►
From YouTube: Bellevue Council Meeting - October 4, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
D
E
G
H
A
D
Yes,
mayor,
thank
you.
D
Now,
therefore,
I,
on
behalf
of
lynn,
robinson
mayor
of
the
city
of
bellevue
washington
and
on
behalf
of
its
city
council,
do
hereby
proclaim
october
6
2021
as
bellevue
school
pool.
Walk
to
school
day,
I
encourage
everyone
to
consider
the
safety
and
health
of
children
traveling
to
and
from
school.
Today
and
every
day.
A
E
H
Now,
therefore,
on
behalf
of
the
mayor
of
the
city
of
bellevue
lynn,
robinson
washington,
and
on
behalf
of
the
city
council,
I
do
hereby
proclaim
the
month
of
october
2021
as
domestic
violence
action
month
in
bellevue.
I
urge
all
citizens
to
speak
out
against
domestic
violence
and
support
local
athletes,
including
those
by
lifewire,
an
agency
that
provides
domestic
violence,
survivors
support
from
housing,
to
legal
advocacy,
to
mental
health
therapy,
towards
preventing
and
ending
domestic
abuse
in
our
communities
and
increasing
publicly
aware
of
an
action
on
this
issue.
A
A
B
Yes,
thank
you.
Mayor.
We've
had
a
couple
of
withdrawals
from
the
pre-registered
list,
but
we
still
have
seven
speakers
this
evening
for
oral
communications,
and
with
that
I
will
call
the
first
speaker
who
is
mon
wig.
I
I
Thank
you.
This
is
mon
wig.
My
address
is
48-11
134th
place
southeast
bellevue.
We
want
to
thank
staff
and
council
for
all
their
continued
hard
work
on
east
main.
We
agree
with
council's
emphasis
on
delivering
housing
and
affordable
housing
in
east
maine.
We
also
agree
with
most
of
staff's
recommendations
in
option
b.
We
are
requesting
only
a
few
modifications
to
staff's
suggestions.
I
These
three
discussion
items
tonight
are
for
amerity
system
and
development
agreement.
Tonight
heartland
will
discuss
far
in
more
detail,
and
I
will
discuss
amenities
and
d.a
regarding
amenities.
The
draft
luca
awards
more
points
to
amenities
constructed
with
non-residential
development,
then
to
amenities
built
with
residential
development.
This
penalizes
residential
development,
especially
in
early
phases.
I
I
I
J
Okay,
honorable
mayor
members
of
the
council,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
provide
a
few
comments.
I'm
bill
thurston,
I'm
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
bellevue
club
wig
properties.
In
their
latter
dated
october,
2nd
has
provided
to
the
council
and
the
city
their
recommendations
to
support
the
vision
they
hope
to
create
for
the
commercial
area
of
the
tod.
J
We
support
those
recommendations.
In
particular,
they
are
recommending
raising
the
base
far
to
3.5,
for
non-residential.
Only
doing
so
will
make
these
areas
more
competitive
with
properties
north
of
maine,
because
other
costly
incentive
requirements
to
support
commercial
interest
would
not
be
required.
We
concur
with
this
the
re.
The
report
correctly
points
out
that
the
downtown
markets,
such
as
lincoln
square
and
other
developments,
can
attract
higher
rents
than
east
maine.
We
concur
with
this
for
commercial,
residential
and
hospitality
areas.
J
J
A
minimum
non-residential
base
far
3.5
is
needed
to
avoid
delaying
development,
which
would
also
delay
the
delivery
of
housing.
Our
vision
is
to
protect
the
club
we
have
today
and
enhance
this
to
support
a
larger
community
and
athletic
facility.
We
also
intend
to
provide
residential
accommodations
consistent
with
the
goals
of
this
district.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
K
My
name
is
lee
streier.
I
was
out
at
3620
southwest
holden
street
in
seattle,
washington,
I'm
a
senior
project
manager
for
heartland
llc,
a
real
estate
advisory
firm.
That's
worked
with
the
city
of
bellevue
many
times,
including
an
analysis
we
did
for
the
east
main
area.
A
few
years
ago,
we
were
engaged
by
weak
properties
to
perform
a
peer
review
of
the
eager
northwest
study
that
was
commissioned
by
the
city's
planning
department
to
assist
in
establishing
the
staff
proposed
far
limits
for
the
east
main
district.
K
The
current
staff
proposed
base
far
for
the
east
main
district,
is
2.5
for
non-residential
and
3.5
for
residential
with
a
max
far
of
5.0,
which
is
achievable
via
bonuses,
including
the
provision
of
open
space
and
affordable
housing
among
others.
In
effect,
this
max
fr
will
be
less
here
due
to
reductions
created
by
critical
areas
within
the
property
boundaries
to
arrive
at
the
recommended
base.
In
max
far,
the
equal
northwest
analysis
examined
a
series
of
potential
development
parcels
within
the
east
main
district.
K
These
parcels
assumed
development
blocks
that
averaged
approximately
60
thousand
square
feet
and
assumed
a
basic
level
of
urban
urban
infrastructure
in
place.
Such
as
streets
and
utilities
that
serve
these
development
blocks,
the
east
main
properties
do
not
have
this
base
level
of
infrastructure,
they're,
currently
large
super
blocks
and
the
cost
to
upgrade
infrastructure.
Up
to
this
base,
condition
assumed
in
the
eco
northwest
study
will
be
greater
than
50
million
dollars.
If
you
include
just
this
infrastructure
upgrade
cost
in
the
analysis,
the
minimum
far
needed
to
incentivize
redevelopment
would
be
approximately
3.5
for
non-residential
development.
K
Additionally,
by
setting
the
base
far
lower
than
adjacent
districts,
not
only
is
the
cost
of
the
infrastructure
an
issue,
but
now
additional
costs
must
be
incurred
just
to
raise
the
base
density
up
from
the
staff
proposed
far
2.5
to
the
adjacent
district-based.
Far
of
4.5,
this
added
cost
required
to
achieve
the
same
density
that
would
be
allowed
by
right
in
adjacent
districts.
K
Finally,
by
limiting
the
max
far
in
the
east
main
district,
which,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
would
be
effectively
4.7
due
to
the
presence
of
the
critical
areas,
the
city
would
be
capping
the
amount
of
housing
that
can
be
created
through
bonus
incentives
by
increasing
the
max
far
it
would
allow
for
a
more
vibrant
mixed-use
community.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
I
appreciated
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
you.
This.
L
Thank
you
good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
council
members.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak.
My
name
is
barbara
braun.
I
am
a
long
time
resident
and
run
my
business
in
bellevue.
L
L
We
cannot
wait
until
after
the
boom
times
to
address
tree
retention,
protection
and
health.
We
must
do
so
concurrently
with
the
development
bellevue's
tree.
Land
use
code
has
several
deficiencies
and
loopholes
that
are
allowing
too
far
too
much
tree.
Removal,
our
neighbors
to
the
north,
kirkland
and
redmond
share
our
tree
canopy
goal
of
40.
L
They
have
similar
tree
land
use
codes
that
are
more
stringent
than
bellevues.
Redmond
is
currently
updating
its
tree
canopy
goal
and
will
adopt
it
in
q1
of
2022
to
catch
up
quickly.
I
suggest
bellevue
adopt
verbatim
redmond's
updated
tree
code.
This
would
be
expeditious
and
ensure
eastside
consistency
on
rules
for
developers
and
property
owners.
L
B
B
N
First
of
all,
this
is
going
to
eat
into
my
time,
but
I
wanted
to
do
a
shout
out
charmaine
to
you.
I
think
the
the
email
that
you
sent
out
to
the
group
of
us
who
are
speakers
outlining
the
process
for
how
to
engage
in
this
speaking
exercise
today
was
was
excellent
and
I
think,
should
be
an
example
used
in
the
future.
So,
thank
you
very
much.
N
I
I
signed
up
to
express
a
concern
about
east
maine
with
respect
to
one
issue.
We've
been
working
on
this
as
mon
said
for
seven
years,
and
you
know
we
I
think,
we've
you
know,
we've
tried
to
get
to
predictability,
to
certainty
about
most
every
issues
and
we're
down
to
issues
of
height
and
far,
and
I
think
we
know
what
the
questions
are
here
about.
N
You
know
what
how
to
move
the
dial
to
trigger
extra
height
and
how
to
move
the
dial
to
trigger
extra
far
but
we're
in
a
position
now
where
it
looks
like
we're
going
to
have
to
move
these
off
to
the
development
agreement
process
right
the
future
and
what
I
think
my
advice
to
council
is:
let's
not
do
groundhog
day
here.
Let's
not
like
put
something
in
place
where
we
come
back
two
years
from
now
in
front
of
you
and
we're
trying
to
like
reinvent
something
from
scratch.
N
I
think,
on
the
on
the
height
issue,
it's
really
clear
that
we
have
sepa
work
to
do
and
that
there
are
benefits
to
the
height
issue
that
need
to
be
evaluated
from
iconic
building
size,
from
lower
heights
on
112th
and
from
earlier
development
of
of
housing,
on
the
east
of
the
west
side
of
the
site
and
likewise,
on
the
far
side,
I
think
there's
an
exchange
to
be
made
between
greater
far
and
housing
and
affordable
housing.
Just
like
there
is
downtown.
N
N
So
I
would
suggest
a
direction
to
staff
to
say
when
we
develop
this
development
agreement,
language
for
the
code
that
we
kind
of
create
some
sideboards
and
we
say:
here's
when
the
council
looks
at
these
development
agreements
in
the
future
of
this
development
agreement,
future
here's
kind
of
the
scope
of
benefits
we
should
be
looking
at,
so
that
we're
not
just
starting
this
process
entirely.
Over
again,
I
mean
we've
all
devoted
an
enormous
amount
of
time
and
effort
to
this
very
productively.
N
I
think-
and
I
think
this
will
help
us
in
the
future
kind
of
move
this
process,
along
with
the
kind
of
predictability
and
the
public
benefits
that
we've
already
identified,
that
can
be
achieved
here.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
your
time
tonight.
B
B
I
do
not
see
a
hand
that
is
the
end
of
our
pre-registered
list
for
oral
communications.
We
have
a
few
minutes
left
if
there's
anyone
connected
to
this
call
who
would
like
to
make
oral
communications,
please
use
the
raise
hand,
function
and
I
see
one
hand,
and
that
is
miss
dean.
Can
you
hear
me
misting?
O
Time
begins
now
great
thanks
so
much
good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
council
members,
construction
on
the
newport
hills,
neighborhood
park
is
supposed
to
begin
tomorrow,
and
I
spoke
to
you
on
september
7th
regarding
my
concern
that
our
park,
planner
included
18
to
21
parking
spaces
in
the
plans
which
contradicts
parking
needs
for
a
neighborhood
park,
as
defined
in
the
city's
2016
parks
and
open
spaces
system
plan.
O
O
O
You
stayed
silent
when
the
parks
board,
with
the
exception
of
board
members,
hamilton
and
heath,
opted
to
ignore
the
neighborhood
park
designation
and
the
result
was
a
park
plan
for
newport
hills.
That's
more
about
servicing
dog
owners
from
outside
our
neighborhood
than
the
recreation
needs
of
the
newport
hills
residents.
O
So
I
ask
again:
where
is
the
parking
study
referenced
by
the
park
planner
because
it
wasn't
in
any
of
the
documentation
that
he
presented
to
council
parks
boards
or
the
neighborhood?
How
is
the
need
for
18
to
21
parking
spots
at
a
neighborhood
park
determined
and
who's
he
building
those
parking
spaces
for?
Why
won't
you
ask
those
questions?
O
O
O
B
P
Okay,
thank
you.
I
wanted
to
mention
about
smart
water
meters.
I've
done
this
once
before,
but
I
thought
I'd.
Do
it
one
more
time
some
of
the
people
aren't
aware
of
a
site
called
electric
sense.
It's
called
lloyd
at
electricsense.com.
P
It
has
a
bunch
of
information
for
people
who
are
sensitive
to
emf,
such
as
myself,
and
also
I
found
out
from
harvest
harmonix,
which
is
the
company
that
set
up
a
coupling
on
the
irrigation
system
of
a
farmer
that
I
know
in
northeastern
washington
that
one
coupling
sends
out
electromagnetic
frequencies
that
are
healing
they're
called
kemanasi
waves
all
over
his
farm.
So
even
one
coupling
can
extend
through
acreage.
P
I
am
very
disturbed
about
the
idea
that
my
water
will
have
a
signature,
an
electromagnetic
frequency
signature.
The
other
thing
I
found
out
just
recently
was
that
harvestharmonics.com
sent
a
sample
of
their
electromagnetic
frequency
water
to
italy
and
it
retained
the
signature,
the
electromagnetic
frequency
signature
for
two
weeks
and
it
could
have
been
longer-
and
they
said
that
it
would
keep
that
signature
as
long
as
there
was
no
end
date
to
that,
it's
kind
of
like
homeopathic,
so
a
lot
of
you.
P
People
must
be
familiar
with
that
where
they
have
an
energy
signature,
these
little
pellets
that
you
put
under
your
tongue
and
they
are
treatment
for
a
lot
of
different
conditions.
P
These
treatments,
these
pellets,
hold
their
electric
signature,
their
energy
signature
forever.
So
doing
this
to
the
water
is
going
to
introduce
electromagnetic
frequencies
that
are
not
healing
5g
cell
phones
cell
towers.
All
that
is
not
healing,
so
we
are
actually
going
to
contaminate
our
water.
Now.
I
understand
the
reasons
why
we're
doing
this.
P
P
B
A
Thank
you
very
much.
We
are
on
to
the
report
of
our
city
manager,
and
I
think
mr
miyake
has
some
good
news
for
us
tonight.
G
G
The
first
one
is
a
good
news
story
to
share
with
the
council
on
an
outstanding
service
award.
We
recently
was
recently
given
to
a
member
of
our
city
attorney's
office,
with
that
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
kathy
gerlar
city
attorney
to
not
only
introduce
the
topic
but
also
to
introduce
the
employee.
This
is
very,
very
timely.
Given
the
you
know,
domestic
violence
month
proclamation
that
was
just
read
kathy.
Q
Thank
you,
mr
miyaki
good
evening,
mayor
and
council
members.
I
am
very
pleased
to
have
the
opportunity
tonight
to
let
you
know
about
the
award
that
was
received
by
the
city
of
bellevue's
domestic
violence,
prosecutor,
bri,
hopkins
and
brie
is
here
tonight
joining
me
and
in
a
few
minutes
I'll
turn
it
over
to
her
to
say
a
few
words.
Q
Given
that,
as
the
council
just
proclaimed,
it
is
domestic
violence.
Action
month,
as
the
councils
recognize,
domestic
violence
is
a
serious
issue
that
is
deserving
of
dedicated
attention
and
efforts,
and
that's
what
brie
has
done
throughout
much
of
her
professional
career.
She's
brought
dedicated
attention
and
efforts
to
resolving
domestic
violence
issues
for
most
of
her
career.
Q
She
specialized
in
handling
domestic
violence
cases
and
both
first
first
for
the
city
of
everett,
and
then
in
the
recent
past
for
the
city
and
currently
for
the
city
of
bellevue,
and
in
that
role
she
handles
all
of
bellevue's
domestic
violence
cases.
These
are,
as
you
might
imagine,
complex
and
difficult
cases
and
on
average
she's
responsible
for
handling
about
250
of
those
a
year.
She's
done
an
outstanding
job.
Q
To
social
workers
to
attorneys
and
others,
and
she
has
also
worked
on
state
legislative
efforts-
was
asked
to
serve
as
a
member
of
a
legislatively
established
task
force
to
assist
our
state
legislature
in
understanding
some
of
these
domestic
violence
issues
and,
finally,
bree's
been
very
active
in
wasana
itself.
She
served
as
a
board
member
and
for
a
number
of
years,
and
she
also
has
and
continues
to
significantly
contribute
to
osama's
mission
by
presenting
and
planning
a
number
of
educational
seminars
for
attorneys
on
domestic
violence
issues.
Q
So
in
summary,
this
award
is
a
well-deserved,
honor
and
recognition
by
brie's,
professional
peers
of
her
outstanding
contributions
on
these
domestic
violence
issues
and
again
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
be
able
to
recognize
her
and
share
that
information
with
you
this
evening,
and
so
with
that,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
bree,
to
say
a
few
words.
Q
R
You
kathy,
I
appreciate
the
kind
words
good
evening,
mayor
robinson
and
council
members
over
the
past
14
and
a
half
years.
I
have
devoted
much
of
my
worst
work
as
a
domestic
violence
prosecutor.
As
kathy
indicated,
I've
worked
in
bellevue
for
approximately
seven
years
prior
to
working
in
bellevue.
I
was
the
domestic
violence
prosecutor
for
the
city
of
everett
for
about
seven
and
a
half
years.
R
R
But
I
want
to
thank
each
and
every
one
of
you
for
the
recognition
here.
I
am
humbled
with
this
today
and
my
role
is
just
one
small
role
and
I
take
great
pride
in
the
work.
That's
been
done
and
left
to
be
done
in
the
city
of
bellevue.
Thank
you
again
for
the
recognition
today.
Well.
A
A
G
Sure,
mayor
and
council
members,
the
again
the
next
topic
under
the
manager's
report,
is
another
good
news
story
about
a
prestigious
award.
The
city
recently
received
from
the
city,
county
communications
and
marketing
association
with
that,
I'm
just
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
brad
harwood,
the
city's
chief
communications
officer.
Just
to
tell
you
about
the
award
brad.
S
Well,
thank
you,
city
manager,
miyaki,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
noon,
house
and
council
members,
I'm
here
today
to
share
with
you
some
excellent
news.
As
mr
miyagi
pointed
out
in
september,
the
city
of
bellevue
won
a
savvy
award
for
its
special
kovit
19
pandemic
issue
of
it's
your
city,
the
issue
for
your
reference
and
the
public's
can
be
found
in
the
council
agenda
packet
online.
S
S
So
this
special
fourth
2020
edition
of
insure
city
was
developed
at
a
time
when
residents
were
really
struggling
with
the
pandemics
shut
down.
All
the
implications
from
that
and
businesses
were
obviously
reeling.
S
The
printed
newsletter
was
also
aimed
at
residents
who
may
not
have
access
to
the
digital
channels
like
the
city's
web
page
or
twitter
feed,
so
copies
were
sent
to
every
address
in
bellevue.
Translated
editions
in
five
other
languages
were
also
available,
and
this
was
a
bellevue
first
for
it's,
your
city.
S
Neighborhood
outreach
contributed
crucial
articles,
human
services
and
econ
economic
development
gathered
useful
information
for
us
to
share,
and
the
diversity
team
led
the
charge
and
advised
on
translations
a
few
special
recognitions
worth
noting
ted
van
dyken
and
graphics,
actually
just
retired,
and
he
was
a
central
player
in
this
and
other
newsletters
and
making
them
look
professional
and
polished
our
it's.
S
Your
city,
editor,
claudioso,
makes
this
look,
makes
this
process
look
easy,
even
if
it's
a
special
edition
and
then
finally,
the
deputy
communications
officer,
michelle
degrand,
who
helped
guide
this
newsletter,
while
actually
I
was
away
on
family
leave,
so
well
done
team.
A
Well,
I
just
want
to
congratulate
staff
on
this
and
thank
you
brad
for
harwood
for
for
all
the
work
that
you
do
for
us
and
everybody
who
worked
on
this.
I
remember
this
edition
really
well
and
it's
just
amazing
when
I
look
back
on
it.
The
last
thing
that
we
said
on
one
of
the
columns
that
bellevue
is
strong
and
resilient
and
we'll
get
through
this
together,
and
indeed
we
have
and
continue
to
do
that.
So
thank
you.
G
So
many
council
members.
That
concludes
my
report
this
evening
and
I
hope
you
enjoyed
the
good
news
stories
this
evening.
Thank
you,
mayor
back
to
you.
A
Thank
you.
Okay,
on
to
the
consent
calendar
is
there
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent,
calendar.
A
Okay,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
any
opposed.
Okay,
we
have
two
study
session
items,
I'm
going
to
ask
that
we
take
a
break
between
them.
So,
mr
miyake,
would
you
like
to
introduce
the
first
one.
G
Yes,
mayor
the
the
first
topic
this
evening,
american
council
members
is
an
update
on
the
king
county
east
trail
framework
plan
for
wilburton
tonight's
study
session
will
provide
council
with
a
progress
update,
including
community
engagement
activities
that
occurred
during
the
summer
and
next
steps
for
the
wilburton
east
trail
framework
steering
committee
joining
us
this
evening.
Our
assistant
director
of
community
development
emile
king,
along
with
associate
planner
jay
bu,
as
well
as
mike
ingram,
our
senior
planner
for
the
transportation
department.
With
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
emil.
T
The
wolverton
segment
to
be
highlighted
tonight
will
add
to
our
mobility
options,
open
space
network
and
be
a
major
place
making
feature.
East
trail
also
furthers
a
key
theme
in
council's
2020
economic
development
plan.
Fostering
a
strong
economy
relies
on
greater
connectivity
between
people,
businesses
and
public
spaces,
and
east
rail
will
add
to
bellevue.
U
Thank
you
emile
good
evening,
mayor
robinson
members
of
the
council.
I
do
have
some
slides
and
I
will
now
activate
those.
Are
you
able
to
see
these
or
what.
A
U
Can
you
see
yes.
U
There
we
go,
I
think,
we're
now
now
we're
good,
so
tonight
we'll
provide
an
overview
of
this
east
rail
framework
plan
kind
of
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish
with
it,
and
why
we've
why
the
county
has
prioritized
this
and
and
why
the
city
is
collaborating
with
the
county
and
with
sound
transit.
U
We
will
share
with
you
the
kind
of
the
high
level
results
of
public
engagement
that
we've
conducted
for
the
last
couple
of
months
here
in
bellevue
and
then
we'll
describe
the
next
steps
for
the
way
forward
for
this.
This
process.
U
Before
we
get
into
the
details
of
the
plan,
I'd
like
to
just
step
back
a
moment
and
look
at
the
context
of
the
overall
east
rail.
It
is
a
a
former
rail
corridor.
It
stretches
for
42
miles
from
renton
in
the
south,
up
to
snohomish
county
with
a
spur
connection
down
to
redmond,
and
it
is
in
the
process
of
being
converted
into
a
trail,
as
emil
had
already
noted.
U
Some
recent
good
news.
Two
weeks
ago,
amazon
announced
a
contribution
of
seven
and
a
half
million
dollars
to
advance
the
rail
corridor,
including
five
million
dollars
to
round
out
the
budget
needed
for
the
rehabilitation
of
the
wilberton
trestle
and
another
two
and
a
half
million
dollars
to
construct
an
interim
trail
connection
from
the
north
end
of
the
trestle
to
the
northeast
state
street
bridge.
So
that
had
previously
been
an
unfunded
piece,
an
unfunded
need
and
now
that
that's
on
track
to
be
addressed
and
that
builds
on
earlier
contributions.
U
U
This
is
the
most
urbanized
area,
the
entire
42
mile
east
rail
corridor.
So
the
county
is
giving
this
particular
attention
and-
and
there
are
a
number
of
opportunities
here,
we'll
get
into
those
in
a
minute.
U
So
it's
about
a
lot
of
the
the
properties
in
in
this.
This
area,
as
well
as
connects
to
some
major
infrastructure,
so
the
planned
grand
connection
connects
to
the
israel
as
well
as,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
the
east
rail
drops
down
and
connects
right
at
the
wilbertons
eastlink
station
as
well.
So
it's
a
pretty
significant
component
of
kind
of
what
what
can
happen
in
the
wilberton
area.
U
So
in
terms
of
the
opportunities
we're
looking
at,
we
recognize
that
you
know
oftentimes
when
you
have
a
rail
corridor.
U
You
know
the
typical
pattern
is
that
buildings
turn
their
backs
to
the
corridor,
and
we've
all
seen
this
usually
looking
at
the
loading
docks
in
the
dumpsters
and
just
pulling
out
the
tracks
and
installing
a
trail
doesn't
in
and
of
itself,
typically
necessarily
change
that
pattern.
So
you
may
get
a
few
additional
connections
into
the
corridor,
so
people
can
access
those
whatever's
going
on
in
those
buildings,
but
but
it's
in
general
you
don't
necessarily
get
a
change
in
how
the
development
happens.
U
So
what
we're
looking
at
here
is:
how
can
we
set
conditions
so
that
the
as
json
properties
redevelop
people
will
naturally
understand
and
want
to
embrace
the
opportunity
to
to
interface
with
the
corridor,
and
so
we
want
to
set
conditions
so
that
that
becomes
the
logical
choice
but
also
understand
kind
of
what
are
the
conditions
that
that
we
want
to?
Have
those
connections
happen,
so
how
much
engagement?
What
does
that
engagement?
U
Look
like
what
kind
of
improvements
do
we
want
on
the
corridor
in
on
the
private
property
adjacent,
so
so
this
is
really
the
opportunity
at
a
high
level
of
what
we're
looking
at
we're.
Also
looking
at
what
can
happen
within
that
corridor
itself,
so
the
quarter
is
100
feet
wide
in
ownership
of
king
county
south
of
6th
street
and
of
sound
transit
north
of
6th
street.
U
So
in
that
100
feet
width,
we
need
about
30
feet
for
the
trail
improvements
roughly
speaking,
and
so
that
leaves
some.
You
know
additional
70
feet
or
so
of
opportunity
area,
and
so
the
question
becomes
well
what
what?
What
do
we
want
to
have
in
that
public
space?
How
do
we
get
it?
How
is
it
maintained
over
time?
And
so
that's
that's.
U
What
we're
exploring
through
the
public
outreach
that
we've
conducted
as
well
as
then
through
this
next
phases
of
the
process,
where
we
try
to
understand
what
will
those
corridor
owners
accept
in
those
spaces
and
and
how
can
we
set
conditions
so
that
we
can
achieve
the
the
goals
that
the
community
would
like
to
see
for
this
space.
E
Thanks
mike
so
in
20
in
spring
2021,
the
wilburton
israel
framework
plan
was
initiated.
City
staff
from
community
development,
transportation
parks
and
community
services
are
collaborating
with
king
county
to
articulate
a
vision
for
the
wilburton
segment
of
israel.
E
E
So
the
key
players
in
this
collaboration
efforts
include
the
steering
committee
who
provides
oversight
and
direction
for
the
framework
event.
It
consists
of
senior
staff
from
different
entities.
Emil
came
from
community
development
and
michael
shiozaki
from
parks
and
community
services
are
participating
on
the
city's
behalf.
E
E
Next,
so
outrageous
engagement
was
a
major
component
of
this
framework
event.
During
the
summer
months,
adjacent
property
owners,
broader
community
and
community
groups
and
organizations
were
engaged
by
intensive
public
outreach,
including
a
virtual
walk
for
the
public,
which
was
also
attended
by
mayor
robinson
and
council
members,
lee
stokes
and
zhang.
E
We
also
hosted
an
online
survey
on
engage
in
bellevue
and
received
over
230
responses
from
the
community.
Other
methods
includes
meeting
with
adjacent
property
owners,
public
meetings
with
neighborhood
and
community
groups
boards
and
commissions,
including
a
bellevue
diversity
advantage
network
bellevue
network
on
aging
youth
link,
board
east
side,
easy
rider,
collaborative
and
wilberton
neighborhood
association.
E
How
do
we
make
the
corridor
more
accessible
for
people
of
all
ages
and
abilities
and
what
are
the
appealing
features
and
amenities
that
are
attractive
to
residents
and
visitors
for
meetings
with
adjacent
property
owners?
We
try
to
identify
adjacent
property
owners,
interests
and
opportunities
and
consider
them
in
the
framework
plan.
Next,
please
build
on
the
diverse
feedback
received
from
the
public
and
stakeholders.
E
The
project
team
identified
some
of
the
common
themes
for
wilbur
and
israel
segment.
There
was
interesting
ensuring
that
the
corridor
is
accessible
for
people
of
all
ages
and
abilities
users.
Safety
should
be
prioritized
to
make
sure
that
both
pedestrian
and
cyclists
feel
safe.
When
sharing
the
corridor,
there
were
significant
support
for
place
making,
including
in
informal
gathering
spaces
with
seating
opportunities,
more
amenities
and
activity
more
more,
more
amenities
and
activities,
as
well
as
more
public
arts
and
performance
spaces.
E
Our
next
steps
will
focus
on
compiling
inputs
from
the
public
and
continue
to
collect
additional
community
input.
The
wilbert
and
israel
steering
committee
will
meet
for
the
second
time
on
october,
the
19th
to
reveal
opportunities
for
the
wilberton
segment
and
consider
each
agency
partners
potential
role
in
realizing
the
vision
for
its
future.
E
The
steering
committee
is
planning
to
convene
again
in
december
and
early
2022
to
complete
their
work
outcomes
from
this
wilbert
and
israel
framework
plan
will
inform
the
development
of
comprehensive
plan
policy
and
coder
management
to
implement
the
upcoming
wilburton
vision
implementation,
and
this
wraps
up
the
presentation.
We
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
brief
you
this
evening.
I
welcome
your
questions
and
comments.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much,
so
this
is
just
information
only,
but
is
there
anybody
who
would
like
to
make
a
comment
or
have
a
question?
V
Thanks,
no,
I
appreciate
getting
an
update.
This
is
really
exciting.
Looking
at
our
2016
interest
statement,
it's
it's
interesting
how
it's
still
so
completely
relevant
and
it
reminded
me
of
when
we
wrote
it
so
a
couple
of
questions
and
or
comments.
V
One
is
what
are
what
are
we
doing
as
a
member
of
the
steering
committee
to
try
to
ensure
grade
separation
at
fourth
and
sixth,
eventually,
when
we
have
the
grand
connection
come
in
there
if,
if
the
road
crosses,
I
don't
know
if
the
road's
actually
gonna
cross
there.
But
what
are
we
doing
on
that?
I
guess
that's
just
a
first
question
and
then
I
have
a
comment.
T
U
Preserving
the
opportunity
for
a
great
separation
at
fourth,
it
will
have
significant
implications
for
how
adjacent
properties
can
interface
and
users
can
access
the
corridor.
So
there's
there's
some
significant
trade-offs
there,
and
the
additional
consideration,
of
course,
for
the
city
is
that
any
improvements
at
northeast
4th
street
would
be
the
city's
responsibility
as
we
introduced
that
crossing,
and
I
would
anticipate
something
similar
would
be
the
case
at
sixth,
although
there's
the
to
the
extent
that
there's
a
crossing
at
six,
the
the
vision
has
always
been,
there
would
be
at
grade.
V
Okay,
you
know,
if
there's
a
light
that
can
turn
if
there's
a
traffic
light
that
can
people
can
cross
safely.
I
just
don't
want
to
see
people
especially
northeast
4th,
which
it's
not
as
busy
on
that
side,
but
it
is
the
second
busiest
arterial
in
bellevue
and
I
don't
want
to
see
people
get
hit
by
cars.
So
that's
I'm
always
concerned
about
that.
So.
V
Secondly,
I'm
wondering
what
king
county's
record
is
or
future
looking
idea
with
regard
to
activating
the
rail
corridor
through
this
through
the
wilberton,
because
they
may
not
have
the
budget
to
build
all
the
amenities
out
to
the
hundred
foot
if
they
are
willing
to
allow
some
of
the
businesses
to
is
called
an
encroachment
permit
to
maybe
put
cafes
not
putting
permanent
things,
because
it
may
need
to
come
up
someday,
but
allowing
them
to
activate
it
and
create
those
amenities
by
private
investment.
V
U
Yeah
the
spot
on
that.
That's
exactly
the
sort
of
thing
that
we
are,
that
this
process
is
intended
to
flesh
out
is
what
sorts
of
activities
would
the
owners,
king,
county
and
sound
transit,
be
amenable
to
you
know
and
and
and
under
what?
What
sort
of
things
are
they
looking
for,
so
that
there
can
be
some
framework
and
guidance
for
the
adjacent
property
owners
or
anybody
else
who
wants
to
under
you
know
proposes
to
undertake
some
kind
of
improvement
within
the
corridor
the
county
can
have.
U
V
I
think
we
should
definitely
encourage
that.
I
mean.
Obviously
the
county
is
going
to
want
insurance
and
identification,
but
if
we
can
allow
people
to
put
art
there,
if
we
can
allow
them
to
activate
it
like
that,
I
think
that
would
be
a
real
benefit
to
the
people
of
bellevue
and
the
people
using
the
trail.
So
thanks.
F
Thank
you
very
much.
It's
exciting
to
see
this.
As
you
know,
I've
been
the
on
the
east
rail
king
county
committee,
but
larger
in
king
county.
Actually
we
have
sonoma
county
as
well
since
2017
and
when
we
we've
really
put,
I
was
really
glad
going
back
and
excited
looking
at
the
all
the
policies,
all
the
interests
we
had
at
the
beginning
at
that
time,
that
we
really
are
doing
those-
and
I
appreciate
council
robertson's
noting
that
actually
on
4th
street
there
are,
there-
are
traffic
lights
there.
F
If
you
haven't
been
by
there,
you
come
up
and
people
stop
right
there
and
people
go
across.
It's
it's
a
first
step
in
this
and
on
what
was
the
other
street.
Is
it
first
street
michael?
We
just
had
a
a
little
kind
of
a
ceremony
there
with
adam
congressman,
adam
smith,
who
is
helping
us
get
some
federal
funding,
because,
apparently
you
know
it's
the
one
that
comes
up
and
drives.
It
goes
around
to
the
park
to
the
about
botanical
gardens
and
all
that
area
and
the
school
it.
U
It
is
an
arterial
roadway
and
it
does
require
significant,
fairly
costly
insulation
of
a
signal
at
that
point
because
of
the
curves
and
the
volume
of
road
of
traffic.
So
the
we,
the
county,
asked
the
congressman
smith
for
to
be
put
on
the
list
for
federal
funding
the
good
news
story.
The
federal
funding
is
looking
a
little
less
likely,
but
the
good
news
story
is
the
amazon
commitment
will
actually
allow
us
to
construct
that
improvement
yeah,
along
with
the
connecting
trail
to
the
north
and
south
right.
F
Well-
and
I
mean
this
is
an
exciting
addition
to
this-
and
getting
the
partnership
together
and
expanding
that
and
it's
what
we
had
dreamed
about
in
terms
of
getting
the
businesses
and
community
involved
in
this
whole
process,
and
it's
it's
as
much
as
we
thought
about
and
probably
more
and
it
was
really
exciting
to
be
just
at
the
end
of
this
segment
we're
talking
about,
but
at
the
trestle
to
celebrate
that,
because
back
in
2017
we
were
talking
about,
you
know
the
trestle
on
how
to
preserve
it
and
everything
else
and
we've
had
some
money
into
it,
and
but
we,
you
know,
it's
been
what
almost
six
years
now
since
then,
and
it
looks
like
it's
coming
that
way
also
so
it's
it's
really
great,
but
the
end,
and
you
also
mentioned
something
congressman
council
member
robertson
about
activating
and
that's
that's
the
whole
idea
of
this
to
activate
that
quarter
and
when
you
go
down
and
look
at
it.
F
It's
just
amazing
and
all
the
way
through
that
and
the
connectivity
to
other
pieces.
The
other
thing
is
great
about
it
is,
it
is
a
true
regional
operation,
kirkland,
redmond
and
renton
with
their
part,
and
that's
all
going
on
and
and
bellevue
and
king
county
have
been
just
great
partners
and
then
with
the
individuals.
So
it's
a
great
story
for
us
and
it's
a
real,
real,
great
piece
so
good
to
see
this
and
glad
we're
we're
moving
along
this
way
and
thanks
the
staff
has
just
been
fantastic.
D
All
right,
thank
you
mayor.
My
comments
are
short.
I
appreciate
the
comments
that
have
already
been
made
about
activating
the
space.
My
comments
are
going
to
be
online,
our
aligned
with
that
specifically
curious
about,
because
I
know
we
had
that
tactical
urbanism
event
previously
and
if
it
could
be
a
space
similar
to
what
councilmember
robertson
was
saying,
but
that
would
allow
for
tactical
urbanism
more
of
that
just
throughout
and
maybe
even
it
might
be
difficult
because
it's
next
to
metro
but
trying
to
get
more
festival
streets.
U
W
Yeah,
thank
you.
I'm
excited
about
activating
the
space
as
well
a
couple
of
things
I
was
thinking
about,
which
may
not
be
exactly
the
same,
but
I
always
think
about
how
the
neighborhood
access
into
the
east
rail
happens
and
so
to
the
degree
that,
as
we
think
about
the
hundred
foot
that
we're
thinking
about
how
we
how
we
actually
get
our
neighborhoods
to
access
the
space,
and
then
I
was
thinking
about.
W
We
had
an
event
up
in
redmond
at
the
google
campus,
where
you
know,
there's
some
additional
seating
areas
and
and
space
where
that
might
land
related
to
the
wilberton
area
and
then,
as
I
was
thinking
about
place,
making
it
may
be
in
there
already.
But
I
was
thinking
about
learning.
Pods
right
kind
of
heritage
displays
those
kinds
of
things
because
I
think
there
are.
That
may
be
some
things
that
we
don't
have
as
much
of
so
to
the
degree
that
we
can
introduce
that
edible
gardens
might
be.
I
think
it.
W
You
know,
I
think
it
does
come
down
to
the
south
end
with
some
places
that
are
close
to
the
water,
to
be
able
to
just
create
some
some
special
types
of
events
for
the
east
side,
because
it
is
so
regional
and
it's
42
miles
how
we
might
think
about
that
visioning
for
the
future
as
we
complete
the
corridor.
So
just
super
excited
about
the
opportunities.
W
So
that's
on
the
the
usage
side.
I
guess
my
question
on
the
steering
committee
would
be
sometimes
it
can
be
hard
to
hear
from
the
voices
of
the
hard
to
reach.
So
I
am
wondering
about
how
the
steering
committee
is
capturing,
those
voices
that
we
may
not
be
hearing
from,
especially
as
I
think
about
you
know
we're
going
to
be
building
out.
The
wilberton
area,
and
so
we're
going
to
that's,
going
to
be
another
kind
of
urban
neighborhood.
W
T
Yeah
from
the
engagement
standpoint,
we
totally
agree
that
the
outreach
and
thinking
about
who's
going
to
be
living
in
these
new
neighborhoods
is
about
utmost
importance.
We
allocated
some
city
money
to
actually
make
sure
that
the
engagement
was
done
in
a
robust
manner,
we're
actually
supplementing
with
other
city
staff
resources
to
help
flesh
that
out.
T
So,
as
the
steering
committee
moves
along
we're
between
our
first
and
second
meeting
right
now
of
four,
we
are
relying
upon
the
the
core
team
and
our
outreach
consultant
to
kind
of
deliver
us
what
we
can
learn
from
people
who
are
here
now,
both
residents
and
business
community
and
then
think
through
how
other
places
have
kind
of
planned
for
those
who
aren't
here
yet
so
totally
agree
with
the
importance
of
learning
learning
from
others,
as
well
as
planning
new
neighborhoods
in
our
city,
where
not
many
people
might
actually
live
adjacent
to
it.
Right
now,.
H
Thank
you
venom
here
I
was
looking
at
the
lengths
of
the
trail
that
go
through
bellevue.
You
know
the
urban
center
and
I
think
the
impact
is
could
be
significant
and
you
know
it's
a
it
touches
on
a
lot
of
things,
and
so
what
we
do
with
it
you
know
can
be
almost
unlimited,
and
I
think
that
a
number
of
things
depends
on.
H
You
know
how
we,
how
well
do
we
execute,
and
I
I
think
the
potential
is
there
a
few,
a
number
of
things
I
was
thinking
about
which
wasn't
mentioned.
You
know
a
lot
of
things
been
discussed,
so
I
don't
need
to
go
through
them
all.
I
think
this
represents
history
and
heritage.
H
You
know
of
bellevue,
with
the
trust
going
all
the
way
through
the
nature
and
then
going
to
mercer
slough
going
to
the
downtown
bellevue
and
all
the
way
through
and
going
to
north.
So
I
think
you
should
reflect
some
of
the
stuff.
It
really
tells
a
good
wonderful
story
and
obviously
it
would
show
what
happens
present.
You
know
otherwise
we're
not
going
to
be
doing
this
and
then,
furthermore,
you
know
what
can
it
do
in
the
future?
H
Like
the
question,
councilman
roberts
was
asking,
you
know
we
do
a
lot
of
things
with
it.
You
know
there's
a
lot
of
opportunities
so
like
safety,
and
I
got
the
interaction
connection,
picking
a
lot
of
stuff.
You
know
between
present
and
future,
so
I
would
say
that
it
actually
represents
opportunity
for
technology
as
well.
You
know
so
really.
This
is
a
something
that
I
I
can
connect
and
link
and
affect
lots
of
value.
H
So
I
think
that's
potential.
There
can
do
a
lot
of
great
things,
so
keep
those
things
in
mind
and
include
the
community,
obviously,
because
whatever
you
represent
present
and
future,
that
means
the
people
that
are
going
to
be
involved,
engage
with
us
and
in
the
future.
So
do
not
miss
them.
You
know
keep
them
involved.
Thank
you.
C
Thank
you,
mayor,
yeah
I'll,
enter
the
comments
of
my
colleagues,
a
great
presentation,
very
exciting
love,
the
way
that
we're
looking
at
the
place
making
and
the
accessibility,
the
the
seating
and
the
public
art
or
performance
space.
What's
there
not
to
like.
I
really
want
to
appreciate
and
and
call
out
the
amount
of
outreach.
It
sounds
like
you've
been
doing
during
this
entire
process
and
great
to
see
that
my
neighborhood
of
lake
hills
was
quite
prominent.
It
looks
like
there
and
some
of
the
the
discussion
and
feedback.
C
So
I
appreciate
that
and
not
something
that
needs
to
be
unnecessary
addressed
today,
but
unless
you
have
any
comments
on
it,
but
just
in
terms
of
the
and
I
know
that
safety
was
one
of
the
one
of
the
issues
that
came
up
here.
So
you
know
during
when
you're
going
through
some
of
these
activated
spaces,
just
in
terms
of
separating
pedestrians
from
the
cyclists
who
might
not
be
stopping
yet
they
might
come
back
for
a
coffee
after
their
bike.
Ride
is
over,
but
they
might
be
just
going
through,
but
you've
got
cyclists.
C
You've
got
pedestrians.
You've
got
places
to
sit,
I'm
sure
the
people
be
out
with
their
dogs,
etc.
Would
love
to
hear
about
that
at
a
future
date
in
terms
of
how
we're
gonna
handle
that
safety
aspect
of
it,
but
so
so
incredibly
excited
about
this
project.
U
I
can
just
chime
in
and
say
that
that
has
been
a
recurring
theme,
the
the
need
to
provide
for
some
separate
accommodation
of
people
moving
quickly
through
on
bicycles
and
those
that
are,
you
know,
moving
at
a
slower
speed
on
on
foot,
we've
heard
that
that's
been
a
pretty
common
theme
throughout
and
then
the
counties
had
some
internal
conversations
with
among
their
organization
and
they're,
also
in
the
same
place.
So
I
think
we
can
pretty
much
count
on
that
part
of
it.
You
know
be
part
of
the
design
features,
fantastic.
C
U
A
A
U
Okay,
yes,
now
I
know
I
have
better
understanding.
So,
yes,
in
terms
of
access
to
their
stations,
the
sound
transit
stations
we,
the
easter
egg,
will
be,
of
course,
we'll
connect
people
directly
to
the
station
at
wilberton
behind
the
whole
foods.
But
we're
also
looking
at
how
people
healthy
stroke
can
connect
people
to
the
urban
center
in
the
downtown
and
to
the
spring
district.
And
so
you
know
coming
from
the
south.
U
It
is
costly
because
of
grades
and
conditions,
but
but
we
want
to
the
goal-
is
to
have
a
high
quality
connection
at
main
street
from
the
east
rail
across
the
freeway,
we're
getting
a
new
bridge
there
over
to
the
east
main
station
and
into
the
lower
part
of
downtown,
because
we're
working
on
improved
bicycle
facilities
on
main
street
from
112th
up
to
108th,
so
that
that
is
work.
That's
in
progress
in
different
pieces
of
it
at
different
stages
and
then
the
other
key
connection
is
up
at
spring.
U
Boulevard,
where
we're
working
on
a
ramp
connection
from
the
east
trail
up
to
spring
boulevard
and,
of
course
spring
boulevard,
includes
our
major,
east-west
bicycle
path
between
the
spring
district
and
downtown,
so
folks,
getting
into
the
north
end
of
downtown
what
can
be
served
by
that
forthcoming
connection
as
well?
So
that's
I
think
that
starts
to
answer
your
question.
I
hope.
A
No,
that's
great.
That
sounds
really
good.
Thank
you
all
right
great
presentation.
We,
it
is
7
13..
Let's
get
back
at
7,
30.
G
Sure,
thank
you
mayor.
Your
next
study
session
topic
is
the
land
use
code,
amendment
for
the
east
main
station
area
and
just
by
way
of
background
tonight,
is
the
fifth
in
a
series
of
study
sessions
for
council
to
consider
the
land
use
code
amendment.
This
topic
was
last
in
front
of
council
on
september.
G
13Th
and
tonight's
staff
seek
your
feedback
and,
if
ready
your
direction
on
the
floor,
error
ratio
also
known
as
far
the
amenity
incentive
options
and
the
development
agreement
joining
us
this
evening
are
mike
brennan,
tris
natanus,
as
well
as
nick
whipple,
all
from
the
development
services
department,
as
well
as
matt
cummins
and
emil
king
from
the
community
development
department.
With
that,
I'm
going
to
go
turn
over
to
mike
to
kick
this
off.
X
Thank
you,
mr
miyaki,
and
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
noon,
house
and
members
of
the
council.
As
mr
miaki
mentioned,
we
are
here
to
continue
with
the
council
and
your
deliberation
on
the
east
main
land
use
code.
Amendment
next
slide:
please.
X
Tonight
we
are
going
to
be
providing
some
information
additional
background
information
on
some
of
the
key
elements
of
the
code,
specifically
the
the
base
and
maximum
floor
area
ratio
or
far
the
public
amenities
and
incentive
options,
and
then
the
development
agreement
options
for
certain
elements
of
the
code
for
flexibility
and
public
benefit
when
future
development
proposals
are
submitted
next
slide,
please
so
the
the
agenda
just
kind
of
high
overview
of
the
topics
for
this
evening.
X
I
want
to
walk
through
quickly
the
timeline
kind
of
where
we've
been
where
we
are,
and
the
plan
forward
to
complete
this
work,
the
framework
and
the
needs
that
are
being
addressed
by
this
rezone
of
this
up
zone.
The
process
for
review
of
the
final
land
use
code,
amendment
topics
and
then
the
essentially
the
meet
of
tonight's
presentation
is
really
walking
through
these
particular
topic
areas,
far
amenities
and
the
development
agreement.
X
On
next
slide,
please
so
the
time
the
timeline,
as
mr
miyaki
mentioned,
the
last
study
session
was
on
september
13th
and
prior
to
that,
we
did
hold
the
public
hearing.
The
council
had
the
public
hearing
in
july,
reminding
the
council
that,
following
the
public
hearing
when
the
council
is
comfortable
with
the
content
of
the
code,
you
can
move
forward
with
adoption
at
any
time.
X
There
are
certain
elements
that
we
are
still
going
to
be
working
through
with
the
council
that
are
in
the
code
tonight.
We,
as
I
mentioned
the
fdr
and
amenities
and
the
d.a,
and
then
we've
got
study
sessions
scheduled
in
in
excuse
me
november,
to
deal
with
some
of
the
other
topic
areas,
but
we
will,
as
we
move
into
november,
need
to
reach
some
decision
points
with
the
council
to
achieve
the
end
of
year,
adoption
that
is
shown
in
this
particular
timeline.
X
If
the
council
needs
additional
information
or
additional
time,
it
could
push
this
timeline
out,
but
we
are
trying
to
advance
this
as
quickly
as
possible
and
any
additional
information
that
the
council
may
need.
Staff
is
committed
to
developing
that
and
advancing
that
back
to
your
discussion
as
quickly
as
we
possibly
can
accomplish
that
next
slide,
please.
X
So
the
the
code
adoption
actually
helps
to
address
some
specific
city
needs,
and
the
council
has
been
very
clear
about
these.
Are
your
policy
adoption
and
in
the
discussions
about
the
east
maine
area.
First
of
all,
you
are
encouraging
near-term
redevelopment
so
want
to
make
sure
that
the
code
is
calibrated
in
a
way
where
there
is
incentive
for
the
property
owners,
in
this
case,
primarily
the
wig
properties,
to
move
forward
with
developing
in
in
the
near
term.
You
want
to
develop.
X
You
also
want
to
increase
the
supply
of
affordable
housing
in
this
particular
area
and
use
some
of
the
value
in
this
up
zone
that
occurs
to
capture
that
goal
for
the
city
and
then,
lastly,
the
incentive
amenities
that
contribute
to
the
public
good
again,
when
you
upzone
property,
it
does
add
significant
value
to
the
property,
want
to
incentivize
that
redevelopment
making
sure
it's
calibrated
correctly,
but
also
capture
some
of
that
value
to
create
public
amenities
like
open
space
streets
that
are
high
quality
in
another
example,
as
mentioned,
is
affordable,
housing
and
say
child
care,
for
example.
X
M
M
This
slide
shows
the
list
of
topics
that
mike
went
through
just
a
little
bit
ago,
and
these
are
the
ones
that
have
been
identified
for
further
discussion
in
attachment
b
of
your
packet.
This
list
of
topics
that's
outlined.
It
is
outlined
in
more
detail
in
that
attachment
and
as
council
moves
through
these
topics
in
in
study
sessions,
including
most
recently
in
the
last
study
session
on
september,
13th
staff
has
and
will
continue
to
update
this
table
to
document
council's
feedback
and
direction.
M
M
As
you
know,
the
topics
of
building
height
and
housing
was
recovered.
At
the
last
study
session,
where
council
did
provide
clear
feedback
and
staff
is
tracking
that
feedback
tonight,
council
is
reviewing
base
and
maximum
density
or
far
amenity
options
and
the
use
of
development
agreements
or
da
to
modify
certain
standards
or
requirements.
M
We
anticipate
being
able
to
present
to
council
a
finalized
attachment
b
on
november
15th,
so
that
we
can
confirm
previous
feedback
and
direction
and
each
of
the
topics.
This
will
also
allow
council
to
consider
the
entire
list
of
adjustments
to
the
draft
luca
for
inclusion
into
the
final
ordinance
and
council
can
potentially
take
action
in
december.
M
These
are
new
requests,
modification
to
requests
or
new
topics,
we'll
likely
add
process
and
time
any
additional
environmental
review
or
in-depth
analysis
will
also
add
process
and
time.
And
lastly,
we
are
looking
for
council
to
provide
direction
on
that
november.
15
date
to
finalize
the
luca
ordnance,
staff
will,
of
course,
do
our
best
to
be
as
efficient
as
possible
to
advance
this
look
at
forward
and
respond
to
any
additional
analysis
or
requests
for
information
from
council.
M
So,
as
noted
earlier
tonight,
we
are
focused
on
the
topics
of
far
amenity
incentive
options
and
development
agreement
items,
as
you
heard
earlier
from
mike.
This
area
is
receiving
a
large
up
zone
and
we
are
also
wanting
to
take
advantage
of
the
city
invested,
light
rail,
that's
coming
through
the
area.
M
M
M
In
later
slides,
that's
coming
up
here
before
we
get
into
those
options,
however,
as
part
of
council's
deliberation
on
the
topics
of
base
and
maximum
far
and
the
amenity
incentive
program,
that's
included
here,
we
want
to
provide
a
quick
recap
on
incentive.
Zoning
incentive
sony
is
a
land
use
tool
that
the
city
has
used
successfully
since
1981.
This
program
is
in
place
in
downtown
and
bell
red.
It
is
a
voluntary
program
where
the
developer
can
choose
to
take
advantage
of
taller
heights
and
additional
far
in
exchange
for
providing
public
benefits.
M
M
As
you
know,
the
city
retained
eco
northwest
to
perform
an
economic
analysis
to
inform
and
calibrate
where
the
base
far
should
be
set
in
relation
to
the
maximum.
Far,
this
economic
analysis
was
completed
at
the
end
of
last
year
and
we've
set
the
base
far
based
on
the
eco-northwest
economic
analysis,
so
that
the
developer
is
encouraged
to
develop
to
the
maximum,
far
and
in
the
near
term,
which
in
turn
will
result
in
public
benefits.
M
It
is
in
the
city's
interest
to
see
development
take
place
and
development
does
bring
economic
good
in
terms
of
jobs,
services
and
revenue
for
the
city
and
with
the
incentive
program.
Affordable
housing,
open
space,
child
care
services,
potential
sheets
and
other
public
benefits
would
be
generated
and
created
for
the
city.
M
So
before
we
go
into
the
various
options
just
to
set
what
is
available
in
terms
of
existing
zoning
for
the
area,
the
east
main
area
is
designated
office,
limited
business
or
oil
b.
This
should
not
be
confused
with
downtown
oil
b
south
or
will
be
central
in
this
oil
b.
Land
use
district
a
developer
may
only
go
to
a
maximum,
far
of
0.5
for
office
and
approximately
1.0
for
residential.
M
M
Y
Thank
you
trisna
and
good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
city
council,
as
tristan
mentioned
in
the
earlier
slide.
There
are
two
options
that
we
have
brought
for
council
consideration
this
evening
and
both
options,
as
mentioned,
will
significantly
ups
on
the
area
as
compared
to
the
current
olb
zoning
so
option
a
the
first
option
here
is
the
current
draft
land
use
code,
that's
before
council,
so
this
option
was
developed
in
december
of
2020
and
so
the
the
use
of
the
the
development
agreement
option.
Y
For
example,
it's
not
included
in
this
option
because
at
that
time,
council
hadn't
directed
such
use
of
a
development
agreement.
Y
The
maximum
far
is
five,
which
is
consistent
with
the
previous
environmental
analysis
and
with
what
was
studied
under
the
economic
analysis
and
then,
as
mentioned
earlier.
There
is
no
development
agreement
option
with
with
this
with
the
current
draft,
since
it
wasn't
directed
at
that
time.
Y
Options
a
and
b
and
the
stakeholder
requests
include
the
use
of
incentive
zoning
as
a
model
for
achieving
public
benefits
within
the
east
main
tod.
So
the
light
blue
color
we'll
go
back
to
the
previous
slide
for
a
second,
the
light
blue
color
above
the
different
base.
Fars
is
showing
where
the
voluntary
incentive
zoning
program
will
be
used.
Y
Y
So
a
well-functioning
incentive
zoning
program
has
to
support
building
a
larger
building
while
also
delivering
public
benefits,
and
the
strength
of
the
program
really
lies
in
the
results
of
the
economic
analysis,
which
was
completed
about
nine
months
ago
by
the
city's
consultant
as
mentioned
earlier
eco-northwest,
and
that
report
did
indicate
that
setting
the
base
far
at
2.5
for
non-residential,
which
again
is
five
times
higher
than
the
current
zoning
allowance
and
3.5
for
residential,
which
is
three
and
a
half
times
higher
than
the
current
zoning
allowance,
would
fulfill
the
council's
desire
for
near-term
redevelopment
and
a
base
far
that
is
sufficiently
high
to
support
a
vibrant,
livable
and
memorable
tod.
Y
The
report
also
indicates
that
any
base,
far
above
a
2.5
for
non-residential
use
and
3.5
for
residential
use,
may
rule
out
large-scale
use
of
an
incentive
system
which
would
then
not
deliver
the
public
benefits
sought
by
council
next
slide.
Please
so
for
a
developer
to
exceed
the
base
floor
area
ratio
and
access
that
additional
development
capacity
up
to
the
five
far
the
developer
would
need
to
provide
certain
public
benefits.
Y
So
the
public
benefits,
as
structured
in
the
land
use
code,
are
tiered
to
focus
on
council
priorities
expressed
through
the
comprehensive
plan
and
through
prior
council
meetings,
so
the
first
tier
is
equal
to
75
of
the
project's
amenities
and
then
the
second
tier
would
be
the
remaining
25
of
a
project's
amenity
points.
So
for
residential
development,
the
incentive
program
does
prioritize,
affordable
housing
as
that
top
tier
amenity,
and
then
any
item
from
the
remaining
list
can
make
up
that
25
percent
of
the
needed
amenity
points
and
then
for
non-residential
use.
Y
Y
Y
The
improvements
to
stream
and
wetlands
was
included
on
the
list
for
east
maine
because
of
the
location
of
sturdivant
creek,
as
well
as
the
tod's
closeness
to
mercer,
slough
and
other
wetlands
within
the
area.
Next
slide,
please
so
option
b.
So
this
is
an
updated
recommendation
from
staff
with
a
list
now
of
different
da
development
agreement
options.
So
the
recommendation
for
the
base
floor
area
ratio
and
the
maximum
floor
area
ratio
do
remain
the
same
as
option
a
which
is
again
consistent
with
the
economic
analysis,
as
well
as
the
prior
cipa
analysis.
Y
Y
So
this
recommendation
includes
a
development
agreement,
option
to
evaluate
non-conforming
exceptions,
and
then
we
also
are
expanding.
The
list
of
amenity
options
available
in
east
maine,
so
you'll
see
special
amenities
on
the
list
for
the
development
agreement
option.
Some
council
members
may
recall
what
was
developed
in
the
downtown
livability,
which
is
the
special
amenity,
so
the
the
da
does
allow
a
path
for
this
flexible
amenity
option
that
that
isn't
contemplated
yet
under
the
code.
So
it
would
just
be
something
really
unique
and
special
to
east
maine.
Y
So
this
slide
shows
the
recommended
changes
in
red.
So
we've
added
some
amenities
to
the
list.
The
the
the
blue
line,
kind
of
remains
in
the
same
spot,
so
the
amenity
prioritization
scheme
is
very
similar
or
is
the
same
as
option
a
so
75
percent
of
residential
development
provides
amenities
through
affordable
housing
and
then
75
for
non-residential
is
earned
through
potential
streets,
open
space
and
child
care.
Y
We've
added
three
amenity
choices
from
the
downtown
code
to
the
east
main
code,
so
those
include
the
pedestrian
bridge,
the
special
amenity
and
then
performing
arts.
As
well
since
these
amenities
were
used
in
the
downtown
code
or
their
existing
in
the
downtown
code,
we
can
easily
fold
them
into
the
east
main
code,
and
we
have
information
on.
You
know
the
cost
of
these
amenities
and
and
we
can
ensure
that
there's
proper
calibration
for
awarding
additional
floor
area
in
exchange
for
these
options.
Y
So
amenities
that
are
not
within
the
land
use
code
do
require
additional
analysis
to
develop
that
incentive
and
then
to
price
the
incentive
and
to
properly
calibrated.
So
that
does
result
in
the
potential
time
delay
if
additional
amenities
were
added
that
aren't
in
the
existing
code.
Next
slide,
please
so
now
just
to
walk
us
through
this
stakeholder
request.
Y
So
staff
does
not
support
increasing
the
base
far
to
3.5.
For
non-residential
use,
so
the
current
draft
does
provide
and
option
b
provides
for
a
base.
Far
that's
five
times
greater
than
the
current
zoning
allowance.
So
the
base
far
was
derived
from
careful
analysis
by
the
city's
consultants
to
balance
the
need
for
the
the
base
far
to
be
set
in
a
way
that
did
not
result
in
a
down
zone
of
the
property
that
it
would
deliver
a
vibrant
place.
Y
Y
Staff
also
does
not
support
the
request
to
increase
the
maximum,
far
to
5.3
so
very
similar
to
the
the
height
request
from
the
september
13th
council
discussion,
where,
where
the
the
request
is
beyond
what
was
studied
under
cipa,
so
it
would
require
additional
time
to
review
if,
if
that
was
considered,
and
then
lastly,
for
the
items,
the
list
of
items
to
scope
under
the
development
agreement,
so
staff,
we
do
support
the
use
of
the
development
agreement
from
departing
from
very
specific
requirements,
such
as
height
floor
area
ratio,
the
special
amenity
as
reflected
in
and
the
recommended
option
b,
but
staff
does
not
support,
providing
an
option
to
negotiate
different
provisions
as
needed
through
a
development
agreement.
Y
It's
more
important
that
that
the
recommendation
identify
very
specific
provisions
in
the
code
to
narrow
those
deal
points
in
the
future
contract
negotiation.
So
this
framework
of
narrowing
down
the
items
that
can
be
varied
does
allow
for
better
administration
of
the
da
tool.
It
also
results
in
predictability
not
only
for
the
future
developer,
but
also
the
public
in
the
city
during
that
review
process.
Y
Next
slide,
please
so.
Lastly,
just
to
wrap
up
the
staff
presentation,
the
stakeholders-
they
do
request
an
expanded
list
of
amenities,
so
this
list
of
12
offers
sorry.
11
options
is
consistent
with
the
staff
recommended
option
b,
so
we've
included
all
the
same
amenity
options
where
the
request
varies
from
the
staff
recommendation
is
the
first
tier
amenities
for
non-residential
development.
Y
So
the
request
is
to
include
enhanced
streetscape,
just
as
information
for
the
council
and
the
public
enhance
streetscape
is
an
amenity
option
that
is
it's
available
in
the
remaining
tier
under
the
staff
recommendation,
the
amenity,
essentially,
it
provides
additional
space
between
the
backup,
curb
and
the
building.
Essentially,
it's
a
it's
a
wider
sidewalk
with
more
landscaping.
It
supports
movable
tables
and
chairs,
with
additional
landscaping,
a
really
effective
way
to
activate
a
building
frontage.
Y
X
Thanks
nick
so
again,
this
is
really
another
presentation
dealing
with
some
of
the
the
major
or
the
key
elements
of
the
code
that
really
have
the
economic
balance
incorporated
here.
So
it's
about
the
calibration,
as
was
mentioned
in
the
presentation,
there
was
a
significant
amount
of
work
done
to
actually
arrive
at
the
recommendation.
X
We've
incorporated
the
council
feedback
so
far
on
these
particular
areas
and
certainly
if
the
council
wishes
additional
changes,
we're
happy
to
provide
additional
information
to
support
that
or
amend
the
code
as
necessary.
So
with
that
mayor
that
completes
our
presentation.
We
are
prepare
to
answer
questions.
A
Thank
you
so,
just
to
clarify
you
know,
the
land
use
codes
that
we
come
up
with
are
going
to
be
for
all
the
properties
in
east
maine,
but
a
development
agreement
can
be
site
specific
or
development
specific,
and
we
are
looking
for
information
on
far
base
and
maximum
we're.
Looking
for
information
on
the
development
agreement,
provisions
like
maximum
height,
far
non-conforming
exceptions
and
special
amenities,
and
then
we're
looking
for
input
on
amenity
options
for
residential
and
not
non-residential,
first
tier
and
an
expanded
list.
A
I
ask
that
you
limit
your
comments
to
three
minutes
because
just
for
meeting
management
purposes,
it's
hard
to
take
in
more
than
three
minutes
worth
of
information
from
anybody
at
a
time,
but
I'll
go
back
around
as
much
as
we
need
to
so
we're
going
to
start
with
the
deputy
mayor,
followed
by
council
members
on
robertson,
stokes,
lee
barksdale
and
myself
so
deputy
mayor.
Would
you
like
to
start
us
off?
Oh.
C
Great,
thank
you
mayor,
appreciate
it
and
thank
you
mike
trisna
ned
great
presentation.
Thank
you
for
getting
us
this
far
on
this
on
this
journey.
Let's
make
sure
we
stick
to
the
december
6th
deadline,
boy
lots
of
questions
that
I'll
maintain
the
three
minute
time
limit
here.
C
I
really
appreciate
that
we
added
to
those
and
it's
a
much
stronger,
more
robust
list.
I
think
from
that.
The
stakeholders
can
certainly
pick
from
one
question,
though,
regarding
and
I
believe
the
stakeholders
may
have
brought
this
up.
Why
not
shift
the
pedestrian
bridge
and
the
enhanced
streetscapes
to
the
tier
one,
because
and
especially
the
pedestrian
bridge,
which
I
see
as
really
critical
for
the
space
given
the
tod
area
and
getting
people
over
to
that
property
from
the
actual
light
rail
station?
So
why
isn't
that
part
of
of
tier
one.
X
So
I'll
I'll
take
an
initial
shot
at
this
question
and
then
nicole
tristan,
if
you
have
additional
thoughts
so
the
more
so
that
the
tier
one
options
were
really
those
options
that
the
council
identified
as
your
kind
of
your
targets,
your
your
priorities,
so
it
was
about
affordable
housing,
creating
open
space
that
provides
a
place
for
people
to
go
respite,
recreate
and
child
care.
So
if
you
move
additional
items
up
into
the
tier
one,
the
the
possibility
of
capturing
some
of
those
priorities
that
have
been
previously
identified
goes
down.
X
So
you
might
take
the
pedestrian
bridge
option
in
lieu
of
doing
child
care
or
providing
condition
additional
open
space,
for
example.
But
again
these
are
council
choices
as
far
as
how
you
want
to
prioritize
these
amenities
within
the
code
and
what
outcomes
you
you
think
are
the
most
important
as
redevelopment
happens
in
this
game.
C
Thanks
mike,
I
always
appreciate
it.
I
always
appreciate
your
expertise
in
zaria
and
always
want
to
see
why
that
decision
or
what
that
recommendation
from
staff
was
made.
C
So
I
appreciate
that
explanation
second
question
here
in
regards
to
the
the
max
far
so
I
I
think
both
staff
and
the
stakeholders,
I
think,
are
agree
that
it's
a
it's
a
it's
a
five
max
far,
but
I
think
there's
a
disagreement
in
terms
of
when
you
start,
including
that
that
that
max
far
either
it's
after
the
reduction
due
to
the
critical
areas
or
before,
and
it
would
seem
to
me
only
fair
to
have
it
after
the
critical
areas
versus
before.
C
X
So
the
way
to
stay
consistent
with
the
way
the
code
is
administered
elsewhere
in
the
city.
Critical
areas
are
not
included
when
you're
calculating
the
maximum
floor
area
ratio.
So.
X
Yeah
correct
me:
if
I'm
wrong
somebody
on
the
more
technical
expertise
here,
but
so
so
in
this
particular
instance,
there
is
some
critical
area
within
this
development
area
within
the
east
main
area.
So
we
apply
the
point,
the
5.0
max
far
across
all
of
the
property,
that's
not
included
as
a
critical
area.
So
in
the
case
where
you
want
to
adjust
the
far
we
wouldn't
want
to
apply
it
to
the
critical
area.
X
We
just
want
to
make
an
adjustment
to
the
max
far
for
the
developable
property,
and
in
this
case
the
the
concern
is
that
the
5.0
that's
been
established
was
what
was
studied
as
part
of
the
cpa,
a
review
and
to
go
beyond
that
starts
to
raise
concern
about
additional
work
that
we
would
need
to
do
so.
X
The
recommendation
was,
if
we're
going
to
do
an
additional
far
to
do
it
as
part
of
a
development
agreement,
and
that
analysis
would
happen
with
the
actual
proposal,
the
development
proposal
and
the
da
as
it
goes
through
the
process.
If
the
council
wanted
to
allow
that
that
small
lift
in
far
for
additional
public
benefit
is
what
was
signaled
by
by
council
at
the
last
meeting.
A
Okay,
great
council
members
on.
W
Yes,
thank
you
mayor
and
thank
you
mike
emil,
intrisuna,
for
continuing
to
work
with
us
and
the
developers
on
this
land
use
code.
You
know
when
I
think
about
the
d.a.
W
What
we
do
here
consistently
is
that
predictability
is
important
both
for
the
developers
and
for
the
public,
so
I
would
be
supportive
of
especially
since
we've
been
working
on
this
for
seven
years,
tailoring
the
d.a
for
those
provisions
that
you've
already
identified,
of
increasing
building
height
and
for
non-conforming
exceptions
and
special
amenities,
and
then
to
the
point
about
not
diluting
the
tier
one
priorities
that
we
want.
As
a
city.
W
I
do
have
a
question
about.
You
know
when
I
think
about
the
pedestrian
bridge.
That's
part
of
our
vision,
zero
and
really
trying
to
create
more
separation
for
pedestrians
and
vehicles.
So
I
think
that
is
a
trade-off
of
whether
we
put
that
into
the
tier
one
and
then
the
other
one
is.
I
see
sustainability,
certification
as
a
second
tier?
W
Is
it?
Is
it
a
second
tier,
because
we
think
that
developers
would
do
that
anyway?
And
so
we
don't
see
that
as
being
a
tier
one,
because
these
buildings
will
be
here
for
many
many
years
and
so
to
the
degree
that
we
are
seeing
sustainable
design
and
construction
and
total
cost
of
ownership.
That
would
be
helpful.
So
that's
one
question
I
have
so.
X
Y
Yes,
thank
you,
council
members
on
for
the
question,
so
it
really
it
kind
of
goes
back
to
mike's
earlier
point,
two
about
really
selecting
kind
of
the
list
of
priorities
that
council
would
like
to
see
in
those
first
tiers.
So
we
we
have
some
properties
within
downtown,
for
example,
that
have
taken
advantage
of
that
sustainability
certificate,
just
as
a
course
of
how
they'd
like
to
develop
their
projects.
Y
That's
not,
I
guess
something
that
they
couldn't
choose
to
do
still
within
east
maine,
but
it's
just
a
matter
of
what
are
those
most
important
priorities
for
east
main
in
particular,
and
so
at
least
how
how
we
presented
option
b
that
would
include
the
affordable
housing,
open
space,
child
care
and
potential
street.
Y
The
more
you
add
to
it,
as
you
kind
of
mentioned
it
sort
of
dilutes
that
that
tier
one
we
do
see
that
that
sustainability
certificate
getting
used,
but
we
did
not
feel
that
that
was
a
direction
prior
direction
that
we
had
received
to
include
it
as
a
top
tier
amenity
for
east
maine,
but
still
an
amenity,
that's
available.
If
they
would
like
to
do
that
within
the
spain
as
a
as
a
second
tier.
W
Okay,
so
it
is
something
that
I'm
concerned
about,
just
because
of
how
long
buildings
last
and
whether
without
moving
it
to
a
first
tier,
it
would
be
done
anyway.
So
if
there's
some
information
about
what
other
building
and
developers
are
doing
and
whether
they're
choosing
the
sustainability
certificate,
even
if
it
doesn't
land
in
a
first
year,
I'd
like
to
understand
a
bit
more
about
that
and
then.
A
Council
members
on,
let
me
stop
you
there
and
I'll
get
back
to
you.
Okay,
councilmember
robertson,.
V
Okay,
thank
you.
So
I'm
thinking
about
the
purpose
and
the
goals
that
we
are
doing
this
up
zone
for,
and
that
is
we
want
to
see
more
housing.
We
want
to
see
transit,
oriented
development.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we
can
meet
our
growth
goals,
which
are
really
bold
and
so,
from
my
perspective,
anything
that
doesn't
allow
the
property
developer
to
max.
That
density
is,
I
mean
max.
The
density
up
to
you
know,
whatever
our
top
numbers
are
is
something
that
we
need
to
figure
out
how
to
how
to
work
around.
V
So
I
have
a
lot
of
questions.
I'll
probably
have
to
come
around
again,
but
first
on
the
critical
area,
far
issue,
I
thought
critical
area
code
didn't
apply
in
downtown
or
maybe
and
maybe
possibly
not
in
bel-rad,
and
I
also
thought
that
when
the
max
far
was
studied,
it
was
net
like
full
far.
If
you
will
and
didn't
take
into
account
the
critical
areas
so
could
someone
please
explain
that
to
me.
Y
Sure
comes
to
mind
robertson.
I
can.
I
can
jump
in
on
the
point
about
the
critical
area
so
in
the
downtown
you're
correct
it
does
not.
The
critical
areas
ordinance
does
not
apply
to
the
downtown.
There
are
no
critical
areas
within
the
downtown,
so
that
section
wouldn't
apply,
then
for
bell
red.
Y
There
are
critical
areas
as,
as
you
all
know,
streams
and
wetlands
throughout
there,
and
so
the
critical
errors
area's
ordinance
does
apply
there
and
there
is
a
density
intensity
calculation
that
would
apply
to
sites
as
they
redevelop
within
the
bel-red
corridor,
that
same
density
intensity.
Y
Calculation
is
what's
being
adapted
for
the
east
main
area,
so
it
would
really
apply
to
the
hilton
hotel
property
since
they
have
sturdinent
creek
behind
the
hotel
and
the
the
impact
on
what
that
density
is
is
is
not
really
understandable
at
this
point
in
that
we
would
have
to
actually
quantify
you
know
what
is
the
extent
of
critical
areas
on
that
property,
so
we
do
know,
of
course,
the
streams
there.
It's
a
type
f
stream.
Y
We
don't
know
what
the
associated
wetlands
might
be
rated
as
so
we
don't
really
know
you
know
how
far
that
buffer
extends.
So
I
assume
at
least
the
stakeholder
request
for
5.3
is
is
grounded
in
some
sort
of
idea
of
this
is
probably
what
the
offset
is
to
make
up
for
that
critical
areas.
But
again
the
request
would
apply
then
to
the
entire
east
main
tod
high
block,
which,
which
might
put
us
way
way
beyond
what
the
offset
is
with
having
the
critical
areas
on
site.
V
Okay,
I
mean
I,
I
think
that
it
would
be
helpful
because
critical
areas
does
apply
here,
and
I
know
there
are
fish
in
that
stream.
I've
seen
them,
so
it
would
be
good
to
figure
out
how
to
make
sure
that
that
works
mayor.
Can
I
ask
one
more:
do
you
want
me
to
defer.
A
If
you
wouldn't
mind
I'll
come
back
to
you
all
right
yeah,
I
have
a
couple
more
thanks.
Thank
you.
Councilmember
stokes.
F
P
F
Okay,
now
I
really
appreciate
the
work
that's
been
done
on
this
on
both
sides.
Staff
is,
I
think,
really
narrowing
this
down,
and
the
first
question
I'd
like
to
ask
on
this.
Is
I
mean-
and
I
want
to
say
I
I
like
the
option
b
and
I
like
what
we,
the
staff
is
recommending,
I
think
there
and
what
the
property
owners
want
here,
things
that
can
be
worked
out
through
that.
F
So
I
I'd
like
to
see
us
get
this
done
and
get
to
and
not
bog
down
in
abcd,
which
ones
are
going
to
choose,
and
all
of
that
I
I
at
this
point
we
laid
out
pretty
well-
and
I
trust
the
staff
as
our
advisors
and
and
working
for
us
to
really
get
us
in
the
best
position
on
this
and
go
forward
on
it.
F
But
what
I'd
like
to
know
is
as
a
specific
question
again
being
these
options
between
the
first
tier
and
second
tier,
it
sounds
like
if
we
we
have
the
four
first
tier
pieces
and
then
we
want
to
add
something
from
the
second
tier
that
there's
some
trade-offs
there.
F
What's
what's
the
it
seems
to
me
that
you
work
at
it
and
maybe
there's
some
some
that
you
would
take
from
the
first
tier
or
second
tier,
and
that
should
be
something
that
I
don't
think
we
can
make
the
decision,
because
we'd
be
here
all
night
and
probably
the
next
night
going
over
all
this
stuff.
But
when
you
get
the
staff
and
and
the
builders
in
place
and
their
experts
working
with
them,
we
ought
to
be
able
to
take
this,
and
I
would
you
know
I
would.
F
X
So
let
me
try
to
respond
to
that
question,
so
the
the
code
does
differentiate.
How
first
tier
and
second
tier
are
applied,
so
remembering
that
the
first
75
of
the
far
lift
in
the
incentive
system
needs
to
come
from
the
first
tier
for
both
the
residential
and
the
commercial,
so
residential
would
be
affordable.
X
Housing
would
have
to
make
up
that
first
75
percent
of
the
far
above
the
base
for
commercial,
it's
open
space,
child
care
and
a
potential
streets
would
have
to
make
that
up
before
you
could
go
into
the
second
tier
and
make
up
the
other
25.
X
If
you
want
to
move
items
out
of
the
second
tier
into
the
first
tier,
you
could
choose
to
just
add
them
or
you
could
choose
to
move
a
first
tier
one
down
into
the
second
tier.
It
really
is
the
council's
option.
I
would
recommend
that
we
probably
want
to
keep
those
top
tier
items
in
the
top
tier,
because
those
are
you
know
very
specific
community
needs
in
this
area
that
we're
trying
to
address.
F
Okay,
that
helps
a
lot
because
I
think
we've
actually
made
a
lot
of
these
decisions
over
time
period
and
the
four
that
are
listed
here
are
things.
We've
talked
about
as
a
top
priorities
for
a
long
time.
So
I'm
comfortable
with
that.
If
we
want
to
work
on
pedestrian
bridge
or
performing
arts,
that
would
be
something
that
we
would
take
into
account
on
the
other
25
percent
right.
F
A
Okay
I'll
come
back
to
councilmember,
stokes
sure,
let's,
let's
go
to
council
member
lee.
H
Thanks
mayor
good
job
staff
working
hard
with
you
know,
proposal
and
also
with
the
developers,
so
we
appreciate
that
my
question
is
that
you
know
this
is
something
that
I
think
we
want
to
see
happen
this
project
and
the
reason
is
that,
because
we
want
to
see
public
benefits,
you
know,
ultimately
this
one
and
the
same.
If
we
don't
get
the
project
developed,
we're
not
going
to
see
any
benefits.
H
So
so,
let's
look
at
how
we
can
get
the
project
done.
I
think
that
depends
on
the
feasibility,
economic
visibility.
The
developers
can
actually
build
it.
The
way
we
want
it,
the
way
they
see
it.
I
think
that's
what
we're
talking
about
console
sees
the
project
we
say
hey.
This
is
really
good
and
by
doing
that,
it's
not
just
for
the
city
for
economic
development,
but
also
for
our
you
know:
community
benefit
public
benefits.
So
it's
a
good
thing,
and
I
I
see
that
you
know
the
question.
The
difference
is
in
two.
H
One
is
the
amenities,
the
other
one
is
far
and
heights.
I
feel
the
only
thing
I
see
is
the
maximum
far
you
know
instead
of
5.3
you'll
talk
about
5.0,
so
I'm
not
sure
you
know
how
we
can
fix
that.
So
I
like
to
hear
more
about
that
and
the
other
one,
of
course,
is
the
3.5
which
the
staff
agrees
with
the
residential
and
they
want.
I
think
what
is
it
2.5?
H
This
is
staff
agrees
to
give
3.5,
so
I
don't
see
there's
that
much
of
a
big
difference-
yeah
3.5,
oh
non-residential
style,
only
provides
2.5.
They
want
3.5.
So
that's
something
that
we
can
talk
about
and
then
you
I
appreciate
the
staff
having
economic
feasibility
looking
at
it,
that's
great,
but
now
I
find
out
that
the
developer
also
have
economic
analysis.
So
I'd
like
to
see
what
the
differences,
maybe
there's
something
that
we
can
work
out
from
that
discussion.
You
know
what
are
the
assumptions?
Are
we
on
the
same
page?
Are
we
not?
H
What
are
the
differences?
Let's
figure
that
out,
okay
and
in
terms
of
them
entity.
I
agree
that
you
know
I
don't
see
that
much
a
difference,
especially
first
tier
the
what
we
want.
You
know
it's
mostly
included,
and
I
heard
also
console
actually
has
options
to
move,
so
I
think
we.
E
H
We
are
in
the
privacy,
you
know
we
can
make
it
work,
make
it
not
work
depending
on
how
realistically
the
economic
is
going
to
come
out
through
the
development.
If
the
developer
does
a
lousy
job,
then
they're
not
going
to
make
it
work.
If
they
do
a
great
job
we
may
have,
we
may
get
even
more
amenities
right.
I
mean
that's
the
whole
idea
of
having
that
done.
So
the
thing
I
heard
is
that
the
developer
would
like
to
have
the
d.a
to
be
a
little
more
specific,
and
I
think
the
staff
says
no.
H
I
don't
know
whether
that's
a
state
I
like
to
stop
confront
that
the
status
is
that
we
don't
want
it
to
be
really
too
specific.
We
want
to
discuss
and
negotiate
it
that
I
think
development
has
some
concerns,
because
what,
if
they
don't
get
it,
then
the
whole
project
goes
out
the
window
and
they're
not
going
to
do
anything.
They
spend
all
the
money.
So
I
like
to
get
those
two
points
clarified.
X
So,
as
far
as
the
far
requests
to
go
to
the
5.3
that
you
see
in
the
stakeholders
request
on
the
screen,
the
recommendation
again
was
if
the
council
wants
to
provide
that
option
to
do
it
as
a
development
agreement
with
additional
public
benefit
when
a
development
proposal
comes
in,
so
that
if
the
council
is
interested
in
that,
we
can
certainly
accommodate
that
within
the
within
the
code.
X
It
would
require,
as
noted
in
the
agenda
materials,
additional
environmental
review
when
that
was
the
development
agreement
comes
through,
but
that
would
happen
again
with
that
project
proposal.
So
in
the
future.
X
As
far
as
the
moving
from
2.5
to
3.5
for
the
non-residential,
I
think
I
think,
during
the
presentation
nick
walked
through
the
how
that
was
calibrated
and
making
sure
that
it
really
is
incentivizing
near-term
development,
but
still
allowing
room
for
those
amenities
that
would
be
captured
with
the
going
to
the
maximum
of
the
five
point.
X
Far
so
again,
if
the
council
wants
to
consider
that
that
is,
you
know,
there's
an
economic
impact
to
the
model,
so
to
speak,
that
we
would
need
to
come
back
and
provide
additional
information
to
describe
what
the
implications
of
that
are
and
then,
as
far
as
the
amenities
system
and
etc.
You
said
the
council
is
in
the
driver's
seat,
you're
absolutely
in
the
driver's
seat
on
all
of
this
getting
to
the
final
adoption.
X
H
X
A
D
All
right,
thank
you,
mayor,
quick
questions.
So
one
of
the
things
that
I'm
hearing
is
this
tension
between
what
goes
on
the
first
tier
and
the
and
the
second
tier,
almost
as
if
there's
sort
of
a
false
dichotomy,
is
there
an
option
or
has
there
been
thinking
around
adding
a
third
tier,
maybe
like
the
first
tier,
is
like
critical.
You
know,
like
critically
me
whatever's
in
that
first
year.
D
Second
tier
is
like
things
that
are
needed
and
they're
consistent
with
division,
and
then
the
third
tier
is
like
nice
to
have
they
fit
within
the
community
and
help
enhance
the
space.
So
that's
one
question
second
question
the
I'd
like
to
add
mom
and
pop
shops,
so
tennis
spaces
for
mom
and
pop
shops,
and
then
can
we
make
the?
D
X
So,
nick
or
trisna
do
you
want
to
handle
councilmember
bart
gales,
barksdale's
questions,
the
third
tier
I
don't
know
if
I
don't
believe
we've
got
a
multi-tier
system,
but
if
we
do
maybe
we
could
describe
that.
Y
Y
So
it
would
be
important
to
try
and
focus
that
list
as
much
as
possible,
and
so,
even
with
the
first
tier,
you
know
there
are
different
options
for
the
developer
to
choose
if
they
provide
child
care,
which
is
the
you're
correct
in
noting
the
up
to
ten
thousand
square
feet
per
per
project
for
bonus
square
footage,
so
that
was
really
derived
based
off
of
our
understanding
of
a
typical
day
care,
size
or
child
care
size.
Y
But
if,
if
they
were
to
a
developer
risk
to
choose
child
care,
use
open
space
potential
streets,
all
three
of
those
amenities
to
kind
of
fill
up
their
first
tier
before
moving
on
to
the
second
tier,
that's
certainly
an
option
we
haven't
looked
at,
though,
trying
to
to
parse
out
certain
items
within
the
first
tier
move
them
to
another
tier,
a
second
tier
than
items
in
the
second
tier
moving
them
to
a
third
tier,
and
we
haven't
done
that
level
of
analysis.
Y
If
that's
something
the
council
would
like,
we
could
certainly
come
back
with
with
some
information
about
that
and
then
with
the
the
question
about
the
mom
and
pop
shops,
or
wanting
to
see
additional
amenities.
Y
So
the
list,
that's
before
councils,
is
a
list
of
amenities
that
the
city
does
have
experience
with
within
within
belred,
as
well
as
downtown
and
and
with
that
there
there
is
some
efficiencies
and
that
we
do
understand.
You
know
the
cost
to
deliver
that
amenity.
We
also
understand
how
to
how
to
properly
award
floor
area
based
on
that
cost.
So
getting
the
calibration
right
is
is
going
to
be
a
little
more
straightforward,
with
already
developed
amenity
options
with
east
main.
Y
In
particular,
there
was
some
calibration
that
was
done
with
with
affordable
housing,
for
example,
to
make
that
one
really
work
for
this
area,
but
if
we
were
to
add
additional
amenity
options
that
weren't
previously
considered,
that
would
take
some
time,
because
we
would
have
to
actually
study
how
how
we
would
design
that
amenity
option.
Y
What
are
some
of
the
parameters
that
we'd
be
looking
at
to
really
make
that
a
successful
option,
and
then
also,
how
do
we
assign
a
value
to
that
to
be
able
to
make
sure
it's
attractive
for
a
developer
to
choose
and
it
also
provides?
You
know
the
floor
area
that
that
would
really
make
them
again
attractive
as
a
choice,
so
that
would
require
some
additional
follow-up.
If
that's
the
direction.
D
A
All
right
thanks,
everybody
I'll,
be
quick.
I
I
like
the
idea
of
of
the
option
b
recommendations
and
that
the
developer
can
bargain
for
more
through
a
development
agreement
beyond
the
baseline.
A
The
two
things
that
I'm
interested
in
is
when
you
look
at
potential
streets
in
the
first
tier,
I'm
wondering
why
that
was
put
in
the
first
tier
and
if
we
could
morph
that
into
something
that
was
enhancing
the
streetscape
with
ped
bike
paths,
if
that
would
be
equivalent
to
that
or
if
we
could
combine
that
and
then
I'll
ask
my
second
question
after
you
answer
that.
Y
So
micah
can
respond
to
mayor
robinson's
question
so
with
the
potential
streets,
so
there's
policy
direction
to
provide
kind
of
smaller
walkable
blocks
in
creating
kind
of
connections
through
for
pedestrians,
for
cyclists,
for
for
vehicles
through
the
site,
so
the
potential
street
we
also
brought
to
council
july
of
2020.
Y
We
brought
this
new
concept
to
you
all
and,
and
you
had
asked
that
we,
we
could
think
more
expansive
on
this
concept
and
we
start
to
allow
for
not
only
vehicular
streets,
but
if
they
wanted
to
do
a
pet
bike
connection
instead,
what
would
that
look
like
so
so?
This
amenity
option
is
really
inclusive
of
that
feedback,
so
it
does
allow
for
head
bike
connections.
It
also
allows
for
vehicular
connections
and
the
enhanced
streetscape
is
an
amenity
option.
Y
That's
used
in
the
downtown
code,
and
it's
it's
really
addressing
the
space
between
the
back
of
curb
and
the
building,
and
it's
it's.
It's
essentially
a
wider
sidewalk.
It
does
allow
it
or
the
intent
of
that
was
to
allow
for
some
outdoor
dining
space.
Some
increased
landscaping
along
the
building
frontage.
That's
really
what
its
intent
was.
Y
We
did
feel
that,
at
least
with
the
potential
street
option
we
were
addressing
that
need
to
provide
ped
bike
circulation
within
the
tod,
which
is
why
it
raised
up
as
a
as
a
first
tier
amenity
for
this,
but
certainly
council's
decision.
If
we
wanted
to
move
enhanced
streetscape
around
that's
something,
we
could
take
feedback
on.
A
I
think
I'd
be
interested
in
doing
kind
of
an
either
or
either
the
potential
streets
or
or
an
enhanced
streetscape
with
ped
bike.
So
whatever
that
would
look
like
and
then
the
other
thing
is,
you
know
we
talk
about
residential,
affordable
housing
incentives.
I
would
like
staff
to
look
at
non-residential,
affordable
housing
incentives
and
what
that
might
look
like-
and
I
know
I
don't
expect
an
answer
tonight,
but
I'd
like
that
to
be
something
that
could
come
back
to
us.
So
let's
go
ahead
back
around
and
we'll
start
with
the
deputy
mayor.
C
Y
The
base
fire
is
4.5
and
the
maximum
is
five.
Okay.
C
Okay
and
then
for
downtown
or
olb
south,
do
they
break
out
the
amenity
system
in
a
in
a
tiered
system
like
this
as
well
or
is
it
just
one
list
of
amenities.
Y
So
deputy
mayor,
the
the
east
main
code
is
modeled
somewhat
after
the
downtown
approach
to
do
the
75
from
a
certain
kind
of
bucket
of
amenities
and
then
the
remaining
from
a
larger
list
and
in
the
downtown
there
are.
The
main
focus
there
is,
is
on
really
open
space
public
realm
related
amenities.
So
with
that,
there's
a
list,
that's
inclusive,
of
probably
eight
or
nine
items
to
be
able
to
respond
to
that
that
need
in
downtown
for
really
public
realm
kind
of
enhancing
amenity
options.
Y
We
did
evaluate
kind
of
the
needs
in
east
maine,
which
is
how
we
arrived
at
this.
This
list
of
first
tier
amenity
options,
but
downtown
has
kind
of
a
different
set
of
priorities,
but
similar
model.
C
Okay,
so
there
is
a
tiered
approach,
then,
for
downtown
is
what
you're
saying?
Yes,
okay!
Thank
you!
Okay!
Well,
I
given
that
information
about
olb
south,
I
I
think
I'd
be
in
favor
of
increasing
the
non-residential
far
to
3.5,
so
have
it
the
same
far
as
as
as
residential.
I
think
it
just
makes
sense
for
this.
Given
the
location,
it's
right,
beside
olb
south.
This
is
an
area
that's
going
to
have
to
compete
against
olb
south
or
compete
against
downtown.
C
W
Yes,
thank
you
mayor,
so
I
would
say
that
I
agree
with
councilmember
barksdale
about
the
mom
and
pop
shop,
adding
that
as
one
of
the
amenities,
I
guess
my
my
other
question
is:
does
this
area
does
the
mfte
apply?
W
Y
W
And
do
we
ever
provide
any
incentive
or
or
acknowledge
or
or
really
encourage,
the
homeownership
piece,
because
we
do
not
have
enough
housing,
especially
them
the
middle
housing,
to
be
able
for
people
to
be
able
to
have
home
ownership
both
to
downsize
as
well
as
to
move
into
so
just
wondered
if
that
can
be
included
and
then
my
other
comment
would
be
on
the
affordable
housing
seems
like
when
we've
talked
about
that
they've
always
come
back
with
no
micro
housing.
A
I'm
going
to
break
in
here
for
just
a
minute
because
there's
a
consistent
thread
to
want
to
re-examine
the
incentives
in
many
different
ways,
and
so
I'd
like
staff
at
the
end
of
this,
to
give
us
some
feedback
on
how
we
might
have
that
moment
without
slowing
down
our
timeline.
But
council
members
on
and
everybody
else.
Can
you
also
comment
on
where
you
are
at
the
recommended
base
fir
option
b
or
something
other
than
that?
Please.
W
So
if
there
is
a
dea
that
allows
us
to
work
with
the
developer
on
the
height
and
the
far
that
that
allows
us
to
do
that
at
that
time.
But
right
now
based
on
what
we
know,
and
I
trust
that
that
the
staff
is
evaluating
the
report
from
equal
northwest
that
we
hired
them
in
good
faith
to
give
us
a
economic
analysis
and
that
that
is
what
resulted
in
what
we're
seeing
here
as
as
option
b.
W
A
Thank
you,
okay,
councilmember
robertson,.
V
Thanks,
okay,
so
picking
up,
so
let
me
just
go
through
where
I
am
with
this
mayor,
so
that
I
can
respond
to
your
question
first
I
would
be.
I
would
be
interested
in
seeing
the
base
far
be
set
at
3.5
for
both.
V
I
would
like
to
see
the
max
far
set
at
five
full
five
far
for
both,
so
that
when
there's
on
the
hilton
site
that
they
can
get
to
five,
because
we
won't
get
the
housing
we
need
without
getting
to
the
full
five
with
regard
to
the
amenities
I'm
comfortable
with
the
list.
The
one
thing
I
would
elevate
from
second
tier
to
first
would
be
the
ped
bridge.
V
I
think
that's
a
really
important
amenity
both
for
traffic
safety,
as
well
as
activating
this
site
and
connecting
with
the
light
rail
system,
which
is
a
wonderful
amenity
for
the
whole
city,
the
d.a.
I
would
you
know
the
reason
that
we
do
da's.
They
have
to
show
public
benefit,
so
I'm
kind
of
looking
at
the
da's
from
a
different
angle,
I'd
like
to
weigh
in
on
the
kinds
of
benefit
I'd
like
to
see
with
the
da
and
that
would
be
potentially
more
more
housing.
V
There's
a
whole
list
of
benefits,
but
more
housing,
particularly
affordable
housing
would
be
one
of
those
things.
I
would
be
very
amenable
to
giving
more
density
more
height,
giving
you
know
flex
on
the
on
the
land
use
code.
I've
thought
for
a
long
time
and
have
talked
about
for
a
long
time
that
we
need
to
have
a
da
chapter
to
allow
us
to
flex
the
land
use
code,
particularly
for
things
like
housing
and
affordable
housing.
V
This
would
just
be
like
the
first
try
at
that
by
putting
it
in
this
overlay,
so
I
would
be
in
favor
of
that
for
the
da.
Let
me
make
sure
I've
touched
everything
I
oh
on
the
ownership
to
councilmember
razan's
point.
I
think
we
talked
about
having
a
slightly
higher
affordability
level
for
ownership,
because
we
wanted
to
encourage
the
development
of
ownership,
housing
and
I'm
still
in
that
camp.
V
So
I
don't
think
that
it
would
be
wise,
however,
for
us
to
start
adding
a
whole
bunch
more
amenities,
shifting
the
ones
that
we've
studied
around
is
one
thing,
but
adding
a
whole
bunch
of
new
ones.
I
think,
would
be
problematic
for
keeping
on
schedule,
particularly
ones
that
have
to
do
with
how
a
space
is
used
versus
how
it's
like
within
a
zone
versus
how
a
space
is
developed,
because
land
use
code
typically
drives
the
height
the
density,
the
floor
plate
size.
V
You
know
how
much
ground
space
there
is
they
don't
say
that
you
should
you
need
to
rent
the
office
space
to
a
national
tech
company
or
only
a
local
renter.
I
mean
that's
just
not
what
the
land
use
code
does.
So,
while
I
completely
support
us
using
our
economic
development
dollars
to
encourage
more
mom
and
pop
shops,
I
don't
think
it's
really
something
that
could
be
easily
managed
in
a
land
use
code.
So
those
are
my
comments.
I
guess
I
I
joined
the
other
council
member
who
asked
for
information.
V
I
asked
this
at
my
briefing
on
the
difference
between
the
two
economic
development
studies.
You
know
what's
the
difference
and
why
and
then
I
guess
I
would
just
also
add
my
voice
to
mayor
and
deputy
mayor
about
being
open
to
adding
an
amenity
of
housing
or
affordable
housing
to
the
commercial
zone.
V
I
know
that
the
housing
roundtable
has
hired
our
consultant
echo
northwest
to
look
at
that,
and
I,
if
we
can
figure
out
a
way
to
incentivize
that,
while
still
having
a
great
development
here
with
open
space
and
such
I
think
that
that
would
be
a
win
for
the
people
of
this
city.
A
Thanks
can
I
can
I
get
clarification
on
something
that
you
said
in
the
very
beginning,
you're
talking
about
bass
and
max
far,
are
you
going
with
option
b.
V
No
I'm
going
with
3
5
3
5
for
bass
the
option
c.
I
guess
because
of
just
it's
four
or
four
point:
five,
just
across
the
str
across
main
street
from
there
it's
like
3.5
would
be
enough
and
max
of
five
but
full
five.
Considering
the
critical
areas.
Okay,.
A
Can
give
me
the
information
on
the
how
you
feel
about
the
option
b
recommendation
in
your
comments,
I'd
appreciate
it.
F
Exactly
what
I
was
going
to
do
and,
as
I
said
before,
I
started
my
first
comment.
I
said
I
go
for
option
b.
I
do
agree
that
to
the
3.5
3.5
and
leaving
it
5.0
is
that
what
you're
looking
for
yeah?
Thank
you
yeah.
I
like
the
the
tiers.
I
like
the
the
way
the
discussion
is
going
on
the
I'll
get
back
to
this.
F
I
want
to
kind
of
interject
this
for
forget
it,
but
on
the
two
recommendations
from
the
consultants,
I
I
really,
I
think
the
the
first
one
are
the
one
that
that
the
staff
put
in
place
actually
is
more
thorough
and
more
rational
on
this
or
the
other
is
a
little
disappointed
in
some
of
the
work
or
comments
on
it
and
but
I
think
overall
both
of
them
actually
support
what
we're
talking
about
here.
So
I'm
not
too
worried
about
that.
Sometimes
you
know.
F
As
a
you
know,
as
a
lawyer,
you
have
experts
on
both
sides
and
they
can't
all
both
be
right
and
a
lot
of
times
it's
in
between.
So
I
wouldn't
get
too
hung
up
on
those
things.
The
one
thing
I
didn't
want
to
say
in
this
and
take
a
look
at
this
is
the
and
particularly
with
the
da,
and
I
I
think
the
da
thing
is
the
way
to
go
on
this.
Let's
get
this
through
get
the
comments
in
place.
F
We
can't
actually
you
know,
dot
every
eye
and
and
cross
every
tee
and
all
in
and
get
to
the
d.a
and
with
the
with
the
the
the
idea
is
to
get
this
done.
Work
on
it.
Let's
get
this
thing
going
and
I
think
we're
in
good
space
on
that.
I
would
like
to
look
at
the
special
amenities
performing
arts
and
suggest
that
something
like
was
done
with
cloudview,
be
a
priority.
F
Look
at
in
this
area
having
performing
arts
community
space
in
this
area
is
really
essential
and
it
will
make
this
a
great
project
and
not
just
a
really
good
one,
and
so
I
would.
I
would
like
to
elevate
that
to
something
that
we
in
the
da
we
look
at
that
and
and
utilize
that
and
that,
obviously,
if
we
go
that
way,
it
offers
some
amenities
to
to
the
developers.
So
I
think
that's.
This
is
a
place
I
would
like
to
see
it
happen.
A
Okay,
thank
you
councilmember
lee.
Can
you
in
your
comments
please
comment
on
where
you
are
with
option
b.
H
I
would
just
support
stakeholders
requests
3.53.5,
max
5.3
I'll,
explain
to
you
why
I
would
love
to
have
all
sorts
of
amenities
I
mean
you
know,
but
I'm
sure
whatever
all
of
us
all
seven
of
us
would
like
to
have
a
lot
more
things
we
want
to
include.
You
know,
because
public
benefits.
What
are
we
looking
for?
But
the
reality
is
what
the
project,
what
the
developer
can
do,
and
I
think
I've
seen
you
see
that
the
thing
that
mentioned
here
is
pretty
consistent.
H
I
think
I'm
very
happy
that
we
are
working
together
and
I
think
development
agreement
can
actually
do
more
on
negotiation
and
we,
as
a
council,
can
add
and
subtract
depending
on
the
reasonable
economics.
You
know
that
we
are
looking
at
real
economies,
not
just
guesses,
and
I
think
we
see
that
nico,
northwest
and
holland.
H
You
know
they
all
have
differences,
but
that
need
to
be
worked
out
so
that
we
know
exactly
how
we
are
comfortable
and
the
staff
would
need
to
also,
of
course,
make
recommendation
to
us
and
if
it's
not,
we've
got
to
figure
out.
What
is
the
right
one,
and
I
believe
that
I
agree
also
that
we
need
to
provide
more
affordable
housing,
not
not
provide
more.
We
can
use
take
advantage
of
the
non-residential
development
to
provide
more
harvesting
as
well.
Why
not
right?
H
If
we
have
an
opportunity
to
do
that,
if
it's
economically
feasible,
I
mean
this
is
a
benefit.
Our
goal
is
to
get
more
housing,
and
so
I
agree
with
that,
and
the
key
point
is
ultimately,
you
know
it's
going
to
be
whether
it's
economically
feasible
for
this
project
to
happen,
and
so
you
know
that's
what
I'm
shooting
for.
So
I
believe
that
the
height
that's
one
question
I
have.
I
want
to
ask
the
staff
indeed,
I
feel
to
me
that
the
stakeholder
would
like
to
have
the
d.a
to
provide
some
certainty.
H
They
don't
like
it
to
have,
you
know,
dea
to
be
negotiated
and
it
may
not
happen
to
their.
You
know
desired
necessity.
So
are
we
thinking
about
when
we
have
a
dea
that
we're
going
to
be
using
da
to
provide
increased
height
or
are
we
thinking
that
we
don't
know
yet
may
not
happen?
So
maybe
the
staff
can
say
a
few
words
about
that.
X
So
the
the
option
b
use
of
the
d.a
based
on
previous
council
direction
on
september
13th,
was
to
use
the
da
to
provide
for
additional
height
with
additional,
affordable
housing
as
kind
of
the
benefit.
So
that
would
be
above
the
max
height
that
would
be
established
in
the
code
you
have
to
set.
What's
the
ceiling
that
that
va
could
take
it
to,
which
is
right
so
which
is
well
the
recommendation
or
the
the
stakeholder
proposal
was
a
request
was
to
go
to
400
feet
or
420
with
mechanic.
H
X
To
accomplish
the
kind
of
distribution
of
far
and
and
building
density
across
the
property,
so
it
again
at
the
end,
it
will
be
the
council's
choice
on
how
high
they
would
want
to
go,
but
that
was
the
maximum
that
was
requested.
H
D
All
right,
thank
you,
mayor.
Just
one
clarifying
question
or
quick
question
for
staff
in
terms
of
incentivizing,
mom
and
pop
shops.
Is
there
any
way
or
anywhere
where
we
are
speaking
to
the
use
of
the
space
in
the
code
or
anywhere
currently.
Y
So
I
can,
I
can
provide
a
response
customer
barksdale
and
then
it
might
be
helpful
if
the
meal
wants
to
weigh
in
on
this
as
well.
So
the
the
land
use
code
in
downtown,
for
example,
before
downtown
livability.
Y
There
were
certain
requirements
that
developers
could
design
a
space
for
to
use
and
use
for
retail,
for
example.
So
we
had
retail
exemptions.
What
became
really
apparent?
Is
it
gets
difficult
based
on
on
different
development
cycles,
when
you
define
how
a
space
should
be
used
to
to
make
sure
that
that
use
is
always
that
that
space
is
consistently
tenanted,
and
so
we
have
had
examples
where,
for
example,
a
project
had
basically
a
vacant
suite
for
almost
30
years
in
downtown
bellevue.
They
took
the
exemption
for
retail
and
it
sat
vacant.
Y
It
was
on
the
corner
of
112th
and
northeast
8th,
so
it
wasn't
an
area
that
was
necessarily
primed
for
retail.
So
there
were
some
challenges,
though,
for
the
developers
to
to
re-tenant
that
space,
because
we
were
so
restrictive
on
the
use,
so
we
have
employed
that
before,
but
it
is
something
that
has
its
challenges.
So
those
are
things
that
we'd
have
to
work
through
and-
and
you
know,
where's
the
appropriate
place
for
those
items
to
go
and
it
would
have
to.
T
Yeah
council
member
barksdale
in
the
in
the
formation
of
the
bell
red
code,
we
did
look
at
some
limitations
on
retail,
especially
on
the
130
at
the
future
shopping
street
out
there.
So
if
council
would
like,
we
can
bring
back
some
of
the
information
that
is
in
the
bell
red
code,
but
hasn't
really
pertained
to
redevelopment
along
that
street.
Yet.
D
Got
it
so
I
mean
to
speak
to
this.
I
guess
the
dimensions
that
support
mom
and
pop
shops
and
the
analysis
that
would
be
required,
and
maybe
it's
separate
from
you
know
the
amenity
system.
Here
I
mean
we're
talking
about
having
a
list
of
amenities
as
part
of
the
dea.
That
would
be
separate
from
this
work.
D
I
would
be
interested
because
I
mean
if,
if,
if
mom
and
pop
shops
are
of
interest
and
a
priority
through
our
economic
development
plan,
at
some
point,
we're
gonna
have
to
do
this,
and
so
I'd
rather
figure
out
what
that
might
look
like
you
know,
and
and
do
some
of
that
work
now,
and
also
because
I
think
this
would
be
a
good
area
for
it,
especially
if
we've
also
talked
about
sort
of
allies
with
addresses,
and
then
you
know,
mother
pop
shops
will
make
for
really
good
alleys
with
address
uses.
D
So
I'd
be
interested
in
that
analysis
and
then
on
the
on
the
the
base.
Far,
I
guess
I'm
I'm
up
for
the
3.5.
I
guess
I
would
like
to
understand
what
that
means,
though,
in
terms
of
I
know,
the
economic
analysis
suggested
2.5.
D
What
is
what
does
that
mean
in
terms
of
the
amenities
that
we
might
not
get
if
we
go
to
3.5
or
might
get
like?
Can
you
speak
a
little
bit
more.
X
So
I
think,
we'll
probably
need
to
come
back
with
additional
information
to
kind
of
describe
the
the
impact
that
moving
lifting
the
base
far
1.0
creates.
So
we
can
try
to
quantify
that
as
the
value.
So
this
is
an
exchange
of
value
between
paying
for
a
public
benefit
and
being
able
to
do
it
essentially
without
any
being
able
to
accomplish
that
development
level
without
any.
X
Investment
in
the
kind
of
the
public
amenities,
so
you
move
the
base.
Far
up,
you
shrink
down
the
amount
of
public
benefit
that
will
be
invested
in
as
part
of
the
development
as
it
advances
so
we'll
try
to
quantify
that
so
that
it's
in
3.5
2.5
those
seem
like
small
numbers
but
and
they
are
a
significant
move
that
we
want
to
make
sure.
We
answer
your
question
and
help.
You
understand
the
magnitude
of
that.
A
A
Yeah,
I
I
think
just
from
the
little
bit.
I
know
I'm
not
interested
in
giving
gifting
1.0
base
far,
but
I'm
really
interested
in
incentivizing
it
to
go
to
the
maximum.
F
A
So
I
think
what
I'm
hearing
from
the
council
is
just
what
you
said
mike
is
to
look
at
the
pros
and
cons
of
starting
at
a
higher
base,
but
also
wanting
to
re-examine
this
amenity
system
that
we
have-
and
I
sure
don't
want
to.
X
X
Tonight
we
heard
some
different
proposals
and
we
heard
some
different
opinions
about
the
prioritization
there
so
that
we
can
come
back
and
try
to
help
the
council
revisit
the
amenities
selections
and
how
you
want
to
array
those
we'll
see
if
we
can
work
it
into
a
another
meeting
that
we've
already
got
scheduled.
If
not,
we
may
have
to
find
a
way
to
squeeze
another
meeting
in
somewhere,
which
is
getting
more
challenging
as
we
head
toward
the
end
of
the
year.
X
As
you
know,
your
council
counter
gets
pretty
busy
as
we
move
toward
the
fall
and
winter
here.
So.
A
We
want
to
do
individual
council
meetings
and
get
feedback
from
each
council
member
on
their
in
their
ideas
of
the
priorities
for
amenities
that
might
be
helpful
for
you
to
come
back.
X
I
agree,
and
I
guess
the
one
piece
of
advice
here,
as
we've
already
mentioned:
if
we're
creating
a
new
amenity
that
hasn't
existed
and
doesn't
exist
elsewhere
in
the
city,
we
would
have
to
go
out
and
try
to
quantify.
You
know
what
the
value
of
that
amenity
is
to
calibrate
it.
So
that's
additional
kind
of
technical
work.
We
would
have
to
do
to
make
sure
it
fits
again.
X
It
really
depends
on
what
that
new
amenity
might
be,
but
mostly
what
we've
heard
tonight
is
how
we're
arranging
amenities
that
we
use
elsewhere
in
the
city
or
that
are
already
proposed
here.
So.
A
Well
and
I'll
just
use
this
moment
because
it's
my
turn
to
to
give
my
feedback,
you
know
I
I
appreciate
the
mom
and
pop
shops.
I
think
what
is
not
unique
is
the
desire
to
retain
restaurants
and
shops
are
on
the
existing
property
when
they
redevelop-
and
I
I
know
I've
read
instances
where,
if
you
can
provide
you
know
one
of
these
businesses
with
a
grant
for
a
year
to
get
them
up
to
scale,
to
a
larger
site
and
a
larger
clientele
that
they
have
more
chance
to
be
successful
so
kind
of
retaining.
A
A
W
C
C
The
recommendation
is
2.5.
I
think
3.5
is
a
reasonable.
You
know
middle
point
that
we
can
agree,
I'm
all
for
the
incentive
system.
Don't
get
me
wrong.
I
think
we
want
all
of
those
public
amenities
etc,
but
you
know,
I
think
we
also
need
to
keep
in
in
mind
where
this
is
is
located,
who
they're
competing
against
and
what
those
other
areas
are
zoned
for.
It
also
sounded
as
if
we
were
starting
to
make
some
some
some
some
traction
here
in
terms
of
that
pedestrian
bridge.
C
I
think
all
recognizing
both
the
safety
implications
of
that,
but
also
just
the
fact
that
it
might
be
critical
to
the
to
the
success
of
this
project
as
well,
but
we
feel
like
we
need
another
meeting,
I'm
fine
with
that.
I
just
don't
want
us
on
to
get
off
track
or
we're
not
hitting
that
december
6th
deadline
anymore.
So
if
we
can,
if
we
can
do
that,
that'd
be
great.
A
W
Councilmembers
on
yes,
thank
you
mayor.
You
know
we
talked
a
lot
about
downtown
and
olb,
and
what
I
think
about
is
that
this
is
the
first
of
talking
about
transit-oriented
development,
where
wilburton
and
bell
red
look
back,
and
so
whatever
we
make
decisions
about
here
related
to
do
we
do
we
look
at
a
far
of
five
with
or
without
the
critical
areas.
I
think
this
is
really
potentially
setting
the
stage
for
how
we
look
at
those
other
areas.
W
This
sets
the
tone
for
other
areas,
and
then
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I
was
clear
about
mayor
your
comment
about
affordable
housing
component
in
non-residential.
W
So
are
we
saying
that,
within
the
residential
properties,
there
would
be
a
a
mixed
use
where
residential
would
be
in
there
so
potentially,
as
we
consider
going
from
a
2.5
to
3.5
on
the
non-res
that
one
of
the
pieces
of
public
benefit
we
might
be
asking
for
is
affordable
housing?
So
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
what
that
concept
is.
I
think.
V
Councilmember
robertson
thanks,
so
I
thought
I
heard
four.
If
not
five
council
members
expressed
support
for
3.5
3.5.
S
F
F
V
A
V
Thought
we
had
support
for
moving
the
ped
bridge
to
tier
one.
I
also
heard
support
for
at
least
being
open
to
have
an
affordable
housing
amenity
for
the
commercial,
as
you
so
ably
described
mayor.
The
other
thing
I
thought
I
heard
support
for
was
to
have
the
d.a
be
a
little
bit
more
expansive
to
be
able
to
this.
Is
you
know,
we're
doing
this
overlay?
V
If
we
don't
have
it
exactly
right,
we
can
flex
that,
but
of
course
we
need
to
have
those
public
benefits,
so
I
would
be
very
interested
in
understanding
the
will
of
the
council
on
that.
V
With
regard
to
whether
we
need
another
meeting
or
not
I'm,
we
may
need
another
meeting
to
stay
on
track
anyway,
but
for
me
the
incentive
system
is
as
good
as
it
is
and
with
maybe
some
those
two
little
tweaks
of
moving
the
ped
bridge
up
and
and
moving
on,
because
we
need
to
make
decisions
and
and
move
on
in
order
to
stay
on
track.
So
I
think
I
covered
everything
and
oh
on
the
max
density,
I'd
like
to
figure
out
a
way
to
make
it
a
full
5.0.
A
F
Yeah
and
the
5.0
also
make
sure
that's
clear
so
answer.
Let
me
ask
this
question:
why,
if
we
raise
the
far
from
2.5
to
3.5,
what
if
we
kept
it
at
2.5
and
we
wanted
to
go
these
incentives
if
we
raise
the
3.5,
why
doesn't
that
increase
the
the
incentives
as
well?
I
mean
I
thought
that
was
a
part
of
the
point
of
that.
F
I
mean:
are
you
saying
if
we
only
have
0.5,
I
mean
explain
the
relationship
there
a
little
better
on,
because
I
think
we're
all
saying
we
want
more
of
these,
these
things
in
the
first
and
second
tiers,
and
that
should
come
from
benefits
given
in
the
far,
and
I
thought
that
was
what
we
were
talking
about
to
a
certain
extent.
X
X
Yeah,
so
nick
can
you
go
up
to
the
basic
far
slide,
so
we
can
talk
about
this
really
quick
or
tris.
Now,
whoever
I
think
tristan
you've
got
the
slides
so
that
that
wouldn't
work.
So
when
we're
talking
about
the
non-residential
it's
the
center
bar,
the
base
far
is
set
at
2.5,
so
in
the
draft
code,
so
the
base
far
allows
the
developer
gives
the
developer
the
right
to
build
that
high
that
level
of
density
2.5.
X
So
the
light
blue
bar
above
that
is
the
additional
lift,
the
2.5
additional
lift
that
they
can
do
to
add
density,
but
to
add
that
density
in
that
light,
blue
bar,
they
have
to
pay
for
the
public
amenities,
so
it's
open
space,
child
care
and
the
other
options
that
are
in
the
in
the
tiers.
So
in
the
excuse
me
the
amenity
list,
so
if
you
raise
the
2.5
up,
then
what
you're
doing
is
you're
reducing
the
amount
of
incentive
that
they
have
to
pay
for,
so
you
won't
get
as
many
amenities
as
you
would.
F
That
really
would
have
helped
have
had
that
explained
at
the
beginning,
and
maybe
I'm
the
only
one
who
didn't
understand
it,
but
that
doesn't
seem
to
make
sense
if
we
agree
to
raise
the
far
from
2.5
to
3.5
in
a
development
agreement.
X
So
the
the
the
question
on
the
table,
or
whether
one
is
to
outright
raise
the
base
fa
or
not
using
a
development
agreement,
but
just
in
the
code
give
that
right
to
develop.
That
would
be
this
option
raise
the
base
to
3.5.
It
would
reduce
the
amount
of
that
additional
far
that's
required
through
the
amenities
system,
so
they
wouldn't
be
required
to
provide
as
much
open
space
or
child
care
or
the
potential
street
amenity
to
accomplish
that
that
maximum
far
5.0,
so
it
really
is.
This
is
the
this
is
the
calibration.
X
F
F
F
A
F
A
A
Is
is
staff
is
recommending
that
we
start
at
2.5?
A
F
Because
I
was
under
the
wrong
assumption
that
there
would
be
some
additional
benefit
out
of
that.
I
don't
know.
I'm
just
trying
to
think
this
through,
because
we're
we're
making
a
big
decision.
We're
talking
we're
talking
about
a
lot
of
amenities
and
things
too,
and
all
of
which
make
this
a
better
development
than
just
building
well.
A
H
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
I'm
still
going
for
3.5
3.5
and
max
5.3
with
one
question:
stop
what
what's
the
major
difference
of
5.3
and
5.0,
then
I
will
make
a
comment.
Yeah
tell
me
5.0
and
5.3.
H
X
Well,
first
of
all,
it
allows
for
a
significant
additional
level
of
density,
so
more
square
footage
can
be
built
as
a
result
of
any
incremental
increase
in
the
base
in
in
the
in
the
maximum.
Far
that's
allowed.
The
the
other.
The
other
challenge
is
that
that
level's
setting
that
as
the
maximum
in
the
code
would
require
that
we
have
to
do
a
little
bit
more
process,
work
related
to
the
environmental
review.
X
H
Okay,
so
I'm
flexible
on
that,
I
can
go
with
5.0
503
doesn't
matter.
I
believe
that
you
know
the
developer
has
already
made
a
lot
of
agreement
to
do
all
the
amenities.
As
we
can
see
you
know
in
the
charter-
and
I
noticed
your
recommended-
our
recommendation
is
not
that
much
different
than
what
the
developer
has
agreed
to
do,
and
so
I
think
it
really
ultimately
depends
on.
H
If
there's
too
many
things
that
they
got
their
hands
tied
and
realistic,
they're
not
going
to
do
it
or
they
do
it,
they
won't
make
any
money.
In
that
case,
we
don't
get
any
amenities,
so
I
believe
that
you
know
they
are
willing
to
negotiate,
especially
if
it's
a
council,
you
know
option,
and
we
can
always
ask
and
if
they're
the
people
that
we
believe
and
trust
and
they
have
a
good
project
we
want.
I
think
we
can
realize
those
things.
As
I
mentioned,
you
know,
I
mean
I
will
left
a
lot
more.
H
You
know
the
question
is:
what
realistically
can
we
get,
and
I
think
this
is
one
way
to
encourage
a
developer
that
wants
to
do
it
and
wants
to
serve
the
community
once
do
a
project,
so
they
can
be
in
business
for
a
long
time
and
that's
what
we've
seen
in
the
city
of
bellevue.
We
got
great
great
people
who
have
made
it
happen,
so
I
stay
say
with
jennifer
done,
I
mean
robert
said
sorry.
I
promoted
you.
D
Nothing
different
from
my
previous
comments
mayor.
Thank
you.
D
On
what
we
would
be
giving
up
in
terms
of
amenities,
yes,
thank
you.
A
Okay,
well,
I'm
I'm
solid
on
the
2535
max
5.0
and
so
let's
go
through.
I
think
we're
going
to
end
up
a
split,
but
we'll
do
it
anyway.
Deputy
mayor.
A
Okay,
council
members
on.
W
And
I
also
believe
that
we,
if
we
are
going
to
go
up
to
the
3.5,
then
we
need
to
be
looking
at
the
mom
and
pop,
because
without
this,
as
an
incentive,
we
will
never
get
to
affordable
retail
spaces.
For
these
small
incubator
mom-and-pop
places,
and
these
tough
things
are
what
government
is
equipped
to
do,
because
otherwise
the
market
won't
do
it.
Thank
you.
A
V
Three:
five:
three
five
max
full
far:
five
and
moving
the
ped
bridge
up
and
also
allowing
greater
flexibility
on
the
d.a
process.
A
F
So
additional
flexibility
in
the
dea
process
would
not
include
some
more
incentives
for
raising
the
base
for
the
far.
F
I
mean
we're
kind
of
pushing
it
at
ourselves
on
this
whole
piece
5.0,
and
I
like
the
and
the
incentives
I
do
think
taking
into
account
special
amenities
and
performing
arts
is,
is
a
priority
for
me
to
work
that
in
and
otherwise
I'm
fine
with
it.
A
X
Okay,
we
can
certainly
do
that,
based
on
tonight's
feedback,
to
try
to
organize
some
different
options
for
council
consideration.
A
Okay,
so
I
wonder
if
you
can
make
a
motion
deputy
mirror.
I
know
this
one's
a
tough
one.
I
think
the
first
line
and
a
half
and
then
add.
A
Or
maybe
just
stop
at
far
of
5.0,
and
then
staff
has
direction
to
come
back
to
discuss
the
amenity
system.
Does
that
sound?
Is
that
a
a
reasonable
thing
to
do
to
come
out
with
a
motion
just
for
the
first
sentence
to
be
ending
at
far
5-0
in
the
recommended
option.
X
Don't
have
to
decide
first,
you
have
to
the
document
that
you're
looking
at
is
the
agenda
memo.
Is
that
what
you're
referring
to
it.
A
Would
re
it
would
read
to
direct
staff
to
incorporate
option
b
of
base,
far
of
2-5
for
non-residential
3-5
for
residential
development
with
a
maximum
far
5-0,
because
that's
like
the
only
thing
we've
decided
on
for
three
tonight,
the
rest
would
be.
Do
we
ask
in
the
motion
for
you
to
come
back
and
for
more
discussion
on
the
amenity
system,
or
is
that
just
enough
of
a
motion
for
you
and
you
know
to
come
back.
X
C
F
Yeah,
I
think
at
this
point
forcing
the
vote
at
this
point
where
there
is
a
question
is,
is
really
not
helpful
because
then
we're
stuck,
we
can't
go
back
and
un-vote
it
I'm
if
you,
if
we
want
to
have
a
collaborative
working
relationship
on
this,
then
let's
do
that.
If
we
just
want
to
take
a
vote,
oh
I
mean
I
can't
abstain
because
it'll
be
counted
one
way
and
I
have
a
serious
question
and
I
think
that's
and
we
there's
no
rush
on
the
time.
This
is
not
going
to
change
the
dynamics
on
this.
A
F
Because
I
said
I
want
to,
I
there's.
A
It's
okay,
so,
okay
mike
it
sounds
like
we'll,
have
to
come
back
and
and
re-examine
this,
and
hopefully
you
can
meet
with
various
council
members
and
and
get
their
questions
answered
so
that
we
can
at
some
point,
take
a
vote,
an
educated
vote
and
move
forward
on
this.
X
We
are,
we
are
certainly
happy
to
meet
with
council
members.
This
is
we
recognize.
This
can
be
very
confusing
and
complicated,
so
appreciate
the
work
working
through
to
where
we
are
so
absolutely
ready
to
support
you,
as
you
continue
deliberation
getting
to
decisions.
A
Okay,
well,
thank
you,
everybody
for
your
good
discussion
and
our
meeting
is
adjourned.
We'll
see
you
next
week,.