►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearings 10/25/2022 Part 2
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
Watch Part 1: https://youtu.be/07S7CmdhxHU
A
A
A
A
B
C
Do
so
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
call
again
the
hearing
for
10
30
and
11
30
and
12
in
the
12
o'clock
cases
to
see
if
anybody
is
going
to
defer,
so
that
might
alleviate
some
pressure
or
some
strain
yeah,
but
I'm
going
to
stop
the
10
30
hearings
I'm,
going
to
call
any
deferrals
or
withdrawals
for
10
30..
C
I
think
that
might
be
11
30
minutes
to
blame.
Okay,
sorry,
it's
okay!
Are
there
any
10
30
hold
on
to
that
thought
for
a
second.
C
C
D
Good
afternoon
Mr
chair
members
of
the
board
Richard
Lynn's
245
Sumner
Street,
East
Boston
behalf
of
the
petitioner.
It
appears
we
will
only
have
a
side
River
board
at
that
time
and
therefore
requesting
an
administrative
referral.
F
I'll
make
a
motion
to
defer.
B
All
right,
Mr
Fortune,
yes,
Mr,
agero,
yeah,
Mr
Robinson,
yes,
Miss
pinata,
yes,
Miss
Logue,.
G
D
That
correct
Mr,
Lynch
221,
that's
the
one,
we're
definitely
deferring
because
I
believe
there's
a
recuse
on
that.
That
will
be
a
four-month
report.
I
believe
279
Maverick
would
actually
not
have
a
quorum
if
you
lose
a
member
and
we
have
another
recusal.
So
what
was
the
reason
for.
B
My
request,
hopefully
we'll
get
it
before
we
lose
another
member,
but
we'll
I
mean
there's
nothing
we
can
do.
This
is
for
some
reason.
This
agenda
is
packed,
I
understand
it's
too
tight
and
we
will
just
do
the
best
we
can
and
if
we
get
to
that
point,
you'll
have
to
make
a
game
time
decision
then
so.
H
F
I
C
K
Mr
Mr
Fortune
Mr,
chair
attorney,
Ryan
Spitz,
so
I
was
hoping,
so
it
appears
that
I,
so
I
have
a
rediscussion
at
11
30.
That
I
just
have
to
Circle
back
with
my
client,
and
it
appears
that
we're
going
to
only
have
a
five-member
board
prior
to
them,
making
the
decision.
So
when
you
call
the
11
30s
I,
just
if,
if
I
can
ask
that.
K
Then
one
other
issue
that
we
have
is
I
have
their
the
rediscussion
for
82
through
84
Boston
street
that
has
been
had
has
had
two
previous
administrative
deferrals
based
upon
having
a
five-member
board.
We
would
move
forward
with
with
the
motion
for
reconsideration
if
we
had
a
six-member
board,
if
there
is
any
way
of
hearing
that
out
of
order,
you.
B
Know
no
I
apologize.
It's
certainly
not
your
fault.
This
is
a
problem
with
just
the
the
make
of
the
board
and
the
extent
of
cases
that
is
coming
before
us,
but
we
have
to
call
we
have
to
follow
the
agenda.
So,
okay,
all
right.
It's
like
a
game
time
decision,
I.
Think
on
that
one
as
well.
I
will
great.
K
C
C
The
first
case
for
10
30.
calling
boa
135
4097
139
Austin
Street.
This
should
reduce
the
first
floor,
deck
size
and
add
a
second
floor
deck
to
the
back
of
the
house,
with
a
spiral
staircase
to
violate
with
a
new
accommodate
a
new
deck
entry.
The
violation
article,
51,
section,
9
side
yards,
insufficient
article
5169,
the
rail
yard,
isn't
sufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
J
I
am
Alice
Minter,
with
negc,
representing
the
clients
who
own
at
139,
Parsons
Street.
J
So
the
project
is
a
minor
interior,
the
the
client-owned
owned
and
occupied
unit
on
the
second
and
third
floor,
they're,
looking
to
demo
their
existing
first
floor,
deck
decrease
it
in
size
and
install
a
second
floor
deck,
so
they
have
egress
from
their
second
floor
to
their
rear
yard.
The
project
is
our
the
house,
as
it
is,
is
already
within
the
setbacks.
B
B
No,
no
I
understand
that.
So
my
point
is
that
the
rear,
the
side,
yard
and
rear
yard
violations
are
pre-existing
conditions
correct,
okay,
all
right,
Mr
Robinson.
How
are
the
plans
well.
F
Shoot
I
thought
this
was
going
to
be
quick,
so
I
only
have
the
spiral
plans.
I
do
not
have
the
adjusted
plans
in
my
pack,
so
I
I'm
unable
to
review
but
I,
don't
see
any
issue
with
what
they're
proposing
I
understand.
What
he's
saying
so
I
would
be
comfortable
if
we
could
move
forward
with
I
mean
we
have
the
incorrect
plans.
They
just.
F
Spirals
there,
which
I'm
fine
with
anyways
but
not
sure
how
we
want
to
proceed
on
that
so.
B
J
B
Okay,
Mr
chairman
go
ahead.
Thank
you
any
any
questions
on
the
board.
Any
anybody
want
to
testify
you,
the
four
or
against.
M
Morning
or
good
afternoon,
rather
Mr
chair
members
of
the
board,
Frank
Mendoza
here,
Austin
writing
liaison
for
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
here
to
report
that
the
having
completed
their
Butters
meeting
and
their
civic
association.
At
this
time,
our
office
is
aware
that
the
Brighton
Austin
Improvement
Association
voted
to
support
the
project
with
the
Proviso
that
they
not
do
the
spiral
staircase
previously
mentioned,
as
well
as
a
reduction
in
deck
size
with
that
said,
as
always,
we'll
defer
to
the
Judgment
of
the
board.
Thank
you.
N
O
G
C
B
All
right
can
I
have
a
motion
and
I
think
I.
Think
if
we
can
frame
the
motion
in
such
a
way
to
to
deal
with
the
issue
of
the
plans.
F
I'll
give
it
a
try,
so
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
the
proposal
with
the
adjusted
stair,
which
it
appears
to
be
more
traditional
and
rectilinear.
I
assume
and
I
will
withhold
signature
until
those
plants
come
through
the
process
for
final
approval.
B
C
The
violations,
article
67
section
11,
the
MFR
is
forbidden
in
Atlanta
sub-district,
article
67,
section
32
RSP
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
67,
633,
graphic
visibility
across
the
corner;
article
67,
Section,
8,
retail
use
forbidden
the
two
f-5000
sub-district
medical
67,
section
9,
the
fluid
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
6769
the
building
has
accessible
stories.
Article
67
section,
9,
the
building
hides
excessive
in
feet:
radical
67,
section,
9,
the
front
yards
insufficient
and
article
667
section
9
of
the
raid
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
Q
Good
afternoon,
Mr
chairman
members
of
the
board,
Attorney
John
pagini
10
Phillips
Road
in
Braintree
with
me
today,
is
Travis
Blake
who's,
the
architect
together
with
Tony
Ferrara,
who
is
the
applicant
635
podcast
in
Roslindale.
Zoning
is
both
neighborhood
shopping
and
two
at
five
thousand.
The
lot
size
is
just
under
12,
000,
11,
920
square
feet,
and
it's
located
at
the
corner
of
Canterbury
Street
and
Hyde
Park
Avenue.
This
is
the
former
Erie
Pub
building,
which
many
of
you
know
since
that
it
housed
the
Delicious
Restaurant,
which
was
unsuccessful
and
ultimately
closed.
Q
Several
years
ago,
the
proposals
to
erase
the
existing
bar
building
and
condemn
single-family
to
the
rear,
which
is
located
at
1002
Canterbury
Street
that
it
bought
to
train
tracks.
Both
these
buildings
are
in
common
ownership
and
construct
a
new
building
containing
27
residential
units,
one
level
retail
space
and
14
off
street
parking
spaces
internal
to
the
building
accessed
off
Hyde
Park
Ave
to
the
left
of
the
building.
The
parking
ratio
is
determined
by
the
article
80
process
to
the
bpda.
Also
there
is
a
a
common
roof
deck
that
will
be
set
back.
Q
That
is
access
to
stairs
in
a
head
house
as
far
as
violations,
one
of
the
violations
which
I'm
Mr
Fortune
read
out
under
neighborhood
shopping,
that
is
multi-family
residential,
isn't
allowed
use
to
enabled
shopping.
That's
a
mistake
on
ISD,
so
we
have
Osprey
parking
in
this
District.
You
have
two
we're
proposing.
14,
Youth,
multi-family,
residential
and
Retail
are
not
allowed
in
a
two-family
district.
Q
The
entrance
of
most
of
the
building
is
in
US
District,
which
the
uses
are
allowed
far
allowed,
as
one
with
2.26
height
allowed
is
three
stories
35
feet,
we're
fourth
story:
42
feet:
front
yard
is
10
feet
existing
front
yard
at
zero.
We
pulled
that
back
to
widen
the
sidewalk
square
at
five
feet.
Three
and
a
half
feet
and
rear
yard
is
10
feet
we're
at
13
feet,
so
there's
no
violation
there.
As
far
as
the
unit
program,
our
first
floor,
retails
914
square
feet.
Q
On
the
first
level
we
have
bike,
storage
and
bike
repair
that
is
533
square
feet.
There
are
18
one
bedroom
units
with
an
average
size
of
663
63
square
feet.
Nine
two
bedroom
units,
an
average
size
of
887
square
feet.
This
proposal
went
through
an
article
aid
process
and
was
approved
by
the
BBA
board
on
June
16th.
We've
worked
extensively
with
the
bpda
BTD
Traffic
Engineers
and
the
public
Improvement
commission.
As
part
of
the
work,
the
developer
has
agreed
to
install
additional
carbon
gliding
sidewalks
and
create
shorter
crosswalks
to
Traverse
High
Park
Avenue.
Q
Additionally,
this
proposal
fire
exceeds
the
inflatability
requirement,
as
will
contribute
approximately
19
affordable
in
five
units,
which
will
be
three
two
bed
units
and
two
one
bed
units.
We
went
to
a
good
Community
process
and
supplied
the
board
with
30
letters
of
support,
including
support
from
the
District
counselor,
as
well
as
the
state
representative
and
we're
all
here
to
answer
any
questions.
B
It
so
okay,
so
this
is
a
pretty
dense
you're,
pretty
much
covering
the
entire
lot,
and
these
are
relatively
small
units
is.
Was
there
a
particular
rationale
in
in
designing
such
small
units.
Q
Yes,
they
were
because
of
the
demographic
demographic
of
the
people
that
they
thought
would
buy
here
would
be
skew
toward
younger
or
empty
nesters.
So
that's
why
they're
skewed
toward
the
one
beds
and
the
two
bedroom
units.
B
Q
I
mean
these
are
these:
are
not
micro
units
and
no
they're,
certainly
not.
B
No
they're
not
like,
but
well
they're,
not
macro
units
either.
That's
for
sure.
Okay,
can
you
explain
that
once
again
explain
the
parking.
Q
You
were
so
initially
we
went
to
the
bpda
with
a
much
higher
parking
ratio.
However,
through
that
process
and
the
fact
that
this
is
right
on
High
Park
Avenue,
with
four
bus
lines
going
back
and
forth
to
Forest
Hills,
they
wanted
us
to
reduce
that
to
a
0.5
parking
ratio,
so
we're
just
over
that
at
27
14
parking
spaces,
okay,.
B
All
right-
and
there
is
a
roof
deck
here
right.
Q
There
is
there's
a
roof
deck
that's
accessed
through,
it
has
built
a
steer
and
a
a
head
house.
I
know
your
position
on
that.
It
would
be
it's
where
it's
a
common
roof
deck.
You
can't
make
accessible
hatches,
but
that's
something
we
could
work
with
the
board
on
all.
Q
F
B
F
Drawings
are
good,
you
know,
I,
think
it
is
it's
a
prominent
corner
and
I
think
it's
it's
doing
a
fairly
good
job,
considering
the
slope
of
the
site
as
well,
because
it
slopes
up
quite
a
bit
I
think
with
the
increased
affordability
at
19.
I
think
that
the
project
has
some
some
nice
aspects
to
it.
So
really.
C
F
No
other
questions
about
the
proposal,
so
thank
you
are.
E
Just
quick
question
on
the
affordability:
I
appreciate
the
19:
can
you
talk
about
the
income
limits
for
those
portable
units?
Absolutely.
Q
All
of
those
units
Ms
panado,
are
at
the
70
Airline
right.
Thank
you.
B
Okay,
has
anyone
here
to
speak
either
for
against
the
project.
S
S
in
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
I'm,
here
to
confirm
that
we
did
receive
all
those
letters,
including
the
one
from
the
neighborhood
association,
Walker
thousand
bill
and
representative
sorry,
representative,
Russell,
Holmes,
Russell,
Homes.
Okay,
thank
you.
So
we
did
receive
those
they
were
all
in
support.
I
haven't
received
any
letters
of
opposition
from
the
community
so
far.
Maybe
I
would
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board.
T
U
U
I
stated
90:
affordability
is
what
we
favor
it's
sort
of
place
all
while
we
make
it
commercial
building
with
new
housing
and
high
affordability
and
I
stated
State.
Rep
homes
also
supports
this
project.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank.
V
C
V
Hi
I'm
Adriana,
Taylor
I
live
on
arborfield
Road,
Roslindale
I've
lived
in
Roslindale
over
50
years
or
so,
and
I
drive
through
this
section
every
day
and
afternoon,
going
to
work
and
coming
from
work.
I
think
it's
about
time
that
we
do
something
with
that
corner.
It
I'm
really
looking
forward
and
I'm
in
fully
support
of
this
project.
Also.
W
T
W
X
Y
P
AA
Hyde
Park
Ave
I've
been
in
it
for
over
30
years,
I'm
in
great
support
of
the
project.
I
think
we
need
to
change
on
that
corner.
I
agree
with
the
other
person,
I'd
be
honor,
I
I'm
in
support
of
the
project
and
I.
Think
it's
a
great
idea.
Thank.
O
B
L
AB
C
You
everybody
finally
next
case
calling
DOA
one:
two:
nine
five:
seven:
nine
nine
63
waldeck
Street.
It's
a
proposed
15
rare
Edition,
we're
going
to
figure
out
what
that
means.
The
violations,
article
65
section,
9
flood
a
ratio-
is
success
of
an
article
65
69.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
to
the
record.
Please.
C
Could
you
read
on
the
Paul's
purpose,
it
says
proposed
15
rare
Edition.
What
is
that.
I
I
We're
proposing
for
additional
for
the
first
four
second
and
third
floor,
because
my
parents
are
handicap,
so
we're
hoping
to
have
the
accessibility
for
them
on
the
first
floor
with
the
bathroom
and
also
basically
for
the
bathroom,
the
living
room
for
them,
the
bedroom,
the
bathroom
and
basically
more
accessible
for
them
on
the
first
floor
and
then
they're
in
the
second
and
third
floor
is
because
we
have
a
large
family.
I
B
F
It
is
a
three-story,
but
this
third
floor
is
set
back
sort
of
offset
three
story
because
of
the.
AC
B
F
No
questions
about
the
proposed
scope,
I
think
it
fits
with
the
neighborhood.
It's
not
it's
not
oversizing
the
house
itself
or
anything
that
it's
I
think
it
works
pretty.
Well,
no
questions.
Okay,.
B
Good
condition:
okay,
all
right!
Any
questions
on
the
board
does.
AE
Yes,
Mr
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
Neighborhood
Services
this
time
the
mayor's
office
like
to
defer
to
the
Judgment
of
the
board
we
held
the
voters
meeting
for
this
proposal
in
January.
AE
There
were
neighbors
were
mostly
in
support.
There's
one
neighbor,
who
voiced
some
concerns
regarding
potential
for
beam
uses
like
an
Airbnb,
but
other
neighbors
were
very
supportive
of
the
opportunity
for
the
family
to
have
access
to
their
age
and
grandparents.
They
also
received
support
in
the
local
civic
association
as
well
with
that
we
defer
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
F
Make
a
motion
to
approve
with
bpda
design,
review.
AF
B
B
Yes,
Miss
pinata,
yes,
Ms
Lowe,
yes,.
O
C
One
three:
six:
zero:
two:
eight
five:
three:
oh
One
Mount
Vernon
Street
just
to
construct
a
new,
approximately
75,
000
foot,
Field
House
athletic
complex
with
indoor
field,
tennis
courts
into
a
walking,
Track,
Fitness
training
rooms,
classrooms
event,
space,
also,
a
cafe
with
outdoor
seating
and
45
surface
parking
space.
The
violations
article
six
second
grade,
High
Street
Parking
facility-
is
located
in
restricted
parking
overlay.
District
article
6,
section
3A,
the
Osprey
pocket
facility
located
in
restricted
hiking
overlay
district
is
restricted,
pocket
District.
C
F
R
Good
morning,
Mr,
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
all
Omni
with
Golson
stores,
I
live
at
27
Parkton
Road,
Jamaica,
Plain
I'm
joined
today
by
Bill
Richard,
with
the
Martin
Richard
Foundation,
who,
together
with
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club
of
Dorchester,
are
the
proponents
for
this
project.
We're
also
joining
this
this
afternoon
by
Roadie
Architects
the
project
architect.
R
The
proponent
is
seeking
relief
associated
with
the
construction
of
an
approximately
75
000
square
foot
field
house
at
the
property
located
at
301
Mount
Vernon
Avenue
in
Dorchester.
The
project
will
contain
Fitness
facilities,
classrooms,
a
teaching
kitchen,
a
cafe
with
outdoor
seating
and
other
amenities
and
programmable
spaces.
R
The
project
site
is
located
in
the
community
commercial
sub
District
to
the
Dorchester
neighborhood
district
and
the
proponent
is
Seeking
a
variance
to
allow
height
in
excess
of
45
feet.
Various
conditional
use
permits
to
allow
certain
project
uses
and
in
our
pod
conditionally
used
permit
for
the
operation
of
an
off
street
parking
facility
containing
45
surface
parking
spaces.
R
We're
also
seeking
conditional
use
permit
for
Ansley
parking
to
allow
the
parking
lot
at
the
project
site
to
be
loosed
for
overflow
parking
by
the
neighboring
McCormick
Endeavor
schools
in
March
of
2022.
The
bpda
voted
to
approve
the
project
and
issue
a
scoping,
determined
waving
further
review
under
article
80.
and
in
June
of
2022.
R
B
Right
well,
thank
you
very
much.
This
is
this
proposal
is
a
long
time
coming
and
I
know
a
lot
of
work.
Effort
has
gone
into
it.
B
A
reminder:
this
is
a
five-member
board
at
this
point
with
with
Mr
Robinson's
recusal,
but
I
assume
you
are
choosing
to
go
ahead.
Yes,
sir.
Thank
you.
Okay,
yeah
can
we
have
most
of
the
violations
that
are
involved
are
conditional
use
violations
because
of
the
nature
of
the
project,
but
it
would
be
helpful
to
have
the
architect
walk
us
through
the
programming
of
the
the
project.
X
Sure
again,
this
is
Kevin
Dior
principal
of
Brody
Architects,
Mr,
chairman
members
of
the
board,
I'll
try
to
sum
that
up
the
purpose
of
the
building
as
a
field
house
for
Recreation
that
really
maximizes
the
potential
for
this
this
site
to
to
achieve
it's,
it's
its
Mission.
There
are
hard
courts
inside
the
facility,
then
there's
a
turf
field
on
the
upper
level
on
floor.
X
Three
a
second
floor
which
includes
a
running
track,
so
we're
really
maximizing
the
amount
of
recreation
that
can
happen
in
this
building
due
to
the
kind
of
aspirational
sort
of
aspects
of
this
project.
We
do
want
this
to
be
a
highly
utilized
building
by
the
community.
It's
a
Community
Asset
and
the
community
Manatee,
so
the
pieces
that
kind
of
go
along
that
are
conditional
uses
are.
X
Are
things
like
that
cafeteria,
which
is,
is
the
definition
used
by
zoning
that
we
felt
would
be
appropriate
for
a
cafe
that
we're
providing
at
the
ground
floor
so
that
if
people
are
spending
a
long
time
here,
which
we
hope
they
will
they'll
need
that
and
then
indeed,
there's
also
an
auditorium
which
we
thought
was
an
outgrowth
of
the
of
the
programming
that
we
did
with
our
youth
advisory
panel.
X
That
this
is
a
an
Athletics
forward
project
that
starts
started
there
and
the
the
nature
of
adding
an
auditorium
allows
for
theater
and
arts
to
have
a
place
in
this
building.
So
it's
due
to
the
kind
of
you
know,
I
guess
once
in
a
lifetime
aspect
of
this
building,
we
did
want
to
create
an
umbrella
of
a
lot
of
different
uses.
So
we
also
have
Bill
Richard,
who
could
probably
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
program,
because
that's
actually
a
very
team
feature
about
this
about
this
project.
B
But
I
have
two
questions
in
particular
one
it
has
to
do
with
access
and
and
Who
who,
how
do
people
get
access
to
it?
Who
will
be?
Who
will
be
able
to
use
it?
What
ages
and.
L
B
What
what
will
be
the
hours
of
operation.
X
R
And
in
the
meantime,
I
can
address
that
I
think
bill
needs
to
be
made
a
panelist
I'm,
not
seeing
him
listed.
R
So
access
to
the
building
will
be
available
during
certain
school
designated
time
slots
to
all
students,
a
BPS
and
then
off
school
hours.
The
the
access
will
be
limited
to
students
who
are
members
of
boys
and
girls,
club
George
Chester,
which
I
believe
Kevin.
You
may
correct
if
I'm
wrong
here,
that
any
Boston
Public
School
student
can
become
a
member
of
Boys
and
Girls
Club
of
Dorchester
for
just
a
dollar.
R
A
year
five
of
those
yeah,
that's
right
so
so
so
membership
is
not
required
to
access
for
school,
sanctioned
events
that
are
run
through
the
McCormick
or
Deborah
schools,
but
for
kids
that
do
want
to
use
the
after
school
programming
or
or
weekend
programming.
That's
available.
The
very
affordable
membership
to
Boys
Club
Dorchester
is
available.
R
So
they're,
not
necessarily
just
during
school
hours,
pursuing
to
the
Moa
the
there
there's
designated
time
during
each
school
day,
but
there's
also
a
system
for
allocating
certain
time
during
the
evenings,
the
weekends
and
school
vacation
time
that
the
schools
and
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club
of
Dorchester.
R
So,
for
example,
if
there
were
to
be
a
sports
event
after
school
hours,
the
school
in
the
beginning
of
the
year
can
can
designate
certain
times
that
the
facilities
will
be
available
for
exclusive
School
use.
All
school
students
can
come
over
during
those
times
and
and
use
the
facility
for
those
purposes
and.
B
Are
there
age
limits
for
for
use
and
access.
R
That
I
believe
the
membership
is
limited
to
under
18,
but
that
that
would
really
be
a
question
for
Bob
Scandal.
The
president
boys
girls,
with
Dorchester
there's
no
age
limit
for
use
during
school,
sanctioned
events.
So
if
there's
a
student
who
is
above
the
age
limit,
that's
coming
with
the
schools,
There's
No
Limit
there
I
just
don't
know
if
there's
a
maximum
minimum
age
for
the
membership
in
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club
of
Dorchester.
R
X
It's
it's
really
due
to
the
process
that
we've
involved
and
sort
of
referencing
that
that
wide
umbrella,
the
Harbor
Point
Community
nearby
neighbors
other
neighborhoods-
will
have
access
to
this
building,
it's
a
low
barrier
of
Entry.
So
in
fact,
we
do
believe
that
seniors
will
want
and
have
access
to
this
do
the
walking
Track
and
the
ability
to
get
access.
There
was
a
another
sort
of
aspect
of
our
program.
X
Is
the
inclusion,
the
the
fact
that
we
are
really
making
concerted
efforts
for
people
with
physical
and
neurological
disabilities
to
to
have
programs
here?
Another
reason
why
a
lot
of
the
program
sort
of
started
to
take
on
what
we're
calling
wraparound
services
to
this
kind
of
magnet
of
a
building,
so
the
elevator
access
and
the
easy
access
to
all
levels.
It
is
overtly
and
inclusive
and
accessible
building.
So.
B
I
see
that
bill
Richard
requested
to
be
a
panelist.
Can
he
be
made
panelists,
so
he
can
contribute
to
the
conversation.
Yes,.
O
AH
School
are
going
to
have
incredible
access
to
this,
as
will
other
kids
from
BPS,
but
in
evenings
and
weekends
it's
going
to
be
open.
It's
going
to
be
open
for
everything,
from
our
challenge
of
sports
and
and
use
for
team
sports
for
kids,
with
Developmental
and
physical
disabilities,
but
also
AAU,
basketball
on
weekends
and
tournaments,
and
that
sort
of
thing.
So
it's
while
there'll
be
a
membership
model,
because
that's
how
the
club
Works
in
terms
of
a
membership
model,
it's
not
a
it's,
not
a
it's!
AH
Not
a
membership
model
like
the
the
club
currently
operates
on
Dia
Street
or
the
clubs
of
Boston
or
the
West
End
house.
They
model
this
is
going
to
be
more
more
open
than
that.
You
know
you
won't
be
required
to
have
a
membership
card
to
get
in,
but
membership
kind
of.
Like
the
you
know,
the
commercial
says
we'll
have
probably
certain
privileges,
I
suppose,
if
you
are
a
member
and
there'd
be
very
little
reason
not
to
become
a
member,
but
it's
not
going
to
be
a
requirement.
AH
This
is
not
your
typical
boys
and
girls
club
model
facility
again
think
of
it
more
similar
facilities
out
in
the
suburbs
where
you
go
for
for
team
play
and
that
sort
of
thing,
but
but
we're
doing
a
lot
more
here
with
the
with
the
the
flex
spaces
and
the
you
know,
the
Enrichment
Services
and
Kevin
mentioned
the
wraparound
Services.
You
know
we're
going
to
have
health
services
for
kids,
social
services
for
kids.
We
have
counseling
space
set
aside.
AH
We
have
a
quiet
space
set
aside
for
parents
who
have
who
have
kids,
who
are
dealing
with
autism,
kids
with
autism.
We
know
don't
particularly
always
like,
but
the
loud
sounds
coming
from
from
a
busy
basketball
court
right.
So
we've
kind
of
taken
a
lot
of
these
things
into
consideration
and
really
trying
to
offer
something
for
everyone.
I
think
it'll
be
a
great
it.
B
Sounds
it
sounds
like
the
problem
will
not
be
lack
of
access,
but
that
that
you're
going
to
have
an
overabundance
of
people
are
going
to
want
to
use
the
facility.
B
All
right
take
testimony
for
again,
so
this
is
a
pretty
exciting
project.
AE
Yes,
Mr
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
Neighborhood
Services,
the
community,
including
the
Columbia
Savin
Hill,
civic
association,
have
been
full
support
of
The
Proposal,
since
it
was
first
filed,
September
of
2021
on
the
PBA
board
voted
to
approve
in
March
this
time
our
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
Thank
you.
AH
E
AB
B
Yes,
Mr
agero.
Yes,
yes,.
E
B
Z
C
AI
John
Moran
Alpine
advisory
services
that
the
mailing
address
of
130,
Beach
Road,
all
Lanes,
Mr
chair.
This
is
a
building
located
in
a
two
h.265
Zone
District
on
the
high
side
of
Chestnut
Street
in
Beacon
Hill.
It
has
gone
through
a
very
thorough
Community
process
and
was
amended
twice.
Initially,
we
were
proposing
a
change
of
occupancy
to
a
two-family
dwelling
which
the
community
had
some
concerns
about,
and
it
reverted
back
to
a
single
family.
AI
We
were
expressed
opposition
to
a
proposed
hatch,
roof
head
house
for
access
to
utilities
that
was
removed
and
access
was
provided
from
a
sloping
roof
line.
The
only
expansion
of
living
space
occurs
in
the
basement,
and
that
requires
a
digging
excavation
of
approximately
two
feet.
Four
and
three
quarters
inches,
resulting
in
a
proposed
height
of
8
feet.
11
inches
the
site
is
not
in
an
a
Jeep
or
District.
It
is
high
on
the
hill.
The
far
is
true,
the
existing
far
is
4.68
and
the
proposed
far
is
5.23.
AI
B
Okay,
thank
you
I'm
curious
as
to
why
you're
digging
down
two
feet
to
get
that
me.
811
is
a
pretty
high
high
ceiling
height.
The.
AI
B
Okay-
and
this
is
a
single
family
home-
yes-
and
it
had
eight
bedrooms.
Yes,
unusual.
B
Homes
don't
have
eight
bedrooms,
that's
I'm,
just
one
I'm
wondering
whether
it
was
in
fact
used
as
a
conventional
single-family
home
or
was
it
used
for
it.
B
F
Plans
are
good,
no
questions,
the
lower
level
is
below
grade,
but
they
are
digging
it
out
and
there
is
no
bedrooms
called
out.
So
really
no
questions
from
me.
Then
the
hatch
is
confirmed
on
the
roof
as
well,
so
nothing
from
Beyond.
This.
AJ
Hello
Mr
chair
members
of
the
board
at
this
time:
oh
Maggie
van
scoy
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
our
office
would
like
to
defer
to
the
Judgment
of
the
board
we
held
in
a
Butters
meeting
in
August,
where
a
director
of
butter
voiced
concerns
about
the
work
in
the
basement,
undermining
the
foundation
of
his
home.
But
the
applicant
has
since
worked
with
him
and
he
seems
satisfied
with
the
insurance
certificate
that
they
provided.
E
AI
C
Thank
you,
Colin
Nick
Colin
next
case
calling
boa
134-6466,
73
Green
Street.
It's
a
gut
renovation
interior,
exterior
down
to
frame
and
Foundation
there's
a
300
square
foot
Edition
the
violations,
article
62
section,
19,
neighborhood,
design,
overlay,
District
change,
its
height
and
the
profile
of
the
roof;
article
62
section
25,
through
structure
restrictions
and
article
6268.
The
rail
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
C
AK
B
AK
For
the
egress,
are
we
talking
about?
Can
you
can
you
say
more,
so
we
don't
have
a
secondary
egress
for
the
upper
unit,
and
we
would
like
to
attend
to
that
by
putting
in
a
two
inch
line
for
permanent
sprinklers
in
the
building.
Just
because
we're
trying
to
make
as
much
use
as
the
space
as
possible
in
a
secondary
egress
would
take
up
a
big
chunk
of
the
or
already
narrow
part
of
the
back
of
the
building.
F
I
mean
I
I
think
there
should
be.
This
is
a
gut
renovation
and
you
know
I,
don't
think
from
at
least
from
my
perspective,
I
guess
as
the
representative
on
the
board.
I,
don't
I'm,
not
sure
we
should
be
weighing
in
on
this
I
think
this
should
be
deferred
to
the
state
yeah
in
terms
of
the
second
means
they
might
Grant
this,
but
I
think
there's
nuances
in
the
code
that
we
typically
don't
tackle,
especially
as
it
relates
to
a
second
means
of
egress
from
a
unit.
F
So
I
I
would
probably
make
a
recommendation
to
deny
the
building
code
and
then
I
guess
we
could
listen
to
the
zoning
case,
which
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
I.
Don't
have
a
problem
with
the
proposal
in
terms
of
use
but
I
guess
then
we
could
potentially
make
that
approved
with
no
building
code
relief
and
then
they
would
have
to
go
get
it
themselves.
I
think
I'm,
trying.
B
To
talk
through
this
out
loud
yeah
yeah,
no,
no!
What
you're!
What
you're
describing
thinking
out
loud
is
exactly
the
the
procedure
that
this
board
has
adopted
over
the
years.
Okay,
which
is
that
we
would
deny
the
request
for
Relief
and
recommend
that
the
applicant
go
to
the
state
to
get
relief
there
to
see
if
they
can
get.
That
is
that
somewhere,
that's
a
more
appropriate.
AD
B
Go
ahead
and
tell
us
what
you're
proposing
for
the
for
the
the
gut
renovation
and
what
zoning
violations
are
triggers.
AK
So
it's
a
two
family.
You
want
to
keep
it
at
two
family,
but
you
know
condo
make
them
Condominiums.
The
addition
is
just
to
really
it.
It
currently
doesn't
really
meet
modern
living
expectations,
so
we
just
wanted
to
make
the
middle
and
the
back
just
a
little
wider
to
accommodate
a
floor
plan
that
we
feel
is
appropriate
for
two
families.
AK
The
roof
profile
we'd,
like
you,
know,
make
it
a
classic
flat
roof.
As
you
can
see
there,
that's
in
keeping
with
a
lot
of
other
buildings
on
the
street
and,
of
course
the
the
issue
is
the
Outdoor
space.
That's
that
it
violates
so
there's
it
was.
Existing
678
350
per
unit
will
be
left
with
404,
with
the
proposed
and
deep
hoping
to
make
up
the
outdoor
space
or
close
to
it
with
the
roof
decks.
B
Okay,
so
the
new
flat
roof
that
you're
proposing
is
how
how
much
higher
than
the
existing
roof.
B
F
It's
existing
they're,
not
actually
extending
the
addition.
Further
Mark,
the
it's
I
think
it's
staying
the
same.
It's
they're
just
making
it
a
little
bit
wider
towards
the
side
yard,
but
not
extending
further.
It's
already
I
think
it's
already.
Basically,
zero
I
think
it
goes
all
the
way
to
the
Rear
Front.
Okay,.
B
Okay,
all
right
Mr
Robinson,
how
are
the
drawings,
otherwise
the
drawings.
F
For
the
renovation
are
fine,
no
questions
besides,
as
we've
already
discussed,.
B
Okay,
any
any
questions
to
the
board.
AE
Yes,
Mr
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office,
Neighborhood
Services.
We
don't
have
a
lot
of
information
on
this
proposal,
as
I
mentioned
before,
we've
had
some
Personnel
changes.
My
Butters
meeting
was
held
on
July
27th
and
from
no
to
the
team
that
the
meeting
was
was
very
positive.
AE
We
don't
have
anything
on
file
if
any
neighborhood
concerns
without
refer
to
report.
Thank
you.
B
Okay
can
I
have
a
motion.
Please
sure
I'll
make
a
motion.
F
To
approve,
with
BP
day,
design,
review
and
no
building
code
relief.
Second,.
E
B
E
B
I'm
too,
in
favor,
so
the
motion
is
fast
without
Proviso.
C
Calling
the
next
case
calling
voa139-0679
112
White
Street
this
erect
an
addition
and
change
our
six
unit,
residential
dwelling
with
roof
Tech
at
six
parking
space.
The
violations,
article
53
Section
8,
the
mfrs-
have
been
used
in
the
3F
2000
sub
District
article
53,
section
56
Augustine
parking,
sufficient
article,
2017-5
East,
Boston,
iPod,
article
particle
53,
section
9.
The
additional
lot
areas
is
profession,
article
5369,
the
polluted
ratio
is
excessive.
It's
not
the
53
section,
9,
the
rail
yard,
isn't
sufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
D
Good
afternoon,
Mr
chairman
members
of
the
board,
Richard
Lynn's
245
Sumner
Street
East
Boston
I'm,
here
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
I,
believe
we
have
William
Lee
from
Monty
French
Design
Studio
on
with
us
as
well.
If
he
could
be
elevated
to
a
panelist
Mr
chairman.
This
project
involves
a
pre-existing
three
unit
dwelling
in
the
historic
section
of
the
eagle
Hill
Neighborhood.
The
rendering
that
you're
looking
at
is
obviously
the
proposed
finished
product.
But
if
we
jump
down
to
I
believe
Slide
Five,
we
can
show
the
existing
conditions.
D
D
Looking
for
a
little
further
down
might
have
been
bad
might
have
been
back
around
slide
slot,
but
I
apologize
just
looking
for
the
negative
context.
So
it's
a
6250
square
foot
lot
Mr
chairman
located
at
three
out
of
2000
District.
It's
essentially
what
would
be
considered
a
double
lot
for
this
District,
actually
almost
a
triple
lot,
because
the
minimum
lot
size
is
2
000
square
feet.
D
We
are
proposing
to
take
the
existing
300
dwelling,
perform
a
complete
renovation,
as
well
as
a
restoration
consistent
with
the
eagle
Hill
standards
for
this
neighborhood
and
change.
The
accuracy
to
the
six
units.
I
would
point
out
that
this
lot
could
accommodate
two
three
family
dwellings
on
the
site
based
upon
both
the
width
as
well
as
the
watt
area,
we
elected
to
maintain
the
existing
structure
at
the
request
of
the
community
and
to
restore
as
much
as
we
can
back
to
a
condition
that
we
feel
is
complementary
to
the
eagle
Hill
Square.
D
With
respect
to
the
units
we
have
a
mix
of
ones,
twos
and
threes.
The
average
unit
size
overall
is
about
970
square
feet,
our
largest
three
bed,
three
bedroom
unit
is
1400
square
feet
and
our
smallest
one
bedroom
units
are
about
685
square
feet
by
way
of
relief.
If
you
want
to
jump
down
to
the
rendering
which
I
believe
is
slide
17
just
so,
we
can
show
what
the
finished
product
will
look
like
and
I
can
always
jump
back
to
the
plans
separately.
D
So
respect
to
the
relief
that
we're
requesting
of
because
this
would
be
considered
a
multi-family
use,
we
do
require
relief
for
use
again.
However,
this
does
meet,
or
at
more
than
enough,
a
lot
of
space
for
two
separate
three
unit
dwellings
which
are
allowed
in
the
district.
We
do
meet
the
lot
width
and
lot
Frontage
requirements
and
our
side
yard
just
set
at
three
and
a
half
feet
and
nine
and
a
half
feet,
which
is
an
excess
of
the
two
and
a
half
feet.
That's
required.
D
Our
rear
yard
does
come
within
22
feet
of
the
rear
property
line.
However,
we
have
worked
closely
with
body
neighbors
to
preserve
an
existing
tree
that
is
in
the
back
of
the
property.
They've
specifically
requested
that
we
not
removed
that
tree
and
we've
had
an
arborist
go
and
review
this
and
ensure
that
the
tree
will
not
be
removed
in
the
back
our
floater
ratio.
D
The
allowable
limit
is
1.0
or
just
slightly
above
that
at
1.06
again
working
closely
with
the
eagle
Hill,
Civic
Association
members
and
direct
the
butters,
the
height
of
our
building
Remains,
the
Same
we
are
currently
at
about
31
and
a
half
feet.
The
height
limit
is
30
five
feet.
We've
maintain
that
height,
although
we
are
including
roof
decks
for
this
project
with
no
head
house
access.
Last
but
not
least,
we
are
proposing
six
parking
spaces.
D
B
B
D
Okay
yep,
so
our
plan
shows
we
are.
We
are
adding
the
addition
to
the
rear
of
the
existing
structure,
but,
okay,
what
part
of
the
building
stays
the
same?
So
if
we
I
think
we
can
go
back
to
the
I
think
it
should
be
early
on
in
the
presentation,
maybe
page
four
or
five.
B
Okay,
that
that
was
so
that's
it's
the
rear,
Edition
that
how
what
what
is
the
square
footage
of
the
existing
structure?
And
what
is
the
square
footage
of
the
addition?
So.
D
The
current
I
have
just
based
on
the
far
we're
at
about
a
0.72.
Far
currently
you'll
be
increasing
that
up
to
1.07,
so
so
the
total
square
footage
I
could
do.
The
math
really
quick
I
think
William
Lee
is
on
is
on
the
call
to
give
us
that
if
that
was.
D
B
The
facade
and
the
rendering
looks
very
nice,
so
I
I
get
that
okay
and
you've
got
six
six
spaces
in
the
in
the
rear.
All
right.
How
are
the
drawings,
Mr
Robinson.
F
Drawings
are
good,
actually,
no,
no
real
questions
on
the
proposal.
I
I
do
I
I
assume.
We
should
probably
hear
Mr
Hampton
that
they
recommend
the
denial
on
this
proposal,
I
believe
so
I.
It
would
be
good
to
hear
their
position
on
this,
but
I
have
no
questions
really,
as
it
relates
to
the
proposal.
Okay,.
B
AL
Yeah,
actually,
we
didn't
really
have
a
problem
with
the
use.
It
was
the
parking
layout
underneath
the
building
that
we
had
a
problem
with,
but
it's
not
so
much
the
use.
Really.
We
like
the
the
exterior
of
the
building
I.
We
just
had
a
problem
with
parking.
AL
They
broke
up
the
massing
out
back
that
it's
underneath.
Okay,
just
we
actually
thought.
If
you
put
maybe
some
screening
or
even
enclose
it
it
would,
it
would
be
better
from
our
point
of
view,
I
mean
I,
guess
that's
not
so
much
a
denial,
but
maybe
something
that
could
be
worked
with
through
design
review,
but
yeah
I
know
when
you
see
denial
without
prejudice,
it
kind
of
stands
out
at
you
and
it's
not
so
much
the
use.
It's
really
the
parking
situation.
Thank.
P
Good
afternoon
Mr
chair
members
of
the
board,
that's
all
ebenez
is
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
my
predecessor,
Hoster
nobody's
meeting
for
this
project
on
October
28th
of
2021
voters
had
concerns
regarding
the
initial
number
of
units
that
were
proposed.
The
applicant
also
met
with
the
Eagle
Hills
civic
association
in
January
and
February
of
this
year.
The
association
asked
for
a
reduced
number
of
units.
P
The
applicant
then
reduced
the
unit
count
from
nine
to
six
members
of
the
community
were
happy
to
see
that
this
design
supports
the
historic
aesthetic
of
people
Health,
as
well
as
the
parking
spaces.
The
association
ended
up
voting
to
oppose
the
project,
but
the
applicant
work
with
the
abutters
and
respondents
feedback
provided
through
the
community
meetings.
Our
office
received
two
letters
in
support
from
directed
voters
and
at
this
time
our
office
related
for
judgment
report.
F
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve,
with
BPA
design
review
and
to
highlight
I
think
look
at
the
screening,
maybe
in
or
the
buffering
associated
with
the
parking
in
the
rear
and
see,
if
there's
anything
that
can
be
done
in
terms
of
that
part
of
the
project
to
be
more
consistent
with
the
designs.
AM
B
Mr
Fortune,
yes,
Mr
rugero,
yes,
Mr
Robinson,
yes,
Miss
pinata!
Yes,.
E
E
C
Rick,
a
new
five-story
mixed-use
building
for
three
local
retail
foreign
shell
units
at
ground
level
and
14
residential
units
above
you're
part
of
existing
passwords
way
for
erection
of
building
the
two
residential
units
shall
be
subject
to
the
city
of
Boston's
inclusionary
development
policy
violation,
just
so
it
just
over
on
the
standard.
These
are
repetitive:
two
different
zones,
so
article
25,
section,
5
flood
housing
districts
in
two
different
fossils
article
32
section
4,
gcard
applicability,
article
53,
section
12,
a
height
is
excessive
article
53,
section
12,
The
Rail
Yards
insufficient
article
53,
section
12.
C
D
B
V
D
Right,
thank
you.
If
we
can
jump
to
slide
four
to
get
a
community
overview,
you
can
see
the
context
of
the
areas.
Are
the
perfect
place
to
start
so
Mr
chairman
members
of
the
board,
this
property
is
located
just
on
the
outskirts
of
Maverick
Square,
it's
within
a
close
walking
distance.
Probably
a
five
minute
walk
to
both
Central
Square,
which
provides
a
lot
of
retail
and
services
as
well
as
Fabric
Square,
which
is
Transportation.
As
you
can
see,
it
is
surrounded
by
both
institutional
as
well
as
government
buildings.
D
This
is
a
one-story
commercial
space
that
is
located
with
Frontage
on
both
Parish
Street
and
Meridian
Street.
My
client
operates
a
dental
practice
which
is
intended
to
continue.
Should
the
site
be
redeveloped,
but,
as
you
can
see
with
the
one
story
structure,
it
is
a
little
bit
different
than
what's
in
its
media
surrounding
context,
we'll
go
to
the
next
slide.
Please.
D
L
D
I
said
this
will
result
in
an
opportunity
for
Mr
Fable
to
continue
his
practice,
but
also
create
residential
housing.
The
goal
is
to
create
a
Transit
oriented
development
for
this
site
again,
based
on
the
fact
that
we're
in
central
close
proximity
to
both
Central
and
Maverick
Square
next
slide,
please
again
different
surrounding
context.
Views
as
you
can
see
off
the
distance
about
two
sites
over
the
board
approved
a
similar
five-story
residential
building
with
round
level
retail.
D
This
site
is
located
in
the
neighborhood
shopping
district,
so
the
proposed
uses
that
we
are
proposing
for
the
site,
including
multi-family
residential,
as
well
as
ground
level.
Commercial
are
allowed
uses.
So
these
are
consistent
with
the
zoning
current
Zoning
for
the
sub
District.
That's
that
the
property
lies
with
the
next
slide,
please.
D
AG
Be
great,
yes,
I,
think
the
county
lens.
This
is
that
Tim
Loranger
with
the
park
for
the
record,
so
yeah,
the
the
general
mass
in
the
building
we
kind
of
picked
up
on
the
masking
and
step
back
with
the
floor
of
that
propagate
65
Meridian
that
which
I've
had
alluded
to.
So
in
terms
of
kind
of
the
massing
horizontally.
AG
You
broke
the
facade
into
these
kind
of
two
main
Bays
that
are
competitor
kind
of
typical
of
the
of
the
scale
of
the
rest
of
the
street
fund,
but
maintain
that
refunding
that
the
graphical
we
have
a
masonry
exposure
from
here
and
then
at
the
top.
At
the
fourth
and
fifth
level,
we
do
set
back
six
feet
to
introduce
some
balconies
that
goes
top
units
and
kind
of
pick
up
on
that
date
and
that
was
established
at
65
Marina.
If
you
scroll
down
a
bit.
AG
So
here
is
just
elevation
of
that
purpose,
along
Reading,
Street,
so
material
wise.
We
have
that
that
masonry
Bridge,
we
have
a
metal
panel
for
those
Mains
this
primary
days
and
then
a
kind
of
vertically
oriented
panel
for
that
top
10
house
section
to
create
a
contrast.
Material
keep
scrolling
things,
so
this
is
on
the
pear
stream
elevation
here.
AG
That
masonry
comes
up
to
third
level
to
kick
off
the
kind
of
date
above
the
existing
properties
to
the
bike
here,
and
then
we
have
that
two-story
orientation
of
that
of
the
upper
Penthouse
piece
and
then
similar
to
the
front,
but
doing
it
so
added
even
smaller
style.
Now
we're
kind
of
introducing
these
series
of
phase
value
games,
I
kind
of
erode
the
scale
of
the
building
there
and
that
will
be
in
that
same
metal
panel
as
the
front
in
terms
of
the
plans.
Do
you
keep
showing?
AG
You
could
go
past
this
sorry?
So
this
is
the
ground
floor
plan
where
we
are
maintaining
those
three
individual
retail
businesses
at
the
front
along
Reading,
Street,
the
whole
retail
parking
staff,
and
then
we
are
introducing
the
residential
Lobby
and
elevator
at
the
rear
of
the
building
off
Terrace,
which
is
kind
of
the
quite
a
more
residential
street.
We're
also
showing
a
small
volt
here
for
kind
of
transforming
utility.
We
won't.
We
will
not
have
any
below
grade
utility
space,
yeah
I
just
keep
going.
You
can
go
through
four
fans
here.
AG
We
have
a
combination
of
one
two
and
three
bed
units
on
the
second
through
fourth
spot
through
fifth
course.
There
are
ten
total
one
bit
for
an
average
square
foot
of
700
square
feet,
two
two
beds
at
885
square
feet
and
two
three
beds
at
1165
square
feet.
So
there's
generally
three
to
four
units
per
floor.
AG
If
you
want
to
keep
throwing
we've
been
accepted
plants,
we
do
have
audio
alternations
on
basically
three
sides,
and
then
we
have
all
of
our
friends
in
July
Paris
fans
for
reading,
because
this
is
basically
an
info
all
around
we're.
Holding
the
street
Edge
on
both
on
both
sides
of
the
treatment
on
the
roof.
There's,
no,
the
only
roof
access
will
be
for
chemical
equipment.
There
isn't
any
shared
or
private
loot
bags
at
the
roof
level.
AG
So
we
have
a
small
elevator,
overrun
mechanical
put
into
the
units
and
then
in
hash
access
from
one
of
the
two
stairs.
D
I
could
just
I
think
it's
just
so
if
I
can
just
point
out
for
the
board
I'm
sure
the
board
is
aware,
plant
East,
Boston
I'll,
let
Jeff
speak
to
the
bpd's
recommendation
on
this,
but
plant
East
Boston
has
identified
corridors
and
boulevards
as
sort
of
being
the
transitional
areas
into
other
parts
of
the
neighborhood.
This
lies
certainly
within
the
area
that
a
higher
density
and
certainly
higher
Heights,
is
being
planned,
or
at
least
recommended
by
the
bpda
as
part
of
planets
Blossom.
D
So
we
believe
our
plan
is
quite
consistent
with
the
objectives
under
the
new
zoning
that
is
likely
to
be
recommended
shortly
from
the
bpda.
One
of
the
things
I
will
point
out
as
well.
Is
that,
even
though
we
did
show
this
project,
as
you
know,
in
the
neighborhood
shopping
sub-district,
the
neighbor
shopping
district
has
very
flexible
zoning
regulations
currently
in
place.
Even
though
the
Plein
East
Boston,
the
recommendations
are
likely
to
allow
you
more
flexibility.
There
is
no
minimum
lot
size
in
the
district,
no
side
yard
setback.
D
The
only
dimensional
control
will
be
a
rear
yard
setback
of
20
feet,
because
this
would
be
considered
a
through
lot.
The
zoning
code
does
permit
a
reduction
of
the
rear
yard
from
the
20
feet
to
actual
Street
modal
on
the
rear
property
line.
So
this
is
a
true
thru,
lock,
condition
that
we're
proposing
and
that's
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
were
cited
for
rear
yard
and
I-
think
that's
based
more
in
power
from
the
fact
that
we're
using
multiple
Watts
so
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
on
the
board.
B
Okay,
that's
what
we're
here
for
so
I,
don't
the
only
question
I
have
actually
is
for
Mr
Hampton,
who
says
that
there
could
be
no
building
code
relief.
What
is
what
is
that
in?
B
AL
B
D
I
I
believe
we're
proposing
these
at
70
Ami,
and
we
will
have
based
upon
the
percentage
of
units
we
have.
I
would
suspect
one
will
be
a
two
bedroom.
One
will
be
a
one
bedroom.
B
Right
Mr,
Robinson,
yep.
F
AL
A
F
Related
to
The
Vault,
one,
only
one
question
I
think
for
the
proponent,
I
think
the
you
know
the
massing
is
actually
I,
think
knitted
in
pretty
well
in
terms
of
trying
to
sort
of
balance
between
the
two
two
fronts
or
two
streets.
This
isn't.
This
was
not
an
article
80
small
project
correct
this.
AN
F
See
some
a
combination
in
the
ground
floor
plain
and
I
I
guess
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
embark's
very
familiar,
obviously
with
complete
streets
and
things
like
that.
F
P
Yes,
good
afternoon,
Mr
chair
and
members
of
the
board
I'll
tell
everybody's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
meeting
in
2021.
Some
concerns
were
voice
regarding
density
and
lack
of
parking.
There
were
very
little
Butters
in
that
meeting.
The
applicant
also
met
with
Maverick
Center
David
Association.
The
group
voted
to
support
the
project.
The
members
asked
to
have
the
mural
that
is
currently
on
the
rear
end
of
the
building
be
preserved,
either
inside
in
the
reception
of
the
building
or
in
a
new
location.
So
we
want
to
make
an
emphasis
on
that.
P
The
neighborhood
group
also
asks
for
new
trees
in
the
front
of
the
building.
Our
office
received
two
letters
in
support,
one
from
a
direct
to
butter
and
the
other
one
from
the
East
Boston
Neighborhood
Health
Center,
and
at
this
time
our
office
would
like
to
refer
judgmental
support.
W
B
D
F
Make
a
motion
to
approve
with
bpda
design,
review,
I
think
specifically
looking
at
complete
streets
and
the
urban
public
room.
A
Can
I
can
I
suggest,
including
a
Proviso
to
identify
whichever
units
are
eventually
selected
to
be
the
IDP
units,
just
in
isd's
certificate
of
occupancy
here
just.
E
B
Lowe
to
him
in
favor
of
the
motion
passes
we're
on
to
11
30..
The
only
only
a
couple
hours
late.
C
Yeah,
well
just
to
remind
you,
I'm,
leaving
at
2
30.
yeah
hboa,
one
three,
six,
seven,
two:
four
six
fourteen
Gardiner
Street
just
to
seeking
to
raise
the
existing
structure
and
direct
a
new
residential
building
with
38
units
and
25
parking
spaces.
The
violations
article
51
Section
8
38
units
have
been
article
51,
section,
9
insufficient
additional
a
lot
of
air
per
unit,
article
51,
section
9
excessive
far
article
51
section,
9,
the
maximum
allowed
height
has
been
exceeded.
C
Article
51
69,
the
number
of
allowed
stories
has
been
exceeded:
article
51,
section,
9,
exhibition,
front
yard,
setback,
medical
51,
section,
9
and
sufficient
rear
ad
setback.
Radical
51,
section,
9
exhibition,
usable
base
per
unit,
article
51,
section,
40.5
design
manual
ring
two-way
aisle,
packing
design,
article
51
section
56,
Osprey
loading,
article
51,
section,
56,
high
speed
parking,
sufficient
and
article
51,
section
53
screening
and
buffering
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please
thank.
AP
You
Mr
chairman
members
of
the
board,
meet
Jeff
Drago
with
Drago
and
Toscano,
with
the
business
address
of
11
Beacon
Street
Aaron
behalf
of
the
petitioner
and
with
me
I
have
Souza
design
who
are
The
Architects
on
the
proposal.
As
was
mentioned,
this
project
is
located
at
14
Gardner
Street.
If
you
could
just
stay
on
that
slide,
Madame
Ambassador
for
one
minute
and
the
proposal
leader
looking
at
this
is
a
rendering
of
the
new
building.
AP
This
area
is
surrounded
by
all
by
Family
residential
apartment
and
condominium
complex
right
now
we
are
seeking
a
raise
two
very
dated
buildings
and
it's
a
pork
chop
rock
with
one
building
behind
another
everything
Asphalt
in
the
middle,
we're
proposing
to
raise
those
structures
and
to
erect
a
four-story
residential
building
with
38
condominium
units
and
25
parking
spaces.
This
will
also
include
40
interior
bike
parking
spaces
as
well
in
a
bike
room,
that's
accessed
directly
out
from
the
ground
level
to
Gardner
Street.
AP
Just
to
point
out,
this
project
went
through
extensive
Community
process
to
get
here
over
two
years.
The
current
proposal
is
at
21,
affordable
on
this
building
and
that
would
be
eight
affordable
units.
This
building
will
also
have
a
lead
gold
standard
for
Energy
Efficiency
as
well.
The
particular
building
is
sick.
The
lot
is
16
286
square
feet
and
the
layout
the
mix
of
the
units
we
try
to
have
both
family
style
and
a
mix
of
different
size
units.
We
have
10
one
bedrooms
at
730
square
feet.
AP
We
have
22
bedrooms
at
883
square
feet
and
eight
three
bedroom
units
1056
square
feet.
If
we
go
to
the
next
slide
in
the
slide
after
this.
Just
so
the
board
can
see
the
context
right
here
right
now.
All
of
that
asphalt.
It
has
two
existing
driveways.
One
of
those
will
be
closed
up
and
now
it'll
all
be
accessed
through
through
a
driveway
that
leads
to
a
ramp
that
goes
down
to
underground
subsurface
level
parking
and
that
will
have
25
interior
parking
spaces.
As
you
can
see
in
the
next
slide.
AP
Everything
around
this
property
is
of
you
know
four
stories:
the
layout
of
the
floor
plan,
so
our
lower
level,
as
I
mentioned,
would
have
the
underground
parking
with
25
spaces
that
would
house
a
trash
room,
sprinkle,
a
room
and
storage
area.
As
we
go
up
to
the
first
floor
that
would
house
our
main
entrance
mail
room
elevator.
This
building
would
also
have
amenity
space
with
a
444
square
foot
gym
for
the
building
and
a
276
square
foot
conference,
room
or
medium.
AP
That
would
help
also
house
our
bike
room
for
40
bike
spaces
and
eight
units
and
four
of
those
units
would
have
exterior
patios.
We
then
the
second
third
and
fourth
floors
are
all
10
units
housed
and
those
were
all
eight
of
those
units.
Each
would
have
balcony
space
as
well.
If
we
could
just
go
down
to
the
last
slide,
they'll
just
show
the
board
a
better
rendering
of
the
exterior
and
the
garage
entrance
should
be
after
the
elevations.
AP
Yes,
next
slide
right
next,
one
yep
right
here,
perfect,
thank
you
that
would
just
show
the
ramp
and
garage
door
that
would
be
down
to
the
garage
level
just
to
go
over
the
violations
that
were
mentioned.
AP
AP
Area
far
at
2.5
and
0.8
is
what
would
be
allowed.
Our
building
height
is
four
store.
We're
proposing
four
stories.
We
tried
to
keep
that
height
as
low
as
we
could
at
41
feet.
Six
inches
and
what's
allowable
under
the
code
is
35
for
usable,
open
space.
We
do
have
a
20-foot
setback,
it'll
be
green
space,
but
what's
required
is
30
rare
yard,
we're
proposing
20
front
yard.
AP
AP
Was
a
it
was
a
small
board,
Mr
chairman
okay,.
B
F
Drawings
are
good,
I.
Think
really,
you
know,
I
do
think
it's
consistent
with
certainly
part
of
the
street,
and
there
is
some
four-story
building
so
I
think
with
the
outdoor
space
and
the
affordability
I
think
it
makes
some
sense,
I
think
I
do
think
there
could
be
a
little
bit
more
work
done
on
the
landscape
plan
in
terms
of
maybe
some
trees,
but
that's
something
we
can
address
for
the
BPA,
but
I
think
in
general.
I
feel
like
the
proposal
seems
to
work.
D
B
B
In
the
board,
we've
got
some
background
noise
if
we
could
get
rid
of
it.
That
would
be
nice.
Thank
you.
Anyone
here
to
testify
you,
the
four
or
against
proposal.
AE
Yes,
Mr
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time
the
nearest
office
like
to
defer
to
the
Judgment
from
the
board.
This
went
through
an
extensive
Community
process.
There
were
some
concerns
raised
from
community
members
who
are
not
happy
with
with
the
alleged
support
track
record
from
the
applicant.
AE
However,
there's
been
a
number
of
changes
made
to
this
proposal,
they're
now
up
to
21
affordability
regarding
IDP,
as
well
as
switch
over
to
Condominiums,
with
that
the
Austin
civic
association
decided
to
go
in
non-op
position
and
Brighton
Austin
improvedness.
A
writing.
Austin
Improvement
Association
voted
to
support
this
proposal,
but
that
would
infer
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
Mr.
N
Good
afternoon,
this
is
more
of
a
creation
Council
of
Reed's
office.
The
counselor
I'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition
to
this
project.
Your
opponent
owns
hundreds
of
units
across
Allston
and
Brighton,
and
the
proponent
has
consistently
failed
to
provide
adequate
and
safe
housing
to
Austin
Brighton
residents.
Over
the
past
10
years,
a
proponent
has
received
approximately
675
building
and
property
violations
and
code
enforcement
violations,
and
this
includes
50
such
violations
in
2022.
N
For
that
reason,
we,
the
counselors,
proposed
to
this
project
we'd,
also
like
to
add
that
we
have
had
issues
where
a
project
goes
through.
Bpda
review
is
approved
as
a
condo
and
then
winds
up
as
rental
units
after
construction,
so
we
are
concerned
with
that
happening
again
and
also
with
the
non-compliance
in
terms
of
owner
occupancy
restrictions.
Thank
you.
AK
O
You
a
few
raised
hands
here.
So
are
you
Tony.
AQ
Yes,
good
afternoon,
Mr
chairman
members
of
the
board
Tony
desidoro,
representing
the
Austin
civic
association
like
to
Echo
all
the
comments
made
so
far.
This
project
got
off
to
a
rocky
spot
in
the
sense
that,
as
the
council's
office
mentioned,
the
the
the
proponent
that
was
proposing
the
project
some
of
the
past
history
with
certain
members
of
the
association
and
then
we
also
had
some
of
the
older
members
who
objected
to
the
taking
down
of
the
two
buildings.
AQ
But
since
it
has
been
changed
for
condominium
project,
21,
affordable,
the
gold
that
helps
soften
the
opposition
to
the
project
and
therefore
we're
going
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board.
But
to
reiterate
what
the
council's
office
said-
and
this
is
extremely
important
appreciate-
a
strong
commitment
for
the
proponent
on
this.
AQ
If
it
gets
approved,
is
that
condo
docs
be
filed
as
soon
as
the
building
is
fully
constructed,
in
that
the
proponent
puts
all
the
units
up
for
sale
on
the
public
market
and
that
they
not
be
simply
rented
out
by
the
proponent
as
as
condo
units.
We
we
want
these
to
go
on
the
open
market.
We
want
ownership
to
change
on
each
of
these
units
and
therefore
we
would
appreciate
a
strong
commitment
from
the
proponent
to
do
so.
Okay,
thank
you.
O
Okay
and
Harry
Potter.
AA
O
Y
My
name
is
yeah
MJ
I
live
in
on
Gardner
Street
I'm
in
full
support
of
this
project,
I
believe
it's
going
to
be
very
conducive
to
the
community.
Not
only
will
it
be
jobs
created,
there
are
condos
going
to
be
created
and
the
neighborhood
in
the
area
does
need
a
facelift.
Hamilton
did
some
projects
over
83,
Gardner
I,
believe
also
41.
Right
now
it
looks
beautiful.
The
town
is
Lively,
now,
there's
more
Community,
Support
behind
and
there's
commercial
spaces
going
up
and
I'm
in
full
support
of
this
project
being
finalized.
Hopefully
thank.
O
AO
John
yeah
hi:
how
are
you
I'm
immediate?
A
butter
I'd
like
to
support
the
project
we're
in
dire
need,
especially
for
affordable
unit
I
stretched.
It.
O
Okay
and
then,
because
you
have
an
email
address
here-
aswei
station
name
and
address
for
the
recipe.
Please.
H
O
You
very
much
okay
and
then
I
have
some
on
the
panelist
sign
minor
and
Annabella
go
ahead.
T
G
Chairman
and
members
of
the
board
and
welcome
to
the
Brighton
Austin
Improvement
Association
we'd
like
to
go
and
record
and
support
this
project
has
evolved
a
lot.
It
is
consistent
with
other
projects
on
the
stream
and
it
is
21
affordable
for
sale,
Home
Ownership,
which
is
important,
and
it
is
a
Leed
certified
and
speaking
to
the
concerns
of
the
other.
This
project
is
being
sold
transferred
to
homeowners,
which
I
think
is
important
and
it
resolves
those
issues.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
O
AN
My
name
is
on
16
Gardner
Street
I,
actually
rent
a
unit
practically
across
from
this
structure.
I
think
that
this
project
is
a
great
idea.
It's
keeping
with
the
current
trends
going
on
pretty
much
all
around
the
almost
the
city
and
it'll
give
a
wonderful
opportunity
for
some
of
these
newer
Generations.
You
know
coming
into
the
city
to
have
some
home
ownership
here
in
the
Austin
area.
Okay,.
F
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
with
BPA
design,
review,
I,
guess
I,
don't
know
we
can
add
something
about
the
the
condo
units.
I
assume
those
will
go.
B
We
understand
that
these
will
be
condominium
units,
okay,.
F
So
I'll
make
a
provide
sorry,
BPA,
design,
Proviso
and
the
understanding
of
these
will
be
market
rate
for
sale
condos.
Besides,
obviously,
the
affordable,
housing
and
they'll
go
through
their
process.
AD
B
C
The
next
two
cases
calling
boa
129
6380-49
R
Emery
Road,
there's
a
companion
case,
VOA
129
129
6381-49,
Emery
Road.
This
is
49
now
Emery
Road,
to
confirm
existing
structure
as
a
a
bond
and
convert
to
a
single-family
home
new
dollar
renovate
two
dwelling
structures
on
the
one
lot,
the
existing
tool.
Failing
nowhere
can
be
done.
C
This
is
one
of
two
buildings
on
the
same
lot,
the
violates
article
51
section
9,
open
spaces
and
insufficient
article
51
section
57.2
existing
building
alignment,
Conformity
article
51,
section
57,
one
building
behind
one
another
building
on
article
51,
section
57.13,
two
or
more
dwellings.
On
the
same
lot,
article
51
section,
9
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
51,
section
9
log
Frontage,
is
insufficient.
Article
51,
section
9
front
yard
is
inhibition.
Article
51
section
9.
C
51-69
the
real
guy
is
insufficient.
Is
this
the
49
Emory
Road
no
work
to
be
done,
violations
article
51,
section,
9,
Open,
Spaces,
sufficient
article
51,
section
57.13,
two
or
more
dwellings
on
the
same
lot,
51
section
9
a
lot
with
the
sufficient,
an
article
51
section,
9,
lot,
Frontage
profession,
salmon,
address
to
the
record.
K
B
All
right,
you're,
gonna,
say
Mr
Fortune
some
time
all
right,
there's
been
a
motion
made
and
seconded
Mr
Fortune.
F
C
Mr,
chair
I,
just
talked
to
Louisville
counselor
I
have
to
leave
at
2
30.
I
mentioned.
Maybe
we
could
do
this
on
the
15th
of
November
instead
of
into
the
new
year
in
January.
So
if
the
applicant
is
okay
with
that,
we
can
move
this
to
November
15th.
Yes,.
B
C
B
B
AA
K
C
Is
anybody
else
going
to
move
forward
on
their
projects
or
are
we
going
to
I'm
trying
to
guess
I'm
trying
to
do
as
fast
as
I
can
is
River
Street
going
to
move
forward
yes
and
I'm
ready
to
go
okay
and
the
colony
next
case,
calling
boa
134
9982
1318-1320
River
Street?
This
is
a
wreck.
A
four-story
mixed-use
structure
consists
of
30
residential
units
levels,
two
and
four
and
ground
floor
coffee
shops
and
I'll.
Take
our
restaurant
enclose,
ground
floor
parking
for
30
vehicles
and
stack
or
pocket
violation.
C
Article
69
section
29.5
lost
street
parking
design
stack
of
parking
article
69,
6,
section,
30.2,
traffic
visibility
across
the
corner;
article
69
section
29,
off-speed,
loading
holding
parking
and
loading
article
69,
60,
29,
Osprey
parking
and
loading
parking,
article,
69,
section
30.1,
conforming
existing
billing
alignment,
article
69,
Section,
8
and
MFR
and
a
3F
is
forbidden.
Article
69,
Section,
8,
small
takeout
restaurant
is
with
it
article
69
69.
The
flooding
race
was
excessive
article
69
69.
C
Q
Good
afternoon,
Mr
chairman
members
of
the
board,
Attorney
John
pelgini
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
body
of
Patel
with
me
today,
is
Mike
Mark,
Joyce
and
John
Saleh,
who
are
the
team
Architects.
This
is
13
1318
River,
Street,
Hyde
Park
zoning
is
three
f-1000.
This
last
size
is
10
732
square
feet.
This
proposal
is
located
at
the
former
Junius
automotive
repair
building
at
the
corner
of
River
Street
and
business
Street
The
Proposal
is
to
raise
the
existing
cement
Auto
building
and
construct
a
four-story
mixed-use
development
with
30
residential
units
and
30
off
street
parking
spaces.
Q
This
proposal
is
directly
adjacent
to
the
High
Park
train
station
violations.
We
have
use
MFR
and
Retail
in
a
3F
District
use.
Retail
is
forbidden
in
the
3F
zoning
sub-district
SAR
0.5
allowed,
where
two
four
five
height
three
stories
35
feet
with
four
stories:
44
feet:
open
space,
side
yard.
This
building
is
surrounded
by
a
brick
wall.
Excuse
me
a
concrete
wall
and
that
will
remain
in
place
of
that
is
existing
rear
yard.
The
same
thing
with
a
concrete
wall
and
parking
loading.
Q
It's
two
space
for
dwelling
in
it
we're
proposing
30
spaces
to
30
units.
The
program
of
the
building
is
three
levels
of
residential.
Each
floor
is
identical:
nine
Studios
average
in
size,
520
square
feet,
12,
one
beds,
average
size
approximately
650
square
feet
and
nine
two
beds.
Average
size
is
approximately
925
square
feet.
It
will
be
a
new
retail
space
located
in
the
first
floor
that
will
be
approximately
1500
square
feet.
Q
Closer
went
to
a
three
and
a
half
year
process,
including
an
articulating
process
during
which
built
the
bpda
and
transportation,
as
well
as
the
BTD
asked
the
development
team
to
use
the
pic
process
to
discontinue
one
side
of
business,
Street
near
a
road
triangle
Memorial
and
increase
Green
Space
through
a
public
park.
That
was
a
Crest
from
the
city
and
they
thought
two-way
traffic
on
both
sides
of
this
triangle,
with
The
Pedestrian
Hazard,
especially
in
light
of
traffic
to
the
community
train
into
the
train
station
itself.
Again,
this
will
create
a
public
Green
Park.
Q
B
Yeah,
just
remind
Mr
Gina
remind
us
why
this
is
here
for
rediscussion.
Q
It
was
another
day
that
we
didn't
have
enough
members
Mr
chairman.
B
Okay,
all
right!
That's
what
I
thought
all
right
talk
about!
The
parking
walk
us
through
the
parking
again
sure.
Q
So
the
parking's
located
on
the
first
floor,
it's
access
off
business
street.
So
this
this
project
is
on
the
corner
of
River
Street,
and
it's
right.
Next
to
the
train
station,
you
come
in
off
business
Street
and
that
will
be
the
access
to
the
parking
garage
and
it
will
be
one
space
per
unit.
Okay,
all.
E
Q
Good
question:
so
it's
a
mix,
so
we
have
twos
ones
and
Studios
I
think
we
have
two
ones:
two
Studios
and
one
two
and
seventy
percent
a
line.
F
Drawings
are
are
fine,
no
question
on
the
drawing
and
I
think
the
the
change
in
the
public
park
and
the
corner.
It
seems
great
I,
guess.
I
have
one
question.
It's
just
point
of
interest
for
actually
maybe
Mr
Hampton.
It
seems
like
a
lot
of
parking,
a
one-to-one
ratio
or
something
that's
right
across
from
the
train
and
it's
stacker.
So
that's
causing
issues
and
costs.
Do
you
have
a
sense
of
why
that
ratio
is
so
high.
Q
I
could
answer
that?
Okay,
that's.
F
Q
So
we
started
out
with
a
much
less
parking
ratio.
You
know
to
the
electives
as
well
as
the
community.
They
felt
like
at
least
one
to
one.
We
were
a
five-star
building,
we
reduced
the
height
to
four
stories
with
one-to-one
parking
and
they
seemed
happy
with
that.
The
park
itself,
as
you
can
see
in
this
illustration,
that's
before
you
that
has
nothing
to
do
with
that
project.
Q
That
will
be
an
open
park
now
that
will
block
one
side
of
business
street,
because
if
you
can
imagine
you
have
a
triangle
coming
down
business
street
with
two-way
traffic
on
one
side
of
the
triangle:
two-way
traffic,
on
the
other,
so
BTD
and
bpda
transportation
thought
that
was
a
pedestrian
Hazard.
So
they
requested
this.
But
again
this
is
a
public
park
that
can
be
used
by
anybody
in
Hyde
Park
to
added
Green
Space
I.
F
B
AE
Yes,
Mr
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
at
this
town,
the
mayor's
office
like
to
defer
to
the
Judgment
of
the
board.
This
proposal
has
gone
through
an
extensive
Community
process.
Over
three
years,
our
office
received
a
number
of
letters
majority
in
support.
We
had
30
signatures
that
were
sent
to
the
board
for
review,
for
this
project
was
deferred
back
in
August,
but
also
received
letters
of
opposition
sent
to
the
board
Brian
in
this
review.
AE
One
was
one
of
which
was
from
a
family
that
lives
on
business
treatment
proposal,
as
well
as
the
Hyde
Park,
the
input
Association
and
the
group
Park
neighborhood
association
people
are
very
pleased
about
the
proposal
to
have
a
public
park
open
to
the
public.
However,
there
are
concerns
regarding
how
the
traffic
might
be
impacted
during
this
construction
period
at
the
local
Street
bridge
is
currently
shut
down
and
its
replacement
will
not
be
open,
at
least
until
the
spring
of
2025.
AE
there's
been
concerns
that
trying
to
avoid
this
area
and
taking
Cleary
Street
will
be
will
be
jammed
up.
This
can
lead
to
dangerous
situations
with
that
we
defer
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
U
U
We
want
to
point
out
the
17
affordability,
the
fact
that
they
work
with
the
community
for
over
three
years
to
reduce
the
height
and
Floors
increase
the
parking
to
one
to
one
and,
of
course,
the
community
benefit
of
the
green
space
in
the
former
home
park.
So
we
again
want
to
go
on
a
record
support
of
this.
Thank
you.
U
S
W
B
All
right,
Emily,
quick
and
just
say
whether
your
support
or
or
opposed
and
and
one
reason
why
thank
you.
AR
Hello,
my
name
is
Lauren
spinney
I
own
1326,
River
Street,
which
is
a
directive
butter
to
this
project.
I
did
send
a
letter
of
opposition
into
the
board.
I,
don't
think
it
was
necessarily
mentioned
when
they
were
listing
it.
But
I
wanted
to
point
that
out.
If
you
can
bear
with
I.
Just
literally
have
seven
sentences
through
I
do
strenuously
oppose
the
height,
the
density
and
the
size
of
this
project.
If
all
of
the
variances
are
granted,
a
single
structure
is
going
to
consume
that
entire
lot
edge
to
edge
Rising
four
stories.
AR
With
no
side.
In
your
setbacks,
a
four-story
building
directly
against
the
abutting
properties
will
Loom
significantly
large
and
I
know.
I
can
speak
for
myself
as
well
as
Miss
Hidalgo
on
business
Street
side
when
I
say
that
we
are
going
to
lose
youth,
we're
going
to
lose
light,
I'm
going
to
lose
a
very
mature
and
established
tree
and
we're
going
to
lose
the
consistent
residential
feel
of
our
neighborhood.
Okay.
AD
My
name
is
Peter
uzoma
and
I
live
at
17
business
Street,
just
next
door
to
the
the
proposed
project
and
I
oppose
it,
and
I
sent
a
letter
to
the
learning
board
of
appeals
and,
like
a
person
that
who
spoke
before
me
was
not
mentioned.
I
oppose
this
project
because
my
house
is
just
next
door
to
it
and
and
there's
the
view
of
my
house
will
be.
AD
AM
Yes,
my
name
is
Pat
chierney
I
live
at
38
Milton
Avenue
in
Hyde,
Park
I
have
lived
here
for
about
50
years,
I
own,
a
building
I'm
a
commercial
landlord
in
Clary
Square,
also
own
a
business
in
Claret
Square,
very
familiar
with
the
area.
The
location
is
perfect
for
residential
development.
The
park
is
amazing
and
will
suit
the
members
of
the
community
very
well
it.
You
can
almost
touch
the
train
station
so
that
we're
going
to
have
young
people
that
want
to
come.
Take
the
train
and
it's
going
to
Enlighten
our
business
district.
T
Because
of
that,
instead
of
six
of
us
repeating
ourselves
and
it'll,
just
be
me,
our
main
contention
is
closing
off
that
segment
of
the
ending
segment
of
business
Street
you,
the
applicant,
is
asking
the
board
to
close
that
segment
of
business
Street
and
redirect
it
to
the
other
segment
of
business
Street.
T
However,
the
applicant
nor
the
city
of
Boston
owns
that
other
segment
of
business
Street
MBTA.
Does
the
board
should
not
be
directing
City
traffic
onto
privately
owned
land
or
to
land
owned
by
another
party,
because
the
potential
is
that
MBTA
will
expand
the
logic
for
promoting
public
transportation.
They'll
expand
this
station
or
perhaps
use
out
of
this
parking
space
a
parking
area
for
for
users.
In
that
case,
business
Street
would
be
closed
off
and
no
longer
used
as
a
throughway.
Okay,
you
didn't
Street,
nothing,
bad,
that's
a
bad
idea:
okay,
okay,.
B
A
B
So
we'll
also
have
to
get
someone
to
read
the
projects
in
the
record.
Okay,
so
our
five
members,
so
this
has
to
be
unanimous.
All
right
can
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
F
I
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
with
continued
bpda
design
review.
I
do
think
that
it
would
be
nice
to
take
a
look
at
the
River
Street
side
and
see
if
there
could
be
some
more
relief
on
that
edge.
I
see
the
building
is
not
perpendicular
to
this
property
line
which
I
understand
but
I.
Think
if
we
can
pull
that
back
a
little
bit
and
look
at
that
and
then
I
guess
my
I
just
want
to
clarify
so
this
project.
F
We
are
not
approving
the
street
closure
in
the
park.
I,
don't
believe.
D
F
Just
want
to
make
sure
that
was
clear
to
the
public,
because
I
hear
the
concern
this
project
can
stand
alone,
at
least
if
we
vote
in
favor
on
without
with
or
without
the
park.
That
will
happen
outside
of
this
discussion,
because.
F
Okay,
so
that
that's
my
motion
with
bpda
design
review
for
the
project
generally.
B
All
right:
okay,
Mr
Fortune,
is
gone
so
Mr
Hero,
aye,
Mr
Robinson,
yes,
Miss
pinata.
Yes,.
E
AF
All
right,
I
I,
didn't
keep
track
of
deferrals.
B
Okay,
Magnolia
place
has
been
deferred,
and
so
is
Webster.
F
I
think
we're
on
Maverick
I
believe
273.
B
B
D
Mr
chairman,
it's
Attorney
Richard
is
the
record.
This
is
our
further
deferral
because
we
had
a
notice
issue
last
time
and
probably
did
not
have
a
five-member
board
the
last
the
last
hearing.
Is
it
possible
this
Project's
been
around
for
a
while?
Is
it
possible
to
get
a
date
quicker
than
the
typical
January
date
basis.
A
A
Day
so
it
should,
it
won't,
be
burdensome
I,
don't
think,
and.
A
D
B
F
Do
we
do
we
do
we
need
to
do
this,
get
read
to
the
record
and
then
a
deferral
I
think
we
need.
B
Second,
I'll
go
well:
there
were
gero
yeah,
yeah
Robinson,
yes,
Donato,
yes,
hello
and
me
we
we
all.
We
all
vote
to
defer.
So
so
we
now
have
the
re-hearing.
D
AF
All
right
calling
next
case
boa
1173599,
535,
537,
B,
Washington,
Street
and
more
22..
This
is
a
re-hearing
of
pure
Oasis
to
open
a
recreational
Cannabis
establishment
at
the
above
reference
location,
but
previously
dynai
disappeared,
but
it
voted
to
reconsider
it
on
September
13th.
After
the
hearing
of
the
after
a
hearing
on
the
applicant's
request
on
the
terms
of
the
zoning
book
called
Zone
Boston
zoning
code
in
the
following
respects:
variance
conditional
use,
permit
and
or
other
relief
as
appropriate.
B
Okay,
as
the
applicants
for
Pure
Oasis
here.
B
A
He
should
be
I
see
his
name
on
there,
yeah
Mike,
it's
Mike
Ross.
No,
it's
they
have
a
new
attorney.
It
is.
B
Before
we
start,
we
are
unfortunately
at
this
point,
a
five-member
board,
so
I
I
know
that
this
is
this.
Is
a
re-hearing
and
you've
already
gone
through
the
process,
but
I
just
do
want
to
warn
you
that
any
motion
would
have
to
would
require
unanimous
decision
of
the
five
members.
So
again,
I
need
to
tell
you
you
have
the
opportunity
to
to
choose
an
administrative
deferral.
Should
you
wish.
AS
I
understood
Mr
chairman.
We
appreciate
that
conferred
with
my
client
expecting
that
that
might
be
the
case
and
they've
decided
to
go
forward
tonight.
You
want
to.
AS
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
members
of
the
board,
Brian
Grossman
about
itch
and
Dewey
200
Crossing
Boulevard,
Suite,
300
Framingham
Massachusetts
01702
is
my
business
address
Council
for
your
Oasis
LLC,
the
applicant
Mr
chairman.
You
know
that
this
is
up
for
for
reconsiderations
I,
think
the
board
is
you're
generally
familiar
with
the
project.
I'm
happy
to
go
into
a
kind
of
in-depth
description
of
that,
but
I
don't
think
they
need
it.
AS
No
I,
don't
think
so,
just
as
a
reminder
that
the
the
proposed
location
meets
all
the
buffer
zones,
so
there
are
no
variances
required.
It's
only
a
conditional
use,
as
the
board
noted
was
voted
to
reconsider
the
prior
denial
that
happened
in
July,
primarily
based
on
the
motion
for
reconsideration
or
request
reconsideration
submitted
by
prior
Council.
AS
That
was
based
primarily
on
the
two
two
cases
that
were
decided
one
by
the
SJC
and
one
involving
the
deals
after
the
decision
was
rendered
and
just
to
highlight
a
couple
issues
from
those
cases
that
specifically
relate
here
and
how
and
how
this
motion
for
reconsideration
or
the
pre-consideration
should
be
considered
in
the
in
the
facts,
in
favor
of
reconsideration
and
now
a
positive
vote
as
the
board
knows
that
the
focus
is
the
criteria
set
forth
in
article
6,
section
6
3,
but
those
findings
concerning
compliance
should
be
informed
by
a
prior
decisions
of
the
board
to
allow
similar
establishments
with
similar
facts.
AS
In
addition,
other
uses
that
may
be
permitted
by
right
that
may
generate
comparable
or
greater
impact
should
also
inform
the
board
decision
when
determining
whether
a
proposed
use
would
have
an
adverse
effect.
So
there
are
uses
that
would
generate
a
significantly
more
traffic.
Significantly
more
parking
need,
but
will
be
permitted
by
right
with
no
review
would
speak
in
favor
of
having
no
adverse
impact.
I.
Think
in
you
know,
in
Holland
Brands
the
court
noted
you
know
a
number
of
others.
AS
Similarly,
situated
retail
cannabis
facilities
that
are
located
near
residential
uses,
where
there's
very
little
or
no
parking
provided
this
site
does
provide
four
off-street
parking
spaces
and
a
look
for
employees.
It
does
involve
or
a
loading
area
that
will
be
off
street,
so
it
will
provide
secure
loading
will
ensure
that
there
is
no
truck
or
delivery
truck,
that
is
blocking
traffic
or
is
required
to
take
up
parking
spaces
on
the
street.
AS
In
addition,
multiple
similar
facilities
throughout
the
city
have
been
permitted
near
residential
uses
in
residential
districts
and
on
this
side
of
Washington
Street,
as
the
proposed
project,
mostly
commercial,
as
you
go
to
the
left
and
to
the
right
of
the
property,
Papa
John's,
and
so
once
ahead,
and
you
have
restaurants
and
barber
shops
on
the
other.
We
do
note
there
are
residential
facilities
in
the
area
we've
received
opposition
from
from
some
of
those
folks,
but
in
terms
of
its
location,
it's
very
simple.
AS
It
is
similarly
situated
to
a
host
of
other
applications
that
have
been
approved
by
the
poor
and
considering
effect
for
those
uses
that
are
permitted
by
right.
There
are
a
number
of
uses
that
are
permitted
by
right
that
would
generate
comparable
traffic
and
parking
demand
to
the
uses
that
are
actually
the
use
that
is
proposed,
uses
that
are
similar.
That
would
be
permitted
in
the
ns1
district
include
local
retail
establishments
Banks
or
even
a
small
takeout
restaurant,
which
the
the
ordinance
defines
as
a
restaurant.
AS
B
Okay,
so
I
mean
so
I
mean
the
sequence
of
events
is
is,
and
you
can
please
feel
free
to
correct
me.
This
came
before
the
board
we
denied
it
I
think
largely
based
on
this
notion
of
it
was
in
a
heavily
trafficked
business
district
and
there
was
a
lot
of
opposition
and-
and
that
was
I,
think
the
logic
of
the
folks
who
voted
to
deny
and
then
it
was
then
it
came
from
reconsideration.
B
It
was
presented
again
and
we
voted
to
reconsider
it,
which
is
what
we're
doing
today
we're
essentially
a
new
hearing
to
reconsider,
so
I
think
I
want
to
stay
away
from
the
various
legal
arguments
about
why
it's
appropriate
to
reconsider,
because
we're
reconsidering
we're
here
at
that
point
so
I
think
what
we
need
to
do
is
just
summarize
again
the
basic
facts
about
the
proposal.
You
know
the
buffer
zone
issues
near
School,
the
proximity
that
kind
of
stuff
and
then
we'll
take
testimony
and
we
will
reconsider,
which
is
what
we
voted
to
do.
Okay,.
AS
Right,
that's
fair
and
I
just
point
out
that
what
I
was
trying
to
articulate
is
not
additional
reasons
for
reconsideration,
which
you've
already
agreed
to
do
is
that
in
looking
at
the
Criterion,
applying
the
criteria
of
whether
or
not
the
use
is
appropriate.
Considering
those
other
issues
that
I
just
highlighted,
inform
that
decision
as
to
whether
or
not
the
uses
I
think
very
briefly,
and
then
we
certainly
move
on
to
the
questions.
But
the
only
other
thing
I
highlight
there
is
is
I
notice
off
the
top?
The
site
complies
with
the
required.
AS
You
know
setbacks
to
schools
and
and
other
other
similar
uses
like
the
YMCA.
So
it
is
only
a
conditional
use
permit.
It
doesn't
require
variance
from
those
Provisions.
The
facility
the
proposed
use,
will
have
very
similar
hours
to
businesses
in
the
area.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
in
some
cases
that
I've
significantly
lesser
hours
than
others
from
a
parking
and
traffic
standpoint,
you
have
expert
testimony.
AS
You
know
report
in
the
record
that
demonstrates
there
will
be
no
adverse
effects
on
parking
and
traffic
that
the
parking
inventory
is
sufficient
for
this
kind
of
for
this
kind
of
use
and
as
I
noted
similar
by
right
uses
that
wouldn't
even
look
at
work
would
have
similar,
and
one
last
thing
on
traffic
is
that
it'll
have
no
no
effect
on
the
level
of
service.
You
know
at
or
near
the
site.
The
current
level
of
service
is
level
B,
and
the
proposed
use
will
not
change
that
that
level
of
service,
okay,.
B
So
and
to
and
to
answer
the
questions,
I
asked:
what's
the
distance
to
the
nearest
school
and
what's
in
the
resistance
to
a
comparable
business.
AS
To
the
nearest
school
is
I,
don't
know
the
exact
distance
to
the
nearest
school.
It's
over
502,
which
is
the
which
is
the
requirement.
Okay
in
terms
of
nearest
business,
the
the
nearest
businesses
across
the
street
across
Fairbanks
to
to
Papa
John's.
So
it's
30
or
40
people,
okay,.
B
So
I.
B
I
mean
I
realize
that
there
that
there
has
been
a
serious
softening
of
that
as
a
as
an
issue,
but
I
wanted
to
ask
as
many
kids,
okay,
all
right
any
well,
there's
no
point
really
asking
Mr
Robinson
about
the
drawings
we've
already
been
through
this
any
questions
on
the
board
about
the
the
nature
of
the
business
and
the
issues
involved.
AF
AC
This
is
Cody
Evans
I'm,
one
of
the
owners
I
think
that
what
the
goal
of
the
city
is
to
do
is
to
have
a
cross-section
of
dispensaries
across
the
city,
so
you're
having
neighborhood
dispensaries,
so
you're
alleviating
traffic
of
someone
from
Austin
going
to
Brighton
someone
from
Roxbury
when
they're
going
to
Dorchester.
The
goal
is
to
have
at
least
52
dispensaries
across
the
city,
so
a
dominicates
traffic
and
B.
It
makes
it
convenient
for
constituents
so
that
they're
not
traveling
outside
of
their
neighborhood,
to
go
to
a
local
dispensary.
AF
AF
AC
A
Level
Playing
Field
and,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
cannabis
becomes
a
commodity.
It's
just
you
know
it's
like
going
to
the
supermarket
for
flour.
You
don't
necessarily
go
to
Across
the
town
to
go,
get
you
know
for
lack
of
a
better
term
sugar
or
flour.
You
just
watch
your
neighborhood
Supermarket
or
it's
corner,
store
and
wrap
flower
and
we're
back
home.
L
B
Money
can
is
there
anybody
here
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
applicant.
AE
Yes,
Mr
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
Mayors
Austin
Neighborhood
Services
at
this
time
in
Arizona,
reiterate
his
opposition
to
this
proposal,
as
we
previously
testified.
There
was
a
lot
of
concerns
expressed
from
directed
Butters
regarding
potential
for
congestion
on
this
very
important
artery
neighborhood
with
the
rest
of
Brighton
as
well
as
concerns
regarding
safety.
It's
an
awkward
intersection,
the
way
that,
when
the
road
flows
into
Washington
Street,
the
road
also
bends
into
some
blind
spots
as
well.
We've
received
90
letters.
AE
AE
L
B
Hi
is
Israel,
is
representative
Moran's
a
gonna
speak
hello.
There,
hello.
P
B
AT
Good
I,
this
is
representative
Mike
Moran
I
I've
been
serving
this
district
for
approximately
18
years
and
I
again
want
to
show
up
at
this
zoning
board.
Thank
you
to
the
chair
and
the
members
of
the
board,
but,
as
as
I
said,
this
not
much
has
happened
in
this
proposal
compared
to
what
happened
the
last
one
and
the
neighborhood
is
clearly.
This
is
something
that
they're
not
supporting
myself.
The
mayor,
Kevin
honen,
are
actively
against
this
location.
AT
It's
not
that
we're
against
the
issue,
because
we
have
supported
other
locations
in
the
community.
It's
just
this.
This
one
in
our
in
our
opinion,
with
our
expertise,
does
not
seem
to
fit
the
character
of
what
we
would
want
there
as
far
as
traffic
flow
and
and
not
being
a
something
that's
going
to
an
adverse
effect
on
a
community
that
lives
around
there.
AT
So
I
would
hope
that
the
the
board
would
do
what
they
did
last
time
and
and
and
reject
this
this
proposal,
because
of
all
the
four
stated
reasons.
Thank
you
thank.
B
AU
Mr
Ehrlich
I'm
at
the
house
right
next
door,
30
inches
away
I've,
expressed
all
my
concerns
at
the
previous
meeting,
where
it
was
right
and
I
think
if
the
members
look
in
their
files,
they'll
also
see
documentation,
I
provide
showing
many
of
the
claims.
AU
Your
Oasis
are
false,
with
photos
of
the
notebook
to
show
that
there's
parking
here,
as
well
as
false
time
stamps
up
in
the
photographs.
If
you
could
go
back
to
that
slide,
also
documented.
If
you
look
in
your
files
that
the
cases
the
three
cases
that
they
cite
that
were
approved,
they
claim
that
those
are
exactly
like
this
and
that
they
had
less
parking,
whereas
I
provided
documentation
in
there
from
public
records
that
that's
not
the
case
at
all
on
the
ample
parking
and
they
have
off-speed
parking.
AU
Yes,
if
you
go
back
to
that
slide
because
they've
downloaded
those
photos
from
Google,
Maps
and
they're,
the
bottom
three
photos
are
of
a
No
Parking
Zone.
There's
no
parking
sign
right
under
the
word.
Laundry
and
I've
made
a
blow
up
of
that
in
my
documentation
to
you,
slot
cleaners
always
had
a
No
Parking
Zone
there.
So,
of
course,
there's
no
cars
there
and
if
you
look
at
the
time
stamps
they
they
mentioned
months,
they
don't
mention
day.
AU
AV
Mr
Ehrlich,
my
name
is
Edmund
Alcock
I
am
counsel
for
Mr
Shakir
and
actually
his
brother
Ed
shekere.
We
submitted
a
letter
in
opposition
I.
Think
the
thing
to
really
point
out,
and
hopefully
people
look
at
the
letter
is
at
the
last
hearing,
pure
Oasis
traffic
engineer
indicated
that
there
were
they
expected
at
least
300
trips
a
day
to
this
site,
more
than
half
of
which
would
be
by
vehicle.
The
concern
that
we
have
is
that
this
site
backs
up
to
residential
neighborhoods
and
and
there's
no
on-site
parking.
AV
B
AV
Suggested
and
and
I
think
just
one
last
Point
chairman
is
a
section
article
6
section
6-3,
one
of
the
Christ
criteria
is:
will
the
use
adversely
affect
the
neighborhood
I?
Don't
think
they've
satisfied
that
this
citation
of
of
these
cases,
the
one
issued
by
the
SJC
and
the
one
issue
by
the
Superior
Court
the
SJC
case
in
taunt,
was
the
the
city
council
allowed
a
dispensary
on
the
same
street?
AV
O
Z
Hi,
this
is
right
across
the
street,
the
proposed
property.
We
are
strongly
opposed
to
this,
not
just
for
safety
and
traffic,
but
just
in
general
to
the
feel
of
the
neighborhood
other.
That
was
already
mentioned.
Also,
there's
Saint
Elizabeth
Hospital
right
there,
and
if
there's
not
much
traffic
and
ambulance
trying
to
get
through
good
luck,
I
would
not
want
to
be
a
patient
there.
The
other
thing
they
didn't
submit
any
safety
and
advocacy.
B
G
Chairman
members,
specific
word,
Annabelle
gone
to
the
right
Mouse
Improvement
Association
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
opposing
this
to
pretty
much.
It
has
been
mentioned.
The
traffic
impact
on
a
very
high
rate
of
traffic
on
that
street
and
having
any
double
parking
or
anything,
is
going
to
cause
a
lot
of
safety
issues
and
lack
of
parking.
Thank
you,
okay.
Thank
you.
B
O
AB
Can
you
hear
me
yup:
go
ahead,
yeah
I
I'm
at
551,
Washington
Street,
and
we
have
our
office
there
and
already
we
have
to
choose
with
the
parking
and
the
double
parking
and
we
can't
pull
out
of
the
driveway,
because
you
can't
see
because
cars
are
double
parked
or
delivery
trucks,
and
so
we're
strongly
opposed
to
this
we'll
be
happy
to
support
Colby
or
any
other
proposal
at
a
location
where
there's
some
parking,
that's
more
suitable
for
it,
it's
already
dangerous
on
the
street.
Thank
you.
B
Very
much
thank
you
very
much.
Okay,
I
think
I.
Think
we've
heard
as
much
testimony
as
we
need
to
so
I
would
ask
somebody
to
make
a
motion.
Please.
AF
I
mean
I'm
just
I'm,
going
back
to
if,
if
a,
if
another
business
goes
there,
I
I
don't
see
how
that
other
business
would
have
any
more
or
less
cars
than
this
business
here
so
I'd
like
to
put
a
motion
to
approve
with
BP
data,
bpda
design
review
and
an
operating
time
from
10
am
to
8
pm
seven
days
a
week,
so
at
least
maybe
I
will
mitigate
any
morning.
AF
B
A
Mr
Ruggiero
this
is
Tom,
can
I
could
also
be
this
petitioner.
Only
this
petitioner
only
yeah
yep,
sorry.
F
F
We
can
I
mean
I,
I,
guess
I
I
mean
I.
You
know
this
I
think
I've
been
on
all
three
of
the
hearings
now
and
I
appreciate
the
concern
and
neighbor
and
I
Joe
I.
Think
you're
I'm
with
you
on
your
you're.
Also
positioned,
so
I
mean
I'd
like
to
support
it,
but
I
wonder
if
we
should
put
a
sunset
Proviso
or
they
come
back
in
a
year.
We
see
how
things
are
going
and
then
you
know
yeah.
F
B
B
Robinson,
yes,
Renato.
Yes,.
E
B
Yes,
I'm
gonna
vote,
no
I
think
the
Austin
position
has
been
very
clear
in
the
motion
therefore
fails
to
pass
because
it
doesn't
give
away
votes.
A
B
Then
we'll
just
keep
kicking
the
can
down
the
road
I
mean
I,
don't
think
that
makes
sense
so
I
even
in
denial.
Without
prejudice
just
kicks
the
can
down
the
road
I
I,
just
don't
I,
just
don't
think
that
there's
I
I
think
there's
there's
too
much
opposition
for
a
business
like
this
to
go
in
and
well.
Joe's
point
is
extremely
well
taken,
which
is
just
about
any
business
is
going
to
have
foot
traffic
and
vehicular
traffic.
B
B
B
I
agree:
yeah
I
agree
with
that.
You
know
well,
okay!
Well,
we
are
I
mean
the
only
way
and
then
the
only
suggestion
I
would
make
is.
We
may
have
emotionally
defer,
because
this
is
a
five-member
board.
Maybe
they'll
have
a
better
chance
of
the
supplement
report.
So
if
we
so
why
don't
we
have?
How
about
someone
who
makes
the
motion
to
defer
I'll.
O
B
A
Mr
Ehrlich
her
dates.
We
can
have
him
come
back
in
the
November
date,
November
15th
there
will
be
a
seven
member
board.
It
is
the
same
as
today
or
we
can
have
them
come
back
in
the
new
year,
which
I
don't
know
who
will
be
on
the
board?
Can
we
hi.
A
AF
AF
AF
K
K
As
you
may
recall,
we
had
a
hearing
on
May
10th
2022.
There
was
a
request
by
a
few
of
the
members
of
the
board
for
elevation
drawings.
For
some
reason,
the
elevation
drawings
were
inadvertently
left
out
of
the
file.
Then
they
were
not
transferred
over
to
the
board
for
review.
At
that
point
we
weren't
allowed
to
supplement.
Since
then
we
have
supplemented
the.
K
So
so
let
me
let
me
go
back
to
so.
They
were
originally
submitted
with
the
original
application,
but
for
some
reason
they
went
inadvertently
not
transferred
over
to
the
zoning
board
from
ISD.
Again,
that's
without
our
fault.
So
since
then
we
have
submitted
resubmitted
those
elevation
drawings
for
your
review.
So
at
this
point,
where
we're
asking
to
respectfully
Recon
consider
having
a
another
hearing
in
order
for
the
board
to
review
the
full
set
of
plans
and
to
base
their
decision
on
the
full
merits
of
this
proposal,.
B
Okay,
now
as
I
recall,
yes,
I
recall
this
one
that
that
there
were
drawings,
that
there
were
issues
that
we
felt
we
couldn't
really
resolve
or
answer
or
form
an
opinion
on,
because
we
didn't
have
enough
information
because
he
didn't
have
the
drawings
I,
don't
really
care
whose
fault
it
was
that's
irrelevant
for
these
proceedings.
But
we
didn't
have
that
information.
I
also
recall.
There
was
a
significant
amount
of
community
opposition
to
this
proposal
as
well.
K
Mr
Ehrlich,
if
you
don't
mind
me,
jumping
in
I,
don't
believe
we
really
had
any
opposition.
We
had
support
from
elected
officials.
B
I,
don't
think
that's
that's
not
my
recollection,
but
again
I
do
mind
you
jumping
in
so
what
we.
So
what
so,
today,
what
we
are
presented
with
is
the
option
to
reconsider,
meaning
that
you
will
come
back
if
we
vote
Yes
that
you
will
come
back
at
another
date
and
we'll
review
it,
because
we
have
more
information
and
that
we
did
not
have
at
the
time
of
the
original
hearing
and
presumably
can
make
it
more
rational,
intelligent
decision
based
on
the
additional
information.
So
why
don't
you
tell
us
what
you?
Why?
K
So
there
were
a
few
questions
of
seeing
where
the
sign
was
according
to
those
elevations
from
different
perspectives,
because
the
only
thing
that
was
received
by
the
zoning
board
was
the
actual
plot
plan.
So
it
was
tough
to
actually
have
a
visualization,
yes,
and
that
was
made
I
believe
the
the
motion
there
was
a
motion
to
defer
to
allow
supplement
was
made
by
Mr,
Robinson
and
Mr
Ehrlich
and
I.
Think
you
actually
I,
don't
know
if
you
second
that
motion,
because
there
was
a
discrepancy
on
the
actual
vote
itself
as
well.
K
I
know
there
was
a
motion
in
front
to
support
that
failed
from
four
to
two
votes
in
one
person
potentially
asking
for
a
deferral,
but
the
deferral
was
not
allowed
to
supplement
those
drawings.
So
again
you
know
those
will
more
or
less
visualizations.
K
B
Now
what
so?
Thank
you
Mr
Smith,
so
now
for
the
five
of
us.
The
question
is:
do
we
do
we
want
to
reconsider
this
case,
because
we
now
have
additional
information
that
we
didn't
have
at
the
time
it
was
presented
to
us
initially
or
do
we
simply
want
to
let
what's
done
is
done
and
move
on
so
any
comments,
thoughts
from
the
board
well,
yeah.
AF
I
mean
I.
Remember
that
hearing
I,
remember
Mr
at
the
motion,
originally
not
caring
to
support
and
then
I
remember,
Mr
Robinson,
asking
for
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
for
a
motion
to
defer
and
for
some
reason
that
motion
was
not
allowed
so
I
I
think
we
should
reconsider
this.
So
I'll
make
a
motion
to
read
myself
I'll.
F
Second,
that
motion
the
information
is
in
the
packet.
I
do
have
one
additional
if
we're
going
to
reconsider
this
there,
maybe
is
a
little
bit
of
time,
but-
and
this
is
a
little
bit
selfish
as
a
Dorchester
resident.
One
of
the
bullet
points
for
the
proponent
is
that
three
existing
Billboards
will
be
removed
and
I
know
it
says
they
will
be
determined
by
Council
Baker
in
the
McCormick
Square
I
guess,
from
a
selfish
point
of
view.
Maybe
I'm
allowed
to
do
that.
F
I
don't
know,
but
it
would
be
great
if
there's
any
way
that
those
three
Billboards
could
be
maybe
documented
or
decided
on
in
the
interim.
So
we
can
make
a
you
know:
it's
it's
a
big
difference.
If
there
are
just
some
small
ones
that
are
in
the
neighborhood
street
or
if
they're,
actually
substantial
ones,
that
really
are
an
eyesore
in
the
community.
So
that's
a
big
piece
for
me.
A.
B
Person,
no,
no,
no
Mr
Robinson!
That
is
not
a
selfish
thing
at
all,
for
the
Dorchester
rather
I
mean
I
wish.
I
was
stunned
when
I
heard
that
I've
never
heard
that
kind
of
Proviso
before
and
I'm
very
curious
as
to
how
that
actually
is
going
to
play
off.
That's
a
that's
a
broader
issue
with
policy
that
all
of
us
should
be
concerned,
but
so
thank
you
for
resurrecting
that
okay.
So
this
has
been
a
motion.
B
There's
been
a
motion
made
and
second
to
reconsider
and
I
will
do
a
roll
call,
Mr
agero,
aye,
Mr
Robinson,
yes,
Miss
pinata!
Yes,.
E
B
Logue
yes
and
I,
I
too
agree.
Let's
read,
let's
devote
to
reconsider,
and
so
it's
Mr
Spitz
to
the
applicant.
We
would
ask
for
two
things:
one
is
the
additional
renderings
and
visualizations
which
I
gather
we
have,
and
the
second
would
be
an
explanation
of
how
the
this
business
of
the
other
boards
coming
down
would
actually
take
place.
Yes,.
K
B
Hear
that
so
you
have
your
opportunity
to
hear
that
all
right
with
that
I
believe
we
are
done
with
the
people's
business
for
the
day
so
see
you
all
see
you
all
next
time.
K
Mr
chair:
we
need
a
hammer
today,
yeah.
What's
the.
A
Date,
oh
yeah,
for
the
reconsiderations
everyone
we
will
re-notice
those
under
the
terms
of
the
evening
act
so
we'll
be
mailing.
The
notice
yeah.