
well
and
our
staff.
Thank
you.