►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Good
evening
welcome
to
the
April
10
2023
hearing
of
the
Planning
Commission
I.
Am
commissioner
davachi
Patel,
chair
of
the
commission.
Tonight
the
commission
will
consider
the
following
items:
an
informational
item
on
performance,
parking
and
Commercial
corridors,
an
amendment
to
the
Arlington
County
zoning
ordinance
relating
to
indoor,
Recreation
and
Redevelopment
of
the
Americana
Hotel.
Additionally,
we
will
be
considering
PC
organizational
matters
in
business,
we'd
like
to
share
a
few
logistical
points
for
those
members
or
Commissioners
participating
remotely.
We
have
one
commissioner
participating
remotely
at
this
time.
A
Tonight's
meeting
is
available
as
a
broadcast
with
closed
captioning
on
Comcast,
Xfinity
channels,
25
and
1085,
Verizon,
FiOS
channels,
39
and
40,
and
the
County
website
audio
of
tonight's
meeting
is
available
via
phone.
If
Commissioners
presenters
speakers
lose
internet
connectivity
during
tonight's
meeting,
please
reconnect
with
us
by
phone
for
our
presenters
or
speakers
joining
us
through
Microsoft
teams.
Please
keep
your
phones
and
devices
muted
until
you're
called
upon.
A
A
B
B
A
A
C
Great,
can
everyone
hear
me
terrific
good
evening?
My
name
is
Melissa
McMahon
I'm
the
parking
and
curb
space
manager
for
Arlington,
County
and
I.
Appreciate
having
this
opportunity
to
speak
with
you
tonight.
We
have
recently
kicked
off
a
special
pilot
project,
called
performance,
parking
and
Commercial
corridors.
This
project
is
funded
by
VDOT
through
an
innovation
and
transportation
fund,
Innovation
and
technology
and
transportation
fund,
and
we
are
excited
to
have
their
support
for
this,
because
we
couldn't
do
a
project
like
this.
C
C
C
C
So
the
purpose
of
this
project
is
to
make
our
metered
parking
spaces
more
available,
More
Often
by
sharing
useful
information
about
parking
options
in
real
time
and,
ultimately
reducing
those
negative
impacts
that
are
associated
with
the
search
for
metered
parking
things
like
double
parking
cruising
and
even
going
somewhere
else
to
do
your
business.
So
this
is
a
pilot
project.
It
is
one
approach
to
potentially
making
combining
occupancy
and
availability
information
with
pricing
to
influence
demand.
So
it's
not
necessarily
the
BL
end-all,
but
this
is
what
we're
experimenting
with
today.
C
I
wanted
to
lay
out
some
things.
This
project
doesn't
do
so
we
don't,
through
this
project,
seek
to
increase
overall
parking
meter
Revenue.
We
actually
don't
know
what
the
impacts
on
meter
Revenue
will
be
when
we
reach
goals
set
out
for
this
project.
This
project
will
not
increase
meter
rates
across
the
board.
We
anticipate
that
there
will
be
areas
where
the
prices
of
parking
will
go
up
because
they're
very
high
demand
areas,
but
there
will
also
be
places
where
parking
meter
rates
go
down
because
they
are
lower
demand.
C
They
are
a
part
of
the
project
and
we
will
actually
learn
information
about
their
utilization,
but
we
aren't
changing
the
numbers
of
them
and
if
anything,
we
might
learn
about
places
where
we
may
need
more,
but
we're
not
going
to
be
decreasing,
and,
lastly,
I
wanted
to
mention
that
this
project
does
not
create
dynamically
or
fast
changing
pricing.
This
isn't
a
hot
Lane.
C
This
is
something
where
we
will
set
out
strategic
pricing
changes
that
are
based
on
information
about
utilization
across
the
whole
system,
and
we
will
probably
change
them
no
more
than
once
a
quarter,
because
we
need
to
be
able
to
see
the
impacts
of
our
changes
on
user
Behavior.
C
C
We
are
excluding,
as
you
could
imagine,
there's
a
lot
of
space
on
Street
affected
by
new
development
projects
parking
in
curb
space,
that's
not
available
right
now
we
aren't
putting
sensors
and
if
we
aren't
using
the
technology
in
the
spaces
that
are
immediately
going
to
go
under
construction.
So
we're
doing
a
lot
to
coordinate
at
this
station
time
between
our
Paving
plan
and
our
mots
for
new
development
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
have
incompatible
plans
going
forward.
C
I
will
give
you
a
quick
overview
of
the
technology.
The
technology
in
this
project
is
using
in-ground
sensors
Wireless
gateways.
There
will
be
a
staff
view
dashboard
for
management
and
decision
making
and
there's
also
going
to
be
a
public
view.
Web
app
interface,
so
I
would
say
you
can
think
of
it
as
a
mobile
friendly
website.
C
This
at
this
point,
but
there's
also
an
API
being
produced
as
a
part
of
this
project,
so
there's
the
ability
for
those
companies,
those
third-party
companies
that
produce
apps
to
use
our
data
set
and
to
actually
display
it
in
their
tools.
This
project
does
not
capture
or
store
private
data.
The
project
doesn't
use
cameras,
so
we
can't
capture
information
like
faces,
license
plates
or
anything
about
a
vehicle
other
than
is
a
vehicle
there
or
not
there,
in
the
space.
C
So
a
little
bit
about
our
stall
occupancy
sensors.
These
are
in
ground,
they're,
completely
wireless
they're
battery
operated
and
they
use
such
low
power
that
they
are
basically
expected
to
have
a
10-year
lifespan.
Assuming
we
don't
dig
up
the
street
and
I
can't
promise
that
we
won't
dig
up
some
of
these
over
the
course
of
the
three-year
project.
C
The
wireless
gateways
will
be
located
primarily
on
traffic
signal
poles
throughout
the
county,
and
these
are
the
conveyors
of
the
sensor
data
to
the
cloud
so
that
it
can
go
into
our
dashboard.
These
are
also
low
power
they're,
just
using
AC,
regular
outlet
power.
They
use
a
cellular
connection
to
connect
to
the
cloud
and
again
these
are
expected
to
to
last
for
10
years,
if
they're
undisturbed.
C
So
we
will
be
looking
at
those
places
of
highest
demand
and
then
coming
up
with
proposals
for
how
price
might
be
able
to
be
changed
to
reduce
the
demand
on
those
blocks
and
push
some
of
that
demand
to
other
lower
demand
blocks
all
with
the
goal
of
making
it
possible
for
people
to
find
those
spaces
more
easily,
more
often
and
again
reduce
the
negative
externalities.
What
we
learn
from
every
cycle
of
price
change,
we
feed
back
into
the
process,
we
analyze
new
data,
and
then
we
make
additional
price
change
recommendations.
C
It's
worth,
noting
that
there
is
no
price
change
that
can
happen
before
a
board.
Ordinance
change
occurs
right
now.
The
meter
prices
are
hard-coded
and
they're
flat.
Basically,
so
this
winter
we
expect
to
go
before
the
board,
with
a
request
for
an
ordinance
change
that
gives
staff
a
little
more
administrative
flexibility
during
the
term
of
the
pilot
program
So
within
the
two
roughly
two
years
of
time,
post
existing
conditions,
data
collection
to
the
end
of
the
pilot.
We
would
be
asking
for
that
ability
to
change
prices
roughly
once
a
quarter.
C
This
slide
provides
a
little
summary
of
our
Outreach
and
engagement
to
date.
In
this
phase
of
the
project,
we
have
started
with
a
high
level
stakeholders
approach,
as
you
can
imagine,
the
metered
spaces
are
in
commercial
areas,
so
this
is
like
retail
businesses.
These
are
a
lot
of
folks
who
actually
might
not
live
here,
but
are
using
meter
parking
spaces
in
our
commercial
areas
too.
C
So
we
were
looking
at
obviously
our
commissions,
our
bids,
economic
development
organizations
and
we've
gone
before
these
groups,
given
a
presentation
very
similar
to
this
one,
we've
also
given
our
first
virtual
public
meeting
that
was
in
the
end
of
February
and
that
recording
is
available
online
for
anybody
who's
interested,
and
that
was
that
first
and
fulsome
introduction
to
the
project.
For
anyone
in
the
public-
and
you
can
see-
we
are
here
tonight
on
April
10th
and
we
have
one
additional
sort
of
stakeholder
level
meeting
scheduled
at
this
point
in
time.
C
But
this
is
really
a
moving
process
and
these
these
get
scheduled
every
day
and
we
are
actually
transitioning
into
a
new
Outreach
phase
of
our
project.
C
C
So
this
is
when
you
will
probably
see-
and
your
neighbors
will
see
folks
out
there
in
the
parking
spaces,
temporary,
no
parking
signs,
they're
core
drilling
holes
in
the
pavement
to
put
the
sensors
in
and
then
they're
moving
along
they're
delineating
the
parking
spaces
so
parking
space
delineation
is
a
core
piece
of
this,
so
that
we
can
have
one
sensor
per
space.
And
so
we
have
we're
going
to
have
for
the
next
several
months,
a
bigger
presence
out
on
the
street
and
in
order
to
manage
that
presence
and
make
sure
the
community
is
seeing.
C
What's
going
on
and
understanding
it
as
we
go,
we've
got
an
Outreach
street
team.
That's
going
out
about
two
weeks,
one
to
two
weeks
in
advance
in
every
street
segment
in
Corridor
that
we're
hitting
with
construction
door-to-door,
knocking
on
the
doors
of
the
businesses,
knocking
on
the
doors
of
the
residential
lobbies
of
larger
buildings
and
giving
them
collaterals.
C
Some
images
of
some
of
that
collateral
are
here
sort
of
what
they
can
expect
to
see,
but
basically
to
try
to
answer
some
questions,
make
them
aware
and
also
Point
them
to
our
website
and
to
our
engagement
form
like
the
ability
for
them
to
provide
feedback
on
the
project
at
this
stage
and
the
feedback
that
we're
soliciting
at
this
stage
is
really
that
high
level
are
the
program
priorities.
Are
the
program
goals
prioritized
in
the
right
way
and
do
our
goals
properly
represent
what
people
are
expecting
to
see
as
an
outcome?
C
C
And
that's
it
for
my
overview.
This
is
the
web
link
to
our
program
overall
and
where
we
are
today,
we
will
constantly
be
updating
that
with
additional
aspects
in
terms
of
how
people
can
engage,
what
we're
doing
we're
actually
probably
going
to
put
up
a
photo
gallery.
So
people
can
see
some
of
the
stuff
that's
going
on
the
street
and
what
they
might
see
in
person
see
how
that
looks.
But
if
you
have
any
questions
happy
to
answer
some
tonight
and
I
appreciate
your
time.
F
Well,
thank
you.
That's
very
interesting.
I
live
in
the
RB
Corridor
and
have
been
very
involved
in
parking.
First
of
my
civic
association
and
every
night
is
a
battle
when
I
get
home.
C
And-
and
we
we
have
much
better
information
that
if
you'd
like
to.
F
Okay,
so,
where
you
have
the
Metro,
stop
there,
that's
Monroe
going
north
and
there
are
some
meters
there,
but
I
don't
think
they
go
all
the
way
there
because
you've
got
FDIC.
That's
in
there.
Also,
if
you
look
from
10th
to
North
Nelson
there,
there's
only
a
few
meters
down
on
the
south
side
of
that
Quincy
park
is
there
on
the
left
hand,
side
or
what
would
be
the
West
Side.
There
are
no
meters
along
the
park
side.
F
Nor
are
there
any
meters
as
you
get
further
up
on
the
Block
on
the
residential
side,
so
I'm
just
curious
about
that
and
again
in
those
neighborhoods,
because
I'm
more
familiar
with
them,
will
you
at
some
point
be
going
back
to
Civic
associations,
possibly
because,
whatever
happens
sometimes
with
the
meters
directly
impacts,
our
neighborhoods,
there
are
sometimes
empty
meters
and
full
neighborhoods
with
people
that
really
should
be
in
a
meter
and
should
not
be
in
the
neighborhood.
F
C
Absolutely
we
have
the
Civic
associations
on
our
radar.
We
haven't
strategically
targeted
them
this
early
in
the
process
based
on
just
prioritization
of
of
various
stakeholders
and
our
Outreach
time,
but
but
I
hear
you
and
actually
I
think
one
of
the
more
productive
points
will
be
when
we
have
that
existing
conditions
data,
because
all
we
have
right
now
are
transactions
at
meters
and
they're,
not
as
you
can
imagine,
totally
accurate.
Not
everyone
pays
the
meter
and
so
I
think.
Once
we
have
existing
conditions
data.
F
C
Yes,
okay
and
it's
those
retail
frontages
are
the
ones
that
are
being
hit
by
our
street
team
today,
with
the
hope
of
engaging
them
early
and
getting
them
aware
of
the
project
and
aware
of
what's
likely
to
happen.
One
of
the
things
we've
heard
is
employees
who
might
use
metered
parking
spaces
today.
Are
they
going
to
be
negatively
impacted
because
those
retail
employees
might
not
make
a
lot
of
money?
They
don't
have
other
parking
arrangements,
and
this
might
be
how
they
how
they
fill
the
Gap.
C
Our
goal
would
be
to
provide
lower
and
higher
cost
Alternatives,
because
you
also
might
not
want
your
employee
parking
right
in
front
of
your
business
because
you
want
your
customers
to
be
there
so
having
nearby
lower
prices
provides
a
a
feasible,
understandable
alternative
to
an
employee
who
has
a
whole
ship
to
work,
and
they
actually
want
to
pay
a
lower
price
and
they
might
be
willing
to
walk
a
couple
blocks.
C
So
those
types
of
strategies
would
be
discussed
and
definitely
the
community
will
be
engaged
in
the
fall
both
prior
to
the
ordinance,
because
the
ordinance
discussion
with
the
board
also
has
to
be
forthright
with
what?
What
are
the
parameters
we're
trying
to
access
in
terms
of
change
and
then,
as
we
do
cycle
through
the
price
changes
we're
going
to
get
information
from
the
data
and
we're
going
to
get
information
from
the
community
Through
qualitative
data.
You
know,
so
we
will
have
feedback
forms
open.
C
F
And
can
I
ask
one
more
so
if
describe
what
my
experience
might
be
as
a
driver
driving
around
and
all
the
meters
are
gone
where
I
need
to
park
and
okay,
if
I
sneak
into
the
neighborhood,
because
there's
not
enough
people
enforcing
that,
that's
one
thing,
but
is
this
system
like
real
time
and
all
of
a
sudden
it
just
I
can
not
necessarily
be
driving
in
with
my
handheld
phone,
be
going
like
gee,
where
do
I
go
I'm
paying,
but
would
it
be
something
that
we
would
be
able
to
then
get
through
our
car
or
something
to
sort
of
say,
hey
there
are
spaces
over
here?
C
There
are
going
to
be
options,
I
think
that
the
the
data
will
be
available
in
a
trip
planning
sense.
So
if
you
know
you're
going
out
to
dinner
with
some
friends
in
Clarendon,
you
can
look
ahead
and
you
can
see
the
trend
data
about
how
busy
different
blocks
are
going
to
be
at
different
times
and
what
the
relative
availability
will
be
as
well
as
price,
and
you
can
see
the
real
what
it
is
in
the
moment
and
I
say
Trends,
because
we're
going
to
have
this
historic
data
that
just
starts
accumulating.
C
So
we'll
know
that
on
Wednesdays
at
8
pm,
it's
like
X,
so
they'll
be
trip
planning,
availability
there,
we'll
we'll
only
really
be
communicating
availability
at
the
Block
face
level.
So
you'll
probably
see
a
map,
that's
color
or
pattern
coded,
so
that
at
a
glance
you
can
see
where
there's
more
and
less
availability
and
you'll
also
be
able
to
compare
price.
C
The
extent
to
which
people
use
it
in
their
car
I
think
you
know
safety
being
taken
into
account.
There's
there
needs
to
be
that
sense
of
like
oh
well.
I
have
that
spot
available,
but
I
don't
want
to
pay
that
rate.
So
maybe
I'll
go
down.
I
know
that
the
the
blocks
a
couple
blocks
down
are
quite
a
bit
cheaper
because
they
are
in
this
pattern
again
we're
not
dynamically
changing
the
price,
so
it
isn't
going
to
be
uncertain
on
a
day-to-day
basis.
E
Thank
you
for
presenting
this
has
been
a
long
time
coming.
I,
remember
a
number
of
people,
even
when
I
was
on
the
Transportation
Commission,
before
2017,
looking
forward
to
it
and
and
and
pleading
for
something
like
this
to
to
to
to
take
place.
E
I
have
a
couple
questions
and
a
couple
comments.
My
first
question
is
to
what
extent
are
if,
if
you
are
core
drilling
and
embedding
specific
sensors,
does
that
mean
that
there
is
a
vision
of
adopting
discreetly
named
and
marked
and
identified
spots
like
in
many
parts
of
the
district,
or
is
that
sort
of
a
sense
of
we're
going
to
let
people
park
anywhere
along
x-strip
and
just
look
at
how
many
of
the
sensors
are
are
lit
up
over
over
a
Time.
C
For
purposes
of
this
project,
we
do
have
to
delineate
the
spaces
that
way
we
can
only.
We
only
have
to
use
One
sensor
per
space,
okay,
otherwise
we
would
have
to
use
more
sensors
to
ensure
we
caught
vehicles
that
we're
trying
to
park
between
kind
of
thing.
We
will
not
be
on
the
staff
side.
We
can
see
ultimately
the
occupancy
of
every
space
at
any
given
time,
but
that's
not
how
we'll
communicate
it
for
purposes
of
public
using
it,
but
we'll
have
that
level
of
data.
E
Right,
it
seems
like
it
would
be
a
a
bad
situation
if
you
had,
you
know
me
and
18
other
people,
all
of
a
sudden,
saying,
oh
spot
118
is
full
and
then
having
a
race
to
get
to
that
that
spot
right
outside
the
restaurant,
but
but
I
just
I'm
to
be
a
little
bit
more
specific
that
what
I'm
wondering
about
is
whether
this
is
pretending
a
change
too
and
I.
Don't
know
what
I
think
about
it
yet,
but
does
this
indicate
a
change
towards?
E
There
are
many
parts
of
the
district
when
you,
when
you
pay
by
parkmobile
right,
you
have
to
enter
both
the
region
that
you
are
in
and
then
you
have
to
identify.
You
have
to
say
I.
My
car
is
in
spot
118
and
there's
a
little
metal
post
sticking
out
of
the
ground
that
has
118
in
it.
You're.
Not
that's,
not.
Okay,
no.
C
No,
we
we
are,
we
have
to
design
a
Zone
structure,
that'll,
be
a
pricing
Zone
structure.
A
C
Be
different
than
right
now
you
can
imagine,
there's
one
zone
everything's
the
same
price
kind
of
thing,
so
we
do
have
to
design
his
own
structure
and
we
have
to
design
it.
So
it's
very
understandable
to
folks,
but
you'll
still
be
at
a
meter.
So
it's
really
just
going
to
be
the
same
meter
experience.
Everyone
has
today.
Okay,.
E
C
Using
the
same
meter
infrastructure,
the
same
Park,
Mobile
infrastructure,
but
the
zones
will
be
communicating
with
the
meters
on
the
back
end
so
that
if
you
pull
up
Park
Mobile
it'll
say
this.
Space
is
two
dollars
an
hour
and
that's
because
we've
sent
that's
the
that's
the
price
for
that
space
in
that
price
Zone.
But
your
experience
will
be
the
same.
Are.
E
You
so
so
we
we
could
end
up
in
a
situation
where
you
know
a
a
quad
cab
with
a
six
foot.
Bed
is
going
to
be
sitting
on
top
of
two
different
sensors.
Yes,.
C
E
E
It's
that
that
there
are
lines-
and
there
is
a
number
and
I
pull
up
next
to
the
number-
and
you
know
it
means
cars
can
be
a
little
bit
less
creative,
but
it
also
means
that
the
data
is
more
reliable
so
that
that's
a
a
one
cent
suggestion
inflation
rate
Supply
I
I,
want
to
share
just
an
experience
in
anecdote,
I'm
sure,
you're
hearing
from
this
from
the
businesses
I
remember
15
years
ago,
when
I
was
a
server
at
restaurant
three,
some
days,
I
would
get
very
lucky
and
and
I
would
be
parking
right
outside
the
the
restaurant,
and
so
when
I
would
at
at
midnight.
E
At
the
end
of
my
shift,
when
I
was
walking,
you
know
to
my
car
with
a
lot
of
cash.
It
was
something
that
even
I
at
a
six
and
a
half
foot
tall
white
man
was
relatively
unafraid.
You
know
and
and
invulnerably
27
was
relatively
unafraid
of
of
doing,
but
it
was
a
much
less
pleasant
experience
when
I
had
to
walk
even
to
the
the
the
public
parking
garage,
just
three
or
four
blocks
further
and
so
I
I
think
that
you
are
going
to
get
if
you
haven't
heard
it
already.
E
You
know
where
there's
going
to
be
pushback
and
and
concerns
expressed
not
just
from
the
employee
employers
but
from
the
employees
who
are
going
to
be
affected
and
and
put
into
a
yeah
perceivably
less
safe
situation
by
being
directed
towards.
You
know,
parking,
that's
further
away
from
the
spots
now.
E
I
I
also
know
that
that's
that
there's
an
extent
to
which
that's
a
problem
to
be
dealt
with
as
between
the
employee
and
the
employer,
but
but
it's
something
that
we
should
be
mindful
of,
and
then
the
only
other
comment
Madam
shared
before
I
yield
is
that
I
I
really
I
would
love
to
see
us
moving
towards
something
that
is
more
dynamically
priced
I'm.
E
Mindful
of
the
fact
that
changes
that
you
know
that
the
goal
is
to
be
80
parked
right,
but
demand
doesn't
change
from
quarter
to
quarter,
I
mean
I,
guess
it
does
right,
but
I'm,
again,
I'm
thinking,
even
just
of
my
experience
as
a
server
at
restaurant.
Three,
the
real
changes
in
demand
are
between
four
o'clock
P.M
and
eight
o'clock
P.M,
and
if
the
goal
is
to
be,
you
know,
80
parked
and
to
reduce
those
trips.
E
Like
commissioner
Begley
was
talking
about,
we
have
to
be
willing
and
able,
and
we
have
to
be
getting
to
a
place,
and
this
I
know
that
this
is
probably
you
know
it
one
step
before
the
other
right,
but
I
I
don't
want
to.
Let
go
that
the
way
to
get
it
80
parked
is,
is
to
figure
out
how
we
can
deal
with
that
four
o'clock
to
eight
o'clock
swing
and
again.
I
know
that
that's
out
of
scope
but
I.
C
Well,
it's
not
out
of
scope
because
there's
a
difference
between
Dynamic
change
e.
I
e
that
street
just
got
really
busy
and
now
the
price
went
up
and
it's
40
bucks
an
hour,
not
gonna
happen,
then
to
be
sensitive
to
time
of
day
and
time
of
day
is
totally
encompassed
in
the
directive.
From.
C
A
E
H
Yeah,
thank
you
very
much.
This
was
very
well
received
in
February
when
it
was
before
Transportation
Commission.
As
you
remember,
we
had
a
very
robust
discussion
that
went
quite
well.
My
question
since
some
have
already
been
answered
by
my
other
commission
fellow
Commissioners.
Well.
First
of
all,
I
do
want
to
say
that,
like
commissioner
Bagley
Clarendon
also
has
some
streets
that
you
have
way
over
there
only
stubs
are
are
metered
the
rest
of
it
is
residential
parking.
So
there's
way
too
much
orange
on
a
number
of
those
streets.
I
C
H
I
concur
with
Phil
with
commissioner
Weir
here
that
Dynamic
pricing
ultimately
is
the
way
to
go.
I
think
San
Francisco's
been
using
that
experimenting
with
it
in
a
couple
of
neighborhoods
and
supposedly
it's
been
successful
so
far,
so
you
know
this
is
a
great
first
step
and
I'm
fully
supported.
I,
just
hope
that
we
could
then
use
that
as
to
move
further
toward
true
dynamic
pricing.
There
are
so
many
good
reasons
to
do
it.
H
Our
curb
space
is
so
underutilized
or
improperly
utilized
and
we're
just
it
just
is
all
the
wrong
incentives
under
the
current
system,
and
it's
not
just
fundraising
it's
because
of
use,
and
for
so
many
other
reasons
anyway,
as
you
as
you're,
fully
aware
of,
certainly
as
you
as
mentioned
earlier,
letting
people
know
what
the
pricing
is
is
going
to
be
very
key,
especially
as
you
move
toward
Dynamic
pricing.
You
have
to
know
real
time.
H
What
is
it
going
to
cost
me
to
be
here
and
if
we're
doing
time
of
day
also,
you
know,
is
it
if
it's
really
cheap
at
noon
but
becomes
really
expensive
at
eight
yeah?
There
has
to
be
some
way
that
that
can
get
out
that
people
are
aware
of
that,
because,
if
you're
just
coming
during
the
day-
and
you
know,
it'll
cost
a
quarter
an
hour
to
park
there,
but
in
the
evening
it
costs-
you
know
ten
dollars
an
hour.
H
H
The
way
the
airports
manage
parking
I
think
is,
is
a
very
good
model
for
a
lot
of
this
anyway.
Thank
you.
This
is
great.
You
know
more
power
to
look
I'd
love
to
see
once
it's
implemented,
you
come
back
and
tell
us
how
it's
working.
J
J
Look
forward
to
doing
it,
Mr
Peterson
two
quick
questions.
One.
Can
you
share
what
the
range
of
pricing
is
because
I'll
be
honest,
I'm,
not
sure,
I'm,
the
type
of
person
that
would
ever
look
up
what
the
pricing
is
in
advance
and
I'm,
just
going
to
like
find
the
spot
that
I
need
that's
closest
to
where
I
need
to
go
and
then
am
I
going
to
be
shocked
at
a
10
an
hour
or
is
it
going
to
be
like
the
difference
between
three
dollars
an
hour
and
450
an
hour?
C
We
haven't
established
that
yet
and
that's
in
part,
because
we
don't
have
existing
conditions,
data
on
the
range
of
occupancy
and
behavior
that
we
have
to
shift,
and
so
in
part,
having
two
years
to
do.
These
changes
is
designed
to
give
us
some
some
time
to
figure
it
out
a
little
bit
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
might
find
is
there
are
areas
that
are
not
very
price
sensitive,
in
which
case
jacking
it
up
and
jacking.
C
It
up,
isn't
going
to
marginally
change
what's
going
on
and
it
will
disadvantaged
households
that
just
can't
afford
it
and
then
they'll
just
be
all
of
this
new
demand
generated.
Basically,
so
we
have
to
look
at
that,
but
we
don't
know
yet
when
we
establish
the
ordinance
with
the
board
in
December,
that'll
be
based
on
Fall,
existing
conditions,
data
and
some
preliminary
proposals
for
where
we
think
and
it's
likely
that
the
board
ordinance
proposal
will
have
to
speak
to
the
range
of
price
that
we're
looking
at
changing.
C
J
You
and
the
second
question
I
had
was
just
I,
I,
think
I'm
having
a
hard
time,
understanding
the
parking
monitors
and
how
you
mentioned
like
what
there
will
be
one
per
spot,
but
a
lot
of
the
the
roads,
and
you
may
have
already
answered
this
and
I
just
missed
it.
A
lot
of
the
roads
aren't
individually.
C
We
are
delineating
spaces
and
what
we
mean
by
that
is
we're
painting
the
lines
between
the
spaces
using
the
best
practice
standards
for
how
big
the
spaces
should
be
for
cars
and
they'll,
be
so
there'll,
be
a
little
bit
of
variability
within
the
range
of
18
to
22
feet
in
in
that
range.
A
typical
car
will
fit,
and
that
will
be
the
outcome
during
the
pilot
project.
C
I
think
the
the
the
jury's
still
out
on
whether
delineated
spaces
are
a
better
or
worse
experience
for
Parkers
I've
definitely
heard
folks
anecdotally
excited
for
delineated
spaces
because
they
see
the
big
spaces
that
are
undemarkated
to
be
a
weird
free-for-all,
and
people
do
strange
things
with
them
and
with
that
space.
But
it's
it
is
a
part
of
the
design.
The
project
design,
whether
we
need
it
in
the
future,
remains
to
be
seen.
But
that
is
part
of
this
and.
J
Will
part
of
this
pilot
be
able
to
assess
if
you
end
up
with
less
people
being
able
to
park
like
if
you
compare
the
results
to
park
mobile
and
if
Park
Mobile
says
actually,
revenues
went
down
because
fewer
people
are
able
to
fit
on
the
street
now?
Is
that
going
to
be
able
to
be
something
you
can
consider.
C
C
If
the
other
thing
we'll
have
is
turnover,
data
and
I,
don't
think
we're
going
to
see
a
substantive
decrease
in
the
amount
of
cars
that
can
fit
in
in
a
block
when
they're
doing
what
they're
supposed
to
do.
But
but
we
will
see,
we
will
see
on
a
micro
and
macro
scale
what
the
differences
are.
When
both
we
really
have
a
lot
of
things
changing
at
once.
C
K
Thank
you.
It's
really
interesting
and
I'm
enjoying
hearing
my
colleagues
questions.
I.
Think
I
want
to
point
out
that,
if
we're
going
to
be
making
parking
a
little
more
restrictive,
a
little
more
expensive,
I
think
something
that
we'll
need
to
focus
on
going
forward
with
our
site
plans
is
making
sure
that
there's
adequate,
pickup
and
drop
off
thanks.
H
Yeah
I,
just
one
quick
question:
will
you
be
able
to
correlate
the
occupied
spaces
with
be
them
actually
being
paying
for
those
spaces.
C
Not
on
a
space
by
space
basis,
but
on
a
meter
basis,
we'll
be
able
to
see
is
how
many
transactions
and
for
how
much
time
has
been
paid
for
in
a
given
area
and
how
much
time
is
that
area
occupied
so
we'll
we
will
be
able
to
see
if
there
are
places
in
the
community
that
are
more
aligned
and
less
aligned
with
more
perhaps
parking
Behavior,
that's
not
accompanied
by
payment
Behavior,
but
we
won't
know
on
a
space
basis.
We
won't
know
on
a
car
basis.
H
J
On
a
particular
submission
of
Hughes,
if
you
can
see
that
on
a
particular
Street
80
of
the
time,
the
occupied
spaces
are
not
being
paid
for,
did
you
then
say
like
let's
send
more
parking
enforcement
on
that
street
at
a
particular
time,
so.
C
That's
one
of
the
possibilities
as
you
as
you
can
imagine,
there
are
constraints
to
how
there's
no
money
that
comes
behind
this
for
more
enforcement
Personnel,
but
it
is
a
it's
a
it's
going
to
inform
us,
for
instance,
places
that
are
not
very
compliant.
It's
one
of
the
words
that
would
be
used
a
block.
That's
not!
That
has
a
lot
of
has
low
compliance
with
meter.
C
Payment
might
also
be
less
price
sensitive
because
those
users
aren't
actually
paying
so
there's
a
bit
of
a
chicken
and
egg
there
that
will
have
to
work
out,
but
we
don't
have
unlimited
enforcement
resources.
It
is
an
area
where
we
would
want
to
coordinate.
L
Commissioner
Peterson
got
the
primary
question:
I
had,
which
was
the
enforcement
function
and
the
real-time
age
of
it,
but
my
only
other
comment
just
for
staff
is
I
think
it
would
be
a
shame
if
we
have
inelastic
demand
of
pricing
in
an
area
that
we
don't
attempt
to
find
what
the
natural
price
point
is
for
80
percent
and
knowing
that
the
increase
in
resources
can
be
used
to
better
fund
certain
areas
of
public
transportation
that
are
more
available
to
more
people.
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Patel.
B
B
I'm,
so
sorry,
our
second
item
is
zoa-2023-4
fbc-29
and
nfbc-16.
We
have
Elizabeth
King
from
AED
to
present
this
item
this
evening.
This
is
the
Columbia
Pike
neighborhood
special
revitalization
district
form-based
code,
NGO
hunger
as
well.
B
I
I
This
ordinance
amendment
is
a
continued
application
of
the
county
manager's
strategy
to
ensure
commercial
Market
resiliency.
The
County
Board
authorized
the
advertisement
for
the
indoor
Recreation
ordinance
Amendment
on
February
18th,
and
the
quick
process
was
identified
as
appropriate.
Given
the
limited
impact
of
this
use,
identified,
tenant
demand
and
experience
with
such
uses
in
Arlington
and
Beyond
and
the
positive
impact
this
can
have
on
Place
making
goals.
I
So,
as
you
can
see
here,
we
attended
the
zoning
committee
meeting
on
March
18th
and
we
anticipate
that
this
amendment
will
go
to
the
County
Board
on
April
22nd,
so
so
to
talk
about
some
Trends
in
indoor
Recreation.
We
are
seeing
evolving
restaurant
Concepts
that
often
blend
food
and
beverage
with
gaming
centers
we're
really
seeing
increased
demand
for
indoor
Recreation
facilities
in
walkable
areas,
along
with
new
and
emerging
activities
and
Technology.
I
This
Market
is
expected
to
grow
at
an
annual
rate
of
12.9
percent
and,
according
to
recent
Cushman
Wakefield
research,
competitive
socializing
Concepts
have
grown
386
percent
since
the
beginning
of
2021.,
and
just
for
a
few
more
Trends
down
at
the
bottom,
gen
Z
have
real.
Most
of
John
Z
have
been
to
a
competitive
socializing
venue
in
the
past,
and
47
would
like
to
go
in
the
future
and
gen
Z
and
Millennials
are
often
leaning
more
toward
experiences
rather
than
buying
things.
I
They're
more
interested
in
buying
experiences
and
indoor
Recreation
facilities
or
businesses
really
offer
those
experiences.
I
So
this
ordinance
is
important
because
it'll
help
us
fill
vacant
commercial
space
and
we
cannot
attract
in
demand
Concepts
without
this
amendment.
This
can
also
help
us
have
Place
making
elements
that
support
residents,
visitors
and
returned
office.
It
can
help
take
pressure
off
public
and
private
or
help
take
pressure
off
public
and
outdoor
recreation
spaces.
I
This
ordinance
amendment
can
help
provide
year-round
opportunities
for
exercise
and
healthy
living.
It
can
lower
the
barriers
to
entry
for
these
businesses
and
provide
opportunities
for
entrepreneurship,
and
it
will
allow
these
businesses
to
open
in
Arlington
keeping
keeping
those
dollars
in
this
community.
I
At
the
zoning
committee
meeting,
we
were
asked
to
look
into
the
history
of
indoor
recreation
in
Arlington,
so
indoor
Recreation
was
first
introduced
into
the
County
zoning
ordinance
in
1950.
It
was
permitted
by
Wright
in
the
C2
district.
There
were
very
few
districts
then,
and
it
was
permitted
under
the
term
Amusement
Enterprises,
which
was
inclusive
of
billiard
or
pool
halls,
bowling
alleys,
boxing
Arenas
dance
halls,
games
of
skill
and
science,
Penny
arcades
and
shooting
galleries
so
long
as
they
were
in
a
completely
enclosed
building.
I
I
Perfect
we're
almost
done
so
here
we
see
the
current
commercial
mixed-use
District
table.
You
can
see
that
there
are
a
lot
of
indoor
different
indoor
Recreation
uses
listed
out,
but
they're
not
all
regulated
in
the
same
way
and
some
are
regulated
more
strictly
than
others,
and
the
real
kind
of
Trend
in
zoning
is
to
go
more
broad
because
there's
not
very
much
a
difference
in
Impact
between
the
different
indoor
Recreation
uses,
so
there's
no
real
way
to
no
real
reason
to
regulate
them
differently.
I
So
what
we're
proposing
in
this
ordinance
amendment
is
to
eliminate
the
game.
Arcades
billiard
pool
halls,
bowling
alleys,
miniature
golf
courses,
skating,
rinks,
tennis
and
Racket,
and
handball
courts
here
are
the
current
use
categories.
We
are
also
from
these
we're
going
to
eliminate
game
arcades,
skating,
rinks
and
some
of
the
other
verbiage,
and
what
we're
going
to
do
here
is
Encompass
everything
in
the
all
other
indoor
Recreation
line,
so
that
all
of
these
similar
uses
can
be
regulated
in
the
same
way
across
our
commercial
mixed-use
districts.
I
Here
you'll
see
the
updates
to
the
use
categories
so
we're
adding
more
updated
examples
and
broadening
the
term
indoor
Recreation
and
all
these
different
examples
of
indoor
Recreation
will
fall
under
that
all
other
indoor
Recreation
line.
I
So
for
our
recommendation,
we
are
recommending
that
the
ordinance
to
amend,
reenact
or
re-codify
article
7,
8,
11,
12
and
sections
three
and
four
of
appendix
a
of
the
Columbia
Pike
form-based
code
and
part
9
of
appendix
B
of
the
neighborhood
revitalization
form-based
code
of
the
ordinance
be
adopted
and
that's
the
end
of
my
presentation.
So.
A
I'm
a
Time,
thank
you
so
much,
commissioner
sarley.
N
Thank
you
for
the
presentation.
This
came
before
the
commission,
the
zoko
committee
on
March
14th,
and
we
had
a
fairly
good
conversation
about
it.
Commissioner
Lon
tell
me,
and
commissioner
Garen
was
there
and
commissioner
Peterson
was
also
there,
so
we
had
a
lot
of
questions
and
a
lot
of
comments,
but
generally
I
think
the
the
the
notion
of
creating
more
resilient
Market
is
very
well
received
and
other
than
making
sure
we
don't
start
the
Manhattan
Project
in
Arlington.
We
had
no
concerns.
N
So
the
motion-
let's
see
if
I,
make
this
correctly
without
commissioner
troll
being
here
to
correct
me,
I,
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
recommend
that
the
County
Board
of
mend
reenact
and
recodify
article
7,
8,
11
and
12
sections
three
and
four
of
appendix
a
Columbia
Pike's
special
whereabout,
revitalization
district
form-based
code
and
part
9
of
appendix
B
Columbia,
Pike,
neighborhood,
special
revitalization
district
form-based
code
of
the
Arlington
County
Zone
ordinance,
as
shown
in
attachment
one
of
the
staff
report
to
facilitate
the
following:
a
adding
a
new
use
table
line
for
all
other
indoor
Recreation
to
the
commercial
mixed-use
zoning
District
use
table
B,
adding
additional
examples
of
indoor
Recreation
to
article
12
use
standards
for
the
recreation
use
category
C,
allowing
the
establishment
of
the
all
indoor
all
other
indoor
Recreation
uses
in
the
ra
4.8
R,
Dash
c
ra-8,
h,
r,
a
dash
h-3.2
c-1,
mu-v-s,
c-0-1.0,
c-0-1.5,
c-0-2.5
c-o.
N
Category
e,
removing
examples
of
recreation
indoor
both
from
the
commercial
mixed
use,
table,
industrial
zoning
districts,
use
table
and
Columbia
Pike
form-based
code
use
tables,
F's,
making
additional
editorial
changes
for
improved
Clarity
and
G
for
other
reasons
required
by
public
necessity.
Convenience,
general
welfare
and
good
zoning
practice
is.
A
N
N
A
B
D
D
Presentation
loads
again:
I'm
Kevin
Lam,
with
the
planning,
Division
and
I'm
the
lead
planner
for
the
Americana
Hotel
Redevelopment
project.
D
So
the
subject
item
before
you
tonight
consists
of
two
parts.
The
first
is
a
rezoning
request
and
the
second
is
a
a
new
site
plan
request
and
there's
also
an
Associated
item,
which
is
a
site
plan
amendment
to
or
for
the
Bartlett
Apartments,
to
modify
the
required
residential
parking
ratio,
as
well
as
permit
off-site
parking
for
the
Americana
project.
D
D
It
is
currently
or
the
site
is
currently
occupied
by
the
former
Americana
Hotel
building,
as
you
can
see
in
this
aerial
image,
as
well
as
the
associated
surface
parking
lot.
So,
as
shown
in
the
second
image,
the
hotel
building.
As
you
can
see
front,
the
existing
elevated
portion
of
Richmond
Highway.
D
So
the
glove
designation
for
the
site
is
high
office
apartment
hotel
and
is
located
in
the
Crystal
City
coordinated,
Redevelopment
District
and,
as
I
previously
mentioned,
the
applicant
is
requesting
a
rezoning
from
Rah
3.2
to
seal
Crystal.
City
foreign
plan
consists
of
a
19-story
residential
Tower
built
at
a
lead
gold
certification
level.
D
However,
this
particular
site
is
not
identified
for
potential
Redevelopment
and
therefore
site-specific
improvements
such
as
future
public
space
or
Transportation
improvements,
or
not
envisioned.
As
part
of
this
conceptual
plan,
and
also
since
the
site
is
located
west
of
Richmond
Highway,
it
is
not
as
subject
to
Crystal
City
Block
plan
requirements.
D
So,
moving
on
to
the
analysis,
one
particular
design
guideline
deviation
I
did
want
to
highlight
tonight
is
related
to
the
minimum
Frontage
requirements
which
are
in
place
to
maintain
a
consistent
building,
Edge
and
further
promote
attractive
and
walkable
streets.
D
However
staff,
you
know
we
do
acknowledge
the
site
is
long
and
narrow
and
which
results
in
unlimited
amount
of
actual
Street
Frontage
on
each
Street
and
given
the
areas
dedicated
to
the
private
driveway
as
well
as
The
Pedestrian
pathway,
you
know,
even
if
the
podium
was
extended
to
its
furthest
extent,
it
would
only
reach
around
69
percent
and
then.
Secondly,
the
sector
plan
recommends
that
no
portion
of
the
poding
facade
be
located
greater
than
10
feet
from
the
rbl.
D
In
this
case,
there
is
an
almost
50
foot,
recessed
area
that
leads
to
the
main
residential
entrance,
and
this
recessed
area
serves
a
few
different
functions.
It
serves
as
a
waiting
area
for
residents
the
retail
patio
space,
as
well
as
access
to
The,
Pedestrian
pathway,
running
along
the
north
northern
side
of
the
site,
but,
as
I
will
get
to
in
the
next
slide,
staff
did
coordinate
with
the
applicant
on
important
design
revisions
to
further
activate
the
space
and
improve
its
relationship
with
the
street
in
order
to
meet
the
intent
of
the
sector
plan.
D
So
staff
identified
the
opportunity
to
create
a
more
inviting
entry
area
given
its
prominence
on
the
street
Frontage
and
to
better
relate
to
its
various
functions.
As
I
mentioned
earlier,
so
working
with
staff,
the
applicant
did
incorporate
wood
bench
seating
with
integrated
planters
that
wraps
around
the
retail
patio,
which
also
creates
a
movement
into
the
recessed
area.
D
So
both
Street
frontages
are
being
designed
in
coordinates
with
two
ongoing
Transportation
projects.
The
first
is
the
County's
South
E
Street
complete
Street
project,
and
the
second
is
vdots
Route
1,
multimodal
Improvement
study,
which
plans
to
bring
this
elevated
segment
of
Richmond
Highway
to
an
at
grade
Boulevard.
D
D
So
the
review
process
for
this
project
began
last
June.
With
an
lrpc
meeting.
There
was
the
online
engagement
opportunity
in
October,
followed
by
two
sprc
meetings,
which
covered
the
following
topics
and
then,
lastly,
the
site
plan
you
know
is
consistent
with
the
glop,
the
zoning
ordinance
and
the
sector
plan
guidance
and
advances
several
key
County
goals
and
policies.
A
Thank
you.
So
much
do
we
have
an
applicant
presentation.
A
O
O
O
Tonight.
I
will
share
an
overview
of
the
main
topics.
Oh
there,
we
go
main
topics
that
have
been
discussed
during
the
entitlement
and
Community
engagement
process,
including
the
site,
design,
height
form
and
architecture,
open
space
and
Landscaping
sustainability,
Transportation
Community
benefits
and
others
related
to
this
project,
starting
off
with
a
brief
project
overview
for
site
context.
Our
project
is
located
between
Southeast
Street
on
the
west
and
Route
1
on
the
East
and
is
directly
across
from
Amazon's
Mets
Park.
O
O
The
massing
of
the
building
was
initially
influenced
by
the
site
constraints
such
as
the
tower
setbacks,
with
the
neighboring
Embassy
Suites
to
the
North
and
the
Paramount
Apartments
to
the
South,
and
then
through
the
design
process.
We
look
to
further
break
down
the
North
and
South
facades,
since
they
are
long
due
to
the
proportion
of
the
site
Additionally.
The
design
also
added
articulation
to
the
east
and
west
facades,
allowing
for
a
cohesive
design
and
creating
for
an
elegant
and
slender
proportion
on
the
street
frontages.
O
The
following
plan
reflects
the
current
ground
floor
for
the
building
and
is
indicated
by
the
key.
We
have
retail
fronting
South
to
eat
straight
in
yellow
the
lobby
in
green
residential
units
in
blue
and
the
amenity
space
in
red.
We
have
all
of
our
vehicular
and
loading
activity
focused
on
the
south
side
of
the
building
and
an
amenity
space
that
will
be
programmed
for
Fitness
on
the
east
side
of
the
building
note
north
of
the
building.
O
There
we
go
inspired
by
the
design
of
the
previous
Americana
Hotel
on
the
site.
Additionally.
The
current
design
includes
some
of
the
feedback
we
received
during
the
community
engagement
entitlement
process,
such
as
the
addition
of
The
Pedestrian
pathway,
increase,
Street,
frontages
and
Tower
setbacks
and
changes
to
help
Define
the
podium
expression.
O
Moving
on
this
rendering
focuses
on
the
residential
entrance
underneath
the
canopy
element,
we
have
coined
as
the
tabletop
designed
to
help
land
the
building
and
stand
out
at
a
pedestrian
scale.
We've
Incorporated
various
biophilic
elements
throughout
the
entitlement
process,
such
as
planters
and
benches,
that
will
use
natural
materials
and
create
a
more
inviting
pedestrian
experience
that
will
frame
the
residential
entryway
and
the
outdoor
retail
patio
and
further
activate
Southeast
Street.
O
Here's
an
additional
rendering
looking
out
from
the
residential
entryway,
which
is
shown
in
the
previous
picture,
creates
an
inviting
condition
with
the
outdoor
retail
seating
activating
the
street
for
the
table
top
the
cast
panel
cladding
material
space
one
and
a
half
feet
apart
for
the
fins
helps
ground
the
tabletop,
while
the
use
of
metal
panel
cladded
materials
response
to
something
lighter
above
and
creates
the
effect
of
an
outdoor
room
as
light
casts
through
the
fins,
while
also
controlling
the
flow
of
pedestrian
traffic.
Towards
South
East
Street.
O
This
building
was
designed
with
no
backside,
as
all
the
facades
are
visible,
so
high
quality
materials
and
details
are
used
throughout
this
rendering
of
Route
1
in
the
future
condition
showcases
the
contrasting
vertical
and
horizontal
Expressions
that
are
featured
on
both
of
the
street
frontages
and
also
pay
homage
to
the
Americana
Hotel,
as
mentioned
from
the
previous
Southeast
Street
View.
This
rendering
also
reflects
the
East-West
connection
that
we
incorporated
to
the
site
design
based
off
Community
feedback,
as
well
as
the
five
foot
and
eight
foot
Tower
setbacks
per
staff's
comments.
O
Additionally,
through
the
feedback
from
the
online
engagement
process,
we
revised
the
design
to
have
a
more
defined
Podium
expression
with
amenity
facing
Route
1
instead
of
the
residential
units
to
help
further
activate
the
street
and
provide
an
entrance
to
the
east
side
of
the
building
that
can
be
utilized
when
Route
1
comes
to
grade,
here's
the
same
rendering.
Oh
here's
the
same
rendering
under
today's
existing
conditions
of
route,
1..
O
O
The
landscape
plan
includes
multiple
levels
of
biophilic
elements
across
the
project.
On
the
ground
level,
we're
using
integrated
seating
and
Landscaping
to
help
activate
Southeast
Street,
the
residential
entry
and
The
Pedestrian
connection
to
the
north
of
the
building
for
the
public
Realm
for
the
residents
of
the
project,
we've
included
an
outdoor
deck,
surrounded
by
canopy
trees
that
is
connected
to
the
fitness
center.
O
Also,
as
mentioned
previously,
we
have
Incorporated
Planters
and
natural
materials
to
frame
the
residential
entry
and
make
it
more
inviting
for
pedestrian
traffic
and,
finally,
as
reflected
in
this
night
view
of
the
southwest
corner,
you'll.
Note
the
additional
green
screens
in
between
the
private
units
that
we
integrated
through
the
community
engagement
process
to
bring
additional
Greenery
to
the
southern
facade.
O
O
Next
I'll
share
some
quick
highlights
of
the
discussion
at
Transportation
Commission
on
March
30th,
starting
off
with
an
overview.
The
site
has
access
to
excellent
public
transportation,
with
two
Metro
stations,
less
than
a
10
minute,
walk
away
and
10
bus
routes
located
within
a
quarter
of
a
mile,
as
well
as
offering
great
pedestrian
and
bicycle
pathways
as
discussed
at
Transportation
Commission.
O
O
The
rendering
here
reflects
the
curb
cut
we'll
have
for
all
of
our
vehicular
traffic,
including
the
residential
and
visitor
parking
package,
drop-off
residential
and
Retail
loading
and
bicycle
circulation
to
a
residential
entry.
That'll
lead
you
directly
to
the
elevators
for
the
lower
levels
and,
lastly,
I
will
provide
a
quick
overview
of
the
community
benefits
related
to
the
project
for
the
bonus
density
for
the
Americana
site
project.
O
The
Profit
package
includes
making
a
cash
contribution
of
6.1
million
dollars
to
open
space
intended
to
fund
Metro
Market
Square,
as
well
as
making
a
contribution
for
the
South
East
Street
Improvement
project
and
providing
public
access
to
the
East-West
pedestrian
pathway,
that'll
connect,
South,
Eid,
Street
and
route
1..
Finally,
per
staff's
request.
We
will
also
be
making
a
7.5
million
dollar
contribution
to
affordable
housing
intended
to
fund
over
80
units
at
the
Crystal
House's
Redevelopment,
located
approximately
0.3
miles
from
the
site,
in
addition
to
the
base
contribution
of
2.1
million
dollars.
A
G
G
They've
done,
lead
gold,
they're
participating
in
the
gbi,
the
Green,
Building
and
Center
program,
and
at
the
request
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
climate
change
energy
and
environment
commission,
and
at
our
request,
the
team
met
with
the
building
decarbonization
Coalition,
which
is
a
non-profit
organization
that,
as
its
name
suggests,
tries
to
help
developers
figure
out
how
to
decarbonize
their
buildings.
So
they've
worked
in
good
faith
to
do
all
that,
but
here
we
are
there.
G
The
project
still
is
using
significant
fossil
fuels
and
I
think
you're
all
familiar
with
the
the
analysis,
the
chart
and
the
criteria
that
c2e2
uses
for
projects-
and
you
know
we
have
good
news
and
bad
news.
The
score
that
we
are
giving
is
a
64.
64
is
a
terrible
score,
but
it's
one
of
the
best
scores
we've
given
you
know
we
are
Arlington.
County
is
not
going
to
be
able
to
meet
its
commitments
to
climate
change,
to
carbon
neutrality
and
to
its
cep
program
to
sustainability
goals.
G
If
we
continue
to
approve
buildings
like
this,
Arlington
is
hosting
so
much
development.
The
eyes
of
the
country
are
on
us
with
the
hq2.
It
would
be
wonderful
if
we
could
be
a
national
model
and
lead
the
way
toward
a
non-electric
future.
You
know
we
can
argue
whether
the
technology
is
out
there.
G
A
H
Yes,
oh
thank
you.
This
was
heard
at
the
Transportation
Commission
last
week.
Our
discussion
involved,
not
surprisingly,
around
the
completion
of
the
protected
bike
lane
on
Eid
Street,
the
East-West
Connector,
which
was
very
well
received,
not
surprising.
We
always
look
for
a
lower
parking
ratio
than
what
is
here,
but
we
do
look
like
the
the
fact
that
it
is
being
some
of
the
parking
is
being
shared
across
the
street.
Given
how
overparked
Crystal
City
is
it's
good
to
be
able
to
use
that
that
that
excess
parking
capacity?
H
H
The
Transportation
Commission
also
added
that
it
recommended
the
County
Board
would
approve
the
site
with
a
lower
parking
ratio
than
what
is
proposed
solely
to
give
the
applicant
flexibility
between
now
and
construction
to
reduce
the
number
of
parking
spaces
further
with
without
seeking
further
approval.
If,
in
the
future,
the
app
this
project
would
like
to
shrink,
let's
say:
make
its
Bike
Room
larger
and
shrink
the
a
number
of
parking
spaces
and
give
it
over
to
bikes.
They'd
have
to
get
a
minor
site
plan.
H
E
Thank
you.
Madam
chair
I
have
circulated
my
report,
the
the
short
version
of
it
for
those
of
you
who
have
not
had
the
opportunity
to
review
it
in
the
tremendous
amount
of
time
between
this
afternoon,
and
now.
My
apologies
for
that.
The
gist
of
it
is
that
they're.
This
is.
This
is
a
project
that
arrived
in
a
very
good
spot
and
and
now
comes
to
us
in
an
even
better
spot.
There
are
I
would
I
would
not.
E
I
would
say
that
there
are
not
any
major
or
material
items
or
issues
that
are
unresolved
for
our
discussion.
There
are
a
few
things
at
the
margin.
I
understand,
I
I
expect
that
that
you
know
that
there
might
be
one
Among,
Us
or
or
more
who
who
have
some
thoughts
on
on
the
the
the
height
to
which
the
bird
friendly
glass
is
being
proposed
to
be
installed.
E
But
but
I
I
raised
that
in
the
context,
not
of
fingering
that
as
a
as
a
problem
with
this
issue
per
se,
but
but
I-
think
maybe
with
this
proposal
per
se
but
I
think
a
you
know
something
that
gets
more
towards
an
Arlington
County
policy
issue
which
isn't
to
I,
don't
mean
to
suggest
that
that
well,
I,
don't
I'll,
stop
getting
ahead
of
ourselves.
E
I
think
that
one
of
the
remaining
issues
to
be
worked
out,
although
I
I
may
prove
to
be
the
only
person
who's
still
animated
by
this
is
the
design
and
materiality
of
the
tabletop,
which
I
think
is
a
tent
pull
feature
for
this
project
and
and
and
during
the
sprc
meetings.
There
was
a
someone
me
who
flagged
a
recent
bad
example
or
a
bad
experience
with
something
that
was
a
really
prominent
and
well-designed
project
at
the
entitlement
stage,
namely
the
the
Boston
pedestrian
bridge.
E
That
ended
up
being
a
very
different
experience
for
many
of
the
people
who
interact
with
it
during
the
day
on
any
given
on
any
given
day.
You
know
the
other
I
think
major
issue,
the
other
issue
that
I
think
took
up.
Most
of
the
real
estate
in
the
participants,
heads
Minds,
was
the
East-West
pedestrian
connection,
but
I
I
also
believe
that
that
has
been
pretty
thoroughly
fleshed
out
and
and
discussed
it.
E
You
know
it
comes
to
us
as
a
eight
foot,
clear
width
with
representations
from
the
applicant
that
there
will
be
a
a
public
use
easement
at
such
time
as
or
should
Richmond
Highway
be
regraded,
it
doesn't
make
sense
for
there
to
be
a
public
use
easement
presently,
because
from
whence
would
people
access
the
Eastern
portion
of
it.
E
I
I
think
that
that's
all
I
want
to
call
out
from
the
Deus
the
only
that
Beyond
approaching
topics
of
discussion
using
the
general
rubric
that
we
use
for
sprc
projects,
with
the
potential
caveat
of
those
two
items
that
I
that
I
raised
a
bird
friendly
class
specifically
and
the
tabletop
feature.
I,
don't
have
any
lingering
topics
to
to
suggest
to
the
commission
and
I
intend
to
advance
the
county
manager
recommended
motion
without
Amendment,
at
least
for
the
purpose
of
getting
us
started.
Thank.
A
You
so
much
I'm
going
to
go
to
commissioner
Hughes,
who
has
a
question
and
then
involved
by
commissioner
gear.
L
Thanks,
commissioner
Patel
I
had
a
question
for
staff
on
the
33
family
units.
There
was
mentioned
in
their
presentation.
Would
they
mind
putting
the
slides
up
and
explaining
to
me
what
those
33
family
units
are.
D
So
the
33
family
size
units
are,
you
know,
essentially
three
bedroom
units
provided
on
site,
so
they
will
be
Market
rather
than
affordable,
but
the
family
size
units
kind
of
just
means
it's
going
to
be
a
three
bedrooms.
L
Is
normally
significantly
above
120
Ami
I
think
we
do
ourselves
a
disservice
on
our
ahmp
a
little
bit
of
a
disservice
and
I
understand
the
hmp
covers
all
incomes,
but
we
tend
to
focus
our
conversation
on
two
types
of
affordable
housing.
One
is
the
60
below
which
we
Define
as
affordable
and
then
the
80
to
120,
which
is
the
middle
income
Ami.
L
So
I'd
recommend
staff
not
go
forward
with
that
presentation
and
stick
with
the
presentation
that
the
app
can
put
forward,
which
was
the
base
contribution
which,
as
you
point
out,
is
Cash
on
site
or
nearby
with
an
additional
cash
contribution.
And
what's
the
applicant
almost
clearly
stated,
which
nearly
every
applicant
was
just
they're,
almost
every
applicant?
That's
not
a
nonprofit.
Does
a
pure
cash.
K
Oh
well,
I
assume
you're
asking
me
because
I'd
like
to
speak
to
the
bird
Parlin
class,
but
I
do
have
a
question
about
the
benefits
given
that
so
much
of
these
are
sort
of
cash
contributions,
and
this
is
probably
for
Mr
Schreiber
as
much
as
anyone
What's
the
timing
of
them
when
they're
all
cash
contributions.
D
So
per
the
condition
language,
the
the
AF
contribution.
K
D
Thank
you,
so
it
is
tied
to
prior
to
issuance
of
the
Shaolin
core
certificate
of
occupancy.
K
D
So
the
others
so
in
terms
of
transportation
that
is
tied
to
the
first
partial
CEO
of
tenant
occupancy
and
then
the
public
open
space
is
going
to
be
phased.
So
the
first
installment
is
tied
to
the
first
permit
above
grade
and
then
the
second
installment
is
also
the
first
partial
clf
tenant
occupancy.
So.
P
P
What
I
would
say
is
by
the
time
this
project
is
constructed.
I
wouldn't
necessarily
expect
all
of
the
improvements
to
which
these
monies
are
attributed
to
to
be
completed
by
that
time,
I
think
that
they
will
be
funded.
Some
of
them
may
be
under
construction,
such
as
the
open
space
Improvement
around
the
Metro,
Market
Square
or
other
open
space.
Improvements
such
as
funding
for
Center
Park
I,
wouldn't
expect
Center
Park
to
be
completed,
but
you
may
see
some
of
the
design
work
underway.
P
Similarly,
with
a
very
large
contribution
for
the
affordable
housing
component,
that
those
are
monies
that
we
would
anticipate
using
at
Crystal
houses.
Just
because
we
have
the
ability
to
leverage
that
to
create
about
93,
committed
calves
again
will
will
that
building
or
those
buildings
that
crystal
houses
be
completed
by
this
time.
Probably
not,
but
I
would
expect
them
to
at
least
be
under
construction
by
then
yeah.
K
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr
Schreiber,
Mr,
lamb,
I,
know
that
jbg
Smith
has,
in
the
past,
been
very
cognizant
of
how
important
it
is
to
build
a
thriving
Community
with
so
much
Redevelopment
in
that
neighborhood.
So
I
guess
I
just
want
to
be
on
the
record
as
saying
when
I
think
we
have.
This
trade-off
with
a
big
cash
contribution.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
putting
off
all
of
those
benefits
until
some
later
stage
as
to
the
bird
friendly
glass.
Can
you
clarify?
K
K
So
again,
here
I
want
to
go
on
the
record.
I
think
it's
really
important
that
you
find
a
way
to
go
from
zero
to
36
feet
most
of
the
bird
collisions.
The
reason
why
we
have
the
bird
friendly
glass
happen
where
there's
Vegeta
station,
where
the
birds
are
in
the
vegetation
and
they
get
confused
by
the
glass
and
then
they
fly
into
it.
K
I
know,
from
other
conversations
with
your
teams
that
you
do
not
want
to
be
picking
up
dead
birds
in
the
morning
and
yet,
in
fact,
that's
what
most
big
buildings
are
facing
and
this
whole
bird
friendly
movement
in
our
area
in
our
region
was
started
by
Anne
Lewis
who's,
an
architect
in
the
district
who
said
we
hate
it
that
we
were
creating
these
buildings,
and
this
is
what
the
out
the
outcome
was.
Every
morning
we
go
around
and
we
pick
up
these
dead
birds
before
everybody
sees
them.
K
So
it's
really
important
the
age
of
36
feet.
If
you
then
had
a
green
roof
at
a
higher
level,
you'd
want
to
have
bird
friendly
glass
at
that
level
too.
So
the
0
to
36
feet,
the
zero
to
eight
feet
is
actually
probably
some
of
the
most
important
0
to
36
feet
should
be
a
minimum.
You
know,
New
York
City
would
have
you
do
zero
to
a
hundred,
so
we're
definitely
going
in
that
direction.
But
I
don't
know
if
you
have
the
ability
to
make
those
changes
now.
E
On
on
the
substance
commissioner,
gear
and
and
to
the
applicant
I
agree,
especially
with
zero
to
eight
I,
think
where
you're
I
suspect
part
of
where
we
are
at
and
I'm
happy
to
be.
You
know
proven
wrong
if
it
if
it
gives,
if
it
opens
an
opportunity
to
do
better,
but
I
suspect
that,
where
we're
where
we
are
at
is
that
we
have
County
guide
posts
right,
and
that
say
you
know
we
can
get.
E
You
know
X
bonus
density
if
we
do
8
to
36
and
that
those
guide
posts
probably
need
to
be
Revisited,
because
those
are
the
numbers
that
applicants
are
gonna
are
gonna.
Hang
there
that's
the
code,
those
numbers,
the
code
hook,
that
applicants
are
going
to
hang
their
their
hat
on,
and
you
know
I
think,
commissioner
Peterson,
even
during
the
sprc,
had
pulled
up
a
resource
that
suggested
some
disparity
between
where
we
are
at
some
just.
E
Yeah
and
so
I
I,
you
know
Mr
Shriver,
Mr,
Lam
I,
think
that
a
suggested
takeaway
is
that
these
are
some
things
that
might
be
Revisited
on
the
staff
and
planning
side
as
much
as
commissioner
gear
and
suggestion
to
the
applicant
that
there
might
be
a
way
to
save
your
tenants,
some
heartache
in
that
those
first
aid
feet.
Q
No
then,
yes,
thank
you.
I
did
want
to
specifically
call
out
that
I
was
pleased
to
see
that
the
applicant
is
allowing
historic
preservation
staff
to
survey
the
site
for
any
artifacts
I.
Think
that's
important.
Q
Coming
from
as
a
prior
member
of
the
hlrb
I
think
that's
done
something
I
was
very
pleased
to
see
I'm
not
sure
what
will
be
found,
but
hopefully
something
interesting
and
since
I'm
already
talking,
I
will
say
that,
while
I'm
very
pleased
to
see
the
large
dollars
associated
with
some
of
the
cash
contributions
being
made
I,
you
know
I
know
this
was
discussed
at
sprc,
but
you
know
having
on-site.
Affordable
units
is
something
that
you
know
I
think
we
really
do
expressly
strong
desire
to
see
on
all
projects.
Q
Your
project
is
lovely,
but
it's
no
different.
In
that
regard,
we
would
still
like
to
see
on-site.
Affordable
housing
wherever
we
can
so
I
did
want
to
kind
of
re-emphasize
that.
Thank
you.
A
E
E
Are
we
willing,
as
a
as
a
county,
to
to
pay
for
that,
because
I
think
the
point
that
the
applicant
raises
and
the
staff
raises
is
that
you
know
we
we
could
we
could
ask
you
know
we
could
insist
that
on-site
calves
and
maybe
get
30
units,
but
the
opportunity
cost
is
the
90
or
so
units
that
the
same
amount
of
of
resources
could
could
get
us
at
Crystal
houses
and
I
I'm.
Not
that's
not
a
leading
question
I,
don't
I
I
can
think
of
arguments
either
way.
I
I,
just
you
know,
don't.
A
Speaking
on
behalf
of
myself
and
commissioner
Steinberger,
now
at
what
cost
are
we
not
willing
to
ensure
that
every
single
property
in
Arlington
County
is
developed
with
on-site,
affordable
housing?
At
what
point
are
we
not
as
a
community
willing
to
take
that
up
at
that
cost?
If
we
hold
ourselves
out
to
be
a
welcoming,
thriving,
inclusive
community,
then
we
need
to
stand
by
that,
and
that
means
we
have
to
have
affordable
housing,
affordable
options
at
every
single
project.
Q
Q
A
Caught
up
I
called
on
commissioner
Bagley,
then
gear,
and
then
then
commissioner
Hughes.
F
Yeah
I
would
just
like
to
align
myself
with
having
affordable
housing
on
all
the
projects,
and
we
mentioned
this
in
the
sprc
and
I
honestly
personally
believe
that
the
county
does
not
ask
enough
of
developers.
I
think
developers
will
still
be
here.
There
seems
to
be
some
fear
if
we
ask
for
too
much
they'll
go
away,
they're
not
going
to
go
away.
There's
too
much
money
to
be
made
here.
So
if
we
really
want
to
be
inclusive,
you
really
want
to
be
a
project
that
stands
out.
F
You
know
come
back
with
a
little
bit
more
affordable
housing.
I
do
have
another
question
during
the
sprc
I
asked.
If
you
would
please
meet
with
the
disabilities
group,
did
you
meet
with
them
just
so
that
you
could
run
things
by
them,
because
it's
not
really
about
ADA,
it's
more
about
Universal
compliance
which
they
are
more
experts
on
than
we
were
so
have
you
done
that
we.
F
K
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I,
want
to
associate
myself
with
commissioner
Weir.
I
am
all
for
affordable
housing
in
a
prior
life.
I
was
a
housing
coordinator,
so
I
believe
in
this,
but
I
also
do
acknowledge.
This
does
come
at
a
cost
when
we
used
to
require
inclusionary
units
I
think
what
we
saw
was
a
comparable
rise
in
everybody
else's
rents
in
the
building,
so
I
think
we
have
to
acknowledge
that
there's
a
way
that
this
happens.
K
And
yes,
if
we
make
this
a
priority,
we
find
a
way
to
to
implement
it,
but
I
do
think
we
need
to
look
at
more
creative
ways
to
provide
housing
opportunities.
I
have
actually
spoken
with
the
applicant's
attorney
about
this.
The
idea
of
location,
efficient
mortgages,
energy,
efficient
mortgages,
first-time
homebuyer
programs,
I
think
there's
a
there
are
a
lot
of
ways
that
we
could
be
using
our
relatively
unencumbered
ahif
funds
to
try
to
address
some
of
those
needs
so
very
eager
to
have
a
broader
conversation
about
this
issue.
L
All
right
thanks,
commissioner
Patel
I
first
want
to
associate
myself.
Commissioner,
commissioner
Steinberger.
You
both
form
my
heart.
Six
years
ago,
seven
years
ago,
I
began
the
policy
of
voting
no
for
all
types
of
proposals
like
this
that
came
forward
with
the
strictly
cash
contribution
or
I'll
call
Cash
contribution
in
Disguise,
where
the
base
contribution
is
always
a
cash
contribution.
L
However,
it's
important
to
note
and
I
do
think
it's
worth
saying,
commissioner,
we
are
is
correct:
the
bang
for
the
buck
when
I
began
that
process
the
bang
for
the
buck
argument,
the
biggest
bang
for
our
hip
Buck
always
comes
pretty
much
from
developing
a
West
Pike
aged
property
into
a
new
property
in
an
area
of
concentrated
poverty
pursuant
to
HUD
in
an
area
where
the
freedom
reduced
lunches
over
90
to
80
percent,
depending
on
the
year
on
the
elementary
school
I,
am
comfortable
supporting
this
proposal
and
the
cash
contribution,
because
staff
identifies
the
location
which
is
basically
across
the
street
from
the
Americana
Hotel.
E
On
a
different
topic,
I'm
going
to
ask
I
think
Mr
Lam.
Maybe
this
is
for
you
Mr
Whitmer,
maybe
for
you,
but
it's
the
one
that
you
knew
coming
about.
E
How
do
we
make
sure
that,
should
there
be
issues
at
the
co
and
permitting
stage
with
the
materiality
and
or
engineering
of
the
tabletop,
that
we
are
not
put
into
a
situation
where
the
experience
is
a
180
from
the
one
that
we
see
at
the
entitling
stage
and
I
know
that
at
sprc
there
was
some
talk
about
potential
condition,
language
or
language
about
what
would
be
a
minor
or
major
site
plan
and
and
I
just
want
to
ask
what,
if
anything,
has
been
fleshed
out
since
then,.
M
Sure
I
can
I
can
take
a
first
stab
and
then
Mr
Lam
may
have
some
comments
as
well.
I
think
the
first
thing
to
point
out
is
that
the
tabletop
has
been
an
integral
part
of
the
design
of
this
project
since
day.
M
One
I
think
some
of
the
other
architectural
features
you
referenced,
maybe
were
not
integral
parts
of
the
project
from
day
one
and
that
that
may
contribute
to
some
of
what
we
ended
up,
seeing
in
practice
that
that
may
have
differed
from
the
plans
post
approval
after
the
entitlement
should
the
County
Board
approve
this.
There
is
an
extended
process
by
which
plans
are
further
refined
through
administrative
processes
and
additional
review.
M
A
final
architecture
and
materials
plan
will
be
submitted
and
reviewed
by
the
county
staff
and
I
can
tell
you
from
personal
experience
that
they
look
very
closely
at
the
renderings
that
were
provided
as
part
of
the
entitlement
to
ensure
that
what
is
submitted
in
the
more
detailed
plan
matches
the
the
spirit
of
those
initial
renderings
from
the
entitlement
if
they
do
not
for,
for
whatever
reason,
they're
they're
deemed
not
to
match
that
there
are
several
processes.
M
That
may
be
undertaken
in
order
to
change
those
underlying
approvals,
whether
that
would
be
an
administrative
change
or
a
minor,
our
site
plan,
Amendment
or
even
a
major
site
plan
amendment
that
would
come
back
to
the
county
board
for
approval.
So
there
are
a
significant
number
of
safeguards
in
place
to
ensure
that
what
we're
showing
today
is
reflected
in
what's
ultimately
built
are
there
changes?
M
Sometimes
there
are,
but
in
my
experience,
staff
does
a
very
good
job
of
of
seeing
where
A
Change
Is
material
versus,
not
no
pun,
intended
a
material
change
would
need
to
come
back
to
get
an
amendment
and
I'm
sure
Mr,
Lam
or
Mr.
Schreiber
may
have
some
comments
on
that
as
well.
D
And
to
kind
of
build
off
that
you
know
the
whole
intent
of
that
condition.
Language
is
to
ensure
Whatever
Gets
built
is
consistent
with
the
approved
plans.
In
terms
of
you
know,
the
building
massing
the
materiality
the
overall
architecture.
So
you
know
as
part
of
that
condition
in
in
if
there
are
any
changes
that
is
subject
to
staff
review,
either
through
an
admin,
change
or
site
plan.
Amendment.
E
So
I
would
just
thank
you,
Mr
Whitmore
for
the
good
pun
and
Mr
lamb
and
Mr
Schreiber
another,
and
your
colleagues
I
just
would
hope
that
you
would
be
particularly
conservative.
Should
there
be,
should
there
be
needed
changes.
I
would
just
ask
that
you'd
be
particularly
conservative.
E
I
think
that
the
sense
of
the
members
of
the
sprc
was
that
the
importance
of
the
tabletop
to
the
project
and
the
importance
of
it
being
right
was
of
similar
value
and
weight
to
the
importance
that
the
applicant's
attorney
has
just
articulated
it
that
it
represents
to
the
applicant
in
the
architecture
as
well
so
I
I,
just
without
without
burdening
a
project.
You
know
without
slowing
things
out
appreciably.
I
just
would
ask
you
to
be
both
judicious
and
conservative.
Should
there
need
to
be
changes
there?
That's
all.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
so
much,
commissioner,
do
you
have
a
motion.
A
J
I
I
just
had
a
question
for
Mr
Schreiber
and
Mr
lamby,
just
about
c2e2's,
bigger
picture
question
about
you
know
this
building
project
is
pretty
good,
scored,
I
think
you
said
a
62
percent,
and
yet
this
in
no
way
is
helping
us
reach
our
community
energy
plan
goals
and
so
I
guess
bigger
picture
question
for
the
future.
You
know
what
do
we
need
to
be
doing
like
what
do
we
need
to
do
to
reach
these
goals
if
we
set
this
community
energy
plan
and
project
after
project
isn't
achieving
it
like?
J
What
is
what
are
we
saying
about
our
you
know,
big
picture
planning
goals.
P
Sure
so
I
can
I
can
answer
that,
and
so
what
what
you're
seeing
with
each
of
these
projects
is
that
they
are
consent
of
what
they
are
consistent
with.
The
the
boards
adopted,
Green,
Building,
incentive-based
policy
and
and
that's
what
it
is.
That
is
a
tool
that
the
board
adopted
as
an
implementation
metric
that's
used
to
help
further
the
goals
of
the
cep.
P
It
is
incentive
based,
those
are
what
our
allowances
are
in
Virginia
and
it
is
scaled,
and
so,
in
this
case
the
applicant
is
participating
and
it
is
a
it
is
an
aggressive
program.
It
is
not
lead
based.
That
is
one
component
from
the
Baseline
there's
many
other
things
that
they
need
to
do
and
they
are
participating
at
the
at
what
is
the
lowest
level,
but
it
does
return
a
0.25,
far
bonus
and
that's
what
the
board's
adopted
policy
is.
P
I
do
know
that
our
department
of
environmental
services
will
be
commencing
a
review
of
The,
Green,
Building
and
Senate
policy
when
it
was
lasted
adopted.
That
was
a
commitment
they
made
to
the
board
to
revisit
that
in
2023.
That
effort
is
underway.
We
and
the
planning
division
are
taking
an
active
role
in
that,
so
I
do
not
know
what
the
conclusion
of
that
will
be.
Is
it
looking
at
just
some
of
the
Baseline
elements?
Is
it
looking
at
changing
some
of
the
far
credits?
I
would
assume
that
all
of
those
things
are
on
the
table.
P
I
think
we.
We
continue
to
hear
one
of
the
concerns,
which
is
a
baseline
commitment
about
the
bird
friendly
glass
and
about
the
vertical
dimensions
of
it.
That,
maybe,
is
something
that
is
considered.
I.
Think
all
of
these
things
that
we're
hearing
are
just
things
that
we
can
share
with
our
colleagues
and
then,
ultimately,
it's
up
to
the
board
to
make
a
decision
on
how
they
want
to
revise
that
program,
but
I
would
say
until
then
these
projects
are
consistent
with
the
board's
adoptive
policy
on
that
effort.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I,
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
I'm
going
to
do
it
I'm
going
to
do
both
aspects
in
one
motion,
I
moved
at
the
Planning
Commission
recommend
one
that
the
County
Board
adopt
the
attached
ordinance
to
rezone
the
property
known
as
1460
Richmond,
Highway,
actually
Madam
chair
before
I.
Let
me
just
ask
it:
let
me
stop
and
ask
a
ministerial
question.
The
website
uses
1400
this
motion
uses
1460..
Is
there
an
issue
if
we
go?
D
1460
is
the
one
because
when
we
looked
at
the
real
estate
Assessors
page,
the
address
associated
with
the
RPC
was
1460.
E
Okay,
so
that
that's
when
we
don't
want
to
get
wrong.
Thank
you
for
indulging
me
so
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
recommended
the
County
Board
One
adopt
the
attached
ordinance
to
rezone
the
property
known
as
1460
Richmond
Highway.
H
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
make
the
following
Amendment
to
the
motion,
which
would
read.
Furthermore,
the
Planning
Commission
recommends
that
the
County
board
approved
this
site
with
a
lower
parking
ratio
than
what
is
proposed
to
give
the
applicant
flexibility
at
any
time
to
reduce
the
number
of
parking
spaces
without
seeking
further
approval.
H
Like
to
speak
to
the
motion
I'm
doing
this,
because,
partly
because
the
way
this
this
site
is
being
developed
there
there,
for
example,
their
bike
room-
is
in
the
parking
garage
because
of
the
rapid,
changing
of
bicycles,
moving
toward
electric
bicycles,
cargo
bicycles,
I
could
foresee
a
fairly
close
in
the
future
that
they'll
be
needing
just
physically
more
room
even
for
the
same
amount
of
bikes.
In
addition
to
putting
in
the
the
charging
requirements
for
electric
bikes,
which
also
May
mean
additional
Transformers
capacity.
H
This
seems
to
me
that
it
would
be
fairly
for
this
side.
It
would
make
sense
to
allow
them
to
have
a
lower
parking
ratio
from
the
start
to
allow
them
to
make
those
changes
without
having
to
come
back
here.
It
fits
with
our
sustainability
goals.
It
would
make
the
the
building
more
marketable
all
around
I.
Think
it's
a
win-win.
Thank
you.
Thank.
J
H
Q
G
Q
L
A
Hughes
hi
Patel
is
going
to
abstain
as
well.
The
motion
carries
seven
to
two
or
seven
seven
to
nothing:
zero.
Okay.
How
about
and
don't
ever
do
that
again,
all
right!
How
about
the
let's?
Let's
have
a
vote
on
the.
E
B
E
A
L
A
A
We
did
receive
committee
reports
from
commissioner
Starley
for
zoko.
We
received
one
for
lrpc.
We
received
sprc
report
I.
H
Okay,
since
I
sent
that
earlier
today,
okay,
we
will
be
having
lrpc
on
Wednesday
the
26th.
Instead
of
doing
it
with
the
a
with
the
with
the
eight
with
the
OG,
it
will
be
a
lrpc,
an
informational
error,
lrpc
on
the
career
center
site.
A
Also
provided
a
pfrc
report,
it
said
lrpc
accidentally,
but
it
was
meant
to
be
pfrc.
She
does
have
a
young
baby
at
home.
Did
commissioner
Hughes
want
to
say
anything
about
OG
I
have
three
rosters.
J
A
April
and
we
have
rosters
to
approve
as
well
I
hope
everybody
saw
commissioner
Peterson's
reminder
twice
now
about
the
changes
to
sprc.
A
J
J
A
Any
objection,
wonderful,
those
are
approved.
I
am
going
to
seek
unanimous
consent
to
approve
the
March
6th
and
March
8
minutes
of
the
Planning
Commission
any
objection,
okay,
so
those
are
approved
as
well.
That
concludes
our
April
meeting
of
the
Planning
Commission
commissioner.
Hughes
will
represent
the
Planning
Commission
at
the
April
22nd
County
board
meeting.
Thank
you
to
everyone
that
made
this
Planning
Commission
meeting
a
success.
Thank
you
to
all
staff.
Thank
you
to
my
fellow
Commissioners.
Congratulations
to
commissioner
schroll.
Planning
Commission
is
adjourned
for
the
month
of
April
I.