►
From YouTube: North York Community Council - September 10, 2020
Description
North York Community Council, meeting 17, September 10, 2020
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=17106
A
Good
morning
my
name
is
james
pasternak,
I'm
the
chair
of
north
york,
community
council
clerk
has
confirmed
that
we
have
quorum.
So
I'd
like
to
now
call
meeting
17
to
order
welcome
everybody.
This
meeting
is
being
held
using
the
city's
webex
technology
with
members
of
council
participating
both
in
the
council
chambers
and
by
video
conference
city
staff
are
also
connecting
to
the
media
meeting
by
video
conference.
A
A
city
hall
remains
closed.
The
public
continues
to
participate
electronically
and
can
watch
the
meeting
streaming
live
on
youtube
at
youtube.com,
backslash
toronto
city
council
live
because
we're
meeting
remotely.
We
ask
for
your
patience
with
any
delays
and
technical
issues.
Currently,
people
register
to
speak,
who
have
been
connected
to
the
meeting
by
audio.
The
list
of
speakers
can
be
viewed
online
by
visiting
the
north
york
community
council
page
at
toronto,
dot,
ca,
backslash,
council
and
by
clicking
the
speakers
box
for
today's
meeting.
A
Before
we
begin,
I
want
to
remind
you
the
important
health
and
safety
measures
that
we
must
all
follow
today
for
those
attending
meeting
in
person.
All
participants
have
been
seated
two
meters
apart.
Please
stay
in
your
designated
seat.
Do
not
change
seats
or
sit
in
another
member's
seat,
but
entering
or
exit
and
moving
above
the
chamber.
You
must
wear
a
face
covering
chamber,
washrooms
and
council
elevators
limited
to
one
person
at
a
time
tower
elevators
are
limited
to
two
people.
Sanitization
kits
have
also
been
provided
on.
A
The
desktops
attendance
in
the
chamber
is
limited
only
to
those
persons
who
are
required
for
the
meeting
number
of
clicks
number
of
clerks
audiovisual
I.t
staff
are
with
us
today.
Any
city
officials
joining
us
in
person
today
are
sitting
in
the
public
gallery
members.
This
is
a
paperless
meeting,
although
I
seem
to
have
a
lot
of
paper
in
front
of
me.
The
city
clerk
has
provided
all
agenda
materials
via
cmp
the
clerk's
meeting
portal,
including
any
confidential
materials.
A
A
This
will
make
it
easier
for
me
as
chair
for
those
watching
on
youtube
to
observe
members
as
they
participate
in
the
debate
and
vote
on
items
for
those
members
who
are
joining
us
remotely.
Please
keep
your
mic
muted
unless
you
wish
to
question
staff
or
speak
to
an
item
and
ensure
that
your
video
is
turned
on
as
part
of
the
agenda
item,
I
would
ask
members
to
raise
their
hand
or
unmute
their
mic
if
they
wish
to
question
staff
or
to
speak.
A
I
will
then
create
a
speaker's
list
and
will
call
on
members
when
it
is
their
turn
to
speak.
When
voting
on
an
item
or
motion,
I
ask
that
members
ensure
that
they
turn
on
their
video,
if
applicable
and
to
raise
their
hand,
to
indicate
their
vote.
To
ensure
that
I
can
see
all
members,
I
will
ask
that
you
keep
your
hands
raised
until
I
reviewed
the
members
in
the
room
as
well
as
the
remote
members.
A
I
want
to
remind
you
that
you're
participating
today's
meeting
in
person
remotely
you
must
still
submit
and
improve
your
motions
by
email.
The
clerk's
staff
will
not
be
printing
motions
for
your
review.
If
you
need
to
confer
with
the
clerk's
staff
in
the
room,
you
must
stay
two
meters
apart
at
all
times,
staff
are
available
at
nycc
toronto,
dot
ca
to
help
with
the
motions.
A
A
Although
we
are
in
different
locations
and
meeting
remotely
today,
the
community
council
would
like
to
acknowledge.
The
land
we
were
on
is
a
traditional
territory
of
many
nations,
including
the
mississauga
of
the
credit,
the
ashwanabe,
the
chippewa,
the
haudenosau
the
window
peoples
and
is
now
home
to
many
diverse
first
nations
inuit
and
metis
people.
We
also
acknowledge
that
toronto
is
covered
by
treaty
13
with
the
mississauga
of
the
credit.
A
A
A
A
A
I
will
move
the
staff
recommendations
on
her
behalf,
all
those
in
favor
post,
how
that
is
carried
item
17-6
preliminary
zoning
amendment,
application
to
valiant
drive
also
counselor
robinson
I'd,
be
happy
to
move
the
staff
recommendations
to
schedule
community
consultation,
all
those
in
favor
posed
that
is
carried
item.
Seven
preliminary
report
5800
young
street.
A
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Councillor
carol
also
item
item.
Eight
preliminary
reports,
6080
young
street
and
11
homewood
also
accounts
for
philly
and
so
same
councilor
carol
hold
it
on
his
behalf
until
he
joins
us
item
nine
accessible
parking
space,
tippett
road-
that
is
my
my
area.
I
will
move
the
staff
recommendations.
A
C
B
Yes
with
it
with
a
quick
comment,
I'll
move
the
staff
recommendations.
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
for
counselors
if
they
see
funded
by
the
ttc
and
they
think.
Oh,
is
this
a
new
stream?
This
is
simply
an
intersection
where
the
the
staff
study
discovered
that
it
meets
the
warrants,
but
the
warrants
are
met
entirely
by
buses
and
that's
why
the
ttc
is
funding
it.
It's
a
very
anomalous
situation.
A
C
C
A
B
A
E
A
Double
support
any
opposed
that
is
carried
a
1718
designation
of
fire
routes,
amendment
to
chapter
880,
fire
routes,
160
transit,
road-
that
is
my
award,
and
I
will
move
the
staff
recommendations,
all
those
in
favor
posed
that
is
carried
1719
designation
of
fire
roots
and
amendments
to
chapter
880,
fire
routes,
18187,
sylvan,
valley,
way,
10
blue
review
place,
20
blue
review
place
and
21
to
84
blue
review
place.
Two
counselors
on
this
councilor
qual,
counselor
carol.
Would
one
like
to
move
the
staff
recommendations.
A
Counselor
call
moving
the
staff
recommendations,
all
those
in
favor
post
that
is
carried.
This
is
a
next
item
is
20,
which
is
my
ward.
We
need
staff
to
fix
up
a
fence
exemption
report
and
bring
it
back,
so
I'm
asking
for
a
motion
to
reopen
and
then
we're
going
to
send
it
back
to
staff,
so
we're
going
to
open
and
refer
so
on
the
first
part
of
it
all
those
in
favor
of
reopening
posed
that
is
carried
and
immediately
referral
to
staff
all
those
in
favor
posed
that
is
carried.
B
Thank
you,
mr
cheryl.
Just
speak
briefly,
because
it
it's
it's,
it's
not
usual
for
a
demolition
permit
to
be
a
walk-on,
so
just
quickly
for
for
the
counselors
benefit.
This
is
coming
to
you
at
the
last
minute.
This
is
actually
a
city
property
will
will
one
day
be
a
road.
It's
not
a
demolition
permit
from
a
private
developer,
but
it
was
just
being
left
because
we
don't
have
the
budget
to
complete
the
road.
However,
the
the
property
has
fallen
into
complete
disrepair.
A
A
A
D
A
H
A
H
A
A
A
D
I
Hi
yeah
thank
you
good
morning,
so
my
name
is
robin
spedner
and
I
am
a
planner
with
the
biglieri
group.
We
are
the
agent
and
planning
consultant
for
the
toledo
corporation.
These
are
the
owners
of
the
subject
site.
With
regards
to
the
staff
report.
We
have
read
it
and
are
in
full
agreement
with
staff.com.
Can
we.
C
I
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
that
was
under
30
seconds.
We
don't
get
that
very
often.
I
I
have
a
just
a
couple,
quick
questions.
One
is
this:
is
the
property
on
the
south
side
of
shepherd
with
the
series
of
bungalows
yeah
yeah,
so
I
noticed
some
heavy
equipment
moving
in
there
are
those
are
those
coming
down
this
month
or
soon.
I
In
the
time
that
we've
had
with
the
area
sanitary
system
upgrades
and
just
the
time
we
have
before
that
settled,
we
reviewed
the
built
form
and
noted
that
it
wasn't
the
most
efficient
type
of
built
form.
It
was
a
stat
town
house
and
it
was
five
story,
so
this
would
require
anyone
living
in
the
proper
units
to
use
three
flights
of
stairs
and
an
additional
two
flights
of
stairs
to
get
to
their
bedrooms.
I
A
A
I've
just
been
handed
some
technical
amendments.
Okay,
there's
there's
some
just
some
some
technical
amendments,
I'll
I'll
move
them
on
behalf
of
staff.
That's
right!
These
came
in
yeah.
Should
we
hold
it?
Do
you
want
to
see
these
oh
they're
on
the
screen?
There
we
go
if
you
want
to
take
a
quick
look,
there's
just
some
minor
changes.
Yeah.
A
A
D
All
right,
thank
you,
mr
chair,
good
morning,
members
of
community
council.
I
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
item
17.2,
which
is
the
final
report
for
the
zoning
bylaw
management
application
regarding
the
property
at
340,
st
clements
avenue,
which
is
located
at
the
north
east
corner
of
avenue
road
in
and
saint.
D
I
just
wanted
to
express
more
thanks
to
city
staff
for
their
hard
work
and
bring
the
application
to
the
stage.
I
fully
support
the
conclusions
and
recommendations
in
the
staff
report.
The
proposed
townhouse
development
will
bring
six
new
family-sized
housing
units
to
a
growing
desirable
area.
It
will
contribute
to
the
diversification
of
the
housing
stock,
as
well
as
provide
pedestrian-friendly
streetscape
improvements
to
lock
avenue
road.
D
In
my
opinion,
the
proposal
is
consistent
with
the
pps
and
conforms
to
the
growth
plan.
It
also
conforms
to
the
official
plan
policies
for
neighborhoods,
as
amended
by
opa320,
by
delivering
compact-built
form
along
a
major
street
which
is
compatible
with
the
existing
character
and
build
form
of
the
neighborhood,
in
my
opinion,
as
well
as
providing
for
appropriate
step
backs
and
transitions
to
to
the
adjacent
properties.
D
D
A
A
A
A
C
I
I
Great,
so
my
name
is
carolina,
gabriel,
I'm
the
second
floor
tenant
at
1165
avenue
road,
which
is
the
triplex
adjacent
to
the
subject
site
at
the
northern
border.
I
grew
up
in
toronto.
My
background
is
in
business
administration
and
community
outreach
program,
and
I
have
been
a
tenant
at
1165
avenue
since
may
2011.,
my
driveway,
which
is
used
as
a
parking
pad
borders
directly
onto
the
northern
lot
line
of
the
subject
site
and
unfortunately
it
is
a
closed
end
driveway.
I
So
that
means
that
I'm
turning
onto
the
driveway
from
avenue
road
and
often
I
need
to
drive
in
nose
first,
I'm
not
able
to
turn
around.
So
that
means
I'm
backing
out
so
reversing
onto
avenue
road.
Whenever
I
need
to
leave
my
driveway,
the
width
of
my
driveway
is
only
2.9
meters
and
the
applicant
has
suggested
a
1.5
meter
setback
from
the
northerly
lot
line,
where
he
plans
to
wreck
a
1.8
meter
height
x.
I
The
issue
that
I
have
is
that
the
1.5
meter
setback
is
not
enough
because
it
creates
the
following
issues.
Firstly,
I
feel
that
it's
going
to
be
very
dangerous
for
the
visibility
of
any
drive.
Any
drivers
well
specifically
me,
but
if
I
were
to
move
any
new
coming
tenant
because
the
pedestrian
corridor
on
avenue
is
very
well
used.
I
Counselor
cool
you'll
know
that
this
development
is
kitty
corner
to
allen
b,
public
school,
less
than
50
meters
and
there's
also
a
ttc
bus
stop
across
the
street.
So
this
means
that
literally
there
are
hundreds
of
people,
often
caregivers
or
parents,
with
their
kids,
who
are
walking
in
front
of
the
driveway
and
it's
very
hard
to
see
them
when
I
need
to
back
up
all
the
time.
I
So
I
would
just
ask
that
council
ask
staff
to
get
comments
from
transportation
services
because
they
weren't,
provided
at
least
I
couldn't
find
them
online,
and
I
would
also
ask
staff
to
review
the
westernly
setback,
because
in
the
planning
rationale
report,
the
development
suggests
to
be
set
back
only
two
meters
from
the
lot
line.
So
that's
avenue
road
now,
but
in
the
staff
report
on
page
17
it
says
that
the
setback
is
going
to
be
3.55
meters
to
be
in
line
with
our
triplex
at
1165
revenue
road.
I
I
The
last
thing
that
I'd
like
to
bring
to
the
attention
of
staff
is
that
neither
the
staff
report
nor
the
planning
rationale
identify
the
current
use
of
the
existing
subject.
Subject:
site
official
plan
policy
3.2.112
states
that
new
development
resulting
in
loss
of
one
or
more
rental
units
shall
secure
an
acceptable
tenant,
relocation
and
assistant
plan
to
lessen
hardship
for
existing
tenants
is
my
understanding
that
there's
not
one
but
two
self-contained
rental
units
in
the
subject
site.
I
I
don't
understand
why
the
applicant
was
not
asked
to
issue
a
housing
issues
report
as
required
for
any
zbd
application
when
a
development
proposes
to
demolish
existing
rental
units,
and
I
would
ask
council
to
urge
the
applicant
to
at
least
be
transparent
about
how
six
2.3
million
dollar
town
homes
are
more
beneficial
than
existing
rental
units
on
the
site.
Thank
you
for
your
time
this
morning,.
A
C
Yeah,
no
thank
you
for
your
input
here
and
I
will
ask
staff
to
respond
to
you
in
writing
and
because
of
some
of
the
same
questions
I
had,
and
also
some
of
these
issues
will
also
hopefully
be
addressed
at
the
site
plan
approval
process.
So
anyways.
Thank
you
for
that,
and
did
you
send
something
in
writing
to
my
office
in
terms
of
your
concerns.
C
A
D
Accommodation,
yes,
jason
brander
from
city
planning
through
you,
mr
chair,
the
when
the
application
would
have
been
filed,
which
I
believe
in
this
was
march
2019.
There
is
a
rental
housing
screen
that
would
have
been
submitted
with
this
in
looking
at
that
they,
if
there
was
one
rental
unit
on
site.
B
D
C
C
Yeah
and-
and
I
will
be
moving
that
there
be
a
a
committee
set
up
with
my
office
and
mrs
capral
maureen
capral
about
the
site
plan,
approval
process
and
also
the
the
other
deputy
there
and
along
with
representatives
from
the
applicant.
I
just
want
to
address
some
quick
questions
here
about
the
the
trees.
First
of
all,
do
you
want
to
clarify?
Is
there
any
clarification
of
the
tree
policy
here
tree
removal,
replacement
policy
here
on
this
site,
yeah.
D
F
Hi
hi
good
morning
through
through
the
chair,
I'm
unaware
of
the
details
of
the
application
I
I
didn't
have
the
I
didn't
know
that
this
would
be
a
tree
discussion
for
this
item.
I
can
certainly
find
the
information
and
provide
it
after
the
meeting.
I
I
have,
as
the
discussion
was
pretty
proceeding,
I've
been
looking
at
aerial
imagery.
C
F
The
through
our
application,
through
a
permitting
application
process,
we
have,
we
apply
a
replanting
requirement,
that's
based
on
the
condition
of
the
trees
in
the
context
of
the
removal
and
any
tree.
So
we
will
derive
a
planting
requirement
through
that
it's
a
standard
requirement
and
any
trees
that
can't
be
planted
on
site
would
be
received
as
cash
in
lieu
without
more
knowledge
about
the
trees
in
question.
I
I
don't
want
to
say
more
than
that.
F
C
D
C
Okay,
anyways
on
to
the
the
planters
on
the
I
guess:
it's
the
east
side
there
there's
gonna,
be
planters
in
terraces.
Is
there
any
agreement
in
place
to
ensure
that
there
will
be
care
and
also
pruning,
etc?
For
these
planters
in
perpetuity
or
is
this?
Is
there
any
time
frame
there
to
make
sure
that
if
this
changes
hands
or
whatever
that
there
are
proper
guidelines
to
take
care
of
these
plantings
that
have
been
promised
in
the
application
you.
A
D
A
B
B
However,
it
is
usual
to
be
much
more
clear
here
where
the
community
is
paying
attention
to
the
approval
about
trees,
and
so
I'm
wondering
if
we
can
get
a
comment
from
forestry
staff,
because
the
way
this
report
is
written,
I
I
understand
why
why
the
community
is
upset.
We
see
three
new
trees
being
proposed
on
the
private
property,
one
on
the
city
property,
where
it
goes
to
talk
to
us
about
the
cash
in
lieu
that
might
plant
trees
elsewhere
in
the
city.
B
It's
all
written
as
if
these
trees
are
being
replaced
one
for
one
and
unless
it's
changed,
my
understanding
of
the
tree
policy-
and
maybe
you
can
clarify
for
this
when
an
individual
is
applying
to
remove
a
private
tree.
We
ask
them
to
replace
three
for
one
and
we
ask
an
even
more
stringent
standard
or
more
generous
standard
of
of
developers
of
multi-unit
properties.
So
is
this
a
poor
choice
of
words
in
this
report,
or
is
this
policy
changed
when
we
next
see
this
in
a
site
plan
control?
D
Sorry
and
I,
through
mr
chair
and
to
your
to
your
question,
counselor
carol
and
I
apologize
I
was
trying
to-
I
guess-
pull
up
the
information
on
the
on
the
arborist
report
as
well
as
well
as
pulling
up
the
comments
from
our
forestry
staff.
So
when
the
arborist
report
was
submitted,
it
takes
into
account
trees
that
are
on
or
adjacent
to
the
site.
D
B
D
B
Speaking
in
the
singular
the
trees
that
cannot
be
replaced,
the
trees
that
cannot
be
replaced
times
what
multiplier,
because
it
we
we
we
don't.
We
don't
generally
require
developers
to
to
just
remove
10
replace
10..
So
we
have,
we
have
applications
larger
applications
where
we
sometimes
ask
them
to
replace
them.
Nine
times
the
number
of
trees,
they're,
removing,
and
so
here
we
seem
to
be
just
asking
one
for
one
for
very
mature
trees.
So
is
that
just
a
mistake
in
the
wording?
Will
the
cache
in
lieu
be
be
a
multiplier
of
the
seven
remaining
trees.
D
So
through
you,
mr
chair,
and
if
forestry
staff
want
to
jump
in
as
well,
but
it's
fine
and
I'm
reading
from
the
comments
that
were
provided
from
forestry
back
in
june
on
this
so
based
on
standard
requirement.
Urban
forestry
requires
a
total
of
11
new
large
green
native
fade
trees
to
be
planted
on
private
property
to
replace
the
private
trees
added
replacement
ratio
of
three
to
one
for
healthy
trees
and
one
one
for
treatment.
Poor
condition.
B
Okay,
so
so
at
the
very
least,
it's
three
to
one.
The
developer
would
know
that.
That's
our
policy,
so
if
we
approve
today
and
then
wait
till
site
plan
control
to
work
out
the
dollars
and
cents
of
that,
we
won't
have
the
applicant
here
saying:
oh,
that's
asking
too
much
of
me.
What
other
benefit
can
I
now
rescind?
He
he's
well
aware
that
that
there's,
a
financial
commitment
here
is
going
to
be
asked
to
make.
C
C
C
C
In
fact,
I
think
next
month
we'll
be
having
a
speed
enforcement
camera
right
there,
almost
on
that
corner
of
saint
clements
or
maybe
on
roselawn
and
avenue
road.
You
know
it's
a
basically
a
four-lane
highway
that
runs
right
by
allenby,
school
and
havergill
school,
and
you
know
anyways.
It
is
very,
very
treacherous
on
that
street.
So
the
one
benefit
here
is
the
access
and
egress
is
on
saint
clements.
C
C
Considering
to
what
is
happening
in
my
ward
with
30
40
50
65
story,
buildings,
at
least
we're
keeping
the
character
of
avenue
road
to
a
certain
extent,
and
then
we've
got
another
item.
We're
dealing
with
on
this
agenda
at
the
positary
site
at
avenue
road
in
lawrence,
and
we'll
have
discussions
about
that.
So
we
will
work
with
staff
to
clarify
some
of
these
issues
and
try
and
make
the
best
of
a
very
challenging
situation,
especially
in
terms
of
traffic.
C
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
Yes,
mr
chair,
I
am
going
to
again
move
the
staff
recommendations.
We
we
did
have
discussion
on
this
item.
When
it
came
to
us
the
first
time
it
would
have
been
more
appropriate.
I
think,
to
ask
questions
that
counsel.
When
we
referred
when
we
were
referring
it
back
here,
I'm
not
sure
why
it
was
referred
back,
because
we
we
did,
you
know,
look
at
it
in
depth
in
in
community
council.
The
first
time
and-
and
you
know
my
my
feelings
are
the
same
as
they
were.
B
Then
there
was
often
this
dispute
between
owners
and
forestry
staff
and
even
toronto
water
staff
over
what
trees
do
to
properties
or
don't
do
to
properties
and-
and
who
is
you
know
what
organism
is
actually
to
blame
or
threatening
a
foundation?
Trees
will
move
around
things
unless
cracks
exist
already,
and
so
my
my
decision
on
this
hasn't
changed.
I'm
going
to
support
the
staff
recommendation
to
refuse
the
removal
of
this.
What
looks
to
be
a
beautiful
tree.
A
A
A
C
C
F
A
H
H
H
H
Those
are
the
exact
words
on
the
application
and
as
such,
today
after
having
met
in
community
council
for
the
discussions,
the
they're
showing
me
that
it
would
only
be
a
3.3
meter
cut,
not
a
5.1
meter,
driveway
cut
at
that
time.
Counselor
shelly
carroll
had
asked.
If,
in
this
ward,
there
would
be
a
two-car
garage
or
double
car
curb
cut,
and
she
had
asked
the
questions
of
transportation
and
transportation
could
not
answer
that
question.
H
H
So
that
is
really
the
the
additional
information
after
having
lived
in
the
home
for
several
months.
That
has
caused
me
to
come
back
and
say:
look
this
tree
will
die
and
the
city
will
lose
its
assets,
it's
just
a
matter
of
time,
but
I
want
to
protect
it
and
increase
it
by
doing
the
right
thing
being
a
21
centimeter
tree.
H
A
D
I
D
A
H
H
On
the
east
side,
there
is
a
bus,
stop
there's
the
daylight
triangle
and
there
was
only
one
location
to
place
this
driveway.
It
wasn't
the
location
I
wanted,
because
I
really
wanted
to
flank
on
the
side
of
garrett
boulevard,
but
they
forced
me
to
go
to
the
west
side
of
the
property
off
off
of
clues.
H
A
H
A
A
H
B
F
B
So
I'm
wondering
if
staff
could
could
enlighten
us
on
why
this
is
coming
to
us
now
was
it?
Was
it
something
noted
in
the
application
before
this
house
was
constructed
and
was
the
tree
required
to
be
protected?
Was
a
protection
zone
required
around
it?
We
have.
We
have
a
report
that
shows
us
the
old
house.
B
F
The
tree
was
protected
during
construction,
because
urban
forestry
didn't
issue
a
permit
for
its
removal.
The
issue
and
and
part
of
it
may
stem
from
the
language
of
our
report
about
the
preferred
driveway
alignment
location
refers
to
the
difference
between
a
double
car
driveway
and
a
single
car
driveway.
F
F
The
permission
approval
through
buildings
and
through
committee
of
adjustment
doesn't
confer
approval
from
urban
forestry.
It's
a
separate
process
and
the
provisions
of
the
street
tree
bylaw
require
us
to
look
at
it
separately
and
and
or
at
least
they
don't
give
us
authority
to
to
to
simply
use
that
prior
approval
through
through
through
committee
of
adjustment
or
through
buildings.
B
Right
right,
mr
chair,
I
wonder
if
we
can,
I,
because
I
want
to
ask
a
general
policy
question.
If
we
could
bring
some
planning
staff
to
the
table,
we
don't
have
a
planning
report
before
us
for
this
property,
but
from
a
policy
perspective,
I
want
to
ask
when
this
first
came
as
a
planning
application
under
our
policy.
B
Our
dips
policy
is,
is
a
double
car
driveway
in
in
in
this
area,
in
a
single-family
dwelling
zone
and
in
this
area
with
these
size
lots
is,
it
is
a
double
wide
driveway
and
a
double
wide
curb
cut.
Is
that
a
variance
and
was
that
variance
just
considered
minor?
And
so
it
was
a
at
committee
of
adjustment.
B
F
I
think
we're
going
to,
if
I
may,
the
there
is.
I
can
speak
to
some
parts
of
this.
I
don't
believe
that
the
double
white
driveway
would
require
any
additional
permissions.
The
non-flank
driveway
as
it's
as
it's
referred
to
the
driveway
flanking.
The
short
side
of
the
driveway
facing
the
short
side
of
the
property
did
require
a
variance.
F
The
previous
property
already
had
a
driveway
on
that
side,
and-
and
I
presume
that
mr
rubino
was
being
straightforward
in
in
the
conversations
about
transportation
and
the
bus
conflict
on
on
the
long
side,
the
flood
as
we
call
it,
the
flank
side,
so
variance-
was
granted
for
the
non-flank
driveway.
Urban
forestry
did
not
oppose
that
a
because
there
was
already
a
driveway
there
and
b,
because
we
did
see
the
potential
for
a
single
car
driveway
to
exist.
A
Well
I'll,
I
realize
these
applications
are
contentious
and
divisive,
but
at
the
same
time
I
visited
the
site.
I
I
met
with
the
owners.
I
took
a
look.
The
the
owner
had
good
faith
approvals
from
committee
of
adjustment.
True
forestry
can
kind
of
override
some
of
the
decisions
made
there
in
in.
In
a
way,
this
tree
is
not
some
beautiful
historic
200
year
old,
canopy
type
tree.
It's
a
very
small
tree.
A
That's
right
on
the
public
right-of-way
at
the
end
of
a
driveway,
its
survival,
its
ability
to
survive
is
low.
In
my
opinion,
over
the
long
run-
and
I
think
government
has
to
be-
has
to
be
good
faith.
We
made
a
we
made
a
decision,
a
committee
of
adjustment.
There
was
a
good
faith,
construction
project,
the
side
of
the
driveway,
the
driveway
configuration
was
not
the
preferred
location.
That
was
a
preferred
of
staff.
Knowing
there
was
a
a
tree
there.
A
I
think
there
was
one
that
that
appeared
on
my
docket,
where
senior
was
worried
about
slipping
on,
leaves
and
wanted
a
full
tree
removed,
and
there
was
another
one
we
dealt
with
earlier,
where,
where
the
roots,
it
was
believed
by
the
homeowner
that
the
roots
were
damaging
the
infrastructure
of
the
property,
where
no
no
proof
was
given
to
that
effect.
But
this
one,
I
think,
has
merit
to
be
saved.
I
think
we
gain
more
trees.
A
B
Yes
I'll
speak
to
this,
you
know
I
I'm
I'm
now
not
put
in
this
position
by
a
resident
in
my
area.
So
I
I
I'm
not
in
this
difficult
position,
but
I
I
was
almost
going
to
be
in
the
position
of
having
to
do
this
same
thing.
We
like
to
support
the
tree
policy,
but
we
discussed
in
north
york,
community
council
pre-pandemic,
and
so
I
know
that
staff
have
been
challenged
by
this,
but
but
you
know,
senior
staff,
most
of
them
being
pulled
into
to
other
endeavors
during
the
state
of
emergency.
B
But
we
were
asking
for
a
review
of
certain
aspects
of
the
tree
policy
process.
Every
policy
needs
a
good
process
and
you
know
I
have
a.
I
have
a
a
a
single
family
dwelling
applicant
in
in
my
word
that
was
put
in
a
similar
position
where,
where
they
went
in
and
all
along
were
quite
open
with
with
the
planning
desk
and
and
working
in
advance
of
proceeding
with
things
and
getting
their
advice
and
planning
staff
actually
said.
B
No,
you
can't
put
the
driveway
there
and
we
got
to
get
rid
of
this
circular
driveway
and
you
got
to
move
it
over
here
and
not
really
noticing
two
giant
mature
trees
where
they,
where
they
actually
were,
telling
the
architect
and
owner
to
put
their
driveway,
and
so
they
proceeded
spent.
A
lot
of
money,
thankfully,
did
not
begin
construction,
but
you
know
you
spend
a
lot
of
money
on
those
retrain
retainers
up
front
and
thankfully
that's
not
before
us,
because
you
know
we
would
have
been
in
a
difficult
position.
B
But
the
the
applicant
began
to
realize.
There's
got
to
be
a
different
way
to
look
at
this
because
he
lives
in
an
extremely
tree,
passionate
neighborhood.
They
have.
They
have
a
whole
committee
just
to
save
trees
within
the
community,
ratepayers
and
residents
association,
and
so
they
they
had
to
go
back
to
the
drawing
board
at
great
expense.
But
this
this
issue
of
of
planning
and
then
committee
of
adjustment,
not
underscoring
nearly
enough
the
position
they
put
our
forestry
staff
in
and
our
council
in,
because
we
have
a
duty
to
try
and
increase
our
tree.
B
Canopy
is,
to
my
mind,
a
broken
link
in
in
the
chain
of
this
policy
process,
and
I
make
this
speech
only
because
I
want
to
remind
staff
that
having
a
report
back
on
the
priority
of
fixing
this
so
that
right
at
the
first
counter,
it's
really
clear
to
people.
The
forestry
staff
will
have
a
duty
to
to
protect
the
tree
at
all.
B
Cost
and
council
has
a
commitment
to
protect
trees
at
all
costs,
and
it's
going
to
put
you
at
odds
really,
then
forces
not
the
applicant
into
an
unpleasant
situation,
but
it
forces
architects
and
contractors
to
do
their
best
work
and
that's
what
I
would
like
to
do.
An
architect
should
should
be
saying
up
front.
We
got
to
design
around
this
tree
because
if
we
don't
I'm
going
to
put
you
in
a
world
of
trouble
later
on
and
once
again
one
did
not,
and
so
you
know
I
can
support
the
counselor
in
this.
B
C
Yes,
I
think
councillor
carroll
really
illustrates
the
frustration.
I
think
that
our
urban
forestry
department
has
and
that
we
have
we've
gone
through
this
before,
where
I
know
I
can't
remember,
called
the
incident.
It
was
in
my
ward,
where
committee
of
adjustment
had
made
approvals,
and
I
asked
whether
urban
forestry
was
even
able
to
make
a
a
report
and
they
weren't,
because
they
said
it's
in
the
hands
of
committee
of
adjustment.
A
A
With
the
tree
replacement
policy
embedded
in
the
motion,
all
those
in
favor
post
that
is
carried.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
have
item
25.
Next
is
application
to
remove
two
city
home
trees,
this
one
we
can
dispose
of
quickly.
There
is
a
motion
attached
to
it.
This
is
what
we
call
a
passive.
This
is
a
passive
house
location.
Oh,
you
know
what
do
we
have.
D
B
Yeah,
I
I
have
a
question.
I
you
know
I'm
having
trouble
with
the
the
the
comment
in
the
report.
It
is,
I
guess,
the
case
that
that
that
you
would
have
made
as
an
applicant
that
you're
going
to
save
us
greenhouse
gases
with
your
house
and
and
what
you're
gonna
do
to
the
house
will
save
more
greenhouse
gas
than
a
regular
house,
but
also
that
it
would
save
more
greenhouse
gas
than
a
tree.
B
D
And
also
with
replacing
the
trees
to
deciduous,
we
gain
that
extra
solar.
We
also
gain
more
cooling
as
well
down
the
road.
So
you
know
what
we're
doing
is
we're
putting
carbon
into
the
atmosphere
to
be
cleaned
up
by
tree,
and
I
mean
we
still
want
to
treat
it
front.
We
love
trees
and
also
you
know,
zero
and
and
down
the
road.
D
D
And
it's
it's
more
about:
well,
it's
about
actually
optimizing
and
getting
even
a
little
bit
more
out
of
out
of
of
out
of
what
we're
doing.
We've
maxed
everything
like
we've
designed
and
looked
at
every
every
specific
way.
We
can
to
make
this.
The
best
thing
we
can
do-
and
you
know
one
of
the
five
principles
of
of
this
pacifist-
is
the
solar
gain
and
so
we're
in
a
position
where
we
need
that
extra
little
peace-
and
I
mean
andrew,
probably
can
speak
more
eloquently
to
this
than
I
can.
B
B
G
Minutes
great,
thank
you
for
this
opportunity,
so
we
all
recognize
that
that
action
on
climate
change
is
imperative
and
pacifist
is
a
key
tool
to
addressing
climate
change.
The
the
toronto
green
standard
is
a
great
policy
instrument
developed
by
the
city,
but
it
doesn't
cover
single-family
homes.
So
there's
a
policy
gap.
The
homeowners,
terry
and
nancy,
could
have
done
a
conventional
home
with
much
greater
environmental
impact.
G
Instead,
they
are
volunteering
to
be
the
first
to
certify
their
building
to
the
pacific
standard.
No
one
in
the
city
has
committed
to
this
goal.
To
date,
they
are
actually
willing
to
invest
their
hard
earned
money
to
do
something.
The
city
wants
and
needs
to
pave
a
path
for
others
and
demonstrate
what's
possible.
G
Achieving
certification
is
an
important
goal
for
numerous
reasons.
From
a
policy
perspective,
the
first
certified
passpost
in
vancouver
helps
spur
vancouver
passwords
policy
and
adoption
of
passivhaus
vancouver
now
has
over
two
million
square
feet
of
past
posts
in
development,
including
a
60-story
high-rise
project.
G
All
because
people
saw
it's
possible
and
then
it
delivered
on
its
promise,
so
they
started
to
apply
the
standard
to
other
projects.
The
value
of
the
property
will
increase
with
passport
certification.
Falling
short
of
passports
will
mean
the
property
won't
be
recognized
by
the
market,
as
there
will
be.
No
third
party
verification
we've
seen
this
with
near
pacific
projects
in
other
markets,
green
washing
is
rampant,
so
certification
is
critical
to
market
trust.
G
The
expansion
of
passports
across
the
city
provides
wider
benefits,
including
environmental
and
economic,
to
the
city,
than
the
two
existing
trees.
I'll
emphasize
that
we
do
not
intend
to
set
a
precedent
and
encourage
free
replacement
on
future
projects.
We're
merely
proposing
this
as
a
necessary
means
for
achieving
much
greater
benefit
for
the
city
and
the
globe,
and
so
it's
really
about
the
the
you
know
it's
beyond
just
this
project
that
we
can
see
others
when
they
see
the
success
of
this
project
that
they'll
want
to
do
likewise.
G
B
G
The
issue
is
with
the
existing
trees
being
coniferous,
they
provide
shading
year-round
and
so
they
block
out
the
sun
in
the
winter.
That
is
an
important
contribution
to
reducing
the
energy
demand
in
the
building
and,
conversely,
they
do
provide
shading
in
the
summer,
so
they
help
reduce
the
the
cooling
load.
So
they've
got
a
double
benefit.
G
B
G
G
B
G
B
A
I
just
I
maybe
I
should
have
said
at
the
top
of
this
item
that
there's
a
parallel
process
going
on
here,
as
this
creeps
through
the
decision-making
process.
There's
another
process
going
on
we're
sitting
and
I
have
a
motion
to
this
effect-
we're
developing
a
policy,
a
new
policy
that
we
do
not
have
now.
This
is
a
policy
vacuum
because
we
don't
know
what
to
do
with
with
tree
tree
removal
tree
planting
on
passive
houses,
passive
houses
that
we
want
to
encourage
and
tree
planting
that
we
want
to
encourage.
A
So
forestry
is
working
on
a
policy
that
will
go
to,
I
believe,
planning
and
housing
and
then
up
to
council,
but
it's
a
few
weeks
away.
So
at
the
end,
I'm
going
to
move
a
motion
for
this
to
be
deferred
until
council
has
reviewed
the
the
policy.
So
I
just
want
to
say
that
now
before
we
move
any
further
on
the
item
yeah,
so
we
are,
we
are
going
to
defer
it.
I
was
going
to
ask
mr
bostock
to
explain
that
in
questions
to
staff.
A
A
A
It's
to
wait
for
council
to
make
a
decision
or
foreign
street
to
bring
a
report
to
council
and
for
council
to
make
a
decision
on
on
a
policy
on
how
we
govern
the
tree,
planting
and
tree
removal
of
of
passive
homes
and
that's
yeah,
so
we're
gonna
make
a.
I
think
we're
gonna
make
a
slight
change
to
this,
so
it
so
people
understand
it's
it's
to
align.
B
B
A
E
E
E
I
support
having
a
tree
bylaw
policy
and
appreciate
having
this
forum
to
present
this
application
under
an
appeal.
I
would
like
the
record
to
reflect.
The
application
was
made
because
the
tree
is
overhanging
the
dwelling
property
and
neighboring
driveway,
which
is
the
narrative
presented
in
the
staff
report.
Please
let
the
report
show
that
the
reason
for
a
private
tree
removal
application
was
for
personal
and
property
safety,
which
is
verified
in
the
application
to
injury,
remove
trees.
E
E
E
The
tree
is
more
of
a
hazard
to
people
and
property
than
any
perceived
economic
benefit.
The
property
has
plenty
of
other
features
that
speak
for
economic
benefits
and
attractions
to
investors.
For
example,
it's
an
extra
large
lot
very
wide
frontage
proximity
to
amenities,
forest-like
conditions
in
the
backyard
with
multiple,
mature
trees.
Significant
observation.
I
would
like
that
members
to
consider.
E
I
am
not
a
developer,
who
came
in
to
tear
down
a
beautiful
bungalow
that
maintains
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
My
neighbors,
many
of
them
long-term
residents
were
relieved
to
know.
I
was
not
another
person
who
wants
to
rebuild
a
monster
home,
taking
up
more
footprints
off
the
lot
and
really
leaving
space
for
mature
tree
planting.
E
My
arborist
report
speaks
for
the
condition
of
the
tree
and
identified
at
least
six
defects
that,
cumulatively
and
on
their
own,
can
be
detrimental
to
the
structural
integrity
of
the
trees.
They
were
listed
accordingly.
Girdling
roots
seams
in
the
roots,
fused
roots,
exposed
roots,
sleek,
die,
ducks
asymmetrical,
crowning,
raised
crowns
and,
of
course,
there's
a
presence
of
retinosis
and
truth.
E
E
E
E
A
B
Yes,
I
wanna
ask
mr
bostoff
some
questions.
He
he
visited
the
tree
and
and
and
prior
to
that
I
think
one
of
your
staff
visited
this
site
as
well.
The
applicant
miss
miss
smith,
really
went
through
the
the
types
of
of
reasons
we
use
when
forestry
staff
do
approve
the
removal
of
the
tree,
because
at
the
counter
there
are
some
applications
that
are
just
approved
by
staff
and
they
never
come
here
for
appeal.
F
F
F
B
Okay
and
just
for
the
record,
this
is
sort
of
an
on
average.
There
is
some
misunderstanding
because
we
we
see
these
these
appeals
before
council,
but
there
are.
There
are
lots
of
instances
where
people
apply
and
they
do
meet
the
conditions
and
forestry
staff
just
go
ahead
and
and
approve
of
that
removal.
We
don't.
We
don't
see
that
at
community
council
we
don't
see
that
later
at
city
council
they
just
happen.
Do
you
have
any
idea
of
the
proportion
of
those.
F
B
When
we
visited
the
site
and
mr
bostock
who's
who's,
the
the
supervisor
of
our
division
for
forestry
needs
actually
visited
the
site,
not
just
you
know,
one
of
his
his
agents,
but
we
had
him
visit
the
site
before
the
appeal
came
to
community
council,
because
we
really
wanted
to
to
make
sure
that
that
that
an
examination
had
really
fully
been
been
been
done,
because
because
the
the
applicant
is
so
passionate
about
this
and
at
that
time
this
is
a
cautionary
tale
about
deferring
items.
At
that
time.
B
I
I
let
the
the
resident
know
you
really
do
need
to
try
and
get
me
some
some
letters
of
support
from
one
or
two
of
your
community
members.
Maybe
your
next
door
neighbors,
because
the
the
problem
that
I
face
is
staff
are
not
recommending
it
and
this
particular
neighborhood.
The
neighborhood
of
baby
village
is
extremely
environmentally
focused,
they
have
ravine
stewards,
they
have
an
environmental
committee
and
because
they
have
had
so
many
monster
homes,
they
have
all
the
development
along
shepard.
B
They
are
passionate
about
the
city
of
toronto's
tree
policy
and
trying
to
avoid
tree
removal
wherever
possible.
They
attend
committee
of
adjustment
meetings
to
just
to
review
items
and
make
sure
the
tree
protection
zones
are
going
to
be
there.
They
they
highlight
after
the
fact
when
something's
been
built,
did
the
setback
is
the
setback
such
in
the
backyard
that
it's
damaging
a
tree,
and
we
have
to
bring
items
forward
later.
B
They're
very
passionate
about
this,
and
what
has
happened
here
is
is,
while
the
applicant
has
been
unable
to
find
any
supporters
for
per
application
for
removal
in
the
interim,
because
they
also
monitor
north
york
community
council
to
see
what
our
actions
are
on
tree
preservation
across
the
city.
The
community
is
now
very,
very
focused
on
this
application,
and
so
we
have
a
letter
on
behalf
of
the
whole
environmental
committee
of
the
residents
association,
a
nearby
condo
community,
st
gabes,
who
have
taken
it
upon
themselves.
B
The
condo
board
to
be
stewards
of
the
tree
replacement
for
the
condo.
They
live
in,
there's
a
lot
of
passion
around
saving
this
tree
now
in
the
community,
and
so
while
I,
while
I
really
appreciate
the
pride
in
her
property
and
the
passion
of
the
applicant,
it's
now
a
matter
of
the
community
mobilizing
around
it,
and
so
I
have
to
support
staff
recommendations,
as
they
are
very,
very
focused
on
this
upholding
the
tree
policy
in
this
community.
A
Thank
you,
counselor
carol.
Anyone
else
to
speak
on
the
item.
No
okay,
counselor
carol
is
moving
the
staff
recommendations,
all
those
in
favor
posed
that
is
carried.
So
we
can
now
go
back
to
item
three
councilor
cole.
You
had
held
item
three
down
it's
a
series
of
addresses
on
lawrence
avenue,
west
and
avenue
road
preliminary
report.
What
would
you
like
to
do
with
the
item?
C
D
D
D
Okay,
it
would
it's
it's
related
to
the
width
of
the
abutting
street,
and
in
this
case
we
are
on
an
avenue.
Avenue
road
is
a
is,
has
an
avenue
overlay,
it
would
be
anything
beyond
so
we
have
other
development
in
the
area
which
is
up
to
eight
stories
beyond
27
meters.
So
that's
what
we
would
consider
to
be
a
small
building
on
a
narrower
street.
We
consider
a
tall
building.
For
example,
it
was
a
street
that
only
had
a
right-of-way
of
20
meters.
It
would
be
beyond
20
meters.
C
C
C
We
can
see
havergill's
property
and
then
there's
the
site
in
question,
which
is
now
housing
a
starbucks
and
used
to
be
the
site
of
a
a
pet
store.
And
then
so-
and
you
know,
the
interesting
thing
is
about
traffic
impact
is
on
this
site
is
right.
Now
it
is
an
extremely
challenging
location
for
traffic
because,
as
you
know,
because
of
pusa
terry's
popularity
they've
had
to
hire
a
traffic
officer
there.
You
know
certainly
every
friday
saturday
sunday.
C
So
that's
caused
a
lot
of
traffic
challenges
because
people
like
to
shop
at
pusa,
terry's
myself,
I
used
to
shop
episodes
when
they
were
at
saint
claire
and
north
cliff,
but
I
it's
not
one
of
my
haunts
right
now,
but
anyways.
So
there
are
traffic
challenges
right
now
because
of
the
car
wash
because
of
the
pusitaries.
C
There's
the
royal
lighting
up
there
and
there
are
two
high
schools
right
around
there:
a
lot
of
pedestrian
traffic
from
havergal
and
from
lawrence
park
collegiate
to
the
to
the
east
and
plus
we've
got
as
you
can
see
in
the
photo
on
avenue.
Road
we've
got
a
a
highway
going
through
the
middle
of
toronto.
That's
avenue
road
and
you
know
people
are
on
their
way
to
the
401
and
beyond.
C
C
So,
whatever
we
do
here,
it's
critical
that
we
take
those
pressures
into
account.
Also,
the
fact
is
that
this
site
backs
on
to
a
toronto
conservation
authority
land,
the
douglas
greenbelt
to
the
rear-
and
it
also,
as
I
said
before,
is
a
gateway
to
the
upper
avenue
community
there
and
the
communities.
C
That's
what
I
think
is
very,
very
important
there
and
that
we
have
sidewalks
on
lawrence
and
on
avenue
road
that
are
wide
and
very,
very
welcoming
to
pedestrians,
and
you
know
other
people
and
certainly
accommodate
some
enhanced,
cycling
opportunities,
etc.
So,
and
certainly,
I
would
hope
that
the
the
application
and
planning
staff
try
to
encourage
some
kind
of
public
open
space
on
the
corner,
whether
it
be
the
public
park
right
there.
C
Yes,
that
there
be
a
perhaps
a
plaza,
you
know
with
inviting
public
art
landscaping,
because
right
now
as
much
as
it's
very
popular,
it's
quite
ugly,
as
you
can
see
what
we
have
there.
We
we
have
what
james
constructs
referred
to.
Maybe
alvarozzowski
would
remember
in
his
book
the
geography
of
nowhere.
C
In
other
words,
you
could
be
in
saskatoon,
or
you
could
be,
you
know
somewhere
in
etobicoke,
north
whatever
it
is,
but
so
we've.
This
is
an
opportunity
to
define
this
area
to
bring
in
some
public
realm
improvements
and
make
it
inviting
a
gateway
into
this
incredibly
wonderful
part
of
toronto
right
in
the
middle
so,
and
I
would
hope
that
we
set
up
a
working
committee.
C
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
So
when
it
comes
to
reports
like
this,
I
see
there's
some
short-term
goals,
short-term
improvements
and
long-term
improvements-
you,
I
guess
staff
visited,
visited
this
intersection
in
the
aftermath
of
a
terrible
accident
and
when
it
comes
to
the
the
short-term
improvements,
what
do
you
think
is
the
normal
timeline
for
getting
those
for
getting
those
looked
at,
studied
or
implemented?
I
see
one's
done
already.
D
Within
typically
a
a
couple
weeks
to
a
couple
months,
I
would
say
less
than
a
year
I
mean
it
depends
on
the
individual
improvement.
You
know
some
signs
can
be
changed
fairly
quickly,
but
when
we're
talking
about
physical
improvements
changes
the
curves
that
sort
of
thing
it's
more
in
the
timeline
of
years-
so
I
say
probably
less
than
a
year,
okay
and
if
there's
something
that
we
could
do
sooner
than
else,
we
wouldn't.
A
B
D
Varies
you
know,
typically,
we
would
coordinate
it
with
some.
You
know
planned
capital
work,
so
you
know
depending
on
when
that
ends
on
calvington.
So
I
think
in
the
report.
We
specifically,
I
guess,
identified
on
the
next
construction,
so
2024
for
keel
street
and
2025
for
calvington
drive.
So
it
would
typically
be
in
that
time
at
that
time,
when
we
would
incorporate
these
improvements.
D
A
A
A
Oh
it's
on
the
screen
already,
where,
where
we
can
encourage
staff
and
support
staff
in
in
looking
at
any
any
potential
opportunities
at
this
intersection
where
we
might
be
able
to
make
it
safer
and
and
reduce
any
kind
of
future
tragedies
like
this,
whether
it's
an
injury
or
or
it's
a
death
or
or
or
and
property
damage.
So
I
think
this
is
what
we
owe
the
the
family
to
to
make
sure
that
we
do
everything
possible
to
to
ensure
that
this
doesn't
happen
again.
A
A
I
believe
it's.
The
last
item
on
the
agenda
is
1727
4588
of
bathurst
street.
The
reason
this
is
here
is
there
was
an
attempt
to
to
bring
us
a
staff
report
earlier
this
in
the
year
for
this
sign
in
front
of
the
the
sherman
campus
or
the
bjcc
on
bathurst
street.
Some
issues
happened
with
the
pandemic.
It
was
to
come
back
in
the
spring.
Kova
delayed
everything,
and
the
reason
this
is
here
is
basically
this.
The
death
point
for
submitting
agenda
items
had
been
missed.
A
So
staff
drafted
this
motion.
It's
a
positive
staff
report
for
a
sign
indicating
the
location
of
the
what
we
sometimes
call
the
sherman
campus
or
the
jewish
community
center
at
4588
bathurst
street.
This
would
normally
come
as
a
staff
report
and
an
item,
but
because
of
some
pandemic
related
issues
and
staffing
related
issues,
it
missed
that
deadline
and
that's
why
it's
here
as
a
member
motion
drafted
by
staff,
I
said
I
would
bring
it
here
to
expedite
it.
A
E
E
E
My
name
is
sophie
halbert
and
I
work
for
the
center
for
israel
and
jewish
affairs,
so
this
sign
is
being
approved
as
part
of
the
construction
of
a
new
jewish
community
center
at
the
uja's
sherman
campus
on
bathurst
street.
This
new
jcc
is
an
amazing
facility
that
has
benefited
from
the
support
of
toronto
city
council
throughout
its
planning
and
construction
process.
E
The
project
is
providing
much
needed:
recreational
infrastructure
in
councillor,
pastrnak's,
ward,
6,
funded
primarily
through
private
philanthropy
and
recognized
for
its
importance
to
the
community
as
a
recipient
of
federal
infrastructure
funding.
For
this
we
are
appreciative,
given
the
unique
valley
setting
of
sherman
campus.
The
sign
which
is
before
committee
today
is
critical
to
letting
the
community
know
that
this
facility
is
open
and
offering
a
wide
variety
of
services
and
programs.
E
The
sign
will
be.
The
sign
will
be
used
to
promote
programs
and
activities
on
the
campus.
It
will
be
used
to
announce
information
on
courses,
camps
day,
cares,
swimming
lessons,
etc,
and
it
will
also
be
used
to
promote
important
civic
activities
that
might
take
place
on
campus,
such
as
blood
donor
clinics
and
community
meetings.
In
emergencies.
It
will
be
used
to
provide
important
resource
and
contact
information
for
things
such
as
the
food
support
program,
connection
with
social,
social
service
agencies
and
health
and
wellness
programming
that
is
available
on
campus.
E
A
A
It
always
was,
and
certainly
it
is
more
so
now
with
the
major
investment
the
community
has
made
in
it.
Are
there
any
questions
for
the
deputies
regarding
this
this
pillar?
This
sign?
No
okay!
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
deputation
and
appreciate
you,
your
patience
and
coming
and
once
again,
on
behalf
of
north
york,
community
council
congratulate
the
great
work
and
investment.
That's
going
into
that
site
that
benefits
everyone
and
the
whole
community.
So
thank
you
very
much.
A
A
A
Shall
this
bill
be
passed
and
declared
as
a
by-law
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that
is
carried
my
campaign
slogan
to
be
chair
as
a
north
york,
community
council
was
done
by
noon
and
we
almost
did
it.
So.
Thank
you
very
much
counselors
city
staff
clerks
our
tech
support.
I
thought
this
was
a
great
format
and
have
a
great
day
and
be.