►
From YouTube: October 22, 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
A
D
A
C
A
A
A
All
right,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
thank
you
for
being
patient
with
us.
We
were
conducting
business
in
a
very
different
capacity
with
a
with
the
RTA
board
thanksgivukkah
week,
but
we
welcome
you
tonight
to
the
American
Fork
City
Council
meeting
it's
October
22nd
2019
and
we'd
like
to
note
that
is.
This
meeting
is
being
held
through
electronic
means
to
one
of
our
council
members,
council,
member
Carol,
and
we
will
follow
the
agenda
as
outlined.
A
Excuse
me,
I'm
getting
ahead
of
myself
here.
I
really
am
I
need
to
look
down
before
we
open
up
a
regular
session
for
council
meeting.
We
have
a
public
hearing
to
conduct
to
receive
public
comments
on
the
fiscal
year,
ending
June
30th,
23,
2020
budget
adjustments.
Anybody
would
like
to
make
public
comment
concerning
this
topic.
If
you'd
come
forward
and
please
state
your
name.
A
Seeing
none,
we
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
now
we
will
move
on
to
our
City
Council
meeting
again.
We
welcome
you
everybody
here
and
if
you
need
a
copy
of
the
agenda,
it's
in
the
room
as
you
entered,
and
we
will
follow
that
agenda
as
outlined.
We
will
first
have
a
Pledge
of
Allegiance,
after
which
you
will
have
an
invocation
by
councilmember
Shelton
and
then
I
will
conduct
the
roll
call.
Everybody
please
stand.
B
Our
Father
in
heaven
forgive
for
the
opportunity
we
have
to
be
gathered
together
as
a
community
and
as
leaders
and
as
those
that
have
interest
in
American
for
to
be
able
to
discuss
matters
of
how
we
can
be
able
to
further
the
interests
of
the
city.
We're
thankful
for
the
opportunity
that
we
have
to
enjoy
the
freedoms
to
have
this
assembly
and
be
able
to
conduct
meetings
on
behalf
of
those
whom
we
serve.
B
We
ask
father
that
they
still
be
with
us
that
we
may
be
able
to
conduct
the
meeting
and
harmony
and
be
able
to
come
to
conclusions
and
be
able
to
do
it
in
a
manner
that
is
respectful
and
honors.
Those
that
have
sacrificed
so
much
for
us
to
be
able
to
enjoy
such
freedoms.
And
these
things
we
ask
and
pray
for
anyone
that
son,
Jesus,
Christ,
amen.
A
A
I
was
asked
that
question
today
in
a
in
a
interview
I
had
with
the
gentleman
from
UVU
and
it's
very
rewarding
and,
as
we
talked
about
Shana
greening
tonight,
I
want
you
to
know
that
I
knew
her
personally
I
worked
at
the
city
in
a
parallel
time,
with
her
and
I
grew
to
love
and
respect
her
for
who
she
was
and
her
efforts
to
the
city.
If
ever
there
was
a
problem,
who
was
a
person
who
wanted
to
help
others,
it
was
Shana,
greening
Shana
knew
from
an
early
age.
A
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Shana
started
working
for
American
Fork,
City,
Police
Department
in
October
of
1991.
She
held
many
roles
in
her
career,
including
patrol
officer,
detective
public
information
officer
and
domestic
violence
advocate
Oliver
roles
were
important
to
her,
but
she
was
especially
proud
of
her
promotion
as
the
first
female
sergeant
of
the
American
Fork
Police
Department.
As
a
patrol
officer,
she
could
count
on
her.
You
could
count
on
her
to
help
stop
and
give
a
helping
hand
and
to
stop
an
issue
a
ticket
or
just
to
stop
and
talk.
A
She
would
visit
the
city
employees,
her
work.
The
night
shift
just
to
check
in
on
them.
People
working
late
hours
could
always
count
on
Shana
to
be
there
as
they
walked
to
their
cars.
If
circumstances
led
to
being
placed
in
the
back
of
her
patrol
car,
you
could
count
on
her
to
be
courteous
and
professional.
She
honors
compassion
for
victims
of
domestic
violence
proved
invaluable
for
the
Department
of
time.
Shawna's,
calm,
demeanor,
Carrie
advice
and
knowledge
of
resources
was
comforting
to
those
in
difficult
circumstances.
A
She
took
her
promotion
to
sergeant
seriously.
She
was
a
natural
leader.
She
was
a
born
mentor
for
the
officers
on
her
crew.
She
genuinely
cared
about
their
well-being,
both
on
and
off
the
job.
She
actively
participated
in
her
community,
including
running
the
steel
day's
5k
run.
She
ran
the
Torch
Run
for
Special
Olympics
and
participated
in
many
other
charities
near
to
her
heart.
She
supported
the
AAF
high
school
football
team
and
baseball
teams,
as
well
as
the
marching
band,
win
or
lose.
A
She
would
greet
them
as
they
returned
from
away
games
or
concerts
in
October
2000
19.
She
was
there
to
greet
the
students
from
the
marching
band
who
had
earlier
been
involved
in
a
tragic
bus
accident
that
resulted
in
the
death
of
one
of
their
directors.
She
knew
the
students
would
be
devastated
and
she
wanted
to
be
there
for
them.
Shawna
was
always
a
caveman
and
supported
her
alma
mater
shotta
served
the
city
of
American
Fork
for
nearly
18
years,
17
years,
364
days
until
her
passing
those
who
knew
her
knew
her
kindness
or
compassion.
A
Her
tenacity
and
her
strength.
She
had
the
biggest
heart
would
do
anything
for
anybody.
She
left
a
lasting
impression
on
so
many.
She
is
dearly
missed
every
day,
this
annual
day
dedicated
to
Shawna
as
the
sergeant
Shawna
greening
day
of
service
as
a
way
for
us,
her
family
friends,
co-workers
and
law
enforcement,
EMS
and
Fire
Department
personnel
to
continue
in
her
to
continue
her
legacy
of
service
to
the
city
of
American,
Fork
and
I.
Think
Shawn
are
just
she
raised
the
bar.
A
F
So,
just
to
give
a
little
background
a
couple
years
ago,
our
our
staff
started
to
do
a
do
a
service
project
every
year
for
someone
or
some
organization
within
the
community
and
we've
we've.
Last
couple
of
years,
we've
participated
with
Tabitha's
way
to
collect
food
donations
during
the
Thanksgiving
time
period
for
for
the
food
pantry
there,
but
as
chief
falls,
Levin
and
I
were
talking
about
how
we
could
recognize
Shawna
for
her
service
and
what
she's
done
for
our
community.
Our
thought
was
hey.
F
G
Since
the
passing
of
our
daughter,
Shawna
was
a
good
person
had
the
opportunity
to
be
with
her
a
little
bit
while
she
was
going
through
some
of
her
sports
and
had
the
opportunity
to
coach
her
with
the
bay
softball
coach,
Don
Cox
from
Utah
Valley
University,
and
she
played
their
softball
and
I
had
the
opportunity
to
be
with
her
but
I'm
so
thankful
to
share
her
with
others
and
to
participate
in
a
surface
project.
This
I
didn't
know
what
it
was
going
to
be.
H
This
was
a
combined
effort
with
myself
city
council
members,
members
of
the
city,
as
well
as
chief
Falls
Lopes,
so
I
can't
take
all
the
credit,
in
behalf
of
the
greening
family,
I'd
like
to
express
our
appreciation
to
the
city
of
American
Fork
for
honoring,
Shauna
Shauna
meant
so
much
to
so
many.
She
was
the
daughter
and
the
light
of
her
parents
eyes.
She
was
a
sister
and
aunt
cousin
friend,
neighbor
officer,
co-worker
and
mentor.
Each
of
us,
for
our
own
reasons,
had
a
special
bond
with
her.
H
A
F
Thank
You
mayor
just
wanted
to
report
the
Timpanogos
special
service
district
had
their
annual
budget
retreat
and
just
to
discuss
the
vision
and
goals
of
the
sewer
district
and
and
kind
of
where
the
districts
headed
and
it
was,
it
was
really
eye-opening.
Quite
honestly,
the
district
is
growing
tremendously.
A
lot
of
the
growth
is
in
Saratoga
Springs
in
Eagle
Mountain,
and
with
that
growth
is
causing
the
district
to
look
at
how
they
will
service
these
areas.
F
A
large
discussion
centered
around
how
to
how
to
how
to
treat
the
sewer
flows
from
those
communities
and
a
discussion
we
had
involved.
Do
we
build
a
new
treatment
plant
somewhere
close
to
the
Jordan
River,
to
handle
all
of
the
flows
from
the
the
west
side
of
the
district?
Or
do
we
build?
Do
we
construct
additional
transmission
lines
from
those
communities
that
will
bring
all
the
flow
back
to
the
sewer
plant
where
it
exists
today?
F
If
that
were,
if
that
were
this,
mic
would
keep
working,
those
new
transmission
lines
would
need
to
come
through
American
Fork
City.
Obviously,
if
new
transmission
lines
need
to
be
built
because
those
those
lines
would
come
from
Saratoga
and
Eagle
Mountain
and
then
and
then
go
along
the
lakeshore
in
some
fashion,
but
it
would
go
through
American
Fork
City
in
order
to
get
to
the
plant.
So
there's
an
analysis
being
done
on
whether
or
not
it
would.
F
It
would
be
beneficial
to
build
a
new
plant
and
keep
most
of
those
flows
over
over
on
the
west
side
or
if
it
makes
sense
to
transmit
those
flows
through
American,
Fork
and
and
Lehigh
to
get
to
the
plant.
So
the
cost
for
something
like
that
is
somewhere
in
the
range
of
120
to
150
million
dollars
to
do
a
new
plant
and
then
with
the
upgraded
lines.
That's
that's
going
to
be
in
the
neighborhood
of
50
to
60
million
dollars.
So
there's
some
very
large
capital
expenditures
that
are
on
the
horizon.
F
C
Don't
have
anything
completely
new
back
up
what
we
talked
about
last
time
about
the
library
being
a
quality
library,
we're
very
happy
about
that
and
I
had
some
of
the
statistics.
I
won't
read
them
all,
but
just
a
couple
that
stand
out.
Last
year
there
were
170
mm
visits
to
the
library
this
year.
It's
a
hundred
and
ninety
five
thousand.
C
B
Mayor
I
never
had
the
opportunity
this
morning
to
go,
judge
some
scarecrows
that
are
over
in
Robinson
Park
and
that's
been
by
the
Beautification
Committee.
So
if
you
get
a
chance,
I
think
there's
six
scarecrows
out
there
last
I
counted
and
there
are
all
different
types
of
scarecrows
and
it
was
kind
of
interesting
to
see
the
talent
that
went
into
that.
The
other
item
I
have
the
report
on
just
comes
from
the
dispatch
board.
We
did
finally
get
approval
when
we
awarded
a
contract.
B
This
has
been
about
just
over
a
year
in
the
making
of
doing
some
other
way
of
redundant
communication
for
our
fire
departments
inside
the
dispatch
service
area,
and
that's
going
to
be
through
fiber
and
I'm
glad
to
report
that
that
500,000
will
include
upgrades
to
every
station
that
will
come
out
of
the
pocket
of
the
district,
not
out
of
the
pocket,
so
there's
14
I,
believe
fire
stations
chief.
You
can
tell
me
if
I'm
wrong
on
that
or
not,
but
they
were
included
on
that.
B
Unfortunately,
our
new
fire
station
that
we're
proposing
was
not
on
that
list
just
because
it
wasn't
one
that
was
already
there
when
we
were
going
through
the
process,
but
I
believe
that's
something
that
we
should
look
for
making
sure
those
upgrades
are
a
part
of
that
station
build
the
Saratoga
Springs
fire
chief
spoke
at
the
board
meeting
and
talked
about
the
importance
of
this
Las
Vegas.
Just
to
let
you
know
the
difference
in
technology
moved
to
this
system
20
years
ago.
B
So
that
tells
you
how
far
behind
the
times
we
really
are
in
our
dispatch
services.
They
said
it
was
a
complete
game
changer
as
far
as
getting
out
the
door
having
more
adequate
information,
that's
coming
and
being
able
to
really
get
that
detailed
information
into
our
first
responders
hands
as
fast
as
possible.
The
other
item
that
we're
working
on
right
now
is
the
tower
situation,
as
we
do
more
research
as
we're
kind
of
transitioning
from
a
county
entity
to
a
multi
County
entity.
B
It's
being
proposed
that
we
take
over
the
licensing
as
the
entity
for
these
towers
versus
the
county.
That
means
we'd
be
responsible
for
the
maintenance
right
now
we're
having
a
lot
of
issues
on
the
south
end
of
the
county,
where
they're
not
able
to
communicate,
because
when
there's
a
tone,
that's
sent
out
to
copper
items,
click
kind
of
like
I,
think
of
like
a
Telegraph
type
thing
to
send
a
message.
Those
copper
heads
are
sticking
really
hard.
They're
replaced
up
in
Salt
Lake
County
every
18
months.
B
They
haven't
been
replaced
in
20
years
on
our
towers,
so
I
think
that
there's
a
lot
that
we're
figuring
out
and
trying
to
make
sure
that
we're
being
proactive
in
our
maintenance
program
to
ensure
good
communication.
We
are
still
looking
for
a
second
tower.
We
talked
with
the
state
who
has
to
give
us
permission
to
build
that
tower
and
there's
26
towers
ahead
of
ours.
B
Am
I
proposed
in
that
meeting
that
we
get
together
with
all
of
our
agencies
and
start
to
petition
the
state
if
we're
the
fastest
growing
County
and
we're
relying
on
one
fire
tower
to
service
the
whole
county?
It
would
make
sense
that
we
maybe
make
our
way
up
that
priority
list.
Not
saying
ask
me
number
one,
but
it's
something
that
I
think
is
it
critical
that
we
need
to
do
so.
I
would
look
at
other
cities
and
agencies.
B
I
I'm
often
asked
about
that.
How
do
you
know
that?
How
do
you
remember
that
for
those
that
aren't
up-to-date
on
their
history,
the
Armistice
I
think
that's
the
word
of
World
War
armistice,
World
War
one
was
signed
at
11
o'clock
a.m.
on
November
November,
the
11th,
and
so
that
is
where
the
tradition
comes
from
to
hold
that
meeting.
I
personally
love
to
attend
it.
It's
a
great
meeting,
it's
a
great
opportunity
for
community
like
ours
to
do.
I
A
number
of
things
include
including
things
such
as
celebrate
and
give
thanks
for
the
freedoms
and
the
blessings
that
we
enjoy
living
in
this
wonderful
country,
but
is
particularly
to
honor
all
those
who
have
served
in
our
armed
services
in
any
way,
shape
or
form,
and
especially,
to
remember
those
who
made
that
ultimate
sacrifice.
So
it
really
is
a
very
enjoyable
program
and
only
lasts
about
an
hour.
I
I
would
encourage
everybody
to
go
there
and
we
have
invited
all
five
of
the
elementary
schools
and
all
five
of
them
have
confirmed
when
I
say
elementary
schools,
the
fifth
graders,
and
we
invite
fifth
graders,
because
that's
what
they're
studying
in
history,
this
year's
not
United,
States,
history
and
stuff.
So
this
fits
in
with
their
program
and
all
five
of
them
agreed
to
come
and
participate
that
in
that
for
the
public
schools.
We've
invited
charter
schools
in
the
past,
but
they
have
not
really
been
receptive
to
it.
I
J
K
Mayor
just
a
couple
of
items,
I
appreciate
the
honor
for
Shawna
Green
draining
tonight.
I
just
knew
she
onna,
because
I
hung
out
one
of
my
best
friends
lived
up
in
her
neighborhood
and
I.
Remember
her
as
as
a
friend
for
all
the
neighborhood
games
before
I.
Remember
her
as
a
police
officer.
But
the
great
thing
about
this
to
me
is
this:
is
this?
Is
home
town
we
honor
one
of
our
own?
Someone
who
grew
up
here
and-
and
you
know,
grew
and
made
a
difference
and,
and
that's
awesome,
I
I.
K
Think
of
you
know
the
past
Chief
Paul,
Durant
kind
of
the
same
thing
and
the
monuments,
and
that
that
we
have
for
him
and
that's
that's
the
beauty
of
a
community
such
as
ours,
so
I
appreciate
that
the
other
thing
that
I
appreciate
is
all
the
great
things
that
are
going
on
with
the
young
people
high
school.
We
often
celebrate
the
band
and
the
band
has
been
the
talk
for
so
many
years
and
it's
a
wonderful
thing,
but
but
this
year
we're
right
in
the
thick
of
great
things.
J
K
A
For
the
mayor's
report,
I
think
there's
there's
one
thing
that
I
had
bored
I
sit
on.
It
I
fail
to
mention
it,
but
I
think
it's
important
to
talk
about
it,
so
that
everybody
understands
the
vibrant
senior
community
that
we
have
I
sit
on
the
senior
citizens
board
and
they're.
Not
waiting
around
to
grow
old
I
can
tell
you
that
I
was
reminded
of
that.
Just
within
the
last
few
weeks
and
I
was
over
neared.
A
The
area
at
another
meeting
and
I
came
out
and
the
bus
was
unloading,
because
this
massive
group
was
coming
back
from
to
'icon,
and
so
they
they
are
just
a
thriving
group
that
has
great
leadership.
There's
not
a
day
that
you
can't
go
down
there
and
feel
like
you're
part
of
something
there's
always
tips
to
be
had
on
fitness
and
wellness
into
your
8
into
your
senior
years
and
the
perhaps
the
greatest
thing
is
this
great
sociality:
they
have,
they
played
bingo,
they
serve
each
other
and
I.
A
Just
feel
really
good
about
how
seniors
in
our
city
have
a
place
to
go
and
feel
a
part
of
something
more
than
themselves.
So
I
just
wanted
to
let
this
council
know
and
everybody
to
know
that,
so
that
is
the
mayor's
report.
We'll
move
on
to
the
comic
consent
agenda.
It's
comprised
of
the
fight
item,
five
items
that
are
before
you
any
any
changes
on
the
minutes.
Mayor.
L
I
just
observed
it
on
the
September
24th
2019
minutes
in
the
discussion
of
eddington
estates
and
the
infrastructure.
It
says
here
on
page
7
line,
21
councilmember
Barnes
asked
who
would
pay
for
the
proposed
changes,
because
we
were
discussing
what
improvements
would
need
to
be
made
before
the
city
accepted
it,
and
it
appears
that
the
minutes
incorrectly
City
would
pay
for
those
changes.
The
discussion
was
that
the
city
could
bid
it
out,
but
it
ultimately
be
the
applicant
who
would
pay
for
those
changes
for
the
infrastructure.
L
B
C
I
A
K
A
C
A
A
A
Number
three:
there's
a
review
and
action
on
an
ordinance
adopting
amendments
to
section
seventeen
point,
four
point:
403
and
section
17
point
four
point:
402
of
the
American
Fork
City
Development
code.
In
order
to
modify
setbacks,
requirements,
its
God
I
think
we're
going
to
need
you
up
front
center.
If
not
this
one,
there
will
be
another
one.
So
I'm
I'll
save
you
the
time
any
questions
on
this.
We
have
staff.
You
might
pull
that
back.
Just
a
little
bit.
N
Just
a
little
background
on
this,
what
this
does
is
in
these
two
zones:
the
CC
2
and
the
GC
1.
What
we're
looking
at
is
amending
the
side
and
rear
setbacks
for
those
two
commercial
zones,
the
other
commercial
zones
that
we
have
allow
up
to
a
0
law
or
a
0
setback.
If
you
will
has
provided
that
no
buildings
or
the
structures
are
outside
of
any
easements
that
may
exist.
N
N
Yes,
some
of
them
do
as
some
of
the
other
commercial
zones
as
well.
Any
project
in
any
of
these
zones
still
requires
Planning
Commission
approval,
and
they
would
have
to
look
at
that
and
if
there
are
any
concerns
those
could
be
brought
up
at
that
time
as
well.
But
yes,
just
as
our
other
commercial
zones.
Some
of
these
do
but
residentially
zoned
properties
and
that's
something
we
would
look
at
as
projects
move
forward.
But
everything
in
these
zones
does
require
Planning
Commission
approval.
B
B
An
item
one,
it
used
to
say
front
and
rear
setback
in
item
two.
It
just
says
side
setback.
It
has
nothing
to
address
the
rear
setback
I'm.
Just
looking
at
those
headings
and
saying
that
we
probably
ought
to
say
that
the
site
and
rear
setback
is
now
addressed
in
item
two
not
addressed
in
item.
One
I
see.
B
O
N
It
could
right
now,
even
in
the
cc1
zone,
there
are
zeros,
basically
zero
lot
line,
setbacks
for
front
side
and
rear.
We
do
have
some
cc1
properties
that
do
a
but
up
to
residential
zones.
N
B
N
B
I'm
worried
when
they
do
that
they
don't
have
like.
What's
the
ability
to
say
you
don't
have
that
ability
to
do
that,
but
you
do
that
makes
sense.
So
usually
we
have
criteria
that
sets
up
saying
hey
if
you're
by
a
neighborhood
or
it's
this
or
that
kind
of
gives
a
little
more
direction.
I
guess
to
the
Planning,
Commission
I
think.
N
Well,
in
the
other
zones,
yeah
I
mean
the
Planning
Commission
does
look
at
those
there's,
not
necessarily
a
list
of
criteria.
I
mean
that
the
current
zone
or
the
current
setback
right
now
is
30
feet
and
the
feedback
we're
getting
from
the
development
community
is
some
of
these
properties
are
unusable.
We
cannot
meet
those
setbacks,
and
so,
in
some
instances
the
Planning
Commission
has
looked
at
that
and
basically
given
findings.
N
If
you
will
of
modification
of
setbacks,
what
we
thought
was,
instead
of
continually
doing
that,
why
not
just
amend
the
zoning
and
that
you
know
that
should
make
it
a
little
easier
for
developed
for
the
developers
to
move
forward
rather
than
having
the
Planning
Commission
make
findings
for
approval
if
you
will
for
case-by-case
basis,
but
if
that's
the
way
you'd
rather
go,
we
can
definitely
keep
it
that
way.
That's
just
what
they've
done
up
to
now.
I
would.
L
Recommend
the
council
allow
the
land
use
authority
some
discretion
there
by
inserting
the
language
the
land
use
of
third
Authority
may
require
a
setback,
a
budding
a
residential
zone
of
up
to
30
feet,
so
that
gives
them
the
ability
to
go
up
to
30
but
down
to
zero.
When
it's
a
buddy
in
a
residential
zone.
B
B
B
L
I
C
D
A
A
C
A
N
Thank
you
mayor,
so
this
was
went
before
the
Planning
Commission
last
week
at
their
meeting,
and
we
understand
they
are
on
kind
of
an
expedited
schedule,
and
so
therefore
it
came
to
you
tonight
what
you're
missing
in
your
packet
are
the
draft
minutes
from
last
week's
meeting,
but
I
can
kind
of
go
over
a
little
bit
of
what
was
discussed.
The
Planning
Commission
ultimately
recommended
approval
of
this
project.
Moving
forward,
this
site
plan
engineering
was
able
to.
N
This
is,
if
you
recall,
this
is
a
site
plan
for
lot
to
what
was
recently
approved
as
the
Beehive
clothing
subdivision,
and
so
this
will
be
located
on
that
lot
to
the
clothing.
The
distribution
or
the
clothing
facility
is
still
on
a
lot
one
that
will
remain
and
Scott's
here
to
answer
any
engineering
related
questions,
but
again
Planning
Commission
recommended
approval,
I'm.
K
O
I
P
P
We
come
back
to
the
city
and
say
well,
okay,
it's
not
sixty
thousand
feet,
it's
85
thousand
feet
so
anyway,
as
a
preliminary
welcome,
we
thank
you
for
working
with
us.
It's
not.
We
know
that
it
hasn't
been
easy,
but
it's
always
refreshing
to
have
a
municipality
that
is
able
to
listen
and
to
work
through
problems.
There
will
always
be
problems,
but
we
appreciate
a
good
partner
that
looks
at
it
says:
hey
we
can
get
through
this
together.
So
we're
excited
about
this.
P
We
know
that
there's
a
lot
more
in
terms
of
working
through
some
of
the
details.
We've
got
a
building,
permit,
that's
being
reviewed,
I'm
sure
there'll
be
many
more
questions
and
councilman
Taylor
appreciate
your
comment
on
he.
The
traffic
study
I
mean
there's
nothing
more.
That
I
like
to
do
than
sit
in
my
bed
and
read
an
extensive
traffic
study,
and
to
that
point
we
we
recognize
that
there
are
some
things
that
we're
going
to
do
as
a
partner
with
the
city.
There
are
intersections
that
need
to
be
upgraded.
P
We've
got
a
impact,
transportation
impact
for
you
that
will
will
cover,
but
we
want
to
be
a
partner.
We've
talked
with
Scott
and
his
team
and,
to
the
extent
that
we
can
be
helpful
and
I
think
he's
got
a
pretty
good
idea
of
how
that
may
work.
We
stand
ready
to
help
improve
these
intersections,
so
we
recognize
that
it's
a
team
effort
and
we're
just
getting
started
and
if
we
can
have
our
way,
we
hope
that
this
is
one
of
many
projects
that
we
can
do
here
in
this
in
this
city.
I
O
I
P
Me
give
you,
let
me
give
you
a
perspective.
We
in
the
last
since
2014
exactly
we're
up
in
there
in
2014
it
was
the
largest
commercial
office
building
in
the
state.
At
the
time.
That's
five
years
ago,
our
company
has
done
over
1.2
billion
dollars
worth
of
development
in
really
five
years.
So
we've
had
a
lot
of
experience
in
working
and
with
a
number
of
different
councils,
Planning
Commission's
and
mostly
a
lot
of
the
city
staff.
P
Really
I
can't
say
enough
with
the
complicated
deal
that
we've
brought
forward
here,
I
can't
say
the
name
but
the
tenant,
who
gets
a
reporting
from
us
two
and
three
times
a
week,
a
national
player.
Everybody
in
this
room
knows
who
they
are
or
will
know
who
they
are
they're
a
little
dumbfounded.
You
you
did
what
you
were
able
to
work
this
out
and
the
council
was
able
to
hear
it
and
as
Planning
Commission
ya,.
O
P
They
understand
what
we're
doing,
and
it's
not
just
me
I
in
fact,
at
some
point,
I
think.
If
there's
a
groundbreaking
I
hope
we
can
make
it
a
nice
public
event
and
invite
the
governor
and
them
and
the
go-ahead
and
EDC
Utah,
the
tenet
will
be
there.
They'll
say
the
same
thing.
This
has
probably
been
one
of
the
more
smoother
processes
and
it
hasn't
been,
and
we
haven't
made
it
necessarily
easy
for
you
right.
We
keep
changing
what
the
design
looks
like
and
it's
a
difficult
site.
P
K
P
J
P
Think
that's
referencing
that
intersection,
which
has
a
railroad
crossing
right.
There
I
talked
with
Ryan
Hills
today.
That's
also
a
concern
that
I
think
the
tenant
has.
They
would
prefer
it
not
to
be
a
ride
in
right
out.
In
fact,
the
picture
that
was
taken
shows
a
left-hand
turn
being
made
from
a
Google
aerial
image.
The
the
concern
really
probably
is
more
of
a:
u
dot
concern
you
dot
has
jurisdiction
over
the
railroad
crossings.
P
However,
the
city
could
allow
a
left-hand
turn
and
Ryan
Hills
have
said
you
know.
Unless
you
dot
was
to
circumvent
and
Trump
that
decision
there
could
be
a
left-hand
turn
that
would
be
allowed.
They're.
The
tenants
traffic
study,
engineer,
sorry,
traffic
engineer,
reviewed
the
study
and
came
back
with
something
similar
saying
it
doesn't
seem
to
be
warranted
that
it
would
have
to
be
a
right
in
right
out.
We
see
that
it
could
be
allowed
for
a
left-hand
turn.
Ryan
Hills
says
well.
P
P
Q
Q
This
is
one
of
those
that
I
would
I
would
echo
again
that
the
developer
has
been
terrific
to
work
with
and
and
I
just
want
to
echo
that
there's
just
a
few
things
that
we
feel
very
strongly
about
as
staff
in
terms
of
infrastructure,
improvements
and
situations
that
we
need
to
do
to
make
sure
that
this
development
works
properly,
that
the
traffic
can
flow
in
and
out.
This
is
one
that
I
can't
emphasize
enough.
How
strongly
I
feel
about
it.
In
my
professional
opinion
and
Ryan
Hales
is
the
one
who
agrees
and
I
should
say.
Q
Q
As
many
of
the
employees
leave
the
facility
to
turn
right
to
go
east
on
1100,
there
could
be
times
where
there's
a
very
good,
steady
stream
of
traffic
going
that
way,
and
if
there
is
a
truck
headed
westbound
at
the
same
time,
that
wants
to
make
a
left
turn
to
go
south,
they
would
have
to
yield
to
that
oncoming
traffic
and
wait
for
a
gap
if
they're.
So,
if
you
sorry,
if
so,
if
truck
was
wanting
to
go
west
to
south,
they
would
have
to
yield
to
the
eastbound
traffic.
Q
K
Q
Q
On
this
one,
so,
okay,
there
you
go
I
just
made
brain.
So
if
a
truck
is
at
this
intersection
and
is
wanting
to
make
a
left
turn
to
go
south
where
right
there,
it
says
5,300
West,
it's
highly
likely
that
their
back-end
is
sitting
on
the
track
and
if
there's
two
trucks,
there's
almost
a
hundred
percent
guarantee
there
sitting
on
the
tracks.
There's
a
extremely
high
likelihood
that
there
that
there
will
be
there
as
they're
waiting
for
that
eastbound
traffic
to
clear
so.
K
Q
All
but
most
of
it
there
is
some
traffic
there
now,
but
it
will
dramatically
increase
many
times
over,
as
the
shift
leaves
and
people
are
leaving
today,
there's
very
little
it's
illegal
today.
This
motion,
this
movement,
that
I
was
talking
about
it
hasn't
we
haven't,
had
any
incidents,
because
today
the
traffic
is
very
light
that
will
change.
B
B
Q
It
is,
and
it's
awfully
close,
but
it's
a
little
further,
there's
the
it's
it.
I
believe
the
double
stripe
ends
there.
I
remember
right,
it
is
an
issue,
but
again
it's
a
little
bit
further
away
the
further
away
you
get
from
the
tracks,
the
better
it
gets
to
where
a
southbound
movement
would
be
okay.
Q
B
Q
Was
pointed
out,
it's
true
in
a
different
image.
You
go
to
Google
Maps,
it
shows
somebody
doing
the
exact
movement
and
you
know
things
happen,
but
I
can
promise
you
probably
right
now
somewhere
in
the
state
of
Utah.
Somebody
just
ran
a
stop
sign
too
and
I
betcha.
There's
ten
people
speeding
right
now
in
American,
Fork.
Q
Coming
out
of
the
parking
lot,
we're
not
recommending
right
in
right
out
so
anywhere
full
unrestricted
access
with
their
site
plan.
It's
it's!
This
movement
right
here
that
we're
concerned
about
I
do
want
to
mention
I.
Think
it's
important
to
note
that
in
the
future,
500
East
is
going
to
be
realigned
with
500
East
right
now.
There's
an
offset.
Q
It
is,
and-
and
that
could
be
what's
built,
but
that
is
one
of
the
things
that
is
is
coming
in
the
future
that
will
improve
the
access.
It
really
is
tight,
a
lot
to
the
timing
of
the
vinyard
connector,
which
we
know
is
coming
as
well
and
and
so
that
realignment
of
500
will
be
a
new
flyover
over
the
tracks
to
line
500
with
500
that'll
help
the
situation
significantly.
Q
In
the
meantime,
the
traffic
study
by
Hales
engineering
shows
the
bulk
of
the
truck
traffic
heading
to
the
south
and
not
using
this
intersection
at
all,
anyways
and
and
I'm
sure.
It's
a
partly
the
result
of
the
fact
that
of
what
we
talked
about.
So
one
of
the
things
that
we
have
talked
about
as
a
staff
and
been
discussing
with
the
developer
is
the
need
to
extend
that
concrete
median
to
further
to
the
west,
even
though
the
movement
is
illegal
now,
but
to
physically
make
it
impossible.
And
again
this
is
a
a
life
safety
issue.
B
This
one
so
the
question
I
have
is:
how
can
we
put
that
condition
on
a
developer
on
a
road
that
they
have
no
control?
I
can
see
that
being
a
condition
of
approval
on
the
parking
lot.
That's
why
I'm
wondering
what
was
this
on?
Because
when
you
look
at
the
motion,
it
says
a
right
in
right
out
traffic
condition,
also
affecting
beehive
clothing,
so
I've
never
seen
that
intersection
has
nothing
to
do
with
their
development.
That's
a
city
issue
that
we
need
to
take
care
of.
Q
Don't
think
it
does,
and
let
me
maybe
I
think
that's
a
good
segue
for
me.
I
think
mentioned
something
important
that
I
want
the
council
to
be
able
to
to
hear
kinda
a
little
bit
more
of
this
discussion.
There
are
other
off-site
improvements
that
are
discussed
extensively
in
the
traffic
study.
That's
been
a
lot
of
the
discussion
over
the
last
two
weeks,
including
two
intersections
that
need
signals
that
are
failing
right
now.
Q
They
are
warrant
a
signal
today,
but
this
and
this
development
will
significantly
make
a
failing
condition
worse,
and
so
one
of
the
conditions
that
we've
been
discussing,
including
the
discussion
with
the
Planning
Commission,
is
that
we
need
to
get
these
improvements
built
today
and
to
help
this
development
function
properly.
The
best
and
fastest
way
and
I
believe
the
most
appropriate
way
to
do
that
is
to
have
the
developer,
build
these
and
then
have
the
City.
Q
Council
approve,
don't
mean
speak
for
you,
a
significant
reimbursement
agreement,
I've
spoken
again
with
John
Rose
partner
yesterday
and
him
just
a
few
minutes
ago.
They
are
completely
on
board
with
that
and
in
support
of
that
we
are
working
through
the
terms.
The
details
right
now
of
that
agreement
with
the
intention
that
we
will
bring
that
for
your
consideration
and
approval
with
our
strong
recommendation
at
the
November
12th
meeting
I've.
Q
We
that's
plenty
of
time
for
us
to
do
that,
to
sort
out
these
details
and
bring
it
to
you
so
so
councilman
Shelton,
in
effect
the
city
would
be
paying
for
those,
but
we
get
it
done
quicker,
sooner,
cheaper,
more
efficient
and
really
in
a
time
frame
that
works
for
them
and,
as
I
spoke
with
Mike.
That
yesterday
said
you
could
wait
on
us,
but
I,
don't
think
that's
gonna
be
a
good
situation.
He
was
completely
on
board
with
doing
it
now,
with
a
reimbursement
agreement.
Would.
B
A
C
P
Definitely
I
think
we
would
probably
agree
with
Scott.
The
tenet
was
hoping
for
a
greater
access,
but
it's
pretty
clear
that
if
you
get
a
lot
of
traffic
there
and
you
start
to
see
queuing,
you
don't
want
to
queue
on
a
traffic
or
on
a
railroad.
Stop
so
I
think
councilman,
Sheldon
you're
right.
That
is
probably
our
concern
as
well,
so
we
don't
control.
Nor
can
we
dictate
what
really
happens
there.
P
Q
I,
don't
think
we're
asking
the
developer
to
dictate
the
conditions,
we're
dictating
the
conditions.
I
believe
the
city
is
very
much
in
in
charge
here
in
in
terms
of
this,
and
there
is
a
safety
issue.
This
is
I
still
believe
the
best
and
fastest
way
to
fix
that
safety
issue
make
it
so
that
their
development
can
proceed.
Let's
let
them
build
them
and
we'll
pay
them
essentially
to
build
that
Island
extension
and
the
other
off-site
improvements
that
are
needed
today.
So.
I
P
Money
washing
sure
you
know,
the
traffic
study
shows
that
those
intersections
that
we're
talking
about
today
have
been
under
duress
for
some
time
period
so
with
or
without
us.
It
needed
to
happen.
I
think
this
study
showed
that
we
now
make
like
an
8%
impact
on
that,
so
we're
paying
a
significant
impact
fee
I
think
it
helps
speed
this
up
to
correct
these
intersections,
but
you
know
I,
don't
think
that
were
the
cause
as
much
as
we
might
be
part
of
the
solution.
If
that's
a
fair
statement.
L
K
K
Q
Q
P
No
in
your
I
didn't
intend
to
say
that
Ryan
Hill
said
it
was
okay.
I
think
what
I
meant
to
say
was
that
it
was
under
the
jurisdiction
of
U
dot,
and
should
the
city
say
that
it
was
okay,
it
could
happen
you
can
restriped.
You
can
allow
that
turn
to
happen.
I
think
this
separate
issue
is
that
it
is
a
safety
concern
and
if
the
city
says
no
we're
going
to
keep
it
in
a
legal
left
turn
we're.
L
Wanted
to
point
out
that
under
Utah
law,
in
addition
to
impact
fees,
the
city
can't
impose
exactions
for
off-site
improvements.
The
legal
standard
is
simply
there
has
to
be
what
the
statute
says:
an
essential
link
between
the
governmental
interest
and
the
improvement,
and
it
has
to
be
proportional.
So
as
long
as
we
can
show,
there's
an
essential
link
and
it's
proportional
to
the
impact
of
the
development
that
is
an
appropriate
exaction.
Q
B
Q
I
think
that's
probably
very
important
to
note
that
you
will
that,
as
you
look
at
those
things
that
we
bring
to
you
November
12th
in
terms
of
all
the
details
on
these
off-site
improvements,
what
they
are,
how
much
they
cost
the
timing
in
all
that
information.
It's
completely
up
to
you
to
approve
or
not
approve
or
modify,
and.
B
As
I
understand
that
this
motion
is
contingent,
or
this
approval
is
contingent
upon
this
being
that
being
agreement
being
signed
that
correct
so
I'm
reading
the
motion
from
the
Planning
Commission
meeting-
and
it
said
with
the
findings
listed
in
the
staff
report
and
subject
any
findings,
including
approval
of
the
traffic
study
of
geotechnical
report
by
the
city
and
third
parties-
a
reimbursement
agreement
being
reached.
So
when
I
read
that
it
says
that
that's
contingent,
because
our
motion
says
all
conditions
identified,
the
public
work
associated
with
that
Planning
Commission
meeting.
B
L
B
I'll
just
mention
I
love
the
feedback
being
a
great
city
to
work
with,
and
everything
like
that.
But
it's
really
hard
when
you
get
same-day
stuff
and
I'm
reading
this
for
the
first
time
right
now,
because
you
know
I've
got
a
business
to
run
in
life
to
live
and
I
would
hope
that
we
would
get
some
of
this
stuff.
A
little
bit
ahead
of
time
would
be
helpful
to
have
that
background.
I
think
we
make
better
decisions
when
we
have
all
the
information.
B
A
What
we
you
know
what
Tim
has
said
tonight,
it
it's
uncharacteristic
of
the
city,
I
guess,
does
the
does
the
the
council
feel
like
we
want
to
go
beyond
that
I
again,
I
want
to
give
everybody
clarity
on
the
impact
fees
associated
with
this
development
and
how
they
will
be
used
proportionately
to
cover
the
impact
around
them
and
not
out
overreach
out
of
their
project
and
I.
Just
again,
I
think
it's
clear
you!
A
B
B
Q
Effectively
so
in
many
ways,
if
I
could
just
chime
in
because
the
negotiation,
the
things
that
were
wanting
to
put
in
a
reimbursement
agreement
to
you
are
already
clearly
identified
in
the
traffic
study
that
has
been
a
work
in
progress
between
us
and
the
developers
engineer
Hales
engineering
there
have
been
several
iterations.
We
are
at
the
point
where
I
feel
confident
that
the
requirements,
the
off-site
requirements
that
we
feel
strongly
need
to
be
put
in
our
detailed
clearly
in
the
engineering
report,
and
so
those
are
the
things
that
we're
wanting
to
say.
Q
B
Just
confusing
to
me,
because
it
seems
once
you
have
the
approval:
you've
got
the
rights
to
do
that
and
before
the
approval
there
would
be
all
the
contingencies
and
all
that
would
be
figured
out.
But
once
you
got
the
approval,
because
that's
why
you
go
through
Planning
Commission
and
City
Council,
and
while
we
have
these
traffic
studies
and
everything
like
that,
I'd
hate
to
come
back
and
all
of
a
sudden
as
a
developer,
say:
hey
I
got
the
approval
I'm
moving
ahead
in
this
video
welcome
to
the
city,
we've
found
an
issue.
B
P
You
better
I
agree
with
you
we're
paying
a
significant
impact
fee
on
this
transportation.
$425,000
I
think
that
to
talk
about
another
exaction
on
top
of
that,
that
would
be
difficult,
I
think
we're
paying
a
very
significant
portion
that
should
easily
cover
the
impact
of
what
anything
we're
doing
to
the
streets
or
the
intersections
of
that
area.
I'm
I
am
willing
to
agree
even
in
your
motion
that
we
partner
with
the
city.
P
So
now
you
know
another
7%.
On
top
of
that,
we
would
then
challenge
and
say.
Well.
Why
did
we
pay
an
impact
fee?
The
impact
fee
should
have
been
able
to
cover
the
cost
of
a
minor
of
what
we've
added
to
the
intersection.
So
I
think
we
would
be
willing
to
say
I
think
similar
to
what
you're
offering
hey.
We
commit
we're,
gonna
pay
the
impact
fee
and
we're
going
to
build
those
intersections
as
part
of
the
project
and
I
think
that
could
be
included
in
the
motion.
I'm.
Okay,
with
that.
Well.
B
P
B
Now
listen
I
got
to
go
back
and
change
all
my
financing
because
there
wasn't
the
due
diligence
done
during
the
planning
process
and
I
see
this
being
a
very
similar
issue
on
a
bigger
scale.
How
much
this
project
is,
but
you've
got
a
lot
of
finance
and
yet
have
put
in
place
when
you
get
the
approval
from
the
city.
That's
what
the
bank's
gonna
say.
We
can
loan
on
that
now
right
and
so
all
of
a
sudden,
if
you
come
back
with
additional
fees,
I
could
see
that'd
be
very
cumbersome
process.
I,
don't
think!
B
Q
Mr.
mayor
councilman
Sheldon
we're
not
looking
at
any
additional
fees,
we're
looking
at
infrastructure,
so
paying
them
having
them,
pay
the
full
impact
fees
and
then,
in
addition
to
that,
build
these
other
infrastructure.
No
additional
money
but
pay
that
additional
infrastructure,
the
bulk
of
which
the
overwhelming
bulk
of
which
would
be
reimbursed
through
a
reimbursement
agreement.
But
no.
Q
There
there
may
be
a
component
I
think
of
that
off-site
infrastructure
that
could
be
attributable
to
them
and
I.
Think
that's
what
we
that's,
probably
one
of
the
things
that
we
still
need
to
look
at.
They
know
we've
been
very
straight
and
open
with
each
other.
They
know
that
that
I
was
additionally
or
original.
Excuse
me
looking
at
that
they
should
pay.
Their
I
may
be
responsible
for
their
proportion.
In
our
discussions
yesterday
they
said.
Well,
we
really
think
that
we
shouldn't
have
any.
Q
Q
We've
got
to
sort
that
out
and-
and
perhaps
the
council
should
give-
maybe
that's
the
best
thing
as
the
council
give
us
direction.
What's
your
feeling
on
that,
it
should
be
one
of
those
ends
or
somewhere
in
between
I.
Don't
think
anybody
would
dispute
on
our
part
that
it
should
be
like
eighty
percent,
but
that's
a
real
number
of
a
real
example
and
I'm
talking
about
the
cost
of
an
intersection
improvement.
The
actual
work
yes.
B
My
question
would
be
what
have
we
done
in
the
past,
because
I
don't
think
that,
to
my
knowledge,
we've
done
this.
In
the
past,
we've
always
said:
hey,
we
do
a
very
effective
impact.
The
analysis
that's
to
take
all
this
into
account
with
the
master
transportation
plan,
the
development
for
the
zoning
this
to
take
place.
So
I
worry
about
a
challenge.
Coming
back,
saying:
wait!
A
second!
You
go
through
this
intense
transportation
impact,
the
analysis
and
now
you're
coming
back
and
adding
on
top
of
it
I
see
the
argument,
then
I'm
going
okay.
B
Q
I
don't
mean
to
speak
for
Tim,
but
I
think
what
Tim
is
saying
is
is
that
the
council
does
have
authority
to
make
these
off-site
exactions
in
addition
to
impact
fees,
whether
you
choose
to
or
not
choose
to
is
up
to
you,
but
you
do
have
that
authority.
So
on
this
particular
example,
real
example
I
used,
should
it
be
93,
should
it
be
a
hundred,
we
will
follow
whatever
direction
you
know,
I'll
bring
that
back
to
you
in
a
reimbursement
agreement.
However,
you
feel
you
want
us
to
do
it.
K
What
is
the
use
of
those
studies
that
we
do
to
make
sure
that
our
impact
fees
are
in
line?
That's
the
struggle
that
I
have
so
the
developer
comes
in.
They
know
what
the
impact
fees
are.
It's
all
laid
out
and
and
the
the
aftermath
of
that
well
turns
out.
We've
really
got
a
lot
of
problems.
I
mean
that's,
not
a
fair
and
equitable
way
to
work
at
it
and,
in
my
opinion,
the
way
that
looks,
and
so
while
I
know.
That
was
a
suggestion
and
something
that
the
council
could
do.
K
This
councilman
is
not
in
favor
of
that.
Just
because
you
know,
we've
we've
been
through
the
mill
on
impact
fees
for
a
number
of
years
and
for
a
while
we
were
too
high.
Then
we
had
to
do
the
adjustment
and
they
came
that
impact
fees
are
Captain,
Hot
Topic
and
it
seems
like
if
we
have
them
in
line.
We
pay
for
these
studies
and
those
are
the
things
by
which
we
should
abide.
Q
Beginning
of
just
you
know,
the
beginning
of
that
process
is
in
the
worst.
We
have
begun
that
process,
so
councilman
Taylor
just
to
respond
to
you.
That
was
almost
the
exact
conversation
the
developer
and
I
had
yesterday,
and
just
so
you
know
my
response
to
him.
I
haven't
even
had
a
chance
to
brief
David
on
this
I.
Looked
him
in
the
eye
and
I
said
it's.
A
pretty
good
point
can
I
think
about
that
talk
it
over
with
those
who
I
need
to
talk
it
over
and
get
back
to
you
and
I.
Q
I
Just
gonna
chime
in
my
two
cents
worth
what's
the
point
of
impact
fees,
if
they
don't
cover
the
impact,
we
set
those
fees,
he
didn't
set
those
fees.
We
set
him.
We
said
this
is
what
we're
going
to
do
now.
I
may
be
missing
things,
I
tend
to
think
kind
of
simple,
but
if
I
understood
what
Clark
was
saying
he's
saying,
we
said
the
fees
are
adequate.
That's
what
we're
gonna
charge
you
that
to
me
should
be,
and
the.
K
K
That
knowing
I'm
saying
that
I
know
that
I
know
that's
not
his
fault,
and
so
we've
got
a
lot
of
things,
including
what
we
had
our
RDA
meeting
on.
That
could
impact
this
and
different
things
that
we
could
do
in
those
same
areas
as
well.
Exactly
there's
a
lot
of
things
to
be
taken
into
consideration.
Tim
brought
up
something
that
said
this
could
be
a
possibility.
K
I,
don't
think
anyone
was
swinging
a
hammer
at
that
time,
and
it
would
still
have
to
come
to
the
council
in
order
to
be
approved,
to
be
able
to
do
that
inside
of
an
inside
of
a
reimbursement
agreement,
apparently
so
I
mean.
Are
we
at
that
point
where
we
need
to
sweat
that
right
now,
I,
don't
think
we
are
because
I
don't
think
we're
prepared
to
are
we
I
mean
to
know
what
that
that
impact
is
I
in
order
to
in
order
for
an
exaction
is
what
I'm
saying.
Q
Not
sure,
and
hopefully
I'm
answering
the
question
you
asked
or
not
the
a
different
question,
but
I
think
we
are
at
the
point
with
the
traffic
study,
where
we
do
know
very
clearly.
What
per
portion
of
the
impact
is
from
them.
We
also
I
think
are
pretty
close
to
knowing
the
cost
of
those
improvements.
We
certainly
know
what
improvements
we're
looking
at
and
I
can
point
out
the
two
intersections.
They
need
a
signal
today
and
that's
really.
K
B
Is
don't
mean
to
speak
for
Scott
I
think
he
was
just
saying:
hey,
maybe
I
can
try
to
read
the
tea
leaves
because
I
don't
want
to
waste
my
time
negotiating
contract
with
the
developer,
to
bring
to
you
on
November
12.
If
there
was
a
strong,
already
sense
on
that
and
I
think,
that's
kind
of
the
idea
was
to
try
to
get
a
consensus
to
help
with
negotiations
of
that
contract
to
help
move
things
along
in
the
12th.
Well,.
G
Q
On
one
of
these
signals,
because
we
had
identified
a
couple
of
months
ago
that
it
was
an
issue-
we've
already
started
the
design
on
it,
just
I
want
you
to
be
aware
of
that,
and
we've
already
been
in
discussions
with
some
of
the
neighboring
entities.
He
kind
of
spilled
the
beans
of
one
of
them's.
You
not
on
the
other
signal.
C
F
Could
I
explain
one
thing
about
the
impact
fee
study
impact
fees
are
very
specific,
so
we
do.
We
do
an
analysis
upfront
and
so
it's
called
an
I
FFP
and
impact
fee
facility
plan.
We
identify
specific
improvements.
We
add
up
all
those
improvements
and
the
timeline
in
which
we
need
to
get
those
done
and
and
then
it's
it's,
it's
basically
a
calculation
of
trips.
How
many?
How
much
impact
is
each
trip
going
to
generate
now?
F
Scott
I,
don't
know
if
you've
looked
at
this
to
see
if
these
improvements
on
this
road,
making
a
right
in
term
right
out
is
on
our
I
FFP.
If
it
is
not
on
the
I
FFP,
then
the
city
could
have
that
as
an
exaction,
because
it
was
never
calculated
in
the
impact
fee.
If
that
in,
if
that
system
improvement
is
included
in
the
impact
fee,
then
we
would
not
charge
any
more
for
that,
because
it's
fully
recovered
in
the
cost
of
that
impact
fee.
B
For
me,
that
was
my
comment
of
why
it
needs
to
be
updated,
in
my
mind,
at
least
every
2
to
3
years,
because
I
would
rather
capture
as
much
as
we
possibly
can
of
those
problem
areas
and
if
they
were
already
two
areas
that
were
already
identified,
and
we
didn't
put
it
in
our
study.
I
want
to
know
why
it
wasn't
included
in
the
study
to
begin
with.
K
A
break
I'll,
second,
that
and
I
just
I,
don't
know
where
the
punitive
language
came
in
I,
don't
know
how
that
got
mixed
into
it.
I
didn't
think
the
city
was
punishing
anybody
I'm,
just
saying
trying
to
understand,
so
that's
a
great
clarification
that
we
received
on
that.
So
there
was
no
I
didn't
think
anyone
was
swinging,
an
ugly
hammer
I'm
just
saying
you
know
we
have
these
things
in
place
so
that
we
can
operate
with
order.
That's
that's
it!
So.
Okay,.
A
K
Q
D
A
Q
Mr.
mayor,
this
item
is
is
much
simpler
than
the
previous
one.
In
fact,
I
would
say
it's
even
more
simpler,
so
I'll
try
to
be
more
clearer
on
it.
This
this
item
is
a
very
simple
change
that
we're
taking
to
you.
The
current
water
rights
can
ordinance
gives
a
list
of
the
different
kinds
of
water.
The
different
water
companies
that
we
would
accept.
Two
of
them
that
are
listed
are
the
Provo
bench
and
the
north
union
irrigation
companies.
Q
They
concur
we're
all
on
the
same
page,
and
so
we
would
like
to
for
the
time
being,
remove
ask
you
to
remove
those
two
of
water
that
we
would
accept.
If,
at
some
point
conditions
change
service
areas
change,
then
we
would
come
back
to
you
and
say
we
recommend
you
put
them
back
in
as
something
we
would
accept
and.
Q
Physically,
no
legally,
yes,
we
are
using
some
of
it
for
some
irrigation.
The
contractor
on
some
some
hey
I
believe,
but
in
terms
of
really
getting
it
into
the
system.
No,
but
legally
we
can
we're
looking
at
potentially
finding
a
way
to
do
some
change
applications
that
would
allow
us
to
pull
that
water
out
of
some
of
our
wells.
So
it's
something
that
we're
looking
at
how
to
use
that
these
two
waters
are
even
right
now,
legally,
we
can't
use
them
American
Forks,
not
even
in
the
service
area,
for
those
so.
I
Q
Q
K
I
Q
Maybe
let
me
answer
the
first
question.
First,
there
is
the
ability
that,
if
somebody
dedicated
water
to
us
that
we
couldn't
use
that
we
could
try
our
best
to
negotiate
a
deal
with
somebody
to
trade
waters.
My
preference
and
recommendation
is
the
council
is,
let's
just
accept
water,
that
we
can.
We
know
we
can
use
rather
than
try
to
take
something
we
can't
use
and
hope
to
trade
it
for
something
of
value.
Q
O
C
A
Q
Q
If
attended
those
meetings,
we're
grateful
for
that
has
proposed
a
resolution
that
has
then
come
to
the
council
for
I
believe
a
ratification,
a
vote
to
support
those
those
restrictions,
and
it's
been
given
us
the
flexibility
each
year
to
say,
depending
on
the
conditions
of
that
year,
what
should
we
do
and
and
a
lot
of
flexibility?
Well,
lo
and
behold,
as
you
get
reading
the
code,
we
find
that
the
section
of
the
code
is
very
rigid
and
specifies
set
times
regardless
of
conditions
or
anything.
Q
So
there's
been
a
conflict
between
the
resolutions
passed
and
what
the
code
says.
What
this
change
would
do
would
be
remove
all
time,
restrictions
from
the
code
and
just
simply
replace
it
with
language
that
says
it's
based
on
a
resolution
passed
by
the
city
as
recommended
by
and
I'm
sorry
paraphrasing,
but
that's
the
gist
of
it.
The
committee
makes
the
recommendation
the
council:
does
it
each
year
depending
on
conditions,
and
it's
not
a
set
thing
in
the
code.
I
K
Q
So
councilman
Barnes
had
just
dawned
on
me
what
I
know
what
happened.
I
was
trying
when
I
was
working
in
minute
track
and
trying
to
attach
I
had
trouble,
and
it
was
only
on
the
third
attempt
that
I
thought
in
my
mind,
I
thought
I
was
that
it
was
successful
yay.
Finally,
on
the
third
try
it
worked
well,
I
looks
like
it
must
have
worked
the
first
two
times
two.
That's.
Q
B
I
had
a
quick
question
for
you:
I
came
across
this
this
last
year,
I'm
fortunate.
Well,
it's
actually
been
three
years
ongoing.
In
my
lawn
we
had
a
condition
called
neurotic
ring,
which
is
horrible,
and
it's
very
difficult.
You
can't
get
rid
of
it.
All
you
can
do
is
try
to
make
it
go
dormant
and
we
tried
three
different
service
companies.
Now
we
tried
you
tubing
and
doing
self
medicating
and
fungicides
and
all
sorts
of
stuff,
and
my
wife's,
like
let's
just
rip
the
darn
thing
out
and
start
over
against
that
man.
E
B
Out
of
it
and
then
all
of
a
sudden,
some
of
our
neighbors
started
getting
it
and
they
came
across
the
company
called
new
ring
and
they
came
over
and
they
said
at
your
watering
schedule.
You
have
to
water
more
frequent
to
get
rid
of
it,
and
so
we
went
with
the
watering
every
day
for
ten
minutes
in
low
and
behold
the
ring
went
dormant
and
so
I
was
like
gosh
everything,
I've
learned
for
the
last
eight
years
on
the
City
Council.
B
Is
you
don't
want
her
every
day,
because
it's
a
waste
and
things
like
that,
but
it
actually,
in
my
mind,
saved
me
quite
a
bit
of
money
from
having
to
buy
all
these
different
products
because
of
the
chemical
use
and
the
bio
whatever.
It
is
makeup
of
it:
watering
that
deep
activates
that
fungus
so
I'm,
omitting
that
you
know
last
part
of
the
year
we
were
watering
every
day,
as
well
as
some
of
our
neighbors
to
be
able
to
get
rid
of
that
condition.
I
don't
know.
E
B
Q
Certainly
I
know
the
intention
and
I
would
hope
the
intention
of
city
staff
would
be
if
there
is
an
exception,
a
special
condition
that
we
would,
of
course
be
reasonable
new
sod,
new
seating
condition
that
you
mentioned
there,
that
you
know
I.
Think
it's
reasonable.
Of
course,
there's
going
to
be
some
exceptions,
I
don't
know
if
we'll
ever
be
able
to
list
all
the
exceptions,
but
that's
the
intent
that
we're
not
going
to
try
to
crack
the
hammer
on
someone.
That's
got
a
condition.
Q
Q
This
this
is,
it
is
removing
the
part
that
dictates
schedule
and
deferring
to
an
annual
or,
however
frequent
resolution
and
and
I
think
Councilwoman.
Carol's
common
is
correct
that
the
resolutions
typically
address
those
exceptions,
and
this
isn't
every
part
of
the
code
that
deals
with
water
conservation.
B
I
B
I
B
What
I
would
love
to
see,
and
maybe
we
can't
do
it
tonight-
we
didn't
notice
it
or
whatever,
but
in
section
through
says
new
construction
and
maybe
put
and
restoration
projects
or
something
of
that
nature
and
add
that
language
and
I
think
it'd
be
very
easy
to,
but
I
think
that
would
help
give
that
safe
haven
that
hey,
if
you've
got
issues
and
obviously
it's
a
competent
landscaper.
That's
giving
you
that
advice
and
things
of
that
nature.
We'd.
Add
that
flexibility
in
there.
Q
What
I
could
suggest
is
it's
getting
time.
We
were
looking
at
convening
this
conservation
committee
again
to
relook
at
resolution.
What
are
the
conditions
etc
to
be
ready
for
irrigation
season?
We're
trying
to
get
an
earlier
start
that
perhaps
we
could
just
receive
direction
from
the
council
tonight
that
when
that
committee
meets
that,
you
would
like
to
see
this.
You
new
year's
resolution
include
those
those
things
and
then
we'll
just
make
sure
I'll
commit
to
you
that
we
discussed
that
in
the
committee
and
that
be
brought
to
you
in
the
next
resolution.
A
Are
programmed
they
typically
will
just
you
know,
turn
them
off
and
the
battery
keeps
going,
but
I
think
with
the
the.
What
we're
finding
out
as
a
committee
is
the
fact
that
that's
just
a
good
practice,
no
matter
what
just
to
keep
the
system
completely
charged
and
the
pressures
up
and
modified
to
fit
their
certain
areas
of
the
city.
We've
just
found
a
good
formula
that
works
now.
Of
course,
there's
always
adaptable
things
and
I
can
tell
you
right
now.
Council,
Michelle
and
I
can
tell
you
what
happened.
I'm
just
gonna.
B
A
C
D
A
Q
Q
Excuse
me
to
through
mag,
through
the
process,
to
build
the
trail
along
200
south,
and
then
we've
been
in
design,
of
course,
designing
the
road,
because
the
trail
money
was
federal
money.
We
were
doing
everything
we
could
to
try
to
keep
those
things
separate,
which
I'll,
frankly
admit
to
you
was
a
challenge
to
figure.
How
are
we
going
to
design
a
road
without
a
trail,
knowing
that
we
needed
to
know
where
the
trail
is?
Q
K
Q
Let
that
go.
What
is
great
about
this
is
there
is
a.
There
is
a
as
as
David
uses
the
lingo
a
haircut,
something
I
don't
know
much
about,
but
there
is
a
reduction
in
the
money
when
money
becomes
de
federalized,
it
was
I
believe
five
point
a
little
less
than
five
point
one.
It
goes
to
four
point
seven,
so
you
do
give
up
some
money
when
it
becomes
de
federalized,
but
you
also
give
up
all
of
those
federal
requirements.
Q
So
my
analogy
was:
if
we
cut
your
gross
pay,
but
your
take-home
pay
is
higher
because
of
whatever
we're
doing
we're
you
know
and
so
forth.
So
using
this
money
or
de
federalizing,
this
money
allows
us
to
combined
the
project
all
into
one
so
that
we
can
build
a
road
and
a
trail
all
at
once,
design
it
all
at
once.
We
would
like
a
request
to
you
tonight
is:
please
approve
the
signing
of
this
agreement
with
the
county
that
D
federalizes
the
money.
Q
We
are
also
looking
at
coming
to
you
in
a
work
session,
I
believe
in
November
very
soon,
to
give
you
a
very
detailed
update
on
all
of
the
work.
That's
been
done
on
the
road
project.
Obviously
this
changes
things,
and
so
we
want
to
come
to
you
at
that
point.
Give
you
in
a
work
session
a
lot
more
information
about
the
status
of
the
project,
what
we're
wanting
to
do
and
to
combine
it.
What
our
recommendation
is
in
going
forward
tonight
just
allows
us
to
get
that
money.
D
federalized.
A
B
A
A
Item
I
number
eight
review,
an
action
on
a
resolution
executing
a
lease
purchase
agreement
with
Zions
Bank
Corporation
for
the
purchase
of
an
ambulance
and
a
brush
truck
Kyle.
Do
you
want
to
I
guess
for
like
try
to
be
prepared
to
answer
questions
if
the
questions
do
arise,
I
think
that
the
pack
was
very
informative,
but.
B
B
B
Right,
but
a
little
pressure
just
tell
him
hey
this
whole
project
was
based
on
you
and
you
left
yeah
anyway.
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
resolution,
approving
the
form
of
the
lease
purchase
agreement
with
Zions
Bank
or
in
a
Salt
Lake
City
Utah
in
the
amount
of
500,
nine
thousand
one
or
$95,
and
authorize
the
execution
and
delivery
thereof.
B
C
I
D
K
I
K
I
I
I
A
C
A
A
R
Yeah
this
year
it
was
in
the
budget.
We
don't
expect
any
more
purchases
of
the
fire
trucks
for
a
while
we've
got
out
of
the
hole.
Now
this
will.
Our
Colonel
ladder
truck
will
move
to
backup
status.
It's
it's
15
years
old
by
the
time
we
take
this
one,
so
we'll
just
move
it
to
backup
status,
and
this
one
will
be
first
out.
So
we
will
have
a
couple
ambulances
on
the
five
year
lease
coming
up
in
a
couple
years,
but
nothing
till
then,
and
those
are
much
smaller
values.