►
From YouTube: North York Community Council - May 2, 2017 - Part 1 of 2
Description
North York Community Council, meeting 22, May 2, 2017
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=11916
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVlKhQ2RTDg#t=26m50s
Meeting Navigation:
0:19:01 - Call to order
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
Are
there
any
declarations
of
interest
under
the
municipal
conflict
of
interest,
Act
I'm,
passing
the
gavel
to
John
Fillion
I'm
declaring
an
interest
in
item
twenty
two
point,
two
and
twenty
two
point:
four:
they
are
both
located
on
earth
skin
Avenue,
because
my
husband
and
I
own
property
in
the
immediate
area
are
there
any
other
taking
the
gavel.
Dock
counselor
account.
B
B
B
Item
seven
preliminary
report,
the
opie
amendment
and
zoning
bylaw
amendment
and
rental
housing,
demolition
and
conversion
application
for
Sheppard
Avenue,
West
numbers;
eight,
four,
seven,
two,
eight
seven
three
we'll
hold
that
down:
there's
a
request
to
speak
item;
eight
in
word,
15
preliminary
report
for
3019
Dufferin
Street.
Madam.
B
B
F
G
B
H
B
To
it
at
the
end
of
the
content,
ok
we'll
hold
it
for
a
few
minutes
item
11
encroachment
of
wayfinding
ground
signs,
1201
Wilson.
This
is
the
Humber
Hospital
site.
If
no-one
has
an
issue
with
that,
we
can
move
it
all
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
12
parking
prohibition
on
VT
streets.
This
is
a
new
street
for
the
new
subway.
If
no
one
has
an
issue
with
it,
can
we?
Yes
do
you
want
to
hold
it
down?
Denzil
No,
all
in
favor
opposed
carried.
That's
item
1213.
B
B
D
D
D
B
B
B
I
G
B
B
D
J
K
L
D
J
D
D
D
D
D
M
N
D
N
N
D
N
D
D
N
A
north-south
portion
and
an
east-west
portion,
okay,
the
north-south
portion
functions
as
a
laneway.
If
you
look
at
the
map,
it's
on
the
last
page
there
so
that
that
functions,
the
the
properties
at
145
Shepherd
get
access
from
that.
So
that's
staying
open.
The
other
part,
that's
labeled
part
one.
Nobody
gets
access
to
anything
from
it.
It
doesn't
even
have
a
curb
cut.
That's
what's
being
closed.
O
D
K
B
B
D
H
P
B
D
B
B
B
Q
Is
it
I
guess
under
on
now?
Okay,
great
thanks,
guys
hi,
my
name
is
Ronnie.
Bhardwaj
I
represent
a
community
group
that
represents
the
residents
on
Elvina,
Gardens,
erskine
Avenue,
and
the
dwellings
on
Mount
Pleasant
against
the
proposed
development
for
an
infill
townhouse
development
in
our
community
I
want
to
first
say
thanks
to
the
city,
pine
Department
and
Katherine
Moore
for
an
X
report
that
accurately
conveys
our
concerns
as
a
community
against
this
proposal.
Q
I
thought
that
I've
come
here
today
and
share
some
other
insight
that
we've
got
around
the
proposal
itself
in
three
specific
areas.
One
is
around
privacy,
so
the
report
accurately
conveys
that
the
height
of
the
structure
and
the
balconies
and
the
actual
the
massive
size
of
the
development
in
terms
of
the
lot
size
will
create
sight
lines
that
will
affect
neighboring
resident.
So
this
is
this
is
a
major
concern
for
for
the
surrounding
residences
that
will
have
their
privacy
impacted
as
well.
Q
What
what
may
not
be
there
disclose
disclosed
in
the
report
is
that
the
laneway
will
create
traffic
behind
the
the
dwellings
on
Mount
Pleasant
as
well.
The
garage
door
will
create
quite
a
bit
of
noise
disruption
that
will
affect
the
neighboring
residents
as
well
from
a
health
and
safety
perspective.
There
are
two
things
to
highlight:
one
is
around
the
traffic,
so
I
know
there's
a
traffic
study
that
that's
being
requested.
But
what
it's
important
to
say
is
the
corner
of
Mount
Pleasant
and
Elvina.
Q
So
if
you,
if
you
combine
that
with
with
parents,
dropping
their
kids
off
that
go
to
the
high
school
nearby
residents
and
that
are
backing
out
of
their
driveways
and
the
new
driveway,
that
specific
corner
ends
up
being
potentially
a
an
endangerment
to
all
of
those
little
children
that
have
just
appeared
so
from
when
this
the
study
of
curd
and
was
created,
it
may
not
have
considered
the
fact
that
that
childcare
facility
has
introduced
numerous
little
children
in
addition
to,
in
addition
to
what
was
there
before.
So
that
is
one
concern.
Q
The
secondary
concern
around
health
and
safety
is
around
garbage.
If
you
look
at
the
the
proposal
with
the
lack
of
driveways
that
are
Street
facing,
there
is
no
there's,
there's
not
an
adequate
provision
for
for
garbage
recycling,
bins,
green
bins.
You
can't
put
in
front
of
a
garage
door.
So
where
does
that?
Go
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
sure
exactly
where
that
goes.
Q
But
the
area
itself
has
had
last
summer
we
had
a
rat
infestation,
I'll
say
infestation,
I
can
quantify
it
I
suppose,
but
how
many
rats
were
found,
but
by
a
garbage
is
definitely
of
garbage.
Collection
and
storage
is
definitely
health
and
safety
concern
for
the
neighborhood.
The
last
area
that
I
wanted
to
highlight
the
report
does
an
excellent
job
of
talking
about
the
fit
for
the
neighborhood
and
how
the
structured
isn't
in
the
style
of
either
the
lot
style
or
or
in
terms
of
size
and
fit
for
the
neighborhood.
Q
N
H
H
My
recollection
is
that
we,
we
didn't
even
come
to
this
body
that
we're
sitting
with
today.
We
didn't
even
come
to
this
body
with
a
what
he
call
those
reports.
Pre-Hearing
preliminary
Thank
You
councillor
apparel
a
preliminary
report
because
we
rushed
the
public
meeting,
so
we
could
work
within
the
120
days.
So
my
question
to
staff
is:
what
is
this?
This
is.
This
is
120
days
of
the
180
days,
zoning
versus
the
Official
Plan,
and
just
if
you
could
speak
to
this
application
appeal,
that's
now
been
made
to
the
OMB
through.
D
H
Just
to
be
clear
staff
staff
couldn't
have
rushed
this
application,
like
literally
we
set
up
the
public
meeting.
We
even
went
out
and
dropped
flyers
because
we
wanted
to
make
sure
everybody
knew
it
couldn't
have
been
more
rushed.
This
staff
did
an
amazing
job
in
pushing
this
through
quickly.
Are
you
would
you
agree
with
that
comment?.
H
Went
above
and
beyond
and
pushed
hard
to
get
the
Flyers
out,
let
people
know
there
was
a
meeting
at
the
library
at
Yonge
and
Eglinton.
We
couldn't
have
done
it
faster
because
we
didn't
even
put.
We
decided
we're
not
going
to
even
do
a
preliminary
report,
we're
just
going
to
get
out
to
the
community
and
get
their
input,
and
here
we
are
with
this
report
before
us
and
and
we've
already
got
an
appeal
to
the
OMB.
Is
that
correct?
That's
correct?
When
was
it
appeal
to
the
OMB
about.
H
Thank
you
very
much.
Should
I
speak
on
it?
Yes,
so
thank
you.
Mr.
chair
I
would
like
to
place
a
motion
that
the
lawyer
just
handed
to
me
as
I
came
into
the
room.
So,
as
you
can
imagine,
this
is
a
bit
unsettling
Bharani
who
just
spoke
is
I.
Think
it's
his
first
time
he's
taken
on
something
like
this.
He
did
a
great
job.
This
neighborhood
is
not
used
to
development
because
it's
not
it's
not
zoned
for
growth
and
if
you
look
at
the
I,
don't
know
how
to
describe
this.
H
But
if
you
look
at
the
report,
basically,
the
developers
carved
out
the
middle
of
a
neighborhood
and
tried
to
plunk
a
development
in
it.
This
is
precedent-setting
one
of
the
most
precedent-setting
cases,
I
think
we're
ever
going
to
face
for
our
neighborhoods
and
I'm
very
pleased
that
staff
fast-tracked
it
and
wrote
a
great
refusal
report.
I
also
want
to
thank
Catherine,
Moore
and
willing
to
Cray
for
their
exceptional
work
on
this
file.
But
I
really
am
pleased
to
see
the
neighborhood
mobilized.
H
Ronnie
has
held
a
couple
meetings,
getting
people
together
to
talk
about
this
and
the
impact
of
this
to
the
neighborhood.
But
here
we
are
I'm
feeling
very
I
just
having
a
hard
time
articulating,
because
I'm
so
upset
to
find
out
within
days
of
the
deadline
coming
up
we're
already
at
the
OMB.
So
unfortunately,
I
have
to
now
place
motions
that
the
lawyer
has
handed
me
to
ask
for
directions.
Report
I,
guess
it's
a
sense.
It
is
motions
for
direction.
Depending
on
when
this
hearing
is
now
scheduled.
H
We
have
to
be
ready
and-
and
we
are,
you
know-
unable
to
really
have
a
lot
of
influence
because
it's
going
to
be
made.
This
decision
by
a
provincial
body
called
the
OMB
I
spent
three
and
a
half
hours
with
the
resident
resonance
of
Carrington
place
last
night
three
and
a
half
hours
because
of
in
on
the
park
again
transforming
with
a
forty
five
storey
tower,
plus
two
more
John
Fisher
school,
which
we're
going
to
be
hearing
about
shortly
again,
a
decision
made
by
the
OMB.
H
Eighty
percent
of
my
applications
are
going
directly
to
the
OMB
and
we're
not
influencing
them
as
the
local
councillors
who
are
elected
to
to
do
just
that,
to
really
define
our
cities
and
our
neighborhoods,
so
I
want
to
thank
Ronnie
and
all
the
whole
neighborhood
who's
been
involved.
We
were
very
respectful
today
of
just
having
one
person
come
and
speak,
because
we
were
so
happy
for
a
few
minutes.
That
staff
had
opposed
this.
H
This
precedent-setting
completely
inappropriate
irresponsible
development
in
an
area
that
will
completely
destabilize
a
neighborhood
and
will
start
a
trend
that
none
of
us
want
to
see,
and
this
area
I
can't
say
it
enough-
has
not
been
identified
for
growth.
So
thank
you
again
to
the
OMB
for
basically
ruining
our
neighborhoods
and
thank
you
very
much
to
the
community.
This
is
an
amazing,
a
community
that
fought
hard
against.
This
worked
work
with
the
planners.
We
have
a
great
report
in
front
of
us
that
says
this
is
a
horrible
development
and
already
we're
at
the
OMB.
B
Thank
you.
We
go
to
item
three
unless
there
are
Oh
actually
before
we
do
before
we
do.
I
would
be
remiss
in
not
noting
the
presence
of
former
counselors
Suzanne
hall
and
Peter
Liang,
who
were
here
today,
as
many
of
you
know,
to
host
the
CNE,
a
breakfast
for
counselors
and
staff
this
morning.
Thank
you.
It
was
a
very
successful
event
and
we're
all
raring
to
go
to
the
CNE
Thank
You,
Suzanne
and
Peter.
D
Read
it
that
North
our
community
council
direct
the
transportation
services
in
consultation
of
Metrolinx
review,
alternate
plans
for
construction
staging
and
lay
down
areas
at
Oakland
station
report
back
to
the
June
13
2017
meeting
of
the
North
Surry
Community
Council.
So
of
moving
all
the
staff
recommendations
and
adding
that
as
a
15th
item.
In
essence,
all
in.
B
D
B
B
M
My
name
is
Anne
Burke
I'm,
the
secretary
of
the
silver
View
Community
Association,
which
is
a
rape
papers
group
affected
by
this
development.
The
staff
report
uses
very
subdued
language
to
list
the
many
unacceptable
aspects
of
this
application
some
quotes
are:
would
destabilize
the
surrounding
stable
residential
neighborhood.
It's
not
consistent
with
the
provincial
policy
statement
does
not
conform
to
the
growth
plan
for
the
great
earth
golden
horseshoes.
The
analysis
of
the
Avenue
segment
study
is
inconsistent
in
the
conclusions
not
supportable.
The
Official
Plan
amendment
is
not
considered
good
planning.
M
The
June
16th
staff
report
had
33
issues
to
be
resolved.
There
is
no
indication
that
any
of
them
have
been
addressed.
This
is
not
a
minor
pushing
of
the
envelope.
It
calls
into
question
the
point
of
having
planning.
Is
there
anything
about
this
application?
That
is
in
the
public's
interest?
Please
keep
in
mind
the
original
subject.
Property
is
c1
with
a
height
limit
of
3
storeys
additional
properties
are
all
are
for
the
avenues.
Designations
allows
mid-rise
buildings
with
a
maximum
height
of
10
storeys.
M
M
The
other
is
the
official
plan
amendment
in
front
of
you,
adding
three
more
towers
and
a
two-story
building.
Some
are
all
not
online.
They
young.
This
is
a
pretty
hefty
intensification
and
it's
not
even
an
urban
growth.
Center
I
have
heard
that
North
York
is
already
about
50%
over
the
population
increased
target.
When
will
you
say
enough
for
North
York?
M
This
project
not
only
ignores
the
45-degree
plane,
it
adds
the
insult
of
expecting
the
official
plan
to
change
the
land
use
designation
on
other
people's
properties
to
facilitate
the
extra
height
somehow,
according
to
the
applicant,
this
won't
affect
the
homeowners.
How
can
it
not
affect
them?
Where
is
a
report
on
all
the
unintended
consequences
of
changing
neighborhood
to
mixed-use?
What
does
it
do
to
property
taxes?
Its
commercial
use
now
allowed
rooming
houses.
Even
garbage
collection
rules
differ
for
residential
versus
commercial.
It
is
not
just
these
properties
once
it
is
allowed.
M
Where
else
would
it
apply
whose
home
would
be
safe?
These
homeowners
did
not
consent
to
this
change
of
designation.
I
hope
that
during
the
discussions
with
the
applicant,
the
city
staff
will
vigorously
defend
the
current
policies
and
standards.
The
argument
that
it
is
better
to
have
the
city
make
some
deals,
then
let
the
OMB
decide
unconstrained
by
the
Official,
Plan
or
other
City
standards
leads
to
the
argument
of
why
the
O's.
Why
should
the
OMB
respect
those
documents
when
the
city
doesn't
and
round
it
goes
if
bad
planning
is
inevitable,
make
the
OMB
on
it.
M
In
this
case,
the
applicant
is
so
divergent.
There
is
not
much
ground
much
common
ground
for
the
record.
I
am
not
opposed
to
intensification,
however.
I
am
imposed
to
the
unlimited
building
of
only
bedrooms
with
not
with
no
thought
for
how
the
occupants
will
live
their
lives.
Where
is
the
office
space
so
that
the
work
is
nearby?
How
will
they
get
to
work
or
school
or
shop
or
recreation?
I?
Sincerely
hope
you
will
do
everything
in
your
power
to
oppose
this
application.
Thank
you.
E
Hello
good
morning,
I'm
Richard,
green
I'm,
the
owner
and
occupant
of
a
house
at
21,
which
would
drive
I,
came
basically
home
from
holidays
a
couple
of
years
ago
to
find
a
white
sign
on
the
on
a
house
just
up
the
road.
For
me
that
basically
said
there's
a
an
application
to
change
the
Official
Plan
the
opie
and
my
house
was
part
of
it.
I
had
not
known
about
this.
E
I
was
most
surprised
about
it,
and
I
definitely
want
to
object
to
changing
the
zoning
on
my
property
without
I've
at
least
told
how
it
will
impact
my
life.
What
will
happen
whether
or
not
I'm
going
to
have
to
pay
higher
taxes?
Because
suddenly
my
house
is
commercial,
whether
or
not
others,
my
neighbors
are
now
able
to
turn
around
and
put
put
in.
You
know
whatever
sort
of
business
they
want,
so
that
all
seems
possible.
Now
I've
read
the
developer's
application.
I
read
the
you
know
the
the
planning
departments.
Why
I
guess
it's
a
rebuttal?
E
It's
a
Rick
for
people.
Hearing
the
council
to
oppose
this
at
the
OMB
and
I
want
to
say
immediately
that
I'm
definitely
in
favor
of
opposing
this
at
the
LMB
I
have
been
to
the
OMB
many
times
about
this
piece
of
property
in
the
past.
That
should
start
by
saying
that
the
bulk
of
this
property
is
undeveloped.
It's
a
piece
of
vacant
land.
It's
got
a
fun.
E
E
D
E
Now,
oh,
yes,
okay,
it
took
us
three
years
to
get
those
parked
cars
removed.
Subsequently,
in
2011
we
went
before
the
OMB
the
current
developer,
asking
for
214
story,
apartment
buildings
that
basically
went
nowhere
in
the
meeting.
The
first
thing
he
did
at
the
OMB
was
asked
for
17
stories
in
the
OMB
sieve.
We
haven't,
got
any
plans
or
documentation
for
that,
so
he
went
back
to
appealing
for
14
stories
not
dragged
on
for
a
little
while
and
then
in
2011.
E
E
When
I
look
at
the
OMB
file
and
I've
certainly
been
down
to
6:55
Bay
more
than
once
and
looked
at
the
contents
of
that
file
is
very
muddied.
This
file
is
now
more
than
six
years
old.
It
contains
multiple
different
types
of
applications,
it's
all
but
impossible
to
to
figure
it
out,
at
least
to
the
layman,
a
property
owner
like
myself,
when
I
wrote
to
the
OMB
and
suggested
they
close
the
file
and
basically
start
again.
The
developer
solicitor
had
a
very
flowery
letters
like
the
OMB.
Why
it
shouldn't
happen
and
therefore
it
didn't
happen.
E
The
official
plan-
that's
the
part
that
really
concerns
me
changes
to
that,
because
not
only
do
I
not
want
to
be
surrounded
by
commercial.
I
really,
don't
know
what
it
means
to
me
as
a
homeowner,
as
I
said
at
the
moment
front
and
back
side
and
side
I'm
surrounded
at
the
moment
by
for
and
there's
there's
houses
there,
except
for
a
little
bit
of
stuff.
That's
undeveloped!
E
E
Doesn't
address
all
of
my
issues:
I
am
a
particular
earned
about
the
shadows
inside
both
the
developers,
application
and
mentioned
in
the
staff
report,
our
shadows
when
I
look
at
what's
a
very
hard
to
read
shadow
study
inside
what
the
developers
provided.
It
appears
to
be
that
might
get
three
hours
a
day
of
additional
shadow
over
my
complete
properties,
not
just
encroaching
on
my
backyard.
It's
there
completely
and
at
the
same
time,
I
find
that
others,
other
residential
properties
will
be
even
more
severely
impacted
than
I.
O
O
It's
very
close
to
yang
Street,
great,
a
great
place
to
live
I'm
going
to
just
be
very
specific
about
what
I
see
in
the
plan,
because
I
really
can't
add
much
more
than
what
my
neighbor
has
said
already
for
my
property
there's
a
roadway
access
road
we
proposed,
which
will
basically
turn
my
property
into
a
corner
lot,
nothing
against
corner
Lots
at
this
point,
but
it's
not
just
a
corner
lot.
It
is
a
corner
lot
that
will
be.
O
Surrounded
in
come
encompassed
by
a
road
on
three
different
sides
of
the
house.
The
the
plan
then
would
make
it
so
that
I,
don't
just
have
traffic
on
Wedgwood
Drive
I
would
have
traffic
behind
the
house
and
at
the
side
of
the
house
and
I
really
don't
see
where
there
would
be
enough
of
a
transition
area
to
make
that
comfortable
for
for
living.
O
The
health
and
safety
issues,
of
course,
with
extra
traffic,
and
that
sort
of
thing
would
be
something
else
we
could
probably
talk
about,
but
I
don't
want
to
you
use
too
much
time
here
if
there's
anything
that
I
could
say
beyond
that,
I
would.
But
my
major
concern
here
is
just
to
show
you
a
specific
example
of
what
would
happen
if
this
development
goes
through
the
configuration
of
my
lot
really
the
the
nature.
O
The
value
of
my
lot
would
change
and
I
could
only
speak
as
someone
who
is
a
residential
property
owner
at
this
point,
I
can't
speak
of
as
someone
whose
property
is
going
to
be
changed
into
commercial
because
it
isn't
at
this
point
that
would
be
conjecture
at
this
time.
So
as
a
as
a
residential
property
owner
I
have
concern
about
what
I
see
in
the
plan
for
this
development,
and
that's
that's
pretty
much
summarizes.
My
main
concern
are.
B
There
any
questions,
thank
you,
sir.
You
may
be
seated.
Are
there
any
other
speakers
to
this
item?
Any
other
speakers?
No
okay.
So
at
this
point,
I'd
like
to
introduce
additional
items,
one
from
councillor
Cole,
a
report
from
the
director
of
building
and
deputy
chief
building
officer
regarding
residential
demolition,
application
for
1603
Eglinton
Avenue
West,
all
in
favor
of
introduction
opposed
Carrie
councillor
Fillion
medal
submitted,
representing
regarding
the
representation
at
an
OMB
hearing
for
Elmhurst
Avenue
numbers
to
15
and
217.
B
All
in
favor
closed
carried
councillor,
Fillion
OMB
hearing
for
1:55
Drury
Avenue,
all
in
favor
opposed
carried
councillor,
fillion
final
one
to
be
known
as
item
45
representation
at
an
OMB
hearing
for
52
and
56
Norton
Avenue,
all
in
favor
of
distribution
opposed
carries.
If
you
have
any
other
items,
please
tell
the
clerk,
if
you're
here,
to
speak
on
any
item
and
you're
not
registered.
Please
register
with
the
clerk
seeing
as
the
item
before
us
is
in
councilor
shiners
Ward,
and
he
is
on
his
way
here.
B
B
C
So
I
need
this,
but
it's
really
finicky
I'd
like
to
begin
a
who
have
diligently
worked
on
the
report
that
is
being
presented
today
on
the
Avenue
Road
study.
They
literally
pounded
the
pavement
and
we
appreciate
it
I'm
heartened
by
many
of
the
improvements
that
we've
already
been
made
on
the
Avenue
Road
corridor
between
Lawrence
and
Wilson,
but
I'd
like
to
highlight
one
aspect
of
the
report
that
has
been
given
less
of
the
ride
priority
than
the
community
would
like.
A
key
recommendation
of
the
Avenue
Road
study
and
the
status
report
being
presented
today.
C
Calls
for
the
improvement
to
the
tree
canopy,
stating
that
Avenue
Road
has
a
very
low
tree.
Canopy
of
less
than
10%,
with
an
objective
of
40.
The
average
in
the
city
apparently
is
26
to
28.
Not
only
do
trees
visually
enhanced
and
give
character
to
a
neighborhood,
they
improve
the
microclimate
and
assist
in
stormwater
management.
C
Our
neighborhood,
like
maybe
in
this
city,
has
been
heavily
impacted
by
basement
flooding
with
the
constant
redevelopment,
intensification
and
the
insult
phenomena,
with
its
increased
lot
coverages
replacing
the
asphalt
and
concrete
bus
loop
that
is
located
at
roe
Avenue
with
more
greenery,
has
never
been
more
relevant
and
required.
The
report
also
highlights
clearly
demonstrates
that
is
that
the
Avenue
Road
area
is
parkland
deficient,
and
this
is
a
report
have
circled
the
area.
The
red
and
pink
indicate
that
we
have
very,
very
low
percentage
of
parkland.
C
According
to
the
Toronto
Parks
planned
from
2013
217
parks
are
an
essential
to
making
Toronto
an
attractive
place
to
live,
work
and
visit,
and
it
recognizes
that
a
growing
and
increasingly
diverse
population
means
more
users
and
competition
for
the
limited
use
of
parks
recommended
recommendation
number
10
from
the
Avenue
Road
study,
directs
parks,
forestry,
forestry
and
Recreation,
and
real
estate
staff
to
acquire
the
roe
Avenue
bus
loop.
Should
it
be
declared
surplus
by
the
TTC
and
create
a
parkette
on
the
Avenue
Road
frontage
of
these
lands.
C
This
bus
loop
on
the
west
side
of
Avenue
Road
was
removed
from
service
in
2005
and
is
apparently
used
for
the
occasional
bus
short
turn.
Today,
most
of
the
time
it
sits
vacant,
a
wasteland
of
Asheville
asphalt,
broken
glass
illegally
parked
vehicles
taking
up
food
from
the
nearby
subway
shop
and
skateboarders
performing
jumps
on
the
curbs.
It
is
visually
unappealing
and
lacks
greenery
and
does
nothing
to
enhance
our
community.
C
This
is
a
map
of
the
bus
loop,
I,
highlighted
it
in
pink.
The
report
is
clear
that,
once
the
declared
surplus
priority
should
be
given
to
retention
for
parkette
use
to
help
address
the
low
provision
of
local
parks.
The
study
state
is
that
city
council
has
recognized
the
deficiency
and
designated
the
area
as
a
priority
area
in
the
new
parks,
but
by
law
whereby
a
higher
alternative
parks
dedication
has
been
levied.
C
That
should
mean
there's
some
money
somewhere,
given
that
all
other
locations
in
the
Avenue
Road
study
identified
as
potential
for
parkland
have
now
been
deemed
infeasible.
The
robust
loop
is
the
only
site
left
in
this
Avenue
Road
corridor.
We
envision
a
park
head
that
would
serve
the
community
by
improving
the
tree.
Canopy
and
parkland
ratio
is
its
proximity
to
Avenue.
Road
would
enhance
business
interest
and
community
lifestyle
by
providing
a
healthy
environment
to
enjoy
an
ice
cream
or
lime
to
read
a
book
or
take
a
break
from
the
hustle
and
bustle
of
a
busy
day.
C
The
parkette
would
be
an
ideal
location
to
host
the
summer's
farmer
market
and
would
visually
improve
the
Avenue
Road
corridor.
But
in
order
for
this
to
happen,
the
TTC
must
declare
the
Lupus
surplus.
Our
councillor,
Carmichael
councillor,
Carmichael,
grant,
has
initiated
a
motion
this
past
September.
To
facilitate
this
outcome,
though,
because
of
funding
concern,
she
has
requested
that
the
property
be
released
to
the
Toronto
parking
authority.
C
Yes,
so
the
question
is:
is
it
possible
for
this
to
be
a
parking
lot
and
park
and
the
answer
is
yes,
but
it
will
cost
a
lot
of
money
and
we,
as
residents
would
like
to
see
this
land
made
into
a
parkland
sooner
rather
than
later,
and
we
do
not
feel
that
any
parking
is
required
in
this
immediate
vicinity.
Thank
you.
The.
J
Is
this
one?
On
okay,
my
name
is
Sheila
democra
and
I'm.
Speaking
on
behalf
of
the
South
Armagh
Heights
residents,
Association,
we
want
to
sell
rough
and
we
take
an
active
interest
in
all
issues
related
to
Upper
Avenue,
as
all
our
residents
are
directly
impacted
by
the
state
of
our
Avenue.
We
were
absolutely
involved
with
condominium
development
at
17-17,
Avenue
Road
and
the
preparation
of
the
Avenue
Road
Avenue
study
that
went
on
from
2007
to
2009.
J
The
report
had
21
recommendations.
The
zoning
and
built
form
recommendations
were
acted
upon
quickly,
but
the
remaining
14
recommendations,
many
dealing
with
beautification
and
improvement
issues
for
the
Avenue,
had
not
been
acted
on.
In
late
2014,
we
asked
our
newly
elected
councillor,
Carmichael
grebs,
to
request
a
review
of
the
status
and
the
action
plan
for
these
fourteen
outstanding
recommendations.
J
The
review
report
states
that
upper
abs
upper
Avenue
is
tree.
Canopy
deficient
less
than
10%
as
well
as
part
deficient.
In
fact,
Sora
has
no
parks
within
our
area.
Our
Avenue
is
also
very
disfigured
by
Boulevard
parking.
We
have
20
locations
for
over
69
parking
spaces,
but
the
actual
number
of
cars
is
often
in
excess
of
the
permitted
base
double
Park
on
passable
horse.
In
some
cases
it
becomes
a
safety
issue
for
both
drivers
and
pedestrians.
J
The
recommendation
section
includes
some
easy
actions,
meaning
that
funding
exists.
There
not
expensive
items
to
start
with
their
standard
improvements
that
the
city
should
make
for
an
avenue
and
they
can
be
done
fairly
easily
in
the
near
future.
They
do
deal
with
some
tree
canopy
issues
and
Brookdale
Park
improvements.
It
also
includes
starting
to
take
action
on
the
elimination
of
Boulevard
parking.
J
This
will
be
a
much
more
difficult
issue
that
will
take
some
time
but
must
begin
at
renewal
of
permits
time
in
January
2018,
but
Sol
reveals
that
all
the
recommendations
related
to
tree
canopy
and
parks
should
be
considered
as
priority
items.
This
would
include
seven
additional
items:
the
robust
loop
becoming
a
park
at
which
Deborah
talked
about
more
green
fingers,
the
Dunblane
Avenue
corner
beautification
has
been
suggested.
The
armorer
Heights
Community
Center
and
the
TC
HC
building
landscaping
has
been
suggested.
J
C
C
It
was
hundreds
and
hundreds
of
hours
of
staff
time
when
I
was
elected
in
2014,
I
was
looking
at
the
Avenue
Road
study
more
intently
and
and
realized
only
six
of
the
21
recommendations
had
ever
been
acted
upon
and
in
speaking
to
residents,
who
put
a
lot
of
time
back
in
2009
into
this
study,
which
was
one
of
the.
If
not
I,
believe
it
was
the
first
avenue
study
that
was
ever
completed.
C
They've
changed
a
lot
since
then,
so
this
one
had
many
issues
that
have
we
do
things
differently
now,
but
residents
put
a
lot
of
time
into
into
this.
This
study
and
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
they
were
their
ideas
and
their
thoughts
came
through.
Some
of
the
things
that
we
have
done
already
is
the
installation
of
the
remaining
Upper
Avenue
branded
street
signs.
C
This
year
we
have
requested
that
the
TTC
report
back
on
declaring
the
Rowe
Avenue
bus
loop
surplus,
so
I
am
allowing
councillor
Cole
to
take
that
one
over
and
hopefully
we'll
have
a
good
report
on
that
in
the
near
future,
and
we're
also
working
very
hard
to
establishing
a
BIA
on
Avenue
Road.
One
thing
that
is
lacking
in
the
area.
It's
a
great
area
is
that
businesses
don't
really
have
a
voice
like
the
residents
do
and
I
feel
the
businesses
need
a
bit
of
a
stronger
voice
with
all
that's
going
on
in
Avenue
Road.
R
Yes,
my
apologies
madam
chair,
for
coming
up
late
councillor,
Pasternak
and
I
were
attending
an
official
event
at
City
Hall
with
the
mayor
and
then
some
of
our
other
colleagues
so
into
the
community.
That's
here,
I
am
a
miss
item:
59
25
50,
997,
Yonge,
Street
Wedgwood
over
court
and
the
comer
Avenue
property
sites.
I
am
moving
the
staff
recommendation,
which
is
to
oppose
the
application
at
the
Ontario
Municipal
Board.
For
my
colleagues
that
are
here
that
might
have
rent
it.
I
read
this
I.
R
Don't
think
it's
very
often
that
you'll
see
that
someone
buys
a
piece
of
property,
wants
to
rezone
it
and
change
the
Official
Plan
and
because
they
can't
do
it
within
the
property
that
they
own,
they
decide
to
bring
amendments
to
all
the
neighbouring
properties,
so
they
can
get
more
height
and
density
on
their
property.
I
mean
I've
seen
many
applications
in
my
years
here,
but
this
one
kind
of
takes
the
cake,
because
the
neighbors
are
opposed
to
the
application.
Many
of
them
and
yet
their
properties
are
used
to
support
the
development
application.
R
As
simply,
if
you
make
the
site
larger,
then
your
technical
ability
to
fit
taller
buildings
on
it
gets
greater.
So
this
applicant
is
asking
to
make
the
size
larger,
including
the
neighbors
that
oppose
it.
So
he
can
get
taller
buildings
right
next
door
to
them
doesn't
make
any
sense.
So
I
have
been
opposed
to
this
application.
Since
it
came
in
it
came
from
two
buildings:
four
buildings:
it's
not
appropriate
myself.
My
staff
and
planning
staff
have
met
and
we've
encouraged
the
applicant
to
go
with
something
that
is
smaller
and
it's
much
more.
R
R
My
only
hope
is
that
we
either
find
a
development
that
better
fits
the
application
or,
if
it's
a
pea,
if
there
is
a
hearing
at
the
internal
municipal
board,
there's
some
common
sense
there
and
it
will
prevail
and
not
permit
an
application
of
this
type.
So
for
those
of
you
that
are
opposed,
you
can
have
concerns
whether
it's
this
application
or
others
that
you
hear
today.
I
would
strongly
recommend
to
you
that
you
take
the
time
to
write
to
your
provincial
member
and
write
to
the
premier,
as
you
have
to
keep
hitting
home.
R
Yet
over
and
over
again,
the
folks
behind
me
here
for
the
planning
staff
are
asked
to
make
amendments
to
that
to
fit
what
someone
else
that
owns
the
property
wants,
and
that's
not
right.
So
you
may
just
be
few
in
numbers
you
think
today,
but
if
you
and
your
neighbors
and
your
friends
continue
to
write
in
to
call,
hopefully
that
will
be
heard
otherwise.
Madam's
chair,
that's
my
motion
and
that's
my
comments
on
it.
N
Well,
I
agree
with
everything
counselor
shiner
said,
and
we've
both
been
here
for
25
years
and
have
seen
a
lot
of
crazy
applications,
but
I
have
to
say,
I
think
this
one
is
the
craziest
I,
don't
think
I've
ever
seen.
Anything
like
this
and
councillor
shiner
I
think
is
agreeing
it
is,
and
just
to
echo
what
Delta
shiner
was
saying.
The
only
reason
that
anybody
would,
even
in
their
wildest
dreams,
come
up
with
an
application
like
this.
N
It
is
just
like
nuts
involves
people's
properties,
who
don't
want
to
be
in
the
application
is
because
of
the
entire
municipal
board.
I
mean
there's,
there's
no
way.
This
would
ever
get
through
your
elected
representatives
and
I.
Guess
they
figure.
You
know
what
the
heck,
let's
roll
the
dice
and
go
to
the
OMB
and
the
one
in
Council
Robinson's
ward
earlier.
It
reminds
me
of
the
one
in
my
ward,
where
that
was
known
as
the
OMB
folly
site
that
we
actually
for
a
period
of
time
named
the
roadway
going
through
the
development
OMB
Falak.
N
Unfortunately,
people
do,
but
only
when
there's
a
development
being
done
close
to
them
and
we
really
need
you
know,
there's
a
provincial
election
next
year.
I'm,
not
sure
the
the
other
party
is,
as
it
has
a
better
history,
but
it
needs
to
be
an
issue.
It
needs
to
be
a
big
issue.
So
thanks
all
right.
B
You've
heard
councillor
shiners
motion
all
in
favor,
okay,
a
recorded
vote
has
been
asked
for
on
counter
shiners
motion,
all
in
favor
councillors,
cold
Carmichael,
Greb,
Menon,
wands,
Audrey,
Mary,
Pasternak,
Gillian,
Robinson,
Carol,
shiner
and
Burnside.
It's
a
unanimous
vote.
Thank
you.
So
we
go
to
the
10:30
public
hearing
now
22.4
final
report,
Opie
and
zoning
amendment
applications
for
90
Eglinton,
Avenue,
West,
17
and
19
Henning
Avenue,
with
the
proponent
like
to
speak.
First,
if
not,
we
have
a
list.
B
L
S
N
N
F
H
H
B
I
Madam
chair
councillors,
I'm
delighted
to
be
up
against
Adam
Brown
with
his
fine
pictures
and
his
excellent
presentation.
I
am
chair
of
Eglinton
Park
residents,
Association,
which
is
the
nine
square
blocks
in
the
northwest
corner,
Yonge
and
Eglinton,
as
we
always
say,
we're
not
NIMBY
we're
cooperating
all
sorts
of
good
collaborations
with
developers
and
have
been
very
happy
with
that.
We
remain
adamantly
opposed
to
this
one,
and
we
do
so
on
a
number
of
grounds
and
because
Adam
brown
is
showing
pictures
anything
talk
about
it
quite
easily.
I
The
first
one
to
talk
about
is
the
shock
of
the
residents
impending,
who
are
not
expecting
the
planters
to
come
through
positive.
The
street
is
reeling.
The
street
has
been
worried
for
a
great
long
time
that
you
have
to
picture
Henning
as
a
cul-de-sac,
a
very
intimate
neighborhood
of
families
who
are
very
close
to
one
another
and
they
feel
in
the
loss
of
cue
houses
and
the
way
in
which
that
loss
happened,
that
their
neighborhood
has
actually
been
attacked
as
a
social
fabric.
I
In
the
meantime,
also,
they
lose
sunlight
for
a
short
time,
but
they
lose
sky.
A
great
deal,
this
business
of
a
separation
does
not
stop
the
tower
from
really
looming
above
them
now
for
history.
A
thing
to
watch
is
that
when
in
12
2014
this
came
to
council
in
August,
it
came
with
a
negative
report
from
the
planner
saying,
Madras
mid
rise,
mid
rise
and
council
sent
it
back
to
them.
I
At
the
last
moment,
emotion
from
Karen
stood
with
the
stipulation
that
it
would
not
be
mid
rise,
and
we
barely
noticed
that
Italy
sank
in
a
little
bit
later
and
planners.
He
spoke
to
actually
a
bit
shocked
by
what
has
happened.
Now
the
planner
says
things
have
been
made
better,
the
planner
says:
look,
we
have
made
a
separation,
the
separation
does
relatively
little
good,
except
to
create
a
lane
way
to
nowhere.
In
particular,
Lestrade
a
hybrid
leaves,
and
the
developer
has
said,
we've
mitigated
by
making
it
beautiful,
but
from
the
eyes
of
Henning.
I
I
His
third
example
is
art
shop,
which
is
a
regrettable
crossing
of
a
line
which
cannot
be
a
mediation,
and
when
that
happened,
I
worried
what
worries
us
most
in
ET
RA
is
precedent.
This
building
is
a
kind
of
camels
nose.
It's
a
camel's
nose,
which
undermines
in
deep
way
is
the
whole
plan
for
mid-rise
all
across
Eggland's
into
both
directions,
because
there
is
a
rule
agreement,
mid-rise
mid-rise,
unless
designated.
This
designation
is
merely
the
result
of
a
kind
of
grandfathering
moment,
foot
in
the
door
just
before
mid-rise
came
in
and
the
rationale
for
that
grandfathering.
I
I,
don't
think
exists.
There
is
no
pretty
good
reason,
except
it's
just
plain
there,
so
to
make
the
the
larger
picture
then
and
I'll
yield
these
other
speakers
on
the
issue
of
buying
a
property,
but
I
would
underline
and
their
behalf
that
councillor
shiner
has
made
a
beautiful
speech
that
directs
immediately
what
happened
here,
the
planner
to
justify
his
claim
to
a
ratio
and
to
justify
the
transition
has
actually
bullied
neighbors
and
the
real
escaping
of
bullied
neighbors
into
selling
and
neighbors.
I
B
I
B
K
Thank
you
very
much
for
coming
and
you've
used
the
word
precedence
in
reference
to
this
application,
but
I'm
just
looking
at
surrounding
buildings
and
and
recently
approved
applications,
and
they
all
seem
to
be
higher
than
this.
So
I'm
wondering
how
this
is
a
precedent
if
it's
lower
than
what's
already
been
approved.
Well,.
I
The
presidents
are
at
most
what
I
assume
in
the
growth
area
inside
Adam
Browns
red
line,
which
is
the
potential
growth
area
where
tall
buildings
are
in
fact
welcomed
by
all
of
us,
and
this
is
outside
the
red
line
and
if
the
precedent-
because
it's
on
the
Avenue
and
the
Avenue,
all
the
rest
of
aprons
and
all
the
way
up
to
Black
Creek-
is
designated
bid
rise
except
where
otherwise
permitted
and
the
other
permissions
are
the
result
of
careful
planning.
And
this
one
is
just
there
because
it's
there.
I
So
we
think
of
it
as
a
precedent
for
how
one
thinks
about
Eglinton
connects
and
how,
for
instance,
the
development
of
Avenue
Road
that
our
counselor
is
embattled
over
asking
for
15
in
a
mid-rise
site
could
easily
look
eastward
and
say:
oh
look.
They
have
24
attending
so
can't
we
at
15
at
Avenue
Road.
So
our
notion
is
if
this
goes
you're
going
to
see
people
putting
in
requests
at
Bathurst
and
it's
Dufferin
all
along
the
line.
Where
there's
a
subway
station
LRT
station
saying
we
can
go
high
because
they
could
go
high.
K
I
Not
going
to
speak
for
the
plant
or
not,
obviously,
density
should
follow.
Obviously,
mid
rise
should
grow,
but
whether
you're
council,
then
the
planners,
can
negotiate
from
strong
position
with
developers.
Ask
for
a
great
deal
of
height
at
LRT.
Stops
might
well
be
interconnected
with
this
one
here.
My.
K
Final
question
is
I'm
sure
you'll
have
opinions
on
where
the
million
dollars
in
section
37
to
local
recreational
assets
will
go
as
part
of
this
agreement.
I'm
sure
you'll
be
meeting
with
your
local
councillor
and
community
groups
to
see
how
that
can
benefit.
Is
that
something
you'd
like
to
have
a
say
on
well.
L
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
councillors
in
North
York,
my
name
is
Andy
Gort
and
I'm,
the
president
of
the
South
cycles
and
residents
Association.
We
are
part
of
the
larger
Yonge
and
Eglinton
community
and
we
are
more
or
less
joined
at
the
hip
and
in
our
particular
area
we
have
twenty
towers
on
the
go
and
all
these
three
three
of
them
have
built
being
built.
So
far,
so
we
haven't
seen
the
end
of
thought
that
yet
I
would
like
to
just
step
back
a
little
bit
to
Yonge
and
Eglinton
secondary
plan.
L
That's
being
a
revised
today
and
the
last
formal
meeting
in
front
of
City
Council
was
in
June.
Last
year,
council
David
China
was
presiding
over
the
planning
and
growth
management
committee
and
councilor
Kristin
Carmichael
Gregg
was
there
as
well,
and
he
pointed
out
to
the
planning
community
that
he
thought
the
Yonge
and
Eglinton
area
was
out
of
control
from
a
planning
point
of
view,
and
he
asked
Jennifer
keysmith
to
get
it
back
under
control.
And
if
you
fast
forward
to
now,
a
lot
has
happened.
One
is
that
we
have
seen
yo
and
B
review.
L
So,
at
least
is
a
potential
for
reform
of
the
OMB.
The
Yonge
and
Eglinton
secondary
Planning
Group
has
really
picked
up
the
basis
and
they've
had
a
lot
of
working
groups
in
Council,
David
shiner
actually
participated
and
attended.
One
of
those
and
they're
very
near
to
coming
up
with
a
new
bill
form
vision
for
this
area,
including
for
this
particular
location.
L
It's
at
Davisville
and
Eglinton.
It
has
residential
neighborhoods
designation
is
part
of
that.
That's
right
next
to
the
Davis
for
school,
and
we
are
very
nervous
that
this
development
is
going
to
set
another
precedent
like
kbf,
seen
on
a
John,
Fisher
school
and
there's
many
other
precedents
in
our
area
that
are
carefully
watched
by
the
developers
or
for
different
or
be
situations.
Right
now
and
I
think
it's
time
to
basically
say
we
need
to
take
a
stand
and
that's
kind
of
what
I
was
hoping
that
you
will
do
today.
Thank.
D
D
L
Not
1951
Yonge
Street
and
it's
right,
north,
it's
at
the
north
east
corner
of
Davisville
and
young,
and
it's
right
adjacent
to
the
Davisville
school
and
the
proposal.
There
is
for
a
34
and
25
story,
two
towers
on
that
location
and
it's
also
designated
as
Avenue,
and
it
has
portion
of
it
does
designate
it
as
neighborhoods.
Today,.
B
T
T
The
other
part
is
the
issue
is
that
the
North
York
planning
report
appears
to
be
a
variance
from
Toronto
and
East
York's,
a
planning
position
in
the
case
of
1674
1684
Bayview
Avenue,
which
is
also
located
in
the
Midtown
in
focus
planning,
study
area
that,
in
that
term
situation
on
Bayview.
It
also
involved
the
acquisition
by
an
applicant
of
neighborhood
designated
property
adjacent
to
the
Avenue
designated
property,
and
in
decades
the
neighborhood
designated
property
was
not
allowed
to
be
used
for
the
axial
plane
calculations.
T
It
will
and,
as
Andy
said,
it
will
create
a
precedent
for
other
Drummond
applications.
It
appears
that
North
York,
Planning
and
Toronto
and
eath
your
planning
districts
are
making
different
recommendations
for
what
are
fundamentally
similar
planning
situations,
but
in
different
in
different
areas.
This
would
be
of
concern
in
any
case,
but
especially
in
this
case,
where
the
two
sites
are
in
the
same
secondary
plan
area.
Furthermore,
we
understand
that
mid
to
the
Midtown
in
focus
built
form
vision
that
includes
the
subject
site
will
be
publicly
revealed
on
June,
the
third
Saturday
June,
the
third.
T
Given
these
serious
concerns
about
inconsistent
application
of
city
planning
policy
and
the
need
to
have
full
information
available
to
the
public,
we
request
that
North
York
Council
defer
this
item
at
this
meeting
back
to
staff
or
just
refuse
it
right
now.
That
would
be
fine
with
us
as
well.
Thank
you
thank.
B
S
R
R
R
R
That's
can
I
ask
my
question:
I,
don't
understand
how
you
can
take
a
narrow
street
such
as
baby,
which
is
a
two-lane
road,
minimum
setbacks
and
mostly
low-rise
I,
didn't
like
the
application,
even
for
the
one
that
you're
talking
about
on
Bayview
and
try
and
compare
that
area
of
Bayview
Avenue
to
this
area
of
Yonge
and
Edgington,
one
of
the
most
active
areas
in
the
city
with
two
subway
lines.
You
might.
D
R
That,
in
due
respect,
because
I
think
that's
what
you
and
I
opposed
when
an
applicant
comes
in
and
sits
on
top
of
a
building
and
takes
a
telescope
and
looks
in
one
direction
and
sees
what
one
person
got
and
takes
a
telescope,
looks
and
other
directs
and
sees
what
they
have
and
says.
I
should
get
it
and
in
this
case,
I
kind
of
have
the
feeling
you're
taking
a
telescope
and
looking
in
those
directions
which
may
be
fair
because
they
happen
sometimes
do
and
do
that,
but
in
the
future.
R
T
Issue
is
one
a
principle
of
acquiring
lands
outside
of
the
mixed
use
area
and
it's
in
my
baby
was
neighborhood,
but
into
the
into
the
neighborhood
single-family
homes
into
the
neighborhood
and
encroaching
and
using
that
those
properties,
as
for
the
axial
plane
calculation
under
the
guidelines,
it's
the
same.
It's
the
same
issue
here.
S
I
live
on
Henning
Avenue
for
the
last
25
years
and
I.
Think
one
thing
has
really
not
been
mentioned
in
any
reporting.
It's
been
mentioned
matter
of
fact.
They
call
it
a
cul-de-sac.
We
are
a
dead-end
street
and
I,
don't
know,
maybe
a
show
of
hands
and
any
of
you
been
on
any
avenues
right.
Exactly
and
I,
don't
blame
you
I
didn't
know
it
existed,
till
I
move
there.
So
the
point
being,
if
you
imagine
your
own
street-
and
you
turn
on
to
it-
100
meters
in
is
the
end
of
your
street.
S
Now
picture
you
have
a
six
story:
building
at
the
foot
of
your
street
and
you're,
going
to
tear
that
down
and
replace
it
with
a
24
story.
Building
and
all
of
the
traffic
will
go
through.
Ending
everything
that
that's
been
mentioned
makes
it
sound
like
Eglinton
Eglinton,
a
glutton.
Well,
Anning
is
a
dead-end
street.
S
With
about
twenty-seven
semies,
now
25
and
you're,
asking
to
multiply
by
10
times
the
population
that
services
that
street
all
of
the
garbage
removal,
all
the
parking,
all
the
visitation
parking
will
go
through
Henning
Avenue
and
the
population
that
lives
there
is
already
overwhelmed
with
parking,
there's
nine
spots
for
them
on
the
garba
side,
the
property.
That's
there
one
in
front
of
17
and
19
when
those
are
gone
or
dump
demolish.
There
will
be
four
parking
spots
left
for
the
entire
street
and
that's
why
a
lot
of
people
have
gotten
bad
parking.
S
S
I
will
put
in
a
request
for
bad
parking
and
I
will
be
forced
to
get
turned
down
by
the
city,
because
we
don't
do
paid
parking
any
more
and
the
other
thing
I
wanted
to
mention
which
I
didn't
know
about
until
the
report
is.
We
are
not
a
fringe
community.
We
have
lived
here.
I'd
lived
25
years,
I
raised
my
kids
here
I've,
because
we
are
a
dead-end
street.
S
S
F
Hi,
my
name
is
Carmen
Rodriguez,
and
this
is
my
brother
Castile
Rodriguez
I
moved
to
Henning
Avenue.
When
I
was
four
years
old,
my
brother
moved
when
he
was
two.
We
learned
how
to
hop
fences
and
play
hide
and
seek
I
knew
seriously.
I
know
every
person
on
my
streets
name,
they
know
mine,
they
know
when
I'm
sick.
They
come
over
with
soup.
We
know
we
know
the
needs
of
our
community.
I
want
to
bring
up
the
point
of
safety.
F
I
know
everyone
on
my
street
and
as
soon
as
you
have
a
building,
how
am
I
suppose
to
how
are
this
kids
supposed
to
know?
Everyone
are
the
funniest
thing
that
we
do
is
as
soon
as
a
car
comes
up
our
street.
You
can
hear
five
adults,
yelling
car
and
every
kid
jumps
off
the
street.
It's
a
habit.
I've
learned
how
to
I've
learned
how
to
do
everything.
Really.
My
neighbors
have
been
my
teachers.
My
neighbors
have
served
a
second
parents
to
me
recently
in
the
past
couple
years.
F
F
F
G
Madam
chair
members
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
Helen
lap,
X
and
find
here
as
a
resident
of
this
neighborhood
I'm
a
registered
professional
planner,
but
I
just
happened
to
have
chosen
very
carefully
where
I
live
and
I
never
thought
I
would
be
in
the
position
of
being
not
in
my
backyard.
But
this
is
in
my
backyard.
G
I've
read
the
staff
report.
It's
very
detailed,
but
in
some
areas
is
lacking
in
substance,
I,
listen
to
count
councillor
Pasternak's
a
Eglinton
connect
when
there's
transit
density
follows,
but
the
density
has
to
be
responsible
and
in
this
case
I
don't
find
it
so
I've
lived
here
like
I,
say
15
years
in
a
seven
story.
Building
that
I
picked
outside
of
the
provincial
growth
centre,
I
picked
west
of
duplex
and
I
followed
the
mid-rise
study.
The
Avenue
study
and
I
felt
those
documents
for
working
towards
protecting
me.
G
The
cumulative
impact
of
all
the
approvals
by
the
OMB
on
our
community
is
terrible.
You
I
can't
go
to
the
cinema.
It's
sold
out.
That's
nothing
to
do
that.
Private
enterprise,
but
I
can't
go
to
the
cinema
on
peak
hours.
I
go
on
the
TTC
and
all
day
it's
rush
hour.
That
never
happens.
So
there
is
a
cumulative
impact
to
this
approval.
I
find
the
staff
report
seriously
lacking
in
the
community
services
and
facilities
study.
There's
supposed
to
be
three
community
centers
here,
there's
only
one
and
it's
going
to
be
shut
for
two
years.
G
I
mean
that
will
reopen
before
the
silting
does,
but
it's
hard
to
get
into
programs
almost
impossible.
It's
getting
harder
and
harder
to
live
at
Yonge
and
Eglinton.
When
another
speaker
said
instead
of
control,
it
is
out
of
control.
There
is
some
phasing
required
here
for
us
to
understand
how
at
the
provincial
growth
center,
the
population
projected
for
the
Year
2031
was
reached
in
2011.
G
So
there's
a
serious
problem
here,
and
this
is
adding
to
the
problem
and
the
million
dollars
won't
help
it
it'll
just
go
into
the
city
coffers
and
be
diluted.
We
have
to
live
there
and
live
there
in
a
way
that
makes
sense,
and
this
kind
of
proposal
and
all
these
buildings
being
proposed
here,
don't
make
sense.
It
is
definitely
out
of
control
and
I'm
asking
you
to
defer
a
decision
on
this
till.
G
B
R
A
You,
madam
chair
you're,
correct
the
eggman
connect
study
in
general,
encourages
mid-rise
buildings
along
an
avenue
and,
in
fact,
the
properties
to
the
west
of
the
site.
What
of
Hanning
were
zoned
in
2014
under
the
Eggman
connects
bylaw.
This
application
came
in
before
that
fallout
was
passed
and
was
not
zoned
under
that
by
alott
1034.
A
So
we
had
to
evaluate
it
based
on
the
merits
of
the
application
and
also
given
the
contextual
environment
around
the
Eggman
growth
Center
and
contextually.
When
you
look
at
what's
happened
in
the
items
of
connects.
Sorry
in
the
a
gluten
Center
area
on
the
edges,
this
application
is
consistent
with
other
approvals.
R
Well
still
I
mean
you
say
because
the
bylaw
came
before
it.
So
how
does
that
affect
this
site
I'm
trying
to
get
it
into
an
answer
in
English?
You
know
we
did
a
plan,
we
enacted
a
plan,
we
said
lower
buildings
and
you're
saying
well.
This
was
there
before.
So
how
does
that
affect
this
site
and
your
ability
to
use
those
approvals
on
it.
A
Well,
there
were,
there
were
essentially
two
approvals
from
the
eggman
Connect
study.
One
was
the
official
plan
amendment
which
introduced
requirements
for
encouraging
rear
lane
system,
and
that
was
that
did,
does
apply
to
this
site
and
was
appealed
by
the
applicant.
As
note
in
the
report,
this
proposal
does
implement
that
aspect
of
it
in
terms
of
introducing
a
real
Lane
system
behind
the
project.
So
in
that
respect,
it's
consistent
with
respect
to
the
zoning
we
we
got
basically
to
what
I'd
say:
conflicting
sort
of
directions.
A
One
was
from
community
council
here
when
the
plumie
report
came
forward
and
it
specified
that
that
we
should
continue
the
consultative
process
on
this.
Recognizing
that
site
is
not
a
mid-rise
site,
however,
pursuing
reductions
in
height
commensurate
with
the
appropriate
transition
settled
upon
for
other
developments
having
a
sense
of
relation
to
nearby
low
density
areas.
So
that
was
the
direction
on
the
plan
report
and
we've
taken
have
in
regard
from
that
direction.
A
But
also
when
the
Agins
of
connect
study
was
considered
by
City
Council,
there
was
a
direction
that
or
a
motion
passed,
that
this
site
be
included
in
the
intent
of
the
bylaw
they're,
going
to
connect
spire
law
as
a
mid-rise
site.
So
we
had
somewhat
conflicting
directions
there,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we
have
to
respond
to
the
application.
A
That's
before
us
and
after
reviewing
this
thoroughly
in
terms
of
the
context
in
terms
of
infrastructure,
in
terms
of
abilities
of
this
site,
to
support
what's
being
proposed
and
given
the
the
gradation
of
Heights
that
are
happening
inside
the
center,
a
constant
center
and
outside
the
center.
We
felt
this
is
a
consistent
application
and
and
has
merit,
and
although
it
is
difficult
in
terms
of
I,
can
understand
the
concerns
of
the
residents
on
any
that
this
changes
the
character
somewhat
of
what?
A
What
of
what
they're
used
to
there
I
think
it's
an
appropriate
change
given
what's
happening
in
that
area.
I
particularly
want
to
point
out
there's
a
couple
of
applications
that
were
recently
approved
and
under
construction
just
outside
the
center.
Here
one
is
on
Yonge
and
Hallandale,
which
has
a
similar
transition
to
the
existing
established
neighborhood
and
the
other
ones
at
Sudan
in
a
young
Street,
which
also
has
a
similar
context,
relationship
with
the
established
neighborhood.
So
we
have
to
have
regard
for
what
is
happening
in
the
area
conceptually
so.
R
Then
the
question
goes:
if
you're,
having
regard
to
what's
happening,
the
area
the
resident
said
well,
by
permitting
this
24
storey,
building
on
this
site,
you'll
be
allowing
that
then
and
looking
at
it
along
the
rest
of
it
and
cannabinews,
because
it
will
be
used.
As
that
example
is.
How
are
you
going
to
deal
with
the
building's
as
you
go
along
the
street,
where
we're
supposed
to
be
lower
height
buildings?
If
you're
approving
this
one
here
at
this
height
well,.
A
Firstly,
what's
fundamental
about
this
project?
Is
that
it
doesn't
after
early
morning
it
doesn't
shadow
Eglinton
park
to
the
north
west
and
and
in
fact
it
only
shadows,
a
green
park
early
in
the
morning,
the
parking
lot,
but
not
the
park
itself.
So
that's
a
fundamental
principle
that
has
to
be
adhered
to
for
any
project
that
happens
along
Eggman,
Avenue
West,
and
that
was
an
emerging
principle
out
of
the
AG
Union
built
form
study
that
was
presented
to
Council.
A
A
We
would
we'd
certainly
have
to
wait
against
the
fact
that
council
turned
its
mind
to
to
those
properties
and
actually
zone
them
under
the
Edmonton
connection
by
law.
So
that
would
have
to
be
a
clear
and
serious
consideration
when
we
review
any
application,
but
we'd
also
have
to
give
some
regard
to
what
what
the
application
is
and
what
merits
it
has.
Given.
The
contact.
A
In
addition,
Council
passed
a
motion
to
have
the
subject
site
be
included
in
the
intent
of
the
bylaw
and
the
eggman
connect
study
as
a
mid-rise
site,
also
on
August
12
2014,
North,
York
and
Council.
Consider
the
preliminary
report
for
this
application
Magnusson
and
in
that
direction
it
was.
Staff
should
have
continued
consultative
process
recognizing
that
the
site
is
not
a
mid
mid
write
site,
however,
pursuing
reductions
in
height
and
density
commensurate
with
the
appropriate
transition
set
upon
for
other
developments
in
the
area.
So.
N
N
A
N
N
N
A
N
D
N
A
Through
you,
madam
chair,
there
is
a
distinct
and
clear
constraint
in
terms
of
replacing
office
hundred-percent
office
on
the
site,
given
the
context
and
the
limitations
on
the
height
and
density
in
the
area.
For
us
to
replace
it,
a
hundred
percent
would
basically
mean
a
sterile,
a
sterilization
of
the
property,
in
other
words,
not
now
allowing
in
any
development
or
any
residential,
because
to
replace
a
hundred
percent
office
and
have
some
residential
as
well.
A
N
D
Existing
office
building
is
six
storeys.
It
has
a
zero
lot
line,
two
heading,
as
is
there
a
lot
line
to
Eglinton
in
order
to
achieve
the
Eglinton
connect
streetscape,
the
new
building
has
to
be
set
back
considerably,
so
this
building
is
set
back
five
meters
into
the
so
that's
into
the
footprint
of
the
existing
building.
It's
also
set
back
on
heading
for
two
meters.
D
In
addition
to
achieve
the
rear
lane
way
if
it
was
solely
on
the
nine
to
Eglinton
property,
be
cutting
into
the
footprint
of
the
existing
office
buildings
again
so
you'd
be
shaving
the
existing
office
building
and
to
try
to
achieve
that.
As
joe
said,
you'd
have
a
very
bulky
base
which
would
have
a
significant
impact
in
terms
of
the
neighborhood
designations
to
the
to
the
north.
We
were
trying
to
do
that,
so
it
is
a
challenge
to
try
to
get
100%
office
replacement.
D
We
did
ask
the
applicant
to
look
at
other
options
like
off-site
office
replacement.
It
could
not
achieve
that.
It
would
be
desirable
to
get
as
much
office
replacement
as
possible
on
this
particular
site.
We
came
to
the
conclusion
that,
for
this
particular
location,
not
being
in
the
center
50%
was
appropriate
as
an
office
replacement
amount.
Ok,.
N
D
N
D
N
D
I'm,
it
would
actually
I
have
to
come
in
on
various
sides,
and
it
would
be
probably
eight
eight
stories
because
of
the
stat
shaving
as
a
base,
and
that
base
was
deemed
to
be
inappropriate.
As
the
applicant
indicated
in
his
presentation,
we
actually
wanted
the
base
of
the
building
to
be
brought
down
to
three
stories,
to
not
be
too
imposing
on
the
Eglinton
connect
streetscape.
So
in
other
words,
you
would
have
a
taped
a
tower
with
an
exceptionally
bulky
base,
which
is
something
that
we
don't
want.
D
K
You
thank
you,
madam
chair.
Just
for
clarity's
sake,
one
of
the
deputies
said
that
the
million
dollars
in
section
37
will
just
go
into
a
citywide
black
hole.
That's
not
what
I
read
on
page
three.
Could
you
just
clarify
for
the
community
what
what
those
funds
can
be
used
for?
It's,
it's
actually
quite
targeted
in
this
agreement
through.
A
K
A
K
A
B
R
So,
madam
Speaker,
if
that
motion
fail,
then
I'll
place
the
staff
recommendation,
I
I,
understand
fully
the
concerns
of
the
local
councillor
and
the
community
and
I.
Think
if
you
look
at
the
history
that
some
of
this
comes
from
a
motion
that
was
placed
by
the
previous
representative
to
look
at
a
taller
building
on
the
site,
the
applicant
did
come
in
with
a
mid-30s
building
dropped
it
down
at
29,
came
back
to
20
for
the
height
difference
on
this
building
from
what's,
there
is
from
28
meters
to
86
meters.
R
It's
like
58
meters
difference
in
it.
It's
substantial.
The
though
work
that
this
planning
staff
has
done
in
regards
to
this
application
I
think
is
based
on
the
fact
that
the
application
was
in
prior
to
the
edgington
connects
approval
along
the
line
and
that's
what
it
says
in
the
report.
So
in
English.
That
means
they
have
to
consider
this
site
without
having
that
planning
study
there.
That's
what
planners
do
and
that's
what
the
representative
for
the
applicant
will
argue
at
the
interior
missile
board.
R
Is
our
site
isn't
subject
to
that,
because
our
office
was
in
before
you
determine
the
what
you'd
like
to
see
at
these
different
heights
along
Addington,
Avenue
I
think
you
have
to
read
the
report
and
it
goes
back
to
what
I
said
earlier.
Maybe
a
little
bit
more.
This
council
does
not
have
the
ability
to
fully
control
development
within
the
borders
of
the
City
of
Toronto.
R
It
starts
with
a
little
line
that
says
the
provincial
policy
statement
about
intensification
means
cities
have
to
add.
We
have
asked
we
have
demanded.
We
have
shouted
through
the
planning
and
growth
committee
and
said:
why
is
the
province
permitting
appeals
of
the
Official
Plan
of
the
city
when
we
are
meeting
our
growth
targets
in
certain
areas
and
don't
believe
more
development
should
be
they're?
R
Young
and
Eddington
is
an
area
like
that
king
of
Spadina
is
an
area
like
that
other
areas
throughout
the
city
are
meeting
and
exceeding
their
growth
targets,
and
yet
we're
told
by
the
province.
You
should
review
development
applications,
make
recommendations
and
decide
what
happens,
but
if
we
don't
like
it,
the
hell
with
you,
it's
just
going
to
get
appeal
to
the
gentleman
as
a
board,
which
is
what
happens
with
sites
like
this.
R
So
we're
kind
of
in
a
conundrum
because,
as
I
said
earlier,
it's
your
provincial
representatives
that
control
development,
but
they
seem
to
control
it.
You
know
it's
like
The
Wizard
of
Oz
I,
guess,
where
you're
out
in
front,
seeing
this
great
big
wizard
doing
his
thing
and
these
little
people
behind
controlling
at
all.
R
So
what
are
we
kind
of
faced
with
we're
faced
with
planning
staff
that
have
done
in
their
professional
opinion,
probably
a
pretty
darn
good
job
of
getting
this
36
storey,
building
down
to
24
of
setting
it
back
from
Edgington
of
setting
it
back
from
the
north
of
getting
a
three-story
podium
and
then
putting
on
top
without
a
smaller
tall
building
on
it?
They
did
a
pretty
good
job
in
the
North
York
division.
R
R
So
it's
kind
of
a
our
own
conundrum.
Here
we
can
support
the
local
councillor.
We
can
refuse
it.
We
can
be
a
ton
Terra
Municipal
Board
hearing
and
at
that
hearing
the
applicant
doesn't
have
to
go
with
the
revised
proposal.
He
can
go
back
to
his
29
storey.
Building.
He
can
go
to
a
36
storey
building.
That's
the
rules,
that's
what
the
Wizard
of
planning
the
provincial
premier
at
Harrow
and
be
allowed
not
that
they
have
to
go
and
defend
what's
here
now
they
can
change
it
or
we
can
look
at.
R
K
You
madam
chair
I,
just
like
to
commend
the
local
councillor
for
working
so
aren't
on
this
file
and
working
with
the
community
that
she
represents
she's,
certainly
fully
understanding
of
the
sensitivity
of
local
neighborhoods
and
preserving
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
and
I
think
she's
done
an
excellent,
an
excellent
job.
That
being
said
in
listening
to
city
staff
and
reading
this
a
report,
it
is
very
hard
to
take
the
position
that
this
should
be
refused.
There
is
this
is
with
walking
distance
of
the
Yonge
subway
line.
K
This
is
a
right
next
to
the
Eglinton
crosstown,
probably
a
seven
billion
dollar
transit
project.
There
are
probably
about
2
million
residents
in
the
city,
a
Toronto
that
would
envy
this
location
to
be
within
steps
of
a
major
transit
line
to
be
in
an
area
of
high
growth
that
has
created
enormous,
tax-free
equity
in
your
homes
and
the
fact
that
there's
a
very
I
think
generous
and
responsible,
section
37
proposal
here
that
will
put
a
million
dollars
into
a
local
park
as
well
as
creating
a
new
park.
K
K
I
will
not
be
supporting
councillor
Carmichael
grebs
motion,
but
this
is
not
the
final
word
for
the
community
that
still
has
to
go
to
City
Council
for
approval
and,
of
course
you
have
the
option
of
taking
this
to
the
OMB
and
fighting
it
fighting
it
there
and
I
and
and
and
certainly
that
is
your
legal
option,
and
that
is.
That
is
your
right,
although
we
don't
do
very
well
at
the
at
the
OMB.
H
Robinson,
thank
you,
madam
chair
I'll.
Be
very
brief.
My
colleagues
have
heard
me
speak
many
times
at
City.
Council
about
my
concerns
about
Yonge
and
Eglinton.
I
am
I,
am
absolutely
of
the
thinking
that
it's
out
of
control
I
represent
the
the
the
opposite
side
of
Yonge
Street
from
the
local
councillor,
so
I
a
hundred
percent
support
the
local
councillors
motion.
Today
it
was
a
speech
that
I
made
at
City
Council
that
prompted
phase
two
of
Midtown
and
planning
to
look
at
infrastructure.
H
There
is
not
the
infrastructure
in
place
and
Yonge
and
Eglinton
to
support
the
development.
That's
happening
there.
There
are
not
the
schools,
there
are
not
the
pools.
There
are
not
the
community
centres.
There
is
not
the
transit
to
support,
what's
happening
at
Yonge
and
Eglinton.
You
can't
get
on
the
young
line.
Three
four
trains
you
wait
every
morning
and
then,
when
you
get
on
eventually,
if
you're
lucky
enough
to
get
on
your
you're
squeezed
in
like
a
sardine,
so
it's
it's
just
not
it's
just
not
ready
for
the
type
of
development.
H
That's
half
at
Yonge
and
Eglinton
and
I've
talked
to
the
chief
planner
about
this
multiple
times
and
I
just
want
to
thank
the
residents
who
came
out
from
the
west
of
young
residents
today
that
came
out.
I
hope
you
stay
for
the
next
item,
which
is
actually
John
Fisher
and
support
this.
The
John
Fisher
parents,
who
have
been
actively
battling
a
very
difficult
situation.
N
Our
residential
target
for
2041
I
mean
it's
just
way
too
much
and
we
don't
seem
to
be
able
to
bring
it
under
control
and
establish
any
sort
of
relationship
between
what
an
area
can
support
and
what
gets
approved
and
whatever
set.
When
we
have
a
conflict
between
sets
of
rules,
old
rules,
new
rules,
we
seem
to
pick.
We
don't
consistently
pick
the
old
or
consistently
thing
to
do.
We
seem
to
pick
whatever
one
favors
the
developer
and
and
on
things
like
where
we
have
a
policy,
you
know
where
we
should
be
requiring
other
percent
replacement.
N
Whatever
the
building
is,
we
should
be
requiring
100%
commercial
replacement.
We
somehow
come
up
with
the
reason
why
that's
too
difficult
for
the
developer
and
we
should
let
them
off
the
hook,
and
then
we
established
that
precedent
for
everybody
else
that
comes
along,
so
I
will
not
be
supporting
this
development.
I
wouldn't
support
it.
If
it
was
at
my
ward,
so
I
was
supported
in
someone
else's,
but
unfortunately
I
wouldn't
clap
too
loudly
because
as
councillor
shiner
said,
this
will
be
going
to
the
entire
municipal
board.
B
B
B
B
B
K
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I,
just
wanted
to
let
deputies
and
snow
who
have
signed
up
through
the
clerk's
office
and
for
those
who
would
like
to
speak,
who
have
not
signed
up.
Please,
please
do
so
with
the
clerk.
There
is
a
plan
today
to
defer
this
item
one
more
month,
so
that
the
the
TDSB
safety
plan
can
be
fully
examined.
The
risk
assessment
can
be
fully
examined,
so,
at
the
end
of
the
day
this
this
can
be.
We
can
hear
deputies,
we
can
debate
it,
but
the
motion
will
be
to
defer
it
to
the
future.
K
My
my
understanding
is
that
that
motion
will
likely
carry
those
who
speak
today
will
not
be
able
to
speak,
should
win
when
this
item
comes
back
to
us.
So
it's
just
a
notion,
a
note
of
caution
that
those
who
who
speak
today,
that
will
be
their
final
word,
even
though
this
item
will
come
back
to
us
at
least
one
more
time,
everyone
clear.
So,
let's
hear
the
deputies.
K
K
D
Submission
it's
an
extraordinary
request
to
build
109
meter
Tower
directly
on
top
of
a
elementary
school,
and
we
think
the
developer
should
comply
with
all
necessary
measures
to
ensure
the
health
and
safety
of
the
children
and
not
place
a
children
at
risk,
and
it's
quite
unfortunate.
This
is
the
second
time
I've
had
to
come
here
to
speak
regarding
a
demolition
permit
when
these
measures
are
clearly
not
in
place
as
I
will
show
you
now.
D
In
particular
was
the
conclusion
that
while
it
could
be
possible
to
mitigate
the
risks,
it
was
not
possible
to
do
so
unless
there
was
a
credible
third
party
around
to
review
and
enforce
action
as
necessary,
and
if
such
third
party
was
not
available,
the
risk
would
fall
within
the
unacceptable
range,
unacceptable,
meaning
the
children
could
not
stay
at
the
school.
This
is
quite
clear
in
the
report
and
the
issue
that
we
have
right
now.
Is
there.
D
One
of
the
key
factors
they
raised
was
noise.
In
the
risk
assessment
itself,
it
sets
out
the
who
recommendation
for
noise
being
55
decibels
outside,
as
you
can
see,
from
the
chart
taken
from
risk
assessment.
There's
a
number
of
locations
on
the
school
which
are
well
above
the
cremated
level
of
55
decibels.
D
K
R
K
D
S
Chair
members
of
committee
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
owner
of
the
18
to
30
Erskine
Avenue
site
the
matter
before
community
council
today
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
site
plan
for
the
development,
the
risk
assessment
or
construction
mitigation
plans.
The
matter
is
strictly
about
rental
housing
and
ensuring
that
the
development
complies
with
the
city's
rental,
housing
and
tenant
assisted
policies.
S
Council
statutory
authority
this
morning
is
strictly
limited
to
rental
housing
considerations.
The
permit
is
simply
ratifying
and
implementing
rental
replacement
arrangements
that
have
already
been
agreed
to
by
the
city
are
set
out
in
an
agreement
signed
by
the
city
and
have
been
registered
on
title.
S
Approving
the
staff
recommendations
will
not
allow
our
client
to
demolish
the
existing
building
as
no
demolition
can
occur
until
site
plan
approval
has
been
obtained.
For
these
reasons,
it
is
both
unnecessary
and
inappropriate
to
defer
the
section
111
permit,
because
the
site
plan,
application
and
the
CMP
details
are
still
being
reviewed.
Subject
any
questions.
Those
are
my
comments.
Thank.
S
The
tenant
assistance
until
the
approvals
in
place-
sorry
I,
couldn't
which
set
of
apologies.
Mr.
chair
through
you,
we
can't
even
pay
the
tenant
assistance
until
the
approvals
are
in
place.
We
have
an
agreement
on
title
that
requires
us
to
do
these
things.
Our
client
would
like
to
have
the
necessary
approvals
in
place,
but.
S
S
R
D
K
K
H
D
D
D
K
K
Yes,
no
there's,
there's
no
doubt
is
there
anyone
who
was
going
to
depute
today,
who
has
not
been
called
okay
councillor
Robin
we'll
go
we'll
go
on
your
advice.
If
you
would
like
to
move
deferral
at
this
moment
unless
there's
other
questions
for
staff,
we
can
finish
up
the
item.
Before
lunch.
People
can
go
home,
we
can
give
out
our
awards
to
our
students.
What
would
you
like
to
do?
I
would.
H
Like
to
move
deferral
of
this
item
and
I've,
given
a
motion
to
the
clerks
and
my
understanding
is
I
need
to
put
that
up
on
the
screen
first,
so
that
my
colleagues
can
see
it
as
you've.
Just
heard
from
my
line
of
questioning
my
extensive
line
of
questioning
that
there's
many
pieces
moving
parts
to
this
issue
and
tomorrow
night,
if
you'd
like
to
come,
there
will
be
a
public
meeting
held
on
this
very
issue
by
the
TDSB
I've
been
invited.
The
province
has
been
invited
and
we're
going
to
be
discussing
the
risk
assessment.
H
That's
been
vetted
by
a
third
party
I
believe
the
parents
are
also
looking
at
hiring
a
third
party
to
fully
vet.
This
risk
assessment,
so
that's
happening
tomorrow
night
on
Thursday
there'll,
be
a
construction
management
plan
meeting
with
all
the
parties
around
the
table,
including
the
developer
and
the
parents
and
the
TDSB
and
the
city,
etc,
etc.
All
key
stakeholders
will
be
around
the
table,
so
there's
much
work
to
do.
We
don't
have
a
site
plan
application
done.
H
We
don't
have
a
construction
management
plan,
place,
a
construction
management
plan
finalized
or
anywhere
near
file
being
finalized,
and
we
don't
have
a
staging
plan.
So
I
see
no
reason
to
support
this
today,
but
instead
defer
it
until
we
have
all
those
parts
and
pieces
pulled
together.
We
are
talking
about
a
junior
grade
school
and
I,
encourage
you
to
go
to
a
place
called
the
Bohemian
cafe.
H
It's
in
the
Uptown
young
BIA
area
go
to
the
back
patio
and
look
over
the
fence,
and
if
you
do
that,
you
will
be
alarmed
because
I
did
that
two
weeks
ago,
from
that
back
patio,
you
will
see
a
perspective
on
this
development
that
will
blow
your
mind,
because
you
will
question
how
it's
possible
for
a
35-story
Howard.
We
built
in
that
setting
in
that
postage,
stamp-sized
lot,
and
so
this
is
a
very
challenging
development
that
involves
young
lungs
and
we
have
to
get
this
right.
So
actually,
staff
helped
me
write
this
motion.
H
We
would
like
to
see
all
of
these
pieces
and
parts
pulled
together
and
heard
concurrently,
whether
it's
by
North,
York,
Community,
Council
or
Toronto
City
Council.
It
needs
to
be
done
right
and
it
needs
to
be
done
together.
So
I
just
want
to
continue
to
thank
the
John
for
parents
who
have
been
amazing
at
shining
a
spotlight
on
this
issue.
Just
their
engagement
is
unprecedent.
I
spend
most
of
my
weekends,
with
them
and
and
also
I
have
to
say.
H
K
Thank
you,
councillor,
Robinson,
any
other
speakers
on
the
matter,
and
certainly
you
you
do
have
a
very
strong
parent
advocacy
group.
I
saw
the
protests
on
TV.
It
reminded
me
of
the
six.
Actually
you
know
so
very,
very
strong
and
strong
local
voiced
by
your
counselor
know.
If
you
remember
the
60s
you
weren't
there.
K
B
32
division,
community,
policing
liaison
committee,
Yorkdale
shopping,
mall
and
Tim
Hortons
have
been
instrumental
in
keeping
this
community
school
campaign
running
for
the
past
six
years
and
we
sincerely
thank
them
for
their
partnership.
Each
entry
is
evaluated
for
its
merit
as
an
educational
tool
to
stimulate
the
minds
of
peers
across
the
city.
To
help
put
an
end
to
racism.
I
would
invite
Sheree
Spivak
school
liaison
officer
for
32
division
MC
to
the
award
ceremony.
Where
are
you?
Oh
there
you
are
Sheri
will
get
up
and
move
to
the
lectern
there.
You
are.
P
Good
morning,
chair,
counselor
Maria,
Jamari
members
of
council
invited
guests
and
members
of
the
public,
the
United
Nations
declared
March
21st
as
the
International
Day
for
the
elimination
of
racial
discrimination.
On
that
day,
in
1960
police
opened
fire
and
killed
69
people
at
a
peaceful
demonstration
in
Sharpeville
South
Africa
against
the
apartheid
laws.
Proclaiming
that
day
in
1966,
the
United
Nations
General
Assembly
called
on
the
international
community
to
redouble
its
efforts
to
eliminate
all
forms
of
racial
discrimination.
This
day
is
celebrated
worldwide.
P
P
We
abide
with
our
service
core
values,
which
promotes
a
heightened
awareness
of
racial
equality
and
diversity,
we're
all
the
same,
and
we
are
all
equal
so
based
on
several
criteria.
The
judges
selected
all
of
your
artworks
and
we
picked
five
of
the
best
and
it
was
tight.
So
there's
some
honorable
mentions
in
there
because
there
was
a
really
tight
race.
The
five
best
pieces
of
art
were
then
judged
by
another
panel
and
then
the
top
five
were
selected.
P
So
the
winners-
the
first
prize,
gets
a
three
hundred
dollars:
cash
plus
a
gift
certificate
to
York
Dale
second
prize.
Second,
winner
gets
two
hundred
fifty
dollars:
cash
plus
a
gift
certificate
to
York.
Dale
third
gets
two
hundred
dollars:
cash
plus
the
gift
certificate
to
York
Dale.
Fourth,
one
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
cash
plus
York
Bills
get
certificate.
This
place,
$100
cash
prize
plus
it
gives
certificate
from
New
York
Dale.
There
are
three
honorable
mentions.
Like
I
said,
it
was
really
tight
and
you're
going
to
receive
a
$20
gift
card
from
Tim
Hortons.