►
From YouTube: Historic Preservation Commission Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 6:00 PM Theodore D. Washington
Description
Historic Preservation Commission meeting agenda can be found here: https://bluffton-sc.municodemeetings.com/
A
First
of
all,
welcome
to
three
new
members,
commissioner
Hess
to
Paul
and
wonder
thanks
for
being
here
notice
regarding
adjournment,
historic
preservation.
Commission
will
not
hear
new
items
after
9
30
PM
unless
authorized
by
a
majority
vote
of
the
commission
members
present
items
which
have
not
been
heard
before
9
30
PM
maybe
continue
to
the
next
regular
meeting
or
a
special
meeting
date
as
determined
by
the
commission
members
notice
regarding
public
comments.
A
Every
member
of
the
public,
who
is
recognized
to
speak,
shall
address
the
chairman
and,
in
speaking,
avoid
disrespect
to
commission
staff
or
other
members
of
the
meeting
state.
Your
name
and
address
when
speaking
for
the
record
comments
are
limited
to
three
minutes.
We
go
for
an
adoption
of
the
agenda.
If
I
could
get
a
motion
to
adopt
the
agenda
of
her
jeans.
C
I'll
make
a
motion
to
adjust
tomato.
A
All
right,
second
to
that
motion,
I'll;
second,
okay,
all
in
favor
any
posing
okay
pass.
So
adoption
in
the
minutes
for
last
month's
meeting
and
I
get
a
motion
to
adopt
the
minutes
for
June's
meeting.
F
A
You
posing
okay
and
Adoption
of
minutes.
We
have
any
we're
gonna
do
election
officers
first.
Actually,
so
we
are
missing
a
chairman.
We.
G
Are
so
Mr
Vice
chairman
acting
chair,
just
real
quick
I'll
go
over
the
process
for
nominations,
because
it's
easier
that
way.
We
just
make
sure
it's
clean.
You
all
can
have
a
conversation
or
a
discussion
about
anyone
who
would
like
to
be
nominated
for
chair.
Currently
we
have
Evan
Goodwin
is
our
vice
chair.
If,
for
some
reason
he
is
nominated
as
the
chair,
then
we
would
need
to
elect
to
the
vice
chair.
G
Otherwise
he
is
the
vice
chair.
Currently,
so
you
can
have
that
conversation,
but
when
you
decide
that
someone
wants
to
be
nominated,
make
sure
that
they're
in
agreement
that
they
want
to
be
nominated,
you
can
just
say
I
nominate,
Katie
Peterson
as
the
chair
and
that
works.
Just
fine
I
will
not
be
accepting
that
nomination
for
the
record,
but
then
there
is
no
second
required
if
you'd
like
to
second
that
you
are
welcome
to
it
acts
as
sort
of
an
endorsement
of
that
nomination,
but
it's
not
necessary.
G
If
there
are
anybody
else
who
wants
to
have
a
nomination,
you
can
nominate
yourself.
You
can
nominate
somebody
else
on
the
commission
to
be
in
that
position.
It'd
be
the
same
process
as
above
once
there
are
no
more
nominations
just
to
ensure
that
there's
nobody
who's
missing
out.
The
chair
will
ask
if
they're
already
additional
or
the
acting
chair
in
this
case
will
ask
if
there
are
any
additional
nominations.
G
The
answer
is:
no,
then
you
state
that
they
are
closed
and
then
you
vote
on
those
nominations
in
order,
so
if
Will
is
nominated,
first
Jim
is
nominated.
Second
carleath
is
nominated.
Third,
you
will
vote
on
will
first,
if
he
gets
a
two-thirds
vote,
then
he's
been
elected
and
there's
no
need
to
go
on
with
voting,
because
it
is
the
order
of
nomination.
So
that's
why
I
encourage
you
to
have
that
conversation
before
you?
Do
it
so
that
you
could
have
a
order
that
you'd
like
to
make
sure
those
denominations
come
through
in?
D
D
A
Right
now
that
that's
out
of
the
way
do
we
have
any
public
comments
not
on
the
agenda.
No.
A
Okay,
we
have
no
old
business
either
it's
a
new
business
can
I
read:
I
need
to
recuse
myself
do
I,
do
it
now
or
afterwards,
I'm
gonna.
Do
it
now?
Okay,.
G
J
G
The
applicant
Pierce
Scott
Architects
on
behalf
of
the
owner,
Larry
Page
request
that
the
historic
preservation
commission
approved
the
following
application.
It
is
for
a
new
two-story
commercial
office
building
of
approximately
288
square
feet
and
a
Carriage
House
of
approximately
1200
square
feet
to
be
located
at
5824
Guilford
place
in
the
old
town,
Bluffton
historic
district,
which
is
lot
14
in
the
stock
farm
development.
It
is
zoned
neighborhood
General.
It
is
currently
a
vacant
lot.
So
at
the
top
of
your
screen,
you
can
see
Highway,
46
or
may
River
Road
then
to
the
left.
G
G
G
G
The
development
plan
also
allows
for
the
addition
of
a
driveway
to
a
site
if
they
want
a
driveway
to
the
site.
This
applicant
has
opted
to
not
add
the
driveway
to
the
site
as
they're,
not
using
that
Carriage
House
structure.
G
As
a
garage
structure,
it
is
not
necessary
to
provide
additional
parking
within
the
stock
farm
development,
as
long
as
the
use
is
one
that
is
permitted
by
the
zoning
District,
which
in
this
case
it
is,
they
have
opted
to
take
the
space
that
would
have
been
used
for
a
driveway
should
they
want
to
add
one
to
add
additional
on-street
parking
here.
So
they've
shifted
the
Ada
space
over
and
added
an
additional
two
spaces
so
that
there's
a
couple
extra
spaces
there.
You
can
see
that
happening
at
the
bottom
here.
G
The
first
floor
of
the
primary
structure.
Again,
Guilford
place
is
at
the
top
of
your
screen.
May
River
Road
is
at
the
bottom
of
your
screen
here.
So
I've
got
it
flipped
from
the
other
site
plan,
I
apologize,
but
the
porch
you
can
see
wraps
the
front
and
then
there's
a
infill
portion
here
and
then
the
porch
is
nearly
the
entire
back
elevation
as
well
with
the
stairwell
that
runs
up
to
the
second
floor
here,
see
the
stairwell,
here's
that
Landing
and
that
infilled
area
on
the
right.
G
So
this
is
again
maybe
for
road
at
the
bottom
Ginkgo
on
your
right.
So
this
is,
if
you
were
standing
on
May
River
Road,
looking
towards
the
building
for
the
roof
plan.
Again
this
is
May
River
Road
at
the
bottom,
Ginkgo
on
your
right,
Gilford
at
the
rear
and
then
the
adjacent
commercial
property.
On
the
left
hand,
side
of
your
screen
for
the
carriage
house,
we
have
the
first
floor
plan
up
on
the
right
corner
top
right
corner
here.
The
second
floor
is
a
little
bit
smaller
than
that
first
floor
and
then
the
roof
plan.
G
You
can
see
how
that
sits.
On
top
of
the
first
floor
with
the
larger
area
on
the
first
floor
there,
so
the
front
and
rear
elevations
top
is
the
front
which
faces
May,
River
Road.
So
you
can
see
the
porch
here,
those
columns
and
then
this
steps
back.
So
this
horizontal
siding
is
set
back
from
the
front
yeah
and
then
on
the
rear,
elevation
you're,
getting
approximately
the
same
amount
of
fenestration.
It's
not
quite
the
exact
same,
but
it
is.
G
G
The
Carriage
House
elevation,
so
you've
got
the
side
that
faces
towards
May,
River,
Road
and
the
building
in
front
of
it.
You
have
the
rear
which
faces
towards
Ginkgo
and
Guilford
Guilford.
Then
you
have
the
Sesame
River
Road
I'm
in
this
one.
The
left
elevation,
which
would
face
towards.
G
Is
me
River,
Road
I'm?
So
sorry
this
is
May
River
Road.
This
is
the
right
elevation
which
would
face
towards
the
rear
elevation
which
faces
towards
Guilford
and
then
the
left
elevation
which
faces
towards
that
adjacent
property.
There
you
go
here
are
the
wall
sections
if
you'd
like
to
look
at
those
closer
I'm
happy
to
go
back
to
that
screen,
as
well
as
the
window
and
door
finish
schedules
the
additional
dealing
details,
including
the
window
detail,
which
shows
that
shutter,
the
service
yard
detail
and
the
exterior
handrails.
G
Some
additional,
mostly
Window
and
Door
details
here,
the
drainage
plan,
which
includes
the
site
plan.
So
again,
you
can
see
this
better
where
they've
included
the
additional
parking
at
the
base
here.
So
this
is
the
property
line,
and
this
is
where
that
sidewalk
used
to
be
that
sidewalk
will
need
to
be
pulled
up
here
and
come
around
the
base.
It
shows
up
that
it
is
coming
around
the
base
on
the
site
plan.
G
And
then
this
is
the
comments
that
the
ARB
provided
the
applicant
has.
Let
me
know
that
they
have
sent
this
to
the
they've,
sent
the
additional
information
to
the
ARB.
They
meet
the
first
Friday
of
each
month,
so
the
order
of
operations
there
is
a
little
off
where
they
need
it
to
be
before
you
all
tonight
and
they've
addressed
these
comments
that
are
hopeful
to
get
the
approval
there
as
I
always
State.
The
ARB
can
be
more
restrictive
than
the
town
of
bluffton's
ordinances,
but
it
cannot
be
in
conflict
with
it.
G
So
in
getting
a
conditional
approval
like
this,
it
is
they
need
to
make
sure
that
they
are
in
alignment,
because
you
cannot
amend
something
that
is
not
approved.
So
that's
just
something
to
keep
in
mind
the
conditions
that
they
have
most
of
them
are
adding.
This
is
existing
landscape
to
to
remain
adding
a
stable
Palm,
so
most
of
it
is
additive
rather
than
subtractive
information
that
I
see
on
the
ARB
conditions.
So
there
are
additional
Landscapes
instead
of
taking.
H
G
G
So
the
first
condition
is
that
a
tree
removal
permit
is
required
because
there
are
trees
that
are
larger
than
eight
inches
in
diameter
of
breast
height,
which
are
being
proposed
for
removal.
This
is
a
standard
condition
that
is
on
just
about
every
application
that
you
all
see
before
you.
It's
it's
primarily
administrative.
G
The
second
is
that
the
approval
from
the
stock
Farm
POA
is
required
prior
to
approval
of
a
certificate
of
appropriateness.
We
did
kind
of
discuss
that
just
now,
but
basically
we
need
something
from
the
stock
Farm
POA.
That
says
they
are
okay
with
the
design
as
it
sits
before
we
can
sign
off
on
ours.
G
The
third
is
because
it's
commercial
property,
any
signage
that
is
going
to
be
proposed
in
the
future.
It
requires
a
site
feature
approval
again
administrative.
We
like
to
include
this
condition,
because
the
only
times
that
we
do
not
include
it,
somebody
comes
through
and
says
what
was
shown
on
the
building
plans,
so
we
make
sure
that
we've
included
it
on
characters
as
our
safety
net.
For
that
the
fourth
is
that
we
need
a
canopy
coverage
exhibit
provided
for
review,
since
that
was
not
included
on
their
landscape
plan
here.
G
G
The
fifth
item
is
that,
during
the
conceptual
review,
the
existing
landscape,
we
requested
that
the
existing
landscape
be
shown
on
the
plans
to
ensure
that
the
adequate
plannings
have
been
retained
or
replanted.
We
just
need
a
little
bit
more
information,
it's
showing
as
existing
Landscaping
here,
but
it
just
doesn't
indicate
what
species
or
the
number
of
plantings
that
are
installed
at
the
front
at
this
time
to
be
moved
up
or
or
remain
in
place
a
little
more
information
there.
G
The
sixth
is
that
the
Apple,
you
must
work
with
staff
to
ensure
the
grading
proposed
will
not
result
in
a
complete
loss
of
discrete
streetscape,
Foundation
plantings
or
impact
the
sidewalk,
while
still
maintaining
positive
drainage.
So
the
survey
that
is
provided
is
a
little
bit
older,
which
is
acceptable
because
we
do
not
technically
require
one
that
is
brand
new.
However,
with
the
streetscape
project
that
went
through
there,
I
think
some
of
the
grading
has
been
changed.
G
I
was
out
there
with
a
tape
measure,
and
it
looks
like
it's
off
a
little
bit
in
order
to
make
sure
that
we
maintain
that
positive
drainage,
where
the
location
of
the
drainage
that's
running
through
the
site.
Right
now
is
running
right
along
the
fence
line,
which
is
where
they're
proposing
the
front
columns
of
the
structure.
G
So
Town
staff
is
recommending
that
the
building
be
pushed
back
on
the
site
about
five
feet,
so
that
that
drainage
is
less
impacted
by
the
placement
of
the
building,
and
then
it
would
be
able
to
heat
flow
with
the
highest
point
being
approximately
where
this
23
is
on
the
plan
here
or
I'm.
Sorry,
25
I
can
read
and
then
have
it
sheet
both
directions
from
it.
G
So
the
high
point
would
be
in
the
center
and
it
would
she
either
way
instead
of
trying
to
re-establish
a
ditch
in
front
of
this,
which
may
undercut
the
sidewalk
a
bit
because
of
the
placement
there.
So
that
is
something
that
staff
is
willing
to
work
with
them
on,
if,
if
you
all
see
a
fit,
whether
it
be
that
they
increase
the
the
fill
in
that
area
to
make
sure
that
it
works
and
leave
the
placement
as
is
or
move
that
building
back
five
feet
and
be
able
to
sheet
flow
either
Direction.
G
That's
something
that,
if
you
all
feel
comfortable
with
it,
staff
does
feel
comfortable
working
with
the
applicant
on
that
to
ensure
that
it's
going
to
be
adequately
drained
so
that
we
do
not
run
into
issues.
We
do
know
that
the
soils
in
this
location
are
what
you
call
not
great,
and
so
typically
the
Lots
along
this
street
have
required
a
lot
of
fill
in
the
past,
and
so
that
is
something
that
we've
dealt
with
on
several
of
these
Lots.
G
Easily
yeah
well
fairly
easily
or
at
least
handled
at
a
staff
level,
because
it
is
Traders
work
and
it
shouldn't
affect
the
architecture
or
much
of
the
placement
of
this
building.
I
did
talk
with
our
building
official
just
to
ensure
that
if
the
building
was
moved
back
five
feet,
there
would
not
be
an
issue
with
any
fire
ratings,
or
anything
like
that,
because
this
building
could
constitute
a
single
building
under
building
code.
G
Even
though
it
is
two
buildings
because
it
all
is
commercial
use,
it
is
under
9
000
square
feet
and
it
is
under
two
or
it's
two
stories
or
under
in
height,
and
it
is
non-sprinkled,
so
it
could
constitute
one
building,
which
is
a
little
bit
funky,
but
it
wouldn't
require
any
additional
fire
rating
between
the
structures.
If
it
is
a
five
foot
distance
between
the
two.
G
So
there
are
a
few
options
that
they
have
and
we
can
work
with
them
to
figure
out
which
one
works
best
for
their
site
and
then
the
last
one
I
covered
that,
because
it
was
the
recommendation
to
move
that
primary
structure
towards
the
rear
of
the
property
line,
to
eliminate
the
need
to
relocate
the
fence,
plantings
or
modify
the
drainage
at
the
front
of
the
lot.
So
two
six
and
seven
go
Fairly
hand
in
hand.
Do
you
have
any
questions
for
me.
C
G
I
have
the
right
rear.
Perhaps
the
applicant
can
speak
to
that
better,
but
I
believe
that
it's
two
feet:
yeah.
J
J
J
J
C
J
Not
necessarily
I,
don't
I,
don't
have
the
shutter
picked
out.
So
I
was
trying
to
mimic
the
windows
but
I,
don't
you
know
I
know
we
wanted
a
panel
okay,
but
I,
don't
know
exactly
the
thickness
of
that
style
until
we
see
what
is
available.
E
K
K
J
J
And
then
the
carriage
house
is
probably
scaled
down.
Typically,
when
I
work
on
major
yeah
buildings,
you
know
massing,
the
primary
usually
is
the
grander
one
of
the
two.
K
I
would
suggest
either
making
the
10
inch
like
all
of
the
columns
on
the
main
building
match.
Probably
would
be
my
preference
or
going
to
you
know,
columns
that
match
the
informal
ones
of
the.
J
K
And
then
the
the
roof
on
that
second
element
is
there:
what
is
the
reasoning
behind
not
having
the
ease
of
line
on
the
412
roofs
with
the
main
roofs?
It
seems
like
it'd,
be.
B
J
Up
here
and
here,
yeah
I
didn't
because
I
the
whole
Major
versus
minor,
so
the
major
Mass
part
versus
the
minor
Mass
part
and
I
didn't
want
as
much
emphasis
in
that
part's
pushed
back
more.
It's
not
on
the
same
plane
and
I.
Didn't
necessarily
I.
Don't
think
that
you
need
a
continuous
Eve
and
it
meant
to
support
and.
D
J
K
J
J
If
I
wrote,
If
I
grew
it
up
a
little
bit
higher
it
would.
There
would
be
a
lot
of
extra
space
between
the
head
and
the
eve
and.
J
K
K
I
had
the
the
double
hungs
look
really
nice,
when
this
is
the
right
side
elevation
here
on
the
second
floor,
then
on
the
Carriage
House
their
casements.
Is
there
a
reason.
J
J
K
J
Oh
you're,
talking
about
these
those
are
yeah
those
they
could
be
double
hung,
but
they
could
be
double
hung.
If
that's
what
you
prefer.
J
F
G
G
K
I
G
H
K
Yeah
I
would
make
a
motion
to
amend
the
motion
to
add
that
the
triple
windows
on
the
the
right
side
of
the
Carriage
House
be
switched
to
from
casements
to
double
hungs.
A
second.
K
H
G
E
C
G
H
G
He
did
trick
you,
though
first
he
did.
He
did
okay.
The
second
item
of
new
business
that
we
have
before
us
tonight
is
a
certificate
appropriateness
for
a
renovation,
in
addition
to
a
contributing
resource
known
as
the
Hayward
Cottage.
G
So
Ansley
Manuel
is
here
on
behalf
of
the
owners,
George
and
Lillian
Hayward,
to
request
the
approval
of
a
certificate
of
reporters
who
renovate
the
Hayward
Cottage
to
include
an
addition
of
approximately
230
square
feet
to
the
existing
21,
87
square
foot,
single
family,
fun
story,
residential
structure
located
at
130,
Pritchard
Street,
which
is
in
the
old
town,
Bluffton
historic
district,
and
it
is
zoned
Riverfront
Edge.
So
this
means
that
it
has
Frontage
on
the
May
River,
so
that
will
always
be
the
front
of
those
lots.
G
I
pointed
to
my
back
as
I
said
front,
but
may
River's
that
way.
So
this
right
here
is
the
is
Pritchard
Street,
which
you
can
see
through
the
rain
out
your
window
here.
So
as
you
go
down,
Purchase
Street
you
go
into
the
gravel
road
portion
of
it,
and
this
lot
is,
on
your
right
hand,
side
all
the
way
at
the
end.
So
this
is
the
May
River,
the
Hayward
Cove
and
then
the
May
river
is
at
the
bottom
of
the
screen
here.
Story.
G
So
the
existing
floor
plan
is
the
one
without
highlighting
on
it,
and
the
demolition
floor
plan
is
that
on
your
right,
so
they're,
proposing
to
replace
some
doors
and
windows
here,
remove
this
portion
of
the
entry
porch
this
portion
of
the
exterior
wall
so
that
they
can
enclose
this
porch
here
they'll
remove
this
portion
they're,
not
removing
it
because
they're
enclosing
it.
G
So
this
portion
here
will
be
enclosed,
and
then
this
is
the
front
elevation
down
here
facing
the
river
and
they're
going
to
be
removing
this
portion
here
changing
out
this
window,
this
door,
changing
that
one
to
a
window,
and
then
this
set
right
here
the
window
will
become
a
door.
So
I
can
show
you
it
again.
Here.
G
We've
got
the
replacement
window
here
for
egress,
and
then
this
window
will
remain
they're
enclosing
the
window
that
was
here
to
create
the
bedroom,
Edition
and
changing
the
other
window
to
a
door.
So
it's
in
the
same
place
as
the
previous
window,
but
it
is
becoming
a
door
they're
adding
this
wall
here.
This
was
an
open
porch,
so
this
portion
will
become
part
of
the
bedroom
and
then
the
this
is
interior
to
the
space
but
they're.
Adding
they're
enclosing
this
area
here
and
then
adding
a
porch
of
the
same
size
to
the
front.
G
Beyond
that,
they're
fixing
the
fireplace
here
they're,
just
re-stabilizing
that
and
then
on
the
bottom.
Here,
they're
opening
up
this
wall
and
adding
a
door
where
there
was
a
window
and
a
door
where
I'm
sorry
a
window
where
there
was
a
door
here
and
then
a
door
where
there
is
a
window
here
to
make
that
so
you'll
see
it
better.
This
is
the
proposed
roof
plan,
so
you
can
see
this
is
the
kitchen
that
was
enclosed
and
then
the
porch
Beyond.
G
But
if
you
look
inside
the
screen,
you
have
the
window
that
becomes
a
door
and
then
the
door
that
becomes
the
window
here
inside
the
screen
porch
facing
the
river,
the
left
elevation
you'll
have
the
entry
porch
that
was
here.
This
will
be
covering
up
that
entry,
porch
it'll
be
just
closer
to
the
West
Side
there.
So
it
encloses
that
that's
a
new
addition,
but
the
rest
will
remain
unchanged
on
the
rear,
Edition
I'm,
sorry,
the
rear
elevation.
G
G
You
can
see
that
enclosed
porch,
so
this
is
where
that
porch
was,
and
this
is
what
the
porch
will
look
like
and
then
they'll
add
the
new
porch
in
front
of
that
and
again,
this
is
the
rear
of
the
structure
and
the
front
of
the
structure
is
for
the
left-hand
side
of
your
screen.
So
the
front
of
the
structure
is
remaining
mostly
unchanged,
with
the
exception
of
that
one
Window
and
Door.
G
This
is
the
window
and
door
schedule
so
they'll
be
reusing
and
relocating
doors
that
were
being
used
to
what
is
becoming
the
exterior
so
where
they
took
out
that
door
on
the
front
elevation
and
changed
it
to
a
I'm.
Sorry
on
the
rear,
elevation
and
changed
it
to
a
door
for
the
new
bedroom,
Edition
they'll
be
taking
that
window
and
moving
it
forward
to
the
next
wall.
G
Here
are
the
details,
so
you've
got
the
bedroom
Section
for
the
walls,
the
proposed
brick
stairs
that
we'll
be
pulling
forward
and
the
shutter
this
house
again
is
a
contributing
resource
that
already
has
shutters
on
most
of
the
windows.
These
are
the
new
what
they
would
need
to
put
on
the
new
portions
of
the
building.
G
This
is
the
bedroom
wall,
section
again
the
porch
yep
I'm.
Sorry,
that's
the
porch
I
was
reading
it
but
I'm
looking
at
it.
This
is
the
porch.
So
this
is
where
they've
infilled
that
kitchen.
So
you
can
see.
This
is
the
roof
line
that
is
existing
and
then
the
proposal
is
to
tie
it
into
here
and
it'll
flatten
by
just
a
little
bit.
I
got
an
email
from
Ansley
earlier.
G
I
have
not
put
it
in
the
slideshow
because
it
was
not
part
of
the
original
submittal,
but,
as
we
discussed,
the
application
I
will
pull
that
PDF
up
for
you
guys.
This
is
the
existing
canopy
coverage
for
the
site.
So,
as
you
can
see,
it
has
75
canopy
coverage
I
believe
that
it
has
close
to
98
canopy
coverage
based
on
the
existing
tree
canopy,
and
then
this
is
the
proposed
landscape
plan.
G
So
bhpc
has
the
authority
to
approve
the
application
and
submitted
by
the
applicant,
approve
the
application
with
condition
or
deny
the
application
submitted
by
the
applicant
as
they
take
into
consideration.
The
eight
review
criteria
which
are
set
forth
in
section
318-3
of
our
unified
development,
ordinance
I,
say
that
line
over
and
over
again
for
those
of
you
who
are
new.
So
you
will
hear
it
a
lot.
G
The
town
staff
has
reviewed
this
application
and
has
found
that,
with
the
one
condition
here
that
the
roof
line
be
reconsidered
between
the
existing
kitchen
roof
and
the
enclosed
porch
and
porch
Edition
to
create
a
better
relationship
between
the
new
and
existing
roof
lines,
and
that
is
this
area
right
here,
where
it
ties
into
the
existing
roof.
But
the
pitch
changes
just
a
little
bit.
G
So
it
creates
a
bit
of
a
complicated
roofline
right
here,
and
that
is
the
only
condition
that
time
staff
has
based
on
the
application.
Submittal
materials.
I
am
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
have
Ansley
the
owners
and
I
believe
the
contractor
is
here
for
the.
Unless
he's
here
in
a
public
comment
capacity
to
discuss
the
application,
should
you
have
any
questions.
G
G
This
is
the
email
I
received
this
morning
that
has
the
or
Monday
that
has
the
an
alternate
roof
line
here,
where
it
drops
just
below
the
roof
line
and
then
from
the
side
elevation,
it
would
fall
just
beneath
that
roofline.
It
would
slope
to
a
flatter
roof
right.
G
Now
it's
proposed
at
a
3
and
12,
or
three
yeah,
three
and
twelve,
and
then
the
main
roof
line
is
at
a
three
and
a
half
and
twelve,
and
so
it
would
drop
a
little
bit
flatter,
but
it
would
fall
below
this
and
not
intercept
with
the
existing
roof
line.
So
it'd
fall
more
in
line
with
the
porch
that
was
currently
there.
E
Currently,
the
house
is
all
shingled,
so
if
I
put
a
metal
roof
on
that
one
section
over
the
enclosed
existing
kitchen
porch
to
the
it
would
it
would
be
the
the
only
part
of
the
roof
that
had
a
different
material.
K
That
I
mean
personally
that
roof
line
tying
in
didn't
really
bother
me
at
all.
I
thought
that
was
a
clean
way
to
do
it.
It's
like
pitch
break
but
shingles.
K
So
it's
pretty
smooth
my
thought
on
the
roof
was
actually
on
the
other
side,
where
the,
where
bedroom
three
is
being
added,
you
know
wondering
why
that
roof
doesn't
take
shape
more
like
the
hip
roof
over
the
kitchen
or
the
hip
roof
over
the
existing
bedroom
on
the
right
side
that
seemed
like
they
would
be
in
the
pitch
yeah,
with
a
it's
kind
of
like
this
right
side.
Here
we're
looking
at
one
window
and
then
the
lower
throat
pitch
roof
that
hips
around
then.
K
K
She
would
set
it
to
ride
up
just
underneath
that
Eve,
like
it
does
in
the
kitchen.
When
you
drive
up
the
street,
that
kitchen's
kind
of
a
unique
little
element
in
the
front
there,
then
you
would
also
see
that
addition,
as
a
second
kind
of
Nod
to
that
in
the
background
from
the
street.
C
What
I
can
see
it
both
ways?
I
mean
I,
can
see
how
the
applicant
has
designed
it
that
way
and
I
can
see
it
being
adjusted
as
the
suggested,
the
poor
truth
over
the
the
kitchen.
C
It
doesn't
really
bother
me
if
it's
as
it's
shown
in
this
elevation,
where
it's
just
a
pitch
break
versus
lowering
it
to
a
2
and
12.
I,
think
that's
going
to
cause
more
problems
with
warranty
and
water
intrusion.
If
we're
sticking
with
an
asphalt,
shingle
roof
versus
there's
no
metal
anywhere
else
on
it.
It.
A
C
I
mean
the
the
existing
bedroom.
From
that
other
side.
Elevation
is
dying
in
just
below
that
main
Eve,
which
is
what's
happening
on
this
new
bedroom,
three
and
yeah.
If
it,
if
it
if
bedroom
three's
roof,
was
raised,
you're
going
to
want
to
your
eye,
carries
over
to
the
now
the
main,
what's
existing
the
porch
roof
and
be
like
well,
why
wasn't
that
raised?
You
know
as
and
then
it's
this
trickle
effect
but
you're
dealing
with
existing
conditions,
yeah
yeah.
K
Well,
I
mean
I
guess
the
argument
was
that
there's
there's
really
there's
the
main
roof
as
one
roof
type
here
and
then
there's
the
high
proportioned.
You
know
secondary
hip
to
roofs
that
are
kind
of
the
bedroom,
Edition
and
the
old
kitchen
Edition,
and
then
the
you
know,
third
type
roof.
Is
that
low
slope
shed?