►
From YouTube: OpenActive W3C Community Group Meeting / 2017-04-26
Description
A public hangout for members of the OpenActive W3C Community Group.
Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-openactive/2017Apr/0009.html
For more information visit: https://www.openactive.io/w3c-community-group.html
A
A
To
share
share
my
slides,
so
yeah
so
main
agenda
item
event,
attendance
and
booking
any
OB,
so
miss
characters
of
the
you
else
want
to
cover
and
they're
just
a
review
of
what
we'll
be
doing
at
the
next
few
meetings.
So
I
circulated
a
kind
of
outline
agenda
and
kind
of
some
discussion
points
week
or
so
ago.
I've
just
come
back
from
holiday,
so
hopefully
that
time
too,
all
I
can
think
about
that
over
the
last.
A
So,
to
my
mind,
we've
got
we
looking
at
kind
of
the
two
separate
phases
to
get
people
more
active,
there's,
helping
them
discover
or
find
the
events
activities,
the
opportunities
that
are
happening
around
them
and
that's
been
our
current
focus
and
then
there's
actually
getting
them
to
participate
and
the
key
part
of
participation
is
signing
up
booking
and
getting
involved.
So
there's
a
handoff
there
from
the
kind
of
discovery
phase
off
to
the
booking
and
participation
phase.
A
So
while
we're
not
planning
to
get
into
the
details
of
booking
just
yet,
we
do
need
to
make
sure
that
those
two
phases
align
some
so
that
in,
whilst
were
still
considering
and
researching
our
best
to
handle
booking
that
the
open
data
that
is
being
published
and
shared
and
used
is
supporting
getting
people
more
active
so
that
there
is
some
kind
of
handoff
to
whatever
existing
contact
points,
booking
systems
or
workflows
that
people
currently
have.
So
what
we
don't
want
to
do
really
is
end
up
publishing
data
that
results
in
kind
of
dead
ends.
A
So
people
can
discover
events
but
they're,
not
what
figure
out
how
to
go
on
from
there
how
to
participate
so
I
put
together
this
next
slide,
which
summarizes
a
for
me
or
try
to
summarize
how
these
two
phases
align
with
one
another.
So
on
the
discovery
phase
is
all
the
detail
that
we
have
in
the
current
specification,
some
of
which
are
just
about
describing
basic
details
of
the
events,
so
textual
descriptions,
dates
and
times
locations.
A
What
will
be
happening,
but
also
some
things
that
are
relevant
to
this
kind
of
sign,
posting
and
handoff
booking,
so
contact
points
to
contact
venues
and
organizers.
Any
notes
for
attendees
things
that
I
could
also
put
in
this
category
are
things
like
capacity,
so
how
many
people
go
to
an
event,
whether
it's
fee
or
or
whether
is
a
fee
to
be
paid
any
other
kind
of
participation
requirements
like
membership
or
equipment?
So
for
me
that
kind
of
discovery
information
is
largely
unchanging.
It's
that
it's
the
current
focus
of
the
open
data
publishing
work.
A
It's
mostly
about
this
kind
of
descriptive
information
about
the
event,
but
there
has
to
be
some
kind
of
sign
posting
on
hand
off
the
booking
and
the
things
that
they're
doing
currently,
in
my
mind,
under
the
kind
of
booking
heading,
are
things
like?
What's
the
current
availability
for
an
individual
session?
No,
is
it
fully
booked
yet
or
not?
What
options
do
I
have
to
pay?
A
Is
it
worth
my
while
to
become
a
member
and
then
I
can
pay
less
or
it'll,
be
free,
more
detail
on
kind
of
pricing
plans
and
then
everything
related
to
the
kind
of
transactional
aspects
of
booking
so
kind
of
confirmation
cancellation?
You
know
any
updates
that
need
to
be
pushed
out
to
attendees,
so
that
kind
of
information
is
more
transactional
and
I.
Think
more
dynamic,
because
you
know
at
least
the
availability
is
going
to
change
over
time.
A
So
that's
my
you
know
that
that's
the
way
that
I've
been
viewing
the
work
so
far
and
why
I
thought
was
important
to
have
a
discussion
to
make
sure
that
we're
doing
this
handoff
correctly.
At
the
moment,
summation
we
have
no
dead
ends,
so
really
I,
just
kind
of
want
to
open
it
up
to
everybody
at
that
point
and
see
what
you
think
of
that
framing.
Does
that
kind
of
make
sense
to
you?
B
Thankfully,
just
one
thing:
I'm
not
sure
that
appropriate
for
the
best,
but
as
always
required
when
making
a
booking
is
terms
of
use
of
pictures
and
that's
something.
We've
come
across.
A
lot
of
our
different
partners
is
making
sure
those
kinds
of
views
are
absolutely
clear
to
the
user
or
accessible
by
the
user.
Yeah
and
I'm,
not
sure
that
should
be
put
in
here
terms
of
use
of
pictures
of
the
pictures
or
isolated.
B
B
A
A
And
then
you
I'm
posting
an
email
earlier,
though
I'm
not
sure
what
everyone
has
a
chance
to
see
it
yet
or
not.
You
went
into
some
detail
about
how
open
sessions
is
handling
summers,
I'm,
gonna,
just
kind
of
step
through
through
your
thoughts.
Yes,.
C
Sure
so
I
can
talk
about
some
of
the
fields,
some
of
which
seems
to
be
included
some
and
not
so
open
sessions,
less
providers
who
they
often
don't
have
booking
systems
they're
often
sought
smaller
providers
and
sports
clubs
and
the
kind
of
are
going
to
in
the
fields
that
were
kind
of
asking
for
that.
C
We
find
important
to
giving
the
end-user
enough
information
to
be
able
to
go
to
something
so
session,
leader
which
I've
not
seen
on
a
spec
I'm,
not
sure
if
it's
on
there,
which
is
basically
here's
the
code
who's
in
charge
of
the
session
that
someone
can
look
out
for
when
they
when
they
get
there
and.
C
Also
that
that
may
come
within
a
profile
image,
then
there's
the
session
contact
the
person.
You
would
contact
if
you
had
questions
about
session
beforehand
and
we
ask
for
either
a
phone
number
or
an
email
address
and
a
name
and
what
we
find.
What
we
find
with
open
sessions
is
that
often
to
the
actual
organizer
of
the
session
may
be
an
organization,
but
then
the
person
you'd
contact
is
sometimes
different.
C
So
we
allow
that
to
be
different.
We
allow
that
to
be
different
set
of
information,
but
you
could
actually
just
say
it's
the
same.
A
bit
like
when
you
check
out-
and
you
say
my
billing
address
and
my
personal
address
is
same
sort
of
thing.
We
could
do
that
feel
they're
moving
on
its
first
session
free
the
options
to
what
we
saw
is
that
quite
a
lot
of
clubs.
Let's
someone
come
and
try
things
out
before
they
have
to
pay
for
anything.
C
Then
we've
got
which
I
see
has
already
been
covered:
the
payment
methods
so
carlo
cash,
that's
if
somebody's
actually
paying
when
they
get
there.
So
we
just
try
and
make
it
as
clear
as
possible
whether
you
have
to
you
know
how
do
you
have
to
bring
cash,
bring
a
card
booking
implants,
email
the
coast
so
you're
coming?
C
We
just
try
and
make
that
clear
and
for
finally,
just
two
more
fields
is
the
meeting
of
instructions
and
what
to
bring
which
are
directly
related
to
booking.
But
we
find
that
they're
really
helpful
in
terms
of
encouraging
people
to
come
along
meeting
instructions
with
objects
often
captured
things
that
an
address
alone
doesn't
capture
and
then
what
to
bring
often
captures
things
that
a
session
description
often
doesn't
doesn't
actually
manage
to
capture,
and
these
are
designed
as
prompts
to
basically
get
providers
to
describe
their
sessions
in
a
better
way
in
a
multiple,
thoughtful
way.
A
So
in
those
last
couple,
then,
you
might
choose
to
all
those
are
separate
fields
in
your
system,
so
there's
a
description:
what
doing
and
meeting
instructions
because
actually
yeah,
okay,
so
two
others
on
the
call
have
that
similar
breakdown.
These
four
kind
of
discussions
so
Terry.
What
do
I've
assumed
a
set.
D
Up
if
we
have
firm
I
think
we
have
a
lot
to
bring
a
field.
I
forget
what
it's
called,
but
we
have
been
a
bring
a
towel,
etc.
But
we
didn't
have
detail
bleaching
instructions,
I'm
thinking
that
that's
a
really
good
idea
to
be
honest,
because
even
if
you
got
called
somehow
guys
got
eggs
and
use
so
she
would
say
no.
You
need
to
go
down
the
end
and
on
colder
team
they're,
not
three
flights
of
stairs
that
saying
I
suppose
very
useful
right.
E
From
a
design
point
of
view,
we
have
additional
information
which
is
kind
of
free
text.
So
typically
it's
the
non-marking
cells
in
the
squash
court
type
thing.
It
may
be
a
bit
of
extra
information,
maybe
even
saying
this
is
research
and
such
instructor.
So
it's
all
in
one
place
with
well.
Okay,
so
you
just
have.
A
F
Leah,
the
other
one
is,
is
whether
maybe
Bishop
is
abroad,
because
once
you
still
correct,
if
you
are
going
to
pending
on
who,
if
you
want
to
protect
all
quiet-
and
they
said
they
would
open
up
some
of
their
dating
priestly
opportunity
day
to
out.
Well,
that's
fine,
but
it
quite
a
lot
of
the
time
you'd
have
to
be
a
member
of
that
seemed
to
actually
take
part,
and
when
we
did
Spago
we
did
two
more
officials.
F
First,
they
were
opening
up
part
of
their
sessions,
so
they
would
have
spare
capacity
and
they
would
open
that
up.
Normally,
you
know
you're
showing
that
in
a
slightly
different
way
than
you
would
do
a
normal
normal
about
350
suppose,
because
you
can
go
into
for
this
first
club
without
being
a
fit
Express
member,
but
we
did
some
work
where
we
basically
could
show
that
these
sessions
here,
actually
you
can
go
in
the
sock,
add
a
fee
or
whatever
you
go
in
using
it.
For
that
particular
session
right,
okay,.
B
Yeah,
we
always
say
if
a
membership
is
required
and
it
tends
to
be
either
free
and
play
or
membership.
B
And
I
think
the
free
text
field
is
a
good
way
towards
we.
We
have
it
what's
called
the
description
of
each
facility
and
if
there's
only
access
information,
then
it
can
go
in
there
it's
bit
of
a
Pandora's
box,
because
you
don't
ask
a
to
find,
but
you
want
each
person
you
spend
your
facility
and
operator
to
have
the
ability
to
give
access
information.
A
Okay,
it's
useful
and
so
I'm
just
going
back
to
one
or
two
the
points
that
Ben
is
making
a
start.
So
then,
this
session
leader
I'd
like
to
discuss
that
a
little
bit,
because
we
do
have
some
support
for
that
in
the
inspect.
Currently
so,
but
I
just
kind
of
want
to
check,
maybe
with
just
looking
at
it
just
to
see
whether
it's
good
enough
or
whether
there's
some
refinements
I'm
going
to
see
if
I
can
bring
up
the
diagrams
am
I
making
easier.
So
here's
that
is
a
the
current
schema
diagram.
A
A
Check,
if
it's
not
so
it's
good,
yeah,
okay,
so
we've
got
the
event
in
in
the
middle
and
an
event
can
have
named
people
and
organizations
associated
with
it
and
there's
currently
two
ways
that
they
can
be
associated.
They
can
be
march
of
the
organizer,
so
we
can
have
the
organizer
be
an
organization
or
it
could
be
a
dividual
person
and
all
there
can
be
a
contributor.
A
So
that's
somebody
involved
in
running
events,
but
not
necessarily
the
organizer,
so
I
think
the
way
that
I've
documented
the
moment
is
that
that
the
I
think
what
you
were
calling
the
session
leader
would
be
the
organizer.
So
if
there
was
a
particular
coach,
then
there
would
be
the
event
organizer
and
we
have
properties
there
to
give
me
the
identify
the
name
description'
if
they
want
to
put
a
bio
image
and
schema.
A
Org
also
has
some
existing
properties
to
add
kind
of
contact,
information,
exact
cetera,
so
we've
got
a
kind
of
basic
framework
for
that.
So
what
I
think
my
question
is:
does
organizer
and
contributor
cover
everything,
or
do
we
need
to
kind
of
be
adding
some
more
subtypes
to
those
relationships?
You
know
so
do
we
need
to
break
out
the
differences
between
a
coach
and
a
trainer
and
the
session
leader,
or
is
that
kind
of
broad
level?
You
know
okay,
I.
D
Think,
there's
probably
a
something
quite
useful
done,
which
is
maybe
insert
another
another
one
which
is
actually
called
something
like
leader,
because
it's
useful
for
the
end
user
to
know
that
it's
being
organized
by
it
could
be
Virgin
active.
It
could
be
undoing.
Closure
said
something
it
could
be
GLL.
It
could
be
a
you
know,
splitting
line
whatever
the
thing
is,
but
useful
smokers
of
the
organization
is
which
is
different
to
who
is
actually
leading
the
session
right.
C
A
So
you
know
in
the
spec
at
the
moment,
we've
got
wording
in
quite
a
few
places
that
the
raises
are
kind
of
warning
around
that
and
that
people
need
to
be
opt-in
to
having
this
information
being
shared
about
them.
So
my
assumption
is:
is
that,
if
somebody's
entering
this
into
a
form
as
part
of
the
lead,
organizer,
then
they're
happy
to
do
that,
and
there
might
be
like
a
bit
of
an
onus
on
platforms
to
make
this
clear
that
this
information
might
be
shared.
G
Obviously
taking
into
account
all
the
saying
about
personal
data
for
Table
Tennis
sessions,
you're,
probably
aware
they're
informal
they're,
probably
in
a
pub
they're
in
one
of
these
venues,
where
or
whatever
that
they
found
the
table
tennis
table
basically
they're
gathering
around
it,
and
so
the
phone
number
for
the
guide.
That's
actually
turning
up
and
bringing
the
bats
and
the
ball
is
the
is
that's
your
entry
point
right.
G
G
Tell
them
I'm
not
going
to
be
there
or
you
can
tell
me
it's
cancelled
or
whatever
a
lot
more
personal,
so
I
guess
it's
to
be
aware
that
this
session
leader
field
doubles
as
a
or
maybe
their
different
roles
are
Dennis,
but
there's
a
different
scenario
where
that
person's
more
important
than
years
and
other
roles
yeah.
Okay,.
A
Yeah
so
yeah
that
would
yeah
it's
useful,
because
I
I
was
going
to
ask
about
contact,
because
what
we
don't
have
at
the
moment
is
a
specific
kind
of
contact
point
and
for
the
event,
my
assumption
has
been
that
when
I
either
use
a
contact
points
for
the
organizer
or
contributor
or
a
contact
point
for
the
location,
because
we
have
schema
doll
that
we
can't
I
was
that
the
model
already
covers
that.
But
it
I
wasn't
sure
whether
we
needed
to
have
contact
for
the
event
that
was
separate
to
this
kind
of
relationship.
F
Be
very
careful,
though,
about
handing
out
or
publishing
I
mean
phone
numbers
as
open
data
with
the
gdpr,
because
otherwise
someone
will
be
advocating
stuff
that
under
the
right
to
be
forgotten,
you
know
organizations
can
follow
it.
It's
a
great
message:
that's
people
to
transfer
to
go
back
through
how
you,
when
they
push
that
information
out
it's
you
know,
I,
don't
think
we
should
really
be
advocating
people
putting
their
personal
phone
numbers
as
open
data.
F
A
Yeah
sure,
and
then
we
can,
we
can
certainly
improve
the
wording
in
this
spec
to
encourage
people
to
think
about
how
that
gets
populated.
But
some
of
this
is
a
issue
for
the
for
the
platforms.
You
know
so
things
like
open
sessions
to
think
about
what
kind
of
user
prompt
they
give
people
when
they're
filling
in
the
forms,
a
sort.
F
A
group
I
agree
with
that,
but
knowing
how
bad
our
sector
is
in
looking
at
the
pork
that
you
know
the
bunkers
and
the
stuff
of
a
lot
of
small
clubs,
because
they
don't
have
this
knowledge,
the
danger
is
that
were
ever
with.
You
know.
Those
elders
continue
to
follow
five
practice
and
potentially
below
what
could
be
bad
practice.
G
F
G
G
If
you
make
the
stage
for
open,
then
you've
lost
the
ability
to
pull
it
back
again,
but
I
think
we
probably
need
some,
because,
because
obviously
user
experience
is
a
challenge
here,
because,
obviously,
if
you
can't
provide
a
phone
number
or
an
email
address
to
actually
turn
up
a
session,
it
will
be
difficult
to
actually
attend
the
thing
which
then
undermines
the
kind
of
point
of
what
we're
doing
so.
I'd
fully
agree
that
we
can't
we
can't
be
telling
people
to
publish
stuff
openly.
G
G
C
Noons
a
good
point
just
to
say
with
open
sessions
when
we
ask
for
an
email
address
that
uses
potential
attendees
can
use.
We
never
published
the
email
address
publicly,
so
it's
just
done
by
a
contact
form
and
the
intention
with
Furnham,
which
is
to
mask
that
unless
a
user
sort
of
goes
looking
for
contact
details,
so
we
haven't
done
that
yet,
but
I've
seen
it
on
gumtree
and
that's
where
the
idea
originates
from.
C
G
It's
been
the
real
challenges
if
our
guidance
says
as
long
as
you
get
explicit
permission
from
someone,
you
can
publish
the
phone
number
openly
that
is
technically
correct,
but
as
Nick
says,
that
might
be
exposing
them
to
additional
risks.
They're,
not
aware
of
in
more
than
just
the
simple
case
in
order
to
provide
the
facility
that
you're
saying
that,
in
terms
of
that,
you
know,
click
to
reveal
because
you'd
still
need
that
data
publish
to
reveal
unless
booking
API
facilitated.
G
A
Know,
I,
guess
I
guess
what's
tricky,
it's
just
where,
so
we
can
include
that
kind
of
facility
in
the
booking
API.
But
what
about
systems
where
there
isn't
for
booking?
There's,
not
a
booking
system
going
to
expose
an
API?
No,
it
is
just
content,
joe
bloggs,
because
he's
going
to
bring
batts
we
need
to.
We
need
to
have
something
to
fill
that
gap.
Whether
it's
guidance,
well
guidance
feels
like
a
minimum
understand
it
all.
A
Just
have
something
ready
framework
but
I
think
trying
to
improve
what
the
sex
is
doing
is
is
something
that
we
probably
need
to
escalate
up
to
open
active
as
the
project
rather
than
for
this
standards
group,
because
I
think
the
people
that
that
might
need
to
read
that
kind
of
guidance
around
personal
data,
UX
commissioning
things
is
it's
kind
of
outside
the
machina,
the
modeling
opportunity.
Data
specification
is
much
more
broader
than
that.
So
there's
a
common
educational
piece,
then
I
think
and.
F
We
did
talk
about
it
when
we
really
started
developing
the
program
of
the
area
where
the
split
was
to
fit
around
leave
the
GDP
OS
and
personal
data,
and
the
program
and
I
think
we
said
we
were
going
to
go
away
and
have
another
think
about
it
and
it
might
be.
It
may
be
something
that
we'd
look
at
as
a
kind
of
module
to
support
some
of
the
work,
but
I
think
you
know
where
we
can.
F
We
should
definitely
pointing
out
to
users
the
implications
of
the
GDP
are
and
what
they
need
to
do
be
aware
of
all
these
issues.
Around
publication
of
any
personal
data
just
make
sure
was
cross-reference
and
all
that
that's
as
far
as
we
can
go
in
terms
of
what
we
do
in
the
standards
group,
but
then
yes,
then,
a
specific
width
or
kind
of
the
better
education
for
the
sector.
We've
Club
matters
a
lot
other
wins
yeah,
okay,
so.
A
In
the
idea
we
haven't
published
yet,
but
we've
got
some
draft
but
guidance
around
handling
of
personal
data
from
a
kind
of
product
point
of
view,
so
things
to
be
thinking
about
doing
development
and
release
and
kind
of
operations,
and
so
that
I
think
is
relevant
to
this,
but
it
could
also
be
tailored
to
the
domain
so
that
it's
using
it.
So
it's
a
bit
more
specific
device
for
the
kind
of
things
we've
been
discussing
here,
but
I've
made
a
note
of
that,
something
that
we
need
to
discuss
more
widely.
A
So
the
scandalous
friends
list
sort
of
that
leaders
contact
points,
I
pricing
them
select,
I
mean
I
just
wants
to
show
you.
The
kind
of
stuff
schema.org
currently
provides
just
as
a
kind
of
because
I
would
be
using
this
I
think
there's
our
starting
point.
So
if
you
suggest
to
come
a
test
test,
how?
Well
you
think
this
is
matches
the
kinds
of
stuff
that
you're
doing
I'm
just
going
to
share
my
browser.
A
A
So
an
event
can
have
multiple
offers
associated
with
it.
So
I
think
that
you
can
give
a
kind
of
event
tickets
as
an
as
an
example,
so
they
have
a
way
of
describing
an
offer
which
includes
ability
to
be
able
to
say
payment
methods
where
the
Opera
offer
is
available
for
a
limited,
limited
period.
A
It's
got
other
things
in
here,
because
it's
covering
product
sales
as
well,
but
price
currency,
also
I,
think
around
a
elegant
eligibility
customer
type.
So
I
think
it
will
happily
cover
the
kind
of
things
where
we
want
to
put
a
price.
You
know
price
members,
non-members
adults
concessions,
the
kind
of
basic
things
that
but
then
was
talking
about.
So
we
have.
We
have
some
vocabulary.
We
can
build
on
there.
A
E
E
People
may
get
it
for
free
because
they've
bought
twelve
for
ten
past
type
Singh,
so
they
might
be
getting
free
because
of
other
things.
They've
got
associated
with
them,
so
I
think
at
the
moment
for
Nick
I'm
struggling
to
even
specify
what
the
non-member
prices
are
for
people
without
making
assumptions
from
an
operator
point
of
view
from
a
actual
what
the
price
is
going
to
be.
It
does
involve
quite
a
lot
of
different
options
really,
and
it's
not
fair.
It's
not
very
flat.
E
E
Almost
yeah,
almost
saying
they
saw
sunlight
date
of
birth,
is
a
prime
example
as
to
whether
you're
going
to
be
charging
a
junior
rate
to
an
adult
rate,
it
may
be
the
juniors
aren't
allowed
into
that
event.
Anyway,
it
might
be
a
adults,
pinning
session
type
thing
it
might
be
in
the
gym
and
they
need
to
be
able
to
14,
and
so
that's
round
eligibility
as
well
as
price.
G
A
B
Think
something
around
that
is
given.
Certainly
what
we
publish
is
the
kind
of
full
price
adults
without
any
memberships,
and
we
do
spend
about
five
time.
But
we
don't
make
me
some
sort
of
membership
and
in
fact
that-
and
perhaps
a
difference
between
this
industry
in
the
travel
industry
is
they
do
have
a
lot
of
atoms,
whereas
we
don't
so
much
and
all
the
kind
of
highest
prices,
perhaps
the
best
one
to
to
publish
when
it
comes
to
be
able
experience,
build
spur
venues
by
price
or
source
of
my
price.
B
And
then
if
people
have
memberships
and
they
will
tend
to
know
what
their
discount
roughly
will
be
from
that-
and
it's
always
good
to
show
people
discounted
price
at
the
end
of
the
journeys
you
know
it
makes
me
feel
that
you're
getting
a
deal
so
slightly
from
an
RP
point
of
view.
We
just
show
the
kind
of
full
price
for
in
adults
depending
on
the
time
of
booking
and
don't
make
assumptions
as
to
the
membership.
B
E
So
I
think
we've
had
lots
of
conversations
in
the
past
about
whether
to
show
the
maximum
price.
It
could
be
also
the
minimum
price
and
say
from
X
and
X
I.
Think
more
recently,
we've
actually
gone
to
a
price,
and
so
we
said
prices
from
10
pounds
to
15
pounds
and
then
probably
putting
a
flag
alongside
it
say,
could
be
inclusive
as
part
of
your
membership,
which
equally
once
we
have.
If
we
have
one
price,
we
only
show
the
one
price.
H
G
A
lot
of
sense
I
mean
you're,
absolutely
right.
This
is
totally
different
to
travel
in
that
respect,
because
the
ranges
can
be
a
lot
lot,
smaller
yeah,
and
certainly
that
I
was
just
thinking
as
although
the
max
might
work
for
some
cases
depending
on
the
activity,
it
could
be
more
likely
you're
paying
a
different
concession.
I
mean
if
you're,
for
example,
if
you're
you're
looking
at
a
60
Plus
activity,
maybe
you've
got
people
who
aren't
don't
qualify
for
that
senior
tier,
but
most
people
going
to
that
session
will
be
seniors.
F
A
A
A
The
system
that
they're
looking
at
might
know
who
they
are,
it
might
be
able
to
kind
of
separately,
look
up
more
of
the
kind
of
shared
information
around
booking
anyway.
So
it's
not
necessarily
that
you
know
the
app
at
that
point
that
there's
no
context
available.
So
it's
just
kind
of
working
out
where
we
want
to
have
a
kind
of
dividing
line
really.
E
The
other
consideration
is
probably
most
of
the
complexity
when
it
comes
to
pricing
is
for
essentially
existing
customers.
It's
that
people
that
live
in
the
borough
and
they
have
a
concession
card
or
people
already
have
a
membership
I'm,
certainly
promoting
and
getting
more
activity
you
almost
looking
at
potentially
slightly
different
user
of
being
that
first
customer
or
that
casual
customer,
in
which
case
of
pricing
is
probably
a
lot
simpler.
G
It's
only
when
you
actually
start
the
booking
journey,
you're,
then
picking
one
session
to
go
through
they're,
not
a
session
ID
and
taking
that
through
the
journey
of
okay.
Now
I'm
going
to
you
know,
quite
get
the
details
and
kind
of
rationale,
rest
of
it
and
everything
prior
to
that
selection
of
an
individual
activity
to
pursue
in
the
journey
is
all
around
slicing
and
dicing
later,
which
is
more
than
the
kind
of
open
end
rather
than
the
shared
end
of
the
spectrum.
G
So
just
beware
us,
but
if
we
don't
have
a
price
in
that
open
data,
it
could
be
limiting
to
quite
a
lot
of
use
cases,
especially
when
you've
got
boutique
fitness,
which
is
like
you
know,
boutique
fitness
where
you've
got
four
or
five
times
the
price
for
exactly
the
same
session.
Because
it's
you
know
in
a
different
facility
and
that's
not
always
obvious
unless
you
actually
drill
in.
Obviously
we
don't
want
people
having
to
click
through
each
one
find
that
yeah.
A
A
Okay,
so
we
talked
about
pricing
to
their
contact
points,
descriptions
so
I'm
Tom
mentioned
kind
of
events
as
our
ability,
and
so
we
have
some
support
for
that
in
the
specification
already
so
this
section
5
5
3,
which
is
what
we
call
the
bench
suitability.
So
at
the
moment
we
can
specify
that
an
event
is
suitable
for
an
age
range
height
and
weight
range
and
gender
restriction.
So
male
female
or
mixed
audience,
and
are
there
other
type
other
other
types
of
eligibility
that
we
should
be
thinking
about
or
teasing?
E
H
E
Than
that
store
was
you've
gone
that
as
our
else
for
thinking,
either
than
that
the
ones
you've
covered
off
and
cover
it.
The
only
the
only
consideration
is
the
other
end
and
again
it's
thinking
about
the
use
cases
where
people
already
have
a
relationship
with
that
operator
is
if
they
had
unpaid
sales
debts
against
their
account.
If
they've
been
perfect,
if
you
flagged
as
a
bad
customers
that,
then
they
may
not
be
able
to
book.
H
A
G
E
Very
spot
on,
like
yeah
things,
become
available
at
different
times,
particularly
for
different
different
people.
So
when
you're
talking
to
a
self
anonymous
people,
you
kind
of
have
to
assume
it's
available
for
them
and
then
once
you
start
to
go
down
the
route
to
the
bookings
journey,
they
may
then
not
be
available
for
a
number
of
days.
Yet.
A
D
Pontius,
just
on
that
have
we
got
a
field
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
seeing
it,
but
I
could
be
missing
it.
Have
we
got
fields
for
this
activity?
You
know
this
event
has
been
canceled
because
quite
a
lot,
the
time
people
love
to
see
it
with
the
cancelled
flag.
Next
to
it.
So
they
know
that
you
know
usually
I'd
go
on
a
Thursday
whatever,
but
this
particular
one
is
not
happening
for
any
reason.
I.
A
Don't
think
our
plan
all
right,
yeah
we
haven't,
we
haven't
documented
in
the
opportunity
data
spec,
but
schema.org
has
a
venn
status
property
which
is
supposed
to
be
used
to
indicate.
Edison
has
been
canceled
to
reschedule,
so
we
can
be,
which
is
probably
bring
that
through,
and
this
is
an
example,
at
least
in
the
prime
of
my
limbs
back.
E
C
Okay,
I
also
just
wanted
to
say,
is
one
thing:
I
forgot
to
include
in
my
list,
which
is
a
categorization
of
coached
or
run
coach.
Some
sessions
are,
they
have
a
definite
leader,
who's
sort
of
telling
people
what
to
do
others
they
don't
have
that
and
I
want
to
just
to
bring
it
up.
There
is
a
distinction
between
coached,
unco,
short,
led
or
unleaded
sessions.
You
get.
A
Okay,
so
going
back
to
what
the
Great
Dane
I
was
just
discussing
about
organizer
contributor
and
if
we
added
leader
was
another
option,
then
I
think
that
would
cover
that
so
that
if
it
was,
if
it
was
a
lead
session,
there
would
be
an
indicated
leader
and
then
not
if
otherwise
it
still
means
you
can
indicate
that.
So
there
are
people
there,
as
contributors
or
organizers
tomorrow,
so
needing
the
event.
C
Does
that
attune
so
comment,
I'm
just
going
to
say
often
that's
the
case,
but
it's
not
always
what
we've
seen
in
open
session
is
that
sometimes
the
organizing
session
isn't
actually
a
qualified
coach
and
said
it's
sort
of
facilitating
the
session,
but
not
leading
in
the
same
way
as
a
coach
would
perhaps
a
bit
of
edge
case.
But
it
does
happen
and.
G
Also
a
lot,
sometimes
the
leader
isn't
known
or
doesn't
want
to
be
shared
or
changes
too
frequently
to
write,
write
down.
That's
a
classic
common
one
where
the
leader
might
be
one
of
four
people
and
you
find
out
when
you
turn
up.
But
it
isn't,
it
is
coached,
so
they
wouldn't
put
a
name
because
they
don't
know
it
is,
or
they
might
put
four
people
and
ram
into
the
field.
The
structures
in
between
the
scene
as
well,
but
the
point
being
that
they're
all
coaches.
So
it
doesn't
matter
who's
which
coaches
on
on
Tuesday
yeah.
A
Okay,
okay,
so
it's
more
of
a
category
great
cool
right,
so
we've
got
a
few
minutes
left.
Was
there
anything
else
that
anyone
wanted
to
in
Doc's
they
any
feedback
on
the
spec?
Any
update
on
anything
that
you're
working
on
that.
D
D
G
The
question
I
was
gonna:
ask
about
this.
Was
that
a
lot
of
the
time
in
general
conversation
we've
been
talking
about
booking
in
terms
of
the
transaction,
and
so
you
know
that
the
point
I
think
what
tom
was
saying.
The
point
we
moved
from
you
move
from
using
the
shared
data
to
using
the
open
data
and
it
becomes.
It
becomes
a
two-way
conversation
where
you
pass
some
user
details
and
it
gives
you
back
stuff
a
lot
of
the
stuff.
That's
in
booking.
The
stage
here
is
more
around.
G
This
is
that
this
is
open
data
that
would
facilitate
the
bridge
to
booking
but
I,
just
kind
of
being.
It
is
more
a
scoping
question
really
because
I
guess
my
understanding
previously
was
that
what's
on,
this
slide
is
all
in
scope
of
our
current
thinking
now,
because
it's
stuff
that
we're
exposing
from
the
system's
as
open
data
and
the
booking
stuff
which
is
we're
doing
in
whenever
then
looking
stuff
comes
around
later
on,
is
going
to
be
more
around
the
transaction.
G
Open
API,
but
not
open
data
type
stuff,
but
I
didn't
see
the
list
here
as
being
in
the
booking
camp.
This
stuff
appears
to
be
more
in
the
kind
of
discovery
it
is
that
I
was
just
checking
without
the
intention,
or
was
there
around
the
word
booking
here
and
this
slide,
basically,
that
we
dopamine
booking
transaction.
We
mean
booking
open
data.
A
Yeah,
okay,
I
see
I,
see
you're,
saying
yes,
I
mean
I,
agree
with
you
that
I
think
majority
of
stuff,
like
on
the
right
happy,
are
the
open
data.
So
it's
more
just
try
to
scope
where
we're
having
our
discussion
and
for
trying
to
mix
comes
in
between
the
raising
awareness
and
doing
the
discovery
around
events
and
then
the
next
stage,
which
I
just
labeled
booking
here.
A
G
It's
got
some
space,
so
I
guess
that's
where
that
would
be
my
question
so
I
totally
understand.
Why
would
save
the
booking
transaction
piece
till
later,
because
that's
a
whole
separate
flow
api's
have
set
things
think
about,
but
I
wonder
whether
this
stuff
is
is
more
part
of
this
conversation
as
a
kind
of
logical
extension
of
the
work
we're
doing.
A
Yeah
I,
don't
know
what
I'm
going
to
media
answer
to
that
it,
partly
because
and
I
think
it
would
be
useful
to
have
a
look
to
see
how
well
the
existing
scheme
that
all
office
stuff
works
for
the
kind
of
use
cases.
People
have
for
this
stuff.
So
it'd
be
good
for
the
fuel
to
take
a
look
at
that
to
see
whether
it
kind
of
covers
the
kinds
of
news
cases,
because
if
it
does,
then
you
know,
there's
not
a
great
deal
with
extending
it.
A
If
there's,
if
we
have
to
do
a
lot
of
new
modeling
work,
because
it's
not
quite
right,
then
I
think
we
just
need
to
make
a
call
about
whether
that
that's
the
right
place
to
focus
attention
on,
because
it
feels
to
me
like
some
of
the
some
of
the
stuff
around
there
kind
of
the
open
parts
of
things
on
the
right
and
is
useful
to
support
the
kind
of
filtering
functionality.
We're
discussing
you
know
finding
the
kind
of
cheapest
local
event
or
running
free
events
locally.
A
So
I'm
over
that,
you
know
kind
of
there's
a
lots
of
ways
that
we
might
want
to
filter
a
drive
discovery.
Events
so
be
useful
to
know
where
the
pricing
is
actually
the
most
important
way
of
for
doing
filtering
and
discovery
or
whether
there's
other
areas
of
the
spec
that
might
need
more
attention
first.
So
it's
just
got
course:
prioritization
thing
that.
F
Seemed
reasonable
I
mean
if
I
look
today
on
the
right,
they
lead
I
would
say
things
like
payment
options.
Paid
and
rekelen
pricing
could
easily
be
useful
with
additional
information.
As
part
of
that
discovery,
I
think
we
talked
about
current
availability
that
almost
suggests
you're
looking
at
serving
up
api's
and
also
getting
the
current
availability
Cassity.
F
You
open
up
all
the
Pandora's
Box
about
facility
sizes.
What
things
you
can
do
at
different
times
of
the
day,
I
think
and
then
the
cancellation
and
Confirmation
Outgames
am
I'm
over
live
type
transaction.
Remember
key,
so
that
we
have
a
look
at
those
with
some
of
that
criteria
or
something
like
that.
Yeah.
G
Is
interesting
that
some
of
those
done
availability
in
cancellation
I
suppose
they
are,
they
are
more
real-time.
That
suppose,
as
is
all
of
this
data,
ideally,
would
be
real-time,
so
that
if
people
change
the
actual
detail
when
the
event
is
or
whatever
that
it
is,
is,
is
updated,
so
I
suppose,
certainly
if
it
in
in
the
simple
case,
availability,
which
is
talking
about
whether
the
class
is
still
available
or
not
booked
as
in.
G
Just
that
you
know
is
the
thing
that,
because
it's
actually
as
if
this
came
up
in
a
conversation,
the
other
day
that
you
know
it
does
the
center
there's
a
site
which
has
classes
all
of
those
passes
are
full
because
the
members
books
and
within
five
minutes
been
going,
live
and
so
to
display
those
classes
on
a
website
where
all
of
them
are
full,
and
maybe
there's
one
space
in
one
class,
isn't
the
best
experience
because
it
doesn't
and
then
the
question
was
well.
Should
we
display
them?
G
Should
we
open
that
data
at
all,
because
it's
going
to
miss
the
abuses
and
we're
saying?
Well,
if
you,
if
you
open
the
data
but
include
the
availability
in
the
data
and
its
really
good
information,
so
they
know
there
are
classes
happening,
even
though
they
can't
book
them.
So
it's
not
going
to
set
their
expectations
that
there
are.
You
know
we
all
these
sessions.
F
But
I'd
almost
say:
there's
a
bit
of
a
difference
here
between
the
objectives
of
the
program,
which
is
one
of
it,
is
opening
up
opportunity,
data
and
starting
off
with
that,
and
then
there's
a
bit
about
trying
to
develop
the
standards
around
it.
But
I
would
almost
say
you
know
in
terms
of
understanding
around
all
that
kind
of
advocacy
and
all
the
other
stuff
is
where
you
that's,
where
you
get
into
a
lot
more,
become
a
lot
more
complicated.
A
Yeah
so
I
took
me
that
I'm
gonna
go
with
what
you
what
you're
both
saying
actually,
but
it
so
that
if
there's
like
the
decision,
point
is
at
what
point
have
you
gone
beyond
discovery?
So
it
seems
to
me
that
it's
reasonable
for
people
to
know
whether
there
is
it
from
it
for
a
discovery,
point
of
you
whether
they
will
have
to
pay
or
even
when
the
event
has
some
availability.
A
Even
if
we
don't
know
how
many
places
are
available,
I
mean
I
can
imagine
using
the
discovery
interface
to
support
that,
but
going
beyond
it
into
how
will
I
pay
or
what
are
the
details?
Pricing
options
are
available
for
me
or
two
different
categories:
a
user
that
feels
more
like
it's
gone
beyond
discovery.
You
know
nobody's
going
to
try
and
find
events
where
they
can
pay
by
Visa
or
PayPal,
for
example.
That
doesn't
seem
like
a
lobbyist
use
case.
So
that's
where
I
would
prefer
to
part
that
kind
of
stuff
we'll
come
back
to
it.
E
It
the
thing
for
me
that
fills
in
between
is
we
typically
talking
about
sessions
here
that
are
scheduled
and
have
dates
and
times
and
stuff.
Once
you
go
through
sort
of
an
activity
that
doesn't
so
badminton
can
happen,
every
15
minutes
it
takes
half
an
hour
and
assuming
there's
not
something
else
booked
in
the
badminton
courts
that
affect
that
level
of
availability
is
actually
quite
complicated
because
we
need
to
check
all
of
the
space
there
is
there.
E
Is
it
booked
out
for
cleaning
all
that
sort
of
stuff
before
giving
the
availability,
whereas
the
example
minute
over
class?
The
class
is
cooked
in
its
there
it's
happening,
and
then
just
working
out.
The
class
T
is
easy,
so
there's
sort
of
different
things
on
the
table
here
that
classes
are
inherently
a
lot
easier
than
something
like
activities
like
badminton
or
squash,
or
things
on
that.
E
G
Although
just
to
add
another
half,
so
we
get
actually
totally
agreed
on
that
and
especially
classes
being
as
they
are
and
being
busy
and
crazy.
That's
good
to
separate
those
two
out
if
we,
if
we
kind
of
group
that
as
classes
and
facilities
as
two
separate
kind
of
categories
sounds
like
I,
think
I
agree
classes
are
so
simple
for
availability
to
say.
Yes,
it's
available.
No,
it's
not
maybe
there's
some
spaces
that
that
could
be
done.
Quite
simply,
one
of
the
things
that
interesting
about
facility
availability
is
that
you
don't
again
for
discovery
purposes.
G
We
don't
necessarily
care
about
whether
court,
1
or
court
2
or
court
3
is
available.
It
could
be
sufficient
just
to
know
that
the
product
of
five
aside
is
available
or
is
not
available
at
a
certain
time
in
a
certain
place.
So
there
are
simplifications
to
make
on
that
and
that
may
be
get
I
understand.
This
is
a
little
bit
of
how
MLP
does
the
availability
stuff
and
for
facilities,
but
I
guess
I'm.
G
is
what's
available
in
the
kind
of
middle
case.
But
then
the
detail,
you
might
be
able
to
shift
that
by
15
minutes
or
whatever
is
so
almost
suggesting
that
week
there's
a
level
of
collects.
We
definitely
want
to
go
into,
which
is
all
about
resource
stuff,
but
there
might
be
something
a
little
bit
above
that
that
still
provides
the
value
and
I
kind
of
change.
I'm
kind
of
talking
about
your
use
case
really
here
more
anything
but
I'm,
assuming
it's
useful
to
be
able
to
tell
people
that
there
is
that
availability.
B
A
Okay,
okay,
so
coming
to
the
end
of
our
time.
What
I'd
like
to
take
care
of
this
description
on
on
the
mailing
list?
So
is
there
a
way
that
we
can
just
axe
in
between
now
in
the
next
call
just
keep
this
going,
maybe
Jamie!
You
could
post
some
examples
of
the
kinds
of
ways
that
you're
describing
these
kind
of
availability
and
pricing
just
so
we
got
some
data
to
look
at
yep.
A
And
if
anybody
else
has
got
other
other
examples
to
kind
of
throw
into
the
mix,
it
would
be
useful
to
see
if
we
can
just
come
to
some
understanding
of
what
some
broad
kind
of
common
requirements
are,
because
it
just
feels
like
going.
It
starts
going
to
distinction
now,
no
classes
versus
facilities
and
having
started
getting
custom
marker.
A
So,
just
before
we
kind
of
wrap
up
and
easily
do
anything
else,
anyone
wants
to
bring
up
on
the
call
today.
I
can
just
give
you
a
very
brief
update
on
the
activity
list
stuff
we
talked
about
last
time.
I
am
so
after
last
call
and
we
kind
of
decided
to
start
stop
just
pulling
together
a
kind
of
merged
list
based
on
those
that
have
been
shared
so
far.
I
did
some
initial
work
to
pull
together
a
common
spreadsheet
that
had
everything
in
from
sport,
England's
sports,
wheat,
AMD
and
Kim.
A
One
of
the
columns
has
been
working
on
merging
that
in
so
the
bitterest
shared
that
listed
me
yesterday,
so
my
chance
to
have
a
look
at
it,
but
she's
kind
of
getting
to
a
point
of
having
a
candidate
list
that
we
could
start
to
look
at
as
a
group.
So
what
I
was
thinking
that
we
could
do
is
we'll
have
a
look
at
that
on
the
next
call,
and
so
we
do
to
have
a
bit
more
discussion
around
disability
support,
because
that
scenario
that
we
know
we
need
to
make
some
improvements
on.
A
F
A
A
Don't
think
we
need
a
whole
session
for
it,
as
I'm
saying
so.
I
think
we
can
just
do
I
think
our
world
is
I'll,
circulate
a
proposal
further
for
some
modifications
to
the
spec,
specifically
around
disability,
support
that
we
can
just,
hopefully,
just
review
and
sign
up
in
the
call,
and
then
we
can
addressed
at
the
discussion
on
the
activity
list.
A
D
Do
just
a
quick,
quick,
teeny,
tiny
one,
which
is
we
were
populating
the
end
point
for
serving
up
BM,
which
events
have
been
updated.
All
room
were
deleted
and
I
was
just
a
little
bit
confused
wondering
whether
we
should
have
another
statuses
created,
because
at
the
moment
I've
just
got.
We've
got
others
with
us,
so
about
8
million
events
populate
and
all
of
them
are
updated.
Even
though
you
know
the
brand
new
ins
coming
on
will
be
a
new
record.
As
for
as
a
record,
the
exists.
D
G
D
What's
what's
happening
moment,
it's
one
of
populating
the
list
they're
all
marked,
updated
and
I'm,
putting
all
the
data
in
with
what
most
things
we
like
update
issues
before
in
a
record
already
exist.
You
change
couple
of
fields,
in
which
case
you
just
served
that
data
at
the
moment,
I'm
serving
all
the
data
for
all
the
records
are.
G
So
yes,
the
paging
spec
doesn't
uncovers
at
the
moment.
It
just
doesn't
there's
no
it's
silly
for
diffs.
That's
a
really
good
question.
It's
actually
patch
right
in
HTTP,
Determan,
ology,
here
hosting,
post
and
patch.
So
yeah.
It's
a
good
question.
We
haven't
there's
no
patch.
It's
just
post
because
of
the
simplicity,
but
that
would
probably
reduce
the
volume
of
update.
Is
what
you're
thinking
for
yeah
exactly
thing
to
think
about
there
yeah.
A
I
think
so
I'm,
okay,
that'd,
be
nice,
want
to
come
back
on
back
to
Iran,
okay
and
I'm,
going
to
wrap
us
up
next
week
when
I
run
over
time,
and
so
thanks
everybody
for
coming
along
another
really
good
discussion,
thanks
again
for
those
who
you
watching
from
home
for
the
recording
I've
got
a
few
actions
to
follow
up
some
suspicions
on
the
list.
So
I'll
circulate
summary
in
the
next
arrow.