►
From YouTube: November 13, 2018 AF City Council Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
It's
7:30
on
this
November
13
2018.
We
welcome
you
to
the
American
Fork
City
Council
meeting.
We
appreciate
you
being
here
in
attendance.
We
have
are
working
off
an
amended
agenda.
That
agenda
has
been
posted
on
the
state
website
in
various
places
throughout
the
city,
as
required
by
state
law,
and
we
will
follow
that
agenda.
I
think
I
might
make
a
modification
to
it
later
on
in
the
meeting,
but
but
in
general
we
will
follow
that
meeting
as
outlined.
A
B
A
D
A
A
A
We're
we're
here
to
make
this
city
better
and
seeing
you
here
makes
me
feel
better
I
feel
like
we
have
a
lot
of
Hope
in
the
future
generation
of
this
of
this
city.
So
thank
you
for
being
here.
We
would
ask
that
you
sign
in
in
the
middle
of
the
room
if
you
haven't,
because
if
you
need
to
prove
to
your
counselor
that
you
were
at
a
city
council
meeting,
your
your
name
will
be
in
the
minutes
of
the
meeting.
A
So
thank
you
for
coming
and
if
I
could
just
offer
a
little
bit
of
advice,
make
sure
you
thank
your
leaders
for
bringing
your
hair
taking
you
on
your
camp
outs.
Putting
out
the
fires,
when
you
did
things
like
that,
thank
you.
You
may
be
seated
we'll
now
move
on
to
the
20-minute
public
comment
period.
Anybody
that
would
like
to
address
the
mayor
and
city
council
key
staff
for
any
issue
that
you
might
have
if
you
would
come
forward
to
the
mic
at
this
time.
A
Seeing
none,
we
will
close
the
public
comment
period
and
we
will
move
on.
We
have
a
special
guest
with
us
tonight,
I'll
introduce
his
name
and
his
association,
and
then
it
is
Paul
Jerome
from
the
board
of
Utah
governing
finance
Association
organization.
If
we
could
invite
you
to
come
forward
this
part
this
moment,
Paul
appreciate
you
being
here.
Thank.
E
So
that's
what
I
want
to
convey
to
you
into
the
residence.
Your
city
is
that
this
represents
going
beyond
what
is
required
by
a
city
to
residents,
know
what
their
money
is
being
spent
on
in
your
city,
they're,
very
important
documents.
The
budget
presentation
is
usually
the
biggest
one
of
the
three.
The
popular
annual
financial
report
is
the
smallest,
the
budget
presentation.
E
Is
it
basically
takes
spreadsheets
that
your
staff
puts
together,
for
it
makes
them
more
readable
and
understandable
as
to
exactly
what
they're
being
used
for,
and
although
it's
a
very
long
document
it's
it's
very
good?
Your
citizens
are
familiar
with
it,
so
they
know
what's
going
on
in
your
city
and
can
hold
you
accountable
for
that.
The
certificate
of
achievement
in
financial
reporting
is
for
making
sure
your
financial
statements
are
in
a
format
that
actually
makes
them
usable
to
make
sure
that
the
financial
records
of
your
city
are
transparent.
E
It
actually
goes
beyond
that
and
actually
has
statistical
information,
so
the
residents
can
see
where
your
city
is
basically
going
from
here
and
fund
accounting
is
was
also
always
set
up
to
make
sure
that
the
financial
records
of
your
city
were
transparent,
but
it
can
be
very
confusing,
as
it
seems
like.
There
are
about
30
different
operations
going
on
and
they're
all
independent
of
one
another,
and
they
really
are,
and
so
the
financial
report
actually
takes
that
and
makes
it
a
little
bit
more
understandable
as
to
what
those
are
being
used
for.
E
A
popular
annual
financial
report
takes
that
and
condenses
it
down
into
basically
a
summary
format,
and
that's
the
one
that
encourage
your
residents
to
start
with,
to
find
out
exactly
what
was
spent
and
then
go
to
the
budget
and
find
out
what
you're
spending
on
it
now.
So
it
does
represent
quite
a
time
commitment
if
your
your
staff
to
do
and
again
it's
not
required.
E
G
E
H
A
I
A
You
been
with
the
city
so
about
a
year
and
a
half
ago
mayor
had
filled
an
eye
and
David.
We
met
down
at
Olive
Garden,
one
of
the
great
restaurants
in
our
city,
and
we
met
with
Kyle
and
I.
Remember
coming
away,
thinking,
I
hope,
I
hope
he
chooses
us
and
it's
evident
that
you
did
and
we're
so
grateful
for
that.
We
appreciate
all
that
you
do
and
I
think
we
should
give
Kyle
a
round
of
applause.
F
B
Why
this
is
cutting
in
and
out
not
touch
it?
Maybe
we
have.
We
have
other
great
staff
members
as
well,
and
this
last
week
we
had
a
service
project
that
the
the
members
of
our
staff
participated.
In
and
again
it
was
to
gather
food
and
other
items
for
Tabitha's
way,
and
it
was,
it
was
a
great
event
and
our
our
staff
just
really
pulled
through
we
gathered
eleven
hundred
and
sixty-seven
pounds
of
food
and
items
for
Tabitha's
way
last
year
was
about
850.
B
B
A
C
J
Councilmember
shield,
thanks
mayor
I,
just
wanted
to
congratulate
our
communities
had
a
lot
of
awesome
events
happen
this
last
week
with
the
football
and
you
think
of
all
sorts
of
different
extracurricular
activities
it's
taking
place.
Our
community
is
definitely
well
represented
and
I
hate
to
name
them,
because
you
leave
a
few
out
and
you
get
about
something
like
me
in
cross-country
or
soccer
or
whatever
really
well.
So
it's
just
great
to
see
these
youth
be
able
to
represent
the
city
so
well,
and
their
commitment
and
dedication
so
I
wanted
to
commend
them
on
that.
J
J
One
thing
that
you
always
worry
about
going
into
a
special
service
district
is:
do
you
lose
control
or
that
customization
that
you
might
have
if
it
was
just
your
organization
and
one
thing
a
grateful
time
that
the
staff
took
there
to
reach
out
to
our
department
and
they
built
in
different
add-ons
or
Alec
Clark.
If
you
go
into
this
RFP,
they
need
different
organizations
needs.
It
covers
all
of
you
out
of
County
and
in
business
as
well.
So
it
was
just
grateful
to
see
that
also
at
Tennessee
new
airport,
that
is
their
organization
and
exist.
J
K
G
Just
a
cravat,
the
other
two
have
said
about
the
community
and
all
the
things
that
take
place.
I
did
want
to
comment
just
a
little
bit
on
the
Veterans
Day
program.
It
wasn't
wonderful
and
it
always
is,
and
it
was
also
just
wonderful
to
be
back
where
it
should
be
held,
and
that
is
in
the
tabernacle.
That
is
it's.
Just
such
a
historic
building
share
a
little
conversation
if
I
may
I
had
with
my
brother
yesterday.
G
He
mentioned
that
somebody
had
mentioned
to
him
that
Veterans
Day
is
the
single
most
important
holiday.
There
is
and
opinion
here
as
a
country
we
kind
of
have
let
that
go
the
wayside.
But
basically
his
comment
was
without
Veterans
Day.
We
would
not
have
any
of
the
other
holidays
and,
if
you
think
about
it
it
it
to
me
makes
a
lot
of
sense
and
I
see
some
vets
and
so
I.
Thank
each
of
you
personally.
H
G
G
L
L
They
had
a
ribbon
cutting
for
crumble,
cookie,
they
had
a
presentation
of
their
business
of
the
month.
They
had
a
ribbon-cutting
perform
Academy
and
they
had
Halloween
I
mean
where
they
business
owners
on
long
Main,
Street
all
get
together
a
new
trick-or-treating
and
that's
a
very
popular
event.
They
had
a
try
team
for
lunch.
L
For
Haven
Beauty
company
and
the
ribbon-cutting
for
chip
cookie
and
at
this
piece
for
you
so
and
I
was
not
able
to
attend
every
single
one
of
these
events,
but
these
are
all
of
their
official
events
and
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
how
much
hard
work
they're
doing
and
how
they're
really
trying
to
boost
the
businesses
that
members
of
the
chamber
they're
working
really
hard
along
that
line.
On
December
1st
at
5:30
they're
planning
a
Santa
parade
on
Main
Street,
it's
by
30
p.m.
L
F
K
They're,
all
you
know
quite
large,
it
makes
it
difficult
to
eat
a
dozen,
but
I've
been
able
to
do
it.
So
just
a
couple
of
things
for
years,
I
have
loved
going
to
the
veterans
program
and
it's
probably
one
of
them,
probably
one
of
my
favorite
with
things
like
the
firemen's
breakfast
and
different
things.
K
It's
probably
one
of
my
favorite
things
in
American,
Fork
city,
that
we
pay
attention
to
not
all
the
cities
have
and
I
went
back
to
my
my
work,
my
place
of
employment
and
I
just
mentioned
a
couple
of
things
to
a
lot
of
the
people
there
and
it's
I
think
sometimes
it's
unfortunately
forgotten
what
has
been
sacrificed
for
us
and
I
really
appreciate
what
our
city
does.
What
our
ceremony
seventh
cemetery
committee
does
to
to
make
sure
that
we
have
a
wonderful
program
every
time
and
you
know
I
wondered.
J
K
Year,
what
it
would
be
like
about
the
band
there's
many
of
you
may
know
the
band
was
coming
back
from
Nash
I,
believe
they
call
it
in
Indiana
and
they
were
not
there
and
I
thought
I
wonder
what
this
will
be
like
without
the
playing
that
I
believe
they
call
the
scene,
two
arms
or
each
of
the
Armed
Forces
theme
song.
You
played-
and
it's
probably
the
most
touching
part
along
with
the
honor
roll
of
anything.
K
That's
there,
where
you
see
these,
these
good
men
and
women,
some
of
them
struggling
to
get
to
their
feet
to
stand
while
they're
the
theme
song
to
the
Marines
is
being
played
or
they
they
discern,
but
they've
had
a
level
in
the
serum.
It's
a
very
poignant,
a
very
touching
thing
and
I
thought
I
wonder
what
will
be
like
without
the
band
there,
but
the
American
Fork
high
school
chain
required
that
it
was
there
and
they
sang
and
I
thought
was
I
thought
it
was
fantastic.
K
It
was
a
different
kind
of
reverence
there
and
it
was
very
much
appreciated
and
so
I'm
very
proud
of
our
city.
For
what
they're
doing
that
way
and
then
kudos
to
our
financing
to
Kevin
I,
think
I,
told
Kyle,
I,
think
I
told
you
this
Kyle
and
David
I
know
when
I
first
got
back
in
the
council
with
here
recently
was
in
all
the
years
that
I
have
had
the
opportunity
to
go
over
the
budget.
K
K
Of
showing
up
for
that
and
with
the
reports
that
come
out
now
and
the
ability
to
digest
that
and
go
through
and
read
that
I
think
that's
critical
because
of
the
world,
not
just
American
city,
but
the
world
is
crying
for
transparency
and
for
the
ability
to
have
an
understanding
and
know
those
things
and
I.
Just
I
really
appreciate
Kyle
for
what
he's
done
and
David
with
the
staff
not
what's
going
on
that
way,
because
that
is
a
huge,
critical
difference
that
I
think
that's
made
so
kudos
to
you
and
well
deserves
others.
K
A
You
for
that
report
for
the
mayor's
report.
You
know
what
can
I
say
that
hasn't
already
been
said
concerning
the
Veterans
Day
program
like
Councilman
Taylor
than
others.
It
is
definitely
one
of
the
things
that
makes
me
proud
to
live
in
American
Fork,
proud
to
be
live
in
America,
something
that
was
a
little
different
this
year.
Is
that.
N
A
Because
you
don't
know
what
that
is,
is
a
it's
just,
a
silent,
reverent
moment
where
everybody
that
has
died
in
the
line
of
duty,
that
is
from
American
Fork.
They
name
their
name
and
they
put
a
flag
on
the
forum.
And
it's
a
very
reverent
moment
tonight.
One
of
those
flags
is
for
a
member
of
our
councils,
his
son
and
I.
Can't
thank
him
enough
for
this
thing.
There's
a
crow,
Feist
and
so
great.
A
A
Stat,
provides
details
and
will
want
more
details
tonight,
I'm
sure,
but
I
just
want
to
make
it
known
that,
as
we
add,
sometimes
we
might
act
quickly
is
if
we
just
made
the
decision
we
just
learned
about
it.
These
are
things
that
we've
been
contemplating
reading,
asking
questions
for
the
better
part
of
about
four
to
five
days
and,
of
course,
with
the
depth
with
the
Tod.
A
It's
been
over
three
months
in
the
process
of
being
the
asking
questions
and
betting
that
that,
and
they
learn
it's
out
so
I
just
want
to
make
that
make
you
aware
of
that.
So
you
just
don't
think
the
word
up
here
make
it
very
quick
decisions.
There's
been
a
lot
of
time
saying
that
I'll
move
on
to
the
common
consent
agenda
rather
than
announce
it
I'll
just
say
as
posted
items.
One
two
and
three
questions.
A
H
D
A
L
G
A
Item
number
2
is
a
review
and
action
on
the
appointment
of
Katie
Bateman
for
the
term
ending
2021
to
the
beautification
shade-tree
committee.
Katie.
Could
you
please
stand?
Katie
was
in
our
last
work
session.
We
appreciate
her
willingness
to
to
serve
in
this
capacity
and
I
would
entertain
a
motion
to
make
it
official
may.
K
K
J
Just
a
few
comments
down
there
Katie's
been
served
unofficially
for
six
months,
maybe
even
more
than
that
on
the
committee.
Patient
away
become
official
she's
been
a
great
enhancement
to
the
to
the
committee
and
I
love.
Her
dedication
and
I
know
from
my
own
wife
being
a
busy
mother.
That
can
only
mean
how
busy
you
are
as
well
so
appreciate
your
family
sacrifice
and
let
me
come
to
thank
you
we'll.
A
H
A
Member
Shelton
aye
council,
member
Barnes,
aye
council,
member
Carol,
councilmember
Taylor,
aye,
okay,
item
number,
three:
the
presentation
and
an
acceptance
of
an
audited
financial
statement
for
fiscal
year,
ending
June
30th
2018.
We
have
representative
Larsen
and
company
and
we'd
have
Russell
Alton
come
for
this
time
step
us
through
this
fine
document.
Oh.
O
P
O
Q
E
O
I,
guess
you
have
this
in
front
of
you
perhaps
electronically,
what
I?
What
I
want
to
do?
Instead
of
you
know,
going
through
a
whole
bunch
of
numbers,
I'm
just
going
to
go
through
the
reports
that
we
issue
and
maybe
just
talk
about
what
they
what
they
mean,
but
I
certainly
want
to
be
helpful
to
you
and
if
you
have
any
questions
about.
O
O
The
first
paragraph
on
page
13
they
that
we
audited
your
financial
statements,
helps
our
building
and
our
responsibility
isn't.
As
the
auditor
is
to
issue
an
opinion
on
the
financial
statements,
it
goes
on
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
procedures
that
we
follow
to
come
to.
Our
conclusion
for
our
oftentimes
people
have
the
idea
that
you
know
when,
when.
E
O
O
O
That's
why
we
were
here
and
then
the
last
paragraph
on
page
13
is
our
opinion.
So
this
is
what
you
get
instead
of
a
plaque
from
from
us.
You
get
that,
in
our
opinion,
the
financial
statements
referred
to
above
present
fairly
in
all
material
respects,
the
respective
financial
position
of
the
governmental
activities,
the
business
type
activities
each
major
fund
and
the
aggregate
remain
in
fund
information
of
American
Fork
City.
As
of
June
30th
2018,
you
see
how
that
can
be
construed
as
non-digestible.
What
it
means
is
that
you,
you
have
a
clean
opinion.
O
The
financial
statements
are
materially
correct,
but
accountants
have
a
fun
way
of
putting
things.
So
that's
what
we
say
if
you
flip
the
page
over
this
refers
to
some
parts
of
this
report
that
aren't
necessarily
audited,
and
then
it
refers
to
some
parts
that
are
audited
and
then
the
last
paragraph
is
makes
reference
to
it.
The
government
auditing
standards
report
that
will
we'll
cover
here
in
just
a
second.
So
that's
the
opinion
or
that's
the
audit
report.
We
call
it
between
that
and
page
105
is
a
whole
bunch
of
financial
information.
O
That's
very
good
information,
but
it
is
in
a
format
that
was
put
together
by
accountants
and,
like
I,
say
not
quite
as
digestible
as
other
things,
but
it's
good
information
so
with
that
I
believe
that
our
the
government
auditing
standards
reporters
at
the
end,
the
last
two
reports,
page
132
so
anytime-
that
we
do
an
audit
for
a
government
entity.
We're
actually
required
to
look
at
your
internal
controls
and
your
compliance
and
it's
not
for
the
purpose
of
issuing
an
opinion
on
either
of
those
things.
O
O
We
call
it
the
state
compliance
report,
governments
in
the
state
of
Utah
required
to
follow
specific
laws,
and
we
looked
at
each
of
those
items
listed
on
in
the
middle
of
page
134,
the
laws
associated
with
those
items
we
we
looked
at
to
make
sure
the
city
was
following
those
specific
rules
and
we
found
that
in
all
material
respects
the
city
is
following
those
rules.
There's
a
an
item
or
two
that
we'll
talk
about
in
the
management
letter,
but
we
don't
consider
material,
but
we
will
discuss
it.
I
guess
we'll
discuss
that.
Now.
O
So
we
call
it
the
management
letter.
This
is
where
we
have
a
chance
to
to
communicate
to
you
as
a
city
council,
any
issues
or
problems
that
we
had
when
conducting
our
audit.
If
you
read
through
that,
you'll
find
that
there
we
didn't
have
any
issues,
but
this
is
the
the
format
or
the
mechanism
that
we
would
use
to
communicate
that
with
you
officially.
O
O
You're
not
supposed
to
have
a
deficit
fund,
balance
and
I'm
sure
that's
been
the
subject
matter
of
many
council
meetings,
but
the
broadband
fund
has
a
negative
fund
balance
and,
according
to
the
letter
of
the
law,
that's
a
finding
and
the
requirement
there
is
this
year.
You
take
steps
towards
correcting
that
and
and
as
far
as
I
know,
for
the
two,
the
fiscal
year
2019,
those
steps
have
been
taken
so
at
least
we're
working
towards
making
that
not
a
deficit.
O
O
O
Start
bugging
them
for
stuff
and
ask
him
for
things
and
they're
very
helpful,
and
they
quickly
just
gave
us
what
we
needed
and
anyway
I
appreciate
him
for
that
and
and
they
do
a
good
job
and
and
I
do
when
I
go
to
these
City
Council
meetings.
I
always
make
it
a
point
to
thank
you,
as
the
council
members,
for
what
you
do
for
your
communities.
It's
great
and
you're.
Like
referees.
It
doesn't
matter
how
good
you
do.
O
K
C
A
D
L
The
year
we
had
developers
coming
to
us
and
saying
this
is
a
big
hope:
that's
gonna
work,
it's
not
gonna,
give
you
what
you
want
and
we
will
debit
Excel.
There
were
some
weeds
that
so
we
have
come
up
with
highway.
We
have
the
new
code
that
we're
I
have
to
say
personally
that
I'm
immensely
satisfied
with
the
code
that
we
have
before
us
when
speaking
of
T
of
these
absent
care.
People
mentioned
that
this
will
appeal
to
people
who
don't
want
to
take
care
of
a
dark.
L
Although
there
are
those
people
out
there,
we
only
talk
about
guards.
We
are
missing
the
point.
I
think
most
people
would
enjoy.
Some
private
outdoor
space
in
this
code
allows
that
in
some
places,
but
the
point
is
that
people
are
willing
to
trade,
a
yard
for
the
ability
to
live
in
a
community
that
has
a
more
urban
fill
that
has
close
access
to
public
transportation,
where
they
can
walk
to
shops
and
services,
where
there
are
multiple
places
for
people
to
gather
we're,
creating
a
place.
That's
walkable.
L
By
that
we
mean
the
traffic
is
slower,
the
sidewalks
have
places
to
stop
and
rest
public
transit
isn't
within
walking.
Distance
buildings
are
closer
to
the
sidewalk
parking.
Lots
are
hidden
from
you,
it's
easy
to
cross
the
street
and
there
are
frequent
quality
open
spaces
that
are
attractive
and
useful.
If
we're
going
to
allow
density
in
our
city,
it
should
be
done
in
a
way
that
doesn't
just
create
a
giant
swath
of
apartments.
This
code
will
require
a
mixture
of
neighborhoods.
All
of
different
characters,
kill
some
neighborhoods
near
the
train
station.
L
We'll
have
commercial
uses
mixed
in
with
housing
options.
Some
farther
away
will
look
similar
to
a
suburban
neighborhood,
but
all
will
have
a
diversity
requirement
so
that
not
every
area
will
look
the
same
I
like
that.
The
code
needs
developers
through
a
series
of
choices
to
allow
them
greater
autonomy,
while
still
creating
the
form
the
city
feels
for
community
building.
The
overhaul
we
have
done
represents
a
significant
effort
by
the
city
to
be
thoughtful
and
deliberate
in
our
planning.
L
A
You
know
if
I
could
just
summarize
this
up
I
kind
of
have
earlier,
but
we
have
been
working
on
this
for
over
three
months
now,
three
months
and
about
15
days.
We
appreciate
the
work
of
the
Planning
Commission.
This
has
gone
through
their
purview
and
they
have
approved
this
as
well.
They
spent
about
three
and
a
half
four
hours
in
one
evening
and
they
really
hammered
it
out
and
so
and
then
and
then
it
came
to
the
council.
A
The
council
has
had
great
input,
I
think
that
in
this,
and
maybe
even
for
us
as
council,
even
as
staff,
and
certainly
as
residents
we
are,
we
all
going
to
get
everything
we
want.
Maybe
not.
We
cannot
come
away
with
something
maybe
on
the
compromise
and
I.
Think
that
we
have
taken
is
a
stet
as
a
council
and
a
staff
of
a
good,
methodical
approach.
A
We
hit
the
brakes
when
we
needed
to,
and
the
word
I
think
I
accord
with
councilmember
Carol
it's
time
to
pull
the
brakes
off
and
let
this
code
do
its
thing
and
I'm
excited
for
what
can
happen
down
there
and
it's
going
to
put
a
lot
of
work
now
back
on
the
staff.
We
know
that
people
are
knocking
on
the
door
and
they've
been
waiting
for
this
this
moment,
so
counseling
I'm,
hoping
to
anywhere.
A
J
Just
a
couple
questions
I
had
I
went
back
and
usually
the
opportunity
give
comments
back
and
things
of
that
nature.
A
couple
of
things
and
maybe
I
missed
it,
because
we're
only
750
pages
there
to
look
at
tonight,
but
and
we
have
kind
of
a
red
line
copy
of
what
was
changed
from
the
last
one.
So
it's
sometimes
hard
to
decide
what
actually
changed
from
the
last
version.
But
one
thing
I
think
is
really
important,
is
how
this
step
back
is
apply
and
what
language
we're
using
inside
that
setback
and.
J
F
R
Think
they're
all
kind
of
going
in
and
out
first
I
thought
it
was
me,
but
yeah
though
the
setbacks
would
be
basically
from
as
they
always
are
with
any
of
the
the
property
lines,
and
so
we
do
have
those
reduced
setbacks.
We
do
have
the
area
where
I
believe
some
of
them
and
Scott
may
be
able
to
better
speak
to
that
word.
You
have
the
right-of-way,
and
then
you
have
the
public
easement
and
beyond
that.
That
was
basically
a
setback
would
be
so.
But
that
was
a
point
of
discussion.
R
Mike
yeah
Mike
as
far
as
like
pointing
out
pages
I'd,
have
to
look
through,
but
I
know
that
you
know
he
took
a
lot
of
notes
and
we
were
we
were
very
thorough
and
where
those
needed
to
be
addressed.
N
J
R
S
Shot-
and
your
point
was
actually
well
taken,
then
that
was
one
of
the
things
that
we
discussed
it
at
length
with
with
Mike,
Hawthorn
and
again,
I
can't
push
it
chapter.
Verse
I'd
need
to
look
at
it,
but
basically
what
we
had
settled
on
was
a
clause
in
there
and
one
of
the
the
phrases
that
basically
said.
You
know
the
setbacks.
S
So
we
didn't
specify
the
number
we
just
said
with
your
proof
cross
section
that
way,
depending
on
what
you're
backing
up
to
you,
you've
got
it
so
I
feel
confident
that,
in
doing
that,
we
were
able
to
get
what
you
were.
What
you
were
getting
in
I
know
you
had
asked:
do
we
need
to
create
a
special
lot
number
for
it
and
we
thought
that
would
probably
be
a
better
way
to
do
it.
The
way
I
just
described
so
again,
I
probably
can
find
the
place
for
you,
the
exact
wording.
N
J
Was
addressed
and
that's
just
a
concern
that
I
have
that's
a
very
unique
thing
that
we
don't
have
in
the
city.
That's
different
in
in
this
coat
section
and
I
think
it'd
be
good
if
they
have
that
describe
what
is
that
going
to
be
and
from
the
legal
perspective,
we've
used
the
word
hard
surface
and
you
found
out
with
the
trail
of
work
down
here
that
when
we
use
the
word
hard
surface,
that
became
very
hard
to
find
legally.
Is
that
compacted
dirt
to
a
certain
level?
Is
it
papers?
E
F
J
S
I
maybe
make
a
suggestion,
then
that
might
be
something
when
we
look
at
the
cross-sections
and
that's
one
of
your
other
items
coming
up
and
you
could
direct
us
to
in
those
cross-section
details
just
put
a
little
more
information.
I
would
suggest
that
would
be
the
best
place
to
put
that
is
on
that
detail
that,
as
it
shows,
here's
that
four
footer
eight
foot
let's
we
can
word
that
as
the
governing
body
sees
fit
to
make
sure
that
that's
defined.
Clearly,
that's.
J
Work
session
we're
trying
to
take
something
done:
independent,
we're
trying
to
know
the
correct
code
right
and
our
current
code.
The
way
it
leads
is
you've
got
section,
r1
9000
and
you
go
through
there
and
says:
here's
the
setbacks
here.
What
you
can
do-
and
you
can
read
through
that-
and
it's
very
clear
what
I
hate
to
do
is
bury
something
and
I.
Don't
think.
It's
intentional,
but
I
think
if
someone's
reading
that
they
on
appeal
is
now
okay.
J
I'm
going
to
build
here,
I'm
gonna,
go
to
this
section
and
read
through
it
and
I
think
they
would
be
for
me
just
easier
to
know
what
all
that
is
right.
There
was
slaughter
setbacks
and
bingos,
typically
I'm
not
going
to
an
engineer's
report
to
look
about
setbacks
on
a
cross
section,
one,
that's
just
not
how
I
come
to
normal
code
in
American
foreign
studies,
just
very
easy
to
put
it
in
there
and
again,
if
you
happy
to
approve
this
continued
upon
that
coming
back
and
fully
describe
it.
L
J
S
S
S
I
I
do
think
that
probably
almost
everyone
who's
going
to
be
developing
is
going
to
go
straight
to
those
cross
sections
and
look
at
what
kind
of
roads
they
need
to
build
and
if
it's
there
written
real
clearly
that
might
be
a
good
place
and
I'm
a
big
fan
of
of
what.
If
anytime,
we
put
in
any
kind
of
requirement
or
anything
that
we
say
it
in
one
place
as
much
as
possible.
So
it's
up
to
you
all,
of
course,
but
my
suggestion
would
be
is
maybe
put
it
in
the
code
to
reference.
S
You
know
something
like
you
know
what
you
put
in
in
the
in
that
four
foot
area
shall
be
in
accordance
with
standard
detail,
number
dah-dah-dah
and
in
in
standard
detail.
Then
they
could
list.
Here's
what's
allowed.
His
was
not
allowed
real
briefly
and
succinctly
again
merely
a
suggestion
to
do
what
you'd
like
to
do.
C
J
I
guess
permits
clarity,
orderly,
describing
this
better
of
message,
ability
in
this
room,
and
then
we
just
pull
out
this
one
section
is
ready
to
be
put
into
new
senators
say:
why
are
we
doing
that
everything
else?
Why
don't?
We
call
the
same
pattern
that
we're
still
following
the
other
setbacks
in
there,
but
now
the
rest
of
those
elites
it's
a
better
best,
but
either
way,
I
think
it's
very
important
when
we
describe
what
that
is,
so
we
don't
end
up
with
some
kind
of
situation
down
the
road.
Well,
it's
up
to
interpretation.
S
J
J
What
it
states,
basically,
that
the
approval
is
either
going
to
do
the
planning
director
and
it
uses
the
word
and
slash
for
the
public
works
director
with
the
right
words
to
proceed
in
cooperation
with
other
staff
and
that's
named
throughout
the
document.
I
brought
that
up
last
time.
I
think
that
we
need
to
have
one
person
that's
over
approvals,
so
that's
going
to
planning
director
or
what
the
public
works,
but
we
put
an
or-
and
that
can
be
somewhat
confusing.
J
J
It's
on
the
numbers
that
we
have
that
page
28,
what
it
uses
that
and
like
I
said
throughout
the
document,
when
you
seen
that
second
line
there
on
number
three
were
eliminating
final
block
lines
are
subject
to
the
approval
by
the
planning,
director
and
or
public
works
director
and
consultation
of
the
cities
down.
Okay,
I
think
that
just
needs
to
be
one
person
who's
doing
approval
on
these
I
think
the
word
in
consultation
with
city
staff.
J
That
way,
if
the
public
works
director
or
the
Director
of
Planning
has
comments,
they
can
connect
with
each
other,
but
I
think
it's
still
one
person
that
make
those
approvals,
and
in
the
current
code
we
say
that
it's
the
Zoning
Administrator
and
that's
why
I
think
that
would
be
the
same
language
again
kind
of
going
Michael.
You
said
Scott
before
one
place.
This
is
just
kind
of
melding
this
outside
document
or
current
code,
where
Adams
already
doing
all
those
approvals
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
make
that
canning
connection.
Listen.
A
Always
been
comfortable
with
the
way
that
you
work
together
and
to
come
up
with
the
right
solutions,
are
you
comfortable
with
the
way
that
it's
worded
the
the
fact
that
you
two
can
work
it
out
and
and
give
the
right
answers
with
appropriate
people?
Did
you
see?
Yes,
do
you
see
any
confusions
on
this
as
a
staff
I.
R
R
J
Coming
off
of
a
past
experience
serving
on
the
Board
of
adjustments
for
nine
years,
this
came
up
quite
a
bit
about
who
is
doing
what,
when
you
have
the
authority
to
prove
what
and
it
was
finger
pointing
with
the
step
we
have
now
I.
Don't
think
so.
But
we
got
a
look
at
this
code
beyond
the
current
positions
that
they're
in
and
we
throw
the
word
and
or
it
in
there
if
it's
just
an
then
that'll
be
right.
J
Both
need
to
sign
up
when
you
put
the
word
an
or
in
Lock
plan
approval
block
plan
approvals.
You
know
public
space
approvals,
who
does
it
really
go
to
and
I
think
you
just
say:
here's
the
point
person
if
you
can
only
send
me
on
that's
great,
because
we
have
that
verbage
and
consultation
on
staff,
because
here's
gonna
be.
The
next
item
that
you
have
is
the
code
with
the
Board
of
Adjustment
states
in
Section
17,
that
if
there
is
an
appeal,
is
to
an
administrative
decision,
that's
been
made.
J
So
when
can
they
make
that
appeal-
and
this
maybe
comes
back
to
the
legal
question
of
how
does
that
hierarchy
work
when
the
appeal
system
goes?
It's
nice
to
know
who
you're
working
with
so
that
person
that
has
the
final
decision
you
disagree
with.
You
know.
You've
got
your
decision
from
there
and
there's
a
clock,
the
stars
and
I
believe
it's
90
days.
You
have
to
file
an
appeal
or
adjustments.
I,
just
think
the
clarity
we
would
provide.
That
would
be
extremely
important,
keeping
it
in
connection
with
our
other
ordinances.
We
have
again.
J
K
You
know
I
I
like
where
Rob
is
going
with
this,
because
we
are
very
fortunate
in
that
situation.
Right
now,
with
the
two
of
you,
but
as
we're
all
experienced
with
know,
things
in
the
city
tends
to
change.
Fortunately,
sometimes
they
get
territorial
with
different
things,
we're
very
fortunate
again,
that's
not
our
current
situation,
but
going
forward.
I
tend
to
I,
tend
to
agree
prob
in
terms
of
we
were
to
take
this.
Maybe
change
the
same
terminology
of
Zoning
Administrator.
K
K
K
J
J
J
S
It
would
be
really
more
in
my
court
to
answer
there's
other
questions
or
issues
that
are
clearly
going
to
be
more
in
Adams
court
to
answer.
So,
if
you
make
it
a
little
more
general,
it's
clear
that
we
we
work
together,
that's
the
or
part,
and
then
there's
some
where
maybe
it's
it's
clearly
both
of
us,
so
it
would,
it
would
be,
and
so
that
was
the
thought
behind
it.
However,
you
feel
is
best
a
word.
Of
course.
We
don't
see
problems
with
it
and
I
will
say
just
on
a
personal
level.
S
C
J
J
Yeah
I
think
so
and
there's
not
a
lot
of
difference
already
when
you
go
back
and
read
that
section
of
there's
only
or
if
it's
officer
at
an
interest
rate
or
anything,
the
terminology
wrong.
But
you
know
it
all
rests
upon
your
shoulders
out
as
far
as
getting
out
those
commits
I
can
see
the
engineering
standards
come
into
play,
but
we
try
to
say
here's
what
we
already
have
in
our
code.
I
would
get
this
to
fit
into
it.
Using
that
definition.
L
J
J
We
took
the
planning,
department
and
half
you
guys
what
four
or
five
years
ago
and
now
they're
going
with
more
work
with
half
the
staff
they
already
have
so
the
more
we
can
make
it
simple
and
streamlined,
and
it
says
in
consultation
with
other
staff
I'm
happy,
and
if
someone
has
a
baroque
they're
saddled
that
hey,
you
approve
something
without
consulting
me.
That's
what
if
the
mayor
did
pay
the
big
bucks
when
the
city
administrator
get
involved
and
say:
okay,
what's
wrong
with
our
processes,
because.
L
N
K
J
C
J
J
I'm
going
to
approve
the
ordinance
we
killing
the
place
in
Section
17
for
606
in
the
American
port
cities
about
876,
already
owe
the
American
port
city
development
regarding
truck
transit-oriented
developments
by
the
American
port
city
code
contingent
to
replacing
on
page
seven
at
the
top
of
the
graph
there,
where
it
says
staff
to
put
that
to
be
the
official
language
of
the
zoning.
What's
the
right
thing
to
do
before
mr.
J
once-ler
nights
officer
I,
think
is
the
language
and
subject
to
going
back
and
having
staff
defining
who's
responsible
for
what
between
the
planning
director
and
the
public
works
director,
bringing
that
back
to
the
council
for
ratification
and
clarification
in
the
code.
As
to
the
setbacks.
In
regards
to
the
four
feet
that
we
have
discussed
on
the
major
arterial
cross-sections
and
the
eight
foot.
K
K
Q
K
R
R
R
Maybe
I'm
getting
terminology
mixed
up
I'm,
just
saying
like
in
that
first
column,
if
you
wanted
to
say
zone
clearance
officer,
but
if
it's
something
that
the
public
works
director
is
going
to
approve
in
later
sections
is
this:
do
you
want
something
more
broad
staff,
as
defined
in
later
sections,
or
something
like
that?
Just
just
so
I'd
like.
K
K
F
J
Yeah
I
think
just
a
side
note
when
I
would
say
my
growing
up
years
and
in
city
government
was
on
the
board
of
adjustments
and
for
nine
years
we
never
had
a
suggested
motion.
It
was
always
through
off
the
top
of
their
head
can
come
up
with
whatever
there
was,
and
so
that
that
was
very
interesting
to
me.
That's
when
I
lost
my
skills
since
converging
in
a
City,
Council
and
being
able
to
just
look
at
a
suggested
motion
and
take
that
further
for
granted.
So
thank.
N
F
L
J
And
part
of
the
motion
I
hope
that
it's
included
another
way
that
we
got
was
to
bring
that
faculty
council
for
replication.
So
it's
not
the
final
decision.
This
is
what
you
know.
They're
gonna,
make
the
changes
and
then
bring
it
back
to
us.
We're
gonna
make
sure
that
it's
cleared
up
to
our
satisfaction.
I
do
well.
J
A
A
B
B
In
section
3.0
for
for
so
that's
on
page
what
I
say:
that's
on
page
ten
it
it
talks
about
the
two
hundred
south
setback.
Its
properties,
adjacent
to
two
hundred
South,
must
meet
the
requirements
of
two
hundred
South
design
and
construction
plans
document
as
generated
by
American
Fork
City.
We
do
the
same
thing
with
the
other
thoroughfares
and
what
I
think
what
we
could
do
here
is
add
not
just
two
hundred
South
but
all
major
thoroughfares
included.
You
know
in
that
section
three
point:
zero,
four,
four
and.
J
J
L
J
So
when
I
look
at
a
construction
plan,
you
know
fair
I'm,
looking
at
what
the
city
owes,
we
don't
put
this
in
private
property
area
I'm
not
moving
in
the
thoroughfare,
usually
for
setbacks,
at
least
that's
not
how
our
current
code
works.
So
the
media,
by
the
developer,
coming
in
here
and
I,
didn't
read
this
specific
section.
So
I
wanted
a
setback
section
like
all
the
rest
of
our
code
is
written
I'm
going
to
feel
like
we
hit
now.
J
J
J
J
S
S
What
I'm
seeing
is
one
issue
is
defining
as
as
you're
saying,
councilman
Shawn.
What
can
go
in
that
four
foot
setback-
and
you
know
my
suggestion
earlier-
was:
let's
put
it
in
the
standard
detail,
whether
you
put
it
here,
the
standard
detail.
You
know
it's
up
to
you,
I'm
with
which
suggestion
you
want
to
follow
to
meet
the
other
separate.
It's
related
issue
is
kind
of
what
I
was
talking
about
a
little
earlier
about
the
lock
it's
going
in
and
saying
so.
S
You
know
if
you
have
lot
tight,
whatever
it
and
we
were
set
at
L
hope
we
can
find
it
here
in
a
little
bit
where,
if
you
have
a
lot
that
backs
up
to
one
of
these
thoroughfares
that
is
not
built
by
the
city
and
as
you
see
that
one
right
there
the
tune
itself
which
is
to
be
designed
by
the
city
as
says
destruction,
plants
as
generated
by
the
city.
Well,
we
also
have
the
standard
detailed,
700
West.
Those
also
have
setbacks.
S
That
will
mean
that
let's
say
you
have
an
L
six
lot,
an
elf
six
lot
in
the
interior
is
not
going
to
have
the
same
set
back
then
in
L
6
line
facing
or
adjacent
to,
one
of
those
roads
I
just
named
is,
and
we
said
that
out
again,
I'm
hoping
we
can
find
it
just
simply
making
people
aware
that
there
is
a
different
set
back
for
your
lot
type.
So
that's
one
issue
again
this.
J
F
A
T
Here's
a
comment
and
there's
some
concern
that
this
code
is
different
and
your
it
sounds
like
the
concern
is
that
a
developer
is
going
to
come
in
and
but
I
understand
the
setbacks.
This
form
based
code
is
totally
different
than
what
you're
gonna
see
in
most
of
cities.
I
mean
there's
a
few
cities
that
have
form
based
code,
so
this
is
a
way
different
process.
We're
gonna,
go
and
and
look
at
this
Loctite
this
Broadway.
This
is
the
permitted
use.
T
If
you
approve
it
the
way
it
is,
you
might
need
to
tweak
it
with
a
text
amendment
here
there
no
code
is
going
to
be
perfect,
but
I
think
you're
close
enough
where
you
could
approve
it
and
then,
if,
if
in
the
future,
it
does
have
an
issue
where
a
developer
can't
figure
out
the
setbacks.
I,
don't
think
that's
the
case.
If
it
is
we're,
gonna
call
Adam
or
engineering
Scott
and
get
that
clarified.
Well,.
H
J
You
go
okay,
I
got
a
set
that
I
need
to
know
what
I
can
do
with
that.
Forklift
said
that,
and
you
call
that,
and
you
get
an
answer,
my
worry
is
it's
nowhere
in
the
code,
it
says
what
can
go
in
that
for
what
setback,
and
so
that's
the
concern
that
I
have
right
now
is
that
we
need
to
define
what
is
right
so
such.
Q
J
Talked
about
a
lot
of
different
things,
that
counsel,
to
be
honest
with
you,
I,
don't
even
know
any
of
us
have
the
exact
clarity
of
what
we're
going
to
allow
in
that
area
and
that's
why
I
think
that
yeah,
let's
go
ahead
and
pass
it
now,
I
think
we're
so
close.
Let's
take
two
weeks
to
come
back
with
some
language
and
say
here's
what
you
can
do
in
that
means,
if
you
bet,
and
if
you
want
to
order
that
here's,
what
you
can
be
able
to
find
exactly
is
allowed.
J
T
R
S
Mr.
mayor
members
of
the
council,
what
I
just
brought
up
the
cross-section
switch
just
to
look
at,
which
is
in
the
next
next
item,
but
where
we
have
it
written
right
now,
it
reads
exactly
it
says:
building
set
back
parentheses,
hardscape
I
I
would.
This
is
why
I
would
suggest,
if
there's
confusion
and
not
sure,
then
maybe
on
the
next
item.
I
would
suggest
again.
Listen.
C
H
F
T
F
Q
K
N
A
We
I
think
we
can
come
up
with
that
tonight
this.
What
hardscape
is
I,
don't
think
we
need
to
come
back
to
two
weeks
past
what
a
heart
state
this
to
me,
arts
gate
can
be
concrete.
Give
me
the
papers,
I,
don't
think
personally
and
I
mean
hardscape
is
asphalt,
but
do
we
want
to
see
asphalt?
It
begins,
we
don't,
but
we
don't
want
compatible
material
and
of
course
our
code
does
not
allow
that
anymore,
but
we
change
that.
Can
you
think
of
any
other
hardscapes.
J
Downside
could
come
back
in
two
weeks,
I've
really
done
it's
a
lot
of
developers.
You
move
forward.
You
come
back
yes,
staff
time
to
be
able
to
collaborate
on
it.
Perhaps
you
with
our
consultants,
come
up
with
the
right
language
is
what
I
hate
to
do
is
have
something,
and
then
we
forget
about
it,
because
we're
just
sitting
here
trying
to
say
this
is
not
the
time
to
be
making
sausage.
This
is
the
time
to
say
the
sausage
a
little
bit
or
dumb.
J
T
L
T
G
J
M
I,
don't
know
all
the
bumpers
they're
waiting.
You
know
that
several
developers
who
have
been
working
on
their
plants
consistent
with
the
code
and
making
tweets
a
long
way
so
that,
as
soon
as
the
moratorium
is
lifted,
they
can
forward.
Can
they
put
an
application
in
within
two
weeks?
I
don't
know,
but
it
wouldn't
shock
me
to
see
an
application
within
two
weeks
and
the
second.
The
application
is
submitted.
M
They
are
vested
in
in
whatever
code.
It
is
in
force
at
the
time.
So,
if
we're
going
to
make
any
type
of
changes,
if
we're
going
to
save
hard
scape,
even
if
you're
looking
at
changing
that
to
a
certain
degree
in
two
weeks,
you
probably
want
to
pull
back
and
define
it
a
little
bit
more
today
and
it
can
always
be
changed
in
two
weeks
again
same
with
zone
with
hearings
officer.
We
there's
been
a
lot
of
talk
about
what
not
that's
the
appropriate
term.
M
Perhaps
tonight
it's
zone,
errands
officer
or
his
designated
representative,
and
that
allows
out
kind
of
a
little
bit
more
leeway
in
in
this
next
two-week
period.
If
that's
the
approach
you're
going
to
take,
he
can
kind
of
point
fingers
and
put
the
building
official
in
charge,
or
some
things
have
Scott
in
charge
of
other
things.
It's
it's
kind
of
at
Adams
desire
at
that
point,
and
then,
in
two
weeks
we
could
come
back
and
revise
it.
Never
changes
just.
J
The
approval
process,
if
need
be,
I,
guess
I,
don't
really
see
the
approvals
coming
in
right
off
the
bat
now
just
because
they
put
in
an
application.
Are
they
vested
absolutely
so
approving
this
tonight
and
then
we
come
back
and
change
it
in
two
weeks.
Where
are
the
same
conditions
that
we
were
under
the
current
motion?
I,
don't
see
any
difference
in
that
they're
still
invested
if
they
put
the
application
in
right
away
versus
you
I'm
getting
that
I
do.
M
I,
just
with
some
of
the
discussion
that's
taking
place,
especially
with
this
hard
surface
discussion,
I
tend
to
a
group
mayor
having
some
some
definitions
might,
even
if
the
one
that's
going
to
be
again
today,
but
if,
if
you
want
to
pull
back
and
not
have
asphalt
as
beating
a
hard
surface-
and
you
know
that
tonight
that
probably
needs
to
be
addressed
so
that
in
this
two-week
period
an
application
doesn't
command
with
all
the
setback
being
at
all.
That's
all
so
we
asked
this
so
quickly.
Dressings.
C
J
That's
on
the
whole,
that's
the
next
item
to
come
up
with
writing.
However,
I
do
think
that
in
the
current
code
we
still
need
to
stipulate
and
certify
where
those
setbacks
are
excavated
referenced
and
things
of
that
nature.
So
I
would
leave
the
motion
of
stance.
Then
we
can
come
back
and
clarify
that
verbage
and
everything
in
two
weeks
and
then
we
can
further
clarify
fault
on
the
next
one,
and
then
we
can
make
the
changes
to
define
further
where
hardscape
is
in
two
weeks
as
well.
S
S
We
just
need
to
find
it
and,
if
you're
concerned
that
that's
not
clear
enough,
we
do
that,
but
I'm
certain
that
I
know
we
talked
with
my
Kathryn
and
David.
Maybe
you
can
help
me
out
if
you
remember
that
discussion
that
we
had
with
Mike,
where
we
added
that
in
where
it
said
where
those
setbacks
are
and
if
again,
if
the
only
issue,
though
about
what
goes
in
it,
is
just
to
define
hardscape
as
concrete
or
if
you
want
to
say
concrete,
pavers
I,
don't
think
we
need
two
weeks
to
do
that.
S
S
J
S
B
And
so
with
that,
if
we
move
it
by
section
3.0
port
for
to
include
the
other
thoroughfares,
it
covers
every
road
that
would
have
a
setback,
that's
different
than
anywhere
else
in
the
theory,
because
it's
only
the
thoroughfare
roads
that
have
that
setback
requirement,
so
200
south
and
the
thoroughfare
roads.
Those
are
the
only
deals
of
the
only
two
cases
where
we'd
house
a
different
set
back
so
I
think
it's
simple
to
add
the
language
in
section
3.0
for
four
to
include
200,
South
and.
K
B
D
A
J
I'm
all
about
moving
forward
on
it,
but
my
biggest
worry
is
how
long
we
discussed
it
here
with
all
of
us
and
we're
all
confused
on.
Does
it
say,
does
it
not
say
where
does
it
say
that
now
I
would
come
in
and
hopefully
over
time
have
become
very
familiar
with
this?
We
can
point
right
to
it,
but
if
we
didn't
prove
something,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
actually
have
it
there
because
I
hope.
So
when
this
final
approval
goes,
I
could
take
and
shred
all
this
stuff
and
I
worry
about
it.
N
Q
J
F
J
K
F
K
K
A
M
M
Sure
that
we,
that
the
motion
is
in
fact
improving
the
codes,
as
is
with
the
understanding
that
that
staff
has
been
directed
to
make
the
change
on
the
zone
clearance
officer
on
I,
believe
those
page
seven,
and
that
staff
has
been
directed
to
further
clarify
who
each
of
who
has
the
approval
authority
for
for
those
specific
issues,
whether
it's
the
building
department
grab
star
the
planning
department
or
pub
works
director.
The
council
is
giving
the
authority
to
Adam
and
Scott
to
work
that
out
for
those
changes
to
them.
M
You
ratified
at
the
next
meeting
until
that
time,
it
is
an
and/or,
that's
what's
being
approved
tonight,
with
the
understanding
that
they
will
come
back
in
two
weeks
to
ratify
any
further
changes.
That
was
my
understanding
of
the
motion,
and
then
we
also
have
the
setback
issue,
but
I
believe
it's
kind
of.
J
We've,
what
we
said
is
that
we
still
need
to
address
it
like
to
stop
point
it
out.
There's
what
goes
in
that
four
feet
and
then
make
sure
that
when
those
at
that
four
feet
exists,
and
so
that
would
be
still
part
of
the
motion,
is
it
part
of
this
definitely
go
back
beautiful
document
and
wherever
it
needs
to
make
sure
it
references
that
extra
four
feet
or
eight
feet
that
they
bring
those
recommendations
back
to
us,
we
made
those
changes.
M
The
question
I
think
on
that
is:
are
we
improving
the
code,
as
is
with
directions
of
staff,
to
come
back
with
changes
in
two
weeks,
or
are
you
making
those
changes
today
for
those
to
be
put
into
effect
and
it
doesn't
sound
like
that's
the
case?
So
really,
what
emotion
is
is
approving
the
code
as
it
is,
with
the
exception
of
the
zone
clearance
officer
change
decides
one
that's
very
clearly
made
and
then
direction
to
staff
to
come
back
in
two
weeks
with
those
requests.
M
C
K
J
J
G
J
L
J
I
could
try
to
connect
without
works
with
me,
so
I'm
going
to
move
that
we
approve
the
wear.
My
hat
here,
ordinance
repealing
replace
in
Section
17
for
608
at
that
time
of
the
American
fourth
city
development
hold
regarding
transit-oriented
developments
in
the
city
for
six
port
city
development
code
and
direct
staff
to
come
back
in
two
weeks
and
to
be
able
to
address
where
it
specifies
planning
director
and
public
works
director,
specifically
who's,
going
to
be
responsible
for
those
items
and.
G
J
G
A
L
J
L
J
That's
the
that's.
The
key
of
having
this
come
back
is
that
we're
gonna
have
time
to
have
it
written
to
look
at
it
and
the
BSA.
Is
that
exactly
what
we
wanted
to
have
versus
tonight
trying
to
come
up
with
something?
And
then
we
end
up?
And
unfortunately,
you
use
a
lot
of
examples
where
we
approve
something
and
later
it
came
back
to
be
something
we
didn't
ever
think
was
going
to
be
that
make
sense.
K
H
G
D
A
We
will
now
turn
to
item
number
4
on
our
agenda
and
it's
reviewing
action
on
and
we're
going
to
change
the
verbage
there
on
an
ordinance
approving
amendments
to
the
transportation
master
plan,
including
Street
cross
sections
with
the
Tod
Zone,
pressurized
irrigation
master
plan,
Sanna
sanitary
sewer
master
plan
and
culinary
water
master
plan.
Sharon.
Can
you
just
maybe
give
us
a
just
a
synopsis
on
why
we
are
calling
this
an
ordinance
as
opposed
to
resolution.
M
In
reviewing
the
agenda
for
today,
there
was
some
concern
from
legal.
Just
the
state
code
talks
about
when
a
resolution
is
appropriate
versus
when
an
ordinance
is
appropriate.
There's
it's
not
determinative,
but
from
a
legal
perspective
we
would
feel
more
comfortable
with
this
being
passed
as
a
ordinance
as
opposed
to
resolution.
It
was
noticed
up
as
a
resolution,
but
we
don't
have
a
concern
about
that,
because
the
content
of
it
is
not
changing,
it's
simply
being
passed
as
an
ordinance
as
opposed
to
a
resolution.
So
there's
no
legal
concern
there.
L
A
L
K
G
A
N
A
D
F
K
O
L
L
K
J
B
J
J
So
maybe
this
year's
are
looking
at
that
spring
line.
Seeing
the
does
qualify,
the
water
projects
would
you
have
on
my
docket
are
significant
and
expense,
and
we
want
to
make
it
so
that
if
the
menorah
City
it's
better,
it's
a
very
difficult
thing
to
come
to
at
times.
But
I
would
like
to
at
least
look
at
that
to
make
sure
that's
a
major
mess
right.
J
50
percent
of
our
city's
water
up
side
of
that
line
in
extra
capacity
to
provide
more
water
in
the
city
for
the
future
growth
it
right
to
the
upper
teens
36
inch
water
line,
all
the
way
down
to
Tod
I
think
there
might
be
some
argument
there,
but
how
do
the
experts
at
least
to
look
at
it?
So
that's
the
only
thing
that
have
it.
Let's
take
a
look
at
that
see
if
that
spring
light
qualifies
for
any
type
of
impact
analysis.
K
A
F
A
N
A
Discussion
hearing
none
I'll
call
for
a
vote:
councilmember
Christiansen,
hi
councilmember,
Shelton,
aye,
councilmember,
Barnes,
aye,
councilmember,
Carol,
councilmember,
Taylor,
I,
okay,
item
number:
six
is
reviewing
action
on
lifting
the
temporary
land
use
regulation
prohibiting
development
within
the
CEO
of
these
zones.
I
think
this
could
be
a
very
quick
motion.
K
D
B
J
B
J
M
Understanding
of
this
is
that
the
Tod
is
going
to
bring
upon
new
challenges
that
and
interpretations
that
we've
never
had
to
deal
with.
You
have
a
different
type
of
code
coming
forward
with
the
Tod
there's
going
to
be
a
little
bit
more
room
for
interpretation,
and
really
this
goes
to
just
kind
of
clarify
that
it
is
our
zone
clearance
officer
that
being
the
climbing
directory
that
is
going
to
have
I'm
saying
those
those
decisions
when
there
is
some
of
that
is
acuity.
You're.
M
M
Concern
here
is
just
that
the
Tod
just
brings
on
such
a
different
dynamic
than
we
received
in
the
city,
and
it's
really
just
trying
to
add
a
little
bit
more
clarifications,
and
it's
definitely
not
that
maybe
doubling
up
a
little
bit
but
it's.
But
the
concern
is
making
sure
there's
clarity
as
to
who's
name,
I.
Guess.
J
Don't
think
kind
of
go
back,
it
don't
discuss
with
the
bus.
You
know,
haven't
written
one
place
and
that's
good
enough,
so
I
can
keep
learning
about
it
where
it's
everywhere
else,
but
I,
don't
know
why
we
have
to
specify
one
zone
is
treated
any
different
and
it's
not
being
treated
any
different
because
again,
17
to
402
clearly
defines
exactly
what
item
six
is
so
I'm,
just
not
sure
the
reason
for
it
again
I
don't
have
any
heartburn
passing
other
than
again.
J
A
F
B
J
Can
we
change
it?
I
mean
what
if
the
city
planner
has
designated
zones
clearance
officer,
which
already
is
designated
in
the
section
right
above
it
that
states
clearly
that
so
I
don't
know,
we
have
to
redo
that
and
then
just
state
for
matters
involving
interpretation,
the
city
and
application
of
the
city's
development
code.
K
N
K
A
K
A
G
A
G
A
A
S
Mr.
mayor,
this
item
is
is
regarding
you:
dot
is
in
the
design
stages
right
now
of
doing
a
significant
widening
project
of
State,
Street
East,
8th
Street
between
roughly
500
East
I
and
the
city
limit
border
with
Pleasant
Grove.
The
project
actually
goes
beyond
that
into
Pleasant
Grove,
but
the
part
that
we're
concerned-
excuse
me,
is
the
part
I
just
described
there,
they're
looking
at
probably
bidding
that
sometime
in
the
spring
and
at
least
by
the
fall
there
abouts
trying
to
be
under
construction
with
that
widening
project.
S
S
S
Since
they've
got
all
the
survey
data,
they
got
all
the
background
on
the
project
and
to
be
able
to
have
them,
provide
these
plans
for
us
that
we
would
then
later
take
out
to
bid
do
as
honors
on
our
own
as
our
own
separate
project
get
in
and
out
before
you
dot
get
started.
So
this
is
to
award
the
design.
S
G
S
J
J
The
plan
is
there
and
now
it's
kind
of
coming
actually
to
fruition
right
and
how
do
we
coordinate
that
and
do
we
need
to
adjust
our
plan,
so
any
report
back
from
staff
on
that
would
be
great.
Thank
you
with
that
mayor.
I'll
move
to
approve
the
East
State
Street
utility
improvement
project
engineering
services
contract,
that's
presented
ii.
K
S
P
A
D
J
Think
my
questions
were
brought
up
in
that
meeting,
but
just
to
reiterate,
as
far
as
right-of-way
acquisition
ever
think,
that's
gonna
be
part
of
this
engineering.
That's
gonna
come
back
and
we'll
see
what
that
looks
like
at
that
point
in
time.
So
I
feel
comfortable
moving
forward
with
it.
So
there's
no
heartburn
I'll
move
to
approve.
N
G
A
H
A
Council
member
Shelton
aye
council
member
Barnes,
aye
council
member
Carol,
councilmember
Taylor
hi,
all
right
item
number
well
I'm
going
to
share
Lyn.
If
there's
anything
else
that
has
been
brought
to
light
on
item
number,
seven
that
you
would
like
to
bring
up.
We
can
go
back
to
that.
Okay,
let's
go
to
item
number
seven.
M
There's
nothing
in
that
section
that
gives
the
zone
clearance
officer
the
authority
to
interpret
the
code
if
there's
disputes
or
disagreements
on
that
it
would
go
to
the
Board
of
Adjustment
as
it
currently
sits,
because
the
Tod
is
going
to
bring
about
likely
some
additional
issues
of
interpretation.
That
was
the
purpose
of
including
the
city
planner
being
designated
as
the
zone
clearance
officer
for
the
purposes
of
interpretation,
application
of
the
Tod
Code,
the
other
to
simplify
it.
M
If
we
wanted
it
to
go
across
the
board,
we
certainly
could
could
modify
that
so
that
the
city
planner
the
zone
clearance
officer
interprets
all
interpreter
has
the
ability
to
interpret
any
zones
within
the
city
as
it
sits
right
now,
though,
that
is
not
a
duty
of
the
zone
clearance
officer,
and
so
we
were
just
looking
to
add
clarity,
so
we
didn't
have
to
go
to
the
Board
of
Adjustment.
Every
time
there
was
a
dispute
in
the
Tod
Code
I.
J
Appreciate
that
clarification,
because
I
thought
it
was
handled
in
Section,
two
of
that
so
where
it
just
uses
the
word
determined
whether
what
use
is
set
forth.
But
if
that
isn't
clear
enough-
and
it
goes
the
board
of
adjustments-
I
thought
that
we
had
talked
about
that
in
a
work
session
and
I
thought.
The
council
is
an
agreement
to
leave
it
at
the
board
of
adjustments
and
provide
sufficient
training
to
the
board
on
a
regular
basis.
I
have
a
big
concern
about
again
treating
this
one
area
so
different
than
any
other.
J
If
we
trust
them
with
the
interpretation
of
our
code,
let's
make
it
across
the
board
and
get
them
the
training
they
need.
I
like
that,
especially
with
my
experience
on
the
board.
Because
then
you
have
five
individuals
and
you
have
an
opportunity
for
both
sides
to
present
their
case
to
an
independent
board
that
has
the
to
review
that
if
I
was
someone
that
wanted
interpretation,
I'd
prefer
to
go
to
a
board
than
versus
one
individual
I
know
some
cities
have
replaced
their
whole
Board
of
adjustments
with
just
one
person.
L
J
Know
in
Fred
England's
when
we're
looking
at
right
now
that
we
had
to
handle
and
I'm
so
glad
that
that
was
done
at
the
sit
at
the
Board
of
adjustments
level
and
not
done
at
the
staff
level,
because
there
was
in
mayor
frost
knows
the
histories
I've,
given
it
to
him.
You
know
we
had
the
mayor
showing
up
demanding
interpretation.
One
way
and
the
great
thing
is:
the
board
is
completely
independent
and
there's
no
undue
influence
of
someone's
job
or
anything
of
that
nature,
and
we
could
tell
the
mayor
sorry.
J
D
A
Have
one
opinion:
what's
the
rest,
the
council
feel
about
this
again.
I.
Do
think
that
there's
merit
in
the
fact
that
this
is
a
this
has
got
complexity
to
it
that
you
know
it
takes
time
to
digest.
It
took
the
Planning
Commission
how
many
hours
just
have
been
deliberation,
making
changes
the
reading
of
the
documentation
so
where's
one
of
the
where's.
The
council
want
to
go.
G
I'm
totally
made
up
my
mind,
but
I'm
leaning
that
way
for
the
simplicity
and
everybody
knows
it's
always
the
same
way
so
that
it
doesn't
look
like
there's
favoritism
for
a
certain
section
or
a
certain
group,
or
something
else,
but
I.
Also,
on
the
other
side
understand,
this
is
a
tote.
This
Tod
is
a
whole
different
thing
and
that's
where
the
conflict
comes
in,
in
my
mind
as
to
how
you
really
do
this.
Are
we
going.
G
F
E
K
J
Let's
be
honest,
there's
a
determination,
that's
made
at
the
staff
level,
first
of
all
right,
so
if
they
put
in
an
application
and
it's
Adam
that
has
to
make
that
Adam
says
no
I
interpret
the
code
to
be
this
way.
That's
when
they're
gonna
go
to
the
board
of
adjustments.
Do
you
can
say
I'm
not
going
to
approve
this
to
happen,
so
you
already
have
that
initial
interpretation
coming
from
staff.
J
What
we're
adding
is
an
independent
of
pule
authority
that
doesn't
have
any
other
influence
and
once
they
make
their
decision,
it
only
goes
to
the
fourth
District
Court.
So
you
can't
I
like
the
independence
of
that
I,
like
the
ability
to
say
no
there's
a
balance
of
power
there
and
I
think
we
lose
that
Bower
of
Palance
Bower.
That.
F
B
And
and
the
antenna,
this
is
not
to
take
away
the
powers
of
the
Board
of
Adjustment
at
all.
In
fact,
they
are
the
appeal
authority
and,
and
they
would
continue
to
be,
the
epillow
authority.
What
this
is
saying
is
hey
as
far
as
matters
of
interpreting
the
Tod
code
and
what
it
really
means.
It
will
be
the
zoning
clearance
officer
now,
if
they
don't
agree
with
that
or
they
want
a
variance
or
they
want
to
appeal.
F
J
I
think
that's
contained
in
the
board
of
adjustment
section
where
it
talks
about
any
administrative
official.
They
have
the
right
to
appeal
to
the
board
of
adjustments.
I
just
think
again
keep
it
the
same
all
the
way
across
every
zone.
If,
if
Adam
comes
in
or
whoever
is
Adams
successor
after
Adam,
has
a
long
career
here
of
30
years
and
retires,
then
you
know
it
goes
right
back
to
the
board.
C
B
J
J
They
also
look
at
the
interpretation,
so
that's
in
state
code
in
that
section,
that's
referenced
there
above,
so
you
got
to
go
back
to
the
state
code
to
look
at
those
powers
that
are
broadly
granted
there
inside
first
paragraph
yep
anyway.
So
what
here's?
What
has
happened
in
the
past,
whether
it
be
wrong
moral
or
it's,
been
Adam
or
it's
been
whoever
they
make
an
interpretation,
they
make
a
judgment.
Call
right
and
someone
says:
I,
don't
agree
with
that.
Who
do
I
go
to
it's
the
Board
of
adjustments,
that's
how
it's
always
operating
the
city.
M
M
M
M
J
A
A
J
A
K
A
J
Shelton,
like
we're
voting
before
we
have
all
the
information
before
us
for
the
last
comment,
but
I'll,
although
named
I'll,
tell
you
this,
we
continue
to
whittle
down
the
Board
of
adjustments
Authority
and
then
we
give
it
back
to
them.
That's
been
the
history
in
this
city.
We
give
it
to
one
person
used
to
be
the
city
administrator
with
the
fencing,
ordinance,
didn't
work
out
so
great,
and
he
said
it's
better
to
have
an
independent
appeal
authority
so
hope
it
doesn't
come
back
to
us,
but
I
vote,
no
councilmember,
Barnes
I'll.
G
D
K
D
N
J
J
F
J
A
P
We're
excited
to
bring
this
to
you
guys
we're
excited
to
get
heart
dye
started.
This
is
going
to
be
great.
We
had
three
people
bid,
Kenny
saying
came
in
the
lowest
the
responsible,
they
do
great
work,
we're
excited
to
have
them
as
part
of
that
we've
already
been
started.
There,
we've
done
a
lot
as
a
city
to
clear
the
ground,
trees,
some
other
stuff
on
the
fields,
including
getting
rid
of
the
structure.
We
even
let
the
fire
department
put
a
bunch
of
holes
in
it
before
we.
P
P
Various
items
like
that
that
we
plan
to
take
at
a
later
time
this
year
to
you
to
award
a
city
will
be
purchasing
it
and
then
Kenny
sync
can
be
installing
it.
It's
just
more
cost-effective
to
have
us.
Do
it
that
way.
We
did
present
to
you
the
the
total
base
bid
for
Kenny
Singh,
which
was
about
4.2
million
in
here.
P
However,
after
talking
with
engineering
with
David
and
even
with
Kenny
saying,
while
we
were
we're
in
line
and
we're
okay
with
most
of
the
the
costs
and
items
there
was
the
structure
itself,
the
announcer
box
structure
that
we
did
have
some
more
questions
on.
It
came
in
more
than
double
what
we
were
estimating
the
cost
to
be,
and
so
I
would
like
to
recommend
amending
the
motion
just
to
reduce
those
costs
that
they
gave
out
of
that
4.2.
P
So
we
would,
we
would
have
you
award
something
lower
would
be
the
recommendation
just
so
that
we
can
take
that
portion.
Look
at
some
more
figure
out
if
it's
a
materials
cost
increase
or
if
it's
something
in
the
architecture,
design
understand
what
those
are
hopefully
I
get
a
down
lower
and
then
bring
that
back
to
you
to
finish
the
awarding.
We
have
the
time
plenty
of
time
to
do
that,
and
we
just
wanted
more
time
to
to
look
at
that
piece
specifically.
So
we're.
R
P
A
P
Was
more
than
half
what
we
were
estimating?
We
felt
it
was
worth
looking
into
to
further,
so
the
revised
award
amount
would
be
for
everything
else,
allow
them
to
get
started
right
away,
and
so
the
rise
amount
would
be
three
million
four
hundred
and
ninety
four
thousand
one
hundred
and
ninety
five
dollars.
So
it's
just
reducing
that
scorekeeper
tower
any
other
questions
regarding
this.
G
P
So
you're
right
substantially
completely
means
the
project
is
largely
completed.
What
we
wanted
to
do
is
give
ourselves
a
warranty
period
for
really
the
grass
we
have
the
face
to
the
soccer
fields
is
getting
me
seated,
hydro
seated,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
we
have
time
to
let
it
come
in
fully
grow
and
make
sure
it's
all
there
as
it
should
be
before
we
finally
cut
him
loose,
say:
everything's
have
been
done,
and
so.
G
G
P
As
I
understand
it,
the
real
intent
of
that
is
just
to
kind
of
warranty.
The
the
hydro
see
to
make
sure
it's
fully
grown,
I'm,
clear,
the
the
payment
timing
and
all
of
that,
but
we
just
were
trying
to
give
ourselves
protection,
so
they
don't
throw
the
seed
down
and
we
have
problems
and
we
have
already
let
them
go.
B
So,
if
I
could
just
jump
in
here,
typically
between
substantial,
complete
and
final
completion-
and
they
are
two
separate
things-
substantial
means-
we
can
actually
use
the
facility
for
what
it's
for.
However,
there
probably
would
be
some
punch
list
items
to
take
care
of
some
clean
up
the
issues,
some
some
final
things
to
take
care
of
before
they
get
final
approval
and
final
payment.
B
Typically,
the
the
the
the
timeframe
between
there
is
a
shorter
period
than
a
year
and
15
days,
and
it
would
be
probably
recommended
that
that
be
no
more
than
60
days
from
from
the
time
of
substantial
completion
to
the
time
of
final
I
think
that
July
30th
date
should
be
amended
to
be
September
15th
of
2019
I
I.
Don't
think
we
should
give
the
contractor
a
year
and
15
days
to
get
from
substantial
to
final.
So
we'll.
N
F
K
A
G
A
H
A
Member
Shelton
aye
council,
member
Barnes,
aye
council
member
Carol
councilmember
Taylor
aye.
Thank
you.
Motion,
passes
number
thirteen
review
in
action
on
awarding
a
contract
for
the
2018
CDBG,
culinary
water
line
replacement
project.
This
is
phase
seven,
as
you
know,
we're
we're
really
hoping
we
can
get
to
phase
eight
we'll
see
what
happens
but
we're
blessed
to
have
phase
seven
in
front
of
us
there.
Any
questions
on
on
this.