►
Description
Meeting Agenda available at https://hiltonheadislandsc.gov/towncouncil/agendas/
A
B
A
You
for
attending
I'd
like
to
call
the
January
3rd
2023
Town
Council
Workshop,
to
order
Krista.
Are
we
in
compliance
of
the
Freedom
of
Information
Act.
D
E
A
You,
prior
to
going
into
the
appearance
by
citizens,
I'd
like
to
take
a
moment
and
say
the
pledge
allegiance.
A
As
we
go
into
appearances
by
citizens,
I
would
first
like
to
ask
everybody
that
if
you
have
some
documents
that
you
would
like
to
present
to
Town
Council,
please
do
so
after
your
three
minutes
is
up.
Each
person
has
three
minutes
to
address
Town
Council.
At
the
end
of
the
three
minutes
you
were
asked
to
conclude
your
comments.
Please
maintain
a
decorum
suitable
for
the
meeting
and
refrain
from
using
any
profane,
abusive
or
obscene
language.
F
First
I'd
like
to
congratulate
the
new
and
re-elected
members
of
the
council
under
recent
appointments
and
I
appreciate
that
it's
late
in
the
day-
and
you
have
a
lot
of
people
here
so
I'll
be
brief.
This
is
a
new
year
and
a
new
Administration
I
would
like
to
rep
and
I'm,
representing
a
group
of
citizens
that
are
asking
you
this
new
tank
Council
to
put
the
interests
of
the
residents.
First
I
would
like
to
thank
Mr
Orlando
and
Italian
staff,
who
have
been
very
supportive
dealing
with
some
traffic
and
stormwater
issues
in
our
neighborhood
recently.
F
F
This
proposed
project
will
have
a
detrimental
impact
on
the
Folly
Field
neighborhood
and
Beach
availability
for
residents
at
Island,
Beach
Park.
We
were
asked
at
the
town
at
a
minimum
conductor,
independent
environmental
study,
as
well
as
a
traffic
study
over
a
weekend
in
July.
The
residents
of
this
island
have
been
asking
for
this
traffic
study
since
2015..
A
G
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
Daniel
Anthony
I
am
the
President
of
the
Jarvis
Creek
subdivision
POA,
located
at
Walking,
Horse
Street
off
Jonesville
Road
I
am
also
the
president
of
the
newly
formed
Jonesville
preservation
Society.
Our
mission
is
to
develop
a
more
transparent
communication
between
Town
officials
and
the
residents
of
Jonesville
Road
and
to
slow
the
escalation
of
development
on
Jonesville
Road.
We
are
not
against
all
development
as
long
as
it
adheres
to
the
purpose
of
the
LMO.
G
That
purpose
is
to
codify
standards
that
regulate
land,
use,
promote
orderly
growth
and
protect
existing
Property
Owners
by
ensuring
a
safe,
convenient,
attractive
and
functional
community.
The
majority
of
Island
residents
and
many
Town
officials
have
expressed
concerns
that
the
LMO
does
not
meet
the
current
needs
of
the
island.
Years
ago,
the
Alamo
guidelines
were
changed
to
encourage
affordable
housing.
However,
these
changes
did
very
little
to
accommodate
those
needs.
G
They
merely
enhanced
the
ability
for
developers
and
investors,
many
of
which
who
do
not
live
in
the
local
community
to
get
rich,
while
our
Islands
suffered
irreversible
damage
to
the
environment,
Wildlife
creeks
and
streams,
saltwater
marshes,
quality
of
life,
the
very
image
of
Hilton
Head
that
all
of
us
have
come
to
love.
The
current
LMO
allows
the
developer
to
design
and
engineer
their
projects
according
to
their
own
interpretation
of
Lowcountry
design,
architecture
and
Community
impact
developers
and
town
officials
will
argue
that
they
adhere
to
the
LMO
rules
and
guidelines.
That
may
be
true.
G
Butlin
only
needs
to
look
at
the
developmental,
Marshland,
Road
or
Bailey's
Cove.
To
see
the
failures
of
the
current
LMO
I.
Ask
you:
is
this
the
future
of
Hilton
Head?
Is
this
affordable
housing?
How
can
someone
claim
that
a
development
addresses
affordable
housing
when
the
price
tag
on
these
units
is
between
500
and
800k?
G
How
can
a
school
teacher
firefighter
police
officer
EMT?
How
can
they
afford
to
purchase
a
property
like
this?
The
LMO
must
be
changed
to
right.
The
wrongs
of
past
administrations,
before
any
more
damage
can
be
done
and
to
protect
this
beautiful
Island
from
the
greed
of
developers.
This
is
a
very
special
item
with
beautiful
beaches,
diverse
and
historical
communities.
We
are
in
danger
of
losing
what
we
have
all
come
to
cherish
and
enjoy.
G
This
would
get
all
of
us
time
to
reevaluate
the
long-term
effects
that
these
developments
bring
to
our
communities
to
address
such
items
as
traffic
and
safety,
environmental
impacts,
utility
infrastructure,
quality
of
life
for
current
residents,
schools
and
hospitals,
emergency
response
time,
just
to
name
a
few.
We
also
ask
for
a
one-hour
meeting
designed
specifically
to
address
these
concerns
for
the
residents
of
Jonesville
Road
and
surrounding
communities.
Thank
you.
H
As
to
the
impact
the
development
will
have
on
traffic,
water,
sewer
and
general
infrastructure.
The
project
has
already
been
approved
and
we
are
left
to
deal
with
the
impacts.
All
improvements
necessary
to
this
area
due
to
Bailey's
Cove,
will
now
fall
on
the
backs
of
the
town
and
our
tax,
paying
residents
rather
than
the
developers
that
will
significantly
profit
off
this
development.
In
addition,
we
are
now
left
living
on
a
one-way,
Inn,
one-way
out
road
with
double
the
traffic
and
population.
H
Now
two
additional
large
developments
are
proposed
and,
if
approved,
would
almost
triple
the
current
population
and
traffic
on
the
road.
The
lack
of
appropriate
planning
for
Bailey's
Cove
is
already
created
an
incredible
traffic
and
safety
hazard
during
heavy
traffic
times
the
new
population.
Our
residents
will
not
be
able
to
turn
off
of
Jonesville
Road
in
any
direction,
meaning
we
will
have
no
way
of
leaving
our
community
if
there
is
any
need
for
emergency
services
during
those
times
there
will
be
no
way
in
or
out
for
emergency
Personnel.
H
We
still
have
not
had
a
fair,
unbiased
and
transparent
assessment
of
the
current
infrastructure
and
the
impact
on
this
historic
area
and
whether
it
can
support
this
additional
development.
We've
been
promised
future
assessments,
and
while
we
are
thankful
for
that,
these
promise
changes
will
not
impact
the
two
new
proposed
developments.
Should
they
be
quickly
pushed
through
before
promise
changes
are
made.
Putting
the
cart
before
the
horse
under
these
circumstances,
will
destroy
our
historic
area
for
years
to
come.
H
I'm
requesting
today
that
the
Town,
Council
and
mayor
stand
up
on
behalf
of
the
safety
of
our
residents
and
halt
any
future
development
over
an
rm4
in
this
area
until
appropriate.
Surveys
take
place
I'm
in
no
way
proposing
that
land
should
not
be
developed
in
the
future
in
this
area,
but
it
is
necessary
that
the
safety
of
the
people
living
there
can
be
protected
and
the
infrastructure
can
support
the
additional
dwellings
before
we
allow
for
any
new
development.
H
Current
LMO
States's
purpose
is
to
guide
development
in
order
to
protect,
promote
and
improve
public
health
safety,
morals,
convenience
order,
appearance,
prosperity
and
general
welfare
of
the
landowners
and
residents
of
the
Town,
respecting
the
rights
of
Real
Property
Owners.
By
adopting
a
comprehensive
zoning
ordinance
for
the
town
and
providing
administrative
procedures
and
development
standards,
I
believe
you
could
ask
any
Resident
on
Jonesville
Road
if
they
feel
that
the
LMO
has
performed
as
promised,
and
they
would
certainly
disagree,
but
when
the
town
selectively
adheres
to
its
ordinances,
we
are
not
just
as
satisfied.
H
I
Hello,
my
name
is
Steve
Clark
I
live
on
Walking
Horse
Street
off
of
Jonesville
Road
I
like
to
Echo
with
this
two
last
speakers.
They
laid
it
out
very
well
I
would
encourage
each
and
every
one
of
you
to
take
15
minutes
and
drive
down
Jonesville
Road.
If
you've
never
have
been
down
there.
It's
a
beautiful
area,
it's
surrounded
by
two
beautiful
marshes
on
both
sides,
it's
already
being
destroyed,
it
will
be
destroyed
and
you
just
need
to
go
down
there
and
take
a
look
and
see
if
this
is
a
fair
thing.
I
That's
happening
to
just
that
area
and
you'll
you'll
you'll,
see
even
where
they
put
the
new
Road
in
it's
on
a
blind
curve
with
the
in
the
30
acre,
bulldoze,
trees
that
came
down
and
they
left
12
Trees
up
I
mean
so
just
take
a
ride
down
there
take
a
look
and
I
appreciate
the
last
two
speakers.
They
did
a
very
nice
job.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Thank
you.
J
You
know
this
is
the
first
meeting
of
this
Council
I
may
go
over
15
seconds
and
I
come
to
you
with
great
sadness.
J
J
J
J
J
J
Some
have
said
they
are
afraid
to
say
something
for
fear,
retaliation
in
a
meeting
I
attended.
Two
weeks
ago
we
were
told
by
families
and
Neighbors
in
that
community
that
the
families
are
sleeping
in
one
room
on
the
floor
and
there's
a
couple
of
council
people
here
was
at
that
meeting,
and
they
heard
that
for
fear
of
these
criminals
coming
and
shooting
up
their
communities
again,
they're
sleeping
with
their
children
on
the
floor.
J
J
J
It
doesn't
matter
the
color
of
your
skin,
your
nationality,
at
all.
We
have
criminals,
Among
Us,
and
we
must
root
them
out
if
we
don't
commit
to
more
resources
to
our
community.
All
the
beautiful
Parks
beaches,
golf
courses,
bike
paths
and
other
attractions
will
disappear
along
with
the
people
who
come
here,
whether
you
live
in
a
gated
community
or
out
of
the
Getty
Community
there's
crime
everywhere
and
I.
Thank
you
for
listening
and
I
hope
the
people
of
this
community
will
think
about
what
I've
said.
It's
all
true.
Thank
you.
K
K
We
want
to
take
a
moment
to
thank
Town
manager,
Orlando
and
his
staff
for
the
efforts
undertaken
to
date.
They
have
not
gone
unnoticed
and
while
there
was
much
improvement,
there
was
still
work
to
be
done,
much
of
which
was
approved
by
the
previous
Town
Council
Members
and
I
look
forward
to
working
to
complete
them,
as
planned
in
the
CIP
for
the
summer
of
2023.,
Town
Council,
Members,
new
ones
and
old.
You've
made
election
commitments
to
increase
the
level
of
oversight
with
respect
to
Island
development.
K
K
Development
approvals
for
other
North,
End
parcels
and
even
plans
for
the
mid
Island
track
will
clearly
be
overwhelming
the
North
End
and
its
beaches
and
Roads.
It
appears
to
the
residential
end
of
this
island
that
the
intentist
overdeveloped
this
area
to
mirror
calignian
Forest
Beach,
where
we'll
stop,
why?
Why
are
we
doing
this?
The
North
End
Beach
areas
do
not
have
the
capacity
the
south
end
has
available
to
high
capacity
projects.
K
We're
acutely
aware
developers
has
a
current
right
to
develop
their
parcels.
We
would
ask
the
town
to
step
up
now,
make
a
new
future
and
make
sure
that
the
development
mirrors
other
community
structures
in
the
area
at
a
minimum.
The
visual
Landscaping
setback,
fencing
height
density
scream
for
more
discussion.
K
Further
that
the
town
at
least
we
would
require
the
developer
to
clearly
state
to
potential
buyers,
The
Limited
nature
of
the
public
beach
access
at
this
small
end
of
the
island.
The
corporate
Giant
that
will
be
Goliath
in
this
on
their
own
website
has
a
mission
statement
that
says
we
focus
on
the
environmental
needs
of
our
community.
Let's
hold
them
to
it.
So
as
a
Paramount,
it's
Paramount
is
a
good
corporate
partner.
Their
buyers
know
that
it's
expected
that
best
use
of
primary
beaches
may
not
be
Islanders.
It
could
be
dreason
or
Berks.
K
This
may
be
more
palatable
by
a
change
in
Palmetto
Breeze
trolleys,
which
could
pick
up
at
the
entrances
complex
and
take
them
directly
to
the
walkway
at
treason,
breaks,
Brooks
or
even
caligny.
You
all
know
we're
now
in
the
process
of
getting
ready
for
the
2023
Beach
season.
Your
CIP
plans
will
be
gone
over
with
you.
There
are
commitments
to
improve
safety,
pedestrian
safety
at
that
Park.
K
I
get
emails
all
summer
and
I
was
at
a
party
nearly
hit
somebody
driving
into
Islanders.
We've
got
to
get
that
pedestrian
path
in
so
time
is
growing
short.
So
please
do
what
is
necessary
to
direct
Town
management
staff
by
providing
clear
policy
development
decisions
and
removing
roadblocks
to
progress.
Thank
you.
A
You
very
much
but
before
we
move
to
Sean
to
say
a
few
words
Mary
I'm
terribly
sorry
for
the
loss
in
your
family,
my
heart
and
condolences
go
out
to
you
and
I'm
sure
from
the
rest
of
us
as
well.
L
Mr
Mayor
before
you
continue
may
I
have
just
a
moment.
I
have
a
couple
of
things
that
I
just
wanted
to
bring
up.
The
first
is
to
also
Express
condolence
for
Loretta
Carr's
loss
of
the
family.
She
was
important
to
your
family.
She
was
important
to
our
community
over
the
years
I've
asked
as
we
get
crime
statistics.
How
much
of
our
crime
is
related
to
drugs
on
the
island.
L
I
haven't
gotten
sufficient
answers
and
I
don't
see
sufficient
statistics
even
coming
out
of
the
crime
stats
that
we
do
get
as
the
newly
appointed
chair
of
community
safety
in
public
safety,
community
service
and
Public
Safety.
That's
it
I
would
like
and
ask
that
this,
along
with
some
of
the
emphasis
that
I
would
like
to
bring
forward
with
regard
to
opiate
addictions
in
Narcan
training
for
the
island,
be
put
on
my
agenda
and
again
I'm.
So
sorry.
L
Additionally,
if
we
can,
please
have
a
278
update.
It's
been
a
while,
since
the
community
has
been
informed
about
what's
currently
going
on
and
what
the
status
is
and
who's
involved,
and
so
I
think
that
that's
critically
important
and
also
in
terms
of
the
LMO.
We
talk
a
lot
about
the
LMO
and
over
the
course
of
time.
L
The
reason
I'm
here
is
because
of
failures
in
the
Land
Management,
ordinance
and
people
know
me
know
that
there
are
a
couple
of
items
in
addition
to
the
ones
that
we
have
done
successfully,
that
we
have
planned,
for
that
will
be
making
a
strong
impact.
I
would
ask
that
we
move
with
all
speed
to
remove
lockouts
from
the
Land
Management
ordinance
and
disallow
them
again
on
Hilton
Head
Island,
so
as
quickly
as
we
can
move
that
forward.
L
In
addition
to
that,
if
we
could
look
at
the
way
the
zoning
and
the
acreage
Works
in
terms
of
how
Lots
can
be
combined
to
create
larger
Parcels
of
lots
for
development,
I
think
that
would
clarify
how
it
is
that
we
expect
Hilton
Head
Island
to
move
forward
in
terms
of
our
development
standards
and
so
I
ask
that
those
two
items
be
moved
to
the
January
17th
agenda
so
that
we
can
directly
begin
to
work
on
that.
Thank
you.
M
Yes,
sir,
if
I
could
just
ask
Sean
since
a
lot
of
comment
today
from
about
LMO
and
issues
with
subdivision
regulations
and
aligning
our
code
standards
with
really
I'd
say
community
expectations.
Would
you
spend
a
couple
seconds
to
Sean
talk
talk
more
specifically
for
Jonesville,
where
we
are
with
certain
subdivision
applications
also
talk
about
the
Jonesville
District
plan
and
some
pending
and
soon
to
be
kickoff
meetings
for
the
district,
as
well
as
LMO
amendments.
N
Yes,
sir,
thank
you
mayor,
council
manager,
others,
Happy,
New,
Year,
I'm
excited
for
2023
and
we're
going
to
hit
the
ground
running
for
the
edification
of
the
folks
in
the
room
and
who
are
watching
yes.
There
are
three
subdivisions
that
are
currently
in
process
along
Jonesville
Road,
Bailey's
Cove
subdivision
was
approved.
That
was
147
units
on
roughly
29
Acres,
a
density
of
right
around
five
five
units.
N
There
are
two
others
Twin
Oaks,
which
has
gone
through
the
Planning
Commission
and
tidelines,
which
which
has
two
phases
at
200,
224
and
234
Jonesville
Road,
those
two
subdivisions,
one
is
22
units
title
loans
combined
is
74
for
a
total
of
243..
N
N
We
plan
to
kick
off
the
Jonesville
District
plan.
Many
of
you
recall.
We
did
the
mid
Island
District
over
the
past
year,
or
so
that
was
probably
the
the
biggest
and
most
complex
District
that
we
will
deal
with.
But
we
plan
to
kick
off
a
Jonesville
District
plan
in
January
talk
to
Consultants
about
accelerating
these
District
plans
so
that
we
can
move
forward
with
code
changes
and
other
things
that
need
to
be
in
place
soon.
Sean.
A
Can
I
just
ask
a
question:
real
quick,
clarify
January.
N
N
Yes,
sir
good
point:
we
will
start
this
month.
N
Shot
yeah
absolutely
well
one.
We
look
at
the
existing
conditions
and
development
levels
that
are
out
there
or
within
the
districts
where
there's
opportunities
for
development
to
still
occur.
But
it's
a
plan
for
like
Mark
mentioned
it's
a
plan
for
public
investment,
public
infrastructure,
it's
roads,
it's
open
space,
it's
drainage
is
establishing
expectations
for
development
potential
for
the
district.
So
for
Mid
Island
district
there
were
District
centers,
where
you
want
to
have
a
maybe
a
higher
level
of
intensity.
N
There
were
recommendations
for
the
historic
neighborhoods
on
how
to
calibrate
that
development
so
that
it's
more
consistent
and
what
we've
experienced
with
our
rm4
district
and
I
know.
Most
people
are
aware
of
it.
There's
a
sliding
scale
of
density
that
comes
with
total
acreage.
So
if
you
have
less
than
three
acres,
you
get
four
units
an
acre.
If
you
have
between
three
and
five,
you
can
get
six
units
an
acre
and
if
you
have
five
or
more,
you
get
eight
eight
units
per
acre
in
the
mid
Island
district.
N
There
was
a
recommendation
to
calibrate
that
those
entitlements,
so
there's
consistency
and
expectations
and
outcomes
for
the
mid
Island
district
and
I
expect
there'll
be
a
a
similar
recommendation
that
would
come
out
for
the
Jonesville
district
and
others
that
we
move
forward
on.
But
it's
a
plan
for
zoning.
It's
a
plan
for
development,
it's
a
plan
for
public
infrastructure
and
investment.
N
So
we
plan
to
kick
off
the
Jonesville
District
in
January.
We
also
are
engaged
right
now
with
some
LMO
amendments
that
have
moved
through
a
Planning
Commission,
a
sub
subcommittee
of
Planning,
Commission,
Planning
Commission
and
a
one
set
will
become
afford
a
public
planning
committee
here
late
this
month,
but
we're
working
through
a
a
complete
assessment
of
our
LMO
amidst
zone
or
LMO
is
a
combination
of
subdivision
and
Zoning
code
sets
the
entitlements
and
expectations
for
development
in
the
community.
But
we
have
a
high
caliber
consultant.
N
That's
doing
a
complete
assessment,
comparing
our
LMO
against
our
plan
or
the
town's
comprehensive
plan
which
outlines
expectations
from
the
community
as
it's
a
public
process.
We
plan
to
have
a
intense
strategic
planning
session
this
January
later
in
a
couple
and
in
a
couple
two
three
weeks
we're
trying
to
get
that
finalized.
N
But
with
the
LMO
amendments
we
will
be
looking
at
zoning
the
entitlements.
We
will
look
at
the
subdivision
regulations
that
currently
exist
and
where
we
can
improve,
we
know
we
can
improve
we'll
look
at
site
design,
building
design
parking,
we've
already
evaluated
our
traffic
impact
analysis,
provision
of
our
code
and
we'll
be
making
some
changes
recommending
some
changes
as
we
move
forward.
With
these
code
amendments
re-evaluate
reevaluating
our
tree
standards,
our
stormwater
ordinance,
open
space
provisions
and,
starting
today
our
new
short-term
rental
ordinance
went
into
effect.
N
We
weren't
flooded
out
of
the
gates,
but
we've
got
activity,
but
we
need
to
have
an
assessment
of
short-term
rental
effects,
island-wide
and
Within
These
districts
to
understand
where
additional
code
Provisions
need
need
to
be
made.
So
we
are
I'm
I'm
excited
because
we're
finally
to
the
point
where
we're
making
meaningful
Headway
diving
in
strategically
and
we'll
make
progress
on
the
rest
of
these
District
assessments
and
to
develop
this
hollowed
master
plan
that
we
can
all
be
proud
of,
which
will
lead
to
code
changes
in
the
LMO
and
and
meet
the
expectations.
A
Thank
you,
Sean
I'd
like
to
deviate
just
for
a
second
and
and
ask
any
council
members
if
they
have
any
comments
to
that.
So
the
public
knows
where
you
stand
with,
with
the
issues
that
they
see
and
what
Sean
just
said.
Yes,
Glenn.
O
First
of
all,
the
issues
that
have
been
raised
here
are
very
serious
to
us
in
terms
of
our
Island
character.
I
know
that
our
friends
citizens
here
are
sincere
in
their
concerns,
they're,
not
just
picking
on
developers
and
so
I
want
to.
Let
you
know
that
in
fact
we
are
hearing
you,
then
I
would
ask
that.
N
We
well
we've
outlined
a
path
six
to
nine
months,
to
go
through
all
the
district
assessment,
the
code
assessment
and
to
bring
forward
recommendations.
I
know
it
sounds
like
a
long
time,
but
it's
really
a
fair
assessment
of
the
time
frame
needed
to
do
these
and
do
them
right.
The.
N
No
sir,
not
specifically
on
each
step,
we
will
outline
the
time
frame
for
each
one
of
these
districts
that
we
that
we
have
and
begin
defining
the
districts
establishing
a
time
frame
for
each
one,
but
collectively
for
all
of
these
at
six
to
nine
months.
Is
our
push
to
get
this
done.
P
Sir,
thank
you
mayor,
I,
appreciate
very
much
that
the
mayor
allowed
us
time
for
us
to
discuss
these
development
pressures.
It's
it's
been
on
my
mind
for
five
years.
In
fact,
I
think
since
I
walked
on
the
beach
and
looked
at
Resort
District
in
2015.,
so
I'm
I'm
happy
to
be
at
the
table
now
to
try
to
help
out
and
I'm
glad
that
we're
going
to
move
with
all
deliberate
speed,
which
is
what
I
hope
and
expect
that
we
will
do
I.
Think.
P
In
the
meantime,
we
need
to
assure
the
residents
that
we
are
doing
something
and
what
can
we
do
in
interim
time
and
I
think
we
need
to
look
at
some
of
our
options
during
that
time.
Certainly
the
staff
has
changed.
The
tan
manager,
through
his
staff,
has
changed
the
review
processes
so
that
we're
more
careful
in
what
we're
looking
at
and
is
keeping
the
Town
Council
informed
about
permits
being
issued
and
under
consideration.
P
I
also
want
to
hear
we've
heard
about
Jonesville
from
the
staff,
but
what
about
15
Wimbledon
Court
and
what,
if
anything,
is
going
on
there?
What's
the
status
of
that
project,
we
heard
a
report
before
the
Planning
Commission
I
was
there
in
December
when
that
report
was
made
I'm
very
concerned
about
the
intensity
of
that
project.
As
a
member
of
the
bike
walk
board
I'm
looking
over
at
Mr
Alfred,
we
served
on
that
together.
P
Q
Mr
Brown
yeah
sure
thank
you,
Mr
Mayor
Sean.
Thanks
for
the
update
the
six
to
nine
month
time
period,
I
think
it's
very
important.
We've
gone
through
the
mid
Island
District
planning,
which
threatened
me
if
I'm
wrong
took
a
little
bit
longer
than
that
I'm
glad
to
know
that
Jonesville
is
next
right,
very
sensitive
area
under
a
lot
of
pressure
right
now
and
next
up,
the
bat
is
absolutely
appropriate.
Q
I
would
just
add
to
the
community
that
we
stay
engaged
outside
of
the
hour
meeting
that
we
are
requesting
with
Mr
Ames
and
his
committee,
because
that
District
planning
is
just
that
the
end
result
of
that
should
reflect
the
expectations
coming
from
the
neighborhood
okay.
So,
let's
roll
about
sleeves
together
and
make
sure
that
this
District
plan
is
appropriate
for
that
area.
It's
not
just
one
meeting.
Q
A
E
Well,
Sean
I'm
impressed
that
you've
got
a
plan
moving
forward
relatively
promptly
and
quickly
on
that
and
I
appreciate
that
very
much
one
question
you
mentioned
that
there
were
three
subdivisions
in
Jonesville
and
one
has
already
been
approved,
am
I
correct
in
assuming
that
the
project
that
you're
working
on
will
affect
the
other
two,
but
not
the
one,
and
is
there
anything
that
can
be
done
with
respect
to
the
one
that's
already
approved.
N
N
There
was
a
couple
specimen
or
a
few
specimen
trees
that
weren't
identified
correctly
on
the
survey,
and
so
we
are
not
authorizing
a
pre-clear
of
that
property
until
mitigation
plan
and
other
things
are
rectified.
There.
We've
also
asked
for
a
few
other
improvements
that
are
part
of
that.
That
property
are
part
of
that
subdivision,
but
the
subdivision
has
been
approved.
N
The
tidelines
and
Twin
Oaks
are
both
in
different
stages
of
review.
The
Twin
Oaks
came
before
Planning
Commission
and
in
in
November,
and
we
went
through
the
Planning
Commission
our
expectations
and
and
and
comments
back
to
the
applicant
and
and
had
the
Planning
Commission
provide
input
as
well.
The
tidelines
is
two
phases
and.
N
L
Thank
you
just
a
couple
of
things
that
I
wanted
to
address
and
I'm,
not
sure.
There's
really
questions
in
here.
I've
asked
for
the
two
items
to
be
put
onto
the
agenda
six
to
nine
months.
Well,
it
may
not
seem
long
and
I
understand
the
processes
that
we
go
through
in
terms
of
government.
This
meeting
then
the
after
then
the
on
and
on
but
six
to
nine
months.
L
Along
with
that,
and
because
of
the
Forward
Motion
in
making
these
changes,
I
wonder
and
I
would
ask
our
legal
counsel
to
advise
us
as
to
whether
or
not
a
pending
ordinance
Doctrine
could
be
put
in
place
with
regard
to
any
future
development
there
that
isn't
consistent
with
what
our
plans
are
as
we
as
we
work.
Those
out
and
I
just
want
to
be
clear.
That
sliding
scale
was
exactly
what
I
was
talking
about,
and
so,
rather
than
leaving
that
hanging.
D
D
Certain
development
developers
have
come
into
this
community
and
have
used
their
practices
from
other
communities
to
develop
here
on
Hilton
Head
and
those
two
are
in
direct
conflict
of
one
another.
There
is
not
preservation
of
natural
vegetation
or
trees,
there's
a
lack
of
sensitivity
to
drainage.
They,
you
can
do
six
or
eight
dwelling
units
per
acre
in
a
cluster
kind
of
development
and
preserve
trees
and
have
an
end
product.
That
makes
sense
we're
not
getting
that
in
a
sense.
D
D
D
D
We've
been
trying
to
do
that
now
for
years
and
we
only
get
deeper
into
the
tar
baby's
tar
and
so
I
think
what
the
town
manager
is
doing
and
what
this
council
is
trying
to
accomplish
is
to
take
a
step
back
to
understand
the
bigger
picture.
So
we
understand
where
we're
going
to
end
up
the
public
planning
committee
will
meet
with.
You
is
looking
forward
to
meeting
with
you,
but
I
think
it's
important
also
for
members
of
the
community
to
work
with
us
with
the
time
frame
that
we
have.
D
A
A
I
want
to
thank
you
again
for
giving
us
the
time
to
spend
a
little
extra
on
this,
and
especially
to
the
to
the
council
members.
It
wasn't
on
the
agenda,
but
I
think
it's
important
that
we
have
these
conversations,
so
you
know
where
we
are,
because
we're
only
as
good
as
you
are
so
I
would
like
to
turn
it
over
to
the
town
manager
to
open
the
discussion
on
the
land
acquisition
program.
Thank.
M
You
mayor,
council
and
first
I
sort
of
said,
Happy
New
Year
to
everyone
as
well
so
good
to
see
everybody
back
here.
Sean
has
put
together
a
presentation
there
aren't
that
many
slides,
but
really
the
intent
is
to
go
through
a
labor
of
love.
Would
you
call
it
Sean?
M
N
Thanks
again
Mark
mayor
and
Council
yeah,
this
has
been
on
all
hands
on
deck
Endeavor.
For
for
a
while,
the
town
owned
property
has
been
a
very
successful
program
over
the
course
since
the
town
was
incorporated,
but
we
have
not
modernized
as
a
tool
for
an
asset
management.
Until
here
recently,
we've
had
everything
in
files,
and
so
every
time
someone
asked,
what
can
you
do
with
the
property
or
what
was
the
property
purchased
for?
What
the
press
release
say?
N
We'd
have
to
dig
through
the
files,
and
it
was
well
it
ate
up
a
lot
of
time
in
your
day
and
what
I
always
appreciated
me
was.
It
might
get
a
question
about
the
same
property
three
months
apart
and
you
just
have
to
go
back
and
take
a
look
through
the
file.
So
anyway,
I
have
a
brief
presentation
and
we'll
get
to
the
dashboard,
but
we've
taken
all
of
the
Town
owned
property
files
and
digitized.
It
add
it
to
database
and
the
idea
here
is
to
have
a
tool.
N
So,
to
summarize,
there's
over
300
properties
in
the
town's
inventory
there
aren't
300
Acquisitions
as
several
Acquisitions
involve
more
than
one
property,
but
there's
over
300
properties
in
the
inventory
there's
over
2
000
Acres
total
now
I'm
going
to
say
that
a
big
chunk
of
that
600
plus
acres
are
development
rights
and
a
big
chunk
is
in
on
the
mainland.
As
you
can
see,
it's
Alan
Ulmer
tract
that
property
was
programmed
for
a
hundred
acres
of
commercial
development
and
about
5
000
residential
units.
N
So
the
town
partnered
on
this
acquisition
of
development
rights
to
take
that
development
potential
out
of
play.
Would
you
imagine
another
5
000
units
right
there
as
you
come
off
Island,
especially
this
is
before
the
Bluffton
Parkway
was
there,
and
so
the
town's
been
active
on
island
and
also
off
Island
and
buying
or
or
buying
land
or
development
rights
for
over
2
000
acres
and
the
town
over
time
is
invested
over
150
million
dollars
in
the
land
acquisition
program.
N
The
down
the
town
does
have
a
land
acquisition
program
that
guides
decision
making.
As
you
move
through
on
criteria
for
reviewing
properties,
how
you
buy,
how
you
sell
the
role
of
council
and
the
attorney
funding
sources,
acquisition
procedures,
and
it
applies
to
all
types
of
acquisition,
easements,
right
of
way
and
purchase
and
sell
a
property.
The
land
acquisition
manual
was
adopted
last
opted
in
March
of
2002
and
it
was
amended
in
in
October
of
2005
and
has
served
as
the
manual
since
that
time.
N
To
keep
the
program
guidelines
are
summarized
here,
but
when
the
town
established
a
land
acquisition
program,
these
were
the
key
points
of
concern.
So
one
address
traffic
congestion
by
reducing
development
potential,
especially
in
strategic
locations
and
again,
I.
Think
that's
why
the
off
Island
Ulmer
track
was
was
important,
preserve
open
space
and
you
set
up
quality
of
the
community
along
major
roads.
N
Now
the
town's
comprehensive
plan
has
been
written,
Rewritten
and
adopted
many
times
since
the
beginning
of
the
land
acquisition
program.
But
the
currently
adopted
comprehensive
plan
is
the
one
that
prevails
during
any
acquisition
at
that
time
and
then
the
final
one
was
the
place
restrictive,
covenants
on
property
or
portions
of
property
and
resell
where
appropriate,
and
the
idea
was
that
it
would
be
a
program.
N
N
There
was
a
bond
issue
for
land
acquisition
in
1990,
the
town
adopted
the
real
estate
transfer
fee,
and
you
can
see
later
this.
Last
year
the
real
estate
transfer
fee
was
extended,
Beach
preservation
fee
was
established
in
1993,
and
then
there
were
subsequent
Bond
referendums
voted
on
by
the
the
citizens
of
Hilton
Head.
N
For
for
these
different
Bond
referendums,
you
can
see
them
in
97,
98,
2000
2003
and
the
last
Bond
referendum
in
two
thousand
and
eight,
we
established
a
tax
increment,
Finance
District
as
a
result
of
District
plans
and
District
plans
were
bridged
to
the
beach
which
was
across
Island
from
the
Cross
Island
Bridge
down
to
caligny.
It
was
Matthew
Chaplin
and
Stony
area,
Mid,
Island
or
Matthews
Matthews
and
Chapel
in
Mid
Island
in
the
Stony
area
on
the
North
End.
N
Those
three
District
plans
were
melded
together
to
create
one
TIF
district
with
three
sub
areas,
but
they've
been
used
for
land
acquisition.
N
As
part
of
that,
we
use
the
Tiff
funding
for
the
acquisition
of
the
property
where
the
uscb
facility
is
on
Office,
Park
Road,
and
then
you
can
see
the
Tiff
was
established
in
1999
for
15
years
and
it
was
extended
in
2014.
for
another
10
years,
and
so
this
makes
up
sort
of
the
composition
of
funding
sources
that
we've
utilized
for
land
acquisition.
N
N
N
Okay,
so
this
is
where
I'm
going
to
spend
a
biggest
chunk
of
the
time.
Okay,
we've
talked
about
this
funding
source
the
year
it
was
enacted
and
out
here
we
can
also
see
the
the
dollar
figure
that
went
along
with
that
funding
source,
but
I'm
going
to
go
through
this,
because
I
think
it's
very
important
to
understand
the
the
purpose
and
intent
for
each
one
of
these
funding
sources.
So
in
1989
it
was
bondage
issue
to
repay
the
1998
bond
to
expand
beach
access
and
parking
facilities
and
other
purposes
approved
by
Town
Council.
N
This
was
primarily
in
the
in
the
Coligny
area
and
chaplain
area
that
1989.
N
P
P
You
thank
you
so
I
think
the
question
and
and
help
the
public
out,
so
the
source
of
the
funding
then
restricts
what
the
town
can
do
with
the
property
as
I
understand
it,
and
these
two
subsections
I
have
learned
subsection
a
deals
with
vacant
land
and
subsection.
B
deals
with
land,
that's
already
developed
or
purchasing
development
rights,
and
so
the
source
of
funds
is
real
estate
transfer
fee.
But
it
also
depends
upon
what
the
land
was
like
when
it
was
purchased
as
to
what
could
be
done
with
the
land.
Is
that
correct.
N
Well,
under
the
the
current
legal
opinion
that
was
delivered
here
in
the
last
year,
that
would
be
a
consistent
interpretation.
Okay
and
you'll
have
we'll
have
some
discussion
with
Council
and
executive
session
on
the
legal
opinion,
but
I'm
just
trying
to
read
the
plain
language
right.
P
But
I
think
it's
important
for
the
public
to
know
that
as
you're
talking
about
these
funding
sources
and
the
stated
purposes
that
that's
what
governs
what
the
town
can
do
with
the
land
and
the
future
is
based
upon
how
it
was
acquired
and
what
the
source
of
funds
were
and
and
as
as
a
retired
lawyer,
I
I,
just
love
reading
all
that
small
print
but
I
think
it's
important
for
the
public
to
understand
a
more
higher
level
concept
of
the
funding
as
you
go
through
this
so
I
think
that's
why
I
stopped
to
ask
the
questions
about
those
two
subsections
and
then,
when
you
go
through
the
various
Bond
referendums,
you
know
some
of
them
date
back
to
there's,
1989
and
I.
P
Think
it
might
be
helpful
to
know.
Is
there
any
of
that
money
left?
Probably
not
we're.
Probably
I
know
Mr
Troyer
sitting
there
and
he
said
no
ma'am
we're
paying.
We
paid
off
some
of
those
and
some
of
those
were
still
paying
on
no
doubt
so.
I
think.
The
other
thing
to
know
is
that
if
the
town's
going
to
look
at
acquiring
property,
we
don't
have
any
that
Bond
referendum
money
left
to
buy
that
with
so
I.
P
N
N
Right
any
other
questions
on
real
estate
transfer
fee
I'll,
move
on
to
the
next
one,
so
the
next
five
that
are
listed
are
all
Bond
referendum
in
97
was
the
first
voter
approved
Bond
referendum
for
land
acquisition
and
include
purchase,
purchasing,
developed
and
undeveloped
land
in
the
town
for
the
public
use
or
use
as
a
management
of
growth
and
development,
public
facilities,
passive
and
active
Parkland
and
preservation
of
historic
sites.
N
The
second
referendum
in
1998
was
slightly
different,
but
for
land
acquisition
for
similar
purposes,
an
acquisition
for
lands
for
management,
growth
and
development,
public
facilities,
passive
and
active
Parkland
and
preservation
of
historic
sites,
furthers
the
goals
of
this
Council
and
all
proceeding
councils
and
is
consistent
with
the
goals
of
the
91
1991
comprehensive
plan.
So
it
added
that
provision
that
linked
it
to
the
comp
plan
on
that
second
referendum.
N
The
third
in
bond
referendum
in
2000
was
the
same
as
the
the
language
I.
Just
read
you
in
1998,
so
I
won't
repeat
that
in
2003,
the
fourth
voter
approved
Bond
referendum
again
similar
purposes
and
I
won't
go
through
that
in
2008.
There
was
a
slight
change
to
the
wording
in
the
2008
Bond
referendum
again
similar
purposes.
O
I
think
that
it
should
be
emphasized
here
that
most
of
these
funding
sources
are
to
restrict
the
use
of
the
land,
to
preserve
it
as
open
space
to
preserve
it
as
green
space
and
not
allow
for
the
development
of
it.
People
don't
understand
that
they
say
the
town
owns
all
of
this
land.
We
do,
but
there
was
a
promise
made
to
the
citizens
that
when
we
spend
your
money
on
this,
we
are
preserving
it
so
that
it
will
not
be
further
developed
as
it
moves
forward.
O
So
I
think
it's
important
that
people
understand
that
with
some
emphasis
and
then
I
have
some
experience
with
conservation,
easements
and
development
rights
and
I
want
to
make
sure
everyone
understands
what
we're
talking
about
here.
The
development
right
is
the
right
to
do
a
particular
type
of
development.
So
if
you
hold
land,
that
is
a
hundred
acres
and
you
can
do
one
unit,
one
house
per
acre
and
the
town
comes
to
you
and
says
we
don't
want
that
much
development.
O
There
you
buy
some
of
those
development
rights,
the
ability
to
put
units
so
that,
after
you
do
that
they
can
do
less
development
on
the
property,
but
the
property
is
worth
less
and
that's
the
reason
you
have
to
make
a
payment
to
the
owner.
The
owner
continues
to
own
that
property
and
can
develop
it
with
its
restricted
development
rights
in
place.
Thank
you.
N
So
the
five,
the
five
most
recent
referende
last
one
in
2008
of
79
million
dollars.
N
N
Think
we
can
paint
those
a
certain
color
I've
got
every
shade
of
green
I
think
you
can
imagine
up
on
this
slide,
but
it
would
be
helpful
if
the
if
that
is
the
Restriction
from
the
funding
source
and
it's
agreed
upon
by
Council,
then
we
we
put
those
in
preservation,
the
ones
that
we
don't
think
could
be
or
should
be
used
based
on
on
the
funding,
source
or
or
other
site
constraints.
P
Sean
I'm,
sorry
to
interrupt
again.
Do
we
presently
have
a
map
on
the
town's
website,
showing
all
these
properties
and
the
source
of
funding
for
the
properties.
N
N
The
the
we
do
have
a
town
old
property
map
and
it
was
it's
coated
based
on
different
types
of
views,
beach,
Parks,
Parks
conservation
areas
and
yes,
it
is
on
the
town's
website.
What
I'm
hopeful
that
we
move
toward?
Is
this
dashboard
approach,
Hub
and
dashboard,
where
it's
a
tool
that
you
can
get
the
information?
That's
in
the
background
and
not
just
see
the
color,
that's
on
the
map,
but
yes,
absolutely
it'd,
be
great
mayor.
P
Another
question:
I'm.
Sorry:
oh,
look
ahead!
While
you're
talking
about
funding
sources
it
the
the
first
slide,
you
showed
the
man
of
acreage
that
the
town
owns
and,
and
you
show
different
funding
sources
here,
where
any
of
those
properties
purchased
with
other
funding
sources
such
as
general
fund,
Capital,
Improvement,
money,
storm
water
fees,
any
of
those
properties
purchased
by
other
funds
lines.
P
N
B
L
We
have,
over
the
last
few
years,
received
advices
from
our
Council
and
from
the
agency
that
does
the
the
bonding
for
us
to
Define
And,
to
clarify
where
those
combined
property
purchases
of
different,
whether
it
was
a
bond
or
whatever
the
case
may
be
so
that
we're
more
specific.
So
it's
not
as
black
and
white
as
just
it
was
bought
with
this
money,
and
you
can
do
these
things
for
it.
N
All
right
we're
coming
one
next
slide,
just
a
couple:
other
funding
sources,
Beach
preservation,
fee
planning,
execution
of
beach,
renourishment
projects
and
maintenance
of
the
beaches,
doing
restoration
projects
such
as
wind,
fencing
or
doing
fencing
and
planting
of
Sea
Oats
and
other
grasses
buying
a
property
for
public
beach
access
in
the
town
of
maintaining
the
same
Capital
Improvements
to
Beach
Parks,
including
the
enumerated
items
and
similar
things
that
may
not
be
expressly
stated
property
purchased
for
public
beach.
N
Access
is
limited
to
that
use
and
then
the
tax
increment,
Finance
districts
and
funding
were
to
implement
Tiff
projects
in
the
sub-districts.
As
I
mentioned,
Pope
on
Palmetto
Bay
was
affectionately
known
to
his
bridge
to
the
beach
and
then
Matthews
chaplain
initiative
area
and
then
Stony
initiative
area
were
all
stitched
together
as
one
TIF
district
with
those
three
sub-districts
and
then
back
to
councilman
Bryson's
question
other
funding
sources.
N
You
can
see
Grant
CIP,
general
fund
tax
revenue,
storm
water,
utility,
Hospitality
tax
summer
donations,
some
have
been
exchanges
and
then
some
are
joint
ownership
and
I.
Think
we've
cleared
up
a
couple
of
those
here
recently
with
agreement
with
the
county
on
some
on
some
swap,
but,
and
you
can
see,
this
is
a
property
that
was
in
chaplain
that
had
development
upon
acquisition
and
it's
been
restored
to
open
space.
N
It
provides
Marsh
views
and
open
space,
so
just
throwing
that
that
picture
in
there
so
we're
getting
close
I,
don't
know
if
we
have
a
drum
roll
Ben,
but
I
think
you
were
in
charge
the
town
owned
dashboard
right,
so
we've
transitioned
from
the
old
paper
file
to
a
modernized
asset
management
tool.
N
The
database
has
a
lot
more
information
contained
within
it,
but
the
categories
that
you
see
on
the
left
side,
acreage,
land
use,
Theta,
acquired
purchase,
price
funding,
source
restrictions,
development
potential
and
development
potential
I
was
a
caveat
because
it
can
be
private
and
or
public
development.
N
The
Town
Council
has
it
has
its
discretion
the
ability
to
develop
any
of
the
properties
they
own
for
the
intended
public
purposes,
but
there's
there's
a
small
subset
that
they
could
develop
both
publicly
or
privately
or
in
combination
and
we'll
get
to
that
in
a
second.
But
zoning
and
notes
on
the
acreage
and
then
the
parcel
the
pin
number
the
identification
number
any
questions
on
on
that.
O
N
N
More
water
in
that
cooler,
next
to
you,
okay,
okay,
yeah
sure,
summary
of
current
land
use
based
on
the
acquisition.
Oh
thank
you
just
to
try
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
breakdown
of
how
the
town
hall
property
has
been
utilized.
N
Five
percent
of
town
properties
have
been
used
for
government
facilities.
Now,
that's
not
Parks.
Okay,
those
are
Town
Hall,
the
fire
stations
fire
and
rescue
headquarters
and
the
town
leases
property
to
the
county
for
the
library,
and
so
it's
a
government
facility,
but
that's
the
use
of
the
property
public
spot
public
park
comprise
28
of
the
Town
owned
Town
land
Holdings
open
space,
another
33
between
those
two
that's
61
percent
development
rights
are
29
percent.
N
So,
if
you,
if
you
were
to
take
out
the
development
rights,
that
percentage
of
open
space,
Park
and
conservation
really
would
inflate
but
development
rights
29,
we
don't
have
fee
simple
ownership
to
that,
but
we
do
have
interest
in
the
property
and
then
conservation
preservation.
Those
are
properties
that
actually
have
a
conservation
restriction
on
the
property,
and
so
there
may
be
others
that
are
classified
as
open
space.
That
Council,
as
we
move
through
through
this
evaluation
and
some
next
steps,
feel
that
it's
appropriate
to
place
those
same
restrictions
on
the
property.
N
P
D
P
N
So,
based
on
the
legal
review
and
I'm,
not
we're
not
going
to
go
through
in
detail
what
that
is
until
Council
legal
council
can
Council
Council
right,
but
in
applying
the
legal
opinion,
the
funding
source,
the
purpose
of
those
funding
sources,
the
the
properties
within
the
asset,
the
town
hall,
property
assets
that
would
that
would
have
some
potential
development
for
public
and
or
private
use.
N
Miss,
brightson
and
I
also
want
to
say
that
some
Pro
some
properties
have
some
private
covenants
and
restrictions
and
where
we
knew
of
those
we've
applied
it
to
the
dashboard.
N
So
it's
not
to
say
that
there
was
potential
there
when
there
wasn't,
and
so
we've
also
modernized
the
nomenclature
for
the
properties
so
that
they
made
more
sense
now,
Sony
one
two
three,
you
know
they're
in
Stony
and
we'd
have
to
click
on
them,
but
the
list
on
the
right
were
the
properties
that
fall
out
of
the
evaluation.
P
I'm
sorry
I
guess
apologize
mayor,
I
have
a
lot
of
questions
today,
but
when
you
say
those
are
selected
out,
what
does
that
mean?
Are
they
selected
out
from
development
potential
or
they
just
selected
out
from
the
town's
total
property
or
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
what
it
means?
Yeah.
N
So
if
we
apply
the
purpose
of
the
funding
sources
and
the
legal
review
that
was
done,
five
percent
of
the
town-owned
properties
have
some
development
potential,
again
public
and
or
private,
and
the
ones
that
are
listed
on
the
right
are
the
list
of
those
properties.
Developments
that
have
development
and
I'll
show
that
graphically
in
the
dashboard
in
a
minute.
But
yes,
that's
what
that
that
is.
R
I
I
have
had
similar
comments
over
the
last
few
weeks
and
what
really
helps
me
is
the
open
space.
Yes,
if
it
has
development
potential,
it's
development
potential
for
the
town
of
Hilton
Head.
It's
not
development
potential
for
economic
development
and
then
that
five
percent,
or
so
that
Sean
had
mentioned
is
that
could
be
something
that
would
have
a
private
development
partner.
N
This
represents
the
full-time
asset
inventory,
the
total
acreage,
which
includes
the
development
rights
that
we
talk
about
and
the
ability
to
identify
anyone
of
the
properties
by
its
updated
name.
So
you
can
see
the
homework
track
here.
The
development
rights
that
were
purchased.
You
can
sort
based
on
the
funding
sources,
and
so
you
can
see
every
funding,
source
or
combination
of
funding
source
that
was
used
for
land
acquisition,
and
so
you
could
identify
those
properties
that
have
real
estate
transfer
fee
so
and
so
forth
and
select
by
that
tool.
N
And
then
again,
the
application
of
all
of
this
is
to
to
boil
it
down
to
those
that
have
development
potential.
And
so
that's
what
this
map
represents.
N
This
is
an
application
of
the
funding
sources,
the
purpose
and
the
funding
source
and
the
legal
review
and
opinion
that
was
provided
to
it,
and
so
you
can
see-
and
we
can
zoom
in,
but
you
can
click
on.
So,
for
example,
we
have
the
North
Point
Property,
it's
currently
in
consideration
for
a
partnership
for
housing.
N
They
can
say
that
that
property,
the
source
of
funding
and
the
and
the
details
based
on
those
categories
that
were
that
I
identified
in
the
database
that
will
be
available,
but
you
can
click
on
any
one
of
these
and
get
that
same
detail
how
much
we
paid
for
it,
how
much
the
town
paid
for
it.
N
What
the
funding
source
was
zoning
and
an
additional
eight
notes.
You
can
see
some
of
the
larger
ones
here.
There
is
a
next
phase
to
this
project.
As
I
mentioned,
we
applied
the
funding
source,
we
applied
the
legal
opinion,
there
are
some
and
we
applied
private
covenants
or
restrictions
that
we
knew
existed
next
step
is
application
of
environmental
constraints
such
as
Wetlands
will,
based
on
council's
Direction,
we'll
do
a
complete
Wetland
survey
to
make
sure
that
properties
that
are
part
of
the
land,
title
property.
I
N
Are
coded
correctly
from
a
from
an
environmental
standpoint
and
we
would
make
sure
that
we
represent
those
is
not
develop
a
potential
if
they
aren't
so
inclined
based
on
those
on
those
Wetland
or
environmental
restrictions,
and
as
we
move
forward
on
any
of
these,
there
might
be
some
due
diligence.
That's
needed
to
be
done
for
private
for
other
private
covenants
or
restrictions.
N
This
is
the
inventory
of
right
now
of
potential
and
gives
a
pretty
good
summary.
It
reduces
the
2000
Acres
or
at
least
the
13
1400
Acres
of
total
down
to
the
126
of
potential.
So
it's
about
10
percent
of
the
actual
land
Holdings.
If
you
take
out
the
development,
development
rights
and
again
I
expect
some
more
of
these
would
be
impacted
by
by
some
Wetland
or
environmental.
You
can
see
property
at
the
Headlands
of
Broad
Creek
I,
wouldn't
say
that
that's
a
really
good
property
for
development.
N
If
it's
not
restricted,
it
should
be,
and
you
can
see,
there's
some
others
along
the
Waterfront
and
so
I
think
that's
an
exercise.
We
need
to
have
councils
to
go
through
these
properties
and
identify
which
ones
they
believe
are
appropriate.
Based
on
this
evaluation
and
then
they're
they're
Collective
wisdom
on
whether
or
not
they
should
be
used
from
a
general
standpoint
and
moves
through
the
council,
that's
that's
it!
That's
all
I
have
for
the
presentation
and
the
dashboard
I'm
happy
to
zoom
in
and
out
of
anything
or
answer
any
questions
at
this
point.
Q
One
of
the
toughest
toughest
things
for
me
after
being
elected,
is
getting
accustomed
to
the
pace
of
government
and
I
got
to
tell
you
I'll
never
get
truly
accustomed
to
it,
but
I
wanted
to
out
loud
thank
Mr
Orlando
and
his
team,
because
one
of
the
first
things
that
I
got
after
Mr
Orlando
pretty
hard
on
was
what
do
we
have,
and
what
can
we
do?
Answer
that
question
so
I
commend
you
and
your
team
for
putting
together
this
product.
I
know
it's
taken,
oh
wow,
but
it's
done
now.
Q
So
I
commend
your
team
for
doing
this.
It
puts
us
as
a
council
in
a
better
position
to
have
qualified
conversations
around
where
we're
going.
Okay,
when
it
comes
to
land
acquisition
councils
before
us
have
set
a
precedent.
Obviously
was
spitting
150
million
dollars
on
land
acquisition.
The
question
now
becomes:
what
are
we
going
to
do?
Q
We've
got
the
tools
here
now.
What
are
we
going
to
do
so?
Thank
you,
Mr
land
on
your
team
for
job
well
done
with
this.
Thank
you
any.
D
Sean,
what
percent
of
that
last
group
that
you
showed
the
five
percent
potentially
developable?
What
would
you
say
is
wetlands.
N
That's
an
excellent
question:
I
know:
property
on
Old
Woodlands,
the
Headlands
of
Broad
Creek
are
a
couple
of
decent
sized
chunks.
I.
Would
let
me
throw
a
number
out
there.
I
would
say
at
least
a
third,
so
I
think
we're.
We
don't
go
from
126
down
to
80
ish.
D
And
my
reflex
is
that
we
ought
to
exclude
those
conceptually
as
to
what
we're
talking
about
yes,
sir
I'm
I'm,
very
interested
in
knowing
how
many
acres,
even
in
the
referendum
properties,
are
wetlands.
D
What
can
we
commit
to
on
this
island
to
preserve
hydrology
and
drainage
and
so
on
and
so
forth?
So
it's
I
think
that's
important
and
it
also
plays
into
perhaps
some
enhancements
in
some
areas
to
allow
the
public
to
access
some
of
this
property
and
actually
get
to
a
place.
What
the
Island
used
to
be
and
and
I
I
I
walked
on
the
new
Shelter
Cove
pathway.
D
This
last
weekend
it
was
completed
last
year,
Shelter
Cove
obviously
had
its
Park
and
so
on
developed
a
few
years
ago,
but
this
just
opened
up
from
there
up
to
the
creek.
The
little
slew
and
I
would
say
that
the
town
has
done
an
exceptional
job
in
providing
places
for
the
public
to
appreciate
what
a
marsh
is
of
you
and
have
the
exercise
that
comes
as
a
bonus
and
so
I
would
encourage
everybody
in
the
room
to
go
down
to
Shelter
Cove.
Take
that
walk.
D
D
So
we
as
Citizens
have
to
make
sure
that
we
are
appreciating
on
our
own
what
it
is
we're
trying
to
preserve.
So
we
have
to
access.
We
have
to
put
ourselves
in
the
place
where
those
things
are
offered
and
I
would
just
encourage
the
town
to
be
looking
at
that
1200
1300
Acres,
that
is
off
limits
for
development,
but
can
be
an
enhancement
for
this
community.
D
I
would
also
like
to
say
that
the
comment
about
Stoney
I
think
needs
to
be
connected
to
what
the
town
has
established
for
Stoney's
benefit
and
perhaps
some
other
areas
of
the
island,
and
that
is
the
Development
Corporation
that
gives
the
town
and
the
citizens
and
owners
of
property
the
opportunity
to
do
something
that
hasn't
been
done
before
and
I.
Think
when
we're
talking
about
all
the
land
that
the
town
owns
in
Stony,
we
have
to
connect
it
to
the
Development
Corporation,
because
there's
a
real
opportunity
to
do
something
there.
Thank
you.
P
Thanks
council
member
Ames,
I
Echo
his
sentiments,
it
is
interesting
to
look
at
the
Marshland.
You
know
compared
to
you
know
we
always
think
about
the
beaches
and
and
Broad
Creek
and
and
other
water
areas,
but
but
the
Marshland
is
important
to
protect
and
you
have
to
listen
to
Captain
Amber
talk
a
little
bit
about
Marshland
to
understand
that.
But
I
think
that
is
helpful.
P
You
know
just
my
comment
earlier:
I
wasn't
being
facetious,
but
I
think
different
color
coding
would
be
helpful
just
because
shades
of
green
I
mean
you
know.
I'll
pick
on
my
husband.
If
you
ask
him
to
go,
get
green
socks
out
of
the
drawer
I,
don't
know
what
he
would
come
out
with,
but
there's
shades
of
Shades
of
Black
they're
shades
of
brown,
they're
shades
of
green
and
I
think
it
might
be
good
to
have
a
little
contrast.
P
A
little
bit
at
you
know,
folks,
looking
on
a
computer
screen
at
home,
but
I
do
think
it
would
be
helpful
for
us
to
know
a
little
bit
more
as
well
about
the
land
that
is
not
developed.
I
think
you,
you
you're,
showing
us
particularly
those
potential
for
development
today,
but
I
guess
you
have
a
similar
dashboard
for
other
properties.
N
Yeah,
if
you,
if
you
collect,
if
you
select
yes,
that
it
reduces
it
down
to
just
the
so,
you
can
see
on
the
top
left
the
total
acreage
and
the
extent.
So
all
these
properties
compiled
if
we
go
development
potential
and
just
hit
yes
I
see
it
reduces
it
down.
Just
to
those
that
kind,
I
would
say
Fallout,
but
we're
the
resultant
properties
that
have
the
potential
and
if
we
applied
councilman
aims,
suggestion
about
removing
some.
What
some
have
environmental
or
Wetland
right
concerns.
N
I
need
to
take
those
off
I
do
want
to
point
out,
because
Council
names
did
make
a
good
point
about
properties
that
have
then
protect.
Many
properties
have
been
protected.
North,
Northridge
property,
big
property
on
the
North
End
is
but
it's
protected
with
a
conservation
easement
there's
some
others
you're
calling
the
gut
on
the
south
end,
but.
B
N
D
Well,
I
think
that,
from
my
standpoint,
looking
at
the
acreage
that
is
restricted
from
development
ought
to
be
considered
in
two
ways:
one
possibly
Public
Access
of
some
kind,
so
that
public
can
appreciate
it
and
then
secondly,
classifying
some
high
percentage
of
that
property.
Forever
Wild,
let
the
habitat
exist,
let
the
subtropical
Forest
be
preserved,
so
I
think
that's
important.
L
David
I'm,
always
trying
to
bring
people
back
to
look
at
the
big
picture
and
all
of
the
details
and
elements
within
while
we're
talking
about
opening
up
areas
for
public
access
and
observation,
and
the
rest
I
think
that
if
we
truly
think
back
to
the
development
of
the
island,
that
it
is
those
natural
spaces
where
our
Wildlife
is
able
to
be
free
and
to
grow
and
and
flourish
and
I,
think
that
that
is
and
I
don't
want
to
say,
is
equal
I'm
going
to
put
it
actually
above
that
access
for
public
access
in
many
cases
that
we
preserve
that
land
for
our
birds
and
fish
and
alligators
and
the
like.
L
So
just
putting
that
detail
back
into
the
conversation
that
we
are
preserving,
not
only
the
Public's
view
of
the
island
but
oftentimes.
That
view
is
really
the
woods
the
trees
and
the
wildlife
and
Flora
that
the
people
of
Hilton
Head
have
come
to
expect
and
appreciate.
So
I
just
want
to
bring
us
back
to
that
detail.
D
The
first
is
in
1982
when
stack
attacks
was
being
built,
stack
of
shacks
is
the
Hilton
Head
Resort
now,
but
it
was
traumatic
for
Islanders,
because
we
saw
trailers
coming
onto
the
island
and
being
stacked
up
in
four-story
buildings
that
was
perceived
a
threat
to
the
value
system
and
character
of
this
island
and
that
spawned
the
public
outcry
for
control.
That's
what
created
the
incorporation
agenda
in
1983..
D
I
think
the
criteria
we
ought
to
be
establishing
beyond
what
has
already
been
established
in
earlier
programs
that
protect
and
expand
open
space
and
environmentally
sensitive
areas
would
be
to
provide
land
for
Workforce
housing,
repurpose,
underperforming
commercial
space
and
redistribute
buy
right
densities,
I.E
development
rights
and
I.
Think
if
we
added
those
three
items
to
what
we
have
already
in
terms
of
preserving
open
space
and
open
land,
we
would
begin
to
solve
some
of
the
issues
that
have
been
raised
today
and
our
Jonesville.
D
What
are
we
going
to
do
about?
Underperforming
commercial
commercial
has
gone
off
Island
by
and
large
those
buildings
are
going
to
have
to
be
dealt
with.
That's
going
to
take
money
as
well,
so
I
don't
know
how
much
money
it's
going
to
take
today,
but
I
do
know
that,
with
your
passion
and
enthusiasm,
because
you're
concerned,
you
feel
the
threat
in
Jonesville.
D
The
broader
community
is
going
to
have
to
feel
that
same
kind
of
threat
and
be
supportive
of
the
kind
of
commitment
that
Tom
people's
leadership
and
Council
had
back
in
the
90s
and
early
80s,
and
that's
a
big
ask
but
I
think
that's
where
we
are
today
in
this
community.
We
have
both
a
challenge
and
an
opportunity
to
make
a
significant
difference
to
what
this
island
is
going
to
be
that
if
we
don't
be
bold,
we
don't
want
to
think
about
where
it's
going.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
Thank
you,
David
Sean
I
know
thousands
of
hours
of
work
has
gone
into
this
and
for
everybody,
that's
had
a
hand
in
it.
Thank
you.
This
is
something
that's
been
needed
for
a
long
time.
It's
great
to
see
you
coming
out
now.
We
understand
that
it's
going
to
change
and
mold
a
little
bit
over
time,
so
everybody
bear
with
us
as
this
is
updated
and
and
tweaked
and
corrected
as
as
need
be,
but
but
thank
you
all
that
had
a
hand
in
doing
this.
Thank
you
is.
P
There,
a
motion,
I'm,
sorry
interrupt
you
again.
We
were
provided
with
this
land
acquisition
manual
and
Mr.
Mr
Ames
spoke
a
little
bit
about
criteria
in
there
and
part
of
this.
If
I
could,
for
just
a
moment,
has
a
couple
resolutions
where
the
Town
Council
established
criteria
for
acquisition
and
I
joined
Mr
Ames.
In
saying
we
need
to
broaden
that
criteria.
P
We
need
to
revise
that
criteria
and
I
have
some
other
ideas
to
add
to
that
and
if
we're
going
I
don't
know
I
know
we
need
to
move
to
Executive
session
to
discuss
other
matters,
but
I
think
we
need
to
talk
about
the
criteria
for
land
acquisition
before
we
decide
about
acquiring
land
and
I.
P
Q
That
was,
you
know,
I
wanted
to
add,
and
it's
the
pleasure
of
the
the
council,
I
guess
I'll
pass
this
on
to
a
town
manager.
We
will
be
meeting
in
a
few
weeks
at
our
strategic
planning
workshop
and
we
will
have
the
pleasure
of
laying
out
our
priorities
for
the
upcoming
year
and
I
joined
councilman,
Ames
and
councilwoman
Bryson
and
having
a
discussion
around
just
being
a
priority,
the
amending
so
to
speak,
of
our
land
acquisition
program
that
was
last
amended
in
2005.
The
the
environment
has
changed
so
to
speak.
Q
L
I
think
that
conversation
is
appropriate
when
it's
been
properly
noticed
to
the
public
that
it's
going
to
be
had,
so
that
all
voices
can
be
heard
so
that
we
have
an
opportunity
to
speak
to
our
constituents
and
the
residents
of
the
island
about
those
about
those
thoughts.
So
I
would
I
am
not
encouraged
to
do
that
today.
D
I
move
Council
go
into
executive
session
for
the
purposes
of
receiving
the
legal
advice
from
the
town
attorney
covered
under
attorney-client
privilege
related
to
the
town
of
Hilton
Head
Island
land
acquisition
program
to
discuss
the
negotiations
incident
to
the
proposed
sale
of
purchases,
property
referenced
from
1
to
15
in
the
agenda
and,
lastly,
to
received
legal
advice
from
the
town
attorney
on
matters
covered
by
the
attorney-client
privilege.
Bradley
Circle
subdivision
said.