►
From YouTube: Executive Committee - June 6, 2019 - Part 1 of 2
Description
Executive Committee, meeting 6, June 6, 2019 - Part 1 of 2
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=15468
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=840WtNtRNZQ
A
B
We've
had
one
in
Scarborough
and
we're
pleased
to
be
here
at
North
York
and
keep
moving
this
around
the
city.
I
think
it's
a
healthy
thing
to
do
in
many
different
respects,
but
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
for
those
for
whom
it
might
have
been
a
bit
more
convenient
to
be
at
City,
Hall,
you've
come
here
today
and
I.
Think
it's
a
positive
thing
that
we
all
did
come
here
today
and
we'll
continue
to
do
that.
B
May
we
all
acknowledge
the
land
that
we're
meeting
on
as
the
traditional
territory
of
many
nations,
including
the
Mississauga's
of
the
credit,
the
Anishinaabe,
the
an
I
beg
the
Chippewa,
the
HOD
nashoni
and
the
windaq
people's,
and
is
now
home
to
many
diverse
First,
Nations,
Inuit
and
maytee
people,
and
we
also
acknowledge
that
Toronto
is
covered
by
treaty.
Thirteen
with
the
Mississauga's
of
the
new
credit
may
I
also
just
acknowledge
today.
As
being
we
just
had
a
lovely
ceremony
downtown
in
front
of
the
Old
City
Hall
is
the
75th
anniversary
of
d-day
and
I.
B
Please
indicate
the
item
number
and
the
nature
of
the
interest.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
committee
wishing
to
declare
any
interest
seeing
none
we'll
move
forward?
May
I
have
a
motion
to
confirm
the
minutes
of
the
executive
committee
meeting
held
on
May
the
1st
2019
moved
by
councillor
Ainsley
question
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried.
B
B
There
is
not
fair
in
the
air,
excessive
air
traffic
noise
over
don
mills
to
be
added
by
capita
Merriman
and
Wong.
So
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carry.
Thank
you
and
then
there's
the
second
of
item.
A
new
business
from
deputy
mayor
Thompson
concerning
the
Van
Horne
outdoor
community
enhancement
program
motion
to
add
that
to
the
favor
opposed
carried
I
would
also
like
to
move
the
following
motion.
B
So
that
motion
is
on
the
screens
behind
us
and
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried.
So
members
of
the
public,
since
the
speaker's
list
will
be
closed
at
10:30
this
morning.
About
an
hour
from
now,
if
you
wish
to
speak
to
an
item,
that's
on
today's
agenda
and
haven't
yet
registered.
Please
register
with
the
city
clerk's
office
staff
at
the
front
table
as
soon
as
possible.
B
Some
people
may
want
to
use
the
overhead
that
is
there,
but
I
would
ask
that
and
in
fact
we
are
asking
that
people
do
stand
at
the
podium.
I
think
that's
better
for
the
television
pick
up
for
that,
so
three
people
would
come
as
I
call
the
names
seat,
the
seat,
the
two
people
will
sit
there
and
one
will
make
the
deputation
and
then
we
can
proceed
from
there.
So,
on
that
note,
we'll
proceed
with
the
rundown
of
the
agenda.
We
have
26
items
on
the
agenda
today
and
so
as
we
go
through.
B
All
right
item-
X
6.1,
the
key
side
update,
is
being
held
for
deputations
item
IX,
6.2
and
I.
Think
the
clerk
has
advised
me.
We
probably
can
deal
with
these
as
separate
matters
cuz.
They
are
in
fact
listed
as
separate
matters.
It
was
being
held
for
deputations,
but
unless
the
committee
member
wants
to
hold
it,
the
deputy
who
was
registered
realized
they're
on
the
wrong
item
and
has
actually
moved
to
6.3.
So
there
are
no
deputations
on
6.2,
so
we
could
move
by
councilor
Crawford.
B
B
Coming
from
myself,
I'm
sorry
about
that,
I
didn't
have
a
copy
of
that.
But
it's
a
motion
from
me,
so
I'm
told
by
the
clerk.
That's
why
you
have
these
magnificent
city
staff
clerk's
to
defer
that
indefinitely.
So
I'll
put
that
on
the
table,
all
those
in
favor?
No,
all
right!
We're
do
you
wish
do
we
do
we
have
questions
or
do
we
all
right?
No
problem
at
all
item
6.7
city
powers
to
regulate
firearms
and
ammunition,
an
update
on
related
initiatives.
B
There
are
no
reputation
so
and-
and
the
report
is
really
involving
us
asking
reiterating
a
number
of
requests
we
made
to
the
Government
of
Canada
with
regard
to
strengthen
gun
controls
and
so
on,
moved
by
Councillor
Nunziata.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carry
item,
6.8
Toronto,
atmospheric
fund
board
request
to
amend
board
composition
and
there's
a
most
motion
on
that
from
I.
Believe
councilor
bylaws
that
right
councillor,
Barlow
deputy
mayor
by
low,
do
you
have
a
motion
on
the
atmospheric
on
board
request?
B
C
B
Just
an
amendment
to
add
a
public
member
from
outside
of
the
City
of
Toronto
to
coincide
with
their
actual
activities,
any
there's
no
other
discussion,
their
particular
content.
We
can
proceed
to
vote
on
the
motion,
the
amendment
here,
that's
on
the
screen,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
and
the
motion,
as
if
the
item
as
amended,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
to
carry
okay.
Thank
you
very
much
item
6.9,
the
1627
and
1675
Danforth
Avenue
Danforth,
Garage
master
plan
final
report.
B
Item
six
point:
ten
ex6
point:
ten
impact
of
provincial
announcement
on
city's
2019
budget
and
2020
budget
process
is
being
held
for
deputations
item
ex6
point
11,
city
of
Toronto's
corporate
asset
management
policy.
The
recommendations
are
in
front
of
us
coming
from
the
city
manager
and
chief
financial
officer
to
adopt
this
policy,
can
I
have
a
motion
to
move
the
staff
recommendations
moved
by
councillor
Ainsley
any
questions
or
comments.
Otherwise,
we'll
proceed
to
call
the
question.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carry
item
6.12,
ex6
point
12,
the
2019
heads
and
beds
levy
on
institutions.
A
B
To
it,
putting
it
up
on
the
screen,
are
we
doing
that
now,
and
so
maybe
this
year
somebody
will
listen,
but
I,
we'll
see
we'll
see
any
questions
or
comments.
Otherwise
we
could
just
deal
with
the
amending
motion
and
then
the
main
item,
all
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
to
amend,
opposed
carried
and
then
the
item
is
amended.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carry.
Thank
you
very
much.
B
B
B
So
this
is
an
item
to
refer
this
back
to
the
city
clerk
for
further
a
report
to
the
executive
committee
in
September.
So
me
I'll,
call
the
question
on
that
all
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
to
refer
back
opposed
Kerry.
Thank
you
item
IX
6.4,
teen
arena
boards
of
management,
2017
operating
surpluses,
deficits,
settlement
again,
there's
a
recommendation
coming
from
the
budget
committee.
Are
you
moving
that
councillor
Crawford?
Thank
you
any
questions
or
discussion.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
to
carry
item.
B
6.15
association
of
community
centers
settlement
of
operating
results
for
the
year
ended
2017
again
there
are
recommendations
forthcoming
from
the
Budget
Committee
moved
by
councillor
Crawford,
the
chair
of
the
Budget
Committee.
Are
there
any
questions,
discussions
otherwise,
I'll
call
the
question:
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item,
ex6
point
16
facilities,
2019
capital
budget
in
2022,
2028,
capital
plan
adjustments
and
accelerations
deferrals
for
the
second
quarter
again
recommendation
on
the
coming
level
of
me
will.
B
B
All
those
in
favor
opposed
to
Carrie
item
e^x
6.18,
the
information
and
technology
2018
year-end
capital
budget
in
2019
to
28,
2028
capital
plan
adjustments
and
accelerations
deferrals
again,
recommendations
coming
from
the
Budget
Committee
moved
by
Councillor
Crawford,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
to
carried
item
ex6
point
19
project
cost,
cost
adjustments
and
deferrals
accelerations
to
the
parks,
forestry
and
recreation
2019
capital
budget
in
2022,
2028
capital
plans.
Second
quarter
again:
recommendations
coming
from
the
Budget
Committee
moved
by
Councillor
Crawford.
B
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carry
item,
IX
6.20
create
t
o
2018
financial
results,
an
annual
report.
This
is
coming
from
the
board
and
there
is
a
recommendation
from
them
that
we
receive
for
information.
The
2018
report
and
approved
the
audited
financial
statements
that
are
attached
to
the
report
and
I
have
a
motion
to
accept
these
that,
from
the
create
teal
recommendations
move
by
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carry
item.
Cex
6.21
amendments
to
the
procedures
by
allah
for
the
board
of
directors
of
tío
live
to
allow
remote
participation.
B
A
Mr.
mayor
I
just
want
to
mention
to
some
of
the
members
that
it's
very
except
what
they're
actually
going
to
be
doing
with
the
program
is
what
the
fund
is
great.
We'd
have
to
actually
go
in
camera
to
discuss
that,
but
in
absence
of
that,
I
can
discuss
it
with
any
of
the
members
if
they
want
to
know
the
program
that
we're
actually
gonna
be
using
the
money
for
it's
actually
quite
exciting,
but
again
I.
B
Roberts
moving
this
on
behalf
of
the
board.
If
there
are
no
discussions
or
questions,
we'll
ask
that
call
the
question
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carry.
That's
he
acts,
6.23,
pardon
me
and
finally
other
than
our
two
items
of
new
business.
We
added
e^x.
Well,
actually
I,
guess:
item
IX
6.2
for
the
by
law
to
govern
Toronto.
Transit
Commission
board,
meeting
proceedings
update
a
letter
coming
from
the
TTC
board,
recommending
that
we
approve
the
amendments
to
their
viola,
which
are
by
and
large
housekeeping
amendments.
B
Is
there
a
member
of
the
Commission
that
wants
to
move
that
recommendation
coming
from
the
Merriman
and
Wang
I'll
call
the
question
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carry
and
we're
gonna
people
are
gonna
want
to
speak
to
the
two
items.
I
assume
of
new
business
will
hold
those
down
for
no,
not
necessarily
all
right.
Well
then,
let's
deal
first
with
the
first
I
think
the
first
one
came
from,
which
becomes
I
guess.
Item
six
point:
two
five
is
the
one
from
a
deputy
mayor,
I'm
in
and
Wang.
B
Is
there
any
need
to
speak
to
that
other
than
to
to
deal
with
the
recommendation?
That's
here.
Okay,
so
it
really
deals
with
the
question
of
report
coming
from
the
city
manager,
about
noise
levels
from
airplanes
and
if
there
is
no
wish
to
speak
or
or
ask
questions
about
that,
I
can
simply
move
the
recommendation
put
forward
by
a
deputy
mayor
man
in
Wang
and
call
the
question
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried.
B
And
then
we
have
the
second
item,
which
is
item
six
point
two:
six
moved
by
Deputy
Mayor
Michael
Thompson,
and
it
is
simply
referring
the
proposal.
That's
attached
to
the
item
to
the
city
manager
for
processing
in
accordance
with
City
Council's,
unsolicited
quotations
or
proposals,
policy
and
I
presume.
There
probably
aren't
any
questions
about
that.
B
B
So
that
brings
us
back
to
the
beginning,
then,
to
the
item
of
the
day,
item
6.1,
key
side,
update
and
there's
a
report
in
front
of
us
from
the
deputy
city
manager,
infrastructure
and
development
services,
and
we
have
thus
far
20
deputies
to
be
heard
on
this.
So
we'll
start
with
I'll
name
the
first
three
and
the
first
three
are
Brian
Kelsey
Toronto
region,
Board
of
Trade
Bianca,
Wylie
tech,
reset
Canada
and
Jim
Balsillie
Council
of
Canadian
innovators.
B
So
if
they
would
take
these
seats
up
front
here
and
Brian
Kelsey
doesn't
need
to
sit
down,
Brian
could
come
straight
to
the
podium.
When
he's
there
ready
to
do
so
and
with
a
reminder
that
there
we're
gonna,
ask
that
people
use
actually
I
have
misspoke
myself
Brian
to
use
the
podiums,
because
it's
easier
for
the
television
and
and
the
rest,
the
other
two
can
sit.
That's
Jim!
That's
there!
Jim
just
take
those
seats
in
there
right
there
in
the
front
row
for
the
deaf
units
Brian.
B
E
You,
mr.
mayor
and
members
of
the
executive
committee
today,
the
executive
is
considering
how
to
proceed
to
consultations
and
to
a
decision
if
Waterfront
Toronto
recommends
proceeding
to
a
final
deal
with
sidewalk
collapse.
However,
there
will
be
speakers
coming
after
me,
we'll
be
speaking
to
another
question,
and
that
is
they'll
be
arguing
that
you
should
not
be
proceeding
with
this
consultation
at
all
on
behalf
of
the
board.
I
want
to
make
a
couple
of
statements
specific
to
that
point,
and
that
is
first.
E
On
the
second
point,
the
Toronto
region,
Board
of
Trade,
as
many
of
you
will
know
in
January,
released
a
porter
report
bibliothèque
calling
attention
to
the
data
regulation
issues
around
so-called
public
realm
data.
What
sidewalk
labs
as
a
company
refers
to
as
urban
data.
We
support
the
regulation
of
that
data.
E
So
let's
resolve
that
issue
as
quickly
as
we
can.
Last
but
not
least,
the
Toronto
region,
Board
of
Trade,
has
pulled
on
this
issue
twice.
I
want
to
be
clear
that
we
haven't
pulled
to
short-circuit
the
critics.
Those
polls
show
that
there's
broad
if
loose,
support
for
sidewalk
proceeding
and
a
small
core
are
growing,
but
nevertheless
small
of
opposition.
E
To
this
deal,
we
released
those
polls
not
to
short-circuit
the
critics,
but
to
help
council
make
the
decision
you
as
an
executive
need
to
make
today,
and
that
is
to
short-circuit
those
who
want
a
short
circuit,
a
full
process
in
the
first
place.
There's
enough
public
support
out
there
to
allow
council
to
proceed
with
a
full
and
robust
debate.
E
B
D
You
very
much
miss
mirror
through
you
to
the
speaker.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I'm
understanding
your
comment
with
respect
to
the
board
of
trades
you're,
suggesting
that
we
should
not
prejudge
this
particular
matter.
We
should
allow
evidence
and
that
evidence
should
really
guide
our
decision-making.
Is
that
what
you're
suggesting
crazy.
E
As
it
is
yes,
but
I
could
even
go
further
than
that
us
counselors
know
that
part
of
this
deal
is
essentially
a
development
deal,
a
development
proposal.
You
know
as
well
as
anyone
in
this
room
and
and
I
think
better
than
some
of
the
critics
of
this
deal
do
that
developments
don't
happen
in
this
city
without
modifications,
without
multiple
proposals,
without
consultation
with
the
community
to
test
whether
you
know
whether
a
particular
configuration
on
a
land
site
will
be
more
popular
or
less
popular
with
constituents
and
with
councillors
to
deal
with
the
massive
regulations.
E
You've
got
in
development
to
me
to
others
who
are
watching
this
process.
This
is
just
replicating
this
that
you've
sidewalk
labs
has
obviously
gone
through
a
lot
of
time
to
revise
their
ideas
and
good
for
them,
because
there's
obviously
been
a
lot
of
public
feedback
and
criticism
of
what
might
happen,
judge
them
based
on
their
final
application,
not
based
on
theories
of
what
their
application
would
be,
you're
required
in
law.
To
do
that
once
you
see
it
a
final
development
application.
This
is
no
different,
despite
the
added
complexity
of
the
other
business
model.
Issues.
D
E
Yeah
sorry,
councillor
I'd,
encourage
everybody
on
council,
actually
read
the
RFP.
If
you
haven't
already
and
I
know,
you've
got
a
lot
of
materials
to
read
every
day,
but
we
have
and
bidders
for
that
process
and
sidewalk.
As
a
successful
bidder,
they've
been
asked
to
specifically
in
the
RFP,
propose
a
range
of
complex
ideas.
Transit
is
specifically
in
there
tell
us
how
you're
gonna
help
get
transit
onto
the
waterfront.
E
E
So
since
sidewalk
has
an
agreement
with
waterfront
to
proceed,
if
if
the
the
public
benefit
from
the
sidewalk
deal,
isn't
sufficient
in
waterfronts
mind
or
in
your
mind
of
course,
it's
your
right
to
say
no,
but
actually
figure
out
what
it
is
before
you
rush
to
your
judgment,
as
some
in
the
audience
would
ask
you
to
do.
Thank.
C
E
Two
comments
on
that
councillor
and
that
is
first,
of
course,
you
know
we
read
with
interest,
miss
clicks
report
in
terms
of
suggesting
that
you
may
need
more
resources.
You
may
need
to
consult
more
experts
to
deal
in
particular
with
the
data
piece
and
I
could
think
of
five
or
six
different
ways
that
you
know.
E
Cities
and
similar
situations
have
come
to
that,
and
one
of
those
ways
might
be
to
to
work
with
the
federal
and
provincial
governments,
which
are
obviously
post
shareholders
in
waterfront
and
are
going
to
be
considering
the
same
issues
to
see
about
drawing
on
their
resources
and
their
analysis.
Even
if
City
Council
may
make
a
separate
decision
or
look
at
that
analysis
through
a
different
lens
I
do
think
you
do
need
some
some
expertise
in
some
outside
comment.
E
On
the
other
piece,
of
course,
you
need
the
proposal,
and
you
know
we've
been
tracking
this
issue
closely
and
it's
mind-boggling
some
days
to
watch
the
company.
On
the
one
hand,
say
they
have
no
intention
of
proposing
X,
and
then
critics
say,
on
the
other
hand,
that,
of
course
they
must
be
proposing.
Why,
and
ultimately,
this
is
a
case
where
we've
had
a
lot
of
occasion
of
this
issue
on
something
that's
supposed
to
be
rumored
to
be
a
thousand
page
document.
E
You
can't
judge
what
the
proposal
is
unless
you
get
that-
and
this
is
a
classic
highly
complex
public
without
a
private
partnership
in
terms
of
the
bid
and
that
the
expectation
that
was
asked
of
the
bidders
when
they
come
in
is
that
they
outlined
multiple
business
models,
multiple
proposals
that
are
dealing
in
multiple
areas
of
regulation,
and
so
until
you
see
which
areas
they're
actually
in
and
actually
out
of
in
terms
of
those
pieces
and
how
they're
confronting
them.
It's
all
theory.
F
E
F
I
guess
I'm
asking
you
that
because
clearly
we're
both
reading
the
RFP
and
I
want
to
make
sure
we're.
Reading
the
same
pages
that
on
page
11,
there's
just
a
chart
that
shows
the
phases
of
the
RFP
with
the
Waterfront
Toronto,
of
course,
being
there
the
whole
time
but
and
then
an
innovation
and
funding
partner
brought
in
at
the
close
of
the
RFP
and
then
another
RFP.
That
would
be
a
future
process
for
infrastructure,
design
and
delivery
and
then,
finally,
another
little
section
real
estate
development
partners,
which
would
be
a
separate
RFP.
F
The
scope
of
the
project
is
so
design
infrastructure,
design,
development,
real
estate
development.
All
those
in
your
opinion
would
be
considered
in
an
RFP
once
this
plan
comes
in
and
sidewalk
would
say
here
all
the
innovations.
Here's
all
the
things
that
we're
bringing
forward
for
discussion
is
that
how
you
understand
that,
yes,.
E
Counselor,
thank
you
for
making
that
point,
because
one
of
the
most
common
points
of
discussion
I
have
with
people
in
the
community
on
this
issue,
is
that
there
are
some
who
have
argued
that
Sidewalk
will
win
or
has
already
won
development
rights
to
everything
in
the
Portland's
and,
of
course,
as
I
believe
you
may
be
arguing.
That's
not
true.
That's
not
true
in
the
RFP.
E
It's
not
true
because
of
the
land
configuration
of
how
waterfront
owns
the
key
side
site,
but
doesn't
own
the
other
land,
that's
within
the
airport
lands
jurisdiction,
and
so
even
if
sidewalk
runs
the
gauntlet
as
we've
called
it.
If
approvals
here
approvals
at
waterfront
of
approvals
from
the
other
two
shareholders,
just
on
the
principles
of
the
MIDP,
you
then
have
other
gauntlets
that
are
triggered.
There's
a
long
regulatory
process
ahead
of
sidewalk
to
even
get
a
building
in
the
ground,
let
alone
get
access
to
the
land.
That's
outside
the
key
side
side.
E
F
G
E
I
think
it
can
be
clearer
and
I.
Let
me
just
give
you
one
sentence
and
say
that
that
part
of
the
challenge
with
this
is
that
waterfronts
original
RFP
was
trying
to
get
multiple
sets
of
sets
literally
innovative
ideas
from
one
bidder
or
one
bid
consortium
at
the
beginning
stage
of
this,
and
then
export
that
from
the
key
side
site
to
improve
how
the
port
land
is
developed.
That's
where
a
lot
of
this
complexity
comes
from
I
might
not
have
done
it
that
way,
but
that's
where
we
are.
B
Yeah,
thank
you.
Okay.
Thank
you
very
much
other
questions
of
mr.
Kelsey.
All
right,
thanks,
very
much
for
your
patience
and
answering
questions
and
for
your
submission.
So
we
have
next
Bianca
Wylie
from
Tech
reset
Canada
to
be
followed
by
Jim
Balsillie
and
Cherise
Berta
from
the
city
building
Institute,
where
our
Singh
University,
so
they
could
be
standing
by
and
miss
Riley
good
morning.
Welcome,
and
you
have
three
minutes
good.
H
Morning,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
about
this
report.
We
as
tech
reset
Canada,
have
two
items
we'd
like
to
talk
about.
Both
our
items
are
informed
by
the
need
to
balance
innovation,
investments
in
energy
with
similar
investments
in
resident
protection
and
democracy.
The
two
items
I'm
going
to
touch
on
are
the
timetable
for
the
assessment
of
this
plan
and
some
additional
criteria
to
consider
in
its
assessment.
Possibly
should
this
plan
even
get
to
you
I'm
actually
going
to
take
a
different
tack
than
mr.
Kelsey
and
I'm
gonna
zoom
way
out
and
suggest.
H
This
is
not
complex
at
all.
This
is
quite
simple,
there's
a
very
simple
thing
happening
here,
and
it
has
a
lot
to
do
with
power
and
an
asymmetry
of
power.
So
I'm
going
to
talk
about
this
in
very
basic
terms.
Firstly,
the
question
on
page
7,
which
speaks
to
the
Waterfront
Toronto
and
sidewalk
labs
relationship.
This
section
does
not
indicate
that
the
plan
development
agreement
between
Waterfront,
Toronto
and
sidewalk
labs,
which
again
this
city,
is
not
party
to
expires
on
September
30th
of
this
year.
H
Given
the
timeline
milestones
in
this
report,
I'm
wondering
why
this
doesn't
appear
as
one
in
the
report
do:
staff
assume
that
the
Waterfront
Toronto,
Board
and
sidewalk
labs
will
extend
their
agreement
and,
if
so,
why
I
think
it's
critical
that
the
off
ramps
for
this
deal
are
clearly
understood
by
the
public.
The
structure
of
this
deal
has
been
highly
unclear.
Some
people
think
sidewalk
Toronto
is
Waterfront
Toronto
when
its
sidewalk
labs.
H
This
has
created
a
particularly
bad
situation
for
accountability,
so
based
on
my
understanding
on
or
by
September
30th
one
or
both
parties
might
walk
away
from
this
deal,
and
if
they
want
to
extend
this
deal,
there
has
to
be
a
vote
from
waterfront
Toronto's
board.
No
such
vote
is
currently
scheduled.
So
if
someone
from
staff
could
speak
to
that
question,
that
would
be
really
helpful.
The
second
thing
is
around
the
criteria.
On
page
13,
you've
got
some
criteria
list.
H
I
was
wondering
if,
regarding
alignment
with
good
governance
and
best
practices,
if
you
might
add
something
related
to
the
global
or
spillover
impacts
of
this
deal,
we
think
about
the
environment.
This
way
right,
cities
think
about
each
other
and
they
think
about
the
impacts
that
their
activities
have
on
other
cities
around
the
world.
We
should
think
about
our
digital
infrastructure.
This
way
to
what
happens
in
Toronto
is
not
intended
to
stay
in
Toronto,
it's
quite
the
opposite.
H
Actually,
that
could
be
good
and
bad
live
in
the
global
nature
of
the
internet
and
digital
infrastructure,
as
well
as
precedent
and
impact.
The
city
bears
moral
responsibility
for
the
Dominos
it
could
set
in
motion
with
this
deal,
including
how
it
shares
in
potential
revenues
of
this
deal
and
the
ethics
of
that.
Nowhere
in
the
criteria
is
there
an
explicit
mention
related
to
how
to
assess
sidewalk
labs
as
an
irrational
actor,
because
they
are
part
of
an
under
regulated
monopoly.
H
I'm
not
talking
about
sidewalk
labs
I'm,
not
talking
about
Google
I'm
talking
about
monopoly
power,
that's
something
that
stands
independent
of
the
firm.
It's
it's!
It's
problem,
independent
of
the
names
of
the
companies
sidewalk
labs,
can
bleed
money
in
Toronto
and
make
it
back
elsewhere.
That's
part
of
the
plan.
We
here
have
a
responsibility
to
stop
problematic
business
models
that
stem
from
an
entrenched
and
under
regulated
monopoly.
We
have
a
responsibility
to
think
of
cities
beyond
this
one.
H
B
You
very
much
for
your
submission.
Are
there
questions
of
the
deputy?
Ok?
Well,
thank
you
very
much
for
your
deputation
Jim
Balsillie
is
next
Council
of
Canadian
innovators
to
be
followed
by
sharise,
Berta
and
Julie
Beddoes.
If
miss
meadows
would
come
and
take
a
seat
in
the
front
row,
mr.
bousley
welcome.
Thank
you.
Have
three
minutes.
G
Thank
you,
your
worship,
members
of
the
executive
committee.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
present
today.
My
name
is
Jim
Bosley
I'm,
the
retired
chairman
and
co-ceo
of
Research
In
Motion,
Cove
I'm,
also
the
co-founder
of
the
council,
Canadian
innovators
and
the
Institute
of
new
economic
thinking
and
chairman
of
sustainable
development
technologies.
Canada
I'm
here,
because
I
think
it's
you
hear
from
representatives
of
the
business
community
who
understand
the
economy
of
intellectual
property
and
data.
G
Smart
cities,
which
rely
on
IP
and
data
to
make
sensors
viable
and
functioning
are
a
1.3
trillion
dollar
industry
annually
growing
at
16
percent
per
year.
They
represent
an
enormous
economic
opportunity
for
Canadians
to
develop
new
technologies
and
create
inclusive
prosperity.
Sidewalk
Toronto
is
not
a
smart
city.
I
know
this
project
was
foisted
onto
everyone
by
the
Prime
Minister's
office
and
I
appreciate
that
you
were
put
in
a
difficult
position:
let's
instead
put
Toronto
on
the
right
track
by
designing
strategies
that
govern
technologically
driven
spaces
for
the
benefit
of
citizens.
G
Barcelona
offers
a
lesson
in
municipal
leadership
that
understands
how
to
use
technology
to
create
more
democratic,
prosperous,
inclusive
and
open
cities.
Montreal
did
the
thoughtful
and
necessary
smart
city
work
up
front
by
one
asserting
authority
over
matters
that
belong
firmly
in
the
hands
of
public
officials,
to
creating
a
guidance
framework
for
IOT
3,
creating
an
open-source
policy
for
creating
a
5g
policy
study
and
five.
G
Creating
a
progressive
procurement
strategy
when
referring
to
sidewalk,
Montreal,
smart
city
leaders
say
for
us
Toronto
is
the
example
not
to
follow
both
cities
spent
five
years
getting
their
strategies
right
before.
Moving
towards
selecting
vendors
I.
Welcome
your
recently
positive
motion
to
develop
a
citywide
policy
framework
and
governance
model
associated
with
digital
infrastructure,
but
I
caution.
This
exercise
takes
three
to
five
years
to
get
it
right
if
your
goal
is
to
protect
Torontonians,
civil
rights,
civil
and
digital
rights.
G
Finally,
during
last
week's
fourteen
country
international
grand
committee
on
big
data,
privacy
and
democracy,
the
meeting
in
Ottawa,
professor
Harvard
Amerada
Shoshana
Zubov,
testified
and
I
quote.
If
Canada
gives
Toronto
to
Google
alphabet,
a
blow
will
be
struck
against
the
future
possibilities
of
democratic
societies
in
the
21st
century.
End
of
quote
I
urge
you
to
do
the
deep
thinking
on
the
central
theme
of
21st
century
governance.
G
B
F
G
Currently,
we
do
not
have
the
governance
framework
established,
but
they
have
established
those
in
other
cities
and
other
jurisdictions
around
the
world,
and
we
are
not.
We
have
to
be
careful
to
protect
the
interests
of
our
most
vulnerable
citizens,
so
those
rules
have
not
been
established
yet
and
in
various
jurisdictions
around
the
world.
These
social
media
companies
have
been
found
to
exploit
vulnerable
and
suicidal
youth
to
sell
them
products
to
capitalize
on
their
vulnerability.
So
we
do
not
have
the
governance
established
on
this
yet
know
what.
F
G
There
they're
very
both
on
the
permissions
allowed
the
the
control
of
the
individual,
the
ages
that
they
involve,
but
they
have
a
responsible
and
extensive
dialogue
on
these
things
is
very
important
to
understand
that
data
is
the
most
potent
force
in
the
world
at
play
right
now,
and
it
is
absolutely
essential
to
get
these
governance
framework
from
certainly
for
our
most
vulnerable
and
AI
society,
but
also
for
the
the
protection
of
democracy
and
many
other
forces
that
data
cross
cuts
and
hijacks.
So.
F
And
there
was
that
you
mentioned
the
motion
that
councillor
Ainsley
and
councillor
cressie
had
made.
But
when
this
item
first
came
before
executive,
it
was
on
January,
24th,
2018
and
I'm
wondering
if
you
are
familiar
with
some
of
those
motions
that
were
made
there,
because
at
that
point
the
executive
committee
itself
looked
at
investigating
the
feasibility
of
establishing
a
democratically
representative
residents
advisory
group
with
fiduciary
responsibility
to
look
after
residents
digital
interest
with
the
following
goals
and
then
there's
a
number
of
goals
that
sound
a
lot
like.
What
you're
talking
about.
G
Not
aware
of
that,
but
I
will
say
this
realm
is
deeply
technical.
These
are
the
most
sophisticated
and
predatory
companies
in
the
world.
I
absolutely
assure
you,
they
know
what
they're
doing
they
know
the
side
doors
I
did
this
game
for
decades.
I
know
how
it's
played
and
they
look
to
prey
on
vulnerability
and
those
that
they
can
use
certain
kinds
of
words
that
it
seems
benign
and
benevolent.
G
G
Have
been
done
upfront
before
a
vendor
was
selected
even
before
in
our
Pia
was
initiated.
Absolutely
this
was
the
cart
before
the
horse,
and
now
there's
you
have
to
start
it
by
Framing
between
citizens
and
their
elected
officials.
Just
what
you
want
this
multifaceted
and
highly
consequential
set
of
forces
to
be,
and
this
consultation
should
not
be
managed
by
a
vendor.
Well
that
alone
setting
an
RFP,
let
alone
Cerreta
selecting
a
vendor.
So
your
altar
doing
is
working
on
creating
compensatory
strategies
for
something
that
was
ill
started.
G
G
Irresponsible
to
be
engaged
with
a
vendor
on
an
implementation
prior
to
laying
of
the
framework
of
which
the
the
citizens
and
their
elected
officials
have
decided
how
to
do.
This
I
cannot
stress
enough
how
multi-dimensional
and
how
consequential
this
is.
This
will
be
the
most
important
decision
you
make
of
your
political
careers
because
it
sets
the
digital
nervous
system
for
generations
to
come.
G
The
deeply
consequential
decision,
far
more
than
I,
think
people
realize
two
years
ago
and
I
understand
that
the
Bloom
has
come
off
the
flower
here,
and
people
realize
this
is
way
more
consequential
than
they
realize
evidence.
What
happened
in
brexit
evidence
what's
happened
in
many,
the
Trump
election
and
many
other
forces
are
at
play
right
now
and.
A
So
there's
so
what
I've
read
or
heard
or
talked
to
people
there's
two
streams
of
thought.
It's
one
is.
We
should
walk
away
from
this.
It's
a
bad
deal
right
at
this
point
and
the
other
one
is.
You
know
you
can
walk
away.
Sorry,
walk
away,
nobody's
gonna
come
after
sidewalk
labs,
the
other
one
is,
you
know,
walk
away,
there's
lots
of
opportunity.
We
just
had
the
collision
conference
here
a
couple
of
weeks
ago.
There's
lots
of
opportunity.
If
we
don't
proceed
with
this,
you.
G
G
How
deeply
undermining
this
will
be
for
their
future
growth,
but,
most
importantly,
is
you
must
understand
you
want
to
achieve
between
you
and
the
citizens
before
you
get
this
process
going,
and
the
objective
of
the
vendor
is
to
hijack
the
distillation
and
the
the
processing
so
that
they
can
move
right
towards
conclusions
before
citizens
and
their
government
have
decided
just
what
they
want.
Thank
you.
B
D
G
Say
know
what
you're
doing
first
and
involve
experts
and
I
know
from
Waterfront
Toronto.
There
were
no
experts
in
IP
and
data
when
they
made
the
original
decision.
I
know
from
the
people
from
the
prime
minister's
office,
they
told
me
they
have
no
IP
or
data
experts
in
this,
so
I
would
say
it's
kind
of
like
having
surgery
for
a
loved
one,
make
sure
they
have
medical
training
before
they
go
in
there
right
and.
D
I
appreciate
that
comment,
so
given
the
position
in
terms
of
where
we
are
today
and
given
your
role
with
respect
to
the
Council
of
Canadian
innovators,
given
the
fact
that
this
is
now
out
in
the
public
domain
for
commentary
and
so
on
and
yes
I
realize
that
there
are
bodies
who
are
going
to
make
decision
on
this
Waterfront,
Secretariat
and
board
and
the
city
in
itself.
What
role,
then,
will
you
and
the
industry
players
who
have
great
knowledge?
D
G
That's
an
excellent
question:
I
did
business
in
over
150
countries
around
the
world
and
scaled
more
commercialization
of
ideas
than
any
other
Canadian
and
I've
seen
how
business
happens
around
the
world
I
don't
understand
why
we
don't
involve
our
domestic
innovators
and
our
domestic
companies
when
we
make
these
decisions
and
have
trade
agencies
think
that
these
should
be
done
by
foreign
companies,
which
brings
all
the
wealth
back
to
their
countries.
This
country
and
this
city
needs
prosperity.
G
D
Mission
vasily
I'm
going
to
give
you
my
business
card
with
my
cell
number
because
as
economic
development,
I
think
this
is
extremely
important.
In
fact,
I
just
had
a
discussion
a
couple
of
days
ago.
Not
with
I
don't
know.
You
know
this
person,
but
with
someone
around
there's
a
very
issue
around
this
very
subject
matter,
so
we
need
your
help
to
help
us
going
forward,
but
you
are
not
today,
though,
saying
that
we
should
not
proceed.
Is
that
correct,
I.
G
Am
not
I'm
saying
understand
the
framework
before
you
proceed
and
do
not
proceed
with
a
specific
proposal
from
a
specific
vendor,
so
I'm
not
saying
don't
proceed
with
a
smart
city,
but
don't
proceed
with
a
vendor
proposed
project
at
this
time.
Absolutely
not
that's
shoes
before
socks,
but
absolutely
you
should
be
proceeding
with
this
process
of
figuring
out
smart
city
and
digital
governance,
which
is
a
multi-year
exercise
and
I
will
say,
smart
cities
that
the
global,
clean
tech
market
is
two
and
a
half
trillion
dollars.
Smart
cities
is
1.3
trillion.
G
A
G
Well,
be
careful
because
much
of
the
the
consultation
was
run
by
the
vendor
and
you
have
to
understand
in
in
the
technology
industry.
Value
chains
are
used
that
supply
chains
and
value
chains
are
very
predatory
and
unstable
where
one
company
tries
to
take
off
so
it.
You
can't
really
have
a
consultation
with
somebody
who
wants
to
blow
you
out
and
you've,
given
them
control
of
the
economic
keys,
and
so
how
you
structure,
the
engagement
will
determine
who
gets
the
trillion-dollar
opportunity.
G
My
view
is
that
I
think
it
would
be
better
to
have
a
few
billion
dollars
in
Toronto
to
pay
for
Toronto,
not
to
avail
it
so
easily
to
foreign
jurisdictions
like
Silicon
Valley.
So
when
you
say
this
consultation,
it's
an
easy
word
to
say,
but
it's
it's
not
that
simple
to
do
with
an
integrity
when
you're
involving
these
kinds
of
forces
and
I
think
you're,
seeing
that
in
all
of
these
investigations
around
the
world
and
election
hijacking
and
multiple
committees.
Thank.
A
You
thank
you.
I
got
the
I
got
the
point.
Are
you
aware
that
when
a
developer
comes
and
does
a
public
consultation
consultation,
mostly
a
statutory
consultation
across
the
city,
whether
it
be
homes
or
condos
or
what-have-you?
Much
of
that
presentation
and
much
of
that
event
is-
is
run
by
the
applicant
yeah.
G
But
that's
our
system
yeah,
but
the
thing
is,
is
you
have
a
system
established
prior
before
you
bring
them
in?
You
have
no
system
for
the
digital
later
in
the
smart
city
at
this
time,
so
they
apply
into
a
system.
You've
actually
brought
in
a
vendor
to
design
the
system,
and
that's
what
I
meant
by
saying
you
put
the
shoes
on
before
the
socks.
You
can
bind
a
a
development
project
from
a
digital
nervous
system
at
the
same
time,
and
that
was
the
original
flaw.
Do.
G
I
know
few
people
who
embrace
change
more
than
I
do
and
have
prospered
on
that
in
my
life
and
I
tell
you
if
you
met
these
smart
city
CEOs,
some
of
whom
do
two
billion
dollars
a
year
in
Toronto.
These
are
not
people
averse
to
change
they're
averse
to
harm
to
their
business
and
to
their
citizens
in
the
city.
They
love
thanks.
B
Counselor
Pasternak
I
just
have
a
couple
of
questions.
If
there
I
don't
see
anybody
else
who
wants
to
ask
any
Cirelli
first
of
all,
I
should
make
a
comment
and
say
to
my
knowledge,
these
twelve
people,
I'm
sure
I,
know
many
of
them,
but
the
12
people
have
never
asked
to
meet
with
me
and
if
they
want
to
ask
through
you
to
meet
with
me,
I'd
be
more
than
happy
to
see.
Perhaps
we
could
even
do
the
same
meeting
with
councilor
deputy
mayor,
Thompson
and
love
it,
but
they've
never
asked
for
a
meeting,
so
they.
B
I
was
gonna,
ask
you
a
different
question,
but
I
think.
Having
heard
all
this
discussion,
my
question
would
be
this.
Would
I
hear
you
saying
exactly
the
same
things,
regardless
of
who
the?
What
do
you
call
it
the
vent
the
bank
vendor?
So
if
it
was,
you
know
ABC
Limited.
If
it
was
you'd,
be
saying
the
same
thing.
We
just
ate
your
tract
you're,
putting
your
shoes
on
here
before
you
have
your
socks
off
percent.
B
Okay,
because
the
other
question
I
wanted
to
ask
you
is:
is
I
mean
you
would
agree
that
as
of
the
moment,
there
is
no
proposal
that
has
been
formally
submitted
or
otherwise
put
out
there.
This
is
the
report
we
have
in
front
of
us
speaks
to
a
process
to
receive
through
Waterfront,
Corporation
and
consider
through
us
and
them,
and
the
other
governments
involved
in
a
proposal
from
a
person
that
has
been
generous.
B
G
If
you
indulge
this
kind
of
exercise
which
I
think
if
people
could
do
it
all
over
again,
I
think
they
would
have
put
the
socks
on
first
and
so
I'm
simply
strongly
encouraging
you
not
to
compound
a
situation
but
really
get
yourself
back
onto
the
right
footing
and
take
charge
of
it.
I
actually
think
you'll
thrive
because
of
the
forces
that
I've
talked
about
of
innovators
and
democratic
interest
and
strong
political
leaders.
I
actually
think
you
have
the
recipe
to
do
this
exceptionally
well
and
Vault
us
forward.
B
Thank
you
very
much,
I,
don't
think
anybody
else
asking
any
questions
so
I'll.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
answers
and
for
your
deputy
moment,
yeah
just
I
have
one
housekeeping
matter
to
look.
After,
unfortunately,
we
had
overlooked.
There
was
one
deputy
at
registered
on
item
6
point
2
4,
which
is
the
TTC
procedural
bylaw,
and
so
I
would
ask
that
the
executive
committee,
somebody
move
that
the
or
I
will
move
the
executive
committee
reconsider
item
the
ex
6.24
and
we'll
come
to
the
deputation
at
the
appropriate
time.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
Kerry.
B
Thank
you
all
right
and
going
back
to
our
deputation
list.
We
have
as
the
next
three
as
Cherise
Berta
from
the
Ryerson
City
Building
Institute,
Julie,
betos
and
Cynthia
Wilkie
from
waterfront
for
all
so
miss
Berta
is
next
and
then
we
have
the
other
to
hopefully
standing
by
miss
verda.
Welcome
three
minutes.
Are
yours
good.
I
Morning,
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
emphasize
some
urban
sustainability
goals
and
outcomes
to
consider
when
evaluating
sidewalks
plan.
First,
as
the
city's
resilience
strategy
recognizes,
climate
change
is
the
urgent
issue
of
our
time.
Reducing
carbon
emissions
should
be
the
leading
objective
on
how
we
plan
our
cities.
I
Sidewalks
goal
is
to
design
a
carbon
positive
neighborhood
with
innovations
to
tackle
emissions,
especially
from
transportation
and
buildings,
which
are
our
two
largest
sources,
there's
nowhere
else
in
our
city,
public
or
private.
Where
this
is
happening,
it
is
imperative
that
we
develop
and
replicate
successful
models.
Second,
we're
not
moving
as
fast
as
we
could
with
vision,
zero
or
changing
how
streets
are
designed,
which
is
the
most
important
way.
We
can
save
lives,
sidewalk
labs
plan
for
Street
design,
public
realm
and
mobility,
prioritizes
people,
placemaking
and
safety
over
driving.
I
Third
sidewalk
labs
is
creating
innovations
to
address
affordable
housing
innovations
and
financing
mass
timber
and
factory
manufacturing
to
bring
down
the
cost
of
housing.
This
plan
and
these
innovations
could
be
tested
and
scaled
and
we
can
learn
from
them
and
encourage
them
elsewhere.
Next,
it's
critical
that
we
build
the
right,
transit
and
active
transit
infrastructure
before
development
occurs
on
the
eastern
waterfront
or
we
risk
locking
in
auto
oriented
streets
and
parking
like
we
did
in
Liberty
Village.
This
is
why
we
should
be
interested
in
sidewalks
ideas
for
financing
the
hugely
important
waterfront
LRT.
I
At
a
time
when
the
province
is
stripping
revenue
tools
from
the
city,
we
need
some
solutions
to
achieve
good
city
building.
So
when
it
comes
to
concerns
about
data
security
in
our
city,
it's
easy
to
point
the
finger
at
sidewalk
labs,
because
it's
a
physical
place
and
a
face,
but
if
sidewalk
labs
were
to
leave
Toronto
issues
of
data
security
and
privacy
in
our
city
would
not
go
away.
I
These
issues
are
not
confined
to
a
single
geography
on
the
waterfront
data
collection
and
monetization
is
pervasive
when
anyone
turns
on
their
phone
location
by
something
online
connects
with
a
network
or
walks
near
surveillance,
cameras,
sensors
are
nesting
in
our
urban
fabric
and
I
agree
with
mr.
Barth
all
silly
that
smart
cities
is
a
challenge
and
it
needs
to
be
addressed,
but
just
like
sidewalk
labs
could
be
a
test
site
for
climate,
positive,
innovative
city
building.
It
too
could
be
a
test
site
for
data
security,
privacy,
regulation
and
public
oversight
of
urban
data.
I
If
we
strive
to
get
this
right
and
continually
evaluate
it
and
improve
it,
it
might
actually
help
us
address
the
bigger
issues
of
smart
cities
and
data
security
and
privacy
citywide
and
beyond.
So
in
closing,
we
have
the
opportunity
to
learn
from
this
master
plan.
I
think
we
should
be
open
to
it
and
creative
and
look
how
it
can
help
to
creatively
address
major
issues
in
our
city
that
we
face
now
and
in
the
future.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
You
miss
Berger.
Are
there
questions
of
the
deputy,
seeing
none
all.
Thank
you
very
much
for
being
with
us
this
morning.
Next
julie,
betos,
Cynthia,
Wilkie
and
then
after
that,
Melissa
Goldstein,
Parkdale,
neighborhood,
land
trust,
so
Meadows
welcome
and
you
have
three
minutes.
Thank
you
for
coming.
Mr.
J
J
You
have
proposal
for
evaluating
the
MIDP
of
I'm
I'm
having
to
hurry
and
I'd
live
a
bit,
because
my
time
is
cut
short.
So
forgive
me
if
I
stumble
Google
and
its
sibling
companies
are
now
so
discredited
and
the
problems
with
sidewalks
proposals
so
widely
criticized
you
may
never
have
to
evaluate
them.
I
think
would
run.
Tronto
will
be
sensible
enough
to
say
no,
but
if
it
ever
does
come
about
that,
you
have
to
evaluate
the
MIDP
I
have
some
suggestions
to
the
ways
that
you
can
strengthen
the
criteria
that
the
staff
report
offers.
J
You
first
of
all,
I'd
tell
you
that
you
will
get
six
hundred
thousand
pages
of
pretty
pictures
of
healthy-looking
people
wandering
through
a
Delic
streetscapes.
That
is
a
smoke
screen.
It's
just
a
diversion
prevent
you
from
looking
at
the
real
deeper
issues
and
there's
nothing
in
the
proposal
that
the
city
and
Waterfront
Toronto
together
couldn't
build.
J
In
those
cases
there
were
public
consultations
before
any
requests
for
qualifications
or
requests
for
proposals
were
issued
in
the
international
competitions
for
the
design
of
the
central
waterfront
and
the
Portland's.
There
was
extensive
public
input
before
the
winners
were
chosen.
Applicants
were
told
what
the
community
wished
to
see
on
its
land
and
were
in
valuate
evaluated
on
how
well
they
could
make
it
happen.
They
were
not
asked
to
tell
us
what
they
were
prepared
to
do
to
suit
their
own
interests.
I'll.
J
F
You've
noted
you've
been
involved
for
many
many
years
on
all
of
the
waterfront
issues,
including
West
Don
lands
he's
Bayfront.
Do
you
think
that,
and
I
was
interested
in
was
what
mr.
bell
dilly
said
about
framing
the
data
and
the
importance
of
data
right
at
the
moment
as
a
commodity?
Do
you
feel
that,
prior
to
the
RFP
or
prior
to
this
process,
on
these
twelve
acres,
that
that
got
enough
texture,
that
that
was
something
that
the
public
was
asked
about
before
that
was
launched,
I
I.
J
J
The
part
two
city
plan
called
unlocking
the
waterfront
what
23
years
ago,
but
the
city
has
an
official
plan
and
with
Waterfront
Toronto
we've
developed
individual
precinct
plans
so
that,
when
proposals
come
forth,
there's
a
framework
to
evaluate
them,
we
have
no
framework
other
than
the
city's
regulations,
basic
planning
regulations
in
which
to
evaluate
sidewalks
proposals
as
real
estate
developers.
In
the
same
way,
as
mr.
Balsillie
said,
we
have
no
framework
to
evaluate
the
data
issues
which
are
stupefying
we
we
should
have
had,
as
we
had,
for
instance,
when
East
Bay
front
was
developed.
J
What
were
tronto
held
huge
public
meetings,
hundreds
of
people's
arrived
when
we
had
a
blank
map,
and
we
were
asked
to
put
on
the
map
what
we
wish
to
see
that
what
the
community
wanted
to
see
on
its
waterfront.
Nobody
asked
us
whether
we
wanted
a
foreign
corporation
to
come
and
build
whatever
it
chose
to
build
on
a
bit
of
our
waterfront.
Just.
F
Looking
at
the
RFP
I,
don't
get
the
impression
that
that's
what
was
in
the
RFP
and
the
page
11,
where
that
was
for
a
funding
and
innovation
partner,
which
everyone's
clear
here's,
how
we
would
fund
things,
here's
the
innovations
were
interested
in
pursuing
particularly
around
climate,
but
the
others.
The
delivery,
the
design
and
development
are
very
clearly
part
of
a
different
RFP.
Do
you
think
those
lines
appear
to
have
been
blurred
at
the
moment?
In
the
public's
mind
anyway,
I.
J
B
You
councillor
Fletcher
any
other
questions
of
the
Deputy
III.
Just
have
one
based
on
something
you
just
said
a
minute
ago.
Do
I
understand,
are
you?
Would
you
rule
out
any
foreign
corporation
coming
here
to
be
part
of
something
we
might
put
on
the
waterfront
or
anywhere
else
in
the
city,
because
you
made
a
reference
to
a
foreign
corporation
coming
in
here?
No.
J
I
mean
the
word
front.
Developments
has
gone
through
with
in
partnership
with
many
corporations,
Tridel,
Heinz,
etc.
However,
when
there
have
been
that
kind
of
deal,
we've
always
known
exactly
what
the
deal
with
when
Heinz
and
try
Dell
took
over
building
on
East
Bay
front.
It
was
perfectly
obvious
what
the
deal
was,
what
their
job
was,
how
they
would
make
money,
what
their
relationship
with
Waterfront
Toronto
was.
There
was
absolutely
no
mystery
here.
I
have
asked
my
good
friends
at
Waterfront
Toronto
over
and
over
again.
What
what
is
the
deal
you're
making
with
sidewalk?
J
J
My
concern
is
that
we,
by
not
understanding
this
deal
better,
we
may
be
at
risk
of
allowing
public
services
and
programs
to
be
privatized
and
that's
a
thin
end
of
a
really
unpleasant
wedge.
I
was
invited
at
the
beginning
of
the
process
to
be
on
one
of
the
advisory
boards
to
the
sidewalk
enterprise,
and
it
was
to
be
the
community
benefits
committee
and
in
the
list
of
issues
to
discuss
what
at
the
top
of
the
list
was
public
health.
J
Well,
the
city
is
the
agency
that
looks
after
public
health,
not
a
private
corporation,
so
I
wrote
a
letter
to
the
head
of
waterfront
pronto
asking
for
reassurance,
but
my
concerns
about
privatization,
of
services
of
utilities
etc
were
were
not
justified
and
my
letter
simply
wasn't
answered
and
I've
asked
senior
staff
at
what
front
row
many
times
for
the
answers
and
I've
never
received
them.
Thank.
B
You
very
much
miss
burrows
will
now
move
to
Cynthia,
Wilkie
waterfront
for
all
and
then
just
to
give
the
next
to
Melissa.
Gould,
see
and
I'd
previously
mentioned
Park
Hill,
neighborhood,
land
trust
and
Ken
Greenberg
greenberg
consultants.
So
those
are
the
next
three
and
spunky
is
next.
Thank
you
and
welcome,
and
three
minutes
are
yours.
Thank.
K
You
I'm
here,
as
the
vice
chair
of
waterfront,
for
all
a
citizens
group
dedicated
to
preserving,
enhancing
and
celebrating
the
entire
Toronto
Waterfront
from
Etobicoke
Creek
to
the
Rouge
River
as
a
unique
natural
and
cultural
resource
for
all
of
us
to
enjoy.
Our
work
is
guided
by
the
city,
central
waterfront
plan
and
by
the
work
of
the
Crombie
Commission,
which
aspires
to
a
waterfront
that
is
green,
clean,
useable,
diverse,
open,
accessible,
connected,
affordable
and
attractive.
K
Many
of
our
members
and
supporters
have
been
actively
engaged
in
the
key
side:
project
development
through
the
joint
Waterfront
Toronto
sidewalk
labs
engagement,
process
of
roundtables
public
meetings
and
working
groups
through
interaction
directly
with
sidewalk
labs,
through
participation
in
Waterfront
Toronto
advisory
and
stakeholder
groups.
I
here
today,
on
behalf
of
waterfront
for
all
to
support
the
staff
recommendation
and
urge
their
adoption
by
this
committee.
We
are
in
the
middle
of
a
global
climate
change
crisis
that
threatens
the
future
of
all
forms
of
life
on
the
planet.
K
We
are
also
in
the
midst
of
a
global
housing
affordability
crisis
that
is
an
immediate
threat
to
the
quality
of
life
in
our
city.
Business,
as
usual
in
city
building,
is
not
good
enough.
We
urgently
need
to
find
a
way
to
do
cities
differently
through
key
side.
Waterfront
Toronto
continues
to
lead
in
urban
innovation
strategies.
This
is
not
a
simple
real
estate
deal.
Sidewalk
labs
partnership
is
intended
to
demonstrate
innovations
in
sustainability
and
social
equity
that
go
far
beyond
what
any
player
in
the
private
sector
can
be
expected
to
address.
K
Will
the
keysight
partnership
deliver
on
a
suite
of
strategies
that
can
help
us
as
a
city
approach,
climate,
positive,
Net,
Zero
development?
Well,
keysight
demonstrates
strategies
to
improve
affordability
and
social
equity.
Will
the
partnership
offer
the
kind
of
economic
development
benefits
contemplated
in
the
RFP
and
project
development
agreement?
We
don't
know
until
the.
K
Proposal,
critics
from
the
digital
justice
sector
have
raised
very
important
concerns
about
the
lack
of
a
digital
governance
and
privacy
framework
to
manage
digital
impotent
innovations
in
the
21st
century.
City.
These
are
concerns
that
apply
as
much
to
the
rest
of
the
city
as
they
do
to
the
key
side
neighborhood.
K
Fortunately,
strong
advocacy
on
the
part
of
this
sector
has
made
key
side
the
catalyst
that
has
been
urgently
needed
to
initiate
municipal,
provincial
and
federal
action
on
digital
governance.
We
are
pleased
to
see
that
in
the
staff
report,
a
significant
portion
of
the
budget
will
be
devoted
to
developing
a
citywide
digital
governments
framework
already.
K
F
Yes
very
clearly
described
the
innovation
plan
and
the
funding
and
innovation
RFP.
That
said,
let's
figure
out
something
great
to
do
here
on
these
twelve
acres.
I
hear
that
you're
concerned
about
making
sure
we
get
the
data
part
right,
and
that
is
now
a
discussion
in
the
city.
I
do
want
to
ask
you
about
the
RFP
again
from
that
innovation.
F
F
K
B
You
councillor
Fletcher:
are
there
other
questions
of
the
decadent
okay
hearing?
None?
Oh!
Thank
you
very
much
Wylie
for
your
deputation
and
for
your
answers
to
the
questions,
and
that
brings
us
to
Melissa
Goldstein
Park,
Hill,
neighborhood,
land
trust
in
the
next
two
after
that
are
Ken
Greenberg,
Greenberg
consultants
and
Max
Deane.
If
they
could
be
ready
and
Miss
Goldstein
good
morning,
and
thank
you
for
coming
and
you
have
three
minutes
supporting.
H
Meirin
counselors
I
want
to
begin
today
by
focusing
on
the
staff
report
in
front
of
you
and
asking
for
clarification
about
the
purpose
of
the
city's
valuation
of
the
MIDP.
We
can't
have
democratic
decision-making
unless
the
public
understands
both,
who
has
the
authority
to
make
which
decisions
and
how
those
decisions
will
be
made.
H
H
It
seems
that
if
Waterfront
Toronto
chooses
to
perceive
the
MIDP
and
holder
in
part
that
sidewalk
labs
will
be
implementing
the
plan
or
the
parts
and
that's
a
huge
mistake,
it's
critically
important
that
the
MIDP
be
considered
separately
from
the
company
that
produced
the
plan.
Waterfront
Toronto
can
choose
to
stop
working
with
sidewalk
labs
once
the
MIDP
has
been
submitted,
and
so
can
the
city
of
Toronto
as
a
company
with
no
development
experience
a
problematic
track
record,
and
that
is
months
and
months
late
delivering
the
plan
that
it
is
hoping
to
win
it.
H
That
is
hoping
it
will
win
it
massive,
a
massive
public
contract.
Sorry
sidewalk
labs
is
probably
not
the
best
partner
to
implement
any
plan,
never
mind
one
of
the
scale
or
importance,
and
so
it's
highly
inappropriate
for
the
evaluation
of
for
this
evaluation
plan
from
city
staff
to
treat
the
MIDP
like
the
evaluation
of
a
sole
source
contract.
The
plan
needs
to
be
evaluated
on
its
own
merits
and
deficiencies
and
weight
is
weighed
against
other
options.
H
Toronto
has
an
affordable
housing
crisis.
At
the
same
times,
it
has
a
hundred
thousand
empty
homes
that
aren't
on
the
rental
market.
This
bc
model
doesn't
produce
empty
homes;
it
only
produces
housing
that
people
will
actually
live
in
and
a
lot
of
it.
But
how
does
it's
an
innovative
idea
like
this,
get
an
opportunity
for
consideration
after
investing
billions
of
our
tax
dollars
in
flood
protecting
and
remediating
the
Portland's,
an
area
the
size
of
downtown
Toronto?
H
I,
don't
want
to
run
out
of
miss
amazing
opportunities
like
this,
to
use
our
incredibly
valuable
resources
and
assets
to
build
a
whole
lot
of
housing
that
people
will
actually
live
in
and
be
able
to
afford
to
live
in,
because
it
didn't
ask
what's
possible
and
chose
instead
to
assume
that
the
same
model
we've
been
pursuing
for
a
while
building
empty
homes
for
investors
and
a
bit
of
not
very
affordable.
Housing
is
the
best
that
can
be
done
because
it
isn't.
H
The
valuation
plan
also
says
that
staff
would
review
the
degree
to
which
the
MIDP
proposal
includes
benefits
for
the
community,
including
those
who
may
be
impacted
by
related
growth,
but
potential
for
community
benefits
needs
to
be
evaluated
alongside
the
potential
for
community
harms.
But
we've
seen
in
California
is
that
those
impacted
by
relat
related
growth
have
been
forced
into
homelessness.
The
San
Francisco
Bay
Area
now
has
twenty
eight
thousand
two
hundred
people
experiencing
homelessness.
Thanks
to
the
arrival,
a
big
tech
I.
H
21,000
more
homeless
people
than
Toronto
has
if
Google
was
good
at
affordable
housing.
There
wouldn't
be
21,000
homeless
people
in
the
Bay
Area,
where
Google's
expertise
lies,
is
in
contributing
to
housing
crises.
The
MIDP
warrants
a
full
impact
assessment,
environmental
impact,
social
impact,
economic
impact
to
evaluate
its
potential
harms
and
potential
benefit.
B
L
Morning,
meritorious
of
the
committee,
you
have
a
written
submission,
which
was
the
five-minute
version,
so
I'm
gonna,
try
and
race
through
this,
as
best
I
can
in
the
time
allotted
I,
want
to
speak
to
how
the
sidewalk
project
could
make
a
vital
contribution
to
the
next
phase
of
Toronto's
evolution
and
the
interest
of
full
disclosure.
I've
been
involved
with
sidewalk
since
2015,
when
I
was
invited
to
join
a
group
of
international
Urbanists
and
people
from
the
tech
world
to
look
at
how
these
things
could
be
combined
to
deal
with
the
major
challenges
facing
cities.
L
In
our
time,
the
advances
in
technology
inevitably
play
a
critical
role
in
the
evolution
of
cities,
how
they
are
absorbed
and
what
impacts
they
have
are
open
questions.
The
key
issue
for
me
comes
down
to
how
a
human
centered
urbanism
could
be
aided
by
technology
and
not
subverted
by
it.
Why
is
this
worth
the
risk
for
Toronto
at
this
point
and
potentially
so
beneficial
we're
in
the
throes
of
an
amazing
growth
spurt
our
existing
systems
are
strained
established
ways
of
doing
basic
things
are
stretched
to
the
limit
and
beyond.
L
We
need
breakthroughs
in
places
to
experiment
and
innovate,
but,
as
we
know,
change
is
very
hard.
Regulatory
structures
and
operating
mechanisms
that
may
have
served
us
well
in
the
past
as
useful
bulwarks
against
making
mistakes
have
now
become
in
many
cases
impediments.
We
have
an
urgent
need
to
test
them
against
new
realities,
issues
of
polarization,
climate
readiness
changes
in
mobility,
and
we
have
to
introduce
a
creative
tension
between
what
is
and
what
could
be
ask
the
what-if
questions
in
fundamental
ways.
The
sidewalk
partnership
may
just
provide
the
catalyst,
R&D
resources
and
the
time
and
space.
B
F
B
F
I
understand
the
excitement
about
doing
things
differently,
and
you
have
indicated
that
you
had
the
honor
to
work
on
this
project
and
talk
to
many
people
prior
to
it.
Coming
to
fruition.
The
issue
of
data
is
become
extremely
large
and
has
been
Shawn
on
the
issue
of
data
who
owns
it,
how
its
used?
Even
this
question
about
the
age
which
you
can
start
taking
data,
but
was
that
part
of
the
earlier
conversations
or
is
that
just
now
emerged
as
one
of
the
big
issues
here?
No.
L
Sir
Fletcher,
this
was
part
of
the
conversations
going
back
to
2015,
longleaf
or
Toronto
was
ever
considered,
and
it
is.
This
is
something
that's
happening
around
the
world
in
all
cities,
as
the
use
of
data
is
penetrating
pretty
much
everything
we
do.
All
of
us
are
involved
in
this,
like
it
or
not,
and
I
think
the
really
key
opportunity
are
one
of
the
key
opportunities
with
sidewalk
in
Toronto
is
to
actually
have
a
serious
open
discussion
about
the
appropriate
use
of
technology.
F
You'd
agree
that
that's
not
for
sidewalk
labs
to
tell
us
how
to
use
the
technology,
that's
for
us
to
determine
a
platform
very
thoughtful,
taking
into
consideration
all
of
the
global
information
we
have
from
other
cities.
So
this
notion
that
we
may
be
the
cart
before
the
horse.
Do
you
accept
that
at
all
I.
L
100%
I,
that
is
a
public
responsibility,
I
think
cities
again
many
many
cities
around
the
world
are
playing
catch-up,
trying
to
put
their
arms
around
this
I.
Think
at
this
point,
once
the
MIDP
is
submitted,
it
goes
to
Waterfront,
Toronto
and
the
city
to
actually
take
a
hard
look
at
those
issues
and
to
create
the
rules
and
the
the
protocols
by
which
data
will
be
handled
that
should
not
be
up
to
sidewalk
under
any
circumstances.
It.
L
You
know
I
think
we're
seized
with
it
today
as
we're
sitting
here.
I,
don't
think
we
can
wait
to
try
and
create
a
perfect
framework.
I
think
we're
dealing
with
this
daily.
It
is
involved
and
pretty
much
everything
we
are
doing
in
our
city
today,
sidewalk
or
no
I
think
if
there
were
no
sidewalk,
we
would
still
have
the
same
issue
to
deal
with.
Thank.
B
A
You
good
morning
my
name
is
max
Dean
I'm,
a
visual
artist
I'm,
also
the
2014,
the
Governor
General's
Award
for
Excellence
in
the
visual
arts,
but
more
importantly,
I'm
also
or
next
year
will
represent
my
25th
year
of
working
and
living
in
the
Portland's.
So
I
think
I
share
the
rare
operator
and
distinct
position
of
being
the
only
person
in
the
room
that
actually
probably
works
in
the
Portland's
and
so
as
a
visual
artist.
A
What's
what
what
I'm
really
involved
in
is
I'm
I'm,
very
much
involved
in
Leafs
of
faith
and
learning
how
to
trust
one's
intuition
and
learning
how
to
and
embrace
risk
and
I.
Think
that
what's
interesting
about
the
sidewalk
labs
and
I
would
like
to
speak
not
so
much
about
what
they're
proposing.
But
what
they've
done
to
date.
Right
like
that
and
I,
think
that
there's
a
kind
of
rare
and
exceptional
kind
of
quality
to
this
group
of
people
that
have
come
up.
A
You
know
with
a
presentation
at
3:07
lakeshore,
which
is
conceptually
tight,
its
enormous
ly,
imaginative,
about
the
way
that
they've
approached
and
dealt
with
us
as
individuals
and
as
a
city
and
so
I
think
that
we
we
have
to
realize
that
this
is
a
group
of
people
that
are
actually
listening
to
us
right,
which
is
a
rare
and
kind
of
unique
kind
of
situation,
because
they
are
they've
responded
to
us
with
great
understanding.
They've
responded
to
us
with
imagination
and,
more
importantly,
they're
dealing
with
us
with
with
compassion
and
so
I
think.
A
What's
truly
unique
about
this
group
and
I
would
ask
you
to
entertain
their
proposal
in
the
in
the
near
future.
Is
that
they've
actually
left
their
egos
at
the
door?
They're
here
for
us,
they're
listening
to
us
and
I
think
that
what
they
should
be
listened
to
and
we
should
entertain
their
kind
of
proposal
with
great
kind
of
seriousness,
and
so
I
would
hope
that
they
would
move
that
we
could
all
move
this
forward
and
a
kind
of
productive
and
imaginative
way,
just
a
community
of
Toronto
but
for
the
citizens.
B
Dean
you
most
certainly
do
so
for
so
far
today,
you're
running
first
in
the
standings
for
economy
of
time,
and
we
appreciate
that
are
there
questions
of
mr.
Dean.
Alright,
we
won't,
but
thank
you
very
much
appreciate
that
very
much
so
Janice
phew,
sir
Nick
DeCarlo
and
Sahar
Raza
are
the
next
three
good.
M
In
the
summary,
the
growth
of
a
sphere
of
influence,
the
growth
of
a
geographic
scope
into
West,
Villiers
Island,
a
transformation
also
in
the
summary
of
the
traditional
role
of
developer
to
a
quasi-governmental
role
and
and
here's
a
quote.
Further.
The
MIDP
may
propose
roles
for
sidewalk
labs
in
advising
Waterfront
Toronto,
on
deploying
technology
and
in
financing
infrastructure
beyond
the
key
side
site,
I
urge
city
staff
and
counselors
Waterfront,
Toronto
and
members
of
the
public
to
keep
pushing
for
more
clarity.
M
About
how
this
project
proposes
to
change
city
governance,
the
public
sphere,
public
sector
work,
this
project
has
prompted
an
important
discussion
in
our
community
about
how
we
can
build
inclusive
and
sustainable
communities
and
ensure
development
works
for
everyone,
particularly
given
the
unique
opportunities
posed
by
public
lands.
And
so
is
these
often
obscured.
M
I
think
other
people
have
commented
that
Sidewalk
Labs
doesn't
have
a
long
track
record
as
a
city
planner
or
developer,
but
cities
have
had
some
experience
with
Google
real-estate
deals,
and
many
of
these
deals
are
marked
by
the
pursuit
of
tax
incentives
and
the
use
of
non-disclosure
agreements,
preventing
public
awareness
of
the
nature
or
even
existence
of
these
deals
and
I've
just
referenced
a
couple
of
those
cases
in
the
in
the
written
comments
in
Toronto.
We
need
to
know
so
to
speak.
M
B
N
You
I'm
retired
for
seven
years
and
have
not
been
active
due
to
various
family
commitments,
but
this
issue,
as
has
brought
me
out
of
my
non
participation
activity
which
I
had
you
know
my
whole
history,
has
been
one
of
being
an
activist
and
the
reasons
why
I
put
a
written
submission
in,
and
they
briefly
addressed
that
and
I
want
to
address.
Some
of
the
questions
have
been
raised.
N
First
of
all,
it
seems
to
me
that
there
are
three
three
issues
that
we're
giving
up
by
following
this
proposal:
one
is
public
control
over
development
and
what
its?
What
we
do
know
now
is
that
whatever
the
proposal
is,
it
will
involve
massive
surveillance
at
the
street
level,
in
interior,
to
buildings
and
and
throughout
the
whole
area
of
that
of
the
development
of
the
city.
The
assumption
is
that
this
is
a
good
thing.
However,
I
think
what
it
really
means
is
that
those
who
control
that
information
then
can
control
how
advertising
is
done.
N
The
relationship
between
the
city
and
the
and
the
and
the
citizen
is
reversed,
because
now
what
happens
is
that
the
city
is
a
an
area
where
mostly
it's
private
land,
but
the
access
to
public
space
is
the
key
to
what
makes
a
city
function
and
what
now
meet
the
the
use
of
surveillance
controlled
by
a
private
company.
What
that
means
is
that
you're
now
in
order
to
participate
in
public
space
you
or
don't
have
to
enter
into
the
private
realm,
and
that
is
a
real
problem
in
terms
of
how
the
city
can
function.
N
And
finally,
the
right
for
the
individual
choose
is
threatened
and
now
I
know
that,
if
I
with
the
example
for
me
as
I
now
use
Google
Maps
on
my
phone
I
used
to
be
able
to
use
Google,
Maps
I
didn't
have
give
my
location
now
it
won't
function
unless
I
tell
Google
where
I
am
I
know
that
I
cannot
access
a
number
of
web
sites
unless
I
allow
cookies
on
my
my
phone
and
my
computer
and
I
can
be
tracked.
If
I
don't
allow
that
I
cannot
access
those
web
sites.
I
can't
get
information.
N
I've
read
research
that
clearly
documents
that,
for
example,
the
the
children's
toys
we
record.
What
children
do
there
are
smart
toys,
I've
read
research,
the
documents
that
that
Google
and
others
follow
what
people
do
turn
on
cameras
and
their
phones
etc.
These
are
serious,
credible
researches.
This
is
not
what
I
want.
This
is
not
what
gives
me
individual
choice.
Three
issues
very
quickly:
I'll
address
I,
don't.
B
N
That
was
answering
your
question
and
the
environmental
crisis.
Yes,
it's
there's
an
environment
crisis,
but
there
are
other
crises
as
well
and
and
the
key
to
developing
the
very
mobile
crisis
is
addressing
democracy
regulation.
It's
not
going
to
be
possible
to
you
can
only
regulate
after
the
data
is
collected
it
if
it's
collected
privately,
they
already
have
the
information
it's
too
late
to
regulate.
And
finally,
why
say?
B
I
Good
morning,
everyone,
my
name,
is
Sahar
Rosa
and
I
am
here
today
as
a
resident
and
an
academic
from
the
GTA
for
the
past
18
months,
I've
been
studying
the
sidewalk
labs
project
and
with
great
anxiety,
because
what
I
well
I
do
believe
that
technology
has
the
potential
for
promoting
public
good.
The
best
evidence
suggests
that
inviting
Google's
sister
company
to
redesign
our
city
from
the
Internet
up
will
not
lead
to
socially
just
outcomes,
especially
because
we
lack
policies
to
protect
the
public
from
tech
corporations.
I
We
have
already
seen
tech
giants,
undercut
democracy,
accountability
and
transparency,
for
example
in
Facebook,
in
Cambridge
analytical
scandal,
in
the
fact
that
Amazon
paid
no
federal
taxes
on
its
eleven
point,
two
billion
dollars
of
profits
in
2018
and
in
Google's
use
of
secret
algorithms
and
NDA's
to
pretend
protect
its
content.
Sorting
logics
from
public
scrutiny
and
sidewalk
labs
itself
has
publicly
stated
that
it
wanted
limited
regulation
to
experiment
with
its
technologies
in
what
they
call
the
testbed
FK
side.
I
Now
we
can
set
precedent
for
how
the
rest
of
the
world
pursues:
technological,
urban
innovation
by
creating
a
governance
structure
that
protects
our
democracy
and
ensures
accountability
and
transparency
among
tech
corporations,
as
the
block
sidewalk
campaign
argues,
waterfront
Toronto's
partnership
with
sidewalk
labs
is
fundamentally
undemocratic
because
it
was
made
without
prior
consultation
with
the
public
going
forward
with
this
project
will
set
a
dangerous
precedent
for
Canada
and
democratic
nations
across
the
globe.
I
thus
offer
five
recommendations.
I
First,
we
must
acknowledge
that
the
concerns
of
the
citizen,
LED
block
sidewalk
campaign
and
restart
this
key
side
development
from
the
RFP
phase.
Once
we
started,
this
RFP
process
must
involve
meaningful
and
educated
consent
and
decision
making
power
afforded
to
disadvantaged
communities
and
marginalized
voices,
including
indigenous
communities,
who
have
been
mostly
left
out
of
this
our
process,
but
have
deep
connections
to
the
land.
This
also
requires
rethinking
the
consultation
process
itself
because
it
tends
to
reproduce
many
equal
power
relations.
I
Second,
meaningful
and
educated
consent
also
requires
that
the
city
offered
digital
literacy
campaigns,
workshops
and
resources
to
ensure
that
citizens
understand
the
implications
of
technologies
before
we
consent
to
them.
Third,
we
need
enforceable
policy
frameworks
that
prioritize
public
interest
in
the
digital
age.
Before
we
proceed
with
any
technological
urban
development,
just
as
the
Canadian
Broadcasting
System
is
regulated
by
the
CRTC,
we
need
to
create
policy
for
publicly
protecting
things
like
data,
intellectual
property
and
privacy.
I
Fourth,
we
need
our
laws
and
policies
to
address
and
limit
the
unprecedented
and
monopolistic
power
of
tech
corporations
direct
or
actively
compensate
for
over
a
decade
of
leaving
the
internet
unregulated,
just
as
New
York,
City
design,
legislation
to
promote
transparency
and
limit
NDA's.
When
Amazon
tried
to
build
their
headquarters
there,
we
need
to
create
our
own
legislation
to
limit
corporate
secrecy,
lobbying
ambiguity
and
obfuscation,
which
have
been
trademarks
with
sidewalk
labs
so
far
in
their
condon
conduct
in
Toronto.
I
And
finally,
we
must
put
critical
thinking,
activists
and
academics
in
conversation
with
programmers,
technologists
and
policy
makers
to
ensure
that
our
technologies
and
policies
are
developed
with
an
equity
inclusion
and
diversity.
Lens
I
have
read
the
city
staffs
report
on
this
project,
and
I
am
amazed
that
there
is
no
room
in
the
budget
for
an
equity,
lens
or
equity
consultants,
and
if
diversity
is
our
strength,
let's
be
true
to
our
city
motto
and
restart
this
key
side
development
in
a
meaningfully
democratic,
equitable
and
inclusionary
way.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
You
I
apologize,
I
hadn't
started
the
clock,
but
you
finished
write
about
it
on
what
I
think
is
three
minutes.
So
thank
you
very
much,
but
are
there
questions
of
the
deputy
okay?
Thank
you
so
much
appreciate
that.
Then
next
is
John.
Wilson
West
Don
lands
Mike
your
carpenter's
District
Council
and
thorvin
white.
It's
so
those
in
the
next
three
good
morning,
good
morning
being
here
and.
O
Thank
you
for
welcoming
welcoming
me
here.
I'm
I
am
John
Wilson.
One
of
the
co-chairs
of
the
West
Don
lands
committee
and
I
am
here
to
offer
my
support
for
the
recommendations
in
the
report,
which
is
essentially
to
proceed
with
an
evaluation
and
consultation
process
on
the
nid
p
when
it
is
issued
and
when
we
receive
it
and
after
Waterfront
Toronto
has
done
their
part
in
looking
over
and
evaluating
the
report
deciding
whether
how
much
and
if
we
will
they
wish
to
proceed.
I
think
it's
important
that
we
remember
where
we
are
in
the
cities.
O
In
this
process
we
have
not
yet
received
the
MIDP.
We
have
received
a
great
deal
of
conversation
if
you
will,
with
Waterfront
Toronto
and
with
sidewalk,
to
this
point,
and
we
are
about
to
find
out
what
it
is
that
they
have
distilled
from
those
conversations
and
from
their
own
and
their
from
their
own
competencies
and
and
wishes.
As
far
as
going
forward
with
the
project,
the
West
on
Alliance
committee
is
not
has
not
taken
a
position
on
whether
or
not
we
should
proceed.
O
We
have,
however,
spent
many
many
years
as
a
group
of
neighborhood
organizations,
social
agencies,
business
organisations
and
environmental
organizations.
In
the
immediate
vicinity
of
the
eastern
waterfront,
we
have
been
asking
Waterfront
Toronto
to
up
their
game
as
regard
to
climate
positivity,
we've
asked
them
to
up
their
game
and
with
every
proposal
would
come
through,
we
would
say:
can
we
do
better
on
affordable
housing?
Can
we
do
better
on
excellence
in
building
design?
O
One
of
the
responses
that
we
have
now
gotten
from
Waterfront
Toronto
is:
let's
see
if
we
can
develop
the
key
side
area
of
the
front,
with
an
innovation
partner
that
has
competencies
in
going
farther
than
what
we
have
previously
done,
and
this
is
something
that
obviously-
and
we
can't
possibly
not
say
that
this
is
something
that
is
of
interest
to
us.
It
is
what
we've
been
asking
for
all
along.
O
We
have
been
doing
this
since
Waterfront
Toronto
was
formed
and
before
Waterfront
Toronto
was
formed,
we've
been
asking
the
city
to
up
their
game
on
things
like
innovation,
innovative
approaches
to
sit
to
city
building,
improving
public
transit.
All
matters
that
are
have
been
part
of
the
discussion
with
sidewalk
labs.
O
F
Back
to
a
couple
of
the
kind
of
foundation
things
I
know
familiar,
you
are
with
this
and
all
other
waterfront
developments
and
that
the
original
RFP
and
you've
called
it
key
side,
which
is
the
12
acres
and
the
project
is
RFP,
is
for
the
12
acre
project,
and
then
it
got
opened
up
a
little
bit
more
in
the
in
the
PDA.
But
is
your
assumption
that
the
innovative
designs
etc?
O
Have
to
admit
to
not
entire
clarity
and
it's
a
criticism
that
I
would
have
of
the
project
at
this
point:
I'm
not
sure
what
is
going
to
be
confined
to
key
side.
What
would
be
proposed
for,
let's
say
the
broader
Eastern
Waterfront
and
what
would
be
proposed
beyond
that.
I
am
really
waiting
to
see.
I
mean,
frankly,
in
our
discussions
in
consultations,
we
talked
about
parkland.
O
Animation
issues
that
we
could
look
across
the
city
to
to
implement
and
I
want
to
find
out
whether
what
the
proposals
will
be
doable.
If
you
will
in
key
side
whether
they're
going
to
be
saying
to
us,
some
things
need
a
larger
footprint
so
to
speak,
and
then
it's
a
frankly
it's
a
matter
of
negotiation.
What
do
you
wish
from
us?
What
are
we
willing
to
give
to
you,
and
we
are
you-
know,
mature
actors
that
can
make
those
decisions
so
there's.
F
G
O
I
believe
that
there
are
portions
of
the
RFPs
that
suggest
Makemake
proposals
for
beyond
the
p-side
area,
but
I'm
certain
that
the
city,
the
province
and
the
feds
will
not
allow
development
in
beyond.
You
know
what
what
the
in
areas
that
further
that
they
regulate,
that
that
is
beyond
the
scope
of
the
MIDP
Thank.
B
You
councillor
Fletcher
and
are
there
any
other
questions
of
mr.
Wilson
all
right,
seeing
none
all.
Thank
you
mr.
Wilson,
very
much
and
brings
us
to
Mike
York,
followed
by
Thorburn
white,
it's
and
Suzanne
Cavanaugh
from
the
NATO
st.
Lawrence,
Neighborhood
Association
mr.
York
good
morning.
Thank
you
very.
O
Much
mr.
mayor,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
be
here
and
make
a
contribution
to
the
discussion,
and
just
on
that
issue,
the
Carpenters
Union
has
been
building
this
city
since
1882
in
Toronto,
so
I
think
it's
only
natural
that
we're
here
making
another
contribution.
In
fact,
actually
this
project,
we
believe,
will
be
a
an
incredible
valuable
contribution
to
our
city
in
really
in
an
area
that's
actually
rapidly
revitalizing.
This
is
a
further
revitalization
fantastic
project
of
mixed-use,
public
space
and
housing.
O
We
see
it
as
a
great
economic
development
driver
and
the
opportunity
for
green
jobs.
Now
it's
probably
not
unusual
for
you
to
hear
the
carpenter
would
be
here
supporting
the
project.
Look
at
the
massed
timber
dimension
of
it
as
a
new
technology
with
an
old
material,
and
we
see
it
as
huge
development
around
innovation
and,
in
fact,
actually
it
meshes
very
well
with
our
own
training
in
mass
timber,
which
we've
just
recently
implemented
for
a
next
generation
of
carpenters.
O
O
You
have
my
letter
before
you
so
I
wanted
to
point
to
a
couple
of
issues
and
that
what
we
believe
this
means
for
Northern
Ontario
if
we
can
implement
as
a
part
of
it
Mills
and
a
manufacturing
component
for
mass
timber
as
president
of
the
Carpenters
District
Council
of
Ontario
have
the
opportunity
to
travel
the
province
and
I've
seen
many
communities
where
the
mill
has
been
shut
down.
It
was
also
recently
in
Austria
and
northern
Italy
doing
a
tour
of
mass
timber.
O
Manufacturing
I
saw
the
huge
potential
that
they
had
developed
around
sustainable
forest
practices,
integrating
the
community
colleges
and
colleges
within
that
sector,
and
also
the
manufacturing
component.
It
really
does
bring
prosperity
to
communities
and
that's
an
argument
we
have
and
putting
forward
at
every
level
of
government
and
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
do
so
at
this
level.
O
So
we
see
that
in
northern
communities,
whether
it's
workers
in
Native
communities
can
also
benefit
from
this
now.
Another
aspect
that
I
noted
was
the
community
benefits
agreements.
We
have
some
great
track
records
of
bringing
youth
women
returning
Canadian
soldiers
and
a
good
example
is
the
Toronto
committee
benefits
network
that
is
working
with
the
Eglinton
crosstown
now
at
West,
Park
Hospital
wasn't
easy
to
get
these
implemented,
but
this
is
an
example
of
a
company
sidewalk,
that's
promoting
it
and
initiating
the
discussions
around
community
benefits.
O
So
that's
that's
something
that's
very
found
unusual,
but
very,
very
positive,
because
when
they
initiate
it
we're
there
to
pick
it
up
and
we're
there
to
work
with
them
in
terms
of
opening
the
doors
of
opportunity
for
many
in
our
community
into
an
exciting
project
and
an
exciting
construction
industry.
So
with
that
I'll
close
and
be
happy
to
field
any
questions
that
might
come
forward,
thank.
B
D
D
Right
and
so
I
know
that
you
have
given
us
an
overview
which
really
would
support
talk
about
the
community
benefits
for
talk
about
the
timber
industry
and
so
on,
and
it
relates
to
the
carpenters,
because
timber
is
really
important
to
what
you
do.
But
as
it
relates
to
the
report
itself,
do
you
think
it's
prudent
for
us
to
actually
go
through
a
process
in
order
to
evaluate
based
on
evidence
and
before
arriving
at
a
decision
to
throwing
this
out.
D
To
speak,
so
my
question
was
very
clear:
what
I?
Well,
it
was
clear
to
me.
My
question
was
simply
this:
we've
had
some
who
basically
have
said
like:
let's
just
stop
this
process
altogether.
What
I'm
simply
asking
is,
would
it
not
be
more
prudent
to
base
the
decision
of
withdrawing
from
this
process
on
evidence,
as
opposed
to
just
simply
throwing
it
out,
regardless
of
any
real
evidence
that
suggests
otherwise
I.
O
B
I
P
Damira
and
members
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
Tom
white.
It's
I'm,
a
resident
of
the
City
of
Toronto
I
live
just
north
of
the
site
on
Parliament
Street
and
Dundas
and
I'm
here
today
to
speak
about
the
key
side,
update
report,
I'm
heartened
to
see
that
the
city
is
developing
its
own
framework
to
which
to
assess
Google's
MIDP
for
the
12,
a
caucus
outside
and
possibly
for
other
sites.
Beyond
that,
to
my
knowledge,
it's.
P
On
the
other
hand,
while
this
is
the
second
time
in
about
18
months
for
citizens
to
speak
to
the
elected
body,
Google
has
had
plenty
of
time
to
speak,
to
staff,
to
speak
to
government
officials
and
elected
a
brief
look
at
the
lobby's
registers.
Lock.
The
city's
lobbyists
registry
shows
that
they
were
in
touch
1550
times
from
March
2018
to
May
2019.
P
This
makes
about
110
opportunities
a
month,
or
you
know
27
opportunities
a
week
or
about
5.5
opportunities
a
day,
for
you
know
a
very
short
time
period
and
they
don't
even
have
a
development
application
at
the
City
of
Toronto,
so
they
are
discussing
something
that
is
not
even
real,
whereas
everyone
else
is
being
told.
We
should
relax
here
and
wait
until
something
real
is
being
put
forward.
P
So
it's
a
little
strange
I've
been
dealing
with
this
behavior
with
other
companies
being
involved
with
Airbnb
being
concerned
about
uber,
and
these
big
tech
companies
have
brought
a
completely
different
ballgame
to
the
City
of
Toronto
wielding
their
influence.
So
I
agree
very
much
with
previous
comments
about
power,
symmetry
lack
of
transparency
and
the
lack
of
a
framework
there's
a
lack
of
a
framework
for
uber.
When
I
came
to
town
there
was
a
lack
of
a
framework
for
Airbnb
when
it
came
to
town.
P
Coming
back
to
the
actual
report,
there
is
something
in
the
report
that
you
know
gives
me
some.
You
know
reason
to
be
concerned,
and
that
is
you
know
what
have
has
been
discussed
here
previously.
The
notion
of
scope,
leap,
I,
have
not
seen
either
in
the
RFP
or
the
PDA,
any
notion
of
a
Google
headquarter
on
the
western
portion
of
West
villiers,
which
is
outside
of
the
12th
acre
key
site
side.
I,
wonder
how
this
came
into.
P
You
know
the
city,
some
keys,
that
update
report,
and-
and
you
know
this
is
a
question
I
have
for
staff,
or
you
know
you,
here's
our
electives.
You
know
if
you
could
shed
some
transparency
on
how
we
ended
up
with
Google
headquarter
that
could
possibly
be
placed
on
the
twelve
twelve
acres
key
side
side,
because
it
allows
for
3.1
million
square
feet
of
I
believe
mixed-use
space.
Perhaps
you.
B
F
P
P
P
F
P
Q
Mr.
mayor
and
executive
members,
thanks
very
much
I
too
have
submitted
a
letter
so
I'm
going
to
give
you
the
abridged
version
since
I'm
now
down
to
two
minutes
and
50
seconds.
The
first
point
wanted
to
make
today
is
that
we
support
the
work
plan.
The
city
staff
have
proposed
and
we
were
encouraged
that
there
was
an
opportunity
here
to
solve
the
issue
around
housing,
affordability
and
getting
us
to
a
climate,
positive
environment
on
the
list.
I
want
to
make
clear
that
I'm
representing
the
st.
Q
Lawrence
Neighborhood
Association,
and
we
are
just
north
of
this
proposed
site.
We
regularly
work
with
city
staff
and
residents
and
developers
and
property
owners
to
ensure
that
proposed
developments
represent
good
planning
and
enhance
our
neighborhood.
We
view
our
Neighborhood
Association
as
active
champions.
We've
been
working
with
the
city
and
with
Waterfront
Toronto
for
many
years
and
are
always
grateful
for
the
support
we
have
had
from
the
city
with
various
projects,
including
the
st.
Lawrence,
Market,
North
Building,
and
getting
approval
in
shovels
in
the
ground
this
summer.
Q
Our
neighborhood
is
adjacent
Shuki
side
and
we
have
been
engaged
since
it
was
first
introduced
to
the
community
in
the
spring
of
2017.
We
were
excited
when
Waterfront
Toronto
advised
us
that
this
block
in
the
central
waterfront
was
going
to
be
treated
differently
than
in
previous
precinct
plans.
We
have
always
seen
Waterfront
Toronto
as
a
leader
with
respect
to
city
building
and
being
innovative.
Q
This
is
an
opportunity
until
it
is
not,
and
now
we
look
forward
to
getting
the
MIT
up
to
review
and
attend
upcoming
community
consultations
with
Waterfront
Toronto,
and
if
successful
community
consultations
with
the
City
of
Toronto
when
Sidewalk
arrived
in
Toronto
immediately,
they
asked
our
neighborhood
questions
about
our
mixed
use:
neighborhood
in
particular
the
housing
mix
along
the
Esplanade.
We
have
been
engaged
in
so
many
community
consultations.
Some
might
even
say,
are
fatigued.
Many
of
our
delegates
have
attended
the
four
roundtable
discussions
co-hosted
by
Waterfront,
Toronto
and
sidewalk.
Q
Toronto
sidewalk
has
led
focus
groups
and
Waterfront.
Toronto
is
also
led
many
meetings.
In
fact,
Waterfront
Toronto
has
attended
the
SOL
on
a
monthly
meetings
three
times
and
we've
had
media,
follow
our
discussions
and
have
had
sidewalk
attend
our
Toronto
monthly
meetings.
Twice.
It's
been
mentioned
in
various
forums
that
there's
not
been
enough
engagement
and
we
would
say
that
is
not
true.
We
have
lots
of
work
to
do
and
we
look
forward
to
supporting
or
to
seeing
the
mid
a
plan
and
the
next
steps
as
Waterfront
Toronto
and
the
city
will
undertake
I.
B
Q
R
Q
F
F
Q
F
Q
Think
one
of
the
comments
I
would
make
and
that
I
said
this
all
along.
It's
like
being
like
a
bird
on
a
wire
and
watching
this
process.
So
going
from
the
RFP
to
the
PDA,
then
to
the
MIT
up.
It
is
a
work
in
progress
and
so
I'm
not
going
to
comment
on
whether
or
not
it
would
be
a
mission
drift,
but
rather
sort
of
a
work
in
progress
as
its
evolving
and
I.
Q
F
F
Okay,
there
is
an
RFP.
There
is
a
PDA
that
designates
the
scope
of
the
project,
I
guess
I'm,
asking
as
someone
who's
been
involved.
Does
it
not
concern
you
that
the
project
may
stray
so
far?
Oh
sorry,
oh
my
so
far
out
of
its
scope.
I
didn't
see
that
very
dramatic
moment
here.
Does
it
shared
the
chair
string
are.
Q
B
Q
So
we've
had
both
Waterfront
Toronto
in
Sidewalk
Toronto
come
to
our
neighborhood
association,
where
we
have
around
60
70
people
attend.
Then
we've
also
been
involved.
Waterfront
Toronto
held
a
series
of
focus
groups
that
were
physically
located
at
3:07.
Lakeshore
sidewalk
has
also
offered
I
guess
they
call
it
Sunday
afternoon.
Drop-In
sessions
and
I
know
that
there
was
one
in
particular
in
March.
Second,
where
I
really
wanted
to
go
because
they
were
showing
a
demonstration
of
their
raincoat
outside
and
while
I
was
inside
visiting
the
micro
unit
that
they
had
set
up.
Q
I
was
there
for
about
three
hours
and
it
was
just
non-stop
people
coming
in
and
out
they
had
done.
Presentations
and
I
had
asked
Waterfront
Toronto
did
you
do
a
count
and
they
said
approximately
800
people
all
I
know
is
for
the
three
hours
that
I
was
there.
I
just
saw
one
neighbor
after
another.
Okay.
Thank
you.
C
Areas
that
we've
heard
a
lot
today,
the
innovation
that
the
the
development
that
is
gonna
happen,
but
then
there's
all
the
data
issues.
So
what
kind
of
conversation
has
your
group
had
about
the
data?
What
kind
of
conversations
and
questions
have
you
raised
and
what
kinds
of
feedback
are
you
getting?
So
I
think
that's
three
questions.
Let's
start
there
I.
Q
Can
give
you
the
answer
all
combined,
if
that's
all
right
yeah,
so
when
water,
French,
Ferran,
toe
and
sidewalk
has
come
to
our
community
group?
That
has
been
a
question
and
again,
we've
had
people
involved
with
the
Civic
lab
groups
that
they
have
had
with
the
digital
lab
groups.
So
we've
had
people
attend
that
we've
also
been
paying
attention
to
the
de
SAP
committee
and
also
to
I.
Think
part
of
what
this
is
is
sparked.
Q
Is
the
discussion
around
the
city
getting
our
policies
in
place
for
governance
around
data,
so
to
me
not
to
take
away
from
the
importance
of
this.
This
is
absolutely
probably
one
of
the
most
serious
things
we've
ever
taken.
A
look
at
the
world
is
watching
our
decision,
but
it
reminds
me
of
similar
discussions
around
what
do
we
do
when
Oberer
arrives?
What
do
we
do
when
Airbnb
arrives?
So
if
it's
not
sidewalk,
then
it
could
be
something
else.
Q
C
S
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
today.
My
name
is
Julie
G,
Lorenzo
I'm,
a
resident
city
builder
and
business
leader
in
Toronto
for
35
years.
As
you
probably
know,
I
was
the
chair
of
the
investment
in
real
estate
committee
of
Waterfront
Toronto
during
the
fall
of
2017.
When
I
was
presented
with
the
framework
agreement
with
barely
four
business
days
to
review
the
very
sophisticated
and
complex
agreement,
the
framework
agreement
is
the
agreement
created
to
document
the
relationship
as
between
Waterfront
Toronto
and
sidewalk
labs.
S
S
Unfortunately,
I
also
need
to
continuously
correct
the
record
about
meetings
by
my
committee
about
the
framework
agreement
in
the
ethics
committee
presentation.
Mr.
Doctoroff.
He
apparently
is
aware
that
there
were
six
meetings
of
my
committee
before
the
vote,
but
he
also
would
know
that
those
meetings
were
not
about
the
actual
framework
agreement,
since
he
knows
exactly
when
the
board
received
it
zero
business
days
before
they
were
asked
to
vote
on
it,
yet
that
very
agreement
with
zero
business
days
to
review
by
the
board
before
the
vote
gave
sidewalk
a
runway
of
nine
months.
S
This
is
surely
not
a
prudent
way
to
start
a
relationship.
No
one
should
be
celebrating
the
precedents
that
that
governance
travesty
represents
some
people
say
we
are
past
that
technically
the
PDA
nine
months
superseded
the
framework
agreement
on
July
31st,
2002
18.
A
very
special
note,
though,
as
ms
Meg
Davis
said
at
the
ethics
committee,
we
probably
should
have
done
a
different
agreement
right
at
the
beginning,
but
to
see
the
two
ceos
within
two
weeks
of
the
vote
had
a
joint
op-ed
in
the
face
of
egregious
governance.
S
So
when
the
Board
of
Trade
and
doors
is
this
transaction
on
behalf
of
all
the
business
people
they
represent,
they
endorsed
this
process
I
described
because
you
cannot
separate
the
process
from
the
product
governance
matters
in
the
civil
society
and
should
matter
to
democratically
elected
government.
The
goal
does
not
justify
the
means,
I
hope
by
now.
Everyone
is
familiar
with
the
ledger
on
this
relationship.
We
have
15
years
of
exemplary
reputation
at
waterfront,
no
precedent-setting
innovation
and
environmental
initiatives,
successful
business
relationship
with
some
of
the
best
builders
in
the
world.
S
The
economic
development
numbers
sidewalk
is
so
fond
of
coding
are
amazingly
similar
to
the
economic
development
numbers
of
Waterfront
Toronto
used
before
and
without
the
proponent.
Waterfront
Toronto
has
1.2
billion
dollars
of
money
to
reclaim
invaluable
land
and
a
site
worth
in
excess
of
500
million
dollars
called
key
side
and
the
responsibility
on
behalf
of
democratically
elected
government
and
residents
for
the
designated
waterfront
area,
some
of
the
most
valuable
lands
in
North
America.
On
the
proponents
side
of
the
ledger,
we
have
a
50
million
dollar
investment.
S
Without
transparency,
it
is
frankly
embarrassing
I'll
skip
because
there
is
my
written
submission
now
for
all
the
world
to
see.
We
have
a
completely
new
precedents
for
doing
business
set
up
not
by
democratically
elected
government
at
the
behest
of
the
residents,
but
with
new
rules
created
by
a
limited
liability
corporation
created
in
2015
that
new
precedence
includes
not
submitting
even
one
official
application
to
the
city
trial
with
the
required
reports
and
background
work.
S
I'll
actually
quote
from
city
documents
to
ensure
the
city's
interests
are
met
and
to
appropriately
assess
the
merits
and
technical
aspects
of
the
proposal.
The
city
requires
submissions
of
a
number
of
information
items.
None
of
those
have
been
submitted.
This
Authority
provides
a
process
that
examines
the
design
and
technical
aspects
of
the
proposed
development
to
ensure
it
is
attractive
and
compatible.
One
of
those
submissions
have
been
made.
Ok,.
B
F
Don't
think
there
is
anybody
here
from
Waterfront
Toronto
but
I'm,
just
gonna
ask
you
from
when
you
were
a
board
member
and
that
RFP
was
developed
because
you
were
there.
Your
consideration
was
that
it's,
the
12
acres,
plus
any
ideas
that
might
be
interesting,
could
be
established
in
other
locations,
but
innovations
not
flopping
buildings,
all
around
words.
S
F
F
A
S
I
quote
something
from
the
RFP:
yes,
please,
thank
you.
No
guarantee
a
volume
of
work
or
exclusivity
of
contract.
Waterfront
Toronto
makes
no
guarantee
of
the
value
or
volume
of
work
to
be
assigned
to
the
successful
proponent.
The
agreement
to
be
negotiated
with
the
selector
proponent
will
not
be
an
exclusive
contract
for
the
provision
of
the
describe
partner
scope
and
deliverables.
Waterfront
Toronto
may
contract
with
others
for
the
goods
and
services
the
same
as
are
similar
to
the
partner,
scope
and
deliverables
or
may
obtain
such
goods
and
services
internally.
This
is
from
the
RFP.
F
S
S
B
T
Good
morning
your
worship,
deputy
mayors
and
councilors,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
appear
today.
My
name
is
Micah
Lasher
I
am
the
head
of
policy
and
communications
at
sidewalk
labs
I
want
to
start
off
by
thanking
city
staff
for
their
report
and
for
their
recommendations
to
executive
committee
and
city
council.
We
believe
that
today
marks
a
new
stage
in
our
ongoing
engagement
with
Torontonians
and
the
City
of
Toronto.
T
The
draft
master
and
innovation
master
innovation
and
development
plan
that
we
will
submit
to
Waterfront
Toronto
in
the
coming
weeks
is
the
product
of
18
months
of
extensive
consultation,
with
more
than
21,000
Torontonians
in
a
wide
array
of
forums,
large
public
roundtables
to
small
expert
advisory
panels
to
one-on-one
interactions
at
our
headquarters
at
3:07,
lakeshore,
Boulevard
East.
What
our
plan
aspires
to
be
is
a
blueprint
for
solving
challenges
facing
cities
around
the
world
and
to
pioneer
those
solutions
together
with
you
here
in
Toronto.
T
There
are
challenges
laid
out
by
the
Waterfront
Toronto
RFP
and
they
are
challenges.
Torontonians
know
well
housing,
increasingly
unaffordable
and
out
of
reach
traffic
congestion
that
takes
valuable
time
away
from
family
and
work
fallout
from
years
of
inattention
to
carbon
emissions
and
a
rapidly
changing
economy
and
workforce.
That
draft
plan
will
go
into
great
detail
about
how
we
propose
to
achieve
waterfront
Toronto's
priority
outcomes.
It
will
include
detailed
plans
for
key
side.
T
It
will
include
a
proposal
for
a
new
Google
headquarters
on
Villiers
Island,
which
we
believe
can
serve
as
a
major
economic
anchor
for
the
city
and
which
we
see
is
entirely
consistent
with
the
catalytic
use
described
in
the
Villiers
Island
precinct
plan.
It
will
also
propose
a
process
by
which
sidewalk
labs,
as
it
proves
itself
over
time
I'm.
T
The
ideas
pioneered
at
keysight
can
be
brought
to
scale
across
the
eastern
waterfront
to
have
a
bigger
impact
for
Toronto
from
creating
a
path:
the
largest
climate,
positive
neighbourhood
in
North,
America
to
the
creation
of
tens
of
thousands
of
jobs
and
thousands
of
units
of
affordable
housing.
We
will
do
all
of
this
with
an
array
of
local
partners.
T
The
plan
will
spell
out
our
business
model
and
transactional
proposals,
and
we'll
do
so
with
a
level
of
specificity
and
transparency
that
is
I
believe
unusual
for
a
private
company
I
recognize
that
there
have
been
many
questions
about
these
issues.
We
haven't
always
had
clear
answers
because
our
plans
were
still
in
formation.
The
draft
master,
innovation
and
development
plan
will
I
hope
clear
up
much
of
the
confusion
and
debunk
the
myths
that
surround
our
plans,
some
of
which
you
have
heard
today.
T
At
the
same
time,
the
submission
of
our
plan
will
not
be
the
end
of
the
conversation.
Far
from
it,
the
plan
is
still
a
draft.
It
will
be
subject
to
further
revision
and
negotiation
as
Waterfront
Toronto
and
the
cities
solicit
feedback
from
the
public
and
an
array
of
stakeholders.
That
process
is
captured
by
the
staff
report
before
you
today.
We
welcome
and
look
forward
to
that
process
of
revision
and
improvement,
which
we
believe
will
make
a
final
plan
stronger.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
I
welcome
any
questions.
Thank.
B
P
You
so
the
draft
MIDP,
the
draft
plan
will
be
presented.
When
do
you
anticipate
that
plan
be
coming
forth
in
the
weeks
ahead,
so
sometime
in
June
is
that
fair
I
would
expect.
So,
yes,
all
right.
So,
following
the
release
of
that
plan,
it
will
be
going
to
Waterfront
Toronto
for
their
consultations,
as
well
as
coming
to
the
city
and
the
other
levels
of
government.
P
So
the
processes
for
the
review
of
that
plan,
as
you
understand
it,
will
be
up
to
the
government.
Absolutely
all
right.
I
just
have
a
couple
questions
related
to
data,
digital
governance
and
privacy.
The
city
is
currently
undertaking
its
process
to
come
up
with
its
policy
framework
governance
model.
Looking
at
data
digital
in
smart
cities,
sidewalk
labs
committed
to
follow
to
a
letter
the
plan
that
the
City
of
Toronto
comes
up
with
absolutely.
T
F
T
T
Well,
first
of
all,
I
would
just
encourage
you.
If
you
go
to
the
sidewalk
Toronto
dossier,
you
can
find
the
framework
agreement
just
for
your
reference
on
page
six
of
the
RFP
it
says
quote,
it
may
be
beneficial
to
advance
the
solutions,
processes
and
partnerships
proven
successful
through
the
project
to
subsequent
developments
on
the
eastern
Waterfront
as
those
lands
become
available
on
page
15,
the
RFP
says
quote
that
the
selected
partner
would
quote,
contribute
appropriate
financial
resources,
and/or
solution,
components
to
support,
building
and
district
level
solutions
for
the
Eastern
Waterfront.
T
F
You,
the
auditor-general,
was
very
clear
in
her
report
on
page
2,
actually
of
Waterfront
Toronto
that
and
I
read
it
earlier
that
there
is
the
approximate
Waterfront
Toronto
does
not
have
the
authority
to
grant
rights
to
lands
beyond
what
it
owns
in
key
side.
Are
you
aware
of
that?
A
report
from
the
Auditor
General
of
Ontario
absolutely.
T
I
think
we're
certainly
cognizant
that
the
ownership
rights,
the
Waterfront
Toronto,
has
the
key
side.
Our
techy
side
lands
that
much
of
the
land
in
the
balance
of
the
Portland's
is
city-owned
and
that
that
is
not
waterfront
run
does
not
have
rights
to
grant
those
lands.
However,
we
are
also
cognizant
of
the
role
that
Waterfront
Toronto
plays
in
the
planning
and
disposition
of
those
lands
under
its
2006
memorandum
of
understanding
with
the
city.
B
T
F
P
T
I
would
just
say:
I
would
say
two
things.
First
of
all,
we're
gonna
put
forth
the
best,
the
best
plan
we
can
and
it
reflects
all
the
work
we've
done
and
it
will
implicate
city-owned
lands
in
different
ways,
and
it
will
certainly
be
up
to
you
to
decide
if
that
plan
should
go
forward
and
you
may
decide
that
it.
It
should
not
so
I
think
that's
we're
not
we're
not
banking.
On
anything
we're
doing
our.
F
Was
an
aside
to
myself,
but
the
microphone
was
on
sorry
about
that.
My
last
question
is:
should
that
not
work
out,
I
mean
that's
a
big.
If,
for
that
particular
development,
would
you
ever
consider
the
East
Harbor,
which
is
zoned
basically
for
the
nature
of
that
business,
I
get
headquarters,
there's
transit,
there's
smart
track
there.
It
would
be
a
perfect
opportunity.
Have
you
had
any
of
those
discussions,
sir
I
have.
T
To
confess
we
have,
you
know,
poured
our
heart
into
the
last
18
months
into
a
planning
process,
centered
at
key
side.
We've
engaged
in
a
vibrant
back
and
forth
with
Torontonians,
and
as
I
said
he
you
may
you
may
ultimately
that's
not
the
plan
you
want
to
move
forward
with,
but
but
we
have
not
in
a
meaningful
way
started
thinking
about
Plan
B,
alright,.
C
Not
going
to
get
into
the
the
deep
dive
because
there
are,
there
are
certainly
members
here
that
are
far
far
more
immersed
in
it.
I
just
have
one
overarching
question:
we
have
one
big
problem
in
Toronto,
it's
in
our
tech
sector,
it's
in
every
sector,
while
we're
attracting
FDI
while
we're
attracting
people
like
yourself,
we
still
have
a
huge
generation
of
people
who
are
engaged
in
the
most
exciting
technology
of
the
future
sort
of
sector
development
and
all
doing
precarious
work
under
contracts.
T
Think
you
know
we're.
We
have
at
this
point,
I
think
about
25
full-time
employees
at
in
Toronto
headquarters
in
307,
lakeshore
and
I
should
emphasize
by
the
way
you
know
this
is
a
I
will
directly
answer
your
question,
but
I
just
want
to
divert
for
one
second,
which
is
that
that
expense
of
those
of
those
employees
and
the
entire
expense
of
our
planning
process
was
entirely
at
risk.
The
RFP
that
we
won
was
simply
the
opportunity
to
make
a
plan
which,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
may
ultimately
be
rejected.
T
So
I
I,
just
I,
wanted
to
mention
that,
but
but
we
have,
as
I
said
about
25
employees
at
our
headquarters
at
3:07,
lakeshore
I
think
we
are
a
pretty
good
employer.
We
are
certainly
not
a
gig
employer
and
I
would
expect
that
that
would
continue
with
any
employees
that
we
would
have
across
the
project
as
it
scales.
I
would
also
say
that
that
we
anticipate
the
vast
majority
of
the
technology
that
is
deployed
in
this
project.
The
vast
majority
of
businesses
that
are
part
of
it
that
set
up
shop
there
to
be
not
ours.
T
We
want
to
create
the
conditions
for
a
vibrant
array
of
businesses
and
partners
to
set
up
shop
and
we
would
we
have.
We
will
propose
I
think
in
a
minute,
an
array
of
workforce
development
approaches,
but
in
general
I
think
we
would
be
eager
at
the
opportunity
to
work
with
you
to
come
up
with
innovative
pilots
around
very
positive
work,
approaches
to
workforce
policy
in
the
project
and.
C
T
C
T
A
Thanks
very
much
mr.
mayor
and
Mike,
thanks
for
coming
in
today.
Couple
of
questions
we've
heard
comments
from
Deputy
this
morning
concerns
about
foreign
entities.
You
guys
coming
in
so
two
questions
there.
Why
Toronto
and
how
are
we
going
to
you
know
as
mr.
bacilli
legit
there's
many
Canadian
and
Toronto
based
tech
companies?
How
are
we
going
to
provide
opportunities
for
them
to
be
a
part
of
this
and
work
on
the
project
as
well?
I.
T
Why
Toronto?
There
were
any
number
of
reasons
why
why
Toronto?
We
were
excited
by
the
prospect
of
working
with
a
with
a
farsighted,
progressive
entity
like
Waterfront
Toronto,
that
was
designed
for
the
purpose
of
creating
intergovernmental
alignment
and
taking
a
outcomes-based
approach
to
revitalization
on
the
waterfront.
That
is
highly
unusual.
T
We
were
generally
excited
by
the
spirit
of
the
city,
to
try
new
things
and
to
to
do
so
with
a
commitment
to
inclusion
and
to
think
about
what
kind
of
future
we're
building
in
cities
generally,
and
we
thought
that
this
was
an
opportunity
in
an
area
to
consider
not
just
digital
technology,
but
the
built
form
approaches
to
affordable
housing
infrastructure,
which
are
many
things
that
that
we
were
formed
to
think
about
we're,
not
a
we're,
not
a
smart
city
device
company
so
that
that's
the
watcher
on
him.
So.
A
T
Know
I
was
told
yesterday
that
our
draft
plan
somebody
went
through
it
and
counted
and
it
contemplates
450,
individual
technological
interventions
and
and
I
imagined
that
we
would
provide
less
than
10
of
those
and
so
I
think
that
there
will
be
an
enormous
opportunity
for
Canadian
based
and
Toronto
based
tech
companies
to
come
and
bring
this
place
to
life.
That's
what
we
want
to
create
here
and
that's
true
in
the
tech
world.
That's
true
in
the
real
estate
world.
T
A
Next
question:
watching
the
clock
I
thought
it
was
really
interesting
that
you
guys
spent
a
year
doing
this
residents
reference
panel.
One
of
my
constituents
actually
participated
in
that
I
sat
down
and
had
a
long
discussion
with
her
about
the
process
and
how
that
worked.
I
have
since
read
the
read
the
report.
A
T
Have
the
residents
reference
port
in
front
of
you,
so
I
would
strain
I
think
a
bit
to
be
specific,
but
what
I
will
tell
you
is
that
what
you
will
see
I,
think
in
the
in
the
draft
master
innovation
and
development
plan
is
an
enormous
amount
of
attention
paid
to
the
feedback.
We've
gotten
in
a
variety
of
forums
and
pretty
explicitly
addressing
how
that
shaped.
The
proposal,
I
would
say
just
in
general,
even
some
of
the
discussion
that
we've
had
here
today,
which
is
quite
consistent
with
feedback.
T
B
C
B
C
Technology-
and
so
we've
talked
a
lot
about
this
data
thing,
so
you
know
urban
design,
I
think
there's
we're
very
familiar
with
it.
We're
always
evaluating
that.
So
you
are
a
technological
company.
You
have
lots
of
experience
in
technology.
Do
we,
as
a
city,
have
the
infrastructure
in
place
to
evaluate
this
proposal?
If
you
were
to
advise
us,
can
you
jump.
T
T
C
T
T
On
earth
honored
to
to
be
here
today,
III
think
I,
wouldn't
presume
to
tell
you
whether
or
not
you
have
the
frame
the
existing
capacity
to
evaluate
the
plan.
But
I
would
say
that
I
think
that
a
proposal
that
is
before
you
today
that
very
much
contemplates
creating
resources
to
evaluate
what
is
going
to
be
a
complex
and
lengthy
plan
seems
like
a
wise
thing
to
do
and
is
consistent
with
the
work
that
councillor
Cressey
has
already
initiated
around
the
data
issues.
So.
T
I
would
imagine
with
Waterfront
Toronto
and
the
city
on
an
array
of
issues
of
terms,
and
it
may
well
be
that
we
may
not
be
able
to
come
to
terms
and
if,
if
you
were
to
put
in
place
as
part
of
your
rules
on
smart
cities,
that
no
American
company
may
deploy
technology
in
Toronto,
then
we
won't
abide
by
that
and
we
won't
do
the
project.
But,
yes,
we
will
follow
the
rules.
The
roads.
A
T
I
should
say
that
we've
made
a
commitment
which
we
would
I
don't
think
expect
the
other
companies.
It's
interesting.
I
should
just
note
that
there
are.
There
are
things
that
we
proposed
to
be
policies
that
would
sit
on
top
of
all
existing
Canadian
privacy
laws
and
I.
Think
that's
an
important
point.
There
is
no
suggestion
than
all
of
the
protections
that
Torontonians
enjoy
today
under
existing
Canadian
privacy
laws.
There's
no
suggestion
that
they
would
not
enjoy
them
a
key
side.
Quite
the
contrary.
T
We
are
proposing
a
layer
of
protection
to
sit
on
top
of
that,
so
that-
and
that
is
that
is
something
that
we
propose
would
apply
to
everybody
involved
in
this
project.
There
are
also
some
unilateral
commitments
that
we've
made,
and
one
of
them
is
to
not
sell
personal
information
for
advertising
purposes
and
I.
Think
I,
won't
I
won't
get
into
the
the
debate
of
whether
we
are
or
are
not
Google,
but
I
will
say
that
in
that
respect,
our
business
model
is
quite
different.
Okay,.
A
T
I
I
can't
speak
to
those
examples,
but
happy
to
talk
about.
You
know
to
look
at
materials.
Obviously
our
hope
is
that
we
will
be
a
going
concern
for
many
years
to
come
and
I
think
different.
Perhaps
then,
maybe
any
other
alphabet
company.
What
we're
proposing
is
a
is
a
business
that
is
going
to
be
physically
anchored
in
a
place.
So
I
recognize
there's
a
concern
that
somehow
this
American
company
is
going
to
come
in,
make
a
grab
and
run,
but
we're
gonna
work.
T
If,
if
you
decide
to
proceed
with
this,
we
will
be
here
for
decades
to
come.
Our
employment
base
will
grow.
The
technologies
will
be
here
the
revenues
that
we
will
be
creating
at
least
a
meaningful
chunk
of
them
will
be
here.
It
was
said
earlier,
one
of
the
deputies
earlier
characterized
us
as
a
company
willing
to
quote
bleed
money
into
Toronto
and
make
it
back
other
places.
I
will
tell
you
candidly.
That
is
not
our
aspiration.
T
B
Right
councillor
means
me,
thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
questions
of
this
decadent?
Okay?
Well?
Well,
then,
thank
you
very
much.
Making
a
patient's
name
present
for
your
reputation.
The
next
at
last
to
because
I
hadn't
mentioned
Billa
final
and
sunny
LaShawn
was
next
and
then
dr.
Co
bond,
Oh,
Flint,
cubano,
Flint
may
I
just
say:
I
have
no
idea
what
you're
gonna
say
excited
know
you
were
coming
today
was
just
an
add-on
to
the
list.
I
want
to
make
sure
in
front
of
the
executive
cleaning
acknowledge
that
mr.
Shermer
was
one
of
the
people.
B
The
I
would
say
the
principal
person
responsible
for
collision
coming
to
Toronto,
which
was
immense
benefit
to
our
city
in
many
different
respects
and
I
wanted
to
say.
Thank
you
to
publicly
in
front
of
the
executive
committee
of
the
city.
Now
you'll
say
your
deputation
I
may
regret
that,
but
whatever
it
may
be,
no
I
have
I'm
just
sitting
here.
Listening
so
but
you're
most
welcome
here
today
you
have
the
same
three
minutes
as
everybody
else.
Notwithstanding
that
you
brought
collision
here
perfect.
R
Okay,
thank
you.
You
worship,
deputy
mayor
members
of
City
Council.
So,
as
the
mayor
said,
my
name
is
Anil.
Sharma
I'm,
the
managing
director
of
techstars
techstars,
is
the
worldwide
network
that
helps
entrepreneurs
succeed.
It's
a
tech
accelerator.
We
operate
50
across
the
world,
including
two
thriving
tech
stars,
accelerators
right
here
in
Toronto
I'm.
R
Here
in
Toronto,
more
than
26,000
people
came
to
the
city,
journalists,
tech,
CEOs
investors,
entrepreneurs
to
see
what
this
city
has
has
happening
in
this
vibrant
tech
ecosystem
and
one
of
the
keynote
speakers
was
actually
Dan,
Doctoroff,
the
CEO
of
sidewalk
labs,
and
he
had
a
rousing
reception
at
on
a
keynote
stage.
So
the
arrival
of
these
three
organizations,
I
think,
is
a
very
positive
signal
to
what
we
have
happening
in
Toronto,
as
we've
emerged
as
one
of
truly
one
of
the
world's
tech
powerhouse
and
thought
leading
cities
and
surging
tech
economies.
R
So
what
what's
also
happened
in
addition
to
the
arrival
of
these
great
jobs
is
the
arrival
of
world-class
tech
companies
from
from
across
the
world
companies
like
Silicon
Valley
Bank,
we
work
Pinterest,
we
have
10-cent
post
mate's
has
just
announced
an
incredible
new
launch
Paytm.
These
are
some
of
the
most
valuable
and
mo
progressive
tech
companies
and
they've
chosen
to
establish
themselves
in
the
city
and
and
subsequently
have
created
a
tremendous
number
of
jobs,
and
not
only
have
they
arrived
here,
but
they've
in
fact
thrived
in
Toronto.
R
We
work,
for
example,
has
indicated
that
this
city
is
its
most
relevant
and
fastest
growing
market
anywhere
in
the
world
and
the
investment
dollars
and
the
job
creation
is
commensurate
with
that.
With
that
position
now,
there's
a
word
that
we
really
didn't
hear
a
lot
today.
In
fact,
I
don't
think
that
word
was
uttered
once,
which
was
with
the
word,
is
startups.
R
The
city
is
teeming
with
startups
and
what
excites
me
most
about
the
potential
of
sidewalk
and
its
arrival
here
is
the
opportunity
of
our
startup
companies
to
engage
directly
with
the
innovation
and
the
thought
leadership
and
the
ability
to
test
pilot
and
advance
their
technologies
with
one
of
these
world-class
test
beds.
I
think
of
it
as
though
we
will
have
home-field
advantage
for
our
innovation
ecosystem.
B
This
guy's
gonna
have
to
cut
you
off
and
you
can
see
that's
a
30
second
collision
bonus,
but
it's
a
one-time
bonus
even
though
collisions
coming
back
next
year.
It
certainly
is
alright.
Are
there
questions
of
the
deputy?
Pardon
me
it's
coming
for
two
more
years.
I
know:
I
only
take
things
one
year
at
a
time
about
having
said
that,
they
have
a
three
year
deal
you're
right.
R
B
C
R
I
haven't
been
involved,
I've
just
been
observing
the
development
of
the
of
the
plan.
I've
been
reading
the
same
media
that
everyone
else
has
both
sides
of
the
arguments.
I
just
have
position
that
overall,
this
is
a
net
benefit
for
the
city's
economy
and
it's
another
signal
for
the
arrival
of
Toronto
on
the
global
tech
scene
would.
B
M
Great
thank
you
good
afternoon
and
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
before
you
today.
So
what
I'll
speak
to
you
about
is
a
small
segment
of
a
larger
academic
study
examining
how
big
tech
and
entertainment
conglomerates
are
handling.
Children's
data
and
my
paper
on
big
data
Disney
in
the
future
of
children's
entertainment
was
published
yesterday,
so
to
clarify
to
speak
to
councillor
Fletcher's
question
in
Canada
and
the
US
children
under
13
are
deemed
to
be
minors
and
cannot
give
consent.
M
Hence
terms
of
use
requiring
parental
consent
on
most
websites
in
the
EU,
with
the
enforcing
of
the
general
data
protection
regulation
in
May
2018
all.
But
two
countries
reach
the
raise
the
age
of
consent
to
16
the
office
of
the
Privacy
Commissioner
of
Canada
recognizes
children
as
vulnerable
and
deserving
of
special
considerations.
They
cannot
make
informed
decisions
as
to
what
they
are
agreeing
to.
M
We
do
not
have
adequate
legislation
in
Canada
to
regulate
today's
data
collection
practices,
particularly
in
the
context
of
minors
where
the
generation
of
pseudonym
eyes
consumer
profiles
via
cross
browser,
fingerprinting
and
other
methods
produces
robust
and
persistent
consumer
profiles.
So
my
findings
on
alphabet
subsidiary
companies
are
alarming
and
well
documented
internationally
and
raise
serious
questions
as
to
whether
we
can
trust
a
big
tech
company
to
self-regulate
alphabet.
M
Let
me
detail
one
instance.
Further.
A
2018
academic
study
found
that
thousands
of
Android
apps
potentially
violated
Coppa
in
the
u.s.,
revealing
that
57,
roughly
50%
57%
of
the
5855
child
directed
apps,
appeared
to
be
in
violation
of
Coppa.
So
the
consistent,
documented
pattern
across
alphabets
companies
is
a
failure
to
enforce
security
data
privacy,
secure
data
privacy
for
children
under
13
until
an
external
organization
calls
attentions
to
violations.
So
why
is
this
important
four
key
side?
M
Sidewalk
labs
is
a
sister
company
2/3
of
alphabet
subsidiaries,
all
of
whom
have
failed
to
meet
compliance
requirements
more
than
once
so
as
John
ficarra
stated,
Trust
is
not
an
algorithm.
Can
we
trust
in
companies
who
trust
in
algorithm
algorithms
based
on
existing
documentation?
We
should
assume
that
we
cannot
thank
you
I'm
over
time.
F
M
So
what
we
have
in
Canada
is
not
as
rigorous
as
is
enforced
at
the
US
and
is
now
sort
of
more
rigorously
for
it,
reinforced
in
the
EU.
What
we
have
on
the
statement
as
to
children's
data
privacy
and
the
website
of
the
office
of
the
Privacy
Commissioner
is
that
children
are
to
be
accorded
special
protections
because
they
are
a
vulnerable
group,
so
the
the
standards
or
common
age
of
consent
is
13,
and
you
see
this
on
Instagram
on
Facebook
on
various
other
social
media
platforms,
and
so
the
kind
of
de
facto
setting
is
13.
M
But
what
happens,
of
course-
and
this
is
going
to
be
a
major
concern
in
the
context
of
urban
data
or
public
data-
is
that
there's
appears
to
be
no
way
to
distinguish
between
the
data
of
minors
and
the
data
of
adults?
All
of
that
will
be
scooped
and
again
based
on
precedent
and
based
on
the
business
model
of
the
web.
Where
data
is
the
new
plutonium,
there
is
no
guarantee
that
the
data
of
miners
will
receive
secure
privacy
protection.
Thank.
F
C
F
B
B
We
could
get
a
couple
of
questions
of
staff
and
I
suppose,
but
I
do
want
to
have
the
lunch
break
at
12:30
for
an
hour
and
so
I
think.
Maybe
we
could
just
take
the
first
round
for
a
couple
of
people,
because
it's
12
19
is
10
minutes
we'll
use
it.
So
are
there
questions
of
staff,
starting
with
councillor
crutchy.
P
L
P
That
Mike
needs
to
be
turned
on
sorry,
so
sometime
sometime
this
month,
perhaps
our
religion,
okay,
once
that
plan
is
received
and
goes
public,
the
stages
of
review
and
the
report
in
front
of
us
goes
into
the
city
review
which
I'll
come
back
to
so
it
first
goes
to
Waterfront
Toronto.
Is
that
correct,
that's
correct
and
what
is
their
process
for
review
so.
L
Through
the
mayor,
they
will
host
a
series
of
public
and
stakeholder
meetings
through
the
summer
and
into
the
fall,
and
then
at
that
point
they
will
evaluate
what
they've
heard.
They
will
prepare
a
report
for
their
board
to
consider
and
for
their
work
to
committee
to
consider
for
a
waterfront
when
a
board
decision
in
either
December
of
2019
or
early
2020.
Okay,.
P
L
We
we
would
initiate
our
review
immediately.
However,
there
would
be
a
public
phase
in
terms
of
stakeholder
and
public
consultation.
That
would
begin
after
what
the
Waterfront
Toronto
Board
has
made
a
decision
and
that
consultation
would
be
on
the
MIDP
itself,
but
also
on
the
waterfront
o
board
decision.
Okay,.
P
P
O
A
You
hear
me
no,
oh,
thank
you.
Sorry.
Through
the
chair,
there
are
several
pieces
there
components
that
are
already
in
progress.
Our
plan
is
to
report
back
and
q4
of
this
year.
The
way
that
we're
taking
it
as
an
iterative
poche,
as
we
heard
through
several
deputies,
there
are
several
pieces
to
it,
both
at
the
city
level,
the
provincial
level,
on
the
federal
level
federal
level.
We
are
engaged
in
all
of
those
forms
plus
in
the
industry.
So
we
will
report
back
in
q4
just.
P
A
B
F
F
F
Maybe
I'll
just
ask
if
Waterfront
Secretariat
but
anyway
replied
back
to
the
issues
that
were
outlined:
the
geographic
scope,
what
the
city
approvals
were
the
MOU
and
the
role
of
the
parties,
including
the
business
implementation
plan
and
the
just
laying
out
a
number
of
things
wanting
it
in
the
PDA.
Were
those
things
put
in
or
did
you
get
an
acknowledgement
of
those
requests?
The.
L
F
F
In
your
great
report,
so
just
one
of
the
questions
before
I
run
out
of
time.
The
two
things
they'll
be
I'm
gonna
ask
for
some
be
clear
on
where
the
RFPs
would
have
to
happen
for
any
further
development
outside
of
key
side
and
also
ask
if
there's
any
been
any
conversations
I
raised
today
with
the
representative
from
sidewalk
that
should
that
not
turn
out
to
be
good
news
story
on
Villiers
Island.
If
there's
been
any
discussions
with
them
about
East
harbor,
which
is
a
planned
place
for
headquarters,.
L
Through
the
mirror,
I'll
answer
the
second
question:
first
I'm
not
aware
of
any
conversations
between
Waterfront
Toronto
and
the
first-called
site.
That
would
be
a
matter
between
them
and
then
on
the
on
the
first
question,
the
you
know,
the
RFP
talks
about
future
process
and
it's
my
understanding
that
Waterfront
Toronto,
you
know,
should
it
move
forward
with
the
MIDP
would
be
working
with
its
partner,
in
this
case
sidewalk
labs
on
further
RFPs
for
developer
partners.