►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
Now
in
session,
please
note
the
meeting
is
being
audio
recorded.
My
name
is
John
Holman,
chair
of
the
commission
and
I
will
be
running
tonight's
meeting,
where
your
volunteer
Representatives
appointed
by
our
County
council
person
or
county
executive
and
entrusted
to
monitor,
Renovations
and
additions
to
our
Baltimore
County
historic
resources.
We
review
and
approve
nominations
to
the
Baltimore
County
preliminary
landmarks
list
and
comment
on
National
register
nominations.
Additionally,
we
are
charged
with
evaluating
submissions
to
the
Baltimore
County
historic
tax
credit
program
that
encourages
the
appropriate
maintenance
and
renovation
of
designated
historic
properties
with
the
Commissioners.
A
A
A
A
Good.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
The
landmarks
preservation
commission
operates
under
the
authority
standards
and
requirements
of
Title
VII
article
32
of
the
Baltimore
County
code.
We
refer
to
the
United
States
Secretary
of
the
Interior
standards
for
rehabilitation
as
administered
by
the
National
Park
Service.
This
is
the
accepted
National
Standard
for
historic
preservation
projects,
our
own
Baltimore,
County,
historic
preservation,
design
guidelines
directly
reference
and
incorporate
the
Secretary
of
the
Interior
standards
for
rehabilitation.
A
We
have
important
preservation
issues
to
discuss
and
debate
at
each
meeting.
If
you
would
like
to
make
comments,
please
limit
your
comments
to
the
specific
application
or
proposal
submission
being
reviewed.
We
ask
for
your
assistance
and
understanding
so
that
the
discussions
do
not
digress
as
an
additional
comment.
We
can
all
agree
that
historic
preservation
is
an
important
aspect
of
the
quality
of
life
in
place
that
makes
Baltimore
County
unique.
As
a
commission,
we
seek
to
recommend
significant
buildings
and
places
for
landmark
consideration
to
the
County
Council
for
their
final
vote.
A
As
Commissioners.
We
serve
on
the
commission
due
to
our
expertise,
interest
and
passion
for
historic
buildings
and
places
and
review
submissions
based
solely
on
their
Merit.
While
we
may
disagree
in
discussion
and
voting,
we
continue
to
be
a
collegial
body
that
respects
each
other
personally
and
professionally.
F
Just
a
reminder:
when
offering
testimony,
we
ask
the
members
the
public
to
sign
up
with
staff
in
advance,
so
we
can
announce
on
them
when
they're
at
the
appropriate
time.
Today
we
do
not
have
any
members
of
the
public
signed
up
to
speak
again.
Applicants
and
owners
or
project
Representatives
do
not
have
to
sign
up.
F
They
can
speak
and
address
the
commission
if
they
want,
at
the
appropriate
time,
staff
will
announce
them
and
then
mute
them
as
well,
and
then
also
just
a
reminder
that
every
commission
member
receives
the
applications
I'm
a
an
application
material
packet
a
week
before
the
meeting
that
includes
all
applications
and
plans
that
the
most
submitted
and
other
information
that
staff
might
have
gathered
to
help
them
review.
The
application
information
in
this
PowerPoint
is
just
a
summary
of
that.
Information
doesn't
include
everything.
F
It's
just
used
to
keep
the
meeting
in
an
organized
organized
manner
to
help
it
Move
Along.
A
Thank
you
Caitlin
and
then
any
any
changes
to
the
preliminary
agenda.
No.
A
A
H
Tim
Smith
property
is
at
601
cliveden
Road
in
Pikesville
County
Council
District
number
two.
This
is
a
non-contributing
resource
within
the
Sudbury
Park
County
historic
district
and
the
owners
proposed
in-kind,
asphalt,
roof
Replacements
to
the
main
house
and
rear
patio,
Edition
incong,
Gutter
and
downspout
Replacements
and
front
porch
repairs
and
in-kine
post
replacements.
A
But
thank
thank
you.
Jessica
Commissioners
any
objections
to
that
being
a
consent
agenda
item.
We
need
to
pull
that
into
the
regular
agenda
hearing
none.
It
asks
for
a
motion
that
we
approve
the
consent
agenda.
E
E
E
F
G
H
E
E
A
H
This
is
the
Burton
property
located
at
4609
Prospect
Ave
in
Reisterstown
County
Council
District,
Number
Four.
This
is
a
non-contributing
structure
within
the
Glendon
County
historic
district
and
the
owners
are
proposing
a
new
deck
and
staircase
construction
on
the
rear,
East
Elevation
and
as
a
note,
the
property
is
a
non-contributing
Cape
Cod
within
Glendon
built
in
1949,
and
the
neighboring
properties
on
both
sides
are
also
non-contributing
resources.
Applicants
wish
to
construct
a
12
foot
by
18
foot,
Second,
Story
deck
and
staircase.
H
The
rise
is
approximately
eight
feet:
I'm
I'm,
sorry,
five
feet:
eight
inches
above
the
slope
ground
surface
on
the
rear,
East
elevation
of
the
main
house.
The
deck
will
be
overlooking
a
Hardscape
patio
at
grade.
The
deck
will
be
supported
by
seven
six
by
six
posts,
with
18
inch
by
30
inch
Footers,
a
four
foot
wide
wood
staircase
raising
11
steps
high
will
be
placed
on
the
East
edge
of
the
deck
construction
and
will
be
supported
by
two
10
inch
by
12
inch
Footers.
A
series
of
two
by
eight
floor
joists
will
support
the
depth.
H
The
decking
will
be
trucks.
Enhanced
foggy
worth
railings
will
be
white
vinyl
with
black
round
aluminum
balusters
and
a
link
was
provided
in
your
materials
packet
and
and
the
and
the
decking
balusters
will
be
wrapped
in
white.
Asic
staff
would
like
to
add
that
the
previous
owners
received
approval
in
May
of
2019
by
the
LPC
for
deck
proposal,
which
does
differ
slightly
in
design,
but
it's
in
the
same
location
and
has
similar
Composite
Materials
staff
provided
the
2019
application.
Technical
committee
report
and
certificate
of
appropriateness.
H
Approval
letter
in
the
meeting
materials
packet
for
the
LPC
to
review
staff
is
accepting
of
the
debt
construction,
as
proposed
as
located
on
the
rear,
East
elevation
of
the
main
home
and
will
not
be
visible
from
Prospect
Ave
or
the
public
right-of-way.
In
addition,
the
use
of
composite
materials
is
acceptable
of
the
structure
is
as
non-contributing
SAS
recommendation
is
to
vote
to
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness,
as
proposed,
citing
Baltimore,
County,
historic
design,
guidelines,
fences
and
landscapes.
H
A
H
An
attendee
with
us
that
that
it's
not
loading
is
Gloria
Boga.
F
She's
online
I'm
not
sure
you're,
the
one
that
dealt
with
the
applicant.
G
That
I'll
make
a
motion
that
we
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
this.
The
submission
perfect.
C
C
A
H
Is
the
porterhouse
the
Robinson
Brown
property
located
at
19,
Chatsworth
Ave,
County,
Council,
District,
Number
Four,
says
a
contributing
resource
within
the
Glendon
County
historic
district
and
the
owners
are
seeking
part,
two
tax
credit
review
for
the
recoding
of
the
existing
standing
sea
metal
roof
and
the
replacement
of
the
existing
asphalt
front,
porch
and
side
roofs.
H
This
is
a
two
and
a
half
story
frame
dwelling
constructed
sometime
prior
to
1898
in
the
faux
Victorian
style,
the
main
Center
cross
gable
roof
is
covered
with
an
early
standing,
seam
Tin
Roof
the
front
porch
roof
contains
a
two-story
Side
Edition,
with
three
tab
asphalt,
shingles
that
were
installed
prior
to
the
owner's
purchase
of
the
home
work
item,
one
for
the
main
roof
recoating.
The
main
roof
is
covered
in
a
coated
standing
seam
Tin
Roof.
The
existing
coating
is
an
asphalt-based
silver
aluminized
coating,
which
is
currently
worn
and
the
underlayment
is
visible.
H
The
owners
are
proposing
to
recoat
the
existing
roof
and
the
work
will
include
prepping,
the
existing
Surface
by
cleaning
with
hot
water,
washer
cleaning
solution
and
high
volume
on
low
pressure
to
remove
dirt,
mildew
and
other
surface
Grime.
After
those
surfaces
are
prepped,
a
primer
will
be
applied
to
all
black
spots
and
two
coats
of
Sherwin-Williams
metal
roof
coating
will
be
rolled
onto
the
surface.
H
A
color
was
not
indicated
in
the
application,
and
staff
asked
the
LPC
to
confirm
the
color
work
item,
two
for
the
front:
porch
and
Side
Edition
roof
Replacements
existing
front
porch
and
two-story
style.
Edition
roofs
are
covered
in
three
tub
asphalt.
Material
The
Proposal
includes
the
removal
of
two
existing
layers
of
roofing
for
place,
any
sheet
install
temperature
ice
and
water
Shield.
The
owners
have
proposed
the
following
two
options:
for
the
replacement
material
option:
one
is
a
permalock
aluminum
shingle.
H
This
is
in
the
Slate
color,
with
the
finish
in
Dawn
gray.
Staff
notes
that
this
is
a
newer
material
and
hasn't
been
seen
in
recent
years.
In
Roofing
proposals,
staff
asked
the
commission
to
discuss
possible
visual
implications.
This
material
may
or
may
not
have
and
staff
recommends
that
if
this
option
is
considered
that
the
smooth
finish
be
used
instead
of
the
slight
finish
proposed,
as
it
adds
a
texture
that
the
existing
three
tab
does
not
have
in
addition
should
discuss.
H
Color
matching
and
take
into
consideration
the
main
roof's
new
coding
and
future
fading
when
determining
the
appropriate
color
for
the
porch
and
Side
Edition
roof
option
number
two
is
a
1.75
inch,
rib
structural
aluminum
standing
seam
roof.
The
panels
will
be
new
18
inch
wide
with
a
.032
snap
lock
and
a
1.75
inch
tall
standing
seams.
H
However,
any
decision
to
use
an
alternative
material
should
be
weighed
against
the
primary
concern
of
maintaining
the
building's
historic
character
staff
would
like
the
commission
to
discuss
the
two
material
options
and
consider
the
following
location
of
The
Replacements,
its
visibility
and
color
and
texture
and
other
possible
visual
characteristics.
In
addition,
staff
would
like
to
point
out
that
an
income
replacement
of
the
three-tab
asphalt
material
in
any
color
meets
our
design
guidelines
as
well
and
still
would
be
tax
credit.
H
H
B
I'm
here
and
unfortunately,
my
wife
is
in
New
York
and
that
it's
terrible
Smoky
condition
but
she's
joined
us
by
phone.
The
we
presented
both
metal
options
because
we're
trying
to
maintain
the
character
of
the
home.
So
we,
since
the
asphalt
shingles,
are
worn,
need
to
be
replaced.
We
do
not
want
to
put
asphalt
back
up.
We
wanted
to.
We
propose
the
interlocking
seam,
because
the
goal
is
once
we
re
once
we
fix
the
front
porch
Side
Porch.
B
B
However,
whatever
product
we
use,
I'm,
okay
with
the
smooth
our
goal-
is
to
actually
install
if
this
is
approved,
we're
going
to
actually
install
the
metal
roofing
on
the
porch
and
the
side,
and
then,
when
the
second
company
comes
to
coat
the
top
roof,
they
will
custom
match
it.
So
they'll
both
be
in
the
same
silver.
You
see
here
in
the
pictures.
B
D
I
I
have
just
a
bit
of
practical
advice
if
there's
any
way
that
you
could
do
the
windows
before
you
redo
the
porch
roof,
the
contractors
are
going
to
be
up
there
and
your
new
roof
might
get
damaged
in
the
process.
So,
if
you
could
do
the
windows
before
you
do
the
roof
that's
ideal,
but
if
not
the
standing,
seam
metal
roof
will
be
the
easiest
to
walk
on
that
shingle
roof
might
get
damaged
just
for
people
walking
on
it
and
in
the
future.
B
Yet
for
the
windows,
the
company-
actually
the
first
company
went
with-
was
wasn't
up
to
our
standard
and
actually
went
to
the
commission
got
a
referral
for
another
company.
However
they're
scheduling
a
year
to
year
and
a
half
out
so
I
don't
think
the
actual
push
roof
will
make
another
year.
B
It's
also
that
interlocking
roof.
It's
mainly
one
you'll
see
on
the
coast,
because
it
has
a
higher
win
rating
in
salt
water
rating.
So
it's
it's
mainly
up
and
down
the
eastern
coast,
but
I
actually
found
that
company
in
the
Timonium
home
show.
G
Would
suggest
I
agree
with
Chris
I
think
the
best
choice
would
be
the
standing
seat,
metal
roof,
not
the
other
it
just
it's
a
different.
It
has
a
texture
of
the
shingles,
but
it
doesn't
have
the
I
mean
it
has
the
pattern
of
the
shingles,
but
it
doesn't
have
the
same
look
of
the
asphalt
shingles,
so
I
I
just
think
it's
it's
a
strange
choice.
I,
don't
know
if
I'm
being
clear
or
to
express
this,
but
I
think
that
the
bottom
line
is
I.
A
Okay,
other
thoughts,
Commissioners
I.
C
I
do
have
a
question:
there
are
several
houses
in
on
the
street
that
are
similar
in
style,
with
the
main
roof
and
the
porch
roof,
either
being
the
same
or
as
in
this
case,
tin,
metal
on
the
main
roof
and
shingle
on
the
porch
roof
when
they
are
in
the
same
style.
They
are
currently
shown
as
all
asphalt,
shingle,
I
guess.
My
question
is:
is
there
historic
evidence
to
indicate
whether
or
not
what
the
original
roof
on
the
porch
was
and
by
making
them
the
same?
B
B
Look
at
several
properties
and
what
seems
to
be
the
habit
on
some
of
these
homes
was
an
epic
economic
decision.
So
what
they
did
was
when
the
smaller
roofs
started
to
fail.
They
kind
of
went
with
shingles
and
some
of
the
homes
had.
We
just
had
a
home
had
a
whole
roof
replaced.
They
found
that
they
took
the
standing
seam,
hammered
it
down
and
put
asphalt
shingles
over
the
metal
roof.
So
a
lot
of
homes.
Here,
where
the
roofs
have
maintained
the
porches
have
deteriorated.
B
It
could
be
what
the
other
gentleman
was
saying
that
they
were
doing.
Maintenance
on
the
house
walked
on
it,
damaged
it,
and
that
could
be
the
case,
but
what
they
found
was
economically.
They
were
allowed
to
put
asphalt
up
and
that's
what
happened
with
this
house
that,
through
our
repairs,
we
found
some
decisions
that
were
possibly
economic.
They
couldn't
pay
to
put
metal
back
up,
and
our
goal
is
to
try
to
restore
the
house
as
much
as
we
can
to
make
it
look
good.
B
So
that's
why
I
didn't
want
to
do
an
in-kind
asphalt
if
I
had
a
choice.
I
know
it's
going
to
cost
me
more
to
do
a
standing
seam
and
we
just
had
two
products
there,
but
we
understand
that
the
board
feels
the
standing.
Seam
is
more
aesthetic
and
pleasing
to
the
house.
Then
that's
the
route
we'll
go
with,
but
we
feel
that
we
should
progress.
The
house
so
I
think
putting
an
in-kind
asphalt.
Shingle
back
up
would
just
kind
of
be
going
in
the
opposite
direction.
A
G
Makes
a
motion
that
we
follow
the
staff's
recommendations
for
for
this
house
for
the
roof,
but
you
do
it
in
the
strike,
the
the
two
Alternatives
and
it
should
be
the
standing
seam
roof
should
be
the
one
that
we
approve.
A
E
I
would
second
that
and
certainly
appreciate
your
attention
to
detail
I'm
trying
to
Elevate
the
current
condition.
A
A
H
Yeah,
our
our
tax
credits
that
were
reviewed
with
MHT
part
two
approval
are
the
king
property
at
711
cliveden
Road
in
Pikesville.
This
is
a
contributing
structure
in
the
sub
Brook
Park,
County,
historic
district
and
it's
a
part.
Two
approval
for
income,
roof
replacement,
Cedar,
Shakes,
dining
repairs
and
Replacements
and
Cedar
Shake
siding
staining
County,
Council
District
number
two,
then
the
not
property
at
517,
Murdock
Road
in
Towson.
H
It's
a
contributing
resource
in
the
Annelise
National
register,
historic
district
part,
two
approval
for
the
installation
of
a
heating
and
air
conditioning
system,
County,
Council,
District
number:
six,
that's
all.
A
Great,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
So
much
so
our
next
meeting
is
is
July,
13th
and
then
Commissioners.
Remember
we
we
get
an
August
vacation
month,
so
we'll
Sprint
to
the
finish
next
month
and
I
think
that's
everything
anything
I'm
missing,
Caitlin
or
Jessica.