►
From YouTube: March 5, 2019 Town Council Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Heavenly
father
we
have
gathered
here
this
evening
as
your
humble
servants,
we
seek
to
represent
the
good
citizens
of
westworld
with
honor
and
integrity.
May
all
of
our
efforts
be
blessed
with
your
wisdom.
May
our
personal
faith
give
us
the
strength
to
act
honestly
and
accordingly,
in
all
matters
that
come
before
us
amen.
B
E
D
F
F
We
did
prepare
an
outline,
I
believe
it's
in
a
packet
that
was
circulated
a
brief
number
of
slide
deck
again.
The
purpose
is
just
to
spend
a
few
minutes
reviewing
the
june
30th
2018
financial
statement.
Audit
results,
please
feel
free
to
ask
questions
at
any
time.
I'm
sure
you've
seen
a
complete
copy
of
the
financial
statements
and
the
like
questions
come
up.
They're
welcome,
beginning
on
page
three
of
the
handout.
Just
a
few
highlights
on
the
town's
general
fund
for
the
fiscal
year
ended
again
june
of
18.
F
The
fund
balance
in
the
general
fund
increased
by
a
little
better
than
775
thousand
dollars
at
the
end
of
the
year.
The
unassigned
or
the
free,
unencumbered
working
capital
balance
was
just
over
962
000
good
news.
There
was
an
increase
in
the
fund
balance
during
the
year,
still
kind
of
tempered.
By
that
you
know
the
the
balance
of
that
is
relatively
low
compared
to
you
know,
benchmarks
the
rating
agencies
look
for
8
to
12
to
even
60
percent
of
your
budget
to
be
in
working
capital,
good,
first
step,
good
step
to
start
building.
F
Flipping
on
to
page
four,
the
outline
again,
you
can
see
the
the
trend
in
fund
balance
over
the
last
six
years.
Again.
This
is
strictly
just
the
town's
general
fund.
It
hit
the
low
point
17
and
bounced
back
almost
to
the
level
of
of
16,
and
actually
the
unassigned
is
the
highest.
It's
been
in
the
past
three
years,
so.
G
F
You
know
certainly
expenditures
were
outpacing
revenues
during
those
periods.
I
think
the
town
did
make
some
good
decisions
we'll
get
to
a
little
bit
in
the
later
in
the
packet.
The
pension
contributions
for
the
past
four
years
have
been
fully
funded.
In
accordance
with
the
x-rays
recommendation
you
know,
certainly
decisions
could
have
been
made
to
short
fund
the
pension
and
keep
more
funds
in
the
general
fund.
You
know
those
decisions
for
the
long-term
health
of
the
community
are
good
to.
You
know
continue
funding
that
pension
benefit.
F
That's
certainly
not
going
to
go
away.
It's
a
it's
an
astronomical
number.
You
know,
I
think
you're
looking
at
revenue
sources
and
the
like,
you
know,
tax
revenues
have
been
relatively
strong
in
the
past
number
of
years.
G
When
you
I
know,
as
an
auditor,
when
you
come
into
a
community,
you
review
the
ordinances
charters
and
so
on.
You
know
the
the
charter
requires
balanced
budgets.
It
also
requires
an
ordinance
to
ensure
that
balanced
budgets
are
there
and
from
from
what
I've
seen
those
ordinances
up
until
fy
17
weren't
really
in
existence.
G
So
when
you
look
at
the
state
law
and
the
local
ordinances,
it
would
seem
that
you
know
there
should
have
been
or
could
have
been
some
type
of
a
warning
or
acknowledgement.
You
know
we're
going
in
a
not
a
good
situation
when
you
look
at
that
trend
right.
So
what
would
your
your
feeling
be
when
you
looked
at
that
issue
in
regards
with
our
old
coordinates
and
the
state
statute
about
notification
of
deficit
spending.
F
I
think,
looking
back
when
again,
we've
been
the
artist
for
a
number
of
years,
looking
back
at
the
quarterly,
you
know
the
budget
reports
and
stuff
that
were,
you
know,
sent
to
the
state,
sometimes
the
end
of
the
year.
There
were
significant
adjustments
that
required.
You
know
sometimes
that
deficit
wasn't
projected
early
enough
in
the
year,
so
where
proactive
steps
could
have
been
taken.
F
You
know
there
were
a
lot
of
moving
parts
within
the
budgets.
A
lot
of
you
know
unanticipated
items.
I
know
that
you
know
the
town's
been
working
with.
You
know:
that's
a
five-year
plan
to
restore
fiscal
stability.
We've
we've
seen
that
been
kept
in
mind,
certainly
at
the
end
of
the
year.
E
How
often
do
I
mean
just
looking
at
this
trend
going
downwards?
Is
this
something
where
it's
did
you
monitor
this
on
a
regular
basis,
or
is
it
something
like
at
the
end
of
the
year?
You
do
the
report
and
say
this
is
where
you
stand
and
all
right
we're
in
a
deficit
again
we're
going
down
the
next
year
same
thing,
and
can
you
can
you
put
the
brakes
on
midstream.
F
F
A
F
F
Thanks,
you
know
again
moving
on
to
page
five
again.
This
is
strictly
for
the
the
fiscal
year
that
just
closed
you
know.
Revenues
were
above
budgeted
amounts
by
about
453,
000
property
taxes,
including
interest
and
payments,
and
lower
taxes
a
little
bit
below
it
was
anticipated.
What
we
saw
there
is
a
collection
of
prior
year
balances.
The
actual
collection
of
current
year
balances
was
right
on
point
with
what
the
budget
assumption
was.
F
Some
of
those
older
taxes
that
there
are
still
liens
in
place
and
they're
collectible
would
just
have
not
been
coming
in
as
anticipated,
certainly
based
on
the
current
year
levy.
There
was
a
little
over
100
percent
when
you
factor
in
those
prior
years,
but
I
think
the
budget
call
for
a
little
bit
better
collection
on
the
on
the
old
balances.
H
Can
I
ask
you
how
those
percentages
collection
assumptions,
how
they
stack
up
against
other
communities
and
other
work
you've
done.
F
The
towns
in
west
warwick
are
pretty
comparable
to
the
other
communities
we
do
in
between
97
and
99
current
year
assessment
collection
rate
you
have
to
factor
in
some
cushion
for
just
appeals
of
the
assessments
when
they're
done
economic
conditions.
Certainly
sometimes
we'll
see.
You
know
when,
when
the
overall
economy
drops
down
that
collection
rate
can
fall,
you
know
92
93,
just
based
on
you
know:
free
cash
flow
with
households
and
and
whatnot
in
relatively
good
times.
F
F
F
Overall
expenditures
were
below
appropriate
amounts
by
about
267
thousand
we're,
always
looking
at
where
the
where
the
overages
were.
You
know:
retirement
insurance,
fire
department,
legal
and
certainly
you
know
nothing
that
we
saw.
There
displayed
a
lack
of
control
or
a
lack
of
reasonable
assumptions
in
the
budget.
Sometimes
things
just
turn
out
differently
than
what
the
assumptions
have
been.
So
no
structural
issues,
just
actual
expenditures
for
the
year
were
in
excess.
F
Moving
on
to
the
school
department,
the
school
department
ended
its
year
with
a
total
fund
balance
of
just
under
three
million
eight
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
183.
That's
not
that's.
Not
a
spendable
format
represented
by
prepaid
expenses
and
inventory,
says
just
about
three
million
664.
That's
been
committed
to
continue
funding
the
educational
budget.
F
The
fund
balance
decreased
in
the
current
year
by
about
507
000.
However,
that
decrease
incorporates
two
pretty
pretty
pretty
big
items
that
were
not
in
the
original
budget.
The
school
department
transferred
almost
920
000
to
its
capital
reserve
fund,
again
continuing
their
practice
of
investing
their
fund
balance
in
long-term
assets
and
then
also
transferred
some
excess
funding
to
the
health
care
fund.
Without
those,
the
school
department
would
have
shown
an
increase
in
its
fund
balance
about
a
million
two
seventy
for
the
year.
F
So
you
know
the
school
did
did
recognize,
grant
grant
funds
just
under
2.5
million
dollars,
supplemented
the
educational
program
and
overall
revenues
of
the
school
were
about
386
thousand
dollars
above
anticipated
amounts
again
in
both
cases
with
the
town
general
fund,
the
school.
You
know,
the
budgeting
of
revenues
appears
to
be
conservative.
There's
no
outlandish.
F
You
know,
plans
put
in
place
so
to
see
the
positive
results
in
the
revenue
side
is
expected,
the
school
department,
you
know,
expenditures
and
other
financing
uses,
were
you
know
just
about
36
000
within
what
the
budget
was
again,
not
factoring
in
those
two
big
items
that
were
transferred
to
other
funds
and
the
school
lunch
fund
again
had
a
solid
year
recognizing
a
small
amount
of
net
income.
That's
generally
again
reinvested
back
in
capital
assets
with
the
lunch
program.
F
The
slide
on
page
nine
shows
the
combined
fund
balances.
A
lot
of
the
rating
agencies
will
look
at
combined
town
and
school
fund
balances,
put
together,
treating
the
town
as
kind
of
one
operation
again
the
total
fund
balance.
There
has
been
relatively
consistent
over
the
past
five
or
six
years,
just
about
that
five
million
dollar
mark,
and
you
can
see
the
blue
line
on
the
bottom,
where
the
town
is
making
up
a
larger
portion
of
that
at
the
end
of
the
18
fiscal
year.
F
The
the
two
funds
are
legally
separate
and
again
the
town
doesn't
have
capacity
to
go
dip
into
that
fund
balance,
but
again
from
a
rating
agency
perspective.
Looking
at
overall
finances,
they
do
get
aggregated
together
in
many
cases,
so
it
tells
a
good
story
against
stability
in
that
total
of
those
two
funds.
F
The
wastewater
authority
has
some
highlights
on
the
10th
page
of
the
outline
revenues
and
expenditures
up
and
down
a
little
bit
from
prior
years,
but
still
a
solid
year
financially
there,
while
the
fund
did
record
a
a
decrease
in
this
net
assets
for
the
year,
almost
2.5
million
dollars
of
expensive
depreciation,
which
is
a
non-cash
item.
When
you
look
at
a
budgetary
basis,
the
fund
was
near
break
even
results
again.
F
F
We
mentioned
earlier
the
town's
pension
plan
again
in
the
june
30
of
the
july
first
18
valuation.
It's
reporting
the
highest
funded
percentage.
It
has
in
the
past
several
years
just
about
23
up
from
just
under
21
the
previous
year,
and
you
can
see
18
and
19
prior
to
that.
So
again,
the
investment
returns
were
positive
and
again
having
those
contributions
being
made
full
for
the
past
four
or
five
years
again
accumulating
more
assets
there.
F
E
F
It's
more
of
a
long-term
perspective
on
that.
Certainly
the
the
liability
is
treated
more
like
a
mortgage.
It's
a
long-term
liability
to
be
retired.
Over
that
basis.
You
know
the
actuary
results
they
will
smooth
in
contributions.
What
those
investment
returns
are.
So
if
there's
a
real
good
year,
you
won't
get
the
benefit
of
that
all
in
one
year,
that'll
be
smooth
over
a
number
of
years
as
well.
F
If
the
benchmarks
come
in
below
and
I
think
the
strongest
thing
there
is
just
to
continue
funding
the
required
contribution
that
the
actuaries
specify
you
know
it
would
take.
I
think,
from
an
auditor
perspective,
to
raise
a
flag
on
where
the
health
of
that
fund's
going
it
would
be
more
than
a
one-year
blip
okay.
F
If
they
were
a
couple,
if
there
was
a
shortage
in
funding,
if
there
were
you
know,
an
experienced
study
showed
that
maybe
the
assumptions
aren't
valid
for
the
fund
as
far
as
mortality
and
investment
returns
and
pay
raises
and
stuff
like
that.
Certainly,
we
haven't
seen
that
in
auditing
those
assumptions
in
the
to
date.
Now.
E
E
F
I
know
as
part
of
the
valuation
of
the
plan
there's
a
cash
flow
projection
of
what
expected
benefits
are
for
periods
in
the
future
and
there's
also
projections
of
what
contributions
are
going
to
be
required
to
to
meet
those
assumptions
where
the
where
the
contributions
are
now,
they
may
get
a
little
bit
higher,
but
certainly
on
a
pay-as-you-go
basis.
We
haven't
seen
anything
in
the
projections
that
there's
going
to
be
an
immediate
lack
of
funding.
E
E
To
me
understanding,
I
think
I'm
understanding
this
right.
I
think
that's
a
problem.
You
have
people
who
are
you
have
a
new
employee
that
comes
in
and
please,
if
I'm
not
saying
this
right,
please
stop
me.
You
have
a
new
employee
that
comes
in
and
contributes
say
five
thousand
dollars
towards
the
pension
fund,
but
you
have
an
employee
that
just
left
is
getting
a
30
000
pension.
E
F
F
If
you
were
60
funded,
I
think
everybody
would
feel
a
lot
better
about
where
the
plan
is
again.
It's
it's
a
very
long-term
view
of
this.
It's
not
an
asset
that
gets
retired
like
a
car
loan
over
five
years.
It's
very
much
a
mortgage
there's!
You
know
you
need
30
or
40
years
to
fund
someone's
full
retirement
benefit
and
then
you're
making
up.
H
F
F
I
know
they're
recommending
that
as
well,
every
five
seven
ten
years
to
take
another
look
at
those
assumptions.
We
compare
those
assumptions
when
we
test
participants
we're
testing
what
the
date
of
hire
is
their
age,
verifying
that
projected
retirement
date
we're
also
comparing
the
expected
rate
of
return
to
what
the
actual
asset
investment
mix
is
and
what
other
communities
are
using
for
that
rate
of
return,
those
all
go
into
what
that
required
contribution
is
each
year.
So
if
there
were
differences
there,
they
would
be
reported
as
findings,
and
you.
F
H
How
comfortable
the
the
16
return
5.92
17
was
was
12.3.
18
was
a
little
less
than
that
quite
a
bit
less
than
that.
How
does
that
stack
up
against
other
communities?
That's.
F
That
changes
every
couple
of
years-
it's
you
know,
there's
about
10
or
12
different
categories
that
get
blended
into
that.
I
know
this
normally
that
off
the
top
of
my
head,
but
we
could
certainly
get
back
to
you
with
what
we're
seeing
other
communities
do.
But
again,
we've
looked
at
the
rate
of
returns
are
comparable
across
our
client
base.
F
The
other
post-employment
benefit
plan
that
the
town
maintained
there's
been
contributions
to
that
plan
at
the
end
of
the
year,
there's
just
under
a
million
five
of
investable
assets
there.
That
is
something
that's
gives
credit
to
the
town.
A
lot
of
other
communities
haven't
funded
anything
towards
their
benefits.
Well,
this
may
not
look
like
a
lot
compared
to
the
overall
liability
of
you
know:
60
million
dollars,
it's
a
start,
and
certainly
there's
again
other
decisions
that
were
made
to
put
money
there.
F
F
During
the
course
of
our
audit,
I
want
to
thank
management
from
the
town
and
school
department
and
the
wastewater
fund
for
the
cooperation
the
audit
was
delivered
on
time.
Everything
went
smooth.
There
were
no
disagreements.
We
do
recognize
that
when
that
happens,
the
audit's
an
invasive
process
and
it's
tough
on
everybody
involved.
So
I
want
to
thank
everyone
for
putting
up
with
us
and
helping
us
out
and
giving
us
access
to
the
records
and
and
closing
the
books.
F
We
had
no
significant
order,
adjustments,
no
material
weaknesses
or
deficiencies
of
controls
that
were
noted.
We
do
have
some
recommendations
that
have
been
kind
of
repeated
the
past
couple
of
years.
Look
at
you
know:
documentation
of
internal
controls,
one
from
a
study
of
effectiveness
and
efficiency,
as
well
as
having
a
documentation
there.
If
there's
turnover,
if
there's
no
employees
to
be
trained,
there's
a
manual
on
how
things
are
to
be
done,
it's
not
uncommon.
We
have
very
few
communities
that
have
full
comprehensive
manuals.
F
It's
a
goal
that
we
recommend
everybody
at
least
consider
and
start
building
on,
but
we
do
also
recognize
that
there's
a
day
job
for
everybody
to
do
in
these
finance
departments
and
there's
not
a
lot
of
extra
time
for
these
activities.
So
we
do
make
that
just
we
take
it
when
when
you
can,
are
there
any
other
questions,
I
might
be
able
to
answer
or
take
back
and
get
you
answers
on
the
follow
up.
H
I
would
say
it's
it's
nice
to
see
that
we're
going
in
the
right
direction,
but
I
think-
and
we
talked
about
trends
one
year-
does
not
make
a
trend.
It's
positive.
F
H
G
G
Thank
jim
and
your
staff,
you
know
working
with
us,
you
know
this
is
our
your
third
year.
So
it's
been
a
pleasure.
You
know
working
with
with
you
and
your
staff,
and
you
know
we
will
be
going
out
for
proposals
for
a
new
auditing
firm.
You
know
three-year
contract,
so
you
know
welcome,
hopefully
we'll.
G
In
and
we'll
see
where
we'll
see
where
we
go,
but
thank
you
for
your
service
and
and
the
cooperation
and
your
staff
has
worked
with
us
very
well.
So
thank
you.
F
I
F
A
Second,
discussion:
council:
vice
president
john
d'amico
is
going
to
read
something
to
the
record
for
us
on
behalf
of
jerry
lee.
B
This
is
not
something
I
take
lightly.
Nor
did
I
find
humor
in
this
matter
upon
seeing
the
town
council's
agenda
for
the
upcoming
tuesday
march,
the
5th
2019,
where
councilman
jason
k
messier
sponsored
an
item
requesting
the
council
to
remove
me
from
an
appointed
position
in
which
clearly
violates
the
rhode
island
constitution
of
an
individual's
civil
liberties,
civil
liberties
and
violate
the
town
charter.
I
am
left
with
a
very
difficult
decision
to
make
based
upon
the
following
questions:
one:
what
were
my
intentions
when
I
made
the
decision
to
apply
for
the
pension
board?
B
B
Let
me
start
off
by
responding
to
the
first
question,
which
was
what
were
my
intentions
and
when
I
made
my
decision
to
apply
for
the
pension
board,
my
intentions
were
of
the
simplest
and
of
the
purest
in
nature.
I
have
been
a
resident
of
the
town
for
nearly
five
years
in
those
five
years.
I
have
heard
conflicting
statements
and
concerns
pertaining
to
the
pension
of
those
employed
by
the
town.
B
These
contradicting
statements
were
great
concern
to
me
not
only
as
a
resident
and
taxpayer,
but
also
as
a
neighbor
and
friend
to
these
individuals
and
all
residents
of
our
community.
I
would
ask
myself
what
is
the
real
answer?
Who
is
sharing
the
correct
information
who
has
or
is
responsible
for
such
a
depleted
pension
system?
How
will
the
employees
of
our
town
be
compensated
if
the
pension
system
fails
after
giving
away
so
many
concessions
on
so
many
occasions
in
hopes
of
putting
our
town
in
a
better
financial
state?
B
How
will
the
taxpayers
be
affected
if
the
pension
system
fails,
so
I
concluded
that
the
best
way
to
address
these
concerns
was
to
get
the
information
first
hand.
I
recently
agree,
I
am
no
financial
wizard,
but
indisputably
I
have
the
means
and
ability
to
educate
research
and
dissect
the
information
to
obtain
a
logical
and
factual
we're
all
result.
B
The
past
highly
educated,
educated
financial
experts
now
excuse
me,
where
are
all
the
past
highly
educated
financial
experts
now
and
how
are
the
decisions
from
the
past
benefiting
our
employees
and
retirees
today
do.
I
believe
I
could
also
serve
on
the
pension
board
in
an
unbiased
manner,
without
being
influenced
by
political
or
outside
pressures.
Considering
recent
events,
I
emphatically
do
now
we
come
to
question
two:
did
I
allow
this
matter
to
go
too
far
and
could
it
have
been
prevented?
B
However,
I
do
believe
that
everything
that
has
transpired
has
done
so
for
a
reason,
whatever
reasons
they
are,
they
will
eventually
come
to
light
personally,
I
believe
it
has
gone
as
far
as
it
is
needed
to
thus
far.
I
have
withstood
all
the
personal
attacks
and
intimidation
that
one
should
should
never
have
to
face
due
to
political
backlash.
B
B
Question
three
was:
did
my
appointment
to
the
pension
board
bring
any
benefit
to
our
town?
Undeniably,
it
has
brought
no
benefit
to
the
pension
itself
or
the
pension
board.
However,
it
has
unequivocally
brought
changes
to
our
town
that
will
benef.
That
will
be
a
benefit
to
the
town
moving
us
forward
toward
a
better
future.
B
The
process
of
how
we
select
and
appoint
members
to
boards
are
being
reviewed
and
policies
and
procedures.
We
would
put
into
place
to
vet
all
candidates
in
the
process
that
will
take
place
after
they
have
been
appointed.
I
do
not
take
sole
responsibility
for
these
changes.
It
was
certainly
an
unintentional
group
effort.
B
B
It
has
open
dialogue
between
individuals
to
when
has
a
human
being.
Excuse
me,
a
human
being
served
their
sentence
of
penance
and
how
we
still
allow
ourselves
to
judge
individuals
today
for
their
actions
from
long
ago,
and
when
do
we
accept
that
an
individual
has
paid
their
price
to
society,
and
when
do
we
acknowledge
that
their
past
actions
have
no
bearing
on
the
individual?
They
have
become
today.
J
B
When
do
we,
as
residents
and
neighbors
finally
come
together
for
the
greater
good
of
our
town
and
community
and
set
aside
these
differences?
When
do
we
recognize
that
our
town
deserves
better?
When
do
when
do
you
realize
that
a
community
united
can
overcome
the
struggle
that
we
have
before
us
to
see
our
town
into
the
future?
B
B
By
allowing
this,
we
would
then
forgo
the
intent
of
such
boards
and
committees
and
relinquish
all
powers
to
the
council
unless
challenged
in
litigation.
Our
town
needs
no
further
litigations
against
it.
It
needs
individuals
to
do
right
by
our
town
and
for
that
reason
alone,
in
the
best
interest
of
the
town,
I
hereby
resign
from
the
pension
board
sincerely
jerry
lee
a
proud,
warwick
resident.
A
A
A
Eyes
have
it.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Jerry
again,
I
apologize
on
behalf
of
the
council
that
the
town
employees,
mr
lee,
and
the
residents
of
west
forward
had
to
go
through
this
over
the
last
three
weeks
on
news,
media
and
social
media
and
wherever
else
it
may
have
taken
place.
A
A
A
A
Second
discussion
again,
this
is
something
that
was
brought
up
to
me
during
election
time.
A
lot
of
vehicles,
including
school
buses
or
ride
buses,
actually
going
right
through
the
intersection.
So
I
brought
it
before
the
traffic
community
did
this
study
and
they
agreed
upon
it.
So
with
that
being
said,
that's
all
I'm
asking
for
as
a
stop
sign
between
alpine
and
navarro
and
summit
in
alpine
any
questions
hearing,
none
roll
call,
vote,
jay.
E
K
I
K
K
So
the
city
of
central
falls
has
gone
forward
with
a
resolution
and
they
are
sending
it
to
the
general
assembly
that
be
it
resolve
that
the
city
council
in
the
city
of
central
falls
urges
the
general
assembly
to
pass
a
law
enabling
legislation
for
cities
and
towns
to
license
tobacco
dealers.
Basically,
what
they're
saying
is
in-
and
I've
been
following
both
cases
and
dealing
with
the
attorneys
on
them.
K
K
When
I
received
that
copy
of
the
resolution
from
central
falls
to
the
legislature,
I
contacted
contacted
david
and
I
suggested
to
david
that
I
thought
that
we
ought
to
join
in
and
that
we
ought
to
send
a
resolution
to
the
legislature
and
all
the
regis
resolution
says
is:
we
are
supporting
central
falls
and
we're
asking
you
the
legislature
to
do
the
same
thing.
That
central
falls
is
doing,
and
that's
what's
before
you
tonight,
to
join
in
central
falls
and
asks
the
legislature
to
allow
you
to
regulate
the
tobacco
sales
in
our
town.
K
I
don't
know
whether
they've
joined
central
falls
or
not.
I
know
in
my
discussion
with
other
attorneys.
Some
of
them
have
have
taken
the
stand,
we're
going
to
continue
on
and
we're
going
to
just
ignore
the
the
superior
court
until
they
tell
our
town
to
stop.
Others
have
said:
well
we're
just
going
to
go
slow
until
the
supreme
court
has,
as
a
say,
the
only
one
I
have
actively
heard
from
that
has
taken
this
step
and
the
initiative
was
the
city
of
central
falls.
So
it
was
a
matter.
K
H
K
Several
occasions-
and
I
have
to
say
that
in
the
years
that
I've
been
here
and
drafting
the
ordinances
for
the
town,
I
have
never
had
anything.
I've
done
that
I
received
the
cooperation,
the
input
and
the
assistance
from
these
students
from
the
high
school.
They
did
their
homework,
they
came
in
and
the
regulation
we
passed
there's
nothing
drastic
about
it.
I
I
K
I
K
K
I
wouldn't
put
my
money
on
that,
but
so
what
the
and
also
the
case
up
to
the
supreme
court
will
take
time.
I
think
the
wise
move
would
be
for
the
legislature
to
take
the
the
bull
by
the
horns
and
say
go
ahead
and
do
it,
but
all
we
can
do
is
ask
them
to
join
in.
I
just
don't
know
I
didn't
want
to
take,
spend
the
time
calling
each
of
the
other
solicitors
it
just
has
nothing
to
do.
E
K
K
What
the
supreme
superior
court
has
said
is:
that's
basically
the
same
with
the
sale
of
tobacco
that
what
the
legislature
has
said
governs
the
state,
the
sale
of
tobacco
through
the
entire
state.
So
you,
the
town
of
westworld,
you,
the
city
of
central,
falls,
you
can't
say
this
is
the
way
the
tobacco
sales
are
going
to
be
regulated.
A
So
again,
when
al
sent
that
to
me,
I
sent
it
over
and
kimberly.
Maine
is
here
along
with
zoe
monroe.
A
Said
again,
game
of
ballin
and
they
they've
they
brought
us
in
to
a
meeting
the
town
council
and
also
rep
senator
serpa,
senator
satchel,
our
former
rep
nunes,
was
there
a
couple
years
ago
and
they
had
a
dinner
which
they're
having
another
dinner
this
monday
in
which
they
invited
the
entire
town
council
to
they
worked
very
hard
in
coming
to
all
these
meetings
having
their
presentations
showing
us
what
tobacco
smells
like
as
far
as
candy,
it's
confusing
to
some
kids
and
basically
the
state
has
taken
over
in
and
discredited,
almost
everything
they've
done
over
the
past
few
years.
I
K
If
I
might
david
just
to
give
the
council
a
little
bit
of
what
this
resolution
says,
I
think
the
first
paragraph
of
it
is
unbelievable.
According
to
the
campaign
for
tobacco-free
kids,
the
us
department
of
health
and
human
services
and
the
center
for
disease
control,
the
following
is
true
and
portrays
a
major
public
crisis.
One
each
day
more
than
350
kids
under
the
age
of
18
become
regular
daily
smokers
and
almost
one-third
will
eventually
die
from
smoking
two.
If
the
current
trends
continue,
5.6
million
of
today's
youth
will
die
prematurely
from
a
smoking-related
illness.
K
Three
tobacco
use
remains
a
leading
cause
of
preventable
death
of
the
united
states,
killing
more
than
four
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
people
per
year.
Four
smoking
kills
more
americans
than
alcohol,
aids,
car
accidents,
illegal
drugs,
murder
and
suicide.
Combined
five
smoking
impacts
nearly
every
organ
of
the
body.
More
than
87
percent
of
lung
cancer
deaths,
61
of
pulmonary
disease
deaths,
32
of
deaths
from
coronary
heart
disease
are
attributable
to
smoking
or
exposure
to
secondhand
smoking.
Six
millions
of
americans
suffer
from
the
debilitating
medical
conditions
throughout
their
lives
due
to
smoking.
More
than
16
million.
K
K
I
thought
that
when
this
council
enacted
the
the
the
ordinance,
I
personally
thought
that
it
was
one
of
the
fairest
ordinances
that
could
be
done
in
this
area
made
my
little
prejudice
because
I
worked
on
the
draft
of
it,
but
I
don't
you
know
it
bothers
me
that
everywhere
we
look,
people
are
are
complaining
about
it.
People,
smoking,
secondhand,
smoking
and
you
know
it
the
legislature's
so
fit
to
say
you
can't
smoke
in
a
restaurant.
You
can't
smoke
in
a
bar
now
they're
saying
you
can't
smoke
on
the
beach.
A
K
B
I
I
just
had
a
comment.
We
did
put
a
tremendous
amount
of
work
into
this.
We
did
go
to
a
number
of
the
meetings.
My
question
is,
and
I
assume
that
the
state's
going
for
some
form
of
uniformity
similar
to
what
they
do
with
alcohol,
what
are
other
states
doing?
Are
they
allowing
the
municipalities
to
make
their
own
decisions
or
are
they.
L
L
We
talked
about
the
smoke-free
workplaces
and
that
took
years
and
years
and
years
that
I
was
involved
in
to
even
do
that
because
it
takes
so
long.
Yet
you
know
they
take
away
the
power
of
the
towns
to
be
able
to
protect
their
their
youth.
So
I
think
you
know
we
came
to
the
town,
because
the
the
state
doesn't
listen,
the
state's
not
listening
to
what
we're
asking.
J
K
A
K
When
I
was
legal
counseling
in
in
east
greenwich
that
I
would
go
to
pal's
restaurant
before
the
meeting
to
have
dinner
and
the
owner
there
was
moaning
and
groaning
I'll,
be
out
of
business
I'll,
be
out
of
business
and
then
when
they
did
it
they
initially
they
said.
Okay,
you
can't
smoke
in
the
restaurant,
but
you
can
smoke
in
the
bar
and
then
they
realized
that
was
foolishness
and
they
said
you
can't
smoke
in
the
restaurant
and
then
it
just
began
to
spread.
K
G
H
L
So
it's
wonderful
to
get
us
some
statistics.
While
I
was
up
here
talking
430
localities,
including
new
york
city,
chicago
430
localities,
including
new
york,
chicago
san
antonio
boston,
cleveland,
minneapolis,
kansas
cities
and
washington
dc.
So
430
localities
have
done
it
along
with
other
states,
so
localities
are
doing.
K
A
I
I
A
Discussion
again
this
this
came
up.
Over
the
last
month,
we've
had
a
few
businesses.
I
know,
councilman
d'amico
has
contacted
me.
I've
had
a
building
owner
contact
me.
We
had
a
business
person
here
last
week
who
contacted
me
here
down
in
rose's
office,
one
of
the
things
that
happened
and
I'll
use
friendly,
guys
pizza
as
an
example,
as
we
did
last
meeting
friendly
guys
up
left
took
off
whatever
it
may
be.
A
New
mexican
restaurant
is
moving
in
they're,
not
using
any
of
that
equipment.
They're,
not
that
mexican
restaurant
is
not
using
any
of
that
equipment.
So
the
tangible
taxes
is
the
discussion
and
the
ordinance
doesn't
say
who's
actually
in
charge
of
paying
those
taxes.
I
B
B
The
question
is
you
know
how
do
we,
if
it's
not
in
the
ordinance,
we
need
to
go
back
and
we
need
to
rework
the
ordinance
to
specifically
state
that
the
property
owner
will
be
held
responsible
to
my
understanding,
it's
not
clear
language.
At
this
point,
and
so
you
know
I
agree
with
the
president.
It
doesn't
seem
to
make
sense
that
we're
we're
holding
the
owner
responsible.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
elaborate
on
that
or
explain
that.
J
No
just
as
I
explained
last
week,
enabling
legislation
would
satisfy.
I
think
a
lot
of
municipalities
are
problems
with
this
through
title
44,
because
if
you
look
at
the
balancing
interest
of
the
parties
involved,
you
have
the
town
that
wants
to
collect
tangible
taxes.
You
have
the
real
estate
owner
of
where
the
tangible
taxes
is
or
the
situs.
J
You
have
the
tenant
that
presumably
owns
or
and
or
controls
the
tangible
property,
and
we
have
the
issue
of
a
lessor
and
lessee
situation
about
you
know
if
you're
just
leasing
the
property,
an
owner
of
the
real
estate,
has
no
right
to
go
into
that
establishment.
Remove
the
property
either
sell
it
or
put
it
out
to
trash,
because
he
has
no
authority
or
control
of
dominion
over
it.
J
So
as
I've
suggested
in
the
past-
and
I
think
a
lot
of
support
would
come
from
all
the
municipalities,
you
would
have
to
say
in
title
44
iv
regarding
taxation,
that
you
want
a
clear
avenue
as
to
who
is
going
to
be
responsible
for
these
taxes
at
the
same
time,
realizing
that
the
tax
collector's
office
or
the
tax
assessor's
office
is
going
to
have
to
provide
information
not
only
to
the
owner
of
the
real
estate,
but
also
to
the
tenant
and
you're,
also
opening
up
pandora's
box
when
it
comes
to
government's
involvement
with
private
business,
because
I
don't
think
a
lot
of
landlords
are
going
to
want
to
share
any
commercial
leases
they
have
with
the
town
to
find
to
establish
who's
responsible
for
a
tax
because,
as
I
told
councilman
d'amico
early
on,
if
you
have
a
triple
needle
a
triple
net
lease,
what
you
pay
on
a
monthly
basis
to
the
landlord
theoretically
you're
supposed
to
go
towards
your
taxes.
J
J
Attorney
d
fiore
put
together
the
municipal
lien
certificate
where
and
on
a
purchase
the
tax
tangible
tax
shows
up,
but
when
you're
not
having
a
purchase
of
property,
there's
no
way
for
anybody
to
know
what
the
tangible
tax
is.
So
as
a
hypothetical
the
owner
has
to
exercise
diligent
over
his
own
property.
He's
got
to
know
that
when
he
brings
a
tenant
in
there,
especially
someone
that's
conducting
a
service
or
providing
something
with
machinery
that
there's
a
tangible
tax
involved.
On
the
same
token,
so
does
the
tenant
now
tenant
does
business.
J
The
tangible
taxes
aren't
paid.
Theoretically,
if
they're
still,
there
he's
not
they're
not
going
to
get
their
license
to
reopen
for
the
next
particular
year
until
those
tangible
taxes
are
paid.
This
always
becomes
a
problem
when
the
tenant
leaves
leaves
the
property
behind
who's,
going
to
be
responsible
for
the
tangible
taxes
again
in
the
past,
with
problems
with
corporations
that
have
gone
bankrupt,
you're
not
going
to
get
the
tangible
taxes
out
of
a
bankrupt
corporation
but
again
real
estate
taxes.
Yes,
tangible
taxes.
A
For
instance,
friendly
guys,
we
don't
know
if
they
receive
their
taxes,
we
don't
know
if
they
have
intentions
on
paying
their
taxes.
We
don't
know
where
they
went
so
now
the
new
business
is
coming
in
and
now
we're
holding
them
accountable.
Now
what
happens
is
if
that
new
business
comes
in,
pays
the
tangibles
and
all
sort
of
friendly
guys
comes
in
and
wants
to
pay
or
send
a
check
in.
I
guarantee
that's
probably
something's,
going
to
happen
there
where.
J
Well,
if
that,
if
that
scenario
happened,
the
check
would
be
returned
to
the
new
tenant.
But
since
it's
not
going
to
happen
because
it's
never
happened,
the
ob,
the
obvious
argument
is
who
is
the
shareholder
or
the
stakeholder
in
this?
It's
the
person
that
owns
the
property
and
that
person
just
can't
turn
a
blind
eye
and
collect
this
check
every
month
on
his
rent
because
he
has
to
know
what's
going
on
in
his
property.
So
let
me.
J
A
J
Once
again,
that's
why
I
just
don't
see
that
enabling
legislation
through
the
general
assembly,
all
the
municipalities,
will
love
this,
because
it's
going
to
be
a
quicker,
easier
route
to
collecting
the
tangible
tax.
But
again,
if
you
look
at
it,
who
is
the
common
denominator,
it's
the
owner
of
the
real
estate.
A
A
I
understand
what
you're
saying,
but
we
as
a
town
council
should
not
be
enacting
and
say
and
punishing
the
new
business
coming
in
of
whatever
happened
between
the
landlord
and
the
tenant
or
whatever
may
happen.
A
family
guy
is
up
and
took
off.
Now
again,
I
don't
know
if
they
up
and
took
off
and
left
everything
behind
left
one
piece
behind
left
everything
I
really
don't
know.
But
again
I
walk
into
a
situation
where
a
new
business
is
coming
into
town
and
we're
asking
them
to
pay
the
friendly
guys
tangibles.
That
is
ludicrous.
A
J
That's
why
you
need
enabling
legislation,
because
if
you
don't
get
enabling
legislation-
and
you
rely
on
the
process
which
is
happening
right
now-
that
the
new
guy
gets
hit
with
the
bill
all
right,
if
you
don't
think
that's
fair,
you
can
have
the
tax
collector
make
a
recommendation
of
this
council
to
waive
those
back
tangible
taxes
once
you
do
it
for
one
you're
going
to
do
it
for
all.
I
don't
know
how.
A
Many
no
timmy,
I'm
not
saying
waive
the
taxes,
I'm
saying
go
after
friendly
guy,
not
we
have
a
collection
process
in
place.
In
other
words,
we
send
them
a
bill
if
they
don't
pay.
It
goes
to
rossie
law.
Office
rossi
law
office
gets
a
percentage
to
try
to
collect
that
now.
That
should
be
their
responsibility.
J
Because
if
it's
not
collected
by
the
the
tax
attorneys,
it
stays
on
the
books
and
your
tax
collector
on
a
monthly
basis,
has
the
tax
that's
owed,
plus
interest
and
penalties
are
crewing.
J
So
again,
if
there's
a
certain
line
item
that
states,
these
are
potential
tangible
taxes
that
need
to
be
collected
from
businesses
that
are
no
longer
in
business,
and
we
don't
know
where
they
are,
and
it's
probably
not
going
to
be
collected.
Are
you
going
to
get
rid
of
that
tax
at
the
end
of
the
year
or
that
dollar
amount
on
your
on
your
projections?.
A
J
Gonna,
that's
I'm
not
disagreeing
with
that.
However,
what
I'm
trying
to
say
if
the
tax
collector
has
a
job
to
do,
and
it's
not
being
done-
needs
to
be
addressed
at
that
level.
However,
if,
in
fact
a
new
business
coming
at
the
town
is
told
that
your
tangible
taxes
are
due
within
six
months,
nine
months,
12
months
and
they're
not
paid,
then
they
get
shut
down.
But
again
the
the
language
of
title
444
right
now
is
so
archaic.
J
It
allows
you
to
go
after
someone
who
may
be
a
representative
which
may
in
fact
be
the
owner
of
the
property,
but
it's
not
clear
and
a
lot
of
people
have
trouble
with
that
statute,
trying
to
understand
about
who
exactly
is
responsible,
but
again,
if,
if
the
tax
collector's
department
is
allowing
this
to
go
on
year
after
year
after
year,
and
not
collecting
the
tax,
we'll
shame
on
the
town,
you
know
nothing.
I
mean
there's
no
way.
Eight
years
should
go
by
before
somebody
has
to
pay
a
tangible
tax.
J
That's
been
there
for
years,
but
all
I'm
suggesting
is
that
and
again
I
think
you
get
a
lot
of
support
is
that
if
there
was
enabling
legislation,
all
the
municipalities
would
benefit
from
it
and
they
also
would
make
landlords
commercial
landlords
much
more
diligent
when
they
put
their
leases
together.
So
do
we
need
to
ask.
J
Think
allen
allen,
allen
and
I
can
put
it
together.
I
think
we
worked
on
it
probably
five
or
six
years
ago,
send
it
off
to
the
delegation
and
see
what
they
think
and
see
if
what
can
happen
this
year,
but
at
this
at
the
meantime
I
mean
we
already
went
to
federal
court
at
one
time
when
it
was
a
transfer
of
property
from
owner
aida,
owner
b
federal
court
said
tangible
taxes
do
not
run
with
the
property,
you
cannot
collect
it
off
the
new
owner,
so
that's
already
been
decided.
E
J
Theoretically,
if
they're
a
fixture,
they
belong
to
the
real
estate
and
the
owner
of
the
property
is
going
to
benefit
from
it,
so
he
would
have
to
pay
the
tangible
tax
if
they're,
not
a
fixture.
There's
something
that's
just
plugged
in
the
question
now
is
who
owns
the
property
who
has
authority
over
who
has
control
and
who's
the
minion?
If
the
owner
takes
it
upon
himself
to
sell
that
property,
he
just
took
the
town's
opportunity
to
get
paid
for
that
because
there
is
like,
I
said
there
is
a
process
right.
J
So,
let's
just
say
on
an
annual
basis,
there's
20
20
particular
tax,
tangible
tax
accounts
that
could
go
to
auction,
but
tim.
Let
me
ask
you
this:
does
it
does
the
town.
A
J
J
That
just
left
right
now,
you
know
the
commercial
tenant
probably
hasn't
paid
its
rent
all
right.
So
it's!
No!
It's
not
going
to
pay
its
storage
fees
correct,
so
usually
what
they
do
is
cover
a
darkness
put
it
out
for
the
trash
put
it
out
for
scrap
or
they
sell
it.
Now.
If
it's
a
fixture,
those
pizza
ovens
were
fixtures,
they
were
connected.
J
You
just
can't
go
in
there
and
sort
them
off
and
then
throw
them
out
into
the
into
the
parking
lot
and
say:
oh,
I
don't
know
what
happened
to
them,
because
there
is
a
process
for
which
the
town
to
auction
the
property
off
is
it
long?
Is
it
onerous,
absolutely
it's
worse
than
our
real
estate
taxes,
so.
E
J
That's
that's
why
enabling
legislation
would
allow
this
town
to
address
situations
just
like
that
landlords
can
come
in
and
either
debate
whether
they
like
it?
They
don't
commercial
tenants
could
debate
whether
they
like
it
or
not,
because
this
happens
in
every
community
rose.
Are
you
here
rose?
What
do
we?
What
is
old
right
now
on
debt
accounts
for
tangible
taxes
just
monitor
mike?
If
I
may
ask.
H
J
A
I
don't
think
any
I'm
not
saying
wave
and
don't
try
to
collect
it.
We
should
be
attacking
friendly
guys,
pizza
or
businesses
that
are
leaving
like,
for
instance,
the
route
three
auto
sales
that
you
brought
up
to
me.
That
route
three
auto
sales
was
an
accident
that
route
three
auto
sales
moved
from
here
to
exeter,
so
we
should
be
chasing
him
up
in
exeter
and
getting
and
going
after
him.
You
know.
J
H
H
K
K
That's
what
that's
the
only
reason
I
understand
that
I'm
fully
in
agreement
with
what
tim
is
saying,
that
the
problem
starts
up
there
and
leaves
a
mess
down
here.
We've
seen
it
in
the
zoning
board
and
a
little
different
from
the
what
you're
stating
david,
where
I've
got
a
commercial
piece
of
property.
I'm
renting
tenants
gone
all
of
a
sudden
there's
either
this
commercial.
These
fixtures
are
there.
A
Can't
say
if
it
was
or
wasn't
all
I
know
was
a
barber
shop
went
in
a
barber
shop
went
out,
a
barber
shop
went
in,
they
have
all
the
same
equipment.
I
don't
know
if
there
was
a
closing
that
should
be
resolved
between
them,
but
a
tenant
up
and
leaves
takes
off,
doesn't
even
say,
they're
closing,
just
shuts
the
doors,
and
I
mean,
and
then
a
new
restaurant
comes
in
who's.
Not
even
using
any
of
that
equipment
says:
hey
we're
coming
in
we're
putting
in
a
mexican
style
restaurant
and
what
are
we
responsible
for?
A
M
Spodnik
carpenter
court,
a
commercial
lease
is
specific
when
you
move
in
the
fixtures
attached
to
that
building,
when
you
move
in
are
considered
fixtures,
not
what
the
person
installs
and
then
takes
off
out
of
town
and
leaves
behind
those
are
not
considered
fixtures
for
the
owner
of
the
property.
The
fixtures
are
the
lights
that
are
attached,
the
walls
that
are
attached
whatever
was
attached.
When
that
person
came
in
and
says,
I
want
to
rent
this
property
and
turn
it
into
a
pizza
place.
Then
they
put
the
pizza
ovens
in.
M
They
may
be
bolted
to
the
floor,
but
they
weren't
there
when
that
person
rented
it
and,
as
far
as
I
know,
from
my
experience
with
commercial
leases,
tangible
taxes
are
the
equipment
used
for
the
purpose
of
a
business
in
progress,
not
because,
okay,
all
of
a
sudden,
the
property
is
left
behind.
When
does
the
landlord
get
his
right
to
reclaim
his
property?
Why
should
he
be
victimized?
A
second
time
chances
are
if
the
group
left
the
town
they
left
the
landlord
behind.
They
left
the
taxes.
Behind
I
mean
what
you're
setting
up
is.
M
Small
businesses
will
come
into
this
town,
not
pay
their
property.
I
mean
not
pay
their
tangible
taxes
and
leave
it
on
the
landlords
who's
going
to
want
to
rent
here
people
that
don't
pay
their
bills.
You
can't
leave
this.
I
mean
property
taxes,
most
commercial
leases
specified
property
taxes
are
either
the
landlord's
problem
or
they're
the
tenants
problem,
but
it's
by
lease,
it's
not
by
the
town.
The
town
can't
come
in
here
and
and
alter
a
lease.
That's
that's
crazy.
M
H
And
I
don't
think
anybody
believes
that
that
should
happen.
I
I
agree
with
that.
Again.
I
think
we
could
discuss
this
all
night.
I
think
we
just
we
need
to
come
to
a
resolution
and
figure
out
how
we
move
forward,
including
how
long
we
keep
something
on
the
tax
rolls
before
we
we
take
it
off
and
if
enabling
legislation
is
the
recommendation,
then
I.
A
I
I
would
suggest
that
I'll
work
with
rose
because
rose
still
needs
direction,
because
she
sees
this
on
a
daily
basis
and
she
doesn't
she,
I
mean
she's,
trying
to
do
her
job.
Her
job
is
to
collect
taxes
and
she
wants
to
collect
as
much
as
she
can.
So
it
helps
our
reports
and
everything
else
and
at
the
end
of
the
year,
we're
looking
pretty
good.
A
But
again
I
I
I
just
ran
into
this
situation.
I
bumped
into
two
clients
two
people
that
were
looking
to
move
here
into
west
florida
in
the
landlord
and-
and
I
totally
agree
with
that
situation-
is
when
totally
I
don't.
I
just
don't
believe
that
a
spanish
restaurant
who
has
nothing
to
do
with
pizza
is
not
going
to
be
using
any
of
that
equipment
should
be
held
accountable.
They
shouldn't
be.
I
agree
with
that,
but.
H
I
A
Black
and
white,
I
think,
mr
whole,
if
you
wanted
to
come
up,
you
can
again
if,
if
there
is
a
in
my
opinion,
if,
if
somebody
sold
the
business
like
friendly,
guys
sold
the
business
to
westcott
house
westcott
moved
in
in
their
closing,
all
that
is
going
to
be
in
writing.
Tangibles
everything's,
going
to
be
paid
up
to
date
at
the
closing
that
should
be
resolved
when
transactions
take
place
when
a
tenant
up
and
leaves.
I
just
don't
think
that
that
should
happen.
That
way,
I
mean
just
my
opinion,
mr
hall.
C
Richard
g
hall,
53
province
street,
my
business
is
that
I
agree
what
you're
saying,
but
I
also
agree
that
if
it
was
another
piece
of
business
that
should
have
been
resolved
and
the
tax
taken
and
figured
into
the
sale
of
the
merchandise,
but
in
the
situation
where
I
have
with
a
guy
just
up
and
left
can't
get
a
hold
of
him,
and
I
even
work
with
her
trying
to
resolve
it.
Trying
to
get
letters.
They
just
don't
correspond.
C
Now,
I'm
left
now
with
a
bunch
of
junk
in
there
that
I
got
to
pay
to
fix
the
roof,
the
water
pipes,
because
they
didn't
pay
electric
and
no
matter
what
I'm
still
out.
Five
thousand
eight
hundred
dollars
plus
eight
thousand
for
the
rent,
and
I
agree
with
what
you
say.
But
what
happens
if
they
want
the
month?
There's
no
lease.
J
Understand
it,
but
I
want
I
want
the
council
to
listen
to
this,
and
this
you
guys
will
find
this.
I
think
intriguing.
This
is
rhode,
island,
general
of
44,
4,
10.,
citizen,
ownership
of
taxable
property
persons,
to
whom
tangible
personal
personally
taxed,
if
any
tangible,
personal
property
described
this
section
located
in
any
town
or
city,
shall
belong
to
any
person.
Partnership,
corporation,
joint
stock
company
or
association
unknown
to
the
assessors.
J
An
agent,
co-signee
or
other
representative
is
personally
liable
for
the
tax
assessed
against
him
or
her
on
the
property
in
his
or
her
possession
or
custody
owned,
as
described
in
this
section,
and
shall
we
lean
on
the
property
of
the
person
unknown
to
the
assessors
for
the
tax
paid
on
the
unknown
person's
property?
Now?
Does
anybody
want
to
try
to
define
and
clarify
that.
J
J
J
C
C
A
C
N
On
sean
wallace
route,
3,
auto
old
route,
3
and
new
route,
3.
well
trying
to
get
a
new
route,
3.
sean
just
give
you
a
home
address
for
little
john
lane,
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
some
type
of
timetable
here.
Basically,
because
I
haven't
been
trying
to
rent
the
building,
obviously
for
a
while
now
and
I
haven't
a
possible
tenant
and
they
went
to
the
town
to
find
out
what
they
had
to
do
to
get
a
license.
They'd
come
to
find
out,
there's
a
tangible
tax
that
hasn't
been
paid.
N
N
So
for
me
to
have
to
ask
the
new
tenant
to
pay
the
1700
tax
is
net.
We
didn't
even
never
even
knew
about
it
until
he
told
me,
but
your
property
taxes
are
current,
of
course,
but
the
tangibles
from
the
previous
right,
which
were
cars,
which
were
cars
and
just
some
other
stuff
that
happened
to
be
in
the
building,
so
the
cars
are
obviously
gone.
I
have
no
way
to
collect
any
of
that
tax
for
you,
because
I
mean
apparently
we're
turning
into
tax
collectors
instead
of
landlords,
which
is
kind
of
my.
I
Only
fear,
my
only
fear
is
setting
a
president,
but
I
think
it's
awful
to
just
leave
empty
businesses
and
have
people
go
well,
I'm
not
going
to
come
here
and
then
we're
not
going
to
get
any
money
out
of
it.
That's
the
way
I
mean
we're
going
to
leave
these
empty
businesses.
If
we
do
this,
but
I'm
also
concerned
about
setting
up
presidents.
A
A
The
restaurant
came
up
here
last
week.
You
said
I
have
no
problem,
paying
my
taxes
yeah
when
he
comes
here
or
what,
if
he
ever
decides
to
leave,
but
he
doesn't
feel-
and
I
totally
agree
with
him-
he
shouldn't
pay
the
previous
guys
taxes
unless
the
business
unless
he
bought
friendly,
guy's
pizza.
N
J
J
N
I'm
just
trying
to
just
trying
to
put
it
in
perspective
a
little
bit
for
a
landlord
right
where
we're
already
in
the
hole
we're
basically
just
gonna
wash
our
hands
of
it,
because
it's
not
worth
going
to
court.
I
understand
you
know
what
I
mean
so
we're
already
in
the
hole
and
we're
trying
to
get
out
of
the
hole
with
the
property,
but.
J
J
N
J
A
Again,
we
can
go
on
all
night,
I
just
so.
We
can
move
on
and
we
can
discuss
this
further.
But
again,
I
think
rose
needs
to
take
this
as
a
case-by-case
basis.
We
can't
stop
new
businesses
for
coming
in
because
our
old
businesses
leave.
So
I
I
think
we
need
to
give
some
sort
of
direction
later
on.
M
Comment:
gina,
speciano,
25,
9th
street.
I
have
to
agree
with
you
david.
The
problem
lies
with:
did
they
file
an
annual
return
and
declare
all
the
equipment
for
the
business
that's
required
by
law
every
year
by
january
31st
and
if
they
left,
they
have
to
file
an
affidavit
saying
for
you
know
where
the
equipment
went
and
did
they
dispose
of
it
and
as
an
assessor,
a
former
assessor.
M
A
M
If
they
leave
behind
the
equipment,
but
it's
not
if
this
new
owner
is
not
going
to
be
putting
in
a
pizza
shop,
the
assessor
needs
to
get
a
affidavit
out
and
find
out.
Have
them
sign
it?
Where
is
the
equipment?
Do
they
own?
Do
they
still
have
it
in
possession
and
that
they
will
pay
the
taxes
until
they
file
that
affidavit
and
anything
from
because
tangible
taxes
go
from
january?
First
to
december
31st
of
the
previous
year,
not
the
current
calendar
year
real
estate.
It
goes
from
the
current
calendar
year.
So
that's
where
and.
I
Obviously,
there's
two
different
situations:
one
we're
talking
about
and
friendly
guy
who
left
pizza
equipment,
I'm
sure
the
guy
wrote
three
auto
sales
didn't
leave
his
cars
behind.
So
I'm
saying
there's
a
difference
there.
If
somebody
takes
their
stuff-
and
you
know
that
it's
there's
obviously
there's
evidence-
that
is
it's
gone,
but
just
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
difference,
but.
M
A
M
And
it
should
be,
the
assessor
should
be
involved
in
that,
because
that's
the
way
I
was
in
east
greenwich,
it
had
to
go
through
the
assessors.
You
had
to
look
at
the
businesses
and
you
had
to
make
sure
you
had
all
the
affidavits
or
you
had
all
the
annual
returns
filed
and
and
and
the
flow
went
very
good,
but
I
mean
you
know,
you're
not
going
to
get
them
all
this.
M
M
Is
this
going
to
be
for
use
of
the
operation
of
the
business
and
you're
going
to
be
responsible
of
it
or
is
the
owner
of
the
building
going
to
be
responsible
for
the
leasehold?
So
those
are
very
important
things
you
have
to
look
for
in
the
leases.
So
thank.
I
D
A
Second,
discussion
again,
this
is
what
came
before
us
last
week.
Again,
I'm
just
going
to
say
real
quick.
I
don't
think
we
should
punish
a
new
business
for
an
old
business.
That's
all
I'm
saying
any
other
comment.
No
any
public
comment
hearing,
none
all
in
favor,
all
right
opposed
eyes.
Have
it
welcome
to
west
warwick
and
good
luck
in
your
business.
Thank
you.
H
J
Nothing
has
changed
as
far
as
the
bankruptcy,
but
I
did
have
a
conversation
with
rose.
Who
did
inform
me
that
the
tangible
taxes
is
she
still
here.
J
Outside
to
talk
to
you
are
getting
paid
so
again
we
had,
I
had
suggested
either
a
30,
60
or
90
day
period
of
time.
So
I
would
just
kick
it
over
30
more
days
to
make
sure
they
make
their
payments
and
all
right.
J
No
just
I
think
that
the
the
business
license
was
conditioned
upon
the
taxes
being
paid
and
they
are.
A
J
H
Paying
attacks-
I
had
a
conversation
with
tony
this
morning
in
regards
to
the
he.
I
guess
he
had
spoken
with
someone
at
university
and
stating
that
they
purchased
that
property,
the
tangible,
now
the
x-rays
and
they
were
supposed
to
be
getting
the
list
together
of
who
uses
what
on
each
on
each
side.
He
did
say.
Sal
was
going
to
be
here
tonight,
so.
J
H
J
If
we
could
put
it
on
for
the
first
meeting
in
april,
just
to
check
okay,
because
and
tony
were
going
to
present
the
report
david.
A
A
D
A
D
A
A
A
J
These
matters
came
before
the
superior
court
with
justice,
richard
leach
presiding
approximately
a
month
ago,
and
he
made
the
request
that
they
be
sent
to
mediation
for
resolution,
and
his
rule
is
that
the
client
themselves
have
to
approve
this.
That's
why
I
put
it
before
the
council
tonight.
I
will
tell
you
that
since
last
week,
both
the
qvm
and
astromed
cases,
four
in
total,
they
have
been
dismissed
outright.
J
Certainly
the
only
three
that
I'm
requesting
approval
and
authority
to
mediate
would
be
new
england
institute
of
technology
versus
westwork,
which
is
kc,
20140712
kc,
2015,
0,
116,
kc,
2016-0244,
casey,
2017-0162
royal
mill,
jg
royal
mill
versus
coutu
kc,
2017-1084
and
moriarty
versus
westward
kc
2014-0267,
and
I
will
be
working
with
sal
to
determine
whether
or
not,
if
there's
any
offers
of
settlement.
We
will
report
back
to
the
council,
but
this
just
allows
for
mediation,
which
is
non-binding,
which
basically,
the
court
is
going
to
basically
pre-try
the
case
and
hopefully
resolve
it
without
trying
it.
E
On
each
one,
it's
I'll
just
take
number
five.
For
example:
moriarty
versus
west
fork,
casey
2014.
2014,
is
that
the
year
2014.
J
What
they
normally
do
once
there's
a
reevaluation,
some
of
the
bigger
commercial
outfits
will
file
it
annually
for
that
three-year
period
of
time
before
the
next
prevail.
Mr
moriarty
is
a
real
estate
matter,
dealing
with
the
size
of
his
property
and
a
condominium
by
he's
got
an
argument
versus
square
footage
and
how
it's
measured,
either
from
the
outside
or
from
the
inside.
So
it's
kind
of
a
simple
case:
it's
not
a
lot
of
money,
but
I
mean
some
of
these
cases
kick
around
for
a
while,
because
plaintiff's
counsel
don't
move
them.
D
J
This
is
a
matter
where
they,
the
attorneys
for
aaron,
settled
a
confidential
settlement
proposal.
Back
on
january
22nd,
I
had
a
discussion
with
sal
and
a
phone
call
with
attorney
cotter
and
on
to
february,
6th
sal
gave
me
a
preliminary
approval.
I
indicated
to
him
that
the
council
would
have
to
approve
it.
This
is
for
tangible
taxes
for
errands
there's
an
issue
about
whether
or
not
they
lease
they
lease
to
own
or
how,
in
fact
they
do.
J
Their
inventory
and
aarons
had
filed
three
separate
cases,
one
against
the
town
of
westwork,
one
against
the
city
of
cranston
and
one
against
the
city
of
providence.
Both
providence
is
settled
and
we're
looking
to
settle,
basically
under
the
same
terms
where
their
taxes
have
been
paid
in
full
for
2015,
2016
and
2017,
but
they're.
Looking
for
a
credit
of
fourteen
thousand
eight
hundred
twenty
eight
thousand
seventy
four
cents
moving
forward
based
upon
the
cost,
benefit
analysis
of
trying
these
cases
even
to
a
a
successful
outcome.
It's
going
to
cost
more
than
that.
J
J
Total
taxes
owed,
I
believe,
were
in
excess
of
75
dollars.
I
don't
know
if
rose
has
that
there
I'm
going
off
the
top
of
my
head.
H
Yeah
this
is
they:
they
went
into
litigation
back
in,
they
stopped
paying
their
taxes
and
it
was
a
2013
bill.
So
they
owe
13
14
and
15
bill.
H
J
J
I
believe
I
believe
sal
could
answer
that
question
better
than
I
can,
but
I
think
it's,
the
method
on
which,
because
of
the
way
aaron's
handles
its
business,
we've
always
said
that
if
the
owner
or
the
lessor
does
not,
unless
he
doesn't
pick
up
the
property,
we
are
taxing
it
on
an
annual
basis.
Much
like
a
car
they're,
arguing
that
it's
a
lease
to
own.
So
as
soon
as
they
put
any
money
down,
even
though
they
haven't
picked
the
product
up,
it
should
be
taxed
as
a
tangible
piece
of
property.
J
H
Back
in
when
it
was
assessed
in
2012,
they
assessed
it
at
31,
500,
1590.
G
J
There
was
a
there
was
an
issue
about
and
was
comical
because
they
tried
to
indicate
that
they
don't
lease
property
in
the
state
of
rhode,
island,
all
of
their
print
media.
I'm
sorry,
print
advertising,
televised
advertising
and
radio
advertising
clearly
indicates
that
they
do
so.
They
informed
us
that
the
word
lease
doesn't
mean
the
same
thing
in
georgia,
where
they're
from
as
it
does
in
rhode
island.
So
we've
had
a
little
bit
of
a
issue
with
it.
Yes,
but.
H
J
H
J
Everything
has
to
be
paid
at
full,
with
interest
and
penalties
prior
to
this
taken
effect
again,
this
has
nothing
to
do
with
any
retroactive
tax.
It's
good
prospective
tax
well,.
G
J
A
I
I
I
talked
to
dave
picose
a
little
bit
after
the
last
meeting.
Just
some
of
the
concern
up
near
the
playground
is
there's
a
few
one-ways
up
there
that
are
really
not
very
well
marked,
they're
kind
of
painted
on
they're
very
light,
so
you
have
some
people
going
different
directions.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
before
the
playground
opens,
we
get
it
clearly
painted
we
get.
It
clearly
marked,
maybe
some
new
signage
up
there.
I
It's
not
even
that
we
have
to
put
a
new
ordinance
just
to
make
sure
that
it's
clear,
because
if
you're
going
to
have
all
those
kids
there,
you
don't
want
to
have
cars
going
there's
going
to
be
more
traffic
in
that
area
once
the
playground
opens.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
before
the
playground
opens
that
we
have
clear
signage
of
which
way
which
direction
you
can
go,
which
way.
I
know
some
people
right.
They
use
the
one
when
you're
coming
out
when
you're
coming
past
the
the
playground
this
way
with
the
playground.
I
A
Light
arrows
so
light.
If
I
remember
correctly
and
correct
me,
if
I'm
wrong,
I
think
the
high
school
students
in
kent
townsend
worked
on
correcting
that
falcon
area
and
so
cameron
can
probably
reach
out
to
ken
and
see
what
we
can
do
to
maybe
repaint
it
or
whatever.
Just.
I
A
D
Science,
post
posted
at
town
ponds
and
water
access
points
stated
to
stay
off.
The
ice
ice
is
not
safe,
sponsored
by
councilman
mccarty.
E
I'm
gonna
have
we
put
this
on
the
agenda
two
two
meetings
ago
and
I
I
put
on
again
just
to
see.
I
spoke
with
ernie
a
couple
weeks
ago
to
see
where
this,
where
this
stands
ernie,
as
far
as
contacting
dm
the
trust.
G
Well
again,
after
the
original
meeting,
the
trust
was
contacted
and
they
responded
that
it
would
be
appropriate
to
put
signage
on
town-owned
waterways,
so
town-dom
ponds
any
type
of
water
like
that.
So
the
trust,
I
guess
numerous
communities
do
the
same.
We've
made
the
same
request,
so
they
indicated
yes,
that
is
appropriate.
Signage
would
be
appropriate.
G
The
liability
issues
would
be,
I
believe
they
cited
a
state
law
as
well,
but
they
thought
it
would
certainly
be
a
good
idea
and
with
appropriate
signage,
would
be
correct.
So
again,
at
that
point,
that
was
the
inquiry
that
was
done
and
to
go
forward.
If
that's
the
council's
wish,
we
would
have
to
review
the.
G
E
Resident
owns
the
pawns,
so
town
doesn't
own
it.
No.
A
No
I'm
not
so
I'm
asking
like
and
so
patuxent
river
authority.
I
mean
we
should
probably
get
them
involved
in
this
because
they're,
basically
in
charge
of
the
patuxent
river,
and
then
you
know,
ward
five
has
a
pond
over
there
on
juniper.
You
know,
that's
not
the
town's
responsibility
so
who's.
You
know
whose
responsibility
are
they
going
to
put
a
sign
up?
Is
the
question
you
know
so
other
things
I
was
thinking
about
after
you.
E
But
that's
up
to
them,
though
I
mean,
I
think,
should
they,
I
would
say
yes,
but
that
again
that's
up
to
them.
You
know
I
I'm
I'm
more
concerned
with
what
we
own.
What
well
that's
why
we
have
to
do
that
inventory
and
it's.
I
think
it's
good
for
us
to
know
too.
E
So
to
me
all
I'm
thinking
is,
I
mean
you
look
out
today
where
it's
it's
yeah
it's
frozen,
but
then
in
a
couple
days
and
it
warms
up
again,
half
of
you
can
walk
on
halfway.
You
maybe
can't
so,
and
I
don't
know
tim
what
your
thoughts
on
are
on
this.
As
far
as
you
know,
I
know
we
have
to
get
the
em
and
the
pra
involved
and
all
that,
but
the
fishing
kit,
we
don't
own
the
river,
that's
right,
but
again
we're
providing
we're
providing
that
invitation
to
go
on
the
river.
J
If
the
access
to
the
river
is
through
property
owned
by
the
town
and
once
dem
signs
off
on
it,
that's
not
the
state.
Those
are
the
properties
you're
thinking
about
nothing,
that's
privately
owned,
nothing,
that's
in
the
backyard
of
a
private
person's
real
estate.
So
right,
I
think
what
david's
idea
is
and
ernie
is
the
inventory
everything
that
the
town
may
have
cross-reference
it
against.
What
dem
has
and
then
you'll
have
an
idea.
Once
you
have
the
inventory
done,
design
the
sign,
let
the
trust
approve
the
sign
and
then
put
them
up
all
right.
E
J
G
A
A
Right
so
I
brought
this
up
only
because
of
our
recent
situation,
and
I
brought
this
up
based
upon
not
the
resignation
of
jerry
lee,
but
if
the
council
decided
to
remove
jerry
lee-
and
that
did
not
happen
here
tonight,
so
the
discussion
that
has
been
brought
up
and
after
the
situation
that
came
before
us,
that
we
should
look
at
all
board
members
that
are
on
board
right
now
and
see
what
their
situation
is.
A
A
Now
I
only
know
of
one
and
it's
very
easy
to
look
up
that
background,
and
I
also
had
the
chief
send
me
over.
I
asked
him
what
the
case
was
at
the
time.
It
was
a
felony,
but
pleading
down
was
misdemeanors.
A
Now
again,
do
we
look
at
that
and
do
we
have
to
look
at
that
and
also
so
the
question
I
have
for
the
council?
Do
you
want
to
have
somebody
review
all
the
boards
and
do
a
background
check
of
everybody
on
the
board?
I.
I
Mean
actually
it
was
my
next
agenda
items
I
mean,
I
think
we
should,
whether
we
can
take
action
or
not
is
it
will
be
up
to
debate,
but
I
think
we
have
the
right
to
at
least
do
a
check.
I
think,
if
it's
fair
for
jerry,
it
should
be
fair
for
everybody
else
in
every
single
one
of
those
boards.
I
think
it
should
be.
You
know,
I
know
that
jerry
got
singled
out
there,
but
I
think
it
should
be
for
everybody
on
every
single
one
of
those
boards.
That's
my
opinion.
A
Again,
I
was
going
to
push
for
this
because
if
the
council
decided
to
remove
jerry,
then
again
I
agree
with
councilman
messier,
if
the
if
the
council
removed
jerry
for
his
background,
whether
it's
15
20
years
ago-
and
it's
only
fear
that
anybody
else
but
a
background
should
be
removed,
jerry
did
resign.
So
it's
up
to
the
council
which,
which
you
feel
now
do
you
feel
that
all
members
on
every
board,
you
have
a
pci
check,
covered
members.
I
I
know
we
haven't,
we
haven't
gone
through
the
list
of
what
we
want
for
the
criteria
for
all
the
boards.
I
think
that
that
criteria
should
be
for
any
current
members
too.
Now
whether
we
can
remove
them
or
not.
Based
on
that,
I
think,
but
I
think
whatever
we
come
up
with
for
the
criteria
for
for
board
members
that
we
appoint
in
the
future.
I
J
H
So
so
I
I
agree
certainly
going
forward.
We
should
do
background
checks,
but
there
are
questions
even
about
that,
whether
it's
a
state,
background
or
national
background
check.
I
actually
looked
to
the
schools
a
little
bit,
because
I
know
that
I
had
to
fill
out
bci
checks
when
I
was
volunteering
or
going
on
being
a
chaperone.
H
When
you
go
to
the
the
general
laws
in
the
state
of
rhode
island
within
title
16,
it
actually
gives
some
clear
guidance
as
to
what
needs
to
be
done
for
an
employee
versus,
and
I
guess
I
would
ask
the
question
our
employee,
our
employees,
subject
to
background
checks.
I
don't
know
the
answer
to
that.
Yes,
yes,.
J
J
O
A
No
cheap
you've
been
in
the
business
long
enough
when
you
get
a
record
and
you
pull
it
off,
and
it
just
looks
like
this
where's
the
council.
No,
that's
not
me,
you
know,
but
again
I
I
believe
in
second
chances,
I
believe
in
individuals
just
because
listen
we've.
If
for
anybody
in
this
room
in
this
town
to
say,
they've,
never
done
one
thing
wrong,
you
might
not
have
got
caught
or
you
know,
we've
all
done
something
that
we've
regretted
in
our
lives
and
to
hold
people
accountable.
A
20,
30
years
later,
it's
ludicrous,
I
used
to
say
even
when
we
had.
You
know
everybody
used
to
pick
on
a
former
councilman
that
happened
35
years
ago.
In
my
opinion,
I
don't
I
used
to
tell
people,
I
don't
care
what
happened
35
years
ago.
I
care
about
what's
happening
today,
because
35
years
ago
I
was
in
diapers.
Well,
no,
I
was
10.
H
A
O
From
the
police
department,
perspective
is,
if
you
want
to
get
a
background
check
that
should
be
stated.
Like
the
solicitor
said
in
the
application,
they
should
be
directed
on
how
to
get
it,
whether
the
town's
going
to
get
it
through
directly
through
the
attorney
general's
office,
or
that
if
the
burden
is
on
the
applicant
to
go,
get
a
copy
of
their
record,
the
police
department
does
not
have
the
authority
or
the
right
to
get
it
and
then
supply
it.
Here.
O
H
The
individual,
if
there
was
a
but
if.
I
O
Checked
something
off
agreeing
to
it:
no,
the
police
department
does
not
have
the
right
to
do
that,
we're
not
the
keeper
of
the
records.
So
if
you
made
a
rule
like
the
school
department,
has
the
authority
under
state
law
that
people
that
need
to
get
a
background
check
for
mentorship
or
school
department
employment?
They
can
either
go
to
the
state
police,
their
local
police
department
or
the
attorney
general's
office.
So
that
gives
us
the
authority
to
access
those
things
right
and
report
back.
J
But
the
bottom
line
is:
if
the
onus
is
on
the
respective
applicant
to
produce
their
record
at
that
point
in
time,
the
council
can
look
at
the
record
to
make
a
determination,
whether
it's
applicable
or
not,
in
addressing
the
application.
So
you
could
address
it
by
saying:
have
you
been
convicted
of
a
crime
in
the
last
10
years
last
20
years?
Something
like
that,
but
it's
all
up
to
you.
J
H
J
It
is
there's
a
couple
of
other
things
that
I
think
you're
overlooking,
and
the
charter
says
you
know
you
have
to
be
a
qualified
election
now,
if
you
happen
to
move
out
of
town
with
an
intention
of
moving
back
once
you
move
out
of
town
you're,
no
longer
a
qualified
elector,
which
means
you
can't
sit
on
that
seat
correct,
but
that
needs
to
be
addressed.
I.
I
O
H
So
that
clearly
needs
to
be
done
as
well,
so
I
do
believe
we
we
are
going
in
the
right
direction.
We
need
checklists,
we
need
job
descriptions,
we
need
an
application,
would
be
nice
if
it
was
electronic,
it
would
be
bring
us
to
the
modern
day.
A
The
roles
and
responsibilities-
that's
something
I've
been
trying
to
get
with
paula
and
the
town
clerk
is
getting
this.
Nobody
has
emails
for
all
these
chairmen
that
are
on
these
boards
like
no
way
to
get
in
touch.
A
I
I
H
So
so
listen!
Yes!
I
I!
This
is
a
discussion
item.
I
would
agree
that
we
maybe
make
it
something
formal
at
the
next
meeting
or.
E
I
have
one
question
on
dci,
though
it's
for
the
chief,
so
if
we,
if
we
go
this
route,
which
I'm
not
saying
we're
going
to-
and
people
come
with
with
part
of
the
process,
is
that
is
the
background
check
and
it's
done
by
the
town
like
we
have
15
appointments
up
and
whether
this
clerk
or
hr
director
gives
you
a
list
of
these
15
people.
That's
the
thing.
J
O
N
O
O
O
N
Can
I
just
make
recommendation,
I
would
just
recommend
that
they
actually
go
through
attorney
general's
office
and
not
use
the
riley
judiciary.
I.
C
Everybody
wants
to
say
hello
to
facebook,
it
was
reduced
misdemeanor,
but
discovery
has
on.
O
J
A
Jay,
you
guys
have
all
been
here
for
two
going
on
three
years:
you've
seen
how
hard
it
is
to
fill
these
boards
and
commissions
they're,
not
getting
paid
a
lot
of
money,
they're
not
getting
paid
someone
not
even
getting
paid
at
all
and
you're
now
going
to
ask
them
to
pay
35
to
come
onto
a
board
and
some
of
them
don't
even
have
they
honestly,
don't
have
it
and
you're
gonna
that
that's
my
only
concern
what
if
it's
tough
enough
to
get
people
to
come
to
these
boards,
you
know
bart,
I'm
gonna
use
you
as
an
example
you're
on
board
of
elections.
A
I
I
H
I
think
it's
a
healthy
discussion.
I
think
we
all
agree
that
we
need
to
improve
it.
We
also
need
to
improve
the
the
communication.
Even
when
we
appoint
someone,
people
don't
know
how
how
to
go
about
being
sworn
in
people
don't
understand
what
the
schedule
meeting
schedules
are.
So
we
need
we
need
to
do
a
better
job.
As
a
group,
I
have
a
question:
when
am
I
getting
the
new
applications,
because
I
have
a
lot
of
people
that
their
terms
are
already
up,
that
their
appointments
were
tabled.
Last
meeting.
H
And
they
do
get
notified
to
come
in
to
get
sworn
in
once
they're
appointed.
The
problem
I
have
is
a
lot
of
these
boards
that
does
like
I'm
control
of
the
zoning
board
tracy's
in
control
of
the
pension
board.
We
know
when
the
meetings
are
being
held.
We
know
what
times
what
you
know
how
many
times
a
month.
Other
boards,
like
juvenile
hearing
board
recreation,
commit
they
come
to
me
and
ask
me:
well
I
haven't
heard
anything.
I
don't
know
when
the
meanings
are.
H
D
E
I
don't
know
if
these
people
are
meeting
in
response
to
that
paul.
I
think
you,
I
think
there
needs
to
be
a
a
mainstream
process
to
this,
and
everyone
should
know
there
should
be
a.
I
would
think,
a
posting
of
not
not
just
on
the
on
the
computer,
but
posting
everywhere,
where
this
is,
when
the
the
pension
board
meets
the
finance
committee
meets
the
planning
board
meets
first.
H
Those
are
up
in
our
hallway
and
you
know
like
our
campus
board
meetings
and
we
post
them
in
three
places.
I
mean
sewer.
Commission
emails
me
their
agendas.
I
posted
it
in
the
hallway.
Plannings
are
posted
in
the
hallway
pension
town
council
can
county
water,
they
come
and
post
their
own,
but
these
other
boards
and
commissions-
I
don't
know
if
they
me.
A
The
clerk's
office,
one
thing
we
need
to
look
at
is
this
application
form,
and
you
know
it
has
date,
new
appointment,
reappointment
board
and
commissioner
committee,
that
you
want
to
go
on
name
street
address
mailing
address
nowhere
on
there's
email,
but
that
all
has
to
be
filled
out
because
but
if.
M
A
I've
come
to
you
and
I
know
I've
gone
to
marion
and
I've
asked
for.
I
need
emails
for
every
chairperson,
so
I
can
sit
down
with
them
and
get
a
job
description
like
like
alharou.
I
can
reach
out
to
him
via
email
and
phone
number
and
say:
hey
al:
can
we
sit
down
and
discuss
or
can
you
and
your
group
or
your
committee
put
a
job
description
and
responsibility
together,
so
we
can
have
that
and
then
we
can
look
at
that
and
say:
okay,
here's
the
job
description
now.
A
Anybody
wants
to
come
in,
I
I
forgot
your
name.
He
wants
to
come
in
and
apply
for
a
board
and
say
what
does
that
board?
Do
I
don't
know
how
many
times
people
have
come
in
and
asked
me?
What
does
that
board
do
attend
the
meeting
and
find
out
is
basically
what
I
tell
them.
A
If,
if
I
could
say
here's
your
responsibilities,
here's
the
the
job
description
you
could
do
that
as
a
clerk.
You
can
handle
job
descriptions
for
any
boarding.
Commission,
that's
what
I'm
saying
I
need.
I
need
all.
H
H
H
E
E
J
My
suggestion
would
be
if
all
five
members
of
the
council
want
to
put
together
recommendations.
You'd
have
one
workshop
where
that
would
be
the
only
thing
on
the
agenda.
You
would
agree
to
say
10
or
15
items
that
you
want.
It
would
be
produced
probably
by
myself
and
ernie
through
the
cleric's
office.
J
Put
it
all
together
and
then
you
guys
would
vote
on
the
final
product
and
then
that
way
it
would
become
an
ordinance
as
long
as
it
doesn't,
you
know,
go
follow
either
the
charter
or
any
statutes
or
any
of
the
charter
itself.
So
if
you
incorporate
everything
by
statute
charter
and
ordinance
into
your
application,
so
everything's
covered.
All
you
guys
really
then
have
to
do,
is
put
together
the
format.
So
you
may
think
you
know.
I
want
a
bci
that
goes
back
15
years.
Maybe
jay
wants
25.
J
Maybe
dave
wants
20
happy
mediums
20.,
so
you
could
debate
that.
But
for
the
most
part
you
want
to
hit
all
the
high
points
on
what
you
guys
are
looking
for
and
again
that's
why?
I
think
it's
easier
to
have
an
application
by
boarding
commission,
because
then
you
know
what
you're
looking
for
ask
them
to
produce
a
resume
if
they
can
so,
instead
of
if
somebody
wants
to
be
on
the
pension
board
and
says
you
know,
I've
been
in
the
environment,
my
entire
life.
Well,
maybe
you
want
to
be
something
besides
the
pension
board.
J
E
J
A
Upcoming
appointments,
we
used
ford,
warwick,
public
library,
westworld,
public
library,
trustees,
board
of
tenant
affairs,
board
assessment
review
board
of
canvases
registration,
ken
county
water
authority
and
recreation
committee.
Public
comment
anything
from
the
council,
anything
from
the
public.
D
D
This
was
just
regarding
the
real
jerry
late
in
the
pension
board,
obviously
shannon
from
the
shelter
I
was
a
volunteer
in
this
town.
It
was
my
second
home
for
nearly
five
years
until
november
2017,
when
the
town
decided
they
were
no
longer
allowed.
Since
then,
I've
followed
the
politics
of
the
town.
I
have
never
claimed
to
be
political
and
honestly,
this
whole
situation
reminded
me
why.
My
point
is
yes,
I
am
an
outsider
who
has
been
paying
attention.
D
What
I
see
is
bothersome
could
just
be
me
and
my
political
ignorance,
but
dang.
It
is
ugly.
I
do
believe
all
involved
have
the
best
interest
of
the
town
at
heart
in
their
own
way,
as
much
as
it
is
denied
the
personal
agendas
vendettas
or
whatever
you
want
to
call
them
is
the
problem
so
to
see
jerry
late.
D
Yes,
my
brother-in-law,
married
to
my
sister
in
my
world,
who
I
would
be
first
in
line
to
tell
if
he
was
a
bad
guy
to
be
painted,
like
a
villain,
is
just
sad
to
get
to
know
him
his
past
and
all
and
to
learn
to
love
him
like
family
has
been
an
honor.
D
It
saddens
me
due
to
the
finger
pointing
and
personal
agendas.
Not
everyone
gets
to
do
the
same.
I
have
listened
to
people
come
up
here
for
over
a
year
now
and
say
for
the
record
so
as
much
as
I
have
feared
actually
standing
up
here
to
defend
my
own
place
in
this
town.
I
feel
it
is
time
I
said
something
for
the
record
so
to
whom
it
made
concern
jerry
applied
for
not
only
one
board
but
two
having
served
on
the
first
for
a
year.
Why?
D
D
There
would
be
an
issue
I
passed
that,
yes,
maybe
he
could
have
expunged
instead,
he
owned
it,
which
I
will
now
own
shame
on
me
for
my
political
ignorance
and
my
faith
in
humanity
for
encouraging
jerry
to
do
just
that
own
it,
because
your
real
past
present
and
future
speaks
for
itself.
It
will
show
your
true
intentions,
and
people
will
see
that
well,
shame
on
me.
Instead,
instead,
a
news
channel
took
what
was
brought
to
them
as
a
hot
topic
and
ran
with
it.
D
What
I
saw
in
that
story
was
a
fallen
officer
in
the
same
month
as
the
25th
anniversary
of
his
death
and
what
the
family
and
loved
ones
felt
seeing
it.
It
is
still
very
fresh
for
my
own
personal
tragedy,
but
I
can
guarantee,
if
I
had
to
relive
it
on
the
news
25
years
later,
it
would
still
be
like
it
was
yesterday
and
just
the
nerve
to
put
it
out
there.
I
just
can't
that
horrified
me
more
than
what
happened
nearly
20
years
ago.
D
J
D
I
never
expected
to
see
something
with
the
truest
of
intentions,
get
turned
into
something
so
ugly
because
of
vendettas
and
people
not
being
able
to
move
forward
and
work
together
in
spite
of
political
agendas
and
personal
feelings
as
much
as
I
would
like
to
say,
you're
lost
west
warwick,
like
I
did
with
my
situation,
knowing
jerry
he
won't.
He
will
still
try,
I
mean
like
he
will
still
serve
his
town.
He
is
a
bigger
person
than
I
am
and
that's
it.