►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
It's
today
is
wednesday
march.
The
ninth
time
is
six
o'clock.
The
time
set
for
our
public
hearing.
Commissioner
davidson
and
I
are
present
mr
kenyon
is
absent.
Madam
clerk,
are
there
changes
to
the
agenda.
C
C
This
is
for
the
high
grove
orchard
subdivision,
applicant
jason
and
shelly
monks.
This
final
plot
for
high
grove
subdivision
meets
the
regulations
found
in
the
ada
county
code
and
idaho
state
code,
as
well
as
satisfying
all
the
conditions
of
approval
from
the
preliminary
flat
approved
on
january
13
2021.
C
C
A
D
A
Okay,
is
there
any
other
anybody
else
wanting
us
to
testify
on?
This
would
feel
like
they
want
to
say
anything.
If
not
I'll
ask
for
a
motion
or
any
witnesses,
there
are
no
witnesses
other
than
staff.
D
All
right,
you
have
to
close
the
public
hearing.
Wasn't
the
public
hearing?
Oh
okay,
all
right!
Well,
mr
chair,
then
I
will
move
to
approve
application.
Number
two:
zero:
two:
zero:
zero
one:
nine,
nine
four
dash
s
dash
final
plat,
high
grove,
orchard
subdivision
and
authorize
the
chair
to
stamp
the
final
plat
on
behalf
of
the
board.
A
I'll
check
take
another
motion.
All
in
favor,
say:
aye
aye
aye
motion
carries,
we
have
some
unfinished
business.
May
I
have
a
motion
to
remove
unfinished
business
from
the
table.
D
Yes,
mr
chair,
I
move
to
remove
the
unfinished
business
from
the
table
for
consideration
I'll.
Second,
the
motion.
A
Motion
carries
I'll
open
the
public
hearing
on
two
zero;
two
one:
zero
three
one:
eight
seven
v
wesley
phipps
and
I'll,
ask
the
staff
for
for
our
report.
E
E
In
order
to
grant
a
variance.
There
are
three
findings
that
need
to
be
made.
The
first
finding
is.
The
branch
should
not
grant
a
writer's
special
privilege
that
is
not
otherwise
allowed
in
the
base
district.
The
second
finding
is
the
variance
releases,
undue
hardship
due
to
characteristics
of
the
site
and
the
third
finding
is.
The
branch
should
not
be
detrimental
to
the
public
health
safety
and
welfare
staff
funds
that
the
variants
would
not
constitute
a
granting
of
a
special
privilege,
as
other
properties
on
west
mclaughlin
street,
have
accessory
structures.
E
A
F
A
D
Mr
chair,
I
think
I'm
ready
to
make
a
motion.
Okay,
I
would
move
to
approve
application.
Number
two:
zero.
Two
one:
zero
three
one:
eight
seven
dash
v
wesley
phipps,
based
on
the
findings
of
fact,
and
the
conclusions
of
law
contained
in
the
staff
report.
A
I
will
second
the
motion.
Any
discussion
hearing,
none
all
in
favor
of
the
motion
say:
aye
aye.
All
right
motion
carries
okay
under
new
business.
We
have
next
for
consideration
application,
202-103-187.
D
Mr
chairman,
considering
we
seem
to
be
having
technical
difficulties,
I
wonder
if
it'd
be
appropriate,
to
move
to
table
this
to
the
end
of
the
agenda,
to
allow
the
individual
who
may
want
to
testify
to
work
out
the
technical
issues.
A
Is
that
a
unadam's
consent
request?
Yes,
okay,
I
don't
object.
We
will
move
the
this
application
to
the
end
of
the
agenda
and
then
we'll
move
on
to
those
that
are
here.
If
you
can
reach
mr
phipps,
that
would
be
fine
all
right,
we'll
now
to
have
under
consideration
application
number
two:
zero.
Two
one:
zero
three
one:
eight
five
v,
a
c
silver
creek
homes.
E
E
The
property
is
located,
827
south,
hidden
creek
lane
in
section
15
township
for
north
range
one
west
and
consists
of
approximately
1.15
acres.
The
assessment
use
application
is
to
construct
a
1
460
square
foot
secondary
dwelling
on
the
second
floor
of
an
accessory
structure
that
is
currently
under
construction
on
the
property.
E
Subsection
8-5-3-48-2
of
a
county
code
states
that
the
liable
footprint
for
secondary
dwelling
shall
be
a
maximum
of
900
square
feet
or
60
percent
of
the
footprint
of
the
primary
dwelling.
Whichever
is
less
the
secondary
dwelling
will
be
for
the
property
owner's
brother
who
will
help
take
care
of
the
of
their
elderly
parents
who
will
live
in
the
primary
dwelling
along
with
the
property
owners.
E
It
should
be
noted,
in
july
of
2021
the
board
granted
a
variance
on
the
accessory
structure
that
will
contain
the
secondary
dwelling.
That
variance
was
for
relief
from
a
development
standard
to
allow
for
the
accessory
structure
to
exceed
the
allowed
maximum
high
of
24
feet
for
an
accessory
structure
by
four
feet
in
order
to
grant
a
variance.
There
are
three
findings
that
need
to
be
made
one.
The
first
finding
is
the
variation
of
grand
ryerson
special
privilege
that
is
not
otherwise
allowed
in
the
base
district.
E
Two,
the
variance
releases,
undue
hardship
due
characteristics
of
the
site
and
three.
The
branch
now
be
detrimental
to
the
public
health
safety
and
welfare
staff,
finds
that
this
application
that
the
variance
constitutes
a
granting
of
a
special
riot
privilege,
because
other
secondary
dwellings
have
complied
with
the
maximum
square
footage
of
900
square
feet.
The
variance
does
not
relieve
an
undue
hardship
due
to
characteristics
of
the
site,
as
the
secondary
dwelling
could
be
designed
to
comply
with
allowed
footage
of
900
square
feet.
E
A
Thank
you
is
the
applicant
here
or
on
on
the
bridge,
wish
to
testify.
H
H
I
I
have
two
people
anonymous
on
landlines.
J
K
H
A
You,
okay,
all
right.
Mr
sorensen
we've
had
a
staff
report
on
your
application.
If
you'd
like
to
present
some
evidence
to
us
or
some
testimony,
we
we
are
allowing
ten
minutes
for
applications
tonight.
Thank
you.
K
Thank
you,
commissioners,
I'll
be
much
briefer
than
that.
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
I
represent
the
homeowners
and
silver
creek
homes.
I've
received
the
staff
report.
K
I
will
note
that
the
staff
report
I
did
receive,
says
it
recommends
approval,
but
then,
if
you
read
through
the
findings
of
fact,
it
says
that
they
recommended
denial.
I
I
think
it's
so
what
my
my
clients
are
trying
to
achieve
here
is
an
apartment
above
the
garage
that
was
previously
approved.
K
We
went
through
the
variance
process.
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
recall
it
was
last
summer
where
we
wanted
to
make
the
the
accessory
garage
four
feet
taller
than
what
was
allowed
by
code
and
they're,
trying
to
add
an
apartment,
above
that
that
garage
with
the
the
goal
of
housing,
a
brother-in-law
to
care
for
elderly
parents.
K
K
I
think
it's
important
to
note
that
the
the
subdivision
hoa
approved
the
garage
structure,
not
one
member
of
the
association,
has
disapproved,
and
you
know
we
obviously
held
another
neighborhood
meeting
for
this
process
and
nobody
showed
up.
K
K
Okay,
basically,
you
know,
I
understand
the
staff
recommended
denial,
but
the
commissioners
have
discretion
to
approve
this.
At
the
meeting
we
had
in
july,
one
of
the
honorable
commissioners
made
a
comment
that
you
know
we
need
to
rewrite
this
antiquated
code.
I
I,
I
would
just
again
implore
the
commissioners
to
decide
with
the
property
rights
of
the
owner
and
and
approve
the
application.
K
I
would.
I
would
stand
for
any
questions.
D
Mr
sorensen,
if
this
is
going
on
top
of
the
original
one,
how
come
that
wasn't
presented
last
summer?
At
the
same
time,
you
were
before
us.
K
K
They
at
that
at
that
time
they
they
wanted
to
get
the
garage
approved
and
then
and
then
wanted
to,
and
then
they
added
on
the
apartment
into
the
design
to
be
above
the
garage
and-
and
I
think
part
of
that
was
they
wanted
to
see
if
the
if
the
garage
structure
would
get
approved
as
well
before,
even
contemplating
that.
So
I
hope
that
helps.
D
E
So,
mr
chairman,
commissioner,
davids
and
in
order
to
grant
variance
the
three
findings
are
one
the
ranch,
schneider
special
privilege-
that's
not
otherwise
allowed
in
the
base
district.
Two,
the
variants
release
an
undue
hardship
due
to
characteristics
of
the
site,
and
three
of
the
variants
should
not
be
detrimental
to
the
public
health,
safety
and
welfare.
D
Mr
sorensen,
could
you
try
to
address
those
three
points.
K
Yeah,
I
don't,
I
don't
think
the
third
one
applies.
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
be
detrimental
to
to
anything.
K
K
K
That
would
be
560
feet
greater
than
than
what's
allowed
by
the
code,
but
I
I
can't
say
that
it
would
be
an
undue
hardship
other
than
to
them
personally
and
what
they
want
to
achieve
as
property
owners,
and-
and
I
guess
I
would
just
reiterate
that
the
the
commissioners
you
know-
have
discretion.
K
K
Again,
I
just
want
to
reiterate
that
you
know:
we've
got
the
support
of
the
neighborhood.
Nobody
showed
up
the
neighborhood
meetings,
the
the
the
neighbors
and
the
association
have
approved
the
structure.
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
that.
Thank
you.
K
Sir,
that
was
to
that
was
to
to
for
the
garage
to
be
four,
I
think,
roughly
four
feet
taller
than
what's
allowed
by
the
code
and,
and
a
lot
of
that
was
based
upon
the
design
that
they
wanted
to
and
to
make
it.
You
know,
look
good
with
the
house,
the
primary
residence,
it's
it's
a
great
looking
house,
but
that
was
the
objective
then
was
to
get
the
the
variance
for
the
structure
of
the
the
accessory
garage
to
be
four
feet
taller
than
what
the
code
allowed
for.
K
Well,
I
don't
know
if
you
call
it
residential
dwelling
technically,
it's
basically
an
apartment.
That'll
go
above
the
garage
space
in
this.
In
the
same
building,
that's
been
that
you
guys
approved.
K
And
mr
danielson
can
speak
to
this,
but-
and
I'm
sure
you
already
know
this,
but
the
the
code
allows
for
900
square
foot
accessory.
K
K
The
well
the
the
house
is
well
under
construction
and
the
yes.
The
garage
is
under
construction,
but
you
know,
obviously
we
can't
move
forward
with
with
the
proposed
apartment
unless
we
get
approval,
but
the
the
the
garages
has
been
framed
and
it's
under
construction.
K
It's
so
the
the
the
purpose.
The
goal
is,
so
the
homeowner's
brother
can
can
live
in
it
to
help
care
for
some
elderly
parents.
K
Well,
the
house
isn't
done
yet,
but
the
the
idea
is
that
the
the
the
elderly
parents
will
live
in
the
house
and
then
the
brother
would
live
in
the
the
the
small
apartment
above
the
garage
we've
we've.
We
have
the
sufficient
parking
for
that.
I
think
that's
evident
in
the
materials
that
have
been
set
forth.
A
K
K
Yes,
it's
detached,
I
think,
there's
some
pictures
in
the
in
the
staff
report
or
in
the
findings
of
fact,
where
you
can
see
you
can
actually
see
it.
I
don't
know
if
you
have
that
in
front
of
you,
but
the
staff
report
on
page
five
there's
four
pictures
and
there's
one
that's
labeled
sal.
A
K
A
Okay,
well,
I
don't
have
any
other
any
other
questions.
You
have
anything
else,
you'd
like
to
add.
K
No
thank
you,
commissioners.
I
appreciate
your
time.
D
Okay,
mr
chair,
yes,
so
mr
sorensen,
I'm
just
a
little
concerned
that
when
one
of
our
conditions
to
grand
variance
is
a
relief
of
undue
hardship,
and
then
you
say
you
have
nothing
to
say
about
undue
hardship
that
makes
it
a
little
difficult
when
you
don't
offer
anything
to
satisfy
that
criteria,
I'm
just
thinking,
maybe
you
could
dig
a
little
deeper
or
maybe
even
the
owners
might
be
better
to
to
testify
and
what
you
know
some
of
the
negative
consequences
might
be.
If
we
didn't
grant
this.
K
You
know
the
undo,
hardship
and,
and
maybe
it
maybe
it's
not
sufficient
enough-
I
don't
know,
but
it
you
know
they're,
trying
to
appropriately
house
this
brothers
trying
to
assist
in
the
care
with
their
elderly
parents,
and
you
know,
as
as
property
owners
in
the
united
states
of
america
that
they're
you
know.
I
don't
think
that
they're
requesting
something,
that's
crazy
and
I
I
I
would
ask
you
to
decide
with
the
property
owner's
rights
and
what
they
want
to
do
again.
I'll.
K
Just
reiterate
that
not
one
person
has
objected
to
to
this.
Nobody
showed
up
that
at
the
neighborhood
meeting
we've
gone
through
this
process,
they're,
just
I
I
would
argue
they're
trying
to
I
I
realize
1400
1460
is-
is
not
tiny,
but
the
code
allows
for
900
square
feet
at
stop
level
approval.
A
I
think
that
we
should
table
this
for
a
future
hearing
and
see
if
we
can
prepare
some
findings
in
fact,
and
conclusions
of
law
that
would
that
would
fit.
It
seems
to
me
that
this
was
a
it's
for
a
family
member
and
I
don't
know
if
you
call
that
an
undue
hardship,
it's
a
6
000
square
foot
home,
but
if
it's
for
a
family
member
take
care
of
a
senior
citizen,
that's
that's
going
to
be
living
on
site.
I
I
would
kind
of
tend
to
to
approve
it.
But
that's
just
me.
D
K
I'm
sorry
I
I
don't
mean
to
interrupt,
but
I
I
believe
I
think
mr
danielson
can
confirm
this,
but
I
if
this
is
approved,
it's
my
understanding
that
they
would
have
to.
They
would
have
to
provide
confirmation
every
12
months,
that
if
anyone
is
living
in
there
it
it
it
complies
with
the
code
which
it
means
it
has
to
be
like
a
family
member.
A
Okay,
all
right!
Well,
I,
unless
there's
any
more
testimony,
is
there
any
more
testimony
I'm
gonna
close
the
public
hearing.
If
there
is
not,
is
there
any
more
testimony
all
right,
I'm
gonna
close
the
public
hearing
on.
A
D
Well,
mr
chair,
I
think
in
general
you
know
I
probably
prefer
hearing
directly
from
the
the
owners
or
the
family,
who,
I
think
could
probably
talk
a
little
bit
better
about
how
they'd
be
having
undue
hardship
if
these
types
of
variances
weren't
granted.
D
But
we
have
heard
testimony
that
you
know
the
purpose
of
this
is
to
be
able
to
care
for
elderly
citizens
within
their
own
home,
and
so
I
can
infer
from
that
that
if
the
individual
wasn't
there
to
care
for
the
parents,
that
may
be
a
bit
of
an
undue
hardship,
and
so
I
I'm
leaning
towards
that.
You
know
based
on
that,
the
fact
that
the
subdivision
did
not
object.
There
seems
to
be
no
objection
from
the
neighborhood.
It's
a
very
large
piece
of
land.
D
The
design
seems
to
be
compatible
with
the
neighborhood,
I'm
leaning,
towards
granting
the
variance.
A
Well
I'll
accept
a
motion,
but
I
would
like
to
include
in
the
motion
that
that
the
owners
of
the
property
certify
is
it
every
12
months.
D
And
so
is
that
currently
in
the
well,
if
we
move
to
granted,
could
we
add
that
in.
E
A
Okay,
if,
if
that's
acceptable
to
to
you,
commissioner
davidson
we
made,
we
need
to
make
a
motion
to
table
it
to
to
come
up
with
revised
findings.
Of
fact,
and-
and
we
want
to
include
in
the
revised
findings
and
conclusions
of
law,
that
the
limited
use
of
this
of
this
secondary
dwelling
is
to
strictly
for
family
members.
D
Mr
chair,
I
would
move
to
table.
H
D
I'd
move
to
table
project
number
202,
103,
185,
v,
dash
ac
application
of
silver
creek
homes,
inc
to
march
22nd,
2022
for
additional
findings
of
fact
and
conclusions
of
law
to
grant
the
variance
with
including
the
condition
that
once
a
year,
it
shall
be.
The
owner
shall
certify
that
no
one
is
living
in
the
accessory
structure
other
than
a
family
member.
A
A
We
have
next
for
consideration
application
number
two:
zero,
two
one:
zero,
two,
nine
three
seven.
I
will
open
the
public
hearing
on
that
application
and
we'll
hear
from
our
staff.
I
I
The
plot
included
a
10-foot
public
utility
drainage
and
irrigation
easement
along
the
lot
line
between
lot
25
and
lot
26
of
block
1
shown
in
red
in
2007
final
approval
was
granted
for
a
property
boundary
adjustment
that
moved
the
lot
line
to
the
west
shown
in
green
when
this
occurred,
the
utility
irrigation
and
drainage
easement
was
not
relocated
or
vacated.
At
that
time,.
I
D
A
L
It's
it
was
it.
I
think
they
speak
for
themselves
that
this
is
an
old
easement
and
I
gained
permission
from
all
the
utilities
to
vacate,
and
so
we're
just
hoping
to
look
to
you
folks
to
see
if
we
can
get
that
completed.
A
Okay,
well,
thank
you
is
there
anyone
else
wish
to
speak
to
this,
not
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
on
application.
202102937.
A
Vac
dale
hope
and
it's
up
to
the
board.
What's
the
pleasure.
A
A
C
So
this
is
a
request
to
vacate
the
platted
building
envelope
on
lot
3
block
1
of
escondida
subdivision.
A
new
and
enlarged
building
envelope
will
be
recorded
to
encompass
the
area
around
the
proposed
1200
square
foot
accessory
structure
properties
located
at
3940
north
falcon
ridge
lane
contains
5.01
acres
in
the
rut.
Districts
so
you'll
see
the
escondida
subdivision
plot
here
lot
3
is
in
yellow,
so
all
lots
within
s.
Candida
subdivision
were
plotted
with
the
building
envelope
easements
to
limit
where
structures
could
be
built
within
the
subdivision.
C
And
so
the
proposed
accessory
structure
meets
all
the
dimensional
standards
in
the
rut
district.
It's.
This
is
also
going
to
be
compatible
with
eagle's
comp
plan,
which
allows
for
accessory
structures
in
the
residential
rural
areas
as
the
vacation
is
requested.
In
order
to
follow
the
construction
for
a
personal
storage
structure,
the
home
located
on
the
site
and
which
would
not
exceed
the
setback
requirements.
C
Application
would
be
compatible
with
the
comp
plan
and
we
will
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
A
Okay,
are
there
any
questions
of
staff.
A
J
A
M
A
Okay,
any
other
just
you
want,
you
want
to
change
the
the
the
envelope
a
little
bit
and
okay.
I
get
it
and.
M
It's
it's
on
that
other
side
of
the
driveway.
Where
you
saw
the
building's
gonna
be
built,
I
could
build
one
about
20
feet
deep.
I
need
one
about
30
feet.
Deep,
that's.
M
A
Is
there
any
anyone
else
wish
to
testify
on
this
matter?
Hearing
none
I'll
close
the
the
public
hearing
on
application;
two:
zero:
two:
two:
zero
dac:
robert
elliott:
okay,
any
discussion
from
the
board.
D
So
mr
chair
is
pretty
straightforward
and
been
approved
by
staff,
so
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
to
approve
application.
Number
two:
zero:
two:
two:
zero:
zero:
zero;
eight
six
dash
vac
for
robert
elliott,
based
on
findings
of
fact,
and
conclusions
and
law
contained
in
the
staff
report
and
the
testimony
heard
this
evening.
A
Okay
I'll
second,
that
motion
any
further
discussion
hearing,
none
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
aye
motion
carries.
A
Okay,
I'm
gonna
open
a
public
hearing
on
application.
Number
two:
zero
one:
six:
zero:
two:
zero:
five:
three
c:
u
p
r
e
t
gabrielle
krueger
before
we
well,
because
we'll
get
a
staff
report.
N
All
right,
thank
you,
chairman
commissioners.
The
item
for
you
is
a
time
extension
for
a
conditional
use
and
private
road
for
a
commercial
writing
arena
with
boarding
and
classes.
This
was
originally
approved
in
2017.
N
This
would
be
the
final
time
extension
allowed
and
would
expire
january
of
2024,
if
approved
by
the
board.
The
subject
property
is
a
5.16
acre
parcel
in
the
rural
rural
preservation.
District
is
accessed
from
the
private
road.
Stagecoach
lane
surrounding
uses
include
single-family
homes
and
vacant
rangeland,
including
the
project,
is
a
barn,
a
covered
arena.
A
hay
shed
runs
with
stalls
for
horses
and
several
shelters.
N
N
The
applicant
must
submit
an
electrical
plan
and
building
permits
to
construct
the
barn
and
other
other
structures
on
site,
because
this
is
the
one
thing
that's
kind
of
a
done
right
now.
This
is
a
picture
of
the
private
road
provided
by
the
ada
county.
Engineer
on
the
left
is
the
before
and
on
the
right
is
the
after
you'll
probably
see
some
other
pictures
from
the
public
here
tonight
or
have
some
discussion
about
this
private
road,
but
these
were
provided
by
our
ada
county
engineer.
N
N
No
agencies
expressed
concern
with
the
project
or
with
the
time
extension
for
this
project
to
approve
the
time
extension.
There
are
two
findings
which
are
fairly
simple
in
manner.
The
application
was
submitted
in
a
timely
manner
and
two.
The
applicant
has
submitted
reasons
that
justify
the
granting
of
the
time
extension
per
the
staff
report
and
findings
the
applica.
N
The
request
was
submitted
in
a
timely
manner
and
reasons
justifying
the
extension
were
also
provided
that
staff
deems
justifiable
sorry,
it's
justified
once
twice
in
one
sentence,
doesn't
work
very
well
but
anyways
that
that's
all
contained
in
the
staff
report
and
findings.
As
you
read
through
that.
N
Finally,
staff
recommends
the
board
approve
the
time
extension
for
this
project,
subject
to
the
conditions
of
approval
attached,
as
exhibit
a
and
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
A
Okay,
could
you
move
your
you
where
you
said
you
had
some
public
comments.
A
And
you
give
the
conditions
for
for
an
approval
of
an
extension
as
timely,
filed
and
and
justification.
Do
any
of
those
have
anything
to
do
with
that.
I
N
Met
those
standards
and
getting
the
application
into
us
on
time
and
their
their
justification,
as
as
you'll
hear
from
the
applicant,
probably
in
a
moment,
with
their
testimony,
covid
related
slowdowns
for
construction
supply,
chain
issues
and
ongoing
interaction
with
their
neighbors
as
they
tried
to
build.
The
project
have
have
resulted
in
the
slowdown
of
this
project
and
and
resulted
in
the
time
extension
as
to
any
of
these
being
directly
related.
N
A
N
N
That
was
all
previously
approved,
as
I
mentioned
in
my
presentation,
our
ada
county
engineer,
which
they
have
the
say
in
terms
of
the
design
and
installation
of
that
road
that
was
all
approved,
last
fall
so
per
staff's
perspective,
as
well
as
the
director
and
our
engineer
that
that
issue
is
closed
at
this
point.
So.
D
So
leon,
are
you
saying
that
whatever
we
decide
today
that
has
no
effect
on
the
code
enforcement
issues?
So
if
there's
ongoing
code
violations
our
decision
on
the
approval
of
extension
of
time,
it
doesn't
affect
that
in
any
way.
Yeah.
N
Chairman
commissioner
davidson,
that
is
correct.
As
I
mentioned,
they
are
working
through
resolving
that
with
our
sheriff's
office
and
they
would
have
to
have
it
resolved
before
final
occupancy
of
the
project
could
be
granted.
So
that's
the
only
connection
point
there,
but
nothing
again
associated
with
the
time
extension
relates
to
that
code
enforcement
issue
specifically.
A
Thank
you,
okay,
thank
you.
Do
you
have
anything
else
for
us?
Okay,
we
have.
Is
mr
gabrielle
here,
krueger
gabrielle,
I
guess
it's
miss
kruger.
A
Okay,
okay,
I
have
set
a
limitation
of
10
minutes.
You
can
you
can
present
anything
you
like
in
10
minutes.
Thank
you
should.
O
Be
fairly
brief,
thank
you.
My
name
is
gabriel
kruger
and
I
am
standing
in
support.
Looking
for
your
support,
my
time
extension
today,
most
of
it
has
already
been
gone
over.
There
was
some
delays
due
to
covet,
of
course,
in
the
crazy
boise
market.
Of
course,
I
would
estimate
that
my
project
has
been
delayed
about
nine
months
due
to
neighbor
interference
and
interaction.
I
think
a
lot
of
the
staff
members
of
ada
county
have
been
well
aware
of
that
as
well.
O
Despite
that,
we've
made
a
lot
of
good
progress.
We've
got
all
the
legal
issues
cleared
up
and
we're.
No,
I'm
sorry,
not
the
sheriff
related
issues,
but
everything
is
ready
to
go,
and
hopefully
we
can
get
this.
This
knocked
out,
hopefully
about
four
months
be
up
and
running
and
complete.
I
lost
the
lease
on
my
facility
last
year.
Nobody
is
more
motivated
than
I
am
to
get
this
wrapped
up
and
going.
My
livelihood
has
been
put
on
hold
my
home
style
life
and
life.
O
In
2019,
we
got
outpriced
from
the
rental
market
in
boise.
I,
our
rent,
went
up
40
over
three
years.
At
this
point,
I
am
truly
have
no
choice
whatsoever
to
be
living
in
a
trailer
on
the
property.
I
am
building
a
house
as
quickly
as
I
can
to
resolve
those
legal
issues
as
well,
so
hopefully
I'm
legal
and
then
a
residence
and
hopefully
that's
all
wrapped
up,
but
that
is
in
regards
to
the
issues
with
the
sheriff's
department.
O
Yeah,
it's
it's
really
just
a
very
small
lesson
burn.
I
am
a
writing
coach
and
I
I
have
a
small
number
of
clients
that
want
to
board
with
me
as
they
take
lessons
and
it's
just
really
an
opportunity
for
me
to
have
a
home
base
for
my
really
very
small
lesson
and
training
business.
It
is
also
my
full-time
residence
and
my
retirement
plan
and
my
my
home
for
the
rest
of
my
life.
So
that's
why
the
house
is
going
in
right
away
as
well.
So
for
me
it's
it's.
The
whole
package.
O
O
A
That
would
be
a
tiny
home
all
right,
yep,
all
right
gabrielle.
Do
you
have
anything
else
you'd
like
to
present.
You
still
have
a
few
minutes
if
you
want,
but.
O
O
A
A
A
Two
do
do
we
have
their
names
good,
could
you
read
their
names
and
then
they
can
give
us
their
names
on
the
record.
A
Okay,
you
have
you,
have
three
minutes.
F
F
I
I
was
just
asked
him
to
be
online.
I
don't
know
whether
there's
a
time
extension.
That's
just
my
opinion.
D
A
A
A
So
if
you
can
keep
your,
if
you
keep
your
testimony
to
that,
go
ahead,.
P
A
P
All
right
great
well,
thank
you,
commissioners,
for
the
opportunity
to
vet
my
concerns
and
reference
to
a
conversation
for
an
appraised,
conditional
use
and
private
road
for
a
commercial
riding
arena.
As
a
neighboring
resident
to
the
property
owned
by
mrs
krueger
or
ms
krueger.
We
request
the
above
extension,
application
be
denied
for
necessary
reasons.
J
P
I
was
going
to
show
you
a
map
of
where
we're
at,
and
I'm
sure
you
already
know,
but
since
you
just
saw
it,
this
is
stagecoach
road.
This
is
my
property.
I
did
want
to
point
out
that
part
of
this
road
is
elevated.
This
is
an
embankment
section
and
on
the
downstream
side,
it's
about
12
feet
on
the
upstream
side,
it's
about
8
feet
and
it
comes
on
the
corner
or
the
intersection
right
after
the
intersection.
L
P
He
was
nice
enough
to
send
us
all
of
the
snacks
and
the
drawings
for
a
cross-section
of
the
road,
and
this
is
his
writing
early
on
in
the
project
somewhere
in
late
july.
A
P
A
P
Get
extended
is
my
understanding,
so
after
he
sent
that
that
was
great,
they
started
construction.
We
went
out
and
met
with
zach
mr
kirk,
and
he
noticed
all
the
discrepancies
as
well.
P
Some
of
them
had
to
do
with
the
slopes
of
the
side
slopes
of
the
road,
the
slopes
on
the
interior,
part
of
the
road,
the
width
of
the
road-
and
this
is
his
letter
to
us
and
the
contractor
and
telling
him
what
he
needed
to
do.
A
lot
of
them
were
the
depth
of
material
placed
on
the
road
it
needed
to
be
six
inches.
P
They
needed
to
compact
it
which
they
had
not,
and
they
placed
a
lot
of
material
in
the
dry
and
still
compacted
it.
When
you
do
that,
you
displace
your
your
binder
with
your
bigger
aggregate,
which
may
leave
a
bunch
of
ruts,
just
not
a
not
a
well
put
together
road,
and
it
doesn't
agree
with
your
your
code.
P
A
Accommodation,
hey
we,
we
have
to
have
one
at
a
time
and
is
it
what's
his
name
we're.
A
Okay,
jesse
jesse,
okay,
jesse,
and
you
have
a
another
neighbor
that
wishes
the
wishes
to
speak
as.
P
Well
last
thing:
the
width
across
the
high
part
of
the
road,
the
embankment
section,
is
22
feet.
Now,
that's
the
part!
If
somebody
falls
over
or
wrecks
there,
that's
gonna
come
back
to
you
guys.
That's.
A
All
right
go
ahead:
yeah,
yeah!
Excuse
me,
you
have
three
minutes
to
make
your
presentation
go
ahead.
B
So
the
denial
you
know
we're
requesting
denial
is
she's
had
adequate
time.
I
mean
this
whole
process
started
in
2016.,
so
many
things
have
changed
over
the
last
years.
The
growth
of
boise
is
just
getting
out
of
hand,
there's
been
conditions
that
have
been
lessened
and
ignored.
We
have
asked
for
continual
help
from
ada
county
we've
even
requested
a
meeting
with
commissioners.
B
No
one
has
acknowledged
us,
we,
it
seems
like,
for
some
reason
this
is
getting
promoted,
but
the
neighbors
are
suffering,
there's
a
condition,
one
that
I
want
to
bring
up,
that.
That
needs
to
be
addressed,
and
that
is
a
turn
lane
down
at
the
highway
21,
it's
a
very
dangerous
intersection
and
it
is
proven
2016
when
there
was
a
traffic
study
that
it
failed
and
whatever
conditions
that
she's
supposed
to
put
in
a
turn
lane.
B
Another
thing
is:
is
that
she
has
deceptive
behavior
she's
lived,
you
know
homesteaded
in
a
camper
even
before
covid.
This
is
an
excuse
that
she's
been
using
she's
partnered
up
with
the
parcel
they've
created
a
business
she's
been
operating
a
business
for
years
and
now
when
she
was
asked
to
move
she's
now
residing
on
her
parcel
in
a
camper
and
for
some
reason
now
that
this
road
has
been
approved,
she
has
a
building
permit
to
build
this.
B
This
tiny
home,
I
don't
even
know
if
she's
going
to
have
power,
water
or
facilities
so
there
there
are
some
concerns
that
that
we
need
to
address,
and
I
don't
know
why
it
would
promote
deceptive
behavior.
I
mean
it's
documented,
so
enough
time
has
passed,
it
needs
to
be
stopped
and
the
extension
denied
she's
had
enough
time.
Her
behavior
has
been
less
than
than
cooperative.
D
Mr
chair,
yes,
so
ma'am,
I
if
I
could
sum
up
your
testimony,
you're
essentially
saying
she's
not
complying
complying
with
the
original
conditions
of
approval.
B
One
of
them
is,
you
know
the
owners
of
all
properties
should
not
be
uncovered
by
this
private
road
easement.
We
were
supposed
to
sign
off
on
it.
Somehow
that
went
away.
B
You
know
it's
just
one
thing
after
another.
We
have
talked
to
your
department
so
many
times
and
have
tried
to
address
like
the
code
issues,
and
one
comment
from
one
of
the
the
individuals
is
we're
in
a
tough
spot.
What
are
we
supposed
to
do?
Well?
Enforce
your
codes
meet
the
conditions,
there's
a
huge
list.
B
A
L
A
Have
you
wanted
us
to
speak?
Please:
okay,
okay,
stay
when
you
get
up
to
the
podium
state,
your
name
for
the
record,
okay
and
and
we
we
have
three
minutes
allocated
for
you.
Thank.
Q
You,
my
name
is
terry
correa
and
thank
you,
commissioner,
davidson
and
commissioner
beck
nice
to
meet
you.
We
are
the
neighbor
that
this
young
lady
wants
to
have
her
commercial
riding
facility.
I
she
applied,
I
guess
in
2017.,
so
this
will
be
her
third
extension.
As
you
know,
a
lot
of
things
have
taken
place
over
the
last
four
years.
Q
We
are
requesting
that
you
take
have
some
serious
consideration
into
everything
that
we've
all
the
whole
community
has
written
letters
and
explain
why
we
don't
think
that
it
should
be
extended.
So
please,
I
hope
you
consider
what
we
have
to
say.
Q
Let
me
start
by
saying
that
the
commissioner's
initial
grant,
four
years
ago
of
this
conditional
use
permit,
was
allowed,
even
after
listening
to
every
single
resident
of
hammer
flats
expressed
their
disagreement
of
building
a
commercial
horse
boarding
and
training
facility
among
their
small
quiet
neighborhood
in
a
rural
preservation
area.
So
here
we
are
four
years
later
with
a
number
of
grievances
that
we
all
have
in
relation
to
the
commissioner's
initial
decision,
and
let
me
also
state
I
had
a
boarding
business
for
20
years.
I
also
trained
a
little
bit.
Q
Q
In
october,
of
2019,
the
property
across
the
private
road
from
our
residents
changed
hands
and
was
purchased
by
mr
james
bailey
sitting
next
to
her
the
following
month,
gabrielle
kruger
and
her
husband
set
up
a
poll
camper
put
a
pit
in
for
the
dogs
and
hooked
up
to
the
electric
available
by
april
2020,
mr
bailey
erected
an
illegal
horse
barn
and
soon
after
miss
krueger
krueger
brought
her
horses.
A
few
boarders
and
a
few
students
weather
was
good.
People
were
out
riding
students,
laughing
lunging
grooming,
their
horses.
Q
Q
Q
Finally
having
to
move
off
in
early
december
of
2021,
she
moved
a
thousand
feet
down
the
road
next
to
our
house.
In
her
little
whole
camper,
she
does
have
places
to
go.
Her
mom
has
a
very
nice
home
on
warm
springs,
so
she
could
live
with
mom.
There
are
rooms
for
rent
on
craigslist.
You
can
go
to
airbnb.
Q
Yes,
you
can
get
a
roommate,
I
did
it,
she
can
do
it
too.
The
following
is
a
list
of
problems
related
to
the
incorrect
insufficient
road
construction
that
planned
in
zoning
gave
her
final
approval,
for
I
am
not
going
to
go
through
that.
That
engineer
is
far
more
experienced
in
explaining
about
the
road,
but
I've
got
my
own
10
specifications
on
on
why
the
road
is
not
up
to
up
to.
Q
Q
During
the
construction
on
stagecoach
lane,
the
property
lines
were
assumed
to
be
the
existing
fence
lines.
However,
fencing
and
ground
was
incorrectly
removed
on
two
sides
of
our
property.
She
just
bulldozed
our
fence
down
and
claimed
it
for
hers,
because
the
survey
said
that
was
her
property.
That
fence
line
was
there
for
40
years
during
two
purchases,
mine
and
the
previous
people
that
lived
there
for
28
years
and
they
never
argued
the
fence
line
or
property
line,
but
according
to
her
it
was
hers,
so
she
was
just
gonna
take
it.
Q
So
we
are
in
a
lawsuit
right
now,
up
from
mediation,
pretty
soon
thousands
of
dollars.
Later
anyway,
she
continues
to
live
in
her
camper.
I
will
just
tell
you
that,
because
of
all
the
the
conditions
and
codes
that
she's
violated,
I
feel
like
who
protects
us,
I
mean:
are
you
guys
going
to
protect
us?
Q
D
So
I'm
not
sure
all
your
testimony
is
sort
of
relevant
to
the
time
extension,
but
so
just
to
address
some
of
the
things
you
brought
up,
it's
from
the
reports
we've
been
hearing,
it
seems
like
the
neighbors
are
not
shy
about
calling
code
enforcement
to
address.
You
know
the
perceived
code
violations
we
get
well.
D
Q
N
A
N
A
Our
engineer
has
a
completed
version
of
the
road.
Okay,
all
right.
N
Yeah
chairman
christopher
davidson,
so
you
know
the
extension
allows
them
to
continue
working
through
those
conditions
in
the
event
they
gain
occupancy
and
then
are
out
of
compliance.
There
is
a
process
that
an
entitlement
can
be
brought
before
this
board
to
have
it
revoked.
I
mean
that
conditional
use
approval
can
be
revoked
by
this
board.
If
someone
operates
outside
of
that
approval,
they
are
still
working
to
comply
with
the
original
conditions
in
the
form
of
constructing
structures
and
different
things
like
that.
J
N
Chairman
christian
davidson,
there
was
one
administrative
time
extension
and
one
board
level
time
extension.
This
is
the
final
time
extension
allowed.
You
only
get
up
to
three
altogether,
two
of
which
have
to
be
board
level,
so
2024
of
january
or
january
of
2024
would
be
when
everything
has
to
be
done,
or
they
have
to
start
the
process
over
again
with
a
new
conditional
use
permit
so
january.
D
2024
yep,
okay,
okay
and
so.
A
Okay,
do
we
have
others
that
wish
to
testify
on
this?
Yes,
sir,
if
you
could
approach
and
state
your
name
for
the
record,
and
you
have
three
minutes.
R
I
am
the
aforementioned
mr
bailey
james
bailey.
I
purchased
this
property
in
2019.
I
think
we
took
possession
in
november
of
2019.
if
I
could
get
you
to
pull
up
the
before
and
after
road
improvements.
I
have
actually
a
statement.
This
has
nothing
to
do
with
your
time.
Extension
you've
made
that
clear.
That's
what
we're
here
for,
however,
I'm
here
to
to
speak
on
the
previous
road,
which
is
on
the
left.
Okay,
that
road
has
been
in
existence
for
years.
R
There's
several
people,
the
correas
and
also
a
mr
jones,
there's
two
people
that
live
at
the
end
of
that
road.
That
road
has
not
been
maintained.
That
road
runs
on
my
property,
there's
an
easement
that
they
have
historically
had
there's
been
no
improvements
on
it.
Ms
kruger
was
required
to
make
a
road
improvement
to
access
her
property.
R
She
also
had
to
get
an
easement
from
fish
and
wildlife,
because
there's
a
section
of
road
that
goes
down
fish
and
fish
and
game
to
her
property
that
also
required
the
road
improvement.
Those
road
improvements
were
made
for
her.
The
call
that
was
made
by
miss
maxine
is
further
down
the
road.
There
is
no,
it's
also
a
cross
fishing
game,
so
she
has
she's,
basically
a
land
locked
in
there
unless
there's
a
road
extension
that
falls
on
me,
because
I
have
this
easement
and
anyone
the
the.
R
I
must
say
that
the
problem
up
there
she
called
it
hammer
flats-
is
that
there's
a
vendetta
against
gabriel
kruger's
father
who
lived
in
the
house
that
the
creators
are
now
in
there's
a
there
was
a
dislike
amongst
the
community.
They
carry
it
forward
and
they're
carrying
it
forward
to
her.
That's
why
they're
so
feverently
trying
to
prevent
her
from
building
a
horse
facility.
R
R
A
D
Mr
chair,
so
thank
you
for
your
testimony.
I.
R
Do
have
one
more
question,
though,
as
as
the
property
owner
they
have
to
maintain
the
road
okay
and
they
have
not
maintained
the
road.
So
it's
my
easement.
They
have
to
maintain
that
easement
is
there?
Is
there
something
that
I
need
to
do
to
make
sure
that
that's
done.
A
Well,
we're
not
here
to
provide
legal
advice;
okay,
we're
only
here
to
do
way
way
on
the
judgment
of
whether
we
should
extend
the
the
that's.
D
A
Okay,
sir,
if
you
could
state
your
name
for
the
record.
S
S
S
However,
if
you
try
to
short
circuit
the
system,
if
you
try
to
build
less
than
code,
it
will
take
time
because
you
will
be
challenged.
You
should
be
challenged.
If
you
don't
decide
to
build
decode
the
code's
important
stuff,
it
protects
the
county,
it
protects
the
neighbors,
it
protects
the
developers,
it
protects
in
cases
of
commercial
operations,
it
protects
the
general
public
which
gets
to
how
the
road
was
developed.
S
The
design
was
developed
through
development
services.
Initially,
the
code
calls
for
the
road
to
be
paved
24
feet
wide
unless,
unless
the
county,
engineer
and
or
the
developer,
submit
a
study
showing
that
the
dust
and
so
forth
from
a
substandard
road
won't
adversely
affect
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
general
public
and
the
neighbors.
J
S
There's
some
dirt
roads
in
the
area.
Why
should
this
one
be
paved
well,
the
other
dirt
road
in
this
area
is
over
a
thousand
feet
away,
whereas
this
road
is
adjoining
my
my
house
so
fast
forward.
So
even
the
lower
standard,
the
county
code
calls
for
a
24
foot
wide
road,
but
the
county
engineer
pretty
effectively
documented
that
it's
only
22
feet
wide.
S
Why
is
all
this
important?
Because
by
violating
the
process
and
documenting
the
lack
of
width
and
other
failures
of
the
road,
ada
county
conceivably
will
be
on
the
hook
for
takings
issues,
conceivably
will
be
on
the
hook
for
damages
injuries
and
so
forth.
If
somebody
crashes
on
that
road,
so
it's
important
that
that
road
be
up
to
code.
S
A
D
S
The
road
basically,
commissioner,
davidson
it's
my
understanding
that,
as
part
of
the
time
extension
process,
if
the
commission
it's
the
commission's
option
as
to
whether
or
not
it
accepts
new
material
and
it's
my
understanding
that
the
commission
can
put
on
additional
conditions,
if
it
so
chooses,
that's
the
prerogative
of
the
commission.
As
I
understand
it,
perhaps
the
county
attorney
will
set
me
straight,
but
I
believe
that
to
be
the
case.
S
Essentially,
the
condition
I'm
suggesting
is
that
the
county
development
services
reboot
the
road
design
process
and
the
road
building
process,
because
again,
it's
clear
from
the
record
that
the
actual
design
that
was
okayed
did
not
comply
with
the
process
in
county
code
and
it's
absolutely
clear
from
reading
the
county
engineers
notes
to
the
applicant
that
the
road
is
built
does
not
meet
even
the
lower
gravel
road
standard.
So
it's
failing
on
at
least
two
counts.
T
D
N
N
County
engineer
has
volunteered
to
as
they're
monitoring
the
development
of
the
site
itself
for
drainage
and
other
things
like
that,
as
the
actual
structures
are
built
they
can,
they
can
take
a
look
at
that
and
see
if
there
are
some
some
things
to
to
resolve
and
work
out
with
with
ms
kruger.
I
don't
know
if
we
necessarily
need
to
add
a
condition.
N
I
think
it
could
just
be
a
direction
by
the
board
to
continue
to
to
look
at
that
until
the
the
occupancy
of
the
of
the
project
is
complete,
which
again
requires
the
construction
of
those
structures
and
other
things
along
those
lines.
So
the
engineer
has
volunteered
to
to
continue
looking
at
that,
and
seeing
if
there
are,
are
things
that
can
be
done,
you
know
it
is
important
to
note
that
ada
county
code
does
allow
the
engineer
to
approve
alternate
designs
in
terms
of
width
where
appropriate.
You
know
other
things
like
that.
N
D
Okay,
mr
chair,
yes,
sir,
if
we
do
grant
the
time
extension
she'll
have
to
be
done
by
january
2024.
now,
wouldn't
that
include
the
roads
going
to
have
to
be
built
to
code
and
to
the
original
conditions
of
approval.
So
if
it's
not
currently
at
that
level,
it
would
have
to
be
by
january
2024
yeah.
N
Chairman,
commissioner,
so
as
I
mentioned
in
my
presentation,
the
fall
of
last
year,
our
ada
county
engineer
did
sign
off
on
the
road
saying
it
was
complete
and
that
part
of
the
project
was
done.
So
we'd
essentially
be
asking
the
engineer
to
to
continue
looking
at
that
and
seeing
if
again,
there
are
deficiencies
to
be
addressed,
but
but
parade
accounting,
engineer,
zach
kirk
november
of
last
year
that
that
part
of
this
project
was
done.
So
it
would
have
to
be
a
probably
a
specific
direction
by
the
board
to
say
continue.
N
Looking
at
that,
until
final
occupancy
is,
is
addressed
but
or
issued
for
the
project.
D
S
If
I
may,
my
reading
of
the
county
code
is
that
the
county,
engineer's
sole
prerogative
in
alternate
designs
of
the
road,
is
limited
to
the
type
of
aggregate
that
is
used
to
cover
the
road.
The
county
engineer
does
not
have
the
authority
to
unilaterally,
on
his
own,
on
his
own
initiative,
establish
a
width
narrower
than
24
feet.
D
G
N
Okay,
chairman
commissioners,
I'll
I
will
add
that
there
was
a
final
inspection
after
that
report,
where
the
county
engineer
said
that
the
road
is
done
so
that
wasn't
included
in
the
late
exhibit
that
you
received.
That
is
part
of
the
the
record
for
the
overall
project,
though,
but
it
wasn't
included
in
those
late
exhibits.
N
So
in
november
of
this
year,
zach
kirk
county
engineer
did
say
the
road
is
complete,
so
her
development
services
perspective
that
aspect
of
the
project
is
is
done,
but
I
do
believe
it's
at
the
discretion
of
the
board
to
say
continue,
monitoring
that
until
final
occupancy
or
something
along
those
lines,
I
mean
that's,
certainly
something
that
you
could.
You
could
ask
for.
Okay,.
S
A
Okay,
we'll
take
your
your
comments
and
advisement.
Thank
you.
O
Yes,
there
was
a
final
report
done
on
the
road
in
november,
and
zach
kirk
found
the
road
to
be,
and
I
quote
within
substantial
compliance
of
the
code.
We
went
above
and
beyond
and
spent
a
great
deal
of
money
to
try
to
work
with
the
neighbors
and
make
sure
that
the
road
was
meeting
all
of
their
concerns.
We
put
on
culverts
that
were
not
required.
We
changed
the
drainage,
drainage
plan
of
the
roads
that
just
basically
to
appease
all
of
their
concerns
of
the
neighbors.
O
The
report
that
jesse
pelotasia
brought
up
was
an
interim
report
and
again
we
were
working
to
get
the
slopes
and
the
width
to
where
it
is.
The
roadway
is
1200
feet
long.
I
would
say
about
two
feet
of
it
or
at
22
feet.
The
rest
are
at
24
feet
sandy
point
lane
going
up
to.
It
is
sometimes
in
areas
as
narrow
as
18
feet.
O
So
I
think
those
are
all
considerations
that
went
into
the
approval
of
the
roadway,
and,
aside
from
that,
if
there
was
any
questions
from
the
commentary
that
you
wanted
to
direct
towards
me
that
you
found
concerning,
I
just
would
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
have.
Regarding
anything
the.
A
Only
question
I
would
have
is:
is
this
application
for,
for
your
time,
extension
is
conditioned
upon
your
getting
the
work
done
and
the
conditions
of
approval-
and
this
is
the
is
the
last
time
extension
you
will
have.
Will
you
will
you
have?
Will
you
be
fully
complied
with
the
conditions
of
approval
by
that
date?.
A
And
you'll
have
all
the
conditions
of
approval
complied
with
correct.
O
I've
only
got
two
more.
I
just
have
the
electrical
plan
to
to
submit
and
the
building
permits
to
get
approved,
and
then
we
can
start
building.
So
I'm
very
building.
O
D
N
Chairman
christian
davidson,
so
just
let
me
repeat
back
what
I
the
scenario
I
think
you're
asking
about.
So
ms
kruger
doesn't
complete
the
conditions.
This
approval
goes
away.
She
makes
new
application
and
then
you
want
to
know
what
happens
at
that
point.
If
we
deny
that,
if
you
don't
allow,
I
mean
it's
always
at
your
discretion
to
approve
an
entitlement
or
not.
You
know,
I
think,
there's
probably
this
is
where
our
legal
advisor
might
come
in
a
little
more
handy
as
to
what
happens
after
something
like
that
occurs.
D
N
Sherman,
the
home
being
built
is
an
allowed
use
up
there,
so
there
you
know
that
home
can
be
constructed
and
she
could
reside
on
site.
She
couldn't
operate
the
commercial
writing
arena.
If,
if
that
were
the
case,
she
could
have
a
barn,
she
could
have
shelters,
but
she
couldn't
operate
a
business
up
there
so
which.
N
A
C-U-P-R-T-E
gabrielle
kruger
any
discussing
from
the
board.
D
Well,
mr
chair,
I
mean
this
was
originally
granted
before
you
and
I
were
here
and
if
I'd
been
on
the
board
four
years
ago,
I
don't
know
if
I
would
have
granted
it
at
that
time.
Based
on
the
you
know,
it
seems
to
be
a
lot
of
concerns
from
the
neighbors,
but
the
fact
is,
it
has
been
granted
and
we
are
sort
of
discovered
by
the
rules
relating
to
the
time
extension.
D
I
definitely
hear
all
the
concerns
of
the
neighbors.
I
mean
this.
D
I
don't
know
if
anyone's
gonna
walk
away
from
friends
after
this
you
know
it
seems
like
this
is
just
an
ongoing
neighborhood
issue
that
that
might
not
be
resolved
anytime
soon,
but
I
am
really
hoping
that
if
we
grant
the
time
extension
that
this
will
all
be
resolved
by
january
2024
for
testimony
that
it
should
be
done
by
january
2024
and
that
all
the
conditions
should
be
satisfied
by
that
point,
let's
I
realize
that's
another
two
years
away,
but
I
just
you
know
again
we're
bound
by
the
rules
regarding
time
extension,
and
I
I
don't
know
if
I
heard
a
lot
of
testimony.
D
That's
just
specifically
on
point
to
challenge
her
right
to
a
time
extension.
I'm.
I
would
love
to
see
the
neighborhood.
You
know
in
harmony
at
some
point.
I
don't
know
if
that'll
ever
happen,
but
I'm
really
hoping
that
you
can
have
this
done
by
january
2024
and
that
would
alleviate
a
lot
of
the
tension
in
the
neighborhood.
D
So
I
am,
I
am
leaning
towards
granting
this.
I'm
very.
I
am.
You
know,
very
concerned
that,
if
I'm
here
in
two
years-
and
it's
has
not
been
completed,
there
are
certainly
no
guarantees
at
that
point.
There's
no
guarantee
this
board
or
another
board
would
grant
another
conditional
use
approval.
So,
mr
chair,
any
comments
from
you.
A
No,
I
think,
we've
we've
had
plenty
of
comments
and
it's
obvious
obvious,
there's
some
tension
in
the
neighborhood,
and
I
don't
I
wish
we
could.
We
could
resolve
that
tension,
but
that's
not
what
what's
in
front
of
this
board
right
now
what's
in
front
of
this
board,
is
rather
not
to
grant
an
extension
of
time.
I
guess
it's
been
granted
twice
before
you
say,
and
this
would
be
the
final
extension
without.
A
Significant
rationale
for
extending
it
again-
and
I
would
I
would
implore
the
neighborhood
to
try
and
work
things
out
if
it's
possible,
if
it's
not
try
to
figure
out
a
way
to
do
it,
and
because
I
do
think
we
should
grant
the
extension,
because
our
code
pretty
much
requires
that
we
grant
it
unless
there's
significant
reason
given
for
against
it,
and
I
didn't
hear
any
reasons
necessarily
again
against
the
extension
of
granting
it.
So
I
accept
the
motion.
D
Well
before
I
do
the
motion
mr
chair,
can
we
well
will
the
the
county
engineer
re-inspect
the
road,
but
when
at
january
2024
just
to
make
sure
that
it
is
remains
in
compliance
or
would
we
have
to
request
that.
N
Chairman
commissioners,
so
county
engineer
has
issued
their
final
inspection
report.
I
I
think
you
could
request
they
inspect
it
again
prior
to
final
occupancy,
but
that's
yeah.
I
think
that's
at
your
discretion
to
direct
the
engineer
that
way-
and
it
has
been
received
final
approval
at
this
point,
but
we
could
have
them
look
at
it
one
more
time
before
again,
the
all
the
other
improvements
are
complete
and
occupancy
is
granted.
D
And
you
know
with
the
two-year
extension,
obviously
you
know
damage
could
occur
to
the
road
in
that
time,
and
so
I
I
don't
think
it's
unreasonable
to
ask
that
the
county
engineer
inspected
one
more
time
prior
to
occupancy.
So
I
would
I
would
make
a
motion
to.
D
I
guess
approve
application
number
two:
zero
two.
D
Two:
zero
one:
six:
oh
two:
zero:
five:
three
c:
u
dash
p
r
dash
t
e
granting
the
time
extension
with
the
additional
condition
that
the
county
engineer,
inspect
and
certify
the
road
prior
to
occupancy,
and
that
is
based
on
the
findings
fact
and
conclusions
of
law
and
based
on
the
testimony
here
tonight.
A
A
Okay,
now
we're
we
had
delayed
the
application
and
new
business
of
wesley
phipps.
Is
he
here
or
online.
A
Well,
we
can
we
moved
this
application
to
the
end
of
the
agenda
and
we're
at
the
end
of
the
agenda.
If,
if
we're
going
to
take
it
up,
we
can't
take
it
up
without
anybody
here
to
testify
on
and
that's
what,
which
is,
what
we'll
do
if
we
don't
have
anybody
here.
R
The
person
who's
dialing
in
I
have
you
unmuted.
Can
you
state
your
name.
A
U
A
E
A
semester
so
mr
chairman
and
commissioner
davidson
project
number
2021-03187a,
is
an
appeal
of
the
director's
decision
to
deny
a
temporary
use
application
for
temporary
living
quarters.
This
application
is
on
the
same
property
as
that.
The
previous
application
we
had
had
earlier
this
evening
for
the
variants
of
the
accessory
structure.
E
The
parties
located
at
7015
west
mclaughlin
street
contains
approximately
1.385
acres
in
the
southwest
community
residential
district.
The
appellant
is
requesting
for
the
board
to
reverse
the
director's
decision
and
approve
a
temporary
use.
Application
for
a
temporary
living
course
is
circled
in
the
red
there
on
the
property.
E
The
temporary
living
quarters
is
needed
to
have
their
son
and
his
family
move
on
to
the
property
or
in
order
for
their
son
to
help
them
as
they
are
getting
older.
A
temporary
living
quarters
may
be
approved
for
maximum
of
two
years
and
the
applicant,
or
order
may
extend
the
duration
of
the
temporary
living
course.
E
The
subject
property
is
located
in
influence
area
b
of
the
boise
air
terminal
airport
influence
areas
overlay
district.
The
purpose
of
this
overlay
district
is
to
provide
for
land
uses
that
are
compatible
with
aircraft
noise
approach
zones
and
airport
operations.
The
influence
areas
establish
use
restrictions
and
noise
attenuation
standards.
E
E
Prior
to
the
adoption
of
ordinance
number
389
on
june
14
2000,
a
temporary
living
quarters
was
allowed
on
the
subject
property
in
1998.
The
property
owners
did
receive
approval
for
a
temporary
living
quarters
on
the
property.
For
that
aforementioned
grandmother
and
in
1998
influence
area
b
did
not
prohibit
temporary
living
quarters
on
the
subject
property.
E
Although
residential
development
is
typically
not
allowed
with
an
influence
area
b,
the
boise
airport
responded
to
the
temporary
use
application
that
they
had
no
objections
to
the
project.
As
proposed,
we
did
receive
a
couple
of
neighbor
comments.
One
neighbor
had
questions
for
staff
regarding
the
temporary
use
application
and
another
neighbor
say
that
they're
in
opposition
to
the
project,
as
they
are
concerned
with
the
number
of
sheds
I've
accumulated
on
the
property
and
they
want
the
property
to
be
a
one
property.
E
Other
agencies
that
responded
to
this
application,
and
also
the
temporary
use
application,
did
not
express
any
concerns
regarding
the
approval
of
the
appeal
or
the
temporary
use.
Application
and
staff
concludes
that
staff's
denial
of
the
temporary
use
application
is
supported
by
the
a
county
code
and
recommends
for
the
board
to
deny
the
appeal
and
affirm
the
director's
decision
and
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
A
E
It
did
so
back
in
1998.
The
applicant
had
received
approval
for
temporary
living
quarters
for
a
grandmother,
so
the
zoning
ordinance
went
through
me.
The
current
zoning
ordinance
that
we
have
today
went
through
a
major
rewrite
in
2000
in
2000
when
they
did
the
rewrite
for
the
boise
airport
influence
overlay
district.
E
D
E
Well,
I
think
I
think
you
know-
and
they
may
could
probably
address
that
better,
because
I'm
not
sure
how
long
the
grandmother
had
lived
on
the
property.
I
know
they
received
approval
in
in
1998.,
I'm
not
exactly
sure
when
the
grandmother
moved
out
of
the
manufactured
home,
and
that
might
be
something
to
ask
the
applicant
so.
E
They
are
actually
moving
a
new
one
on
there,
so
old
manufactured
home.
That
was
on
there
for
the
grandmother
that
was
removed
from
the
property,
okay
and
then
they're
moving
a
new
one.
On
from,
I
think
it's
cascade
or
donnelly
to
this
product.
They
want
to
move
this
to
the
property
itself.
E
D
A
Thank
you,
okay,
linda
or
wesley
phipps.
Are
you
online
and
ready
to
present
your
evidence.
A
U
Wanted
to
address
the
people
who
talked
about
all
the
outbuildings
we
have.
We
have
definitely
taken
a
lot
of
those
out
and
they're
all
under
4
200
square
feet,
but
we've
cleared
a
whole
bunch
of
stuff
out
of
there
and
make
room
for
our
mobile
home.
U
So
we've
taken
care
of
all
that
stuff
with
brent.
You
know,
and
with
he
knows
about
what
we've
got
done,
but
anyway
we,
the
temporary
living
quarters,
is
mainly
for
us.
Our
son
is
living
in
our
house.
He
came
moved
to
boise
to
buy
it
from
us,
but
then
it
went
before
he
got.
There
went
sky
high
and
he
couldn't
afford
it
so
they're
just
renting
it
from
us,
so
we
just
need
a
place.
J
U
U
And
it's
not
going
to
be
it's
going
to
be
off
the
road
it's
going
to
be
behind
the
fence
to
the
rear.
It's
not
going
to
deter
anybody!
It's
not
going
to
be
seen
by
anybody,
except
for
a
little
bit
on
the
road
down
there.
If
you
can
look
up,
but
they
won't
be
detriment
to
the
area
and
we
won't
impede
anything
on
the
neighborhood
and
be
very
quiet.
A
No,
I
don't
have
any
questions.
Do
you
have
any
questions,
mr.
D
Chair,
do
you
do
mrs
phipps?
Do
you
get
a
lot
of
airplane
noises
where
you
live.
U
You
know
most
of
them
go
over
to
victory
road
area
and
once
in
a
while,
they
turn
sharp
and
come
over
us,
but
that's
it.
It's
very
quiet.
There.
D
Okay,
because
I
think
one
of
the
concerns
when
they
put
these
new
restrictions,
is
they
don't
want
people
moving
in
and
then
complaining
about
the
airplane
noises
and
suing
the
airport.
You
know.
Is
that
going
to
be
an.
E
Mr
chairman,
christopher
davidson,
so
it
would
be
for
two
years
so
basically
they
would
get
a
building
permit
to
move
the
manufacturer
home
on
the
property
that
build
a
permit.
Would
basically,
you
know,
be
for
tying
it
down
and
connecting
it
to
the
proper
utilities
and
services
and
then
that
initial
zoning
certification
issue
with
the
build
improvement
would
be
good
for
two
years.
E
And
then,
if
the
manufacturer
home
is
still
made,
you
know
after
the
two
years,
then
they
would
come
into
our
office
and
get
a
zoning
certificate.
And
then
we
could
issue
them.
Four
zoning
certificates
and
each
zoning
certificate
would
allow
them
to
live
an
additional
two
years
in
the
manufactured
home
on
the
property
and
then
at
the
end
of
year,
10
then
they'd
either
need
to
move
the
manufactured
home
off
the
property
or
they'd
have
to
reapply
for
a
new
temporary
use.
Application.
A
U
A
U
A
And
his
family,
and
it's
probably
how
about
it's,
probably
a
rather
burdensome
with
with
your
son
and
your
family
and
you
living
in
the
same
house.
A
Yeah,
I
I
I
get
that
okay,
all
right,
I
don't
have
any
any
more
questions
of
the
of
the
does.
Your
husband,
mr
phipps,
want
to
want
to
testify.
U
I
just
want
to
mention
that
the
central
health
department
has
no
objections.
The
boise
public
works
department
cannot
be
subdivided
or
connect
to
city
which
we
don't
want
to
do,
and
we
have
no
detrimental
effects
on
the
safety
and
welfare
of
anything.
So
you
know
we're
not
gonna
we're
gonna,
be
quiet.
People
we're
gonna,
paint
everything,
everything's
gonna
match
and
we're
gonna
be
really
happy
there.
So
I
think
I
let
him
talk
to
you,
but
if
you
don't
have
any
more
questions,
this
is
this.
D
A
D
I
don't
know
if
we
send
reminder
letters
on
that.
We
probably
don't
so
it's
going
to
be
up
to
you
to
do
the
two-year
responsibilities
so
that
you
stay
in
compliance.
If
this
is
granted,
I.
A
A
It's
not
necessary,
mrs
zips,
if,
if
we
just
wanted
to
we're.
A
J
M
U
Well,
well,
when
we
had
the
the
old,
the
you
know,
the
grandma
there
we
had
sewer
its
own
septic
tank
and
lined
in
for
that
and
power
and
water
had
its
own
connection
there
so
ann,
and
we
sent
the
central
just
health
department
said.
You
know
we
send
it
in
and
paid
our
fee
for
them,
and
they
have
no
objections
to
this
proposal.
A
A
T
A
Give
alex
a
few
minutes
a
minute
a
little
bit
to
if
he
calls
in
right
real
quick,
we'll
we'll
take
take
assessment.
Otherwise,
I'm
going
to
close
the
public
area.
A
Okay,
I'm
inclined
to
close.
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
on
application.
Number
two:
zero:
two
one:
zero
three
one,
eight
seven,
a
wesley
phipps.
Is
there
a
discussion
amongst
the
board.
D
You
know,
I
think,
we've
heard
a
pretty
decent
testimony.
I'm
I
think
I'm
inclined
to
grant
the
temporary
use.
You
know
it's
obviously
tough
times
out
there
for
real
estate
in
boise
and
people
who've
lived
here.
D
Their
whole
lives
are
feeling
the
the
pinch
and
we're
getting
priced
out
of
you
know
the
houses
that
our
grandparents
built,
and
I
think
we
need
to
take
that
into
consideration
when
we
look
at
some
of
these
land
use
issues,
and
this
one
as
presented
does
not
seem
to
be
any
kind
of
substantial
burden
for
the
community.
I
we
heard
testimony
that
one
neighbor
was
concerned
about
some
of
the
additional
sheds.
D
D
D
So
I
I
think,
based
on
the
testimony
we've
heard,
it
would
be
a
an
undue
hardship
to
deny
this.
You
know
elderly
people
need
to
be.
D
You
know,
looked
after,
you
know,
because
it's
expensive
to
go
to
an
assisted
living
home,
and
you
know
I
think,
if
you
want
to
move
your
family
to
look
after
the
parents
and
the
grandparents,
it's
it's
an
admiral
thing.
Admirable
thing.
I
think
it's
within
the
interest
of
the
the
government,
because
that
reduces
the
need
for
somebody
to
go
to
the
er
constantly
if
they're,
not
if
they
don't
have
people
around,
they
can
keep
an
eye
on
them.
D
So
I
would
hand
that,
back
over
to
you,
mr
chair.
A
A
The
way
I
see
it
and-
and
I
agree
with
you
on
on-
we
as
a
community-
ought
to
to
applaud
efforts
of
families
to
take
care
of
their
own,
and
this
is
the
circumstances
in
which
they
can
take
care
of
their
own,
and
I
think
we
should
grant
it
grant
the
the
variance
and
we
will
need.
We
will
need
some
time
to
to
write
a
new
con
findings
fact
and
conclusions
of
law.
How
much
time
do
you
need
for
that?.
H
Mr
chairman,
again
we
could
target
the
march
22nd
open
business
meeting.
I
think
that
would
give
brent
enough
time
to
okay.
D
Chair,
I
would
move
to
table
project
number
202,
103,
187,
v,
wesley
and
linda
phipps
to
march
22nd
for
additional
findings
of
fact
and
conclusions
of
law
to
allow
for
the
temporary
dwelling
unit
with
the
conditions
that
were
previously
discussed
the
two-year
time
period
and
with
the
10-year.
A
D
Let's
see
and
that's
my
motion.