►
Description
Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon Borough Council Planning & regulatory Services Meeting on Wednesday 5th April at 3:00pm
A
B
All
right,
thank
you,
and
thanks
for
calling
the
bar
for
confirming
that
and
good
afternoon
everybody
and
welcome
to
the
regulatory
section
of
the
hybrid
meeting
and
the
planning
and
Regulatory
Services
camera.
They
can
ask
that
everybody
please
mute
their
make
at
all
times
unless
invited
to
speak.
For
those
of
you
who
are
physically
in
the
chamber,
can
I
remind
you
when
speaking,
you
need
to
wait
until
you
see
yourself
on
the
screen
sue
the
life.
B
He
can
pick
up
your
comments
if
you
speak
before
your
image
is
projected
those
listening
on
the
live,
feed
or
the
zoom
won't
hear
what
you
say.
This
is
important
in
the
case
of
being
required.
Audio
recording
is
being
used
to
assist
in
preparing
the
foreman
millets.
Therefore,
anybody
participants
in
the
meeting
consensitive
being
recorded
and
live
streamed
on
YouTube,
so
apologies
I
am
aware
of
apologies
from
counselor
library
and
counselor
Ian
Wilson
on
councilor
Philip,
Dimitri
yeah,
any
others
who's
Sasha's
going
to
be
here
for
any
others
we'll
take
them
as
to
develop.
C
C
The
listing
is
being
considered
under
Section
80
part
1
of
the
planning
act.
Northern
Ireland,
2011.
DFC
has
assessed
the
merits
of
listing
the
property
against
the
criteria
set
out
in
their
publication
of
Mayor
2019.
In
this
case,
the
significant
criteria
include
style
proportion,
plan
form
structural
system
setting
age,
Rarity,
authenticity,
local
importance,
and
there
were
some
alterations
noted
that
were
detracting
from
the
building
JFC
in
their
survey
have
described
this
vernacular
Heist
as
being
mud
walled,
and
it
may
be
a
pre-1760
construction.
C
It
is
located
at
the
head
of
a
private
land
leading
to
the
listed
turmoilera
Farm.
The
department
advised
that
the
age
of
the
building
in
itself
is
noteworthy,
but
the
fact
that
it
has
retained
is
roughly
hearing
roof,
trusses
and
batch
under
a
tent
covering
makes
it
more
valuable
and
of
considerable
local
importance.
C
The
survey
sends
out
historical
information
regarding
the
ownership
and
it
is
currently
in
the
ownership
of
the
kind
soul
and
is
being
used
as
a
store.
It
is
located
within
the
existing
open
space
zoning
of
silverwoods
golf
course,
and
Ski
Center
within
the
development
11th
of
craigavon
urban
area,
as
defined
in
the
Craig
Albin
area
plan.
C
D
C
Leicester
building
as
the
council,
as
the
property
owner
planning
officers
consulted
with
colleagues
from
the
Estates
department,
and
there
is
no
objections
to
the
proposed
listing
underst
have
been
solved
regarding
the
proposed
listing,
a
draft
response
is
attached
at
appendix
2
and
that
just
sends
out
the
Asian
planning
standards
website
of
the
site,
the
constraints
and
Advising.
The
council
is
no
objections,
so
the
recommendation
is
that
members
would
approve
the
draft
response
as
I'd
land
an
appendix
2..
Thank
you,
chair.
B
E
Thank
you
char,
and
these
lastings
always
invokes
on
debate.
This.
Isn't
the
ownership
of
council
I
note
that
there's
been?
Is
it
some
inappropriate
or
alterations?
Windows
are
removed,
and
things
like
that
does
this
mean
then
have
this
listed?
We
would
have
to
bring
it
back
to
his
former
glories,
or
does
it
pretend
to
be
a
steward
and
the
way
it
is
at
the
moment,
because
in
the
past
there
has
been
a
listed,
a
link
to
her
being
considered
when
they
listed
the
link.
E
People
have
asked
for
a
link
to
put
back
to
the
reservational
state.
In
fact,
in
past
years,
I
was
involved
in
one
where
the
Thai
truth
had
completely
collapsed.
I'm
recording
great
pain
to
the
owner
on
the
runs
testing,
this
big
pot
back
so
I'm,
just
wondering.
Where
are
we
stand
with
this
building
this
Council
ownership
used
as
a
store,
well
stay
of
that
and
and
years
to
come
as
it
is
now.
Thank
you.
C
You
know
as
if
they
would
maintain
any
other
building,
and
it
has
just
been
noted
that
those
you
know
there's
been
some
things
something
changed:
there's
some
PBC
around
water
goods
and
things
like
that
and
the
internal
M
elements
of
the
heisting
debate.
Pretty
much
have
been
sort
of
lost
over
the
years,
but
I
think
in
in
the
case
of
this
one.
It's
the
very
fact
it's
like
a
structured
form
is
very
important.
C
There's
a
thatch
under
10
mod
wall
buildings
are
sort
of
very
unique
to
our
area
and
DSC
are
very
Keen
to
list
them.
But
no,
the
the
quick
answer
to
your
question
is
no.
What
there
wouldn't
be
expensive
wouldn't
be
expected
to
put
everything
back,
as
was
if
they
wanted
to,
they
would
have
to
apply
for
Less
ability,
so.
F
G
Thank
you
chairman,
thanks
Judy,
for
your
report
on
my
my
question
was
similar
to
alderman
Anderson's,
but
obviously
thanks
Julie
for
the
the
the
clarification
look.
You
know,
I've
said
it
before
in
this
committee
UTD.
Obviously
they
are
the
custodians
of
our
heritage
and,
as
as
Julia
is
out
playing,
this
is
a
very
unique
structure
and
it
is
something
that
you
know,
obviously,
with
the
thatch
with
the
ten
and
the
mod
walls
is,
is
very
rare
in
its
locality.
G
But
look
again
it's
it's
something
that
I
think
going
forward.
I'm
hoping
the
states
have
taken
that
into
consideration
and
because
down
the
line.
If
we
try
to
do
something
this
and
then
next
thing
you
can't
do
because
it's
listed
and
we'll
be
kicking
ourselves,
but
look
anyway
as
I,
say,
I'm
happy
to
make
a
proposal
chairman.
G
We
accept
the
recommendation
at
this
stage
and
as
in
the
the
latter
and
let
it
go
back
to
hcd
and
and
maybe
what
do
you
call
it
terrible
questions
myself
just
to
just
to
be
sure,
because
it
it
as
soon
as
it's
listed
it's
hard
to
deal
list.
I
can
tell
you.
So
we
are
we.
We
are
in
a
situation
where
you
know
where
it
is
and
things
they
got.
I
could
see,
it
could
have
potential
and
down
the
line,
but
anyway
I'm
happy
to
propose
the
ladder
at
this
stage.
H
Thank
you,
chair,
just
based
on
the
responses
to
Oliver
Anderson's
question,
sir,
like
I'm,
happy
to
Second
yeah
cancer
Nicholson's
proposal.
You
know
this
is
a
fairly
historic
building
on
paid
lesson
that
we're
not
a
fact
now
any
private
citizens
there's
not
going
to
be
anything
absolute
burden
on
them.
They'll
have
to
be
on
the
States
team.
To
you
know,
look
out
this
building
going
forward.
Button
can
have
that
the
second
based
on
the
fact
that
you
know
there's
going
to
be
a
new
additional
course
at
this
stage.
I
Yeah,
thank
you,
chair
and
good
afternoon
members,
members
of
the
report
before
you
furnishes
you
with
information
in
relation
to
like
planning
and
enforcement
caseloads
and
includes,
amongst
other
things,
figures
for
the
number
of
planning
applications
received
over
the
course
of
last
business
year.
On
the
number
of
decisions
issued.
Members
may
recall.
I
B
Thanks
Steven
any
queries.
Members
on
this
one,
okay,
I
know:
what
is:
is
it
concern
right
there
just
in
terms
of
the
workload
of
the
tournament?
That's
not,
but
let's
learn
our
staff
in
any
one
way.
It's
just
the
realities
of
trying
to
operate
a
system
that
keeps
and
generating
more
applications.
Every
time
you
you
turn
around
as
the
sand
goes.
So
it's
not
easy.
We
appreciate
that,
in
terms
of
you
know,
Alexa,
Recruitment
and
Retention.
How
is
that
you
know?
B
I
Yeah
absolutely
sure
there
always
has
a
challenge
around
trying
to
fill
vacancies,
but
we
are
in
the
process
of
doing
that
at
the
moment,
obviously
restricted
in
terms
of
how
much
you
can
disclosure
end
up,
but
we
are
going
through
a
process.
We
have
a
number
of
vacancies
at
the
moment,
we're
working
very
hard
to
try
and
fill
those
to
do
that
as
quickly
as
possible.
B
J
Thank
you,
chair
and
good
afternoon
members
item.
4.1
is
a
request
for
a
name
of
a
housing
development
of
consisting
of
five
dwellings
off
the
Mountain
Road
in
portadown,
and
details
are
to
contained
within
appendix
one.
The
Appling
is
preferred
emphasis.
Development
is
Germany,
Kelly
Manor
and
the
main
reason
is
that
the
adrenically
is
the
timeline
for
the
Syria
and
members
are
asked
to
note
that
there
are
total
three
thailands
of
Germany
Kelly
in
the
world,
but
new
development
currently
has.
K
J
Thank
you
chair
item.
4.2
is
a
request
for
a
name
of
a
Housing
Development,
consistent
90
values
off
the
black
School
Road
and
in
black
school
details
are
in
appendix
2..
The
airplane's
referred
in
info
development
is
clover
Heights
and
the
applicant's
main
reason
for
the
bird
name
is
that
there's
an
existing
development
called
Cloverdale
on
the
opposite
side
of
the
road,
and
this
site
is
on
an
elevator
ground
officers
of
assessment,
the
Enterprises
compliant
with
the
policy,
and
the
recommendation
therefore,
is
for
members
approval
of
clover
Heights
for
this
development.
B
B
F
B
J
F
B
H
E
D
J
J
In
a
normal
year,
we
would
on
a
busy
year
we
would
receive
in
a
value
of
250
million
pounds
worth
of
investment.
However,
in
the
last
12
months
alone,
we've
received
applications
for
the
notional
construction
investment
of
just
over
411
million,
which
is
quite
significant
by
previous
years.
We've
also
carried
out
over
14
919
state
inspections
and
undertaken
2283
plan
assessments,
and
they
should
all
the
prob.
J
The
appropriate
statutory
notices
on
these
departments
also
continue
to
deliver
the
currencies,
probably
certificate
function,
I
think
Advanced
properties
across
the
border
and
the
last
12
months
we've
received
and
ministered
3560,
yet
new
applications
and
issued
3599
certificates
to
solicitoring
agents
related
to
property
sales.
Thank
you
chairs
for
members
information,
but
happy
to
take
any
questions.
Members
may
have.
B
We
will
now
be
moving
into
a
confidential
session
of
the
county,
so
this
means
we'll
turn
off
the
live,
feed
and
it'll
be
returned
when
the
meeting
is
restarted.
Can
I
ask
now
that
the
ICT
officers
please
turn
off
the
live,
feed
and
confirm
with
me
when
the
confidential
section
of
this
meeting
count
proceed.
Thank
you.
B
I
B
B
B
Six
should
I
say
application
for
employment
permission
so
good
afternoon,
and
welcome
to
this
section
of
the
hybrid
meeting
of
the
plum
regulatory
Services
committee,
I
asked
everybody
to
mute
their
mics
at
all
times,
unless
invited
to
speak
for
those
who
are
physically
in
the
chamber,
can
I
remind
you
that
when
speaking
into
your
mic,
you
need
to
wait
until
you
see
yourself
on
the
screens,
so
the
live.
Feed
can
pick
up
your
comments.
If
you
speak
before
your
image
is
projected
those
listening
to
the
live,
feed
or
the
zoom
won't
hear
what
you
say.
B
This
is
important
in
the
case
of
being
required.
Audio
recording
is
being
used
to
assist
in
preparing
the
formal
minutes.
Therefore,
anybody
participating
in
the
meeting
consents
to
being
recorded
and
live
streamed
on
YouTube.
During
the
course
of
the
meeting,
questions
may
be
asked
by
counselors,
who
are
members
of
the
committee
and
obligants
for
client
information,
objectors
or
those
speaking
on
their
behalf
and
pseudo
and
kind
solution
to
advertiosity
in
the
end
with
any
and
to
enable
them
to
determine
the
application.
B
So
that
being
said,
we're
going
to
move
to
appendix
one
and
as
we
know-
and
this
was
considered
a
wee
while
ago
and
a
list
is
available
there
in
the
opening
or
in
was
the
the
latest
presentation
of
who
considered
that
at
the
time.
So
we
just
want
to
make
his
aware
of
that
again
and
we'll
move
through
to
roshin
and
she's
going
to
bring
the
presentation
on
this
one
so
appendix
one
thanks.
L
This
application
is
for
the
direction
of
five
detached
to
two-story
dwellings
and
attached
garages
on
landscillary
of
37
to
43
seagull
road
with
access
via
lands
adjacent
to
and
west
of
19
Seagull
Drive
put
it
down.
The
application
is
being
presented
to
committee
as
more
than
four
objections
before
separate
postal
addresses
have
been
received.
L
The
application
was
presented
to
the
planned
and
Regulatory
Services
Committee
in
June
2019,
with
a
recommendation
to
approve
I
thought.
Maybe
it
was
agreed
that
the
application
be
deferred
subject
to
further
information
to
be
submitted
in
relation
to
the
provision
of
a
bin
storage
area,
clarification
of
boundary
details
and
to
address
and
accuracies
in
the
finished
floor
levels
in
the
submitted,
drainage
assessment
and
Amanda
set
of
drones
were
submitted
in
the
intervening
period.
The
Heist
Types
on
The
Possession
remain
unchanged,
albeit
clarification
on
levels
has
been
received.
L
The
layout
now
includes
an
area
for
bin
collection.
At
the
entrance
there
has
been
a
minor
change
to
the
elevation
of
house
type
B
and
further
clarification
and
Boundary
details
has
been
received.
A
number
of
Amanda
drainage
assessments
have
been
submitted
in
the
intervenom
period,
as
well
as
an
additional
support
and
drainage
information.
L
The
proposed
development
will
not
Prejudice
Road,
Safety
or
inconvenience
the
floor
traffic
and
therefore
records
with
the
spps
pps3
and
decam
15..
The
site
is
not
identivated
being
at
risk
from
flooding.
However,
following
the
receipt
of
a
number
of
objection,
objections
related
to
flood
risk
and
drainage
issues,
DFA
Rivers
advise
that,
having
regard
to
the
objections
indicate
when
the
proposed
amount
was
located
in
an
area
where
there's
evidence
of
a
history
of
surface
water
flooding,
a
drainage
assessment
was
required
to
be
submitted.
L
L
The
revised
layout
now
includes
a
provision
for
a
bin
storage
area
of
in
regard
to
the
above
and
the
previous
report.
Officers
are
of
the
opinion
that
the
proposed
development
complies
with
the
spps
and
all
the
other
relevant
planning
policies
on
this
basis
and
subject
to
the
conditions
attached,
it
is
recommended.
The
plan
of
permission
be
granted,
and
members
will
just
draw
your
attention
to
an
addendum
that
was
circulated
yesterday.
Just
updating
some
of
the
conditions
and
imagine
the
burden
of
some
of
the
conditions
and
I'll
just
take
you
through
the
slides.
L
And
the
red
arrow
also
shows
you,
the
location
of
our
site.
I
can
just
say
it
Northway.
It
was
just
on
the
edge
of
the
north
weather,
and
this
is
the
site
location
plan.
That's
the
application
site
outlined
in
red
and
Northway.
It
lays
to
the
northwest
of
the
application
site,
the
SQL
drive
to
the
east
and
that's
just
an
aerial
view
of
our
site
and
an
updated
aerial
view
of
the
site
and
claimed
in
red,
and
these
are
a
few
photographs
from
the
surrounding
area.
L
L
L
L
This
is
the
updated
site
layout
and
it
sort
of
gives
you
an
indication.
There
are
separation.
Distances
between
the
dwellings
are
on
single
drive,
so
there's
a
24
meter,
separation,
distance,
I
think
the
absolute
minimum
is
23
there
back
to
back,
and
this
is
the
elevations
of
floor
plans
of
the
proposed
dwellings.
Just
to
give
you
an
idea
of
the
proposed
house
types.
L
L
B
Okay,
thank
you
Russian
and
in
terms
of
people
speaking
here
on
this
application.
We
have
a
number
of
people.
We
have
David
McMaster,
who
will
be
making
a
representation
and
objection
and
also
Richard,
Alexander
and
Megan
a
representation
as
the
applicant
and
also
with
speaking
rights
in
here
in
person
who
owns
the
architect,
Tim
Collins
Consulting
engineer,
we
also
have
from
DFI
David
Sheard
allowicious
lochran,
who
don't
have
speaker
here
to
answer
any
questions.
B
M
Thank
you
chair.
We
would
confer
with
the
correct
news,
has
been
served
and
that
the
applicant
and
Department
have
confirmed
the
objectors
ownership
of
a
portion
of
land
which
we
will
further
address.
The
planning
statement
totally
incorrect
in
relation
to
the
impact
of
drainage
works
and
retained
vegetation.
Our
concerns
still
exist
in
respectively.
In
each
there
are
a
number
of
inconsistencies
and
levels
between
various
documents
submitted,
which
can
have
a
serious
negative
effect
on
surface
water.
A
revised
drawing
was
submitted
with
an
updated
drainage
reported
at
7th
October
21.
M
M
It
is
also
evident
that
in
certain
positions
to
propose
cut
off
tree
and
will
likely
be
above
ground
level,
we
also
note
that
there
appears
to
be
no
valid
section
schedule.
6
agreement
and
new
information
has
been
made
available
in
relation
existing
dreams,
traversing
the
site
serving
for
properties
in
single
road,
with
the
private
connections
from
number
37,
actually
passing
through
the
corner
of
plot
five's
house.
M
M
M
This
only
applies
to
grounds
within
the
boundary
that
order
landowned
by
the
department
yeah
in
terms
of
conditions.
Six
and
seven
is
almost
seven
years
of
elapsed.
It
would
have
been
prudent
to
have
an
updated
survey
showing
Crown
spread
and
root
protection,
annotated
with
threes
in
close
proximity,
two
plots
one
and
two:
it's
questionable
of
the
development
can
be
carried
out.
We're
also
surprised
in
the
previous
condition,
six
relating
to
three
and
each
has
been
aware
entirely
inward.
M
In
conclusion,
it's
unfortunate-
or
they
won't
say
embarrassing-
that
this
application
has
been
brought
back
to
commitment
with
so
many
issues,
namely
questions
on
legality
of
some
conditions,
discrepancies
in
levels
between
drawings
and
anomalies,
with
technical
reports.
We
would
request
that
members
take
into
consideration
these
issues
and
we
believe
that
the
recommendation
to
be
approve
cannot
be
supported
as
presented
today.
Thank
you.
B
N
1992
previously
passed
for
three
dwellings:
95,
three
Bungalows
99,
two
dwellings,
all
three:
six
Bungalows
o
six,
six
Bungalows
and
08
15
apartments
across
three
number
buildings
spiked
on
many
occasions.
Having
stated
that
they
have
no
objection
to
the
development
in
principle,
Miss,
Henry
and
her
agents,
Mrs
McMaster,
have
purposefully,
delayed
and
frustrated
the
planning
approval
of
those
development
with
38
objections
to
date.
N
N
G
Thank
you
chairman,
and
thank
you
for
all
those
who
presented
thus
far
and
and
I
do
remember
this
one.
It
is
quite
a
while
ago,
I
think
of
it
covered
since
so
I
I,
I,
I
I
can
show
your
frustration.
But
look
you
know
we're
here
today
and
as
I
say,
we'll
we'll
have
to
deal
with
lots
in
front
of
us
and
obviously
there
was
a
few
issues
brought
up
chairman
in
relation
to
drainage
concerns.
G
Now
I've
looked
at
the
papers
and
it
it
seems
to
be
that
and
a
water
being
consulted.
Riverside
has
been
consulted
and
there's
no
concerns
am
I
right
and
saying
that
that's
my
first
question
chairman
I
suppose
from
the
for
the
plan
that
was
just
for
clarification
and
then
the
the
the
the
final
one
would
be
in
relation
to
just
clarification
where
the
bin
storage
is
for.
G
For
a
start
and
the
the
other
one
was
in
relation
to
the
the
ownership
of
a
there
was
a
reference
to
ownership
of
a
parcel
of
land
which
wasn't
really
clarified
where
that
was
on
on
the
plan.
If
you
guys
be
more
detail
where
that
is
in
in
the
context
of
of
of
the
the
overall
scheme
and
finally,
the
trees,
I
was
I'm
not
aware
of
any
tpos
in
a
site
just
for
clarification,
as
well
chairman,
just
in
relationship
a
few
things
there
for
rushing
to
work
through.
So
thank
you.
B
L
Thank
you
chair.
Yes,
I
can
confirm
that
both
na
water
and
rivers
agency
were
consulted
on
this
application
and
both
will
come
back.
Saying.
There's
no
objections.
In
fact,
we've
had
a
number
of
consultations
because
we're
down
at
you
know
quite
a
few
changes
to
the
drainage
assessment
and
additional
drainage
information,
and
it
has
been
with
River
G
as
the
end
they've
come
back
and
they're
happy
they're.
You
know
they're
happy
with
the
drainage
assessment
that's
submitted,
so
they
have
no
objections.
L
L
If
you
can
actually
see
it
on
the
drainage
plan
there,
just
as
you
drive
into
the
drive
on
the
left
hand,
side,
there's
our
area
set
back
and
that's
where
the
the
proposed
and
location
area
is
okay
in
terms
of
ownership.
Yes,
there
has
been
a
query
over
well,
it's
not
so
much
a
runnership,
Over
Control,
the
proportional
land.
That's
required
for
visibility
and
for
the
proposed
footpath,
which
we
accept
is
is
the
objector's
ownership
and
she
has
been
served
notice
on.
L
So
the
correct
certificate
has
been
filled
out,
but
it
is
part
of
an
adopted
service
trip,
so
it's
under
the
control
of
DFA.
So
that's,
obviously
it's
a
control
issue.
Okay
and
in
relation
to
the
trees.
Look,
yes,
obviously,
there's
a
drainage
plant
pose
there
and,
yes,
there
is
a
number
of
trees
that
we're
asking
to
be
retained
as
part
of
a
condition
and
like
we
do
believe
that
you
know
the
drainage
has
taken
account
of
the
trees.
However,
there
is
a
degree
of
flexibility
there.
L
There
is
a
condition
saying
like
if
any
of
those
trees
that
we're
asking
between
have
to
be
moved
or
removed.
Basically,
you
have
to
come
back
to
us,
it
can't
be
removed
unless
you
come
back
to
us
with
written
consent
to
any
variation.
So
there
we
think
it
has
been
taken
account
of.
There
is
a
degree
of
flexibility
that
can
be
moved
slightly,
but
if
something
has
to
be
removed,
you
have
to
come
back
to
us
and
and
seek
our
permission.
G
Those
questions
and
just
for
clarification,
I,
say
road
service.
Here,
obviously,
there
was
mention
of
a
service
stripper
and
I'd
love
to
do
some
Google
Maps,
and
it
does
show
the
garden
you
know
obviously
coming
across.
Are
you
saying
that
that
service
strip
is
not
part
of
the
ownership
of
the
the
person?
A
is
it
I
think
you
mentioned
Mrs
Henry
was
it
of
Ms
Henry.
G
All
right,
but
no
just
just
clarification
on
on
Google
Maps.
It
does
look
like
Miss
Henry's
hedge
who's,
right
out
there
to
the
curb
which
will
enclose
the
service
trip
so
is
is,
is
the
contention
that
she's
claiming
the
service
trip
or
and
if
she,
if,
if
she
is
that,
obviously
would
block
the
visible
display
I'm
right
in
saying
that.
K
At
some
stage
the
Hedge
has
been
moved
back
to
its
current
location.
You
can
see
the
actual
scarring
on
if
you
look
at
Google
Maps,
so
it
does
mean
that
that
that
hedge
has
is
actually
at
the
far
boundary
of
our
service
trip.
So
it
is
infringing,
and
it
is
actually
preventing
full
view
of
the
service
strip
and
sight
lines
for
the
for
the
incoming
development.
K
K
B
D
K
B
H
Salvage,
thank
you
chair.
Thank
you
for
those
who
presented
so
far.
If
I
could
ask
that
Mr
McMaster
related
to
the
surface
water
on
Advantage
issues
are
suppose
you're
doing
three
minutes.
Could
you
elaborate
a
little
bit
more
on
the
issues
that
you
believe
I?
Think
it
related
to
some
of
the
manhole
covers
the
water
common
item.
Could
you
just
gives
me
a
bit
more
information
about
that?
Please.
M
M
The
last
report
that
was
submitted
I
think
was
the
7th
of
October
2022
and
when
you
look
at
the
levels
and
compare
them
with
the
levels
on
the
site
layout
at
a
few
points,
there's
a
proposal
for
a
300
millimeter
3M,
which
comes
around
the
back
of
houses
and
seagull
down.
The
side
then
goes
on
to
the
road
where
it
becomes
a
solid
pipe
and
then
goes
down
in
among
the
trees.
M
There
are
mountains
are
located
for
the
the
upper
Austrian.
L2
is
basically
to
the
left
of
plot
it's
in
the
center
of
the
road.
Basically,
between
plots
one
and
five
there's
a
manhole
L2
there.
We
see
everyone's
two
manual
L3
on
the
three
in
each
drawing
there's
a
fall
of
200
millimeters
across
that
to
me.
M
I'm,
not
dream
at
L3
has
gotten
in
third
level
of
49.7
the
one
before
that
as
an
invert
level
of
49.9.
So
when
you
add
on
the
depth
of
the
pipe
the
required
cover
and
the
pipe
to
comply
with
statutory
requirements,
that
pipe
is
sitting
up
on
the
road,
so
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't
work
and
then
you
know
really
look
to
it
and
back
to
the
Landscaping.
B
O
The
laundry
and
is
there
really
to
take
any
storm
run
off
from
you,
know
the
state
behind
the
site
and
to
stop
any
drainage
from
our
side
going
into
other
Lands
Beyond
the
site.
You
know,
honestly,
tagging
is
it's:
it's
really
just
grindery
and
it's
you
know
it's
really.
It's
a
very,
very
small
flow
and
you
know
you're
quite
right
in
what
you
say.
O
E
E
E
When
we
talk
about
sufficient
space?
Is
that
they've
been
today
in
one
time
one
for
each
household
or
more
or
less,
or
what
is
it?
Is
there
sufficient?
They
already
put
more
than
the
faith
depending
when
they're
being
collected,
and
things
like
that,
so
maybe
it
is
a
sufficient
space
to
to
cover
a
lot
of
issues.
Those
are
two
points.
Thank
you.
K
B
E
L
Just
in
regard
to
the
updated
addendum
that
was
circulated,
I
think
it
was
yesterday.
We
have
actually
changed
the
word
and
of
those
conditions,
both
in
relation
to
footpath
and
the
visible
display
to
say
that
no
development
shall
commence
until
the
visibility
spares
are
in
place
and
no
development
shall
commence
until
the
third
path
is
in
place
and
that's
obviously
you
know
where
there
are
issues
of
land
ownership
or
control.
Obviously,
we
would
like
to
be
sure
that
those
can
be
put
in
place
for
development
is
commenced.
G
Yeah
and
chairman
I
suppose
it
was,
it
was
something
that
Mr
McMaster
said
and
then
obviously,
Mr
cousins,
replied,
Mr,
McMaster
inferred,
the
the
level,
the
copper
level
and
the
invert
level
was
the
same.
Yeah
you
did
not
is.
Is
that
a
typo
and
and
what
I'm
saying
is
if
Representatives
I've
signed
off
on
this
draw
on
you
know
what
I
mean.
Have
they
potentially
missed
this
you
know
like?
G
O
B
L
L
Of
the
drainage,
drainage
yeah,
there
was
a
condition
on
and
obviously,
as
I
read,
the
condition
now
it's
referring
to
the
wrong
drawn.
So
if
members
were
amended
to
approve
this,
we
would
amend
that
drawn
to
to
updated
to
refer
to
the
most
recent
drawn
that
all
drainage
and
sewer
systems
should
be
provided
as
designed,
detailed
and
specified
in
the
drawn.
G
Yeah
I
suppose
I'm
happy
enough
for
the
with
the
condition
in
relation
to
what's
been
talked
about
in
relation
to
the
to
the
service
step,
but
I
I
I
as
Mr
Mars,
is
obviously
the
objector
you
did
refer
to.
Obviously
you
have
a
different
opinion
than
that
of
road
service
in
relation
to
this,
this
service
trip.
G
M
M
Yeah
and
we're
two
planning
applications.
The
first
one
had
an
iridius.
The
road
above
the
site
was
4.6
meters
wide.
So
the
determination
was
it
hit
me
a
radius.
We
sent
tapered
back
into
the
4.6
the
earlier.
It
is
subsequent
to
that,
coincidentally,
the
date
that
the
final
adoption
of
the
first
one
took
place.
There
was
an
approval
granted
for
a
second
application
for
the
house,
which
now
exists
above
this
site
that
increased
the
width
of
the
reward
by
one
meter.
So
we
obviously
get
the
4.6
to
correspond
with
the
5.5.
M
The
service
strip
was
never
re-adopted
to
our
contention
is
that
the
Lord
was
4.6
table
and
the
5.5,
and
we
have
actually
spots
on
site
we
put
pin
on
site
and
therefore,
when
it
was
increased
to
5.5
the
service
trip.
At
that
point
they
were
talking
of
a
small
area,
but
the
service
Step
at
that
point,
as
adopted
under
the
original
adoption,
has
been
reduced
and
there's
a
strip
it
Still,
Remains
and
Mrs
Henry's
ownership.
M
And
I
am
aware:
we've
had
numerous
meetings
at
various
reports
and
investigations
and
we
can
understand
the
road
Services
point
of
view
is:
we've
got
the
road
we
require
not
writing
now,
but
we're
saying
you
don't
have
the
service
trip
that
you
originally
adopted
and
there's
a
piece
of
land
here
that
has
to
be
addressed
and
that's
that's
when
we're
not
to
the
point
we're
talking
about
and
the
documents
we
have.
We've
looked
out,
we've
taken
dimensions
on
the
road,
we
put
thoughts
in
the
door
and,
as
it's
been
stated,
the
scars
already.
M
G
G
K
As
Mr
McMaster
has
said,
we
have.
We
have
reviewed
this
on
on
a
number
of
occasions.
Now
what
I
can
say
is,
or
although
I
wasn't
part
of
the
process
for
the
two
applications
that
we've
noted
I've
gone
back
looked
been
on
site.
The
two
adoptions
and
the
two
applications
had
a
5.5
meter,
and
that
includes
the
prop
the
the
application
for
Mrs
Henry's
house.
K
So
we
differ
on
the
points
of
the
4.6
and
the
5.5
and
in
essence
that
gives
us
that
is
a
difference
in
our
opinions,
Road
Services
adopted,
as
was
approved
in
the
applications
we
believe
we
have
done
so,
which
includes
a
service
trip,
and
whilst
we
can
see
how
this
has
come
about
and
the
fact
that
Mrs
Henry's
property
was
at
one
time
out,
it
probably
shouldn't
have
been.
It
was
under
two
adoptions
that
we
have
done
were
correct.
L
If,
if
you
know
many
coming
in
members
just
to
reiterate
similar
to
land
ownership
issues,
this
is
this
is
a
land
control
issue
and,
from
a
planning
perspective,
this
sort
of
sits
outside
the
process.
We
would
consider
this
to
be
a
civil
issue
between
the
two
parties
and
wouldn't
be
clear
as
procreate.
You
know
proceeding
with
making
a
determination
on
the
application.
B
G
G
B
B
G
I'll
start
Ballroom
I
suppose,
but
no
luck,
Charlie
say
thanks
for
everybody.
Obviously
it's
this.
This
is
a
obviously
a
quite
a
complex
one,
hard
to
believe
you
know
for
five
hours.
It
gets
so
so
complex,
but
look
as
as
as
it's
been
sort
of
outlined
there.
You
know
there
is
sort
of
discrepancies
within
levels
and
things,
but
I
think
there
can
be
all
sorted
out
in
relation
to
and
obviously
ni
water
or
the
the
sort
of
the
the
ruling
body
on
on
on
on
drainage
and
things.
G
So
and
as
as
Russian
has
said,
the
the
one
I'm
Batman
with
is
you
know.
Obviously
we
as
a
committee,
it's
the
the
ownership
or
you
know,
planning
does
not
convert
height
up
and,
and
that
has
always
been
drummed
into
us
from
from
day
one
and
training
and
things
so
I,
I,
I,
I,
I
I,
do
feel
sort
of
obviously
I
I
can
understand.
You
know
the
the
issues
that
that's
been
raised
here,
but
I
think
you
know
this.
G
This
one
here
has
has
been
around
a
long
time
and
I
think
you
know
a
lot
of
the
issues
have
been
addressed
from
our
last
meeting
and
and
I
I.
Think
you
know
we're
we're
sort
of
we're
we're
we're
we're
we're
we're
for
me
personally,
you
know
as
I
say:
I
I
do
understand
the
the
the
the
concerns,
but
I
I,
don't
see
how
we
can
really.
You
know
it's
my
only
personal
opinion,
whether
we
go
against
it
this
evening.
You
know,
but
we.
F
G
H
Thank
you,
chair,
I,
think
I
have
to
agree
with
what
kind
sir
Nicholson
said
this
plan
application
has
been
kicking
about
in
the
system
for
a
long
time.
It
was
last
heard
by
his
committee
nearly
four
years
ago
and
I
think
you
know
we'll
have
to
take
on
board
the
comments
of
the
confidence
authorities
on
the
matters
in
relation
to
drainage.
Are
they
also
road
service
and,
as
cancer
Nicholson
said
on
this
camera's
committee,
land
ownership
is
not
the
The
Preserve
of
this
forum
and
we
can't
say
that.
H
So
if
there's
issues
there,
that'll
have
to
be
addressed
elsewhere.
Not
here
so
you
know,
haven't
read
report
and
heard
the
responses
from
both
the
jackler
and
the
applicant
I
think
you
know
the
recommendations
is
I'd
land
on
the
reporters
thought
that
we
will
have
to
go
with,
but
as
cancer
Nicholson
said,
that's
that's
my
opinion
at
the
minute.
So
if
others
have
others
opinions
I'm
glad
to
hear
them.
Thank
you,
chair.
B
I
suppose,
from
my
own
perspective,
I'm
content
with
what
I
have
heard,
and
you
know
Vernon
Maine,
being
cognizant
of
the
fact
that
you
know
we
don't
have
that
and
say
on.
You
know
ownership
a
lot
of
this.
It
is
an
issue
for
eight
say
this
chamber
between
the
parties
concerned
so
I'm
contentious
to
to
and
because
we
accept
the
recommendation
as
as
delivered
to
his
so
I
make
out
a
proposal.
B
I
was
already
greed
or
any
older,
seeing
any
life
soon
or
any
feedback.
On
the
same,
so
we
will
take
that
as
approved
and
we
will
move
on
thanks
to
everybody
for
returning
eight
for
this
one
and
I'm
sorry
for
the
delay
again,
not
within
our
our
gift,
unfortunately,
and
but
we
will
move
on
to
appendix
five
Elder
is
going
to
take
this
one.
B
P
The
applications
before
you
this
evening,
as
it
is
a
major
plan
application
officers
of
Taken
members,
have
read
the
report
unfold,
including
the
addendum
and
a
substance.
It's
a
synopsis.
Only
the
application
site
is
located
within
the
settlement
if
I'm
settlement,
development
limits
of
RMR
and
it's
not
zoned,
as
defined
by
the
Army
area
plan
2004.
besides
adjacent
to
Stone,
House
and
lands
to
the
north,
which
are
currently
under
development
and
exist
in
residential
departments
to
the
east,
west
and
south.
Furthermore,
there
is
an
extant
approval
on
the
site
under
plan
approval.
P
0-2008-0790-Rm,
which
is
also
for
housing
officers,
consider
the
site
not
to
consider
the
site
to
not
fall
within
the
definition
of
open
space
of
public
value
and
therefore,
policy,
OS
1
ppscs
is
not
applicable
to
the
site.
In
accordance
with
paragraph
5.72
of
the
Strategic
plan
and
policy
statement,
the
getting
principles
for
plan
authorities
and
determine
plan
applications
is
that
sustainable
development
should
be
permitted.
Having
regard
to
the
development
plan
and
all
other
material
considerations,
and
that's
the
proposed
to
filamental
costs,
demonstrable
harm
to
interests
of
acknowledged
importance
and
short.
P
Therefore,
the
planning
process
operates
the
presumption
in
favor
of
development
unless
harmless
cause
to
acknowledge
interests
of
acknowledge
importance.
Officers
are
of
the
opinion
that
the
post
Falcon
creates
no
conflict
with
the
professions
of
Pharma
area
plan
2004
and
the
spps
such
that
the
proposal
to
develop
the
site
for
residential
purposes
is
considered
acceptable
in
principle.
P
Regarding
the
proposed
design,
layout
and
amenity
office
surgery
has
no
concerns.
The
development
is
then
you're
in
keeping
with
the
Json
phase
of
development,
which
has
been
constructed
some
similar
to
the
Json
phase
of
development
to
the
north.
Cotton
has
proposed
on
the
site
with
predominantly
two-story
dwellings
proposed
test
stuff
for
the
access
road.
It
had
been
proposed,
with
exception
of
four
Advanced
to
the
south
of
the
site
and
single
story
dwellings
proposed
to
the
west
of
the
access
road.
P
P
The
finished
floor
level
was
proposed,
or
in
general,
considered
to
have
a
lesser
impact
on
the
dwells
to
the
east
than
those
which
were
previously
approved.
Members
are,
however,
advised
the
development
proposed
is
considered
to
create
no
conflict
with
the
policy
professions
of
pps7
they're
down
on
the
ppsm
pps12
are
creating
places
open
space
professing
the
landscape
and
arrangements
are
in
keeping
with
those
previously
approved
faces
of
development
are
also
considered
acceptable.
In
this
context,
child
support
assessment
form
has
been
submitted
and
considered.
P
The
access
will
utilize
success
and
access
Arrangements,
previously
approved
and
constructed
for
a
previous
cases
of
The
Wider
denory
development.
A
total
of
sexy
and
cartilage
parking
spaces
and
22
on
Street
visitor
parking
spaces
have
been
provided
which
exceeds
the
requirements
of
the
park
and
standards
document.
P
Pfa
roads
have
raised
no
concerns
with
access
or
parking
provision
and
officers,
although,
if
we're
satisfied
that
no
confidence
access
with
the
policy
preparations,
pps3
Advantage
assessment
accompanied
this
plan
application
officers
in
consultation
with
DFI
rivers
are
content
that
the
measures
proposed
will
effectively
mitigate
the
flood
risk
to
the
proposed
development
and
from
the
development
elsewhere
such
that
the
proposal
will
complies
with
policy
fld3
or
PPS
15
or
faced.
Members
will,
however,
note
that
a
condition
has
been
included
and
requiring
a
final
genus
assessment
to
be
provided
overall
subject
to
this
condition.
P
Officers
raised
no
concerns
in
relation
to
the
policies
of
PPS
15.,
the
impact
of
the
development
of
natural
heritage
and
the
environments
being
considered
in
the
report.
The
application
status
is
approximately
100
meters
East
from
the
banghorn
river,
which
is
hydrologically
connected
to
lochner,
a
knockback
special
protection
area,
ramsarside
and
knockney
area
of
special
scientific
interest,
which
are
of
international
national
importance
protected
by
the
habitats,
regulations
and
environment
Northern
land
order
2002.
P
following
consultation
with
the
Dara
and
Sheridan
fire
Medical
Services
officers
are
content
that
the
development
can
perceive
without
any
adverse
effects
and
the
Integrity
of
any
site.
Biodiversity,
checklist
and
preliminary
ecological
appraisal
have
been
considered
and
the
natural
environment
division
of
Dr
arrays
no
concerns
construction.
P
Three
objection
matters
have
been
received
and
these
objections
have
been
fully
considered
in
the
report
on
the
addendum
overall
officers.
Consider
the
proposal
to
comply
with
the
local
development
plan,
the
policy
requirements
of
the
spps
and
all
other
relevant
plan
policies,
and
on
that
basis
approval
is
recommended
for
the
recent
Sidelines
in
the
report
in
the
addendum
and
subject
to
the
confession
suggested
in
the
report
on
the
addendums.
P
The
next
slide
then
just
show
scenario
a
overview
of
the
site.
This
is
an
older
image
so
to
the
north
of
the
site.
Previous
phases
of
the
development
have
predominantly
been
constructed,
and
you
can
also
see
the
link
road
to
the
East.
End
is
Monier
a
park,
and
one
year
at
the
end
and
to
the
to
the
west
of
the
site.
P
P
P
So
this
is
just
a
range
of
the
different
house
types.
So
there
is
a
bit
of
a
mixture
in
terms
of
finishes
of
render
and
red
brick,
but
also,
as
the
next
slide
will
show,
there's
a
there's,
two
story:
elements
and
a
single
story.
Elements
yeah
the
following
states
and
just
show
some
of
the
cross-actions
and
the
red
dash
line
showed
the
accent,
approval,
yeah,
just
a
comparison
release.
Just
a
few
of
the
sections
from
the
northern
section
of
the
site,
followed
by
a
few
sections
from
the
center
of
the
site.
P
Systems
proposed,
so
this
is
just
there.
The
details
of
of
that
system,
so
the
first
day
of
photographing
just
shows
the
northern
section
of
the
site,
which
is
currently
been
used
as
a
a
building
compound,
and
you
can
see
the
other
phase
of
the
development
there
and
the
next
site
manager
shows
again
the
Builder's
compound
performs
part
of
the
site,
and
you
can
see
the
stock
pile
of
fair
soil
there
as
well.
P
P
Again
this
side-
and
you
can
just
see
the
Topography
of
the
site,
which
is
increases
to
the
to
least
the
next
slide.
Then
you
can
just
shows
a
closer
image
of
that
boundary
on
the
next
slides
then
just
shows
the
southern
portion
of
the
site
so
to
the
right
hand,
side
of
that
it
would
be
where
the
area
of
a
proposed
open
space
would
be
located.
P
P
And
it's
just
another
few
yeah,
sorry
next
item
just
another
few
of
those
boundaries
and
then
the
next
slide,
just
a
close-up
of
the
of
a
section
of
the
boundary
with
Monier,
which
doesn't
have
a
hedge
and
final
slide,
then
just
shows
image
of
the
of
the
site
from
the
second
phase
of
the
DNA
development,
which
would
fit
into
the
proposed
side.
Thank
you.
B
Okay,
thanks
Kate
and
with
us
today
on
Lane
is
Diana
Thompson
and
she's
going
to
make
a
representation
as
the
agent
in
support
of
the
application
and
to
join
this
via
Zoom.
So
they
are
very
welcome
and
your
time
clock
should
appear
on
the
screen
and
then
you
can
just
start
your
address
test.
Whenever
you're
you're
around.
Q
Okay,
thank
you.
Mr
chairman
and
elected
members,
I'm
very
grateful
for
the
opportunity
to
address
the
committee
this
evening.
I'm
the
planning
consultant
and
the
named
agent
for
the
this
application.
Also
on
the
line
is
Mr,
ran,
marktavi
and
he's
the
agent
for
the
architect
for
this
game
and
he's
available
to
also
answer
any
questions
you
might
have
on
the
design.
Q
This
is
the
fourth
phase
of
the
very
highly
desirable
deanery
domain,
Housing
Development.
It
was
brought
forward
at
speed
owing
to
the
success
of
the
very
much
sought
after
first
and
second
phases
of
the
schemes,
phase
three
is
underway
and
will
be
brought
to
the
marketplace
in
due
course.
The
efficiency
of
your
planning
officers
in
processing
this
application
will
mean
that
the
DNA
domain
will
continue
to
meet
highs
in
need
and
RMR
for
many
months
to
come.
Q
It
will
also
mean
that
when
the
time
comes,
the
contractor
can
move
seamlessly
onto
this
phase
of
development,
and
this
continuity
will
secure
his
Workforce
and
keep
his
team
of
some
subcontractors
and
gainful
employment
so
pausing.
There
I
really
want
to
express
my
thanks
to
the
planning
department
for
making
this
happen.
The
professionalism
and
hard
work
is
a
highly
refreshing
change
and
many
other
local
authorities
would
do
well
to
take
a
leap
from
their
book.
They're
a
real
crowded
to
you
and
I
know.
Q
This
has
been
all
the
more
challenging
and
important
in
the
context
of
the
difficulties
with
the
new
planning
portal
system,
which
seems
to
be
more
not
working
than
it
is
working.
So
a
sincere
thanks
to
the
team
for
bringing
this
forward
to
this
month's
committee
meeting.
The
application
site
is
part
of
a
significant
residential
allocation
in
North
Arma
that
has
been
in
the
planning
pipeline
for
the
best
part
of
17
years.
Q
Its
position
within
the
settlement
limit
as
unallocated
land
plus
a
part
implemented
planning
consent
sets
up
a
double
presumption
that
firmly
establishes
the
acceptability
and
principle
of
housing
on
this
site.
We
say
the
scheme
is
a
quality
residential
layout
that
complies
with
pps7
and
creating
places.
We've
read
the
case
officers
report
and
we
endorse
entirely
its
analysis
and
fully
support
the
recommendation
that
field
planning
permission
should
be
granted.
B
Hello,
thank
you
very
much
and
down
you're
right
on
the
right
on
the
bottom
of
your
females,
see
what's
that
must
have
practiced
that
one
yeah.
No,
thank
you.
Thank
you
and
Prius
indeed
for
our
planners
in
that
regards.
So
that's
good,
that's
recorded
on
YouTube
forevermore,
but
and
thank
you
and
members.
B
G
Yeah
thanks
chairman
thanks,
Tiana
and
yeah.
It's
it's
good
to
hear.
Somebody
Pray,
there's
no
plan
on
all
this,
but
yeah
look
it's
it's
it's
great
to
hear
that,
but
no
Mike,
my
questions
are
for
well.
Have
you
ever
like
I
the
existing
boundaries?
Obviously,
can
you
show
the
photographs
they're
they're,
being
retained,
just
just
the
clarification
on
that
there
are
one
and
the
extent
of
the
security
anymore.
G
Obviously,
I'm
look
at
the
sections
and
obviously
there's
there's
a
point
where
there
is
no
retaining
walls
just
how
far
along
that
goes.
You
know
in
in
in
relation
that,
and
the
on
the
sections
is
red
lines.
I'm,
assuming
is
that
the
original
approval,
so
really
what
you're
doing
is
comparing
to
the
the
the
the
the
the
proposed
against
what
was
already
approved
in
the
red
right,
okay
and
and
I'll
be
up
Mr
chairman.
Thank
you.
P
Yeah
in
terms
of
the
boundaries
they're
predominantly
all
to
be
retained
and
they've
been
conditioned
as
such
in
the
report,
but
I
think
it
is
also
worth
mentioning
it
to
the
rear
of
the
defense
and
and
retained
structures.
There
is
actual
additional
plant
and
I
think
it's
in
the
region
of
a
six
thousand
square
meters
of
platinum.
The
whole
way
around
that
site.
So
that's
gonna,
you
know,
obviously
have
biodiversity
impact.
You
know
benefits
and
also
then
help
the
screening
as
well.
P
It
I
think
there's
also
some
compensatory
plan
on
planting
to
the
southern
boundary
as
well
the
retaining
wall.
It
runs
from
the
dwell
on
site
number,
one
to
site
number,
17
I
believe
so
that
would
be
from
it
to
the
stuff
that
link
wrote
from
the
top
for
the
northern
one
a
across
a
hopefully
that
that's
clear
where
that
is.
I
O
B
G
G
B
G
G
It's
it
as
as
kids
are
playing
the
the
additional
planting
will
help
it
integrate
within
that
sort
of
the
topography
that
it's
in
and
I
think
it's.
You
know,
in
my
opinion,
it's
it's
it's
it's
it's
it's
another
good
example
of
of
of
of
new
houses
in
in
in
the
armor
area,
which
again
is
very
sought,
after
so
I
I.
Think
and
it's
it's.
B
B
R
R
R
This
is
the
layout
as
approved
under
in
2006
0998,
so
you
can
see
that
it's
a
very
similar
layout
to
what
has
been
submitted
and,
as
it
said,
this
development
under
around
2006
or
998
could
be
implemented
next
slide.
Please,
and
that's
just
showing
the
two
in
context
together,
I
think
that
completes
his
legs.
Thank
you.
G
Yeah
chairman,
thank
you
and
thanks
thank
you
for
the
report
and,
as
declares
are
playing.
Obviously,
this
has
got
previous
approval
and
it's
owned
within
the
Craig
Avenue
plan
and
and
it's
pretty
much
a
similar
scheme
so
and,
as
you
said,
it's
a
very
detailed
report
and
everything's
in
there
and
all
consultations
have
come
back
and
there's
no
issues
so
chairman.
If
you
want
to
take
a
propose,
I'm
happy
to
propose,
we
accept
the
recommendation.
So
thank
you.
B
R
Thank
you
chair.
This
is
very
similar
actually
to
the
previous
appendix
it's
appendix
4,
and
this
application
is
the
adjacent
site
for
13
social
houses,
including
the
house,
to
provide
wheelchair
access.
There
are
no
Consulting
objections
to
the
proposal
and
there
are
five
third-party
objections.
In
this
case,
the
principle
of
development
is
acceptable
again
as
it's
within
the
development
limit
for
craigavon
on
land
zone
for
housing.
This
site
is
not
0.5
hectares
and
it's
accessed
again
off
baliorne
Manner
and
existing
residential
development.
R
One
of
the
critical
issues
again
is
the
fallback
possession
in
2006
of
and
2006
0998
413
dwellings,
exact
same
amount,
which
are
positioned
in
the
same
format
as
the
proposal
and
which
could
be
implemented.
The
keysight
requirements
in
the
plan
have
been
considered
within
the
planning
report,
as
well
as
qt1
or
pps7,
and
other
relevant
planning
policies
and
I
would
also
just
draw
your
attention
to.
There
was
an
addendum
submitter.
There
was
a
slight
variation
to
condition.
R
4
suggested
there
was
a
wee
tweak
to
one
of
the
ones
was
10
rather
than
one
percent,
and
there
were
extra
details
in
regards
to
the
parking
spaces
to
show
that
they're
slightly
above
standard,
and
so
other
issues,
though
in
within
the
report,
have
been
considered,
are
design
and
layout.
Archeology
landscape
features,
Landscaping
movement,
pattern,
access,
traffic,
parking
materials
and
all
amenity
issues
have
been
considered
in
full.
A
drainage
assessment
has
been
completed
and
rivers
agency
have
no
objection.
A
biodiversity
checklist
has
been
submitted
and
niea
have
no
objections.
R
The
site
was
also
considered
under
the
natural
habitat
conservation
assessment
requirements
and
would
not
have
an
adverse
impact
on
the
Integrity
of
a
European
site.
Finally,
all
the
issues
raised
within
the
five
letters
of
representation
have
been
considered
and
full
and
are
addressed
within
the
planning
report
and
again,
the
recommendation
is
to
approve
and
we'll
just
go
through
the
presentations
very
similar
to
the
previous
one.
R
So
this
is
the
13
units
in
the
proposed
site
layout
plan
next
slide,
please,
this
is
the
proposed
Heist
types
like
slide
plays
next
slide
place,
Justice
types
and
layouts,
and
the
house
for
waiter:
yes,
has
a
left
in
the
middle
of
the
layout
plan.
Next
slide,
please
there's
a
section
through
the
site
next
slide.
Please.
R
B
F
G
G
B
Okay,
I'm
not
going
to
just
do
a
technical
issue,
the
first
the
part
of
appendix
3,
not
the
presentation.
I
was
in
the
screen
presentation,
but
the
your
open
Notes.
If
you
could
just
deliver
those
again
for
appendix
3,
that'd,
be
able
to
start,
and
the
vote
was
heard
or
the
proposal,
but
on
the
the
view
of
the
slides
or
scene.
But
it's
just
the
first
part
of
the
you
know
the
report
itself.
If
you
could
just
deliver
a
lot
again
for
us
that
would
just
tidy
that
up.
Thank
you
and
X3.
R
This
appendix
3
is
an
application
for
it:
social
housing
units.
There
are
six
third-party
objections
to
the
proposal
and
there
are
no
issues
from
consultates.
Principle
of
development
is
acceptable,
as
this
is
within
the
development
limit
for
craigavon
area
on
land
zone
for
housing,
the
site
measures
not
0.52
hectares
and
is
accessed
off
Bali
or
Manner,
and
existing
residential
development.
R
One
of
the
critical
issues
for
this
application
is
the
fallback
position
under
n2006
0998
for
four
dwellings,
which
are
positioned
in
the
same
format
as
this
proposal
and
could
be
implemented.
The
keysight
requirements
in
the
plan
are
being
considered
within
the
planning
report,
as
well
as
qd1
of
pps7
and
other
relevant
planning
policies.
I
would
just
draw
members
attention
to
the
addendum,
which
was
submitted,
which
outlines
details
in
regards
to
the
parking,
the
size
of
the
spaces
and
the
requirement
there
as
well,
but
other
issues
within
the
report
itself.
R
Other
issues
such
as
design
and
layout,
archeology
landscape,
features,
landscape
plan,
movement,
pattern,
access,
traffic,
parking
materials
and
all
amenity
have
been
considered
infill.
There
are
no
drainage
or
flood
risk
issues
for
this
site.
A
biodiversity
checklist
has
been
submitted
and
Nar
Nia
have
no
objections.
The
site
has
also
been
considered
under
the
natural
habitat
conservation
assessment
requirements
and
would
not
have
an
adverse
effect
on
the
Integrity
of
a
European
site.
B
R
L
My
future,
this
application
seeks
permission
for
extensions
to
the
existing
Pavilion
to
provide
new,
changing
rooms,
shower
toilet
and
gym,
to
provide
additional
facilities.
For
ladies
rugby
include
an
extension
to
the
existing
bar
and
function,
room
and
provision
of
a
new
shared
for
storage
and
Machinery,
with
new
dog
outs
path
and
Pitch
side
reeling
to
the
picture,
Banbridge
Rugby,
Club,
arteriesley
and
Banbridge.
L
The
application
is
being
presented
to
the
committee
tonight
as
more
than
four
objections
from
four
separate
addresses
have
been
received.
The
application
site
is
within
an
existing
area
of
open
space
outside
of
the
area
plan.
I'll
set
it
in
the
report.
Officers
consider
The
Proposal
complies
with
the
spps
and
policy
OS,
1
and
pps8,
and
is
considered
acceptable
at
this
location.
L
Access
to
the
site
will
continue
to
be
provided
via
existing
access,
and
it
is
proposed
to
utilize
the
existing
car
parking
provision
that
exists
within
the
club
grounds.
Although
there's
an
increase
in
floor
space,
I
was
just
consider
that
this
is
mainly
offset
as
a
rationalization
of
existing
substandard
and
temporary
Arrangements
within
the
site
which
are
currently
used
for
changing
and
storage
purposes.
L
Officers
in
consultation
with
DFI
roads
are
content
that
there
will
be
no
increase
in
traffic
generated
by
the
proposed
development
and
a
proposed
condition
which
would
restrict
the
membership
numbers
of
the
club
to
the
current
levels
in
order
to
control
this
matter,
officers
are
satisfied.
The
Proposal
will
not
Prejudice
Road,
Safety
or
inconvenience
for
people
with
traffic
and
therefore
complies
to
kps3
and
the
parking
standards.
L
Fluvial
flood
event,
DFI
Rivers,
accept
the
logic
of
fra
and
have
no
objection
subject
to
a
number
of
conditions.
Officers
in
consultation
with
DFA
rivers
are
there
for
Content
that
the
measures
proposed
will
effectively
mitigate
the
flood
risk
and,
as
such,
the
proposal
complies
of
PPS
15
and
the
spps.
L
A
noise
impact
assessment
was
submitted
which
considered
the
acoustic
performance
of
the
pose
facade
and
roof
specification
of
the
extension
to
the
function
route
to
prevent
noise
Breakout,
an
assessment
has
been
conducted
in
the
noise
impact
on
the
three
closest
residential
receptors.
In
all
scenarios,
it
was
assessed
that
the
existing
roof
proposed,
extended,
roof
and
proposed
wall
will
provide
adequate
noise
attenuation
and
reduce
potential
impacts
on
the
nearest
dwellings.
L
The
Environmental
Health
Department
are
consent,
subject
to
a
condition
restricting
the
use
of
the
Amplified
music
or
speech
within
the
gym
area.
A
second
condition
is
also
recommended,
which
requires
the
incorporation
of
sound
insulation
materials
as
specified
in
the
noise
impact
assessment,
based
on
the
advice
and
conditions,
also
to
contend
that
the
residential
immunity
would
not
be
unacceptably
adversely
affected
as
a
result
of
the
proposed
development
and
should
receive
a
degree
of
betterment
due
to
improve
noise,
attenuation
materials
and
management
of
the
facility.
L
All
issues
that
have
been
raised
in
third
party
objections
have
been
fully
considered
in
the
report.
Obviously
the
opinion
the
post-development
complies
with
the
spps
and
all
other
policies
and,
on
this
basis,
sub
to
the
subject
of
the
conditions
attached,
it
is
recommended.
The
plan
of
permission
be
granted
and
I
would
like
to
draw
members
attention
to
an
addendum
report
which
was
circulated
earlier
and
summarizing
a
written
representation
by
the
applicant
and
also
secondary
to
a
further
condition
and
I'll.
Just
take
you
through
the
report
or
the
slides.
L
L
Again
is
going
to
be
a
bit
difficult
to
see
on
the
slide,
but
the
the
hatched
areas
show
the
proposed
extensions
to
the
existing
Clubhouse.
So
you
can
see
there's
an
extension
to
the
rear
extension
to
the
north
and
extension
to
the
South
there
and
then
propose
storage
unit
down
further
to
the
side
and
that's
the
the
again.
The
colors
are
great,
but
you
can
see
the
location
of
the
Rose
Path
and
handrail
around
the
pitch.
L
L
B
H
Thank
you
for
your
report,
sir.
Thank
you
for
admin
Christian
in
terms
of
the
extension
to
the
function,
areas
that
it
says
that
the
the
this
new
structure
should
be
about
in
terms
of
noise
and
the
existing
functional
rooms
has
the
rear
doors
which
is
are
opening
they're.
Just
briefly,
explain
why
this
is
a
betterment
in
terms
of
noise.
Please
thank
you.
L
Sorry,
it's
been
noted
a
number
of
the
representations
that
they
exist.
The
use
of
the
existing
external
rear
diversion
to
the
function
room
causes
noise
noise
spell
at
the
moment
from
the
venue,
so
the
removal
of
these
rear
fire
doors
on
the
South
Side
will
prevent
any
breakout
noise,
obviously
from
that
pathway,
and
it
effectively
removes
a
weak
component
from
the
existing
facade.
G
L
Yeah
but
I
would
agree
with
you
and
in
the
noise
impact
assessment
they
have
proposed
materials
that
will
insulate
against
those.
There
is
new
noise,
insulating
materials
that
will
be
incorporated
into
the
design
so
that
facade
the
roof
and
the
windows
will
provide
betterment
in
terms
of
materials
that
they're
using.
So
that
has
been
set
out
in
the
noise
assessment
and
considered
by
the
Environmental
Health
Department.
B
H
Yes
sure
I'm
happy
to
propose
to
accept
the
recommendation
that
I
think
from
the
report
of
this
very
comprehensive.
But
you
know
this
will
be
a
betterment
for
the
clubhouse
and
ultimately
it
will
encourage
more
characters
to
become
involved
with
sports
and
I
know.
It's
not
a
problem
consideration
but
I
think
that
something
we
should
welcome.
So
I'm
happy
to
oppose
a
chair.
G
Yeah,
yes,
chairman
happy.
Second,
as
as
Chris
Savage
said,
you
know,
it'll
I
haven't
been
to
the
club
recently,
you
know
for
the
the
armed
forces
that
you
you
could
see.
You
know.
Obviously
it
can
be
a
really
vibrant
place.
I
think
this
extension
will
will
do
away
with
all
those
kind
of
you
know.
Little
temporary
buildings
and
it'll
obviously
get
up
facility
which
allow
the
club
to
go
forward
and
I
said
as
Norma
I'm
on.
So
thank
you.
John.
B
P
Let's
plan
on
application
seeks
full
plan
information
for
the
reaction
of
residential
development
comprising
93
residential
units
with
photo
voltaic
roof
panels,
Associated
garages,
Associated
Road
works
and
hard,
and
soft
landscaping
and
Associated
site
Works
advanced
stuff,
the
Tully
Galley
Road
in
craigavon.
The
application
is
before
you
this
evening,
as
it
is
a
major
planning
application.
Officers
have
taken
that
members
have
read
the
report
on
the
addendum
unfold
and
such
this
as
a
synopsis.
Only
the
application
site
is
located
within
the
settlement.
P
The
family
development
limits
of
the
Krug
Avenue
urban
area
or
non-sewn
for
phase
one
housing.
Zoning
ch5,
as
defined
by
the
craigavon
area
plan
2010..
The
side
is
adjacent
to
cycle
and
pedestrian
paths
to
the
east,
Northeast
and
Southeast
with
housing.
Beyond.
These
paths,
Brian
law
integrated
college,
is
located
west
for
site.
The
Anson
to
the
north
of
the
state
are
also
zoned
housing
lands,
but
not
developed,
and
various
phases
of
Housing
Development
approved
on
The
Wider
side
are
currently
under
construction.
P
The
proposed
development
is
considered
to
comply
with
the
key
State
requirements
of
Sony
ch5
and
office.
Surgery
has
no
conflict
between
the
post-development
and
the
Garden
area
plan
or
the
spps.
Therefore,
the
proposal
to
develop
the
site
for
residential
purposes
is
considered
acceptable.
In
principle.
Regarding
the
proposed
saying
there
is
an
immunity
officers
raise
no
concerns.
The
proposed
density
is
considered
acceptable
for
this
area.
P
P
N-2007-0873F
and
the
layout
of
the
development
is
considered
to
be
a
betterment.
The
extant
approval
had
three-story
residential
elements
on
elevated
sections
of
the
site
which
have
been
removed
and
the
relationship
with
the
cycle,
paths
and
footpaths
within
the
Craig
album
area
are
considered
to
be
better
integrated
within
the
proposed
development.
Members
are
whoever
face
that
the
development
proposed
is
considered
to
create
no
conflict
with
the
policy
professions
of
pps7.
The
addendum,
the
ppsm
pps12
for
creating
places
open
space,
profession
and
Landscaping
arrangements
are
deemed
appropriate
with
further
Landscaping
requirements.
Condition
was
necessary.
P
The
use
of
photovoltaic
roof
panels
are
also
considered
acceptable
and
officer.
Tree
has
no
concerns
in
the
context
of
PPS
18.
transfer,
transport
assessment
form
has
been
submitted
and
considered
access
for
utilized.
The
accessory
instrument
previously
approved
on
backstamp
approval,
with
the
existing
Central
reservation
remark
to
depict
the
right
hand.
Turning
in
a
total
of
186
in
cartilage
parking
spaces
and
61
on
Street
visitor
parking
spaces
have
been
provided.
Officers
raised
no
concerns
with
the
parking
Arrangements
in
the
context
of
parking
standards.
P
Efi
roads
have
provided
a
comment
on
the
parking
profession
and
the
FI
rotary
has
no
issues
with
the
access.
Arrangements
officers
are
satisfied
that
there's
no
conflict
between
the
proposal
and
the
professions
of
pps3
a
generous
assessment.
The
company,
this
plan
application
offers
some
consultation
with
the
FI
register
content
that
the
measures
proposed
will
effectively
mitigate
the
solid
risks
to
the
proposed
development
and
from
the
development
elsewhere
so
set
the
Post
open
pay.
P
P
The
impact
of
the
development
on
natural
heritage
and
the
environment
has
been
considered
in
the
report
immediately
south
of
the
sites.
There
is
a
hydrological
link
to
the
Lakme
and
lock
bags
special
protection
area
which
are
of
international
and
National
importance
and
protected
by
the
habitats,
regulations
and
the
environment.
Northland
order
2002.
P
following
consultation
with
theater
and
shared
Environmental
Services
officers
are
content
that
the
development
can
proceed
without
any
adverse
effects
on
the
Integrity
of
any
sites.
Biodiversity
detect
this
an
ecological
statements
have
been
considered
and
the
national
environment
division
that
there
is
no
concerns,
the
Water
Management
unit
of
their
face
that
they
are
satisfied
that
the
proposal
will
not
impact
adversely
on
the
water
environment
overall
office
surgery
has
no
concerns
regarding
the
policy
professions
of
pps2
officers
also
raise
no
concerns
regarding
contamination
from
following
consultation
with
the
regulation
unit
of
Dara
and
the
Environmental
Health
Department.
P
Concerning
contamination,
preliminary
risk
assessment,
ni
Waterford,
face
that
there
is
available
capacity
at
the
wastewater
treatment
works.
No
objections
were
received
regarding
this
plan
on
application,
so
overall
officers
consider
the
proposal
to
comply
with
a
local
development
plan,
the
policy
requirements
of
the
spps
and
all
other
relevant
Talent
policies.
Donat
basis,
approval
is
recommended
for
the
reason
sight
line
and
the
report
on
the
addendum
and
subject
to
the
convection
suggested
in
the
report
on
the
addendum.
P
P
Sorry,
that's
just
from
the
area
plan
which
shows
the
Zoning
for
phase
one
housing
land,
the
next
item
yeah.
So
this
is
the
site
layout.
So,
as
you
can
see
it
had,
there
are
earlier
phases
which
have
been
previously
approved
or
shown
in
Gray,
but
the
Development
Centers
right
in
the
central
area
of
open
space,
and
then
you
can
see
that
then
your
open
space
would
say
fronts
on
to
the
cycle
paths
and
pedestrian
pathways.
P
P
So,
just
in
terms
of
the
middle
section
there,
a
at
the
right
hand,
side
at
the
elevated
section
of
the
site
on
the
accident.
Approval
is
where
a
three-story
elements
would
begin
to
be
proposed.
So
you
can
see
that
there
is
a
betterment
in
terms
of
the
facial
impact
with
the
the
two-story
rather
than
the
three-story
and
that
elevated
Saxon.
P
So
these
are
just
next
photo
just
as
say
the
site
entrance.
So
you
can
see
the
construction
Mark
has
started
in
earlier
phases
and
the
hatching
there
will
have
a
right
hand
turning
the
input
into
it
again,
just
this
just
a
frontage
or
a
photo
across
the
front
edge,
and
you
can
see
the
rising
land
within
the
site
away
from
the
road.
P
B
D
H
Of
Salvage
thank
you,
chair
on
just
a
very
quick
okay,
just
in
relation
to
the
photovolvic
Ruth
Pals
I've
probably
come
across
that
before
will
there
be
a
benefit
to
the
householder
in
terms
of
electricity
bills
going
forward?
Is
that
something
that
yeah
I
don't
know?
It's
not
particularly
a
plan
unless
you
know,
but
would
that
be
a
benefit
to
the
residents
of
the
properties.
P
Okay,
so
the
solar
panels,
they
don't
have
exact
details,
but
it's
likely
that
could
be
used,
for
example,
to
generate
hot
water,
but
at
the
stage
the
developers
decided
to
include
it,
but
ultimately
it's
likely
that
those
Works
would
have
been
permitted
to
follow
them
after
the
houses
were
occupied.
But
at
this
stage
together
in
the
construction
process
needed
to
included
within
their
application,
foreign.
F
B
B
Okay,
all
agreed
only
country
views
on
that,
one,
not
the
tech
nearly
so
that
bases
on,
as
this
is
the
last
plan
on
regularly
server
Services
committee
meeting
before
the
election,
it's
coming
on
the
18th
of
May
and
just
put
on
record
and
our
best
wishes
to
Alderman
Anderson
Alderman
twibel,
Kinsler
McNally,
who
have
been
serving
on
the
committee
for
a
number
of
years.
I
just
want
to
thank
us
all
for
your
contribution
over
that
time,
and
it's
been
good
with
through
a
lot
of
RPA
and
the
whole
introduction
of
this
committee.
F
It's
really
just
to
thank
you
for
your
comment,
Mr
chairman
and
say
that
I
have
learned
an
amazing
amount
in
the
number
of
years
that
have
been
on
the
planning
committee
and
I'll
certainly
take
that
knowledge
forward
into
whatever
the
future
holds
I.
Thank
you
for
and
others
and
all
the
planners
for
their
guidance
and
their
help
and
support,
and
it
has
been
as
I
say,
a
learning
experience.
It
has
been
a
profitable
experience.
Thank
you
very
much
indeed.
E
Remember
the
days
going
around
for
site,
maybe
some
such
like
great
times
to
remember
but
again
I
would
thank
you
chair
the
way
you've
conducted
the
the
discharge
as
well.
It's
been
a
very
to
me
anyway,
a
lakeable
comedic,
but
we
all
seem
to
get
through
the
business.
Some
nights
we've
been
longer
than
others,
so
I
would
just
say
thanks
to
Damien
and
all
the
plumbers,
all
the
team
to
the
Democratic
Services
team
for
all
the
work
that
they
do
in
the
background
who
Donnie
and
the
team.
E
Maybe
things
work
might
be
running
smoothly
today,
well
to
Donna
and
the
team
as
well
on
to
Tom
and
the
Berlin
control
and
all
the
building
control
team
and
on
on
the
legal
services,
air
or
her
ways
Council
and
manage
the
time
when
we
needed
the
violent
Insurgent
interactions
to
keep
us
right.
So
as
we
seek
new
posture,
ultimate
Bible
I
think
we'll
find
plenty
to
occupy
and
ourselves
going
forward.
So
best
wishes
to
everyone.
H
You
very
much
Sharon
just
to
Echo
your
comments
to
the
retirement
cancers
and
Alderman
Artisans
and
Alderman
tribal
said
thanks
to
his
staff
and
everybody
involved
in
club
I'd
just
like
to
thank
you,
chair
for
the
way
of
Harvard
this
meeting
this
last
year,
you've
been
very
inclusive.
You've,
let
everybody
have
your
say,
and
the
maintenance
have
found
well
and
I.
Think
the
members
are
grateful
for
your
leadership
and
some
of
the
difficult
decisions
we've
had
to
make
during
the
course
of
this
year.
H
B
B
It's
a
learning
committee,
as
you
say,
hey
it's
one
of
the
least
political
Committees,
of
course,
as
well,
which
seem
to
all
just
focus
on
the
what's
in
front
of
us
and
get
the
get
the
meeting
done
and
I'm
just
Echo
as
Alderman
Anderson
in
case
there's,
obviously,
at
all
the
support
work
that
goes
on
around
this
camera,
it
is
fairly
intensive
and,
as
we've
seen
today,
there
are
hurdles
to
overcome
and
it
had
done
a
great
job
again.
I'm
getting
us
through
that
on
our
legals
as
well.