►
From YouTube: March 31, 2021 Caucus - Work Session
Description
the April 5, 2021 Agenda was discussed.
B
Thank
you
welcome
everyone
to
the
march
31st
caucus
of
the
albany
common
council
present
for
the
record
are
council
members
flynn,
anani,
howie,
farrell,
fahey,
conti,
frederick
and
doshay,
along
with
staff,
danielle
gillespie,
our
clerk,
john
rafael,
ricciardo,
our
research
council
and
brett
williams.
The
corp
council
and
along
comes
mr
robinson,
also
include
him.
B
B
B
Is
gonna
be
a
public
hearing?
Oh
yeah,
you
know
I
looked
right
at
it
and
yeah
and
skip
down
it.
I'm
I'm
still
outside
cleaning
up
my
yard.
Sorry,
under
public
hearings.
Prior
to
the
the
meeting
minutes,
we
have
ordinance
46
122
20
that
we'll
be
having
the
public
hearing.
C
C
D
I'm
sorry
I
was
I
was
talking
to
my
mom
and
my
son
they're
on
the
other
side
of
the
computer.
Talking
I'm
so
sorry,
I'm
assuming
they're
on
standby,
I'll
reach
out
to
them
first
thing
in
the
morning
just
to
make
sure
that
once
the
it's
approved
and
then
signed
off
by
the
mayor,
everything
is
available
for
public
consumption
and
then
I'll.
Let
you
know
or
send
an
email
out
to
the
council
body
to
let
them
know
how
quickly
they
can
have
it
go,
live.
B
Thank
you
richard.
So
on
to
local
laws
introduced,
we
have
local
law
f
of
2021
by
mr
ballerin.
B
It's
a
local
law
in
relation
to
eviction
proceedings
that
will
be
a
referral
to
the
law
committee.
B
Okay
and
mr
balor
and
I
you're
driving-
I
don't
know
that
you
want
to
say
anything.
I
mean
we
can
discuss
it
in
committee.
So
it's
an
introduction.
Thank
you.
Okay!
Thank
you.
Next
local
rga
2020
some
relation
to
the
chief
building
official
enacting
in
emergencies
that
will
also
be
going
to
law.
B
Next
local
law,
h
of
2021
by
mr
inani
local
law,
relation
to
the
issuance
of
violation,
notices
of
violations,
penalties
enforcement
stock
works.
That's
mr
nani
that'll
be
a
referral
to
law.
B
It's
all
in
the
building
in
code
enforcement
realm
next
local
law.
I,
if
anyone
has
any
questions
or
comments,
just
throw
your
hand
up
I'll,
eventually
see
you
local
law,
eye
of
2021
by
miss
fahey
and
again
has
to
do
with
the
residential
occupancy
permits
and
rental
dwelling
registry.
That
will
be
a
referral
to
law.
F
B
Okay,
next
is
local
law
j
of
2021
by
mr
o'brien
in
relation
to
the
installation,
repair
service
lines,
replacement,
lead
service
lines.
B
That
was
that
already
talked
about
in,
and
it
was
in
in
the
general
services
committee.
When
mr
coffee
came
so
it'll
just
be
an
intro
and.
G
G
B
B
B
The
in
the
the
committee
meeting
for
general
services,
there
was
another
issue
with
with
the
lead
pipes.
This
was
something
that
came
out
of
that
there
was
a
discussion.
G
C
H
C
C
Was
introduced
in
the
form
of
an
ordinance
this
one,
which
adds
a
new
section
to
that
same
chapter,
is
introduced
as
a
local
law
and
the
original
chapter.
The
underlying
chapter
was
added
by
local
law.
So
I'm
not
sure
why
the
ordinance
that
was
actually
noticed
and
discussed
in
committee
that
comes
later,
why
that
was
done
as
ordinance
versus
when
it
should
have
been
done
as
a
local
law.
I
Let
give
me
one
moment
to
look
at.
I
assume
that
was
directed
to
me.
Give
me
one
moment
to
look
at
chapter
371
and
all.
C
C
C
I
I
think-
and
I
apologize
if
I'm
mistaken
here,
but
e-code
said
that
371-54,
which
is
the
section
at
issue
in
ordinance,
4
31-21,
that
it
was
amended
by
1
18
1990,
which
I
guess
I
took
to
mean
an
ordinance
because
that's
how
we
number
ordinances
right,
although
now
that
I
think
about
it,
118
the
18
wouldn't
be
an
ordinance
so
yeah.
I
suppose
I
I
misinterpreted
that
as
being
having
been
amended
by
ordinance
rather
than
local
law.
I
B
Okay,
so
how
do
we
reconcile.
I
Well,
we
have,
I
guess
in
the
past,
we
have
let
other
legislation
slide
that
doesn't
entirely
conform
with
the
rule.
Legislative
equivalency.
C
I
I
But
otherwise
I
I
guess
we
could,
I
don't
think
we
could
just
amend
it
to
be
a
local
law.
I
think
we'd
have
to
sort
of
reintroduce
it
as
a
local
law
and
then.
A
A
E
C
E
B
Thank
you
for
that.
Richard.
B
Local
laws,
then
we
go
on
to.
B
Where
am
I
local
law,
l
of
2025
miss
love
that
passed
the
committee
with
positive
recommendation?
That's
item
number
two
under
local
lost
hell.
B
B
And
then
local
law
e
of
2021
by
mr
ballerin
also
positive
recommendation.
I
believe
that's
mine.
Excuse
me
yeah
kind
of
ta
here.
Excuse
me,
but
yeah
the
past
public
safety
so
we'll
be
moving.
That
also.
H
H
Well,
it
also
does
not
appear
on
the.
H
H
E
C
But
you
are
going
to
amend
it
during
consideration
of
local
laws,
correct
right.
B
I
William
yeah
regarding
local
law
e,
which
I
think
we
I'm
not
sure
if
we
were
done
with
our
conversation
about
that
or
not
but
lieutenant
flack
at
apd,
reached
out
to
me
earlier
today
and
pointed
out
that.
I
The
local
law
refers
to
section
357-4,
a
and
b
in
a
few
different
locations
that
I
have
to
change
that
to
357.2
a
and
b.
That's
just
a
small
edit.
It
won't
change
any
of
the
substance
of
the
local
law,
but
I
will
need
to
make
that
edit
before
it
gets
acted
on
so
okay.
I
guess
that
I
don't
know
if
we
can
bypass
a
sort
of
ministerial
typographical
change
without
having
to
age
the
law
again.
C
In
any
event,
I
think
the
mayor
was
willing
to
do
an
emergency
message
for
passage
on
the
night
of
introduction.
So
I'm
sure
she'd
be
willing
to
do
an
emergency
message
to
take
care
of
that
for
monday.
B
F
Just
a
point
of
information:
I
don't
know
if
anybody
reads
the
new
york
state
report,
but
buffalo
is
also
had
an
awful
lot
of
problems
and
they're
fortunate
enough
to
have
the
erie
county
sheriff's
department,
which
seems
they're
going
to
be
helping
them
out
with
their
helicopters,
finding
these
atvs
and
bikes.
So
maybe
sometime,
we
could
just
get
a
couple
of
days
with.
K
F
B
B
The
40s
number
12
under
ordinances
held
so
ordinance
46,
1
22
20,
is
the
subject
of
our
public
hearing,
we'll
be
moving
forward
with
that.
Based
on
the
hearing,
it's
46
122
of
20,
as
amended.
L
Don't
we
have
the
10
and
11
before
the
44,
the
scots
gr
scott
street.
B
B
That
ordinance,
46
1
22
20.
next,
mr
o'brien's
december
16,
under
ordinance
hotel
4
31
of
21,
that
was
for
the
lead
pipes,
went
to
committee
pass
with
a
positive
recommendation,
we'll
be
moving
that.
D
E
A
Oh
kelly,
right
before
we
I
didn't
realize
we
already
went
over
the
u.s
deal
renumbering
just
because
for
the
right.
Yes,
yes,
go
ahead,
yeah
for
the
for
the
minutes.
This
is
what
nikon
recommends.
So,
just
as
everybody
saw
in
my
email
last
week,
I
just
want
to
make
just
to
reaffirm
it.
The
u.s
still
remembering
based
on
secret,
it's
a
type
2
action.
So
no
further
environmental
review
has
to
be
done
on.
E
E
B
Right
so
next
resolution
is
introduced.
It's
32
41
21.
B
By
miss
doshay
right,
I
got
that
right,
we'll
be
discussing
that
and
well
we're
having
you
there
judy
right,
we'll
be
discussing
this
in
our
meeting.
B
It's
which.
B
H
J
M
B
H
B
Are
okay
yeah?
We
can,
we
can
just
go
with
it.
C
No
it
it
has
a
whole
bunch
of
talks
about
opportunity
zones
and
but
I
guess
people
don't
like
opportunity
zones.
That's
okay,.
A
N
I'm
okay
with
voting
for
it
on
monday,
but
I'm
actually
curious
what
the
administration
is
doing
leads
to
trying
to
promote
more
affordable
homes
in
the
city.
So
that's
the
only
thing
that
I
wouldn't
mind
taking
it
to
committee,
to
hear
some
of
the
steps
that
being
taken
to
address
some
of
the
endeavors
of
this
resolution.
F
B
Yeah
and
I
and
I
just
thought
yeah
we
could
discuss
it-
it's
affordable
housing.
I
also
wanted
to
you
know,
hear
from
the
administration
that
there's
that
affordable
housing
task
force,
I
think
it's
been
down
for
a
while
to
get
some
input
from
them
and
to
see
where.
C
B
C
Yeah
it
was
introduced,
actually
was
introduced
along.
It
was
incorporated
into
the
first
time
we
did
the
waste
collection
fee
and
that
it
was
in
that's
that
original
local
law
that
authorized
the
waste
collection
fee.
D
H
I
think
that
we
can
probably
do
that.
I'm
not.
That
is
a
joint
meeting
and
usually
I
don't
think
that
we're
anticipating
a
lot
of
public
comment
on
the
on
the
budget
for
the
year.
So,
let's
put
it
on
for
then.
H
H
A
I
have
no
problem
with
that
because
this
I
I
what
I
got
really
involved
with
miss
love
and
it
was
kind
of
came
from
one
of
her
constituents
as
the
the
purpose
of
this
resolution.
So
I'm
very
familiar
with
a
lot
of
the
topics.
That's
in
the
resolution.
H
All
right,
so
aside
from
giving
faye
notice
and
giving
the
mayor's
office
notice,
does
anybody
see
anybody
else
that
we
should
invite
all
right?
Thank.
J
O
M
Kelly-
oh
I'm
just
sorry
getting
back
to
resolution
3241
21r,
whether
it
be
who
was
in
that
committee
meeting
to
have
representative
from
the
albany
county
land
bank
there
as
well.
M
E
B
Okay,
I
mean
that
we
could.
We
can
ask,
try
to
get
them
there,
just
yeah.
Okay,
can
you
can
you
take
care
of
inviting
them
miss
gillespie.
D
H
Yeah
jr:
do
you
see
any
way
that
the
planning
department
would
be
involved
in
this
as
well?
B
B
Are
you
going
to
say
something,
mr
williams?
Oh
no,
okay,
yeah!
You
lit
up
okay.
Next
resolution,
33
41
21
consented
to
elimination
of
two
full-time
positions:
creation
of
two
others
and
the
officer
the
treasurer
that'll
be
miss.
Farrell
with
finance
will
be
going
to
finance.
B
Likewise,
with
resolution
3421
21r
impacting
buildings
and
regulatory
compliance
salaries,
that
will
also
be
ms
farrell,
the
finance
and,
lastly,
resolution
35
41
21
we're
all
co-sponsors
on
that.
The
anti-asian
racism
resolution
you
pass.
J
Kelly,
can
I
just
make
a
statement.
I
just
want
to
thank
god,
councilmember
conte,
for
his
statement
today
as
we're
speaking
about
he
asking
for
county
legislature,
george
landing
to
resign,
and
I
second
his
statement
that
he
put
on
today.
C
The
whole
video
there
was
a
county
legislator
named
george
langdon,
who
made
some
rather
homophobic
remarks
at
some
conference.
C
I'm
not
sure
exactly
when
that
happened,
but
there
was
some
video
of
that
on
social
media
that
I
think
appeared
today:
county
exec,
dan,
mccoy
county
legislative
leader,
andrew
joyce,
both
put
out
statements
condemning
it
and
calling
for,
I
guess
his
resignation.
I
also
put
out
my
own
statement
today
as
well,
and
I
can
forward
that
to
everyone
I'll
send
that
I'll
send
it
to
danielle,
maybe,
and
she
can
forward
it
to
members
and
there's
something
else
to
just
cry.
I
know
there.
L
Richard,
if
you
wouldn't
mind
just
making
our
post
public,
we
could
share
it
off
of
your
page
too.
C
Yeah,
I
know
it's
on
my
the
council,
facebook
page
as
well
as
my
personal
page.
J
B
Next,
on
to
two
resolutions
for
finance,
it's
resolution:
23
31
21r,
that's
number
nine
on
resolutions
held
and
number
10
resolution,
25
31,
21r
they're
slated
for
the
finance
committee
meeting
tomorrow
and
we'll
be
moving
them
pending
their
the
outcome
of
those
meetings.
In
those
discussions.
B
Next
is
number
11
under
resolutions
hell,
it's
myself,
miss
love
and,
mr
robinson
more
so,
mr
robinson,
it
went
to
committee
and
passed
with
a
positive
result.
I
don't
know
know
if
mr
robinson,
if
you
wanted
to,
is
he
still
here?
B
I
don't
see
him
want
to
say
anything
about
it,
but
it
passed
so
we'll
we'll
be
moving
that
also
it's
in
honor
of
warren
mackey
and
renaming
livingston
in
his
honor.
B
B
Yes,
oh
yeah,
no,
it's
livingston
between
between
lark,
antoine.
F
The
only
reason
I
bring
that
up
is
discussions.
I
had
with
bill
trudeau
about
different
things.
He
mentioned
that.
I
think
everybody
knows
that
paul
dillon,
the
sign
fabricator
died
sometimes
last
year.
H
F
E
B
F
B
B
E
Kelly,
I
I
came
in
late,
but
on
ordinances,
number
14,
the
lead
pipes
in
the
water
system.
That's
also
a
pass
to
pass.
B
B
Okay,
so
we're
talking
12.,
it
ties
into
the
the
intro
that
you're
doing.
Mr
williams,
can
you
explain
it
to
him
since
you
got
your
hand
up
anyway,.
I
First
yeah
we're
combining
so
ordinance
4
31
21,
which
is
the
original
led
by
ordinance
that
was
introduced
back
in
march.
That
probably
should
have
been
a
local
law
rather
than
an
ordinance.
So.
K
I
The
plan
that
we
worked
out
was
that
431
21
would
be
withdrawn
at
the
next
meeting
and
then
the
changes
that
were
in
that
ordinance
would
be
incorporated
into
local
law
j
of
2021,
and
then
it
would
all
be
passed
as
one
item
of
legislation
instead
yeah
and
how
long.
I
That's
seven
days
right:
okay,.
I
And
then,
since
I
guess
I
have
the
floor
for
the
moment,
I
just
wanted
to
mention
the
the
position
change
resolutions
with
the
last
batch.
The
council
had
asked
for
a
little
more
uniformity.
I
guess
with
regard
to
how
those
resolutions
are
put
together
and
presented
so
with
30,
33
and
34,
the
newest
ones
that
are
getting
introduced.
I
On
monday,
I
tried
to
kind
of
standardize
the
the
format
a
little
bit,
so
I
welcome
any
input
from
council
members
on
whether
that
seems
like
a
workable
format
or
if
there
are
any
changes
you'd
like
to
see,
I
tried
to
make
it
a
little
clearer
what
positions
are
being
eliminated
and
where
money
was
being
taken
out
of
and
what
positions
were
being
created
and
where
the
money
was
going.
So
again,
I
welcome
any
input
on
that
and
then
one
more
point
I
just
wanted
to.
I
Let
the
council
know
that
I
am
going
to
be
taking
some
time
off
next
week
and
part
of
the
week
after
so
your
old
friend
jared
pellerin
has
graciously
agreed
to
cover
for
me,
so
treat
him
nicely,
please,
as
I'm
sure
you
will-
and
I
will
see
you
in
a
few
weeks.
L
I
think
that's
wonderful
brett
I
just
wanted
to
if
you
are
not
getting
information
that
you
need
for
that
format.
L
I
L
B
H
Yes,
so
I
just
want
to
provide
some
immediate
feedback
that
I
appreciate
what
you're
doing
with
creating
a
standard
format,
and
it
always
puzzled
me
when
I
started
with
the
common
council,
how
we
weren't
putting
actual
amounts
and
changes
into
our
resolutions,
which
I
think
is
really
critical
for
it
to
be
clear
what
we're
authorizing,
and
so
this
is
great
as
far
as
I'm
concerned.
Thank
you
very
much
for
that.
B
All
right
so
we're
at
the
end
of
the
agenda.
I
wanted
to
kind
of
talk
a
little
bit
about
local
go
ahead.
All
the
ordinances
go
ahead.
J.R,
oh.
A
Yeah,
just
real
quick,
I
just
need
a
little
a
little
straw
poll.
I
guess
you
could
say
really
from
the
council
members.
We
did
get
a
re.
We
did
get
the
notice
from
the
planning
department
that
we
are
involved
agency,
we're
an
involved
agency
for
purposes
of
secret
for
the
project
on
washington,
avenue
and
they're,
asking
that
the
planning
board
be
the
lead
agent
or
if
we
oppose
it.
So
I
just
need
for
the
record,
for
the
minutes
is
any.
Is
everybody?
A
Okay,
with
deferring
to
the
planning
board
the
only
involvement
the
council
has
on
it
is
they're
the
developers
looking
for
a
pilot,
but
it's
not
before
us
at
this
present
time.
So
that's
the
only
involvement
the
council
has
on
it.
So
is
everyone?
Okay,
with
deferring
to
the
planning
board
on
it.
O
E
Yeah,
it's
a
student
dorm,
it's
where
the
crest
field
of
hotel
is
it's
in
it's
in
the
12th
ward,
but
I'm
I'm
okay,
with
the
planning
board
being
the
lead
agency,
okay
seeker.
B
Okay,
so
yeah
local
see
we
were
we
kind
of
skimmed
it
earlier
it's
gotta
age,
but
we
had
a
pretty
in-depth
discussion
at
our
pub
the
last
public
safety
meeting,
and
I
just
wanted
to
I
I
again
I
personally,
I
I
I
don't
think
and
local
aussie
takes
the
the
ability
to
use
tear
gas
against
from
away
from
the
police
department.
I
don't
support
that,
but
I
wanted
to
have
a
discussion
to
get
other
members
thoughts.
B
I
it's
clear
where
the
sponsor
is,
but
again
it's.
I
think
it's
a
really
serious
issue.
If
you
guys
think
we
should
discuss
it
or
do
it,
you
know
deal
with
this
someplace
else
we
can,
but
we
had
the
committee,
it
passed
out
of
committee
with
a
positive
recommendation,
but
we
we
need
to
have.
E
Yeah,
I
didn't
participate
in
the
public
safety
committee
meeting,
but
but
my
feelings
are
and
that
you
know
maybe
it
should
be
tweaked
such
that
whatever
tear
gas
is
going
to
be
used.
It
requires
the
specific
consent
of
the
highest
ranking
person,
the
chief,
if
he's
there,
certainly
you
know
not
not
a
I.
E
I
guess
I
wouldn't
bring
it
down
to
the
commander
or
sergeant
level,
because
quite
frankly
I
mean
what
what
is
the
alternative-
and
I
mean
is-
is
the
only
other
alternative
shooting
projectiles
through
the
air
at
people
or
close
close
quartering
with
a
baton
or
with
a
spray
mace
I
mean
it
seems
to
me
that
as
a
riot
control
agent,
that's
what
it
was
designed
for
dispersing
people.
Obviously
it
has
to
be
used
wisely
and
not
frequently,
and
that's
that's
my
feeling
I
mean
it
seems
to
me.
E
O
Thanks
kelly,
I
I
did
listen
in
on
the
meeting
and
I
I
didn't
participate
because
I
I
really
wanted
to
listen.
I
know
so
little
really
about
tear
gas
and
oh
my
gosh.
What
what
an
incredibly
emotionally
charged
issue
it
is,
and
this
particular
meeting
anyone
who
wasn't
there.
I
would
strongly
encourage
you.
I
mean
it
was
a
long
meeting,
but
it's
worth
listening
in
and
I
have
to
honestly
say
during
the
course
of
the
meeting.
I
really
went
back
and
forth
as
to
whether
or
not
I
supported
this
or
not.
O
There
was
definite
flip-flopping
and
I
do
feel
I'm
glad
kelly
that
you
brought
it
up
again
tonight.
I
I
I
couldn't
help
but
feel
that
we
needed
more
discussion
on
the
issue.
You
know
some
of
it
is
because
you
know,
as
mike
says
what
is
the
alternative?
O
O
You
know
the
taking
of
life
and
you
know
what
are
the
alternatives
to
that
and
it's
worth
listening
to
to
hear
this
one
of
the
sergeants
and
I'm
forgetting
her
name
again
kelly.
Can
you
remind.
O
Alex
hanson
and
she
was
directly
affected.
Somebody
threw
a
brick
through
a
car
window
and
she
got
glass
in
her
arm
and
she
felt
like
her
life
was
being
threatened.
You
know
what
is
the
recourse
when
that
type
of
thing
happens
and
kelly,
you
know,
was
reminding
us
that
there
were
molotov
cocktails
being
thrown
at
the
police
as
well.
I
mean
people
and
it's
not
just
the
police,
of
course,
but
people
were
in
danger,
so
you
know
what
our
I
think
we
have
to
ask
that
question.
O
What
are
the
alternatives
now,
since
then,
I've
gone
back
and
done
more
research
on
the
cs,
gas,
and
I
know
it
I
mean
from
what
I'm
finding
out
is
that
it's
very
un,
unregulated
people
don't
know
the
long
term
effects
on
it.
So
this
really
there's
there's
a
lot
of
concerns
on
both
sides
of
this
argument.
O
It's
a
really
tough
one,
and
I
I
appreciate
everyone's
input
at
that
meeting,
but
I
can't
you
know.
I
really
don't
know
where
we
should
stand
on
this
and
I
can't
help
but
think
we
need
more
information.
So
just
that's!
Those
are
my
two.
B
Cents:
okay,
mr
shay.
H
Thank
you.
I
do
wanna
in
addition
to
the
conversations
that
were
had
during
the
public
safety
meeting.
Following
that
meeting,
we
received
the
mayor's
response
to
the
resolution
that
was
passed
passing
the
plan,
the
second
paragraph
of
that
talks
about
the
outreach
that
they
engaged
in
and
she
highlights
this
outreach
resulted
in
recommendations
such
as
the
reinvestment
of
asset
forfeiture,
the
ban
on
tear
gas
community
diversion
initiatives
and
countless
other
recommendations.
H
H
She
doesn't
say
almost
everything
she
says
everything
I
know
that
there
were
two
places
where
this
was
mentioned
in
the
report,
and
people
seem
to
want
to
focus
on
the
fact
that
a
ban,
the
one
part
of
the
report
talks
about
restricting
the
use
of
tear
gas
in
heavily
populated,
dense,
neighborhoods
and
says,
and
look
for
safe
and
effective
alternative
measures
which
will
allow
for
the
efficient
disbursement
of
unauthorized
mass
gatherings.
H
H
And
the
mayor
talks
about
implementing
things
needing
to
rely
on
other
people,
the
the.
E
H
The
cold,
including
the
state
legislature,
some
things
need
to
be
changed
to
state
legislature.
Some
things
need
to
be
changed
by
us
adopted
by
us.
H
So
this
is
one
example
of
that
and
a
clear
majority
of
the
council
voted
to
approve
the
resolution
adopting
this
plan
that
the
mayor
is
telling
us
that
she
intends
to
implement
every
one
of
the
recommendations
so
with
us
up
to
us
to
either
support
her
in
that
or
stand
in
the
way
of
that,
I
will
note
that,
as
a
result
of
a
number
of
people
raising
concerns
about
hostage
situations,
I
have
proposed,
and
it
was
passed
out
of
committee
with
a
motion
by
mr
hoey
to
address
hostage
situations.
H
I
had
a
conversation
with
j.r
about
that
language
and
he
indicated
that
hostage
situation
is
a
hard
one
to
define.
I
went
into
the
penal
law
and
see
that
kidnapping
and
I
forget
the
other
terminology,
and
so
I
deals
with
restraining
individuals
against
their
will,
and
so
I
have
referred
to
that
because
mr
ballerin
also
raised
the
issue
of
it,
not
necessarily
being
an
indoor
situation.
H
H
I
had
a
subsequent
conversation
with
mr
ballard,
in
which
he
indicated
that
he,
his
intent,
was
to
go
beyond
that
and
allow
the
use
of
tear
gas
anytime.
H
There
is
someone
with
a
gun
which
is
a
significant
dilution
of
the
restrictions
in
this
and
also
would
apparently
allow
the
release
of
tear
gas
fairly
routinely
in
highly
densely
populated
areas,
and
I
will
note
that
a
lot
of
the
gun,
violence,
majority
of
gun
violence
happens
where
people
of
color
live
and
that's
one
of
the
concerns
here
is
that
this
the
incidents
last
year
were
done
in
an
area
had
the
release
has
not
happened
in
32
years
in
general,
with
regard
to
demonstrations,
but
but
had
to
do
with,
ironically
people
of
color
expressing
concerns
about
the
treatment
of
the
police
towards
them
and
that
that
is
when
there
was
and
and
frankly
I
think
people
are
gratefully
upset
about
that
situation
and
then,
ironically,
that's
when
tear
gas
was
used
in
mass.
H
I
am
concerned
about
the
escalation
of
violence.
My
perception,
the
escalation
of
violence
by
the
police
against
people
of
color,
and
that's
not
just
across
the
country
that
includes
here
in
albany,
and
I
have
had
an
enlightening
of
what
people
mean
when
they
talk
about
the
militarization
of
the
police.
H
I
think
that
we
need
to
set
up
a
different
dynamic
and
set
the
police
force
to
work
on
coming
up
with
those
alternatives
that
the
collaborative
report
talked
about
and
which
seemed
to
have
been
being
used
in
other
demonstrations
in
general.
H
So
I
just,
I
think
people
should
take
a
close
look
at
what
the
mayor
has
said
in
response
to
the
to
the
resolution,
and
I
think
that
people
who
voted
in
support
of
the
plan
need
to
follow
through
on
supporting
the
plan.
Thank
you.
B
G
Thank
you.
I
I
re
watched
the
whole
public
safety
hearing.
It
was
four
hours
I
mean,
and
it
was
tremendous
kelly
and
you
know
I
appreciate
you
keeping
the
process
moving.
I
did
send
everybody
an
email
with
the
an
article.
It
was
an
op-ed
from
a
national
guard.
I
think
he
was
a
colonel.
You
know
talking
about
the
militarization
of
crowd
control
and
this
is
a
serious
problem.
You
know
we're
a
democracy.
G
People
are
allowed
under
the
you
know
the
first
amendment
to
go
down
and
complain.
If,
if
they're
not
happy
with
the
way
things
are,
as
judy
said,
it
was
32
years.
I
think
the
police
reported
they've
used,
tear
gas
twice
and
contrary
to
councilman
o'brien.
G
G
You
know
the
officers
came,
they
pulled
the
chief
into
the
building
and
I'm
left
out
in
the
yard,
and
if
you
go
to
there's
an
actual
video
and
I
did
save
it-
fulton
county
news,
where
the
guy
recorded
everything
you
can
see
me
climbing,
trying
to
get
out
of
there
and
thank
god
for
kelly
and
thank
god
for
corey.
G
G
G
G
G
We
got
a
problem
in
albany
where
we
don't
have
enough
policemen
right
now.
I've
been
saying
this
since
I
started
the
numbers
are
terrible.
You
know
we
keep
getting
the
academies
and
you
know
graduating,
but
people
are
leaving,
they
haven't
had
a
contract
in
years.
Well,
it's
a
union
problem.
Well,
no,
you
can
do
a
you
can
give
people
a
raise
right
across
the
board.
I
brought
this
up
the
meeting,
but
we'll
make
sure
everything
in
the
council
here's
this
there's
no
law.
That
says
you
can't
give
your
your
employees
a
raise.
G
We
do
it
all
the
time
in
these
resolutions
moving
money
around
and
doing
stuff
like
that,
you
don't
have
to
worry
about
that.
I
don't
see
any
union
saying,
don't
give
our
employees
more
money.
So
we
have
a
police
force.
That's
on
duty,
because
I
missed
I
wasn't
at
the
first
and
it
was
a
riot.
I
wasn't
at
the
first
ride.
It
was
at
the
second.
It
was
right
after
our
meeting
I
went
down
there.
These
guys
were
tired.
These
officers
were
standing
there
all
day
in
this
heavy
deer.
It
was
a
june
day.
G
It
was
warm.
I
remember
how
warm
it
was.
You
know,
standing
there,
people
yelling
at
him
dressed
up
in
military
garb.
I
mean
the
tensions
were
there,
it
was
a.
It
was
a
powdered
keg
ready
to
go
and
it
did
go
I
mean
so.
I
hear
people
say
well.
You
know
that
what
else
can
we
use?
What
did
they
use
a
hundred
years
ago?
What
did
they
use?
150
years
ago?
G
There
was
terrible
riots
in
albany
and
across
the
country
strikes
and
other
things.
What
were
used
for
crowd
control?
What
was
used
for
the
occupied
albany
crowd,
controlled
down
at
city
hall
at
city
hall,
did
they
use
tear
gas?
No,
they
went
in.
They
went
in
with
horses
and
stuff
like
that.
There
are
alternatives,
and
you
know
there's
an
old
saying.
Necessity
is
the
mother
of
invention.
G
G
G
I
think
I
got
a
picture
of
the
guy
sitting.
The
mattress
on
fire
underneath
the
police
car
was
that
person
ever
arrested.
I
don't
know
okay,
but
we're
the
people
who
make
the
the
policy
and
the
laws
in
this
city,
and
I
think
this
is
a
good
war.
This
is
a
good
start
that
not
to
use
weapons
and
that's
what
it
is.
It's
a
weapon
I
brought
up
at
the
meeting
I
got.
I
was
never
right
after
that
being
gassed.
G
I
had
all
sorts
of
intestinal
problems
I
had
to
have
part
of
my
intestine
taken
out
now.
Can
I
prove
that
was
that
tear
gas
night?
No,
but
I've
read
about
it,
I
I
googled
it
and
I've
done
some
research
and
you
know
we
don't
know
the
full
effects
of
these
these
chemicals,
and
you
know
I
think
we
really
need
to
push
this
forward
and-
and
I
hope
my
fellow
council
members
will
side
with
this
law.
Thank
you.
B
Good.
Thank
you,
mr
hoey.
I
apologize.
I
looked
away
for
a
second,
I
don't
know
who's
first
out
of
mr
o'brien
johnson
and
ballerin
we'll
since
you
already
spoke,
mr
o'brien
I'll,
come
back
to
you,
mr
johnson,.
K
I
don't
even
know
where
to
begin.
I
just
say
I
hear
a
lot
of
reactive
talk.
You
know,
where
is
the
proactive
approach?
K
You
know,
de-escalation,
I
think
that
until
we
really
start
having
our
police
force
have
culturally
responsive
education,
where
you
have
or
where
you're
forced
to
have
everybody
in
a
room
and
really
work
through
their
differences
and-
and
you
know,
attempt
to
have
an
understanding,
because
you
can't
you
know
like
when
I
think
about
tear
gas,
I'm
thinking
about
it
being
used
on
our
high
school
students
going
to
and
from
school.
The
pictures
that
I
see
of
people
who
have
you
know
authority
over
our
kids.
K
You
know
that's
a
that's
how
the
tool,
that's
the
vision
of
the
tool
that
I
see
when
I
think
about
the
first
night
of
the
protest.
You
know
the
tool
that
was
utilized,
it
wasn't
an
announcement
and
it
wasn't
any
warning
it
just
was
utilized,
and
you
know
when
I
think
about
the
council
president
asking
a
question
about
what
is
the
the
regulation?
What
is
the
routines
and
not
being
able
to
give
be
given
a
a
a
clear
answer?
K
That's
problematic
and
then
here
people
use,
you
know
military
situations
as
a
reason
why
they
still
should
have
it
as
a
tool
like
we
have
to
stop
creating
scenarios.
You
know,
like
our
you
know,
we
we're
going
to
create
a
scenario
why
it
still
should
be
used.
K
K
The
message
is
clear:
that
people
spoke.
I
don't
understand
why
we're
still
having
a
conversation
about
it.
You
know
you
know
I
I
I
didn't
want
to
say
this
to
the
chief,
but
that's
you
know
like
that's
where
I'm
expecting
that
45
000
increase
that
he
got
like
you
know.
I
feel
like
that's
where
you
can
show
your
worth
to
the
city
when
that
question
is
acts
as
the
head
of
the
apd,
you
had
a
chance
to
be
able
to
show.
K
You
know
when
you're
at
the
top
you're
expected
to
be
able
to
respond
to
the
needs
at
the
moment
and
right
now
it
sounds
like,
although
we've
had
these
situations
that
clearly
left
a
bad
imprint
on
the
people,
although
we're
at
a
time
when
people
are
calling
for
change,
we're
gonna,
say:
okay,
we're
gonna
change
it,
but
we
still
need
to
have
access
for
this
situation,
and
I
just
think
that
I'm
strongly
against
it.
K
The
people
that
people
spoke-
and
you
know
from
firsthand
experience
and
personal-
you
know
up
close-
it's
not
a
a
good
situation
to
be
in
so
I
will
be
supporting
the
the
non-use
of
terror
guys.
Thank
you.
B
P
Ballerina,
can
you
guys
hear
me?
Yes,
okay,
so
I
want
to
piggyback
on
what
was
already
said.
It
was
a
very
emotional
meeting
and
part
of
it
was.
I
think,
because
of
the
presentation
that
apd
did.
Ap
did
did
a
presentation
about
the
type
of
get
the
fuse,
the
side
effects
and
so
so
forth
and
the
the
issue
I
had
with
the
presentation
biggest
issue
I
had
with
the
presentation,
was
that
it
had
very
little
lessons
learned.
P
It
had
very
little
what
we're
going
to
do,
different
and
and
what
we
can
do
better,
and
I
in
many
ways
I
don't
blame
the
detective
that
made
the
presentation,
I'm
not
sure
if
he
was
given
the
heads
up,
that
four
of
the
five
committee
members
had
felt
that
gas
had
felt
that
burning
in
their
skin
and
in
their
eyes
and
after
they
showered,
they
knew
the
side
effects
and
they
knew
the
anxiety
and
the
fears
that
it
brought.
P
You
know
those
those
those
fears
and
anxieties
and
and
burning
sensations
that
they
were
speaking
about,
and
I
will
be
the
first
to
admit
it
figured
it
was
a
trigger,
and
maybe
I
myself
didn't
explain
what
I
was
looking
for
as
clearly
as
I
would
I
wish
I
could
have,
and
I
got
caught
up
between
trying
between
saying
gun,
men
and
gun
person.
Let's
be
honest,
most
of
these
individuals
are
picking
up
gun
males.
P
I
do
appreciate
the
language
that
has
been
added
and
I
I
do
appreciate
the
fact
that
there
was
information
that
there
was
added
language
about
a
hosta
situation,
because
my
concerns
that
I
I
I'm
hoping
we
can
address
by
the
time
this
gets
to
the
floor
is,
is
not
that
it
shouldn't
be
not
that
it
shouldn't
be
banned.
When
we're
dealing
with
protests,
I
agree
it
should
be
damn
banned.
When
we're
dealing
with
protests,
it
should
be
used
as
a
tool
to
deal
with
disorder
conduct
it
shouldn't
be
used
in
that
manner.
P
My
my
concerns
are
that
I
feel
that
it
can
still
be
a
good
tool
to
be
dealt
with
in
a
hasty
situation,
which
I
again
I
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
the
sponsor
has
added
that
language
are
in
and
also
when
you
have
a
gunman
situation.
I
think
that
is
you
know.
P
I
understand
it's
not
that
doesn't
make
it
a
complete
total
ban,
but
it
gives
it
a
very
narrow
scope
of
how
it
could
be
used
that
I
do
believe
is
going
to
help
save
lives,
and
I
I
think
that
we
have
had
an
increase
in
gun
violence
in
our
city
and
not
just
have
we
had
an
increase
in
gun
violence.
We've
had
an
increase
in
the
in
the
style
of
the
violence.
We
have
seen
assassination
style.
P
The
last
thing
we
want,
if
it
can
be
prevented,
is
a
shootout
on
our
streets.
I
agree
with
with
councilwoman
dolce.
There
should
be
a
warning
and
there
should
be
an
announcement
made
so
that
residents
can
have
an
opportunity
to
close
their
windows
or
get
out
of
the
get
out
of
there.
I
can
tell
you
in
my
neighborhood
in
my
ward.
We
had
this
situation
a
few
months
ago,
so
it's
not
as
if
it's
this
far
far
away
thing
that
doesn't
happen.
Well,
we
thought
that
was
a
hassle.
P
The
police
came
in
with
this
tool
and
it
was
a
it
allowed
for
to
save
lives.
It
really
did,
and
I
I
I
I
think,
it's
again
it
it's
not
a
total
ban,
but
it's
a
very
now
use.
P
I
also
believe
addresses
the
issues
and
concerns
that
are
being
brought
up
by
those
who
who
who
want
a
complete
ban.
I
think
it
also
brings
up
and
addresses
those
concerns,
and
I
do
think
it
protects
those
individuals
that
that
council
members
want
to
protect,
but
it
also
makes
it
so
that
it's
a
tool
that
can
be
used
when
we
have
a
severely
dangerous
situations,
specifically
when
we're
talking
about
hasta
situations
and
individuals
with
guns
in
our
neighborhoods.
P
So
I
and
I'm
very
open
and
blunt
about
my
position,
and
I
am
because
I'm
I'm
I
want
us
to
be
thinking
of
how
this
affects
the
interaction
on
the
ground
level
and
and
how
different
situations
that
occur
and
how
we
can
prevent
this
from
happening
in
the
situations
like
that
monday,
you
know,
but
how
we
can
use
it
in
situations
like
what
occurred
you
know
in
in
in
in
my
war.
B
Right
go
ahead,
mr
o'brien.
E
Certainly,
if
the
chief's
going
to
be
there,
it
should
require
nothing
less
than
his
authorization,
which
obviously
didn't
happen,
because
they
had
to
fall
him
away
into
the
police
station
after
the
tear
grass
was
set
off.
So
I
guess
the
question
is
obviously
I
think
you
need
better
regulation
of
who
can
authorize
no
matter
what
circumstances
when
and
where,
because
it
seems
to
me
from
what
tom
said.
The
chief
didn't
even
know
that
that
it
was
going
to
go
on.
E
So
that's
that's
a
pretty
big
red
flag
on
how
it
was
used
at
that
particular
time.
The
other
point
is
tom.
Thomas
said
it's
banned
by
the
geneva
conventions.
I
don't
know
I.
I
was
a
jag
in
the
national
guard
and
I
went
to
jag
school
and
what
is
banned
in
the
geneva
conventions.
Are
all
the
nerve,
reagents
blood
agents
and
intended
to
be
lethal
weaponry,
that's
done
by
by
by
by
gases.
K
E
Had
as
a
national
guard
jag,
but
I
agree
with
what
alfredo
said,
and
he
was
there-
I
mean
I,
it
shouldn't
be
used
routinely
and
when
it
is
used,
I
think
it's
got
to
be
approved
at
the
highest
level
of
command,
which
had
obviously
lessened.
E
B
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
o'brien.
I
I
just
I
just
want
to
add-
and
I
had
a
conversation
with
mr
shea
earlier
about
trying
to
create
another
exception
by
way
of
having
the
the
chief
for
deputy
on-site,
making
the
call,
also
language
in
line
with
our
our
riot
first
in
the
penal
law.
New
york
state
is
an
e-felony
and
it's
it's
a
person,
that's
guilty
of
right,
and
this
is
in
response
to
this
riot
situation.
B
A
person
is
guilty
of
riot
when
10
or
more
persons
engages
in
tumultuous
violent
conduct,
thereby
intentionally
wreck
or
recklessly,
creates
a
grave
risk
of
public
harm
and
in
the
course
someone
gets
hurt.
Physical
injury
or
significant
substantial
property
damage
occurs
like
setting
a
building
on
fire,
or
something
like
that.
B
Having
that
rule,
where
the
chief
has
to
be
there
to
see
it
to
make
the
call
or
one
of
the
deputies
having
this
neat
the
riot
definition
or
law
or
or
being
in
place
as
the
the
guiding
factor
and
limiting
it,
it's
its
use
to
the
folks
there
on
the
ground
and-
and
I
have
no
issue
with
either
one
of
those
instances
where,
where
tear
gas
was
used.
B
I
I
was
down
there
in
the
parking
lot
at
the
boe
right,
alongside
the
police
fighting
to
get
the
barricade
back
from
the
the
10
or
15
people
that
were
it
was
a
tug
of
war
and
then
the
young
man
throwing
the
molotov
cocktails
back
and
forth,
and
I
have
to
say
I
was
actually
proud
of
the
police
department.
B
At
that
point.
The
truck
got
set
on
fire
and
that's
when
they
advanced
and
you
know,
kind
of
things
kind
of
went
awry.
B
I
have
no
issue
with
the
initial
use
of
the
gas,
it's
that
it
kind
of
spread
out
and
they
kept
going
and
adding
more
and
more,
which
was
was
troublesome,
and
I
think
that
initial
shot
might
have
been
what
what
was
what
was
needed
and
then
stay
in
your
ground,
stop
and
don't
spread
out
that
that
was
part
of
what
I
I
thought
was
the
problem
that
was
pearl
street.
That
was
riot.
That
was
crazy
headquarters.
B
I
I
also
don't
have
an
issue
with
the
initial
use
of
the
gas,
because
remember
our
in
that
situation,
some
of
the
members
were
up
there.
The
way
the
police
department
was
staging
behind
the
barricade.
There
was
a
lot
of
folks
out
there
on
the
ground,
but
then,
once
the
commercial
grade
fireworks,
let's
not
just
call
them
fireworks.
If
one
of
those
those
are
fireworks
that
were
meant
to
explode,
you
know
300
500
feet
up
in
the
air
that
you
hear
and
they're
thundering.
B
B
I
think
they
should
have
stood
their
ground
stood
with
headquarters
and
and
dealt
with
it
that
way,
but
they
kind
of
followed
which
was
problematic
and
that
turned
into
a
game
of
cat
and
mouse
that
led
all
over
which,
with
which
things
got
out
of
control,
but
so,
if,
if
in
getting
back
to
what
this
exception,
I
guess
you'd
say
I
want
to
create,
is
chief
or
deputy
on
the
grounds
meet
the
riot
first
degree,
felony
type
of
behaviors,
and
then
the
chief
has
to
has
to
make
the
call
and
they
can't
chase
people
it
just
just
enough
tear
gas
to
stop
what's
going
on
there
and
not
go
beyond
that.
B
That's
what
I
offered
in
in
the
conversation
earlier
with
mr
o'shea
and
that's
what
I
think
would
would
be
helpful
in
this
instance,
and
the
thing
is
right:
it's
been
32
years,
it
hasn't
been
used
to
think
about
albany's,
a
capital
city.
We
have
not
riots,
but
we
certainly
have
demonstrations
here
pretty
regularly
and
the
police
department
handles
it
without
an
issue.
B
Obviously
there
was
something
different
and-
and
I
don't
want
to
chalk
it
up
to
it
being
folks
of
color
versus
white
people
and
maybe
there
that
was
the
case
to
a
degree,
but
it
was
crazy.
I
I
would
suggest
and
ask
that
every
council
member
look
at
watch
the
meeting.
If
you
don't
watch
anything
else,
listen
to
what
sergeant
alex
hansen
said.
B
Listen
to
her
comments,
it's
important
that
you
get
her
her
impression.
She
she
feared
for
her
life
and
just
one
more
thing
and
now
be
quiet
is
the
presentation
I
I
didn't
have
a
problem
with
the
facts
in
the
presentation
it
just
went
on
too
long,
but
also
I
I
was
expecting
more
and
not.
I
don't
want
to
say
by
way
of
maya
culpa
or
whatever,
but
we're
trying
to
mend
the
relationship
with
the
community,
so
there
should
have
been
some
of
that
in
there,
but
also
for
me.
B
What
would
have
really
been
helpful?
Is
I
kind
of
have
an
impression,
and
can
I
imagine
what
things
were,
but
how
about
some
body
camera
footage
as
a
part
of
that
presentation?
What
what
better
way
to
show
people
what
our
officers
were
up
against
than
to
have
footage
from
one
of
their
cameras,
and
I
think
a
lot
of
you
would
have
been
shocked
and
said:
oh,
oh
wow
and
maybe
even
moved
by
it
and
have
a
better
understanding
of
where,
where
what
they
were
dealing
with.
So
please
view
sergeant,
alex
hansen's
comments.
P
G
Mike
well,
you
can't
see
it.
Oh,
you
can
see
it
a
little
bit.
Just
google,
my
use
of
tear
gas,
just
google,
it
you'll,
see
1925
you,
the
geneva
protocol,
1925
predicted
the
use
of
gas,
the
tear
gas
1993,
there's
even
more
on
it.
There
was
more
countries
involved,
so
you
know
I
don't
know
when
you
took
your
jag
training,
but
things
have
changed.
G
I
mean
definitely
in
1993,
it
was,
you
know,
banned
for
military
use,
so
yeah
and
the
other
thing
I
wanted
to
talk
about
was
that
was
the
first
thing.
Let's
talk
about
for
councilman
ballerin,
where
you
want
to
try
to
save
some
hostages.
G
Let's
talk
about
waco
texas
76
people
died
because
they
threw
in
tear
gas.
It
started
the
buildings
on
fire.
76
people
died
because
they
didn't
want
to
come
out
and
face
the
guns.
They
were
afraid,
they're
going
to
be
killed.
There
was
a
lunatic
running
it.
I
mean
don't
get
me
wrong,
but
when
we
start
talking
about-
and
I
again
it
really
bugs
me
when
I
hear
somebody
say
it's
a
tool-
it's
not
a
tool,
it's
a
guillotine,
a
tool
or
is
it
an
execution
weapon?
G
I
mean
that's
what
we're
talking
about
this,
this
dangerous
stuff
that
that
we're
allowing
now
and
just
to
answer
kelly-
I
mean
they
were.
Definitely
you
know,
I
wasn't
there
the
first
night,
but
you
know
nobody
seems
to
be
addressing.
Do
we
have
enough
police
on
the
force
right
now
to
handle
situations
like
this?
G
Okay,
maybe
that's
the
big
difference
from
like
when
we
had
occupy
albany
and
today
we
had
different
chiefs.
We
had
different
administrations,
you
know
to
me
the
police
are
the
most
important
things
and
we
started.
We
really
need
to
look
at
them
as
public
safety,
not
law
enforcement,
it's
public
safety
to
keep
the
public
safe
and
that's
something
we
seem
to
be
getting
away
with.
You
know
getting
away
from
them.
I
should
say
that
you
know
they're
there
and
you
know.
G
Safety
is
a
is
a
big
issue
with
most
people
and
most
of
our
our
citizens
and
residents
of
the
city.
They
want
to
feel
safe
and
you
know
how
do
you
keep
people
safe?
You
know
you
could
say
yeah
we'll
do
this
tool,
we'll
throw
everybody
in
jail.
You
know,
you
know
every
every
person.
You
know
that
doesn't
go
with
the
guidelines,
let's
just
throw
them
in
jail
and
what
happens
they
we
throw
them
in
jail
and
then
they
learn
to
be
even
better
at
cree.
You
know
committing
crimes.
G
We
got
to
look
in
our
society
at
how
we
help
people
change
from
being
lawlessness
to
being
lawful
citizens
and
residents
of
our
community,
and
I
you
know
I
want
to
get
back
to
this
escalation.
G
G
G
I
was
doing
everything
I
could,
even
though
I'm
not
a
social
worker,
anything
trying
to
calm
people
down-
and
you
know
having
this
weapon
being
used
on
our
citizens
is
just
you
know,
we're
we're
throwing
gasoline
on
the
flames.
We
really
need
to
reach
out
to
our
community
and
we
are
doing
it.
Don't
get
me
wrong.
I
mean
there's
tremendous
amount
of
work.
I
know
kelly
with
with
the
committees
that
you're
on
the
anti
the
violence
task
force
and
you
know,
reimagining
the
police.
G
It's
been
a
tremendous
amount
of
work
and
I
I
think
we're
going
the
right
direction
and
what
I
said
before
too.
What
if
we
do
ban
it,
and
it
turns
out
that
this
was
the
stupidest
mistake
this
council
ever
made.
How
hard
is
it
to
put
it
back
in?
It's
not
like
it's
it'll
take
forever.
We
meet
every
two
weeks,
so
if
it
turns
out
that
this
was
a
bad
decision,
we
can
always
put
it
back,
but
I
would
rather
err
on
the
side
of
let's
protect
our
citizens.
G
You
know
those
windows
were
open.
There
were
protocols,
they
were
supposed
to
use.
The
chief
even
said
it
during
the
meeting
he's
the
only
one
who
can
authorize
the
release
of
that
gas.
If
I
remember
correctly,
I
can
go
back
and
look
at
the
tape,
but
I'm
pretty
sure
he
said
that,
but
the
gas
was
or
his
designee
the
gas
was
let
loose.
I
wasn't
there
the
first
night.
I
can't
judge
on
that,
but
the
second
night
there
was
no
warning.
The
gas
was
let
loose
and
yeah.
G
I
walked
down
the
block
and
later
when
I
was
able
to
breathe
and
see
again,
I
saw
people
throwing
the
fireworks
and
it's
just
like
this
is
we
should
have
caught
the
persons
in
the
act
but
I'll
shut
up
now,
but
you
know
this
is
this
is
probably
the
most
important
decision
we're
going
to
make
it
as
this
council
as
we
come
to
an
end
in
november,
I
mean
well
in
january.
This
is
going
to
be
the
most
important
thing
and
you
know
you
got
to
respect
what
what
what
our
citizens
and
residents
want.
G
B
F
On
that,
what
are
you
gonna
do
when
you
need
it?
Okay
need
something,
wait,
two
weeks
what
happens,
meanwhile,
what
would
have
happened?
I
would
have
liked
to
know
if
that
wasn't
that
tear
gas
wasn't
used
that
night
when
things
was
really
going
on,
I
mean
you
know.
They
say
that
the
tear
gas
is
to
de-escalate
people,
keep
them
keeping
a
safety
zone
between
them.
I
can
understand
that
they
were
trying
to
de-escalate
now.
What
if
they
didn't
do
that
and
everyone
just
came
together.
F
Another
thing
I've
been
thinking
about
you
know
riots
sometimes
or
be
too
different
between
two
different
groups
and
the
cops
get
stuck
in
the
middle
of
it.
What
do
they
do,
then?
Just
everybody
let
it
go,
and
you
know
then
my
concern
is
too.
If
the
riots
get
so
big
in
our
police
department,
three
shifts.
Isn't
enough,
do
you
get
mutual
aid?
Would
they
want
to
come
in
officers
from
other
municipalities?
F
Would
they
want
to
come
in
well
dirt
chiefs
say
we
are
I'm
not
bringing
my
guys
in
there?
We
can't
you
know
we
don't
have
the
power
to
do
it.
Where
is
that
leaving
right?
It's
get
worse,
just
little
things
that
you
gotta,
I
think
about,
I
think
about
it.
After
meeting
the
other
night-
and
I
don't
know,
I
say,
keep
it
as
a
tool
and
be
very
strict
with
who
can
who
can
order?
F
It
done
just
think,
though,
just
think
what
might
have
happened,
I
mean
those
guys
were
getting
hit
with
cop
went
down
and
he
was
a
horse
officer
if
they
weren't
on
horses
that
night
and
I
don't
think
it's
even
be
safe,
bringing
in
horses
maybe
for
crowd
control
with
you
know,
protesters
outside
the
capitol
or
something
but-
and
I
think
you
need
some-
you
need
some
alternatives
and
take
time
and
study
it.
Just
don't
just
don't
abandon
it
right
now
and
that's
what
the
collaborative
was
saying
take
time
can't
do
everything
right
now.
F
B
Okay
and
I'll
say
we're
in
a
moment
in
history
where
this
this
it
may
quite
conceivably
have
a
summer
like
last
summer,
if
we
don't
don't
work
together
on
this,
mr
say
you
look
like
you
wanted
to
speak
before.
Did
you
want
to
say
something
and
then
we'll
jenny?
If
you
wanted
to
kind
of
talk
about
our
stuff
from
leadership.
J
K
So
I'll
just
say
that
you
know,
in
response
to
mr
igo's
comments,
you
know.
K
I
was
down
there
before
you
know.
When
the
tear
gas
came
out,
that's
when
things
got
agitated.
You
know
like
what
what
happened
was.
It
was
words.
You
know
people
were
yelling
and
they
were
upset
and
they
were
screaming.
You
know,
but
when
the
terror
guys
came
down,
you
know
things
got
heightened.
So
once
again
you
know
we're
we're
talking
about.
K
You
know
the
once
the
tear
gas
was
used
once
it
was
administered
it.
You
know
the
the
whole
it
got
chaotic
it
got
more
chaotic,
it
didn't
calm
it
down.
So
you
know
anything
that
happened
after
that.
You
know,
you
know
one
could
say
what,
if
they
didn't
use,
tear
gas.
What
what
you
know
what
they
had
to
start,
throwing
on
things
like
that,
like
I
don't
want
to
get
in
that
conversation,
because
you
know
that's
a
hard
conversation
to
have,
but
you
know.
K
You
know,
I
think
about
you
know
like
I'm,
not
gonna
go
into
a
graphic
story,
you
know,
but
that
happened
on
the
street
that
I
live
it.
Let
me
just
say
that,
and
not
only
did
it
happen
after
that,
then
it
was
barricades
up.
I
couldn't
get
to
my
you
know
the
natural
flow
to
go
home.
I
couldn't
I
couldn't
go
home
in
my
natural
route
for
three
weeks
later
and
you
know
we're
we're
using
once
again.
You
know
we're
saying
you
know.
K
We
hope
that
something
doesn't
happen,
but
you
know
we're
ignoring
what
has
what
has
happened
and
who
is
who
it
consistently
and
continuously
happens
to
and
now
we're
saying
hold
up
well
what?
If,
what?
If
somebody
storms
the
capital,
you
know
what,
if
somebody
stormed
city
hall,
then
what
are
we
gonna
do
and
I'll
just
say
this
right.
K
I
bet
you.
If
we
ask
sheriff
apple
questions,
he
can
give
us
clear,
cut
answers
of
how
he's
gonna
do
something.
What's
the
procedures,
and
you
know
because
that
you
know
like
that,
didn't
happen.
It
left.
Even
you
know
it
added
a
more
foul
taste
to
you,
know
this
conversation
and
we're
still
having
it
and
we're.
You
know
it's
saying
you
know
we're
wrong.
You
know
we're
wrong
for
responding
to
the
people,
because
once
again,
this
is
not
something
that
you
know.
K
We're
we're
in
front
of
the
people
were
in
front
of
this
and
the
people
were
at
the
end
of
the
the
the
container,
the
spray.
You
know
the
spray
went
on
the
people
and
once
you
touch
the
people
and
once
the
people
speak,
I
don't.
K
Why
are
we
you
know
acting
like
we
didn't
hear
and
acting
like
we
don't
know,
and
I
you
know
it's,
it's
a
tough
situation
right,
but
you
know
the
one
thing
that
we
can
do
is
not
listen
to
the
people
and
then
wonder
why
they
not
there
when
we
need
them.
What
wonder?
Why
are
they
not
participating
in
these
processes?
K
So
please
you
know
we
we
have
to
remember
yes,
let's
remember
what
has
happened
and
was
how
we
got
to
this
conversation
and
not.
Let's
take
the
conversation
in
a
different
direction
and
say
you
know
what
if.
K
So
please
don't
forget,
because
you
know
we
have
people,
you
know
you
know,
as
I'm
listening
to
you,
I'm
I'm
think
is
today
is
dante.
Ivey's
birthday.
K
So
I
you
know,
I
I
feel
strongly
against
this,
and
you
know
I
know
I
spoke
earlier
and
it
just
seems,
like
you
know,
we're
being
pressured
because
it's
like
we're
taking
a
tool
away
from
the
police.
Nobody
wants
to
tie
the
police
hands,
but
you
know
a
lot
of
stuff
that
we're
doing
we
end
up
paying
for
you
know,
without
sometimes
without
the
community
knowing
about
it.
F
Derek
you
you
just
mentioned
something
about
well
ask
craig
apple
whatever.
Let
me
thinking
okay,
I
think
maybe
there
has
to
be
some
sort
of
get
together
with
public
safety
and
see
what
other
municipalities
do
see.
What
consensus
is
there
might
be
better
ideas
than
just
dropping
this
right
away.
That's
why
I'm
saying
let's
sit
back
for
a
little
and
look
into
this
a
little
deeper.
What
alternatives
might
be?
There
has
to
be
better
alternatives,
but
until
we
get
them
you
know,
that's
my
only
suggestion.
So
thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
mr
igor.
J
P
L
Is
going
to
be
a
short
presentation
from
the
budget
department
to
kind
of
talk
about
where
we
are
like
what
we
know
about
the
the
funding
from
the
federal
government,
and
that
is
and
I'm
going
to
do
like
a
quick
synopsis
of
it.
But
since
we're
already
losing
a
lot
of
people,
I
would
just
recommend
they
did
a
great
powerpoint
and
they're
going
to
be
doing
that
it
has
a
lot
of
facts
with
it.
So
if
you
can't
join
in
tomorrow,
then
please
watch
it.
L
I'm
also
going
to
be
sending
out
the
powerpoint
presentation,
so
you
can
go
through
there
and
then
you
can
come
with
questions
so
it'll
be
an
another,
exciting
finance
committee
meeting
with
not
just
things
to
vote
on,
but
again
presentations,
so
just
to
quickly
go
through
it.
There
is
albany
will
be
receiving
85
million
282
416,
it's
going
to
be
paying
two
installments.
L
Sadly
my
notes,
it's
not
exactly
clear,
but
we
get
half
and
then
another
half
and
I
believe
it's
the
next
year,
but
that
will
be
cleared
up
tomorrow.
L
New
york
state
got
12.6
billion
within
albany
other
things
impacting
us.
The
school
district
got,
46.6
million,
cdta
got
51.7
million,
and
albany
county
got
59
million
the
funding
a
lot
of
the
funding.
It
can
be
spent
on
four
main
pieces
and
it
has
to
it's
it's
a
five
year.
It
has
to
be
spent
by
2024,
but
it's
also
for
that
those
five
years.
So
an
important
thing
for
us
to
keep
in
mind
is
this
is
not
just
you
know,.
K
L
Million
dollars
that
we
need
to
spend
right
now,
but
it
is
something
that's
supposed
to
support
us
over
the
next
five
years.
A
big
piece
that
it's
supposed
to
do
is
to
bring
back
revenue
loss
so
within
the
city
of
albany
over
the
next
five
years.
Their
projected
revenue
loss
is
just
over
58
million
dollars.
L
It
can
also
be
used
in
response
to
the
public
health,
emergency
or
negative
economic
impacts.
So
that
is
a
kind
of
a
broad
based
one
and
there
still
is
not
yet
any
guidance
from
the
federal
government
on
exactly
what
that
means.
So
there's
a
lot
of
questions
that
people
have
been
asking
that
we
just
don't
yet
have
the
answers
to
until
we
get
that
guidance
from
the
federal
government
and
that
so
the
external
task
force
that
mike
whalen
and.
L
I
yeah,
who
I
know
way
better
than
mike
whalen,
but
I
wrote
down
mike
whalen's
name
because
I
know
jake
so
the
they
are
leading
that
there
absolutely
an
opportunity
for
council
members
to
get
involved
in
that,
but
they're
still
kind
of
putting
together
the
pieces
for
it
because
they
don't
yet
have
the
guidance
from
the
federal
government.
L
We
corey,
and
I
will
kind
of
be
working
together
to
talk
to
different
council
members.
Cory
will
be
the
real
point
person
about
different
potential
initiatives
that
we
would
like
to
see
that
may
or
may
not
impact
our
wards.
L
L
I
think
that
it'll
leave
us
with
a
lot
of
questions
as
well,
but
it
does
kind
of
help
frame
how
we
can
really
look
at
this
funding
and
how
we
can
move
forward
with
it,
and
I
think
it'll
be
helpful
for
council
members
in
terms
of
what
we're
seeing
the
needs
that
we're
seeing
as
a
council
in
albany
and
also
you
know
for
some
individual
members.
L
You
know
you'll
have
like
richard
has
lark
street.
So
how
has
that
been
impacted
by
covet?
I
think
different
members
will
have
pieces
to
kind
of
bring
in
and
really
discuss
so
that
will
be
coming
tomorrow
night
and
I'm
going
to
be
basically
every
time
I'm
going
to
try
to
do
an
update
with
every
caucus
that
I
have
been
doing
as
I
get
information
I'll
continue
to
share
it.
L
If
anybody
has
any
specific
questions,
I
would
say,
apart
from
tomorrow,
please
ask
nick
blaise,
who
will
be
there
because
he
will
obviously
be
much
better
answering
them
than
I
will,
but
as
we
kind
of
go
along
with
this
definitely
reach
out
to
me-
and
I
will
do
everything
I
can
to
get
them
answered,
and
but
it's
definitely
it's
something.
L
As
a
council,
we
should
very
much
be
a
part
of
and
make
sure
our
voice
is
heard,
along
with
understanding
that
we
also
want
to
plug
these
budget
gaps
for
the
city,
so
it'll
be
great
to
be
able
to
have
that
understanding.
I
know
that
I've
had
a
lot
of
outreach
from
constituents.
I'm
sure
you
guys
have
too
so
to
be
able
to
explain
those
the
budget
needs.
I
think
it'll
be
really
helpful
for
all
of
us
kelly
did
you
want
me
to
bring
up
the
mayor's
letter?
I
have
that
in
my
notes
too.
L
Actually
before
I
move
into
that
we
this
was
touched
on,
but
we
are
very
short
staffed
in
apd.
They
are
40
officers
down
and
23
are
inactive
for
various
reasons.
You
know
military
leave
illness,
so
they're
very
short-staffed.
If
you
go
to
the
albany
police
department
page,
please
share
it
out,
because
our
staffing
in
apd
directly
impacts
how
we
can
handle
things.
So
as
we
move
forward
with
the
other
discussions,
we
really
each
of
us
need
to
do
everything
we
can
to
get
police
officers.
L
So
there
is
a
current
class
that
has
25
in
it,
but
we,
we
obviously
have
a
much
bigger
need
than
that.
So
please
share
that
out.
In
addition
to
sharing
that
out,
if
you'll
remember,
if
we
want
to
have
our
parks
clean
and
beautiful,
we
also
need
those
seasonal
workers
hired
for
dgs.
L
So
I
believe
that
is
also
on
the
dgs.
Please
page,
please
anything
you
can
do
to
get
you
know
if
you
hear
somebody
share
it
anything
we
can
do
to
get
that
staffing
there,
because
we
all
want
these
things.
But
if
we
don't
have
the
staff
in
place
it
that's
one
of
the
biggest
issues
so
making
sure
that
we
can
actually
hire
the
people
to
do
the
work
is
so
important.
L
So
that
is
definitely
something
that
that
we
really
just
as
council
members
would
be
great.
If
we
could
do
that
and
then
kelly
did
you
watch.
Should
I
talk
about
the
mayor's
letter.
L
Yeah
on
the
on
the
police
reform
that
we
passed
the
police
reform
bill
in
the
executive
order
thing.
I
apologize
if
my
words
are
all
over
the
place.
K
L
Days
my
mind
is
mush
and
my
day
job
and
my
evening
job
has
have
really
been
colliding
this
week.
So
so
we
understand-
and
we
definitely
appreciate
the
work
of
everyone
in
the
committee
and
everybody
all
the
staff
that
that
did
that
it
was
a
huge
process.
L
L
That
policing
is
a
huge
issue,
there's
not
an
easy
piece
to
fill
so
the
council
itself.
We
didn't
love
this
legislation
that
we
passed
so
from
our
stance.
L
We
agree
that
it's
not
ideal
the
council,
the
members
that
voted
for
it,
a
lot
of
them
myself
included,
talked
about
understanding
that
this
is
the
beginning
of
the
process,
and
that
is
a
very
important
piece
that
even
though
a
ton
of
work
was
put
into
it,
we
have
a
lot
of
work
that
is
left
to
do
so.
We
I
mean
I
stand
by
what
we
said
with
that.
L
I
think
that
a
lot
of
us
would
have
been
happy
for
it
to
go
further,
but
also
understood
that
we
had
an
executive
order
that
we
had
to
work
within
and
wanted
to
move
forward
and
understood.
It
was
a
process
with
that
said.
The
mayor
has
the
power
to
veto
it
and
that's
her
choice,
if
they're
unhappy
with
it.
L
L
So
that
was
our
kind
of
within
leadership.
What
we
discussed.
G
B
Yeah
that,
but
that
from
I
I
spoke
to
mr
pachardo
and
going
into
executive
session,
for
that
was
not
because.
B
Right
right
and
well,
the
thing
is
most
folk
and
I
wanted
to
start
with
that.
But
then
I
had
a
conversation
with
mr
piccardo
and
he
kind
of
against
it,
but
it
is
something
that
needs
to
be
dealt
with.
It
is
and
we'll
have
to.
Maybe
we
can.
F
F
B
Yeah.
Thank
you
mr
ago,
mr
owen.
G
Yeah,
just
you
know,
there's
been
a
lot
of
changes
in
the
city
and
I
I
was
just
curious.
Do
you
guys
know
like
who's
in
charge?
Who's,
the
the
the
chief
planning
officer
and
the
changes
in
corporation
council
are
some
assignments
being
reassigned.
I
know
they're
down,
I
think
two
attorneys.
So
do
we
have
any
updates
on
that
like
who
you
know.
B
Yeah
brad's
got
planning,
brad
glass
is
heading
that
up
and
in
corporate
council.
It's
still
marisa.
B
Right,
that's
yeah!
That's
that's!
I
should
have
said
standing
in
but
brad's
taking
care
of
that
now.
They're,
I'm
sure
down
the
line.
The
mayor
is
going
to
reappoint
someone,
but
that's
that's
where
we're
at
right.
Now
with
that,
and
then
you
mentioned
the
corporation
council,
I
know
they're
down
attorneys
maurice
is
still
the
corporation
council.
Okay,.
G
And
I
meant
like
I
know
two
people,
let
amy
levine
left
and
then
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
I'm
trying
to
think
of
her
name.
I
can
picture
her.
She
used
to
do
a
lot
of
the
real
estate
dealings
and
stuff.
I
think
brett
took
over
for
some
of
that.
But
I'm
just
curious.
You
know
they're.
A
They're
still
there,
everybody
in
corporation
council's
offices
they're
splitting
the
work
amongst
all
the
remaining
attorneys
right
now
they
haven't
they're.
I
believe
they're
going
to
get
ready
to
start
hiring
for
a
new
planning,
attorney
and
and
another
assistant
corporation
council
for
general.
So
I'll
update
you
guys
I'll
follow
up.
They
they're
they're
they're
spread
thin,
though
I
will
tell
you
that
okay.
G
G
G
Because
they
started
doing
and
what
happened
was,
if
you
know
frank
camiso
was
the
the
ward
leader
up
here
was
dealing
with
and
I
can't
think
of
her
name
and
she
was
gone
and
he
kept.
He
doesn't
use
email
so
he's
calling
leaving
messages.
G
F
L
We
we
put.
L
D
We
have
about
25
to
27
applicants,
because
it's
not
a
civil
service
position.
We
have
to
manually
go
through
them
to
make
sure
that
they
meet
the
minimum
qualifications,
as
stated
in
the
job
posting,
so
we're
still
in
the
process
of
going
through
reviewing
the
applicants
and
seeing
if
they
have
the
qualifications
that
would
make
them
an
excellent
replacement
for
michelle.
D
Some
people's
resume
is
about
three
or
four
pages
long.
They
also
provided
writing
samples
for
us
to
go
through
and
determine
if
they
would
be
able
to
fill
such
large
shoes.
B
Right
and
yeah,
and
I
kind
of
I'm
working
with
danielle
to
do
the
minimum
qualification
thing
because,
like
like
she
said
hr,
doesn't
do
it
for
us,
so
we
got
to
kind
of
go,
do
that
and
then
and
then
and
then
go
from
there.
B
You
sent
me
along
with
the
attachments:
that's
all
of
them
right:
okay,
okay,
I'll
get
through
it;
okay,
thanks
so
yeah.
I
think,
unless
anyone
has
anything
else,
we're
okay,
all
right
so
with
that
mr
ago,.
F
B
Okay,
all
right
will
we
adjourn
thanks.