►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
And
welcome
to
the
July
3rd
2023
meeting
of
the
Arlington
County
Planning
Commission
I'm
Jim
lantelmi,
a
member
of
the
commission,
and
before
we
do
anything
else,
both
the
Planning
Commission
chair
and
the
vice
chair
are
on
excused
absence
tonight.
As
such,
under
the
Planning
Commission
bylaws
article
3,
section
4,
the
members
present
must
nominate
and
vote
on
an
acting
chair
for
the
meeting.
Do
we
have
a
nomination?
B
Yes,
I
moved
to
nominate
commissioner
Lan
tell
me
as
the
temporary
chair
for
tonight's
meeting.
Second.
A
Ed
by
commissioner
Bagley,
we
can
now
move
ahead
with
a
vote.
Commissioner
Bagley.
C
A
Commissioner
jivara
commission
commissioner
Burkey
aye
commissioner
sarley
aye
commissioner
Steiner
aye
our
new
commissioner
Robertson
Robertson
aye
and
online
commissioner
Weir
aye.
It's
unanimous
I
can
now
move
ahead
as
acting
chair
very
good
tonight.
The
Planning
Commission
is
having
the
first
of
two
public
hearings
that
are
scheduled
for
this
month.
We
will
be
hearing
three
items
tonight,
but
first
note
that
the
previously
announced
agenda
item
the
Bingham
Center
has
been
postponed
at
the
applicant's
request
to
the
September
Planning
Commission
hearing
staff
will
be
reading
a
brief
referral
report.
A
If
you're
here
for
that
matter,
we
will
not
be
discussing
it
tonight
or
at
Thursday's
meeting
on
tonight's
agenda.
First
will
be
zoning
amendments
to
the
Columbia
Pike
form-based
code.
Second
will
be
Renovations
in
additions
to
the
Barcroft
Garden
Apartments
and
third
will
be
consideration
of
the
Arvest
site
plan
application.
A
Now
before
we
even
get
to
that
I'd
like
to
share
a
few
logistical
points
for
virtual
participants
and
or
Commissioners
participating
remotely.
Tonight's
meeting
is
available
as
a
broadcast
with
closed
captioning
on
Comcast,
Xfinity
channels,
25
and
1085.,
Verizon,
FiOS
channels,
39
and
40,
and
on
the
County
website.
A
Audio
of
tonight's
meeting
is
available
via
phone
if
Commissioners,
presenters
or
speakers
lose
internet
connectivity
during
tonight's
meeting,
please
reconnect
with
us
by
phone
for
other
presenters
and
speakers
joining
us
through
Microsoft
teams.
Please
keep
your
phones
and
devices
muted
until
you're
called
upon.
Please
turn
off
sound
to
any
other
devices
around
you
to
minimize
interference
and
please
keep
your
cameras
off
until
the
clerk
calls
you
to
speak.
A
When
called
upon
to
speak.
You
must
unmute
Yourself
by
clicking
on
the
microphone
icon.
That's
located
on
your
meeting
command
bar
the
moderator
does
not
have
the
ability
to
unmute
you
once
you've
spoken.
Please
turn
your
camera
off.
If
you're
dialing
in
by
phone
press
star
6
to
unmute
public
speakers,
you
will
be
called
upon
by
the
clerk.
At
an
assigned
time.
Pre-Registration
to
speaker
tonight's
hearing
was
required.
We
are
not
able
to
accommodate
additional
speakers.
A
A
If
you're
dialing
in
by
phone
and
unable
to
see
the
screen,
we
will
provide
an
audible,
30-second
warning.
You
will
be
on.
You
will
be
muted
when
your
time
has
concluded.
The
meeting
chat
is
active
for
presenters
or
Commissioners
who
need
technical
assistance.
Only
please
do
not
use
the
meeting
chat
for
discussion.
Public
comment,
questions
about
agenda
items
or
requests
for
more
information.
A
All
public
comment
must
be
shared
verbally
for
the
record
during
the
assigned
public
testimony
period.
And,
lastly,
this
is
a
public
forum.
Tonight's
meeting
will
be
recorded
and
posted
on
the
County's
website.
All
information
associated
with
tonight's
meeting,
with
a
written
or
spoken,
is
subject
to
the
Virginia
Freedom
of
Information
requirements
and
before
we
start
on
our
agenda,
I'd
like
to
take
to
acknowledge
and
introduce
the
newest
member
to
the
Planning
Commission
commissioner
Peter
Robertson
right
over
there
welcome.
D
First
item
for
the
evening
as
spoken
is
for
the
Bingham
Center
site
plan
application.
It
does
have
two
parts,
the
site
plan
and
the
ordinance
to
vacate,
but
we
will
not
be
discussing
this
item.
As
mentioned
earlier,
we
do
have
a
report
for
deferral
that
will
be
read
by
Matt
Pfeiffer,
our
planning
staff.
E
Good
evening,
Mr
chairman,
my
name
is
Matt
Pfeiffer.
With
the
planning
division,
see
we
I'm
just
going
to
give
a
very
brief
presentation,
so
the
Bingham
Center
site
plan
and.
E
Sorry
about
that
Bingham
Center,
site
plan
and
vacation
was
requested
by
the
developer
to
be
deferred
to
the
September
Planning
Commission
and
accounting
board
meeting,
so
staff
is
recommending
deferral
of
both
components.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
medical
clerk.
The
next
item.
D
A
Mean
okay
staff
is
first
up
for
this
excuse.
D
A
F
See
I
need
to
double
check
on
this.
I
got
a
motion
today
for
the
vacation.
Should
we
do
that?
One
first.
E
Speak
into
the
mic,
I
would
do
the
site
plan
first
on
the
vacation.
Second,
all
right.
F
A
We
actually
go
just
go
ahead
and
vote
on
that,
commissioner
Bagley
aye
Mr
Jabara,
aye,
Mr,
Burkey
aye,
commissioner
sarley
aye,
commissioner
Steiner
aye
and
commissioner
Robertson
aye,
commissioner
Weir
aye
and
I
vote
I
as
well.
It's
unanimous
do
we
have
a
second
motion.
I.
F
Do
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
recommended
the
County
Board
to
defer
the
subject
vacations
associated
with.
A
Do
we
have
a
second
second
Kush
strainer
and
we'll
take
the
vote
now,
commissioner
Bagley
aye,
commissioner.
C
A
G
Hi,
my
name
is
Cliff
Hogan
I'm,
with
the
planning,
Division
and
I'm
here
to
present
for
some
zoning
text
amendments
to
do
some
technical,
Corrections
and
updates
to
the
zoning
ordinance.
There's
three
one
is
to
update
our
zoning
regulations
for
Telecom
facilities
to
conform
with
the
code
of
Virginia.
The
second
one
is
a
minor
technical
correction
for
fence
encroachments
on
Corner
lots,
and
the
third
is
a
a
correction
to
the
regulating
plan
and
the
form-based
code
for
the
Town
Center
portion
of
the
Columbia
plate
form-based
code.
G
So
as
far
as
the
Telecom
facilities,
this
is
basically
to
accommodate
changes
to
the
code
of
Virginia
that
were
adopted
in
2017
that
basically
established
criteria
for
Telecom
facilities
to
on
how
low
calories
can
regulate
their
Telecom
facilities
through
their
local
zoning
ordinances.
There
were
pretty
much
two
main
portions
of
that
one
was
it
established
a
type
of
project
called
an
administrative
review
eligible
project
and
then
it
further
prohibited
localities
from
requiring
special
exceptions
or
variances,
or
any
other
kind
of
special
conditional
use
permit
for
administrative
eligible
projects.
G
There's
also
some
some
criteria
for
small
cell
facilities
and
to
like
providing
some
application.
Administration
guidelines
such
as
setting
fees,
review,
timelines
and
so
forth,
this
is
was
a
new
development.
Prior
to
this,
the
code
of
Virginia
was
silent
about
like
Telecom
facilities
and
as
such,
our
current
zoning
ordinance.
Basically,
telecommunications
facilities
are
a
there
are
use
that
is
allowed
it's
treated
as
a
type
of
utility
it's
allowed
in
every
zoning
District,
but
in
every
case
it
requires
use
approval
of
a
use
permit
by
the
County
Board.
G
It's
not
within
a
historic
district,
and
it's
not
designed
to
support
small
cell
facilities
and
then
a
small
cell
facility
is
essentially
a
an
antenna
that
occupies
less
than
six
cubic
feet
and
area
or
a
facility
with
the
cumulated,
with
multiple
small
cell
antennas
that
occupies
the
community
cumulative
volume
of
28
square
cubic
feet
or
less.
G
So,
as
I
mentioned,
these
regulations
have
been
in
effect
since
2017.
So
since
July
1st
2017,
the
zoning
division
has
been
issuing
telecommunications
permits.
These
are
essentially
administrative
permits
that
we
issue
for
administrative
review,
eligible
projects
and
again
it's
it's
only
for
these
administratively
eligible
projects
and
any
projects
that
don't
meet
that
again
have
to
follow
the
County's
procedure
for
like
getting
a
used,
permit
approval
or,
if
there's
already
existing
use
permit,
then
they
would
need
to
do
an
administrative
change.
G
And
what
the
text
Amendment
for
the
Telecommunications
telecommunications
facility
is
proposing.
It's
a
amendments
to
all
the
use
tables
to
to
identify
a
small
cell
and
Micro
Wireless
facilities
as
a
as
a
buy
right
use
in
all
zoning
districts,
creating
a
use
standard
for
telecommunications
facilities
to
indicate
when
a
project
does
or
does
not
need
to
obtain
a
use.
G
Permit,
adding
some
definitions
from
the
code
of
Virginia
to
define
a
small
cell,
Micro,
Wireless
and
wireless
facilities
and
and
then
some
minor
edits
to
the
use
categories
that
we
use
to
define
when
a
project
is
a
utility
versus
a
telecom
so
forth.
All
these
amendments
will
basically
are
basically
reflect
the
Telecommunications
permitting
process.
That's
been
again
been
in
place
since
2017.
G
The
next
the
technical
correction-
this
is
just
a
a
minor
text:
Amendment
text,
amendment
to
our
regulations
for
fence
encroachments
on
Corner
Lots.
In
March
of
this
past
year.
There
were
amendments
to
well
many
portions
of
zoning
orders,
but
one
of
them
was
the
the
encroachment
allowances
for
fences
and
walls
for
to
accommodate
parks
and
stormwater
management
facilities,
and
at
that
time
the.
G
Requirement
that
on
Corner
lots
that
have
Corner
lots
are
essentially
allowed
as
six
foot
fence
in
their
what's
normally
prohibited
portion
of
the
yard,
but
it
still
needs
to
be
three
feet
from
the
street
right
of
way
that
provision
was
struck
inadvertently
when
this
amendment
happened
in
March,
and
this
is
basically
to
restore
that
requirement,
which
has
been
long-standing
in
the
zoning
ordinance
yeah
and
the
last
one
again
is
just
to
correct
the
building
restriction
line
on
the
town
center
regulating
plan
and
the
form-based
code.
G
Essentially,
there
is
a
required
building
line
which
is
running
coterminous
with
the
district
line
as
well
as
lot
lines,
and
this
conflicts
with
the
requirement
that
form-based
code
projects
be
have
a
setback.
Every
setback
of
at
least
12
feet
so
as
opposed
to
being
built
to
that
line.
So
this
amendment
would
again
remove
that
line
from
the
regulating
plan.
G
G
And
this
was
the
the
the
regulating
plan.
Amendment
was
done
by
Olivia
Sontag
who's,
a
co-author
on
this
report,
and
this
was
the
the
community
outreach
that
she
has
done
for
just
the
regulating
plan.
A
D
F
A
H
No
just
what
I
forwarded
earlier,
the
OG
heard
this,
and
it
was
extremely
uncontroversial-
I
mean
it.
We
don't
want
buildings
to
be
required
to
be
built
right
up
to
the
lot
line
and
and
I'll
say
that
the
I'll
just
note
again
that
the
only
heard
the
third
of
these
three
amendments,
the
the
RB
element,
it
did
not
hear
the
other,
the
other
two.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
The
item
is
now
before
the
commission.
Does
anybody
have
any
questions
for
staff
or
any
comments.
F
B
F
I
moved
at
the
Planning
Commission
recommended
the
County
Board
adopt
the
attached
ordinance
to
amend,
reenact
and
recodify
the
Arlington
County
zoning
code
articles
three
four:
five:
six:
seven:
eight
eleven
twelve
and
eighteen
Section
3
of
the
appendix
a
Columbia
Pike
special
revitalization
district
form-based
code
to
one
update
zoning
regulations
for
telecommunications
and
wireless
facilities
to
conform
with
the
code
of
Virginia
to
correct
the
technical
error
relating
to
fence
and
wall
encroachment
on
Corner
lots
and
three
correct.
The
erroneous
required
building
line
on
the
Town
Center
regulating
plan.
A
Do
we
have
a
second
second,
commissioner?
Strainer?
We
can
now
move
it
any
any
further
discussion
on
this:
okay,
good
ready
for
a
vote.
Commissioner
Bagley
aye
commissioner
Guevara
aye,
commissioner
Burkey
aye
Mr
sarley,
aye,
Mr,
Schreiner
aye,
commissioner
Robertson
aye,
commissioner
Weir
aye
and
I
vote
ISO,
it's
unanimous!
Thank
you.
Let's
now
move
on
to
the
second
item:
Madam
Clerk.
D
A
Thank
you,
Miss
Conti,
it's
it's
all.
Yours.
I
I
So
this
is
a
neighborhood's
form-based
code
use
permit
for
Barcroft
for
renovations
to
a
portion
of
section.
Three
joining
me
this
evening
are
Mark
McCauley
from
AED
and
then
Melissa
danowski
from
housing
and
I'm
actually
going
to
pass
it
off
to
Melissa.
First,
to
just
give
you
guys
an
update
or
some
background
on
Barcroft
and
an
update
on
the
status
of
the
mfdp.
J
Thank
you
Olivia,
so
I'm,
Melissa
danowski,
the
county
project
coordinator
for
Barcroft
and
as
Olivia
mentioned
I,
will
be
providing
a
brief
refresher
on
the
background
of
the
acquisition
and
some
other
General
updates
before
tuning
it
back
to
her
for
the
rest
of
the
sap
presentation.
J
To
date,
since
the
time
of
acquisition,
the
giant
lunch
team
had
worked
on
a
master
financing
and
development
plan,
which
was
submitted
to
the
county
on
October
29
2022,
the
master,
financing
and
development
plan
or
mfdp
for
short,
is
a
high-level
overview
of
some
of
their
proposed
planning.
Land
use
and
affordability.
Concepts
backside.
J
So
County
staff
is
now
in
the
process
of
reviewing
the
mfdp
and
long-term
planning
Concepts
that
will
go
through
a
public
engagement
process
and
ultimately
County
Board
consideration,
which
is
anticipated
for
late
2023
or
early
2024,
and
as
County
staff
and
journalist
continue
to
work
on
long-term
planning
for
the
site.
Jerry
Lynch
has
agreed
to
move
forward
with
advancing
an
initial
renovation
project
of
93
Homes
at
barcraft
apartments.
J
This
will
allow
jeralyn
to
begin
to
deliver
renovated,
upgraded
homes
for
existing
barcraft
residents,
while
providing
enough
time
for
an
hourly
County
staff
and
Jerry
Lynch
to
continue
to
work
on
the
long-term
planning
and
recommendations
for
the
initial
renovation
project.
Jerry
Lynch
is
considering
buildings
that
are
part
of
the
existing
neighborhood
Farm
based
code,
Conservation
Area,
and
are
not
envisioned
by
either
the
county
or
generator
Redevelopment,
regardless
of
the
alternate
plans
for
the
overall
property.
J
Next
slide,
thanks
in
terms
of
the
resident
notification
and
tenant
on-site
relocation
process,
dryer
Lynch
remains
committed
to
a
resident
first
approach.
All
details
about
the
relocation
plan
and
the
renovation's
impact
on
existing
residents
will
be
communicated
to
Residents
early
afternoon
in
a
variety
of
ways,
and
an
in-person
resident
meeting
was
held
on
April
24th
to
inform
the
impacted
residents
and
answer.
Questions
and
translation
was
provided
per
the
County's
relocation
guidelines.
J
I
All
right,
thank
you,
Melissa
and
Melissa
will
stay
on
if
there
are
any
follow-up
questions
for
her
about
tenant
relocation
or
the
status
of
any
of
that
so
large
property.
But
the
item
before
you
this
evening
is
focused
on
that
section:
three
and
actually
just
a
portion
of
section
three.
I
I
So
I'll
just
give
a
very
light
overview
because
the
applicant
has
a
presentation
prepared,
but
here
on
screen
you
can
see
where
these
existing
or
the
proposed
editions
are.
The
unit
count
does
remain
at
93
they're,
not
increasing
the
overall
unit
count,
but
some
14
of
those
units
become
three
bedroom
units
and
then
four
of
the
units
will
become
four
bedroom
units,
so
adding
some
family-sized
units
to
the
to
this
section.
I
So
this
is
within
the
neighborhoods
form-based
code,
so
there
are
several
specific
aspects
of
this
project
that
we
reviewed.
This
is
within
the
conservation
area,
boundaries
which
requires
it
to
comply
with
the
conservation
area
standards
and
go
through
review
by
the
halrb.
It
also
contains
a
designated
natural
Preserve
area
which
the
applicant
has
preserved.
I
You
can
kind
of
see
the
general
outline
of
that
area,
and
this
blue
area
here,
which
are
all
these
trees
shown,
are
within
that
natural
Preserve
area
and
are
being
preserved
and
then
the
other
element
again
are
those
modifications
to
parking
into
setbacks.
The
applicants
proposing
to
preserve
all
existing
parking
on
site,
including
spaces
within
two
of
the
structured
garage
Bays.
I
So
additional
considerations
for
review
of
this
project
are
the
ongoing
South,
George
Mason
Drive
study,
so
the
kind
of
continued
efforts
to
plan
that
will
inform
future
kind
of
Street
and
streetscape
improvements
along
the
perimeter
along
South
George
Mason
drive
along
this
property.
The
other
element-
that's
still
in
development,
is
the
master,
financing
and
development
plan
which
will
inform
the
project
additional
Community
engagement-
that's
planned
for
later
this
year
and
early
next
year
and
again,
all
of
those
other
site-wide
improvements
and
streetscape
improvements
that
will
occur
in
a
future
process.
I
So
this
item
was
reviewed
by
the
form-based
code
advisory
working
group
twice
once
in
April
and
then
again
in
June.
It
also
went
to
the
design,
Review
Committee
and
the
hlrb
twice
for
review
and
the
applicant
will
kind
of
give
a
summary
of
of
those
meetings.
And
then
we
plan
to
go
to
Housing
Commission
this
Thursday
and
then
County
board
meeting
in
July.
K
Thank
you,
Mr
Sterling
tell
me
a
moment.
While
we
get
our
screen
up
hi
good
evening,
everyone
I'm
Lauren
Riley
with
Walsh
Colucci,
and
we
represent
the
applicant
in
this
case.
Gyron
Lynch
real
estate,
Partners
I'm
joined
tonight
in
person
by
Alice
Hageman,
with
gyre
Lynch
and
Jeff
krepps
with
FICA,
is
joining
us
as
well
and
I.
Believe
other
members
from
our
design
team
are
are
online
as
well
and
we're
here
tonight
to
give
you
a
brief
introduction
overview
of
our
form-based
code.
K
This
first
renovate
renovation
project,
which
is
not
only
going
to
provide
necessary
site
and
building
improvements
like
in
unit
washer
dryers,
new
appliances,
upgraded
storm
water.
It's
also
going
to
provide
additional
family
size
units
which
is
much
needed
in
this
area.
Next
slide,
yeah
and
just
to
orient
there.
We
go
a
little
bit
of
delay
just
to
orient
everyone
to
wear
the
project
is
this
is
a
overview
of
the
Columbia
Pike
Corridor
and
you
can
see
the
entirety
of
the
bar
crop
site
they're
outlined
in
blue.
K
This
area
is
historically
significant
because
these
existing
59
buildings
were
constructed
in
the
1940s
and
the
1950s,
both
during
and
after
World
War
II,
in
order
to
relieve
housing
shortages
in
the
northern
Virginia
region,
and
all
these
buildings
are
good
examples
of
mid-20th
century
Garden,
Apartment
design,
which
are
designed
in
a
more
simplified
colonial
revival.
Style
and
the
entirety
of
Barcroft
has
kind
of
developed
into
two
phases.
K
So
the
first
phase,
which
is
where
our
project
site
is,
was
started
development
in
the
1940s,
and
you
know
some
notable
design
elements
of
that
phase
or
brick
exterior
walls,
slate
roofs
and
some
ornamented
entry
surrounds
and
then
phase.
Two
came
a
little
bit
later
in
the
1940s
and
early
1950s
and
it
had
a
more
modified
Garden,
Apartment
style.
It
had
larger
parking
areas,
smaller
landscaped
Courtyards
and
it
had
more.
Simplified
entry
surrounds
it's
the
next
slide.
K
Then
here
you
can
see
how
the
history
of
bar
crop
is
reflected
in
the
neighborhood's
form-based
code.
This
is
the
neighborhood's
Code
Central
sub-area
regulating
plan
which
contains
much
of
Barcroft
again
outlined
in
blue.
There
you'll
see
some
of
the
site
on
the
west
and
the
north
there
shaded
in
that
light,
blue
color,
that's
where
redevelopments
currently
anticipated
in
this
regulating
plan
and
then
you'll
see
the
remainder.
K
Much
of
the
bar
crop
site
is
in
that
light,
green
shaded
area,
which
is
known
as
the
conservation
area,
where
buildings
and
existing
mature
tree
canopy
are
anticipated
to
be
preserved
and
the
conservation
area
within
the
neighborhood's
code
was
not
only
created
in
order
to
preserve
existing,
affordable
housing
entry
canopy.
It
was
also
created
to
incentivize
additional,
affordable
housing
by
allowing
additional
density
for
projects
that
preserve
historic
features
or
traditional
design
elements.
K
So
then,
here
you
can
see
our
how
the
project
site
Maps
there
onto
the
conservation
area
and
the
regulating
plan,
the
project
sites
on
the
corner
there
at
South,
Four,
Mile,
Run,
Drive
and
South
George
Mason
Drive,
as
as
Ms
Sontag
pointed
out
it's
five
buildings
with
93
units
today
and
they
and
then
that
mature
tree
canopy
area
as
well.
K
And
four
four
buildings
and
areas
that
are
located
within
the
conservation
area,
the
form-based
code
does
allow
certain
improvements.
It
allows
building
Renovations,
it
allows
building
additions,
as
well
as
landscaping
and
site
improvements,
and
all
these
improvements
and
changes
must
comply
with
the
conservation
area
standards
in
part
seven
of
the
code.
These
are
all
modeled
after
the
U.S
Secretary
of
interior
standards
for
rehabilitation.
K
So,
in
conformance
with
those
Neighborhood
form-based
code
regulations,
the
applicant
requests
to
renovate
the
exterior
of
these
five
buildings,
which
I'll
go
over
in
just
a
moment
as
well
as
construct
additions
on
three
of
these
buildings.
Those
are
those
blue
boxes
there
on
on
the
backs
of
those
buildings,
and
these
additions
are
intended
to
create
more
family
size
units
which
has
been
encouraged
by
County
staff.
K
Today
there
are
93
units
across
these
buildings,
but
they're
all
one
and
two
bedroom
units,
and
so
with
these
additions,
the
applicant
is
able
to
convert
several
of
its
two-bedroom
units
into
three
and
four
bedroom
units
to
serve
families
in
this
area.
With
this
application,
the
applicant
will
also
provide
all
93
units
as
committed,
affordable
housing
units
and,
lastly,
you'll
see
it
might
be
hard
to
see
on
the
slide,
a
small,
green
shaded
area
there
behind
Building
22.
K
The
applicant
also
proposes
a
new
landscape
Courtyard
behind
that
building
to
provide
additional
Gathering
space
for
its
residents,
sign
and
here's
an
illustrative
image
of
what
that
courtyard
might
look
like
the
it
consists
of
an
elevated
decking
structure
that
will
mitigate
any
interference
with
existing
Roots
below
that
provides
quite
a
bit
of
seating
area.
Outdoor
grilling
space
we'll
also
be
planting,
some
understory
trees
there
and
then
speaking
of
of
trees
on
the
rest
of
the
site.
K
K
Yeah,
and
here
you
can
see
the
massing
of
those
proposed
additions
on
the
top
left
image.
You
can
see
how
they
relate
to
the
existing
buildings
in
order
to
honor
the
historic
buildings.
We've
placed
all
the
additions
on
the
rear
elevations
there,
and
through
these
renderings,
you
can
see
what
those
start
to
look
like
and
how
they'll
interact
with
the
existing
buildings.
K
K
We
also
discussed
the
exterior
Renovations
with
the
hlrb
and
the
DRC.
With
this
application,
the
applicant
will
be
repairing
and
repointing
brick,
where
it's
needed,
they'll
also
be
repairing
portions
of
the
Slate
roofs
that
need
it,
as
well
as
replacing
exterior
light
fixtures
with
other
light
fixtures
that
are
historically
compatible
with
the
buildings
and
then
also
as
part
of
the
Interior
upgrades
they'll
be
replacing
those
older
heating
and
air
systems
with
newer
with
newer
systems,
and
so,
as
you
can
see
where
the
numbers
three
and
four
are
they're
on
the
front.
K
Besides,
some
of
those
vents
are
going
to
come
out
and
those
areas
will
be
patched
with
brick
to
match
the
existing
or
salvaged
brick
from
the
rear,
but
because
of
these
new
systems,
we
also
need
new
wall
openings
for
ventilation.
So
we've
requested
a
modification
of
the
conservation
area
standards
to
allow
for
those
new
wall
openings,
but
to
respect
these
historic
facades,
we've
placed
all
the
new
wall
openings
on
the
rear,
elevations
next
slide.
K
It
also
requires
cladding
of
any
exterior
wood
trim
with
vinyl
or
aluminum
material.
Now
we
understand
that
this
is
not
historically
appropriate
for
these
buildings,
and
so
dryer
Lynch
will
be
requesting
a
waiver
from
Virginia
housing
for
these
requirements,
unfortunately,
won't
know
the
outcome
of
that
waiver
until
this
fall,
and
so
that's
why
we've
included
those
items
in
this
in
this
use.
Permit
application
I
slide,
and
then
you
can
see
how
those
how
those
two
elements
might
look
on
the
facades.
K
The
cladding
of
the
exterior
wood
trim
would
only
occur
on
the
fascia
boards
at
the
top
of
the
building
is,
and
as
well
as
the
wooden
entry
surrounds
and
then
on
your
right.
You
can
see
the
preferred
canopy
design
option
that
we've
discussed
with
the
hlrb
and
the
DRC.
You
know
if
required,
these
will
all
be
provided
at
all
residential
entrances
on
the
front
and
the
back
of
the
buildings
side.
K
Then
here's
here's
a
summary
of
all
the
requests
that
we've
gone
over
today.
We've
followed
our
form-based
code
use
permit
that
allows
the
renovation
of
the
existing
buildings
the
proposed
editions,
as
well
as
those
landscape
and
site
improvements,
as
Ms
Sontag
mentioned,
we're
requesting
a
modification
to
permit
the
existing
parking
and
setbacks
for
those
buildings
to
remain
as
they
are
today,
and
then
we're
also
requesting
those
modification
of
the
conservation
area
standards
to
permit
the
new
wall
openings
and
the
window
vinyl
window
replacements,
as
well
as
Virginia
Housing
requirements
as
well.
K
D
A
Okay,
in
addition
to
what
you
provided
earlier,
is
there
anything
further
for
the
all
report.
Commissioner
Weir.
H
No,
the
the
OG
was
very
supportive
of
the
of
the
of
The
Proposal.
A
L
You
can
go
ahead.
I
just
have
one
quick
question
on
the
outdoor
Courtyard
I
saw
in
small
type
ADA
Compliant,
but
I
saw
the
steps.
How
does
somebody
who
is
not
able
to
do
the
steps?
How
do
they
get
up
there?
Yes,.
K
M
That
is
kind
of
the
Highlight.
The
an
ADA
parking
space
would
be
in
that
parking
space.
The
parking
area
you
could
see
on
the
left
hand
side.
That's
the
place
that
we
will
get
in
level
to
an
upper
part
of
the
Terrace,
the
existing
ones,
down
about
six
feet
below
that
grade,
and
so
we're
basically
allowing
folks
to
get
into
the
upper
area.
And
then
those
who
are
able
would
go
down
a
set
of
steps
to
the
lower
area
as
well
so
trying
to
accommodate
everybody
in
the
same
space
and.
N
We
would
have
the
same
features
on
both
both
floors,
so
grills
picnic
tables.
Everything
that's
on
the
lower
level
would
also
be
on
the
upper
level
as
well.
Foreign.
A
O
Maybe
I'm
I'm
missing
something.
Is
there
and
I'm
I'll
confess
I'm,
pretty
familiar
with
the
site?
I
live
about,
maybe
half
a
mile
away
so
that
block
on
George
Mason
as
well
as
Four
Mile.
It's
not
a
super
steep
grade
where
you're
talking
about,
but
there
are
steps
up.
Are
we
going
to
be
making
any
site
improvements
at
this
point
to
allow
accessibility
from
the
sidewalks
or
existing
conditions
remaining.
K
Thank
you
for
that.
Due
to
the
grade,
we,
the
applicant
team,
has
studied
opportunities
for
making
these
buildings
more
accessible
and
due
to
that
steep
topography,
both
in
the
back
and
in
the
front
of
the
property
we're
not
able
to
make
any
of
those
units
Ada
accessible,
though
that
is
a
priority
for
the
team,
as
they
look
across
the
entire
site
as
a
whole
to
to
upgrade
units
to
be
Ada
accessible,
where
we
can
make
them.
Okay,
yeah.
F
N
So
there's
there's
no
elevators
and
in
addition,
when
you
walk
in
the
main
entrance,
it's
immediately
a
split
foyer.
So
it's
not
you
know,
there's
not
even
room
for
a
wheelchair
lift
so,
unfortunately
to
Lauren's
point
we
won't
be
able
to
accommodate
Ada
units
in
this
specific
section.
Instead,
we'll
be
looking
as
we
renovate
the
rest
of
the
site,
we'll
be
looking
to
make
modifications
that
work
with
not
only
the
topography,
but
you
know
existing
exterior
entrances
and
things
to
to
create
those
accessible
units.
F
Thank
you,
I
I
would
encourage
like
as
much
as
Universe
designer
you
can
still
Implement
here.
You
know
not
everyone's
Ada
is
a
wheelchair
sort
of.
What's
the
politically
correct
term.
My
wife
is
always
correcting
me
this,
but
you
know
what
I
mean
like
there's
different
sort
of
issues
that
can
so
visibility.
You
know
acoustic
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
So
you
know
as
much
as
you
can
make
it.
Universal
Design
I
strongly
encourage
that.
Yes,.
N
And
I
I,
we
are
looking
to
include
a
few
modifications
for
visual
impairments
and
auditory
impairments
as
well.
B
Yeah
first
off
I
do
want
a
second
What.
My
fellow
commissioner
was
saying
about
the
Ada
accessibility
I.
Think
if
you're
going
to
go
to
all
this
trouble
to
renovate
all
these
properties,
it's
important
that
everybody
can
anybody
can
live
in
them.
So
first
question
of
the
the
93
committed,
affordable
units.
I
know
that
will
stop
me
if
this
question
is
reported
in
a
weird
way,
so
it's
going
to
be
an
average
of
60
Ami.
K
N
B
It
is
right
now,
so
if
it's,
if
right
now,
the
its
average
is
out
to
be
about
50
percent,
we'll
cross
all
the
board,
I
don't
want
it
to
be
yeah,
making
it
less
affordable,
yeah.
K
County
staff
and
we'll
we'll
make
sure
absolutely.
B
Thank
you
find
that
out
and
then,
since
commissioner
Garen
is
not
here,
I
feel
obliged
to
ask
about
the
trees.
Is
there
I
know
you
mentioned
that
there's
a
there's
the
potential
the
tree
loss
happening
in
other
parts
of
the
property.
Is
there
a
way
to
prevent
that?
Just?
K
And
I'll
let
Jeff
pipe
up
with
the
and
go
over
our
tree
exhibit
and
get
the
one
we
got
from
each
other.
Yeah.
M
I
think
the
short
answer
is
that
we,
as
a
development
team,
feel
very
strongly
that
one
of
the
most
compelling
components
of
the
bar
Croft
property
is
this
mature
canopy
right
and
it's.
We
believe
it's
in
everyone's
best
interest
to
maintain
that,
to
the
extent
that
we
can
the
graphic
that
we're
trying
to
find
the
colorful
graphic
that
you
saw
earlier
indicates
trees
that
are
being
removed
only
for
due
to
construction
impacts.
M
In
other
words,
if
the
footprint
of
the
addition
lands,
where
a
tree
is
it's
going
to
have
to
come
out
or
if
there
are,
if
there
is
trenching,
to
provide
the
required
storm
drainage
right,
one
of
their
Virginia
Housing
requirements
is
to
capture
all
the
downspouts
right.
So
currently
there
is
none
of
that,
and
so
all
the
water
goes
Overland
results
in
a
lot
of
erosion,
so
we're
capturing
all
those
downspouts
as
part
of
the
storm
water
management
sort
of
strategy.
One
of
the
things
that
will
happen,
though,
is
as
we
capture
those
downspouts.
M
We
have
to
take
them
somewhere
right
and
connect
them
to
the
storm
drain,
so
there
would
be
some
trenching,
so
the
trees,
and
there
are
very
few
actually.
If
you
look
at
this,
this
particular
graphic
when
it
comes
up
we're
removing
I
think
there
are
16
that
are
coming
out.
Let's
do
specifically
to
construction
impacts.
M
M
There
are
some
realities
to
construction
process
that
will
inevitably
result
in
some
canopy
loss,
but
we
really
do
strongly
hope
to
admit
to
to
minimize
that
and
beyond
that
I
think
I
would
just
say
that
we're
committed
to
planting,
and
certainly
with
this
first
phase,
we're
planting
far
in
excess
of
the
amount
that
we're
required
to
provide.
You
know,
due
to
those
Replacements,
so
I
think
we're
doing
what
we
can
to
help
maintain
and
to
ensure
that
there
would
be
a
future
canopy
at
Barcroft
as
we
go
down
the
road.
B
Thank
you
I
think,
commissioner,
again
would
be
happy
with
that.
A
C
I
think
you're
just
a
question
about
planting
trees,
if
I
remember
correctly
because
of
the
number
you're
taking
down
you're
supposed
to
be
planting
39,
but
you're
actually
planning
71.
Is
that
correct?
That's
right,
okay,
I'm!
Just
trying
to
remember
from
what
I
read.
Thank
you
thanks.
A
Thank
you
other
questions.
Yes,
Christian
Berkey.
O
Thank
you,
Mr,
chair,
I
want
to
revisit
the
income
averaging.
Thank
you,
commissioner,
Steiner
for
bringing
that
up.
I
think
this
question
is
for
Miss
tanaski
good
to
see
you
so
I
understand,
and
this
has
been
sort
of
the
intent
from
the
applicant
for
a
while
to
look
at
income
averaging
for
the
affordable
housing
commitment.
There's
some
language
on
page
40
of
the
staff
report
that
speaks
to
these
units
being
no
greater
than
30
Ami.
But
my
understanding
is
we're
looking
60
Ami,
probably
missing
something.
J
Yeah,
yes,
let
me
just
get
to
it.
I
believe
seems
really
wants
something.
J
No,
it
is,
this
is
a
good
question,
a
little
to
it
to
make
sure
I
get
it
right.
J
Okay,
okay,
so
it's
it's
the
the
languages.
The
developer
agrees
that
the
affordable
events
of
the
cash
unit
shall
not
exceed
30
of
the
Ami
level.
Okay,.
J
60
was
crossed
out
because
we
are
exploring
the
income
averaging
tool.
So
it's
that
the
developer
agrees
that
the
affordable
rent
of
the
cafe,
that
shall
knowledge
not
exceed
30
of
that
Ami
level
as
published
by
Hud.
J
So
if
the
run
is
at
50
Ami,
if
the
Ami
levels
for
that
unit
is
determined
to
be,
50
am
I.
The
developer
agrees
that
the
affordable
rent
through
that
cash
unit
shall
not
exceed
30
of
50
Ami.
In
that
case,.
J
Yes,
it's
it's
about
the
rents,
so
think
of
it.
If
you
have
a
50
again
a
50
in
my
unit,
then
then
you're
saying
that
the
rent
for
that
50
Mi
unit
should
not
exceed
30
of
that
of
that
rent.
O
Okay,
okay,
I,
don't
want
to
belabor
the
point
we
can.
We
can
revisit.
I
was
just
curious,
but
we
can
we
can
talk.
Offline
I
did
have
another
question.
If
that's
all
right,
Mr
chair
I
want
to
go
back
to
parking
real
quick.
This
may
have
been
covered.
So
if
so,
I
apologize.
What
is
the
default
parking
requirement
that
we're
backing
away
from
with
the
request.
B
K
Per
per
unit
and
I
think
that
would
require
it's
really
92
parking
spaces
and
we
have
86
on
site.
A
K
Yes,
I
think
Lauren
Ferris
might
be
online
as
well
to
summarize
their
their
input,
but
they
they
were
comfortable
with
the
modifications
that
we
requested
for
Virginia
Housing.
They
understand
that
they're
required
and
we
worked
with
them
on
the
canopy
design
options
to
pick
one
that
they
they
were
all
so
comfortable
with
and
I.
Think
they'll
be
writing
a
letter
to
support
our
waiver
request
to
Virginia
Housing
great.
A
Thank
you.
I
will
say
that
I
am
pleased
that
something
has
come
before
so
quickly
from
the
new
owners
from
when
they
took
over.
It
was
just
a
year
and
a
half
ago.
A
You
know
it
was
quite
a
stunningly
good
news
when
that,
when
we
heard
that
but
I'm
always
a
little
skeptical
about
when
something
will
actually
happen,
this
is
like
record
time
to
get
something
actually
being
built.
I
know,
there's
a
lot
more
to
go
and
there's
a
lot
more
planning
that
has
to
be
done
and
that's
appropriate,
but
to
get
out
of
the
gate
this
quickly.
Thank
you.
This
is
good
news.
These
are
good
number
of
you
know
between
the
renovations
and
the
expansion
of
desperately
needed
larger
units.
A
Know
this
is
a
county
priority.
You
know
we
fully
supported
that
any
other
questions
comments.
P
Mr
chairman,
the
the
number-
the
ratio
replacement
of
trees
71
to
39
is
impressive.
Do
you
know
what
the
caliper
inch
replacement
is?
You
know
small
trees,
don't
provide
the
same
ecological
value
that
large
ones
do.
M
That's
correct:
the
the
county
standard
is
two
and
a
half
to
three
and
a
half
inches
roughly
so
for
the
canopy
trees.
That's
what
our
intent
would
be.
The
smaller
understory
ornamental
trees
usually
fall
a
little
bit
below
that.
That's,
but
again,
that's
County
standard.
We'll
certainly
do
what
we
can.
It
will,
due
to
the
number,
largely
depend
on
what
we
can
find
in
the
industry,
but
that
is
the
intent.
F
So
I
would
like
to
associate
myself
with
Mission
lawn.
Tell
me
sentiment.
I
think
we
are
indeed
very
supportive
and
very
excited
to
see
this
project
coming
through.
I
did
have
a
quick
question
just
for
clarification,
so
the
additions
to
the
existing
structure
will
be
essentially
programmatically
attached
to
apartments
right.
Those
are
not
the
cores
of
the
building,
which
kind
of
goes
back
to
my
original
question.
So
everything
access
to
the
second
floor
is
essentially
stairs
and
those
are
to
remain
as
they
are
currently.
K
N
But
I
was
going
to
say
here's
a
here's,
a
floor
plan
showing
that
this
is
showing
sort
of
a
typical
three-bedroom
bump
out
on
the
right
side
in
a
typical
four
bedroom
on
the
left
side,
and
you
can
see
so
the
the
stairwell.
The
core
is
the
same,
and
it's
just
expanding
the
the
units
to
as
Lauren
mentioned
those
living
rooms.
There.
F
A
Yeah
I,
like
the
idea
of
Bumpass
I've,
seen
them
be
done
on
other
of
our
older
buildings.
There's
some
apartments
that
are
just
north
of
Columbia
Pike,
along
Four,
Mile
Run,
where
that
was
done
a
few
years
ago
and
it
looked
like
they
were
always
there
I,
when
I
Bike
by
I'd,
see
them
being
built
and
now
that
they're
fin
they're
finished
quite
a
while
ago,
but
they
fit
very
very
well
with
the
existing
buildings,
they're
they're
very
consistent.
Do
you
still
have
the
open
space?
A
These
are
Garden
Apartments,
also
so
I'm,
very,
very
supportive
of
this
type
of
increase
in
size
or
increase
in
units
to
existing
buildings.
I
think
I
think
it's
a
great
idea.
So
thank
you.
Do
we
have
any
other
comments?
Oh
commissioner,
Weir.
H
Thank
you,
I
want
to
follow
up
on
the
question
about
resize
my
understanding
and
I.
This
is
as
good
as
any
opportunity
to
get
it
confirmed.
Is
that
once
upon
a
time,
County
required
slightly
larger
and
older
trees
and
that
that
the
standard
has
been
adjusted
in
in
recent
years
to
a
smaller,
younger
trees
that
are
currently
that
we
currently
see
planted
in
in
projects
in
large
part
because
of
the
survivability
rate
of
the
younger
trees
being
being
greater
than
the
older
trees?
H
Is
that
is
that
correct,
or
or
is
it
mostly
correct
or
not
correct,
and,
and
can
you
please
fill
me
in
on
the
details?
If
not?
Thank
you
happy.
M
To
yes,
that
is
largely
correct.
The
original
the
standard
used
to
be
about
four
to
four
and
a
half
inches,
but
primarily
for
Street
trees.
What
industry
research
has
shown
over
time
is
that
smaller
trees
actually
tend
to
catch
up
to
their
larger,
a
tree
planted.
That
was
slightly
larger
Planet.
H
So
the
the
requirement
that
I
that
I
had
in
mind
is
Street
trees.
Is
there
a
is
there
a
requirement
in
place
for
for
trees,
where
you
don't
have
that
Ripple
limitation
like
this
or
thank
you
by
the
way
for
the
clarification
for
the
clarification
is?
Is
there
a
separate
requirement
for
for
non-street
free?
Please,
no.
M
The
the
current
landscape
guidelines
do
not
distinguish
between
public
and
private
I.
Just
know
that
the
conversations
that
we've
had
with
urban
forestry
and
there
is
specif
specificity
within
the
guidelines
talking
about
Street
trees,
but
it
has
been
broadly
applied
to
all
of
the
landscape
trees
to
be
installed.
So
there
is
no
specific.
A
C
Just
a
comment
I
want
to
associate
myself
also
with
the
comments
commissioner,
tell
me,
and
commissioner
sarley
mentioned
about
how
pleased
I
am
to
see
this
project.
I
grew
up
down
the
street
from
this.
A
lot
of
my
friends
actually
lived
there,
and
so
it
needed
to
be
done
back
then
for
them
to
be
renovated.
The
fact
that
it's
at
least
happening
now
it
makes
me
really
happy
to
see
so
thank
you
for
all
the
work
yeah.
O
I'll
make
a
motion
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
recommend
that
the
candy
board
approved
the
subject
use
permit
in
accordance
with
the
Columbia
Pike
neighborhoods
form-based
code,
article
11.2
of
the
zoning
ordinance
appendix
B
for
preservation,
Renovations
and
additions
to
the
barcraft
Departments
buildings.
Number
22-26,
located
within
section
three
of
the
overall
apartment,
complex
with
modifications
pursuant
to
the
Columbia
Pike
neighborhoods
form
based
code
for
SUP
pack
and
parking
requirements
associated
with
the
existing
buildings
to
remain
subject
to
the
conditions
of
the
staff
report.
A
Thank
you.
Do
we
have
any
further
comments,
discussion,
I.
O
Have
one
comment:
I
think
this
is
wonderful.
I'd
associate
myself
with
with
all
the
comments
we've
had
up
here.
This
is
sorely
needed.
This
is
a
very
modest
proposal
that
will
provide
a
lot
of
needed,
affordable
housing,
we're
preserving,
affordable
housing,
but
but
needed
space
really
excited
to
see
what
you
folks
do
in
the
next
couple
years
so
really
appreciate
this.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
let's
move
on
to
a
vote.
Commissioner
Bagley
aye,
commissioner
Guevara
aye
commissioner
Burkey
aye,
commissioner
sarley
aye,
commissioner
strainer
hi,
commissioner
Robinson
aye,
Kershaw
Weir,
all
right
and
I
vote
I
as
well
the
eyes
have
it
it's
unanimous.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
Madam
clerk.
We
move
on
to
our
final
item.
D
D
A
Okay,
Mr
Schultz,
it's
it's
yours!
When
you're
ready.
Q
Thank
you
Mr
chairman
I'm
Peter,
Schultz
I'm,
the
planner
for
this
particular
project
with
me
is
Jane
Kim
from
the
Department
of
Environmental
Services.
To
answer
any
questions.
Q
Q
Here
are
photos
of
the
existing
General
land
use
plan
and
the
zoning,
as
you
can
see,
it
has
two
different
zoning
districts.
Two
different
categories
in
the
general
land
use
plan
we'll
be
discussing
what
we'll
be
doing
with
the
Glutton
zoning
later.
Q
I'm
not
going
to
read
all
of
this,
but
the
developer
is
proposing
a
mixed-use
residential
building
of
20
251
units
of
approximately
3
000
square
feet
of
retail
or
retail
equivalent
as
permitted
on
the
site.
Zoning
modifications
requested
include
for
additional
retail
density,
additional
residential
density,
additional
change
from
the
parking
parking
ratio
and
a
modification
to
the
signs
sign
ordinance
as
you'll
see
later.
Q
The
policy
guidance
we've
used
for
this
site
is
the
special
glup
study
that
was
conducted
in
2020
and
2021
and
was
before
you
in
July
and
June
and
July
of
2021.
Q
Q
Q
Heights
capped
at
eight
stories
or
90
feet
concentrated
along
Arlington
Boulevard
in
the
middle
of
the
site
and
then
tapering
down
to
neighboring
areas,
a
public
space
of
about
10
percent
of
the
size
of
the
site
at
the
corner
of
Wayne
Street
and
Irving
Street,
Pershing,
Drive,
I'm,
sorry
and
significant
Landscaping
at
the
South
and
the
east
of
the
property,
including
in
VDOT
right-of-way,
remove
an
unneeded
frontage
road
with
within
VDOT
right-of-way
and
replace
with
the
landscaped
and
improved
multi-use.
Q
On-Site,
affordable
housing
was
an
expectation
of
this
site
plan
of
20,
of
the
difference
in
the
floor
area
between
the
maximum
density
that
could
have
been
achieved
and
and
is
proposed
to
be
achieved,
a
preservation
or
Recreation
of
the
existing
sign
and
the
motel
lobby
at
the
corner
of
Pershing
and
Arlington
Boulevard,
and
we'll
see
some
of
that.
This
was
a
schematic
potential.
Q
Redevelopment
scenarios
developed
in
the
plan
and
you'll
see
from
the
developers
plan
presentation
how
the
plan
is
is
well
conformant,
with
this
guidance
of
this
site,
with
a
couple
modifications
that
we
think
actually
improve
the
site
overall
project
Evolution
was
a
site
layout
during
our
first
sprc.
The
s-prc
was
concerned
about
what
would
go
around
the
future
public
open
space.
I'll
discuss
this
a
little
later
in
the
community
benefits
discussion,
but
this
public
open
space
was
not
designed
during
this
process.
So
all
pictures
you
see
here
are
schematic.
Q
It
will
be
a
post-approval
process
led
by
the
department
of
Parks
and
Recreation,
but
with
monetary
and
in-kind
contributions
by
the
developer.
As
you
can
see
on
the
left,
there's
some
general
there's
some
Blank
Space
of
this
proposed
building
facing
the
proposed
public
space
at
the
second
sprc.
The
developer
proposed
a
revised
plan
that
increased
the
amount
of
Windows
pulled
back
the
row
of
townhouse
Loft
style
units
in
order
to
create
more
usable
public
space.
Q
Those
of
you
who
attended
the
sprc
process,
they
had
said
that
they
would
change
us
and
they
indeed
have
in
their
last
approval,
is
that
there
had
been
originally,
as
you
can
see
here,
on
the
southern
end
of
the
site.
There's
a
group
of
townhouse
style
units
here
there
would
have
been
parking
accessed
by
this
shared
Muse,
which
also
would
be
shared
with
bicycles
and
pedestrians.
You
can
see
the
connection
here
to
the
Arlington
Boulevard
Trail
cars
would
come
in
and
park
in
this
South
site
staff
had
great
concerns
about
that.
Q
The
sprc
also
had
great
concerns
about
that.
So
the
developers
revised
the
plan
that,
while
I
do
not
have
a
color
rendering
there
will
be
no
parking
in
this
Southern
stick
of
townhouse
style
units,
and
so,
where
you
see
this
car,
that's
actually
the
turn
in
the
internal
driveway
system,
as
the
developer
will
probably
show
you
in
their
presentation
ends
here.
So
all
car
use
ends
a
lot
sooner
than
it
would
have,
as
you
saw
during
the
sprc
process.
Q
Q
There
were
some
other
issues
with
Landscaping:
here's
the
southern
facade
of
the
building,
where
there
were
proposed
Transformers,
which
created
not
only
an
area
of
no
Landscaping
but
also
blank
walls
facing
what
would
have
been
Arlington
Boulevard
and
also
the
Arlington
Boulevard
multi-use
Trail
already
by
the
first
sprc.
The
developer
had
corrected
that
condition.
Q
And
created
a
a
landscaped
area,
move
the
Transformers
to
another,
more
appropriate
location
under
the
sidewalks
on
Pershing
Drive
and
created
a
much
better
design
situation
here.
Q
Historic
preservation
was
a
big
part
of
the
discussion
of
the
sprc
and,
as
you
can
see,
there
are
big
changes
between
the
first
and
second
sprcs.
The
developer
also
worked
with
our
historic
preservation
program
and
our
Urban
designers
to
help
come
to
a
a
solution
where,
as
you
can
see
here
in
the
top
right
corner,
the
historic
sign
and
Lobby
is
more
Faithfully
recreated,
while
the
materials
are
too
deteriorated
to
use,
especially
the
sign.
Q
It
just
does
not
meet
any
code
requirement
today
and
is
quite
rusted
through
they
are
recreating
the
historic
sign,
as
recommended
in
the
special
glove
study
and
recreating
the
historic
Lobby
entrance
free
of
its
1980s
Renovations.
As
you
might
see
there
today,
and
also
it
may
not
show
up
very
well
here,
they
will
be
reusing
to
the
extent
they
can
Stone
from
the
existing
Stone
cladding.
That
is
around
the
foundation
of
the
existing
Lobby,
to
bring
it
back
to
its
mid-century.
Splendor
proposed
features
amenities.
Q
The
developer
is,
as
part
of
the
to
earn
the
additional
density
foreign
section
15.59.
They
will
be
designing,
building
and
maintaining
the
10
000
square
foot
public
open
space
at
the
corner
of
North,
Wayne,
Street
and
North
Pershing
Drive
to
the
right.
Q
You
see
that
anything
is
as
purely
conceptual
at
this
point,
but
working
with
the
staff
we
had
developed
a
building
around
it
that
interacts
well
with
the
park
and
staff
is
quite
satisfied
that
it
will
seem
open
to
the
public
and
a
public
space
and
with
appropriate
programming
and
design
by
the
developers.
Consultants,
who
will
be
chosen,
go
with
the
Department
of
Parks
and
Recreation
other
proposed
features
and
amenities,
as
called
for
in
the
special
glup
study.
They
will
be
an
improved
12
foot
wide
Arlington
Boulevard
mixed
use,
Trail.
Q
Q
They
will,
with
vdot's
permission,
and
we
have
their
agreement
on
site
with
them,
to
remove
Wainwright
Road
and
to
replace
it
with
a
12
foot,
wide
Arlington
Boulevard
mixed
use,
Trail
and
a
landscape
Plaza
at
the
corner
and
as
well
as
replacing
the
dead
and
dying
calipar
trees
with
a
new
row
of
double
row
of
trees
on
either
side
of
the
trail
and
creating
a
multi-mobility
hub
here,
while
on
the
there
is
already
a
capital
Bike
Share
station
across
the
street.
There's.
Q
Q
The
developer
is
part
of
the
features
amenities
again,
as
I
stated
before,
recreating
historic
elements
and
reusing
to
the
historic
Stone
as
well
as
actually
commemorative
signage.
On
the
property
too.
In
the
signage
we
don't
know
what
exactly
it
will
be.
They
will
similar
to
the
Joyce
motor
site,
work
it
with
our
historic
preservation
program
after
approval
to
commemorate
events
at
this,
which
actually
turns
out
to
be
a
rather
historic
site
and
a
gateway
to
Arlington.
Q
There
are
also
seven
family
sized
two
and
three
bedroom
committed,
affordable
units
on
site.
That
was
a
strong
recommendation
of
the
special
the
on-site.
Affordable
housing
was
a
recommendation
of
the
special
glup
study.
The
sprc
felt
very
strongly
that
these
units
should
be
family
sized,
and
so
the
developer
was
able
to
work
with
staff
for
seven
two
and
three
bedroom
units.
Q
Other
features
include:
there
are
going
to
be
protected
bike
Lanes
on
both
sides
of
Pershing
Drive
in
the
frontage
of
the
building
and
sustainable
Design
Elements
they're,
going
to
follow
the
Green
Building
incentive
program,
bird
friendly
glass,
energy
star,
all
of
the
basic
as
you'll,
see
in
condition
18
of
our
site
plan
conditions,
the
various
Arlington
Baseline
prerequisites
to
also
earn
additional
density.
Q
Just
to
show
you
the
public
process
schedule.
This
is
just
for
the
site
plan
only
as
I
stated
before.
The
special
glup
study
had
a
year-long
process
in
2020
and
2021,
which
culminated
with
the
County
Board
approving
the
adopting
I
should
say
the
special
glup
study
document
as
the
guidance
for
the
site
and
authorizing
advertising
of
a
glup
change,
concurrent
with
a
site
plan
and
that's
what
this
is.
So.
Q
Therefore,
the
developer
is
asking
of,
for
the
so
say,
recommendation
that
the
PC
recommends
that
the
County
Board
adopt
the
resolution
to
approve
the
general
land
use
plan,
Amendment
the
rezoning
and
the
concurrent
site
plan
and
I'll
be
here
on
Jane
Kim
from
Des.
If
you
have
any
questions.
Thank
you.
Thank.
R
So
good
evening
everybody
I'm
Matt
Roberts
with
the
herschler
law
firm
here
tonight
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
here
tonight
with
me,
both
in
person
and
online
as
Nan
Patel
with
Arlington
Boulevard
LLC
Brian
Arias
with
Studios
architecture.
Ashton
Allen
is
online
with
Studios
architecture,
we'll
be
helping
with
the
presentation
and
various
other
of
our
team
members
from
Land,
Design
and
Bowman
Consulting
are
on
the
line
as
well.
R
Thank
you,
first
of
all,
very
much
to
Jane
and
Peter
and
the
other
staff
for
helping
to
Shepherd
this
project,
as
they
always
do.
I
think
you
know,
like
very
many
of
the
other
products
I've
brought
through.
You
know
it's
so
much
better
for
having
gone
through
the
process.
We
are
here
tonight
and
happy
to
be
here
with
the
unanimous
support
of
the
Housing
Commission
Parks
and
Recreation
Commission,
and
also
the
Transportation
Commission.
So
very
quickly.
R
Next
slide,
please
Ashton,
as
Peter
mentioned,
you
know
the
applications
that
you
have
before
you
are
really
the
outcome
of
the
2021
special
glop
study
that
the
board
approved
for
this
site.
That
special
glove
study
gave
us
a
lot
of
guidance
in
terms
of
what
we
should
propose
here
today
and
really
look
towards
mixed
use
on
the
site.
R
You
know
kind
of
gave
us
some
open-ended
criteria
for
that,
but
generally
mixed
use
and
trying
to
complete
the
Gateway
into
this
neighborhood
sort
of
completing
what
had
happened
across
the
street
with
2201
Pershing
several
years
earlier,
and
that
guidance
included
a
number
of
key
goals
and
ultimately,
recommendations
focusing
a
lot
largely
on
public
spaces
at
this
site,
both
as
Peter
mentioned,
transforming
Wainwright
road
to
the
southern
extension
of
the
Arlington
Park
Trail,
creating
a
new
on-site
public
open
space
in
the
form
of
a
park.
R
Again
talking
talking
a
lot
about
completing
that
Gateway
into
the
neighborhood,
not
just
architecturally,
but
also
have
that
density
and
that
height
transitions
to
our
neighbors
and
the
neighboring
surroundings,
and
last
but
not
least,
embracing
some
of
that
site.
History
really
for
us
going
back
to
the
arva
motel
in
1955
when
it
was
sort
of
first
approved.
It's
had
a
lot
of
iteration
since
then,
but
that's
really
the
one
where
we
focused
our
time
next
slide,
please
Ashton
and
always
a
question
of
how
you
get
there.
R
So
our
application
does
in
fact
track
with
the
study
we
are
proposing
a
mixed
use:
development
of
the
site,
residential
and
Retail
about
251
units,
A,
Little,
Less,
Than,
3,
000
square
feet
of
retail
use
and
we'll
be
delivering.
R
As
Peter
mentioned,
a
number
of
community
benefits
lead
gold
certification,
the
the
extension
of
the
trail
South
along
Pershing
Drive,
as
I
mentioned,
with
those
micro
Mobility
features
which
we're
working
out
with
the
es
the
off-site
protected
bike
Lanes
both
on
our
side
of
Pershing
Drive,
but
also
completing
that
on
the
north
side
of
Persian
Drive,
where
it
isn't
today
and
then
providing
the
on-site
Park
as
well
as
adus
I,
do
think.
That's
a
really
critical
element
of
this
application.
Where
you
might
see
incomparable
projects,
perhaps
more
units.
R
We
really
stressed-
and
it
was
really
stressed
to
us
to
look
at
opportunities
for
on-site
family
units
and
then
you
know
felt
very
strongly
about
that
as
well,
and
so
the
outcome
is
ultimately
seven
on-site
units,
but
many
of
those
in
the
three
bedroom
and
two
bedroom
plus
Den
category
so
really
getting
larger
units
than
you
might
in
a
comparable
project.
So
with
that
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
Ashton
to
walk
you
around
the
site
and
then
happy
to
take
any
questions
that
you
might
have.
S
Good
evening,
thank
you,
Matt
and
thank
you
Peter
for
a
great
introduction
of
the
project,
I'm
going
to
move
through
a
series
of
images
that
show
the
planning
for
the
glup
and
then
the
design
as
it
resulted.
So
this
is
a
view
that
you
saw
earlier
of
the
corner
of
Pershing
and
Arlington
Boulevard
floating
above.
That
looks
back
at
the
project
from
the
glub
study
and
then
the
design
as
a
as
as
it
evolved
again
with
Pershing
Drive
on
the
on
the
right
and
and
Arlington
Boulevard
on
the
left.
S
The
the
historic
sign
is
was
mentioned
is
brought
forward
with
the
with
the
elements
of
the
lobby
and
oops
couldn't
see
architecture
down
below
zooming
in
as
Peter
showed
there
here
are
these
historic
elements
being
brought
forward
the
sign
the
the
wall,
the
and
the
historic
signs
looking
at
the
corner
of
Arlington,
Boulevard
and
Pershing?
These
are
some
of
the
micro
Mobility
hubs
and
the
potential
location
with
these
fixed
stations,
as
Peter
mentioned,
bring
those
forward
again
from
the
glove
working
through
where
those
actually
end
up
on
the
site.
S
This
is
a
view
looking
across
Pershing
Drive,
so
here
we're
seeing
on
the
left.
You
can
see
the
corner
of
the
the
the
historic
sign
and
on
the
right,
the
the
retail
space
that
fronts
the
park
and
in
the
center
here
is
this
drop-off
court
and
the
the
one
vehicular
connection
point
that
passes
through
the
site
where
all
all
vehicles
all
vehicles
operate.
S
This
is
a
view
of
the
glop
again
from
the
corner
of
Wayne
and
Pershing.
Looking
at
that
open
space
and
and
the
massing
and
the
architecture
as
designed
as
we
drop
down
at
that
corner
and
see
you
know,
as
Peter
mentioned
the
additional
glass
and
and
the
lower
rise
coming
out
and
the
the
park
that
will
be
designed
in
the
future,
it's
a
park,
I
think
as
we've
been
developing
the
process
again,
this
is
not
a
design,
but
merely
an
idea.
S
We've
really
focused
on
the
opportunity
to
enhance
some
of
the
biophilic
features
that
are
inherent
in
the
neighborhood
and
that
were
embodied
within
that
glep
study
and
carrying
those
forward.
As
we
start
or
as
the
developer
starts.
Those
meetings
with
with
the
community
also
we've
been
focused
on
how
the
streetscape
is
going
to
be
improved,
providing
a
minimum
of
six
foot
sidewalks
all
around
the
site,
the
one
spot
on
person
drive
that
actually
meets
that
six
foot
is
next
to
the
park
easement.
S
S
Looking
at
the
actual
architecture,
we
have
the
the
park,
he's
been
on
the
left
and
we
have.
You
could
see
the
the
curve
of
vehicles
as
they
turn
under
the
building,
and
then
this
pass-through,
which
is
only
pedestrians
and
and
bicycles,
and
wheels
as
Peter
called
it
didn't
want
to
take
a
moment
to
talk
about
some
of
the
landscape.
Rich
experience
that's
going
to
happen
up
on
this
building.
S
This
is
a
within
the
4.1
submission,
but
I
know
there
have
been
a
lot
of
questions
through
the
process
on
green
Roos
and
we
wanted
to
show
some
of
the
Intensive
landscaping,
that's
being
planned
at
these
at
these
roof
areas
and
along
the
pool
such
that
that
experience
of
green
can
be
looked
at
down
from
the
residents
above
and
also
experienced
at
the
edge
of
the
building,
as
you
passing
through
the
muse
we've
now
flipped
over
to
the
Arlington
Boulevard
side,
and
this
is
the
improved
multi-use
Trail
and
the
pass-through
underneath
the
building,
and
one
of
the
things
we
want
to
talk
about
is
through
the
glup
process,
as
Peter
mentioned.
S
In
addition
to
removing
the
vehicles
from
from
this
path,
we've
also
worked
to
further
totally
underground
parking
within
the
within
the
within
the
project.
In
this
Zone-
and
this
section
shows
this
red
line
is
where
the
grade
is
along
the
building
face
and
you
can
see
the
parking
below
and
then
the
apartments
up,
a
small
Stoop
from
that
spot,
really
I
think
enhancing
the
overall
experience
and
a
good
Testament
to
the
process
and
the
design
here.
S
We're
looking
at
this
similar
biophilic
features
along
the
Arlington
Boulevard
Trail
enhancements
as
again
Peter
mentioned
as
part
of
that
work
with
with
VDOT
in
the
right
of
way,
and
we
are
looking
forward
to
creating
that
great
environment
that
the
the
glove
established
and
I
think
that
the
design
team
has
continuing
to
enhance,
as
well
as
looking
at
this
Zone.
That
Peter
highlight
that
is
now
a
pedestrian
and
wheels
only
as
Vehicles
turn
under
the
building.
S
Finally,
flipping
around
to
Arlington
Boulevard,
looking
back
the
project
again
from
the
glove
where
you
see
the
stepping
mass
and
some
of
the
articulation
and
then
the
final
design
is
that
turned
out
from
a
little
bit
lower
perspective,
the
same
stepping
design.
Obviously
the
Transformer
is
removed.
We've
got
the
sign,
and
you
know
some
of
the
architectural
features,
like
the
geometry
of
that
sign
that
begins
to
carry
forward
in
these
in
these
stepped
Bay,
articulations,
so
I'm
sure
there'll
be
plenty
of
questions
we're
thrilled
to
be
here.
S
It's
been
an
incredible
process
and
we
look
forward
to
answering
any
questions,
I'm
going
to
stop
sharing
my
screen
but
happy
to
bring
anything
else
up
or-
and
we
have
some
additional
information
if
there
are
questions.
Thank
you.
Yeah.
A
Thank
you.
It's
the
applicant
is
completed
great,
it
Madam
clerk.
Do
we
have
any
public
speakers?
We.
A
D
T
Yeah
good
evening,
I'm
Jim
McIntyre,
chair
of
the
climate
change
energy
and
environment
commission,
while
the
participant
is
participating
in
the
Green
Building
incentive
program.
As
with
many
of
the
projects
we
have
reviewed,
it
really
doesn't
really
come
up
to
what
we
think
is
necessary
in
order
to
address
the
kinase
goal
for
carbon
neutrality.
We
scored
this
at
about
58,
which
again
is
about
in
line
with
with
many
of
the
other
projects
we've
looked
at
on.
T
Unfortunately,
here
we
as
with
most
projects,
we
do
focus
on
electrification,
and
at
this
point,
these
the
design
is
really
continuing
to
call
for
fossil
fuel,
for
the
HVAC
systems
and
for
the
hot
water,
and
you
know,
without
as
long
as
buildings
continue
to
be
built
with
fossil
fuels
that
really
locks
in
carbon
emissions
for
for
at
least
a
decade
or
more
to
come
now.
T
The
applicant's
energy
performance
model
actually
did
indicate
that
there
were
Pathways
to
design
with
all
electric
systems,
and
we
would
strongly
encourage
them
to
continue
to
pursue
those
options
again.
We
we
tend
to
also
focus
on
Energy
Efficiency
they're,
of
course,
committing
to
the
minimum
required
by
the
Green
Building
incentive
policy
of
20
percent.
Again,
we
would
strongly
encourage
at
least
25
percent
or
more
above
the
ashrae
Baseline
again.
T
The
first
first
way
of
decarbonizing
is
is
reducing
the
amount
of
energy
you
have
to
use
in
the
first
place,
and
so
and-
and
we
do
think
that
it
is
possible
that
they
can
certainly
get
above
that
amount
again
EV
charging
in
order
to
help
facilitate
for
the
transition
to
electric
vehicles.
We
would
strongly
encourage
that
they
strive
for
at
least
50
percent
of
spaces
to
be
EV,
charged
charging
ready
again
they're
committing
to
the
minimum
requirements.
T
The
plan
does
have
a
lot
of
very
nice
nature-based
Landscaping
that
we
we
commend
and,
of
course,
would
encourage
them
to
continue
to
find
more
room
for
trees
on
the
site,
as
as
they
continue
to
continue
to
develop
at
the
landscaping
design.
And
finally,
we
would
also
suggest
that
the
applicant
look
for
other
opportunities
to
look
at
the
material
selection
to
reduce
the
carbon
emissions
embedded
in
those
materials
that
they're
selecting
again.
T
You
know
remind
people
that
you
know
over
the
last
week
or
more
we've
been
dealing
with
excessive
heat
in
the
South
and
even
in
our
areas
here,
code
red
code,
purple
days
because
of
fires,
climate
related
fires
up
in
Canada.
So
it
really
is
imperative
that,
with
all
new
development
that
these
projects
really
actually
build
towards
what's
necessary,
which
is
buildings
that
don't
use
carbon,
don't
use,
fossil
fuels
within
them
are
highly
energy
efficient
and
otherwise
support
a
transition
to
decarbonized
community.
Thank
you
very
much.
D
U
Two
minutes,
despite
what
the
applicant
said,
this
project
has
much
to
and
look
at
that
group.
Well,
you
should
see
a
few
small
plant
beds
on
the
roof.
There's
no
real
blue
move.
The
building
is
the
building
is
still
contained.
My
roof
contains
much
synthetic
terrific,
we're
decking
other
things
which
will
protect
us.
We
can
take
this
somewhat
around
the
building
needs
a
real
real
move.
Now
this
may
be
too
late
to
do
it,
but
it's
a
major
deficiency.
U
Please
recommend
that
accounting
board
require
the
Opera
to
do
the
following:
replace
all
mowed
lawns,
including
the
lawn
between
the
arms
and
four
of
our
bike
trail
and
the
building.
The
plantings
native,
shrubs
ground
covers
and
perennials
that
was
for
pollinators
between
those
trees
is
grass
mold
grass.
U
That
is
no
good
and
applicants,
don't
seem
to
recognize
this,
but
if
you
were
know
when
tolerated
on
mental
grass
and
surgeon
grants
and
insects
with
pollinated,
attract
four
or
five
feet
and
four
so
far,
more
poundings,
so
I
should
hang
out
from
this
room
and
the
balcony
the
ground
in
the
front
Ledges.
There
are
no
Vibes
in
that
building.
U
Eggs
other
species
that
come
milk
with
other
plants
in
all
three
trenches
and
with
sidewalks
and
elsewhere,
elevator
plants
around
the
tree,
trenches
to
protect
them
from
the
plants
from
trampling
and
dorms
make
the
prior
public
space
primarily
biophilic
from
the
way
it
looks
now,
doesn't
look
it
through
that
way
the
plant?
That's
what
pollinators
do
not
fill
most
of
the
playgrounds
but
ball
fields
on
those
Lawns.
U
A
A
You
can
raise
raise
the
I've
never
done
that
Podium.
So
you
can
get
the
microphone
closer.
We
can
hear
you
then.
V
V
Mr
chair,
my
name,
is
Ann
Bodine
from
Lion
Park
I
pose
a
recommended
change
to
the
glop
zoning
and
site
plan
usage,
because
first
it's
a
massive
edition
of
Housing
and
density,
and
it
adds
eight
percent
of
our
existing
stock
with
no
addition
of
services.
Second
and
my
main
point,
it
entirely
overlooks
that
the
special
glop
and
the
site
plan
are
two
separate
processes
and
both
must
confer
Community
benefits.
V
I
know
it
was
an
intended
revision
of
the
special
glop
in
2008
and
2019
to
segregate
the
two
with
special
glove
preceding
site
plans,
but
not
approving
the
special
glout
before
site
plan.
This
prevents
presents
problems.
It
ends
up
bundling
and
burying
the
benefits
that
are
separate
and
should
accrue
from
two
separate
Awards
to
the
developer.
In
fact,
the
special
Club
booklet
says
that
authorization
at
the
glep
amendment
does
not
imply
that
the
County
Board
supports
the
proposed
change,
but
only
that
is
within
the
realm
of
consideration.
V
But
here
we
are
with
arva
at
round
two
and
we
are
told
that
uplapping
is
a
fade
accompli.
The
draft
board
report
says
the
glub
study
concluded
that
if
an
applicant
proposed
a
site
plan
in
harmony
with
the
recommendations
of
the
special
glove
study,
then
a
change
would
be
appropriate.
The
county
cannot
tell
residents
the
glub
study,
isn't
an
approval
and
Community
benefits
can't
be
broached
during
the
special
glove
study
phase
only
to
show
up
in
round
two
to
tell
us
the
Dies
cast
so
I'm
asking
for
a
new
process.
V
I'm
asking
you
recommend
disaggregating
special,
go
up
from
site
plan
and
ensure
we
get
a
Full
Slate
of
benefits.
Looking
at
this
project,
the
combined
list
of
community
benefits
for
both
a
special
glove
and
a
site
plan
for
arva's
underwhelming
special
glop
comes
with
expectations
of
20
percent
of
affordable
housing
and
up
to
20
percent
tree
canopy.
This
project
has
less
than
five
percent:
affordable
housing,
even
below
normal
site
plan,
and
no
added
tree
canopy
in
a
neighborhood
that
has
lost
more
canopy
than
any
other
I'd.
V
Also
ask
you
to
start
showing
the
math
for
both
sides
benefits.
Seven
affordable
apartments
is
worth
three
million
10
000
square
foot
Park
is
worth
two
million.
We
already
have
bike
paths
in
this
site.
This
is
an
additional
minimal
plus
up.
If
we
see
these
across,
we
can
better
assess
these
trade-offs
and
I'm
asking
you
to
do
that
before
we
go
ahead
with
any
approval
here.
Thank
you.
A
We
have
any
other
commissions,
no
okay.
This
was
her
before
the
Transportation
Commission
last
week
and
as
Mr
Roberts
mentioned,
the
Transportation
Commission
voted
unanimously
to
recommend
approval
of
the
project.
A
Our
discussion
involved
such
things
as
the
the
Improvement
in
the
bike
facilities,
not
just
Arlington
Boulevard,
but
also
both
sides
of
Pershing
two
bike
rooms
at
ground
level,
so
that
to
roll
right
in
that
was
a
well
received.
There's
also
more
permeability
on
this
site,
with
both
the
East-West
north-south
rights
of
way
going
through
what
is
essentially
a
super
block
right
now,
and
so
it
is
a
is
going
to
be
good
for
all
users.
It
isn't
just
a
vehicular
oriented
it's
very
much
pedestrian
and
bicycle
oriented
too.
A
F
Thank
you
Mr
chair,
so
this
is
an
interesting
sprc
report.
So
first
of
all,
I'd
like
to
thank
commissioner
schro
who's
no
longer
on
the
commission
and
is
now
a
full-time
parent
for
chairing
the
both
the
special
glup
study
and
the
sprc
process,
and
then
commissioner
Peterson
took
the
Baton
from
him,
but
she's
not
here
tonight.
So
she
handed
me
the
Baton
and
hopefully
we'll
close
out
the
the
race
as
a
team
here,
I
don't
have
it
much
to
add
from
the
report
that
commissioner
Peterson
provided
for
us.
A
Thank
you,
discussion
topics.
Does
anybody
have
any
that
they
would
like
to
raise?
We
have
Community
benefits
such
as
affordable
housing.
We
have
I,
think
Parks
and
Rec
issues,
because
we
have
some
open
space
here
and
biophilia
I
mentioned
Transportation.
Other
topics
that
anyone
would
like
to
raise.
O
Yeah
I
think
I
would
just
like
to
get
a
as
a
topic
but
I'm
previewing.
My
question
get
a
staff
response
to
miss
bodine's
concern
about
the
special
glove
requests
being
paired
with
the
site
plan.
Okay,
if
we
could
talk
about
that.
A
Okay,
why
don't
we
start,
then?
Actually
why
don't?
We
start
first
with
the
community
benefits
which
oh
I'm,
sorry,
commission,
Strider.
L
And
I
don't
know
if
it
falls
in
I
want
to
go
Circle
back
around
Miss
McIntyre's,
some
of
Miss.
What
Miss
McIntyre
brought
up
about
energy
and.
F
Sorry
one
one
more
thing,
commissioner:
Peterson's
report
mentioned
phasing
as
a
neighborhood.
A
Okay,
we'll
hold
that
one
off
to
the
end.
Okay,
why
don't
we
start
off
with
affordable
housing
as
a
topic?
A
Any
comments,
questions
from
the
description
Schreiner?
Yes,.
B
So
I
know
the
the
the
emphasis
was
on
larger
family-based
units,
and
you
said
there
were
seven
committed,
affordable
units
total.
A
mix
of
those
is
going
to
be
two
bedroom
and
three
bedroom.
What
is
what
does
that
mix?
Look
like.
R
Sure
so
I
believe
it's
correctly
stated
in
the
staff
report,
so
I'm
going
to
use
that
to
remind
myself,
but
it
is
two
three
bedrooms:
two
two
bedroom
plus
dens
and
then
Peter
I
believe
the
rest
is
a
mix
of
two
bedrooms
and
one
bedrooms
after
that.
Q
B
R
Well,
I:
don't
think
that
every
single
unit
is
designed
to
be
directly
aimed
at
families,
but
I
think
something
that's
unique
in
this
project
that
you
don't
tend
to
find
incomparable
ones,
especially
in
the
edu
side
as
the
generation
of
three
bedroom
and
the
allocation
of
two
bedroom
plus
dens.
You
know
we
had
a
really
great
conversation
about
this
at
Lyon
park
at
the
community
meeting
a
few
months
back.
They
really
pressed
us
on
this
and
you
know
why
would
we
include
a
two
bedroom
plus
denim?
R
You
know
Ashton's
on
the
line,
so
he
can
kind
of
walk
through
some
of
the
arithmetic
of
that,
but
also
some
of
the
design
behind
that
really.
You
know
there's
sort
of
a
great
substitute
in
some
ways
for
these
three
bedrooms,
because
they
give
you
the
opportunity
to
have
that
Den
kind
of
act
as
sort
of
a
substitute
bedroom
space.
So
we've
tried
our
best
to
take
that
20
and
allocate
it
towards
larger
units
on
the
site
and
really
came
up
with
that
combination,
discussions
with
housing
staff
and
planning
staff
and
the
Housing
Commission.
Okay,.
Q
One
two
or
two
bedroom,
plus
Den,
two
two
bedroom
Loft
units
in
condition
number
41
of
our
site
plan.
Just
to
let
you
know
we
have
requirements
for
occupancy
of
these
buildings
and
that
or
I
should
say
the
committed,
affordable
units
and
that
calf
units
showed
me
the
minimum
standard
of
occupancy
by
at
least
two
persons
with
the
bedroom
size
being
adequate
for
a
minimum
of
two-person
occupancy.
The
two-bedroom
calf
units
will
be
allowed
to
be
occupied
by
at
least
four
people.
Okay,.
A
And
are
they
at
60
80?
What
what
level
affordability
are
we
talking
about.
A
A
S
There
will
be
gas
connections,
as
ctv2
pointed
out
there
is.
There
is
some
gas
service
within
the
building?
There's
a
gas
for
the
Emergency
generator,
there's
gas
for
hot
water,
and
there
is
a
gas
for
some
dough
as
reheat,
which
actually,
in
the
energy
analysis,
resulted
in
less
of
a
carbon
footprint
than
an
electric
preheat
in
in
that
analysis,
but
I'll
pull
up
just
kind
of
a
quick
side
summarizing
some
of
the
some
of
the
general
features.
S
You
know
with
the
way
that
we're
getting
to
the
20
Energy
savings
and
then
kind
of
pull
up,
I.
Think
one
of
the
questions
about
you
know
there
is
within
the
within
the
doas
the
heat
pump
dough
as
that
there
is
a
gas
reheat
which
really
operates
at
extreme
temperatures,
and
in
that
analysis
we
actually
determined
that
we
were
getting
a
better
carbon
footprint
performance
from
that
gas
reheat,
which
is
why
that's
there,
rather
than
an
electric
reheat.
S
Another
question
that
came
up
there
since
I
have
the
the
screen
up
is
about
electric
vehicles
and
one
of
the
things
that
the
team
looked
to
do
thinking
forward
is
actually
provide
additional
space
within
the
electric
volt.
So
this
is
a
detailed
drawing
of
the
from
the
from
the
site
plan
set,
and
you
can
see
that
we've
got
a
switch
and
two
Transformers
and
essentially
additional
Vault
space.
So
as
that
as
demands
meet
that
that
can
be
accommodated
without
you
know:
extreme
changes
to
the
plan,
so
an
additional.
A
S
That's
a
detail
that
we
talked
about
at
at
TC,
Transportation
Commission,
and
it's
not
it's
not
one
that
we
have
formalized
but
I
think
it's
an
aspiration,
and
certainly
the
the
you
know
the
two
bike
rooms
have
different
identities.
There's
a
larger
bike
room,
that's
closer
to
the
public
space
park
that
has
room
to
accommodate
things
like
like
cargo
bikes
and
larger
chart,
scooters
and
I
think
the
intent
is
that
that
area
is
being
is
a
could
service.
Those
things
and
that'll
be
part
of
that
design
process.
A
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Bagley
yeah.
L
So,
and
what
I'm
hearing
is
that
you
are
ready,
you
will
have,
or
you
feel
confident
that
you
can
have
adequate
EV
Chargers,
whether
it's
now
or
moving
forward,
is
what
I'm
hearing
okay
and
also
that
you
feel
that
your
choices
on
some
of
the
gas
and
the
fossil
fuel
things
you
feel
are
as
good
as
they
can
be
for
the
carbon
footprint.
Is
that
what
I'm
hearing
yeah.
S
L
And
to
the
question
about
the
carbon
emissions
in
the
materials:
now
that's
one
I
haven't
really
heard
so
much,
but
now
I
guess
we're
going
to
have
to
add
that
to
our
list.
A
S
S
One
of
the
things
is
thinking
about
the
base
structure
material,
and
how
do
you
use
carbon
sequestration
and
things
like
Concrete
Construction,
which,
again
here
the
the
project,
is
looking
not
to
be
a
short-term
project
but
a
long-term,
viable
building
that
will
last
many
many
years
more
than
a
more
than
a
I'll
call
it
a
stick
built
Wood
Construction
that
you
see
happening
all
over.
S
There
are
also
elements
in
the
materials
like
like
brick
and
finding
the
ways
that
those
are
brought
from
close
by
and
that
those
are
done
in
in
ways
that
have
lower
carbon
Footprints
are
things
that
certainly
as
as
thoughtful
designers,
we
talk
about
and
think
about
a
lot
and
I
think
it's
appropriate
to
be
talking
about
it
in
in
this
forum,
and
it's
something
that
you
know.
We
don't
have
metrics
for
that
today,
but
certainly
our
criteria
that
we
as
as
thoughtful
designers
and
thoughtful
developers
are
looking
to
to
advance.
S
L
And
going
back
to
Dr
Byrne's
comments
about
the
green
roof.
Can
you
show
the
the
slides
again
that
are
they
just
green
patches
that
have
been
added
to
that
or
I
mean
my
idea
of
a
green
roof?
Is
a
green
roof?
So
can
you
go
back
and
show
what
that.
S
Is
sure
and
I'm
going
to
start
I'm
going
to
actually
start
with
a
different
slide?
That
I
think
is
to
me
actually
one
of
the
most
powerful
visuals
on
the
project
and
most
meaningful
to
to
to
to
me
as
an
architect.
Moving
through
this
design
is
really
the
massive
transformation
for
this
project
is
taking
a
car
Focus
site,
that's
really
heavily
paved
and
transforming
that
into
a
site
that
is
heavily
landscaped
and
heavily
planted.
You
know
taking
impermeable
area
and
transitioning
it
to
permeable
area.
You
know
this
park
he's
been
Zone.
S
The
design
team
has
worked
very
hard
to
remove
all
garages
or
any
structure
below
it,
so
that
that
land
can
really
percolate
and
have
thriving
landscape
within
it.
You
know
the
so.
With
that
I'll
kind
of
jump
back
to
you
know
a
couple
slides.
You
know
there
is
green
within
the
roof
and
kind
of
intensive
planting
as
as
we're
looking
at
it.
This
is
a
slide
that
you
have
not
seen.
This
is
a
a
roof
Terrace
that
is
on
the
corner
of
Pershing
Drive
and
on
Arlington
Boulevard.
S
S
The
fundamental
point
is
that
the
the
project
site
is
being
used
for
percolation
and
storm
water
management,
because
there
is
so
much
sight
and
it's
being
converted
back
into
permeable
land,
so
the
actual
storm
water
management
of
green
roof
on
with
on
the
building
is
not
something
that
is
required
for
what
we
need
to
kind
of
elevate
that
stature.
So
in
that
light,
the
planting
on
the
building
can
serve
a
more
directly
biophilic
function
rather
than
a
kind
of
storm
water
technical
function.
So
it
allows
some
more
flexibility
that
address
your
question.
Yeah.
L
A
Okay,
do
we
have
any
other
comments
on
sustainability
issues
and
we
moved
since
we
sort
of
moving
into
biophilia
too,
commissioner
Burkey
I.
O
Just
want
to
revisit
the
EV
capability
and
I
appreciate
the
the
information,
so
miss
McIntyre
had
said
that
e2c2
I,
don't
know
if
you'd
formally
recommended
but
had
made
a
request
for
50
of
the
spaces
to
be
charging
ready.
Is
that
I'm,
just
and
I
I'm
going
to
claim
some
ignorance
here?
Is
that
something
that's
been
done?
I'm
really
not
sure
what
a
Miss
McIntyre.
If
you
want
to
comment,
I'm,
not
really
sure
what
the
Baseline
is
I
know
we,
you
know
we
look
at
some
limited
capability,
but
it
wasn't.
O
D
Q
For
the
level
of
lead
bonus
that
they're
requesting
the
Baseline
standard
recommendation,
that's
in
our
standard
conditions
is
they
have
to
have
park
at
least
four
percent
of
the
current
spaces
and
be
ready
for
15.
So
that's
at
this
level,
I
can't
speak
to
any
higher
levels,
but
at
the
level
they're
claiming
okay.
Thank
you.
F
I
have
a
question
for
my
edification:
let's
put
it
that
way,
how
can
it
be
that
a
fuel
or
a
fossil
fuel
is
has
a
smaller
carbon
footprint
than
the
electrification?
Is
that,
like
a
a
a
a
Time
snippet
that
we're
getting
like?
How
does
how
does
that
report?
F
That
seems
counterintuitive
I
guess,
is
what
I'm
trying
to
say
so
I'd
love
to
have
a
little
clarification
on
how
we
go
to
fossil
fuels
and
we
still
have
a
smaller
carbon
footprint
than
the
electrification
of
the
building.
Is
that
because
of
the
current
standards
of
the
way
electricity
is
provided?
Is
that
a
calculation
based
on
historic
fossil
fuel
consumption.
S
S
If
you
want
to
talk
further
about
that
that
energy
model
report
and
we
could
bring
in
our
our
friends
at
Sustainable
Building
partners,
that
can
can
explain
a
lot,
but
it's
it
it
frankly
that
analysis
surprised
us
and
it
is
a
particularity
of
this
site,
but
because
normally
we
would
we
would
have.
S
A
For
that,
let
me
do
a
little
follow-up
on
commissioner
Charlie's
question.
It
struck
me
that
it
was
more
for
heat
in
extreme
situations
that
gas
would
kick
in
because
essentially
doing
resistance
heating
from
electricity
is
just
really
inefficient,
but
does
this
so
so?
Is
that
correct?
That's
right,
you're
saying
but
you're
also
using
it
for
hot
water
and
I.
S
A
S
A
A
Do
we
have
bird
friendly
glass
for
those
glass
for
the
windows
that
are
there?
How
are
we?
How
are
we
dealing
with
that.
S
Yes,
we
are
providing
bird
friendly
glass,
for
you
know
the
the
Zone
that's
talked
about
in
the
code,
I
believe
it's
32
feet
to
eight
feet.
The
only
exception
to
that
zone
is
the
portion
of
the
plan.
That
is
recreating
the
historic
Lobby
that
that
glass
is
to
be
focused
on
recreating
that
historic
element,
and
so
that
would
not
have
the
the
bird
friendly
additions
to
it,
which
would
change
the
aesthetic.
A
Right
and
I
could
understand
that
from
an
hlr
Beast
viewpoint,
but
is
there
some
way
that
the
glass
itself,
even
though
it's
historic,
could
have
something
on
it?
You
know
sometimes
there's
appliques
even
that
people
put
on
on
those
sort
of
things,
so
a
bird
doesn't
smash
into
it
because
it
is
it'll
almost
be
a
light
Beacon
during
the
in
the
evening.
You
know
it's
going
to
be
well
lit
because
it's
a
Lobby,
the
fear
is
that
would
end
up
being
a
bird
magnet
during
migration
season.
S
I
think
that's
certainly
something
that
the
team
would
consider.
I
I
think
what
our
design
experience
has
been.
The
invisible
or
UV
bird
protections
are
are
much
more
visible
than
I.
Think
everyone
would
hop
and
we're.
You
know
we're
looking
forward
to
that
technology
continuing
to
improve
and
certainly
consider.
F
Associate
myself
with
commissional
and
tell
me
sentiment
and
I'm
hoping
that
hlrb
and
the
DRC
can
see
that,
like
a
light
or
discrete
fretting
pattern,
you
know
is
acceptable
within
the
historic
preservation
context.
A
See
trees,
we
actually,
you
know,
trees
tree
replacement,
yeah
I
have
been
on
the
site
and
you're
right.
It
is
just
an
asphalt,
it
is
90
asphalt
at
least
appears
that
way,
it's
quite
quite
unattractive,
but
there
are
some
trees.
What
how
are
you?
What
is
your
Landscaping
plan?
How
many
trees
will
be
added
to
the
site
and
are
there
any
that
actually
can
be
preserved?
S
It'll,
let
Gabriella
Kenmar
from
Land
Design
answer
that
thank.
W
You
hi,
can
you
hear
me
good
evening
and
I
apologize
I'm
on
Candlelight,
my
overhead
light
bulb
just
blew
a
few
hours
a
few
minutes
ago.
If
you
can
all
hear
me,
let
me
clarify.
I
do
have
some
numbers
for
you
all
to
clarify
the
question
about
the
tree
canopy
on
site
as
inventoried
by
our
civil
engineer
and
the
team.
W
There
are
72
trees
that
exist
in
the
site
today,
despite
how
Bleak
the
image
that
Ashton
shared
a
few
minutes
ago
of
those
28
have
to
be
removed
because
they
have
been
deemed
unhealthy
and
in
or
in
Decline
we
are
proposing
69
trees
currently
on
the
site,
and
so
that
is
the
Surplus
from
what
it
is
out
there
today
with
healthy
new
trees
with
vigorous
growth,
that
is
the
math.
Hopefully,
that
makes
some
sense.
There
are
the
trees
that
exists
along
Route
50.
They
are.
W
Repair
trees
they'll
have
to
be
replaced.
Ultimately,
we
had
intended
to
preserve
but
they're,
not
in
good,
in
good
condition,
plus
they're,
not
a
desirable
sort
of
street
tree.
So
we
want
something
that
is
safer,
that
has
a
better
a
tree
branch
pattern
instructor
for
the
for
all
the
cyclists
that
go
that
will
go
under
and
between
the
two
rows
of
trees
that
we're
providing
or
proposing
rather
I
hope
that
answers
the
question.
Yes,.
F
Sorry
I
have
a
small
editorial
and
it
just
came
up.
I
I
appreciate
Ashton's
comment
that
this
is
a
significant
Improvement
to
the
existing
condition,
and
undoubtedly
that
is
the
fact,
but
you
know
we
still
have
to
Aspire
right,
so
it's
clearly
an
improvement,
but
the
bar
is
so
low
to
begin
with.
I
think
that's
like
a
slightly
unfair
comparison.
I
just
wanted
to
quickly
react
to
that.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
You,
commissioner,
sarley
the
park
space,
has
that:
how
will
that
be
planned
out?
What
sort
of
process
will
there
be
for
how
that
will
be
used
yeah?
What.
Q
It
will
look
like
the
version
of
the
condition
you're
in
is
not
the
finalized
version
that
the
County
Board
is
eventually
going
to
see,
but
essentially
it'll
be
like
other
planning
processes
where
the
DPR
and
the
developer
will
go
over
a
list
of
Consultants.
They'll
choose
a
consultant.
They'll
start
a
process
as
soon
as
as
soon
as
a
civil
engineering
plan
when
they
need
to
submit
a
civil
engineering
plan,
they
will
there's
a
time
limit
on
the
process.
Q
There
are
generally
two
or
three
Community
meetings
that
DPR
will
lead
and
then
the
goal
is
to
have
the
design
of
the
space
and
it's
you
know
it's
only
ten
thousand
square
feet.
So
it
should
go
relatively
smoothly
to
have
that
by
the
time
that
the
developer
has
to
submit
their
final
landscape
plan
and
final
civil
engineering
plan
to
be
constructed
at
the
same
time
as
the
building
there
will
be.
Q
However,
I
should
mention
a
condition,
a
condition
that,
in
the
event
that
the
department
of
Parks
and
Recreation
does
not
have
the
capacity
to
lead
a
public
review
process,
the
developer
could
actually
cash
out,
but
I.
Think
everybody's
preference
is
that
they
do
it
at
the
time
that
the
the
but
the
one,
important
part
of
the
special
glove
study
was
that
the
department
of
parks
said
that
they
they
wanted
to
take
the
lead
on
the
process,
and
that's
so
that's
why
we
did
not
plan
it
during
the
sprc
process.
Well,.
A
Thank
you.
You
will
then
also
reach
out
to
Lion
Park.
Q
L
I'm
not
sure
if
this
is
the
appropriate
time
to
ask
this,
but
where
will
when
construction
begins?
Where
will
trucks
go
not
go,
not
be
allowed?
L
There's
always
a
construction
liaison
and,
as
a
former
civic
association
president,
it
would
be
very
helpful
to
make
sure
that
whoever
the
liaison
is
really
is
made
aware
of
all
the
things
that
have
happened
up
until
they're
on
the
ground
with
the
development
a
lot
of
times.
What
has
been
discussed
sometimes
isn't
always
relayed
to
them
and
is
now.
Is
this
going
to
also
be
pile
driving
at
all.
R
S
Yes,
I
can
and
I
can
also
mention
that
from
the
pile
driving
standpoint
know,
the
the
plan
here
is
that
this
is
a
a
more
conventional
foundation
and
not
on
piles
good.
L
I
would
just
question
is
or
sort
of
my
observation
and
my
hope
with
all
of
this
is
when
assuming
this
is
approved,
that
there
is
still
tremendous
conversation
going
on,
because
I
remember
sitting
through
the
initial
glup
meetings,
where
the
neighbors
were
seemingly
much
more
involved
and
perhaps
through
the
process
they
feel
as
though
their
concerns
have
been
met,
or
maybe
they
gave
up.
L
I
don't
know,
but
especially
for
the
Neighbors
who
are
closest
by
that
communication
is
ongoing
with
them,
and
should
everybody
should
know
in
advance
how
you're
going
to
get
stuff
around
and
and
all
of
a
sudden
trucks
are
going
any
other
way,
because
it's
a
path
of
least
resistance
and
just
from
a
good
neighbor
standpoint.
I
hope
that
this
message
is
delivered
down
the
line
because
we're
all
sitting
here
now,
but
the
folks
who
are
on
the
ground
they
haven't
heard
any
of
this
stuff.
Sure.
R
No
I
mean
the
the
community.
Outreach
has
been
an
absolute
for
us
from
almost
right.
After
sure,
the
special
glove
study
got
approved.
We
were
back
out
with
the
community
in
Virtual
meetings.
We've
held
I
mean
it's
Ashton.
You
can
correct
me
here,
but
it's
at
least
three,
if
not
four
meetings
just
with
them,
specifically,
in
addition
to
the
you
know
the
sprc
and
so
forth.
So
having
that
communication,
having
that
level
of
direct
connection
has
been
an
absolute
must
for
us
you're
absolutely
correct,
we
will
have
a
liaison
I.
R
Think
one
of
the
things
I've
personally
stressed
to
to
the
community
is
that
you
know
in
the
projects
where
nothing's
ever
perfect.
Where
things
go
wrong,
you
need
to
make
sure
that
you've
got
a
mechanism
in
place.
I
think
one
of
the
biggest
things
I've
seen
in
projects
when
something
does
go
wrong.
You
know
someone
from
the
construction
team
parking
where
they're
not
supposed
to
it
does
happen.
The
best
thing
you
can
have
is
you
know,
direct
point
of
contact.
R
Somebody,
you
know
is
going
to
be
responsive
and
you
know
I
think
Nan
has
shown
a
a
an
absolute
commitment
to
that
throughout
this
process,
you
know
being
available.
Having
questions
answered,
I
mean
that's
something
we
will
absolutely
be
carrying
forward
in
terms
of
your
question
about
hauling
her
out.
This
is
the
preliminary
draft
of
the
hauling
route,
certainly
subject
to
change.
R
You
know
in
discussion
with
staff
and
and
as
our
plans
get
approved,
but
at
least
as
a
preliminary
matter,
the
idea
is
to
bring
trucks
off
of
Arlington
Boulevard
down
Washington
Boulevard
up
Pershing
into
out
of
the
site
back
down,
Arlington,
Boulevard
and
head
out
towards
the
the
dump.
So
at
present
that
seems
to
be
the
most
efficient
route.
R
F
F
F
R
I
mean
yeah,
Ashton
can
speak
more
eloquently
to
it
than
I
will
be
able
to,
but
essentially
what
we
did
was
push
the
garage
down
below.
You
know
the
the
area
of
the
of
the
units.
So
essentially
now
you
have
the
units
and
the
Muse
sort
of
matching
up
in
terms
of
where
pedestrians
and
bicyclists
can
come
through
that
area,
there
won't
be
cars
and
conflicts.
Originally,
the
idea
was
that
we
were
going
to
have
cars,
making
sort
of
a
right
turn
into
that
southern
leg
that's
been
eliminated.
S
The
units
yeah
the
units
above
essentially
grew
the
the
parking
did
not
move
an
entire
level.
It
moved
more,
you
know
closer
to
the
order
of
four
feet.
The
you
know
the
it
was
not
a
significant
drop
in
parking,
but
it
was
significant
in
terms
of
its
relationship
to
grade
and
the
relationship
between
the
Muse
connection
as
it
passed
through
the
building.
S
In
order
to
make
that
work,
you
could
see
these
small
Dimensions,
which
you
might
not
be
able
to
read,
but
there
are
some
very
tight
sections
that
you
know
as
we
get
into
the
detail,
design
and
executing
this
project
are
going
to
be
challenging,
but
I
think
what
we
heard
is
that
the
you
know
the
benefits
were
a
significant.
S
We
saw
what
were
were
significant
enough
to
to
go
through
to
go
through
the
effort
to
to
really
make
this
work
so
great.
Thank
you.
That's
what
we're
doing
it.
B
I
noticed
that,
at
the
beginning
of
the
presentation
there
was
a
real
emphasis
on
the
mid-century
modern
architecture
style,
but
as
we're
looking
at
the
renderings,
there
just
seemed
to
be
a
lack
of
color
in
it
and
again
this
is
more
aesthetic,
but
if
there's
a
way
that
you
can
rope
in,
maybe
some
of
the
original
colors
from
the
original
sign
into
the
building
design
I
think
that
might
be
a
way
to
kind
of
spruce
it
up
a
little
bit
make
it
look
a
little
more
aesthetically
pleasing
in
the
neighborhood,
not
the
most
important
topic,
but
still
worth
bringing
up.
S
Certainly,
that
type
of
aesthetic
was
a
conversation
in
many
sprcs
and
that
the
kind
of
mid-century
aspect
and
taking
certain
components
of
materiality
for
the
neighborhood
was
the
you
know
the
origin
of
the
architecture
that
you
see
but
appreciate.
The
comments.
F
I'll
just
quickly
associate
myself
with
that
concern,
you
know
and
anything
that
you
can
do.
The
googie
sort
of
sign
is
very
playful
and
fun
and
the
building
has
sort
of
a
serious
sort
of
quality
to
it,
which
you
know
it's
not
bad
by
any
measure.
But
you
know
there
is
a
little
bit
of
a
almost
dissonance
on
that
and
I
will
say
that
Aesthetics
is
a
very
important
issue.
It's
tied
to
longevity
of
you,
know
and
health
much
like
biophilia.
So
it's
a
very
important
topic.
A
Thank
you
other
questions
comments.
Yes,
Madam
clerk.
D
A
R
No
I
don't
believe
we
were
ever
formally
invited
to
halrb,
but
we
did
have
halrb
present
at
sprc
and
we've
had
extensive
conversations
with
historic
preservation.
Staff
I
mean
the
reality
of
the
situation.
Is
you
know
we
had
a
structural
engineer
who
you
know
has
actually
been
recommended
to
me
through
other
folks
at
the
County.
You
know
someone
that
they
trust
and
had
this
individual
in
their
company
go
out
there
and
Survey.
You
know
the
sign
survey
of
the
lobby
and
basically
figure
out
is
this:
something
that
can
be
saved.
R
I
mean
I,
think
the
report
which
has
been
shared
it's
online
and
you're
happy
to
provide
it
pretty
much
speaks
for
itself,
though
it's
it's
just
not
just
due
to
the
age
and
natural
weathering
conditions
and
so
forth.
It's
just
not
in
the
shape
that
can
be
saved.
Unfortunately.
So
what
we've
kind
of
said
along
the
way
is
we're
going
to
pay
homage
to
that
and
I.
Think
we've
done
a
very
good
job
of
that.
A
Yeah,
thank
you.
Sbrc
did
fully
explore
that
as
I
recall.
I
do
recall
that
too
very
good.
The
special
glove
study
issue,
that's
something
that
really
is
larger
than
this
process.
So
this
particular
thing
so
I'm
not
sure
I
really
think
it's
appropriate
for
us
to
get
into
that,
though,
I
would
ask
Mr
Pfeiffer
if
you
would
mind
sort
of
explaining
the
relationship
between
a
special
Club
study
and
then
the
sbrc
afterward.
A
E
Microphone
is
intermittently
working
I
apologize
for
the
for
the
brief
pause
there.
So
the
special
gloves
study
is,
you
can
think
about
it
as
a
site-specific,
almost
area
plan
that
is
requested
by
the
developer,
and
so
we
went
through
that
process.
You
know,
commissioner,
tell
me
I
know
you
were
extensively
involved
in
that
a
couple
of
years
ago,
at
the
conclusion
of
that.
E
As
Mr
Schultz
mentioned,
the
board
adopted
a
glup
study
booklet,
which
provides
recommendations
and
discuss
the
the
process
as
well
as
they
advertised
the
change
in
the
general
land
use
plan
designation
for
the
site,
with
the
intention
that
the
site
plan
that
you
all
are
acting
on
this
evening
would
be
in
conformance
to
that
glup
study,
booklet
and
then
implement
the
recommendations
of
the
glove
study,
so
specifically
with
request
respect
to
community
benefits,
I.
E
Think,
given
the
fact
that
you
know
when
we
do
these
glove
studies,
it's
assumed
that
they'll
be
implemented
by
site
plan,
and
so
many
of
the
infrastructure
and
improvements
open
space,
Transportation
improvements,
things
of
that
nature.
Housing
are
contemplated
as
part
of
that
glup
study
right
and
so
that,
when
a
site
plan
comes
in
the
way
that
they
would
earn
additional
density
would
be
by
implementing
those
recommendations
from
the
glup
study.
Now
there
are
other
things.
E
Of
course
we
have
an
up
glup
contribution,
which
you
all
have
heard
about
this
evening
as
well,
and
so
that
that
as
well,
is
coming
forward
with
the
site
plan
and
that
captures
the
Delta
between
the
existing
density
through
the
existing
glove
designation
and
then
what
is
proposed.
So
that's,
that's
essentially
the
way
we
view
the
relation
between
the
site
plan
and
the
glove
study.
A
L
L
If
we
move
forward
with
this
tonight,
this
wouldn't
be
precedent
setting
for
any
future.
If
there's
a
Gallup
study,
that's
out
there
and
there's
a
site
plan
that
comes
in
and
the
neighbors
are
like.
This
is
what
we
went
through
for
all
these
days:
nights,
weekends
and
everything
else,
and
there's
no
departures
right.
So
this
wouldn't
be
precedent.
Setting
no.
E
A
Thank
you
any
other
comments.
Questions
before
we
go
for
motions
I
do
do
want
to
say:
I
was,
as
people
mentioned
present
through
both
the
special
Club
study
and
then
all
the
sprcs.
A
The
I
do
want
to
commend
the
staff
of
the
Developers
for
how
closely
they
did
work
with
Lion
Park,
which
did
participate
in
at
every
phase
every
meeting
they
were
there
and
they
were
vocal
and
it
was
people
who
weren't
just
at
the
far
end
of
lion
Park,
either
as
people
who
were
right
there.
So
you
know
there
they
were
very
much
involved.
A
Their
input
was
was
heard
and
responded
to
so
I
think
that
this
project
did
evolve
in
response
to
that
Community
process,
and
you
know,
I
I
personally
am
very
comfortable
with
where
we
are
right
now
and
how
we've
how
far
we've
come
for
this.
So
you
know
I
think
this
is
this
is
where
I
think
the
process
did
in
fact,
work
quite
nicely.
F
Great,
probably
thank
you
Mr
chair.
We
have
three
motions
on
this
project.
A
E
We
have
any
idea:
I
would
recommend
that
we
do
three
separate
motions:
okay,.
A
Okay,
do
we
event
anybody
want
to
speak
to
the
motion
comments?
Okay,
let's
take
the
vote.
Commissioner
Bagley
aye,
commissioner
Guevara
aye
commissioner
Burkey
aye,
commissioner
sarley
aye,
commissioner
strainer
aye,
commissioner
Robinson
aye,
commissioner
Weir
aye.
When
I
vote
I
as
well
unanimous.
Do
we
have
any
further
motions?
Yes,.
A
Do
we
have
a
second
second
Mr
Robert,
commissioner
Robinson?
Thank
you.
Anybody
want
to
speak
to
the
motion.
Take
a
vote,
commissioner.
Bagley.
C
C
A
F
Spln22-00006
Speed
number
469
to
permit
an
eight-story
mixed-use
building
with
approximately
251
dwelling
units
and
approximately
3
000
square
feet
of
retail
or
retail.
Equivalent
use
with
modifications
of
zoning
ordinance
requirements,
including
additional
density,
reduce
residential
and
Retail
parking
ratios
signs
and
other
modifications
as
necessary
to
achieve
the
proposed
development
plan,
subject
to
the
conditions
of
the
attached
ordinance.
A
Do
we
have
a
second
second,
commissioner
Bagley
thank
you
and
is
anybody
here
to
speak
to
the
motion
and
let's
go
ahead
of
the
vote.
Commissioner
Bagley
aye
commissioner
Guevara
aye,
commissioner
Burkey
aye,
commissioner
sarley
aye,
commissioner
Steiner
aye,
commissioner
Robinson
aye,
commissioner
Weir
aye
and
I
vote
I
as
well.
It
is
unanimous
the
matter
is
passed
and
completed.
Thank
you
all
very
much.
Thank
you.
Staff
and
applicants
go
forth
and
prosper.
Thank
you
all
very
much
for
your
time.
X
A
Good
Madame
clerk
do
we
have
anything
further
tonight,
but
to
recess
that's
right,
okay,
very
good!
Again,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
we
will
be
continuing
this
meeting
after
a
recess,
but
we
will
continue
this
Thursday
July
6th
at
7
pm,
so
I
want
to
thank
all
the
staff.
I
want
Madam
clerk.
Thank
you.