►
From YouTube: March 15 Wetlands and Creeks Committee Meeting
Description
March 15 Wetlands and Creeks Committee Meeting
A
Call
the
order
of
the
wetlands
and
creeks
committee
of
march
15
2022
and
for
our
audience
I
want
to
say
hello
and
thank
you
for
viewing
our
meeting
the
arcade
wetlands
and
creeks
committee
we're
being
teleconferenced
in
response
to
our
local
efforts
to
reduce
the
spread
of
covet-19
virus.
So
we
again
want
to
thank
that
community
for
their
efforts
to
slow
the
spread
of
covet
19
in
arcata.
A
So
we
will
any
votes
that
we
take
tonight
will
be
roll
call
votes
this
evening
and
if
you
wish
to
make
public
comments
during
the
public
comment
period
or
for
an
individual
agenda
item
during
the
meeting.
There's
two
way.
One
is
that,
during
the
public
comment,
portion
of
any
item-
click
on
your
raise
your
hand
on
the
right
hand,
side
of
your
screen
when
it's
time
for
public
comment
on
an
item
and
you
wish
to
speak
on
the
clerk
will
unmute.
You
and
you'll
have
three
minutes
to
comment.
A
C
B
C
A
E
D
A
Communication,
this
time
period
when
people
are
dressed
to
me
on
matters
not
on
the
agenda.
If
the
conclusion,
the
committee
may
respond
to
statements,
any
request
that
players
can
be
action
will
be
set
by
the
committee
for
future
adventure
referred
to
staff.
Do
we
have
any
public
communication
submitted
for
tonight's
meeting
and
remember
raise
your
hand
on
the
right
side
of
your
screen
or
press
start
nine
on
your
phone
to
raise
your
hand,
and
we
do
have
one
problem.
F
Yeah
great,
thank
you,
chairman
brown,
and
thank
you
committee
members
yeah.
My
name
is
scott
mcbain,
I'm
the
owner
of
a
small
business
in
arcadia.
There's
a
restaurant
just
down
the
street
from
city
hall
along
valley,
bank
creek
and
some
of
you
may
know.
We
developed
the
isaac's
a
lot
just
once
off
the
block
one
blocks
up
in
the
co-op
building
back
in
2004.
I
think
it
was
part
of
the
reason
that
we
bought
that
to
develop
this
building
around.
F
It
was
because
jolly
giant
creek
flowed
underneath
it
in
a
concrete
cover
and
it's
part
of
our
project.
We
delayed
the
greek
and
so
transportation
is
kind
of
the
main
thing
that
we
do
as
part
of
our
company,
so
we're
very
interested
in
improving
the
city
and
or
we
hope
that
our
actions
there
just
our
contribution
to
the
community,
which
is
something
that
we
can
expand
on
and
in
the
past.
F
When
that
happened,
and
so
I
decided
to
make
some
recommendations
to
the
committee
to
potentially
not
lose
those
kinds
of
opportunities
in
the
future-
and
I'm
not
necessarily
trying
to
head
to
the
another
agenda
item
here,
but
for
the
us
with
a
unique
opportunity
to
kind
of
think
big
as
far
as
developing
kind
of
a
creek
restoration
plan
for
particular
creek
through
the
downtown
area,
beyond
just
the
gateway
area
but
for
the
entire
city.
So
I
was
hoping
to
maybe
put
this
on
here.
F
We
are
of
potentially
kind
of
developing
a
bigger
picture
restoration
plans
for
jolly
giant
creek.
That
would
include
not
just
setbacks,
which
I
think
you
guys
have
worked
on
in
the
past,
but
also
looking
for
opportunities
for
additional
daylighting
and
even
if
those
opportunities
aren't
manifested
like
right
now
because
of
constraints
of
ownership
or
things
again
with
the
gateway
plan.
It's
an
opportunity
to
think.
F
A
Thank
you,
scott.
I
would
love
to
respond
back
to
you
about
that
so,
but
yeah.
We
could
put
this
on
a
feature
agenda
item.
So
I
guess
at
the
conclusion
of
all
oral
communications.
We
can
bond
the
statements.
So
all
right
are
there
any
other
oral
communications
for
the
committee
tonight.
You
would
raise
your
hand.
C
H
A
B
I
think
answer
your
question
is
a
little
bit
of
both,
so
we
had
a
citywide
fish
passage
assessment
completed,
which
would
have
included
jolly
giant
creek
so
that
took
a
comprehensive
look
at
fish
passage
criteria
for
the
greek.
I
think
that
our
drainage
master
plan
also
speaks
to
an
extent
some
opportunities
for
jelly
joint,
quick.
So
those
are
some
off
about
the
top
of
mind
planning
documents,
but
then
we
do
also
look
at
more.
I
H
H
Point
maybe
it
might
be
worth
rolling
these
together
and,
as
our
committee
having
a
subcommittee
at
least
have
a
map
of
where
we
think
jolly
giant
creek
is
and
the
other
creeks
for
that
matter,
which
I
think
we
do
at
some
level
from
the
fish.
It
must
be
in
the
fish
passage
and
the
drainage.
I
would
assume
and
then
kind
of
flag
opportunities
and
maybe
prioritize
them
as
it
seems
like
we
could
do
a
little
more
comprehensive,
long-term
planning
for
opportunities
that
might
arise.
H
A
A
K
C
C
Jack
well,
I
was
just
saying
you
know
with
changes
in
committee
membership.
Not
all
of
us
are
familiar
with
all
the
things
that
the
committee
has
done
in
the
past
so
periodically,
and
maybe
particularly
now
as
the
the
gateway
plan
is,
is
really
a
cool
opportunity
for
addressing
jolly
giant
creek
within
the
this
infill
plan
that
we
could,
as
a
committee,
spend
some
time
down
the
road
just
reviewing
all
the
stuff
that
the
city
and
the
committee
has
done
before
on
jolly
giant
creek.
C
D
A
That
didn't
really
go
through
a
discretionary
review
that
would
brought
it
to
our
committee,
but
there
is,
I
mean
the
city
has
a
current
proposal
out
to
redesign
8th
and
9th
street
and
that's
where
jolly
giant
creek
either
runs
along
or
crosses,
and
I
don't
know
I
mean
it
was
mainly
for
more
of
a
complete
street
design.
But
there
is
opportunity
there
and
is
that
project
gone
too
far
as
the
funding
not.
H
I
guess
I
guess
what
I'm
wondering
is
given
that
it
wasn't
within
our
discretional
purview
to
review
it.
I
guess
that's
why
I'm
like
kind
of
curious
about
having
reviewing
the
existing
stuff
and
then
at
least
having
that
summary
document
to
date,
here's
a
map,
here's
where
they
are,
here's
where
some
opportunities
are
and
here's
what
we
know
about
these
things.
H
H
H
H
Are
we
going
to
try
to
make
it
as
a
work
item
in
a
meeting
or
a
present?
You
know
I
don't
like
coming
to
a
meeting
and
then
just
kind
of
talking
about
it
and
everything
it'd
be
nice
to
have
kind
of
a
sub
committee.
So
it's
lined
out
like
emily,
always
comes
pretty
much
prepared
and
she
has
stuff
like
we're.
Gonna
talk
about
this
this
and
this-
and
this
is
the
kind
of
the
framework
we're
within,
and
I
know
we
all
have
limited
time.
A
B
We
can
present
a
staff
report
corresponding
to
that
map
and
potential
project
list,
so
include
the
map
in
the
list
of
the
agenda
packet
ahead
of
time
provide
a
staff
report.
Perhaps
at
that
meeting
the
wetlands
and
creeks
committee
could
consider
formation
of
the
subcommittee,
I'm
not
sure
if
subcommittee
formation
has
to
be
agendas
pursuant
to
the
brown
act.
You
know
I
think
that
might
be
good
to
play
safe
on
just
in
case.
A
A
A
A
A
H
H
G
Well,
I
mean
in
general
I
I'm
not
prepared
to
and
probably
not
qualified
to
when
it
when
it
boils
down
to
it
to
really
evaluate
jeremy's
potential
conflict
of
interest.
But
you
know
it
doesn't
hurt
to
recuse
out
of
an
abundance
of
caution,
but
it
would
be
tied
to
things
you
know,
there's
there's
a
couple
of
different
ways
to
be
conflicted
and
I
think
the
thing
that
could
be
of
interest
here,
whether
or
not
there's
an
actual.
In
fact.
I
Yeah
so
wes
just
back
to
your
question,
it's
more
just
a
perceived
conflict.
I
personally
have
not
been
directly
involved
with
the
sequoia
document,
but
the
firm
I
work
for
obviously
ghd
has
been,
and
so
when
in
doubt
our
motto
is
to
sit
it
out.
So
that's
what
we're
going
to
do.
That's
what
I'm
doing
here
and
I
think
that's
in
the
best
interest
of
the
city
and
for
the
community
and
myself.
G
All
right
good
evening,
all
thank
you
for
the
invitation
it's
great
to
get
out
and
talk
with
all
of
the
different
committees
about
the
gateway
area
plan
and
the
subject
matter.
That's
most
relevant
to
the
committees.
We've
been
sort
of
focusing
on
that,
but
I'd
also
like
to
give
a
general
overview
of
the
document
just
so
that
you
have
kind
of
a
you
know,
context
for
where
that
subject
matter,
that's
of
particular
interest
to
you
fits
within
the
document.
G
G
I
guess
I'll
start
with
by
saying
really
trying
to
address
all
the
you
know.
Potential
for
you
know,
opportunities
within
this,
this
gateway
area
to
try
and
enhance
the
the
environment.
Try
and
enhance
the
you
know
the
public
sphere,
trying
to
enhance
the
the
process
and
the
potential
for
providing
what
this
community
needs.
Now
let
me
get
into
the
future.
G
G
G
So,
just
again,
orienting
real
quick.
The
first
section
is
the
people
summary
similar
to
an
executive
summary.
Where
you
know
the
really
important
executive
gets
a
slimmed
down
version
of
cliff
notes.
Version
of
the
document,
in
this
case
the
important
person
that
executive
are
the
people,
and
so
we've
provided
a
people
summary.
If
you
have
don't
have
time
to
read
the
entire
document,
you
can
really
get
a
sense
for
what
the
document
is
attempting
to
do
by
reading
this
people's
summary.
G
We
go
through
and
I'm
not
going
to
walk
through
the
entire
document
here,
but
I
do
want
to
stop
at
a
couple
of
key
places.
The
first
is
to
just
look
at
the
area
that
we're
talking
about
here,
so
here's
samoa
boulevard
and
the
yellow
line
outlines
the
gateway
area
plan.
It
picks
up
some
of
the
commercial
properties
along
samoa
and
then
it
zigzags
in
basically
picking
up
opportunity
sites.
Here's
arcata
trailer
court
before
it
hits
samoa.
I'm
sorry
k
street
k
street
runs
down.
G
G
I
recently
had
a
public
member
tell
me
that
he
had
calculated
the
acreage
and
I
don't
know
how
he
did
it,
but
he
he
got
a
different
number,
so
we're
still
trying
to
resolve
on
that.
It's
somewhere
between
128,
138
acres,
so
quite
a
bit
of
area
and
one
of
the
striking
things
as
you
look
at
the
aerial
is
that
there's
a
lot
of
open
space
within
this
120
838
acres,
there's
still
quite
a
bit
of
built
environment,
but
there's
a
lot
of
vacant
parcels
as
well,
notably
you
know
to
this
committee.
G
There's
you
know
jolly
dragon
creek
that
does
run
through
here's
the
little
strip
that
scott
was
talking
about.
I
believe
that's
where
they're
I'm
sorry
they're
just
outside
right
here,
a
little
strip
that
scott
was
talking
about
that
have
been
restored,
but
you
can
see
it
pops
up
here
and
there
so
we'll
get
into
that
in
a
little
bit
more
detail.
G
But
this
is
the
area.
The
other
thing
I
wanted
to
point
out
is
that
the
blue
line
with
the
little
heartbeat
there
and
then
the
jag
there.
This
is
the
coastal
zone
boundary
areas
south
of
this
are
in
the
coastal
zone
areas
north
that
are
outside
the
coastal
zone
shown
in
this
extent
right
here.
So
that's
an
important
piece
too.
We're
also
talking
about
the
local
coastal
program
today
and
we'll
dig
into
that
in
the
next
item.
G
So
I
just
want
to
see
a
couple
of
key
pieces,
any
questions
about
orientation
or
map
or
what
we're
looking
at
here,
where
the
is
that
this
whole
area
right
here
is
the
other
thing
I'll
currently
zoned,
with
the
commercial
here
smackdown
in
the
middle
of
the
building.
So
there's
a
legacy
land
use
here,
much
of
the
area
that
started
to
convert
anyway,
what's
going
on
district
and
and
that
sort
of
mix
of
uses
that
you
know
were
called
for
that
area
that
the
city
you
know
embraced
so
we're
taking.
G
District
and
sort
of
supersizing
people.
The
next
question
is
the
challenges
and
opportunities.
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
these
any
detail,
but
they
do
identify
the
various
elements
that
we're
trying
to
address
when
and
one
that
will
be.
A
relevance
to
this
committee
obviously
is
climate
change
and
sustainability.
G
G
G
Largest
number
of
vacant
parcels,
it's
a
real
opportunity
for
weatherman
and
restoration.
We
have
the
hub,
which
has
second
highest
development,
intentionally,
focusing
on
infidel
development,
section
right
here
as
well,
incorporating
this
as
well.
It's
fine
to
have
creek
zones
in
other
zoning
districts.
That's
not
a
problem,
so
they
don't
have
miracle
limits
out
there
I
mean,
then
we
have
a
virtual
zone.
G
G
Show
this
landing
snap
to
you
to
identify
that
we
do
recognize.
There
are
some
areas
we
want
to
retain
for
natural
resources.
So
so
what
does
that
look
like
we've
got?
I'm
gonna
jump
right
over
to
open
space
and
conservation,
which
is
one
of
the
areas
where
I
think
we'll
be
of
this
committee
and
I'll
just
point
to
the
overall
structure
of
each
of
these
elements.
Basically
conservation,
that's
chapter
number
six
chapter
starts
with
an
overview
you
can
tell
you
know
based
on
the
graphics.
G
But
we
did
identify
near
the
existing
breaks
again,
you
can
see
where
they
did
right,
as
well
as
some
opportunities
for
for
restoration
if
you're
late,
particularly
creek
again,
is
one
of
the
the
types
if
you
will
of
open
space
categories,
and
the
idea
here
is
that
we've
got
a
lot
of
railroad
track.
That
left
right
alongside
portions
of
jolly
giant
creek,
we
have
some
properties
like
the
car
wash,
which
is
an
up
a
huge
opportunity
for
a
private
development
that
could
daylight
more
creek.
G
And
then
the
conceptual
open
plan
map
essentially
takes
the
same
area
focus
not
necessarily
on
the
recreational
languages
that
you
can
talk
about
about
those
if
you're
interested
and
we're
on
sort
of
the
the
creep
and
opportunities
work
trails,
and
that
sort
of
thing
where
we
have
you
know
the
opportunity
to
do
information.
There's
already
a
proposed
restoration
right
here
in
areas
that
we
can.
You
know
codify
as
new
natural
resource
spaces,
which
I've
talked
about
already
and
then
this
section
gets
into
you
know
the
specific
policy.
G
G
G
Areas,
you
know
maintaining
an
awesome,
allow
for
passive
recreational
uses
so
on
schmitt
power
property,
for
example.
If
we
could
create
new
trails
through
there,
maybe
we
could
transition
that
over
time
from
basically
a
homeless
encampment
to
something
that's
a
community
amenity
for
you
know
for
folks
to
to
walk
on
and
enjoy
the
the
wildlife
and
whatnot.
G
G
And
then
I
think,
the
the
last
piece
that
I
just
wanted
to,
let
you
to
before
the
other
day
foundation
is
under
the
mobility
section,
where
you
start
to
see
the
relationship
between
you
know
the
the
aspirational
amenities
and
you
know,
and
the
creek
segments,
and
so
these
green
dotted
lines
are
new
trails
opposed
to
those
probably
followed
orders.
So
there's
probably
called
them
incoming.
G
If
you
have
general
general
comments
or
usings,
then
we're
more
than
happy
to
take
some
some
comments,
because
I
think
I
just
might
just
have
a
conversation
around
ways
to
improve
this
document
and
to
you
know,
then
we've
we've
made.
You
know
some
suggestions
on
how
we
do
that.
So
it's
really
up
to
your
committee,
whether
you
want
to
you
know
formally
take
action
or
whether
you
want
to
make
some
suggestions
and
we'll
see
how
we
can
bring
this
to
the
council
before
pulling
together
a
penultimate
final
document
draft
document.
A
B
G
That's
her
face
yeah,
there's,
there's
a
huge
volume
of
paperwork
being
moved
around
on
on
this
item
for
sure,
and
we
certainly
actually
had
that
experience
with
one
other
committee,
where
I
think
we,
it
was
somehow
mislabeled
in
one
of
bringing
the
economic
development
committee's
recommendations
to
the
parks
and
rec
committee.
So
now
we're
just
traveling
that
down
downhill.
I
guess
you
know
you
got
the
parking
rate
committee
recommendations
potentially
sorry
about
that.
No
problem.
B
G
G
It
would
be
great
if
you
made
a
recommendation.
It's
to
your
discretion.
The
couple
of
committees
that
we've
gone
to
to
date
have
said
we're.
You
know
we're
happy
to
give
you
some
some
suggestions
and
there
was
general
consensus
kind
of
straw
poll
voting
going
on,
but
there
wasn't
a
formal,
yes
approve
this
plan.
This
way.
G
What
I
think,
what
I
understand
the
park
and
rec
committee's
reasoning
to
be,
is
that
you
know
this
is
still
in
draft
form,
maybe
bring
it
back
one
more
time
once
you
know
you've
gotten
direction
from
the
council
on
what
what
you
know.
What
what
final
you
know
what
the
final
document
is
going
to
look
like.
G
What
we've
been
doing
with
the
committees
that
we've
gone
to
thus
far
is
kind
of
heard
suggestions
said
yeah.
You
know,
I
think
we
can
make
those
recommendations.
For
example,
the
parks
and
rec
committee
felt,
like
there
weren't,
wasn't
a
heavy
enough
emphasis
on
active
recreation
in
in
one
of
the
policies.
G
A
So
maybe
along
those
lines,
and
if
we
made
some
comments
and
that's
as
far
as
we
went,
what
will
you
do
with
those
comments?
Be
code
not
codified
but
recorded
and
and
added
to
all
the
other
comments
you
get
on
the
draft
okay,
great
plan
and
if
we
make
a
formal
action
does
does
it
something
else
different
happen,
or
it's
just
noted
as
a
formal
action.
G
G
This
is
what
we
would
lose
from
the
plan.
If
we
did
that,
so
it
really
depends
on
the
nature
of
the
conversation.
What
we've
been
getting
thus
far
at
the
committee
level
has
really
been
ways
to
polish
and
enhance
and
highlight,
and
those
kinds
of
suggestions
that
don't
have
a
countervailing
policy
impact
on
some
other
area.
You
know,
we've
just
said
right,
meeting
yeah
we
can.
G
We
can
make
those
changes
and
make
those
as
a
recommendation
to
the
city
council,
but
ultimately,
all
of
the
changes
that
come
forward
out
of
all
the
different
engagements
that
we're
doing
you
know
will
formally
be
directed
by
the
council
at
one
hearing,
hopefully
so
that
there's
not.
You
know
a
lot
of
back
and
forth
between
well
this.
You
know
this
committee
said
this.
So
now
we're
going
to
go
back
and
ask
all
the
committees.
What
do
you
think
about
that?
A
G
That's
a
really
great
question:
we
are
looking
to
have
a
stable
project
description
for
the
environmental
document.
The
environmental
document
is
evaluating
the
gateway
area
plan,
but
it's
also
evaluating
the
the
general
plan
updates
that
we'll
be
doing
as
well
as
the
coastal
zoning
or
I'm
sorry,
as
well
as
the
zoning
ordinance.
That's
associated
the
form
based
zone
code.
G
G
B
I
I
another
way:
potentially
you
could
think
about
it
is
like
in,
I
guess,
I'll
use
the
term
infrastructure.
You
know
so
more
active
recreation
would
be
like
a
soccer
field
or
a
playground
or
a
bocce
ball
court.
You
know
things
infrastructure
that's
put
in
place,
whereas
passive
recreation
would
be
like
the
trails
in
the
community
forest,
the
trails
of
the
marsh,
so
I
I
would
say
less
less
group
versus
individual
and
more
infrastructure
related.
D
D
Also,
I
had
some
questions
about
ga
6f
about
wetland
areas
allowing
for
passive
recreational
uses
within
wetlands.
How
does
that
compare
with
the
city's
existing
regulations
for
allowable
uses
in
wetlands?
It's
been
a
while,
since
I
read
that
so
I'm
do.
We
currently
allow
for
passive
and
or
active
recreational
uses
in
wetlands.
G
G
Well,
this
is
the
I
guess.
What
I
would
say
is
you
know
this
is
the
you
know
feasible
has
has
a
legal
definition,
but
I
think
what
we're
trying
to
say
here
is
that
you
know
you
know
there
are
going
to
be
some
real
opportunity,
areas
for
enhancement
and
restoration
and
they're
going
to
have
a
you
know,
an
impact,
a
larger
impact.
G
It
doesn't
impact
the
ability,
you
know
the
city's,
no
net
loss.
You
know
policies
or
anything
like
that.
It
doesn't,
you
know
replace
that,
but
the
concept
here
is
that
we
want
to
you
know:
support
restoration,
especially
of
you
know
these
larger
complexes
and
to
ensure
that
you
know
again,
they
consult
consolidate
scattered,
low-quality
wetlands
into
a
higher
quality
wetland
complexes
like
it
says
in
that
final
sentence
there
so
really
just
embracing
the
idea
that
you
know
in
it.
You
know
that
that
we
can.
G
We
can
do
better.
You
know
there.
There
are
existing
wetlands
out
there,
but
we
can
do
better
and
working
with
the
private
landowner,
not
just
to
not
touch
their
wetland,
but
to
to
actually
you
know,
go
a
step
further
and
enhance
and
restore
them.
There's
also
opportunities.
You
know,
I'd
pointed
to.
Let
me
zoom
back
out
I'll.
Come.
Let's
see,
you
know
in
this
area,
for
example,
in
the
barrel
district.
Sorry,
you
know
this.
This
is
a
prettiest
well-established.
You
know
high-quality
wetland
already.
G
You
know
it's.
It's
only
degraded
by
the
fact
that
people
are
living
in
it,
but
there
are
also
you
know,
kind
of
scattered
pocket
wetlands
throughout
here
that
you
know,
do
two
things
number
one:
they
you
know
they
don't
have.
You
know
a
lot
of
you
know
they
don't
contribute.
A
high
degree
of
you
know
habitat
value
in
their
current
state,
but
then
they
also,
you
know,
impact
the
ability
of
the
city
to
use
that
land
for
other
purposes.
G
So,
instead,
if
you
embrace
the
idea
that
you
know
there
may
be
these
low
quality
wetlands
and
if
you
can,
you
know,
enhance
other
wetlands
and
and
contribute
to
you
know
larger
complexes
elsewhere
in
the
city
that
that
program
would
ultimately
get
us
a
you
know:
bigger
bang,
for
the
buck.
In
terms
of
you
know,
habitat
qualities
and-
and
you
know
the
types
of
wetlands
that
we'll
have
in
the
absence
of
that
policy.
G
D
G
Yeah
absolutely
they're
going
to
be
areas
where
I
mean
you
know,
we've
all
seen
it
you've
reviewed.
You
know,
I
don't
know
if
you
know
how
I
don't
know
that
you've
reviewed
them
in
this
capacity,
but
you've
always
seen
wetland
delineations
in
the
area
and
maybe
there's
you
know,
you
know
very
small.
You
know
wetland,
that's
in
an
area
that
is,
you
know,
going
to
be
developed.
You
know
it's
been
a
long
time
since
I've
been
involved
and
engaged
in
wetland
delineations.
G
But
you
know
one
of
the
things
that
used
to
trouble
me
was
that
I
would
be
delineating
something
that
was
literally
a
100
himalayan
blackberry.
You
know
a
non-native
and
invasive
species
that
types
out
as
fat
wet
species
and
you
have
to
call
it
a
wetland,
and
it
just
drove
me
nuts
that
this
is.
You
know
something
that
is
you
know
that
we're
protecting
and
also
you
know
when
you
have
certain
policies
that
you
know
wouldn't
allow
you
to.
You
know
to
impact
that
wetland.
G
You've
lost
an
opportunity
to
you
know,
transform
that
into
something.
That's
you
know,
has
more
native
species
and,
and
maybe
more
contiguous
with
you
know
an
you
know,
larger
wetland
that
provides
more
habitat
value.
So
this
policy
kind
of
recognizes
the
ability
to
you
know
take
advantage
of
those
opportunities
where
they
exist.
H
H
Besides
having
the
creek
overlaid
on
this,
where
it's
daylighted
or
at
least
felt
giant
the
figure
itself,
you
go
down
the
figure
just
for
a
sec
just
hit
the
next
page.
It
seems
like
that's
the
punch
line
right
there,
where
these,
just
as
you're
kind
of
describing
down-
and
I
guess
that's
called
the
barrel
district
within
that
kind
of
maroon-ish
polygon.
H
H
So
this
is
kind
of
the
punch
line
right
you.
This
is
the
where
the
creek
will
be
and
where
I
guess
some
kind
of
open.
I
don't
know
what
that
passive,
open
space.
What
it
will
actually
be
like
but
is
is
that
true.
This
is
kind
of
the
punch
line
here
where
the
rest
will
be.
I
I
have
to
look
at
the
densities
and
to
know
what
kind
of
you
know
how
much
what's
going
in,
to
propose
to
go
into
these
areas
like
housing
and
stuff.
H
H
H
H
G
H
Protection
or
they'll
be
the
only
places
where
we
kind
of
have
the
natural
or
whatever
nothing's
natural
around
here
anymore,
there's
no
redwood,
trees
or
whatever.
But
the
point
is
this
is
where
basically,
the
creek
and
wetlands
space
slash
open
space
would
be.
Is
in
these
green
and
off-green
polygons
correct.
The
rest
will
be.
G
G
You
know
linear
features,
here's
the
car
wash
property,
that's
identified
there,
so
we
can
have
a
specific
measure
that
would
allow
for
daylighting
to
create
there.
This
is
identified
because
we
want
to
ensure
that
we
have.
You
know
access
to
the
trail
for
the
rail
for
a
trail
and
that
we
can
implement
the
city's
restoration
project
here.
We've
already
done
a
restoration
project
here.
There's
one
proposed
right
here,
and
so
these
are
identifying.
G
What
we
already
know
are
are
sort
of
baked
into
the
plan
as
large-scale
public
infrastructure,
but
the
design
specifications
are
going
to
incorporate
a
lot
of
green
space
and
open
space
within
the
properties
themselves
and
I'll
just
point
out.
For
example,
you
know:
there's
there's
a
wetland
complex
right
here.
I
don't
know
how
much
of
it
is
actually
wetland,
but
you
know
I've
gone
back
and
looked
at
it
and
I'm
I'm
certain
that
there's
some
wetland
in
this
area
right
here
we're
not
proposing
that
you
can
now.
G
You
know
just
because
it's
not
in
one
of
these
designated
areas,
you
can
go
and
obliterate
that
wetland
and
you
know
build
on
it.
The
idea
is
that
there
are,
you
know,
certainly
other
constraints
that
are
site-specific
and
or
opportunities
that
are
site-specific
that
will
be
implemented
through.
You
know
that
more
detailed
form-based
code
and
then,
in
addition,
I
mean
for
this
one.
This
is
you
know
this
is
a
coastal
wetland.
It's
several.
You.
D
G
At
least
an
acre,
you
know
of
coastal
wetland,
you
know
that's
not
going
anywhere
anytime
soon.
It
is
really
poor
quality
right
now,
there's
a
ton
of
invasives.
In
there
and
again,
as
I
mentioned,
there
are
people
living
in
it.
You
know
doing
their
business
in
it
and
you
know
it's
going
to
stay
like
that
forever,
unless
we
do
something
that
incentivizes
investment
in
it
and
so
what
we're?
What
we're
proposing
in
the
plan,
I
guess
is,
for
you
know
a
you
know
in
in
this
image.
G
G
You
know
some
of
the
inspiration,
for
you
know,
ideas
of
what
the
built
environment
might
look
like.
You
know
these
pictures
from
other
plan
areas.
You
know
kind
of
just
like
this
one
zooms
in
on
the
building.
So
there
are
some,
you
know
large-scale
buildings,
some
that
show
you
know,
set
setbacks
and
whatnot
to
show
you
know
parks
and
you
know
where
it's
interspersed.
I
don't
know
why
these
are
highlighted
the
way
that
they're
highlighted,
but
you
know.
G
Where
you
know
it's
quite
a
built
environment,
but
you
know
what
the
plan
aims
to
do
overall
is
to
ensure
that
there's
high
quality,
high
density
environment
that
we
don't
lose
sort
of
the
values
that
in
the
in
the
aesthetic
and
the
you
know,
the
the
you
know
communal
space
and
recreational
space
that
we
all
value
and
we
think
it
can
be
done.
You
know,
even
though
there
are
larger
scale
buildings
proposed
in
here.
G
As
a
matter
of
fact,
as
I
mentioned
the
you
know,
the
plan
you
know
started
out
as
sort
of
like
you
know,
development.
How
do
we
get
more
housing?
How
do
we
get
more
recreational
opportunity
and
it
has
there's
a
little
duality
and
final
analysis?
There's
only
one
doctor
how
many
one
hour,
unemployment
and
it
focuses
on
the
project
better
in
much
more
detail.
C
So
david,
I
want
to
say
one
more
thing
about
the
item.
G86F
wetlands
area,
which
we
were
previously
discussing.
I
I
think
that's
a
fascinating
paragraph
and
I
am
I'm
really
interested
in
the
idea
of
no
net
loss
standard,
and
I
I
think
that
the
committee
I'd
love
to
have
a
conversation
with
the
committee
just
to
open
casual
conversation
with
the
committee
about
this
paragraph
and
see
how
everyone
feels
about
it,
maybe
at
a
future
meeting.
So
I
just
want
to
say
that
that's
a
really
cool
paragraph
worthy
of
careful
consideration.
C
In
my
opinion
and
then
the
other
thing
I
wanted
to
say
was
in
figure
7
the
conceptual
open
space
plan.
The
the
linear
park
that
you've
pointed
out
to
us
a
couple
times
is
really
cool.
I
love
it.
It's
you
know
it,
I'm
so
glad
it's
in
the
plan,
it's
the
biggest
part
of
jolly
giant
creek
in
the
gateway
area
plan,
and
I
just
wanted
to
ask
you.
It
may
be
such
a
small
minor
thing.
C
C
G
That
yeah,
that's
a
great
question.
That's
a
private
parcel
individual's
parcel.
We
have
tried
to
find
these
on
this
one.
This
is
you
know
of
you
know.
I
don't
know
this
area,
I
guess
is
you
know
potentially
developable.
One
of
the
things
that
you
know
could
happen
here.
Is
you
know
this
landowner
is
willing
to.
You
know
give
up
a
portion
over
here.
We
could
maybe
expand
this
a
little
bit
here
and
drop
this
out.
I
think
we
identified
this
originally
because
we
thought
that
we
had
easements.
G
C
End
street:
okay,
that's
fine!
Just
I
didn't
understand.
I
didn't
even
knew
that
was
probably
owned
by
the
city
or
private,
or
what
and
I
watch
its
evolution
over
time
and
it
makes
me
come
it's
it's
an
interesting
piece
that
could
sort
of
think
or
help
anchor
the
bottom
of
that
linear
park
and
make
it
a
better
park.
A
A
I
mean
it's
like
well,
that's
on
private
land,
but
there's
a
lot
of
roadway
where
there's
a
creek
and
where
I'm
not
suggesting
that
the
whole
creek
be
daylighted.
I
think
there
are
opportunities
as
you
talk
about
some
of
the
right-of-way
improvements,
so
we're
we're
making
a
lot
on
passive
recreation
for
biking
and
head
pedestrian
access,
but
not
really
considering
the
creek
as
being
a
creek,
and
so
I
think,
there's
opportunities
in
the
right-of-way
by
a
bridge
narrowing
down
the
right-of-way.
A
A
Seems
like
removing
the
culvert
to
their
own
private
land.
I
just
think
there's
more
opportunity
in
the
public
right
away
and
this
being
a
city
plan
that
there
should
be
some
incentive.
Now
we
know
bridges
are
very
expensive,
but
as
incentives
come
from
development
that
that
should
be
also
a
focus
on
some
of
these
areas.
H
All
right
classic
zoom
here,
no,
I
I
was
just
going
to
reiterate
that
I
was
thinking
about
that.
Earlier
too,
with
the
bridges
I
brought
up
a
photo
from
another
spot.
I
think
that's
a
great
idea
is
contemplating
it's
like
a
wildlife
corridor
bridge,
no
only
it's
a
aquatic
corridor
bridge
in
a
sense
for
the
creek,
especially
if
it's
permeable
you
know
rain
water,
container
or
various
things
anyway.
Just
wanted
to
reiterate
that.
I
don't
really
like
that
idea.
It's
also
you
know
the
long-term
infrastructure.
G
Yeah
yeah,
no,
that's
a
good
point
and
you
know
the
I'm
not
exactly
sure
where
the
culvert
goes
under
here.
You
know
it.
Pops
back
out,
there's
a
little
bit
of
daylight
in
here,
and
you
can
look
underneath
this
building
and
you
can
see
there's
I
don't
think
the
creek
runs
under
here,
but
there's
like
a
backwater
and
so
the
the
one
you
know
piece.
The
reason
why
we
didn't
include
this
as
a
daylight
section,
and
I
agree
it
would
be
great
as
a
bridge.
G
You
know
daylight
version,
but
we
have
the
plan
right
now.
Those
were
on
l
street
being
a
one-way
couple
with
k
street
and
so
l
street
would
be
connected
to
a
through
road
and
segregated
class.
One
trail.
So
this
is,
you
know
this
is
one
of
those
areas,
there's
a
plan
in
this
this
corner
and
that
would
be
a
policy
bouncing
decision
that
would
have
to
be
made
one.
One
way
this
can
be
you
know
considered.
G
I
guess
is
that
you
know
we
have
to
look
at
the
again
the
feasibility
of
this.
You
know
you
already
have
trail
that
goes
across
here.
We
need
some
cross
matching
this
one
from
eleven.
This
question
can
be
gone
through
from
down
here.
So
theoretically
you
could
eliminate
the
l
street
crossing
for
the
hyper
traffic.
G
You
know
and
then
bridge
this
portion.
If
we
didn't
turn
now
into
a
you
know
when
they
couple
it,
but
then
you
know
you're,
basically,
you
know
creating
a
you
know
very
expensive
project
for
a
very
small
portion
of
creek.
I
think
something
might
depend
on
where,
where
it
pops
out,
I
mean
this
building,
you
know
if
it
was
an
austin
rebuilt
another.
You
know
somewhere
else
on
the
property,
and
then
this
portion
of
you
know
the
creative
sword.
I
think
that
is
a
you
know:
an
option.
C
Yeah,
if
that
block
were
ever
redeveloped,
I
mean
you
can
see
how
much
it's
just
chunk
open
parking
lot,
and
I
think
that's
the
portuguese
hall
there
or
something
like
that.
But
if
that
were
to
redevelop
it's
possible
that
a
fairly
large
portion,
you
know
almost
this
a
block's
width
of
jolly
giant
creek
could
be
daylight
if
the
city
could
work
it
out
with
a
private
land
on
it.
G
H
G
Yeah,
that's
a
great
question
too.
We
do
have
right
now
our
timeline
established
that
it
would
run
through
the
end
of
this
year.
We
have
some
some
funding
sources
that
you
know
expire
at
the
end
of
the
year.
I
think
that
you
know
we've
been
you
know,
working
with
those
those
grant
sources
to
make
sure
that
you
know
we're.
G
You
know
going
to
be
able
to
comply
with
the
the
requirements
of
them,
and
I
think
that
you
know
I'm
hoping
that
they'll
be
flexible,
but
the
idea
right
now
is
that
we
would
run
through
the
end
of
the
year
complete
the
sql
process,
and
you
know,
have
you
know,
documents
that
we're
ready
to
adopt
either
at
the
end
of
this
year.
Early
next
year,.
G
Yeah
yeah,
so
the
yeah
and
we'll
be
coming
back
to
your
committee
too.
With
the
you
know,
the
sections
of
the
general
plan
update
that
are,
you
know
again
relevant
to
this
body
and
you
know
there'll,
be
you
know,
recommendations
on
that.
I'm
sure
all
of
that
will
be
packaged
together
and
evaluated
under
the
under
the
eir
and
then
you
know
the
recommendations
from
the
various
committees,
the
recommendation
from
the
planning
commission.
Ultimately,
the
decision
by
the
city
council.
A
So
one
other
comment
I
had
was
regarding
street
runaways
and
again
there
are
the
cross
sections
and
stuff,
but
just
the
opportunity
for
stormwater,
particularly
in
the,
and
that
was
one
of
our
goals.
At
the
very
beginning,
we
talked
about
the
stormwater
considerations
in
the
jolly
giant
creek
watershed
to
try
and
clean
that
area.
Up
so
again,
thinking
about
the
I
mean
we
talk
about
complete
streets
and
I
think
the
term
is
green
streets.
When
you
add
lid
features
in
the
street
right,
aways
and
so
again,
promoting
promoting
that.
G
G
We
are
also,
you
know
again
we're
subject
to
the
ms4
requirements.
You
know
above
and
beyond,
whatever
the
policy
and
and
the
plan
says
here
and
that
that
does
require
on-site
stormwater.
I
think
there's
possibility
in
subdivisions
to
create
you
know
sort
of
regional
stormwater
systems
under
the
ms4
requirements,
but
otherwise
they'll
all
be
on
site.
A
A
But
I
think
if,
if
you
can
promote
that
more
so
to
basically
do
water
banking,
for
instance,
you
know
so
that
you
provide
storm
water
just
because
you
know,
because
of
existing
developments,
jolly
giant
creek
is
highly
impacted
for
it
and
just
noticing.
You
know
the
city
did
a
lot
of
curb
return
or
curb
improvements
in
the
jolly
giant
creek,
and
there
were
a
lot
of
storm
drains
right
next
to
where
that
occurred,
and
the
city
did
nothing
regarding
storm
water
there
and
so
again
it's
not
a
public
works
thing
in
their
mind.
G
A
A
Okay,
any
other
comments
on
the
policies
or
the
mapping
on
here.
I
guess
we
can
also,
as
jackie
recommended
looking
at
the
wetland
areas
thing
that
maybe
our
next
meeting
can
more
vet
that
and
provide
comments
on
our
own
okay
hearing,
no
other
comments,
and
we
should
open
this
up
for
public
comment.
K
Eliminating
a
lot
of
these
smaller
wetlands
and
combine
them
right
now,
I'm
on
the
corner
of
7th
and
l
street-
and
I
don't
know
if
you
can
hear
the
frogs
but
there's
a
lot
of
frogs
out
my
front
door,
and
so
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
this.
I
believe
it
to
be
a
storm
water,
drainage,
along
l
street,
and
what
will
happen
to
this
habitat.
I
know
on
the
upper
end
of
l
street.
K
They
lost
a
lot
of
their
frog
habitat
with
along
the
data
center
and
when
the
bicycle
path
went
in
connecting
to
alliance
street.
So
anyways,
that's
my
concern
on
some
of
that
language.
It
would
be
really
nice
if
we
had
a
detailed
map
and
studies
of
what
exactly
the
size
and
the
area
and
or
the
locations
of
the
wetlands
in
you
know
the
city
as
a
whole,
but
especially
the
gateway
area.
So
anyways.
Thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
listen
to
me.
A
A
A
J
E
E
So
I
think
we
need
to
look
at
the
maintenance
of
maybe
more
street
sweeping
trying
to
keep
the
material
out
of
jolly
giant
creek
we're
going
through
a
lot
of
energy
to
try
and
daylight
and
open
up
for
wildlife.
And
I
think
we
also
need
to
keep
in
mind
that
we
need
to
maintain
the
material
that
is
going
down
in
the
storm
drains
and
re-polluting
the
jolly
giant
creek
in
janes
creek
areas.
E
So
if,
if
we
could
get
that
into
into
the
plan
of
that,
we
need
a
lot
more
street
sweeping
or
some
kind
of
maintenance
program,
I'm
just
not
seeing
that
here
in
in
these
areas.
So
I
I
hear
there
is
some
street
sweeping,
but
maybe
keep
it
going
because
there's
just
a
lot
of
stuff
going
down
into
the
storm
drains.
A
E
J
There
we
go
okay,
that
should
be
working.
Sorry
about
that.
These
all
these
new
formats
always
are
different.
Throw
me
for
twists
just
wanted
to
encourage
the
voice
of
the
of
the
committee
with
you
know
it
anything
that
can
be
put
into
this
gateway
plan
that
will
encourage
you
know,
opening
up
that
jolly
giant
crick
and
any
other
small
small
version
there's
a
couple
of
other
little
guys
there.
That
are
also
lost,
but
I
mean
once
all
this
development
happens.
J
You
know
in,
however
long
that
takes
three
years
20
years,
50
whatever
it
is,
I
think
you
know
whatever
you
can
put
in
there
to
help
protect
that
and
keep
it
as
an
open
waterway,
and
you
know
with
the
bridge
idea
or
encouraging
landowners
for
whatever
means
to
to
try
to
do
that.
I,
I
think
that's
really
a
great
way
to
move
forward
with
that,
and
you
know
any
language
built
into
the
the
the
general
plan
and
gateway
plan
that
encourages
that.
J
E
G
I
think
it's
all
made.
You
know
perfect
sense,
and
I
think
those
are
you
know.
Certainly
apart
from
the
you
know,
the
you
know,
content
of
daylighting
additional
areas
of
the
creek.
I
think
they
all
you
know
fit
squarely
within
just
clarifying
and
improving
the
you
know,
communication
value
of
the
of
the
tool,
and
you
know
I'd
love
to
see
more
creeks
daylighted
as
well.
You
know
where
we
can.
You
know
possibly
do
that.
So
we'll
look
to
strengthen
that
that
language
as
well.
D
Bob
I
I
would
like
to
re-emphasize.
I
think
it
was
you
who
initially
brought
it
up,
but
there's
scattered
throughout
here
some
policies
that
do
address
what
whatever
you
might
want
to
call
it
green
infrastructure,
low
impact
development,
green
streets,
but
if
that
could
be
more
emphasized,
maybe
in
some
separate
standalone
policies
to
make
that
more
of
a
priority.
I
see
it
the
there's
something
that
says.
D
D
A
A
G
J
G
Your
discussion,
your
deliberations,
you
know
any
kind
of
commentary
on
the
the
content.
What
I
will
say
about
the
you
know
the
the
lcp,
the
local
coastal
program
that
we're
you
know
trying
to
go
through
the
process
of
updating
right
now
in
general,
is
that
you
know
we've
we
feel
like
we've
gotten
a
you
know.
G
Okay.
So
having
said
that,
I'll
I'll,
just
note
that
you
know
we've
put
into
your
packet,
the
sea
level
rise
section
and
I've
got
that
up
on
my
screen.
If
you
want
to
dig
into
detail,
we
can,
but
you
know,
sea
level
rise
section
seemed
like
it
would
be
most
most
appropriate
for
this
committee.
There
are
also
comments
that
happened
at
the
last
last
time.
We
brought
this
document
forward
and
we
addressed
many
of
those
concerns
and
comments.
G
Some
of
those
comments
are
related
to
the
glossary,
so
I've
also
got
the
glossary.
If
you
want
to
dig
back
into
how
we
address
those
glossary
issues,
but
right
now,
we've
got
you
know.
We
worked
with
the
coastal
commission
staff,
both
our
local
staff
and
state
sea
level
rise
staff
to
pull
together
the
document
that
this
excerpt
was
from,
and
we've
done
that
over
the
last
approximate
two
years
we've
been
working
with
them,
several
versions
back
and
forth
have
about.
G
You
know
early
2023
looking
at
you
know
our
local
hearings
for
certification
and
then
submitting
that
in
say.
You
know
late
late
spring
to
the
coast,
commission,
for
their
review
and
certification
and
hopefully
have
you
know
new
and
improved,
updated
local
coastal
program.
Sometime
late
that
year,
I
will
say
that
this
document
is
updating
our
coastal.
This
is
the
the
policy
side.
G
So
you
know
the
documents
that
we're
using
right
now
for
a
local
coastal
program
you
know,
are,
are
fairly
dated.
They
don't
correspond
well
to
existing
land
uses,
they
don't
correspond
well
to
existing
zoning
ordinances
or
you
know
our
you
know
I
would
argue,
are
are
thinking
about
planning
at
this
point,
and
so
it's
it's.
You
know
pretty
important
that
we
update
these,
we
think
and
so
yeah
without
going
into
the
content.
That's
that's
sort
of
where
we're
at
procedurally.
G
J
A
A
There's
19
about
both
zone,
one
and
two,
and
then
you
have
a
bunch
of
policies
for
just
zone
one
and
zone
two,
and
there
seem
to
be
a
lot
of
repetition,
but
maybe
that's
what
the
coastal
commissions
require.
I
love
the
overall
strategy
it
it
endorses
adaptability
and
innovation
and
things
and
then
a
lot
of
the
policies
seem
severe
and
dry.
You
can't
do
this.
You
have
to
do
this
sort
of
a
thing,
and
so
I
I'm
I'm
missing
the
connection
between
those
policies.
So
so
anyway,.
I
A
First
abating
sea
level
rise
and
or
pump
stations
weirs,
you
know,
so
I'm
thinking
about
a
full
variety
of
development
and
how
these
policies
might
affect
those
things
pumping
may
be
something
we
look
at
for
dealing
with
sea
level
rise,
and
yet
there
are
policies
in
there
about
being
energy
efficient,
efficient
and
you
know
actually
a
pump
would
have
to
be
three.
It
would
have
to
be
a
minimum
at
the
15
foot,
elevation
or
three
feet
above
the
sea
level
rise
which
doesn't
really
work
for
pumps
anyway,
just
you
know
that
language.
A
G
Yeah,
I
think
you
know
you
raised
some.
Some
important
concerns
the
way
that
the
you
know
the
draft
was
developed.
You
know
our
our
intent
was
to
have
the
minimum
number
of
policies
necessary
to
implement
the
coastal
act,
that
sort
of,
or
was
our
starting
point
we
received,
as
I
think
I'd
mentioned
before.
G
You
know,
principles
of
you
know
the
city.
Managing
and
maintaining
you
know
it's
its
uses
and-
and
you
know
providing
you
know,
for
you
know,
protection
in
the
near
term.
Implementing
the
sea
level
rise
policy
that
you
know
that
we've
established
you
know
through
community
outreach.
We
essentially
said:
okay,
we're,
you
know
we're
gonna,
you
know
accept
those
policies
into
the
document.
G
I
would
certainly
be
game
for
a
discussion
around
how
to
reduce
the
number
of
policies,
because
I
couldn't
agree
more.
I
feel
like
we
have
at
this
point
way
too
many,
and
so,
if
the
you
know,
if
the
committee
wants
to
you
know
work
through,
you
know
this
section
or
any
of
the
sections
and
help
us,
you
know
start
to
parse
out.
You
know
which
policies
really
are
not
necessary.
G
You
know,
for
our
community
in
particular,
we'd
be
happy
to
push
back
on
that.
I
know
we've
received
some
some
comment
from
the
public
about
you
know
all
of
the
transportation
policies
that
you
know
really
support.
You
know
vehicles
as
opposed
to
you
know,
alternative
modes,
and
they
want
to
see
us.
You
know
not
emphasize
vehicles
so
much
and
and
literally
every
single
one
of
those
policies
was
a.
G
A
There's
one
idea,
I
think
the
other
general
comment
is
coast.
Commission
has
a
conflict
resolution
where
policies
conflict
with
each
other,
and
here
you
have
things
like
about
view
shed
versus
improvements
for
sea
level
rise
and
such,
and
so
I
don't
and-
and
I
think
the
introduction
mentions
that
too.
This
is
just
one
section
by
itself,
but
it
also
fits
in
with
all
the
others,
and
so
the
idea
of
being
able
to
have
some
of
these
specifics,
but
also
be
able
to
look
at
the
different
conflicts.
G
G
D
G
Okay,
okay,
I'll
check
in
with
them
and
see.
If
there's
there
are
a
couple
of
great
improvements
that
we
picked
up
on,
that
will
help
facilitate
better
implementation
of
the
coastal
act
and
also
make
it
a
little
less
onerous
for
folks
that
are
doing
smaller
projects.
So,
for
instance,
we
included
a
waiver
provision
similar
to
the
coastal
commission's
waiver
provision.
G
But
I
think
you
know
with
the
comment
that
you've
made
and
I
I
do
want
to
make
make
sure
that
I've
got
sort
of
you
know.
A
straw
poll
nod
to
do
this.
I'd
be
willing
to
go
back
through
the
document
and
you
know,
try
and
go
through
and
strike
along
policies
that
we
think
are
are
redundant
or
repetitive,
or
you
know
unnecessary
and
bring
that
back
to
the
committee.
G
A
G
You
know,
policy
based
on
you
know
the
the
engagement
that
we've
done
to
date.
Any
project
to
implement
that
policy
would
go
before
the
the
coastal
commission
state
coastal
commission,
because
all
those
projects
would
be
in
the
retained
jurisdiction,
and
so
you
know
it's
kind
of
like
we're.
We're
taking
a
stand,
but
the
hill
we're
standing
on
is
very
small.
I
guess
that's
what
I
would
say,
but
we
are
putting
forward
our
intentions
on
how
we
believe
the
you
know.
L
A
A
A
B
B
So
I
can
jump
in
and
provide
some
context.
If
that's
helpful
annual
report
is
an
annual
process,
as
in
the
name.
Typically,
staff
prepares
a
draft
which
has
included
in
your
agenda
packet
with
the
intent
that
committee
members
review
that
draft
prior
to
the
meeting,
and
if
there
are
comments
or
edits
on
the
annual
report,
we
can
wrap
those
in
in
tonight's
discussion.
B
The
annual
report
is
slated
to
go
to
city
council
on
april
6th,
I
believe.
Historically,
the
chair
has
presented
the
annual
report
so
also
wanting
to
see
if
bob
is
willing
and
available
on
april
6
to
present
the
annual
report,
and
if
not,
then
we
can
delegate
another
committee
member
tonight
as
well.
A
B
A
Okay,
good-
and
the
other
thing
I
wanted
to
make
note-
was
the
original
form
of
the
committee
was
the
arcata
marsh
task
force,
which
was
formed
in
1981,
and
so
this
would
represent
the
40th
year
of
not
the
committee,
but
but
at
least
the
involvement
in
wetlands
and
creeks.
So
but
wow
happy
40
years.
A
E
B
A
B
A
C
A
Yeah,
so
a
couple
so
before
we
open
up
to
the
public,
just
a
couple
things
is
so
april.
6Th
is
right.
Before
I
leave
town
to
give
a
presentation,
I
can
do
april
6,
but
I
think
I'll
be
like
crunched
to
try
and
get
everything
done
before
leaving.
So
I
would
welcome
anybody
else
who
would
like
to
do
that.
B
The
meetings
have
been
very
recently
shifted
to
in-person
for
council
and
staff
and
community
members,
but
it's
run
also
as
a
hybrid
for
members
of
the
public
wanting
to
call
in
so,
if
necessary.
I
think
we
could
do
it
virtually
though.
Certainly
it
would
be
the
preference
of
the
council
to
have
presenters
in
person.
A
And
just
I've
always
kept
it
real
short,
like
here's,
the
report,
assuming
that
they've
all
read
and
I've
known
that
other
committees
actually
go
through
every
word
of
the
report
and
any
feeling
for
how
the
council
this
council
it's
a
full
agenda.
Do
they
want
to
hear
every
detail
from
it
or
do
we
assume
that
they've
read
it
and
they
just
want
to
receive
it?
And
thank
us
for
our
hard
work.
B
Recently
there
has
been
a
lot
more
council
discussion
on
agenda
items,
and
so
I
think
that
providing
more
upfront
about
the
content
of
the
annual
report
would
be
helpful.
I
do
expect
council
members
may
have
questions
some
of
them,
certainly
being
newer
council
members
so
yeah.
I
would
say
that
this
year
maybe
takes
a
little
bit
of
a
different
flavor
and
providing
a
more
of
a
summary
of
the
report
itself,
as
part
of
the
presentation
would
be
beneficial.
I
A
A
E
K
A
L
Oh
great,
thank
you
and
happy
40th
anniversary.
I
just
wanted
to
touch
on
bob's
comment
regarding
no
thank
you
for
thinking
of
ray.
He
did
not
serve.
He
had
resigned
prior
to
2021,
so
that'll
save
emily
one
extra
little
task
and
beat
yay,
and
thanks
again
for
tonight.
Thanks
for
the
great
discussion,
robust
conversation
about
the
gateway
area
plan,
this
committee
always
rocks
and
thank
you
again
for
your
service.
L
A
J
A
B
B
D
B
H
H
A
B
B
We
have
just
our
coastal
development
permit
outstanding,
so
hopefully
we'll
have
that
in
the
next
coming
months
and
we'll
be
able
to
stay
on
construction
schedule
for
that
we
have
submitted
our
100
design
for
the
boat
launch
project
at
the
terminus
of
south.
I
street
to
our
funders
for
review,
with
the
hope
of
putting
that
out
to
bid
at
the
end
of
march
and
constructing
that
this
summer,
so
fingers
crossed
that
we
are
able
to
stick
to
that
timeline.
B
Professors
of
a
senior
engineering,
water
quality
monitoring
class,
and
so
they
are
going
to
be
doing
water
quality
monitoring
in
various
parts
of
jane's
creek
as
part
of
their
senior
class.
It's
not
a
capstone
project,
but
I
think
it's
a
lab.
So
I
think
there's
like
six
different
lab
days
and
a
final
report
associated
with
that.
B
I
did
ask
that
they
prevent
provide
us
their
reports
of
their
findings
and
the
the
next
wetland.
The
may
wetlands
and
creeks
committee
meeting
is
after
final
exams.
So
I
don't
know
if
we'll
have
any
student
presentations,
but
I
put
it
out
there
if
we
have
any
interested
students
that
the
committee
would
welcome
a
presentation
of
their
findings,
some
of
the
or
the
main
areas
that
they're
going
to
be
doing
water
quality
sampling
at
are
westwood
manor
park.
James
creek
meadows
park
the
con.
B
B
Measure
a
recommendations
were
passed
by
the
parks
and
rec
committee,
acting
on
behalf
of
the
ad
hoc
committee,
that
was
in
february
they
had
a
special
meeting.
I
have
it
up
right
now.
I'll
share
my
screen
to
show
the
overall
right
here
highlighted
just
to
draw
your
attention
overall
projects
across
committees
that
were
recommended
for
funding
for
the
next
fiscal
year
are
right
here.
In
my
highlights,
the
committee
wetlands
and
creeks
committee
priorities
that
were
recommended
for
funding
are
jane's
creek,
fish
and
water
quality
monitoring,
as
well
as
the
invasive
species
inventory.
B
And
then,
lastly,
not
a
project
update,
but
a
personnel
update.
We
have
submitted
an
our
received
assigned
offer
letter
for
the
new
program
manager,
so
we're
hoping
to
bring
them
on
in
early
april.
So
at
your
next
committee
meeting
I
will
be
introducing
them
and
eventually
we'll
transition
them
into
being
the
liaison,
but
I'm
not
sure
what
the
timeline
on
that
will
be
specifically.
A
A
A
E
I
B
A
B
B
After
the
next
fiscal
year
starts
like
significantly
after
right,
so
if
we
were
to
revisit
this
again
in
may,
it
would
be
before
it
would
be
before
our
next
fiscal
year
starts,
which
the
current
recommendations
are
speaking
to
so
there
wouldn't
really
be
any
new
information
per
se
based
on
the
performance
of
the
project.
So
I
feel
like
the
later.