►
From YouTube: OpenActive W3C Community Group Meeting / 2022-12-07
Description
A public hangout for members of the OpenActive W3C Community Group.
For more information visit: https://www.openactive.io/w3c-community-group.html
A
A
So
today,
quick
update
on
the
data
equality
report
and
framework,
so
I'm
going
to
work
with
myself
and
Chris
predominantly
have
been
working
on
and
we'll
show
some
example:
draft
data
quality
metrics
that
I've
been
knocking
about
and
I'll
talk
about
how
I
created
a
data
set
to
measure
those
and
then
I'll
have
a
quick
chat
about
the
activity
list.
A
If
we've
got
time
at
the
end,
so
I
shall
move
straight
on
Oh
and
before
we
do
that,
of
course,
I
can
just
yeah
I
will
increase
from
the
ODI
Nick
and
Dominic
Fennell
from
I'm
In
only
from
London
sport,
Steve,
Winfield
and
Nathan
solder.
A
So
the
idea
we
had
a
visit
from
the
office
of
national
statistics,
data
quality
Hub
and
they
talked
about
the
data
quality
action
planning
process
and
our
approach
was
informed
by
that
plan,
which,
basically
you
start
with
the
purpose
of
the
data.
A
So
that's
what
we're
looking
at
repeatable
measurements
tied
to
the
purpose
that
allow
the
Publishers
or
providers
data
creators
to
to
understand
where
issues
may
arise
and
to
tackle
them
up
front.
So,
in
the
use
case,
we're
also
the
yeah.
The
the
purpose
of
the
use
case
that
we're
focusing
on
immediately
is
Discovery
and.
A
Although
in
time,
similar
approach
will
be
extended
to
other
use
cases,
so
this
is
a
diagram
that
s
left
is.
The
idea
is
that
each
one
of
these
might
be
data
quality
metric,
and
it
shows
that
while
the
data
might
be
perfectly
suited
for
for
one
use
case
or
one
purpose
or
another,
it
may
be
less
suited
for
other
use
cases
so
part
of
the
the
drive
this
phase
of
open
activity
is
to
explore
new
use
cases
additional
use
cases.
A
So
this
is
going
to
be
a
useful
tool
for
that
as
well,
and
this
is
a
allows
for
a
better
discussion
around
data
quality
than
just
simply
saying
it's
good
or
bad
data.
It
depends
obviously
on
what
you're
trying
to
do
with
it.
So
this
is
a
way
to
kind
of
quantify
that
we're
focusing
on
Discovery.
A
B
A
A
So
thus,
depending
purpose
and
experience
that
we're
looking
for
Nick
shared
from
some
of
the
work
with
MCR,
active
and
other
implementations
recently
has
set,
a
spreadsheet
was
listed,
a
set
of
fields,
okay
and
it's
smaller
set
than
the
whole
open
active
specifications.
So
these
are
the
kind
of
core
fields
and
Chris
is
doing
a
little
bit
of
work
on
that
to
kind
of
hone
that
down
further
for
a
set
of
fields
for
me
to
then
go
away
and
try
and
create
some
draft
measures.
A
So
that's
what
we're
going
to
look
at
today.
I
only
have
a
few
to
show
you,
so
it
it
shouldn't.
Take
too
long,
but
hopefully
it'll
prompt
some
some
thoughts
and
some
questions
so,
but
first
I
just
explain
how
I
created
the
data
set
that
I'm
then
going
to
measure
the
data
quality
on.
A
So
we
start
off
with
one
catalog
of
catalogs,
which
links
to
four
individual
catalogs
which
links
to
112
data
set
pages
and
each
of
those
contain
the
API
endpoints,
so
I
think
I
listed
276..
So
for
me
measuring
open
active
data,
this
is
the
route
I
would
take
if
it's
not
listed
in
the
catalog.
A
How
am
I
going
to
find
it?
How
is
any
of
our
users
going
to
find
it?
So
that
to
me
is
is
an
important
step.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
things
are
getting
getting
listed
there
of
those
276,
API
endpoints
only
222
returning
data
when
I,
when
I
run
this
roundness
of
weakness
so
ago.
A
It's
the
paged
data,
of
course,
so
collect
about
six
six
and
a
half
thousand
pages
of
Json
data
returned
from
each
of
those
from
from
all
the
sites
and
if
you
unpack
all
that
you
get
about
two
over
two
million
records,
some
of
which,
of
course,
are
deleted
and
out
of
date.
So
by
the
time
you
sword
and
filter
the
data
to
just
the
live
or
current
or
open
active
records,
you
get
about
a
million
and
a
half.
A
And
I
just
thought:
well,
I'll
start
with
just
a
quick
kind
of
look
at
the
variation.
In
some
of
these
things,
what
type
of
records
are
coming
through
and
instantly?
My
data
quality
spy,
the
sensors
were
tingling
when
I
see
things
like
capital,
E
Event,
and
then
you
know
a
normal
e-e
event
and
it
feels
like
those
should
be
merged.
And
if
you
look
again,
there
are
some
others
there
that
the
with
sessions
with
an
uppercase
and
without
is
a
scheduled
session
the
same
as
a
session.
A
So
is
someone
coming
to
open
active
data?
You
know
relatively
new
there's
a
lot
of
variation,
a
lot
of
things
to
pick
and
and
these
kind
of
measures
it
raises
a
lot
of
questions.
A
These
are
all
costs,
challenges
that
someone
implementing
a
tool
or
a
service
using
open
active
data
will
have
to
have
to
solve
some.
It's
interesting.
A
Oh-
and
this
is
just
a
kind
of
a
final
page
from
those
stats
that
I
was
exploring,
so
these
were
I've
been
asked
by
sport
England.
You
know
how
many
Publishers
we
got
out
there,
how
many,
because
in
some
slides
I've
been
presenting,
it
says
we
started
with
eight
early
adopters
way
back
in
2016
or
whatever,
and
now
we
had
over
100
organizations.
A
But
if
you
look
at
the
data
were
presented,
data
from
over
6
000
named
organizers,
activity
providers
course
leaders,
clubs,
leagues,
Etc,
and
there
may
be
more
because
sometimes
the
data
super
event
in
the
in
some
of
the
data
feeds
didn't
unpack.
So
so,
there's
still
a
couple
of
things
to
explore
there
over
1800
organizers,
or
course,
providers
only
have
one
entry,
one
session
or
one
slot.
A
So
I
guess
we.
These
are
the
the
tools
that
we've
got
things
like
the
London,
open
sessions,
tool
and
and
other
tools
to
help
with
kind
of
Grassroots
providers
list
their
data
they're.
You
know
they're
being
used
and
there's
quite
a
lot
of
data
in
there
from
those
smaller
providers.
A
I'll
move
on
now,
so
this
was
I'll
say,
explore
the
data,
someone
new
to
open
active.
When
you
see
these
things,
it
prompts
a
lot
of
questions
now
different
kinds,
so
I'd
claimed
cleansed
up
those
sessions
and
cruelly
kind
of
put
mush
them
together
for
the
purpose
of
this
quick
exploration,
so
obviously
with
different
kinds
of
data,
you'd
expect
to
see
different
patterns
so
on-demand
events.
It's
no
surprise
that
there's
no
postcodes,
you
know,
but
things
like
the
the
low
completion
for
events.
A
There's
low
completion
in
activity
that
surprised
me
until
they
speak
into
to
Nick
I
learned
that
originally
the
event
was
the
first
set
of
opportunities
published.
So
this
will
include
a
lot
of
older
feeds,
but
if
you
imagine
you're
trying
to
bring
all
that
data
together
in
activity
finder,
if
the
activity
name
is
missing,
that's
one
of
those
core
critical
Fields,
that's
going
to
impact
the
experience!
So
it's
interesting
to
see
and
the
the
newer
the
yellow
highlighted
Fields.
There
are
the
the
new
one.
A
There's
some
stuff
to
to
explore
I,
don't
pick
and
discover
that
discuss
so
if
I
just
explained
each
type
of
data
for
each
type
of
data,
I
try
to
find
the
activity
name
in
the
data
feeds,
and
sometimes
of
course,
it's
it's
named
different
things
and
I.
This
is
a
count
of
how
many
were
complete.
How
many
I
was
able
to
find
so
not
null,
not
missing,
not
blank,
so
that
is
a
58
58.2
percent
completeness
for
events
of
activity.
I
should
explain
that
at
the
start,
sorry,
it
doesn't
say
percentage
anywhere.
A
There
did
well
I'll
do
I've
gone
for
a
while
I'll
just
pause
for
a
moment,
and
if
anyone
has
any
comments
or
thoughts,
Steve
Stevens
first.
B
No
somehow
it
I
was
away
with
somebody
walking
past
the
office.
Apology,
no
problem,
no
problem,
you
thought
I
had
a
question
all
interesting
stuff.
I
can
just
make
a
statement
interesting,
stuff
and
and
it'd
be
interesting
to
if
you
just
go
back
to
the
previous
slide.
Sorry,
if
you
don't
mind,
no,
so
maybe
it
was
one
before
that,
perhaps
I
don't
know
yeah
yeah
yeah
there
was,
it
was
just
sorry,
so
go
back
to
the
last
one,
sorry
bigger
part
I'm
just
was
it
this
way
forwards?
B
No,
it's
the
one
where
there
was
income
yeah
there
were
incomplete
data.
Perhaps
it's
the
last
one
that
you
you
you
you
like.
A
C
B
I
apologize
but
it'd
be
interesting
to
understand.
From
my
perspective,
I
I
jll,
just
complete
the
data
fields
have
been
that
have
been
enabled
for
us
to
be
completed
as
part
of
our
open,
active
settings
by
open
play
and
as
far
as
we're
concerned,
we've
completed
them
as
fully
as
we
can,
but
but
interesting
I
noticed
that
some
of
these
the
last
column
URL,
for
example,
we
didn't
put
a
URL
in
every
single
activity
type
or
every
every
activity
schedule.
B
So
I'm
thinking.
Okay,
so
why?
Why
haven't
we
done
that?
Well,
one
because
we
don't
use
it.
Therefore,
it's
not
beneficial
for
gll,
because
it
doesn't
deliver
any
benefits
for
us
from
our
open
Play
perspective,
but
of
course,
from
an
open
data
perspective.
It's
actually
quite
important,
and-
and
perhaps
some
of
those
other
data
fields
are
fields
that
we
perhaps
overlooked,
because
they're
not
necessarily
relevant
to
us,
but
they
would
be
to
a
consumer
of
the
data
like
London
sport
or
anybody
else
or
any
of
the
other
any
other
Brokers
out
there.
D
A
That
yeah,
that
is
helpful,
I'll,
just
speak
to
that
briefly.
So
it's
a
it's
a
it's,
the
first
exploration
and
and
for
me
you
know
who
what,
where,
when?
Why?
What
is
the
activity
theware
of
it
and
from.
A
Either
of
those
things
I
guess
the
postcode
or
the
the
coordinates
you
can,
you
can
get
a
pretty
you
can
get
to
the
other
quite
easily,
so
so
I
think
that's.
This
needs
to
be
expanded
to
include
a
broader
measure
of
location,
I
think.
Maybe
there
is
something
else
about
reading
or
you
know,
a
kind
of
locality,
a
higher
level
of
geography,
that's
useful
for
search
or
I.
Think
I,
guess
that
that
needs
to
be
explored
with
the
the
implementers.
A
Do
people
use
a
geospatial
search
around
the
coordinates
you
know
in
in
an
activity.
Finder
I'd
have
to
understand
the
flow
about
that
a
bit
better.
D
D
A
Yeah,
okay,
so,
and
to
go
back
to
yours,
Stephen,
obviously
really
interesting,
as
I
said,
there's
no
driver
for
for
you
to
add
a
field
that
has
no
value
internally
but
yeah
for
in
the
world.
That
is
significant.
Does
anyone
would
say
anymore
about
how
URLs
are
used.
D
I
think
I
agree
with
Stephen
and
Euros
are
very
important,
but
I
can
definitely
see
cases
where
a
booking
system
might
not
necessarily
have
an
online
way
to
view
an
event,
or
course,
if
it's
just
simply
like
an
integrated
booking
system,
and
perhaps
it's
all
managed
manually,
for
example,
so
I
think
you're
always
probably
excusable
to
miss,
because
otherwise,
if
you
try
to
enforce
it
too
much
you'll
end
up
with
a
lot
of
data
with
the
same
URL
and
I.
E
Yeah
I
agree
with
that.
If
it's
helpful,
if
it's
helpful
within
the
gll
data
set,
the
URL
is
the
Deep
link
URL
for
play
for
play
for
open
play
for
flow,
and
so
that's
that's
automatically
I
think
automatically
populated
as
the
Deep
link
in
many
cases.
E
So
that's
the
kind
of
idea,
I
think
what
they've
been
saying
absolutely
agree
with
some
systems
you
can't
deep
link
and
when
you
can't
deep
link,
you'll
just
have
one
URL
that
just
sends
you
to
the
sometimes
in
some
cases
it's
the
home
page.
E
You
know
and
you've
got
to
find
you've
got
to
go
on
your
own
Discovery
Journey,
arguably
better
than
nothing
if
you
were
going
to
have
to
go
somewhere
rather
than
just
kind
of
Google,
to
figure
out
where
the
where
the
session
is
I
believe
URL
is
currently
in
required
field,
which
links
back
to
our
previous
conversations.
One
of
the
few
required
Fields
that
we'll
probably
be
coming
across
here.
A
A
Relatively
low
completion
on
that
session
in
for
activity,
information,
postcode,
I,
wonder
very
low.
Doesn't
it
that
there's.
C
A
E
A
Suppose
go
I'm
going
back
to
to
your
comments.
Stephen
it's
it's
possible
to
get
similar
set
of
figures
for
each
feed.
A
You
know
I
just
didn't
want
to
start
sharing
those
in
this
kind
of
open
setting,
but
happy
to
to
you
know,
explore
those
with
individuals
if
they
like,
if
they
want
to
get
in
touch.
That's
that's
what
we
can
think
of
a
good
way
to
share
that
kind
of
more
detailed
information.
B
Yeah
I
was
just
I
just
came
to
understand
when
it
said
URL,
because
Nick's
right
in
in
the
open,
Play
system
for
flow,
it
automatically
generates
a
URL
for
which
is
Nick,
said
it's
a
deep
linking
for
bookings,
but
we
also
have
other
URLs
that
we
set
in
like
video
URL,
but
we
don't
do
that
for
every
every
location
and
I
think
there
might
be
a
couple
more
as
well
that
that
might
have
been
requirement
for
Manchester,
but
we
haven't
done
for
for
everywhere
else
as
an
example.
B
F
A
Well,
in
which
case
the
these
measures
still
are
value,
then,
because
it
shows,
if
that
was
deemed
a
the
necessary
field
for
the
experience
in
Manchester,
then
that
kind
of
might
be
the
ideal
that
we're
working
towards
in
time
and
being
able
to
report
how
far
off
we
are
that
you
know
how
far
off
that
we
are
is
that's
the
kind
of
the
point
of
the
these
measures.
A
E
A
I
can't
find
those
I
want
to
own
that
so
alongside
this
I,
don't
let's
see
if
we've
got
the
well
that.
A
Andy,
the
one
Linked
In,
the
document.
A
Do
you
have
the
list
of
fields
that
I
was
going
to
work
through?
You
know,
I
just
took
a
handful
of
them
here.
You
just
paste
that
into
the
chart,
that'd
be
great.
A
E
A
So
the
The
Proposal
is
to
explore
completeness
uniqueness
and
the
timeliness
where
we're
talking
about
start
dates.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
talking
about.
A
About
events
and
opportunities
that
are
current
now
and
not
not
historic,
so
that
list
of
is
there
anyone
going
to
go
and
Surround
which
they
wouldn't
expect
to
be
completed.
We've
talked
about
URL
in
some
cases,.
D
A
When
you
say
you
just
put
a
latitude
and
longitude
or
all
of
the
other
fields
left
blank.
A
C
Nathan,
just
on
that
with
regards
to
the
postcode,
so
you
know
you've
just
said
there
that
if
you
don't
have
it,
but
wouldn't
it
have
already
been.
C
D
Yeah
so,
unlike
most
of
cases
like
our
venues,
we'll
have
postcodes
attached,
but
there
could
be
instances
where
the
actual
facility
or
the
location
of
the
event
is
in
a
different
location.
And
in
those
cases
it
might
not
have
a
postcode
because
they
might
have
just
set
a
different
location
like
using
a
what
free
words
address
or
something
like
that.
Okay,.
D
There
is
a
potential
there
to
remap
it
back
to
a
postcode
by
doing
a
reverse
lookup
on
the
on
the
geocordinates,
but
when
you've
already
got
geocoordinates,
it
doesn't
really
seem
like
a
a
particularly
useful
thing
to
do.
D
C
The
only
reason
I
ask
is,
and
whether
I'm
looking
at
the
right
thing
or
not,
but
I'm,
looking
at
the
the
opportunity,
spec
and
I'm
looking
at
the
addresses
and
street
address
to
just
locality,
address
region,
postal
code
and
address
country
are
all
required
Fields.
So
hence
the
reason
why
I've
sort
of
put
them
in
the
list
there
I've
kind
of
looked
at
this
spec
I've,
looked
at
the
as
I
said,
the
spreadsheet
that
Howard
mentioned
that
Nixon
over
and
that's
the
reason
why
that's
kind
of
in
there.
C
D
Right
I
see
what
you
mean.
I
was
under
the
impression
that
the
required
field
for
an
event
is
a
location
rather
than
an
address.
E
There's
a
GitHub
issue
relating
to
this
that
I'm
just
trying
to
find
to
paste
in
that
will
shed
light
on
this.
This
whole
conversation
about
addresses,
which
I
thought
would
help
if
we'd
be
named,
something
involving
the
words
address
and
required,
but
give
me
a
sec
I'll
I'll
paste
it
in.
Basically,
this
is
a.
This
is
a
point
of
view.
E
I've
got
it
I've
got
it
it's
a
point
of
of
previous
contention
around
ad
hot
ad
hoc
venues
and
events,
I'm,
sorry,
I
talk,
I
talk,
events
and
sessions,
not
venues,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
that
an
ad
hoc,
an
ad
hoc
event,
like
a
cycling
session,
for
example,
might
start
from
the
street
corner.
E
You
know-
or
you
know
where,
where
it
crosses
Foxhall,
Bridge,
Road
or
something,
and
if
that
is
where
you
want
people
to
meet,
that's
that's
legitimately,
not
a
postcode,
and
so
some
data
especially
running
cycling,
those
kind
of
activities
where
you're
literally
meeting
outside
at
a
point,
often
the
pub
or
something
or
outside
this
this
venue.
But
when,
when
it
is
literally
a
point
on
the
map,
there
was
a
challenge
there
and
we
kind
of
said
to
the
data
providers
at
the
time.
E
Can
you
provide
this
information,
make
it
required
they're
like
it,
doesn't
really
make
sense
to
do
that,
and
therefore
hence
the
the
conversation.
And
so
there
was
this
kind
of
idea
that
if
only
postcode
NGO
has
provided
the
meeting
point
must
be
specified
and
also
that
when
postcode
is
recommended
rather
than
required,
unless
Geo
is
provided,
so
basically
the
the
rule
being
the
proposed
rule
being,
and
this
is
going
back
to
2020
now,
but
the
proposal
being
that
the.
If
the
postcode
is
not
specified,
we
must
have
geocoordinates.
E
If
the
geocoordinates
are
not
specified,
we
must
have
a
postcode,
because
you
need
to
be
able
to
put
the
thing
on
a
map
somehow
either
one
of
those
things
the
preference
being
for
geo
coordinates
because
you
don't
need
to
do
a
lookup
and
data
quality
measure
is
something
that
we've
been
pushing
on
since
2018
I
think
everything
should
I
think
the
first
version
of
today's
page
even
had
Does.
It
include
Geo
Club.
E
It's
because
doing
a
lookup
from
postcode
to
Geo
is
expensive
and
a
burden
on
the
data
consumers
so
better
to
have
Geo
and
sometimes
inaccurate,
as
well
so
better
to
have
Geo
in
there.
If
we
can,
if
that's
helpful,
it's
very
arguably
zoomed
right
in
there
on
one
specific
issue
but
yeah.
That's
why
that's
like
that.
C
So
in
terms
then
of
postcode
for
event
that
wouldn't
be
a
good
measurement,
then
to
have
in
terms
of
completeness,
because
there
may
be
instances
that
it
wouldn't
be.
You
know
you
wouldn't
have
to
postpaid
for
it
love
for
the
examples
you
gave
and
you
know
it'd
be
a
lot.
You
know
for
running
events
and,
for
you
know,
yeah
any
any
kind
of
those
events
where
you
you
know.
I
did
one
back
in
July
where
I
started
on
a
beach
I'm,
not
gonna,
have
a
postcode.
You
know
for
this
particular
grain
of
sand.
C
That
I
started
on
so
I
get
that
so
in
terms
of
having
postcode
as
a
measurement
for
event.
It
shouldn't
be
that
it
should
be
more
for
the
location.
That's
provided
yeah.
D
A
I
think,
but
that's
good
I,
think
in
terms
of
a
measure-
and
you
know
I
suggested
this
before
that
it
should
be
postgood
or
longitude
latitude
coordinates
like
as
says.
That's
the
rule.
The
business
rule
has
been
decided.
So
if
you
consider
either
of
those
things
we
should
be
at
100
and
currently
I'm,
not
so
that
that
can
be.
You
know,
that's
a
simple
refinement
and
one
of
them
that's.
You
know.
This
is
precisely
the
kind
of
honing
in
on
what
the
right
things
to
measure
are.
E
And
that's
a
really
good
example
there
and
how
it
is
something
that
should
be
required.
I
mean
it
should
be
passing
the
validator
if
one
of
those
two
things
isn't
present,
and
so
it's
a
good
thing
to
uncover
how
something
has
come
to
be
in
data
that
doesn't
have
one
of
those
two
things
and
and
where
that's
coming
from
I
mean
there
shouldn't
be
any
any
publisher
publishing
that.
But
but
maybe
there
are-
and
you
know
what's
on
Earth:
are
they
flying
in
the
airplane,
yeah.
A
You
know
by
looking
at
the
the
feed
level
API
level
version
of
this
table.
We
can
we
can
hone
in
on
what
it
is.
We
may
discover
that
it's
how
I've
taken
these
you
know
very
varied
streams
and
tried
to
filter
them
being
hot.
It
might
be
that.
B
Can
I
can
I
just
Harry?
Can
I
just
make
a
comment
to
Nick
there,
Nick
I'm,
just
looking
at
our
settings
now
for
facilities
and
activity,
templates
and
templates,
and
actually
I
can't
find
anywhere
that
I
have
the
ability
to
specify
that
degree
of
granularity
for
an
activity
that
might
be
taking
place
at
a
venue
or
facility
a
Leisure
Center,
where
they're
organizing
a
running
event
that
doesn't
actually
start
in
the
Leisure
Center
but
starts
somewhere
else.
B
B
E
Right
right,
so,
okay,
so
that,
yes,
so
there's
there's
there's
kind
of
two
separate
things:
there's
the
specs,
including
all
possible
scenarios
and
use
cases
and
then
there's
a
booking
system
that
implements
a
subset
of
the
specification
according
to
the
particular
use
case.
E
So
for
the
Leisure
operator,
the
booking
system
only
implements
things
that
Leisure
operators
are
likely
to
want
to
do
is
the
idea,
so
they
wouldn't
necessarily
have
the
capability
and
Leisure
operators
system
to
start
a
running
event
that
isn't
in
the
venue
that
they're
operating
now,
you
might
say
we
do
that,
in
which
case
interesting.
We
should
add
that
as
a
feature,
but
don't
tell
Sam
that
yet,
but
but
but
that's
certainly
the
way
that
this
is.
E
E
They've
got
a
very
specific
set
of
things
that
they
include
in
there
and
it's
geared
in
that
way,
and
so
you
wouldn't
be
able
to,
for
example,
set
up
a
squash
court
in
that
booking
system,
because
it's
obviously
for
runners
and
therefore
squash
shorts,
don't
make
sense
in
that
context,
and
so
it's
that
type
of
idea
of
there's
the
standards
that
cover
all
these
use
cases
and
rules
around
those
things.
E
B
To
say
yeah
yeah
there
will
be,
there
will
be
types
of
activities
that
we
run.
That
won't
necessarily
be
at
the
postcode
of
the
facility
where
it's
been
organized
by
and
I
used
to
work
from,
because
you
know
because
we
could
be
running
things
in
the
park
that
might
be
later.
But
you
know
you've
taken
a
group
outside
to
do
something
specifically.
B
For
example,
yeah
yeah,
because
yeah
interesting
well,
don't
mention
that,
but
but
interesting
in
one
of
our
Leisure
centers
have
been
up
in
Cumbria.
We
we
run
from
the
Leisure
Center
itself.
They
run,
they
have
a
little
satellite
location
where
they
run
group
exercise
classes.
But
it's
like
40
miles
away.
B
That's
absolutely
remote!
No,
we
set
it
up
as
a
different
resource
of
the
same
location,
but
I'm
just
thinking.
This
might
be
example,
where
you
need
to
put
the
coordinates
for
that
particular
a
particular
sort
of
resource.
That
is
a
long
way
away
from
the
venue
yeah
that
that
could
be
an
example.
For
example,
yeah.
E
Yeah,
it's
like
that
sounds
like
it's
at
the
resource
level
within
flow,
as
you
say
and
and
Legend
does,
does
do
that,
but
certainly
I
don't
know
flow.
Does
that
and
that's
really
interesting,
because,
certainly
at
the
moment
that
data
would
come
through
with
a
postcode
on
the
the
center,
as
you
say,
and.
B
B
A
And
we're
into
another
metric
there
of
accuracy.
You
know
the
postcode
in
the
data
is:
is
that
is
it
accurate
as
the
place
to
start,
but
that's
notoriously
difficult
to
measure,
but
as
it's
measured
by
that
frustration
in
your
end
users,
if
they're
discovered
they're
in
their
own
place?
So
that's
that's
a
separate,
a
separate
challenge,
I
think
in
in
how
to
explore
that
further.
So
Nick
I
might
pick
up
with
you
on
that.
If
that
constitutes
a
student
of
activity
or.
E
Yeah
and
and
certainly
Stephen
for
this
immediate
issue,
I'll
I'll,
raise
on
the
data
on
the
issues
log
for
flow
for
the
far
future,
but
that's
that's
the
thing
to
think
about
just
so
that
it
doesn't
get
lost,
but
obviously
don't
feel
like.
You
need
to
do
anything
with
that.
With
that
note
in
any
any
immediacy,
but
it
sounds
like
it's
worth
capturing.
Do
you
agree.
A
Right
is
that
I
I
copied
that
list
into
it
into
a
slide
in
the
deck,
so
it'll
be
there
for.
If
anyone
goes
back
for
future
reference,
but
it
hasn't,
it
hasn't
appeared
in
my
presentation,
I
think
so.
If
anyone's,
if
does
anyone
have
anything
for
say
around
around?
A
You
know
inspired
by
the
these
kind
of
ideas
of
completeness
and
uniqueness
and
timeliness
of
those
fields
that
have
shown
there
we've
we
suggested
that
they're
not
all
needed
and
that
postcode
and
or
lat
long
will
will
do
for
the
location
for
the
wear
of
things.
E
A
F
F
Yeah,
because
I
I,
that
was
what
I
was
going
to
be
comment
on,
is
essentially
a
lot
yeah.
These
fields
are,
are
all
kind
of
important
and
and
agreed
that
need
to
be
required,
but
your
url
required
has
the
Nuance
of
it
actually
being
a
relevant
URL
and
is
a
little
bit
harder
to
measure,
but
uniqueness
of
that
URL
would
I
guess
be
a
metric
to
to
see
because
yeah
we're
having
a
few
issues
in
this
department.
F
A
See
that
and
that's
a
proxy
really
isn't
it.
We.
We
think
that
a
unique
URL
is
a
deep
link.
Is,
is
next
term
you
know,
so
that
goes
right
to
the
booking
page
for
that
specific
slot
or
or
session,
and
not
everybody
can
provide
that
you
know.
So
that's
that's
the
world
we're
in
a
minute,
but
if
we
measure
measure
that
capability,
that's
you
know
that
shows
how
we're
moving
forward
in
that
department.
F
A
And
and
the
one
thing
that
isn't
on
there
is
image,
you
know
an
image
for
the
activity
and
that's
something
that's
been
mentioned
in
the
past
as
a
really
adds
value
to
the
user
experience
and
activity.
Finders
I,
don't
know
any
thoughts
on
that
yeah.
We
can
report
on
well.
F
D
D
So
an
example
would
be
there's
going
to
be
no
standardization
about
aspect
ratio,
yeah.
A
D
Trying
to
display
images
with
an
abstract
aspect
ratio,
not
even
sure
if
it's
going
to
be
a
portrait
or
landscape,
it's
quite
complicated
and
then
you've
got
resolution
and
just
image
size.
So
if
you're
doing
some
kind
of
processing
and
putting
it
into
a
single
frame,
you
might
have
problems
where
the
image
is
only
about
20
by
20
pixels,
because
they've
uploaded
an
icon
or
something
yeah.
B
F
Maybe
a
measure
there
as
well,
because
there's
you'll
see
providers
provide
images
but
they're,
just
generic
bratlight
logos
or
kind
of
organization
image,
as
opposed
to
specifically
specific.
D
Yeah
yeah
so,
for
example,
on
playfinder.
If
we
don't
have
proper
photographs
for
a
venue,
we
do
have
kind
of
default
representative
images
of
each
type
of
sport.
A
Yeah
we
will
move
on,
so
thank
you
very
much
or
I'll.
Just
rub
up
with
next
steps
on
that
which
so
I'll
I'll
take
the
list
and
those
those
comments
and
thoughts
and
again
do
it.
Another
iteration
honing
in
on
on
some
some
example,
measures
I'll
share
those
probably
by
email
or
you
know,
by
the
the
slack
Channel
and
comments
comments.
Welcome
in
terms
of
the
the
reporting
framework
we're
drafting
a
paper.
Chris
has
been
working
on
that
and
so
we'll,
which
just
explains
the
process
we've
gone
through.
A
E
It
might
be
worth
also
sharing
this
initial
list
that
you've
put
together
shortlist
from
the
w3c
mailing
list
and-
and
there
might
be
considerations
from,
for
example,
I
know,
Sports
England
has
done
some
behavioral
change
Research
into
What
fields,
like
images,
for
example,
are
a
thing
from
their
perspectives
that
are
helpful,
whether
it's
worth
taking
in
that
angle
as
well,
and
also
not
to
put
up
on
the
spot,
because
I
know
he's
on
the
score,
but
I'm
sure
some
of
that
I'm
in
customers
have
got
a
view
on
what
Fields
they
find
important.
E
A
That's
we
definitely
do
want
to
include
all
sorts.
I
will
be
sharing
this
directly
with
sport
England
in
our
kind
of
regular
catch-ups
that
we
have
with
them,
but
yeah.
B
A
A
I'll
give
you
a
sneak
preview,
in
fact
before
we
get
to
that
which
is
I,
wonder
if
it's
an
opportunity
to
use
broaden
the
use
of
the
of
the
activity
list
as
an
opportunity
to
use
it
to
raise
awareness
of
open
active.
So,
for
example,
we've
got
lots
of
missing
descriptions
and
if
that's
for
a
sport
or
activity
that
has
a
national
governing
body,
we
can
engage
them.
A
Try
and
get
them
to
contribute
descriptions,
raise
awareness
of
open,
active,
this
activity
list
and
the
other
elements
of
the
standard
see
where
they
are
on
their
journey
to
publication
to
share
in
open
data,
but
also
a
big
you
know.
Big
push
in
this
phase
is
to
move
from
data
fragmentation
to
data
standardization
in
the
sector.
That's
the
the
category.
A
So
this
is
a
good
example,
I
think,
because
everywhere
you
look,
everyone's
got
their
own
version
of
an
activity
list,
so
it
feels
like
it's
an
opportunity
to
do
more
to
you
know,
create
some
reference
data
for
the
sector,
we're
in
a
good
position
and
that
we're
trying
to
create
you
know
Open
Standards,
for
data
for
the
sector.
A
Is
it?
Is
it
something
that
open
active?
The
initiative
should
should
seize
and
kind
of
use.
So,
for
example,
there
are
other
funding
bodies
within
sport
England,
but
the
bodies
funded
by
sport,
England
that
are
creating
their
own
activity
lists.
Some
of
them
are
derived
from
ours,
but
I.
Just
wonder
if
if
people
had
thoughts
on
that
and
that
that
section
here
at
the
bottom,
so
we
have
sport
England
if
we
were
all
using
the
same
code
for
a
type
of
activity,
we'd
be
able
to
draw
that
line
between
the
money.
A
A
We've
got
an
active
live
survey
and
a
four
Global
are
doing
some
work,
return
style
data
I.
Think
it's
called
where
they
they're
mapping
participation
in
those
activities
and,
ultimately,
we,
you
know
we'd
see,
hopefully
be
able
to
understand
the
kind
of
Health
impacts,
which
is
where
we're
trying
to
get
to
the
health
outcomes.
So
if
we
were
using
a
standard
set
of
reference,
data
we'd
be
able
to
have
a
much
Fuller
understanding
and
appreciation
of
of
that
of
that
value
chain.
A
So
my
questions
are:
what
about
the
activity
list
do,
as
everyone
have
any
ideas
or
thoughts
about
that,
while
we're
on
I'll
just
put
the
whoops.
F
Personally,
I
think
it's
does
a
pretty
good
job
from
when,
wherever
we've
interacted
with
it,
it's
pretty
complete,
I
think
the
process
of
adding
things
to
it
is
not
not
easy
enough.
It
takes
too
long
and
usually
when
you
need
to
add
something
to
it,
it's
quite
a
thing
that
needs
to
be
done
immediately
in
in
the
past.
F
That's
caused
quite
some
friction
points,
but
generally
speaking,
I
think
the
completeness
of
it
is
is
actually
pretty
good
and
we
will
have
scenarios
in
which,
within
our
platform,
people
will
add
activities
and
we've
not
had
any
that
have
not
been
on
there.
For
example,
they're
like
some
edge
cases
but
yeah
I,
think
generally
speaking,
but
it's
not
often
that
there
aren't
aren't
matches.
A
I
mean
I
think
had
some.
You
know,
they've
got
that
situation
again,
I
think
where
a
client
wants
to
can't
find
their
exercise
in
the
list,
and
they
want
to
add
one
so
we're
interested
in
how
we
can
speed
up
that
process.
A
I
think
my
thought
was
the
currently
it's
managed
separately
to
the
other
elements
of
the
of
the
standard.
So
there's
an
activity
list
committee
which
I
don't
think
has
meant
recently
for
a
while,
and
the
process
seems
a
little
bit
disjointed
or
away
from
from
this
group.
A
So
I
was
interested
in
views
around
whether
we
bring
the
kind
of
review
or
approval
of
changes
to
that
to
that
list
to
this
group
or
a
subset
of
this
group
with
a
view
to
trying
to
make
it
a
more
timely
process,
but
also
with
a
view
to
trying
to
broaden
its
appeal
and
use
elsewhere.
Can
you
see
the
activity
list
on
my
screen
now
by
the
way
I've
just
been
scrolling
through
it.
A
E
I,
don't
I
think
I
think
the
activity
list
well
so
I
guess
I
can
speak
to
the
the
intention
behind
the
separation,
which
might
be
helpful
to
think
about
whether
we
want
to
keep
it
or
not,
at
least
in
theory.
E
The
group
of
people
that
sit
in
this
forum
talking
about
kind
of
medium
to
long-term
standard
stuff
and
those
things
go
into
kind
of
you
know
the
for
the
backlog
to
implement,
maybe
through
beta
and
then
eventually
into
the
specification
documents
and
so
there's
a
kind
of
long
process
like
the
issue
we
shared
a
minute
ago,
which
was
started
in
2020
and
has
been
back
and
forth
on
it.
E
So
there's
this
kind
of
the
purpose
there
being
to
kind
of
slowly
shape
the
the
standards
and
there's
implications
every
time
we
we
make
changes
to
the
standards
and
cost
for
things
and
for
people.
E
E
It
should
potentially
well,
hopefully
be
a
group
of
people,
that's
representative,
of
the
different
activities
that
the
list
is
about.
So
whereas
this
is,
this
group
is
much
broader
concerns
and
from
my
understanding
of
previous
Dom
has
actually
been
on.
The
on
the
committee
was
I
think
is
on
the
committee
but,
as
you
say,
hasn't
met
for
a
while,
but
there
are
quite
a
few
kind
of
back
and
forth
in
there.
Quite
it's
quite
a
detailed
conversation
around
where
their
activity
should
be
in
or
not
based
on.
E
You
know
whether
they,
whether
they
should
qualify
as
an
activity
or
whether
just
because
someone's
come
up
with
a
really
cool
way
of
doing
something
you
know
like
handstand
yoga,
but
their
particular
brand
of
handstand
yoga.
You
know
I'm
just
making
it
up,
but
yoga
stand
probably
shouldn't
be
on
the
activity
list,
because
it's
just
they've
just
made
it
up,
and
perhaps
handstand
yoga
or
some
generic
term
that
encompasses
that
and
other
brands
that
might
come
along
is,
is
more
appropriate.
E
E
It's
also
types
of
things
against
things
like
that
and
therefore
having
this
using
this
forum,
for
that
conversation
potentially
is
a
different,
such
as
just
a
different
audience
and
different
concerns,
and
so
the
reason
for
having
it
as
a
separate
committee
is
that
it,
you
know,
there's
a
clear
accountability
for
the
list,
and
it's
very
you
know
specifically
around
that
list.
E
Potentially
there
are
issues
in
terms
of
how
actions
came
out
of
that
committee
and
process,
and
things
like
that.
I've
only
heard
I
wasn't
part
of
it
myself,
but
there's
there's
definitely
something
to
pick
up
around
process
if
we
did
want
to
continue
with
the
current
approach,
because
I
think
the
I
think
there
were
some
challenges
there,
but
I'm
not
sure
that
they
were
challenges
with
where
the
conversation
was
happening.
E
I
suspect
those
challenges
would
have
existed
wherever
the
conversation
happened.
If
that
makes
sense.
Okay,.
A
Well,
I've
shared
in
the
chat,
a
Google
sheet
that
Chris
has
collected
from
it
put
together,
which
has
the
activity
list
here,
our
active
list
and
I
think
yeah.
So
we
have
this
concern
or
you
know
something
to
think
about.
Well,
we
have
trademarked
items
in
a
in
an
open
list
which.
A
A
These
are
the
categories
used
in
the
active
live
survey,
so
this
is
where
they
understand
participation
and
outcomes
moving
communities.
They
use
these
information,
I
think
or
these
categories
to
to
monitor.
A
A
E
A
Bit
slow
to
update
from
Tom,
we
had
need
to
reflect
those
wider
voices
from
Nick.
If
that's
a
the
fair
need
to
summary
any
other
thoughts.
I.
F
Think
those
two
specific
things
are
fairly
conflicting:
aren't
they
in
terms
of
more
voices
and
speed,
but
I
agreed
I
think
there's
nothing
wrong
with
the
did
it
fit
the
discussion
and
and
the
way
it's
dealt
with.
It
seems
logical
but
yeah
if
there's
a
way
in
which
they
can
kind
of
provisionally
be
exceptions
on
in
the
short
term
that
that
can
be
I,
guess
reviewed
every
time,
because
my
understanding
is
that
that
group
meets
once
a
month,
and
that
is
often
canceled
and
things
like
that.
F
So
when,
on
the
other
side
of
things,
if
you've
got
someone
who's
like
makes
a
logical
request
that
is
blocking
their
activities
being
published
as
open
data
and
I've
had
scenarios
where
I've
waited
like
months
and
that
that's
just
they've
just
had
a
bad
experience
of
open
active
in
that
scenario,
so
yeah
just
Keen
to
to
try
and
have
some
sort
of
keep
the
discussion,
but
not
create
friction
from
from
moving
things
forward.
D
E
Okay,
yeah,
that's
it
exactly
I
think
there
was
a
conversation
in
this
forum
a
few
months
ago,
which
is
which
has
been
published.
I
checked.
That
was
one
of
the
ones
that
was
the
video,
was,
was
retrieved
and
and
published
because
a
couple
videos
were
lost
so
that
and
the
conversation
was
basically,
the
activity
list
is
not
suitable
for
the
facilities
use
case
because
you've
got
300
whatever
it
is
for
I
can't
remember
how
many
there
are
lots
of
activities
and
with
spaces.
E
You
don't
have
that
many
types
of
spaces.
We
don't
need
an
aqua
yoga
space.
You
need
a
swimming
pool
and
therefore
that's.
A
An
electrician
start
drilling
in
my
house,
so
the
this
this
session
of
the
w3c
is
going
to
come
to
a
noisy
conclusion,
I
think
anyway.
So
there's
a
link
there
to
the
document.
I
will
put
that
in
the
slides.
If
anyone
has
any
has
any
further
thoughts,
so
Chris
I,
you
had
you'd
come
up
with
a
kind
of
a
handful
of
questions
around
the
kind
of
if
we
think
about
quality,
with
our
data
quality
Hudson.
A
Looking
at
the
activity,
there's
some
things
around
the
inconsistencies
of
mappings
some
duplications,
those
kind
of
things
to
I'm,
just
trying
to
think
of
the
way
forward
here.
A
Kind
of
happy
with
the
idea
of
you
know
positive
about
the
idea
of
Greater
consistency
in
the
use
of
activity
list,
a
lot
of
the
other
ones,
the
ones
they
use
were
derived
from
ours.
So
it
could
be
there's
just
another
kind
of
case
of
the
grouping
or
hierarchying
different,
broader
terms,
narrower
terms
that
kind
of
things
that
might
allow
a
lightweight
good,
convenient
and
robust
mapping.
A
I
think
I
still
have
a
question
mark
around
the
the
kind
of
the
use
of
trademarked
names
and
whether
they
trademark
variations
on
on
a
normal
activity.
We
want
to
be
very
expression.
F
On
that
sorry,
Howard
yeah
I
was
just
going
to
say
on
that
yeah.
Just
kind
of
reminded
me
that,
like
the
activity
list,
is
pretty
good
aside
from
group
exercise
which
is
completely
hard
to
manage,
because
it's
either
when
you
provide
the
end
user
experience,
it's
either
group
exercise
which
doesn't
kind
of
make
that
much
sense
or
it's
a
triple
X
combo,
20,
20
or
something
and
you're
like
it's
not
used.
It's
not
helpful
for
the
for
the
user.
So
it's
trying
to
maybe
understand
that
side
of
things
within
the
hierarchy.
E
Yeah
and
with
regards
to
group
exercise,
obviously
EMD
UK
had
a
big
hand
in
the
original
list
in
terms
of
making
sure
that
that
stuff
was
cut
off,
because
that's
probably
where
the
most
complexity
is
really
in
group
X.
Everyone
else
kind
of
gets
on
with
it,
and
so
the
group
exercise
stuff.
E
The
trademark
decision
was
something
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
sure
if
this
is
written
down
anywhere,
I
kind
of
hope
it
is,
but
certainly
there
was
a
there-
was
a
kind
of
rule
of
thumb
used
for
when
trademarks
go
in
the
list.
I
guess
a
good
example
here
is
Zumba.
E
You
know
zumbros
on
one
side,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
you've
got
you
know,
handstand
Yoga
Yoga,
stand
that
someone
just
made
up
on
trademarked
yesterday
and
they've
got
one
session
running
in
the
whole
country
that
we
probably
don't
want
on
the
list,
and
the
list
today
has
been
kind
of
trying
to
find
that
middle
ground,
where
sessions
that
are
trademarked
and
consumers
are
likely
to
search
for
I'm,
not
sure
if
the
decision
was
made
based
on
things
like
you
know,
the
Google
search
analytics
on
on
particular
terms
how
popular
they
are
in
general
search.
E
That
would
seem
sensible
to
me,
but
other
things
like
that,
whether
it
was
more
EMD
saying
based
on
their
experience
and
what
they
what
they
see
in
the
market,
these
things
are
what's
more
popular
might
well
be
in
the
latter,
but
that
certainly
is
is
the
idea
behind
it.
So
I.
Imagine
that
this
kind
of
conversation
and
anything
that
Chris
Hunt
covers
in
in
terms
of
double
checking
the
mapping
would
be
really
useful
to
go
into
if
there
was
an
activity.
This
committee,
you
know
reconvening,
maybe
checking
everyone
still
in
the
same
jobs.
E
You
know
it
might
well
be
that
you
know
the
that's
good
input
into
that
discussion
and
I'm
sure
they
would
be
some
good
debates
to
have
around
hierarchy
and
things
like
that
and
I
hope
you'd
be
able
to
get
Jade
back
in
there
or
someone
from
previous
discussions
who
was
behind
a
lot
of
that
hierarchy.
Decision
because
obviously
rearranging
things
has
has
consequences
for
the
users
so
and
deleting
things
is
problematic.
So
yeah.
A
That's
that's
good
to
know,
I
think.
A
Yeah
I
think
you
know
it's.
It's
not
necessarily
a
case
of
there's
a
no
trademark
rule,
it's
about
understanding
the
decisions
and
if
there
was
something
you
know
a
rule
of
thumb,
if
we
can
be
clear
about
that
when
it
comes
to
speeding
up
that
process
of
getting
something
in
or
off
the
list
we
can
be.
That's.
That's
was
my
kind
of
ambition
there
not
to
rule
things
out
because
yeah
the
trademark.
A
So
yeah
cheers
everyone.
So
thank
you
very
much.
C
C
So
I
have
undertaken
a
review
of
the
activity
list,
not
just
that
Stephen
sorry
I
know
you
said:
you've
got
to
go
if
you
need
to,
you
can
watch
it
back,
but
now
instead
I've
untaken
the
review
of
the
activity
list,
not
just
from
the
data
quality
side
of
things,
but
also
from
a
processing
side
of
thing
as
well,
because
during
the
investigation
you
know
it
was
pointed
out,
look
it
just
takes
a
long
time
for
activities
to
be
added,
for
whatever
reason
so
I
have,
you
know,
put
a
paper
together
and
I
think
maybe
in
the
it's
you
know
we're
too
close
to
Christmas.
C
Now,
there's
no
point
of
potentially
restarting
it
now,
but
whether
it's
a
new
committee
that
comes
together
that
you
know
or
it's
the
old
committee
back
together,
I,
don't
know
but
I
think
that
needs
to
be
started
again
more
than
looking
at
the
data
quality
side
of
things
is
that
we
look
at
the
processes
we
try
and
speed
that
up.
We
shouldn't
be
waiting
two
to
three
to
four
months,
however
long
it
currently
is
to
add
an
activity.
It
shouldn't
be
that
much
of
a
complex
process.
C
So
the
aim
is
to
restart
that
in
the
New
Year
get
a
new
committee
Go
in
all
the
present
wire,
the
current
one
get
that
process
streamlined
and
then
once
we
start
looking
at
that,
then
I
can
start
looking
at
the
data
quality
side
of
things,
I
mean
just,
for
instance,
very,
you
know
very
very
briefly.
You
know,
there's
we've
got
on
the
activity
list
running
machine
as
one
activity
and
treadmill
was
another.
Now
to
me,
unless
someone
can
say
no,
they
are
two
different
things.
C
I
would
think
a
running
machine
and
a
treadmill
is
the
same
thing
personally,
but
it's
those
kind
of
thing,
yeah
I,
know
I,
know
yeah
it's
one
of
those
things.
Isn't
it
Nick,
but
yeah
there's
those
little
things
that
do
stand
out,
but
I
think
let's
get
the
processes
streamlined.
First
of
all,
and
then
we
can
move
on
to
looking
at
data
quality.
E
Sorry
as
you're,
adding
on
add-ons
Howard,
if
you're
able
to
pull
from
your
work,
all
the
unique
activities
that
are
currently
in
use
that
might
be
helpful
in
input
into
Chris's
analysis
there,
because
what,
if
running,
machine
and
treadmill
are
never
used
in
the
data
kind
of
a
bit
of
a
moot
point
to
an
extent,
we
can
probably
be
a
bit
more
easy
about
changing
them
or
whatever
else
it
might
be.
But
if
there's
things
that
are
heavily
used,
that
that's
something
else
to
consider.
E
So
it
might
be
that's
that
will
help
guide
the
focus
of
where
the
important
conversations
are.
Do
you
know
where?
Where
all
data
is.
A
Might
help
okay,
brilliant?
Thank
you
very
much.
I'm
gonna
have
to
call
and
hold
that,
but
thanks
everyone
for
some
good
discussions
that
are
really
really
helpful
and
some
clear
ways
forward:
I
think
for
our
you're
wrapping
up
the
kind
of
draft
data
Quality
Reporting,
which
is
the
first
round
which
we'll
share
to
get
some
ideas
before
we
kind
of
move
forward.
So
thank
you
all
very
much.
Do
we
any
other
business
and
is
it
worth
having
a
meeting
on
21st
December,
or
is
everyone
going
to
be
Christmas
ready?
A
A
That's
fine,
so
I
think
we
will.
We
could
win
in
the
new
year,
but
so
all
of
us-
everyone,
if
I,
don't
speak
to
you
before,
have
a
great
Christmas.