►
From YouTube: August 27, 2019 AF City Council Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Our
agenda
has
been
posted
in
various
places
and
on
our
website,
and
if
you
would
like
a
copy
of
that
agenda,
it's
on
in
the
middle
of
the
room
on
that
desk.
There
will
follow
the
agenda
as
outlined,
we'll
first
start
off
with
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance
and
the
invocation
by
councilmember
tater,
after
which
I
will
conduct
the
roll
call.
If
everybody
please
stand.
B
Our
dear
Heavenly
Father,
as
we
bow
our
heads
and
come
before
thee
this
night
at
the
beginning
of
our
city
council
meeting.
We
were
grateful
Vicki,
we
could
be
gathered
here
as
citizens
and
business
people
and
Scouts
and
employees,
and
we
express
appreciation
for
these
great
freedoms
that
we
enjoy
for
this
community
that
we
live
in
and
for
all
the
many
blessings
which
thou
has
so
graciously
given
unto
us.
B
We
pray
that
this
night
we
will
conduct
the
affairs
of
this
city
with
civility
with
knowledge
and
strength
that
we
as
a
council
might
have
the
knowledge
to
put
things
into
place.
That
would
be
for
the
best
benefit
of
our
city.
We
are
grateful,
Heavenly
Father
for
all
those
who
fight
for
our
freedom.
We
pray
that
we
will
be
a
gracious
and
a
grateful
people
for
all
that
we
have
been
given.
B
A
They'll
now
conduct
the
roll
call
councilmember
Christiansen
here.
I'll
note
that
councilmember
Shelton
is
currently
absent.
I
do
expect
him
back
here
soon:
councilmember
Barnes,
there
councilmember
Carol,
councilmember
Taylor.
Okay.
Item
number:
two
is
a
20-minute
public
comment
period.
We'd
ask
anybody
that
would
like
to
make
public
comment
to
keep
it
brief.
Two
to
three
minutes.
We
have
one
that
has
offered
up
a
written
request
and
we'll
invite
him
up.
First,
Mitch
Boland.
Would
you
come
forward
at
this
time
and
if
just
to
just
state
your
name,
even
though
I
just
stated
it?
Okay,
yeah.
C
My
name
is
Mitch
Bowlin
and
I'm.
A
fairly
new
resident
here
in
American
Fork,
been
here
for
about
a
year,
moved
into
the
arrived
neighborhood
just
south
of
I-15
and
since
I
have
a
short
period.
I'll
just
get
right
to
it.
There's
a
lot
of
new
developments
going
in
in
that
area
and
I
just
feel
like
traffic
flows
need
to
be
improved
to
facilitate
the
the
additional
traffic
in
that
area.
I
had
some
suggestions
with
a
map
correlating
they're
number
one
at
the
third
west
and
mahogany
drive.
C
There's
a
four-way
stop
there
that
doesn't
really
make
any
sense
anymore,
because
third
west
is
much
more
busy
than
mahogany
drive.
In
fact,
one
side
of
mahogany
drive
there
is
a
dead
end
and
so
I'm
I
think
that
should
be
turned
changed
to
a
two-way
stop
and
then
on
the
other
side
of
the
freeway
at
the
frontage
road
and
200
north
there.
C
That
ought
to
be
a
three-way
stop
the
traffic
coming
from
the
frontage
road
trying
to
get
on
to
either
second
south
or
third
west
can
get
really
backed
up,
especially
right
after
a
front
runner,
train
comes
drops,
people
off
and
maybe
eventually
a
roundabout
would
probably
be
the
best
way
to
get
traffic
through
that
area.
Number
three
that
frontage
road
there
is
currently
has
speed
limit
of
25
miles
an
hour.
C
There
were
houses
there
on
that
road
when
I
moved
that
moved
in,
but
they
have
since
been
demolished
so
I
believe
it's
only
commercial
and
they're
wide
that
we,
the
roads,
were
just
redone
with
wide.
It's
really
wide
I
and
traffic
flow
right
now
is
generally
traveling
between
40
and
45
miles
an
hour.
Even
though
the
posted
speed
limits,
25
I
think
we
got
to
bump
the
speed
limit
to
two
more
match.
C
The
flow
of
traffic,
maybe
40
miles
an
hour
there
and
then
the
last
one
is
number
four
down
at
the
fifth
east
exit
I
go
when
I
work
in
Orem.
So
when
I
come
in
I
exit,
northbound,
I-15
and
head
south
on
5th
east
and
there's
a
light
there,
that
gives
me
a
left
turn
permissive.
But
when
traffic
going
south
on
5th
east
gets
backed
up
trying
to
get
on
the
freeway,
there's
no
light
there
to
stop
to
tell
them
to
not
go
through.
C
C
C
C
B
G
E
A
F
C
C
A
A
H
D
A
F
A
Well
now,
you're
putting
the
pressure
on
the
mayor
here
to
report
and
the
council
member
Carol
I
think
I
usually
have
something
to
say
so
welcome
again.
I
said
something
all
right,
but
nothing
substantial
to
report.
So
all
right,
we'll
now
move
on
to
the
common
consent
agenda
consisting
of
the
two
things
that
are
there.
A
A
D
B
A
A
A
G
B
D
J
A
Am
going
to
I
can
work
off
this
one
on
the
you
know,
I'll
have
to
go
off
the
amended
agenda.
So
an
item
number
three
on
the
amended
agendas
review,
an
action
of
a
reimbursement
for
Keystone
construction
for
improvements
on
700
West
I
appreciate
Scott
for
sitting
up
close
here.
If
you
have
any
questions.
D
J
K
Burns
I
mean
I,
don't
remember
if
we've
been
discussing
it.
I
know
wrong.
Certainly
I
don't
remember
discussing
I,
don't
think
here
with
the
council,
but
it
is
it's
on
the
south
side
of
300
north
east
of
North
County
Boulevard
a
couple
of
little
slivers
that
in
our
master
plan
it
shows
us
wanting
to
widen
that
road.
That
is,
the
intent
is
to
do
some
road
widening
that
Deveaux
properties,
the
person
who
is
just
recently
purchased.
K
It
is
looking
at
developing
it,
and
so
we've
been
in
contact
with
them
about
buying
those
now
before
they
build
and
then
being
able
to
wide
that
at
some
time,
but
at
least
locking
that
down
now.
So
there
are
two
different
agreements,
because
each
different
property
is
is
a
different
owner,
they're
related,
but
it's
a
different
different
entity,
and
so
that's
why
it's
two
different
agreements,
one
for
each
piece
of
property.
H
H
K
That's
part
of
the
agreements
I
have
to
look
at
I'm,
pretty
sure
we
have
the
the
full
survey
description
on
the
plat
itself,
and
this
is
just
kind
of
the
intent-
was
to
kind
of
reference
this
that
that's
the
description
of
the
property
that
we're
buying
a
piece
of
we're
not
buying
the
whole
thing.
It
would
be
just
a
piece
of
it
at
which
is
shown
on
the
plat.
H
H
J
B
Could
we
could
we
make
a
motion
of
the
prove
all
of
this
purchase
agreement
with
a
enhancement
of
the
legal
description,
the
proper
legal
description
to
be
added?
Could
we
do
that,
as
according
to
the
the
drawing
in
order
will?
What
are
we
calling
that
exhibit
a
yeah
yeah?
You
could
add
that
language.
B
A
D
D
H
G
G
G
A
H
A
A
D
Subdivision
I'm
sorry
located
at
435
East
200
North
in
the
r1
7500
residential
zone
and
to
authorize
the
mayor
and
city
council
to
sign
the
plat
and
accept
the
dedications
with
instructions
to
the
city
recorder
to
withhold,
recording
of
the
plat
subject.
All
conditions
identified
and
the
public
record
associated
with
the
August
7
2019
Planning
Commission
meeting
I
have.
H
H
B
A
K
Believe
that
is
how
it
is
now
and
I
certainly
am
NOT
opposed
to
changing
that,
and
it's
probably
more
of
a
discussion
than
tonight,
because
I'm
pretty
sure
there
are
other
parts
of
the
code
that
would
need
to
be
changed,
but
I
very
much
in
support
of
part
of
that
and
would
be
happy
to
go.
Look
at
that.
If
that's
what
you'd
like
us
to
do
and
bring
back
to
you
another
another
night.
D
K
A
H
I
L
J
I
A
Shelton
I
accounts,
member
Barnes,
I
counts,
membered,
Carroll
I
counts,
member
Taylor,
I,
all
right.
I'm
gonna,
pull
up
to
number.
Two
item:
number
two
review
in
action
on
a
resolution
authorizing
the
city
to
execute
the
inner
local
cooperative
rement
of
light
hub
communication,
communications
agency;
I,
don't
know
if
we're
going
to
have.
Can
we
get
pull
that
document
up?
A
B
So
I
read
I
read
over
this.
With
my
non
legal
mind,
I
had
talked
to
the
mayor
about
a
couple
of
things
that
concerned
me
and
he
and
I
kind
of
worked
through
that
I
would
really
like
to
know
not
being
well
versed
in
their
local
agreements,
but
just
enough
to
to
get
by
when
we
had
our
work
session.
A
week
ago
we
talked
about
the
attorney
that
was
there
I'm.
Sorry
I
apologize
can't
remember
her
name.
She
was
she
was
here.
B
She
talked
about
some
very
specific
things
that
wouldn't
would
would
make
disagreement
would
alleviate
some
of
the
heartburn
we
had
with
those
things
that
we
we'd
talked
about.
Can
you
just?
Can
anyone
demonstrate
to
me
where
those
are
those
those
measures
of
added
security?
That
kind
of
would
have
swage
the
trepidation
we
had
for
this
going
forward?
Do
we
know
where
those
are.
I
But
if
you
read
in
10.9,
it
basically
makes
sure
that
the
payments
will
be
delivered
to
that
entity
directly.
So
if
you
read
through
that,
that's
where
we
make
sure
that
if
we
have
an
asset
and
there's
an
example
here,
by
way
of
example,
light
hub
may
enter
into
an
agreement
for
the
use
of
the
American
Fork
Network
Operations
Center
and
American
Forks
mid
mile
fiber
between
Spanish
work
in
downtown
Salt,
Lake
City,
and
that
would
be
an
agreement
that
American
Fork
would
control.
So
we
would
control
that
contract
yeah.
That's.
B
Why
I
read
over
that,
and
and
now
you
know,
I
understand
that
and
I
was
thinking.
By
way
the
example
American
Fork
with
their
network
operating
center
could
enter
into
an
agreement
with
light
of
hub.
So
that's
one
of
those
things,
so
that's
our
ass
that
remains
our
ass
and
always
will
be
our
asset,
but
that's
a
separate
contract
with
light
hub
and
the
interlocal
agreement
or
the
inter
local.
It's
a
part
of
the
interlocal
agreement.
L
The
key
language
there
that
I
see
it's
Esme,
there's
nothing
that
says
it
shall
or
it
needs
to,
or
anything
like
that.
It
just
says:
hey:
they
can
enter
into
a
contract
which,
quite
frankly,
even
without
that
section
and
in
our
local
contender,
into
a
contract
with
another
agency
for
services
and
things
of
that
nature
right
so.
A
Any
other
concerns
of
the
council
has
I
kind
of
been
through
this
I
actually
read,
lined
it
prior
to
the
council
receiving
it.
Some
things
that
I
felt
were
important
to
be
added,
namely
how
board
members
were
brought
up.
I
just
felt
like
it
was
important
to
kind
of
follow
the
pattern
of
the
that
we
have
seen
in
cities
understand
where,
basically,
the
name
is
presented
by
the
mayor,
the
council
has
to
ratify
that
name
and
they're
put
onto
that
board
and
there's
a
process
that
we
do
that
for
all
our
boards.
B
H
I
So,
thank
you,
Barbara
councilmember,
Tricia
Anson
excuse
me
brought
up
one
item
in
11.6,
and
that
is
the
last
sentence.
It
says
it
currently
says
unless
otherwise
requiring
a
two-thirds
vote,
a
majority
vote
of
the
total
votes
of
the
entire
board,
whether
or
not
all
board
members
are
present,
shall
constitute
action
by
the
board.
That
actually
should
be
a
majority
vote
of
the
total
votes
of
the
quorum
present
shall
constitute
action
by
the
board.
I
In
other
words,
the
majority
of
the
board,
who
are
present
at
the
board
meeting
would
constitute
action
by
the
board
unless
it's
required
to
be
a
two-thirds
vote
which
would
be
outlined
in
the
in
the
document
earlier.
So
we
just
need
to
change
that
that
it's
the
majority
vote
of
the
total
votes
of
the
quorum
present.
L
So
I
was
trying
to
figure
out
this
huge
massive
thing,
we're
trying
to
accomplish
here
in
the
next
two
months
and
a
lot
of
stuff
flying
right.
Just
it's
coming
pretty
quick,
at
least
for
me
and
so
I
was
trying
to
think.
Where
does
this
come
in
line
with
it?
I
know
when
Clark
and
I
had
that
meeting
with
David
and
the
mayor
and
we're
talking
about
it,
we
thought
maybe
the
local
would
come
after.
L
L
Is
you
know
taking
Tim's
advice
anytime,
you
get
into
a
contract,
the
always
says
you
look
at
your
first
way
out
right
and
so
I'm
just
wondering
if
we
go
down
this
route
and
it's
something
we
decide
not
to
do
as
I
read,
it
was
a
50-year
deal
right,
commitment
which
I
actually
like
that's
one
of
the
problems
with
inter
locals,
is
people
jump
in
ship
and
you
never
do
long
term
planning
when
you
who's
gonna
be
a
part
of
it.
But
what
do
you
see
there?
Tim?
That's
helping
us.
M
Out
so
the
50-year
sunset
is
statutory.
The
current
and
her
local
agreement
talks
about
the
dissolution
of
light
hub
in
terms
of
with
the
withdrawal
of
the
member
that
would
be
forthcoming
under
the
bylaws.
So
there's
nothing
in
the
agreement.
Currently
that
speaks
of
with
the
withdrawal,
it
wouldn't
remember,
I,
guess.
L
That's
one
of
the
concerns
I
saw
as
well
as
we're
joining
an
entity
without
understanding
the
bylaws
of
it
and
maybe
that's
common.
I
we
tend
to
had
only
done
this
once
before,
and
we
had
the
bylaws
worked
up
because
we
had
a
working
document
beforehand.
We
were
converting
from
a
special
Service
District
to
an
interlocal,
so
we
kind
of
changed
some
things
and
flipped
it
over.
So
the
only
worry
is
joining
something
without
knowing
how
it's
going
to
operate.
How
do
we
get
out
of
it?
L
M
I
just
would
point
out
that
as
a
stakeholder,
the
bylaws
would
be
drafted,
I
mean
the
city
would
be
the
party
who
would
be
in
conjunction
with
the
other
member
right
drafting
those
and
enacting
those.
So
at
this
stage
it
would
would
be
safe
to
bet
that
there
wouldn't
be
bylaws.
That
would
be
contrary
to
any
of
our
city
interests,
since
we
would
be
the
ones
who
would
be
having
to
adopt
them.
L
Unless
there's
a
third
city
that
joins-
or
in
this
case
as
I,
read
it,
if
there's
a
tie,
the
executive
director
breaks
that
tie.
So
really
we
got
one
vote
with
another
City
and
if
that
doesn't
work
out,
then
we're
at
the
mercy
of
the
executive
director
I
would
just
rather
like
to
see
what
those
bylaws
look
like.
How
do
we
get
out
of
it?
L
What
for
unhappier
I
don't
know
I've
seen
too
many
contracts,
and
we
know
the
litigation
we're
in
right
now
with
various
contracts
that
have
been
in
it
in
too
and
I'm
not
trying
to
delay
it.
Is
there
a
way
we
could
add
into
the
language
that
we
approve
this
contingent
upon
bylaws
forthcoming
or
something
of
that
nature.
N
Yes,
thank
you,
it
is.
It
is
customary
upon
the
adopting
of
an
interlocal
cooperative
agreement
that
the,
but,
as
as
a
new
entity
that
the
bylaws
being
adopted
as
the
very
next
action
in
and
they
would
speak
in
more
detail
to
what
are
the
the
authorities
of
the
executive
director.
What
are
the
limitations
on
the
age
of
director?
How
is
the
executive
director
appointed
and
removed,
and
so
forth
and
Tim
is
exactly
right
and
saying
that
as
one
of
the
founding
members
of
the
agency,
you.
F
E
L
N
N
B
L
N
The
rating
agencies
would
be
involved
in
either
event.
What
what
this
does
is.
It
gives
you
basically
the
best
of
two
of
two
options
and
and
you
you
would
have
the
choice
of
going
down.
Whichever
path
is
most
favorable
to
the
city,
but
yes,
the
rating
agencies
would
still
be
involved
either
way.
So.
N
In
the
same
position,
you
are
as
having
the
choice
of
either
one,
and
so
it
does
provide
that
that
benefit
of
whichever
way
is
better
you'll
note
in
the
other
local
that,
as
a
project
is
formed
only
the
participating
member
of
the
project
votes
on
that
project,
and
so
you
don't
lose
any
control
to
the
other
entity
in
you
were
to
take
that
option.
So.
L
I
Part
of
that
I
think
is
as
a
founding
member
and
and
as
we
would
be
drafting
this
and
the
other
entities
would
be
adopting
this
I
think
the
biggest
benefit
to
us
is
that
we
could
draft
our
own
side
agreements
and
that
we
would
be
able
to
control,
especially
the
mid
Mile
and
the
and
the
knock
services.
I.
Think
that's
I,
think
having
having
drafted
this
and
having
been
the
founding
member
to
enact
this.
Then
we
kind
of
set
those
rules
up
front
so.
L
L
A
L
Not
a
crazy
idea
is
there
any
merit
to
doing
a
shorter
term
contract
with
that
other
entity
right
now,
seeing
that
there's
no
other
entities
looking
to
jump
on
immediately,
it
would
still
allow
us
to
share
those
economies
of
scale
that
that
could
later
six
months
to
a
year
convert
into
an
interlocal.
We
have
a
chance
to
look
at
those
bylaws
and
have
a
chance
to
really
see
how
that
goes
and
I
see
that
kind
of
like
the
dating
period.
B
Well,
from
my
standpoint,
I,
don't
know
where
the
other
party
mentioned
is
I
mean
it's
Kaysville.
It's
a
public
document.
Caged
bills
is
talking
about
this.
If
bonding
under
that
interlocal
is
critical
to
them.
We've
talked
about
not
so
it's
just
a
great
choice
for
us,
but
if
that's
critical
for
them,
then
not
having
this
in
place
would
stop
them
from
going
forward.
Perhaps
in
that
way,
I
like
having
the
choice,
you
know
we're
on
the
hook
for
it,
no
matter
what
but
I
don't
and
I
also
believe
as
a
new
entity.
B
I,
don't
think
it
holds
us
at
bay
at
all
whether
we
do
that
or
not,
but
if
it
would
be
helpful
to
them
and
we
immediately
start
deferring
the
cost
of
our
use
of
our
own
asset
or
sharing
those
cost.
Let's
say
those
economies,
and
so
that's
that's
why
I
think
I'm
comfortable
pushing
forward
because
we're
not
it's
it's
it's
yeah,
but
that's
where
I
am.
D
F
I
Be
the
board,
it
would
be
the
light
hub
board,
but
you
would
have
a
representative
that
represents
the
city
in
that,
and
that
representative
would
obviously
be
able
to
consult
with
our
City
Council
to
say:
hey
what
these
are
the
proposed
bylaws.
Do
we
want
to
go
down
that
path?
Do
you
see
any
concerns
you
know,
and
so
there
is
that
connectivity
so.
D
I
L
I
guess
what
I
would
like
to
see
is
maybe
that
that
template,
what
path
are
we
going
down?
Give
me
a
little
more
assurance,
then
all
of
a
sudden
saying,
hey,
I,
think
we're
doing
this
over
here
and
all
of
a
sudden,
the
bylaws
come
out
heading
this
way
and
now
all
the
sudden
it's
going
this
way
all
we've
got
is
a
shell
right.
L
Where
do
they
vote
in
the
best
interest
of
the
inner,
local
and
David
would
maybe
have
a
good
opinion
on
this,
but
my
understanding
is
that
fiduciary
duty
as
a
board
member
is
that
you
have
to
represent
the
entity
that
you
sit
on,
not
necessarily
the
entity
that
you're
representing
that
makes
sense.
So
they'd
have
to
vote
in
the
interest
of
light
hub,
not
necessarily
interest
of
American
port
city.
So
again
just
trying
to
see
where
that
goes.
It's
just
hard
going
into
something,
not
knowing
what
it
is.
L
Usually
we
do
an
interlocal
agreement,
it's
pretty
detailed
out
what
we're
doing
this
is
a
brand-new
one
and
that's
why
I
just
have
a
little
bit
of
heartburn
saying
gas,
we're
kind
of
joining
something
without
really
knowing
inside
what
how
that's
going
to
work?
Now?
Maybe
staff
has
that
understanding,
but
for
me
to
cast
a
vote
I'm
kind
of
going
to
be
nice
to
maybe
have
a
little
bit
of
clarity.
What
that
would
look
like,
for
instance,
if
would
already
exist?
What
does
determination
of
it
say.
I
M
A
G
N
N
Does
the
debt
stay
on
your
books
or
on
light
hubs
books?
If
it's
on
light
hubs
books,
then
it's
light
hubs
asset
during
the
duration
of
the
bonds
and
then
you
can
determine
what
happens
to
the
title
of
the
asset
at
that
point,
I'm
correct,
but
but
but
in
that
context,
because
it's
the
American
Fork
project
only
American
for
votes
on
it,
Kaysville
would
not
so.
N
I
G
L
I
L
I
L
There's
I
think
I
read
in
there
somewhere
that
they
can
come
out
and
give
special
assessments
and
things
like
that
to
various
cities.
Right
nice
don't
lie
I
just
feel
like
we're,
jumping
the
gun
joining
an
entity
without
even
really
having
our
project
nailed
down
and
knowing
what
it's
going
to
look
like,
there's
so
many
questions
we
still
haven't
even
answered
as
far
as
the
fiber
inside
the
city
goes
again.
This
just
feels
like
it's
premature
and
the
queue
I'd
almost
think
it'd
be
like
okay.
Yes,
we're
moving
forward
this
project.
L
All
of
us
have
a
really
good
understanding
of
where
it's
going,
and
maybe
we
do
after
that
long
meeting
the
other
night,
but
it
felt
like
there
was
still
a
lot
of
questions.
A
lot
of
us
had
even
from
how
do
we
enter
people's
property?
How
do
we
legally
go
about
installing
the
fiber
to
start
joining
an
entity?
L
Just
feels
like
that's
pretty
mature
at
this
point
and
if
there's
things
we
need
to
do
together
with
Kaysville
to
help
us
both
further
along
I'd,
rather
do
a
more
shorter
term
contract,
it's
a
little
clearer
and
more
transparent,
and
then
we
can
always
convert
to
an
our
local
down.
The
road
I
don't
see
where
that
hurts
us
at
all,
but
I
feel
like
it
builds
in
some
protections
for
us
do.
L
B
It's
a
brand
new
entity,
so
I'm
down
with
the
bylaws
I.
Don't
I,
don't
struggle
with
that.
Rob
I
mean,
but
that's
from
past
experience.
I've
had
with
my
own
business
and
creating
those
bylaws
the
entity
was
there.
Then
we
crafted
the
bylaws,
so
I,
don't
I,
don't
have
heartburn
with
that,
not
that
yours
isn't
valid
or
warranted.
But
my
question
is
so
I
mean
I've
already
made
up
my
mind
by
virtue
of
what
you
said
tonight
with
I:
don't
want
to
bomb
through
the
interlocal
I.
B
Don't
want
to
I
know,
there's
much
that
I
still
have
to
understand,
but
I
want
that
asset
to
be
ours,
and
that's
so.
If
we
enter
into
this
inner
local
and
we
decide
like
councilman
Shelton
says
we
don't
go
forward.
Kaysville
wants
to
go
forward.
We
consider
instructed
con
contract
with
our
NOC
through
this
interlocal,
because
we're
a
part
of
this
right-
and
you
know,
economies
of
scale
still
exist.
Even
though
we
don't
have
that
and
we,
you
know
we're
still
an
okay
spot.
There
is
that
is
that
correct,
I.
N
N
Taylor,
and
so
it
is
it
that
it's
it's
it
it's
two
sides
of
the
coin,
and
so
you
benefit
by
providing
your
NOC
services
in
your
mid
Mile
fiber
to
light
hub
as
other
cities
come
onboard,
you
would
receive
additional
revenue
on
beverage
of
their
subscribership
that
you
otherwise
wouldn't
have,
and
so
it's
the
it's
that
operational
side
that
and
we
haven't
discussed
a
lot
tonight.
We've
talked
about
the
finance
side
and
the
ownership
side,
but
it's
really
the
operational
side,
where
you
begin
to
realize
economies
of
scale
that
you
otherwise
wouldn't
have.
L
N
Could
but
then
you
wouldn't
be
on
the
front
end
of
setting
the
rules
of
the
road
I.
Think.
N
F
J
It
seems
like,
if
down
the
road
they
want
in,
and
we've
already
got
this
box
set
up,
I'm
just
gonna
call
it
a
box.
Then
they
have
to
accept
that
box.
But
if
down
the
road
that
box
isn't
set
up,
then
we
have
to
accept
to
some
extent
what
some
of
these
other
people
may
want.
It
seems
to
me
in
my
mind,
but
in
the
end,
no
matter
what
happens
which
road
we
go
down,
I
am
understanding
that
we
still
have
to
knock.
J
B
J
E
F
H
B
If
I
were
king
for
a
day,
so
I
think
I've
got
enough,
III
would
rather
be
at
the
table
and
control
our
destiny.
Then
then,
that's
just
the
way
I
feel
about
it.
I
don't
see
the
motion
on
the
thing
so
I'm
gonna
do
my
best
to
make
my
own,
and
that
is
I
would
authorize
the
mayor
and
city
council
to
exit
our
extra
execute.
B
I
B
Yes
and
an
outlining
also
the
change
in
11.6
that
goes
for
the
members
of
the
board
in
attendance,
so
the
clarification
so
approve
the
approve.
The
resolution
authorizing
execution,
mayor
frost
as
the
city's
representative
on
light
hubs
board
and
the
City
Council
to
be
able
to
view
the
bylaws
prior
to
adoption.