►
From YouTube: OpenActive W3C Community Group Meeting / 2023-03-01
Description
A public hangout for members of the OpenActive W3C Community Group.
For more information visit: https://www.openactive.io/w3c-community-group.html
A
Hello,
everyone
and
welcome
to
the
open,
active
Community
calls
today
as
usual.
If
you
haven't
already,
please
sign
up
to
the
w3c
community
group
slightly
arduous
process,
but
it
does
help.
Let's
keep
in
touch
with
everyone,
and
today's
call
could
be
a
short
one
because
it's
mainly
some
updates.
But
we
may
we
may
start
some
discussions,
we'll
see
so
update
on
the
data
quality
metrics
and
an
update
on
the
fast
track
process
for
managing
the
activity
list,
which
we've
been
working
through
here.
A
Quick
conversation
about
facility
types
list,
and
then
we
can
scan
through
the
the
other
topics
which
we'd
kind
of
sketched
out
for
the
year
and
see
if
there's
any,
that
we
want
to
to
prioritize.
So
just
jump
straight
in
I
sent
the
link
to
this
in
this
General
channel
on
the
slack,
but
I
will
and
there
will
be
a
link
in
the
slides
for
anyone
who's
watching
later
so.
A
Thank
you,
I'll
just
give
everyone.
Have
you
got
that
link
and
is
it
opening
up?
Okay
for
people
I'm
glad
you
you've
got
it
Andrew,
but
your
ODI,
so
I
might
have
expected
you
to.
A
Brilliant
Okay
so.
A
Just
quickly
walk
through:
what's
what
we've
got
here,
so
it's
starting
to
produce
some
feed
level
data
quality
summaries
based
on
the
the
set
of
measures
that
we
identified
for
Christmas
as
being
most
pertinent
to
the
Discovery
use
case.
So
what
Simone
needs
to
to
see
in
an
activity
finder
to
to
kind
of
provide
a
positive
experience,
so
so
I've
started
to
calculate
those
at
a
feed
level,
and
so
here
we've
got
the
organizer
and
then
the
type
of
feed.
A
So
it's
mostly
session
series
and
scheduled
sessions
right
now,
there's
some
courses
and
events
in
there,
but
I'm
moving
now
on
to
the
facility
stuff.
So
this
should
flush
out
I
just
wanted
to
test
the
principles
on
these,
and
so
the
quick
count
of
all
the
opportunities
that
are
currently
live.
Shall
we
say
in
the
data,
so
the
status
is
not
deleted,
so
that's
account
and
the
summary
the
total
is
over.
Eight
hundred
thousand
so
out
of
40
odd
feet.
A
So
so
some
big
numbers
going
out
but
I
would
add
a
caveat
that
not
all
of
those
opportunities
are
valid
really
because
some
of
them
are
in
the
past.
So
when
we
think
of
the
activity,
finder
kind
of
use
case
they're
looking
for
activities,
they
can
book
book
on
for
in
the
coming
weeks,
so
we've
got
to
manage
that
slightly
and
then
we've
got
the
the
metrics.
So
these
are
percentages
across
the
way.
A
Now
so
there's
the
activity
ID
in
the
API
feed
match
the
official
open,
active
activity
list
and
the
benefit
of
that
is.
It
allows
people
to
group
things
properly
and
display
them
and
make
the
necessary
connections
links
to
facility
types,
all
sorts
of
reasons
why
it's
a
good
idea.
So
there
are
some
instances
where
it
doesn't
match
right.
A
A
So
that's
that
one
then
we
have
does
the
session.
Have
a
name
and
I've
put
a
few
extra
checks
in
there
to
check
that
the
name
isn't
just
an
empty
string
and
then
it's
you
know
not
a
nonsense
name.
So
it's
reassuring
to
see
that
most
of
them
do.
Does
it
have
a
description
and
the
column
G
is
basically.
This
is
the
what
of
the
activity
of
the
opportunity
you
know.
A
A
People
don't
join.
Thank
you,
I
missed
that,
so
it's
there
now
yeah.
So
this
is
the
what
of
the
activity
and
then
I'm
going
to
concrete,
which
is
the
where
so
we
want
to
it
either
has
a
postcode
or
latitude
longitude
geospatial
coordinates,
obviously
that's
essential
for
the
end
user
to
know
to
know
where,
where
it
will
be,
but
also
in
the
kind
of
creation
of
activity
finders
to
display
things
on
maps
and
do
that
location,
search
and
all
those
kind
of
things.
A
So
in
this
report,
I
haven't
validated
any
postcodes,
so
that's
something
and
I
haven't
validated.
The
Latin
long
coordinates
either.
So
it's
simply
they
exist
in
the
data.
At
this
stage,
I
mentioned
before
of
those
eight
hundred
thousand
opportunities.
Not
all
of
them
are
valid
really
in
that
they
have
dates
in
the
past.
A
So
you
and
I
think
you
know
all
the
idea
is
that
all
these
percentages
should
be
the
higher
the
better
you
know
so
100
is
is
perfect,
and
so
we've
got
some
quite
quite
low
figures
there.
So
that's
something
to
to
explore
whether
the
feeds
are
they
haven't
implemented
the
kind
of
cut
off
which
which
stops
sharing
old
information
in
the
API
feeds,
or
perhaps
they
haven't
implemented
the
the
update,
delete,
kind
of
status
thing
correctly.
A
So
some
things
to
explore
there
and
maybe
that's
something
Chris
we
can
discuss
and
you
can
make
some
calls,
maybe
start
exploring
that
with
people
and
then
this
final
one
is
a
kind
of
proxy
for
whether
booking's
enabled
it's
it's
States,
whether
it's
a
percentage
of
whether
or
not
the
record
has
a
unique
URL,
which
is
a
kind
of
proxy
for
that
click-through
capability
to
click
through
from
the
instance
or
the
session
to
to
the
booking
page.
E
A
That's,
that's
probably,
that's
probably
exactly
what
it
is
yeah
and
you
know
for
some
of
the
not
everyone's
got
booking
enabled.
Not
everyone
is
at
that
stage,
and
some
of
the
some
of
the
feeds
are
like
listings.
If
you
like,
they,
they
say
what's
available,
but
they
don't
necessarily
let
you
click
right
through.
So
we
wouldn't
expect
that
is
a
it's
a
bit
of
a
crude
measure
of
of
the
of
that
kind
of
Readiness
for
booking
it.
A
Okay,
I
mean
yeah;
most
of
them
will
have
a
generic
link
within
the
feed
itself,
but
there
is
a
specific
box
if
you
like,
for
The
Unique
URL
for
a
session,
and
it's
at
that
point
we'd
hope
to
see
something
unique
or
a
template.
It
could
be
that
you
know,
as
long
as
the
feed
is
providing
instructions
to
create
a
unique
URL,
and
that's
so
that's
sometimes
how
it's
done.
A
D
A
Right
and
I
said
I
would
introduce
you
but
I
didn't
so,
let's,
let's
do
it
welcome
to
Andrew
Newman
with
Jason.
G
G
I'm
Andrew
I
work
at
the
ODI
as
a
principal
data.
Specialist
and
I'm
overseeing
open
active
for
ODI,
so
I
think
I'm
going
to
pick
up
care
in
this
group
in
the
future,
which
will
enable
Harrods
to
become
the
the
technical
expert
from
ODI
in
the
call,
and
you
won't
have
to
worry
about
sharing
the
meetings
you
can
just
go
over
being
clever.
A
Yeah,
okay,
I've.
F
Just
about
the
Everyone
Active
numbers
where
it
says
scheduled
session
and
session
has
a
name
is
one
I
am
not
sure.
That's
right.
B
There's
going
to
pass
in
the
details
through
in
the
in
the
open
data
yeah.
A
D
A
Yeah
I,
don't
know
what
I've
done.
I've
lost
everything
so
I
accept.
You
know
and
I'll
add
no
caveats
around
this.
This
is
a
work
in
progress,
kind
of
reporting
method,
routine,
so
the
code's
still
being
developed.
Let
me
explore
that.
A
I
did
just
go
through
these,
but
maybe
you
know
and
I
kind
of
went
through
them
great
with
a
fine-tooth
school,
but
maybe
I
stopped
at
number
three
or
something
and
and
then
kind
of
just
kicked
it
off.
So
let
me
explore
those
yeah,
so
just
I'm
pleased
you
know
for
please
just
do
do.
Let
me
know
if
there's
anything
that
looks
off,
because
you
can
focus
my
attentions
on
those.
F
I'd
question
the
sessions
has
a
day
in
the
future
for
us
as
well,
just
because
the
data
that
we're
sending
is
all
valid.
It's
all
live
sessions
that
are
taking
place
now
so
I,
don't
know
why
that
would
only
be
at
45
unless
there
is
some
difference
between
where
you've
got
a
facility
and
a
event.
A
Yeah,
well
let
me
let
me
get
some
examples.
Debbie
and
then
you
know
something
around
the
name
and
something
around
those
dates
and
I'll
share
those
with
you
because
I
think.
That's
you
know,
that's
how
I'll
my
next
step.
You
know
if
you
raise
a
concern
here,
you
think
it
looks
wrong.
I'll
dig
into
it
and
get
some
some
examples,
but
that
link
to
facilities
so
that
we
haven't
you
know:
I,
haven't
moved
on
to
the
facility
types
facility
uses
and
Slot
speeds
yet
well.
F
Okay
and
the
the
URL
I
think
I'm
on
the
same
page
as
what
Andy's
put
into
the
chat
is
I'd
want
to
understand
from
our
perspective,
where
we're
expected
to
store
that
for
it
to
come
into
the
feed
and
it's
probably
a
conversational
suit
myself
and
Andy
and
Nick
Maybe
from
the
Gladstone
interface
perspective.
D
B
Absolutely
fine
because
it
was
just
mulling
in
my
mind
before
I
was
asking
to
ask
the
question,
but
thanks
Debbie,
the
yeah
yeah,
my
thought
query:
was
there
Nicholas
that
at
the
moment,
the
way
we've
been
looking
at
it
is
that
we're
obviously
doing
an
integration
with
the
broker?
Who
will
be
consuming
the
pages?
D
So
this
is
talking
about
I,
believe
there's
a
a
URL
that
we
can
create.
That
goes
straight
to
the
Everyone
Active.
D
D
Yeah
there
isn't
there
isn't
a
a
page
on
everyone,
active's
website
per
activity
that
is
or
guess
you
have
to
be
a
member
to
see
those
pages
and
that's
why
there's
the
URL
doesn't
make
sense.
Yeah.
F
A
D
F
B
D
A
Yeah,
okay
yeah,
so
this
is
specifically
looking
for
Unique
combinations
in
the
URL
for
the
session,
so
I
think
what
I
wouldn't
expect.
One
from
what
you've
said
there
I
think
if
it
doesn't
go
through
to
a
specific
page
for
non-members,
you
know
so
that
I
wouldn't
expect
that
to
to
be
as
high
but
see.
This
was
this.
A
This
is
a
draft
kind
of
measure
until
we
dig
into
what's
a
better
measure
for
for
the
book
of
bookable
side
things,
it
might
be
that
there's
a
you
know,
I
mean
we
already
have
some
indications
of
which
feeds
are
bookable.
We
just
need
to
make
it
a
little
bit
more,
a
little
more
August,
perhaps
on
the
status
page.
So.
A
A
couple
of
couple
of
things
there
for
me
to
to
explore
and
I'll
come
back
to
you
Debbie
by
email.
If
that's
okay,.
C
Do
you
mind
if
I
ask
the
list
of
providers
that
you've
got
in
this
data
set,
so
Angus
live
down
to
run
together?
Is
that
just
a
random
list
of
organizations
that
have
opened
their
data
or
is
that
the
definitive
list,
the.
A
This
comes
from
the
status.
Page
is
kind
of
the
start.
Point
and
I
have
looked
mostly
at
session,
sorry
scheduled
sessions
and,
where
appropriate,
I've
pulled
in
the
relevant
data
from
session
series
to
get,
for
example,
the
activity
data.
So
if
you
scan
down
that
most
of
those
session.
A
That
is,
as
it
says,
at
the
Top
This
is
a
slightly
it's.
It's
a
bit
vintage
it's
around
from
the
early
days
of
open
active,
but
it's
been
revamped
recently
to
include
all
the
feeds
that
are
live
according
to
the
data
catalog,
which
is
where
we
kind
of
start
from
the
data.
Catalog
lists
data
catalogs
for
Gladstone,
the
legend
and
another
one,
and
then
all
the
other
ones
and
the
gll
is
in
that
is
linked
to
from
there
and
then
from
each
individual
catalog.
A
C
A
F
The
issues
column,
those
appear
to
be
issues
that
have
that
are
older,
probably
resolved
so
I'll.
E
A
That's
true:
well,
we're
started
a
piece
of
work
with
Chris
to
kind
of
get
on
top
of
the
issues.
So
if,
if
there's
an
old
issue,
there
that's
been,
there's
no
longer
live
or
it's
been
completed,
the
work's
been
done
whatever
it's
no
longer
a
problem,
please
close
it
off
and
we're
trying
to
kind
of
focus
in
on
that
so
I
know
there
is
already
an
issue
in
this
in
these
counts
that
not
all
of
the.
A
So
if
I
click
on
that
one,
for
example,
it
takes
you
to
a
GitHub
page
specifically
for
that
feed
and
if
people
spot
an
issue
with
a
fee,
they
can
raise
an
issue
here
and
they
Publishers
or
whoever
can
can
kind
of
look
into
it.
So
it's
one
way
to
kind
of
feedback,
data
quality
issues,
but
I
say
there
are
some.
There
are
a
lot
of
old
issues
on
there,
so
we're
trying
to
work
out.
A
What's
the
best
way
to
to
do
that,
we
still
think
the
GitHub
pages
are
probably
a
GitHub
page
for
each
repo.
Each
feed,
rather
is
still
the
best
way
to
to
log
little
niggles
that
you
find
in
a
data,
or
you
know,
serious
issues
that
you
find
in
data
because
it
gives
like
a
central
place
for
people
to
to
comment
and
feedback,
and
people
who've
knew
the
problem
can
maybe
other
comment
and
kind
of
get
that
community
Spirit
go
and
help
to
try
and
help
get
get
the
data
improved
and
get
the
data
out
there.
A
So
not
all
of
those
sorry
just
to
go
back
to
Steven's
question.
Not
all
of
those
session
feeds
have
gone,
have
come
through
yet
to
the
to
the
report.
So
I'll
have
to
check
why?
D
A
That
you're,
right
and
I
know
exactly
how
that's
happened.
So
I
took
a
shortcut
there
in
the
last
kind
of
two
hours
to
get
this
ready
for
the
day
to
feed
through
the
the
organizer
name
and
I'll,
see
what
I've
done.
I've
kind
of
taken,
the
first
entry
for
an
activity
from
a
feed
and
of
course
there
can
be.
There
may
be
more
than
one
so
well
spotted
and
thank
you
Nick.
D
D
So
if
you,
if
you
wanted
to
do
that,
just
in
your
where
you
can
see
those
issues
there
that
are
old,
just
sign
into
the
corner
with
your
username
and
if
you
can't
remember
your
password
you're
going
to
reset
it
and
then
you
can
just
click
on
the
issue
and
click
close.
It's
been
dealt
with.
A
Yeah,
we
really
appreciated,
and
you
know
that's
the
kind
of
message
we're
going
to
try
and
try
and
share
that
if
people
can
close
off
the
ones
that
are
already
resolved,
it'll
help
Chris
hone
in
on
on
where
he
can.
He
can
help
I'll.
Just
on
this
open
active
status,
page
The
Proposal,
once
we
find
out
all
the
glitches
and
you
know
and
and
we
have
confidence
in
the
kind
of
data
quality
metrics
that
we've
got
there.
A
The
proposal
would
be
that
we
we're
going
to
revise
this
this
tool
anyway,
but
the
proposal
would
be
that
we
start
to
display
the
data
quality
metrics
in
a
more
prominent
way,
perhaps
linked
to
from
this
page.
Or
you
know
so
or
maybe
you
know
you
hover
over
a
feed
and
it
gives
you
the
summary
of
the
the
data
quality
metrics
or
something
like
that.
So
that's
just
the
proposal
at
the
moment
that
we
would.
We
would
use
a
ver,
an
update
to
this
page
There's
an
opportunity
to
share
the
data
quality
results.
A
Okay,
I
will
go
back
into
the
Saigon.
G
A
Well,
I
was
giving
people
a
pause
there
to
answer,
but
we
went
through
a
process
Before
Christmas
Andrew,
to
to
kind
of
arrive
at
those
at
those
measures.
G
A
They're,
not
they
are
draft,
you
know
and
they're
based.
They
were
kind
of
the
headline
figures
for
the
discovery
use
case,
but
the
process
we've
got
now
we've
got
some
measures
is
to
get
that
kind
of
reporting
process
going
and
once
we've
got
that
going,
we'll
start
to
look
at
expanding
or
refining
those
measures,
but
then
also
moving
on
to
other
use
cases.
A
There
are
different
set
of
things
that
they
really
need
to
see
in
the
feeds
to
be
able
to
decide
if
that
activity
is
right
for
them.
So
that's
you
know
what
we
might
move
on
to
start
capturing
or
measuring
how
well
those
adaptations
and
accessibility
kind
of
adaptations
are
reflected
in
the
data
feeds
and
that
might
come
from
a
open,
active
data
feeds
or
it
might
be
drawn
in
from
active
places.
Yet
you
know
so
that's
that's
the
plan.
D
Did
you
I
think
previously
on
call
Howard?
We
talked
about
this
idea
of
getting
other
data
users
feedback
on
maybe
folks,
like
MCR,
active
or
or
other
on
them,
what
they
care
about
to
make
sure
that
we're
kind
of
considering,
because
I
know
this
group
I
think
we
might
on
this-
call
be
the
only
data
user
side,
representative
representatives
of
an
eye
on
the
iron
inside
that
we
get
to
get
a
broader
view
on
on
that
I
mean
especially
as
a
lot
of
the
things
that
are
in
the
data
quality.
D
Metrics
right
now
are
required
Fields.
So
you
know
whether
that's
the
position,
because
they're
things
we're
already
asking
for
or
whether
you
know
things
other
than
that
might
be
helpful.
A
Absolutely
I
think
absolutely
we'll
you
know
we're
basically
just
as
well
as
Define
those
metrics
we're
trying
to
Define
that
process
to
to
do
the
report
and
then
I
think
that's
been
my
now
that
I've
got
an
initial
set
of
metrics.
That
was
made
my
focus
the
reporting
side
of
it.
So
maybe
that's
a
question
for.
A
G
And
I
think
my
other
thought
on
this
I
think
you've
hinted
at
this
yourself.
A
couple
of
times
is
that
in
some
places,
you're
kind
of
doing
quite
a
simple
count
and
we
probably
need
to
I
think
postcode
was
the
example.
You
decided
we'd
probably
need
to
start
looking
at
whether
some
of
the
data
is
actually
valid
in
terms
of
its
content
as
well.
So
so
you
know
there
is
one.
Is
it
any
good
I
think
I
think
it's
very
good
good
way
of
thinking
about
extending
this.
D
Yeah
a
good
example
for
British
cycling.
Actually,
their
feed
was
included,
is
our
understanding
is
the
postcodes
and
all
that
non-coordinates
are
often
quite
as
far
apart.
We're
talking
40
miles
apart
and
so
obviously
it's
quite
it's
quite
difficult
to
know
where
to
turn
up
if
you've
got
a
pin
on
the
map
is
40
miles
from
the
postulated
being
given.
D
Can
just
gap
on
with
it,
but
that
I?
Don't
we
don't
know
the
extent
of
that
issue,
we've
raised
it
with
them
and
I
know
that's
one
of
the
things
on
their
backlog
to
look
at
when
British
cycling
do
re-engage
and
then
they're
going
to
at
some
point
and
look
at
that
so
but
having
that
up
front
might
be
a
nice
thing.
Well,.
A
A
D
I
don't
know
if
it
might
be
helpless
to
suggest
the
next
step,
but
certainly
we
are
some
of
our
customers
who
are
front
ends.
I'm
thinking
you
know,
Tom
at
played
has
probably
gotten
Dom
on
on
our
team,
and
others
are
kind
of
really
in
the
weeds
of
where
some
of
the
data
quality
issues
are
basically
when
they're
going
through
feeds
and
things
like
that
and
I'm,
not
sure.
If
you
know
we
have
another
call
like
maybe
here
and
we
try
to
make
sure
those
people
come
along
and
kind
of
and
explain
to
them.
D
This
is
the
place
you
can
Surface
your
previous
experience
and
grievance
with
various.
You
know
things
that
haven't
been
there
when
they've
expect
them
to
be
and
all
the
rest
of
it,
and
that
might
be
if
they
feel
that
that
will
help
improve
data
quality
in
the
future,
because,
obviously
a
lot
of
the
stuff
is.
You
know
issues
from
the
past
that
are
logged
in
GitHub
and
you
know
everyone's
aware
of,
but
if
they
get
the
sense
that
it
might
be
helpful
to
people
who
are
putting
new
feeds
together
and.
A
Yeah,
definitely
if
we
can
learn
it
for
a
new
feeds,
but
also
to
kind
of
help
prioritize.
You
know
which
of
those
old
issues
might
still
be
worth
working
on,
because
a
a
big
impact
pot
potentially
on
on
the
end
users.
So
the
lesson
there
I,
think
or
I
think
kind
of
one
of
the
things
to
take
from
that
is
that
we
need
to
get
a
broader
audience
in
for
these
discussions.
So
we'll
try
and
plan
ahead
for
a
and
you
know
a
revised
data
quality
of
expanded.
A
A
D
Could
we
do
that
in
parallel?
It
sounds
like
they
might
be
a
bit
one's
an
engagement
activity
which
involves
getting
the
right
people
to
a
call
and
and
when
they
come
and
expressing
and
the
other
one
sounds
like
it's
kind
of
more
getting
the
numbers
from
the
feeds
in
the
right
places,
which
sounds
also
very
valuable.
To
get
to
the
point
where
the
spreadsheet
that
we
looked
at
there
is,
you
know,
I,
might
say
we're
above,
but
might
be
tweaked
and
changed.
A
D
And
yeah
I
think
I
think
what
we've
got
today
might
well
be
enough
for
that
bringing
to
life
pieces
you've
seen
almost
people
reacting
on.
This
call
well
hang
on
what
about
this
we've
done
about
that
Etc,
but
but
you
just
maybe
it's
the
audience
on
the
user
side
that
are
the
people
going.
D
These
are
the
gaps
in
my
front-end
user
interface
that
because,
obviously
the
data
I
say
Obviously,
but
the
data
is
good
enough
for
the
data
Publishers,
because
well
not
always,
but
often
because
if
Debbie
wanted
the
data
to
be
better,
for
example,
they
would
have
an
interest
to
make
the
data
better
for
Everyone
Active
to
use
case.
But
it's
it's
not
Everyone.
Active
is
close
here.
D
It's
the
you
know:
change
for
life
or
the
NHS
or
the
decathlon,
or
the
whatever's,
where
they'll
put
that
same
data
in
a
different
context,
and
that's
where
the
gaps
become
more
obvious
and
that's
probably
where
it's
more
interesting
to
kind
of
get
that
that
sense
of
What's
missing.
A
G
I
think
the
other
thing
you
can
think
about
doing
is
providing
kind
of
targeted
guidance,
so
I
think
Howard.
He
mentioned
you
know,
activity
list
match,
ID
matches
might
just
be
because
the
URL
is
poorly
structured.
So
actually,
how
does
this
evidence
that
you're
producing
here
help
us
improve
the
guidance
that
we're
providing
and
then
how
do
we
go
and
engage
with
people
to
politely
tell
them
that
they
need
to
be
better
at
following
that
guidance
and.
F
G
There's
a
I
think
there's
some
real
potential
value
out
there,
foreign.
A
There's
lots
of
lessons
around
the
documentation
and
just
highlighting
the
importance
of
some
of
these.
These
fields
I
think
we'll
move
on.
I've
got
a
few
more
things
to
cover,
but
the
link
to
that
spreadsheet
is
there
and
I
will
be
revisiting
those
figures
when
I
get
a
chance.
A
Okay,
so
we
talked
about
previously
the
activity
list
and
we
bring
in
management
of
that
into
this
group
rather
than
via
separate
Activities
Committee.
That
was
not
meeting
very
regularly,
and
so
we've
got
a
kind
of
big
backlog
of
suggested
activities
to
be
added
to
the
list.
So
I
just
wanted
to
talk
with
Chris
walk
us
through
this
flowchart
kind
of
process.
A
Last
time
and
I
just
wanted
to
hone
in
on
this
box,
which
is
where
the
curator
of
the
activity
list,
which
most
likely
going
to
be
Chris
in
the
ODI,
receives
a
proposal
and
is
going
to
review
the
proposal.
So
we
we've
been
thinking
through
the
shared
a
list
of
questions
which
were
the
current
criteria
and
we've
had
a
look
at
creating
a
oops
wrong.
One,
oh
no
delete
it.
A
Oh
no
so
I
had
a
set
of
a
set
of
questions
that
were
the
kind
of
fast
track.
Flowchart
decision
tree
process.
Let's
see
if
I
can
remember
them,
but
Chris
is
there
on
hand.
So
is
it
a
predominantly
physical
activity?
A
A
B
A
Yeah
is
it
recognized
or
administered
by
a
body,
for
example
a
regional
or
national
International
sporting
body?
So
if
it's
yes
to
all
of
those,
then
it's
in
the
list.
If
it's?
No,
so
let's
say
it's,
it
is
distinct
from
an
existing
entry.
It
is
well
defined
to
provide
a
good
definition,
but
it's
not.
We
don't
find
a
national
body.
Then
we
ask.
Is
it
an
established
activity?
Is
it
six
people
doing
it
or
is
it
six
thousand?
A
Sixty
thousand
six
hundred
seven
and
this
the
scale
of
those
kind
of
things
will
help
us
decide
whether
or
not
if
it's
already
well
established,
then
it
goes
in
the
list,
so
the
the
principles
of
play
which
and
of
course,
if
it's
not
if
it
falls
far
of
any
of
those,
then
we
bring
it
here
for
a
discussion
unless
it's
an
obvious.
No,
for
example,
it's
not
a
predominant
physical
activity,
in
which
case
Chris
would
respond
politely,
but
we
won't.
A
We
had
I
had
some
more
principles
we
were
discussing
this
this
morning,
so
I've
clearly
not
saved
version
of
these
slides,
but
we
want
the
list
to
be
inclusive.
We
want
it
to
be
a
tool
to
engage
different
activity
providers
and
the
purpose
of
it
is
to
facilitate
search
to
make
it
easy
for
people
to
find
activities
that
they
might
want
to
go
and
do
nearby,
and
those
are
two
principles
that
around
getting
things
on
the
list
adding
to
the
list,
but
we
want
also
to
I
wanted
to
manage
what
is
it?
A
D
A
A
You
know
a
lot
of
enthusiasm
for
it.
It
could
be
added
to
the
list,
but
if
we
do
that
again
and
again
again-
and
we
keep
let's
say
Scottish
country
dancing-
is
a
variation
of
Scottish
dance.
Do
we
want
to
add
that
onto
the
list
the
the
list
could
grow
and
grow
and
grow
we're
at
700
activities
now,
if
it
became
seven
thousand,
is
that
going
to
have
a
noticeable
impact
when
someone
does
that
search
in
the
in
a
activity
finder?
D
It
won't
affect
the
the
what
the
activity
funds
we
work
with
generally
filtered
list
anyway,
so
it's
as
a
front-end,
but
it's
a
hierarchical
tree,
and
so,
if
you
want
to
be
able
to
search
for
a
specific
term,
you
can
do
that
and
that's
what
the
free
text
searches
roller
skating
will
also
complete
to
roller
skating
or
whatever.
D
But
if
you
want
to
select
from
a
drop
down,
you
know
provide
an
experience
where
you
can
browse.
For
example,
generally
people
aren't
browsing
at
700
different
items
there
there
curating
it
down
to,
depending
on
the
use
case,
a
subset
of
those
and
they're
higher
up
in
the
hierarchy.
So
roller
skating
is
the
top
level
roller
disco
is
underneath.
So
if
you
search
roller
skating,
you'll
probably
get
roller
disco
where
you
will
get
rid
of
disco
in
the
results.
D
You'll
get
everything
below
that
in
the
tree
when
you're
searching
so
adding
more
detail
is,
is
less
of
an
issue
because
of
the
way
that
people
are
selected
in
the
level
of
detail
that
they
show,
and
it
is
helpful
to
tag
something
as
specifically
as
you
can
at
the
guidance
that
is
generally
being
given
to
people
who
are
using
activity.
Listers,
take
the
most
specific
tag
and
use
that
for
your
activity,
you
don't
need
to
tag
everything
all
the
way
up.
The
tree.
A
A
The
you
don't
have
there
will
be
no
concerns
about
taking
a
relaxed.
You
know
or
inclusive
attitude
to
adding
things
to
the
list.
D
We
went
about
I
suppose
there
is
a
balance,
though,
because
that's
where
I'm
wondering
well.
This
is
where
the
criteria
comes
from
I
suppose,
but
if
it's
the
requests
yeah,
this
is
the
point
of
the
criteria
that
you
mentioned
there,
making
sure
that
they
have
enough.
You
know
it's
it's
a
legitimate
activity,
because
if
it's
relaxed
and
inclusive
and
anyone
can
just
add
whatever
they've
made
up-
that's
where
it
gets
a
bit
more
difficult.
D
So
if
it's
def,
if
it's
a
defined
activity
that
people
are
doing-
and
you
know
that
there's
a
Wikipedia
page
four
and
whatever
the
other
things
we
want
to,
we
want
to
say:
oh
yeah,
there's
a
Wikipedia
page,
there's
usually
quite
a
good
one,
because
to
actually
get
a
page
on
Wikipedia
past
certain
level
of
that
community
self-polices
and
need
to
have
a
certain
amount
and
credibility
behind
the
thing
and
listen
references
and
things
like
that.
D
So
something
like
that
has
a
Wikipedia
page
and
something
else.
It
might
be
a
good
way
of
thinking
about
it.
Yeah.
A
So
we
had
this
we're
looking
for
a
consistent
with
my
principles
was
a
consistent
approach
to
to
to
the
checks
that
we
carry
out
so
Wikipedia.
Looking
in
Google
Trends
things
like
that,
you
know
there
is
a
consistent
approach
to
be
followed
so,
but
from
the
sound
of
it
there
isn't.
You
know
a
there
is
a
bounce,
but
there's
no
immediate
concern
around
increasing
the
size
list.
We
said
in
our
last
one
that
changed
hierarchy
is
fine.
A
Adding
new
things
is
fine,
just
don't
delete
anything,
you
know,
that's
what
would
upset
the
existing
implementations.
G
Like
I
guess
things
can't
be
deleted,
but
we
can
provide
guidance
in
the
activity
list
to
advise
people
not
to
use
particular
terms
moving
forwards.
So
we
have
some
duplicate
terms,
just
because
of
grammar
and
punctuation.
So
you
could.
You
could
tag
one
of
those
as
use
this
other
one.
Instead
in
the
description
or
something
so
so
gradually
over
time,
the
use
of
terms
decreases
and
I
I
guess
we
should
be
able
to
look
at
some
some
point
in
the
future
auditing
terms
to
identify
terms
that
sounds
being
used.
Perhaps.
A
We
started
that
process
now
by
the
way,
but
so
Debbie
you've
got
your
hand
up.
F
Yeah,
it
wasn't
related
to
what
Andrew
was
saying.
If
you
want
to
finish
that
point
before.
F
All
right,
I'm,
just
questioning
that
first
criteria
of
moderate
activity
now
I
know
that
I
know
it
seems
bizarre
because
we're
talking
about
open
active,
but
if
you
put
your
client
hat
on
or
or
like
a
council
hat
on
from
our
perspective,
Nick
and
and
they'll
probably
understand
what
I
mean.
If
we're
talking
about
Westminster,
they
would
be
looking
to
use
the
open
dated
solution
to
almost
replace
The
Operators
booking
system
and
activity
finder,
in
which
case
you'd
want
more
than
just
moderate
activities.
Available.
D
F
F
Not
rarely
because
we
did
they're
bookable
so
they're,
not
it's
not
like
a
badminton
court,
which
is
what
Ivo
facility
is,
which
is
something
that's
bookable
in
an
open
area.
They
are
specific
sessions
and
times
that
you
can
book
into
in
the
same
way
you
could
book
for
swimming,
and
things
like
that.
D
D
F
Yeah
and
it's
the
same
for
us,
women,
isn't
it
like
the
sessions.
G
F
G
F
I
get
what
you're
saying,
but
just
opening
it
up
to
that
first
point
that
I
made
that
if
we
want
to
be
able
to
use
this
solution
for
clients,
they're
not
going
to
accept
that
only
certain
activities
are
available
to
them
through
the
feed.
There
is
multiple
activities
that
take
place
in
a
center
that
are
not
necessarily
an
activity
one.
If
you
go
down,
you
know
the
well-being
route
as
well,
they're,
not
necessarily
physical
activities.
F
They
may
be
consultation
sessions
or
the
warm
space
sort
of
situation
that
we're
in
at
the
moment,
they're
not
active
sessions,
but
they
are
sessions.
A
We
have
been
given
some
thought
to
the
the
link
with
the
well-being
side
of
things,
so
the
social
subscribing
and
it
might
be
activities
like
a
painting
class.
You
know
which
is
it's
socialization,
it's
creative,
it's
good
for
well-being.
You
might
meet
people
with
loneliness
those
kind
of
things.
It's
not
a
physical
activity,
and
we
were,
we
know
from
our
work.
A
We're
not
referral
about
how
local
Authority
is
blunt
to
show
those
physical
and
non-physical
kind
of
all
the
services
and
activities
that
are
available
in
one
place
and
there
isn't
a
consistent
language
for
those.
For
those
terms,
we're
trying
to
be
consistent
have
a
consistent
vocabulary
for
the
physical
activity
side.
A
It's
a
really
good,
really
good
challenge.
One
option
is
that
we
have
we
manage
the
activity
stuff
and
there's
another
version
and
we
join
them
together.
You
know
all
the
client
Joys
them
together
to
meet
that
need
you've
described
Debbie
rather
than
to
store
in
the
definitions.
In
the
open,
active
side
of
things.
I
don't
know,
Steven
you're
going
to
handle
continue.
G
I
I
was
just
wondering
so
in
our
in
our
model.
Our
first
question
is:
is
it
predominantly
a
physical
activity
and
I
wonder
if
we
just
need
to
change
the
lens
a
little
bit
and
make
that
question?
Something
like?
Is
this
an
activity
that
is
beneficial
to
physical
or
mental
health,
because
then
you
could
bring
some
of
those
wider
well-being
things
under
in
under
that
mental
health
balance,
you
know,
sitting
in
a
steam
room
or
a
sauna,
and
relaxing
is
good
for
someone's
mental
health.
A
D
A
different
lenses
are
interesting,
two
thoughts.
The
first
is
if
we
were
to
expand
the
scope
of
that,
my
suggestion
would
be
a
very
structured
and
consultative
way.
I.E,
we
don't
just
kind
of
add
some
stuff
that
seems
like
well-being
in
there
we
actually
go
to.
Whoever
is
that
is
the
authority
on
well-being,
I,
don't
know
who
that
is,
but
the
equivalent
of
the
dcms,
also
because
of
sports
England
or
whatever,
then
maybe
five
or
six
Charities.
D
That
could
do
that
and
say
to
them
we're
going
to
try
and
structure
a
list
as
an
exercise
we're
going
to
edit
the
activity
list,
wholesale,
we're
gonna
and
we
want
to
iterate
it,
and
you
know
there
might
be
five
or
six
versions
until
they
were
happy
with
it,
and
then
that
gets
added
to
the
activity
list
of
the
thing
and
and
then
scope
expanded.
If
we
were
to
do
that
would
be
my
suggestion
on
that
and-
and
the
second
part
is
when
we
think
about
activity.
D
D
As
long
as
we're
not
putting
you
know
fish
and
chips
in
the
cafe
and
there
is
a
physical
activity
but
I'm
sure
I'm
sure
most
of
it
you
know,
I
mean
if
there's
a
facility
there,
it's
it's
there
for
a
reason.
A
C
Can
yeah
I
don't
know
what
happens
to
apologies?
I
just
wanted
to
support
Debbie's
comment
about
the
the
debate.
That's
going
on
about
the
what's
tradition
of
the
non-physical
activity
activities
like
sauna
Suite.
So
it's
completely
support
that,
but
I
just
wanted
to
raise
a
comment
before
the
end
about
something
Nick
said
in
the
about
the
previous,
the
topic
of
discussion,
and
then
it's
about
asking
the
Brokers
for
the
what
their
view
is
on
the
quality
of
data
and
the
data
I'm.
C
Just
mindful
that,
as
an
operator,
we
only
publish
the
data
generally
that
that
we
actually
need
to
use
ourselves
unless
we're
compelled
to
do
otherwise
and
obviously
Nick
will
know
with
gl's
MCR
active
project.
We
we
published
additional
data
that
we
don't
actually
need
ourselves,
but
we've
made
it
available
because
that's
what's
been
required
by
the
client,
but
I
wouldn't
want
to
set
any
unrealistic
expectations
because
any
data
any
data,
that's
missing,
not
necessarily
the
data
quality.
Perhaps
but
data.
That's
missing!
C
If
it's
not
there,
because
then
it's
because
it's
not
available
for
us
to
publish
it
because
the
data
field
either
didn't
exist
or
it's
just
generally.
Not
available,
in
which
case,
then
you
need
to
guard
against
expectations
about
whether
that's
a
realistic
for
us
to
put
our
time
and
effort
into
making
it
available
with
our
software
supplier,
against
all
of
the
priorities
that
we
have
to
balance
and
judge
against.
So
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
comment
from
an
operator's
perspective.
C
C
I,
don't
really
know,
what's
missing
necessarily
I
mean
Nick
would
know
better
than
I
would
what's
missing,
I
think
we've
just
about
to
provide
everything
that
our
clients
requested
for
our
particular
project,
but
I
just
wanted
to
call
it
out.
That's
all.
D
Yeah
there's
things
like,
for
example,
it
might
be
the
attendee
instructions,
which
is
things
that
the
attendee
needs
to
bring
with
them
are
something
that
is
not
it's
not
necessarily
across
all
the
sites,
if
that's
not
something
that
is
displayed
to
the
gll
user
who's
just
attending
casually.
But
attendee
instructions
is
something
that
clients
like
MC
are
quite
because
it's
obviously
activating
an
audience
that
isn't
active.
D
Knowing
that
you
need
to
bring
a
water
bottle
and
don't
worry
about
the
tennis
racket,
because
it's
a
beginner
session
you
know
is,
is
important
to
to
know
so.
You
need
to
know
to
you
know:
don't
need
to
call
ahead
and
try
and
figure
out
about
tennis
rackets,
because
it's
just
provided
and
so
that
that's
quite
good
intonation,
which
is
is
required,
may
not
be
on
the
website
and
I.
D
Think
part
of
where
this
gets
interesting
is
there's
probably
a
good
argument
to
make
that
it
might
be
helpful
for
gl's
existing
user
base
to
know
about
the
tennis
racket
situation
in
those
centers
and
it's
a
bit
nuanced,
because
obviously
it's
something
that
the
operation
you
haven't
acquired
so
far,
maybe
they're
getting
away
with
it,
because
it's
on
the
website
somewhere
else.
Maybe
it's
the
receptionist
that
you
know
or
maybe
the
first
session.
D
You
turn
up
and
figure
it
out
and
there
could
be
good
argument
for
you
know,
user
experience
or
something
else
that
is
about.
Maybe
that
data
is
useful
and
that's
the
the
Nuance
that
discussion
I
think
Steven's
Point.
Is
that
you're
not
going
to
get
that
on
day,
one
just
by
saying
you're
missing
some
Fields.
A
Can
you
know
research
team?
We
can
take
that
message
into
those
conversations
with
the
Brokers.
You
know
when
we
ask
them
what
do
they
think
about
data
quality
to
be
mindful
that
whatever
they
tell
us,
we
we
haven't,
got
a
magic
button
or
anything
to
to
kind
of
make
that
appear,
but
we
can.
We
can
have
those
conversations
super
mindful
of
time.
I
think
that's
been
really
really
helpful.
A
I
did
have
one.
There
were
a
couple
of
things,
but
I
don't
know
if
we're
getting
a
chance
so
yeah.
Clearly
another
mishap
on
my
slides.
There
is
still
still
around
we
had.
We.
A
Do
you
want
to
mention
the
the
example,
an
example
of
a
change
to
the
facility
types
list,
because
we
have
I
know
you
mentioned
it
on
slack
for
a
future
discussion,
but
if
you
just
want
to
introduce
it,
the
the
topic.
E
Yeah,
we'll
do
so.
This
is
just
saying
that
currently
there
is
a
facility
type
2
activity,
mappings
list
that
is
managed.
E
Open
active
in
general
and
it's
the
issue
I've
raised-
is
about
formally
defining
that
mapping
as
a
strict
equivalence
just
for
using
that
mapping
in
for
facility
use
feeds.
Well,
there
are
two
reasons
really
facilities
feeds
that
currently
don't
provide
a
facility
type
and
the
the
Second
Use
is
for
providing
suggestions
of
you
know
you
can
still
see
a
front
end
that
wants
to
provide
suggestions
of
sessions
for
someone
booking
a
facility.
E
So
in
order
to
know
what
that
facility
type
map
student
in
the
session
instance
so
yeah
that
that's
that's
what
the
the
the
issue
is
about.
The
the
nature
of
that
equivalence.
A
So
that's
a
mapping
of
facility
types
and
activities
to
kind
of
enable
enable
better
search
and
also
to
solve
the
problem
where
some
of
our
older
feeds
don't
include
facility
type
when
perhaps
they
should
so,
we
will
have
a
discussion
about
that
further
on
I
had
the
question
which
I'll
raise,
but
we
won't
discuss
now.
Oops,
which
was
should
the
facility
type
list
be
managed
in
a
way
similar
to
the
open.
Active
list
is
becoming
moving
towards
that.
A
So
that's
my
thoughts,
my
question
rather
but
for
discussion
at
later
date.
Thank
you
very
much.
Everyone
I
meant
to
do
the
the
register
earlier,
but
I'll
just
say
we
had
Andrew
myself,
Chris
and
Tim
from
the
ODI
Nick
and
Civ
from
Iron
Man
Stephen
from
dll
Andy
Gordon
from
Gladstone
and
Debbie
from
Everyone
Active.
So
thank
you
all
for
joining
and
some
some
good
conversation
there,
some
useful
stuff
for
me
to
follow
up
on
so
speak
to
you
all
soon
cheers.