►
From YouTube: Planning and Regulatory Services Committee Wednesday the 6th of October 2021 at 3.00pm
Description
Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon Borough Council Planning and Regulatory Services Committee on Wednesday the 6th of October 2021 at 3.00pm in the Council Chamber at Craigavon Civic and Conference Centre.
B
B
Okay,
I'm
not
seeing
any
lights
on
we're
on
the
agenda
item
2.0,
which
is
declarations
of
interest.
We
can
just
take
them
as
we
go
through
the
meeting,
then
we're
on
to
agenda
item
three
start
with
3.1,
which
is
a
draft
development
plan
practice
note
han
over
to
helen's
stoops
on
zoom,
who
take
us
through
this.
This
part,
whenever
you
rally
home.
C
C
As
part
of
the
preparation
of
the
local
development
plan,
the
council
must
publish
a
draft
plan
strategy
and
a
draft
local
policies
plan
for
public
consultation
following
consideration
of
representations
received.
The
council
must
then
submit
these
documents
to
the
department
so
that
it
may
cause
an
independent
examination.
C
An
independent
examination
is
public
examination
of
the
development
plan
document
that
is
conducted
by
an
independent
body
such
as
the
planning
appeals
commission.
This
development
plan
practice
note
primarily
focuses
on
procedures
as
well
as
good
practice
that
apply
to
both
the
plan
strategy
and
the
local
policies
plan.
C
B
B
B
Thank
you,
alderman
anderson,
such
proposed
by
councillor
nicholson
seconded
by
alderman
anderson,
who
are
all
the
great
members
they're
all
great.
Thank
you
helen
who,
okay
members
around
the
agenda.
Madam
3.2,
it's
an
information
item,
it's
an
update
in
planned
case.
So
so
I'm
going
to
hand
over
to
damian
maldon
who
take
us
through
this
report.
F
F
So
you'll
see
that
there
is
a
lot
of
output,
but
the
number
of
applications
coming
in
continues
to
be
high.
We
just
aren't
sure
at
this
stage
how
long
that
will
continue
for
and
but
it
is,
it
is
placing
pressure
on
the
limited
resources
we
have
at
the
moment
and
it's
impacting
on
our
case
load.
So
currently
it
sits
at
1585.
F
we're
continuing
to
make
coverage
to
drive
that
down.
As
you
know,
members
from
previous
meetings
and
the
number
of
call-ins
just
to
give
you
that
statistic,
the
number
of
call-ins
during
the
the
month
of
september
six
making
it
seventeen
year-to-date
you'll,
also
see
in
that
report
before
you,
the
enforcement
quarterly
report
and
you'll
you'll
see
from
that
information.
We
have
400
just
over
400
current
live
enforcement
cases.
F
F
The
vacancy
level,
at
the
moment
within
the
department
sits
at
around
20
and
we're
continuing
to
work
extremely
closely
with
human
resources
to
fill
those
vacant
posts,
and
but
it
isn't
a
straightforward
process,
and
but
we
are
reasonably
optimistic
that
we
will
be
able
to
fill
those
vacant
posts
in
the
coming
weeks
and
we
we
are
well
advanced
in
relation
to
some
of
the
posts.
Others
may
be
not
as
advanced,
but
we
are
hopeful
that
ongoing
work
with
human
resources
will
result.
G
G
For
that
reason,
members
are
advised
that
for
those
applications
affected
by
the
plan,
all
decisions
made
by
officers
under
delegated
authority,
as
well
as
all
recommendations
plan
presented
to
this
committee,
will
need
to
be
made
having
given
weight
and
full
regard
to
the
guidance
provided
in
the
palm
members.
His
items
were
noting,
but
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions.
Thank
you.
B
E
Yeah
yeah
chair,
thank
you
and,
and
thanks
roshin
for
your
report
and
chairman
sort
of
given
the
nature
of
this,
and
can
I
propose
we're
going
to
committee
for
a
conversation
with
members,
just
as
obviously
with
the
planning
committee
we'll
have
a
lot
of
responsibilities
going
forward
and
I
think
there's
a
lot
to
discuss
in
relation
to
what
what
our
obligations
are
in
relation
this
and
I
do
think
it
does
touch
on
a
legal
matter.
So
I'm
supposed
to
go
to
committee.
I
have
a
conversation
sure
thank
you.
B
B
B
Okay,
that's
us
back
and
open
business,
we're
still
an
item
3.3
or
any
questions
and
open
business
on
this
matter
or
happy
to
note
happy
to
note.
Okay,
thank
you,
members
and
thank
you.
Russian
and
damien.
Okay,
members
ronda
item
four,
which
supports
from
head
of
building
control.
So
item
four
point:
one
street
name
report
for
black
thorne
manor,
I'm
having
over
to
tom
to
take
us
through
this
one.
I
Thank
you
chair
and
thank
you
john
good
afternoon
members
item.
4.1
is
a
request
for
an
image
of
the
development
consisting
of
33
dwellings
on
the
site
located
at
larry
road
in
bleary
and
details
around
appendix
one.
The
applicant's
preferred
name
for
this
development
is
blackthorne
manor.
The
applicant's
main
reason
for
the
preferred
name
is
that
it's
derived
from
the
ecology
of
the
site
noted
in
the
tree
survey.
Blackthorne,
hedges
and
beach.
Hedges
are
present
on
the
site
and
are
to
be
retained.
I
They
also
contained
that
with
the
that
the
preferred
name
is
in
keeping
with
the
long
established
horticultural,
themed
development
names
within
the
blurry
village
and
given
examples
of
oakland
park,
cedar
court
cedar,
drive,
cedar,
lodge
beach
close
on
horse
on
drive.
I
Members
should
know
that
the
development
of
a
local
development
of
the
balance
breeding
road
has
also
got
the
name
beech
hall.
Therefore,
officers
feel
that
the
third
name
suggestion
would
be
inappropriate
in
this
location.
So,
as
it
said,
the
applicant's
referred
nameplace
development
is
blackthorne
manner,
and
the
recommendation
therefore,
is
for
members
approval.
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions.
J
Weibull
just
to
say
that
it's
a
very
recent
argument-
and
I
think
it's
very
appropriate
name-
I'm
happy
to
propose.
B
I
Thank
you
chair.
This
is
a
request
for
the
naming
of
the
development
consisting
of
14
dwellings.
Outsider
carried
out
at
terminal
galley
road
in
bambridge.
This
site
was
occupied
by
a
row
of
derelict
houses
which
have
now
been
demolished,
and
details
are
contained
within
appendix
two.
The
applicants
reasonably
prefer
proposed
names
are
that
the
site
was
historically
known
by
two
of
the
names,
and
the
third
name
is
based
on
the
town
land
of
drum.
I
The
galley
members
will
note
from
the
historic
maps
of
atonics
2
that
the
area
was
originally
known
as
bryce's
row
from
1842
and
then
from
1905
was
known
as
smith's
hill,
and
the
applicant's
preferred
name
is
miss
hill
recommendation
is
from
members
approval,
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions.
Members
may
have.
B
Thank
you
are
any
other
proposals
from
the
floor
and
see
any
well
all
the
great
members.
Okay,
I'll
agree
on
that.
One
next
item
on
the
agenda:
4.3
again
we're
still
with
tom
it's
a
consultation
and
proposed
amendment
to
the
building
regulation,
technical
guidance
and
recently
changing
place,
toilet
provision.
I
Thank
you
chair.
The
purpose
of
this
report
is
to
seek
members
approval
to
submit
the
attached
draft
response
at
appendix
5
to
the
current
consultation
regarding
proposed,
amend
the
billing
regulations
to
introduce
requirements
for
changing
breast
tortoise
or
cpts,
and
these
will
be
within
certain
identified
new
buildings,
but
also
within
certain
identified
existing
buildings,
which
are
undergoing
a
material
change
of
use,
the
constitution's
permission
issued
by
the
department
of
finance,
but
the
standard
branch
who
are
responsible
for
setting
legal
requirements
contained
within
the
building
regulations.
I
This
amendment
would
set
a
standard
criteria
for
cpt
facility
provision
specifying
the
types
of
buildings
what
facilities
would
be
required,
as
well
as
size
capacity
and
other
factors
which
would
trigger
cpt
provision
just
for
members
own
information
cpt.
This
taurus
differ
from
existing
standard,
torus
and
disability
standard
assignment
provision,
insofar
as
they
are
designed
to
meet
the
needs
of
people
with
profound
and
multiple
learning
disabilities,
as
well
as
people
with
other
physical
disabilities,
such
as
spinal
injuries,
muscular
dystrophy
and
muscle
cirrhosis.
I
These
facilities
enable
people
with
complex
secure
needs
to
take
part
in
everyday
activities
such
as
travel
shopping,
family
design
or
attending
sporting
events,
and
the
standard
size
of
a
cbd
facility
room
is
a
floor
area
of
12
square
meters.
Approximately
facility
would
cost
in
a
region
of
30,
plus
thousand
officers
have
reviewed
the
documents
and
their
comments
are
included
in
the
consultation
response
form
at
appendix
5
and
for
ease
of
reference.
Our
comments
are
in
in
blue
to
the
six
questions.
I
In
summary,
the
draft
council
response
welcomes
the
proposals
and
to
introduce
criteria
for
changing
place,
toilet
facilities
and
the
building
regulations,
as
these
facilities,
as
mentioned,
will
allow
for
those
complex
care
needs
to
take
part
in.
I
Furthermore,
this
response
also
notes
that
many
of
those
cpts
already
installed-
I
would
not
necessarily
be
in
locations
that
would
be
required
under
these
building
regulation.
Amendment
proposals,
but
rather
they're,
provided
as
a
direct
result
of
central
government
funding
through
inclusivity
funding
again
council
officers
would
support
this
approach.
Although
we'd
be
concerned
that,
on
like
other
regions
in
the
uk,
northern
ireland
does
not
currently
have
a
dedicated
changing
business
fund,
which
developers
or
property
owners
could
avail
of
and
to
assist
with,
the
provision
of
cpt
facilities
as
required
the
closing
date
first.
B
B
I
do
agree
that
there's
some
unusual
aspects
to
propose
new
change,
given
that
you
think
that
areas
where
there
is
current
toilet
probation
but
almost
have
to
monitor
you
upgrade
those
such
as
the
likes
of
our
public
toilet
facilities
and
their
town,
centers
and
likes
for
big
parks
like
large
park,
gospel
park
and
so
on,
which
may
not
necessarily
be
covered
by
this,
but
then
they're
all
our
places
likes
of
example
and
they're.
B
Quite
a
small
rural
graveyard
will
be
covered,
but
you
know
you
wouldn't
think
that
sort
of
needed
and
definitely
the
strong
point
about
the
changing
places
fund.
I
think
that
would
be
good
to
see
that
come
alongside
this
proposed
legislation
when
it
is
complete
to
help
encourage
a
number
of
you
know,
businesses
and
so
on,
to
get
on
board
with
us
and
providing
some
financial
assistance
towards
fully
or
partly
funding
the
cost
of
those
changing
place
upgrades.
This
will
be
my
thoughts
on
the
counselor
nicholson,
yep.
E
Thanks
chair
and
truly
agree
with
everything
you've
you've
said
this
is.
We
should
welcome
this.
This
has
been
a
long
time
coming
german.
E
We
need
to
get
clarification
on
on
on
the
the
the
the
regulations,
because,
as
soon
as
we
put
in
black
and
white
into
the
the
technical
booklets
that
that's
that's
where
it
is
and
obviously
there'll
be,
we
want
to
get
the
right.
You
know
the
right
requirements
and-
and
I
totally
agree
with
tom,
asking
those
questions,
because
I
do
agree
with
you-
there's
a
lot
of
anomalies
in
it.
E
Where
you
know,
potentially,
you
could
create
conflict
down
the
line
with
our
bilingual
officers
and
and
obviously
a
facilities,
and
but
look
no
totally
welcome
a
chair,
and
I
will
second,
your
your
call,
the
finance
minister
to
release
the
funds.
The
funds
were
agreed
in
ndna.
E
So
there's
no
excuse
these.
This
money
should
be
out
and
available
to
allow
these
people
to
make
these
adoptions
and
provide
these
new
facilities,
because
it's
been
a
long
long
time
coming.
So
I
think
you
know,
is
a
committee
just
want
to
should
send
a
resounding
voice
and
back
counselor
flagger
and
call
for
the
accounts
of
the
child
that
the
change
of
places
fund
to
be
released
immediately
by
the
finance
minister.
Thank
you,
chair.
L
Just
tackle
the
sentiments
that
have
been
said
before
myself,
I've
had
the
pleasure
of
turned
our
fantastic
facility
behind
us
here,
the
site
league,
leisure
center
and
the
amount
of
change
in
places
facilities
within
there.
That
makes
every
bit
of
difference
to
helping
people
with
disabilities.
I'm
just
happy
to
support
the
comments.
Thank
you,
chad,.
B
B
Okay,
members,
with
a
proposal
on
the
floor
by
country
nicholson
second
by
alderman,
bard,
accept
the
recommendations,
oh
all,
great,
all
the
great
members:
okay,
okay,
we're
on
that
agenda,
item
five
point
or
four
point:
four:
what's
an
item
for
information,
we're
sticking
with
tom?
That's
an
update
in
the
building,
control
and
property
certificate
application.
I
Thank
you
chair
this
just
to
update
members
on
terms
of
what
good
undertaken
by
the
building
tool
department
at
the
moment,
notably
as
members
say
in
pentax
six
for
the
first
six
months
of
this
financial
year,
and
we
have
received
just
over
1700
applications
and
that
has
a
notional
construction
value
of
just
under
a
117
million.
In
september
alone,
we
had
239
applications
with
a
notional
value
of
just
over
18.05
million,
which
hopefully
signs
two
signs
of
continued
positivity
in
our
local
construction
industry.
I
During
the
six
months
period,
we
undertook
1224
plan
assessment
cases
and
strategic
decision
notice
were
issued
on.
All
of
these.
The
departments
are
also
completed
in
a
six-month
period
just
over
7,
690,
site
inspections
and
currently
with
the
influx
of
applications.
Our
turnaround
times
are
not
quite
as
fast
as
we
would
like
it,
but
we
have
commenced,
with
the
recruitment
for
current
begin
posts,
to
address
this
issue,
so,
hopefully
we'll
get
back
on
target
as
quickly
as
possible.
I
The
department
also
continues
to
deliver
the
council's
property
certificate
function
for
the
conveyancing
of
properties
across
the
board.
In
this
six
months
period,
we've
received
administered,
2324
applications
and
processed
and
issued
2322
certificates
to
solicitors
and
agents
relating
to
property
sales.
I
I'm
happy
to
report
that,
with
their
new
systems
place
that
we
have
no
backlog
with
these
and
we
are
turning
over
and
at
least
90
percent
of
these
within
the
target
of
10
days.
O
Thanks
very
much
tom-
and
it's
not
often
have
15
minutes
left
at
the
end
of
this
section,
to
really
focus
on
on
building
control
issues.
So,
firstly,
just
thanks
for
for
all
your
efforts
today
and
churning
out
so
many
checks
and
on
all
sorts
of
regulatory
analysis
of
that
over
over
that
period
of
time
in
a
timely
manner
as
well.
We
appreciate
it
and,
but
just
on
a
wider
point,
I
suppose
it's
something
that's
very
topical
in
the
in
the
media.
At
the
moment,
with
the
ancillary
britain.
O
That
are
ongoing
and
across
the
uk
it's
almost
brought
to
my
attention
in
recent
weeks,
where
development
that
had
been
dormant-
or
you
know
not
commenced
for
a
number
of
years,
following
the
slump
in
the
housing
market
and
that
development
has
now
started
to
to
be
built
out.
If
you
like
with
that.
O
As
I
know,
it's
something
I
have
raised,
we
at
home
in
the
past
and
those
houses
are
being
emulated
under
the
regulation,
as
it
was
at
the
time
of
approval
and
on
that
basis,
have
a
concern
around
that
in
terms
of
the
the
spec
or
the
level
insulation
that
will
be.
You
know
legally
permitted
to
be
used,
I
suppose
from
the
developers
and
the
builders
perspective
in
line
with
the
regulation
at
the
time
versus
the
whole.
O
Trajectory
of
you
know,
climate
and
climate
change,
energy
efficiency
and
those
two
issues
seem
to
jar
considerably.
When
we
consider
the
fact
that
you
know
the
the
you
know,
all
the
focus
of
the
minute
is
around
efficiency
and
what
we
can
do
to
minimize
the
use
of
fossil
fuels,
and
yet
we
have
this
peculiar
anomaly,
where
you
know
a
dormant
development.
Can
recommence
tomorrow,
but
be
completely
fine
with
the
fact
that
you
know
a
50
ml
cavity
wall
insulation
will
be
acceptable.
O
You
know,
whereas
that
is
vastly
inferior
to
what
we
know
and
can
be
utilized
today
in
terms
of
what
technology
is
available
and
the
benefit,
ultimately
that
that
would
pass
on
to
any
potential
buyer
or
homeowner
and
going
forward
on
there
and
the
ultimately,
the
reduction
in
them
made
oil
or
gas
or
whatever
they're
going
to
consume
in
that
property.
To
keep
warm,
I
feel
like
during
during
winter.
So
I'm
wondering
is
there
some
way
of
those
two
issues
being
reconciled
or
can
build
and
control
legislation
catch
up
with
the
fact
that
you
know?
O
Can
we
put
a
stop
on
this
in
terms
of
saying
right,
regardless
of
when
the
digger
comes
in
here,
you're
going
to
have
to
adhere
to
specifications
around
particularly
energy
efficiency
and
insulation,
as
they
are
today
as
opposed
to
how
they
were
10
years
ago?
Or
you
know
whatever
the
case
may
be,
and
you're
only
talking,
I
think
maybe
that's
the
case.
You
know
one
house
could
be
built.
O
It
could
be
land
dormant
for
a
number
of
years
and
then
that
process
starts
again,
but
you
know
things
are
so
immediate
now,
and
technology
has
moved
on
so
much
and
the
arguments
around
energy
efficiency
are
so
high
level
at
the
minute
around
the
climate.
I
think
it
is
something
we
need
to
be
very,
very
aware
of,
and
I
think
we
should
make
some
move
to
try
and
signal
that
up
the
line
that
we're
not
completely
comfortable
without
purely
from.
D
O
I
Thank
you,
sir,
and
another
muslim
makes
a
very
valid
point.
This
was
raised
at
length
with
our
legislators
back
in
during
the
last
change
in
regulations
in
2012.
I
I
If,
if
he
hasn't
started
above
floor
level,
then
it
would
no
longer
be
valid
and
would
have
to
have
a
new
application,
but
that
was
the
only
concession
at
that
time.
The
other
thing
is
that
the
there
is
an
energy
efficiency
certificate
for
every
new
dwelling,
but
again
that's
down
to
the
detail
and
the
house
purchaser
may
not
necessarily
know
the
intricacies
of
that
certificate
and
what
that
means
for
them.
I
What
I
would
say
is
that
members
may
not
be
aware,
but
the
bernie
sanders
branch
have
informed
us
that
there
is
a
new
consultation
due
to
combined
in
the
coming
weeks.
It's
a
it's
on
an
uplift
to
the
conservation
if
you
own
power
regulations.
So
that
is
a
very
valid
point
that
could
well
be
raised
at
that
time,
and
I'd
say
it
has
been
an
ongoing
difficulty
for
us
trying
to
enforce
something
and
the
the
experience
has
been
that
generally,
you
have
different
types
of
contractors.
I
You
have
some
very
good
contractors
who
will
do
the
latest
and
you
have
some
it'll
be
down
to
cost,
and
what
we
find
is
that
those
are
based
on
cost
won't
use
the
higher
quality
installations
until
the
older
installations
are
actually
no
longer
available,
but.
I
We
from
an
enforcement
point
of
view
cannot
enforce
regulations
above
and
beyond
when
the
application
is
made
currently.
But,
as
I
said,
with
the
consultation
coming
forward
in
the
coming
weeks
and
months,
it
could
be
an
opportunity
to
raise
that
very
valuable
point
again.
E
It
is
a
problem
and
not
so
much
in
housing.
Developments
as
thomas
said,
because,
obviously,
unless
they're
they're
they're
started
you're
in
the
new
regs,
but
one-off
houses
and
things-
and
you
know,
we've
all
seen
things
like
tom
say.
For
example,
you
see
foundations
doug
in
the
countryside.
You
know
to
secure
the
planning,
obviously
have
a
billing
troll
application
in
and
you
were
brought
out
to
site
to
check
the
phone.
So
does
that
mean
that
their
dwelling
would
would
be
on
the
regulations
that
it
was
approved
or
would
the
new
application
require.
I
And
through
the
chair,
yes,
a
one-off
house
in
the
company
said
if
it's
land
dormant
or
if
it's
at
foundation
level,
we
can
only
by
law,
enforce
the
regulations
we
can
recommend.
But
we
can't
enforce
anything.
That's
above
and
beyond
the
regulations
that
were
applicable
at
the
time
of
the
application.
B
Thank
you,
tom
content,
councilman,
yes,
okay,
members
of
no
other
lights
on
or
happy
to
note,
okay,
happy
note
and
thank
you
tom
for
taking
us
through
those
okay
members
from
the
agenda
item
five,
which
is
a
confidential
report,
secret
proposal
and
second
her
to
go
on
the
committee
proposed
by
councilman
clown
sacrament
by
alderman,
barr,
okay,
I
just
have
to
read
out
following
members
and
online
viewers
in
accordance
with
the
schedule,
six
of
the
local
government
act
example:
information.
We
will
be
now
moving
into
a
confidential
session
of
the
council.
B
B
F
Thank
you
sure,
members
that
first
item
we
touched
upon
earlier
on
in
the
meeting,
and
there
is
a
letter
in
from
the
ulster
farmers
union,
raising
concern
about
the
planning
advice,
note
and
they
have
written
to
the
minister
to
ask
that
the
planning
advice
not
be
withdrawn,
and
so
it's
our
intention
officer's
intention,
an
urgent
agreement
to
send
a
copy
of
the
council's
response
to
the
minister
to
share
that
with
ulster
farmers.
Union.
F
So
it's
just
to
make
your
where
members
of
that
that
there
will
be
a
review
of
the
policy
and
that
requirement
to
inform
their
phy
of
any
proposals
or
decisions
of
that
nature.
B
Thank
you
damian
any
any
views
on
that
one.
No,
I
certainly
do
so.
I'd
actually
ask
the
like.
I
think
we
should
write
respond
to
the
minister,
saying
that
armada,
bamberg
and
ku
cregavenburg
council
is
completely
opposed
to
any
fracking
taking
place
within
the
council
area
and
would
request
that
the
minister
place
a
complete
bomb
on
any
fracking
taking
place
within
northern
ireland.
E
Remind
me:
did
you
bring
as
far
as
the
rules
of
motion
to
the
council
like
I,
I
think
it's
a
difficult
one.
You
know
from
from
a
committee.
I
think
it's
a
full
council
matter
because,
like
we're,
41
members
we're
only
a
committee
and
you're.
Actually,
speaking
about
the
council
or
you
speak
on
behalf
of
the
committee.
B
Thank
you,
country
nixon.
I
should
be
aware
all
recommendations
from
committees
other
than
our
planning
decisions,
our
recommendations
that
need
to
be
ratified
at
full
council.
So
if
the
decision
was
to
come
that,
we
proposed
send
this
letter
that
that
would
then
be
or
approved
at
full
council
or
you
know,
changed
whatever
happens
with
full
council
so
with
so
all
the
proposals
on
the
floor.
Are
you
looking
to
come
in
here
or
jimmy.
F
Yeah
deluxe
thanks
chair,
for,
let
me
back
in
look
at
the
only
thing
I
was
going
to
mention
sure
is
that
when
the
the
we,
the
council
will
be
consulted
on
the
review
of
the
policy
that
dfi
is
going
to
undertake
and
that
we
don't
know
when
that
will
be.
But
I
would
expect
that
will
be
sort
of
the
end
of
this
year
early
next
year,
and
that
would
be
an
opportunity
at
that
stage.
F
O
O
And
it's
just
just
all.
I
think
we've
had
this
on
a
number
of
occasions
in
the
past.
I
think
there
was
a
going
back
a
number
of
years.
There
was
positions
on
wind
turbines
and
various
issues
around
energy,
and
I'm
just
you
know,
I'm
just
particularly
concerned
about
a
council
plan
department
issuing
a
decision
when
we
have
to
approach
applications
generally
without
prejudice.
O
So
I'm
not
content
that
we
issue
any
directive
in
this
because
it's
up
to
us,
if
such
an
application
comes
before
this
committee
to
fully
consider
it
come
to
the
table
without
any
views,
ea
rna
and
if
we
do
have,
then
we
have
to
remove
ourselves.
So
I
personally,
like
I,
you
know,
have
a
view
on
many
different
things.
O
The
planning
committee
is
somewhere
where
you
should
come
and,
as
we
were
told
extensively
in
our
legal
training,
come
to
the
table
and
deliver
deliberate
or
not
without
prejudice,
if
you
like,
so
I'm
not
sure
where
it's
such
a
blanket
decision
of
a
planning
committee
would
leave
us
so
we'd
appreciate
the
aliens
advice
on
that
thanks.
B
Thank
you
bringing
damian
charlie,
but
certainly
my
own
vienna
does
that
I
don't
think
a
plan.
Application
for
fracking
would
ever
come
to
council,
because
a
plan
application
related
in
fracking,
I
say,
would
be
considered
as
a
regionally
significant
application,
therefore
be
decided
by
the
department
department
for
infrastructure.
So
essentially
we
would
have
no
view
in
it
as
a
planning
committee.
B
My
proposal
is
that
council
would
write
to
the
ministers
taking
the
corporate
view
that
we
are
against
tracking
and
asking
the
minister.
Do
they
die
in
a
complete
battle
on
it?
So
it
wouldn't
be
the
plan
committee
of
big
council
as
a
whole
we'll
be
taking
that
decision,
we'll
bring
in
damien
knight.
F
Yeah,
thank
you
chair
and
look.
I
suppose
I
I
have
to
share
alderman
wilson's
concerns
about
this.
My
concerns
upon
an
officer
would
be
that
the
planning
committee
is
putting
itself
in
invera's
position
here
by
being
perceived
to
predetermine
the
applications
of
a
certain
nature,
and
you
know
we
may
never
get
an
application
for
fragging,
but
we
don't
know
what
those
lie
ahead
and
if
the
planning
committee
was
to
make
its
position
no
one
at
this
stage
it
shows
it's
got
a
closed
mind.
F
It
chooses
predetermined
the
application
that
set
its
position
in
advance.
There
are
legal
implications
around
that
and
I
think
there
is
a
risk
involved,
so
you
know
I
would
share
alderman
wilson's
concerns.
I
don't
know
whether
the
legal
adviser
might
want
to
add
what
I
said
that
chair.
If
you
think
it
would
be
helpful.
O
Yeah-
and
I
mean
it's-
it's
completely,
not
from
a
perspective
of
how
that
you
know
a
particular
view
on
what's
before.
Is
it
simply
from
the
the
pretext
of
the
plumbing
committee
on
its
general
neutrality,
on
issues
prior
to
them
being
considered
by
the
committee
on
an
application
per
application
basis
and
a
new?
You
know
what's
saying
here:
planning
policy
on
oil
and
gas
development,
including
development
involving
fracking?
O
So
it's
covering
a
wide
variety
of
topics,
and
you
know
just
from
my
perspective,
I
think
it's
useful
that
we,
you
know,
signal
our
intention
year
or
day
on
any
application
prior
to
any
application.
Coming
I
mean
we
could.
We
did
have
a
counselor
previously,
who
signaled
his
attention
towards
wind
turbines
and
then
withdrew
himself
for
all
those
applications.
You
know
that
ever
came
so
well.
That
was
his
own
volition.
O
He
did
that,
and
you
know
I
that's
up
to
that
individual
person,
but
you
know,
should
we
have
took
the
view
as
a
council
that
we're
completely
against
wind
turbines
as
of
committee,
then
I
think
it
would
have
been
you
know
it
wouldn't
have
been
very
long
before
would
have
been
in
hot
water
in
that
regard
and
because
there
was
plenty
of
plan
and
obligations
came
in
for
wind
turbines
over
that
early
stage.
So
that's
purely
from
that
basis,
so
we'd
welcome
any
other
advice.
B
Thank
you,
alderman
wilson.
I
suppose
I
mean
I
would
disagree.
I
think
it
is
entirely
appropriate
that
council,
as
an
organization,
could
take
a
position
against
fracking
if
we
chose
to
do
so.
If
the
recommendation
would
come
from
this
committee
or
indeed
any
other
committee,
that
would
be
a
decision
for
full
council
to
decide
on
a
lie
down
from
councillor
tolman.
P
Thanks
chair,
if
consciousness
wants
to
form
a
council,
if
you
should
bring
it
through
the
council
committee
or
if
he
wants,
the
former
council
fees
should
not
be
done
through
the
committee
when
the
crack
procedure
is
deformed,
they
bring
a
notice
of
motion,
and
so,
of
course,
larvae
wants
to
bring
the
proper
process,
and
you
know
we'll
have
that
this
discussion,
you
know
the
sdlp
is
a
froze
to
fracking
opposed
to
fracking,
just
as
we
are
to
oppose
the
parties
trying
to
form
council
policy
in
the
wrong
manner.
B
Thank
you
count,
sir
tolman.
I
would
disagree.
I
suppose
any
proposal
come
on
from
any
committee
but
then
go
to
full
council
and
depend
on
what
happens
if
all
kinds
of
would
either
become
council
policy
or
not,
and
you
could
do
so
either
by
a
notice
of
motion
or
proposing
to
agree
to
a
recommendation
of
a
committee
report
to
disagree
and
have
a
recommendation
of
committee
report
and
a
proposing
something
relevant
to
a
report
that
has
been
added
before
committee,
which
I
have
done
so
on
item
7.2,
okay,
members.
B
B
Thank
you,
alderman
barbless,
suggested
by
damian,
I'm
happy
to
do
so.
Would
you
like
to
come
in.
A
Thank
you
chair.
I
would
echo
the
comments
of
damien
in
this
matter
that
we
have
to
ensure
that
any
application
that
could
come
before
the
committee
or
council
in
future
is
not
deemed
to
be
predetermined
and
that
it
has
been
considered
with
an
open
mind.
A
Otherwise,
we
could
end
up
in
litigation
such
as
judicial
review,
further
down
the
line.
O
Bit
like
that,
I
mean
it's
in
this
day
and
age,
you
know.
Sometimes
that's
scene
is
all
you're
in
support
or
something
or
you're,
not
in
support
of
someone
that
could
be
hugely
topical.
Like
fracking
I
mean
I
can.
I
can
sense
where
you're
coming
from
from
an
alliance
party
perspective
from
you
know,
a
green
climate
type
perspective,
which
is
totally
fine,
but
where
I'm
coming
from
is
this
committee's
authority?
O
This
committee's,
I
don't
know
just
this
committee's
ability
to
take
any
application
and
deliver
it
on
without
someone
leaving
or
someone
before
they
actually
come
here
going,
but
you
said,
you're
not
going
to
do
anything
about
it
or
you've
already
give
us
your
view,
and
this
that's
simply
the
issue,
and
this
could
be
about
anything
because
I
have
views
on
lots
of
things,
but
it
doesn't
mean
I
want
to
stop
a
plan
policy
or
a
plan
application
being
made
to
this
council
for
such
a
thing
and
then
that
I
wouldn't
be
able
to
deliberate
on
it.
O
So
I
think
that's
where
we're
coming
from,
and
you
know
I
just
think
it's.
Needless,
I
think,
as
counselor
tomorrow
said,
the
way
to
bring
it
is
through
a
notice
of
motion.
If
your
you
know,
policy
points
are
to
be:
that's,
that's
the
venue
or
the
arena
they
should
be
decided
upon,
which
is
full
council
everybody's
in
you're,
not
signaling,
one
particular
committee,
but
I
think
plan
is
completely
different
because
we
we're
one
of
the
most.
I
don't
know
we're.
O
We
have
it's
quite
a
high
part
committee
in
terms
of
the
decisions
we
make
and
on
where
they
go
after
that
and
the
weird
people
put
on
them.
So
that's
my
perspective.
I
think
we
just
have
to
be
super
careful
and
form
an
opinions
on
such
a
thing
that
then
maybe
excuse
or
prevent
somebody
from
submitting
any
type
of
application
around
petroleum
or
whatever
you
know
and
the
difficulties
that'll
bring.
You
know,
so
I
do
respect
the
advice
that
I've
been
given
on
this
issue.
I
suppose
now
there's
been
a
proposal.
O
I
either
propose
that
we
don't
then,
on
purely
on
the
basis
of
the
legal
advice
that
we
have
been
given,
that
we
don't
proceed
down
that
path.
Just
for
the
autonomy
of
this
committee.
B
O
Just
that
we
don't,
you
know,
signal
a
predetermination
around
such
you
know
any
application
of
any
type
that
we
don't
signal
that
as
a
committee,
not
against
somebody
bringing
a
motion
to
council
and
arguing
their
point
there,
and
it
may
well
be
that
everyone's
supportive
of
that,
but
I'm
against
the
committee
issuing
that
type
of
directive
that
we
are
against
a
certain
per
se.
Our
type
of
plan
and
application
come
on
the
council
for
a
particular
purpose.
I'm
just
not
happy
with
that.
P
B
P
B
E
Yep
thanks
chair
and
no
you're
right,
like
your
proposal,
is
legitimate,
but
I
do
share
the
concerns
of
alderman
wilson
and
I
will
second
his
given
the
legal
advice,
and
I
will
point
out
something
I
lost
damian.
It
does
refer
to
in
the
latter.
You
know
the
decision
is
to
commence
work
on
a
review
of
strategic
planning
policy
on
oil
and
gas
development,
including
the
development
fracking.
E
In
addition
to
seeing
the
outcome
in
the
policy
review
like
that
policy
review
will
form
policy
which
we,
as
a
committee,
may
have
to
make
judgment
on
down
the
line
and,
if
we're
turning
around
we're
saying
you
know
close
our
mind
and
saying
like
this
this
this
is.
This
is
an
opinion.
Before
we
even
see
what
the
outcome
is
of
the
the
the
the
the
the
plan
and
policy
review.
I
I
I
think
it's
it's
it's
very
larger.
E
I
think
we
have
to
wait
and
see
you're
entitled
your
opinion,
your
title,
your
party
policy
opinion
and
at
the
end
of
the
day,
but
I
think,
has
been
outlined
by
the
legal
here-
that
we
we
as
a
committee
need
to
remain
autonomous
because
this
could
perform
this
application
could
come
to
our
committee.
There's
not
necessarily
they're,
all
reasonably
significant
sure,
and
I
don't
think
you
can
say
it's
black
and
white
as
simple
as
that,
there
will
potentially
be
applications
come
to
this
committee
that
will
be
formed
as
part
of
this
policy.
B
Thank
you
councillor
nicholson
again,
I
don't
see
an
issue
with
ourselves
having
a
view
whether
it's
now
or
whether,
in
a
couple
of
months
time,
if
you're
against
dragon
you're
against
it,
doesn't
matter
whether
it's
an
hour
or
three
months
down
the
road,
and
I
think
you
know
I
think,
with
alderman
wilson.
You
know
imagine
the
point
about
you
know:
energy
efficiency
of
housing
and
things
like
that.
B
M
Yes,
thank
you
chair.
The
letter
is
based
around
fracking.
It's
not
a
pastor
around
anything
else.
It's
just
clean
and
simple.
All
committees
write
ladders,
all
the
time
related
to
the
different
ministers,
different
departments.
This
one
is
around
fragon,
it's
not
around
any
other
parts
of
the
ladder
or
the
proposals.
What
to
say
about
petroleum
about
other
issues.
It's
just
fragging,
so
I'm
still
in
support
of
the
ladder.
I'm
not
it's,
not
a
motion.
It's
not
a
emotion!
We'll
look
on
the
council
to
take.
B
Thank
you,
country,
duffy,
couldn't
say
about
it
myself.
Funny
reminds
me.
I
had
the
pleasure
this
morning
of
attending
the
arma
planetarium
as
it's
launched
its
five-year
strategy,
and
I
think
goldman
bar
was
there,
whereas
well,
maybe
one
or
two
years
where
also
as
part
of
the
planetariums
process,
they
are
produced.
A
video
for
cop
26,
which
highlights
was
that
aluminum
bar
are
placed
on
the
cosmos,
which
shows
how
how
fragile
the
earth
is
given
the
ground
picture
of
our
whole
universe
and
how
fragile
this
is
sort
of
those.
B
So
we
do
need
to
keep
looking
after
our
environment
and
particularly
protecting
it
from
the
any
potential
negative
consequences
of
climate
change,
man-made
climate
change.
So
certainly
it's
highlighted
to
myself
this
morning
that
we
need
to
pursue
all
efforts
as
opposed
to
protect
ourselves
and
protect
our
bra.
I
think
writing
a
menace.
A
letter
to
the
minister.
You
know
saying
that
we're
against
fracking
in
the
bar
and
asking
our
tree
violet.
I
think
it's
a
small,
a
small
thing
we
can
do,
but
it's
still
significant
on
what
they
call
them
in
wilson
yeah
I
mean.
O
I
think
that's
a
major
mistake
to
do
for
a
chair
of
a
committee
to
do
that,
and
the
legal
advice
in
my
opinion
suggests
that
that
is
the
case,
that
we
should
avoid
doing
that.
The
legal
training
that
we
went
through,
which
was
extensive
back
at
the
start
of
this
whole
procedure
of
planning
before
you
know,
coming
to
through
rpa.
O
It
was
quite
heavy
on
that
perspective
on
on
that
basis,
and
I
this
is
not
about
energy,
it's
not
about
it's,
not
even
about
the
claimant.
It's
about
this
committee,
it's
simply
about
the
processes
of
this
committee,
so
I
have
my
view
on
fracking.
I
have
my
view
on
that.
But
when
I
come
to
committee,
I
have
to
set
that
aside
and
objectively
consider
a
planning
application
and
you
could
bring
a
plan.
O
You
know.
I
just
don't
think
that's
great,
and
I
would
urge
you
not
to
go
down
that
road.
Not
from
I
mean
that's,
this
isn't
an
environmental
issue.
It's
a
pure
committee.
O
It's
about
the
efficiency
of
this
committee
as
on
how
it's
viewed
by
a
potential
applicant
who
wishes
to
come
before
us.
So
that's
from
my
perspective.
I
just
want
to
make
that
completely
clear
in
case
it
goes
off
somewhere
where
I'm
all
for
fracking
or
I'm
all
for
some
type
of
it's
not
about
that.
It's
basically
about
this
committee
on
how
it
operates.
B
Thank
thank
you
alderman,
wilson,
to
say
that
dragon
isn't
linked
to
climate
or
linked
to
environmentalism
and
certainly
bespoke
and
certainly
well,
you
sort
of
made
reference
to
dispose
himself
and
indeed
every
other
member
of
this
committee,
including
yourself
on
each
application
we'll
have
to
consider,
while
they
view
themselves
to
be
of
an
open
mind,
while
they
consider
the
application
those
are
about
what
19,
18
19
that
we're
dealing
with
later
on
and
then
day
one
I
was
going
to
make
a
declaration
of
interest,
but
it's
since
been
pulled,
as
that
would
be
the
appropriate
thing
to
do,
have
no
problem
making
a
declaration
of
interest.
B
If
I
feel
the
need
to
do
so
in
order
to
keep
the
impartiality
of
this
committee
intact.
I
also
if
I
feel
the
need
to
do
so
to
make
a
proposal
on
any
matter
that
comes
forward
before
this
committee,
any
other
committee
or
any
other
full
council
unless
you
she
has
come
through
to
us
and
7.2
as
councilor
duffy's
mentioned.
This
is
about
writing
a
letter.
I
see
no
harm
in
it.
We
write
letters
all
the
time
we
even
wrote
a
letter
to
the
minister
of
this
week
relating
to
the
pam
I
mean
counselor.
B
What
wilson
excited
police
old,
one
wasn't
made
reference
to
emotions
and
so
on,
and
perhaps
that
would
be
another
route
to
do
it.
This
is
also
a
perfectly
legal
route
to
do
it,
and
then
data
sort
of
surprising
he's
talking
about
motions,
given
the
fact
that
he
and
his
party
severely
limited
motions
for
members.
For
example,
I'm
only
allowed
to
bring
one
motion
a
month.
I've
already
used
it
now.
My
voice
is
silent
in
terms
of
my
ability
to
bring
motions.
So
certainly
what
point
of
order.
N
L
B
B
Yes,
old
bombard
just
that
you
have
to
give
the
order,
but
I'll
tell
you
what
I
will
take
the
got.
The
question,
maybe
okay,
remember
just
to
clarify.
So
we
have
a
proposal
on
the
floor
from
myself.
Second,
by
councillor,
duffy
upper
right,
a
ladder
saying
obviously,
council
is
against
bracken
with
them,
it's
boundary
and
lasting
minister,
terry
van
fracken,
regionally
and
the
sec.
That's
second
by
country,
duffy,
and
then
the
second
proposal
was
just
sort
of
proposing
a
while
to
do
that
and
I'll
take
a
view.
B
B
B
Okay
members,
so
let's
just
put
a
records
proposal
from
the
south
second
by
councillor,
duffy,
to
write
the
letter
to
the
minister
saying
that
we're
against
fracking
in
the
council
area,
I'm
asking
her
to
place
a
bomb
overall,
okay
members,
I'm
just
going
to
bring
you
through
here,
but
I'm
going
to
bring
you
in.
We
just
wait
until
you're
on
the
screen.
So
people
in
the
online
can
hear
you
okay,
first,
the
auburn
bar.
I'm
sorry,
all
my
knowledge.
B
K
E
B
B
B
B
So
we're
now
on
to
item
eight,
any
other
business
haven't
been
received
any
at
this
stage.
Okay,
it
looks
like
that's
not
finished.
Okay.
Members
were
finished
with
the
portion
of
this
meeting,
so
maybe
ask
members
return
back
for
about.
I
said
by
25
to
5
for
the
planning
applications.
Okay,
see
it's
all
then.
B
B
Members
of
the
public
are
advised
that
the
planning
and
regulatory
services
committee
is
being
held
in
the
council
chamber
and
queer
gavin
civic
center.
However,
due
to
covert
restrictions,
the
number
of
persons
who
can
be
physically
facilitated
in
the
chamber
severely
limited
as
a
result,
members
of
the
public
are
only
able
to
view
the
meeting
on
youtube
and
anyone
wishing
to
address
the
committee
has
been
invited
in
the
first
instance
as
an
attendee
audio
recording
is
being
used
to
assist
in
preparing
the
formal
moments.
B
Also,
during
the
course
of
this
meeting,
questions
may
be
asked
by
councillors,
who
are
members
of
the
planning
and
regulatory
services
committee
or
planning
officers.
Applicants
for
planning
permission
objectives
are
those
speaking
on
their
behalf
in
doing
so
counselors
endeavor
to
ascertain
the
information
once
they
fail
as
necessary
to
enable
them
to
determine
the
application.
B
Okay
members,
so
appendix
one
has
been
removed
from
the
schedule
following
their
state
of
information,
which
requires
furthering
the
investigation
by
officers.
Appendix
2
has
been
removed
from
the
schedule.
As
the
reason
I'm
giving
here
is
further
consultation
required
appendix
3
we're
having
a
bit
of
difficulty
connecting
through
to
one
the
peaceful
who
has
had
speaking
rights,
so
we're
going
to
skip
it
for
the
time
being
and
come
back
to
it.
Appendix
4
has
been
removed
from
the
schedule,
with
the
raising
given
further
consultation
required.
B
So
the
first
item
we're
going
to
be
considering
today
is
appendix
5,
which
is
application
number
ll
with
2021
1069,
slash,
f,
okay
and
I'm
handed
over
to
sinead
mcavoy
senior
planning
officer.
But
I'm
just
aware,
whereas
a
person
with
speaking
rights
could
they
be
invited
to
resume
at
this
stage?
Q
Q
Q
The
purpose
of
the
application
is
to
vary
the
net
retail
sales
area
of
the
approved
unit,
number
five
to
be
occupied
by
marx
and
spencer,
from
1140
square
meters
to
1
301
square
meters,
and
to
remove
the
restriction
on
the
permitted
rs
for
deliveries
to
the
site
as
such.
While
there
is
an
application
provided
a
convenient
unit
of
1858
square
meters,
gross
which
will
not
change
the
net
sales
area
is
now
proposed
to
be
increased
by
161
square
meters
or
14
percent.
Q
All
applications
for
retail
developments
above
a
threshold
of
one
thousand
square
meters,
gross
external
area
which
are
not
proposed
in
a
town
center
location,
are
required
to
undertake
a
full
assessment
of
retail
impact
as
well
as
need
and
update.
Retail
impact
assessments
has
been
smelled
to
support
this
section.
54
application.
Q
Q
It
is
envisaged
that
the
strong,
independent,
independent
food
shops
in
band
bridge
will
benefit
from
introducing
mns
to
band
bridge.
Shoppers
will
more
likely
to
make
linked
shopping
strips
to
the
town
center
if
they
stay
in
bound
bridge,
rolling,
leave
to
visit,
spruce
field
or
near.
You
will
note
that
the
range
was
approved
last
month.
The
range
has
a
floor.
Space
of
250
square
meters
of
convenience,
floor
space
and,
as
a
consequence,
a
cure
of
impact
assessment
has
been
provided
by
the
applicant
to
consider
the
impact
of
the
ranged
food
and
drink
floor
space.
Q
The
application
seeks
to
vary
the
condition
to
remove
the
rs
for
delivery
m
s
for
receive
frozen,
are
frozen
and
chilled
goods
from
britain
that
arrive
in
overnight
ferries
due
to
the
service
demands
of
all
their
stores.
The
removal
and
restrictions
delivery
times
for
hdv
vehicles
would
ensure
they
can
continue
to
operate
and
are
not
restricted
to
the
store
times
previously
approved.
Q
The
opposed
site
is
in
the
middle
of
a
large
retail
park.
It
is
surrounded
by
commercial
uses
and
industrial
land
to
the
rear
and
considering
the
impact
in
any
sense
of
receptor
officers
in
consultations
with
the
environmental
health
department.
The
competent
authority
on
such
matters
have
no
objection
to
the
principle
of
removing
these
hours
of
delivery
times.
Others
have
taken
into
consideration
all
other
materials
raised
in
response
to
consultation
and
publicity,
and
it's
recommended
that
the
variants
of
these
contains
conditions
are
approved.
Q
Q
That
just
remember
again,
that's
the
real
view
of
the
post
site
in
which
we
approved
in
may
this
year
and
that's
the
location
plan
in
relation
to
where
it
sets
in
relation
to
the
bridgewater
retail
park.
Next
slide,
please
so
that's
the
site
layout
is
approved,
and
so
the
layout
has
approved
will
not
change.
The
footprint
will
not
change
the
overall
size
and
store
will
not
change.
Q
It's
simply
an
internal
net
floor
space
for
retail
next
slide,
please
so
the
proof
plan
under
application
la28
is
there
so
the
unit
gross
floor
space
will
not
change
next
slide.
Please!
So
that's
a
brief
service.
Your
arrangement
you
can
see
is
to
the
north
of
the
site,
so
it
shares
and
linked
with
tesco
and
you'll
note
from
the
report.
Tesco
do
not
have
a
restriction
rate
in
two
hours
of
operation
for
delivery
times,
so
this
is
consistent
with
the
previous
approval
for
that
store.
Q
That's
just
a
view
of
the
rear
of
the
site
and
access
for
delivery.
So
this
delivery
will
come
in
and
to
the
left
will
be.
You
can
see
that
the
large
steel
structure
under
a
under
construction,
which
is
the
mns
store
and
then
to
the
right
there
is
home
bargains
and
then
it
just
that
is
tesco
next
slide,
please!
So
that's!
Q
What's
coming
up
to
the
site
side,
access
to
the
land
to
the
left
is
industrial,
mixed-use,
land
and
there's
no
sense
of
receptors
in
close
proximity,
and
the
next
slide
is
a
front
view
of
the
site
at
present
times.
You
can
see
it's
well
under
construction,
and
this
is
the
six
to
vary
the
conditions.
B
Thank
you
sinead
for
that
for
taking
us
through
that
report,
members
also
attending
the
same
as
damon
lockery
the
agent,
and
he
has
bacon
rights
for
clarification
purposes,
name
and
you're
very
welcome
to
committee
this
afternoon.
B
Okay,
members
we're
into
the
questions.
First,
any
members
have
any
questions
for
either
sinead
or
human.
B
B
Not
seeing
any
lights
on
so
we
move
into
the
decision
phase.
Is
there
any
proposals
for
members?
Oh,
who
came
in
very
quickly
there
councilman
mclaren,
you
managed
to
come
in
first.
B
E
B
Thank
you,
country,
nicholson,
so
proposal.
It's
been
second
to
accept
the
recommendation
for
councilman
councillor
nicholson
or
any
other
proposals
on
the
floor.
B
Okay,
I
don't
see
any
so
we're
all
the
great
members.
Okay,
thank
you
and
even
thank
you
for
joining
us
verizon.
I
guess
you
got
off
easy
on
this
one.
Thank
you.
Okay,
membership
just
check
to
see
if
the
previous
obtained
disease
is
ready,
yet.
Q
Thank
you
chair.
It
opposes
us
for
the
rest
of
the
tax
dwelling
house
and
the
reason
the
applications
before
the
plan
and
regulatory
service
committees,
because
the
application
has
attracted
objections
from
four
or
more
addresses,
and
the
opinion
is
to
approve
authors,
have
taken.
The
members
have
read
the
reports
including
addendum
circulated
this
morning,
and
such
this
is
a
synopsis.
Only.
Our
claimed
plan
of
permission
has
been
granted
this
site
for
a
dwelling
assaults.
Q
The
dwelling
is
a
bungalow
and
stated
to
ensure
it
has
not
detrimentally
impacted
only
adjoining
our
nearby
neighbors,
the
existing
landscaping
on
site
and
consists
of
mature
trees
along
the
rear,
burnley
of
the
rear
boundary
of
the
site
which
are
to
be
retained,
and
the
proposed
hard
and
soft
landscaping
consists
of
additional
tree
and
shrub
planting.
In
addition
to
lawn
area
and
fencing,
access
has
been
taken
from
the
site
onto
an
existing
laneway,
which
then
connects
to
low
town
road.
Q
This
application
does
not
alter
extinguish
or
otherwise
affect
an
existing
or
valid
rate
of
wave
pertaining
to
this
site.
The
attention
report
acknowledges
that
one
of
the
objectives
who
objected
twice
are
now
content
proposal
and
withdrawn
their
objections.
All
other
objections
have
been
fully
considered
and
documented
within
the
main
reports.
Q
Just
taking
it
through
the
powerpoint
presentations,
there's
an
aerial
view
of
the
site
in
the
context
of
the
surrounding
properties
outlined
in
red,
with
the
lane
way
down
to
the
low
town,
roads
exclade,
please
so,
there's
the
the
site
layout
and
the
green
line
indicates
that
as
a
right-of-way,
so
the
applicant
has
shown
that
there
is
an
existing
right-of-way
pertaining
to
these
lands
and
then
the
landscaping
around
with
a
detailed
landscape
and
plan
on
planting
plant
and
spill
it
as
well
next
slide,
please
so
the
elevations
of
floor
plans,
there
was
a
5.5
meter,
high
ridge
from
finished
floor
level,
bungalow
no
upper
floor
windows
or
rooms
with
a
side
elevation
of
a
sunroom.
Q
Next
slide,
please
the
site
sections
through
the
site
through
every
property
around
it.
So
you
can
see
the
separation
distances
in
excess
well
in
excess
of
20
meters,
which
we
would
require
for
a
two-story
house
with
upper
floor
windows.
So
it
exceeds
the
requirements
of
the
guidance
and
creating
places
regarding
separation,
distance
and
not
in
mind
we're
content
that
this
application
will
not
have
any
detrimental
impact
may
on
the
immunity
of
any
adjoining
nearby
properties.
Q
Q
Q
B
Thank
you
chanead
for
taking
us
through
that
presentation.
Members,
as
mentioned
by
schneider,
there's
an
addendum
report,
and
that
has
been
circulated
on
the
station
time
for
us
all
of
you.
Okay,
membership
on
zoom,
we
have
barney
mckevitt
from
blackjack
property
services
to
make
a
representation
as
the
agent
and
support
of
the
application.
B
D
Thank
you
good
evening,
committee
members.
Thank
you
for
your
opportunity
to
speak
this
evening.
I
would
just
like
to
reiterate
the
prior
comments
made
by
the
planning
officer
regarding
the
application
on
the
assessment.
The
council's
plan
department
have
been
very
mindfully,
considered
all
aspects
of
the
application
and
and
fully
considered
all
the
contributions
made
by
both
ourselves
and
other
third
parties
before
making
the
recommendation
on
this
reserve
matters
application.
D
I
would
fully
support
and
endorse
the
council's
recommendation
and
I
look
forward
to
any
queries
any
committee
member
may
have
in
relation
to
this.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
barney
and
you're
welcome
to
stay
with
us
for
the
rest
of
the
session
here
and
you're
able
to
answer
any
questions.
Members
might
have
okay
members
we're
now
into
a
question
for
you
any
members.
Any
questions
on
this
application.
R
Thank
you
chair
for
letting
me
in
sinead
thanks
very
much
for
your
comprehensive
report
on
that.
You
did
well
with
the
objections
I
just
want
to
ask
you.
You
mentioned
significant
separation
distances.
Could
you
just
give
us
an
idea
in
terms
of
actual
distance
is
what
they
are
from
them
properties.
Thank
you,
chair.
Q
Yeah,
the
dwelling
too,
that
the
layoff
number
20a
is
25.5
meters
separation,
distance.
The
dwelling
to
the
back
is
32
meters,
separation,
distance.
It
sits,
40
meters
from
the
front
dwelling
house
and
40
meters,
separation,
distance
and
then
number
22
use
26
meters
in
separation.
Distance,
clearly
places
would
envisage
for
a
two-story
upper
floor
window
20
meters,
so
we
were
content
that
this
is
a
above
and
beyond.
That
probably
would
be
expected
in
regards
to
separation,
distance
and
impact
on
the
mean
of
there.
B
B
E
Just
waiting
for
the
picture
up
here,
he
said
no
thanks,
chair
and
as
as
coach
savage
said,
it's
a
very
detailed
report
and
I
suppose
it
is
a
reserved
matters,
application
and,
and
it's
clear
in
the
report,
all
conditions
have
been
met,
so
you
know
it
does
and
I
think
some
of
the
objectives
have
been
been
pacified
as
well.
So
I
think
in
the
ranger
I
think
it's
it's
pretty
straightforward.
B
E
I
propose
sure,
given
obviously
recent
comment
there,
that
we
accept
the
recommendation
thanks
sure.
B
R
Thank
you
chair.
I
will
be
happy
to
the
second
councillor
nicholson's
proposal.
B
B
Okay,
we're
all
the
great
members
and
thank
you
barney
for
joining
us.
Not
too
many
questions
for
you
there.
So.
B
S
Thank
you
very
much
chair.
The
application
seeks
reserve
matters,
permission
for
replacement
dwelling
and
garage
is
before
you
this
evening.
As
the
applicant
is
a
member
of
the
planning
department,
the
application
site
is
located
in
a
rural
area.
Approximately
two
miles
southwest
of
ritual
permission
has
previously
been
granted
for
outline
approval
for
replacement
dwelling
and
garage,
and
this
reserve
matters
application
meets
the
conditions
of
this
outline
progression,
which
included
a
restricted
ridge,
height
of
6.5
meters
from
finished
floor
level.
S
S
S
This
is
taken
from
the
turner
scope,
road
looking
directly
in
at
the
site,
so
you've
got
the
gable
land
they're
covered
in
ivy
on
its
current
access
point
just
beside
it.
Next
slide,
please.
S
This
is
taken
slightly
further
up
the
road
taken
from
number
83
looking
back
down
so
again,
just
where
you
can
see
my
car
parked
to
the
right,
you
can
see
that
the
gable
of
the
drone
to
be
replaced
next
slide.
Please
it's
not
sticking
from
within
the
site.
Looking
at
the
front
elevation
next
slide,
that's
taken
from
just
through
one
of
the
windows.
You
can
see
the
rear
elevation
there
and
the
remains
of
what
has
been
a
chimney
breast
at
one
time.
Next
slide,
please.
S
H
S
S
M
Yes,
thank
you,
terry
just
just
a
quick
question.
You
are
happy
enough
that
it
was
a
dwelling
and
in
the
past
I
know
we
have
visited
site
visits
around
some
other
say,
dilapidated
buildings
and
we
sort
of
had
to
produce
evidence
away
in
the
past.
You
know
from
ladders
who
are
pitchers
or
anything
like
out
there
that
have
buzzed
well
and
not
a
barn
or
not
stone
something
else.
So
if
he's
your
hobby
himself.
S
Okay,
it
does
have
a
porch
to
the
front
of
it,
it
does
have
domestic
size
window
openings
and,
as
the
next
photo
then
show
there
was
chimney
breasts
inside
super
confident
it
wasn't
well.
It
has
all
four
walls
intact
and
has
the
characteristics
of
a
dwelling
house.
So
we
are
content
and
outline
permission
has
already
been
granted
on
the
site
for
us.
B
E
Thanks
chair,
I'm
I'm
tempted
to
you
know
because
I
know
who
this
application
is
within
the
planners
and
but
no,
no,
I
think
you're
right
sure
like
clearly
it
has
got
the
the
the
features
of
a
dwelling
and
I
think
you
know,
and
the
walls
are
substantially
intact
which
fulfills
policy.
So
I
think
it's
again
it's
pretty
slippery.
Yes,.
B
B
Thank
you,
members.
There's
a
proposal
on
the
floor.
That's
been
second
cancer
salvage
as
you
departed
during
the
application.
You're
not
able
to
take
part
in
the
decision.
Okay,
members
were
proposed
by
council
nicholson
seconded
by
alderman
wilson,
to
accept
the
recommendation
and
the
other
proposals
on
the
floor.
B
That's
in
any
knights
on
they're
all
great
members:
okay,
okay,
thank
you!
Trudy.
We
move
on
to
application
or
appendix
number
seven,
which
is
area
where
it
slash
twenty
twenty
one,
slash
co,
one
two,
seven
slash.
N
Q
Thank
you
sure,
yeah.
The
application
is
before
the
planner
regularly
service
committee,
because
it's
an
application
that
relates
to
a
major
application.
The
application
proposes
two
numbered
internally
illuminated
signs
depicting
the
range
and
three
number
of
non-illuminated
signs:
advertising
the
brand
and
type
of
products.
The
store
will
sell.
Q
Officers
are
contempt,
their
postsenate's
respects
immunity
when
assessed
in
the
context
of
the
general
characteristics
of
locality
and
those
not
prejudice
public
safety.
The
proposal,
therefore,
is
considered
to
comply
with
relevant
planning.
Policies
such
as
design
and
level
of
elimination
of
the
advertisements
is
considered
to
be
acceptable.
Q
So
it's
the
location
of
the
rain
store
that
was
approved
last
month
through
planning
committee
site
location
plan,
remind
me
of
where
exactly
it
is
in
relation
to
the
bridgewater
a
retail
park
next
slide,
please!
So
that's
existing
proposed
front
facade
elevation,
so
you
can
see
at
the
present
time
they're
built
with
no
senate.
So
the
range
is
going
above,
the
the
entry
to
the
door
and
then
two
smaller
signs,
advertising
and
typing
range
of
product
that
will
be
sold.
The
range
will
be
illuminated
that
signage
and
then
a
next
slide.
Q
Q
I
think
slade
please
and
then
there's
going
to
be
two
on
the
side
elevation
which
will
be
facing
onto
the
dual
carriageway,
so
the
re-insane
itch
again
will
be
illuminated
and
the
the
one
beside
it,
which
is
the
iceland
and
elevation
treatment,
will
not
be
eliminated
next
slide,
please
as
a
close-up
of
what
it
will
look
like.
So
it's
raining
on
there,
niceland
just
gonna
sit
beside
it.
Q
So
that's
a
view
of
excessive
advantage
in
relation
to
the
site.
So
it's
going
to
be
beside
the
tesco
site,
as
you
can
see
next
slide
please
and
that
there's
a
close-up
view
of
the
front
of
the
side
that'll
be
built
over
and
obviously
it's
not
built
as
yet
adjacent
to
the
tesco,
and
so
that
there's
a
view
on
approach
to
the
car
park
and
just
below
mcdonald's,
so
that'll
be
the
just
in
front
in
front
of
you.
Q
So
it's
true
yeah,
I'm
in
context
of
the
tesco
store
and
that's
a
view
and
from
google
images
from
the
dual
carriageway.
So
you
will
see
it
will
be
that
end
site
there
and
the
range
will
be
illuminated
well,
all
others
will
not
and
next
slide,
please
that's
just
a
close-up
of
what
it
looked
like
from
the
other
side
and
there's
a
good
level
of
screen
in
there.
So
there
will
be
a
small
impact
in
relation
to
your
small
visual
presence
of
the
site
and
closer
up
to
the
side.
B
B
B
The
interviews
are
run
at
all.
Okay,
we're
moving
into
the
decision
phase.
Then
any
proposals
on
this
one.
B
Oh
otherwise,
they're
all
agreed
all
great
okay.
Thank
you.
Members.
Before
we
go
on
to
the
next
appendices
members,
I
just
want
to
note
that,
as
you'll
see,
appendice
9
to
18
inclusive
were
all
presented
at
the
plan
meeting
last
month.
However,
there
was
a
issue
with
the
live
stream
in
which
the
audio
of
those
appendices
were
disrupted.
So
in
order
to
keep
the
integrity
of
the
process,
these
are
going
to
be
presented
again
as
fresh
applications.
S
Thank
you,
chair
members
of
the
chair
has
said
with
six
of
these
applications
before
you
this
evening.
They
all
seek
list
of
building
content
for
the
provision
of
fibre
broadband,
and
these
first
two
relate
to
the
old
tech
building
and
the
old
town
hall
and
band
bridge
they're
before
you
this
evening,
as
they're
made
on
behalf
of
the
council.
S
Both
applications
seek
to
execute
a
track
from
the
existing
cable
box
in
the
footpath
to
the
basis
of
the
building
core
will
be
removed
from
the
inside
of
the
building
to
allow
the
cable
to
be
fed
into
the
building
and
terminate
within
the
existing
columns
cabinet.
The
works
of
the
old
tech
building.
S
This
one
is,
is
the
anonymously
out
of
the
six
that
actually
involves
excavation
at
a
depth
of
0.4
meters
below
ground
level.
A
10
millimeter
core
will
then
be
made
from
outside
the
building
through
the
existing
mortar,
approximately
600,
millimeters
above
ground
level,
which
will
allow
the
cable
down
to
the
building.
S
So
in
this
case
that
it
actually
will
be
visible
from
the
outside,
it
will
have
an
elephant's
foot
on
a
conduit
which
will
be
used
between
the
ground
level
and
the
entry
point
of
the
building
to
house
the
cable,
the
old
town
hall
in
bambridge.
It
proposes
to
explain
0.2
meters
below
ground
and
again,
the
quarterback
removed
in
this
instance
is
30
millimeters.
S
S
Officers
have
consulted
with
the
atd
in
both
applications
and
are
in
agreement
that
the
proposals
comply
with
the
spps
and
pps6
and
will
not
have
an
adverse
impact
on
the
list
of
buildings.
As
detailed
in
each
of
the
reports.
Hed
has
suggested
conditions
specific
to
the
building
in
question,
and
these
have
been
included
in
the
report
circulated.
S
S
S
That's
the
aerial
photograph
of
the
site
on
the
next
slide,
so
that's
photographs
that
both
taken
from
downshire
road
next
slide,
please.
So
these
photographs
are
taken
within
the
site,
so
you'll
see
that
this
building
actually
does
have
a
lot
of
utilities
along
this
side
elevation
anyway,
and
the
cable
is
to
go
where
the
cable
is
sitting
with
the
red
pipe.
So
that's
where
the
the
new
cable
will
go
along
that
front
elevate.
Our
side
elevation
next
slide,
please!
So
that's
an
image
of
an
elephant's
foot,
that's
actually
our
our
building
and
bridgewater.
S
So
we
have
that
tonight.
This
one
will
differ
in
that
it
will
have
a
conjugate
leading
from
that.
The
next
slide,
please.
So
those
are
our
elevations
floor
plans
and
cross-sections
for
it.
Next
slide
then
takes
us
to
the
the
old
town
hall,
which
is
in
the
center
of
bridge
next
slide.
Please,
what's
our
set
location
plan
next
slide,
our.
N
S
Photograph,
so
that's
the
photograph
taken
from
the
downshire
bridge
next
slide
and
that's
taken
from
scarborough
street,
so
our
the
works
are
to
take
place
on
scarborough
street
next
slide,
please.
So
these
are
taken
from
scarborough
street
you'll,
see
the
existing
comms
box
in
the
footpath
there,
and
it's
literally
to
take
the
cable
just
across
into
that
elevation
between
the
the
two
sets
of
doors
next
slide:
please
and
that's
our
elevations
floor
plans
and
cross-sections.
That
should
be
us.
Thank
you.
B
B
E
Yup
thanks
sure
happy
to
accept
the
recommendation.
Thank
you.
B
B
B
B
G
Thank
you,
chair
members.
The
next
two
applications
also
seek
listed
building
content
for
the
provision
of
fibre
broadband
and
they
relate
to
logantown
hall
and
border
downtown
hall.
These
applications
are
before
you
this
evening,
as
they've
been
made
on
behalf
of
the
council,
and
both
applications
seek
to
excavate
a
track
from
the
existing
cable
box
in
the
footpath
to
the
base
of
the
building,
a
coral
being
roofed
from
inside
of
the
building
to
allow
the
cable
to
be
fed
into
the
building
and
terminate
within
the
existing
columns
cabinet.
G
The
application
that
lurkin
town
hall
proposes
to
execute
0.4
meters
below
ground
level
and
to
remove
the
30
millimeter
core
from
the
building.
The
port
of
downtown
hall.
Application
also
proposes
to
excavate
0.4
meters
below
ground,
but
in
this
case
the
core
will
be
10
millimeters
through
the
existing
mortar.
In
each
case,
the
core
will
be
sealed
and
the
track
backfilled
and
reinstalled
stated
to
match
the
existing.
It
is
considered
in
each
case.
The
proposal
will
not
significantly
alter
the
physical
appearance
of
the
listed
structure.
G
Officers
have
consulted.
The
hed,
in
both
applications
are
in
agreement
that
the
proposals
can
play
with
the
spps
and
ppsx
and
will
not
have
an
adverse
impact
on
the
list
of
buildings,
as
detailed
in
each
of
the
reports.
Hed
suggested
conditions
specific
to
the
billing
in
question,
and
these
have
been
included
in
the
report
circulated.
G
In
addition
to
this
consideration,
officers
are
the
opinion
that
the
provision
of
fiber
broadband
will
ensure
the
continued
use
of
these
heritage
assets.
No
objections
were
received
in
relation
to
the
proposals.
Officers
recommend
the
consent
to
be
granted
with
applications
subject
to
the
conditions
set
out
in
the
reports
and
I'll
just
take
you
through
the
slides.
G
B
B
Sorry
jump
to
gun
there
counter
my
gun,
so
we'll
move
into
the
decision
phase.
Now
and
again
we
have
to
treat
these.
You
know
both
separately,
so
need
so
we'll
take
the
one
for
application:
10,
appendice,
10
application
area
2020
by
2021,
slash
zero,
nine,
two
two
slash
lbc,
which
is
one
relating
to
the
blurgan
town
hall.
Any
proposals
on
this
one
thanks
for
macklin.
B
B
Okay,
thank
you.
Allman
fabulous
over
a
proposal
on
the
floor
from
alderman
announcement,
second
by
alderman,
viable
to
accept
the
recommendation
to
approve
for
the
footballing
hall
any
other
proposals
not
seeing
any
who
all
agreed.
B
Okay,
that's
also
a
great
news,
so
move
on
dependencies,
12
and
13
will
be
presented
together.
At
least
12
is
earlier
2021
slash,
zero,
seven,
six,
slash
and
appendix
13
is
earlier
with
slash
2021-0777.
S
Thank
you
chair,
as
per
the
previous
four
applications,
again
we're
seeking
this
list
of
building
consent
to
provide
fibre
broadband
in
this
case
to
the
county,
museum
and
the
shambles
market
in
our
mark
and
again
they're
made
on
behalf
of
the
council.
S
In
this
case,
each
application
six
decks,
create
a
track
again
from
the
cable
box
in
the
footpath
to
the
base
of
the
building,
the
core
will
be
removed
and
the
cable
are
fed
into
the
building
to
terminate
within
the
existing
columns
cabinet.
In
both
these
applications.
It's
proposed
to
excavate
0.4
meters
below
ground
level
and
to
remove
a
30
millimeter
core
from
the
building.
In
both
cases,
the
core
will
be
sealed
and
the
track
back
filled
and
reinstated
to
match
the
existing
situation.
S
It's
considered
in
each
of
these
cases
that
the
proposal
will
not
alter
the
physical
appearance
of
the
structure,
and
we
have
consulted
with
the
gd
here
in
agreement
with
us,
and
the
proposals
comply
with
spps
and
pps6
hed
again
have
suggested
conditions
specific
to
the
building
in
question,
and
these
have
been
included
in
the
reports.
S
We
can
advise
that
there
were
no
objections
received
and
the
consultation
with
the
atd
were
favorable
and
therefore
recommend
the
consent
be
granted
for
both
these
applications
subject
to
the
condition
set
out
in
the
reports
you
can
go
to
the
slides.
Please.
S
So
our
first
one,
then,
is
the
county
museum.
It's
just
located
to
the
east
of
the
mall
in
our
next
slide.
Please
that's
the
location
of
the
site
within
the
general
area.
Next
slide,
that's
our
aerial
photograph,
the
next
slide!
So
that's
the
photograph
taken
from
the
valley
shown
the
frontage
of
the
building.
The
next
slide
that
was
taken
from
charlemagne
gardens
and
showing
the
contrast
between
that
the
older
original
building
and
the
later
extension
that
went
up
in
the
60s
next
slide.
S
Please
so
that's
taken
from
the
back
of
charlemont
gardens
and
shows
whether
the
work
should
be
carried
out
next
slide
please.
So
this
is
the
comms
box
in
question
and
the
track
will
run
across
the
entrance
and
terminate
just
to
the
front
of
that
red
car
next
slide.
Please.
Those
are
elevations
floor
plans
on
cross
sections
next
slide,
please.
S
S
This
photograph's,
taken
from
dawson
street,
shown
at
the
main
elevation
of
the
shambles
market
and
the
works
to
be
carried
out
are
to
the
very
right
of
this
photograph.
Next
slide,
please.
So
this
is
closer
up.
You
can
see.
There
are
already
a
number
of
utility
boxes
in
the
the
footpath
next
slide.
Please.
S
So
these
photographs
are
taken
from
the
corner.
You
can
see
there
are
common
one
to
the
immediate
right,
that's
where
the
the
tracking
will
come
to
next
slide.
Please
and
that's
taken
from
the
cathedral
route
look
inside
from
the
other
elevation
next.
N
J
E
Now,
thanks
charlene,
I
suppose
I
just
want
to
reiterate
what
I
said
the
last
time.
I'm
concerned
this
drilling
down
through
stone
walls
at
45
degrees,
and
I
really
do
want
to
emphasize
that
you
know
the
in
particular.
The
chambers
yard
is,
is
a
very,
very
important
historic
building
in
our
massachusetts,
and
I
would
hate
to
you
know
things
to
change
when
things
go
on
site,
so
need
to
be
really
robust
that
there
can
be
no,
you
know,
obviously
alternative
and
then
what's
that
proposed
sure.
That's
all
thank
you.
S
Thank
you
chair.
We
have
liaise
closely
with
both
the
council
officers
and
with
the
gda
and
they're
content
that
this
is
acceptable
to
them
and
will
work.
In
addition,
we've
had
clarification
from
the
agents
that
apparently,
once
the
works
are
done
and
the
reinstatement
works
from
place.
It
has
to
be
inspected
by
council
officers
to
make
sure
that
their
content
was
up
before
they
can
actually
go
forward
to
payment
stage.
S
B
Thank
you
trudy.
You
contend
country
nixon,
okay,
any
further
questions
on
these
ones,
members,
I'm
not
seeing
any
light
zones
so
we'll
move
into
the
discussion
stage.
Any
views
on
these
ones,
I'm
not
seeing
any
lights
on
so
we'll
move
into
the
decision
phase
and
again
have
to
take
these
one
at
a
time.
So
we'll
start
with
appendices
12,
which
one
relating
to
the
county
museum
in
arma
country
nicholson.
B
Okay,
that's
proposed
by
country
nicholson,
country
mclaughlin;
yes,.
B
Okay
members,
so
with
a
proposal
from
counter
necklace
and
second
by
country
mcclelland,
to
accept
the
recommendation
interpreter
for
the
county
museum
and
the
lrvs
nothing
anyway.
So
I'll
agree
on
this
one
members,
okay,
we're
all
agreed
on
that
one!
So
then
we'll
move
on
to
appendix
13,
which
is
the
one
relating
to
the
champions
market.
Any
proposals
on
this
one
members,
councillor
nicholson
a
proposed
chair.
B
B
Q
Thank
you,
sir.
The
applications
is
charged
condition.
14
of
lao.
We
had
2016
1150
f,
and
the
reason
is
before
the
plan
and
regulatory
service
committee
is
because
his
condition
was
related
to
a
major
plan,
application
condition.
14
required
the
drainage.
A
drainage
assessment
shall
be
submitted
to
and
approved,
and
writing
by
the
council
prior
to
the
commencement
of
any
works
in
sight
and
any
mitigation
measures
contained
therein
shall
be
implemented
prior
to
the
occupation
of
any
part
of
the
development
officers
can
confirm
that
a
drainage
assessment
has
been
submitted.
Q
This
has
been
appraised
by
dfi
rivers
agency
who
have
no
objections
to
this
discharge.
Excuse
me,
therefore,
officers
in
consultation
with
the
efi
rivers
are
contempt.
Their
post
trainees
methods
and
network
design
are
satisfactory
and
their
post
development
will
not
increase
the
flood
risk
to
the
proposed
development
and
from
the
development
elsewhere
in
the
vicinity
in
accordance
with
policy
fld3
of
pps
15
and
therefore
we'll
be
for
being
to
approve.
Q
B
R
B
Thank
you,
country,
duffy,
so
of
a
proposal
from
country
to
salvage
second
by
councillor
duffy.
That
will
accept
the
recommendation
and
the
other
proposals
were
all
the
great
members
all
the
grade.
Okay
round
appendix
15.,
it's
application
number
earlier
weird
slash,
2021-0795,
slash
dc
again
we're
hanging
back.
Q
Q
This
was
a
requirement
from
deera
water
management
unit
in
response
to
the
full
applications.
Full
application
officer
considered
the
affirmation:
aforementioned
final
construction,
environmental
management
plan,
the
proposed
methodolo
methodology
used
for
the
safe
operation
of
the
site
and
for
the
protection
of
the
water
environment
and
have
carried
out
consultations
with
the
air
water
management
unit.
Who
have
no
objection
to
this
discharge
on
this
be
on
the
base
of
the
information
submitted
officer
of
the
condition
13
of
lao.
Yet
2019
1660
f
can
now
be
discharged
and
the
same.
There's
no
presentation
in
here.
B
Let's
say:
90
lights
up,
so
we'll
move
into
the
station
phase.
Any
proposals
on
this
one
members.
K
B
S
Thank
you
chair.
This
application
relates
to
discharge
of
condition
associated
with
the
approval
of
a
major
planning
application,
from
extension
to
an
existing
quarry
condition.
28
of
approval,
lau8
2016
0383
required
the
submission
of
the
construction
method
statement,
which
was
to
set
up
collision
prevention
measures
to
protect
the
water
environment
during
the
development
and
restoration
of
the
site.
This
condition
was
requested
by
an
iea
water
management
unit.
S
B
Okay,
we'll
move
on
to
the
decision
phase.
Any
proposals
from
the
four
members.
B
Q
Yeah,
thank
you,
chair,
hey
the
post
discharge
of
conditions,
nine
and
ten
on
plan
application
lao
we
had
twenty
twenty,
oh
two,
four
off
and
the
racing
is
before
the
planner
regularly
service
committees,
because
it's
conditional
relates
to
a
major
plan
and
obligation
condition.
Number
nine
stated
that
no
sidewalks
of
any
nature
development
shall
take
place
all
in
accordance
with
the
programme
of
archaeological
works,
work
which
has
been
submitted
to
an
approved
as
per
condition
number
yet
and
condition.
Q
Number
10
required
a
program
of
post,
excavation
analysis
and
preparation
of
an
advanced
report
to
be
submitted
to
and
approved
by
and
written
by,
the
council
archaeological
testing
was
carried
out
and
reported
subsequently
written
outline.
The
results
of
that
excavation
officers
have
carried
out
consultation
with
the
efi
historic
monument.
You
know
who
are
content
that
conditions
nine
and
ten
of
plant
approval
lawyer,
2020
0240f
can
be
discharged
on
this
basis.
Officers
recommended
the
application
be
approved.
B
You
cannot
send
any
lights
up
so
moving
the
decision
phase.
Any
proposals
on
the
phone
members
counselor
wilson
was
on
first.
E
Yep
thanks
chair,
it's
been
and
it's
gonna
be
an
early
night,
but
earlier
one
for
me,
I
owned
a
clear
bikini
interest
in
this
application,
so
I
will
leave
the
chamber.
Thank
you.
Q
Yeah,
thank
you
chair.
The
application
is
just
supposed
to
just
charge
condition:
number
10
of
application,
lao
2019,
not
999
f,
and
the
raising
the
application
before
the
plan
and
regular
service
committee
is
because
of
conditional
relates
to
major
application
condition.
Number
10
stated
that
not
the
standard
part
5
class
they
have
to
plan
and
general
from
a
development
order.
No
development
shall
take
place.
No
kind
of
construction
management
plan
statement
has
been
submitted
to
and
approved
and
written
by,
the
plan
authority.
Q
The
proof
plan
and
statement
shall
be
adhered
to
throughout
the
construction
period
and
shall
provide
for
parking
of
vehicles
on
the
site
for
our
site.
Operatives
and
visitors,
rich
for
construction
traffic
method
of
prevention
of
mud,
been
carried
onto
the
highway
location
of
soil,
heaps
and
management
of
dust
on
site
and
arrangements
returning
vehicles.
In
short,
this
application
removed
the
developments
from
developers,
permanent
development
rights
in
relation
to
construction
activity.
Q
Officers
have
considered
the
construction
management
plan
and
submitted,
but
highlights
imposed
methodology
used
for
the
safer
operation
of
the
site
and
includes
and
provides
for
all
the
information,
satellite
and
aforementioned
condition.
As
such
officer
content
discharge,
contaction
10
of
lao,
yet
2019,
not
999f,.
B
B
B
Okay,
members,
that's
us
just
left
me
to
thank
the
planning
officers,
the
legal
advisors,
democratic
services,
staff,
ita
team
and
all
of
your
sales
members
for
facilitating
and
smooth
running
of
us
maiden.
So
just
ask
the
iit
team
to
and
a
live
link.