►
From YouTube: OpenActive W3C Community Group Meeting / 2023-01-18
Description
A public hangout for members of the OpenActive W3C Community Group.
For more information visit: https://w3c.openactive.io/
How to join this group: https://www.w3.org/community/openactive/how-to-join-the-group/
A
Hello,
everyone
welcome
to
the
w3c
community
group,
hang
out
for
open,
active
January,
2023
18th
of
January
2023.
and
could
be
a
short
session
today,
because
we're
quite
light
on
numbers
reminder.
If
you
haven't
already,
please
join
the
w3g
community
group,
there's
a
link
in
the
slides
which
are
up
on
the
w3c
pages.
A
A
So
here
we
just
spell
out
the
process
that
we've
been
through
over
the
course
of
what,
for
five
or
six
calls
pointing
towards
the
obviously
National
statistics.
Didier
I
did
call
the
action
planning
approach
where
you
consider
what
the
use
case
is
what
the
need
for
the
data
is
consider
which
elements
are
important
work
out
what
things?
What
good
would
look
like
for
those
elements
and
then
put
in
place?
A
A
This
is
kind
of
aggregated
figures
for
the
whole
for
a
snapshot
of
the
the
data
mid-november,
and
these
are
some
of
the
the
elements
that
we
identify
as
important,
so
an
activity
that
matches
to
the
activity
list,
but
it
has
a
name
or
a
description,
postcode,
some
kind
of
geographic
element
that
they
are
relevant
for
Discovery.
So
these
are
looking
for
events
that
are
coming
up.
A
A
A
A
C
A
A
A
But
these
were
old
events
that
weren't
up
to
date,
they
weren't,
you
know
they'll,
be
filled
it
out
by
most
activity
Finders
because
it
happened
in
the
past
and
they
clearly
indicated
no
restrictions
for
gender
or
I.
Think
for
gender
that
one
so
just
a
quick
example
of
what
it
looks
like
at
an
individual
feed
level,
an
apologies
to
the
to
the
two
organizations
that
I've
kind
of
highlighted
there.
But
the
plan
is
to
automate
that
process.
A
C
This
background
noise
in
the
office,
I
didn't
say,
apologies
I'll,
tell
me
as
much
as
I
can
yeah
I
was
just
gonna
suggest
that
this
is
really
great.
It
might
be
worth
surfacing
this
to
the
AEF
Forum,
where
there'll
be
a
probably
because
this
is
it's
more
of
a
business
requirements,
thing
kind
of
which
of
these
are
focused
on
I
guess,
rather
than
kind
of
more
technical.
How
questions
so
that
might
that's
just
a
thought:
I
had
to
yeah.
C
A
Okay,
well,
so
this
is
a
work
to
come
and
we're
keen
to
discuss
the
results
or
the
process.
You
know
with
anyone,
any
any
data
publisher,
that's
interested
or
any
data
user,
of
course,
to
check
that
we're
kind
of
honing
in
on
the
right
things
in
terms
of
data
quality,
as
they
see
it
so
I'll
move
on
now,
but
please
do
get
in
touch
with
Chris
or
myself
or
hello
at
openactive.io.
A
If
you
want
to
know
more
about
this,
so
proposed
timeline
for
Tool
development,
this
is
just
a
sketch
out
view
of
our
plan.
We
have
a
new
developer,
join
the
team
from
the
ODI,
so
we
have
a
little
more
resource
now
to
start
looking
at
updating
some
of
the
tools
to
make
it
easier
for
data
Publishers
and
for
data
data
users.
A
So
our
plan
is
to
make
a
start
with
the
crawler,
which
is
the
code
that
goes
to
the
catalog
of
catalogs
and
then
spiders
out
to
each
catalog
to
each
day
set
site
to
get
a
list
of
all
the
open,
active
endpoints,
all
the
API
feeds
that
are
out
there.
So
that
is
first
thing.
I'm
going
to
use
that
to
update
the
status
page,
current
states
page
is
being
populated
by
Static
lists
right
now,
so
that
that
there's
a
chance
that
will
be
out
of
date.
A
So
that's
the
plan
so
we'll
update
a
crawler,
update,
States
page
and
move
on
to
look
at
what
can
we
learn
from
the
visualizer
tool?
That's
out
there
already.
That
already
does
some
of
this
work.
The
crawling
and
harvesting
feeds
so
we'll
look
to
extend
that
and
create
a
data,
Quality
Reporting
or
Explorer
tool
and
again
we'll
feed
the
results
of
that
into
the
states
page.
A
So
we'll
start
to
fill
out
this
view
of
what's
happening
with
the
open
active
data
with
some
more
with
some
of
the
Insight
we're
getting
from
the
data
Quality
Reporting
work
now
we'll
move
on
as
our
developer
gets
more
familiar
with
the
data
and
the
and
the
feeds
we'll
move
on
to
the
validators
and
then
explore
the
booking
capabilities
in
the
test.
Suite
and
we'll
make
again
they
will
return
to
the
status
page.
A
So
there's
a
kind
of
One-Stop
Shop
shows
everything
you
need
to
know
about
a
feed,
and
that's
these
are
approximate
tidelines
that
you
know
just
to
flag
that
now
yeah
so
because
currently,
the
there's
just
a
very
simple
test
to
this
flag
here,
green
tick
or
Red.
Cross
is
a
very
simple
check
to
see
that
you're
getting
some
kind
of
response
from
the
API
feed
and
we
want
that
to
be
a
little
bit
more
informative
and
a
little
bit
more
useful.
C
One
thing
on
the
just
a
question
of
whether
we
are
also
going
to
do
some
work
on
the
reference
implementation.
That's
the
kind
of
bit
that
works
alongside
the
any
changes
to
the
test,
suite
and
validator
I
guess
would
need
to
be
reflected
in
the
reference
implementation
so
that
everything
can
still
yeah
work.
A
A
A
Nothing
nothing
more
to
add
on
that
again
comments
and
feedback,
welcome
and
we'll
move
on
to
the
kind
of
final
bigger,
hopefully
the
bigger
topics
for
today,
but
it's
a
small
small
group.
So,
let's
see
where
we
get
to,
but
that's
the
starting
to
plan
out
this
year
and
the
work
of
of
this
group
for
for
the
coming
year
and
which
areas
or
any
areas
or
topics
that
we
we
should
be
focusing.
So
we
can
get
them
into
the
calendar
and
so
far
apart
from
the
data
quality
work,
it's
been.
A
You
know
the
agenda's
just
been
whatever's
in
the
front
of
my
mind
at
the
moment,
and
obviously
we
want
that
to
be
ensure
that
the
community
gets
a
chance
to
discuss
the
things
that
are
relevance
and
importance
to
them.
So
my
idea
would
be
from
in
discussion
now
and
then
in
the
other
forums
to
service
a
long
list
of
topics
that
we
could
focus
on,
which
would
then
review
and
prioritize.
A
A
A
So
if
we
can
describe
those
things
I'm
talking
about
ramps
for
wheelchair
access,
pool,
hoists
and
all
those
kind
of
facilities,
if
we
could
describe
those
in
a
consistent
way,
that's
something
we
can
add
to
the
feeds
over
time
to
to
improve
that,
to
make
it
easier
for
everyone
to
know
if
an
activity
is
going
to
be
right
for
them.
So
that's
the
first
kind
of
thing
that
comes
to
mind
progressing
the
work
done
on
the
accessibility.
C
B
A
D
A
Looking
to
see
that
they
are
fully
exploited
is
kind
of
key
reference
data
for
the
sector,
so
that's
something
we
can
hope
to
to
progress
in
the
near
term
and
that
falls
on.
We
had
a
brief
chat
about
that
about
how
those
other
sport,
England
funded
bodies,
are
using
lists
of
activities,
but
they
don't
always
align
so
there's
a
piece
there.
C
C
A
A
Prioritize
them,
take
them
to
the
opening
Christian
committee
kind
of
get
other
views
and
then
schedule
them
in
throughout
the
year.
So
we
can
make
the
most
of
the
time
we've
got.
Whether
people
give
up
to
this
group
consisted
beyond
the
the
date
quality
work.
It's
been
a
little
bit
ad
hoc
in
the
in
the
since
I,
took
over
in
the
last
summer.
A
F
E
A
A
D
A
A
It
seems
like
there's
quite
a
good
fit
for
that.
So
that's
an
opportunity
to
extend
that-
and
this
is
a
chance
to
Roots-
gives
us
a
it's
a
new
angle,
I
suppose
to
the
open,
active
feeds
in
it.
It's
an
opportunity
for
self-directed
exercise
rather
than
coached,
or
you
know
necessarily
at
a
facility
or
a
gym.
So
it's
a
different,
a
different
side
of
it,
but
certainly
something
to
explore.
E
D
C
About
what
was
the
first
one,
you
mentioned
there
before
referrals?
That's
it!
Thank
you,
goodness
Roots.
It
might
be
helpful
before
any
next
discussion
on
that,
just
from
where
it
kind
of
got
to
before.
If
there
are
Publishers
who
are
interested
in
publishing
their
data,
getting
that
data
out
of
them
in
any
form,
I
mean
when
we
so
Roots
is
obviously
a
little
bit
less
mature
than
a
lot
of
the
other
specifications.
C
C
You
know
look
at
and
see
how
it
fits
in
or
what
that
looks
like
so
great
if
they've
got
people
like
kayaking,
saying
you
know,
we'd
love
to
do
something
with
roots,
I
guess
my
first,
my
first
my
suggested
first
question
to
them
would
be:
what
have
you
currently
got
and
can
we
have
like?
Are
you
happy
to
share
that
openly?
C
And
if
it's
the
case
that
we're
looking
at
data
capture,
then
my
suggestion
would
be
what
initiatives
are
there
that
are
actually
starting?
That
you
know
are
an
opportunity
to
capture
the
data,
because
we've
also
had
lots
of
kind
of
hypotheticals
before
where
it's
like.
Oh
yeah
we'd
love
to
capture
this
and
it
kind
of
doesn't
go
anywhere
because
there's
no
projects
on
the
horizon
that
are
going
to
build
in
things
to
capture
that
for
kayaking
or
for
whoever
it
is
which
is
yeah.
C
A
A
You
know
given
time
pressures
that
everyone's
under
and
which
is
why
I
was
Keen
to
move
from
the
the
kind
of
General
data
quality
stuff
to
the
feed
level
stuff.
But
I'd
like
to
keep
this
focused
on.
You
know
not
on
hypothetical
things,
where
possible
and
I
think
that's
the
case
with
open,
active
and
open
referral
as
well,
that
there
are
enough
initiatives
where
people
are
trying
to
to
embed
that
kind
of
social
prescribing
capability
that
it's
it's
beyond
just
a
hypothetical.
Now.
A
D
C
Things
in
here
about
places
feed
which
we
had
conversations
about
previously,
but
I
am,
and
we
got
to
somewhere
with
it,
but
it
wasn't
really
in
a
place
where
it
was.
It
was
particularly
formalized,
so
it
might
be
good
to
revisit
the
places
feeds
again.
I
know
they're
being
published
by
a
few
organizations
just
to
kind
of
yeah
check
that
that
still
will
make
sense.
C
Yeah
sure
so
the
use
cases
you're
finding
exactly
you're
finding
the
place
itself,
rather
than
the
things
that
are
going
on
in
the
place,
and
this
is
something
that,
for
example,
MC
are
actively
using
and
I
think
playways
also
use
to
help
organ
people
to
find
organizations
with
certain
types
of
facilities
like
find
all
my
local
swimming
pools.
That
kind
of
thing,
rather
than
find
me
a
ticket
type
of
class.
C
So
historically
the
open
active
data
has
been
much
more
focused
on
the
sessions
and
the
places
data
exist
within
those,
but
there's
also
become
it's
become
obvious
that
there's
a
need
for
within
the
ecosystem
to
represent
just
the
places
to
hang
other
things
off
and
that's
where
the
closest
food
comes
in,
so
not
not
on
its
own
necessarily
from
a
static
system,
because
static
data
is,
is
not
that
useful
and
also
to
mention
that
there
is
a
kind
of
connection
to
active
places
that
has
been
I.
Think
it's
in.
C
C
So,
although
a
lot
of
people
are
like,
oh,
we
should
link
all
the
stuff
together
when
you're
like
okay,
great
so
which
booking
system
is
going
to
put
active
places
to
reference
data
inside
it
everyone's
like
so
UK
based
active
places
is
he
is
a
UK
only
data
set,
so
my
my
International
booking
system
is
going
to
have
to
have
this
drop
down
only
for
UK
reference
data.
How
does
that
work?
Can
we
not
use
something
else?
Oh
and
or
I,
already
use
Google
Places.
C
Can
we
not
use
a
Google
Places
ID
instead
of
an
active
places
ID?
Why
are
we
coming
up
with
our
another
set
of
IDs
if
it's
a
international
use
case?
So
it's
back
to
that.
There's!
No
one
yet
has
said
yeah.
We
really
want
to
implement
active
places,
reference
data
in
our
booking
system
to
to
to
link
everything
together,
I.
A
C
Yeah,
actually
off
the
top
of
my
head,
I
mean
if
given
Sporting,
Good
funds
active
places
if
they
had,
if
you
did
it,
the
other
way
around,
which
might
make
more
sense,
active
places
can
link
to
data
and
data
feeds
if
all
places
have
a
place
ID,
which
is
part
of
the
kind
of
places
for
your
conversation,
then
you
can
link
the
ID
from
active
places
to
the
open
data
sets
and
absolutely
brilliant
Debbie's
answered
it,
which
is
they're
already
doing
it.
So
maybe
sorry
I
speak
to
you
soon.
C
G
G
It
was
just
a
field
for
us
to
put
that
number
in
I,
don't
know
how
they
would
pull
those
IDs
from
active
places.
I'm
not
sure,
there's
just
I
know
we're
talking
to
active
places.
We've
also
had
a
challenge
of
like
where
one
site
closes
and
another
one
opens
and
that
sort
of
stuff.
So
if
you
were
to
pull
that
information
from
active
places,
it
potentially
could
be
wrong.
Maybe
it's
just
that
Danger.
A
G
I
know
what
they're
doing
at
the
moment
is
extremely
manual.
Isn't
it
their
job,
Lee
I
think
they
ring
around
to
find,
if
there's
any
changes
in
a
particular
location,
whether
they've
introduced
new
facilities
or
and
and
obtaining
like
information
like
the
size
of
the
pool
and
all
of
that
sort
of
stuff,
which
feels
like
an
awful
job
to
do.
G
I
feel
sorry
for
those
people,
because
it's
not
just
Leisure
that
they're
doing
it
for
but
they're
doing
it
for
a
lot
of
other
a
lot
of
other
areas
as
well,
but
yeah
we
had
a
meeting
about
with
them
about
a
few
things
and
decided
that
we
would
store
that
ID
so
that
we
could
associate
the
two
in
hope
that
going
forward.
That
meant
that
we
would
be
able
to
possibly
communicate
with
them
if
a
change
was
made
or
something
like
that,
and
just
maintaining
that
connection
a
bit
easier.
C
That's
great,
that's
that's
really
highlights
the
use
case
there
doesn't
it
and
it
might
be
really
good
to
have
a
conversation
with
a
few
other
systems
as
well
to
see
if
anyone
else
is
picking
this
up
and
I
still
wonder
whether
active
place
is
doing
the
work
and
linking
into
open
active
data
might
be
the
easier
way
around
for
everyone,
because
obviously
otherwise,
there's
a
lot
of
booking
systems
individually.
That
need
to
put
the
field
in
that's
Debbie's,
talking
about,
rather
than
just
active
places,
doing
it
once.
G
We
do
everything
in
Gladstone,
but
then
we
have
to
go
into
the
interface
for
open
active
because
not
ever
since
pulled
from
Gladstone
and
then
we
need
to
communicate
with
active
places,
and
then
we
also
need
to
communicate
with
four
Global
and
they're
not
pull
in
from
active
places
for
everything,
yeah
and
there's
just
so
many
things
now,
there's
so
many
pools
from
data.
We
just
need
to
stop
having
to
put
it
in
so
many
different
places
when
you
need
to
synchronize.
A
A
C
It
could
be
sorry,
how
does
it's
going
to
say
it
could
be?
It
could
be
good
to
host
a
call
with
you
know
that
a
lot
of
other
operators
that
might
be
interested
in
simplifying
the
challenge
that
Debbie's
outlined
there
to
kind
of
see.
If,
if
there's
lots
of
ways
of
solving
that
problem,
certainly
the
open
active
data
that
is
entered
could
be
used
by
active
places.
But
I
know
active
places
is
far
more
information
than
just
what
open
active
captures.
C
So
there's
definitely
some
sinking
there,
but
the
number
of
fields
total
synced
between
the
two
is
probably
quite
small,
compared
to
as
Debbie
outlined
the
kind
of
enormity
of
of
open
active
of
sorry
of
active
places,
because
it's
like
how
how
wide
is
your
swimming
pool
in
inches
or
something
you
know
or
centimeters?
You.
A
Know
there
may
be
scope,
we
we
may
be
able
to
simplify
their
lives
if
we
can
provide
them
a
list
of
of
changing
locations
drawn
from
you
know,
changes
in
the
feeds
that
might
that
might
be
something
they
can.
They
can
use
to
Target
their
kind
of
Maintenance
activity.
It
might
be
ways
to
you,
know
win-win.
A
So,
just
right
now,
I've
got
kind
of
the
accessibility
components
of
the
of
the
specifications
or
the
the
opportunity.
Spec
location,
spec
describing
immediate
features,
I
mean
by
that
I
think
activity
lists
which
again,
some
of
those
features
already
appear
in
the
active
places.
So
to
me
there
is
a
lot
of
overlap,
so
accessibility,
the
activity
list
and
the
facility
list
high
frequency
sessions,
the
overlap
with
open,
active
and
open
referral
or
the
interface
roots
places.
G
The
excess
accessibility,
one
and
I
think
you
mentioned
at
the
beginning,
just
wanted
to
clarify
a
lot
and
as
it
stands
in
the
godson's
face
that
we've
got,
we
can't
associate
a
type
of
accessible
equipment.
Let's
say
to
a
place
such
as
a
hoist
I
think
you
mentioned
hoist
and
stuff
at
the
beginning.
So
that's
the
intention
is
it
that
we
could
do
such.
A
Well,
the
the
intention
is
we
explore,
what's
what's
possible,
you
know
and
and
desirable.
We
know
that
we
possibly
don't
do
enough
to
make
it.
You
know
from
from
we've
had
various
ODI
events
where
we've
talked
to
disabled
Sports
people
and
they
the
the
message
was
that
we
don't
do
enough
to
explain
what
facilities
are
available,
whether
that
activity
is
going
to
be
right
for
for
a
particular
need
set
of
needs.
So
so
we
want
to
explore
that
and
see.
What's
what
we
can
do.
G
Yeah
that
we
had
a
call
with
Powersport
and
I'm
just
trying
to
remember
who
else
was
on
it
from
I'm
in
let's
do
trying
to
help
with
power
sports
setting
up
a
activity.
Finder
and
those
sorts
of
things
came
up
in
at
the
moment
you
can
only
assign,
what's
it
called
like
something
like
event,
is
wheelchair
accessible
to
the
event
rather
than
to
the
facility
itself.
A
A
A
A
G
But
at
the
same
time,
I
don't
know
if
the
if
it's
right
to
rely
on
active
places
rather
than
the
operator
or
should
it
be
the
other
way
around
just
because
if
active
places
are
ringing
round
and
that's
their
way
of
doing
it,
that's
a
very
delayed
approach.
Yeah
they
might
not
find
out
for
12
months
that
something's
changed
at
that
facility.
C
It
might
be
that
when
we
have
the
active
places
conversation
if
active
places
is
interested
in
integrating
with
open,
active
I.E
pulling
places,
data
from
open,
active,
they're,
obviously
going
to
get
more
live
data,
so
it
might
be
that
and
if
let's
say,
they've
got
120
Fields
if
they're
ringing
around
everyone
and
25
of
those
fields
to
synchronized
with
open
active
automatically,
you
know,
Debbie
doesn't
need
to
update
them
on
stuff.
That's
changed
that
openactive
has
already
sharing
with
the
world.
B
Sorry,
isn't
me
trying
to
find
the
mu
band.
No
I
mean
that
you've
covered
pretty
much
everything
I'm
just
going
through
my
head
and
everything
I'm
just
yeah
we're
active
places
at
the
moment
and
just
downloading
some
data
from
that
as
well.
To
have
a
quick
look
but
I
suppose
I
mean
they
might
not
be
interested
in
mainly
is
when
we
get
around
to
so
the
the
issues
potentially
from
from
GitHub,
because
one
of
the
things
I
want
to
look
at
is:
are
the
issues?
B
Are
they
getting
resolved?
Are
they
staying
open
for
too
long?
Are
they
closing
when
they
should
be?
Are
we
looking
at
potential?
You
know
slas
or
anything
like
that
and
trying
to
put
some
sort
of
process
or
procedure
in
place
just
to
make
sure
that
there's
a
track
of
okay,
we've
had
x
amount
of
issues
raised
this
month?
Are
they
getting
resolved?
You
know
month
on
month,
or
are
they
staying
stagnant
and
not
actually
getting
resolved
and
making
sure
the
right
people
are
being
aware
of
them?
A
C
Yeah
good
to
do
that
as
part
of
the
status
page
work,
perhaps
to
make
sure
it's
up
to
date
and
whatever
and
the
process
is
already
I,
think
documented,
but
make
sure
that's
clear.
I
was
going
to
say
also
back
on
this
slide.
I
wasn't
sure
which
side
to
attack,
because
you
jump
back
physically
I
can
get
into
the
last
slide.
This
slide
courses
is
another
one.
We've
done,
I
mean
courses.
C
Data
has
been
opened
up
by
several
organizations
now
and
I
know
that
cap2
have
done
some
work
around
that
to
open
up
their
their
courses,
data,
and
so
they
I
think
there
was
some
feedback
from
that
implementation
as
well.
So
it
might
be
a
good,
a
good
time
to
kind
of
gather
our
thoughts
on
courses
and
have
a
think
about.
You
know,
make
sure
everyone's
happy
with
the
way
it's
shaken
out
across
the
different
implementations
and
and
then
formalize
that
somewhere,
basically.
B
F
C
Good
good
question:
no,
no,
it's
great
great
to
clarify
it's
very
Leisure,
specific
kind
of
Sociology.
So
it's
all
very,
like
yeah
courses
as
in
like
a
swimming
session,
you
if
you
could-
and
you
can
sign
up
to
a
five-week,
whatever
tennis
course
to
learn
to
play
tennis,
beginner
tennis
in
Islington
Tennis
Center,
which
is
a
gll
site
where
you
can
learn
to
to
do
that.
Where
you
can
start
swimming
lessons
in
in
a
kind
of
swimming
pool
where
you
get
like
a
it's
a
a
year.
C
G
C
One
more
previous
slide:
I
didn't
get
to
see
the
that
that
point.
The
previous
slide
I
realized
that
we
might
have
missed
in
the
little
posted
things.
The
activity
list
editor
there's
a
a
kind
of
a
bit
of
a
gap
at
the
moment,
because
the
control
vocabularies
are
stored
in
lots
of
different
places,
and
maybe
they
should
all
just
been
the
one
editor
don't
know,
but
that
bit
some
inconsistency
there
be
worth,
including.
C
C
A
E
C
C
A
E
A
A
A
F
F
A
A
These
are
taking
each
kind
of
API
endpoint
at
this
stage,
so
if
we
looked
at
I
think
it
was
that
one
this
is
the
data
set
site
so
for
these
are
each
one
of
these
is
a
feed
of
session
series
and
sessions
and
facility
uses.
So
these
are
based
at
that
level
at
the
moment,
so
these
could
be
aggregated
up
to
a
kind
of
I.
Suppose
a
Gladstone
level
are
I'm
wondering
where
I'd
get
the
operator
from
there,
but
if
you
I'm.
A
F
G
D
A
G
A
G
A
E
Sorry
I
was
just
going
to
say:
I
would
be
interested
in
seeing
the
same
results
for
GL
excellent
on
the
under
the
flow
open
data
feed
so
similar
to
what
Debbie's
requested.
Because
yeah,
as
Nick
pointed
out,
we
we've
put
the
information
into
the
data.
Entry
is
down
to
us
flow
just
displayed,
so
I
would
be
interested
in
seeing
that.