►
Description
City of Boston Licensing Board - Voting Hearing - 01/20/2022
A
A
While
the
public
is
encouraged
to
attend,
there
will
be
no
additional
public
testimony
accepted
today,
we're
beginning
with
the
license
premise:
inspection
hearing,
which
occurred
on
tuesday
january
18th,
2022
item
number
one
955
llc
doing
business
as
dylan's,
located
at
951
boylston
street
date
of
the
incident
october,
31st
2021
patron
on
patron
assault
in
violation
of
mass
general
laws.
Chapter
138,
section
64.
and
chapter
265,
section
13,
a
an
expired
assembly
permit
in
violation
of
mass
general
laws,
chapter
138,
section,
64
and
boards
rule
1.02
b.
B
A
B
B
B
C
B
A
Okay:
violation
with
a
written
warning
item
number
six
fuente
cleaning
services,
inc,
doing
business
as
belarus;
columbia
located
at
28,
bennington
street
in
east
boston
date
of
the
incident
november.
6
2021
failure
to
adhere
to
licensing
board
guidelines
regarding
window
covering
in
violation
of
mass
general
law,
chapter
138,
section
64.,.
B
The
agreement
that
we
had
with
the
licensee
that
prevented
him
from
covering
his
windows
was
something
we
negotiated
together
with
the
local
district
captain.
I
have
not
had
an
opportunity
to
discuss
with
him.
I
do
see
a
violation
because
the
window
coverings
were
the
windows
were
covered
and
you
can't
see
in
from
outside,
but
I
would
like
to
defer
the
vote
on
this
until
I
can
check
in
with
the
local
police
captain.
A
B
A
Chapter
138,
section
64
and
chapter
265,
section
15a
sultan
battery
patron
patron
in
violation
of
mass
general
laws;
chapter
138,
section
64
and
chapter
265,
section;
13a
assault
and
battery
patron
employee,
in
violation
of
mass
general
chapter
138,
section
64
and
chapter
265,
section;
13;
a
failure
to
call
9-1-1
in
violation
of
mass
general
laws;
chapter
138,
section,
64.
and
boards
rule
1.14
b;
and
failure
to
cooperate
with
police
in
violation
of
mass
general
laws.
Chapter
138,
section
64
in
board's
rule
1.10
a
and
b.
B
C
B
C
B
My
my
biggest
concern
is
with
the
licensee
not
making
himself
available.
He
immediately
closed
down
the
license
premise
after
the
incident
to,
as
he
said,
regroup,
but
that
completely
impeded
the
investigation
by
boston,
police
and
especially
the
district
police
officers,
and
I
have
never
in
all
the
years
that
I've
been
chair.
This
board
have
seen
a
hearing
be
used
as
an
investigation
and
it's
clear
that
the
police
are
still
not
able
to
get
the
information
they
want
from
the
licensee
and
hopefully
with
the
with
their
attorney
working
with
them.
B
B
I
also
vote
that
they
submit
a
written
security
plan,
a
training
plan
for
their
employees
and
they
notify
us,
I'm
sorry,
backup,
danny.
I'm
sorry,
I
think
I'd
like
to
call
that
a
reopening
plan
that
will
include
a
written
security
plan,
a
training
plan,
a
list
of
their
staff
and
that
staff
will
include
any
security
officers.
They
have
any
any
subcontractors
they
have
and
should
they
be
using
promoters.
B
C
I
agree
with
all
that
I
did
have
a
comment
about
cooperation.
No
really,
but
when
I
said
everyone
that
was
like,
I
think
they
they
muddied
the
waters
in
a
way
on
cooperation.
But
really,
when
I
thought
about
it,
it's
like
they're
really
trying
to
say
that
they
were
compliant
with
like
what
was
clear
and
cooperation
is
something
more
than
mere
compliance.
I
mean
they're
supposed
to
work
with
the
police
like
actively
and
that's
what.
B
I
was
trying
to.
I
was
troubled
by
troubled
by
the
dha's
answer
that
he
had
told
the
police
to
be
back
in
town
on
a
certain
date,
but
then
his
response
was
well.
You
never
called
me.
I
think
I
think
the
district
police
officers
have
a
lot
they're
juggling
and
having
to
track
down
this
out
of
state.
Dj
is
not
something
they
should
have
to
do.
That
person
should
be
coming
forward
with
the
helpful
information
with
instagram
account
names.
Anyone
that's
familiar
with
them.
B
B
Reinforce
the
24-hour
contact
should
not
be
an
hr
person.
The
reason
why
we
have
a
24-hour
contact
for
these
licensees
is
for
cooperation
with
boston
police.
We
have
many.
We
have
many
examples
of
how
licensees
video
cameras
have
helped
solve
crimes,
not
crimes
that
are
necessarily
committed
within
the
license
premise,
but
on
the
streets
of
boston,
and
that
is
the
reason
why
we
want
the
24-hour
contact.
Should
we
need
to
get
video
footage
of
a
crime
that
occurred
in
the
license
premise?
B
C
B
C
A
Absolutely
and
that
can
also
be
included
in
the
communication
that
goes
out
to
them,
which
will
be
included
in
the
app
in
the
licenses
file
as
well.
So,
just
to
recap
what
I
believe
the
vote
was:
there's
a
vote
for
a
violation
and
a
four-day
suspension
to
be
served
on
a
date
upon
reopening
and
to
be
approved
by
this
board
in
advance
of
their
reopening.