►
From YouTube: Beaufort County Council Public Facilities Committee meeting Monday, August 22, 20223:00 PM
Description
*THIS MEETING MAY BEGIN AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF THIS MEETING HAS BEEN PUBLISHED, POSTED, AND DISTRIBUTED IN
COMPLIANCE WITH THE SOUTH CAROLINA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - June 20, 2022
6. CITIZEN COMMENTS - (ANYONE who wishes to speak during the Citizen Comment portion of the
meeting will limit their comments to no longer than three (3) minutes ( a total of 15 minutes ) and will
address Council in a respectful manner appropriate to the decorum of the meeting, refraining from the
use of profane, abusive, or obscene language)
7. DIVISION UPDATE FROM ASSISTANT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, JARED FRALIX
AGENDA ITEMS
8. RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO AWARD J.S. CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR IFB#060922E BLUFFTON PARKWAY PATHWAY (FISCAL IMPACT: $245,101.32)
9. RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO AWARD THE RE-IMAGINING RIBAUT ROAD MASTER PLAN TO
STANTEC (FISCAL IMPACT: TOTAL PROJECT $297,631.84)
10. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A CHANGE ORDER DESIGN FOR NEAR-TERM INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TO INCLUDE THE INTERSECTIONS OF SC170 AND DEL WEBB BLVD/SEAGRASS STATION RD AND SC170 AND OLDFIELD WAY TO THE SC170 DESIGN CONTRACT (NEAR TERM IMPROVEMENTS) (FISCAL IMPACT: TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $507,850)
County Council Agenda – Beaufort County, SC
11. RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO AWARD IFB#050622E TO APAC ATLANTIC FOR THE AIRPORT FRONTAGE ROAD PHASE I PROJECT (FISCAL IMPACT: $2,434,778)
12. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A CHANGE ORDER TO ICE, PLLC FOR RFP#053019E PATHWAY PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES (FISCAL IMPACT: $3,230,518.48)
13. RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO AWARD RFQ#051922E ON-CALL TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING SERVICES
14. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO CONSIDER ADJUSTING THE SCOPE OF THE US 278 CORRIDOR PROJECT
15. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE MAINTENANCE WORK ON PRIVATE ROADS
16. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF RIGHT OF WAY KNOWN
AS 16TH STREET EXTENSION AND A RELATED DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO THE TOWN OF PORT ROYAL
17. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING AUTHORIZATION FOR GOLF CARTS TO USE MULTI-USE TRAILS AND PATHS
18. DISCUSSION OF THE BEAUFORT HIGH SCHOOL ACCESS REALIGNMENT
19. CHAIRMAN'S WRAP UP
20. ADJOURNMENT
TO WATCH COMMITTEE OR COUNTY COUNCIL MEETINGS OR FOR A COMPLETE LIST OF AGENDAS AND BACKUP PACKAGES, PLEASE VISIT:
https://beaufortcountysc.gov/council/council-committee-meetings/index.htm
A
C
A
A
We'll
take
that
up
when
when
he
is
here
so
that
might
move
around
a
little
bit
and
secondly,
I
think
many
of
you
are
here
for
the
issue
on
the
high
school
access
and
I
think
it
would
be
appropriate
to
have
you
speak
at
that
time
after
you
heard
what
the
administration's
recommendations
are
as
opposed
to
doing
it
at
our
normal
public
comment,
I
think
I'd
be
more
productive
for
all
of
us.
So
if
there's
no
objection
on
that
question,
hospice.
D
A
Last
Point
yeah
I
agree
with
that.
Okay,
a
little
area
suggested
that
it
it
might
be
of
interest
to
see
if
we
can
move
that
up
and
when-
and
we
will
do
that,
so
you
know
we
is
there
any
folks
here
for
probably
comment
on
items
other
than
the
High
School
access
report.
Okay,
what
are
the
other
items
just
roughly
the
golf
golf
cart:
okay,
okay
and
golf
cart.
Okay,
that
gives
us
an
idea,
okay,
so
with
the
most
of
them
to
change
the
agenda.
A
A
We
have
approval
of
the
minutes
from
June
22nd
or
June
20th
the
agenda
as
amended
yeah
the
approval
of
the
agenda
as
amended
since
we
approved
the
amendment
because
it
now
approved
as
recommended.
Thank
you,
sir
again
seconded
okay,
any
objections
seeing
none
stands
approved
without
objection.
June,
20th
minutes.
Looking
for
a
motion
on
that.
E
A
Think
it's
a
second
I
think
Paul
did
okay.
That
stands
approved
without
objection,
so
in
the
in
the
interest
of
time,
let's
go
ahead
and
take
up
the
item,
which
is
the
high
school
access,
which
is
item
number
18.,
since
we
have
a
lot
of
people
here
for
that
and
just
as
a
little
bit
of
background.
From
my
perspective,
this
has
been
hanging
fire
for
a
period
of
time.
It
was
suggested
that
this
come
forward
to
public
facilities,
which
we
did
in
June.
A
Out
of
that
meeting,
we
narrowed
down
the
options
to
a
so-called
alternative
four
and
an
alternative
five
which
provided
entry
into
the
school
complex
from
more
or
less
the
southeast,
which
is
the
direction
of
most
of
the
Zone
school
zone.
And
then
there
was
a
subsequent
meeting
last
week
with
the
school
district
and
they
had
some
thoughts
on
all
that.
So
I
think
the
next
step
would
be
a
call
on
our
administrator
to
give
us
thoughts
on
where
we
go
next
and
then
hopefully
focus
our
discussion.
G
I'll
get
it
started,
then
I'll
hand
it
over:
that's
okay
to
Eric,
so
yeah,
so
where
we
are
on
the
sales
staff
program.
Specifically,
ladies
Allen
is
we're
working
through
the
different
projects,
the
access
roads
and
the
mainline
Corridor.
Some
of
the
projects
are
later
in
the
agenda
that
we'll
actually
have
ready
to
go
out
to
bid.
Others
are
in
design
and
some
are
still
in
preliminary
design.
G
What
we
also
did
we
separated
the
corridor
802
and
21
corridor
from
those
access
roads
and
then,
as
we
were
going
through,
we
actually
shifted
the
design
of
the
high
school
realignment
into
that
group
of
projects
because
it
kind
of
fit
a
little
bit
more
closely.
So
we're
trying
to
figure
out
what
that
alternative,
vest
looks
like
initially
in
2018
or
19,
we
held
the
meeting.
We
came
up
with
three
Alternatives
at
the
meeting.
Two
more
alternatives
to
the
south
side
of
the
school
were,
were
introduced
and
studied.
G
We
came
back
a
few
months
ago
to
fellow
facilities
and
talk
through
those
through
those
additional
Alternatives
and
basically
one
kind
of
cuts
through
Hazel
far
through
the
Park
Crystal
Lake,
and
connects
at
Hazel
Farm
dirt
road.
The
other
one
takes
a
more
Southward
approach
and
kind
of
comes
around
the
bottom
of
Crystal
Lake
and
it
connects
at
perutaboy.
G
So
we've
softened
the
two
approaches
into
Hazel
farm
and
made
that,
where
it
lines
up
a
little
bit
more
cleanly
to
Crystal
Lake,
as
well
as
on
the
southern
side,
readjusted
the
alignment,
so
it
doesn't
impact
as
many
properties
every
single
option
that
we
have
impacts.
Somebody
or
some
some
thing.
Some
stakeholder
there's
really
not
a
great
option.
In
any
scenario,
however,
one
of
the
options
that
was
discussed
is
more
specifically
in
our
school
board
meeting.
G
Was
that
no
option?
Our
option,
zero
is
somebody
called
it,
and
that
is
let's
not
do
any
of
these
that
are
cutting
through
any
of
these
different
properties
and
stakeholders
leave
the
signal,
as
is,
however,
what
that
would
do
is
what
we've
been
moving
forward
with.
Is
the
option
from
on
the
bridge
to
802
that
that
section
would
be
redefined
as
a
more
walkable
Urban
downtown,
feel
and
reduced
from
right.
G
Now,
it's
a
four
and
three
Lane
section
down
to
a
full
three-lane
section,
with
wood
grass
strips
and
walking
areas
on
the
side
on
both
sides.
If
we
were
not
able
to
do
the
access
road,
this
option,
zero
would
remain
the
signal
in
place
and
increase
that
back
to
a
four-lane
section
or
five
Lane
section
with
turn
Lanes
as
needed
to
facilitate
the
volume
of
traffic.
G
That's
there
today
in
his
current
state,
let
alone
future
design
right
now,
the
the
volume
warrants
that
it's
four
lanes
today
through
that
section
all
the
way,
basically
from
Meridian
to
802.
so
option.
Zero
is
another
option.
That's
out
there,
there
I'm
sure
there's
a
lot
of
folks
that
have
different
opinions,
but
that's
kind
of
where
we
are,
and
maybe
Eric.
If
you
want
to
add
to
it
from
there.
F
So
yeah
we
we
are
out
of
options
on
this.
If
we
go
Meridian
we're
going
to
upset
the
people
that
live
along
Meridian
and
the
property
owners
there,
if
we
do
something
to
Yeomans
we're
going
to
upset
people,
that
are
that
you
know
how
the
interest
in
Yeomans,
with
the
traffic
circle
and
again
the
impacts
on
Meridian.
If
we
come
through
by
the
high
school,
the
school
board
doesn't
like
that
option
as
we
met
with
them
last
week
and
also
a
lot
of
people
here
today.
F
To
probably
say
we
don't
want
you
to
impact
Crystal,
Lake
Park
and
those
two
options
would
definitely
impact
Crystal
Lake
Park.
So
it's
a
12
to
15
million
dollar
fix
for
something
that's
going
to
alleviate
about
2
000
cars
a
day
only
off
of
the
Sea
Island
Parkway.
When
you
take
out
the
school
traffic,
that's
only
twice
a
day,
certain
periods
of
time
through
the
year.
So
you
all
as
Council,
have
to
decide.
F
There
is
for
it
to
be
a
three-lane
section.
Jared
and
Jennifer
and
Brittany
have
done
a
phenomenal
job.
I
want
to
make
it
clear.
They
have
done
a
phenomenal
job,
trying
to
plan
and
do
Transportation,
Planning
and
transportation
engineer
with
a
lot
of
constraints
and
a
lot
of
people
telling
them
what
not
to
do
and
what
to
do
many
times
on
both
sides
of
the
equation.
So
those
are
the
options
available
to
you.
My
recommendation
as
a
County
Administrator.
F
If
you
guys
want
to
hear
me
say
it,
we
do
is
that
you
do
the
four-lane
section,
all
the
way
from
the
woods
Memorial
Bridge
out
through
Walmart,
because
you
can
make
it
very
walkable.
You
all
come
through
a
four-lane
section
on
your
way
here,
some
of
you.
When
you
drive
down
Boundary
Street,
we
can
do
the
same
thing
over
there.
There's
another
area
that
you
may
not
be
familiar
with
in
in
Charleston
area
called
Coleman
Boulevard
with
Mount
Pleasant,
Coleman
Boulevard,
just
past
yum,
Creek,
there's
a
four-lane
walkable
section
that
has
a
median.
F
That's
landscaped,
that
four
Lane
section
even
has
on
the
street
parking
with
the
buildings
really
close
to
the
road.
It
feels
safe
traffic.
There
are
no
traffic
problems
through
there
per
se.
There
are
new
traffic
safety
issues
through
there
and
there's
no
pedestrian
vehicle
conflicts
through
there.
So
that's
basically
it
it's
decision
time
for
you
all,
because
we
can't
do
anything
over
there
until
this
issue
is
resolved.
So
we've,
given
you
all
options:
okay,
Mr.
H
Chairman,
yes,
I,
attended
the
meeting
in
person
thoroughly
vetted
every
single
one
of
those
options
and
the
conclusion
was
we
shouldn't
do
anything
with
those
options.
We
should
go
back
to
square
one,
which
is
what
is
being
proposed
now
that
we
handle
the
traffic
that
way
the
school
district
will
handle
the
traffic
in
the
morning
and
in
the
afternoon
the
way
they've
been
doing
it
for
umpteen
years
since
that
school
district
was
created,
and
so
that
would
be
my
recommendation
that
Council
take
that
particular
action.
I
G
So
the
cost
does
not
go
with
the
option.
Obviously
it's
not
zero,
but
the
costs,
even
though
it
sounds
like
a
lot
less
that
hey,
we
already
have
a
traffic
signal
there.
It
actually
is
probably
going
to
be
more.
We
don't
really
have
that
number.
Yet
the
option.
Zero
is
kind
of
a
more
recent
option.
Priced
up.
The
reason
being
is
in
the
three
Lane
section
that
we
were
going
to
leave
it
as
we
didn't
have
to
move
the
curb
and
gutter
I.E
nor
the
strength,
storm
drainage
below
or
the
utilities.
I
G
Public
well
and
it's
not
necessarily
that
they
haven't
seen
it
as
just
a
different
format,
because
when
we
first
looked
at,
we
had
a
public
meeting
town
hall
meeting
for
the
access
roads
and
then
a
separate
one
for
the
major
arterials
four
lanes
was
an
option.
It
just
got
moved
to
the
bottom
because
of
the
three
lanes
was
the
preferred
option
Yep.
This
is
Jennifer
right.
J
Thank
you
so
to
add
on
to
what
Jared
and
Eric
both
have
said.
We
don't
have
updated
cost
estimates
because
it
was
it
just
came
up
at
the
end
of
last
week,
the
back
to
your
question.
If
the
public
has
seen
this
Jared
is
correct,
the
original
virtual
meeting
actually
presented
three
different
options
of
widening
that
area
from
Woods
Memorial
Bridge
up
to
the
Sam's
point
intersection.
J
All
of
those
exhibits
are
actually
still
out
on
the
penny
website
for
for
anybody
to
view
depending
upon
how
we
come
through
that
area
and
the
widening
there
actually
could
be
some
commercial
relocations
depending
upon
which
side
of
the
road
or
how
the
alignment
is
tweaked
through
there.
So
that
will
add
to
the
cost
and
that's
the
unknown
at
the
moment.
K
K
But
that
area
is
growing
and
it
may
be
a
good
time
for
us
to
look
at
a
completeness
there.
The
city
limit
right
now
is
at
the
Walmart.
There
is
a
white
hole.
You
know:
white
oil
plant
Whitehall
Park,
that
commercial
area
right
at
Meridian.
So
if
you
look
at
that
whole
entire
area
and
bring
back
a
recommendation
to
see
how
it
would
work
for
us,
I
think
that
may
be
something
that
would
be
very
supportive
of
I
would
just
tell
you
this
while
you're
looking
at
Walmart.
F
Parallel
Rune
yeah
yeah.
Thank
you.
We
can
look
at
that.
So
the
great
thing
about
this
is
the
timing
is
very
good
right
now.
You
all
will
recall
that
several
months
ago
you
authorized
25
000
on
hiring
a
consultant
to
come
in
and
do
a
planning
insurance
for
ladies
Island,
so
we
are
close
to
finishing
and
finalizing
that
agreement
and
scope
of
work
to
bring
in
a
firm
to
do
this.
F
I've
always
said
that
it's
entirely
possible
to
make
Rhodes
pedestrian
friendly
unlockable
with
four-lane
sections,
but
the
devil
is
in
the
details
of
how
you
go
about
designing
it
and
planning
for
it
and
holding
the
access
us
management
plan
and
setting
the
development
standards
for
the
development
along
that
Corridor.
So
it's
good
timing.
L
Paul
this
operation,
zero,
I,
assume
the
curbs-
have
to
be
moved
back
on
that.
What
about
those
businesses
that
the
city
of
Beaufort
asked
to
bring
right
up
to
the
almost
right
up
to
the
road
like
I'm
thinking,
specifically
about
Butler
Marine?
That's
right,
a
couple
other
ones
so
how's
that
going
to.
G
Work
it'd
go
back
to
the
engineer
and
say
one
idea,
and
one
of
the
Alternatives
earlier
was
that
the
widening
would
take
place
to
the
north.
One
was
that
the
Latin
women
take
place
to
the
South
and
one
was
a
shared
widening.
The
advantage
of
Shifting
One
Way
versus
the
other
way
you're
only
moving
to
storm
drainage
and
the
utilities
on
one
side
of
the
road,
but
you're
impacting
more
right
away.
G
B
I
really
like
this
idea-
I
don't
know
about
other
council
members,
but
my
email
and
phone
kind
of
blew
up
over
the
weekend.
People
saw
this
agenda,
and
rightly
so,
and
even
before
that
my
daughter
was
in
the
first
graduating
class
at
Beaufort
High
School
in
2001.,
when
that
school
was
put
there,
there
was
a
lot
of
angst
about
Meridian,
Road
and
I
was
on
school,
Improvement
Council
and
just
giving
you
a
little
bit
of
History
lesson.
B
It
was
a
you
know,
a
lot
of
promises,
not
in
writing,
but
a
lot
of
promises
were
made
to
the
neighborhood,
but
I
think
this
will
help,
but
that
was
out
doing
roundabouts
and
of
course
we
don't
want
to
impact
Crystal
Lake.
Thank
you
and
and
Miss
Brittany
and
Miss
Jennifer
for
being
the
smart
people.
You
are
I
think
this
is
a
good
solution.
Appreciate.
A
That
anybody
online-
that
has
a
comment-
okay,
see
now
I,
guess
my
sense
of
where
we
are.
Let
me
try
this
on.
You
is
that
what
I'm
hearing
is
people
like
what
is
being
proposed
as
the
option
zero
that
may
take
away?
What
a
lot
of
you
are
here
for
and
being
concerned
about
now
there
may
be
another
group
of
people
who
might
be
opposed
to
option
zero
that
are
not
here
and
Eric
mentioned
that
there'd
be
the
charette.
A
So
my
sense
is
that
what
I'm
hearing
is
Council
like
kind
of
likes
the
zero
option,
but
that
would
be
premature
for
us
to
vote
on
that
today
and
give
people
that
might
not
like
that
option,
a
chance
to
come
in
so
I
hate
to
Kick
the
Can
down
the
road,
but
it
does
seem
to
me
we
potentially
could
move
this
out.
One
more
meeting
am
I
missing
something.
No.
G
I
think
that's
appropriate
and
I.
Don't
think
we're
necessarily
kicking
the
can
just
by
doing
some
further
evaluation.
So
if
it's
all
right
from
from
you
I
think
for
us
as
staff,
it
would
be
helpful
if
the
direction
is
to
move
forward
to
explore
the
shops
in
option
zero
and
come
back
with
further
detail
regarding
costs.
Relocations,
right-of-way
acquisition,
Etc,
and
we
can
definitely
do
that
before.
D
G
D
G
So
there's
a
couple
when
you're
doing
right
away,
there's
a
couple
different
damages,
one
there's
just
you
pay
for
the
property
that
you
affect
the
second
one
is
they
have
to
be
relocated
altogether
or?
Third,
is
you
don't
relocate
them,
but
you've
damaged
the
way
they
do
business?
So
there's
the
damages
more
than
just
the
value
of
the
property
itself,
so
one
two
or
three
and
it
just
depends
on
the
right-of-way
need
and
the
slopes
and
and
how
that
affects
the
property.
A
Okay,
so
a
question
for
Council
anybody
disagree
with
that
approach
of
bringing
having
a
lot
more
discussion
next
month
and
an
opportunity
for
those
people
that
would
now
potentially
react
negative
to
zero.
My
understanding
is
we're
primarily
talking
about
three
versus
four
lanes
and
making
sure
that
it's
a
walkable
type
of
scenario
is
that
correct,
yep?
Okay,
let
me
ask
this
so
the
folks
that
are
here
relative
to
this
issue,
I,
don't
think
we
need
to
talk
about
the
the
ones
that
were
moving
off
of
the
table.
Are
there
any?
A
M
Us
there
for
a
minute,
Tony,
yeah,
I'm,
sorry
I'm
a
little
out
of
practice,
so
I
just
want
to
say
I'm
here
because
of
my
concern
about
Crystal
Lake.
The
standard
principle
would
be
access
to
a
park
not
through
a
park.
That's
a
very,
very
important
principle,
and
we
should
probably
try
to
stay
consistent
with
that
principle
in
the
CIP,
the
Capital
Improvements
program,
which
is
part
of
your
2040
comprehensive
plan.
M
4.2
million
dollars
should
not
be
allocated
in
any
way
shape
or
form
to
affect
the
consistency
and
the
beauty
of
Crystal
Lake.
So
I
would
say
that
option.
Zero
is
the
preferred
option,
is
better
in
fact
that
we
build
walkable,
neighborhoods
walkable
communities,
so
the
options
that
deal
with
the
roads
other
than
ladies
Island
Drive
affecting
Crystal
Lake,
is
a
preferable
option.
Thank
you
very
much.
Okay,.
A
N
Sir
Joseph
Allard
and
I
was
here
to
represent
Crystal
Lake,
but
actually
it's
back
to
option.
Zero
I
was
in
the
planning
board
at
the
time
back
in
92
93,
so
that's
28
years
ago
or
so,
and
we,
the
county,
paid
for
a
planner
to
come
in
and
give
us
a
plan
for
a
four-lane
road
down
this
whole
stretch
and
it
was
modeled
after
Abercorn
Street
or
something
like
that.
You
know
narrower
slower
traffic
and
pedestrian
friendly.
N
O
O
we're
not
doing
traffic
improvements
for
saving
2
000
cars
today
we're
doing
it
to
deal
with
the
traffic
anticipated
in
the
future.
You
know
right
now,
at
the
time
of
the
ladies
Island
plan,
we've
calculated,
there
was
a
planning
calculated.
There
was
something
either
4
700
platted
approved
plots
for
homes
on
ladies
Island.
We
have
400
on
Cane
Island
sitting
there
and
I.
O
Don't
know
if
you're
aware
of
this,
but
there's
an
offer
on
the
table
by
a
developer
from
Charleston
who's,
offering
forty
thousand
dollars
an
acre
for
214
acres
in
Holly
Hall,
so
we're
looking
at
5500
new
potential
residences
over
a
period
of
time
going
back
to
plan
zero
just
puts
us
back
to
where
we
were
five
years
ago
and
really
accomplishes
very
very
little
in
terms
of
getting
traffic
off
the
Sea
Island
Parkway
I
did
want
to
say
one
thing.
You
know
this
we'll
keep
hearing
this
thing
about
cutting
through
Crystal
Lake
Park.
This.
O
O
P
Private
schools
have
games
there,
so
we
would
want
to
a
highway
going
right
by
where
our
school
is
and
and
rendering
a
bunch
of
our
property
useless,
and
it's
it's
very
frustrating
as
well
that
we're
one
of
the
biggest
stakeholders
in
these
in
these
plans-
and
we
have
not
been
reached
out
to
officially
about
any
of
this
planning.
We
just
had
to
kind
of
find
out
about
this
kind
of
thing
on
Facebook
and
come
to
the
meeting
today.
Q
Daniel
Berryman
my
wife
and
I
own
64
Meridian,
and
it
we're
impacted
by
the
traffic
circle
on
Meridian.
There
are
seven
properties
that
are
impacted
on
that
on
that
roundabout
right
there
that
we
really
were
thinking,
there's
got
to
be
a
better
option,
so
that's
here
in
option
zero.
Of
course,
we
kind
of
I
would
say
we're
related
if
it
could
anything
that
would
move
that
traffic
circle
away
from
us,
because
it
does
it
in
it
impacts
us
greatly
on
our
properties
there
on
the
water,
so
so
good
option,
zero.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
I
think
that
probably
concludes
this
item
and
I
wouldn't
be
surprised
in
general.
We
can
talk
about
it,
but
this
this
may
end
Eric
and
may
it
may
lend
itself
to
a
work
session
or
something
because
it
gets
very
difficult
to
make
a
final
decision
at
a
committee
meeting
we'll
see,
but
in
any
event,
thank
you
for
your
interest.
You're
all
welcome
to
stay,
but
if
you've
got
better
things
to
do
we'll
understand
and.
F
F
K
Yes,
sir
I
I
think
Mr
Greenway
I
agree
with
you
I
understand
which
what
you
your
concerns
at
the
same
time.
This
is
this
is
maybe
an
opportunity
opportunity
for
us
to
kind
of
do
it
right
by
looking
at
a
total
picture
and
and
then
moving
traffic,
because
not
only
are
we
looking
at
the
infrastructure,
we
also
need
to
with
Jared
to
look
at
traffic
flow,
and
hopefully
this
will
hopefully
take
all
that
into
consideration,
as
we
plan
21
from
Woods
bridge
to
the
Walmart
and
I'm.
That's
what.
F
K
F
No
I
understand
what
you're
saying,
but
the
the
moving
the
traffic
issue
through
the
four-lane
corridor
is
a
no-brainer
there,
there's
no
modeling
that
you
have
to
do
with
that.
If,
if
the
engineers
or
Jennifer
Bragg
and
Jared
pralix
says
that
if
we
made
this
four-lane
section,
it
makes
the
Beaufort
High
access
issue
go
away,
then
I'm
willing
to
take
that
to
the
bank,
because
I
have
confidence
in
their
ability.
You.
F
Have
another
meeting
and
tell
you
all
that
again
and
give
you
the
numbers
if
you
want
us
to
do
it,
but
at
some
point
somebody's
gonna
have
to
make
a
motion,
so
we
can
move
this
project
forward
and
so
that
we
can
move
the
other
project
forward.
That's
coming
up
later
on
the
same
agenda.
That's
all
I'm,
saying
to
you.
Thank.
L
Yeah,
thank
you.
Mr
chairman
I
am
going
to
make
a
motion
because
this
does
need
to
move
forward.
We're
going
to
get
some
pushback,
no
matter
what
we
do,
but
this
off
option
zero,
which
hasn't
been
completely
vetted
I,
don't
think
for
some
potential
problems
with
drainage
movement
curbs
some
businesses
at
the
city
of
Beaufort
has
to
move
too
close
to
the
front.
B
A
A
A
A
A
Okay,
let's
come
back
come
back
to
order,
and
this
brings
us
back
to
citizen
comments.
We've
used
up
a
few
of
the
minutes,
so
if
there's
three
or
four
people
that
would
like
to
speak
on
a
different
issue,
let's
go
ahead
and
take
those
I've
got
a
long
list
of
people.
So
I
don't
know
the
names.
But
if
you
would
like
to
speak,
raise
your
hand
and
I
will
call
on
you.
Yes,
sir,
give
us
your
name
and
the
subject
all
right
and
it
should
be
an
item.
R
Good
afternoon,
okay
and
my
name
is
Dave
Barton
I'm
on
the
board
of
Spanish,
moss,
Trail
and
with
me
are
Mr
Gene,
Regala
and
Mr
Steve
mix,
who
are
also
board
members
and
we're
here
to
express
our
opposition
to
item
17
with
regards
to
the
Spanish
moss
Trail.
Okay
I
have
a
brief
statement
from
Dean
Moss,
the
president
and
the
members
of
the
board.
If
I
can
read
it
at
the
record,
you
may
read
it
into
the
record
all
right.
R
Allowing
golf
cart.
Golf
carts
on
the
Spanish,
moss
Trail
would
effectively
change
the
usage
and
experience
of
all
who
use
it.
In
addition
to
the
philosophical
differences
and
safety
concerns,
the
county
must
also
consider
enforcement
of
regulations
pertaining
to
motorized
vehicles,
as
well
as
changes
in
jurisdictions
along
the
trail,
including
the
town
of
Port
Royal
and
the
City
of
Beaufort.
For
these
and
surely
other
reasons,
we
must
speak
for
the
citizens
of
Beaufort
County
when
we
say
that
golf
cart.
Usage
on
the
Smashbox
Trail
is
a
bad
idea
that
should
not
go
beyond
this
point.
R
A
Thank
you.
We
appreciate
being
a
great
deal
for
what
he's
done,
particularly
leading
the
transportation
project.
Recently
anybody
else
that
would
like
to
speak.
Okay,
seeing
none.
That
concludes
citizen
comments
and
that
takes
us
to
the
main
agenda
and
Jared.
We
have
I
think
five
or
six
items
which
are
basically
contract
ones.
You
and
your
married
band
have
been
kind
of
busy.
We
got
seven
million
to
approve
plus
so
I'll.
G
Get
all
together.
Okay,
this
is
what
happens
when
we
take
a
month
off,
so
got
a
lot
of
work
going
on
all
right.
The
first
one
here
is
just
a
typical
month
for
you
that's
right!
Well,
we
have
some.
Some
months
are
heavier
than
others,
just
because
the
way
things
stack
up
so
the
first
item
here
is
a
pathway
award
recommendation
of
award
for
the
Bluffton
Parkway
pathway.
So
this
is
a
small
section
on
Bluffton
Parkway
from
the
traffic
circle
Eastward
for
about
600
feet.
G
G
G
All
right
just
stop
me
along
the
way.
Second,
one
is
a
recommendation
award
to
reimagine
reboot
Road
master
plan,
so
in
February
22
we
contracted
with
stantec,
who
is
already
on
our
on-call
traffic
engineering,
on-call
services
to
Mass,
to
give
help
to
develop
a
master
plan
for
Boundary
Street
from
our
Rebo
Road
from
Boundary
Street
to
the
Russell
Bridge.
G
It's
about
five,
five
and
a
half
miles
along
this
section,
and
then
the
goldwood
to
look
at
transportation
for
safety
for
mobility
of
all
uses,
not
just
vehicular
but
pedestrian,
bicycle
mass
transit
and
such
and
land
uses
that
create
the
the
plan
to
make
sure
everything
adjacent
to
what
we
have.
There
is
two
municipalities
or
Beaufort
County
is
helping
coordinating,
but
city
of
Beaufort
and
town
of
Port
Royal,
and
the
goal
would
be
that
this
would
be
the
jumping
off
point
similar
to
a
Boundary
Street.
G
So
this
project
was
also
included
on
the
proposed
sales
tax,
Transportation
sales
tax,
and
this
is
the
step
to
help
get
us
in
that
direction,
regardless
whether
sales
tax
is
here
or
not
so
the
contract
fee
is
for
270
thousand
dollars,
574
with
a
10
percent
contingency,
giving
us
a
total
contract
value
of
297
631
dollars.
This
would
be
paid
out
of
north
of
the
broad
impact
fees.
G
G
We
were
also
trying
to
look
at
trying
to
create
a
homogeneous
section
because
you
go
from
one
jurisdiction
to
another
but
you're
on
the
same
segment
there.
So
you
can't
really
tell
the
difference
when
you're
going
from
Port
Royal
to
the
city
of
Beaufort
versus
once
you
cross
the
bridge,
you
know
you're
100
import
Royal
on
them
on
the
other
side
of
the
bridge.
We
can
definitely
take
a
look
at
that
all
right.
Let's
take
a
look
at
that
at
a
separate
study,
but
I
understand
what
you're
saying.
G
Again,
no
I
really
hope,
so.
My
hope
is
that
in
a
future
year
that
this
would
be
funded
as
part
of
a
sales
tax
project.
So
what
comes
of
this
is
the
bones
of
a
future
project.
So
that's
that's
how
we're
moving
forward
with
it
and
our
intent.
Now,
whether
future
sales
tax
happens
or
not
that's
to
be
determined,
but.
K
G
To
be
yeah,
they
said
so
this
it
started
out
as
a
planning
document,
but
what
we
in
the
engineering
department
we
wanted
to
make
sure
it
was
something
that
could
be
built.
We
didn't
want
to
put
a
roundabout
in
the
middle
if
it
didn't,
if
it
wasn't
even
feasible
so
using
stantat
they're
on
our
traffic
on
call
services
contract,
so
they
can
do
planning,
but
they
can
also
do
traffic.
G
G
All
right,
so
that
would
be
a
contract
award
to
stantec
in
that
amount.
The
next
one
there
number
11.
is
a
recommendation
of
award
for
airport
Frontage
Road
phase
one
project,
so
this
went
out
to
bid
on
April
6th.
This
is
the
section
of
again,
ladies
Island
2018
sales
tax.
This
is
a
cross
on
the
southern
side
of
21
across
from
the
airport,
basically
tying
in
at
the
Walmart
stoplight
and
looping
around
all
the
way
behind
Taco
Bell.
G
And
then
the
second
phase,
which
goes
directly
behind
Taco
Bell,
would
be
at
a
later
date,
because
we've
got
a
lot
more
environmental
hurdles
and
permittings
to
do
and
that
would
tie
into
the
what's
the
next
Road
Little
Creek
lost
out
on
a
little
creek.
You
can
understand
why
I
get
them
confused.
So
this
is
the
first
section
from
the
signal
to
thank
you
so
as
again
April
6,
we
went
out
to
bid
on
this
one.
We
received
bids
one
bid
from
APAC
to
Atlantic.
G
The
bid
came
in
a
little
over
2.4
million
after
review.
They
did.
It
appear
that
the
bid
was
responsive.
So
we
have
a
20
contingency
on
this
as
well
for
a
total
contract,
Award
of
2.9
million,
two
million
nine
hundred
twenty
one
thousand
seven
hundred
forty
five
dollars
and
that
would
be
awarded
to
aipac
Atlanta.
G
G
That's
750
000
only
made
it
through
partially
through
the
six
of
the
first
six
we're
working
full
design
on
that
right
now,
but
what
this
is
with
the
15
million
dollars
that
was
over
collected
in
the
sales
tax
that
was
put
towards
the
additional
project
or
additional
Pathways.
So
we
asked
for
ice
to
give
us
a
full
scoop
for
the
remaining
work.
G
That's
left
on
the
the
original
six
plus
the
remaining
eight
and
it
came
with
an
additional
fee
of
2.2
million
dollars
so
with
a
10
contingency
on
that
plus
their
current
value
contract
value
of
750.
That
gives
us
a
total
contract
value
of
3.3
million,
two
hundred
thirty
thousand
five
hundred
eighteen
dollars
and
again
this
gets
us
through
the
first
14
out
of
the
24
that
we
had
there
and
I
missed
number
10.
G
P
G
000.,
it
is
200
000
I
may
have
missed
both
it's
3.2
million.
Yes,
sir,
all
right,
so
the
next
one
either
on
call
on
call.
So
this
one.
This
is
an
on-call
transportation
engineering
I
mentioned
earlier.
We
have
on-call
traffic
engineer
again.
I've
talked
about
traffic
being
signals
Transportation
road
design.
So
we
have
three
on-call
traffic
guys
right
now.
This
is
for
for
Road
design.
We
put
this
out
in
April,
hoping
to
advertise
and
have
a
qualified
Consultants
onboarded.
G
So
the
way
this
would
work
is
much
the
same
as
the
traffic
that
anytime,
we
have
a
project.
We
we
assign
that
to
the
firm
and
they
provide
us
with
the
fee.
That
fee
then
comes
back
to
council
for
award
on
that
specific
project.
This
would
be
the
funding
source
would
be
a
mixed
use
of
funds,
anything
that
we
use
road
projects
on
so
Road
use
impact
fees,
sea
funds
grants
sales
tax
projects
all
the
likes.
G
The
the
hope
with
this
is
that,
specifically,
whether
we
have
a
sales
tax
program
or
not,
that
we
can
more
efficiently
put
the
projects
out
the
bid
and
and
get
design
underway
as
fast
as
possible,
as
well
as
have
a
large
group
of
folks
that
are
sitting
there
on
retainer
for
us
to
pick
from.
So
we
have
a
large
toolbox
behind
us,
so
those
would
be
contract
awards
for
those
eight
firms
listed
and
I.
Think
that's.
Let
me
go
back
to
10
10.
G
10.,
so
this
is
the
recommendation
of
a
change
order
on
170
on
the
near
term.
So
right
now
we
have
a
contract
with
AECOM
on
the
near
term.
Improvements
along
sc170,
what's
been
asked,
is
there's
a
lot
of
comments
received
from
staff
and
council
members
on
two
additional
intersections
to
look
at.
This
is
almost
kind
of
getting
into
was
referenced
as
the
midterm
design,
but
one
being
sc170
and
Del
Webb
and
seagrass
station.
G
So
this
is
actually
south
of
the
corridor
that
the
the
plan
that
we're
working
from,
but
it's
in
line
with
all
the
other
improvements-
and
this
is
the
main
entrance
there
off
of
174
Sun
City
and
then
the
second
one
is
up
to
the
Northern
end
of
the
of
the
corridor,
which
is
SC,
170
and
old,
fill
way
or
across
from
what's
the
future
East
Argent
in
Jasper
County.
So
this
would
be
a
contract.
Add
to
the
existing
con
contract.
Acom
has
a
fee
of
two
hundred
and
ten
thousand
dollars
with
a
twenty
percent.
G
Contingency
would
give
us
a
contract.
Add
a
254
000
again.
This
would
bring
their
total
contract
amount
to
507
850.
This
would
be
paid
out
of
impact
fees,
Bluffton
Road
impact
fees
as
well
with
this
one
additional,
just
kind
of
update
on
170,
just
everybody
where
we
are
so
currently.
We
are
under
review
with
our
preliminary
or
with
our
final
design
on
the
near-term
project.
So
basically
the
five
intersections
from
278
to
tide
watch,
Cherry,
Point,
Argent,
Boulevard
and
sc462..
Excuse
me
there.
G
So
we've
got
those
into
D.O.T
we're
waiting
comments
back
from
those
guys.
We
speak
to
hear
something
very
soon
from
them.
We've
had
some
coordination
with
them
and
it's
looking
looking
like
we're
going
to
have
those
comments
back
here
soon.
Our
goal
is
to
go
out
to
bid
with
the
with
the
design
drawings.
This
fall
with.
Hopefully,
the
opportunities
award
to
a
contractor
at
the
end
of
this
year,
so
construction
could
get
started
at
the
first
of
next
year.
We
anticipated
being
about
a
six
month.
Construction
timeline
for
those
first
batch
of
improvements.
G
So
by
summer
of
next
year,
we're
hopeful
that
we'll
have
some
immediate
relief
I'll,
be
at
not
final
relief,
but
immediate
relief
to
some
of
the
pinch
points
along
170..
A
couple
things
we're
working
concurrently
with
that
is
part
of
those
improvements
are
improving
the
the
offline
off
of
278,
headed
eastbound
or
westbound.
Excuse
me
going
north
on
170
so
that
that
off-ramp
will
be
improved,
but
the
other
three
will
not
so
we're
currently
working
with
DOT
to
see
if
they
can
help
come
up
with
funding
to
improve
the
resurface.
G
The
other
three
ramps,
so
we
improve
all
four
of
them
while
we're
there
and
then.
Secondly,
dot
had
previously
had
planned
that
the
section
of
278
from
170
to
the
okatee
river,
that
they
were
going
to
resurface
that
as
well,
that
got
bumped
in
their
funding
cycle
to
another
year,
but
pending
a
recent
discussion
with
Dot
and
us
trying
to
really
push
them
to
help
us
out
with
this
they're
going
to
look
and
see
if
they
can
move
that
back
into
current
funding
cycle.
G
And
potentially
we
can
stack
that
all
together
with
doing
that,
we
have
some
striping
improvements
that
we
have
planned
on
278
if
you're,
if
you're
getting
on
278
170
going
south
and
you
go
around
the
loop,
you
have
to
merge
into
the
lane
which
slows
down
traffic
and
then
there's
the
oncoming
ramp.
That
has
a
free
float.
So
we
basically
flip
flop
that
and
give
the
free
flow
to
the
Loop.
So
you
don't
have
people
slowing
down
up
above
the
bridge
and
then
the
the
other
on-ramp
would
be
a
merge.
G
So
we're
looking
into
that
and
hopefully
can
make
that
that
happen
and
then,
where
this,
these
change
orders
would
take
place
is
hopefully,
as
that
project's
working
through
then
we'd
be
able
to
finish
the
design,
the
permitting
and
hopefully
out
to
bid
about
the
same
time
that
first
short-term
project
is
nearing
me
to
close.
So
we
can
basically
keep
rolling
into
these
near-term
projects.
So
I
know
that
was
a
lot.
I
probably
need
a
drink
of
water.
B
G
So
we're
we're
currently
doing
it
as
far
as
the
scope
we're
we're
improving
the
flow
underneath
the
bridge
on
170.,
okay
and
the
signal
that's
right
there
at
the
base
of
that
ramp.
Part
of
the
improvements
also
are
doing
some
resurfacing
up
that
ramp
back
towards
Hilton
Head.
Oh
all,
right,
okay!
So
that's
the
one
ramp
out
of
the
four
that
we're
improving
as
part
of
the
170
Improvement
you're.
A
The
other
comment
I
would
make
just
to
build
on
this.
We've
had
discussions
in
recent
weeks
about
whether
or
not
it
would
make
sense
to
actually
be
investing
money
in
designs
of
projects
that
are
potentially
on
the
horizon,
the
theory
being
one
they
make
them
more
shovel
ready,
and
secondly,
sometimes,
unless
we're
in
the
pipeline,
at
both
the
state
and
the
federal
level
we're
not
as
eligible
for
funds
as
we
would
like
to
be
so
well.
We've
agreed
that
that
makes
some
sense
and
we'll
see
this
coming
forward
for
discussion
and
approval.
A
When
we
look
at
a
budget
amendment
which
probably
come
forward
in
September
and
I,
think
Jared's
identify
something
on
the
order
of
10
million
that
may
make
sense
to
to
spend
in
that
direction.
Also,
I
think,
as
we
get
more
learned
about
these,
you
know
the
opportunities
that
the
true
investment
and
we
would
still
can
get
reimbursed,
and
then
we
could
use
that
money
to
invest
in
other
ones.
A
Also
I
had
discussions
with
a
couple
of
the
Mayors
who
were
disappointed
that
we
put
the
transportation
sales
tax
off
until
24
and
I
described
what
we
were
doing
here
with
this
investment
fund
and
I
think
it
really
positions
the
transportation
Penny
to
be
in
a
better
position
because
we'll
be
further
Downstream
and
actually
get
to
some
of
these
projects
sooner
than
we
otherwise
would
have
so
stay
tuned.
For
that,
but
I
think
that's
a
good
winner
going
forward
any
other
comments
on
these
items.
K
A
A
So
the
history
from
the
county
standpoint
is,
as
this
has
moved
forward
two
years
ago
we
approved
the
money
and
did
a
study
for
what
was
called
an
independent
review
to
look
at
the
work
that
had
been
done
at
that
point
in
time,
and
there
were
some
good
recommendations
that
got
Incorporated.
We
also
set
aside
some
money
for
concept
of
having
a
land
planner,
look
at
that
and
the
town
of
Hilton
Head
decided
to
do
that
on
their
own.
A
So
they
didn't
draw
on
the
funds
that
were
approved,
but
there
was
a
firm
called
mksk
that
did
the
work
for
them.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
they
came
up
with
25
recommendations,
the
vast
majority
of
which
I
believe
have
been
adopted
in
various
phases
and
are
being
included
in
the
project
and
there's
now
on
the
table
to
do
a
second
independent
review.
A
But
it's
it's
different
than
the
first
one
in
the
sense
that
what
the
town
perceives
is,
rather
than
just
looking
at
the
section
of
the
278
quarter,
that
when
you
first
come
on
the
island
through
an
area
called
Stony
that
this
would
actually
take
a
look
at
the
whole
island.
If
you
will
and
in
fact
even
extend
out
to
the
Moss
Creek
light.
So
it's
kind
of
a
comprehensive
planning
of
the
of
the
whole
whole
island.
A
My
sense
in
reading
the
scope
and
talking
to
people
and
keeping
in
mind
that
this
was
first
proposed
roughly
four
months
ago.
This
is
probably
a
6
to
12
month,
exercise
and
I
should
also
at
this
point,
say
I.
Think
Senator
Davis
has
been
very
helpful
in
in
moving
this
forward,
suggesting
some
of
this,
and
also
you
know
he
was
responsible
for
really
getting
us
the
money
for
the
state
infrastructure
bank.
So
we
need
to
always
remember
to
thank
him
for
the
hard
work
that
he
does
for
us
now.
A
So
if
you
kind
of
think
about
the
project
and
broke
it
into
two
pieces,
we've
got
the
the
piece
on
the
bridges
which
was
triggered
by
the
need
to
replace
the
one
defective
bridge
and
to
the
best
of
my
knowledge,
there
really
aren't
any
open
issues
that
we're
we're
dealing
with
and,
in
fact,
I
think
the
items
that
were
suggested
by
mksk,
the
land,
planner
I,
believe
those
are
being
Incorporated.
There
was
a
question
about
making
the
bicycle
trail
a
little
bit
wider.
Maybe
we
could
narrow
some
of
the
the
the
lanes.
A
I
was
a
concept
of
bump
out,
so
people
could
you
know,
stop
on
the
trail
and
be
able
to
fish
or
observe
or
whatever
it
was
so
that's
kind
of
the
bridge
section
of
it.
If
you
look
at
the
land
portion,
let's
call
it
Stoney
for
the
time
being,
I
think
the
an
independent
review
would
actually
be
very
helpful.
I
think
there's,
there's
good
things
that
would
come
out
of
it
and
those
things
could
be
incorporated
on
the
run
and
I
think
it
could
be
done
without
delaying
the
the
overall
project.
A
Now,
as
I
looked
at
the
scope
of
what
the
town
is
proposing,
I
don't
see
anything
that
would
be
lost
by
proceeding.
So,
for
example,
they
want
to
look
at
going
all
the
way
out
to
the
Moss
Creek
light.
That'll
be
helpful,
we'll
see
what
happens.
There
may
be
some
useful
input
about
whether
or
not
there's
so
many
changes
that
would
be
need
to
be
made
out
in
that
particular
area.
A
A
If
we
go
down
that
path,
then
the
question
is:
how
do
you
divide
the
two
you've
got
the
bridges
on
one
hand,
you
got
the
Stoney
area.
On
the
other
hand,
we
have
the
area
in
between
which
we'll
call
Jenkins
Island
for
the
most
part,
and
certainly
the
bridges
whatever
deal
we
I
first
I
would
leave
that
to
Dot
and
and
Jared
to
figure
out
what
is
the
best
place
to
draw
that
line
of
demarcation.
A
If
we
go
down
the
path
of
splitting
those
two
but
clearly
from
a
transportation
standpoint,
they
would
need
to
get
through
the
signal
area
and
then
there's
elevations
and
curvatures
and
all
kinds
of
tapers
and
things
that
Transportation
Engineers
deal
with,
which
would
take
them
part
way
to
the
right.
My
personal
sense
is
be
great
to
get
through
the
causeway,
because
that's
finally,
the
last
major
environmental
impact
that
we
have
because
we're
widening
into
the
water,
but
certainly
not
intrude.
A
You
know
into
the
Stony
area,
but
again
I
would
I
would
leave
that
to
to
them.
So
that's
what's
really
on
the
on
the
table
here
in
the
sense
of
that
resolution
that
we
have
before
it's,
which
is
to
proceed
with
the
bridge
portion
of
it.
So
we
don't
delay
the
project
any
further,
which
has
a
lot
of
risk.
Financial
risk
associated
with
us,
while
at
the
same
time
allowing
the
town
to
proceed
with
the
independent
review.
So
let
me
first
open
up
if
there's
a
motion
to
that
effect.
A
H
A
It
appears
to
include
what
what
took
place
at
their
council
meeting
last
Tuesday,
which
has
in
it
a
a
scope
of
work
for
the
independent
review,
a
draft
memo
of
understanding
or
intergovernment
agreement
between
the
county
and
ourselves,
which
would
be
coming
forward
at
some
point
and,
as
I
said,
I've
I've
looked
at
those
I,
don't
see
any
conflict
with
what
what
is
being
proposed
here
so
anyway,
I'll
open
it
up
for
discussion
as
to
whether
this
is
something
we
want
to
consider.
This
would
be
proceeding
with
the
bridge
portion
and
standing
back.
M
B
Have
a
question
I,
don't
see
how
you
can
break
the
two
of
them
apart,
especially
in
light
of
wasn't
the
environmental
assessment
done,
considering
both
of
them
yeah
we're
gonna,
do
another
environmental
assessment
just
to
address
the
Stony
part,
because
cultural
resources
and
the
Goa
culture
is
a
huge
part
of
any
environmental
assessment.
So
I
don't
see
how
you
can
split,
but
yeah.
A
A
F
D
Well,
it
would
also,
if
you
to
were
to
have
a
co-joined
bridge,
so
the
two
Bridges
landing
on
the
on
the
other
side
of
the
intercoastal
that
would
essentially
destroy
Mariners
Cove.
Yes,
the
one
Bridge
Landing
allows
a
elevated
exit
on
the
bridge
and
Meredith's
hope
would
be
not
next
to
the
bridge,
but
it
would
essentially
be
off
to
the
side
under
the
undated
portion.
Assuming
that's
the
way
the
exit
would
appear.
D
D
That
end
to
end
study
also
was
really
from
95
to
Sea
Pine
Circle
with
the
Adaptive
traffic
signals
that'll
be
part
of
the
study
that
they
do
and
the
big
issue
is
the
is
the
Gateway
at
Stony
and
the
question
is:
will
they
make
Sony
better
or
will
they
make
it
bigger?
Now,
if
the
bridge
is
a
one,
Bridge
option
is
the
one
we
decide
upon
and
we
sheet
on
it.
D
I,
don't
think
the
one
Bridge
option
coming
into
Maryland's,
Cove
and
ending,
let's
say
at
Jenkins
Island
and
joining
278
will
have
anything
to
do
with
what
is
eventually
decided
about
the
Stony
Gateway,
the
Stony
Gateway
decision
on
how
many
lanes
there
will
be,
whether
it's
a
Parkway
or
a
highway
and
and
how
that
will
be
built
out.
There's
really
nothing
to
do
with
to
where
the
bridge
comes
in
next
to
Meredith's
Cove
and
joins
up
windmill
Harbor.
So
I
mean
I
think
the
study
will
be
fine.
D
I
would
encourage
the
town
to
have
that
study
so
that
they're
satisfied
that
they
get
the
best
possible
outcome
for
the
Stony
Gateway
and
they
get
the
best
possible
outcome
for
the
Adaptive
traffic
signal
study
from
nine
to
five
right
to
Sea
Pine
Circle,
but
that,
as
as
the
chairman
indicated,
we'll
just
add
time
to
the
study
and
I
think,
while
all
of
that
is
going
on.
If
we
agree
that
we
want
the
one
Bridge
option,
we
can
start
the
design
phase
of
that
bridge
and
not
waste
another,
not
waste
any
more
time.
D
T
A
F
Yeah,
let
me
let
me
correct
one
thing:
I
don't
want
I,
don't
want
something
to
be
in
the
paper
that
I
didn't
say:
dot
is
taking
direction
from
the
county,
they're,
not
taking
a
position
one
way
or
the
other
on
this
issue,
because
I
will
state
again
for
the
record
that
this
is
a
Beaufort
County
project
in
its
entirety.
We
can
work
with
the
town
of
Hilton
Head,
but
it
is
our
project.
D
B
F
Have
no
more
questions
and
that's
theoretically
possible
that
we
can
sync
the
two
projects
up
at
the
end,
because
the
bridge
construction
is
going
to
take
so
long
and
that
construction
to
the
roadway
and
the
Stony
area
is
an
insignificant
part
of
the
project
that
is
theoretically
possible,
that
everything
can
mirror
up
and
all
of
it
be
done.
At
the
same
time,.
F
To
this
project,
yeah
I
had
a
call
today
from
the
town,
Josh,
Gruber
and
they're
very
concerned
about
this
resolution
and
I
understand
that
they're
concerned.
But
this
is
just
a
recommendation.
I
committed
to
him
that
I
would
ask
you
all
that
you
all.
If
you
make
the
recommendation
to
move
this
forward
to
council
that
you
allow
me
the
opportunity
to
meet
with
the
town
manager
and
Josh
Gruber
and
Whitney
and
Jared
and
myself
go
meet
with
them
to
see.
I
Mark
I,
actually
I
like
it
and
I,
have
gotten
some
calls
of
people
asking
me
to
not
support
it.
But
after
looking
at
it
when
I
came
on
Council,
we
already
passed
the
one
cent
sales
resolution.
Here
we
are
at
the
end
of
my
fourth
year
and
we're
still
looking
at
this
and
there's
been
no
sense
of
urgency.
I
think
that
this
committee,
this
Council,
needs
to
show
a
sense
of
urgency
with
what's
happening
and
I
think
that
we
do
that.
I
H
H
That
is
not
something
that
we
take
lightly
number
two.
As
our
County
Administrator
has
said,
this
is
a
county
project
it
and
if
you
take
a
look
at
our
resolution,
the
pro
the
the
project,
as
amended,
is
not
subject
to
Municipal
approval,
because
defined
in
the
law
are
three
things:
the
term
structurally
deficient
functionally
Obsolete
and
the
fact
that
it
crosses
the
intercoastal
waterways,
because
all
three
of
those
are
in
fact
true.
H
Hilton
Head
does
not
have
to
have
approval
to
replace
those
bridges
and
that's
why
we're
moving
forward.
We
no
longer
can
afford
the
luxury
of
delaying
the
project
be
because
of
the
IGA
we
have
in
place
because
the
cost
overruns,
and
because
of
the
times
that
we
need
to
move
forward
and
that's.
Why
we're
doing
what
we're
doing.
U
Yeah,
thank
you.
I've
always
supported
the
single
Bridge
option,
so
I'm
glad
to
hear
that
that
seems
like
it's
the
path
forward
where
I
get
concerned,
I
always
make
two
parts
number
one
is
when
we
start
talking
about
splitting
the
neba
process
and
I'm
also
a
little
bit
concerned.
Maybe
I
was
misunderstanding:
is
it
possible
that
we
move
forward
with
the
bridge
now,
but
then
the
roads
don't
get
done?
Is
that
even
a
potential
under
this.
U
Feels
to
me
like,
if
we're
opening
the
door
for
nothing
to
happen
between,
say,
Jenkins
Island
and
the
Cross
Island,
but
that's
going
to
be
a
huge,
missed
opportunity
and
potentially
create
more
problems
than
what
we're
solving.
Maybe
not
you
know
how
big
this
bridge
is,
but
I
think
you
take
my
point
yeah.
So
it's
just
a
little
bit
concerning
to
me
and
it's
also
concerned
to
me
with
the
NEPA
thing
that
you
know
potentially
we're
just
gonna
inadvertently
delay
this
thing.
G
So
what
we're
doing,
if
we
move
forward
with
this
action,
is
we're
splitting
the
project
up
and
not
in
phases
but
in
separate
projects.
So
to
your
point,
Miss
Howard,
with
the
NEPA
process,
the
NEPA
purpose
and
need
right
now
is
safety
and
congestion.
When
we
do
this
part
we're
basically
removing
the
congestion,
because
it
may
not
sync
up
on
the
timeline
with
the
road
project,
and
we
may
tie
a
six-lane
bridge
back
into
a
four-lane
road
section
which
shortly
thereafter
turns
into
a
five
Lane
and
a
six
Lane
at
Cross,
Island
Parkway.
G
And
if
that
happens,
that's
to
your
point
the
the
fine
line
that
we
have
to
walk.
We
have
to
be
comfortable
that
we
are
solving
a
safety
problem
in
the
bridge
Replacements
and
not
necessarily
A
congestion
problem.
Should
the
town
decide
to
move
forward
with
a
project
of
their
own?
That
would
be
a
separate
project.
H
Is
our
resolution
to
move
forward
but,
as
the
resolution
says,
three
groups
sc-d-o-t,
the
state,
infrastruct
infrastructure
bank
and
the
Federal
Highway
Administration-
have
to
agree
with
what
we
want
to
do
now
and
that
the
proposed
changes
don't
establish
the
funding
for
the
project.
But
we
need
to
do
this
to
move
this
project
forward.
If
it's
ever
going
to
get
built.
A
I
guess
my
last
comment
would
be
if
I'm
correct,
that
the
ultimate
cost
is
being
impacted
at
the
rate
of
about
a
million
dollars
for
every
week
we
delay
the
town
study
is
probably
going
to
take
six
months
to
a
year,
we're
talking
50
million
dollars.
We
don't
have
and
there's
there's
nothing
lost
by
taking
the
time
to
let
them
do
their
project
and
it
still
can
be
totally
contained
within
the
project
timeline
to
build
the
bridges
and
tied
into
the
construction
comments.
U
A
What
what
now
the
question
is?
Well,
if
this
is
a
Beaufort
County
project,
why
do
we
have
to
allow
them
to
have
I
think
the
answer
Chris?
Is
that
there's
a
thing
called
Municipal
consent
and
they
have
to
Grant
it
for
anything
that
goes
through
their
Town
limits?
That's
right!
So
what
this
one
this
is
that
can
Stony
go
through
the
town
limit,
so
they
have.
They
have
a
veto
power
over
that,
whereas
Joe
said
they
don't,
because
we're
dealing
with
Federal
Highway
over
intercoastal
on
the
bridges,
that's
correct.
Okay,.
A
Okay,
we
do
have
a
motion
I
believe
in
a
second,
so
this
stands
approved
without
objection,
and
there
are
two
final
comments
that
I
would
make
to
it.
One
is:
it
does
seem
to
me
that
the
section
across
Stoney,
even
though
it
requires
Municipal
consent
from
the
town,
is
one
that
they
might
consider
granting
on
just
that
section,
because
I
believe
everything
they've
asked
for
from
the
MKS
study
is
included,
for
example,
having
it
Meander
to
create
a
more
of
a
Parkway
effect.
A
And
secondly,
the
mou
includes
talking
about
adaptive
controls
and
that's
where
you're
using
you
know
state-of-the-art
technology
to
to
manage
on
a
real-time
basis
intersections.
If
you
it's
been
going
on
the
intersections
on
Hilton
that
are
actually
better
now
than
they
were
10
years
ago,
and
there's
agreement
on
all
of
us
to
to
continue
that
process.
A
A
A
G
So
all
of
that
is
kind
of
in
work
already,
regardless
of
mou
and
then
secondly,
it
just
last
meeting
at
lats
earlier
in
the
months
it
got
approved
in
their
tip
to
fund
a
access
management
study,
all
the
way
from
I-95
to
Sea,
Pine
Circle.
So
all
of
that'll
kind
of
be
connected.
It's
already
sort
of
set
up
without
mou
in
place,
but
separate
from
the
Bridge
Project.
So.
A
T
Might
be
some
discussion
so
before
we
use
the
private
road
maintenance
ordinance
that
was
originally
brought
before
this
committee
back
in
April.
At
the
conclusion
of
that
committee
meeting,
you
asked
staff
to
come
back
and
revise
the
existing
ordinance.
Since
then,
I've
met
with
assistant
County
Administrator
foot
to
discuss
the
ordinance,
in
particular
the
evaluation
of
said
private
roads
by
either
the
fire
chief
within
that
District
or
an
EMS
representative.
T
A
Okay,
let
me
just
give
a
little
bit
of
what
I
kind
of
understand
is
part.
Part
of
the
issue
here
is
I
think,
as
the
legal
staff
has
looked
at
it,
there's
some
reservations
about
County
governments,
doing
doing
work
on
private
roads
and,
secondly,
I
think
there
was
discussion
that
got
us
to
a
point
that
said,
if
you're
going
to
do
it,
probably
the
best
measure
of
what
needs
doing
would
be
anything
that
had
to
do
with
Public
Safety
as
the
ability
of
a
fire
truck
or
a
EMS
vehicle
to
get
to
a
vehicle.
L
Death
I
appreciate
it
I'll
try
to
be
brief.
This
has
been
a
long-standing
issue
in
Beaufort
County
and
over
the
over
the
years.
My
years,
it's
kind
of
ebbed
and
flow,
and
sometimes
it's
a
good
idea.
Sometimes
it's
a
bad
idea.
I
understand
the
legal
concerns
that
our
attorneys
have
and
I
certainly
respect
that,
but
as
a
practical
matter,
there
are
times
when,
in
my
humble
opinion,
it
does
make
a
lot
of
sense
for
Beaufort
County
to
do
minimal
amount
of
grading
on
roads
so
that
they're
passable
the
ordinance
that
has
been
crafted
here.
L
Kurt
did
you
crackers
beautiful
piece
of
work?
There
are
two
two
well
one
thing
I
do
want
to
comment
in
a
very
positive
way:
I'm
glad
you
put
in
funerals
in
there
because
I,
don't
think
I
doubt
very
seriously.
There's
anybody
in
this
room
or
listening
on
TV
for
many
people
who
realize
appreciate
the
magnitude
of
the
problem
we
have
had
historically
on
on
burials
and
a
lot
of
the
cemeteries
in
Beaufort
County
are
remote
and
difficult
to
access,
and
you
I
mean
you
just
can't.
L
Imagine
the
difficulty
that
or
the
the
grief
that
a
family
would
have
to
endure
to
try
to
get
a
a
a
hearse
into
a
into
a
burial
area
a
graveyard
and
the
roads
are
so
bad
that
they
can't
even
get
immersed
in
it.
There
have
been
plenty
examples
that-
and
this
covers
that-
thank
you
for
that.
I
do
have
one
question
about
it,
which
I,
don't
maybe
it's
me
I,
don't
know
the
rest
of
it.
I
think
is
excellent.
L
I
agree
with
every
point
on
it,
but
item
number
F
foxtrot
under
on
item
two
to
Aid
municipality,
special
purpose
districts,
special
tax
districts
within
Beaufort,
County
in
the
construction,
repair
or
maintenance
of
roadways
or
other
projects
located
within
the
municipal
District
I
assume.
That
means
that,
where
there's
private
property
involved,
because
the
way
it
reads
it
sounds
like
we're
going
to
help
them
with
their
roads,
but
I,
don't
know
that
that
was
the
intent
or
maybe
I'm
not
reading
it
correctly.
L
L
F
Ordinance
that
policy
statement
only
comes
into
effect
if
someone
is
bringing
their
Road
up
to
County.
Okay,
the
way
this
would
be
identity
so
that
policy
statement
would
still
be.
If
they
want
us
to
take
over
maintenance
of
the
road,
then
they
got
to
spend
the
money
to
bring
the
road
up
the
county
standards.
So
that's.
This
is
a
one-time,
Public
Safety
or
a
minimal
number
of
times,
Public
Safety
work
on
private
roads
for
ambulances,
fire
police
funerals
to
be
able
to
access
properties.
We
have
a
situation.
F
A
couple
situations
here
in
the
county
and
Bill
can
elaborate
on
this.
We
have
one
situation
in
particular
where,
if
there's
someone
that
gets
sick,
we
have
to
tell
the
family
they
need
to
bring
that
person
out
to
the
nearest
pellet
road,
because
we
cannot
take
an
ambulance
down
that
road
and
that's
in
in
those
situations.
Every
second
might
be
vital,
so
gotcha.
H
I
I
If
we're
going
to
do
this,
we
should
have
a
limit
on
how
much
is
spent
for
each
item.
We
should
have
something
in
here
that
we
actually
then
go
back
to
the
property
owners
who
they
are
and
and
make
them
accountable
for
that
money,
whether
that's
leaning
their
property
or
doing
something
like
that
that
they,
when
they
sell
their
property
they'd
pay
this
back
again.
I
But
you
know
when
I
read
this:
it's
just
you
know,
even
pressure
run,
gravel,
pipe
or
materials
will
not
be
routinely
provided
they
will
not
be
provided,
says
routinely
provided.
So
what
does
that
mean?
Is
that
we
can
be
using
those
things
by
fixing
up
with
other
people's
roads
and
what
I've
seen
a
lot
of
times
is
the
fact
that
that
a
road
doesn't
get
improved
because
you
have
proper
owners
of
sheriff
and
no
one
can
agree
to
pay
for
it.
Does
that
mean
the
word?
I
K
Mark's
comment
one
of
the
things
in
a
in
a
rural
community,
particularly
when
they're
here's
property.
There's
really,
if
you
pull
your
microphone
number.
Oh.
Thank
you.
Oh
one
of
the
things
about
the
rural
community
in
Beaufort,
particularly
where
there's
a
lot
of
Ayers
properties.
So
there's
really
no
ownership
say
to
a
lot
of
these
roads
that
you
can't
not
really
close.
K
If,
even
if
you
wanted
to
and
the
this,
this
ordinance
right
here
will
basically
give
the
account
administrator,
Public,
Safety
folks,
our
Public
Works
supervisor,
the
authority
to
say
we
need
to
do
something
with
this
road
just
to
make
it
accessible
for
emergency.
There
are
folks
who
are
actually
living
down
roads
that
at
the
Head,
Road
itself
is
owned
by
someone
else,
and
they
refuse
to
give
the.
K
Right
away
for
the
county
to
maintain
that
and
make
it
a
county
road,
so
it
will
always
remain
a
private
road,
even
though
the
folks
who
live
further
down
that
road
want
to
make
it
a
private
I
mean
a
county
road,
because
we
cannot
get
all
the
signatures
involved.
They
would
just
refuse
to
allow
that
to
happen,
but
they
are
suffering
because
they
are
coming
and
not
being
able
to
have
emergency
access
to
those.
K
You
know
in
that
road,
so
I
I
understand.
When
you
have
urban
areas,
you
have
municipalities,
you
may
have
a
better
Road
system,
but
in
the
rural
area,
it's
it's.
It's
a
country
road
and
with
all
this
excessive
rain
that
we
have
been
getting
here
lately,
I,
don't
know
whether
folks
can
actually
get
in
or
out
of
their
roads
even
to
get
to
get
food.
So
I
think
this
County.
K
Should
be
ready
to
say
to
anybody
who
would
want
to
challenge
this
here,
go
ahead
and
sue
us,
because
we're
going
to
provide
service
to
our
people.
That's
what
this
basically
does
here:
minimum
net
net
to
a
standard
that
the
county
would
want
before
they
take
over
road,
but
just
allowing
the
EMS
the
sheriff
to
get
down
these
roads
folks
to
to
bury
the
Deads,
because
most
of
the
Deads
I
mean
cemeteries,
are
accessible,
I
mean
really
actually
on
the
water
and
it's
very
difficult
to
get
to
there.
H
H
If
an
emergency
were
to
happen
on
that
road,
we
have
a
problem.
Now
we
may
have
a
means
and
method
of
addressing
those
roads.
Maybe
we
go
to
the
people
who
are
on
that
road
to
indicate
the
only
way
we
can
get
there
is
to
improve
this
road
in
for
an
emergency
purpose
and
here's
how
we're
going
to
do
it?
That's
something
for
us
to
elaborate
on
before
we
finalize
this.
K
L
Are
you
done
your
New
York?
Oh
okay,
I
was
kind
of
baited
breath.
I
thought
we'll
get
this
one
well,
I
just
want
to
say
we're
not
talking
about
maintaining
these
roads,
we're
just
talking
about
the
minimum
amount
of
fix
the
text
to
be
able
to
get
an
emergency
vehicle
and
again
I'm
going
to
save
it.
Kurt
I
think
you've
nailed
it.
You've
covered
this
very
specific
circumstances
under
which
this
can
happen.
F
That's
one
of
the
things
that
we
might
consider
doing
to
councilmember
Lawson
when
he
said
what
he
said.
It
made
me
think
of
one
situation
where
councilmember
Lawson
chairman
passed,
my
and
I
were
in
a
meeting
with
a
neighborhood
a
few
months
ago
that
people
were
using
a
private
road
to
access
commercial
businesses.
F
K
A
U
U
A
Q
G
We
have
here
is
we
have
a
a
road
or
a
series
of
Roads
16th,
Street
extension,
that
for
all
intensive
purposes,
has
been
a
a
town
owned
Road
for
a
long
long
time.
The
problem
is
it
never
got
formally
conveyed
so
We
Came,
Upon
This
on
GIS,
it
even
shipped
us
up
as
a
countdown
Road
and
it's
blown
Road
I
can't
find
this.
G
The
town
is
doing
some
work
and
some
drainage
work,
and
they
can
take
a
look
at
this
as
we
looked
into
it
editor
right
away
to
determine
that
it
had
not
ever
been
too
good.
So
this
would
be
a
conveyance
of
property
of
abroads
to
the
down
a
Port
Royal
for
them
to
maintain
at
no
cost
just
a
straight
quick
claim.
A
F
If
the
council
is
the
time
to
do
it,
they
have
to
meet
all
the
other
regulations
to
go
along
with
using
golf
carts
and
they
would
have
to
have
a
decal
that
we
would
issue
kind
of
like
we
do
with
this
with
the
solid
waste
program
in
order
for
them
to
be
on
those
Pathways.
Pretty
much
in
the
nutshell,
Kurt
can
answer
any
details
about
the
about
your
nuts
and
what
just
about
to
answer
questions.
B
V
D
V
D
D
L
You
know
I
I
have
to
say
this
because
to
me
it's
so
obvious.
The
purpose
of
a
trail
is
for
people
to
get
exercise.
I
mean
riding
a
riding.
A
golf
cart
down
an
exercise.
Trail
is
like
taking
a
golf
cart
to
the
gym
and
riding
it
around.
The
gym.
I
mean
it
makes
absolutely
no
sense
to
me,
but
I
mean
I'm,
absolutely
opposed
to
it
on
the
Spanish
Mars
Trail.
Some
of
these
other
areas,
I,
don't
I'm
not
familiar
with
them.
So
I
can't
comment.
A
S
Can
go
on
is
that
what
we're
saying
three
Trails
total
there
is
the
Boston
Parkway
right.
There
is
Buckwalter
Parkway,
and
this
trail
that
we
just
discovered
that
it
qualifies
for
Anna
I'm
glad
some
of
you
kind
of
find
it
humorous.
But
it's
already
happening
now
in
Bluffton,
they're
driving
them
down
there,
anyways
and
by
isoligans
bicycles,
are
actually
on
the
road
on
Bluffton,
Parkway
and
Buckwalter
in
groups
of
15
20
30
people,
those
that
live
around
Sun
City,
see
it
all
the
time.
It
is
a
big
thing
in
communities
in
Bluffton.
S
A
lot
of
you
already
get
to
experience
that
in
downtown
Beaufort
and
downtown
Bluffton
Hilton
Head,
Golf
Cart
living
is
a
very,
very
popular
thing.
You
guys
don't
have
to
worry
about
that,
because
you
have
speed
limits
under
35
miles
an
hour.
We
don't
have
that
luxury,
but
so
far
the
county
and
the
municipalities
have
done
a
great
job
on
Buck
Buckwalter
and
the
Bluffton
Parkway
on
putting
bike
pass
on
both
sides.
S
Obviously,
there
comes
risk
and
reward
with
it,
but
it
does
present
the
opportunity
to
be
able
to
take
their
golf
carts
that
they're
already
driving
to
pick
up
their
kids
from
school
to
go
to
the
grocery
store
to
go
to
the
movie
theater
a
lot
of
restaurants.
This
is
things
that
they
look
for
I've
gone
around
my
area
and
asked
if
this
is
something
they
want.
I've
talked
to
the
town
of
Bluffton
already.
S
This
is
something
that
they
do
also
favor,
and
if
we
took
the
first
step
that
they
would
even
consider
putting
it
into
their
new
neighborhood
ordinances
that
they
approve,
Sun
City
already
does
it
and
they
Cracker
Barrel
already
has
golf
car
parking.
Food
Lion
already
has
golf
cart
parking
that
entire
complex
does.
This
just
gives
the
area
of
Buckwalter
place.
You
have
five
different
schools
in
that
location,
talking
about
putting
another
school
in
that
same
location,
that
these
have
access
to
multiple
neighborhoods
that
already
have
access
to
these
bike
paths.
S
A
V
D
V
H
U
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
I
think
that
Logan
did
a
very
good
job
of
summarizing
the
issue
as
it
pertains
to
Bluffton,
Parkway
and
Buckwalter.
For
those
reasons,
I
do
support
this
in
those
areas.
I
am
very
adamantly
opposed
to
extending
this
to
the
Spanish
moss
Trail,
so
Alice.
If
you
want
to
make
a
motion
to
that
effect,
I
would
be
happy
to
be
the
second.
B
S
I
have
not
talked
to
the
police
bar
I've
talked
to
the
town
themselves,
I've
talked
to
Lisa
about
it
and
through
the
idea
around
us
that
that's
something
they
would
like
to
see
in
the
area,
but
as
for
the
police
department,
I
can
tell
you.
I
live
right
there
on
that
road,
and
you
have
people
not
in
the
audience
right
now.
They're
already
driving
on
them
and
the
police
department
is
not
stopping.
B
A
I
O
I
Know
I'll
support
it,
but
I
I
almost
think
that
we're
making
the
pathways
unsafe,
especially
we
start
talking
about
golf
carts
crossing
over
the
highways
and
Jared.
You
might
talk
about
that
because
there's
there's
The
Pedestrian
crosswalks
they're,
not
golf
cart
and
you
have
to
redesign
all
those
intersections
to
handle
those
golf
carts.
Crossing
I
think
those
paths
on
Bluffton
Parkway,
my
district,
get
there
six
feet
wide.
A
golf
cart
is
six
feet
wide.
You
get
two
golf
carts
trying
to
pass
each
other
plus
also
some
walking
on
that
trail
and
someone
riding
a
bike.
I
I
mean
I
I.
Think
that
that
again,
I'm
four
I
don't
know
what
you're
trying
to
do
and
I
want
to
do
it,
but
I
think
we're
raising
a
safety
concern,
a
nightmare
that
we're
not
ready
to
all
we
need
is
a
one
golf
cart
to
get
hit
crossing
over
intersection
and
it
it's
all
over.
It's
not
a
good
idea.
I
just
have
one.
E
F
Just
to
allay
some
of
the
concerns,
I
will
tell
you
that
Downtown
Charleston,
you
have
to
be
real
careful
when
you
go
down
there
now,
because
they
allow
golf
carts
to
be
driving
on
the
public
Road
in
Downtown
Charleston.
There's
a
lot
of
traffic
downtown
Charleston
on
the
weekends.
So
I
don't
know
that.
It's
that
big
of
a
safety
I
have
my
own
safety
concerns
about
golf
carts
and
people
riding
on
golf
carts
without
seat
belts
and
things
like
that
on
on
public
roads.
D
I
F
H
at
various
places,
the
Del
Webb
Boulevard,
to
get
over
to
the
other
side
at
seagrass
station.
That's
tough,
currently
on
the
Bluffton
Parkway
they're,
putting
the
path
as
you
go
from
the
the
developments
all
the
way
to
the
end
to
the
Buckwalter
Parkway.
If,
if
this
is
approved,
they're
going
to
have
to
widen
that
because
right
now,
it's
maybe
four
feet
wide
at
the
most.
It.