►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 5-7-19
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
A
A
A
Use
they
may
7th
is
now
in
session
just
to
remind
to
please
make
sure
your
cell
phones
are
off
and
in
conformance
with
the
Open
Meeting
Law,
this
meeting
is
being
live-streamed.
If
you're
here
in
support
or
an
opposition
of
to
a
project,
we
ask
that
you
give
us
new
information
when
it's
your
turn
at
the
podium.
That
is
what
we
want
to
hear
is
new
information,
repeating
repeating,
what's
already
been
said,
is
not
helpful
to
us
in
making
a
decision
I'm
also
going
to
advise
you
that
the
May
21st
Smith
meeting
has
been
cancelled.
A
B
You,
madam
chair,
the
hearing
minutes
of
April
30th
2019
and
they
revised
meetings
of
March
26,
2009
teen
will
be
heard
at
the
first
June
meeting.
So
we're
gonna
go
right
into
the
extension
so
calling
BOA
three:
eight:
nine
zero,
four
seven
90210
two
white
street
name,
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
C
Sumner
Street
Suite
110
from
attorney
Richard
lances
office
I'm
here
today
seeking
a
confirmation
on
a
request
for
an
extension.
This
case
was
actually
subject
to
a
judicial
appeal
and
the
appeal
was
dismissed
in
February
16th
of
2018.
So
we
just
want
confirmation
that
the
decision
would
stand
for
two
years
from
the
date
of
dismissal.
C
This
case
was
initially
the
variance
was
granted
on
this
at
a
hearing
held
November,
18th
and
2014.
The
decision
ended
with
inspectional
services,
On
February
10th
of
2015.
However,
a
judicial
appeal
was
taken
on
this
through
without
the
process,
the
appeal
was
actually
dismissed
back
in
February
16th
of
2018,
so
we
just
want
a
confirmation
or
a
dominant
for
the
record
that
the
trio's
actually
runs
from
the
date
of
the
judicial
appeal,
but.
A
D
Jonsin
architect,
190
old
colony
of
Boston,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
Although
we
have
broad
about
a
support,
we
have
made
major
revisions
to
this
multi-family
building
due
to
the
requests
of
the
Executive
Committee
of
the
Civic
Association.
They
have
a
meeting
tomorrow,
night
and
they'd
like
us
to
present
the
final
revisions.
Therefore,
we
respectfully
request
a
deferral
to
the
earliest
possible
date.
D
A
Should
have
said
this
before
you
got
understand,
but
for
all
community
groups
and
applicants
we
are
we
really
we
looking
very
strictly
at
our
policy
about
granting
extensions.
We
are
this.
This
has
increased.
Our
workload
and
meeting
schedule
is,
has
really
flipped
out
of
control.
So
this
is
a
reminder
that
summer
is
coming
up
and
we
always
see
an
increase
in
the
number
of
requests
for
deferral.
A
E
B
B
A
F
Requesting
to
defer
all
the
matters
before
the
borough
with
zoning
items
that
we're
going
to
be
addressing
fa,
our
setbacks,
pre-existing
conditions.
Since
then,
we
also
had
building
code
issues
that
we've
been
working
with
the
plant
examiner
and
flags
ever
suggested
that
we
should
go
before
the
sport
to
address
those
issues.
So
we
have
filed
a
necessary
paperwork
to
have
those
added
to
this
hearing.
G
A
H
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
mark
the
Catholic
house
law,
75
Arlington
Street
in
Boston
attorney
for
the
applicant
we're
seeking
a
deferral
based
on
a
request
of
the
JPA
that
we
appear
before
their
general
meeting
on
Monday
May
13,
we've
already
completed
our
butter
meeting.
We
had
a
meeting
with
the
plans
and
zoning
committee,
after
which
OH&S
requested
a
hearing
date,
which
was
the
sign
for
today.
However,
JPA
is
general
meeting
is
next
Monday
the
13th,
so
we
just
need
to
appear
before
them
for
their
final
vote,
suitably.
I
A
B
This
is
to
modify
a
roofline
chaining
a
few
interior
wall
layouts.
The
violation
is
article
27
G.
This
is
in
the
East
Boston
iPod
article
53,
section
9.
The
flood
area
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53
section
9
a
height
of
success,
of
its
stories,
article
53
section
9,
the
required
side
yard
is
insufficient.
53
section
I
on
the
required
Riyadh
setback
is
insufficient
name.
It
adds
a
full
erected
clip.
K
K
I
L
K
M
I
K
N
O
J
B
Boa
nine
one,
six,
two
three
six
one:
ninety
eight
Byron
Street
mr.
build
a
two-story
19
by
15
addition,
no
basement
addition
to
contain
one
bedroom.
Second,
floor
level:
a
study
office
in
the
first
level,
a
current
first
floor,
egress
to
grade
level
shall
be
maintained,
renovated
with
no
addition
violations.
Nautical
27g.
This
is
in
the
East
Boston
iPod
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
A
P
P
I
I
N
O
B
Boa
nine
one,
eight
nine
seven,
six,
four
seven
eighty-three
East
East
Broadway:
this
is
to
legalize
the
extended
living
space
to
the
basement
for
unit
one
and
an
existing
to
family
dwelling.
No
work
can
be
done:
violation,
article
27s,
section
five:
this
is
in
the
South
Boston
iPod
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
P
P
P
A
P
T
I
I
M
A
M
L
I
I
I
V
Ahead
when
they
show
members
of
the
Warren
McCulloch
dome
from
councillor
Flinx
office,
the
counselor
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition
to
this
proposal.
There
many
concerns
coming
from
the
director
borders
on
the
on
the
community
outreach
for
this
particular
project.
Actually,
one
I,
because
I
go
record
opposition.
Thank
you.
V
W
X
X
I
believe
that
there
has
been
confusion
in
a
lack
of
public
process.
I
have
never
seen
the
plans.
I
tried
to
ascertain
those
plans
from
1010
massive.
They
were
moved
over
here
for
this
hearing
and
I
have
not
been
able
to
look
at
those
plans.
Yet
I
would
ask
that
you
defer
the
process
today.
If
your
record.
P
B
B
This
is
to
demolish
an
existing
building,
erect
a
new
six-story
mixed-use
building
with
ground
floor,
commercial
space
and
nine
residential
units,
above
violation,
tatical,
27s,
section
nine.
This
is
in
the
South
Boston
iPod
article
68,
section
33
Osprey
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
68
section
8,
Claudia
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
68,
section
8,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
article
68,
section
8,
the
use
of
open
spaces
and
sufficient
article
68
section
8.
The
front
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
68
section
8.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient.
An
article
68
sections
section
8.
Z
Madam
chair
members,
this
is
an
application
for
a
new
six
storey
building
at
71-75
West
Broadway,
which
is
the
corner
ace.
This
is
currently
a
single-story
commercial
building,
best
known
as
the
president
location
of
balls
diner.
Madam
chair
members.
This
application
seeks
the
erection
of
the
new
six
story.
Building
that
would
contain
ground-floor
commercial
space,
approximately
1128
square
feet
of
a
use
that
is
as-yet-unidentified
we're
not
seeking
any
relief
for
any
future
intended
use
with
nine
units.
Z
Nine
dwelling
units
located
above
the
building
will
rise
to
a
maximum
height
of
sixty
five
and
a
half
feet.
The
dwelling
units
will
be
divided
as
two
units
per
floor
with
rows
two
through
five
and
then
one
unit
unit
number
nine
find
the
entirety
of
the
sixth
floor.
The
units
are
comprised
of
one
one
bedroom
and
one
two-bedroom
unit
flow
is
two
three
four
and
five
and
they'll
be
the
sixth
form
number
unit.
Number
nine,
which
occupies
the
entirety
of
the
sixth
floor
is
a
two
veteran
unit,
15
three-bedroom
unit
with
15
bedrooms.
AA
Z
This
is
located
in
an
MFI
RLS,
multi-family
residential
local
service
zone,
sub
district
under
Article
68.
It
requires
relief
for
FA
are
the
maximum
under
the
MF.
Rls
is
1.5.
This
is
just
over
6.
It
occupies
the
entirety
of
the
site,
it's
a
zero
lot
line
building
and
there
are
bays
on
floors
two
through
six,
which
accounts
for
the
point
one
in
the
in
the
FA
are
saving
of
Barrett's
on
height
on
minimum
useful,
open
space
for
a
dwelling
unit.
Again
this
is
a
zero
setback.
Z
Building
was
that
we
have
a
boat
on
West,
Broadway,
Mosel
on
a
street,
the
rear
yard
setback
in
those
side,
yard
setback
on
the
right
side
and
again,
there's
a
because
of
the
size
of
the
site,
2244
square
feet.
It's
not
possible
to
apples.
An
active
first
floor
use
in
parking
lot
on
the
ground
floor,
there's
no
parking
associated
with
this
building.
It
is
located
on
the
same
block
as
the
MBTA's
Broadway
Red
Line
station.
It's
maybe
200
feet
from
the
station,
so
this
is
there's
a
true.
A
transit
oriented
development.
A
Z
Z
U
AB
I'm
Derek,
a
Tchaikovsky
representing
the
WBA,
was
probably
Neighborhood
Association,
so
we
would
like
to
offer
our
conditional
support
for
this
project.
We
think
that
details
need
to
be
further.
Details
need
to
be
resolved.
We
need
to
see
further
details,
but
in
general,
the
erection
of
a
building
of
this
size
and
this
use
on
this
corner.
We
broadly
support.
Thank.
V
The
chair
members
of
the
board
on
Akali
room
from
councillor
Fink's
office,
the
counselor
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition
to
this
project,
with
her
from
many
neighbors
of
others,
and
the
entire
South
Boston
community
in
opposition
to
this
project.
Teacher
concerns
about
the
type
of
sex
toys,
the
density,
parking
impacts
and
issues
with
trash
removal.
We
also
heard
concerns
about
pedestrian
safety
during
the
course
of
the
construction
phase
at
this
very
busy
intersection
due
to
the
high
volume
of
food
and
vehicular
traffic.
As
a
result,
we
will
close
this
project.
Thank
you.
V
AC
Malinda
Whatman
judy
my
dress,
55
West
Broadway
Street
unit,
one
South
Boston
I
speak
on
behalf
of
the
45
to
55
West
Broadway,
condominium
association
and
I
am
a
member
of
the
West
Broadway
Neighborhood
Association.
It
strikes
me
that
with
seven
violations
to
the
zoning
rules
that
it
undermines
to
have
to
approve
this
undermines
the
actual
purpose
of
the
zoning
port
that
we're
looking
at
preserving
neighborhoods,
and
this
building
would
do
just
the
opposite.
AC
A
AD
Z
Community
process
there
was
the
barrios
meeting
sponsored
by
the
office
of
neighborhood
services.
At
a
lot
of
recent
during
in
February,
there
was
a
presentation
to
the
West
Broadway
Neighborhood
Association
and
its
regular
monthly
meeting.
There
was
a
follow-up
presentation
to
the
WBA
specifically
on
design.
I
know
that
W
DNA,
even
in
his
testimony,
referencing
some
concerns
they
still
have
are
very
concerning
boat
design,
a
lot
is
happening
in
and
some
of
it
that
has
occurred.
Z
It's
been
good
and
that's
been
a
development
that,
as
you
know,
how
to
go
on
strict
oversight
by
WPA
and
that
my
clients
are
committed
to
continuing
to
work
with
them
on
design
issues,
because
there
are
examples
down
there,
where
the
design
didn't
quite
go
the
way
that
it
should
have
so
my
clients,
as
on
the
other
projects
that
have
worked
under
this
neighborhood,
a
committed
to
working
with
both
the
BMW
VNA
on
design,
will
continue.
Regular
updates.
Z
Z
Absolutely
because
it
is
a
small
site
because
there
there
needs
to
be
a
dialogue
that
needs
to
be
communication
with
the
55
West
Broadway
Association.
This
site
is,
is
continuous
to
their
site
and
not
Welman
buildings,
but
to
their
parking
area,
and
that
is
certainly
something
we're
committed
to
not
only
because
it's
neighborly,
but
because
it's
a
necessity
through
this
process,
a.
A
A
B
Do
a
nine
three
eight
zero,
nine
nine
105
West
first
Street.
This
is
demolition
of
an
existing
warehouse
building
to
allow
for
new
construction
of
a
ground-up
seven
storey
office,
building
with
one
level
of
backing
basement
space
retail
space
on
the
parole
violation,
article
21,
section
1:
the
setback
of
the
parapet
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record
late.
AE
AF
AE
Realized
that
we
thought
that
was
also
a
parapet,
setback
that
had
not
been
cited,
ice-t
read
issued
a
subsequent
turndown
letter
and
we
were
afforded
you
to
get
this
one
additional
piece
of
Seneca
Lake
necessary
to
construct
the
project.
The
project
has
receives
community
support,
the
EPP,
a
football
and
married
other
permits
and
approvals
like
Boston,
Lawrence
or
site
plan
approval,
so
that
it
can
go
into
construction
later
this
week.
So
this
just
completes
the
sweep
of
zoning
relief
evening
for
the
project.
What.
AE
Parapet
setback
requirement:
this
is
based
on
I
fight.
You
essentially
requires
a
when
you
make
looking
building
so
setbacks
of
like
20
and
35
feet,
which
bomb
this
tight
site
and
irregularly
shaped
site
is
not
possible.
It
also
ends
up
with
floor
plates
above
60
feet
that
just
are
not
responsive
to
the
market.
It
makes
the
project
completely
uneven
operate,
so
this
design
was
approved
by
the
be
CDC,
the
BPA
and
the
community,
so
nothing
that
the
project
itself
has
changed.
A
B
This
is
the
Arachne
new
three
new
three
family
dwelling
building
with
four
parking
spaces
and
roof
deck;
the
violation,
article
27
s,
section
five
in
the
South
Boston
iPod
article
68,
section
33
street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
68
section
8
the
floor.
The
ratio
is
excessive.
An
article
68
section,
80
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
68,
section
8,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient
and
not
equal.
Sixty
eight
section,
eight.
The
really
odd,
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
V
Members
of
the
board
on
a
kaliram
from
councillor
Finn's
office,
the
counselor
would
like
to
call
recording
support
of
this
project.
The
applicant
did
work
with
their
butters
and
the
Civic
Neighborhood
Association
to
get
out
to
take
off
the
roof,
deck
and
other
concerns
that
they
had
in
there
isn't
why
we
support.
Thank
you,
madam.
W
E
R
A
R
It's
an
egregious
plan
to
sort
of
gain
profit
on
the
area.
The
only
the
current
owner
of
the
property
has
does
not
manage
the
property.
Well,
as
you
are
aware,
the
Ender
square
area
is
there's
a
lot
of
drug
use.
There
are
people
that
urinate
and
defecate
behind
that
building
and
it's
poorly
managed.
Currently,
so
you
know
it's
upsetting
in
the
neighborhood
when
I'm
an
owner-occupied
unit-
and
you
know,
there's
no
concern
of
the
property
now,
but
in
order
to
make
some
profit
on
that
area,
we're
going
to
be
losing
access
to
air.
R
AH
Hi,
my
name
is
Susan
Kelly
and
I
live
at
19
Roger
Street
I'm,
a
director
butter
and
I
opposed
this
project.
I
bought
my
house
about
22
years
ago.
One
of
the
reasons
I
bought
that
property
was
the
open
space
in
BEC.
This
project
completely
blocks
the
back
of
my
house.
The
back
deck
will
be
no
sunlight
at
all.
AI
AG
AG
AG
Of
the
opposition
was
on
Raja
Street.
As
you
look
at
drawing
a
one
touch
to
see:
23
9
2015,
it's
perfect
way,
but
that's
where
it's
coming
from.
Instead
of
the
3
foot
side
guide,
setback,
which
is
all
that
the
code
requires,
we
have
twice
at
60.
Additional
is
a
dimension
showing
how
far
away
the
dead
place,
the
structure
and
quality
existing
there.
We
are,
and
gods
of
the
townhouses
come
22.
AG
A
G
AK
L
B
P
Had
a
conversation
with
the
butter
mystic,
doesn't
four
issues
will
the
way
the
process
was
held?
The
community
outreach
process
was
held.
She
feels
adequately
at
a
time,
though,
my
firm
was
not
involved.
It
was
reported
to
me
that
they
held
a
Florence
meetings.
Have
the
property
outside
weather
was
inclement,
so
they
actually
held
it
inside
the
property?
P
Mr.
Govan
do
complications.
She
recorded
surgery
to
attend
that
was
there
playing.
My
client
has
reached
out
to
her
personally
on
numerous
occasions,
but
they
were
unable
to
have
a
fruitful
conversation.
They
gave
her
a
copy
of
the
plans
as
we
have
them
today.
She
requested
a
full
scale
drawings,
which
okay.
L
I
A
E
AF
AF
AF
A
A
Can
I
can
I
just
have
silence
in
this
room?
Please
make
sure
your
cell
phones
are
off
and
in
conformance
with
the
Open
Meeting
Law,
this
meeting
is
being
live-streamed.
If
you're
here
to
speak
in
support
or
in
opposition
to
a
project.
Please
give
us
new
information
when
you
are
at
the
podium.
Mr.
mr.
fortune,
thank.
A
B
AL
AL
There's
we've
had
two
community
meetings,
but
we
still
have
to
appear
before
the
Mount
Hope
Canterbury
Neighborhood
Association.
We
do
have
a
date
on
June
13th,
the
region
or
OH&S,
notifying
the
Zoning
Board
of
Appeals
that
we
are
prepared
as
a
miscommunication
between
myself
and
mr.
Coppinger,
which
I
take
responsibility
for
so
we
just
have
one
more
neighborhood
association
meeting
to
appear
before,
and
we
expect
to
be
prepared
to
present
that
the
next
available
and.
AL
B
B
AG
AG
L
AG
It
was,
there
was
one
site
that
was
changed
in
the
notes
section
of
the
refusal
letter,
as
well
as
going
propose
three
family
to
a
two
family.
So
for
this
specific
matter,
I
think
it's
important
that
it's
it
is
react
eyes,
it's
something
that
we've
been
in
communication
with
in
March
in
April.
It
just
does.
B
AF
B
A
B
AN
AF
B
E
B
This
is
directing
new
for
unit
residential
townhouse
dwelling
with
roof
stacks
on
a
vacant
lot
and
proposed
for
off
street
parking.
The
violation
is
article
50,
section.
29
lot
width
is
insufficient
to
accommodate
the
three
buildings
article
50
section
29
lot:
frontage
is
insufficient
name
an
advert
for
the
record,
please
my.
AO
A
AO
AF
G
AO
Have
a
four-bedroom
duplex
as
the
front
unit
its
accessed
directly
from
gray.
That's
about
1,500
square
feet.
We
have
a
two
bedroom
duplex
in
the
middle,
that
is
about
850
square
feet.
We
have
a
studio
in
the
rear
that
is
over
450
square
feet,
and
then
we
have
a
another
floor
bedroom
that
is
around
1,300
square
feet
and.
AO
L
I
AO
AO
I
AF
A
AP
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Jessica
Thomas
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
and
we
like
to
go
on
record
to
support
the
project
he
met
with
the
Neighborhood
Association
in
the
abutters,
who
was
in
support
of
the
project.
I
was
there
will
bring
new
home
ownership
for
the
area.
B
Your
next
two
cases
calling
boa
nine
two
three
eight
one,
eight
one
Maple
Street
companion
case,
boa
nine,
two,
three,
eight
one,
nine
one
Maple
Street.
This
is
the
change
of
oxygen
from
a
2
to
a
3
family
violation
that
occurred
50,
section
29.
Additional
law
here
is
insufficient
article
30
section
20
of
the
Floyd,
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
50,
section
20
and
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
This
is
parking
for
two
vehicles
behind
the
home,
a
violation,
article
50
section,
43,
auspey
parking
and
loading
requirements
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
Q
A
Q
A
Q
I
I
L
AP
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Jessica
Thomas
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
and
we
like
to
go
on
record
to
support
as
well.
We
did
have
a
butters
meeting
and
met
with
the
Neighborhood
Association,
who
was
in
support
of
the
project.
There
was
no
opposition.
Thank.
A
B
AQ
AQ
AQ
AQ
AQ
AQ
L
I
H
A
AP
Important
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Jessica
Thomas
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
and
we
like
to
go
on
record
to
support
as
well.
We
had
in
a
butters
meeting
and
also
met
with
the
neighborhood
group,
who
was
in
support
of
the
project,
no
real
opposition
from
any
of
the
neighbors.
Thank.
AQ
A
A
B
B
This
is
a
change
of
walk
from
nine
apartments
here,
salon
day
spa
day,
kiya
tonight,
at
Babu's,
hair
salon,
day,
spa
professional
office
and
local
retail.
This
is
a
constructed
second,
at
dirt
story.
Addition
to
an
existing
building
violates
article
65
section
9,
the
freudian
ratio
is
excessive
in
article
65,
section
9,
the
front
yard
isn't
sufficient.
They
even
address
on
the
record,
please.
Madam.
AR
AR
AR
AS
G
AT
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
faced
a
tree
for
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
of
this
proposal,
and
we
ask
that
there
will
be
that
there,
the
design
review
included,
especially
for
the
commercial
space
we're
going
in
support,
but
also
requesting
that
design
review
be
added
for
the
commercial
spaces.
Thank
you
thank.
AV
The
board
Ghent
karta
for
greater
Ashmont
Main
Street.
This
is
one
of
the
designated
Main
Street
parcels
due
to
an
oversight
from
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
were
not
looped
into
the
abutters
process
here
or
have
seen
the
plans
I
sent
an
email
yesterday
to
madam
chair
with
our
position
on
essentially
the
same
project
from
2010,
just
urging
Design
Review
because
of
the
end
and
DoD
overlay
here,
and
we
would
love
to
be
kept
in
the
loop
going
forward.
AW
AW
AW
Opposition
is
based
on
of
the
trash
disposal
on
the
tracks
is
being
disposed
on.
Ashmont
Clark,
this
has
been
a
20-plus
year
issue.
Exactly
a
butters
meeting
and
I
was
told
that
I
really
need.
The
improvements
would
come
to
my
attention
about
how
the
trash
would
be
improved.
Again,
it's
been
the
butters
meeting
was
on
March
11th.
Nobody
has
contacted
me,
the
architect
who's
sitting
here.
I
spoke
to
him
and
I
explained
all
my
the
childhood
we've
been
had
to
him
he's
heading.
To
get
back
to
me
with
improvements.
AW
AW
AW
Lose
City,
unfortunately,
the
only
what
we
keep
saying.
What
we
keep
hearing
is
rats
show
us
rats
and
we
can
take
care
of
so
there's
this.
What
happens
is
this
truck?
This
monster
comes
down
our
private
dead-end
street
at
five
thirty
in
the
morning,
lifts
up
this
two-ton
dumpster
to
empty
it,
and
then
slam
it
down.
I
have
pictures
here
that
represent
the
trash
overflowing
each
week.
Okay,
thank.
AW
AW
A
AT
A
AX
Name
is
Donna
Smith
I'm,
a
Drake,
it
Street,
9
drinking
Street,
I
live
quite
close
to
this
property.
There's
already
no
parking,
it's
very
little
in
the
back
and
there's
two-hour
parking
on
the
front
the
people
use
and
they
stay
there
all
day.
Every
day
you
call
it
a
city,
they
don't
come
out.
They
Park
in
the
bus
way
they
Park
took
more
than
two
hour
limit.
They
block
my
driveway.
So
this
is
on
street
parking.
AX
Okay,
they
want
to
add
to
other
floors.
I'm
sorry.
They
want
to
add
to
other
floors.
There's
already
no
parking.
Okay,
they're
back
parking
lot,
there's
not
enough
parking
back
there.
So
when
they
don't
park,
I
can't
find
a
parking
lot.
They
block
my
driveway
that
courtesy,
BB
beep
people
come
out
when
they're
done.
If
they're
in
the
laundromat
they
come
out
when
he
finish
the
laundry.
If
the
cooking
their
dinner
or
doing
whatever
they're
doing
to
visit
somebody,
they
don't
come
out
until
they're
done.
AX
A
AR
Jeff
when
we
were
at
the
about
his
meeting
and
I
did
mention
that
we
spoke
with
the
gentleman
who
was
the
real
bother
about
the
transportation
committee.
Looking
at
fixing
that
fence
when
we
get
into
construction.
Not
immediately
that
also
discussing
with
the
trash
pickup
company
about
the
time
in
which
the
trash
picked
up
and
the
owners
told
me
personally
that
he's
gone
over
there
and
made
sure
that
the
dumpster
is
not
overflowing
and.
A
D
AR
AR
AJ
A
You,
okay,
so
there
are
issues
with
your
building.
We
will
take
a
motion
and
decide
on
this
particular
process,
but
I
would
suggest
very
highly
that
at
the
conclusion
of
our
our
disposition
of
this
property
that
you
speak
with
the
abutters,
and
perhaps
that
could
be
somebody
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
to
really
bring
closure
to
this.
Okay
me.
A
A
B
Gonna,
go
back
to
the
couple
of
the
cases
are
called
earlier.
I'm
gonna
go
boa
nine
zero,
four
three:
eight
seven
123
to
125
Center
Street.
This
is
directly
nine
unit.
Building
11
parking
spaces
violations,
article
65
section,
8,
Tom
house
type
residential
unit-
is
a
forbidden
use.
Radical
65,
section
I,
the
main
entrance
access
location
shall
face.
The
cell
face
the
front
lot
line,
not
equal
65,
section
9,
the
fluidy.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section
I
in
the
front
yard
setback
is
insufficient.
B
AG
Chair
members
of
the
board,
the
current
current
property
at
123
at
125
to
family
home
13150
for
square
foot
lot
on
Center
Street
squarely
the
st.
Mark's
Neighborhood
Association.
The
proposal
here
is
to
raise
the
existing
structure.
Demo
delay
has
been
completed
and
erected
nine
unit,
residential
building
from
condo
ownership,
the
dimensional
requirements
or
other
setbacks
are
met.
The
front
yard
is
10
feet
more
than
what
the
existing
modal
diameters,
the
30
foot,
rear,
yard
setback
is
met.
This
idea,
ten
feet.
One
side
is
10
feet.
AG
The
other
side
is
a
little
bit
more
at
varying
13
feet
at
1
to
11
feet.
On
the
other
side,
there
is
a
height
violation.
This
is
about
great
35
feet.
Is
that
height
that
tallest
part
of
this
building
is
in
the
center
portion
of
the
lot
where
it
gets
to
be
upwards
of
38,
which
we
increase
in
excess
of
us
required
as
well
as
height.
The
number
of
storeys
two
and
a
half
stories
above
grade
is
a
requirement.
AG
AY
My
name
is
Michael
Pollan
and
vice
president
of
Cinemax
of
association,
and
also
a
member
of
the
same
out
of
about
community
development
development
same
out
even
after
after
our
Chester,
we
know
the
developer
and
his
team
met
with
other
neighbors
outside
of
the
same
market.
A
mouse
Civic
Association
and
development
team
was
involved
from
the
very
beginning.
A
AY
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
A
AT
Go
ahead
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
faces
wrinkles
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
opposed
to
the
project
based
on
some
lack
of
a
butters
support.
We
have
heard
from
three
different
civic
associations
that
are
opposed
to
this
I
understand
that
they
do
have
support
from
st.
Mark's,
but
many
of
the
concerns
that
we
had
were
related
to
density
in
the
number
of
units
proposed.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
AZ
AZ
Since
then,
he
has
not
wanted
to
come
to
see
us
to
renegotiate
any
kind
of
deal.
We
are
not,
and
I
am
NOT
against
any
kind
of
development,
but
because
of
the
increased
traffic
and
density
in
pocket
that
it
will
cause
there
is
it's
totally
insane
cuz
right
now
the
parking
situation
in
the
traffic
situation,
it's
horrendous,
Center,
Street
and
also
Austin
Street
has
a
lot
of
traffic
and
it's
a
two-way
street,
but
it's
real
busy,
which
is
a
lot
of
time,
that
transit
two-way
streets
into
one-way
streets
in
many
times.
A
So
let
me
see
if
I
get
this
so
the
basically
your
your
three
issues
or
density
traffic
and
parking
and
look
the
the
desire
for
loopback
from
the
developer
back
with
the
community
and
with
you,
okay.
So
now
I've
heard
these
three
issues.
Anybody
else,
please
give
me
additional
information.
Thank
you,
sir.
Give
me
additional
information,
please
my.
BA
Name
is
Dominic
Isetta
and
I'm,
an
officer
of
the
Melville
Park
Association.
First
of
all,
I
want
to
mention
that
this
particular
parcel
actually
falls
within
the
boundaries
of
three
neighborhood
associations:
st.
marks,
Melville
park
and
Codman
Square.
So
there
are
three
groups
plus
it
it
abuts
Loesch
park,
which
has
its
own
its
own
group
of
people
that
are
always
concerned
about.
What's
going
on
around
the
park,
the
developer
had
his
lawyer
come
in
November
and
make
a
presentation
to
us.
Please.
BA
BA
This
house
is
over
150
years
old
and
to
simply
tear
it
down
and
build
something
that
kind
of
looks
like
it,
isn't
what
we're,
what
we're
looking
for
and
I
emailed
the
lawyer
Patrick
back
in
December,
and
offered
to
pull
together
a
meeting
of
all
all
three
neighborhood
associations,
representatives
of
them
and
members
of
the
Friends
of
Loesch
park,
and
so
that
he
could
all
sit
down
and
discuss
what,
with
some
discuss
the
issues
he
declined
to.
Do
that
and
the
the
plans
that
he's
currently
presented
to
you.
BA
A
BB
Good
morning
my
name
is
Sally
Graham
I'm
at
28,
Moultrie
Street
I
am
also
with
the
Melville
Park
Association
I'm,
one
block
from
this
development
I'm
a
member
of
the
Friends
of
dr.
leche,
Park
and
I'm,
also
on
the
board
at
the
Codman
Square
neighborhood
associated
council.
Just
to
my
concerns
are
just
as
Dominick
and
Donnell
have
already
expressed.
I
also
represent
Norma
and
Orlando
Diaz.
They
are
direct
abutters
at
117,
Center
Street.
They
were
unable
to
be
here
today.
They
are
in
Puerto
Rico
dealing
with
family
issues.
I
spoke
with
them
last
week.
BB
BC
A
You
so
it
sounds
to
me
that
the
issue
really
that
I'd
like
to
hear
from
because
I
think
you've
addressed
to
them
the
demolition
issue
with
the
historic
building
because
you've
gone
through
the
demo
demo
delay
process.
Yep.
Okay,
can
you
talk
please
about
the
process
about
closing
the
loop
with
the
butters
I'm?
Sorry,
one
minute
are
you
speaking
in
opposition?
A
A
AG
This
has
been
a
lengthy
community
process.
We
began
approximately
months
ago.
It
began
before
OS
with
a
intimate
group
from
me
at
the
time
for
rifles
and
the
property
with
the
current
owners,
as
well
as
the
directive
putters
his
neighbors,
and
it
was
myself
and
protect
in
the
group
of
expediter,
said
we're
generally
in
support
of
the
proposal.
None
of
those
people
that
have
been
identified
on
any
opposition
fighters
that
are
ever
at
that
initial
meeting.
AG
A
AG
Presented
as
a
courtesy
to
Melville
Park,
not
in
this
association,
where
the
neighboring
want,
as
well
as
in
currency,
two
continents,
squares,
I
met
with
the
president
prior
to
that
toss
before
we
even
began
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
project
and
some
concerns,
although
you
know
not
in
support
now,
were
based
on
the
design.
The
initial
design
work
was,
there
was
a
larger
townhouse
units
and
a
more
modern
frontal.
AG
Yes,
in
a
Melville
Park,
although
we
did
they're
not
here
in
support
the
the
change.
The
current
change
that
has
been
emailed
amenable
for
myself
and
the
architect
was
to
change
entirely
the
design.
It
was
a
modern
building
initially
and
then
it
was
a
hybrid,
it's
modern,
traditional
style
and
kinetics.
Although
we
couldn't
say
the
existing
structure,
which
would
be
beneficial
to
the
developer.
S
B
AG
AG
B
This
is
construction
tonight
joining
unit
and
parking
the
bottom
floor
and
retail
store.
The
violation
of
article
65,
section
41
off
speed
parking
requirements
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
9,
a
lotta
air
for
additional
dwelling
units
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section
9,
the
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section
9,
the
height,
is
excessive
in
stories.
Article
65,
section,
9
height,
is
excessive
and
feet
medical
65,
section
I,
the
front
yard
setback
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section
I,
the
side
yard
setback
requirement
is
insufficient
and
eigvals
65
section
9.
AG
A
change
in
their
few
letter
on
February
28
to
address
the
parking
violation,
and
that
is
on
the
agenda
today,
is
relief
being
sought.
The
proposal
has
changed
slightly
that
I
shouldn't
before
I.
Take
this
into
it
in
the
change
has
been
to
increase
in
parking
from
what
was
initially
five
spaces
to
kind
spaces.
There
is
still
relief
for
parking
lot
today
and.
AG
Proposal,
a
citizen
existing
to
install
a
retail
building
or
industrial
building
at
the
corner
of
Wrentham
fan
your
Chester
out
and
in
this
building
essentially
expands
upon
that
footprint.
Although
that
building
is
being
raised
at
18:54
to
a
Chester
have,
and
the
proposal
is
to
have
a
nine
parking
spaces
through
the
to
a
relocated,
curb
cut
on
Wrentham
that
sure
cut
will
be
reducing
nificantly,
but
it
will
remain
to
be
a
physician
further
towards
go
Chester
out
in
the
middle
of
the
best.
Drawing
for
that
one.
AG
A
101
that,
additionally,
it
is
a
small
retail
space
in
the
first
four
or
five
hundred
fifty
five
square
feet
of
retail,
as
well
as
two
residential
units
per
floor
above
the
first
floor
to
be
three
residence
to
two
bedrooms,
one
Monday
positioned
on
each
level
floors
two
three
and
four:
it
will
be
a
rental
building,
elevator
access
from
the
lobby
to
each
to
each
area.
In
addition
to
the
nine
parking
spaces,
one
of
them
inclusive
of
the
nine
parking
spaces.
AT
AY
AV
AV
Is
basically
when
this
project
initially
came
to
us
we're
very
excited
to
have
this
parcel
redeveloped?
It
should
be
it's
in
deteriorating
condition.
We
urged
at
the
time
there
was
just
over
600
square
foot
of
commercial
and
five
or
six
parking
spaces.
We
urged
the
elimination
of
a
couple
of
those
parking
spaces
to
make
a
more
rentable
foot
traffic
possible
business
space
on
the
first
floor,
and
that
was
received
with
enthusiasm
by
the
developer.
We
understand
that
the
butters
meeting
was
very
contentious
before
it
went
to
the
full
st.
Y
Y
A
T
BD
Speedy,
my
daughter,
but
I
want
to
speak
myself.
I
am
leaving
their
house
for
14
years
and
we
never
all
the
ways
we
got
from
because
people
they
go
mud
station
take
a
train.
It
delivers
powerful
on
the
registry,
now
magic
for
this
nine
unit.
They
wonder,
filter
their
natural
degree
of
maka,
more
traffic
and
flashed
the
mouse
when
they
gotta
take
the
the
road
the
mouse.
BD
They
can
be
tremendous,
so
I,
really
under
one
ring
with
that,
because
I'll
do
the
vegetable
at
the
building
there
come
a
very
high,
they
can
make
a
nun
unit.
Now
they
got
only
just
a
little
karate
there
now
imagine
when
they
can
put
a
nine
unit.
They
got
a
block
on
my
window
on
the
Sun
I
came
to
know
your
I
can't
do
nothing.
So
thank.
A
AG
A
S
Y
B
T
O
Y
AF
A
Y
I
A
AT
I
A
B
This
is
seeking
change
of
oxygen
permitting
in
order
to
renovate
the
existing
commercial
property
to
an
auto
rental
location
violation,
51,
section
16,
a
rental
car
location
is
forbidden,
Newton,
article
51,
section,
53,
screening
and
buffer
requirements
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
AK
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
Nix
Azul
of
McDermott
cruelty
in
Miller,
28,
State,
Street,
Suite
8:02
in
Boston
with
me
to
my
immediate
right,
is
Josh
Maxwell
from
Enterprise
rental
car.
The
appellant
to
my
far
right
is
Scott
Rogers
from
JK
home
run
engineering
of
the
project
engineer
a
little
bit
of
background.
We
have
a
handout
just
to
familiarize
you
with
the
property
and
in
the
project
properties
located
at
288,
Washington
Street
in
Brighton.
It's
the
corner
of
Winship,
Cambridge
and
Washington
streets.
AK
It's
a
unique
corner
lot
that
fronts
kind
of
juts
out
into
Washington
Street.
It's
a
little
over
5,000
square
foot.
Lot!
It's
currently
an
auto
body
shop.
It's
a
long
standing
long.
Existing
gas
station
service
uses
currently
the
Alpha
Omega
foreign
car
service
service
station.
What
we're
proposing
is
in
line
with
the
historic
use
of
the
property
we're
proposing
to
change
the
use
in
occupancy
to
a
rental
car
use
for
enterprise,
rental
car
and
the
change
you
know
we
think
is
very
similar
in
nature.
AK
A
AK
So
we
would
suggest
and
submit
that
the
proposal
is
in
line
with
the
long-standing
existing
use
as
a
service
shop.
This
is
a
car
rental
agency.
However,
we'd
also
submit
that
you
know,
what's
being
proposed,
is
less
impactful
to
the
community
and
less
impactful
to
the
environment.
Less
noise,
less
fumes,
less
exhaust
will
be
managed
appropriately
by
a
longtime
operator
of
rental
cars
in
the
city
very
familiar
with
urban
settings
and
with
how
to
manage
a
lot
of
the
size
and
this
type
of
the
city.
AK
Hours
of
operation
are
Monday
through
Friday
7:30
a.m.
to
6
p.m.
Saturday
9:00
to
12:00,
9
a.m.
to
12
noon,
only
Sunday
closed
and
we
did
meet
with
the
Vai
a
January,
10th
I,
don't
know
if
anybody's
here
from
the
group
today,
but
they
did
vote
in
support.
We
also
held
in
a
butter
meeting
on
April
1st
with
the
mayor's
office.
No
butters
showed
up
at
that
meeting.
AK
A
AK
AO
AK
AK
B
A
quick
question:
the
capacity
how
many
vehicles
gonna
be
on
site
15,
there's.
AK
15
vehicles,
only
of
which
I
think
a
few
of
them
are
employee
spots,
actually
so
that
you
could
see
to
the
left
of
the
garage
door.
Those
I
believe
would
be
the
employee
spots
and
this
rendering
it
doesn't
show
it's
just
a
it's.
Just
a
trade
dress,
rendering
if
you
look
on
see
the
15
done
yeah.
If
you
look
to
be
the
second,
the
last
page
in
our
handout,
that's
actually
from
Holmgren
engineer,
and
that
shows
the
accurate
description
and
spacing
of
the
spots
and
that's
how
it's
used
now.
J
AK
We
can
look
at
that,
that's
an
existing
fence,
that's
there,
it's
actually
in
pretty
good
condition,
so
we
preferred
it's
and
it's
been
a
long-standing
condition
there.
Well,
we
are
proposing,
as
you
can
see,
on
the
engineering
plan.
The
landscape
plan
is
a
whole
bunch
of
that
area
in
front
of
the
fencing
is
just
grass
and
weeds,
and
what
we're
proposing
is
to
obviously
make
that
a
nice
plantings.
We
have
a
whole
layer,
you
know
we'll
have
mulch
and
in
a
whole
layer.
You
know
a
whole
whole
additional
scope
of
landscaping
dad
there.
BF
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
with
contractor
support
of
this
project.
As
African
mentioned
we
held
in
the
butters
meeting
no
concerns
were
raised.
They
went
in
front
of
right,
Nelson,
Improvement,
Association
received
overwhelming
support.
We
feel
this
is
a
great
opportunity
to
actually
take
more
cars
off
of
the
street.
It
gives
bright
and
residents
a
chance
to
maybe
not
have
a
car
ownership
but
rent
a
car
every
now
and
that
in
the
event
that
they
need
one.
Thank
you
morning.
W
AJ
A
B
A
A
A
Session
for
Tuesday
May-
seventh-
just
a
reminder:
please
make
sure
your
cell
phones
are
off
and
in
conformance
with
the
Open
Meeting
Law.
This
meeting
is
being
live-streamed,
also
a
reminder
that
if
any
of
you
have
cases
aren't
from
me
for
the
May
21st
meeting,
that
meeting
is
now
cancelled
and
all
projects
will
be
heard
on
June
25th.
There
will
be
outreach
and
advertisement
about
that
fact.
A
BH
B
BH
BH
A
B
B
B
Z
With
the
business
address
at
three
fifty
West
Broadway
in
South
Boston,
madam
chair
members,
at
the
first
hearing,
this
was
deferred
to
allow
for
the
Android
square
Civic
Association
to
review
and
vote
on
this
at
that
meeting
and
a
butter
had
some
concerns
and
objections.
My
client
then
has
to
meet
without
a
butter
before
Henry
Square
was
in
a
position
to
vote.
That
meeting
has
occurred.
We
are
not
able
to
get
on
the
may
Andrew
square
Civic
Association
agenda.
The
June
meeting
will
be
held
on
June.
Z
No
changes
my
client
resolved
many
issues
with
conversations
with
the
ax
butter.
The
butter
still
I
believe,
has
an
objection
to
the
right-side
setback,
but
the
key
point
here
is
that
we've
been
asked
to
defer
it
to
allow
the
Andrew
square
process
to
play
out
and
allow
them
to
have
a
vote
on
the
matter.
B
Pushed
us
into
August,
13th
and
2019
at
11:30.
Are
there
any
other
deferral
withdrawals
for
11:30?
We
discussions
there.
You
know,
call
the
first
two
cases
calling
VOA
four
five,
five
three
to
six
so
far:
east
605,
East,
sixth
Street.
There
was
a
companion
case,
VOA,
eight
five,
four,
five,
two
eight
six,
two
five
East
sixth
Street.
Z
Z
A
Z
Because
right
now
we're
in
a
position
where
the
elected
officials
will
not
support
this
without
an
additional
community
meeting.
Ideally,
if
you
don't
want
to
go
forward
with
in
the
face
of
opposition
from
some
of
the
elected
officials,
there's
the
additional
opposition.
My
client
has
been
working
with
directed
by
Therese
for
the
better
part
of
six
months.
This
baby
ii
differ
a
lot
there
and
I'm,
not
even
sure.
Today
we
were
making
progress,
but
then
we
were
advised
that
additional
signatures
of
nearby
residents
here
last
night
we've
been
asked
to
what.
Z
I
I
think
we're
in
agreement
that
that
we
certainly
don't
need
a
longer
deferral.
I
I
think
that
we
need
to
have
I'm
sure
that
we
need
to
have
one
meeting,
because
my
clients
have
made
a
number
of
concessions
to
the
point
where
we're
nearly
in
agreement
with
the
directive
butters.
But
we
have
been
requested
to
have
one
more
meeting
before
proceedings.
I
think
we
could
do
this
very
quickly.
I
realized
that
the
board
is
extended
out,
may.
B
This
is
just
corrected
for
three
story:
building
with
eight
residential
units
and
nine
parking
spaces
violation,
article
50,
section
28,
the
multi-family
dwelling
is
a
forbidden
use.
Article
50,
section
29
additional
lot
areas,
insufficient
article
50,
section
29,
the
fluidy.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
Medical
50,
section,
29,
useable,
open
spaces,
insufficient
article
50,
section,
29
front
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
15
section
29,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
50
section
29
of
the
real
yacht
is
insufficient
in
article
56
to
32
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden
use
they
have
an
address
for
the
record.
AN
You,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
attorney
Jeff
Drago
from
Cragen
Toscano,
with
an
address
of
15
Broad
Street
with
me:
I
have
the
owner,
Jean,
Bernstein
and
developer
of
92
George
Street,
as
mentioned
we're
proposing
on
a
vacant
lot
to
erect
a
three-story
building
with
eight
residential
condominium
units
and
nine
interior
parking
spaces
and
would
go
with
those
units.
This
particular
district
falls
under
two
separate
zoning
districts
that
cut
right
across
this
lawn.
One
of
them
is
the
new
market,
I
DEA
and
the
other
one
is
a
three
f.
Four
thousand.
AN
Some
is
eight
thousand
five
hundred
and
twenty
seven
square
feet
and
the
gross
square
footage
of
the
building
is
nine
thousand
eight
hundred
and
sixty-seven
square
feet.
I'm
gonna
go
over
the
bedroom
in
unit
sizes
and
bedroom
count.
Before
with
the
floor
plans,
we've
got
four
two
bedrooms
on
average
or
1185
square
foot
two
beds,
and
then
we
have
four
one
bedrooms
at
six
hundred
and
seventy
five
square
feet.
The
first
floor
includes
nine
parking
spaces
bike,
rack
bike,
rack,
an
elevator
lift
second
floor
houses
units,
one
through
four
third
floor
units.
AN
Five
through
eight,
we
worked
diligently
with
community
process
and
we
did
get
a
letter
of
support
from
the
D
s
ni
group
from
this
neighborhood
with
them.
We
worked
on
changes
from
our
original
plan
and
those
changes
just
to
mention.
That
was
why
we
saw
to
deferral
the
last
time.
One
was
reducing
the
building
from
a
four-story
building
to
a
three-story
building
which
eliminated
our
height
violation.
We
reduced
the
actual
height
from
38
feet
to
30
feet
and
our
unit
count
was
reduced
from
nine
units
to
eight
minutes.
AN
A
AN
So
for
the
you
want
to
go
to
reach
one
man,
I'm
sure,
okay,
so
because
it's
split
from
two
different
groups,
the
new
market
really
doesn't
trigger
any
violations
just
one,
but
the
3f
for
thousands
with
mostly
their
triggered.
The
additional
watt
area
mm
require
per
unit
we're
only
at
6000
525
if
they
are
allowable
in
that,
as
the
point
8
or
at
1.15
height
do
now
meet
so
that
was
triggered
prior
usable,
open
space,
650
per
dwelling
unit
we're
at
481
and
then,
with
our
side
yard.
A
AN
AN
AN
A
L
AP
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Jessica
Thomas
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
and
we
like
to
go
on
record
to
support
on
pending
BPD
a
review
as
they
mentioned
they
did
meet
with
the
community
groups.
They
met
with
to
neighborhood
associations
and
had
to
abutters
meetings
which
originally
there
was
some
opposition,
but
they
did
decide
to
work
with
the
community
to
scale
the
scale
it
back
a
bit
and
also
hire
local
contractors.
BI
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Michaela
Parkin
from
City
Council
Hakeem
Chinese
office.
We
would
also
like
to
go
on
the
record
giving
conditional
support.
As
the
development
team
mentioned,
they
did
make
changes
based
on
community
concerns
and
they
will
be
working
with
the
BPD,
a
design
review.
Thank.
AM
Or
in
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Ben
Murphy
from
the
New
Market
Business
Association.
We
met
with
the
posers
several
months
ago.
They
have
since
made
some
changes
that
we
requested,
although
we
are
disappointed
that
they
did
not
come
back
to
speak
with
us
again
after
that
we
recognize
that
the
neighborhood
is
in
support
and
we
will
default
to
the
neighborhood's
opinion.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
B
Voa,
nine
two,
two
six
one:
four,
sixteen
on
Robeson
Street.
This
is
directing
new
single-family
dwelling
roof
deck
above
two-car
garage
on
existing
5730
square
foot
vacant
lot.
This
is
proposed
to
off
street
parking
access
through
16
Robeson
street
proposed
driveway
the
violations
article
55
section
40,
the
off
street
parking
facility
facility
facilities
required
by
section
55.
Forty
shall
be
provided
on
the
same
lot
as
the
main
use
of
what
they
accessory
article
55,
section
41
point
one
to
two
or
more
dwellings.
B
BJ
A
BJ
BJ
Of
course,
so
we
had
our
JP
NC
meeting
on
the
20th
of
March,
for
which
we
had
a
vote
of
support.
The
letter
issued
by
David
Barron,
the
chair
of
the
zoning
committee
is
in
the
package
before
you.
The
problem
was
we
had
slight
modifications
to
the
plans
which
we
did
not
have
time
to
represent
it
to
ISD.
Those
were
represented.
BJ
Madam
chair
to
you
specifically,
there
is
confirmation,
by
way
of
this
email
issued
by
lisa
hong,
the
examiner
for
EST,
as
well
as
Stephanie
Hayes
of
the
BPD,
a
confirm
me
that
there
are
no
two
violations.
Those
are
the
plans
you
have
before
you
are
confirmed
acceptable
by
be
PTA
and
ISD.
At
this
point,
what
we
are
proposing
as
a
single
family,
the
family
owns
a
real
parcel
which
has
six
feet
of
frontage
only
on
walking
on
a
terrace.
BJ
So
it
is
somewhat
landlocked
in
a
warm
extensive
community
process
that
began
in
January
of
last
year.
It
was
ultimately
the
election
of
the
family
to
build
a
single
family
home
that
addressed
Robeson
Street,
as
opposed
to
in
a
similar
orientation
to
those
parcels,
Makemake
Terrace.
In
doing
so.
If
you
look
at
the
rear
of
the
package
presented
before
you.
BJ
A
A
BJ
Not
designed
to
be
a
conveyance
of
real
estate
in
the
end,
the
family
will
memorialize
an
easement
to
permit
access
across
the
land,
so
the
land
will
be
retained
by
the
front
parcel
16
to
provide
access
to
the
rear.
So
he
was
satisfied
on
street
parking
requirements.
As
for
plans,
we
just
need
access
by
way
of
easement
across
a
16.
BJ
Also
for
your
reference,
if
you
look
to
the
last
page,
we
have
a
summary
table
of
all
of
the
immediately
adjacent
parcels,
summarizing
respective
square
feet
of
those
parcels,
the
respect
respective
for
building
footprints,
as
well
as
perspective
FA,
are
coming
from
mass
Land,
Records,
the
city's
Assessors
website,
etc.
We
have
a
pointed
point:
8
FA
are
allowable
fa.
Re
is
0.38,
so
we're
coming
in
at
the
low
half
of
what
is
otherwise
permissible.
We're
also
proposing
a
single-family
where
otherwise,
every
family
is.
A
BJ
We
have
two
parcels:
one
is
front-facing
robust
and
the
other
one
runs
perpendicular
to
it
to
separate
distinct
portions,
the
owner
of
the
property
purchased
them
that
way
in
ATS.
They
have
remained
separate
on
the
D
reference.
There
are
two
separately
divided
portions.
We
have
not
subdivided
land
to
make
a
separate
parcel.
BJ
BJ
We
had
elected
and
orientation
similar
to
open,
exist,
unlocking
of
Terrace.
We
believe
that
our
setbacks
would
be
this
configuration,
which
we
easily
met,
giving
me
width
and
length
of
the
parcel
in
trying
to
provide
evidence
to
the
butter.
We
have
made
it
more
difficult
on
yourself
by
electing
to
have
a
address
that
faces
Rock
Enoch
Terrace,
which
means
that
we
have
to
abide
by
setbacks
that
look
like
this,
so
that
causes
some
setbacks
that
otherwise
wouldn't
necessarily
be
present.
BJ
If
we
had
a
different
orientation,
which
we
have
elected
in
privacy,
241
feet
of
terrace
to
aid
your
question,
madam
chair,
we
have
off
street
parking
violations
in
the
sense
that
we
need
to
have
access
across
16
offices
for
words
to
five
street
parking
spaces
for
the
parcel.
So
we
will
have
that
goes
of
parking
spaces
by
code
you're
not
supposed
to
be
only
a
home
to
the
rear
of
another,
because
we
have
elected
to
build
and
have
an
address
of
16
or,
as
opposed
to
16
rocky
milk.
We
have
that
violation
as
indicated.
BJ
I
BJ
There's
more
clarity
to
we
anticipate.
If
we
have
gone
through
this
process,
we
will
have
to
engage.
A
civil
engineer
will
have
the
land
properly
tested
for
existing.
Putting
so
which
is
bled
to
be
present.
Blasting
is
cost
prohibitive
if
the
family
encounters
putting
stone
or
some
other
form
of
slate
or
impasse.
Other
atenists
to
reduce
the
square
footage
of
the
basement
to
the
believer
becomes
economically
not
feasible.
To
do
so,
which
case
they
were
the
main
go
great.
I
I
I
BG
New,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Enrique
Pepin
from
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
We
have
gone
through
an
efficient
and
long
community
process
and
also
there
has
been
very
strong
support
from
the
community
and
the
Neighborhood
Association.
At
this
moment
we
have
no
further
questions
or
concerns
on
the
project.
BK
My
name
is
Merlin
Southwick
hear
me:
I
live
at
26,
sigourney
Street,
which
is
up
the
street
on
the
same
walk,
not
on
Robeson.
That's
connected
on
the
block.
I
attended,
most
many
of
the
neighborhood
meetings.
I've
watched
a
family
work
to
adjust
their
plans,
I've
seen
them
change
many
times.
I
support
the
project,
because
I
believe
that
they
have
found
the
best
balance
between
what
they
need
in
order
to
live
there
and
what
the
neighbors
have
requested
around
them.
BK
I
have
lived
in
my
current
house
since
1977
I've
attended
spores
of
neighborhood
meetings
as
more
than
40
projects
have
been
added.
Since
we
moved
to
our
house
four
years
ago,
I
watched
all
of
this
standard
opposition
and
support
for
projects
proceeded
I've,
never
seen
a
project
go
forward,
yet
that
hasn't
had
some
opposition
even
at
the
very
end
and
I'm,
particularly
supportive
of
this
project,
because
it
allows
a
family
who
has
lived
in
the
neighborhood
and
raised
their
children
there
to
find
a
way
to
keep
another
generation
in
the
neighborhood.
BL
When
my
name
is
Alvin,
jigs
I
live
at
number
28
Olmsted
straight.
My
wife
and
I
moved
there
43
years
ago
and
I'm
here
to
speak
in
support
of
the
project.
16
are
Robson
Street,
I'm
very
happy
to
speak
in
support
and
often
opposed
many
of
the
development
that
happened
in
the
neighborhood,
but
this
is
one
that
I'm
very,
very
happy
to
get
behind
the
door.
Horsley
is
seeking
the
permit
that
would
enable
her
daughter,
son-in-law
and
grandchild
who
are
now
renters
to
own
a
home
in
the
neighborhood.
BL
BL
Every
effort
to
be
reasonable
and
accommodating
to
the
concerns
of
of
the
butters
in
this
project
is
permissible
by
code.
As
far
as
the
physical
building
parameters
are
concerned,
that
is
the
lot
is
own
design
for
three
family
and
there
they
seek
to
build
a
single-family
dwelling.
Peter
Joe
has
been
thorough,
respectful
in
disclosing
her
intent
to
convert
the
garage
structure
into
a
free-standing.
BL
BL
It
is
Sarah
and
her
husband
are
not
newcomers
to
the
neighborhood.
Sarah
has
been
very
very
long
time.
It
is
hardly
in
a
time
when
displacement
is
happening
in
the
area
where
people
who
can
bring
diversity
to
the
neighborhood
are
willing
to
build,
build
and
remain
in
Jamaica,
Plain
and
I'd
like
to
submit
my
statement
for
the
record.
Thank.
BM
My
name
is
Lee
Glen
I
live
at
14
Park
Lane
in
Jamaica
Plain,
which
is
just
two
streets
from
Segura
Street
I've
lived
in
my
house
for
52
years.
The
horses
have
lived
there
almost
that
long.
They
are
very
committed
to
the
neighborhood
they're,
very
good
citizens
they've
done
their
best
to
try
to
make
a
project
which
will
allow
their
family
to
stay
together
and
stay
in
the
neighborhood,
and
they
are
nothing
except
good.
Citizens
who've
tried
really
hard
on
this
project.
Thank
you.
A
A
BN
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
will
call
Webster
from
state
councillor
Matt
o'malley's
office.
The
council
has
heard
from
both
sides
on
this
issue.
A
lot
of
residents
have
reached
out.
He
wants
to
appreciate
that
he
remains
concerned
at
this
time
and
hopes
that,
if
anything
is
approved,
it
will
undergo
robust
design
review
process
and
continue
working
with
the
neighbors.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
BO
X
BO
I
did
submit
a
letter.
I
believe
that
the
project
does
propose
does
not
meet
the
requirements
for
granting
the
variances
that
they're
requesting
it's
a
house
in
a
backyard
without
any
street
frontage.
This
creates
safety
issues
the
proposed
houses
of
a
design
and
scale,
that's
not
in
keeping
with
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
It
increases
density
traffic
and
the
loss
of
green
space
that
serves
as
a
buffer
between
streets.
BO
BP
Hi,
my
name
is
Serena
nickel
I
live
at
12,
Robeson,
Street,
number,
2
and
I'm
in
a
director
butter.
The
lot
goes
behind
my
yard.
That
proposed
structure
is
planned
to
be
nine
feet
from
my
backyard
property,
where
my
three
children
like
to
play.
I
have
concerns
about
the
construction
process
about
safety.
I
also
find
this
scope
and
scale
of
the
house
too
large
for
the
area.
BQ
My
name
is
Claire
Conley
I
live
at
17
rocky
North,
Terrace
eclair,
currently
17
rocky
nook,
Terrace
I'm
about
40
feet
from
this
parcel
of
across
the
street,
from
14
rocky
North
Terrace
the
project
for
the
same
reasons
as
the
previous
opponents,
but
also
because
in
large
part
the
abutters
should
decide
what
works
for
them.
I
felt
that
the
community,
both
the
abutters
and
all
the
neighbors,
totally
understood
the
desire
of
Joey,
Horsley
and
Sarah
to
have
find
a
way
for
Sarah
to
live
here
as
an
owner
and
so
forth.
BQ
But
there
were
numerous
proposals
put
forward
that
were
just
rejected
out
of
preference
or
just
out
of
hand.
There
were
15
requests
submitted
that
at
the
very
next
community
meeting,
the
attorney
just
sneered
at
the
attendees
and
said
you
know
we're
not
doing
it.
The
requests
were
things
like
fencing,
vegetation
barriers,
drainage
control,
basic
things,
so
there
clearly
has
not
been
a
desire
to
work
with
the
abutters
I
think
the
abutters
have
clearly
shown
a
desire
to
work
with.
The
proponents
also
make
two
points.
One.
BQ
This
parcel
was
created
when
the
entire
area
was
subdivided
in
1916.
Dis
parcel
was
specifically
and
apparently
intentionally
created
to
be
a
land,
not
personal.
It
didn't
receive
six
feet
of
frontage
until
forty
years
later,
when
they
built
rocky
enough
Terrace,
and
it
just
happened
to
curve
into
a
piece
it
again.
And
the
last
item
is
that
theories
of
twin
to
this
proposal
being
proposed
at
18
Robeson
Street.
It
was
proposed
four
years
ago.
The
community
was
adamantly
opposed
to
it.
BQ
BQ
BJ
A
BJ
So
when
we
have
a
formal
engaged
contract
with
a
general
contractor,
we
will
make
sure
and
we're
happy
to
enter
into
an
MoU
with
Nia
butters
that
there
will
be
a
management
plan.
There
will
be
a
proper
person
on-site,
the
mother
of
my
proponent,
to
the
right
lives,
on-site,
local
issues,
retired
she's.
Here
often
there
is
somebody
actively
on
the
property
a
lot
of
the
time
to
be
a
representative
of
the
project.
So
we
are
happy
to
abide
by
a
MOU
to
be
reached
as
far
as
a
construction
plan
and.
G
BJ
S
S
A
S
B
This
is
to
combine
existing
two
lots,
one
with
some
pocket
to
Ruth
to
fight
create
one
lot
at
tendrils
in
fact
construct
a
new
three-story
three
unit
residential
buildings.
Above
three,
there
will
be
three
off
street
parking
spaces.
The
violations,
article
50
section
43-
are
street
parking
design
of
maneuverability
article
50,
section
29
a
lot
of
areas,
insufficient
article
50,
section
29.
A
lot
frontage
is
insufficient
article
50
section
29,
the
Floyd.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
50,
section
29,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
B
A
BR
BR
BR
But
we're
reconstructing
a
smaller
house
than
a
house
that
existed
if
you
look
at
the
subdivision
plan
from
1894
and
you
see
a
much
larger
house
on
the
site.
So
this
is
the
location
of
a
three
family
house
that
was
demolished
some
years
ago,
and
this
this
is
to
replace,
with
a
smaller
three
family
house
on
this
lot.
BR
So
the
it
also
is
a
unique
situation
in
that
roof
and
park
fronts
comes
down
from
roof
and
Street.
If
you
look
at
the
subdivision
plan
and
Ruthven
Park
is
20
feet
wide
at
the
street
at
Ruthven
Street.
So
when
you,
when
the
city
calculates
the
lot
frontage
they're
looking
for
45
feet
on
Ruthven
Street,
when
in
fact
we
this
lot
has
fifty
nine
point,
eight
two
feet
on
roof
and
park.
BR
BR
The
front
yard
violation
is
that
the
front
yard
calls
for
20
feet
of
front
yard
in
this
zone.
This
particular
design
has
fourteen
point
five
feet
of
front
yard,
but
it
aligns
with
the
side
of
home
at
73
Ruthven
Street,
so
the
new
house
does
line
up
with
when
you
look
down
Ruthven
Park
from
Ruth
Minh
Street.
On
the
left
hand
side
they
would
line
up.
The
riad
requirement
under
the
code
is
30.
Feet.
Structure
has
12
feet
of
riad,
but
it's
equal
to
what
was
the
reality
of
the
prior
structure.
BR
So
when
you
look
at
the
1894
site
plan-
and
you
look
at
our
proposed
plan,
you
can
see
that
the
house,
as
proposed
by
my
client,
which
is
a
three
family
house,
is
smaller
than
what
pre-existed.
Of
course
that
was
constructed
prior
to
the
adoption
of
the
code
and
the
open
space
requirement
is
650
and
I
believe
the
calculations
for
this,
as
proposed
is
640.
There
was
a
community
process.
A
BR
A
BR
So
that
there
are
three
parking
spaces
shown
on
the
on
the
site
plan
with
the
drawings
that
were
submitted
to
you
this
morning
and
my
clients
own.
If
you
look
at
the,
if
you
look
at
the
1894
drawing
you
can
see
that
there's
lots
a
B
and
C.
This
is
what
C,
which
is
the
subject
matter
of
this
appeal.
My
clients
also
own
lot
B,
because
they
own
lot
B
and
lot
C
they
own
the
fee
in
the
right
away,
so
they
own
to
the
middle
of
the
the
park.
That's
a
private
way.
A
BR
BR
BR
Manoeuvrability
is
what
the
issue
is
and
I
think
that
that
would
be
resolved
with
design,
because
we
can't
when,
when
the
design
we,
when
the
application
goes
in,
you
can't
assume
in
the
process
of
plans,
examination
that
the
person
owns
the
land
next
door
and
that
an
easement
can
be
granted
for
someone
to
back
into
and
turn
around
and
come
out
the
other
way
when
they,
when
they
check
off
the
violations.
They
merely
look
at
that
particular
property
and
not
kind
of
lighting
piece
of
property.
So.
BR
BR
BR
BR
I
AP
Afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Jessica
Thomas
with
the
mayor
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
and
we
like
to
go
on
record
to
support
contingent
upon
BPD
a
review.
The
Neighborhood
Association
did
reach
out
what
concerns
about
trash
removal
and
also
implementing
Design
Review.
However,
we
do
have
55
letters
of
support.
We
also.
There
was
also
a
butters
that
were
there
that
were
in
support
of
the
project.
J
AP
A
BT
My
name
is
Connie
Forbes
I'm,
with
the
garrison
Trotter
Neighborhood
Association,
and
we
had
one
meeting
where
the
proponent
did
appear,
but
the
questions
that
were
asked
were
not
answered
and
they
had
agreed
to
come
back
and
present
again
to
the
to
our
body
of
membership
and
on
two
occasions
they
did
not
show
up.
I
was
at
the
abutters
meeting,
which
occurred
at
Pleasant
Hill
Baptist
Church,
which
was
an
indoor
meeting,
and
there
were
questions
that
came
up
from
other
abutters
as
well.
BT
Trying
to
get
those
answers
is
like
pulling
teeth,
and
so
we
did
have
a
lot
of
questions,
especially
the
question
about
the
easement,
because
there
are
two
properties
in
front.
This
is
a
property
in
someone's
backyard.
I
know
if
you
saw
the
Baystate
banner
article
just
came
out
its
behind
two
people's
homes,
and
so
we
had
questions
about
what
the
easement
agreement
would
have
been.
BT
We
had
questions
about
ownership
because
the
paperwork
on
file
does
not
show
the
ownership
is
being
the
person
who's
representing
themselves
here,
although
they
did
represent
themselves
at
the
abutters
meeting
as
these
owners.
The
legal
documents
stating
ownership
does
not
reflect
the
owner
here
as
being
the
owner.
That
was
a
major
question
that
was
not
answered.
It
is
a.
It
is
a
private
way
again.
The
easement
was
the
question
and
we're
all
about
policy
procedure
and
equity
and
handling
things.
We
have
a
question
about
this
property.
BT
First
of
all,
it's
a
one
way
in
one
way
out
behind
someone's
home
and
if
there
any
emergency
or
anything
happening,
there's
a
safety
issue
that
we
asked
about,
because
what,
if
a
fire
truck
or
what,
if
anyone's,
had
to
access
that
property
roof
in
the
street
itself.
The
main
street
that
this
is
off
of
has
a
huge
parking
issue
as
it
is,
and
and
so
you're
creating
a
problem
for
the
for
the
safety
of
the
people
who
are
going
to
be
residing
there
to
that.
BT
There's
a
lot
of
things
that
are
happening,
that
we
don't
have
ears
to
that.
We
could
not
in
our
pursuit
of
getting
those
answers.
Answer
trash
management
is
a
big
big
issue
for
us,
because
if
there's
no
trash
service
coming
into
the
street,
they
means
trafficking
for
different
someone
else's
home.
In
front
and
just
in
terms
of
recent
weather
in
Boston,
we've
had
a
lot
of
intense
winds,
blowing
barrels
down
the
street
and,
if
you're
dumping
your
barrel
in
front
of
someone
else's
home
who's
cleaning
up
that
mess.
A
BT
A
BT
You
thank
you
yeah.
Those
are
the
major
points,
but
there
are
other
points
again.
Ownership
was
a
question
because
if
you
don't
own
the
property
and
you
your
paper
worker
in
and
saying
you
own
it
that's
the
range
of
consideration
you
want
to
address
as
well,
and
that
was
a
letter
from
President
Lisa
of
the
organization
stating
that
we
could
not
find
the
owners
present
here
as
being
the
actual
property
owners.
A
BR
L
BS
And
there
will
be
a
management
company
also
most
likely
hired
by
the
homeowners.
That's
gonna
manage
the
property
because
it
will
be
condominium
so
and
I
literally
live
one
block
away
from
from
this
this
property.
We
all
take
care
of
our
own
trash
and
I'm.
Assuming
that
the
homeowners
that's
gonna
live.
There
also
is
gonna,
be
concerned
and
take
care
of
their
own
trash.
Like
everybody,
every
other.
BH
S
A
A
B
Calling
POA
nine
zero
seven
three
two
four
one,
two
seven
will
cut
Road.
This
is
the
cleanability
three
three-story
townhouse,
combined
to
lots
of
parking
existing
building
to
be
raised,
violated
article
65,
section,
41,
RC
parking
loading
requirements,
65
forty
one
point:
four
parking
location:
article,
65
section:
eight
townhouse,
four
units
forbidden
article
65,
six,
nine,
a
lot
frontage
is
insufficient
article
65
section:
nine,
the
fluid
a
ratio
is
excessive,
not
equal.
Sixty
five,
six,
nine,
the
villain
height,
is
excessive
and
stories
articles.
B
BU
BU
BU
The
wattage,
the
requirement
is
15
feet.
We
have
30
feet
the
FA
are
this
error
is
0.4,
we're
proposing
it
up
there
22
the
building
height
regard
to
the
number
of
storeys,
and
this
is
the
requirement-
is
2
and
a
half.
We
are
proposing
three
front
gap,
setbacks
15
feet,
we
are
proposing
content
side,
yards
10,
feet
were
performing
6
and
it
really
is
30
and
we're
proposing
to
sell
now
share.
With
regard
to
this
project,
we
found
a
lengthy
community
process.
We've
had
at
least
three
of
buddies
meetings
and
met
with
mouth
holding
association.
BU
BU
A
AF
A
BU
A
I
I
AF
BV
A
A
B
For
11:30
I'm
calling
boa
893
8
1
9
761,
Washington
Street.
This
is
erect
a
new
three
family
house
on
the
vacant.
Lot
violation,
article
65
section
41
no
occupy
can
provided
medical
65-69
a
lot
areas
insufficient
article
65
6a9
additional
latias,
insufficient,
not
equal
65,
section
9
of
the
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
6
and
I
on
the
lot.
Frontage
is
insufficient
article
65
section
9,
the
fluid
a
ratio
is
excessive.
B
Article
65,
section
I
of
the
building
height
success
of
its
stories,
article
65,
section,
I'm,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient,
equals
65,
6
9
of
the
building
height
is
excessive
defeat.
Article
65,
section,
9
of
the
front
yard,
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section
I
on
the
side
yard,
is
insufficient.
An
article
65
section,
9,
hooray
yard,
is
its
official
name
an
address
for
the
record
player.
BU
BU
BU
BU
The
height
is
at
35
feet
two
and
a
half
stories
we're
at
34
feet,
but
we
have
three
stories.
Using
open
space
is
52
square
feet
per
dwelling
unit.
We
were
proposing
288
square
feet
per
dwelling
unit,
front
yard,
we're
using
the
mobile
setback
as
there
are
other
three
families
facing
the
property
to
the
right
there
Saiga
accept
that
requirement
is
10,
we
have
been
happy,
we
are,
is
30
and
we
were
proposing
three
feet
in
the
rear.
With
regard
to
a
community
process,
Pam
chair,
we
have
met.